SG3 outcome• General agreement on the check-list approach• Background document to be extended / further discussed (5 people in parallel session)• Main requirements for urban AQM inventories:

– consistency across the scales– transparency– inclusion of relevant sources (local-specific)

• To be included in the background document:– further discussion on scenario development needed (uncertainty, non-technical measures, etc.)– discussion on spatial allocation of future emissions– include annexes with examples, references, etc.

FAIRMODE WG2 meeting. 15th sep 2010. Kjeller

1) how far are we in the work plan from 2010?

First draft of the “guidance document on emission and projections needs at local scale” already available

2) What are the main priorities for work in 2011?

- expand and refine the document

- involvement of more emission experts

- development of an EI questionnaire for AQM application participating in the benchmarking process of SG4

3) What input do we need from the other SGs?

- contributions from SG2 (particular requirements of EI to support SA analysis)

- Information from case studies involved in the SG4 benchmarking process

FAIRMODE WG2 meeting. 15th sep 2010. Kjeller

4) Identify deliverables to other subgroups in 2011

- Analysis on “case studies” for SG4

FAIRMODE WG2 meeting. 15th sep 2010. Kjeller

SG4

Benchmarking process

AQM resultsObserved values“EI questionnaire”

SG3

Benchmarking results

AnalysisEI assessment

Indicators?

Urban EI guidance document development

Workplan

• Background document development– first revision. December 2010

• Development of EI questionnaire– march 2011

• Interaction with SG4– analyze case studies according to SG4 workplan– Feedback to the guidance document for second revision (inputs from other SG?)

• Background document development– second revision. December 2011

FAIRMODE WG2 meeting. 15th sep 2010. Kjeller