silicon sensors for lumical two possible options wojciech wierba institute of nuclear physics pan...

9
Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Upload: edmund-booth

Post on 19-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Silicon sensors for LumiCalTwo possible options

Wojciech WierbaInstitute of Nuclear Physics PAN

Cracow

Page 2: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Pads•12 sectors in (15°)

•15 cylinders in r (width 13.33 mm)

•180 pads on half plane

•Inner pad - ~302 mm2

•Outer pad - ~955 mm2

•Capacitance ratio = ~3.16

Odd and even planes rotated by 7.5 deg

Page 3: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Strips•64 concentric strips (width 3.125 mm)

•60 radial strips (3°)

•Inner concentric strip - ~800 mm2

•Outer concentric strip - ~2734 mm2

•Capacitance ratio = ~3.42

•Radial strips - ~1885 mm2

Page 4: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Wafer size

• Small wafers are not suitable, causes a lot of tiles per half plane

• Best wafer size – 24 inch – not available

• 12 inch wafer acceptable (~300 mm dia)

Page 5: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Tiles of the sensors for both options (12” wafer)

Page 6: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Gap between tungsten platesHalf plane of the detector will consist 3 tiles

•Support to glue tiles and place for the electronics

•Ceramic plate ~0.5 mm thick

•Silicon sensor ~0.3 mm thick

The gap between tungsten plates should be in order of 1 mm

Page 7: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Comparison of the two optionsPads Strips

Masks 1 2

Number of channels 10800 7560

Energy resolution 40% E 31 – 43 % E

Angular resolution ~ 70 - 90 rad ~ 50 – 90 rad

Capacitance ratio on tile 3.16 3.42

Mean area of pad/strip 630 mm2 898 mm2

Smalest pad/strip 302 mm2 267 mm2

Largest pad/strip 955 mm2 1885 mm2

Capacitance ratio 3.16 7.06

Bias, coupling to amplifiers complicated easier

Number of sensors per tile 60 20 radial, 64 conc.

Page 8: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

More realistic MC

•Rotation of the odd and even planes

•Angle: pads – 7.5°, strips - 7.5° ?

•Gaps between tiles (~0.1 – 0.2 mm to be discussed)

•Pads edges, guard rings

•Concentric stripes divided in 3 parts for half plane

•Gap between tungsten plates ~0.8 – 1.0 mm

Page 9: Silicon sensors for LumiCal Two possible options Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow

Conclusions

•Both options are comparable•Number of channels is near the same•Resolutions (energy & angular) are near the same•Strips needs 2 masks•Strips needs probably 2 types of amplifiers•Pads have more complicated bias and coupling connections