sign languages for linguistics 1 (stanford)

30
12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 1 Sign Language: At least 4 myths, a few true facts, and fun stuff from the web Nancy Frishberg, Ph.D. [email protected]

Upload: nancy-frishberg

Post on 05-Dec-2014

2.741 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

This introduction to ideas about sign languages was prepared for Stanford University's Linguistics 1 course in November 2008. It emphasizes the 4 myths, shows some authentic ASL vlogs and websites that use ASL as one of the modes of communication. (Links have not been verified again.)

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 1

Sign Language: At least 4 myths, a few true facts,

and fun stuff from the web

Nancy Frishberg, Ph.D. [email protected]

Page 2: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Always start with a joke

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 2

Page 3: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 3

Goals for Today

•  Let’s share assumptions and questions about sign language

•  Let’s correct some misunderstandings and decide how to reconcile some incompatible ideas

•  Let’s agree on how to decide whether sign language fits in the scheme of human language behavior

•  Let’s learn a few fun facts about signing

Page 4: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 4

My contact with deafness

•  Hard of Hearing mother •  Toddler friend also “Hard of Hearing” •  Junior High School friend had deaf

grandparents – We spelled; I learned a dozen signs

•  Grad school entry (in linguistics) coincided with Bellugi’s first NIH grant

Page 5: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 5

Your experiences with Deafness? Signing?

•  School? •  Scouts? •  Sesame Street? •  Other TV? Movies?

•  Informal contact? •  Formal instruction? •  Language Files

readings?

This is where you get to ask stupid questions -- but, there are no stupid questions -- and reveal your assumptions and preconceptions

Page 6: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Some of the student questions •  Genetics of deafness? •  Differences between

ASL and other sign languages

•  Expressive capacity? •  How does ASL create

new words •  Is ASL grammar

equivalent to English grammar

•  When did signing start? •  How does sign express

ideas like “sarcasm”? •  Shouldn’t there be one

sign language – universal?

•  Regional differences •  “Music” equivalent?

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 6

Page 7: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 7

A Couple of Examples of Fluent Signing

•  Jane Norman’s blog and vlog http://thedeaflens.com/?cat=24

•  Hatrak Sisters Enterprises http://www.hatraksisters.com/

Page 8: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 8

4 Myths - 2x2

•  Signing is Pantomime •  Signing is Universal

•  Signing is a coded form of speech •  Signing is fingerspelling

Page 9: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 9

Myth! Signing is Pantomime

•  Is pantomime conventional? standardized? –  Or can it change from one person to another?

From one occasion to another? –  How about signing?

•  Does pantomime fit the temporal requirements or habits of a human language?

•  How culturally bound is pantomime? How about signing?

•  Does pantomime imply “concrete” or “simple”? How about signing?

Page 10: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 10

Myth! Signing is Universal

•  If signing were a universal language, then –  You would understand what we’ve seen on these

vlogs and websites without transcripts or interpretation

–  You would not need any help understanding what any deaf person signs

–  People from around the world would be able to communicate with each other successfully and effortlessly in gesture

–  There would not be many sign languages, nor regional variation within each sign language

Page 11: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 11

Myth! Signing is a coded form of speech

•  If signs are coded speech, then there is a 1:1 relationship between signs and spoken language – At what level would this coding happen?

•  Sounds? Cf. Cued speech •  Words? Parts of words? Cf. SEE, etc. •  Spelling? (see next slide)

Page 12: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 12

Myth! Signing is fingerspelling Fingerspelling is a method of representing (English)

words using a series of manual gestures that correspond to the alphabet

•  No difference between capital and lowercase, limited use of punctuation –  i.e., it’s not writing

•  One-handed vs. two-handed spelling –  Quick aside on history of ASL and BSL, Rochester Method

•  How does it function in the stream of signs?

Page 13: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 13

Signing is

•  A mode of producing and perceiving specific primary human languages –  ASL ≠ BSL; ASL ≠ LSF –  Different sign languages are not mutually

intelligible to native signers –  Not transparent to non-signers, but possible more

obviously iconic than (most) spoken languages •  Capable of all expression available to other

modes of human language –  Meets the duality of patterning criterion for human

languages

Page 14: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 14

Modalities of Production Speech Signing

One articulator Two articulators, plus face/body

Invisible to speaker Generally visible to signer

Invisible to addressee Visible to addressee

Asymmetric Mirror-image symmetric

Breathing, vocalization, pitch, timbre, pausing, silence

Gesture area, size of space, rhythmic structures, pausing, silence

Other? Other?

Page 15: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 15

Modalities of Perception Speech Signing

Ears - auditory Eyes - visual (& tactile?)

Omni-directional Subscribed visual angle

Speech concentrated in certain frequencies of human hearing

Foveal vs. peripheral vision; cones and rods

Distance limits? Barriers? Noise? Darkness?

Distance limits? Barriers? Noise? Darkness?

Speaker’s voice competes with addressee’s voice

Signer and addressee can overlap without apparent conflict

Other? Other?

Page 16: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 16

Questions

•  From the reading •  From our discussion so far •  If time permits, we’ll continue to …

Page 17: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 17

2 Articulators + Face

Page 18: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 18

One- & Two-handed signs

Teuber, et al. (1980) computer tally of 1628 non-compounds

1-handed signs 38% N = 585

2-handed signs 62% N = 1230

Drawn from Stokoe, Casterline & Croneberg’s Dictionary of American Sign Language (1965).

Not based on usage frequency, but on dictionary entries.

Page 19: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 19

Constraints on 2-handed signs

Type 1 Type 4

Type 2 Type 3

Two hands have the same shape?

Two hands both

moving?

Yes

Yes

No

No

Page 20: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 20

Type 1

•  Two hands same shape

•  Both hands both move

Page 21: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 21

Type 2

•  Two hands same shape

•  One hand moves

Page 22: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 22

Type 3

•  Two hands different shapes

•  One hand moves

Page 23: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 23

Type 4

? •  Two hands different shapes

•  Both hands move

Page 24: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 24

Constraints on 2-handed signs

Symmetry Condition

32%

*(ill-formed in

ASL) 1%

Symmetry (shape) &

Dominance (relations)

11%

Dominance Condition

19%

Two hands have the same shape?

Two hands both

moving?

Yes

Yes

No

No

Page 25: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 25

(at least) 5 Functions of the Face in ASL

1.  Affective •  speaker attitude toward utterance

2.  Intensifier; other adverbials •  RECENTLY •  THHH, tongue flap

3.  Lexical •  LATE vs NOT YET; PAH!

4.  Sentential intonation markings •  Q, REL…

5.  Backchannel •  one nostril twitch vs. two nostril twitch

Page 26: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Beyond Marlee Matlin

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 26

Page 27: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Beyond Marlee Matlin •  Marketing materials from companies

who know they have culturally Deaf customers –  http://www.goamerica.com/10digit/ (25 Sept 08) –  http://www.deafmd.org/

•  Deaf Folklore turns into mainstream ad “Bob’s House” (Pepsi Ad, SuperBowl08) –  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffrq6cUoE5A

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 27

Page 28: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Research about New Technologies & Signing

•  Recognizing ASL for dictionary lookup –  http://www.thoughtware.tv/videos/show/2870

•  Signs webcast from home –  http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~ekeating/Publications/

ASLVirtSpace.pdf

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 28

Page 29: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

Mobile ASL (U Washington) •  What is required to carry ASL

conversations over US cell phones? – SW: Appropriate frame rate, compression – Machine vision: Skin detection, activity

detection – HW: Camera on same surface as screen

http://mobileasl.cs.washington.edu/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaE1PvJwI8E

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 29

Page 30: Sign Languages for Linguistics 1 (Stanford)

12 November 2008 Linguistics 1: Frishberg 30

Online “Dictionaries” of ASL http://gupress.gallaudet.edu/bookpage/GDASLbookpage.html (this is where I took the 2-handed examples from) http://www.lifeprint.com/index.htm (this is the one that Language Files uses) http://www.handspeak.com/tour/index.php (yet another dictionary that shows examples from ASL and a few other sign languages)

Bibliography of Sign Language http://www.sign-lang.uni-hamburg.de/BibWeb/