session et al. - representing the other
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
1/24
ECPR - JOINT SESSION OF WORKSHOPS, 22-27 March 2002, Turin
Workshop 14:
Political Participation of immigrants and their Descendants in post-war Western Europe
REPRESENTING THE OTHER:
Undocumented migrants and their supporters,
mobilising in France 1996/97
(First draft, not yet for quotation)
Christine LUDL (FU-Berlin/IEP Paris)
Karl-Kunger-Str. 9D-12435 Berlin
fon: +49 (0)30-53.69.84.49mail: [email protected]
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
2/24
2
1. Introduction: Presentation of the sans-papiers movement
This paper deals with the sans-papiers movement, a movement of undocumented
migrants in France, which named themselves without papers and gained wide public
attention in 1996/97. The movement started off in March 1996 when 300 mostly African
migrants occupied a church in the 11th district of Paris. Some of them started a hunger
strike; three days later the police evacuated them. Within these first few days, the main
methods of action and the characteristics of the future movement were already laid out: a
group of undocumented migrants, sticking together, occupying mainly churches that
appeared again at another place almost immediately after the evacuation; a group that uses
hunger strike as a method of action and asked for papers, that is to say the regulation of
their administrative status. As soon as the information of the occupation of St. Ambroisecirculated, French organisations, which traditionally had supported the collective action of
undocumented migrants, appeared on the scene. These supporters were mainly non-
governmental organisations working in the field of immigration, churches, trade unions and
small, extreme left wing parties. The movement was widely covered by the media and
encountered large support and sympathy by the French population. It first gained enormous
public attention in August 1996 when the police evacuated the church St. Bernard, which
they had been occupying for some weeks. The extreme violence of the police and the broad
media coverage of the evacuation together with a broad movement of solidarity that had
emerged during the weeks preceding the evacuation, lead to a demonstration of more than
11000 people in the centre of Paris.
The second breakthrough of the movement was situated in the context of the demonstrations
against the Debr Law in February 1997, a project of reinforcing existing immigration laws.
This project encountered widespread resistance within the French population, and lead to
mass demonstrations of more than 100 000 people in Paris that finally forced the
government to abandon the project. The parliament elections in June 1997 that brought to
power a coalition of the socialist party, the green party and the communist party, marked a
turning point: the movement is loosing power and started to disappear. It left some
leftovers behind which still remain today.
In this paper, I will present some results of the research that I have done on the movement,
including 4-months of fieldwork in Paris and its surrounding suburbs. I will argue that this
case study provides an example for a theoretical shift in paradigm explaining the
mobilisation of groups drawing on weak resources. The latter has mostly been analysed in
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
3/24
3
terms of resource mobilisation approaches, stressing the necessity of economic or political
resources like people, know-how, money etc. In the case of the mobilisation of
undocumented migrants, people and organisations supporting them are generally considered
as their main resource. I will argue that the French non-governmental organisations,
churches, trade unions, and parties supporting the sans-papiers do represent still an
important resource. Nevertheless, in this example, one can observe that the availability of
resources has ceased to be the sole and exclusive explanation of mobilisation. To be more
precise, on the one hand one can observe a diversification of paradigms explaining
mobilisation. Specifically concepts of framing and collective identity are gaining
importance. On the other hand, the concept of collective identity as I understand it here and
which differs from traditional approaches of identity in movement theory, gains special
importance as it provides aspects cross-cutting other approaches such as resource
mobilisation or framing.
My argument will develop in three steps: First, I will discuss approaches of collective
identity in social movement theory and explain the concept of identity I am drawing on in
this paper.
Second, by comparing the actual movement to those that preceded it, I will explain how the
sans-papiers could mobilise a considerable amount of French supporters. The movement
even gained a new category of supporters, mainly ordinary French people who had had no
experience in political action and movements before. This means also to explore the often
conflictual relation between the sans-papiers and French supporting organisations. I will
argue that a certain autonomy of the sans-papiers constituted the condition for the broad
support because it allowed them to develop their own argumentation. These arguments
directly and successfully addressed the French society. Theoretically speaking, this means a
shift from resource mobilisation to concepts of framing. In addition to that, the effects of
this frame complement my conception of collective identity and its crosscutting character:
The supporters representations of who the sans-papiers were and what they wanted have to
be seen in permanent interaction with the sans-papiers self-representation, that also
influenced the self-positioning of the French side. This provides useful insights into the
success of the movement during its first phase.
Third, I will concentrate on the motivations for action and the perception of political
activities by the immigrants themselves. Their representation of political action within the
movement is highly influenced by their experiences and relations to their respective home
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
4/24
4
countries. Evidence will be given to the fact that these perceptions differ considerably from
those of the French supporters. This then will strengthen my argument that it is above all the
game of intertwined representations on both sides which has mobilising effects - whether
these representations correspond to reality or not. I will mainly draw on the example of
West-African immigrants who launched the movement. In addition to that, the example of a
group of north African women will provide a different view on existing relations to their
home countries, though having the same effect: as in the case of the Africans, these
relations influence considerably their motivation for participation in the movement.
I will limit the analysis to the first phase of the movement from March 1996 to spring 1997.
By doing so, I wont explain the reasons of the movements decline, but rather the reasons
for a relatively strong mobilisation in its first phase.
2. Theoretical perspectives: The choice(s) of identity1
Theories of resource mobilisation generally focus on social movements as political, rational
and strategic activities of movement organisations, their internal organisation, structure and
function as well as their resources such as money, time, number of supporters and people
involved etc. (Hellmann 1998, 13). As a part of rational choice theories, resource
mobilisation approaches have the underlying assumption of decision-making-processes that
follow a rationale of costs and benefits (Hellmann 1997, 32; Simant 1998, 48). This strictly
economic (McCarthy/Zald 1973, 1977) or more political (Obershall 1973) approach has
been dominating explanations of the mobilisation of groups with weak resources like
homeless people or migrants. For example, Johanna Simant, in her analysis of
undocumented migrants mobilising in France between the early 70ies and 1992, draws on
the model of Obershall, focussing on the one hand on selective incentives, and, on the
other hand, on the role of political entrepreneurs, stating that precisely the groups dont
mobilise but are mobilised and sometimes even entirely constituted by politicalentrepreneurs, speaking on behalf of a group of which they dont share all characteristics
(Simant 1998, 53).2
In this presentation I will show that representations and imaginaries as an integral part of
identities of actors can turn out to be much more powerful than selective incentives or the
1Title with reference to Martin 1995.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
5/24
5
role of political entrepreneurs. However, before doing so, I will discuss approaches of
collective identity in social movement theories, arguing that, in general, they don't
sufficiently take the relations between culture and politics, as well as power relations into
account (Poletta 1997, 432-438; Martin 1989, 805). More specifically, they neglect the role
of representations and imaginaries within the concept of identity. Alternatively, I will
suggest a concept of identity based on representations and imaginaries, constructed by an
interactive process of narration.
Generally speaking, approaches of collective identity consider identity as a resource for
mobilisation, able to constitute collective actors by discursive and symbolic means (e. g.
myths of foundation, symbols, rituals). One can distinguish two different traditions of
analysis within the collective identity approach (Roth 1998, 53). One mainly draws on therole of culture, that is to say material culture, in constituting collective identities (and by
consequence in analysis (Fillieule 1993, 42)). The other tradition focuses on socio-
psychological aspects and the emotional ties one invests in collective action (Roth 1998,
53). Apart from these general considerations, Manuel Castells, Alain Tourraine and Alberto
Melucci dealt more in detail with the aspect of collective identity. While Manuel Castells
and Alain Touraine only provide relatively rudimentary definitions of identity3, Alberto
Melucci suggests a more elaborated, though not sufficient concept of collective identity.
Hence I will concentrate on his approach.
In general, Melucci considers culture and the symbolic dimension as crucial for the
understanding of identity. For him, collective identity is implied in most theories of
collective action, though not sufficiently taken into account. He defines collective identity
as a system of relations and representations (Melucci 1996, 76), as an interactive and
shared definition produced by several interacting individuals (or groups at a more complex
level) and concerned with the orientation of action in the field of opportunities and
constraints in which the action takes place (Melucci 1995, 44 and 1996, 70f). He
distinguishes three dimensions of collective action: 1) A process of cognitive definition of
ends, means and the field of action, 2) A network of active relations and 3) emotional ties
2Simant completes her analysis by including the role of: formation of actors preferences, their politicaland social trajectories, the space of mobilisation, as well as repertoires of action.3
Castells 1997, 6. For a critique of the concept of identity used by Touraine, see Melucci 1996, 67; Roth1998, 59.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
6/24
6
(Melucci 1996, 70f). The permanent interaction of these three levels leads to the process of
collective identity construction.
Although this definition confers an important role to relations and representations, it turns
out to be much less specific on functions and characteristics of representations and
relations. To be more precise, one can develop two main critiques: First, the representations
in question exclusively concern the ends, means and the field of action. Consequently,
they are located within the context of the movement, neglecting the representations
emerging from a much broader social, political and cultural context. These more general
representations may seem to be in no direct relation with collective action but turn out to be
powerful in shaping representations of action and decision-making within a movement. This
critique joins the point of view of Hellmann who stated that approaches of collectiveidentity imply a strong concentration of social movements on themselves (Hellmann 1998,
20). Hence, relations of movements with their environment remain outside the analysis and,
on the contrary, are taken into account by other approaches like framing theories. This leads
to a second critical remark. Not only the general relations of movements to their
environment and therefore their position within societal power structures are left unclear
but also the character of the relations between the self and the other within the process of
identity construction.
Alternatively, I suggest a definition of identity that focuses on the interactive construction
of representations and imaginaries through a process of narration. It includes every
representation that may be relevant for mobilisation and, through the aspect of narration,
fills the gap of the characteristics of relations between the self and the other. This
predominant role of narration has been stressed by Stuart Hall who considers as most
important ... not who we are or where we come from, so much as what we might
become, how we have been represented and how that bears on how we might represent
ourselves. Identities are therefore constituted within, not outside representation ... They
arise from the narrativization of the self, but the necessarily fictional nature of this process
in no way undermines its discursive, material or political affectivity, even if the
belongingness, the suturing into the story through which identities arise is, partly, in the
imaginary (as well as in the symbolic) and therefore, always, partly constructed in fantasy,
or at least within a fantasmatic field (Hall 1996, 5).
Denis-Constant Martin, referring to Paul Ricoeur provides more details on these processes
of narration: "For him [Ricoeur], the comprehension of oneself as an Other, with the others,
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
7/24
7
is always an interpretation, which finds in the narrative one of its most complete media of
expression. The narrative borrows from history as well as from fiction and treats the person
as a character in a plot. The person as a character is not separable from its life experiences,
but the plot allows for a re-organization of the events that provide the ground for the
experiences of the person/character ...
One proposes ones identity in the form of a narrative in which one can re-arrange, re-
interpret the events of ones life in order to take care both of permanence and change, in
order to satisfy the wish to make events concordant in spite of the inevitable discordances
likely to shake the basis of identity. Narrative identity, being at the same time fictitious and
real, leaves room for variations on the past - a plot can always be revised - and also for
initiatives in the future. It is an open-ended identity which gives meaning to ones practice,which makes any one act meaningful. But, as a narrative being an utterance it is meant for
oneself as well as for the Other. It therefore implies the utterance by others of their own
narratives. In social terms, the interactions of practices are integrated in the interactions of
narratives, provoking a multiplicity of interactions and an interweaving of narratives
(Martin 1995, 7f.)
In the same line of argument, still referring to Ricoeur, Martin considers representations as
being the crucial element that allow the shift from individual to collective identities, from
psychological to social structures (Martin 1994, 21). In fact, ... in an individual narrative
there is always a part that derives from the interiorization - thus the re-interpretation - of
collective schemes ... As much as an individual is always attached to groups, a narrative
always tells the story of one or several groups, and group identity can be analysed as a
narrative, just as individual identity (Martin 1995, 8).
In addition to that, a clear distinction between representations and imaginaries may be
useful. These two notions can be defined by what Clifford Geertz calls models of and
models for: On the one hand, representations, or the worldview, consist of the
collection of notions a people have about how reality really is. On the other hand, he defines
imaginaries as an ethos, namely an ideal of reality or the general lifestyle, how people like to
do things (Geertz 1973, 85ff).
On the basis of this brief theoretical discussion, I will show that precisely the intertwining
representations and imaginaries of actors allowed mobilisation in the case of the sans-
papiers movement. I will focus both on representations prior to the movement as well as
those that emerged during the months of collective action. As far as the French supporters
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
8/24
8
are concerned, I will deal with their representation of French society as it is, with their
imaginaries of how it should be and the role the sans-papiers are supposed to play in this
process. As for the migrants, both representations and imaginaries, drawing on their cultural
background, of how to position themselves between France and their respective home
countries via their project of migration as well as the consequences for participation in and
representation of collective action will be considered.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
9/24
9
mot aux hommes sans papiers :
je pense vous, qui signifiez tant pour nous, nouslesde-papiers-nantis sans plus de foi, citoyens dgots
d'un beau pays dgoutantje passerais vous voir, si je n'avais peur de vousfatiguer plus encore?
il fait moche nous pourrions faire un feu que vosamis prparent le petit bois, nous apporterons le
papier: nos cartes d'une identit qui nous psentdepuis si longtemps, et plus encore chaque jour quevous jeunez
AmitisLeos Carax 4
3. The French supporters side: The French society in question
To understand the main issues of the movement in 1996/97, a short glance at the
mobilisation of undocumented migrants from the early 70ies to the early 90ies is necessary.
Johanna Simant has shown that all categories of traditional supporters are mobilised by
single persons, occupying a marginal position within their association or organisation.
Because they are not at their place, these activists engage in the defence of those who have
no place at all, the sans-papiers (Simant 1998, 435). Consequently, she suggests that the
case of the sans-papiers is a heretic case, characterised by supporters with minor positions.
At the same time, because of its heretic character, the collective action of undocumented
migrants attracts those people. In addition to that, in the 70ies and 80ies, a cultural and
political avant-garde of artists and intellectuals discovered parallels between the sans-
papiers marginal position and their work (e. g. Michel Foucault working on prison,
asylums etc.) or their own position in society, which they also considered as marginal (as in
the case of many artists).
The heretic character of defending undocumented migrants has to bee seen in the context of
immigration discourses in France since the early 70ies. In 1973, the right wing Front
National launched the slogan of wild immigration, thus conferring a particularly radical
character to the defence of undocumented migrants. In this context, mobilising for the sans-
papiers, meant to pass traditional left wing parties and organisations (Socialist Party,
Communist Party, trade unions) on the left, and offered a possibility of taking even more
4
Leos Carax, mail to the sans-papiers of St. Bernard, August 13, 1996,http://www.bok.net/pajol/messages.html, 13.01.2000.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
10/24
10
radical positions. Requesting equal rights between French citizens and immigrants, or even
illegals, meant to attack the State in its very basis, that is to say in its monopoly of
defining and granting the national status (Simant 1998, 159, 191).
During the 80ies and the 90ies, the whole range of political parties had to deal with the
Front National and its positions on immigration, which lead to a national consensus on
immigration, forwarding the idea of regulating and controlling migration flows. At the
same time, the public representation of undocumented migrants as a danger to the public
order established itself in large parts of the society. These developments considerably
reduced the possibilities of mobilisation for undocumented migrants (Simant 1998, 203),
and were even reinforced by increasing unemployment, the treaty of Shengen and a
constant harmonisation of immigration politics within the European Union. Therefore, thehunger strikes of undocumented migrants in 1991/92 received only marginal support and
very little public attention.
Considering this context, the relatively wide mobilisation as well as the public attention and
sympathy the sans-papiers movement reached in 1996/97 may seem astonishing. The
question is wy, going beyond the explanation of the extremely emotionally charged
evacuation of St. Bernard and the mobilisation within a broader context against the Debr
laws, the sans-papiers movement gained a relatively wide public consensus in 1996/97.
The core element of the movements success consists in the successful construction of a
positive public self-representation as without papers, replacing the image of illegals.
This factor itself is in close relation to the relative autonomy from their supporters. In fact,
until 1992 it is true that the French supporters played a dominant and paternalistic role in
defining a movements orientations and often even initiated the collective action of
migrants. By contrast, the movement of 1996/97 started without any contact to immigrants
organisation or other supporters. On the contrary, it started against them: after waiting for
months for SOS Rascisme to deal with their dossiers, at about 300 west-African migrants
decided to pass to action themselves and occupied the church St. Ambroise.5They stressed
their autonomy right from the start, continued their action notwithstanding the advise of
immigrants organisations and insisted on defining themselves the movements orientations.
For this, they institutionalised what they called the meeting of the families where major
decisions were taken and supporters excluded. The immigrants autonomy was object to
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
11/24
11
many discussions with their supporters; nevertheless, they achieved a kind of vacuum at the
beginning of the movement, which allowed them to develop their own arguments.
Madjigune Ciss, one of the leaders of the movement stressed, that the sans-papiers, on the
basis of these arguments, explicitly intended the movement as a campaign to convince the
media and the public.
This media campaign had a twofold objective: first to abolish the representation as solely
Africans by stressing the diversity of their origins on the one hand, and their similarities
with French citizens on the other (being students, having children, friends, working, paying
taxes etc.). This also meant to present, in a very emotional manner, mainly women and
children in the media, contradicting the clich of the illegal male immigrant who works on
the side.6
In fact, this strategy of underlining their diversity and their frenchness can beexplained by the republican context in France, which is very hostile to any mobilisation or
claim making on an ethnic basis (Blatt 1997, 46ff).
Second, as mentioned above, they succeeded in erasing the image of illegals, linked to
illegal activities on their profit that they hide in the dark, thus justifying their persecution by
law. In fact, the term of illegals implies a clear culpability. By creating the expression
without papers, the sans-papiers inversed the direction of this culpability. By forging their
image as without papers they stated that they once had possessed papers, that it was their
right to have papers and that it was the French state that had removed them. Thus, the
French state was guilty of not according them their papers. At the same time, they
voluntarily left the dark of the illegals behind them and presented themselves and their
stories to the French public.
By this, within a few weeks, the movement had turned the heretic cause of the sans-papiers
to an issue that encountered a wide public consensus. To defend the sans-papiers was no
more radical or the expression of an extreme left wing political position. By consequence, a
much more broader mobilisation that was no longer restricted to extreme left wing parties,
NGO, churches or trade unions became possible. Between March and July 1996 regular
demonstrations took place in Paris, gathering between several hundred and 1000 people (Le
Monde, Mai 24, 1996, 12 and August 14, 1996, 6). During the days that preceded the
evacuation of St. Bernard the number of persons demonstrating increases constantly: On
5This is one part of how the movement started; I will come back to a second aspect later.6See the manifest of the sans-papiers: http://www.bok.net/pajol/film.html#texte,15.02.1999.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
12/24
12
June, 15 a demonstration in Paris gathers 6000 people, on August, 21 between 8000 and
15000 (Le Monde, June 18, 1996, 13 for the lower and Diop 1997, 166 for the higher
number). People living in the neighbourhood of St. Bernard and other supporters camp
around the church and a survey in August 1996 states that 56% of the French approved the
regularisation of the sans-papiers.7
From a theoretical point of view, one can consider that a group of political entrepreneurs,
namely Madjigune Ciss and Ababacar Diop, the two Senegalese leaders of the movement,
constructed a strategic master frame (Snow 1986; Snow/Benford 1988; Kliment 1988):
They successfully staged the theme of protest by clearly pointing out the problem, offering
interpretations concerning their origins, naming responsibilities, and opening up to
solutions.
However, as Francesca Poletta pointed out, if one includes culturally shaped representations
of actors, one comes to the limits of framing theories. What the sans-papiers consider as
strategic or not is highly influenced by their representations [and] offers important insights
into the cultural shaping of instrumental decision making. It suggests that broad semiotic
templates mold movements organizations vocabularies of protest, their understandings of
what is feasible, strategic, and legitimate. (Polletta 1997, 440ff).
I will concentrate on the sans-papiers representations in the next section of thes paper. Yet,one can use this argument also to explain why precisely this frame had been strategic, what
dynamics the public self-representation of the sans-papiers launched on the French side,
developing their proper representations in close connection to their societal and cultural
background. More specifically, this will reveal another important particularity of the
movement of 96/97: Apart from the traditional supporters mobilising for the same reasons
as usual, and apart from a general consensus on the case of the sans-papiers, a new category
of supporters appeared. The interviews that I did with different categories of French
supporters revealed that there can be found a considerable number of people, mostly of
intellectual background and with slight affinities to the political left, who never had any
direct connection to political parties or associations or social movements before. The
movement of the sans-papiers thus represented their first experience of active political
participation and mobilisation.
7 Wir mssen den Kampf wieder von vorne beginnen. Interview mit Madjigune Ciss, Sprecherin der
Coordination nationale des sans-papiers in Frankreich. December 1997,
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
13/24
13
To explain more in detail the inner French developments that dialogued with the sans-
papiers movement I will mention three aspects and give a brief explanation of each of them:
First, the movement of the sans-papiers has to be seen in a wider context of the withouts.
During the 90ies, the economic crisis and the increasing unemployment rate lead to a
growing number of people who shared the prefix without, for instance without a job,
without housing, without money etc. As a leader of a trade union pointed out, the
ordinary French citizen suddenly became concerned, the sans-papiers only represented one
group among others, and a sudden similarity appeared between them and the French (Ein
neues Verhltnis zwischen Nord und Sd 1996).
Second, during the 80ies and early 90ies, the representation of increasing xenophobia
gained important parts of French society, especially slightly left orientated but little
politicised intellectuals. This representation of a society drifting towards a generalisation of
xenophobia and racism emerged mainly from the National Front winning several local
elections in the South of France as well as from the reinforcement of immigration
legislation. In this context, the movement of the sans-papiers served as a sort of catalyst for
these little politicised people who started now to engage in political action. The following
quotation from an interview clearly highlights this development. The narrative starts with
the beginning of the movement by which the person felt directly concerned because he had
already been sensible to questions of immigration, repression of foreigners and xenophobe
legislation in France. At the beginning, as he was no member of an organisation, he
followed the movement with sympathy but with a certain distance, namely by participating
in meetings or demonstrations organised by the sans-papiers. The story continues as
follows:
And then the movement really gained importance ... and the more its importance wasgrowing, the more I wanted to get involved more directly ... and I was searching for anidea what I could contribute to the movement as a citizen directly concerned byquestions of immigration etc. ... people like me, and I think we were many in this case,I remember, we were extremely distressed/overwhelmed by the things that happenedand by the importance they gained. So, for me, the necessity to get directly involved inthe movement became really something inevitable, I could not do in another way; Ireally had to participate...
I had had no practice of militantism. Nothing. I hadnt been member of any party, Ihadnt been member of any association, therefore I had followed things with a certaindistance by going to important demonstrations ... and then, I remember, I startedcollecting press articles on the situation of foreigners, evolutions in legislation. For
http://www.contrast.org/borders/kein/hintergrund/cisse.html, 18.02.1999.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
14/24
14
example, I was interested in the Pasqua laws because I was directly concerned, I had tofill in fiches dhbergement [registration forms for visitors from abroad, C. L.] and Irealised that this was becoming completely absurd ...
So, it came like this, its because of strictly personal reasons and this is also the reason
why, when the sans-papiers occupied St. Ambrois in March 96, I felt a relief. I toldmyself, this is something new that happens here and it proved also that this kind ofinsatisfaction and frustration and discontent that what was growing over the years, Iwas not the only one to feel it. If there were 300 Africans in a church, this was to saythat I wasnt alone, that there were lots of other people feeling that there was axenophobe drift going on against which you had to mobilise. This was my impression:at the point where I am, I am not alone. I am not alone feeling that because at this time,I hadnt been part of any associative network etc. and I told myself, this is strange, Idont understand why we are having such an absurd legislation, after all, this isunbelievable. This had been my personal reflection at this time. (Interview, September15, 1999, Paris).
Apart from that, not only the movement acted as a catalyst to political participation but also,
in the eyes of some supporters, it became a mirror of French society and at the same time
the key to solve its problems: And then, I told myself, really, if we have the will to further
things, here we have an extraordinary key avec this problem of the sans-papiers ... I mean,
what a pertinence, these people read in the deepest way in our society ... the sans-papiers
put the finger where it hurts, really willing to, I think, deeply, to help the French society to
get along with its immigration problem. (Interview, September 16, 1999, Paris).
Third, for the supporters, these issues of immigration, increasing xenophobia, and racism
are closely linked to central values of the French society like human rights, generosity,
solidarity, and hospitality. The point is then, that according to the supporters
representations, the French society is in crisis because it had lost these values. The
movement of the sans-papiers revealed and highlighted this crisis of society and at the same
time developed to an extraordinary possibility of revitalising these values by defending the
sans-papiers. This aspect is clearly illustrated by Sthane Hessel who was member of a
group of mediators between the movement and the French government. At a press
conference at the very beginning of the movement he stated: We wish to have thepossibility, in the next days and weeks, to highlight our point of view that is the following
one: France has to be, to stay and to become again what it had ceased to be at a certain
moment, a human place of welcome and respect of the rights and dignity of all persons
staying on its territory. (Hessel in Kebadian 1999). At the end of the same press
conference, Christiane Hessel declared: I have a dream: that my country finds back to its
values. (Hessel 1997, 311, underlined by S. H.).
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
15/24
15
Consequently, a kind of a parallel French movement developed. The supporters invented
their own rituals like the parrainages, a sort of partnership for sans-papiers and which
allowed them to restore in part the heretic and revolutionary character of the movement, as
it is prohibited by law to support undocumented migrants. Some parts of the ritual, even
explicitly excluded the participation of the sans-papiers. Further more, at some places, there
existed collectives of sans-papiers where the members were exclusively French citizens
trying in vain to find some sans-papiers to support. Similarly, in the end of the movement,
there were much more supporters left than sans-papiers.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
16/24
16
... par exemple comme cette femme, ... o elle est devant la tour
Eiffel, donc a montre quelle est en France et on la voit l au vi llage
avec des enfants....je les ai mis cte cte, l, cest la mme femme... donc il y a vraiment la cohabitation entre lAfrique et puis la
russite ici, quoi ...
... la carte tlphonique o cest marqu Pourquoi pas vous?. Elle,
elle lavait tout le temps sur elle, elle tait vide mais elle trouvait a
tellement. Ctait un papiers pour elle, un papier didentit, Pourquoi
pas vous?.8
4. The immigrants side: Links to countries of origin and the role of a
legal status in France
As far as the immigrants representations of collective action are concerned, I will present
two examples from different periods of the movement. Despite they refer to very different
groups of migrants with different approaches to migration and the movement, they converge
in their effect: They both provide an example for the crucial role of countries of origin in
shaping the actors approach to migration as well as representations of collective action and,
by consequence, the role of the legal status. Evidence will be given to the fact that these
representations can have mobilising effects that go far beyond the explanations provided by
resource mobilisation approaches. The first example is provided by a group of North
African women who joined the sans-papiers during summer and fall 1997, at a stage wherethe decline of the movement had become obvious. The second example is drawn from
West-African migrants who played a central role at the very beginning of the movement.
To start with the North African Women, first I will briefly present the group, then resume
and analyse their narratives. The 10 Moroccan and Algerian women, on whom one part of
my fieldwork is based, mainly came to France between 1983 and 1994. They are aged
between 30 and 50 and work mainly as domestics, nannies etc. They were organised in a
unit of the movement in a western suburb of Paris. In summer 1999, a network of Frenchfeminists close to the movement contacted them. During the following months, regular
meetings of the women and the network were held in Paris with the aim to further their
regularisation, as well as the writing of a manifest of women, that was supposed to make
the point on gender issues within the broader context of the movement and its relation to
administration services.
8 Interview, artist, project Les papiers des sans-papiers, Paris, July 21, 1999.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
17/24
17
During the meetings, the women told their stories. As they had had no experience of
political or feminist action before, the meetings, where only women were allowed to
participate, provided an extraordinary possibility for them to tell their story, for the first
time, in a semi-public space. In fact, they all attached much significance to the meetings and
to the very fact of speaking. The structure of their narratives follows a common scheme of
life stories (on life histories and their structure: Passeron 1990, Bourdieu 1986; Gergen
1997, 172-176; Polkinghorne 1997, 27-31). They centre on the justification of getting
papers and, in a coherent way, coordinate the different elements of their stories to arrive at
this end.
The womens stories start with their arrival in France and end implicitly with their
regularisation or a forced return to their countries of origin. On the one hand, theirnarratives dont transcend the starting point of arrival in France. Aspects of their life before
emigration are completely absent of their stories and thus can be understood as life
histories without depth (Girola 1996). On the other hand, the stories do not exceed their
ends either. The women neither have any imagination of a life with papers nor concrete
information what might happen if they had to leave the country. As far as the details of
emigration are concerned, all women mention a difficult economic situation (low wages 6
of 10, unemployment 2 of 10, job offer by a French employer 1 of 10, one women came to
France for medical treatment). For 5 of 10 women the decision of emigration goes with a
difficult personal situation (divorce or break up of a long relationship, death of the partner,
traumatic experience). Thus, the decision to migrate is located in a combination of events
that distinguish clearly from life as usual and combine to an extreme situation that forces
them to leave their country.
The stories end with the impossibility of return, which is due to the same economic reasons
that lead to emigration: We would have to begin right from the start, we wouldnt have
money or a job (Meeting RAJFIR, Paris, July 18, 1999). In addition to that, their families
depend economically from the womens income in France. They all need us! (Miriam),
with our work on the side we make them live (Malika) (Meeting RAJFIR, Paris,
September 19, 1999).
What is even more important, gender relations implicitly play an important role in their
representations. In general, they enjoy the independence of women in French society
compared to their Muslim home countries: In France we are used to a way of living, we
are used to the habits (Tania), we appreciate the liberty of women, in Morocco, a
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
18/24
18
women cant go out at any time (Khadija), we cant take any responsibilities (Khadija)
(Meeting RAJFIR, Paris, July 18, 1999). Miriam concludes: When you have seen some
light, you cant go back. (Meeting RAJFIR, Paris, September 19, 1999). The important
point is, that most of the women do not use these possibilities, for example they dont go
out late etc. What is important is their existence. The women mention these aspects as a
reason why they are not willing to return. In addition to that, in the case of return, they
would be considered as liberal women, as a prostitute (Meeting RAJFIR, Paris, July 18,
1999) for having lived alone or with relatives (which is the case for the majority of them) in
France at an age between 30 and 50. Under these conditions it would nearly be impossible
to get married, nor would it be possible to live on their own; the fact of emigration makes
them loose their position in their countries of origins society.
Between these two fixed points of the inevitability of leaving and the impossibility of
return, their narratives place the life in France. Due to their status as undocumented
migrants, this life is suffering or suffering in silence (Miriam, Meeting RAJFIR, Paris,
July 18, 1999): The fact of having no papers separates them from their families for years
and implies low wages, insufficient health services, the constant danger of having to leave
the country etc. Therefore, following the logic of their stories, the only solution to a better
life in France is receiving papers.
Hence, the impossibility of return, related to gender issues, turns out to dominate the
womens representations. In addition to that, by telling their story to French feminists, they
not only make sense of their own story that consists in justifying their migration project but
also develop these emerging gender identities as one part of the story. Despite a relatively
weak general mobilisation of the movement at this time and despite of political
entrepreneurs that had lost their credibility and thus their force of mobilising the unit, the
women were extremely determined and motivated to action. Hence, in this case, the actors
representations turn out to be more powerful in motivating to collective action as the role of
political entrepreneurs: The leaders of the womens unit lost their power; the French
feminists took in some way over their role but never could have succeeded without meeting
the womens representations.
The second and last example refers to the West African migrants who launched the
movement. One can distinguish two notions that are crucial to the immigrants
representations of migration and collective action as well as the way they conceive the ties
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
19/24
19
to their countries of origin: On the one hand their representations centre on the notion of
justice, on the other hand on the notion of dignity.
First, the notion of justice is situated in the context of colonial and neo-colonial relations
between France and their countries of origin. The sans-papiers used the argument of
colonial ties as a strategic argument to address the French public and media.9 On the other
hand, it constituted a powerful means of mobilisation of their own basis precisely because
of the representations of social relations it expressed. The sans-papiers considered the fact
of living without papers in France as unjust, regarding the devasting effects of colonialism
and neo-colonialism. By doing so, they expressed a representation concerning the structure
and functioning of social relations that is based on exchange and which can frequently be
observed in many African countries (Olivier de Sardan 1996). Even if the partners are by nomeans equal, the fact of giving something to someone or of doing someone a favour implies
the obligation of the latter to do so in turn. Malik, a sans-papiers from Senegal put it this
way, expressing the entire ambiguity of colonial relations: Africa is in the ownership of
France, colonisation has also been for showing the way but France has also taken profit
of Africa, France has an obligation towards Africa (Interview, Paris, September 21,
1999). What is called obligation in this quotation, is expressed in more political terms by
Madjigune Ciss who spoke of shared responsibilities (Interview, Berlin, December 12,
1999). In a similar way, the West-African migrants conceived politics within the movement.
For example, most of them precisely considered this contract as broken, when the left who
had expressed its sympathy with the movement in public, after winning the elections of
1997, proceeded only to insufficient measures of regularisation, according to the sans-
papiers perception. Malik, from Senegal, expressed this fact as follows: The left had won
the elections with the help of the sans-papiers, the left has taken profit of the sans-papiers,
French people approved [the regularisation of the sans-papiers], the left had claimed
regularisation of all but it didnt keep its promises. (Interview, Paris, September 21,1999).
The notion of justice can also be found at the very beginning of the movement. During the
presidential elections of 1995, African migrants without papers supported Jacques Chirac
9 By doing so, they dialogued with the representations of French supporters who experienced thediscussions on colonialism as reconciliation: We spoke of history, we spoke of the history of France,obviously, I mean, of what touched us and of what weight heavily upon on us in this history. And I think,
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
20/24
20
because of his discourse on social cleavages and social injustice. After his election, he
expected him to keep his electoral promises. As concrete measures did not come, they
decided to pass to action (Interview, Paris, September 17, 1999).
Closely linked to this notion of justice is the sans-papiers representation of their relations
to the French state and society. For them, it went without saying that they had the right to
stay in France under human conditions. Malik stated I will lower my head in Germany but
I wont lower my head in France, we have the right to be here. Other countries had the
right to restrict immigration, if Germany says, we do not want to have any immigrants, it
has the right to do so, on the contrary, this wasnt true for France (Interview, Paris,
September 21, 1999). During the occupation of St. Bernard, a young woman expressed this
representation of the sans-papiers concerning their position in France: We have to explainto the French that they must change their legislation. That is why we are here and why we
continue. (Hahn 1996, 11).
As far as the notion of dignity is concerned, like the notion of justice it has to be understood
with regard to the cultural background of African migrants and the relations between
migrants in France and the families in their respective countries of origin. In fact, these
relations remain very close and the migrants consider their project of migration as a kind of
adventure aiming at a significant contribution to the development of their village (Timera
1997, 99f). In general, the whole family takes the migration decision, organises, and
finances the journey. Therefore, the migrant has a duty of reimbursement towards the
family. In general, the family takes the decision of migration. It is discussed within the
family and, in fact, there will be someone chosen to leave and who has to represent the
interests of those who remain. Thats it. There is a kind of debt vis--vis the rest of the
family (Madjigune Ciss, Interview, Berlin, December 12, 1999). It follows that the
migrants aim above all at economic success, the latter determining their hierarchical
position within the community of migrants in France but also with respect to their families
(Timera 1997, 101f). And precisely this success and its location within cultural patterns is
constitutes the centre of the notion of dignity: A friend of mine keeps saying, I dont
know, it is a question of dignity. Because I left my country not for fun, you know. It is
precisely because I couldnt stand the situation there anymore and I wanted to help my
parents, my family etc. ... So, he keeps saying, if you ever find my in a plane, with
this was really extraordinary, because after all, it was something like reconciliation (Interview, Paris,
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
21/24
21
handcuffs and without luggage and nothing ... this concerns my dignity (Madjigune
Ciss, Interview, Berlin, December 12, 1999).
If a legal status is not necessarily a condition for economic success, it is certainly the
condition for a stable contract, a regular income, and the possibility to visit ones family in
his or her home country. It follows, that a legal status in France determines ones position in
hierarchical relations to other migrants and within family relations (Timera 1997, 102).
Work without papers is not valued as real work because of its uncertainty in time and
income (Meeting Collectif des sans -papiers, Paris, August 31, 1999). On the other hand,
economic success is honoured by ones family and village: Madjigune Ciss reports the
case of one of the sans-papiers of St. Bernard who, while staying in France, had been
elected mayor of his village in Mali because of his success and his considerablecontribution to village development (Interview, December 12, 1999, Berlin).
As far as participation in the movement is concerned, the sans-papiers often understood
their action in these terms of dignity and obligation to success: Being sans-papiers is like
hunting, you know. And if you ever come back from hunting with empty hands, you are
ashamed ... So, this is like he [person of whom she was speaking above] understood it. So,
we went occupying St. Ambroise etc. and he, he said, I even couldnt return to the place
where I live. Because some of the people there asked me, what are you doing? You will be
presenting yourself to the television etc. And he, he said, If I come back without papers, I
never could look at these people because this concerns my dignity (Interview on
December 12, 1999, Berlin).
Thus, this example offers important insights into the migrants motivations for participating
in the movement. These motivations transcend the selective incentive of handing in ones
dossier to an association etc. Precisely, the representations presented in this example,
explain more in detail ones motivations, or interests to reach special gains provided by
selective incentives.
5. Conclusion:
To conclude, the results of this research on the movement of the sans-papiers provide an
example of how actors representations, understood as a central part of their identity,
September 16, 1999).
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
22/24
22
constructed by an interactive process of narration, transcend approaches of resource
mobilisation. Further more, they also crosscut theories of framing, the latter gaining special
importance within the movement of the sans-papiers. The conclusion of representations
crosscutting theoretical approaches can therefore be completed by the result of a
diversification of theoretical approaches (resource mobilisation, framing, collective
identity) explaining the mobilisation of groups drawing on weak resources.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
23/24
23
6. References
Ein neues Verhltnis von Nord und Sd (1996). Der Kampf der Sans Papiers inFrankreich. Radiobeitrag fr den WDR, Kritisches Tagebuch am 13.11.1996.
Blatt, David (1997): Immigrant Politics in a Republican Nation. In: Hargreaves, AlecG./McKinney, Mark (Hrsg.): Post-Colonial Cultures in France. London, New York:Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986): Lillusion biographique. In: Actes de la recherche en sciencessociales, no. 62-63, juin, S. 69-72.
Castells, Manuel (1997): The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. II: ThePower of Identity, Oxford.
Diop, Ababacar (1997):Dans la peau dun sans-papiers. Paris: Seuil.
Fillieule, Olivier (1993): Lanalyse des mouvements sociaux: pour une problmatique
unifie. In: Fillieule, Oliver (sous la dirction de): Sociologie de la protestation.Les formes de laction collective dans la France contemporaine, Paris:LHarmattan, S. 29-64.
Geertz, Clifford (1973): The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Gergen, Kenneth J (1998): Erzhlung, moralische Identitt und historisches Bewutsein.In: Straub, Jrgen (Hrsg.): Erzhlung, Identitt und historisches Bewutsein. Diepsychologische Konstruktion von Zeit und Geschichte. Frankfurt am Main:suhrkamp, S. 170-202.
Girola, Claudia M (1996): Rencontrer des personnes sans abri. In: Politix, no. 34, S. 87-98.
Hahn, Dorothea (1996): Aufstand der Heimatlosen. In: die tageszeitung, no. 4999,13.08.1996, S. 11.
Hall, Stuart (1996): Introduction: Who needs identity?. In: Hall, Stuart (Hrsg): Questionsof cultural identity . London: Sage.
Hellmann, Kai-Uwe (1997): Marginalisierung und Mobilisierung. Konzeptionelleberlegungen zur Emergenz und Mobilisierung von Marginalisierten. In:Forschungsjournal NSB, Jg. 10, Heft 2.
Hellmann, Kai-Uwe (1998): Paradigmen der Bewegungsforschung. Forschungs- undErklrungsanstze - ein berblick. In: Hellmann, Kai-Uwe, Koopmans, Ruud(Hrsg.): Paradigmen der Bewegungsforschung. Entstehung und Entwicklung vonneuen sozialen Bewegungen und Rechtsextremismus. Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag.
Hessel, Stphane (1997):Danse avec le sicle . Paris: Seuil.
Kebadian, Jacques (Regie) (1999): Dune brousse lautre/Hommes de pays loin.Dokumentarfilm, Paris: La Lanterne.
Kliment, Tibor (1998): Durch Damatisierung zum Protest? Theoretische Grundlegung undempirischer Ertrag des Framing-Konzepts. In: Hellmann, Kai-Uwe, Koopmans,Ruud (Hrsg.): Paradigmen der Bewegungsforschung. Entstehung und Entwicklungvon neuen sozialen Bewegungen und Rechtsextremismus. Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag, S.69-89.
-
8/13/2019 Session Et Al. - Representing the Other
24/24
24
Martin, Denis-Constant (1989): A la qute des OPNI. Comment traiter linvention dupolitique?.Revue franaise de science politique, dcembre.
Martin, Denis-Constant (1995): The Coices of Identity. In: Social Identities, vol. 1, no. 1.
Martin, Denis-Constant 1(994): Introduction. Identits et Politique. Rcit, mythe etidologie. In: Martin, Denis-Constant (Ed.): Cartes didentit, comment dit-onnous en politique? Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciencespolitiques.
McCarthy, John/Zald Mayer N (1973): The Trend of Social Movements in America:Professionalization And Resource Mobilization. Morristown: N. J.
McCarthy, John/Zald Mayer N (1977): Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: APartial Theory. In:American Sociological Review, vol. 82, no. 6, S. 1212-1241.
Melucci, Alberto (1995): The Process of Collective Identity. In: Johnston,Hank/Kandermans, Bert (Eds.): Social Movements and Culture, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, S. 41-63.Melucci, Alberto (1996): Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age.
Camebridge.
Obershall, Anthony (1973): Social Conflict and Social Movements, New Jersey.
Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre (1996): lconomie morale de la corruption . In : Politiqueafricaine, 63.
Passeron, Jean-Claude (1990): Biographies, flux, itinraires, trajectoires. In: Revuefranaise de sociologie , no. 1, vol. 31, S. 3-22.
Polkinghorne, Donald E. (1998): Narrative Psychologie und Geschichtsbewutsein. In:
Straub, Jrgen (Hrsg.): Erzhlung, Identitt und historisches Bewutsein. Diepsychologische Konstruktion von Zeit und Geschichte. Frankfurt am Main:suhrkamp, S. 12-45.
Polletta, Francesca (1997): Culture and Ist Discontents: Recent Theorizing on the culturalDimensions of Protest. In: Sociological Inquiry, vo. 67, no. 4, november, S. 431-450.
Roth, Roland (1998): Patch-Work. Kollektive Identiten neuer sozialer Bewegungen.In: Hellmann, Kai-Uwe, Koopmans, Ruud (Hrsg.): Paradigmen derBewegungsforschung. Entstehung und Entwicklung von neuen sozialen Bewegungen
und Rechtsextremismus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, S. 51-68.
Simant, Johanna (1998):La cause des Sans-papiers. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Snow et al. (1986): Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement
Participation. In:American Sociolgoical Review, vo. 51, S. 464-481.
Snow, David A./Benford, Robert D. (1988): Ideology, Frame Resonance, and ParticipantMobilization, in: Klandermans, Bert (Ed.): International Social MovementResearch. vol. 1, S. 197-217.
Timera, Mahamet (1997): Sans-papiers africains face aux communauts dorigine. In:Fassin, Didier/Morice, Alain/Quiminal, Catherine (sous la dirction de): Les lois delinhospitalit. Les politiques de limmigration lpreuve des sans-papiers . Paris:La Dcouverte, S. 95-106.