short term memory, fluid intelligence and brain …
TRANSCRIPT
SHORT TERM MEMORY, FLUID INTELLIGENCE AND BRAIN NERVE SPEED IN A POPULATION WITH VARIABLE CULTURAL EXPOSURE
RUNNING TITLE: Ache cognition
KEYWORDS: short-term memory, fluid intelligence, central nerve conduction velocity, acculturation, Ache
John Wagner* Robert Walker ([email protected])
Kim Hill ([email protected]) Draft #2 for Human Nature
22 pages of text 3 tables 5 figures
DO NOT CITE IN ANY CONTEXT WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHORS
*Address all correspondence to: J. Wagner, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico. Albuquerque, New
Mexico 87131. phone: 505 277-1628 email: [email protected] webpage: http://www.unm.edu/~wagner
2
ABSTRACT
Objectively assessing cognitive parameters among non-Western populations would
provide an important tool for human ecology researchers. However, applying western-
derived psychometrics in traditional societies is complicated by variable exposure to
testing materials and tasks, which affects performance. To explore these issues we
collected three types of cognitive measures among the Aché (ah-CHAY), a forager-
farming population of eastern Paraguay. Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM),
forward spatial span (SS), and visual evoked potentials (VEP) provide measures of fluid
intelligence (Gf), short-term memory (STM) and visual system integrity, respectively.
VEP reflects the latency between a visual stimulus and processing in the occipital cortex;
dividing head length by this latency provides an estimate of nerve speed in the brain, or
central nerve conduction velocity (CNCV). After controlling for age, correlations were
found between STM and Gf, and between Gf and CNCV. These findings are consistent
with an emerging picture of the organization of mental abilities and are notable given the
unique nature of the sample. Further, age-specific (cross-sectional) trends in
psychometric scores show rapid decline over adulthood in comparison to westernized
populations. We interpret this pattern in light of variable cultural exposure and changing
health conditions since the Aché made first contact and settlement in the mid-1970s. A
potential method for evaluating the cross-cultural validity of psychometrics is described.
3
INTRODUCTION
There exists limited knowledge of cognition among traditional and small-scale
populations. Given the broad range and variability of factors that intimately interact with
cognitive function across the lifespan it is desirable to develop objective measurements
that can be applied across cultures. Reliable instruments for assessing cognition could
provide answers to a number of evolutionary questions that are best studied in non-
industrial or traditional populations, which are frequently isolated and experience unique
environmental conditions.
Efforts to develop "culture-free" intelligence tests have been made for nearly a
century (Jensen 1980) and interest in cross-cultural comparisons has increased in recent
years with attention paid to standardizing certain biases (Van de Vijver and Hambleton
1996). However, applying standard psychometrics in traditional populations is more
difficult because the euro-centric biases of these tests (Nessier et al. 1996) can become
acute in societies with limited exposure to test taking materials and tasks. A lack of
relevancy clearly contributes to poor performance on some western-derived psychometric
tasks among traditional populations (e.g., Ardilo and Moreno 2001).
A frequent component of cultural exposure is schooling and its effect on test taking
performance. Schooling is a potent variable for predicting performance on psychometric
tasks because it contributes to systematic problem-solving, abstract thinking,
categorization, sustained attention to material of little intrinsic interest, and repeated
manipulation of basic symbols and operations (Nessier et al. 1996). Studies support that
even a minimal amount of schooling is an extremely important source of variance on IQ
tests and the development of intelligence (see Ceci 1991 for review).
4
A further complication arises where previously isolated populations come into contact
with outside influences such that cohorts emerge between an older generation with less
exposure to (in this case) Western culture and a more acculturated younger generation.
However, these types of situations also provide an opportunity to investigate the
influence of cultural exposure on particular psychometrics and other cognitive issues of
interest.
Here we present the results from three types of tests that provide distinct but related
information concerning cognitive ontogeny and performance collected among the Aché,
an indigenous South American population who experienced first contact and settlement
in the mid-1970s. Before describing the population and tests in detail, we briefly review
intelligence and cognitive concepts where applicable.
Intelligence and Cognitive Correlates
The concept of general intellectual ability or g arose from early findings that an
individual�s performance at one test tended to correlate with their performance on other
tests (Spearman 1904). This general ability or factor was later refined into two distinct
abilities: fluid and crystallized intelligence (Horn and Cattell 1966). Fluid intelligence
(Gf) is characterized as a general problem solving or reasoning ability that has the �fluid�
quality of being applied in virtually any situation. Gf handles abstract thought, is not
dependent on prior knowledge and tends to decrease with age. In contrast, crystallized
intelligence (Gc) consists of specific, acquired and stored knowledge such as vocabulary
and tends to increase over the lifetime. It is generally held that Gf is more amenable to
cross-cultural analysis because it is involved in dealing with novel situations that require
learning and adaptation; whereas Gc is language or culture-specific. The general factor
5
(g) and its subcomponents Gf and Gc sit at the top of most hierarchical models of
intelligence with various arrays of subsystems that support these abilities (e.g., Carroll
1993).
In cognitive psychology, the construct of working memory capacity (WMC) is held to
be closely related if not isomorphic to the psychometrician�s Gf given that performance
on measures of WMC correlate highly with a variety of Gf tasks (Engle 2002; Kyllolen
1996). There is also good evidence that the cognitive or brain systems that underpin Gf
and WMC are mediated in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and more specifically in the
dorsolateral PFC (Kane and Engle 2002). An influential model of working memory
consists of a three-component system with an attentional controller, or central executive,
aided by two subsystems that handle auditory and visuospatial information, respectively
(Baddeley and Hitch 1974). The phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad, as they
have come to be known, are short-term memory stores that probably use a mechanism for
reading into and refreshing information in the store. These slave systems subserve the
central executive, which regulate from their active memory portions what is elevated to
active or �working� thought processes. A fourth component, the episodic buffer, was later
proposed to account for empirical findings concerning the integration of short and long-
term memory processes by the central executive (Baddeley 2000).
The WMC system is responsible for the maintenance of information in a highly active
and easily accessible state with the central executive responsible for allocating attentional
resources such as focusing attention, preventing distraction, or dividing attention during
multi-tasking � abilities that lie at the core of fluid intelligence (Kane and Engle 2002). A
conceptual separation between the central executive and short-term memory (STM)
6
processes of WMC has now been demonstrated (Cowan 1995). Strong correlations arise
between STM and WMC due their being closely intertwined and initially led to the
conclusion that both were involved with Gf. However, latent variable analyses have since
revealed that it is primarily the central executive that accounts for the correlation between
WMC tasks and measures of Gf (Conway et al. 2002; Engle et al. 1999) with
performance on STM tasks tending to be domain-specific and WMC being more domain-
general (Kane et al. 2004). However, few tasks can actually be considered ��pure��
measures of STM or WMC and some amount of overlap is expected on any given task
whether it is considered simple or complex (Conway et al. 2002).
Another approach to cognitive assessment investigates biological substrates that
underpin mental abilities such as measuring brain volume or using brain-imaging
techniques to measure the rate of cortical glucose uptake during cognitive tasks (Haier et
al. 1988). Processing speed, or the ability to execute basic cognitive processes, has been
suggested as a primary factor underlying cognitive performance (Jensen 1998) typically
measured through reaction time or inspection time tasks. Overall, a consistent but
moderate correlation is found between speed tasks and measures of Gf with variability in
performance at repeated trials�probably reflecting the integrity and fidelity of signal
processing�also likely involved (see Geary 2005 for review). However, performing
processing speed tasks also requires attentional focus such that performance will be a
product of basic processing mechanisms and how much the task draws upon the central
executive (Conway et al. 2002).
Conduction velocity in brain nerve axons is a likely component of overall processing
speed and has been suggested as a factor underpinning g (Reed 1984; Jensen 1998). Only
7
two studies have investigated the relationship between nerve speed in the visual system
(hereafter central nerve conduction velocity or CNCV) and intelligence measures with
both finding significant correlations (Reed and Jensen 1992; Reed et al. 2004a). To
compute CNCV, head length is divided by the latency of a visual evoked potential
(VEP)�a standard clinical tool for assessing the integrity of the visual system. We
describe VEP in some detail as this measure may be unfamiliar for some and is key to
understanding the CNCV measure.
Pattern-reversal VEP is the most common method for collecting VEP and uses a
reversing black-white, checkerboard pattern as the stimulus. Each stimulus reversal elicits
a corresponding response in the occipital cortex occurring approximately 100ms after the
stimulus, Electrodes placed over the occipital cortex record the electrical activity of the
processing response which is observable as a characteristic peak waveform, or P100.
Pattern-reversal VEP only requires subjects to focus their gaze on the surface of display
screen and is appropriate for all subjects except the very young or disabled where a
flashing light is preferred (flash VEP). The latency of P100 follows a U-shaped curve
over the lifespan with early rapid decreases in P100 latency (faster processing) associated
with myelination of the optic nerve, followed by gradual maturation through early
adulthood coincident with continual maturation of the visual cortex (Brecelj 2003). P100
increases slightly across adulthood (slower processing) and is reflective of changes in
optic nerve conduction velocity (Fotiou et al. 2003) although unspecific decline in retinal
structures and luminance response may also be involved (Fiorentini et al. 1996). Decay in
visual cortex structure is probably not involved because, in contrast to some other brain
8
regions, the visual cortex shows minimal if any degradation with increasing age (Raz et
al. 1997).
Optic nerve conduction velocity depends on the fiber diameter of the axons, the
number and form of ion channels in the axon membrane, and the quality (thickness and
stability) of the myelin sheath generated by the oligodendrocytes (Kandel et al. 1991).
However, estimates of this velocity using VEP must consider test parameters known to
affect P100 latency � particularly the size of individual checks in the checkerboard
pattern and luminance. Check size has been shown to reliably affect P100 latency with
larger checks (fewer checks within the same viewing area) being associated with shorter
P100 latencies relative to smaller checks (Moskowitz and Sokol 1983). Luminance also
affects P100 with brighter screen displays associated with shorter latencies (Tobimatsu et
al. 1993). The general pattern of visual ontogeny is that the ability to discriminate larger
checks presented on bright screens is achieved earlier than the ability to discriminate
small check sizes presented on dimly lit screens. P100 latency is an indicator of visual
system ontogeny and P100 values will appear more adult-like at younger ages if the
checks are larger and brighter. Conversely, the use of smaller and dimmer checks will
produce a picture of visual ontogeny characterized by an extended period of continual
development before reaching adult levels. A similar pattern obtains for aging adulthood
where senescence is more prominent for checks that are small and dim versus large and
bright (Mitchell et al. 1987; Porciatti et al. 1992).
In addition to the VEP parameters just discussed, there are a number of anatomical
and conceptual issues involved in how to interpret CNCV (head length/ P100) � either as
a reliable indicator of nerve conduction velocity or in its functional relation to Gf. These
9
issues are beyond the scope of this paper but we refer interested readers to relevant
discussions (Burns 1999 and related; Jensen 1999; Reed and Jensen 1992; Reed et al.
2004b) and agree with Jensen that, given the few studies and positive correlations
between CNCV and Gf reported thus far, replication is in order (Jensen 1999).
Here we evaluate two psychometrics believed to be minimally influenced by cultural
exposure: forward spatial span (SS) and Raven�s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM)
(Raven et al. 1998). Our version of SS test is very similar to the Corsi Blocks tapping
task and is considered an excellent measure of short-term memory (STM). Raven�s
Progressive Matrices is the most widely used psychometric in the world and is widely
considered to be the most reliable indicator of Gf.
Short-latency potentials like P100 are only indicative of early sensory processing and
should not be confused with later evoked potentials that occur with subsequent or higher
cortical processing steps in response to a cognitive task, which have been variously but
not consistently correlated to psychometric intelligence (e.g., Caryl 1994). No prior
significant correlations between P100 and Gf have been reported save for the previously
mentioned studies that use P100 to calculate CNCV. We also use P100 values from
pattern-reversal VEP to compute CNCV and test for age-controlled correlations among
all variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study group
The Northern Ache were nomadic hunter-gatherers without horticulture before first
peaceful contact in the 1970s (Hill and Hurtado 1996; Clastres 1998). There is no
evidence of friendly relations between the Aché and any other ethnic population in
10
Paraguay until the 1960s and 1970s, when various groups made contact with outsiders.
The Aché currently live in five major mission/ reservation settlements with a total
population of about 1,000 individuals. Data for this study were collected in the
communities of Arroyo Bandera and Kuetuvy, cultural groups that lived in isolation until
the mid to late 1970s (Hill and Hurtado 1996). The Aché now have a mixed economy
with some communities heavily dependent on cultigens, farm animals, and wage labor,
while others are still partially dependent on hunting and gathering in the nearby
Mbaracayu Natural Reserve. Game animals comprise up to 80% of the Ache diet in the
forest (Kaplan et al. 2000) but the settlement diet is based on a staple of sweet manioc
planted in slash-and-burn fields.
The Aché continue to suffer considerable mortality and morbidity as a result of
disease exposure and particularly tuberculosis (Hurtado et al. 2003). Health conditions
have likely improved after settlement�evidenced by improved growth patterns in the
younger generation�with increased access to medicine and doctors.
Because of the acculturation process, the sample includes an older generation who
lived most of their lives as hunter-gatherers and a younger generation who have grown up
on reservation settlements. Following contact, the Aché have undertaken formal
classroom instruction with school days lasting about 3-4 hours and punctuated by long
seasonal vacations. All individuals under age 25 have attended some school but no one
over age 40 has ever been to school. A genealogical approach with interview-generated
age ranks was used to age all individuals in the population born before fieldwork
commenced in the late 1970s (see Hill and Hurtado 1996), while ages for individuals
born during the fieldwork period are exact to the day.
11
Visual evoked potentials (VEP) and Central Nerve Conduction Velocity (CNCV)
Most people residing in the two communities were recruited to participate in
February-March 2005 by J.W. and R.W. Results from 161 individuals are included in
these analyses (86 males, age range 5-75, mean = 28.71, std. = 18.62; 75 females, age
range 3-73, mean = 26.76, std. = 17.477). Participants had basic anthropometrics
collected including head length measured with calipers to the nearest millimeter from the
nasion to the inion. Subjects were then fitted with an electrode cap (Electro-Cap
International, Eaton, OH) made of an elastic spandex-type material with pure tin recessed
electrodes attached to the fabric and arrayed in the international 10-20 system. Recessed
electrodes place a conductive layer between the scalp and the metal conductor and have
the advantage of reducing movement artifacts (Cooper et al. 1980). Electrodes were filled
with conductive gel using a blunted needle syringe at locations F3, F4, C3, C4, P3, P4,
O1, O2, T4, T5, FZ with an average reference and a ground electrode positioned slightly
below FZ. Impedances were always held below 10 kilo-ohms and typically below 5 kilo-
ohms. Following collection of resting electroencephalography (EEG) pattern and flash
VEP were collected. However, for our purposes here we only report the P100 latency of
the pattern-reversal VEP to conform to prior studies that calculate CNCV. Of the various
measurable components of VEP, P100 is the most informative due to its stability and low
variability (Chiappa 1990).
Electrophysiological signals were amplified with Neuron-spectrum-3 and analyzed
with software Version 1.4.5.28 (Neurosoft Corporation, Ivanovo, Russia). Bandwidth
was set from 0.5 to 35 Hz with a quantization frequency of 200 Hz. EEG signals for the
VEP test were collected using the registration montage described above. The software
12
allows for post-test reconfiguration of the montage such that a VEP montage was created
with active electrodes at O1 (left occipital) and O2 (right occipital) with a reference
electrode at Fz (frontal sagittal) to better isolate occipital cortex recordings (Chiappa
1990). The pattern-reversal checkerboard was presented on a 15-inch flat-screen monitor
(LiquidVideo E15LCD1). Viewing distance was 1 m and luminance remained constant at
30 cd/m2. Field size was 18° x 13.5° with individual checks subtending an arc of 60�.
Participants were directed to focus on a red dot at the center of the checkerboard pattern,
which reversed at a rate of 1 Hz (two reversals per second) for 100 reversals. Trials were
run in duplicate and P100 was taken as the average of O1 and O2 for both trials although
these values rarely differed by more than a few milliseconds. The analysis epoch was 400
ms.
Data were inspected offline and artifacts from eye blinks, which were clearly visible
as muscle artifacts in the F3 and F4 electrodes, were excluded from the analyses as were
any other obvious signs of major electrical interference. A mean of about 80 pattern
reversals were used for averaging. It was discovered that even removing over half of the
trials had little effect on the VEP waveform and P100 latency such that we are confident
that the P100 values are robust. Nine subjects were removed from the analyses due to
uncertainty in identifying P100 waveforms. For example, one older subject (75) had
obviously occluded vision and no discernable P100 peak. Two others had obvious
indications of mental or physical disability. For the remainder of subjects, VEP
waveforms were identified for the characteristic P100 peak and marked to the nearest
millisecond as shown in Figure 1.
13
Figure 1. Representative VEP waveforms recorded from left and right occipital (O1 and O2) and referenced to Fz. By moving the line cursor to the apex of the major peak (P100) latency is recorded to the nearest millisecond. The earlier peak (N75) occurs about 75ms before the P100. X-axis is measured in milliseconds and vertical axis in microvolts.
Psychometrics: Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices and Forward Spatial Span
All testing sessions began with casual conversation and joking for several minutes.
Participants understood that they were being tested for mental ability and were typically a
bit nervous and competitive. The Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) were
administered by K.H. alone with a subject in a small room. CPM consists of a set of 36
schematic colored figures in which one is asked to find a rule connecting a set of figures
and to complete the set according to the rule. Each figure has a piece missing and
respondents are prompted to choose one of six choices below each figure to complete the
pattern (Raven et al 1998). It was clearly explained by Hill, who has over 30 years
experience working with this populations and speaks the native language fluently, that
the subject should look at the pattern and figure out which piece fits into the missing
space correctly. The first two items on the test are extremely easy such that if a subject
missed these items it was assumed they did not understand the task correctly. If there
were errors on either of these two items, the above procedure was repeated until the
10uV
14
subjects picked answered correctly. Respondents were prodded by asking such questions
as, �do you think that piece really fits the pattern? Look, can you see how it is different
and doesn�t make the pattern look right? Pick another one that fits the pattern.,� and so
on. The patterns and rules become increasingly complex throughout the 36-item test and
no time limit was given. Prepubescent subjects � or younger than about 12 years of age �
were not included.
Short-term memory (STM) was assessed with a simple forward spatial span (SS) task,
which asks participants to replicate, following the experimenter, an increasingly long
sequence of spatial locations. Locations were 9 circles (4cm diameter) drawn randomly
on a cardboard plate (30cm diameter). Figure 2 provides an approximate pictorial
representation of the task. A semi-random (non-consecutive) sequence was committed to
memory by J.W. who began the test by pointing at the first circle and then prompted the
participant to mimic his motion. J.W. then repeated pointing to the first location and then
added another location and prompted the subject to again mimic this motion. Subjects
typically caught on very fast as to what was expected both very young and old. It was
assumed that any subject who could not replicate the first 3 locations did not understand
the task and instructions were repeated until it was clear they comprehended the task. The
spatial sequence was then lengthened by one location per trial until the subject failed to
correctly repeat a sequence. At this point, the same sequence was repeated and if subjects
were able to correctly repeat the sequence on this attempt the trial would continue with
another location added. However, if they incorrectly repeated the sequence the second
time their score was recorded as the last number of correctly repeated spatial locations.
15
Figure 2. The forward Spatial Span (SS) task. The experimenter points to the first location (1) and prompts the subject to mimic this motion before again pointing to the first location followed by a second location (2). The sequence is lengthened according to this fashion one location per trial until the participant fails to mimic two consecutive sequences.
Analytical methods and strategy
We rely on non-parametric curve fitting (i.e., least ordinary weighted sum of squares
or LOWESS) plots of performance by age to display subtle changes with age that may
not be captured in a parametric model. Individual scores that control for age are taken as
the residual off of the LOWESS fit for that particular age. We present data together and
by sex given evidence for sex differences in P100 latency and CNCV (Reed et al. 2004b)
that arises from anatomical size differences and hormonal influences (Celesia et al.
1987). Sex differences in SS and CPM are believed to be minimal (Court 1983; Hester et
al. 2004) with a slight male advantage sometimes reported (Lynn and Irwing 2004). We
also compare and contrast trends in psychometrics from other populations across
adulthood ages because this age range encompasses the potential acculturation effect on
psychometric performance previously mentioned. Given previous findings of significant
correlations between short-term memory tasks and Gf, and between Gf and CNCV, one-
tailed significance tests are justified.
16
RESULTS
Descriptive statistics for the sample are provided in Table 1. P100 and head length,
and hence CNCV, all share the same age ranges, means and standard deviations. The
mean age of respondents for the SS task is lower than for CPM because subjects under
the age of 12 were not administered the CPM.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the sample and tests. Significance indicators in the left mean column test for sex differences (Independent samples t-test, 2-tailed), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
Test Age N Min Max Mean S.D Range (yr) Mean S.D. P100 (ms) 161 99 149 116.4 7.18 3-75 28.2 17.72
Male 86 108 142 117.5 7.51 5-75 29.0 18.02Female 75 99 149 115.0* 6.57 3-73 27.3 17.44
Head Length (mm) 161 152 199 177.8 7.57 � � � Male 86 159 199 180.1 7.50 � � � Female 75 152 191 175.1** 6.74 � � �
CNCV (m/s) 161 1.17 1.84 1.533 0.1110 � � � Male 86 1.18 1.84 1.538 0.1145 � � � Female 75 1.17 1.80 1.527 n.s. 0.1072 � � �
Spatial Span 164 4 15 8.0 2.24 5-75 28.0 17.87Male 92 4 15 8.1 2.46 5-75 28.9 18.58Female 72 4 14 7.9 n.s. 1.94 6-60 26.7 16.95
Raven's CPM 129 2 32 16.0 6.86 12-70 35.5 16.11Male 76 3 32 16.3 7.05 12-70 38.6 16.03Female 53 2 29 15.5 n.s. 6.62 13-66 31.1 15.28
Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) and Central Nerve Conduction Velocity (CNCV)
Figure 2 indicates that P100 latency and CNCV show developmental changes up until
late adolescence or early adulthood (~18 years of age) and then senesce slightly across
middle adulthood before rapidly senescing after age 60. While the over 60 years old
17
sample is very small (n=4), the marked senescence pattern is a likely accurate for several
reasons. First, the few subjects in this age range with identifiable P100 values exhibited
slow latencies. Second, a 75-year old subject was excluded due to an undecipherable
P100 peak�attributable to obvious visual deterioration. And lastly, the number of
individuals over age 60 is limited, suggesting that strong senescence is operating in this
population at older adult ages.
(a) (b) Figure 3. a) P100 (in ms) across the lifespan for males and females. Note that the Y-axis is inverted to give a more intuitive feel for ontogenetic patterns. b) Central Nerve Conduction Velocity (CNCV), computed as head length divided by P100 latency across the lifespan for males and females. Data are fit with a LOWESS in both figures.
Psychometrics
Figure 4a presents cross-sectional age trends spatial span (SS) and has the same
general shape as P100 latency and CNCV although SS scores appear to decline rapidly
across adulthood and particularly in comparison to a westernized population (Figure 3b).
A significant sex difference also exists in SS between ages 15 and 25 with males
outperforming females (independent samples T-test, p = 0.006, t = -2.937).
! Female" Male
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Age
100
110
120
130
140
150
P100
(ms)
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!!
!
!!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!!!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!!!
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
""""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""
""
"
"
""
"
"
""
"""
"
"
"""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
! Female# Male
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Age
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
CN
CV
(m/s
)
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!!
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
###
##
#
#
##
###
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
###
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
18
(a) (b) Figure 4. a) Forward spatial span scores across the lifespan with LOWESS fit curves for each sex. b) Forward spatial span scores across the lifespan for Ache and Australian samples (data adapted from Hester et al. 2004, reproduced with permission).
Figure 4a presents cross-sectional age trends in CPM and the expected pattern of
general developmental and aging trends is observed. However, a highly significant sex
difference emerges between ages 15 and 30 with males again outperforming females
(independent samples T-test, p = 0.000, t = -4.054) and scores again decline rapidly
across adulthood. The rate of this decline appears to be somewhat faster than observed in
an industrial society (Figure 4b).
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Age
Spa
tial S
pan
AustralianAche
Age
80757065605550454035302520151050
Spa
tial s
pan
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
10
Male
Female
19
Figure 5. a) Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) scores across the lifespan with LOWESS fit curves for each sex. b) CPM scores across the lifespan for Ache and Italian sample (data adapted from Measso et al. 1993).
Table 3 presents Pearson correlations for test variables taken as residuals off of the
LOWESS best fit line thereby controlling for age. The extremely high correlations
between P100 and CNCV result from P100 being in the denominator for the calculation
of CNVC. CPM correlates with SS (stronger in males) and with CNCV (stronger in
females). Correcting P100 for head length, or dividing head length by P100, strengthens
the correlation of SS and CPM with CNCV except for male SS where there is virtually no
effect.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Age
CPM
AcheItalian
Age
70656055504540353025201510
CPM
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
male
female
20
Table 3. Pearson correlation matrices. Lower left halves control for age by using the residuals off the LOWESS fit by age. Upper right halves indicate the number of valid (listwise) cases for a given correlation. * Correlation significant at the 0.05 level, ** correlation significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed). Significance values provided if correlation was stronger than 0.2 or p-value less than 0.2. TOTAL P100 CNCV Spatial Span CPMP100 161 156 80 CNCV -0.756** 156 79 Spatial Span -0.064 0.076 77 CPM -0.024 0.199* 0.190* p = 0.040 p = 0.049 FEMALES P100 CNCV Spatial Span CPMP100 75 70 33 CNCV -0.827** 70 32 Spatial Span 0.005 -0.061 29 CPM -0.076 0.239 0.099 p = 0.094 p = .304 MALES P100 CNCV Spatial Span CPMP100 86 86 47 CNCV -0.769** 86 47 Spatial Span -0.141 0.139 48 p = 0.097 p = 0.101 CPM -0.072 0.157 0.218 p = 0.146 p = 0.068
DISCUSSION
Assessing cognition within a traditional or non-Western population presents a unique
set of challenges. We found correlations between measures of STM and Gf, and between
Gf and CNCV, collected among a group of traditional living forager-farmers. These
findings are consistent with previous studies (Conway et al. 2002; Engle et al. 1999; Reed
21
et al. 2004a) and are perhaps more impressive considering the nature of the sample, that
is, a traditional population, relatively small N distributed across much of the lifespan, and
controlling for age indirectly through residual analyses. Considered in this light, these
findings lend powerful support to the conceptual and empirical bases for the
interrelationships among STM, Gf and nerve speed.
Accounting for the pattern of Aché psychometric scores across the lifespan is open to
interpretation but requires consideration of the effects of variable cultural exposure in
combination perhaps with changing nutritional and disease patterns. Ache scores on both
tests decline much more rapidly across middle adulthood in comparison to trends from
other industrialized populations; SS scores are comparable at young ages before declining
rapidly and CPM scores are significantly lower at all ages.
The effects of schooling on psychometric test performance should not be
underestimated given the clear evidence, although the effect appears to be stronger for
verbal versus nonverbal tasks (Cahan and Cohen 1987). The abilities encouraged by
schooling relate directly to the functional conceptions of executive function, WMC and
Gf. In general, performance on Gf tasks depends on controlling attention, inhibiting
irrelevant information, and the speed and fidelity of information processing (Engle 2002;
Jensen 1998). To this list we would add that performance on Gf tasks also depends on
prior experience with testing materials and tasks. A cultural exposure or experience effect
is bound to be stronger when it encompasses pre-pubertal periods of higher neural
plasticity but probably operates over the entire lifecourse in terms of continual learning
and cognitive approaches to problem solving. Given that the Ache were nomadic hunter-
gatherers until the mid 1970s, it is perhaps not surprising that subsequent exposure to
22
western culture and moderate schooling could produce significantly improved
performance on psychometric tasks within the more recent generation.
At the same time, some of the cohort difference in test scores could be attributable to
steadily improving living conditions following settlement in the 1970s including
increased access to medicine, healthcare, and more consistent and higher caloric intake
(Hill and Hurtado 1996). Enduring worse living conditions throughout pre-contact life
would now be realized as more severe senescence in the older generation.
Future Directions and Conclusion
Our interest in pursuing this research was not solely guided by a desire to delineate
individual differences in intelligence per se and, based on previous studies, we expected
to encounter some degree of cultural dissonance with respect to psychometric test
dynamics. However, we also endeavored to collect objective physiological measures of
cognitive integrity with which to evaluate overall developmental and aging trends in the
population as a whole. Consider that all of the measures used here (P100/CNCV, SS,
CPM) exhibit expected age-related changes across the lifespan coincident with
development and senescence. However, the psychometric trends for the Aché are
noticeably different from that found in other populations. Combining the above
approaches could potentially offer a method for evaluating the validity of various
psychometrics within any given population.
Consider for example that aging trends in Gf tasks closely approximate those for
information processing speed in a large German sample (Li et al. 2004). Whether a
common underlying source of variation � perhaps attentional focus or neuronal speed
transmission � accounts for this pattern would not be particularly important. All that
23
would be required is for a predictable relationship to exist between the tests of interest,
and that the information be collected in a population where acculturation and schooling
differences are not a factor. If we assume that psychometrics are more prone to cultural
modification than physiological variables, it might then be possible to apply these tests in
a traditional population to compare the expected with the observed trend and evaluate the
age-specific validity of the psychometric task. We note that by recording short-latency
potentials (<200ms) while passively viewing a monitor, VEP demands minimal effort
and cooperation from participants, and thereby avoids most of the confounding effects of
acculturation, motivation and familiarity with test materials. Unfortunately, VEP results
cannot be formally compared across studies due to poorly understood variation arising
among laboratories, requiring the establishment of within-laboratory reference values
(Odom et al. 2004). Developing VEP or CNCV norms in association with Gf measures in
a population where acculturation or schooling differences are not a concern (or even
controlling for IQ) seems to be a reasonable approach for evaluating the differential and
age-specific validity of psychometrics within a given population.
The inability to formally compare VEP across studies limits our ability to characterize
the senescent VEP/CNCV pattern in the Aché. On the one hand, the large check sizes
used in this study (60�) and clear age decline in P100 across adulthood suggest marked
senescence. On the other hand, the relatively low luminance (30 cd/m2) of the
checkerboard stimulus � also presented on a flat screen monitor which has not to our
knowledge been performed before � would mitigate in the opposite direction by
exaggerating senescent trends and is likely contributing to the relatively longer P100
latencies recorded here.
24
There are limitations to this data and particularly its cross-sectional nature. Although
words such as �development", "senescence" and �change� are used, these should be
interpreted with caution. Also, forms of dementia, such as Alzheimer�s disease (AD),
were not gauged in this study and could possibly be contributing to the rapid deterioration
of cognitive skills as evidenced by psychometrics. Mean P100 latencies are normal in AD
patients indicating that optical pathways are spared (Martinelli et al. 1996). However,
from ethnographic experience we doubt dementia is highly prevalent among the Ache
and point out that age-specific mortality acting against cognitively impaired individuals
(Deary and Der 2005) could be particularly strong in relatively high senescence, high
mortality populations such as the Aché.
In conclusion, we found modest but compelling correlations among measures of
STM, Gf and brain nerve speed that accord with an emerging picture of the organization
of mental abilities (Geary 2005). Effects of task relevance, cultural exposure, and
schooling should be considered when applying western-derived psychometric in non-
western populations. The application of psychophysiological techniques such as VEP
appears useful for estimating neural integrity and may assist in evaluating the cross-
cultural efficacy of psychometric tasks. We encourage further investigations of this topic.
25
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A Leakey Foundation General Research Grant to JW funded this research.
Comments from several reviewers were instrumental for improving the focus of this
paper.
26
REFERENCES Allison, T., C. C. Wood, and W. R. Goff
1983 Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory
evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55: 619-36.
Ardila, Alfredo, and Sonia Moreno
2001 Neuropsychological test performance in Aruaco Indians: An exploratory study.
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 7: 510-15.
Baddeley, Alan. D., and G. Hitch
1974 Working memory. In: G.A. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and
motivation; pp. 47-89. New York: Academic Press
Brecelj, J.
2003 From immature to mature pattern ERG and VEP. Documenta Ophthalmologica
107: 215-24.
Burns, Nicholas R.
1999 Biological Correlates of IQ Scores do Not Necessarily Mean That G Exists.
Psycoloquy 10.
Cahan, Sorel, and Nora Cohen
1989 Age versus schooling effects on intelligence development. Child Development 60:
1239-49.
Carroll, J. B.
1993 Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York:
Cambridge University Press
27
Caryl, Peter G.
1994 Early event-related potentials correlate with inspection time and intelligence.
Intelligence 18: 15-46.
Ceci, S. (1991).
1991 How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive
components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology. 27:
703-22.
Celesia, G. G., D. Kaufman, and S. Cone
1987 Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 68: 161-71.
Chiappa, K. H.
1990 Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. New York: Raven Press
Clastres, P.
1998 Chronicle of the Guayaki Indians. Cambridge: The MIT Press
Conway, Andrew R.A., Nelson Cowan, Michael F. Bunting, David J. Therriault, and
Scott R.B. Minkoff
2002 A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory
capacity, processing speed, and general f luid intelligence. Intelligence 30: 163-
83.
Cooper, R., J. W. Osselton, and John Crossley Shaw
1980 EEG Technology. Boston: Butterworths
Court, John H.
1983 Sex differences in performance on Raven's Progressive Matrices: A review. Alberta
28
Journal of Educational Research 29: 54-74.
Cowan, N.
1995 Attention and memory: an integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Deary, Ian J., and Geoff Der
2005 Reaction time explains IQ�s association with death. Psychological Science 16: 64-9.
Engle, Randall W.
2002 Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in
Psychological Science 11: 19-23.
Engle, Randall W., Stephen W. Tuholski, J.E. Laughlin, and A.R.A. Conway
1999 Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent
variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology / General 130: 169-183.
Fiorentini, Adriana, Vittorio Porciatti, M. Concetta Morrone, and David C. Burr
1996 Visual ageing: unspecific decline of the responses to luminance and colour. Vision
Research 36: 3557-66.
Fotiou, Fotis, Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis, Apostolos Iacovides, and George Kaprinis
2003 Pattern-reversed visual evoked potentials in subtypes of major depression.
Psychiatry Research 118: 259-71.
Geary, David C.
2005 The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence.
Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association
Haier, R. J., K. H. Nuechterlein, E. Hazlett, J. C. Wu, and J. Paek
1988 Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studies
with positron emission tomography. Intelligence 12: 199-217.
29
Hester, Robert L., Glynda J. Kinsella, and Ben Ong
2004 Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks. Journal of the International
Neuropsychological Society 10: 475-81.
Hill, K., and M. Hurtado
1996 Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. New York:
Aldine de Gruyter, Inc.
Horn, J. L., and R.B. Cattell
1966 Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of
Educational Psychology 57: 253-70.
Hurtado, A. Magdalena , Kim R. Hill, Wilhelm Rosenblatt, Jacquelyn Bender, and Tom
Scharmen
2003 Longitudinal Study of Tuberculosis Outcomes Among Immunologically Naive
Ache´ Natives of Paraguay. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121:
134-50.
Jensen, A. R.
1980 Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press
�
1998 The g factor. Westport: Praeger
Jensen, Arthur. R.
1999 The G Factor: the Science of Mental Ability. Psycoloquy 10.
Kandel, E. R., S. A. Siegelbaum, and J. L. Schwartz
1991 Synaptic transmission. In: E. R. Kandel, J. L. Schwarts and T. M. Jessel (eds.),
Principles of neural science; pp. 123-34. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
30
Kane, Michael J., David Z. Hambrick, Stephen W. Tuholski, Oliver Wilhelm, Tabitha W.
Payne, and Randall W. Engle
2004 The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal
and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental
Psychology / General 133: 189-217.
Kaplan, H., K. Hill, J. Lancaster, and A. M. Hurtado
2000 A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity.
Evolutionary Anthropology 9: 156-184.
Kyllonen, P. C.
1996 Is working memory capacity Spearman�s g? In: I. Dennis and P. Tapsfield (eds.),
Human abilities: their nature and measurement; pp. 49-75. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Li, Shu-Chen, Ulman Lindenberger, Bernhard Hommel, Gisa Aschersleben, Wolfgang
Prinz, and Paul B. Baltes
2004 Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent
cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science 15: 155-63.
Lynn, Richard, and Paul Irwing
2004 Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 32: 481-
98.
Martinelli, V., T. Locatelli, G. Comi, C. Lia , M. Alberoni, S. Bressi, M. Rovaris, M.
Franceschi, and N. Canal
1996 Pattern visual evoked potential mapping in Alzheimer's disease: correlations with
visuospatial impairment. Dementia 7: 63-8.
Measso, G., G. Zappala, F. Cavarzeran, T.H. Crook, L. Romani, F.J. Pirozzolo, F.
31
Grigoletto, L.A. Amaducci, D. Massari, and B.D. Lebowitz
1993 Raven's colored progressive matrices: a normative study of a random sample of
healthy adults. Acta Neurol Scand 88: 70-4.
Mitchell, K. W., J. W. Howe, and S. R. Spencer
1987 Visual evoked potentials in the older population: age and gender effects. Clinical
Physics and Physiological Measurement 8: 317-24.
Neisser, Ulric, Gwyneth Boodoo, Thomas J. Bouchard, A. Wade Boykin, Nathan Brody,
Stephen J. Ceci, Diane F. Halpern, John C. Loehlin, Robert Perloff, Robert J. Sternberg,
and Susana Urbina
1996 Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist 51: 77-101.
Odom, J. Vernon, Michael Bach, Colin Barber, Mitchell Brigell, Michael F. Marmor,
Alma Patrizia Tormene, Graham E. Holder, and Vaegan
2004 Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Documenta Ophthalmologica 108: 115-
23.
Porciatti, V., D. C. Burr, M. C. Morrone, and A. Fiorentini
1992 The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in
humans. Vision Research 32: 1199-209.
Raven, J.C.
2000 The Raven's Progressive Matrices: change and stability over culture and time.
Cognitive Psychology 41: 1-48.
Raven, J.C., John H. Court, and J. Raven
1998 Manual for the Coloured Progressive Matrices (1998 edition). Oxford: Oxford
Psychologists Press
32
Raz, N., F.M. Gunning, D. Head, J.H. Dupuis, J.M. McQuain, S.D. Briggs, A.E.
Thornton, W.J. Loken, and J.D. Acker
1997 Selective aging of human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: Differential
vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cerebral Cortex 7: 268-82.
Reed, E. T.
1984 Mechanism for heritability of intelligence. Nature 311: 417.
Reed, E. T., and A. R. Jensen
1992 Conduction velocity in a brain nerve pathway of normal adults correlates with
intelligence level. Intelligence 16: 259-72.
Reed, Edward T., Philip A. Vernon, and Andrew M. Johnson
2004a Confirmation of correlation between brain nerve conduction velocity and
intelligence level in normal adults. Intelligence 32: 563-72.
Reed, T. Edward, Philip A. Vernon, and Andrew M. Johnson
2004b Sex difference in brain nerve conduction velocity in normal humans.
Neuropsychologia 42: 1709-14.
Spearman, C.
1904 The Abilities of Man. London: MacMillan
Tobimatsu, Shozo, Shizuka Kurita-Tashima, Miyuki Nakayama-Hiromatsu, Kohei
Akazawa, and Motohiro Kato
1993 Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of
luminance, contrast and check size. Electroencephalography and Clinical
Neurophysiology 88: 12-9.
Van de Vijver, Fons, and Ronald Hambleton, K.
33
1996 Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines. European Psychologist 1: 88-99.