simulation at nasa for the space radiation effort dr. robert c. singleterry jr. nasa...

14

Upload: rachel-macpherson

Post on 26-Mar-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC
Page 2: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort

Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr.

NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6)

NASA Langley Research Center

HPC User’s Forum, Stuttgart, GM

Page 3: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Overview

Simulation at NASA for Space Radiation What are Our problems? Am I (we) Unique? Possible Solutions? No Real Conclusion!

Page 4: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Simulation at NASA for Space Radiation

What is Space Radiation?• One of the top 5 problems that must be solved

for extended space travel

Page 5: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Simulation at NASA for Space Radiation

Just solve the Boltzmann Equations:

Easy as pie …… there’s pie?

22

2 2

0 4

1 1ˆ ˆ1 , ,2 1

ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆd d ( , ) , ,

ˆ ˆˆ, , , ,

jj j j

j

k j kk

j j

ES E E E

A E

E E E E

E f E

r

r

r n r

Page 6: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Simulation at NASA for Space Radiation

Not so Easy!!• Stochastic Methods• Monte Carlo is the most prevalent

• Deterministic Methods• Discrete ordinates is the most prevalent

• Now can use finite elements for the geometry solution

• Straight ahead method (what we use now)• Dozens if not hundreds of other methods exists also

Possible solutions for space radiation?• Physics allows the straight ahead method• Many ways to even solve with this method• Interpolation• Ray-by-ray

Page 7: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Simulation at NASA for Space Radiation

Today’s method of choice for us

Page 8: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

What are Our Problems?

As vendors move towards a multi/many core environment, the individual cores slow down to beat thermal limits

The NASA Space Radiation code is a physics research code with a web based front end• Last thing thought about was execution time• Physics code was written from 1970 to present• Legacy does not begin to explain it• It is serial!!! (We have added dynamic memory allocation)

All is not lost, just limited

Page 9: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

What are Our Problems?

Interpolation – not much to do here• Thread the mathematics• Course parallel over interpolation points

Ray-by-Ray• Since the rays are independent, each ray can

go on a core• Thread the mathematics

Still hit a wall at about 1000-2000 cores• Would take more money than we have to rewrite

our code for a cluster environment Latest NASA machine: 43,008 cores!!!

Page 10: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

What are Our Problems?

As cores go from 43,008 to 1,000,000• Our algorithm is stuck at 1000-2000 cores

without major rework that we cannot afford• Not sure how many more cores we could utilize

if we could afford a rework but << 1,000,000!!!

-------------- SUMMARY ------------- As the cores get slower, our execution time

gets longer as we cannot use more cores Yet users want more and better answers as

computers get more powerful• OK, as user’s needs become more demanding

Page 11: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

What are Our Problems?

HPCWire, 9/24/08, “Intel: CPUs Will Prevail Over Accelerators in HPC”

“What we're finding is that if someone is going to go to the effort of optimizing an application to take advantage of an offload engine, whatever it may be, the first thing they have to do is parallelize their code”• Richard Dracott, General Manager, HPC

Business Unit

Page 12: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Am I (we) Unique?

There are many small and large ISV’s• Abaqus < 128 cores• Few open source packages can >>128 cores• Most (if not all) engineering, day-to-day

packages cannot use more than 1000 cores• MCNPX can use <2000-4000 cores for certain

types of problems Most everybody needs help! Those that do not need help can afford• To rewrite code when new architectures arrive• To write code from scratch to fit an architecture

Page 13: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

Possible Solutions?

Smarter compilers – User’s Point of View!• No new language, just amend Fortran and C• Like MP but with MPI – Programming Environment

• Nice if housed in current environments• Intel• PGI• Absoft• etc…

• Do not care if production compile takes days• Enable non-x86 hardware in current compilers• ASICs• GPGPU/Cell• FPGA• etc…

Page 14: Simulation at NASA for the Space Radiation Effort Dr. Robert C. Singleterry Jr. NASA Administrator's Fellow (Cohort 6) NASA Langley Research Center HPC

No Real Conclusions

Nothing but the possible solutions Develop new algorithms to solve the

Boltzmann Equation so >1,000,000 cores can be utilized• Over 10M$ and 3 years to parallelize and V&V

what we already have and must be done first!!• Over 100M$ and 10 years to develop new

methods of solution to fit the vision of chip makers and then V&V the methods

Space Radiation is a small but unique solution domain of the total radiation analysis world