sexual reproduction of nausithoe aurea(scyphozoa ... · sexual reproduction of nausithoe aurea139...

11
SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 139 INTRODUCTION Campbell (1974) reviewed the general aspects of reproduction in the Cnidaria, while the revisions of Beams and Kessel (1983) (oogenesis) and Miller (1983) (spermatogenesis) were especially focused on the Hydrozoa. Lesh-Laurie and Suchy (1991) reviewed the microscopic anatomy of Scyphozoa. Eckelbarger (1994) provided the most complete study of oogenesis on representative species of the four orders of Scyphozoa, and Arai (1997) reviewed the reproduction of the four orders. Gametogenesis in the Scyphozoa has received little study. Widersten (1965) compared 3 species of Semaeostomeae and 1 species of Rhizostomeae, of some 200 species of Scyphozoa (Mianzan and Cor- nelius, 1999). Recent studies have been conducted on the ultrastructure of 12 scyphomedusae (Avian and Rottini Sandrini, 1991; Eckelbarger and Larson, 1988, 1992; Eckelbarger, 1994). The microscopic anatomy of coronate medusae was studied by Haeckel (1881), Claus (1883), Maas (1897), Vanhöffen (1902) and Komai (1935) includ- ing the structure of the gonads, but only the proba- ble significance of the structure to the systematics of Coronatae was discussed. Few coronate develop germ cells in the scyphistoma stage. However, Nausithoe racemosa (Komai 1936) and Nausithoe eumedusoides (Werner 1974) show precocious gamete production during strobilation (Komai, SCI. MAR., 65 (2): 139-149 SCIENTIA MARINA 2001 Sexual reproduction of Nausithoe aurea (Scyphozoa, Coronatae). Gametogenesis, egg release, embryonic development, and gastrulation* ANDRÉ C. MORANDINI and FÁBIO L. DA SILVEIRA Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] SUMMARY: The structure of the ovaries and testes of Nausithoe aurea, reared in the laboratory, is described to update the knowledge of coronate scyphomedusae gametogenesis and early development. The testis is similar to those of other scypho- zoans. The organization of the ovary agrees with the description for other coronates, with free oocytes in the mesoglea. The oocytes develop in a limited region of the gastrodermis, and a maturation gradient is observed from this point on. Egg release, embryonic development, and gastrulation mode of Nausithoe aurea are also described. Egg production was contin- uous for 55 days, and the output of released eggs oscillated without observed cue. Cleavage was holoblastic and adequal, but after the 8-cell stage, the cleavage became pseudospiral. Gastrulation occurred through multipolar ingression and began 24 hours after fertilization. Key words: Scyphozoa, Coronatae, Nausithoe, sexual reproduction, gametogenesis, embryonic development, gastrulation. *Received May 5, 2000. Accepted January 19, 2001.

Upload: ngokien

Post on 19-Oct-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 139

INTRODUCTION

Campbell (1974) reviewed the general aspects ofreproduction in the Cnidaria, while the revisions ofBeams and Kessel (1983) (oogenesis) and Miller(1983) (spermatogenesis) were especially focusedon the Hydrozoa. Lesh-Laurie and Suchy (1991)reviewed the microscopic anatomy of Scyphozoa.Eckelbarger (1994) provided the most completestudy of oogenesis on representative species of thefour orders of Scyphozoa, and Arai (1997) reviewedthe reproduction of the four orders.

Gametogenesis in the Scyphozoa has receivedlittle study. Widersten (1965) compared 3 species of

Semaeostomeae and 1 species of Rhizostomeae, ofsome 200 species of Scyphozoa (Mianzan and Cor-nelius, 1999). Recent studies have been conductedon the ultrastructure of 12 scyphomedusae (Avianand Rottini Sandrini, 1991; Eckelbarger and Larson,1988, 1992; Eckelbarger, 1994).

The microscopic anatomy of coronate medusaewas studied by Haeckel (1881), Claus (1883), Maas(1897), Vanhöffen (1902) and Komai (1935) includ-ing the structure of the gonads, but only the proba-ble significance of the structure to the systematics ofCoronatae was discussed. Few coronate developgerm cells in the scyphistoma stage. However,Nausithoe racemosa (Komai 1936) and Nausithoeeumedusoides (Werner 1974) show precociousgamete production during strobilation (Komai,

SCI. MAR., 65 (2): 139-149 SCIENTIA MARINA 2001

Sexual reproduction of Nausithoe aurea (Scyphozoa,Coronatae). Gametogenesis, egg release, embryonic

development, and gastrulation*

ANDRÉ C. MORANDINI and FÁBIO L. DA SILVEIRA

Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

SUMMARY: The structure of the ovaries and testes of Nausithoe aurea, reared in the laboratory, is described to update theknowledge of coronate scyphomedusae gametogenesis and early development. The testis is similar to those of other scypho-zoans. The organization of the ovary agrees with the description for other coronates, with free oocytes in the mesoglea. Theoocytes develop in a limited region of the gastrodermis, and a maturation gradient is observed from this point on. Eggrelease, embryonic development, and gastrulation mode of Nausithoe aurea are also described. Egg production was contin-uous for 55 days, and the output of released eggs oscillated without observed cue. Cleavage was holoblastic and adequal,but after the 8-cell stage, the cleavage became pseudospiral. Gastrulation occurred through multipolar ingression and began24 hours after fertilization.

Key words: Scyphozoa, Coronatae, Nausithoe, sexual reproduction, gametogenesis, embryonic development, gastrulation.

*Received May 5, 2000. Accepted January 19, 2001.

1935; Werner, 1974). The scyphistomae of The-coscyphus zibrowii (Werner 1984) develop eggswhich transform into planulae (parthenogenesis)(Werner, 1984; Sötje and Jarms, 1999). Some stud-ies focused on the histology of four species ofpolyps of the Coronatae (Chapman and Werner,1972; Kawaguti and Yoshimoto, 1973; Matsuno andKawaguti, 1991).

There are few studies of embryonic developmentin Scyphozoa. Most have reported observations onthe Semaeostomeae and Rhizostomeae (Goette,1893; Hyde, 1894; Hargitt and Hargitt, 1910;Teissier, 1929; Littleford, 1939; Widersten, 1965).The only investigations on coronate species areMetschnikoff (1886), about Nausithoe marginataKölliker 1853 and Conklin (1908), about Linucheunguiculata (Swartz 1788) (= Linerges mercuriusHaeckel 1880).

Berrill (1949), based on literature data, suggest-ed a relationship between egg diameter and type ofgastrulation. In species with large eggs, gastrulationoccurs through invagination; in species with smalleggs, gastrulation occurs through ingression; and inspecies with eggs of intermediate size occurs a mixof the two processes.

Mergner (1971) and Arai (1997) presented somereview information about the embryonic develop-ment of Scyphozoa. Mergner (1971) summarized thatthe general aspect for Scyphozoa is radial cleavageand gastrulation through invagination, eventuallyingression may occur, and that the development waspoorly known compared to Hydrozoa. This knowl-edge has remained little changed up to the present.

This work describes gametogenesis, egg release,early embryonic development, and gastrulation inthe coronate Nausithoe aurea Silveira and Morandi-ni 1997, and compares the gametogenesis with thefindings of Claus (1883) and Maas (1897), the onlyhistological works on coronates not included inrecent reviews of sexual reproduction in the Scypho-zoa (e.g. Eckelbarger, 1994; Arai, 1997). The aim ofthe study is to update the knowledge of coronategametogenesis and to investigate early developmentof the species.

METHODS

The scyphistomae were sampled by SCUBA div-ing in August 1997 in the São Sebastião Channel atPonta do Urubu (23°51.06’S 45°24.77’W) (SãoSebastião Island) São Paulo State, Brazil. They were

growing on the calcareous debris of the coral Mussis-milia hispida (Verrill 1902) at 3-7 m depth. Twenty-four polyps were reared in the laboratory for 92 daysto obtain the medusa stage. A total of 232 medusaewere reared for 82 days, producing gametes over thelast 55 days. For details of the rearing technique seeSilveira and Morandini (1997; 1998).

Each batch of medusae, from different strobilat-ing scyphistomae, was kept in separate plastic cupswith an airtight cover. A total of 63 female and 169male medusae were produced by 2 and 4 strobilatingscyphistomae, respectively. The total number ofbatches of female and male medusae were 3 (coded1, 1’, 2) and 8 respectively. One scyphistoma strobi-lated twice in 40 days, and its ephyrae matured intofemale medusae at different times - batches 1 and 1’.Each morning (8-9 a.m.), the oocytes were separat-ed from the females, and the medusae were fed for 5minutes or until their stomachs were completelyfilled. The medusae were kept in plastic cups at22°C under a 2h light/22h dark regime. The oocyteswere counted, measured, and used for in vitro fertil-ization.

The released oocytes were put together with 5male medusae for a period no longer than 1 hour, toprevent medusae from eating the oocytes. Embryon-ic development was observed in vitro. The differentembryonic phases were preserved according to theirdevelopmental stages (2-64 cells) and time periodsof development (11, 24, and 48 hours).

The mature medusae were anesthetized with tri-caine (3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester methane sul-fonate salt - C10H15NO5S) and preserved in 4%formaldehyde solution in seawater. For histologicalpreparations, medusae were refixed in Heidenhain’sfixative (SUSA) (Pantin, 1948). The embryos werepreserved in a 4% formaldehyde-seawater solution.

For histology the medusae were dehydrated inethanol series, cleared with Xylene, and embeddedin Paraplast®. The specimens were serial sectioned5µm, stained with Harris haematoxylin + Eosin-Floxin (HE) (Lightner, 1996) or Weigert hema-toxylin + Mallory trichromic (Mahoney, 1973), andmounted on slides with Permount®.

Measurements for gametogenesis were madewith a Wild M20 microscope and photographs takenwith a Carl Zeiss Jenaval mf-AKS microscope withattached camera. The diameters of 20 cells, of eachphase, were measured: male germ cells at highpower magnification (1000x); female germ cells atintermediate power magnification (400x), and whenthe nucleoli were visible.

140 A.C. MORANDINI and F.L. DA SILVEIRA

In Figure 6, generated with the graph option ofMicrosoft‚ Word 97, we used a best fit regressionline adjusted by the polynomial regression (y = b +c1x + c2x

2 + c3x3 + …+ c6x

6) (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995:665). We omitted the first 9 days of data for batch 1because of variation in the number of medusae in theplastic cup.

Histological sections of the medusae weredeposited in the Cnidarian Collection of the MuseuNacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro(MNRJ 3365-3374).

RESULTS

General structure of the gonads

The medusae are dioecious and producedgametes continuously for 55 days. The gonad formsas an evagination of the floor of the gastric cavity,peripheral to the gastric filaments within the centralstomach. The gonads consist of two gastrodermaltissue sheets, filled with mesoglea in which sperm,in follicles, or free oocytes develop (Fig. 1).

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 141

FIG. 1. – Schematic view of a histological section (oral-aboral) of a medusa of Nausithoe aurea. A male and a female gonad are representedleft and right of the stomach, respectively. Note: the gonads are evaginations of the gastrodermis. CG: coronal groove; GF: gastric filament;

Go: gonad; GS: genital sinus; M: mouth; Ma: manubrium; Rm: ringmuscle; S: stomach.

FIG. 2. – Schematic view of a histological section (oral-aboral, to the right of the stomach) of the testis of Nausithoe aurea. Note: the gonadis an evagination of the gastrodermis; the follicle opens to the genital sinus. CG: coronal groove; E: epidermis; Ex: exumbrella; F: follicle;

G: gastrodermis; GS: genital sinus; GVC: gastrovascular cavity; M: mesoglea; Rm: ringmuscle; S: subumbrella; Sz: Spermatozoa.

Spermatogenesis

The testis is composed of several follicles (Figs.2, 3). The maturation of the germ cells in every fol-licle occurs in a centripetal pattern, and the celltypes form distinct layers (Fig. 3). The spermatogo-nia lie on the margin of the cyst, forming a thinlayer. They are spherical with reduced cytoplasmand with nuclei ranging in diameter from 4.8-6.0µm. The spermatocytes are also spherical cells, withnuclei diameter ranging from 4.8-6.6 µm and withgranular chromatin. The spermatids are sphericalcells with reduced cytoplasm; in the nucleus (diam-eter 2.4-3.6 µm) the chromatin is concentrated inclusters. The spermatozoon has a conical head(length 4.2-6.0 µm), followed by a region that doesnot stain (HE), with the tail pointing to the center ofthe cyst before becoming mobile.

Oogenesis

The ovary shows distinct areas of gastrodermalepithelium: one, internal, surrounding the genitalsinus, with spherical cells and some vacuoles; andthe other, external, with columnar cells containingmany vacuoles (Fig. 4). The oocytes develop fromthe gastrodermis (Fig. 5), and lie in the mesoglea.Oocytes were observed in different stages, with norelation to the age of the medusae. Small spherical

cells were observed near a limited region of the gas-trodermis (diameter 16.5-36.0 µm), with reducedbasophilic cytoplasm, light nuclei (diameter 10.5-22.5 µm), and scattered chromatin. These cellsmigrate into the mesoglea, and showed two distinctphases: basophilic and acidophilic oocytes. Thebasophilic oocytes were spherical or elliptical(diameter 31.5-82.5 µm), light nuclei (diameter18.0-46.5 µm), and conspicuous nucleoli (diameter6.0-10.5 µm). The acidophilic oocytes were spheri-cal (diameter 73.5-133.5 µm), light nuclei (diameter24.0-51.0 µm), and nucleoli (diameter 9.0-12.0 µm).In oral-aboral sections, a maturing oocyte gradientwas observed towards the free side of the femalegonad (Fig. 5). Some of the yolk granules in theoocytes showed a central dark spot, resembling thenucleus of a very small cell (Fig. 4).

Egg release, embryonic development and gastrulation

The fertilization is external, with the oocytesreleased through the mouth. Mature female medusaereleased oocytes from 11/Sep-5/Nov/1997. The totalnumber of oocytes released varied throughout the peri-od, ranging between 0-485 oocytes per day (Table 1).

Figure 6 shows that the release of oocytes wascontinuous for the whole study period, but withsome variation in the number of oocytes released.

142 A.C. MORANDINI and F.L. DA SILVEIRA

FIG. 3. – Schematic view of a transverse histological section of the testis of Nausithoe aurea. Note: the organization of the gonad with folli-cles; the development of the germ cells in the follicles. F: follicles; G: gastrodermis; GS: genital sinus; M: mesoglea; Sc: spermatocyte; Sg:

spermatogonium; St: spermatid; Sz: spermatozoon.

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 143

FIG. 4. – Schematic view of a transverse histological section of the ovary of Nausithoe aurea. Note: the distinct areas of gastrodermal epithe-lium, internal with spherical cells and external with columnar cells. AO: acidophilic oocyte; BO: basophilic oocyte; G: gastrodermis; GS:

genital sinus; M: mesoglea.

FIG. 5. – Schematic view of a histological section (oral-aboral plane and to the left of the stomach) of the ovary of Nausithoe aurea. Note:oocytes in different stages; the differences between the gonad epithelia; the presence of mucous in the genital sinus. E: epidermis; Ex: exum-brella; G: gastrodermis; GS: genital sinus; GSA: genital sinus aperture; GVC: gastrovascular cavity; GZ: germinative zone; M: mesoglea;

Mc: mucus; Rm: ringmuscle; O: oocyte; S: subumbrella.

The oocytes remain grouped by a mucus strand.Spawned oocytes were almost spherical, 132-188 x164-208 µm (n = 100; mean ± SD = 167 ± 11 x 179± 8.5 µm) in diameter, and are dark brown. Releasedoocytes are enclosed by the egg envelope, and usu-ally have 2 polar bodies (Fig. 7a); in some cases 3-4polar bodies were observed. Sometimes the sperma-tozoa were observed moving in the space betweenthe egg envelope and the oocyte surface.

Cleavage is radial and holoblastic. After 1.5 to 2hours of mixing the oocytes with male medusae, weobserved the first cleavage. The division is merid-ional (beginning in the polar bodies region, the ani-mal pole), forming a heart-shaped figure (Figs. 7b,7c). The second cleavage occurs almost 2.5 to 3hours after fertilization, and is also meridional (Fig.7d), and the third at 3.5 to 4 hours, and is equatori-al. After the 8-cell stage, the cleavage becomespseudospiral.

After 24 hours folowing fertilization, the embryobegins to rotate inside the egg envelope until it rup-tures and the embryo is freed. At this stage the

embryo is almost spherical (Fig. 7e). After 48 hours,the embryo moves actively in the water column ofthe rearing vessel (Fig. 7f).

Observations of histological sections of thereleased oocytes and the first cleavage stages addedno more information to that gained from observa-tions on live embryos, except for confirming theabsence of any zooxanthellae.

The histological sections of the embryos (24, 48hours) showed that gastrulation occurs through mul-tipolar ingression (Fig. 8), and may begin approxi-mately 24 hours after fertilization. In the sections of11-hour-old embryos, no migrating cell was everobserved. No invagination or grouping of cells inone pole was observed in any section.

In the 48-hour embryos we could not see thebasal lamina. The presumptive gastrodermis stillhad few cells, and most of the space inside the stere-ogastrula was filled with yolk granules. The ecto-dermal cells were very irregular in shape.

DISCUSSION

General structure of the gonads

The structure of the gonads of Nausithoe aureaagrees with other Coronatae species from studiesfocusing on histology/anatomy (Claus, 1883; Maas,1897), systematics (Haeckel, 1881; Vanhöffen,1902), and vitellogenesis (Eckelbarger and Larson,1992). The general organization of the gonad is sim-ilar to other scyphozoan species (Hargitt and Har-gitt, 1910; Widersten, 1965; Avian and Rottini San-

144 A.C. MORANDINI and F.L. DA SILVEIRA

TABLE 1. – Data of the 3 batches of medusae of Nausithoe aurea,releasing oocytes from 20/Sep-5/Nov/1997. Table shows therange/batch and mean/medusae numbers of released oocytes bybatch (total number of oocytes divided by the total number ofmedusae each day). Variation on medusae number and spawning

period is shown.

batch range/batch mean/ number of spawning medusae medusae period

1 0-168 11 8-7 47 days1’ 3-318 8 17 26 days2 0-485 8 22-21 40 days

FIG. 6. – Mean number of oocytes per day released by medusae of Nausithoe aurea reared from 20/Sep-5/Nov/1997 and best fit regression line. Spawning period for batches are: 1, 20/Sep-5/Nov; 1’, 11/Oct-5/Nov; 2, 27/Sep-5/Nov/1997.

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 145

FIG. 7. – Embryonic stages of Nausithoe aurea. (a) Newly released oocyte of Nausithoe aurea. Note the egg envelope and the polar bodies.O: oocyte; EE: egg envelope; PB: polar bodies. (b) First cleavage. (c) 2-cell stage. (d) 4-cell stage. (e) Embryo 24 hours after fertilization.

(f) Embryo 48 hours after fertilization.

FIG. 8. – Schematic view of a longitudinal histological section of the 48-hour embryo of Nausithoe aurea, showing the gastrulation (multi-polar ingression) process. H : migrating cells.

a

fe

dc

b

drini, 1991; Kikinger, 1992; Eckelbarger and Lar-son, 1992; Eckelbarger, 1994) and showed thearrangement of gastrodermis layers as described byWidersten (1965).

The germinative zone (gastrodermis region fromwhich the germ cells migrate to the mesoglea of thegonad) was observed in other coronate species:Haeckel (1881), called the region “germinativeepithelia” for Nausithoe (Nauphanta) challengeri(Haeckel 1880); Maas (1897), studying Periphyllaand some Atolla species, called it germinative zone(“Keimzone”).

Spermatogenesis

The general structure of the testis of N. aurearesembles the descriptions of Claus (1883) forNausithoe punctata (= N. albida Gegenbaur 1856,following Mayer, 1910); Widersten (1965) forCyanea capillata (Linné 1746), Cyanea lamarckiiPéron and Lesueur 1809 (= C. palmstruchii Öster-gren 1909, following Russell, 1970), and Aureliaaurita (Linné 1746); and Kikinger (1992) for Coty-lorhiza tuberculata (Macri 1778).

Claus (1883) reported that the structure of thetestis is similar to that of the ovary, but that themesoglea layer is reduced in the former, because ofthe development of the follicles. In addition he stat-ed that in oral-aboral sections the follicles werefused. However, we believe that this observationwas a misinterpretation of the sections. According toMaas (1897) there was no genital canal inside malegonads of Atolla and Periphylla. The shedding ofspermatozoa occurs through the rupture of the testiswall (Campbell, 1974), and any gastrovascular canalsystem associated with the gonad region may func-tion as a “genital canal”.

Arai (1997:143) interpreted the misleading fig-ure 7 of Widersten (1965:53), saying that: “Sperm ofscyphozoa … develop in follicles formed by invagi-nation of the epithelium into the mesoglea of thetestis … (Figure 6.4)”. Vanhöffen (1902) stated thatin male medusae the follicles differentiate in themesoglea. Widersten (1965:49) and Kikinger(1992:343) corroborated that the follicles areformed by migrating cells of the “genital epithelia”into the mesoglea of the gonad.

The spermatozoa of N. aurea do not form spermpackages (“spermatozeugmata”) as observed insome Rhizostomeae, such as C. tuberculata(Kikinger, 1992) and Cassiopea andromeda(Forskål 1775) (Gohar and Eisawy, 1960). The

region of the spermatozoon of N. aurea, which doesnot stain, is the region of the mitochondria accord-ing to Afzelius and Franzén (1971) in the ultrastruc-ture study of the spermatozoon of a Nausithoespecies.

Oogenesis

Claus (1883) observed some differences in theovary of N. punctata between the aboral (thickerlayer of columnar cells) and oral epithelia (thinnerlayer with small vacuoles). The vacuolated aspect ofthe epithelium covering the genital sinus may berelated to secretion. Claus also observed smalloocytes migrating to the mesoglea from the germi-native zone (“Keimepitel”). The comments of Claus(1883) on the vacuolated epithelium, and our obser-vations on sections and live materials, showed thatthe presence of these vacuoles are related to spawn-ing (oocytes within mucous strand). Avian and Rot-tini Sandrini (1991) suggested that the large amountof mucus is peculiar to species with external fertil-ization and may provide a chemoattractant for sper-matozoa.

Maas (1897) observed a maturing gradienttowards the free sides of the gonads. Vanhöffen(1902, Taf. VII, Fig. 47) showed that in the femalegonads of Atolla wyvillei Haeckel 1880 (= A. verril-li Fewkes 1886) the early oocytes (basophilicoocytes) are attached to the wall by a peduncle, dif-fering from all other known coronate species.

The dark spots in the yolk granules of theoocytes, resembling the nuclei of “shrunken cells”of some Hydrozoa (Tardent, 1985; Thomas andEdwards, 1991) were never mentioned in otherworks, but they were illustrated in Figure 8 of Avianand Rottini Sandrini (1991: 192), figs. 13-14 ofKikinger (1992: 346), and Figure 3 of Eckelbargerand Larson (1992: 635). The appearance of thesedark spots might be a consequence of the histologi-cal techniques employed, or might be related to thedifferent stages of the vitellogenesis process occur-ring in the growing oocytes, as established by Eck-elbarger and Larson (1992) and Eckelbarger (1994),using ultrastructure techniques.

According to Eckelbarger (1994), one of thedistinguishing features between the differentorders of Scyphozoa is the mode of the oocytesnutrition in the female gonad. Nausithoe aureaagrees with the pattern defined for Coronatae; freeoocytes in the mesoglea without close associationto any cell.

146 A.C. MORANDINI and F.L. DA SILVEIRA

Egg release, embryonic development and gastrulation

Jarms (pers. comm.) affirmed that medusae ofNausithoe marginata in laboratory, after a spawningperiod, produce eggs again after several weeks.Conklin (1908) had observed for Linuche unguicu-lata that after spawning (= empty gonads) themedusae sank and died, and that the spawningalways occurred in the morning (8 a.m.). The con-tinuous egg production of Nausithoe aurea seems todiffer from L. unguiculata, although this is an obser-vation restricted to the laboratory.Mature medusae are one of the possible results ofstrobilation-planuloid formation the other (Silveiraand Morandini, 1997), and continuous gamete pro-duction may maximize the success of sexual repro-duction. Thus, continuous egg release in this speciesis likely an adaptive trait evolved in response to thenatural selection of medusae.

Larson (1986) suggested that the coronates Atol-la chuni Vanhöffen 1902 and Atolla wyvillei Haeck-el 1880 release a few eggs at a time, continuously.Jarms et al. (1999) believe that the life cycle of Peri-phylla periphylla (Péron and Lesueur 1809) lasts forsome decades, and may be related to continuous andscanty egg release. Eckelbarger and Larson (1992)stated that deep sea coronates produce few eggs perday. In contrast, L. unguiculata, an epipelagicspecies, releases more than 100 eggs per day (Kre-mer et al., 1990). Thus, the mean number of eggsreleased by N. aurea medusae fits the values for thedeep sea coronates. Arai (1997:145) summarizedthat oceanic scyphomedusae produce a low numberof eggs throughout the year, while neritic temperatespecies have a strong seasonality in the productionof ephyrae and gametes. Silveira and Morandini(1998) suggested that the observed seasonality ofmedusae swarming of L. unguiculata (followingtheir gametogenesis) is related to the marked strobi-lation period. N. aurea is so far a neritic species(considering the zooxanthellate scyphistomae), sub-tropical-tropical, and its medusae release eggs inlaboratory for 55 days. In the laboratory andthroughout the year, the scyphistomae always stro-bilated a few days after they were collected (pers.obs.). There were oocytes in different stages in thegonads (in vivo) and in histological sections.Considering the discussion of sexual reproductionof Scyphozoa by Arai (1997), we suggest that N.aurea is indeed a neritic species and producesgametes throughout the year. This condition repre-

sents a new pattern for the biology of N. aurea. Inthe São Sebastião Channel, it remains to beanswered which factors may account for the absenceof ephyrae/medusae in plankton samples and inten-sify the mechanisms of asexual reproduction ofcoronates (Silveira and Morandini, 1997, 1998).

The early development of N. aurea resemblesthat of L. unguiculata observed by Conklin (1908),and agrees with the brief description of Silveira andMorandini (1997). Conklin (1908) observed that theeggs were released with a mucus strand and that theegg envelope persisted until the gastrula stage.Montgomery and Kremer (1995) showed that thetransmission of zooxanthellae from the female to theembryo of L. unguiculata occurs through the mucusstrand.

Hargitt and Hargitt (1910) stated that the polarbodies were formed prior to or at fertilization.Widersten (1965) observed that the expulsion of thepolar bodies occurs while the oocytes are in themesoglea of the gonads. We always observed polarbodies with released oocytes, which suggests thatmeiosis is completed prior to fertilization, followingCampbell (1974:171) and Tardent (1985:175).

The water in which female medusae were main-tained (“egg water”, sensu Giese and Pearse,1974:33) induces male medusae of N. aurea tospawn, but the release of her eggs is independent ofmales.

Mergner (1971:24) stated that, in general, cleav-age in Scyphozoa [e.g., Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus1746)] is radial, adequal, and holoblastic, althoughin some species a pseudospiral cleavage might beobserved as a complementary phenomenon. Thecleavage of N. aurea conforms to this last type, withpseudospiral cleavage after the 8-cell stage.

Following the hypothesis of Berrill (1949), Lar-son (1986) suggested that large eggs would indi-cate direct development (see Table 2), based onmedusae of P. periphylla and Atolla species.Recently, Jarms et al. (1999) described theholopelagic life cycle of P. periphylla, whichagrees with the hypothesis of Berrill and Larson(large eggs - direct development).

According to Conklin (1908), the gastrulation ofL. unguiculata occurs through invagination. Heobserved that sometimes gastrulation occursthrough a mass of endodermal cells migrating fromthe vegetal pole (unipolar ingression). Hargitt andHargitt (1910) stated that for Aurelia the gastrulationoccurs mainly through invagination, but that it is notthe only process. Table 2 shows some literature data

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 147

concerning gastrulation in several scyphozoanspecies. The data reinforce the hypothesis of Berrill(1949) about the relation between egg size and modeof gastrulation.

The elongate appearance of the 48-hour embryosis similar to that of the planuloids produced asexual-ly by the polyps (see Silveira and Morandini, 1997).

The absence of the basal lamina from the histo-logical sections of 48-hour embryos of N. aurea,suggests 2 possibilities: that the ingression of cells atgastrulation continues for a period over the initial 2days; or, the basal lamina is so thin that it was notdistinguishable with the microscopy employed.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by FAPESP (97/03325-3 and 97/08137-0) as grants for Master Dissertationof the first author. We thank the Director and staff ofCEBIMar, at São Sebastião, SP, for their support.We are deeply grateful to Mr. G.R.C. Monteiro(FITO) for the drawings and Mr. E. Matos (IB USP)for helping us with the histology, and MSc J.T.Hiratuka (IME USP) for help with the egg releasedata. We are indebted to Dr P.F.S. Cornelius (TheNatural History Museum, UK) for providing usimportant literature, and Dr S.L.S. Bueno (IB USP)for suggestions regarding the histology. We are alsoindebted to Drs M.N. Arai (Pacific Biological Sta-tion, Canada), J.W. Reid (Smithsonian Institution,USA) and class BIZ5712 (IB USP) for the com-ments on earlier versions of the manuscript and revi-sion of the English. We are gratefull to Drs. G. Jarms(Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museumder Universität Hamburg, Germany) and D.K. Hof-mann (Fakultät für Biologie, Ru -UniversitätBochum, Germany) for valuable criticism of themanuscript.

REFERENCES

Afzelius, B. and Å. Franzén. – 1971. The spermatozoon of the jel-lyfish, Nausithöe. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 37: 186-199.

Arai, M.N. – 1997. A functional biology of Scyphozoa. Chapman &Hall, London.

Avian, M. and L. Rottini Sandrini. – 1991. Oocyte development infour species of scyphomedusa in the northern Adriatic Sea.Hydrobiologia, 216/217: 189-195.

Beams, H.W. and R.G. Kessel. – 1983. Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi, K.G.and R.G. Adiyodi (eds.), Reproductive biology of invertebrates,Vol. I, Oogenesis, oviposition, and oosorption, pp. 31-66. JohnWiley & Sons Ltd, New York.

Berrill, N.J. – 1949. Developmental analysis of scyphomedusae.Biol. Rev., 24: 393-410.

Campbell, R.D. – 1974. Cnidaria. In: Giese, A.C. and J.S. Pearse(eds.), Reproduction of marine invertebrates, Vol. I, Acoelo-mate and pseudocoelomate metazoans, pp. 133-199. AcademicPress, New York.

Chapman, D.M. and B. Werner. – 1972. Structure of a solitary anda colonial species of Stephanoscyphus (Scyphozoa, Coronatae)with observations on periderm repair. Helgoländer wiss.Meeresunters., 23: 393-421.

Claus, C. – 1883. Untersuchungen über die Organisation undEntwicklung der Medusen. Prag und Leipzig.

Conklin, E.G. – 1908. The habits and early development of Lin-erges mercurius. Publs Carnegie Instn, 103: 155-170.

Eckelbarger, K.J. – 1994. Oocyte nutrition in the lower Metazoa:the Scyphozoa. In: Wilson, W.H., S.A. Stricker and G.L. Shinn(eds.), Reproduction and development of marine invertebrates,pp. 15-28. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Eckelbarger, K.J. and R.J. Larson. – 1988. Ovarian morphology andoogenesis in Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa: Semaeostomeae):ultrastructural evidence of heterosynthetic yolk formation in aprimitive metazoan. Mar. Biol., 100: 103-115.

Eckelbarger, K.J. and R.J. Larson. – 1992. Ultrastructure of theovary and oogenesis in the jellyfish Linuche unguiculata andStomolophus meleagris, with a review of ovarian structure inthe Scyphozoa. Mar. Biol., 114: 633-643.

Giese, A.C. and J.S. Pearse. – 1974. Introduction. In: Giese, A.C.and J.S. Pearse (eds.), Reproduction of marine invertebrates,Vol. I, Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate metazoans, pp. 1-49.Academic Press, New York.

Goette, A. – 1893. Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte vonPelagia noctiluca Pér. Z. wiss. Zool., 55: 645-695.

Gohar, H.A.F. and A.M. Eisawy. – 1960. The development of Cas-siopea andromeda. Publ. Mar. Biol. Sta. Al-Ghardaqa, 11:148-190.

Haeckel, E. – 1881. Report on the deep-sea medusae dredged byH.M.S. Challenger, during the years 1873-1876. Thomson,C.W. and J. Murray (eds.), Report on the scientific results of thevoyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876.Zoology - Vol. IV, 2, pp. 1-154.

Hargitt, C.W. and G.T. Hargitt. – 1910. Studies in the developmentof scyphomedusae. J. Morphol., 21(1): 217-262.

Hyde, J.H. – 1894. Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger Scyphome-dusen. Z. wiss. Zool., 58: 531-565.

Jarms, G., U. Båmstedt, H. Tiemann, M.B. Martinussen and J.H.

148 A.C. MORANDINI and F.L. DA SILVEIRA

TABLE 2. – Comparison of egg sizes and gastrulation in different species of Scyphozoa. Ø: diameter; (rel): size of released eggs; ing: ingression; inv: invagination; del: delamination; *: species with direct development.

Order Species Ø egg (µm) Gastrulation Author

Coronatae Linuche unguiculata 240 (rel) inv-ing Conklin, 1908Nausithoe aurea 132-208 (rel) multipolar ing present workNausithoe marginata 230 inv Metschnikoff, 1886Periphylla periphylla* 1280-1680 del Jarms et al., 1999

Rhizostomeae Cotylorhiza tuberculata 120 ing Berrill, 1949Semaeostomeae Aurelia aurita 150-230 ing-inv Hyde, 1894

Chrysaora hysoscella 47 ing Teissier, 1929Chrysaora quinquecirrha 70-190 (rel) inv Littleford, 1939Cyanea capillata 120-150 ing Hyde, 1894Pelagia noctiluca* 300 inv Goette, 1893

Fosså. – 1999. The holopelagic life cycle of the deep seamedusa Periphylla periphylla (Scyphozoa, Coronatae). Sarsia,84(1): 55-65.

Kawaguti, S. and F. Yoshimoto. – 1973. Electron microscopy on ascyphozoan, Stephanoscyphus racemosus. Biol. J. OkayamaUniv., 16: 47-66.

Kikinger, R. – 1992. Cotylorhiza tuberculata (Cnidaria: Scypho-zoa) - Life history of a stationary population. P.S.Z.N. I: MarineEcology, 13(4): 333-362.

Komai, T. – 1935. On Stephanoscyphus and Nausithoe. Mem. Coll.Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ. Ser. B, 10(5): 290-339.

Komai, T. – 1936. On another form of Stephanoscyphus found inthe waters of Japan. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ. Ser. B,11(3): 175-183.

Kremer, P., J. Costello, J. Kremer and M. Canino. – 1990. Signifi-cance of photosynthetic endosymbionts to the carbon budget ofthe scyphomedusa Linuche unguiculata. Limnol. Oceanogr.,35(3): 609-624.

Larson, R.J. – 1986. Pelagic Scyphomedusae (Scyphozoa: Coro-natae and Semaeostomeae) of the Southern Ocean. In: Kor-nicker, L.S. (ed.), Biology of the Antarctic Seas, XVI. Antarct.Res. Ser., 41: 59-165.

Lesh-Laurie, G.E. and P.E. Suchy. – 1991. Cnidaria: Scyphozoa andCubozoa. Harrison, F.W. and J.A. Westfall (eds.), Microscopicanatomy of invertebrates, Vol. 2, Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria,and Ctenophora, pp. 185-266. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York.

Lightner, D.V. – 1996. A handbook of shrimp pathology and diag-nostic procedures for disease of cultured penaeid shrimp.World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge.

Littleford, R.A. – 1939. The life cycle of Dactylometra quinquecir-rha, L. Agassiz in the Chesapeake Bay. Biol. Bull., 77: 368-381.

Maas, O. – 1897. Reports on an exploration off the coasts of Mex-ico, Central and South America, and off the Galapagos Islands,in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish CommissionSteamer “Albatross”, during 1891, Lieut. Commander Z.L.Tanner, U.S.N., commanding. XXI. Die Medusen. Mem. Mus.Comp. Zool. Harv. Coll., 23(1): 1-92.

Mahoney, R. – 1973. Laboratory Techniques in Zoology. Butter-worth & Co., London.

Matsuno, A. and S. Kawaguti. – 1991. An ultrastructural study ofthe polyp and strobila of Atorella japonica (Cnidaria, Coro-natae) with respect to muscles and nerves. Hydrobiologia, 216-217: 39-43.

Mayer, A.G. – 1910. The medusae of the world III. The scyphome-dusae. Carnegie Institution, Washington D.C.

Mergner, H. – 1971. Cnidaria. In: Reverberi, G. (ed.), Experimentalembryology of marine and fresh-water invertebrates, pp. 1-84.North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

Metschnikoff, E. – 1886. Embryologische Studien an Medusen, einBeitrag zur Genealogie der Primitiv-Organe. A. Hölder, Wien.

Mianzan, H.W. and P.F.S. Cornelius. – 1999. Cubomedusae andScyphomedusae. In: Boltovskoy, D. (ed), South Atlantic Zoo-

plankton, pp. 513-559. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.Miller, R.L. – 1983. Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi, K.G. and R.G. Adiyodi

(eds.), Reproductive biology of invertebrates, Vol. 2, Spermato-genesis and sperm function, pp. 23-73. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,New York.

Montgomery, M.K. and P.M. Kremer. – 1995. Transmission ofsymbiotic dinoflagellates through the sexual cycle of the hostscyphozoan Linuche unguiculata. Mar. Biol., 124: 147-155.

Pantin, C.F.A. – 1948. Notes on microscopical technique for zoolo-gists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Russell, F.S. – 1970. The medusae of the British Isles, Vol. II,Pelagic Scyphozoa with a supplement to the first volume onhydromedusae. Cambridge University Press. London.

Silveira, F.L. da and A.C. Morandini. – 1997. Nausithoe aurea n.sp. (Scyphozoa, Coronatae, Nausithoidae), a species with twopathways of reproduction after strobilation: sexual and asexual.Contr. Zool., 66(4): 235-246.

Silveira, F.L. da and A.C. Morandini. – 1998. Asexual reproductionin Linuche unguiculata (Swartz, 1788) (Scyphozoa: Coronatae)by planuloid formation through strobilation and segmentation.Proc. biol. Soc. Wash., 111(4): 781-794.

Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. – 1995. Biometry. The principles andpractice of statistics in biological research, 3rd Edition. W.H.Freeman and Company, New York.

Sötje, I. and G. Jarms. – 1999. Detailed description of Thecoscy-phus zibrowii Werner, 1984 (Scyphozoa, Coronatae) withremarks on the life cycle. Mitt. hamb. zool. Mus. Inst., 96: 5-13.

Tardent, P. – 1985. The differentiation of germ cells in Cnidaria. In:Halvorson, H.P. and A. Monroy (eds.), The origin and evolu-tion of sex, pp. 163-197. Alan R. Liss Inc., New York.

Teissier, G. – 1929. La croissance embryonnaire de Chrysaorahysoscella (L.). Arch. Zool. exp. gén., 69: 137-178.

Thomas, M. B. and N. C. Edwards. – 1991. Cnidaria: Hydrozoa. In:Harrison, F.W. and J.A. Westfall (eds.), Microscopic anatomyof invertebrates, Vol. 2, Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, andCtenophora, pp. 91-183. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York.

Vanhöffen, E. – 1902. Die Acraspeden Medusen der DeutschenTiefsee-Expedition 1898-1899. Wiss. Ergebn. Dt. Tiefsee-Exped. Valdivia, 3: 3-52.

Werner, B. – 1974. Stephanoscyphus eumedusoides n. spec.(Scyphozoa, Coronata) ein Höhlenpolyp mit einem neuenEntwicklungsmodus. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters., 26:434-463.

Werner, B. – 1984. Stamm Cnidaria, Nesseltiere. In: Kaestner, A.(co-ord.), Gruner, H.-E. (ed), Lehrbuch der Speziellen Zoolo-gie, , Band I, Wirbellosee Tiere. 2 Teil, Cnidaria, Ctenophora,Mesozoa, Plathelminthes, Nemertini, Entoprocta, Nemath-elminthes, Priapulida, pp. 11-305. Fischer, Stuttgart.

Widersten, B. – 1965. Genital organs and fertilization in someScyphozoa. Zool. Bidrag Uppsala, 37: 45-58.

Scient ed.: J.M. Gili

SEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF NAUSITHOE AUREA 149