sign languages for linguistics 1 (stanford)
DESCRIPTION
This introduction to ideas about sign languages was prepared for Stanford University's Linguistics 1 course in November 2008. It emphasizes the 4 myths, shows some authentic ASL vlogs and websites that use ASL as one of the modes of communication. (Links have not been verified again.)TRANSCRIPT
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 1
Sign Language: At least 4 myths, a few true facts,
and fun stuff from the web
Nancy Frishberg, Ph.D. [email protected]
Always start with a joke
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 2
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 3
Goals for Today
• Let’s share assumptions and questions about sign language
• Let’s correct some misunderstandings and decide how to reconcile some incompatible ideas
• Let’s agree on how to decide whether sign language fits in the scheme of human language behavior
• Let’s learn a few fun facts about signing
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 4
My contact with deafness
• Hard of Hearing mother • Toddler friend also “Hard of Hearing” • Junior High School friend had deaf
grandparents – We spelled; I learned a dozen signs
• Grad school entry (in linguistics) coincided with Bellugi’s first NIH grant
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 5
Your experiences with Deafness? Signing?
• School? • Scouts? • Sesame Street? • Other TV? Movies?
• Informal contact? • Formal instruction? • Language Files
readings?
This is where you get to ask stupid questions -- but, there are no stupid questions -- and reveal your assumptions and preconceptions
Some of the student questions • Genetics of deafness? • Differences between
ASL and other sign languages
• Expressive capacity? • How does ASL create
new words • Is ASL grammar
equivalent to English grammar
• When did signing start? • How does sign express
ideas like “sarcasm”? • Shouldn’t there be one
sign language – universal?
• Regional differences • “Music” equivalent?
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 6
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 7
A Couple of Examples of Fluent Signing
• Jane Norman’s blog and vlog http://thedeaflens.com/?cat=24
• Hatrak Sisters Enterprises http://www.hatraksisters.com/
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 8
4 Myths - 2x2
• Signing is Pantomime • Signing is Universal
• Signing is a coded form of speech • Signing is fingerspelling
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 9
Myth! Signing is Pantomime
• Is pantomime conventional? standardized? – Or can it change from one person to another?
From one occasion to another? – How about signing?
• Does pantomime fit the temporal requirements or habits of a human language?
• How culturally bound is pantomime? How about signing?
• Does pantomime imply “concrete” or “simple”? How about signing?
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 10
Myth! Signing is Universal
• If signing were a universal language, then – You would understand what we’ve seen on these
vlogs and websites without transcripts or interpretation
– You would not need any help understanding what any deaf person signs
– People from around the world would be able to communicate with each other successfully and effortlessly in gesture
– There would not be many sign languages, nor regional variation within each sign language
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 11
Myth! Signing is a coded form of speech
• If signs are coded speech, then there is a 1:1 relationship between signs and spoken language – At what level would this coding happen?
• Sounds? Cf. Cued speech • Words? Parts of words? Cf. SEE, etc. • Spelling? (see next slide)
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 12
Myth! Signing is fingerspelling Fingerspelling is a method of representing (English)
words using a series of manual gestures that correspond to the alphabet
• No difference between capital and lowercase, limited use of punctuation – i.e., it’s not writing
• One-handed vs. two-handed spelling – Quick aside on history of ASL and BSL, Rochester Method
• How does it function in the stream of signs?
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 13
Signing is
• A mode of producing and perceiving specific primary human languages – ASL ≠ BSL; ASL ≠ LSF – Different sign languages are not mutually
intelligible to native signers – Not transparent to non-signers, but possible more
obviously iconic than (most) spoken languages • Capable of all expression available to other
modes of human language – Meets the duality of patterning criterion for human
languages
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 14
Modalities of Production Speech Signing
One articulator Two articulators, plus face/body
Invisible to speaker Generally visible to signer
Invisible to addressee Visible to addressee
Asymmetric Mirror-image symmetric
Breathing, vocalization, pitch, timbre, pausing, silence
Gesture area, size of space, rhythmic structures, pausing, silence
Other? Other?
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 15
Modalities of Perception Speech Signing
Ears - auditory Eyes - visual (& tactile?)
Omni-directional Subscribed visual angle
Speech concentrated in certain frequencies of human hearing
Foveal vs. peripheral vision; cones and rods
Distance limits? Barriers? Noise? Darkness?
Distance limits? Barriers? Noise? Darkness?
Speaker’s voice competes with addressee’s voice
Signer and addressee can overlap without apparent conflict
Other? Other?
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 16
Questions
• From the reading • From our discussion so far • If time permits, we’ll continue to …
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 17
2 Articulators + Face
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 18
One- & Two-handed signs
Teuber, et al. (1980) computer tally of 1628 non-compounds
1-handed signs 38% N = 585
2-handed signs 62% N = 1230
Drawn from Stokoe, Casterline & Croneberg’s Dictionary of American Sign Language (1965).
Not based on usage frequency, but on dictionary entries.
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 19
Constraints on 2-handed signs
Type 1 Type 4
Type 2 Type 3
Two hands have the same shape?
Two hands both
moving?
Yes
Yes
No
No
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 20
Type 1
• Two hands same shape
• Both hands both move
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 21
Type 2
• Two hands same shape
• One hand moves
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 22
Type 3
• Two hands different shapes
• One hand moves
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 23
Type 4
? • Two hands different shapes
• Both hands move
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 24
Constraints on 2-handed signs
Symmetry Condition
32%
*(ill-formed in
ASL) 1%
Symmetry (shape) &
Dominance (relations)
11%
Dominance Condition
19%
Two hands have the same shape?
Two hands both
moving?
Yes
Yes
No
No
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 25
(at least) 5 Functions of the Face in ASL
1. Affective • speaker attitude toward utterance
2. Intensifier; other adverbials • RECENTLY • THHH, tongue flap
3. Lexical • LATE vs NOT YET; PAH!
4. Sentential intonation markings • Q, REL…
5. Backchannel • one nostril twitch vs. two nostril twitch
Beyond Marlee Matlin
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 26
Beyond Marlee Matlin • Marketing materials from companies
who know they have culturally Deaf customers – http://www.goamerica.com/10digit/ (25 Sept 08) – http://www.deafmd.org/
• Deaf Folklore turns into mainstream ad “Bob’s House” (Pepsi Ad, SuperBowl08) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffrq6cUoE5A
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 27
Research about New Technologies & Signing
• Recognizing ASL for dictionary lookup – http://www.thoughtware.tv/videos/show/2870
• Signs webcast from home – http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~ekeating/Publications/
ASLVirtSpace.pdf
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 28
Mobile ASL (U Washington) • What is required to carry ASL
conversations over US cell phones? – SW: Appropriate frame rate, compression – Machine vision: Skin detection, activity
detection – HW: Camera on same surface as screen
http://mobileasl.cs.washington.edu/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaE1PvJwI8E
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 29
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 30
Online “Dictionaries” of ASL http://gupress.gallaudet.edu/bookpage/GDASLbookpage.html (this is where I took the 2-handed examples from) http://www.lifeprint.com/index.htm (this is the one that Language Files uses) http://www.handspeak.com/tour/index.php (yet another dictionary that shows examples from ASL and a few other sign languages)
Bibliography of Sign Language http://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/BibWeb/