sfi allsite monterey october final 2010
TRANSCRIPT
CURRICULUM BASED ON THEORY AND EVIDENCE
THERE ARE 5 DOMAINS OF FAMILY LIFE THAT AFFECT FAMILY MEMBERS’ WELL-BEING
OUR CURRICULUM ADDRESSES ALL 5 ASPECTS OF FAMILY LIFE (It’s not just a parenting class or communication skills training.)
1. PARENTS AS INDIVIDUALS
2. The COUPLE RELATIONSHIP
3. PARENT-CHILDRELATIONSHIPS
4. FAMILY OF ORIGIN PATTERNS
5. STRESSORS and SUPPORTS
Culture
Economic forces
FAMILY SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE MISSING
Work
School
Peers
Friends
Social support and Life Stress
Social support and Life Stress
Development and Evaluation Team
Philip Cowan and Carolyn Pape Cowan,
University of California, Berkeley
Marsha Kline Pruett, Smith College
Kyle Pruett, Yale University
Peter Gillette, University of California Berkeley
Data Manager
Supporting Father Involvement
Informational
session*
16 week
Fathers
groups*
16 week
Couples
groups*
*A Case Manager for every study family
• Post-intervention assessments 9 months after baseline
• Follow-up assessments 18 months after baseline
• Pre-intervention (baseline) assessments
Bi-monthly consultation for site staff
SUPPORTING FATHER INVOLVEMENT
Random Assignment to:
Participants
289 families completed pre and posttests
67% Mexican American (an African American sample added later)
75% married 20% cohabiting 5% not living together
Supporting Father Involvement PHASE I
Results (2-1/2 yr followup)
PARENTS FROM CONTROL GROUP One 3-hour group meeting• Stayed the same or got worse over time (no change in father involvement, couple satisfaction down, symptoms up)• Reported more behavior problems in their children than they had on entering study.
PARENTS FROM FATHERS AND COUPLES GROUPS
• Mothers and fathers reported more father involvement in caring for children.• Parents reported no change in child behavior problems since entry to project.
Met weekly for 16 weeks/32 hrs
PARENTS FROM COUPLES GROUPS
Showed additional benefits:
• Their parenting stress declined• They showed no decline in couple relationship satisfaction – which we found in couples in both the control group and the fathers groups.
Positive Benefits Endure Over Time
Baseline 9 months
2 months after groups end
18 months
11 months after groups end
2.5 years
22 months after groups end
These intervention results have now been replicated with another 280 low-income families – Hispanic and Caucasian – and more recently at a site with 40 African American families.
Dissemination throughout California by Strategies
Danny Molina (and others)www.SupportingFatherInvolvement.org/strategies
• Information
• Agency father-friendliness• Technical assistance to run SFI groups
NEW PHASE IV
50% CWS FAMILIES-- referred by Child Welfare staff-- couples assessed as safe to work with together; child not being abused now
50% NON-CWS FAMILIES-- recruited as in previous phases
Random assignment to:
COUPLES FATHERS GROUP (2/3) GROUP (1/3)
NOW(2/3) DELAY(1/3) NOW(2/3) DELAY(1/3)
Intervention effect? Intervention effect?
CAUTIONARY NOTE
• Only first third of families = 100/300
• Only to first posttest (intervention results often better at second posttest)
• Almost all data from couples groups (90 vs 10)
• No data on some important measures (Child Abuse Potential, Danger Assessment)
COMPLEXITIES
Effects can be found for Non-CWS, CWS, or BOTH;
Effects can be found for MOMS, DADS, or BOTH
COMPARISON OF NOW AND DELAY
Non-CWS CWS
INDIVIDUAL
Anxiety √
Drug use √ √ √ √
Alcohol use √ √
COUPLE
Conflict √√
Violent ProbSolving
√√
Collaborative Prob.Solving
√√
COMPARISON OF NOW AND DELAY
Non-CWS CWS
PARENTING
Father involvement
√
Harsh parenting √ √ √ √
CHILD
Hyperactivity √√
Anxiety/depression √√