- shape coexistence in the neutron-deficient hg isotopes ...€¦ · 92intruder bands observed for...

36
Shape coexistence in the neutron-deficient Hg isotopes studied via lifetime measurements P.R. John , D. Mengoni, D. Bazzacco, A. Boso, S. Lenzi, R. Menegazzo, F. Recchia, G. Colucci Dipartimento di Fisica and Astronomia, Universit` a di Padova and INFN, Sezione di Padova, Italy. M. Siciliano , A. Goasduff , J.J. Valiente-Dob´on, G. de Angelis, G. Jaworski, D. Testov, D.R. Napoli, F. Galtarossa, M. Cicerchia INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Italy. Th. Braunroth, A. Vogt, B. Birkenbach Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik der Universitat zu K¨oln, Germany. J. Pakarine Department of Physics, University of Jyv¨ askyl¨ a, University of Jyv¨ askyl¨ a, Finland B. Melon, A. Nannini, M. Rocchini Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita degli Studi di Firenze, INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy G. Benzoni, N. Cieplicka Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Italy. B. de Canditiis, F. Davide, D. Quero, D. Ashad, P. Rath Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Italy. W. Witt, P. Koseoglu, J. Wiederhold Institut f¨ ur Kernphysik der Technischen Universit¨ at Darmstadt, Germany June 29, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Shape coexistence in the neutron-deficient Hg isotopes studied via lifetimemeasurements

    P.R. John, D. Mengoni, D. Bazzacco, A. Boso, S. Lenzi, R. Menegazzo, F. Recchia, G. ColucciDipartimento di Fisica and Astronomia, Università di Padova and INFN, Sezione di Padova, Italy.

    M. Siciliano, A. Goasduff, J.J. Valiente-Dobón, G. de Angelis, G. Jaworski, D. Testov, D.R. Napoli, F. Galtarossa, M. CicerchiaINFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Italy.

    Th. Braunroth, A. Vogt, B. BirkenbachInstitut für Kernphysik der Universitat zu Köln, Germany.

    J. PakarineDepartment of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

    B. Melon, A. Nannini, M. RocchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Universita degli Studi di Firenze, INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy

    G. Benzoni, N. CieplickaDipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Italy.

    B. de Canditiis, F. Davide, D. Quero, D. Ashad, P. RathDipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Italy.

    W. Witt, P. Koseoglu, J. WiederholdInstitut für Kernphysik der Technischen Universität Darmstadt, Germany

    June 29, 2016

  • The neutron-deficient isotopes around N ≈ 104

    � Intruder bandsobserved for176−190Hg

    � Differentdeformation:� ground state

    band oblatedeformed

    � Intruder bandprolatedeformed

    K. Heyde and J.L. Wood, Rev.Mod. Phys. 83 (2011)

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    172 176 180 184 188 192 196 200 204

    92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 124

    Exci

    tatio

    n En

    ergy

    [MeV

    ]

    Mass Number, A

    Neutron Number, N

    0+

    2+4+

    6+

    8+

    10+

    12+

    4+

    6+

    6+

    8+

    0+2+

    4+6+

    8+10+

    12+

    ˜ Adapted from L.P. Gaffney et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024307 (2014)

    2 of 22

  • The neutron-deficient isotopes around N ≈ 104

    � Intruder bandsobserved for176−190Hg

    � Differentdeformation:� ground state

    band oblatedeformed

    � Intruder bandprolatedeformed

    K. Heyde and J.L. Wood, Rev.Mod. Phys. 83 (2011)

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    172 176 180 184 188 192 196 200 204

    92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 124

    Exci

    tatio

    n En

    ergy

    [MeV

    ]

    Mass Number, A

    Neutron Number, N

    0+

    2+4+

    6+

    8+

    10+

    12+

    4+

    6+

    6+

    8+

    0+2+

    4+6+

    8+10+

    12+

    ˜ Adapted from L.P. Gaffney et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024307 (2014)

    2 of 22

  • The neutron-deficient isotopes around N ≈ 104

    � Intruder bandsobserved for176−190Hg

    � Differentdeformation:� ground state

    band oblatedeformed

    � Intruder bandprolatedeformed

    K. Heyde and J.L. Wood, Rev.Mod. Phys. 83 (2011)

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    172 176 180 184 188 192 196 200 204

    92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 124

    Exci

    tatio

    n En

    ergy

    [MeV

    ]

    Mass Number, A

    Neutron Number, N

    0+

    2+4+

    6+

    8+

    10+

    12+

    4+

    6+

    6+

    8+

    0+2+

    4+6+

    8+10+

    12+

    This Presentation

    ˜ Adapted from L.P. Gaffney et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024307 (2014)

    2 of 22

  • Two state configuration mixing

    � Two state configuration mixing model: observed states are amixture between these two unperturbed intrinsic states |Jo〉 , |Jp〉:

    |Ja〉 = α1 |Jp〉+ α2 |Jo〉|Jb〉 = −α2 |Jp〉+ α1 |Jo〉

    � Changing contribution as a function of neutron number

    � Transition prolate deformed → mixing → oblate deformation� Maximum mixing in the 2+1 state for

    184HgK. Heyde and J.L. Wood, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011)

    3 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 1861784 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 186178

    Increase in2+ energyMore spherical structure

    176Hg

    R. Julin et al., J. Phys. G 27(7):R109 (2001).

    4 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 186178

    Increase in2+ energyMore spherical structure

    176Hg

    R. Julin et al., J. Phys. G 27(7):R109 (2001).

    Strong E0 component22+ → 21+Strong Mixing

    184,186Hg

    M. Scheck et al., PRC 83 037303 (2011).

    4 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 186178

    Increase in2+ energyMore spherical structure

    176Hg

    R. Julin et al., J. Phys. G 27(7):R109 (2001).

    Strong E0 component22+ → 21+Strong Mixing

    184,186Hg

    M. Scheck et al., PRC 83 037303 (2011).

    180-186Hg PlungerT. Grahn et al., PRC 80 014324 (2009)M. Scheck et al., PRC 81 014310 (2010)L.P. Gaffney et al., PRC 89 024307 (2014)

    4 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 186178

    Increase in2+ energyMore spherical structure

    176Hg

    R. Julin et al., J. Phys. G 27(7):R109 (2001).

    Strong E0 component22+ → 21+Strong Mixing

    184,186Hg

    M. Scheck et al., PRC 83 037303 (2011).

    182-188Hg COULEXN. Bree et al., PRL 162701 (2014)

    180-186Hg PlungerT. Grahn et al., PRC 80 014324 (2009)M. Scheck et al., PRC 81 014310 (2010)L.P. Gaffney et al., PRC 89 024307 (2014)

    4 of 22

  • What we know about this region

    176 180 184 188 192190182 186178

    Increase in2+ energyMore spherical structure

    176Hg

    R. Julin et al., J. Phys. G 27(7):R109 (2001).

    Strong E0 component22+ → 21+Strong Mixing

    184,186Hg

    M. Scheck et al., PRC 83 037303 (2011).

    182-188Hg COULEXN. Bree et al., PRL 162701 (2014)

    180-186Hg PlungerT. Grahn et al., PRC 80 014324 (2009)M. Scheck et al., PRC 81 014310 (2010)L.P. Gaffney et al., PRC 89 024307 (2014)

    Galileo

    4 of 22

  • 188Hg – at the edge of shape coexistence

    � At the heavy edge of the shapecoexistence

    � Ground state band supposed oblatedeformed

    N. Bree et al., Phys. Rev. Let. 112:162701 (2014).

    � Degree of mixing not yet firmlyconfined

    ˜Adapted from F. Hannachi et al., Nucl. Phys.A 481, 135-160 (1988)

    5 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    6 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    6 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    6 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    d2.5 mg/cm2 natTa

    600 µg/cm2 160Gd

    11 mg/cm2 197Au

    34S @ 185MeV 188Hgβ=0.0179

    +6n

    � 34S + 160Gd ⇒ 188Hg + 6 n� We arrived up-to 7 pnA using Tandem and Alpi� Main evaporation residual 188Hg > 50% of total ER� Probability of detecting at least 1n > 17 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    0

    2e+06

    4e+06

    6e+06

    8e+06

    1e+07

    1.2e+07

    1.4e+07

    1.6e+07

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Counts

    /0.5

    keV

    Energy (keV)

    Ta

    Au

    Au Ta

    Ta

    Au

    Au

    Ta

    Au

    � Background from Fission (e.g. Fusion-Fission)

    � Background from Coulex⇒ Reduced by condition 1n > 1

    8 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    0

    2e+06

    4e+06

    6e+06

    8e+06

    1e+07

    1.2e+07

    1.4e+07

    1.6e+07

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Counts

    /0.5

    keV

    Energy (keV)

    Ta

    Au

    Au Ta

    Ta

    Au

    Au

    Ta

    188H

    g

    Au

    � Background from Fission (e.g. Fusion-Fission)

    � Background from Coulex⇒ Reduced by condition 1n > 1

    8 of 22

  • Experiment using Galileo (+NeutronWall)

    0

    2e+06

    4e+06

    6e+06

    8e+06

    1e+07

    1.2e+07

    1.4e+07

    1.6e+07

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Counts

    /0.5

    keV

    Energy (keV)

    Ta

    Au

    Au Ta

    Ta

    Gd

    Au

    Au

    Ta

    188H

    g

    Au

    � Background from Fission (e.g. Fusion-Fission)

    � Background from Coulex⇒ Reduced by condition 1n > 1

    8 of 22

  • (Ab)Using for suppressing Coulex

    � First timecompletely digitalNeutronWall

    � Very “dirty”selection ofneutrons

    � Fast onlineselection of ZCOin order to reducedata rate

    � Nearly dead-timefree

    Clean neutrons

    9 of 22

  • (Ab)Using for suppressing Coulex

    � First timecompletely digitalNeutronWall

    � Very “dirty”selection ofneutrons

    � Fast onlineselection of ZCOin order to reducedata rate

    � Nearly dead-timefree

    Used neutron condition

    9 of 22

  • (Ab)Using for suppressing Coulex

    � First timecompletely digitalNeutronWall

    � Very “dirty”selection ofneutrons

    � Fast onlineselection of ZCOin order to reducedata rate

    � Nearly dead-timefree

    0

    500000

    1e+06

    1.5e+06

    2e+06

    2.5e+06

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

    Counts

    /keV

    Energy (keV)

    neutron gated spectra

    9 of 22

  • Very preliminary results

    � Accelerator problems duringexperiment ⇒only 2.5 days of beam time

    � Analysis is still in its early phase

    Gate in flightSpectra

    2+1 ⇒ 0+gs transition @ 152◦

    10 of 22

  • Very preliminary results

    � Accelerator problems duringexperiment ⇒only 2.5 days of beam time

    � Analysis is still in its early phase

    Gate in flightSpectra

    2+1 ⇒ 0+gs transition @ 152◦

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    s u

    20mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    60mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    100mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    200mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    300mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    400mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    390 400 410 420 430 440

    Energy (keV)

    600mu

    10 of 22

  • Very preliminary results

    � Accelerator problems duringexperiment ⇒only 2.5 days of beam time

    � Analysis is still in its early phase

    Gate in flightSpectra

    2+1 ⇒ 0+gs transition @ 119◦

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    s u

    20mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    60mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    100mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    200mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    300mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    400mu

    −100 0

    100 200 300 400 500 600

    390 400 410 420 430 440

    Energy (keV)

    600mu

    11 of 22

  • Very preliminary results

    � Accelerator problems duringexperiment ⇒only 2.5 days of beam time

    � Focused on the 2+1 state

    � only 2-3 distances with in-flightcomponent for higher-spin states

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

    R

    Distance (mu)

    R(S/Tot)

    R(U/Tot)

    � T1/2 = 26 (3) ps

    � not corrected for ≈ 30% feeding of 135 (15) ns isomeric state� Very preliminary result, analysis still ongoing

    � From Coulex: T1/2 = 13.1+23−18 ps N. Bree et al., Phys. Rev. Let. 112:162701 (2014).

    12 of 22

  • Outlook and future perspective

    � Promising data and great performance of the system, Plungerstable up-to 7 pnA

    � Finish to analyse the data

    � Investigate the option to use NeutronWall as a multiplicity filter

    � Accelerator problems during the experiment ⇒ Recovery beamtime in July

    � Study of 190Hg

    13 of 22

  • 190Hg – a γ-soft nucleus?

    � Transition between shape coexistenceand single minimum

    � Change in configuration� Signs of γ-softness

    J.P. Delaroche et al., Phys. Rev. C 50:2332, (1994).

    � Dipole bands with π(2p4h)configuration observed

    A.N. Wilson et al., Phys. Let. B 81, B 505(1):614, (2001).

    � Super deformed band observedA.N. Wilson et al., PRL 104, 162501 (2010).

    3

    2

    4 5 68

    1012

    16

    18 20

    24

    28

    35

    45

    6 50o

    15o

    30o

    45o

    60o

    10

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

    ˜Adapted from J.-P Delaroche et al., Phys.Rev. C 81, 014303 (2010)

    14 of 22

  • Thank you for your attention

    Thank you for your attentionAlso special Thanks to M. Loriggiola and A. Goasduff, G. Jaworski

    15 of 22

  • Shape coexistence and lifetime measurements

    � Transition strengths very sensitive to the wave functions� Huge change in nuclear structure, but B(E2; 2+1 → 0+gs) ≈ 50 W.U.� Change in major contribution with higher spins

    L.P. Gaffney et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024307 (2014)

    Adapted from L.P. Gaffney et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024307 (2014).16 of 22

  • Cross section estimate 190Hg

    � Gemini

    17 of 22

  • Cross section estimate 188Hg

    � Gemini

    18 of 22

  • Fission 190Hg

    � Gemini

    19 of 22

  • Fission 188Hg

    � Gemini

    20 of 22

  • Proposed experiment (alternative)

    � Setup Galileo + Cologne Plunger (+ Euclides as veto)

    � Reaction 40Ar + 154Sm and 152Sm (500µg/cm2 evaporated on1.2 mg/cm2 181Ta) 1 pnA

    � Reaction channel −4n for 188Hg and 190Hg� 12 target-stopper distances between 10µm and 1200µm each 4 h

    � Energy lower ⇒ less contribution of fission

    Energy Channel σ-xn Fraction γ − γ-coinc./h 2+/4+172 MeV −4n 190Hg 13 mbarn 55.4% 900178 MeV −4n 188Hg 19 mbarn 72% 1200

    + 1 day for change of energy + calibration⇒ 5 days of beam time

    21 of 22

  • 190Hg a γ-soft nucleus

    Adapted from J. P. Delaroche et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, 02332 (1994).22 of 22

    Motivation – Shape coexistence in the neutron-deficient Hg isotopesExperimentAppendixAppendix