shelter/nfi working group meeting
DESCRIPTION
Shelter/NFI Working Group Meeting. Islamabad, 11 th September 2014. Introduction and agenda. Flood situation overview Provincial updates Early Recovery 2012 updates Shelter Cluster Evaluation Shelter Research Update - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Shelter/NFI Working Group Meeting
Islamabad, 11th September 2014
2
Introduction and agenda
Flood situation overview Provincial updates Early Recovery 2012 updates Shelter Cluster Evaluation Shelter Research Update Key Findings from Study of Community Coping
Capacities after Disasters (CCCD) Humanitarian Programme Cycle 2015
Flood situation overview
2014 Monsoon Rainfall, % of Departure,1 July – 6 September
July August 1-6 Sep Jul - Sep
Pakistan -- 40% -- 49% + 90% --23%
Punjab --30 --- 45 + 200 -- 1
KP -- 31 --- 37 ---36 ---32
Sindh - 96 --- 81 -- 13 --- 78
Balochistan -- 34 --- 46 -- 36 --- 39
AJK --26 --- 41 + 156 0
GB + 18 ---44 + 156 +119
Worst Affected Districts
Punjab Sialkot, Narowal, Lahore, Gujranwala,
MandiBahauddin, Gujrat, Hafizabad, Chiniot, & Jhang
PAK & GB PAK: HattianBala, Haveli, Sudhnoti and Kotli;
Gilgit Baltistan: Diamir
8
As of 10 Sept, an estimated 233 people are reported to have lost their lives while, 40 people have been injured due to the flash floods (NDMA).
According to the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) an estimated 7,790 houses have been reported as damaged or destroyed.
To provide immediate assistance to the affected families, 301 relief camps have been set up in the affected areas, providing emergency health care, cooked food, some non-food items and temporary shelter.
The authorities expect an estimated 3 million people to be affected by the floods in the coming days.
Provincial updates
10
Sindh update
11
Significant flood forecast for River Indus at Guddu and Sukkur announced by Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMT) on 6th September.
River Indus likely to attain high to very high flood levels in the coming days.
Guddu: at risk 13th/14th September 2014
Sukkur: at risk 14th/15th September 2014
Flood forecasts - Sindh
12
Breach at Sanghar
Breach reported in Jamrao canal RD-191 near bhaji mori area of Shahdadpur. Rescue teams deployed.
Breach is approx. 150-200 feet, near Sanghar-Shahdadpur Road of Jaagan Wasaan village. More than 20 villages reportedly inundated. Water entering in area of Tando Adam.
13
Provincial Authorities Update
PDMA will convene a Sindh Humanitarian Coordination Meeting on 11th September to discuss agenda points below:
1. SoPs for registration/endorsement of I/NGOs working in Sindh
2. On-going floods in Pakistan and possible impacts in Sindh
14
Coordination Meetings called by Deputy Commissioners in Sukkur and Kashmore on 8th September for coming monsoon emergency.
Authorities have started announcements and flood alerts in katcha areas of Kandhkot, Kashmore and Sukkur for evacuation.
DC requested all humanitarian organizations to share their resources list with authorities as soon as possible.
Provincial Authorities Update
Provincial Coordination Updates Preparedness sessions on Information Management,
Coordination during emergencies and CCCM held for Authorities and NGOs from August to September.– Districts Khairpur, Ghotki, Jacobabad, Kandhkot at
Kashmore, Sukkur, Shikarpur and Qamber Shahdadkot
Regular coordination meetings convened in Sukkur, Jacobabad, Shikarpur and Kashmore for 2012 early recovery.
16
Coordination meetings in Qamber Shahdadkot and Ghotki held as per need.
Current priorities: Advocacy related to coverage gaps; use of vulnerability criteria for selection of beneficiaries; enhanced engagement from local authorities needed.
Provincial Coordination Updates
Most acute gaps - ER 2012 shelter
Jacobabad Ramzanpur, Mubarkpur, Jongal, Ghari Chand, Saeedokot and
Thul NaoKashmore Sodi, Akherio, Goshpur, laloo, Habit, Maller and BadaniShikarpur Amort Sharif, Rahimabad, Sultan Kot, Nim, Karan, Ghair Tego
and Ghair DakhoGhotki Ranwati, Wasti Jaewan, Rukh and AdilpurQambar Shadadkot Aitbar Khan Chadio, Jamali, Qubo Saeed Khan and Mastoi
Challenges
Recovery shelter construction is slower than expected, and shelter assistance coverage remains well below needs.
Good coverage of ER projects in Shikarpur and Jacobabad, but more support needed in Kashmore and Ghotki.
New shelter activities in Ghotki and Qambar Shadadkot not coordinated with working group and local authorities.
19
KP/FATA update
NFI distribution Targeted number of families is 83,000 (i.e.
blanket coverage) with 50:50 split between NRC and UNHCR
To date, UNHCR has distributed about 37,000 and NRC has distributed about 28,000, i.e. around 78% coverage.
20
KP/FATA Update
Registration Data Upgrade
Joint task between WFP, UNHCR and PDMA / FDMA to improve and extend the data collected during the initial rapid registration
To support food distribution and provision of winterised NFIs later this year as, barring a few early returns, most IDPs will remain displaced over the winter.
Data Upgrade starting this week at the 5 food distribution centres in Bannu and will then go to other districts once the winterised NFI distributions start within the next couple of months.
21
KP/FATA update
Protection Cluster Vulnerability Assessment
Currently 84,000 registered by FDMA, but 26,000 have failed a follow up verification by NADRA.
Vulnerability assessment attempts to identify the most vulnerable IDPs that have not been registered or remain unverified. Six Vulnerability criteria agreed at HCT level.
Referrals for families to be assessed from field partners and the grievance desks that have been setup
22
KP/FATA Update
Recent pilot identified just 96 vulnerable families from 185 interviews (52%), from 300 recommendations from 5,000 families that had approached the grievance desks to date. Estimated that around 5,000 vulnerable families will be identified overall during the coming month.
Challenges are difficulties to find the people in the field and training enumerators to assess vulnerabilities accurately. Also to complete fast enough before IDPs understand the criteria that are being used and adapt their answers accordingly.
Early Recovery 2012 updates
Early Recovery Summary by Province - 2012Pakistan Flood Shelter Cluster
Early Recovery
10-Sep-14
Early Recovery Shelter Distributed (HH)Committed
In Construction Phase
Completed Occupied Coverage
ProvincesNumber of AFFECTED districts*
Houses Destroyed or
Damaged*ORS T-Shelter ORS T-Shelter ORS T-Shelter ORS T-Shelter Total
Coverage: Need /
Response
Remaining Need
Balochistan 4 68,814
6,285
-
1,620 -
2,859
-
2,343 -
6,285
9%
62,529
Sindh 8
209,936
59,896 622
14,445
-
26,524 622
23,127
-
60,518 29%
149,418
Punjab 3
107,423
8,803 465
2,620
-
2,587 -
1,888
- 9,268
9%
98,155
TOTALS 15
386,172
74,984
1,087
18,685 -
31,970
622
27,358
-
76,071 20%
310,101
Cluster target:
193,086 or 50% 98,330
* Affected districts, Damage houses figures from MIRA and Satellite imagery and cross-referenced with NDMA and PDMA and pipeline as reported from cluster members
** Households served only reflects the distributions made by humanitarian partners
ER Shelter - Agency Summary – 2012
HANDS IOM ACTED CRS Concern PREPARED Concern WW/Rapid
Fund
CESVI SWRDO Islamic Help NRC TKF0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
3500033000
14790
11277
6073
2924 26471115
400 858 465 300 185465
ORS
T-Shelters
ER Shelter - Province Summary – 2012
Sindh Punjab Balochistan0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
59,896
8,803 6,285
622
149,418
98,155
62,529
Gap T-Shelter
ORS
27
Shelter Cluster Evaluation
Shelter Research Update
Shelter research Phase I -Completed
report available online at http://shelterpakistan.org/
31
Key achievements Development of a comprehensive database to record post-flood shelter
reconstruction projects implemented in Southern Pakistan since October 2010, in coordination with Shelter Cluster partners and relevant government stakeholders.
Mapping of recovery shelter projects related to floods between 2010 and 2012 to provide a visual overview of the shelter response, based on records from the newly-developed database.
Selection of 14 indicators with respective variables and metrics to assess the benefits and disadvantages of various shelter designs constructed during the Pakistan flood responses.
Design of a research methodology for Phase II to evaluate and compare the performance of various shelter solutions against flood hazards, ultimately recommending an optimal model for flood-resistant housing in Southern Pakistan.
Shelter research Phase II Proposed
Building on the work completed during Phase I, the specific objectives for the second phase of the research are to:
• Capture and analyse technical, economic, environmental and social advantages and disadvantages of various shelter recovery project designs, and build a comparative analysis of their performance in terms of flood resistance, climate proofing and wider resilience, environmental and market impact, value for money, and local suitability.
33
Test and verify the scientific validity of key DRR features introduced in shelter programmes since 2010 through rigorous physical material testing.
Physical testing will potentially include: – Immersion tests– Full scale structural strength tests– Material tests to determine the physical and mechanical properties of
different materials e.g. material strength test– Water absorption tests
These tests relate to the following hazards, which will be covered in
the research:– Damages to foundation and sub-structure due to flooding and standing
water– Damages to walls and super-structure failures due to long-standing water,
flooding, heavy rains and strong winds– Roof collapse due to heavy rains, stagnant water or strong winds
34
Define best practices and develop recommendations for stronger flood resilient/DRR construction technologies that are low-cost, replicable, adapted to vernacular designs and contribute to building the overall resilience of communities at risk.
Produce a set of guideline documents (Post-Flood Recovery Shelter Toolkit) on improved flood-resistant, low-cost housing in Southern Pakistan that is adapted to the needs of various audiences to inform future shelter and housing programming.
Objectives
Key Findings from Study of Community Coping Capacities after Disasters (CCCD)
– Objectives
– Methodology
– Terminology
Context
Recovery ratioaftermath challenges versus current challenges
Do not manage to cultivate/sell crops as much as be-fore
Insufficient drinking water
Lack of seeds/tools
Difficulties to access the market
No Food
Difficulties to access medical facilities/medicines
No tools/material to repair houses
Insufficient water for domestic use
Insufficient/Unavailability of fodder for livestock
No house/shelter to protect them from heat/cold
No money to care for most basic needs
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
22%
31%
34%
34%
37%
39%
40%
42%
46%
49%
57%
32%
36%
33%
29%
57%
24%
15%
16%
24%
20%
25%
41%
52%
50%
43%
91%
40%
25%
28%
44%
40%
59%
Challenges (Current Vs Right After Floods)
Challenges (after water receded)
Challenges (current)
Recovery
Coping Capacities – what are they?
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Shahdadkot Shikarpur Overall0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Community’s coping capacities
Contracted debts/borrowed money / bank loan
Removed children from school to work
Reduced amount of food con-sumed to pay for immediate expenses
Sold livestock to get money
Looked for different job/livelihood opportunities to get more money
Sold relief assistance to get money
Sold salvageable materials from destroyed houses/infrastructure
Sold productive assets (tools, rickshaw, mill)
Sold personal belongings (jewelry, etc.)
Sold land
Other
Why those coping mechanisms?
Get food Get medicines/pay for the doctor
Arrange money to repair house
Get money to pay for fodder
Get money to buy seeds/tools
Others0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Reasons for adopting coping strategies
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Sh. Shikarpur Grand Total
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Shahdadkot
Shikarpur Overall0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
28%
32%21%
35%
29%
60% 65% 68% 48% 61%
How un-assisted communities perceive their houses before and after the flood
Better than before Same as before Worse than before
Housing conditions before and after flooding assisted vs unassisted
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Shahdadkot
Shikarpur Overall0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
57% 57%
68%
56% 59%
43%36%
21%28% 32%
7%
11%
16% 9%
How assisted communities perceive their houses before and after the flood
Better than before Same as before Worse than before
Use of DRR Techniquesassisted vs unassisted
Raised plat-form
Deeper foundations
Better Plinths
Better Roof Thicker walls
Did not try/could
build better
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
35%
24%
18%15%
12%
55%
USE of DRR Techniques – Unassisted communi-ties
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar ShahdadkotShikarpur Overall
Raised plat-form
Deeper foundations
Better Plinths
Better Roof Thicker walls
Changed the location for higher grounds
Have a new type of house
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
67%
53%
48%51%
23%
3%
8%
Which techniques communities learnt from tranings
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar ShahdadkotShikarpur Overall
Shelter - Assisted Communities
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Shahdadkot Shikarpur Overall0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
71%
82%
58% 60%67%
21%9%
25% 20%
19%
7% 9% 8%
20%12%
Was the training used?
Yes, to repair houses after they got damaged Yes, to maintain the house (re-plaster etc.)Yes, to help other families repair their houses No
Shelter – unassisted communities
Lack of skills Lack of building material Lack of money to purchase the mate-
rial
No time as busy with job/other work during
the day
No manpower/help to rebuild the house
No skilled labor0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
53%
82%
95%
9%5%
18%
Key challenges for the community in rebuilding houses
Jacobabad Kashmore Qambar Shahdadkot Shikarpur Overall
Humanitarian Programme Cycle 2015
• Replaces the Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP)
• Piloted in 21 countries including Pakistan in 2014
45
46
Components
Humanitarian Needs Overview (HNO) KP/FATA IDPs Refugees Nutrition Residual Shelter Needs (?)
Strategic Response Plan (SRP) projectization vs. cost per action
More info: www.humanitarianresponse.info/programme-cycle
AOB