shared converged services statenets / net@edu conference february 13, 2008
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Shared Converged Services
StateNets / Net@Edu ConferenceFebruary 13, 2008
![Page 2: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Agenda
• Voice Services at ENA– Platform Design– Service Features– We can share!
• Shared Application Development
– A possible model for collaboration and sharing
• Q&A
![Page 3: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
ENA Converged Services
• Brief History– 2006: ENA decides to offer Voice/VoIP services
– 2007: Offer Voice services to 6 customers (Pilot)• Install 1st Voice Platform• Intercarrier agreements with RBOCS/CLECs etc.• First 6 Pilot School Districts• Offering Focuses on Hosted PBX/IP Centrex and SIP Trunking Services
– 2008: 20+ School Districts signed up for Services• ~20K IP Centrex End points• Multiple District-wide Trunking Solutions• Able to serve both Urban and Rural Districts
![Page 4: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Service Requirements• Carrier-class
– Reliability of Telecommunications solution vitally important to K-12 community and their constituents
• Future Looking– Architecture allows for integration w/ future converged services
• Open Standards Architecture• SIP vs MGCP
• Feature Rich– Features should be equivalent to what customers could get with
proprietary CPE solutions
![Page 5: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Platform Architecture
• Redundancy– Every key platform component is redundant (N+1)
– Redundant IP and PSTN connectivity
– Redundant utility power + battery + generator
– Platform can experience multiple component failure without dropping a call
– UPCOMING: Geographically diverse primary and backup platforms
• We’ve tried to this right, and can share
![Page 6: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Multiple Layers of Administration
• Regional/Wholesale Administration• School District/End Customer Administration• End User Configuration Control
– End User Portal
– Attendant Console
![Page 7: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Administrator’s Portal
![Page 8: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Model for Shared Application Development
• Swisscom Model– Open Converged Services Platform available to developers world-
wide
– Mash-ups/widgets/scheduling apps etc.
– Swisscom can deploy any developed apps/services in Switzerland
– Contributors are free to deploy same services anywhere else
![Page 9: Shared Converged Services StateNets / Net@Edu Conference February 13, 2008](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081603/5697c01b1a28abf838ccf66f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Q&A