shared vocabularies for collective intelligence
DESCRIPTION
Understanding the importance of common vocabularies for collective intelligence, the EIIF XG Incubator example for Emergency ManagementTRANSCRIPT
Shared Vocabularies for Collective Intelligence
DEST/IEEE 2009Paola Di Maio, University of Strathclyde
Contents
Collective Intelligence Shared Knowledge Representation Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics Shared vocabularies Emergency management EIIF W3C XG
Natural Ecosystem
Digital Ecosystem
Knowledge Ecosystem
Human Collective Intelligence.
The dynamic aggregation of cognitive, reasoning and knowledge resources of humans supported by intelligent and networked information systems.
Intelligence as collective property
important parts of our intelligence reside in collective properties, not individual properties
important parts of our personal cognitive processes are caused by unconscious and automatic processes such as signaling and mimicry.
modeling humans as a distributed, network-based intelligence and then layer on individual cognitive processes is a radical change of emphasis for most researchers. (Alex Pentland, MIT)
CI as COMPLEX SYSTEM
Emergence results from dynamic combination of a system components, and based on the dependence of the whole on its parts, and their parts mutual interdependence and specialization.
Pattern formation: are the visible, orderly outcomes of self-organisation and the common principles behind matching behaviors.
Paradoxes. Diverse and heterogeneous components of a system can results in contrasting and sometimes opposed characteristics both being present , such as simplicity and complexity, order and disorder, random and predictable behavior,
IMPLICIT VS EXPLICIT CI
In explicit CI, individuals actively contribute information, knowledge and reasoning resources to a common repository – say a web based environment – so that they can be combined and manipulated.
Implicit CI takes place when our intelligence is tapped without individuals knowing it Whenever browsing the web while logged in into our accounts, our search history is recorded, Google even made it a useful feature: when 'search history' is on, a trail will be kept, surely useful in many ways, and potentially a gold mine of information. One of the caveats of implicity CI is intellectual property.
BENEFIT: Speed of Aggregation
Speed advantage: Assume a fire emergency, of wildfire spreading over a region. Classical Examples of Collective Intelligence have sprung up during large scale disasters in recent years, using simple tools such as blogs, wikis and webboard where citizens would post information incident related information.
BENEFIT: Capacity, Reach, Quality, Complementarity
Diverse and complementary backgrounds and opinions
widest breadth and depth provided adequately engineered CI process
are in, the quality of the outcome from a collective efforts is higher than in individual efforts.
CO EVOLUTION
LIMITATIONS OF CI
The way that ants map out their environment, that bees decide which flower fields to exploit, or that termites build complex mounds, may create the impression that these are quite intelligent creatures. The opposite is true. Individual insects have extremely limited information processing capacities. Yet, the ant nest, bee hive or termite mound as a collective can cope with very complex situations. [...] The obvious question is whether high collective intelligence can also emerge from high individual intelligence. Achieving this is everything but obvious, though. The difficulty is perhaps best illustrated by the frustration most people experience with committees and meetings. Bring a number of very competent people together in a room in order to devise a plan of action, tackle a problem or reach a decision. Yet, the result you get is rarely much better than the result you would have got if the different participants had tackled the problem individually.
Francis Heylighen
Examples of CI
Collective Knowledge Bases Indices Collective reasoning and problem solving Collective decisions Making Forecasting/Prediction Markets
Stochastic, from the Greek "stochos" means "aim, guess", referring to conjecture and randomness. SD refers to the global logic that underpins the development of a system as the result of individual behaviors of a community of individuals appear to be random, or at least not following a hierarchical, centrally imparted behavior, yet resulting in an organic, socially purposeful action. In human CI systems, this principle corresponds to the state of randomness of communities where participants are not selected on the merit of their seniority, rank or expertise, but open (uncrontrolled) participation is encouraged. Collective intelligence relies on the principle of participation, thus characterized by chaotic patterns of interaction.( W. Sulis)
Stochastic Determinism
Interactive Determinism
According to this principle, the interaction among the constituents of a system results in some unique collective property, a type of synergy where the sum is more than just the sum of its factors. Thanks to ID, a system defines it dynamic processes on the fly, as a constant flow of chain reactions that are 'unpredictable' however they follow some built in logic. Self organization is the result of ongoing interactive determination and adjustments .( W. Sulis)
CI behavior is determined by adaptive responses to the interaction among individuals and their environment, and does not depend on a shared cognitive representation (knowledge representation, model of the world). Biological systems do not have mental capabilities in the cognitive sense, and their behavior can be boiled down to a set of environmental responses. In biology, simple life forms do not posses the cognitive apparatus to support mental capabilities required for mental models to form, in contrast to human systems whose communication depends on shared conceptual and semantic models.( W. Sulis)
NON REPRESENTATIONAL CONTEXTUAL DEPENDENCE
SHARED KR
EXPLICIT HUMAN CI REQUIRES SHARED KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
Models (Ontology, schemas) Artifacts (vocabularies)
Image by P Levy
Shared Vocabularies
Different kinds of vocabularies: (taxonomies thesauri, glossary data dictionary)
Shared vocabulary is generally a controlled vocabulary
Controlled Vocabulary Paradox:No single definition of what a CV is
* A carefully selected set of terms - words and phrases - such that each concept from the domain of discourse is described using only one term in ...
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/controlled_vocabulary
* A set of standard subject terms used by a database to describe the subject content of the items cited within the database. Many, if not most, databases use a controlled vocabulary. These controlled vocabularies vary from database to database. ...
www.clarion.edu/395/63165/
…. many other definitions of what a controlled vocabulary is …
Lexical Relations
Integration vs Interoperability
PRAGMATIC SEMANTIC SYNTACTIC. Carlile
Syntax, Semantic, Conceptual, Pragmatic
Shared Vocabulary Levels
Syntax (schema, xml, rdf) Semantics (meanings) Conceptual (representation) Pragmatic (use) Procedural (common processes)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
In a broad sense, it is envisaged that there is a top level 'universal' interoperability requirement, which is to support the communication and mutual reinforcement of all potential agents able to provide capability to deliver aid and act as first responders during an emergency to interoperate
Responders need the ability to easily and fluidly share information, voice data and video. That is not possible with most deployed systems. [Bob Block]
In such unconstrained scenario responders may be a mixed bag of organisations and individuals whose operations are regulated by different protocols, who communicate in different languages and following different rules, each providing a contribution to overall emergency relief capability. The above is likely to be a chaotic 'open world' scenario, where resources and decision making are distributed, and coordination is the key strategic requirement
Functional Boundaries
Resources and Assets Safety & Security Staff Responsibilities Utilities Management Patient, Clinical, Medical SLA and QoS Security Ethics
Problem Space
Terms/concepts used by different agencies in the same operational field Terms/concepts used by different agencies in different operational fields Terms/concepts used by agencies in different countries, across 1. and 2. above
W3C EIIF
Incubator Group Aim to create common framework for
information exchange EM Metadata Open, encourages wider participation Many challenges, creating the common view
is non trivial
Framework Diagram
Vocabulary
Conclusion
Information Integration/Interoperability is necessary for optimisation of the supply chain in EM (and other fields) for innovation, process transformation, agility
Understanding the underlying challenge of shared vocabularies may lead to more problems initially,but to more realistic and sound solutions in the long term
Likely to remain work in progress
Qs?
Thank you for listening Questions, comments, suggestions, Paola.dimaio at g/mai'l