sheppard v maxwell
TRANSCRIPT
SHEPPARD V. MAXWELL (1966)
By Leo Moreno
Facts of the case
Samuel Sheppard challenged his verdict as the product of an unfair trial.
He was accused of second-degree murder of his pregnant wife.
Questions
Does the publicity of his trial interfere with the fairness of his trial?
Did this interfere with his civil liberty of a fair trial that’s guaranteed in the Bill of Rights?
Civil liberties: Rights to protect from government.
Bill of Rights: The first ten amendments.
Table
Right Amendments Question
The constitutional amendment designed to protects the rights of persons accused of crimes, including protection against double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and punishment without due process of law.
5th Did he receive a fair trial?
5th Amendment: Designed to protect the rights of the persons accused of crimes.
Self-incrimination: The situation occurring when an individual accused of a crime is compelled to be a witness against his/herself in court.
Conclusion
The warren court found in an 8-to-1 decision that Sheppard did not receive a fair trial. The court concluded that the trial judge should’ve either postponed or transferred the case so it could be a fair trial.