simple. not simplistic

206
Simple. Not Simplistic. A book by Aaron Mark.

Upload: aaron-mark

Post on 07-Mar-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A monograph made during the Spring 2012 Semester at Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation under the guidance of Studio Lot-Ek and Thomas de Monchaux

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Simple. Not Simplistic.A book by Aaron Mark.

Page 2: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 3: Simple.  Not Simplistic

geometric historyThe following ten pages contain selected examples of architecture studio projects completed prior to Simple. Not Simplistic. While none of the geometries shown are duplicates of one another, they all fall into the same family of shapes.

Page 4: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 5: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 6: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 7: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 8: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 9: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 10: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 11: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 12: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 13: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 14: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 15: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 16: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 17: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 18: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 19: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 20: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 21: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 22: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 23: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 24: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 25: Simple.  Not Simplistic

SIMPLE NOT SIMPLISTIC

People often get words that sound the same with like definitions confused for one another. Simple and Simplistic and Complex and Complicated are tragic examples of this type of confusion.

I am interested in simple design ideas rather than complicated ones. To be simple is not to be simplistic. To be simply stated is to be concise. To be simplistically stated is to be naive about how complex an idea is. To be complex is not to be complicated. Having a complex idea is to understand that there are many inter-related parts. Having a complicated idea is to not understand the inter-related parts.

I believe that confused architecture is bad even if it looks interesting or even if it looks beautiful. My intent is to create architecture that is clear conceptually, formally, and functionally but not be naive about what it is. Architecture is inherently complex. Architectural designs that should always be thought about and understood as inter-related. Complicating what these are leads to a confused architecture. Simple and complex are both acceptable. Simplistic and complicated are sins.

My preoccupation with particular geometric forms has largely influenced my work for several years. In the past, there has been little investigation of a particular family of re-occuring geometry. Projects have developed, for better or worse, with out realizing or addressing how these specific geometries can impact or drive an architecture. In this book, I have integrated significant investigation into the implications of geometry as it is applied to the forming of buildings of particular site and program.

Lot-Ek has asked us to make physical concepts. For me, these physical concepts have started with geometric statements. In each of the five buildings we were asked to make, I aspired to use geometric statements to invent solutions that address the complexity of program and inhabitation.

This book is an exploration of the potential of simple geometries as spatial devices.

Page 26: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 27: Simple.  Not Simplistic

FIVE BUILDINGS.

1. Retail

4. Theater

Given five opportunities to explore the insertion of formal studies into urban context, in each chapter, geometric study adapts to program and setting

Five unique sites along New York City’s High Line are given for five general program types: Retail, Storage, Health Center, Theater, and Hotel. Each site provides a new set of characteristics and limitations that influence the proportions and applications of a desired form requiring a balance of geometric purity and programmatic practicality.

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 28: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 29: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 30: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 31: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 32: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 33: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 34: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 35: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 36: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 37: Simple.  Not Simplistic

thrift store for ideasThe Thrift Store for Ideas features a showroom that seeks the collaboration and the evolution of original ideas through the selling of novelty. Here, individuals can purchase patented ideas or inspiration that have been discarded by creative people.

The open air structure allows for an open exchange of ideas and accessibility. A viewing space at the level of the High Line acts as a visual link between occupants of the High Line and the showroom.

FIVE BUILDINGS.

1. Retail

4. Theater

Given five opportunities to explore the insertion of formal studies into urban context, in each chapter, geometric study adapts to program and setting

Five unique sites along New York City’s High Line are given for five general program types: Retail, Storage, Health Center, Theater, and Hotel. Each site provides a new set of characteristics and limitations that influence the proportions and applications of a desired form requiring a balance of geometric purity and programmatic practicality.

Page 38: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 39: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 40: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 41: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 42: Simple.  Not Simplistic

1.

Page 43: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2.

1. The display space fills the interior of the show room, maximizing the density of displays allowed at the Thrift Store.

2. The viewing space from the High Line allows visitors of the park to look into the show room.

Page 44: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 45: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 46: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 47: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 48: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Ground Plan

Page 49: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor Plan

Page 50: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site PlanRoof Plan

Page 51: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site Plan

Page 52: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 53: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 54: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 55: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 56: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 57: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 58: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 59: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 60: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 61: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 62: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 63: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 64: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 65: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Totem storageThe Totem Storage Space is a facility for placing small personal items of large sentimental value. The goal of the architecture is to emphasize the impact of an individual’s experience with their personal item.

A dense field of storage units within and above the mass in addition to the sea of letter boxes at the ground level of the site creates a large scalar shift from outside and inside. The heavy mass touches the ground selectively limiting accessibility in order to promote privacy.

Page 66: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 67: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 68: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 69: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 70: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2.

1.

1. The entrance from the High Line limits separates totem storage from the letter boxes at the ground level.

2. Personal items are stored within 8x8x8 inch boxes that exist within a field of storage cells at the roof level.

Page 71: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2.

1.

1. The entrance from the High Line limits separates totem storage from the letter boxes at the ground level.

2. Personal items are stored within 8x8x8 inch boxes that exist within a field of storage cells at the roof level.

Page 72: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 73: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 74: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 75: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 76: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 77: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 78: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 79: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 80: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Ground Plan

Page 81: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor Plan

Page 82: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Roof Plan

Page 83: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site Plan

Page 84: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 85: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 86: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 87: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 88: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 89: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 90: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 91: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 92: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 93: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 94: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 95: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 96: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 97: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 98: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 99: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 100: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 101: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Dive and ClimbThis health club utilizes a repeated series of mirrored frusta units which house artificial climbing rocks and pools of water for diving determined by orientation and depth. The interior forms of each unit vary in tilt and depth to provide several difficulty levels for both diving and climbing accomodating a range of fitness levels.

In addition to holding personal fitness functions, each unit also acts as a light well that tunnels diffused light onto the site below.

Page 102: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 103: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 104: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 105: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 106: Simple.  Not Simplistic

1.

2.

Page 107: Simple.  Not Simplistic

3.

1. The deepest diving units go up to a depth of 40 feet, allowing for scuba training.

2. Entrance to the health club at the High Line level through the easiest difficulty-level rock walls offered at the facility.

3. In addition to the High Line Level Entrance, more difficult climbing units can be accessed from the ground level where climbers can hook onto automated belay devices.

Page 108: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Climbing units range in difficulty based on overall height and the tilt of the interior surfaces.Diving units range from most easy and shallow to most difficult and deep.

Page 109: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Climbing units range in difficulty based on overall height and the tilt of the interior surfaces.

Page 110: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 111: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 112: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 113: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 114: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 115: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 116: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 117: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 118: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Ground Plan

Page 119: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor Plan

Page 120: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site PlanRoof Plan

Page 121: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site Plan

Page 122: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 123: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 124: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 125: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 126: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 127: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 128: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 129: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 130: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 131: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 132: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 133: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 134: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 135: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 136: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 137: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 138: Simple.  Not Simplistic

FIVE BUILDINGS.

1. Retail

4. Theater

Given five opportunities to explore the insertion of formal studies into urban context, in each chapter, geometric study adapts to program and setting

Five unique sites along New York City’s High Line are given for five general program types: Retail, Storage, Health Center, Theater, and Hotel. Each site provides a new set of characteristics and limitations that influence the proportions and applications of a desired form requiring a balance of geometric purity and programmatic practicality.

Page 139: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Concert WheelThe Concert Wheel uses a radial formation of frusta units to direct a centralized focal point from all audience members to conductors and also individual focus to specific musicians of the ensemble beyond. Audience members occupy units in pairs above ground while musicians perform below.

A reflecting pool at the ground level of the project visually completes the ring of the geometry that is partially hidden below ground.

FIVE BUILDINGS.

1. Retail

4. Theater

Given five opportunities to explore the insertion of formal studies into urban context, in each chapter, geometric study adapts to program and setting

Five unique sites along New York City’s High Line are given for five general program types: Retail, Storage, Health Center, Theater, and Hotel. Each site provides a new set of characteristics and limitations that influence the proportions and applications of a desired form requiring a balance of geometric purity and programmatic practicality.

Page 140: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 141: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 142: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 143: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 144: Simple.  Not Simplistic

1.

Page 145: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2.

1. The entry of to the Concert Wheel leads to the center of the ring where all participants of the show are visible.

2. Each audience cell points specific views towards the center and to an individual musician’s cell beyond.

1.

Page 146: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 147: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 148: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 149: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 150: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 151: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 152: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 153: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 154: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor PlanGround Plan

Page 155: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor Plan

Page 156: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site PlanRoof Plan

Page 157: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site Plan

Page 158: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 159: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 160: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 161: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 162: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 163: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 164: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 165: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 166: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 167: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 168: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 169: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 170: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 171: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 172: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 173: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 174: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 175: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 176: Simple.  Not Simplistic

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 177: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Hotels FieldThe hotel operates as a field below ground, a field at ground, and a single large module very high above ground.

In this project, an array of a single geometry operates in a field condition generating spaces varying in levels of intimacy.

Hotel units in the field function at a domestic scale which is contrasted by communally scaled auditorium spaces contained in the large module sitting above.

2. Storage

3. Health Club

5. Hotel

Page 178: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 179: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 180: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 181: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 182: Simple.  Not Simplistic

1.

2.

1. Hotel units are divided into two levels to take advantage of form the interior space of the geometry.

2. Points of entry are located where site restrictions prevent units from operative as hotels.

1.

2.

1. Hotel units are divided into two levels to take advantage of form the interior space of the geometry.

2. Points of entry are located where site restrictions prevent units from operative as hotels.

1.

2.

1. Hotel units are divided into two levels to take advantage of form the interior space of the geometry.

2. Points of entry are located where site restrictions prevent units from operative as hotels.

Page 183: Simple.  Not Simplistic

3.

3. Smaller auditorium spaces accommodate smaller audiences for more intimate functions.

3.

3. Smaller auditorium spaces accommodate smaller audiences for more intimate functions.

Page 184: Simple.  Not Simplistic

At the highest level, large auditorum spaces accommodate large masses of people.

Page 185: Simple.  Not Simplistic

At the highest level, large auditorum spaces accommodate large masses of people.

Page 186: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 187: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 188: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 189: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 190: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 191: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 192: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 193: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 194: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 195: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Smaller auditorium spaces are located below larger auditoriums.

Page 196: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Ground Plan

Page 197: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Second Floor Plan

Page 198: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Roof Plan

Page 199: Simple.  Not Simplistic

Site PlanRoof Plan

Page 200: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 201: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 202: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 203: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 204: Simple.  Not Simplistic

This book was made in spring 2012 under the guidance of Lot-Ek Studio (Ada Tolla and Giuseppe Lignano) and Thomas de Monchaux at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation.

Page 205: Simple.  Not Simplistic
Page 206: Simple.  Not Simplistic