significance for risk assessment of increases in background levels of carcinogen-derived protein and...

1
S24 Abstracts / Toxicology Letters 180S (2008) S6–S27 tive substances are observed. The examples of use of amphiphilic polymer of N-vinylpyrrolidone as the carriers of low molecular weight and modificators of proteins are given. These polymers do not act on viscosity characteristics of blood and do not destroy erythrocytes. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.711 W14: Exogenous and Endogenous Background Exposures to Car- cinogens and Regulatory Consequences 61 Significance for risk assessment of increases in background lev- els of carcinogen-derived protein and DNA Aadducts Peter Farmer University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom Human DNA and protein are exposed continuously to many molecules capable of causing damage, derived from both exogenous and endogenous sources. These compounds may interact directly with the macromolecule to form adducts (genotoxic), or indirectly by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause oxidative damage. Analysis of DNA from healthy humans reveals many types of damaged 2 -deoxynucleosides, with oxidatively modified species predominating and accounting for at least 1 modified base/10 5 nucleotides. Typically, background levels of DNA adducts resulting from low molecular weight alkylating agents have been detected in the 1–10adducts/10 7 nucleotide range. Background levels of amino acids alkylated by endogenous electrophiles are similarly seen in haemoglobin from control individuals. The default position currently taken by many regulatory bodies is that for genotoxic car- cinogens the relationship between exposure and mutations or later biological effects has no threshold, i.e. any level of DNA adducts is considered to represent a carcinogenic risk. However if an endoge- nous damage-producing process is relatively active, it is possible that the excess biological effect associated with a low dose exoge- nous exposure to the same compound may not be detectable, i.e. an increase in mutation frequency cannot be seen over that of the untreated control species, and the endogenous process effectively defines the risk. There is consequently considerable current interest in the shapes of dose-response curves for biomarkers of exposure (such as DNA adducts) and effect in situations where the damage has both exogenous and endogenous causes, such as for example the case with ethylene oxide. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.704 62 Products of endogenous metabolism as cause of promutagenic DNA adducts Hermann M. Bolt Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany The most prominent example of an endogenous compound pro- ducing DNA adducts is ethylene oxide, which is derived from endogenous ethylene. Ethylene is a normal body constituent; its endogenous formation is evidenced by exhalation in rats and in humans. The most abundant DNA adduct of ethylene oxide is 7- (2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (HOEtG). For a cancer risk assessment at low levels of DNA damage, exposure-related adducts must be dis- cussed in relation to background DNA damage. In rats, subacute ethylene oxide exposures on the order of 1ppm cause DNA adduct levels (HOEtG) of the same magnitude as produced by endoge- nous ethylene oxide. Endogenous background levels of HOEtG in DNA of humans are comparable to those that are produced in rodents by repetitive exogenous ethylene oxide exposures of about 10ppm. A second topic to be highlighted is “etheno” DNA adducts, known to be formed from the carcinogen vinyl chloride, but also derived from endogenous sources. The major DNA adduct induced by vinyl chloride (approximately 98% of total adducts in rats), 7-(2- oxoethyl)guanine, is almost devoid of promutagenic activity. The clearly promutagenic “etheno” adducts N2,3-ethenoguanine and 3,N4-ethenocytosine each represent approximately 1% of the vinyl chloride DNA adducts in rats, and 1,N6-ethenoadenine is found at even lower concentrations. Etheno adducts have a long persistence and are repaired by glycosylases. Likely reasons for this background are oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.705 63 Comparative biological activation of the endogenous carcino- gen isoprene and chloroprene Bernard Golding Newcastle University, School of Chemistry, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom Buta-1,3-diene is probably carcinogenic in humans, with leukaemia being a significant risk from occupational exposures (IARC Group 1 carcinogen). The mono- and di-epoxides of butadiene are carcinogenic metabolite(s). Isoprene (2-methylbuta-1,3-diene) is the major endogenous hydrocarbon and so human exposures are unavoidable. However, isoprene is much less carcinogenic (ca. 100-fold) to mice and rats than butadiene. Studies of can- cers among occupationally exposed workers, as well as animal experiments, led to the conclusions that isoprene is an animal carcinogen and possibly carcinogenic in humans (Group 2B). The metabolism of isoprene is similar to that of butadiene. Chloro- prene (2-chlorobuta-1,3-diene) is a bulk industrial chemical that is possibly carcinogenic in humans (Group 2B). The metabolism of chloroprene is complex giving rise to a number of reactive metabolites: epoxides, chloro-aldehydes and chloro-ketones. The metabolite 1-(chloroethenyl)oxirane shows selectivity for G and C residues in DNA. Cytidine adducts are difficult to repair and this may be a mutagenic lesion. However, the reactive metabo- lites of chloroprene are efficiently scavenged by epoxide hydrolase and/or glutathione (S-transferase), therefore limiting the carcino- genic risk from these metabolites. The diene metabolites differ in their reactivities towards nucleophiles and there also differences in the ability of epoxide hydrolase and glutathione (S-transferase) to destroy these metabolites. All in all, the various factors conspire to make butadiene relatively more carcinogenic, whereas isoprene and chloroprene are less carcinogenic than might be anticipated. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.706 64 Sources and quantification of human backgroudexposure to acrylamide Jürgen Angerer Institut fuer Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin Universitaet, Erlangen, Germany We elucidated human metabolism of acrylamide (AA) by applying labelled AA. Using a newly elaborated LC-ESI-MS/MS method we

Upload: peter-farmer

Post on 30-Nov-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Significance for risk assessment of increases in background levels of carcinogen-derived protein and DNA Aadducts

Letter

S24 Abstracts / Toxicology

tive substances are observed. The examples of use of amphiphilicpolymer of N-vinylpyrrolidone as the carriers of low molecularweight and modificators of proteins are given. These polymers donot act on viscosity characteristics of blood and do not destroyerythrocytes.

doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.711

W14: Exogenous and Endogenous Background Exposures to Car-cinogens and Regulatory Consequences

61Significance for risk assessment of increases in background lev-els of carcinogen-derived protein and DNA Aadducts

Peter Farmer

University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Human DNA and protein are exposed continuously to manymolecules capable of causing damage, derived from both exogenousand endogenous sources. These compounds may interact directlywith the macromolecule to form adducts (genotoxic), or indirectlyby generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause oxidativedamage. Analysis of DNA from healthy humans reveals many typesof damaged 2′-deoxynucleosides, with oxidatively modified speciespredominating and accounting for at least 1 modified base/105

nucleotides. Typically, background levels of DNA adducts resultingfrom low molecular weight alkylating agents have been detectedin the 1–10 adducts/107 nucleotide range. Background levels ofamino acids alkylated by endogenous electrophiles are similarlyseen in haemoglobin from control individuals. The default positioncurrently taken by many regulatory bodies is that for genotoxic car-cinogens the relationship between exposure and mutations or laterbiological effects has no threshold, i.e. any level of DNA adducts isconsidered to represent a carcinogenic risk. However if an endoge-nous damage-producing process is relatively active, it is possiblethat the excess biological effect associated with a low dose exoge-nous exposure to the same compound may not be detectable, i.e.an increase in mutation frequency cannot be seen over that of theuntreated control species, and the endogenous process effectivelydefines the risk. There is consequently considerable current interestin the shapes of dose-response curves for biomarkers of exposure(such as DNA adducts) and effect in situations where the damagehas both exogenous and endogenous causes, such as for example

the case with ethylene oxide.

doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.704

62Products of endogenous metabolism as cause of promutagenicDNA adducts

Hermann M. Bolt

Institut für Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universität Dortmund,Dortmund, Germany

The most prominent example of an endogenous compound pro-ducing DNA adducts is ethylene oxide, which is derived fromendogenous ethylene. Ethylene is a normal body constituent; itsendogenous formation is evidenced by exhalation in rats and inhumans. The most abundant DNA adduct of ethylene oxide is 7-(2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (HOEtG). For a cancer risk assessment atlow levels of DNA damage, exposure-related adducts must be dis-cussed in relation to background DNA damage. In rats, subacuteethylene oxide exposures on the order of 1 ppm cause DNA adduct

s 180S (2008) S6–S27

levels (HOEtG) of the same magnitude as produced by endoge-nous ethylene oxide. Endogenous background levels of HOEtG inDNA of humans are comparable to those that are produced inrodents by repetitive exogenous ethylene oxide exposures of about10 ppm. A second topic to be highlighted is “etheno” DNA adducts,known to be formed from the carcinogen vinyl chloride, but alsoderived from endogenous sources. The major DNA adduct inducedby vinyl chloride (approximately 98% of total adducts in rats), 7-(2-oxoethyl)guanine, is almost devoid of promutagenic activity. Theclearly promutagenic “etheno” adducts N2,3-ethenoguanine and3,N4-ethenocytosine each represent approximately 1% of the vinylchloride DNA adducts in rats, and 1,N6-ethenoadenine is found ateven lower concentrations. Etheno adducts have a long persistenceand are repaired by glycosylases. Likely reasons for this backgroundare oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation.

doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.705

63Comparative biological activation of the endogenous carcino-gen isoprene and chloroprene

Bernard Golding

Newcastle University, School of Chemistry, Newcastle upon Tyne,United Kingdom

Buta-1,3-diene is probably carcinogenic in humans, with leukaemiabeing a significant risk from occupational exposures (IARC Group1 carcinogen). The mono- and di-epoxides of butadiene arecarcinogenic metabolite(s). Isoprene (2-methylbuta-1,3-diene) isthe major endogenous hydrocarbon and so human exposuresare unavoidable. However, isoprene is much less carcinogenic(ca. 100-fold) to mice and rats than butadiene. Studies of can-cers among occupationally exposed workers, as well as animalexperiments, led to the conclusions that isoprene is an animalcarcinogen and possibly carcinogenic in humans (Group 2B). Themetabolism of isoprene is similar to that of butadiene. Chloro-prene (2-chlorobuta-1,3-diene) is a bulk industrial chemical thatis possibly carcinogenic in humans (Group 2B). The metabolismof chloroprene is complex giving rise to a number of reactivemetabolites: epoxides, chloro-aldehydes and chloro-ketones. Themetabolite 1-(chloroethenyl)oxirane shows selectivity for G andC residues in DNA. Cytidine adducts are difficult to repair andthis may be a mutagenic lesion. However, the reactive metabo-

lites of chloroprene are efficiently scavenged by epoxide hydrolaseand/or glutathione (S-transferase), therefore limiting the carcino-genic risk from these metabolites. The diene metabolites differ intheir reactivities towards nucleophiles and there also differencesin the ability of epoxide hydrolase and glutathione (S-transferase)to destroy these metabolites. All in all, the various factors conspireto make butadiene relatively more carcinogenic, whereas isopreneand chloroprene are less carcinogenic than might be anticipated.

doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.706

64Sources and quantification of human backgroudexposure toacrylamide

Jürgen Angerer

Institut fuer Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin Universitaet,Erlangen, Germany

We elucidated human metabolism of acrylamide (AA) by applyinglabelled AA. Using a newly elaborated LC-ESI-MS/MS method we