set1
DESCRIPTION
haha its pretty messed upTRANSCRIPT
CHEM 713
1
Suggested reading material
CHEM 410/713/7130-01 - Prof. Holger Kleinke
Chemistry of Inorganic Solid State Materials
- A. R. West, Solid State Chemistry and its Applications, John Wiley.
- R. Hoffmann, Solids and Surfaces, VCH.
- J. K. Burdett, Chemical Bonding in Solids, Oxford University Press.
- C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley.
- M. O'Keeffe, B. G. Hyde, Crystal structures: Patterns and Symmetry.
gg g
1
- H. F. Franzen, Physical Chemistry of Solids.
- plus review articles, TBA
Course web page: https://uwaterloo.ca/learn
Periodic Table
2
CHEM 713
2
From molecules to the SOLID: is the solid state special?
Frequently used classifications for solids
a) elements: new modifications (e.g. fullerenes), structure comparisons,
growth of high purity crystals ...
b) crystalline materials: synthesis and crystal growth, defects, structure –
chemical bonding – physical properties ...
c) noncrystalline/amorphous materials: special physical and chemical
properties ...
d) (quasi)molecular solids (e.g. phosphides): structural relations ...
e) covalent solids (e.g. diamond, boron nitride): extreme hardness, very
3
) ( g ) y
high melting points ...
f) ionic solids (e.g. NaCl): structural chemistry, ionic conductivity ...
g) metals, semiconductors, isolators: close packings of spheres, alloys,
mechanical and electrical properties, chemical bonding ...
Crystalline Solids and CrystallographyMechanical Properties
Electrical Properties
Metals/Alloys, e.g. Titanium for aircraft Cement/Concrete Ca3SiO5
'Ceramics', e.g. clays, BN, SiCLubricants, e.g. Graphite, MoS2
Abrasives, e.g. Diamond, Corundum
Magnetic Properties
Optical Properties
Metallic Conductors, e.g. Cu, Ag ... Semiconductors, e.g. Si, GaAs Superconductors, e.g. Nb3Sn, YBa2Cu3O7
Electrolytes, e.g. LiI in pacemakers Piezoelectrics, e.g. -Quartz in watches
CrO2, Fe3O4 for recording technology
Pigments, e.g. TiO2 in paints
4
Catalysts
g g 2 pPhosphors, e.g. Eu3+ in Y2O3 is red on TV Lasers, e.g. Cr3+ in Al2O3 is ruby
Zeolite ZSM-5 (an aluminosilicate) - Petroleum refining - methanol to octane
CHEM 713
3
Solid State Chemistry - Permutations
ExampleSuperconducting Tc (K)
Elements - A 80-106 (known) Nb (9)
Binary - AB (80 x 79)/2 = 3160 (known) Nb3Ge (23)Mg3B2 (39)
Ternary - ABC (80 x 79 x 78)/6 (5% known) La2CuO4 (40)
Quaternary - ABCD 1.5 M (surface scratched) YBa2Cu3O7 (93)
ABCDE Gazillions (trace) HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8 (134)
5
DON’T mix up atoms (the motif) with
CRYSTAL STRUCTURE
UNIT CELL
The periodic arrangement of atoms in the crystal.
The smallest component of the crystal, which when replicated in (one, two or) three dimensions reproduces the whole crystal.
The solid state: some basic definitions
DON T mix up atoms (the motif) withlattice points
Lattice points are infinitesimal pointsin space
Atoms are physical objects
Lattice Points do not necessarily lie
6
Lattice Points do not necessarily lie at the centre of atoms
Primitive (P) unit cells contain only one lattice pointNon-primitive (NP) contains more than one lattice point
CHEM 713
4
The solid state: some basic definitions
The unit cell
“The smallest repeat unit of a crystal structure, in 3D, which shows the full symmetry of the structure”
The unit cell is a box
(parallelepipedon) with:
• 3 sides - a, b, c
• 3 angles - , ,
7
Atomic position: (x, y, z)(fractional coordinates)
The solid state: some basic definitions
Atoms in different positions in a unit cell are shared by differing
numbers of unit cells
Counting Atoms in 2D unit cellsCounting Atoms in 2D unit cells
Atoms at the corner of the 2D unit cell contribute only 1/4 to unit cell count
Atoms at the edge of the 2D unit cell contribute only 1/2 to unit cell count
Atoms within the 2D unit cell contribute 1 (i.e. uniquely) to that unit cell
Counting Atoms in 3D Cells
8
Vertex atom shared by 8 cells 1/8 atom per cell
Edge atom shared by 4 cells 1/4 atom per cell
Face atom shared by 2 cells 1/2 atom per cell
Body unique to 1 cell 1 atom per cell
CHEM 713
5
The solid state: some basic definitions
1-dimensional lattice symmetries are found in many ornaments
2-dimensional lattice symmetries were famously exploited by the artist M.C. Escher in many patterns
9
http://www.mcescher.com/Gallery/gallery-symmetry.htm
2D-Lattices, e.g., graphene
10
CHEM 713
6
3D-Lattices, e.g., graphite
Clinographicview
Planview
11
Note staggering of consecutive layers(contrast with Boron Nitride)
LATTICE An infinite array of points in space, in which each point has identical surroundings to all others.
12
P = PrimitiveI = Body-centredF = Face-centeredC = Side-centered…plus 7 crystal classes 14 Bravais Lattices
CHEM 713
7
Bravais Lattice EquivalenciesThere are fourteen Bravais lattices. It easy to see that a cubic system cannot be side centered (because it would no longer be cubic). But how about these possibilities....?
Show that an I-centered monoclinicb
ac
lattice should be transformed into a C-centered one.
c
13
Show that an F-centered tetragonallattice must be transformed into a smaller I-centered.
How about monoclinic B - or tetragonal C?
Close Packing of Spheres
1926 Goldschmidt proposed atoms could be considered as packing in solids as hard spheres
This reduces the problem of examining the packing of like atoms to that of examining the most efficient packing of any spherical object,
- e.g. have you noticed how oranges are most effectively packed in displayse.g. have you noticed how oranges are most effectively packed in displays at your local shop?
14
CHEM 713
8
Close Packing of Spheres
A single layer of spheres is closest-packed with
a HEXAGONAL coordination of each sphere
A second layer of spheres is placed in the indentations left by the first layer
•space is trapped between the layers that is not filled by the spheres
•TWO different types of HOLES (INTERSTITIAL sites) are left
15
•OCTAHEDRAL (O) holes with 6 nearest sphere neighbours
•TETRAHEDRAL (T±) holes with 4 nearest sphere neighbours
Close Packing of Spheres
T
O
P
P
When a third layer of spheres is placed in the
indentations of the second layer there are TWO
choices:
1. The third layer lies in indentations directly in line
(eclipsed) with the 1st layer,
Layer ordering may be described as ABA
16
2. The third layer lies in the alternative
indentations leaving it staggered with respect to
both previous layers,
Layer ordering may be described as ABC
CHEM 713
9
Close Packing of Spheres
17
ccp/fcchcp
Close Packing of Spheres Mg, Be, Sc, Ti…
Hexagonal Close Packing
hcp
18
Cubic Close PackingCu, Ca, Sr, Ag, Au, …
ccp/fcc
http://kleinke.uwaterloo.ca/simplestruc.html
CHEM 713
10
Hexagonal Close Packing a = b, c = 1.63a, = = 90°, = 120°
A
B
A
B
A
C
Cubic Close Packing
Coordination number CN. 12Anti-Cuboctahedral
2 atoms per unit cell(1/3, 2/3, 1/4) (2/3, 1/3, 3/4)
a = b = c, = = = 90°
B
C
A
Note the shift in origin! ABABAB (HCP)
B
A
19
Coordination number CN. 12Cuboctahedral
4 atoms per unit cell(0, 0, 0) (0, ½, ½)(½, 0, ½) (½, ½, 0)
A
B
C
A
ABCABC (CCP/FCC)
Close Packing of SpheresThe most efficient way to fill space with spheres
Is there another way of packing spheres that is more space-efficient?
In 1611 Kepler asserted that there was no way of packing equivalent spheresat a greater density than that of a face-centred cubic arrangement. This is nowknown as the Kepler Conjecture.
This assertion has long remained without rigorous proof In 1998 HalesThis assertion has long remained without rigorous proof. In 1998 Halesannounced a computer-based solution. This proof is contained in over 250manuscript pages and relies on over 3 gigabytes of computer files and so it willbe some time before it has been checked rigorously by the scientificcommunity to ensure that the Kepler Conjecture is indeed proven! (SimonSingh, Daily Telegraph, Aug. 13th 1998)
G l S filli R V /V ith
20
General Space filling Rfill = Vatoms/Vcell, with
Vatoms = Sum of atom volumes per cell, thus
Vatoms = Z 4/3 r3 with Z = number of atoms per cell;
Vcell = volume of the unit cell. CCP: Vcell = a3, Z = 4
(4r)2 = 2a2
Rfill = 0.74
CHEM 713
11
Close Packing of Spheres
Alternatives
a = b = c, = = = 90°
2 atoms in the unit cell:
(0 0 0) (1/2 1/2 1/2)(0, 0, 0) (1/2, 1/2, 1/2)
W, Li, V, Cr…
Packing efficiency Rfill = Vatoms/Vcell
Vatoms = Z 4/3 r3 = 8/3 r3; Vcell = a3
d = 4r
21Hence: not that close-packing!
d2 = a2 + a2 + a2 = 3 a2 => d = 3 a = 4r Pythagorean theorem
<=> a = 4/3 r = 2.31 r
=> Vcell = (4/3 r)3 = (4/3)3 r3
Rfill = Vatoms/Vcell = 8/3 / (4/3)3 = 3 /8
Rfill = 0.68
Primitive Cubic [-Po]Coordination Number 652% Packing Efficiency
Vatoms/Vcell = 0.52, since
Close Packing of Spheres
Comparison of Packing Efficiencies
atoms cell
Vcell = a3 and Vatoms = Z 4/3 r3
with a = 2r and Z = 1
Body Centered Cubic [W]
Close-Packed (ccp or hcp)Coordination Number 1274% Packing Efficiency
ccp
22(increased pressure favors higher packing efficiency)
Body-Centered Cubic [W]Coordination Number 868% Packing Efficiency
bcchcp
CHEM 713
12
Periodic Table of Metal Structures
Close Packing of Spheres
Classification seems unpredictable, but patterns emerge from an understanding of band structures (stability of a particular structure as a function of electron count).
23
Other examples
Close Packing of Spheres
Polymorphism:
• Some metals exist in different structure types at ambient temperature &
pressure
• Many metals adopt different structures at different temperature/pressure
• Not all metals are close-packed
• Why different structures?
=> Residual effects from some directional effects of atomic orbitals
• Difficult to predict structures
24
Trend: BCC clearly adopted for low number of valence electrons
Best explanations are based on Band Theory of Metals (later)
CHEM 713
13
Close Packing of Spheres
Polymorphism:
• Some metals exist in different structure types at ambient temperature & pressure
pressure > 92 kbarpressure
T < 13.2ºC
92 kbar
Gray tin- semiconductor- diamond structure - CN 4
Å
White tin- metal- tetragonal structure- CN 6
d(S S ) 3 02 3 18 Å
High pressure tin I- metal- tetragonal structure
CN 8
25
- d(Sn-Sn): 2.81 Å- density: 5.7 gcm-3
- d(Sn-Sn): 3.02 - 3.18 Å- density 7.2 gcm-3
- CN 8d(Sn-Sn): 3.11 - 3.70 Ådensity 8.4 gcm-3
High pressure tin II- Metal- bcc- CN (8+6)
p > 500 kbar - d(Sn-Sn) 2.85 - 3.29 Å- density 10.9 gcm-3
More complex close-packing sequences than simple HCP & CCP are possible:
• HCP & CCP are merely the simplest close-packed stacking sequences, others are possible!
Close Packing of Spheres
All spheres in an HCP or CCP structure have identical environments
• Repeats of the form ABCBABCBABCB.... are the next simplest
• There are two types of sphere environment
• surrounding layers are both of the same type (i.e. anti-cuboctahedralcoordination) like HCP, so labelled h
• surrounding layers are different (i.e. cuboctahedral coordination) like CCP, so labelled c
26
• Layer environment repeat is thus hchc...., so labeled hc
• Alternative: unit cell is alternatively labeled 4 H,
because it has 4 layers in the c-direction and is hexagonal
• The hc (4 H) structure is adopted by early lanthanides
• Samarium (Sm) has a 9-layer chh repeat sequence
CHEM 713
14
Non-Ideality of Structures
• Cobalt metal that has been cooled from T > 500°C has a close-packed
Close Packing of Spheres
structure with a random stacking sequence
• "Normal" hcp cobalt is actually 90% AB... & 10% ABC...
- i.e. non-ideal HCP
• Many metals deviate from perfect HCP by "axial compression"
• e.g. for Beryllium (Be) c/a = 1.57 (c.f. ideal c/a = 1.63)
C di ti i [6 + 6]
27
• Coordination is now [6 + 6]
with slightly shorter distances to neighbors in adjacent layers
Layers and Interstitial Cavities in Close packed Structures
28
There are one Oh and two Td holes per site in CCP - hence K3C60.
CHEM 713
15
Close Packing of Spheres
Location of interstitial holes in close-packed structures
The HOLES in close-packed arrangements may be filled with atoms of a
different kind.
It is therefore important to know:
• where holes are placed in space relative to the positions of the spheres• where holes are placed in space relative to the positions of the spheres,
• where holes are placed relative to each other.
fcc packing
fcc packing with Oh holes (+)
29
Close Packing of Spheres
30
CHEM 713
16
Close Packing of Spheres
31
Close Packing of Spheres
Different cavity sizes: the octahedral hole
r: radius of packing atom;rh: radius of hole
ccp/fcc
M: metal atom (hole);X: anion (packing atom)
a = rX + 2 rM + rX
½ a = rM + rX (I)
d2 = a2 + a2 => d = 2 a
d = 4 rX = 2 a
½ a = 2/2 rX = rX 2 (II)
32
(I) = (II):
rM + rX = rX 2
rM = (2 – 1) rX
rM/rX = 2 – 1 = 0.414
CHEM 713
17
Close Packing of Spheres
Different cavity sizes: the tetrahedral hole
d2 = a2 + a2 => d = 2 a
d = 4 rX = 2 a <=> ¼ a = ½ rX 2
=> rX = ¼ a 2
g = rX + 2 rM + rX
g/2 = rM + rX
(g/2)2 = (a/4)2 + (b/2)2
33
(g/2)2 = (a/4)2 + (b/2)2
(rM + rX)2 = (½ rX 2)2 + rX2
(rM + rX)2 = ½ rX2 + rX
2 = 3/2 rX2
rM + rX = (3/2) rX = ½ 6 rX
rM = (½ 6 – 1) rX
rM/rX = ½ 6 – 1 = 0.225
Ionic (and other) structures may be derived from the occupation ofinterstitial sites in close packed arrangements.
Close Packing of Spheres
34http://kleinke.uwaterloo.ca/simplestruc.html
CHEM 713
18
ccp Li3Bi typefilling of all Oh and Td voids
Close Packing of Spheres
35
K C3 60C60
Close Packing of Spheres: descriptions based on linking polyhedra; e.g. triangle, tetrahedron,
square pyramid, trigonal bipyramid, octahedron, trigonal prism, pentagonal bipyramid, square antiprism, cube, … and capped variants thereof.
36
CHEM 713
19
Overview: coordination numbers and polyhedra
37
cf. VSEPR rules (CHEM212): http://www.shef.ac.uk/chemistry/vsepr/
Examples? Point groups? Missing polyhedra?
Perfect packing occurs when anions touch and cations fit perfectly in the pocket. Then, anions touch anions and cations to ch anionstouch anions.
If cations are too large (larger rM/rX), anions cannot touch (not ideal).
If anions are too large (smaller rM/rX), cations “ ttl ” i k t ( )
38
“rattle” in pocket (worse).
Conclusion: The listed rM/rX ratios are the minima, not maxima.
CHEM 713
20
Limiting Radius Ratios
What's the Numerical Value of a Specific Ionic Radius?•Ionic radii in most scales do not generally meet at experimental electron density minima, because of polarization of the anion by the cation
39
•The various scales are designed to be selfconsistent in reproducing ro = rM + rX [ or: ro = r+ + r– ]
{Use the same scale for cation and anion!} •Ionic radii change with coordination number r8 > r6 > r4
{Use the appropriate one!}
What's the Numerical Value of a Specific Ionic Radius?
40
CHEM 713
21
Limiting Radius Ratios: do they work?
•For Li+ and Na+ salts, ratios calculated from both r6 and r4 are indicated •Radius ratios suggest adoption of C Cl t t th iCsCl structure more than is observed in reality •NaCl structure is observed morethan is predicted •Radius ratios are only correct ca. 50% of the time, not very good for a family of archetypal ionic solids -random choice might be just as
41
random choice might be just as successful as radius ratio rules and saying that all adopt the NaCl structure more so! •Is the Goldschmidt cation-anion Contact Criterion all there is to it? No!
too simplifying! Lattice energy must be considered!
Limiting Radius Ratios: why don’t they work better?
U A/r
•Energy rises as r+/r- falls until the structure can no longer support cation-anion contact.•At the geometric limiting radius ratio the -UL A/r0•At the geometric limiting radius ratio, the energy remains constant as r+/r- falls, because ro = r+ + r- but instead is limited by "anion-anion contact".•NaCl-CsCl transition at r+/r- = 0.71•ZnS-NaCl transition at r+/r- = 0.32•Taking r8 > r6 into account indicates that the CsCl structure is never favorable
42
(dotted line)•CsCl structure is only adopted where 8:8 coordination maximizes Dispersion Forces•NaCl structure is highly favored by covalency (best utilization of Cl- p3
orbitals)
CHEM 713
22
When the radius ratio rules work, do they do so for the right reasons?• Radius ratios might appear to work well for predicting structures of oxides, e.g. TiO2 (consider r(Ti4+)/r(O2-) )• 75 pm / 126 pm (Shannon & Prewitt) = 0.6061 pm / 140 pm (Pauling) = 0.44
Limiting Radius Ratios
• 6:3 Coordination, as is observed in practice for TiO2
• But...• Ti4+ is very polarizing - covalency in bonding?!• r(O2-) was determined in systems like MgO, CaO etc...• Perhaps we really should use covalent radii?• rcov(O)/rcov(Ti) = 73 pm / 95 pm = 0.77• 8:4 Coordination, i.e. fluorite structure - NOT what's observed!
43
,Alternative reasoning?Ti in TiO2 is 6-coordinate because this maximizes covalent bonding, not
because the radius ratio rules are necessarily correct! Beware! Use radius ratios as a simple predictional tool, not as a means of rationalizing structures.
Ternaries
Binaries AB
Structure Maps Is there any general influence of ionic radii on structure?
44
Separation of structure types is achieved on structure diagrams,... but the boundaries are complex
Conclusion: Size matters, but not necessarily in any simple way!
CHEM 713
23
Mooser-Pearson Plots
Combine bond directionality,size and electronegativity
x-axis is , (bond ionicity) y axis is the average PQNy-axis is the average PQN
larger orbitals (larger PQN)
lead to less directionality
45
-Sharp borderlines, a critical ionicity which determines structure
-Boundaries are curved - not so helpful!
- Indicates the increased ionicity of Wurtzite over Zinc Blende
(higher Madelung Constant of Wurtzite)
Unit cell
Sodium ChlorideCl with Na in all Oh holesLattice: fccMotif: Cl at (0,0,0);
Na at (1/2,0,0) 4 NaCl in unit cell (Z = 4)Coordination: 6:6 (octahedral)
46
[NaCl6] and [ClNa6] octahedra
Linking of [NaCl6] octahedra
CHEM 713
24
Structure variants of NaCl
NaSbS2: Na+ and Sb3+ randomly on the Na+ sites; S2- on Cl-.
Long term annealing: Na and Sb orderLong term annealing: Na and Sb order. d(Na-S): 2.85, 2.88, 2x 2.92, 2.97, 3.00 Å;d(Sb-S): 2.44, 2.73, 2.74, 2x 2.92, 3.38 Å.
=> Monoclinic distortion.
FeS2: Fe2+ on Na+;
a
b
c
47
CaC2: Ca2+ on Na+ ; C2
2- on Cl-.
S22- on Cl-.
Pyrite: fool’s gold
Nickel ArsenideHCP As atoms with Ni atoms in all octahedral holesa = b = 3.57 Å, c = 5.10 ÅPositions:
2 Ni at (0, 0, 0) & (0, 0, 1/2) 2 As at (1/3, 2/3, 1/4) & (2/3, 1/3, 3/4) 0 ½( , , ) ( , , )2 NiAs in unit cell, thus Z = 2
0,½ 0,½
0, ½0,½ ¼
¾
48
Face and edge-sharing [NiAs6] octahedra
[NiAs6] octahedra[AsNi6] trigonal prism
CHEM 713
25
Cadmium IodideHCP I atoms with Cd atoms in all octahedral holes of every other layer.
0 0
00
¼
¾
0 ½
CdI2
49
Edge-sharing [CdI6] octahedra
0,½ 0,½
0, ½0,½
¼
¾ NiAs
ZINC BLENDE or SphaleriteCCP S2- with Zn2+
in half of the Td holesLattice: FCC4 ZnS in unit cell (Z = 4)Motif: S at (0, 0, 0);
½
½
½
½
¼
¼ ¾
¾
WURTZITEHCP S2- with Zn2+
in half of the T holes
Motif: S at (0, 0, 0); Zn at (1/4, 1/4, 1/4)
Coordination: 4:4 (tetrahedral)
⅝⅝
50
in half of the Td holesLattice: Hexagonal - P a = b, c = (8/3)aMotif: 2 S at (0,0,0) & (2/3, 1/3, 1/2);
2 Zn at (2/3, 1/3, 1/8) & (0, 0, 5/8) 2 ZnS in unit cell (Z = 2)Coordination: 4:4 (tetrahedral)
⅝
⅝⅝
⅛½
CHEM 713
26
Polymorphs ofZinc Sulfide
WURTZITEZINC BLENDE
51
4 nearest neighbors 12 next-nearest neighbors
Cub-octahedral Anti-Cub-octahedral
plus different next-next-nearest neighbor coordination
ccp Ca2+ with F- in all tetrahedral holesLattice: fccMotif: Ca2+ at (0, 0, 0);
2 F- at (1/4, 1/4, 1/4) & (3/4, 3/4, 3/4)4 CaF2 in unit cell (Z = 4)
Fluorite (CaF2)
¼,¾
¼,¾
¼,¾
¼,¾
½
½ ½
½
2 ( )Coordination: Ca2+ 8 (cubic) : F- 4 (tetrahedral) anti-Fluorite: Na2O
52
Linking of [FCa4] tetrahedra K2[PtCl6]
CHEM 713
27
Rutile (TiO2)“HCP” anions (distorted), Ti atoms in ½ of the Oh sitesUnit Cell: Primitive Tetragonal (a = b = 4.59 Å, c = 2.96 Å)Positions: 2 Ti at (0, 0, 0) & (1/2, 1/2, 1/2)
4 O at (0.3, 0.3, 0), (0.7, 0.7, 0), (0.2, 0.8, 1/2), (0.8, 0.2, 1/2)
Ti: 6 (octahedral coordination); O: 3 (trigonal planar coordination)
½
½
½
53
Rhenium TrioxideLattice: Primitive Cubic 1ReO3 per unit cell Motif: Re at (0, 0, 0); 3 O at (1/2, 0, 0), (0, 1/2, 0), (0, 0, 1/2) Re: 6 (octahedral coordination) O: 2 (linear coordination) ( )ReO6 octahedra share only vertices (= corners)
½ ½
54
½ ½
CHEM 713
28
CdI2: HCP anions (I), Cd atoms in all Oh sites of every other layerCdCl2: CCP anions (Cl), Cd atoms in all Oh sites of every other layer
Layered AB2 structure types
CdCl2
CdI2
55
NiAs
Transition metals with chalcogen and pnictogen atoms
e.g. Ti(S,Se,Te); Cr(S,Se,Te,Sb); Ni(S,Se,Te,As,Sb,Sn)
Examples of Structure Adoption
g ( ) ( ) ( )
CdI2Iodides of moderately polarizing cations; bromides and chlorides
of strongly polarizing cations; e.g. PbI2, FeBr2, VCl2Hydroxides of many divalent cations; e.g. (Mg,Ni)(OH)2
Di-chalcogenides of many quadrivalent cations; TiS2, ZrSe2, CoTe2
CdCl2 (ccp equivalent of CdI2)
56
Chlorides of moderately polarizing cations; e.g. MgCl2, MnCl2Di-sulfides of quadrivalent cations; e.g. TaS2, NbS2 (CdI2 form as well)
Cs2O has the anti-cadmium chloride structure
CHEM 713
29
For these structure types:• NaCl rock salt• CaF2 fluorite• ZnS zinc blende• NiAs nickel arsenide• ZnS wurtzite
Binary Solids ABx
ZnS wurtzite• Na2O sodium oxide• TiO2 rutile• CdCl2, CdI2, MoS2 (cadmium dichloride, cadmium diiodide,
molybdenum dissulfide)• Li3Bi lithium bismuthide• ReO3 rhenium oxide
C
57
Can you:0. Give examples? 1. Describe the structure as filling of interstitial holes in close-packing? 2. Draw the unit cell in a plan (layer) or perspective view?3. Recognize the structure from a plan or perspective view of a unit cell?4. Identify coordination numbers & geometries & point groups of atoms?5. Calculate density, distances, and formula units?
1 CCP = ABCABCABC (coord # = 12)
2. HCP = ABABABABAB (coord # = 12)
One Oh hole per lattice point, and two Td holes (hence K3C60)
3. BCC (coord # = 8 or 8+6) [not close packed]
4. Derivative (ABx) Structures
Close packed spheres - a Summary of Geometrical Features
( x)
AB NaCl - interpenetrating CCP, Oh sites
NiAs - HCP As atoms, with Ni atoms in Oh sites
ZnS (Zinc blende) - interpenetrating CCP, ½ Td sites
ZnS (Wurtzite) - interpenetrating HCP, ½ Td sites
AB2 CaF2 - Fluorite - cations CCP, anions fill all Td sites
Na2O - Antifluorite - anions CCP, cations fill all Td sites
58
CdCl2 - CCP anions, cations ½ Oh sites (alternate layers) filled
CdI2 - HCP anions, cations ½ Oh sites (alternate layers) filled
TiO2 - Rutile - "HCP" anions, cations fill ½ Oh sites (ordered frame)
AB3 ReO3 - Cubic, with cations at all corners, anions along all edges
[not close packed]
Li3Bi and K3C60 - CCP anions with all Td and Oh holes filled
CHEM 713
30
Layered AB2 structure types
MoS2: S anions NOTclose packed; layer sequence AABB,
Mo in half of theMo in half of the trigonal prismatic sites of every other layer.
Lattice: Hexagonal - P Motif: 2 Mo at (2/3,
1/3,3/4), (
1/3,2/3,
1/4) 4 S at (2/3,
1/3,1/8), (
2/3,1/3,
3/8), (1/3,
2/3,5/8), (
1/3,2/3,
7/8) 2 M S i it ll
59
2 MoS2 in unit cell Coordination: Mo 6 (Trigonal Prismatic) :
S 3 (base pyramid)
Layered AB2 structure types
filled
empty
60
CHEM 713
31
More on layered AB2 structure types and layer sequencies
A
B
B
c
c
CdI2
empty
B
B
A
a
c
61
MoS2
A
A
B
b
More on layered AB2 structure types and layer sequencies
analogous to CdI
A
A
B
to CdI2
NbSe2
B
B
A
A
62
analogous to MoS2
A
B
B
B
CHEM 713
32
More on layered AB2 structure types and layer sequencies
CdI2layer
63-MoTe2
Distortion leads to Mo-Mo bondformation, driven by the d2
configuration.
Ternary SolidsPerovskites, ABO3
Lattice: Primitive Cubic 1 CaTiO3 per unit cell Motif (A): Ca at (1/2, 1/2, 1/2); Ti at (0, 0, 0); 3 O at (1/2 ,0, 0), (0, 1/2, 0), (0, 0, 1/2)
Ca: 12 (cuboctahedral coordination)Ti: 6 (octahedral coordination) O: 6 (4 Ca + 2 Ti) TiO6 octahedra share only vertices
Remember ReO3?
64
Remember ReO3?
CHEM 713
33
La2CuO4 {K2NiF4 structure}: Doped La2CuO4 {La2-xSrxCuO4} was the first (1986) High-Tc Superconducting Oxide (Tc ~ 40 K),
La2CuO4 - the first High-Tc Superconductor
for which Bednorz & Müller were awarded a Nobel PrizeNobel Prize.
La2CuO4 may be viewed as if constructed from an ABAB... arrangement of Perovskite cells known
65
Perovskite cells, known as an AB Perovskite .
La2CuO4 - the first High-TC Superconductor
Alternative descriptions
66
CHEM 713
34
One may view the structure as based on:
1. Sheets of elongated CuO6 octahedra, sharing only vertices;
2. Layered networks of CuO46-, connected only by La3+ ions.
La2CuO4 - the first High-TC Superconductor
Comparison of La2CuO4/Nd2CuO4
C t t l tif f t li k d C OCommon structural motif of vertex-linked CuO4 squares.
This motif occurs in all the high TC copper oxides.
Differences are in the structure of the 'filling' in
67
the 'sandwich' of Cu-O layers.
- Intergrowth Structures
YBa2Cu3O7 - the 1:2:3 SuperconductorThe first material to superconduct at above liquid N2 temperature, TC > 77 K. YBa2Cu3O7 can be viewed as an Oxygen-Deficient Perovskite
68
CHEM 713
35
YBa2Cu3O7 - the 1:2:3 Superconductor
Two types of Cu sites:
• Layers of CuO5 square pyramids
(elongation => essentially vertex-
linked CuO4 squares again)
• Chains of vertex-linked CuO4
squares
indicated in a
69
indicated in a
Polyhedral Representation
Cooper Pairs
In Ogg's theory it was his intentThat the current keep flowing, once sent;So to save himself trouble
The first man to suggest the paring of electrons was R. A. Ogg,an experimental chemist. No-one believed him.
Superconductivity
The Meissner Effect
So to save himself trouble,He put them in double,and instead of stopping, it went.
70
The Meissner Effect
Superconductors are diamagnetic to the total exclusion of all magnetic fields. This is a classic hallmark of superconductivity and can be used to
levitate a magnet.
CHEM 713
36
Spinels - AB2O4 e.g., MgAl2O4
1. Take eight cubes based on CCP of A.
2. Add B4O4 cubes to half of Td holes, i.e., AB4O4
3. Add AO4 cubes to other half of Td holes, i.e.,
AB4O4 + AO4.
4 STOICHIOMETRY of mother cube =
AO
BT
T
TT
CCP O atoms, A atoms in 1/8 of the Td holes, B atoms in 1/2 of the Oh holes.
4. STOICHIOMETRY of mother cube =
AB4O4 + AO4 = A2B4O8 = AB2O4
T
71
Eight sub-cells inside fcc array of A atoms
FRONT BACK
Fe3O4 – magnetite – is ferromagnetic
More on Spinels
Oxidation state
Normal spinel
Inverse spinel
II, III MgAl2O4 MgIn2O4
Atomic positions:Mg (0, 0, 0),Al (x, x, x); x = 0.625O (x x x); x = 0 375
II, IIIIV, IIII, IVI, I
2 4
Co3O4
GeNi2O4
ZnK2(CN)4
WNa2O4
2 4
Fe3O4
TiMg2O4
NiLi2F4
Ionic radii: Mg2+ 72pm Fe2+ 78pm Co2+ 75pm
72
O (x, x, x); x = 0.375Mg2+ 72pm Al3+ 54pm
Fe2+ 78pmFe3+ 65pm
Co2+ 75pmCo3+ 61pm
CHEM 713
37
Rule 1: A coordinated polyhedron of anions is formed about each cation, the cation-
anion distance determined by the sum of ionic radii and the coordination number by
the radius ratio.
Rule 2: The Electrostatic Valency Principle
An ionic structure will be stable to the extent that the sum of the strengths of the
Pauling rules for ionic crystals - J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51, 1010 (1929)
An ionic structure will be stable to the extent that the sum of the strengths of the
electrostatic bonds that reach an ion equal the charge on that ion.
When Mm+ is surrounded by n Xx–: ebs = m/n and x = ebs
with ebs = electrostatic bond strength of M–X bond
Rule 3: The presence of shared edges, and particularly shared faces decreases the
stability of a structure. This is particularly true for cations with large valences and
73
small coordination number.
Rule 4: In a crystal structure containing several cations, those of high valency and
small coordination number tend not to share polyhedral elements.
Rule 5: The Principle of Parsimony
The number of different kinds of constituents in a crystal tends to be small.
Crystalline Defects
Schottky defects
Entropy and defects in crystal lattices
74Frenkel Defects
How will these defects affect density?
In ionic conductors, e.g. in battery applications (LiCoO2), small ionsmigrate from site to site via eitheror both mechanisms.