simpler web architectures now! (at the frontend 2016)
TRANSCRIPT
Elevator pitch
Show client-side techniques that make server-side rendering a feasible option for your web applications.
client-side web benefits
simpler deploys and operations (PaaS and server-less architectures too)
partial updates
fine-grained content caching (ajax)
cross-team components
enables richer interactions (...that are not even possible in classical web)
client-side web challenges
rate of change
device diversity (especially on mobile)
https://meta.discourse.org/t/the-state-of-javascript-on-android-in-2015-is-poor/33889/8
time-to-first-interaction (mobile, latency/bandwidth + CPU)
AMP + Progressive Web Apps: Start fast, stay engaged - Google I/O 2016
interoperability and evolvability (single runtime, isolation vs small bundle size)
techniques
pjax → partial updates (HTML views over ajax)
client-side includes (caching and reusable content)
server-side driven updates (update state, application logic kept server-side)
pjax
jquery-pjax (GitHub 2011)https://github.com/defunkt/jquery-pjax
pushState ajax
~500 LOC (not counting comments)
demo: web shop
team A: products, static site (variations, related information)
team B: shopping cart and check-out
separate teams → separate systems (Conway’s Law)
client-side includes
hinclude.jshttps://github.com/mnot/hinclude/
2005 by Mark Nottingham (@mnot)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Nottingham
~150 LOC (not counting comments)
hinclude.js
<hx:include src="/path/to/include"> Fallback content here</hx:include>
<hx:include src="/path/to/include" id="foo-include"> Refresh like this: hinclude.refresh("foo-include")</hx:include>
h-include.js
custom element version of hinclude.jshttps://github.com/gustafnk/h-include
custom element polyfill: 3KBhttps://github.com/WebReflection/document-register-element
<h-include src="/path/to/include"> Fallback content here</h-include>
includes in includes, etc etc
fix for flashy fallback content
<script> <!-- https://gist.github.com/egeorjon/6755681 --> document.documentElement.className = document.documentElement.className.replace( /(?:^|\s)no-script(?!\S)/g , '' )</script>
<style> h-include:not(.included) { display: none; }
.no-script h-include, h-include.included { display: block; }</style>
server-side driven updates
domain events<h-include src="/path/to/include"> <-- after inclusion --> <div data-refresh-on="shopping-cart-item-added"> <p>Shopping cart: 0</p> </div></h-include>
server: if(xhr): return domain event(s)
client: for each event: for each subscribing element: trigger refresh on parent h-include
server-side web (with pjax and client-side includes)
✓ partials updates (pjax + client-side includes + server-side driven updates)
✓ better caching (client-side includes)
✓ cross-team components (client-side includes + server-side driven updates)
✗ enables richer interactions (do you really need them in all scenarios?)
thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! thank you! (@gustaf_nk)https://github.com/gustafnk/static-web-shop-examplehttp://static-web-shop-example.netlify.com/
https://github.com/gustafnk/h-include
question: what about isomorphic web apps?
high language lock-in effect (probably javascript)
iso web apps != progressive enhancement
blocking vs non-blocking data flow (hard!)
time-to-meaningful-interaction (“Uncanny Valley”)
1KB JS == 1ms UI thread stall on mobile
your best devs busy not producing valuehttps://www.jayway.com/2016/05/23/6-reasons-isomorphic-web-apps-not-silver-bullet-youre-looking/