session 3 | participating in the 2018 call for proposals how to ......from main to sub criteria •...

32
Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to write a good BBI JU proposal WI-FI user: xicb510 | password: Meeting Polyvios Hadjiyiangou Call Coordinator Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking (BBI JU)

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals

How to write a goodBBI JU proposal

WI-FIuser: xicb510 | password: Meeting

Polyvios HadjiyiangouCall CoordinatorBio-based Industries Joint Undertaking(BBI JU)

Page 2: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

The recipe for success

Impact

Excellence

Implementation

Impact

High competition/quality proposals

Even if you have unique expertise, it is not enough

to be successful (competition within a

budget line)

Every word counts…within the page limit

Impact

Page 3: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

The central role of expert-evaluators

• ‘Overlap’ between topic and proposal– No overlap– Full overlap– Partial overlap

• Evaluation (sub)criteria– The ‘bridge’ between topic text and proposal

Topic Proposal

Page 4: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

From main to subcriteria

• Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria– ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020 subcriteria– BBI JU-specific subcriteria

• Differences between ‘types of action’– Coordination & Support Actions (CSAs)– Research & Innovation Actions (RIAs)– Innovation Actions (IAs)

• DEMOs• Flagships

Page 5: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Excellence: WHAT?

Excellence: WHAT?

Page 6: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Clarity and pertinence of the objectives

– Are the objectives:clear,structured, well-quantified (if applicable),

Objective Description (Specific) Target values (Measurable) Achieved at time

Specific challenges of the call/topic

Addressed challenges in proposal WPs

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

linked (pertinent) to the topic text?

Page 7: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Soundness of the concept andcredibility of the proposed methodology

– ‘Concept’: the ‘big idea’ behind the proposal Concept in a “nutshell” (diagram)

– ‘Proposed methodology’: • How to go from ‘big idea’ to reaching the stated objectives• Have all elements described in the topic text been taken into account• e.g. All proposals should commit to conducting, as part of the project, a

life-cycle assessment (LCA)RIA: (e.g. brief explanation and a dedicated WP) IA: should also assess the economic and environmental impacts, as

well as the social impact if applicable, by the time of submission.

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Page 8: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Extent that proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential.

– What is the state of the art (SoA) (evaluated as is)? – What’s the benchmark?– how does your proposal go beyond the SoA?– Tip for RIA: clearly describe the (start and end) TRLs

Item e.g.Technology

State of the art Progress compared to SoA

H2020 subcriteria (RIAs and IAs)

Page 9: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Coverage of the whole value chainBBI JU-specific subcriterion (IAs)

Page 10: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Coverage of the whole value chain

– Why? IAs are close to market => this subcriterion checks that your idea takes into account biomass, processing and end products and markets (e.g. coverage of the value chain in a nutshell – diagram);

– Why not in RIAs? Because RIAs (topic-specific) can focus on a specific technological problem in a part of the value chain

Page 11: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Impact: SO WHAT?

Excellence: WHAT?

Impact: SO

WHAT?

Page 12: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Importance of impact

• BBI JU focuses on impact– Impact score: max. 5/5 (like ‘Excellence’ and

‘Implementation’)...– ...but threshold is 4/5 ( 3/5 in ‘Excellence’ and

‘Implementation’)...– ...and weighting factor of 1,5 in IAs

impact has become more and more important in EU funding (evaluations)

Page 13: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Outputs of the project vs. the expected impactsmentioned in the work plan

– Are all ‘expected impacts’ listed in the topic text dealt with...– ...in a qualitative AND quantitative manner?– Any other impacts that could result from the project and are not

mentioned in the Call?

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Page 14: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

BBI JU specific objectives: demonstratetechnologies; develop business models,set up flagship biorefinery plants: KPI 1 New cross-sector interconnections in bio-based economyKPI 2 New bio-based value chainsKPI 3 Cooperation projectsKPI 4 New building blocks based on biomass of European origin validated at demonstration scaleKPI 5 New bio-based building materialsKPI 6 New demonstrated ‘consumer’ products based on bio-based chemicals and materialsKPI 7 Flagships resulting from BBI JU-funded projects

BBI JU KPIs

Page 15: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Outputs of the project vs. the expected impactsmentioned in the work plan

– Tip: describe explicitly how your proposal contributes to each listed ‘expected impact’, e.g. via a table.

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Impacts listed in the call Project’s impacts

… …

Page 16: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Exploitation, dissemination and communication ofproject results (including IPR and - where relevant -research data management)

– Dissemination & exploitation: more than an eligibility criterion; this is also evaluated by experts

– Tips: • Also provide quantative data (how many conferences,

publications, target audiences,...) => be specific, avoid ‘generic’ diss./comm./expl. plans

• Include relevant (also public) deliverables• Explicitly describe IPR (Intellectual Property Rights)

management

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Page 17: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Extent to which the proposed consortium owncontribution, including additional investments, will helpin maximising the impact of the action– Clearly describe if and how much “own contribution” (‘in-kind’,

‘Financial Transfers’ and/or ‘additional investments’) is included in the proposal...

– ...AND explain how this will maximise the impact of the action – Don’t just list the amounts, also explain them

H2020 subcriteria (RIAs and IAs)

Page 18: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

“Own contribution” in proposal - Part A:

– ‘In-kind’: can be derived from budget table (e.g. € 1 million costs, € 650k requested BBI JU contribution = € 350k ‘in-kind’)

– ‘Additional investments’ and ‘Financial Transfers’: cf. call-specific questions in the proposal’s ‘part A’

Page 19: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Part A: Call-Specific Questions

Page 20: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

“Own contribution” in proposal?

• Part A:– ‘In-kind’: can be derived from budget table (e.g. € 1 million costs,

€ 650k requested BBI JU contribution = € 350k ‘in-kind’)– ‘Financial Transfers’ and ‘additional investments’: cf. call-specific

questions in the proposal’s ‘part A’• Part B:

– To be described in more detail (incl. their impact) in section 3.4 (‘resources to be committed’)

– Additional investments and Financial Transfers: cf. table in Guide for Applicants (GfA)

Page 21: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Entity ActivityContribution to the BBI JU

objectives

Estimated private

investment

(M€)

Estimated value

public investment

(M€)1

Other EU funding received

Beneficiary providing financial transfers

Beneficiary receiving financial transfers

Amount of financial transfers (€)

List of activities to be performed by the receiving beneficiary

Additional investments

Financial Transfers

“Own contribution” in proposal - Part B:

Page 22: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Implementation: HOW?

Excellence:WHAT?

Implemen-tation: HOW?

Impact: SO WHAT?

Page 23: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Quality and effectiveness of the work plan(incl. deliverables), including resource allocation

The Proposed methodology is how to go from ‘big idea-concept’ to reaching the stated objectives. However, even the ‘good’ approach (‘Excellence’) needs a good work plan (‘Implementation’).

– Presentation of the overall structure of the work planObjectivesDescription of workTasksDeliverables

– Tip: check coherence of budget allocation and timing throughout the proposal (e.g. list of deliverables and Gantt chart: same timing?)

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

BBI JU FAQ: difference between methodology (‘Excellence’) and work plan (‘Implementation’)?

Page 24: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Allocation of tasks, ensuring that all participantshave a valid role and adequate resources

– convince expert-evaluators that the consortium members have specific role, e.g. via resource allocation (money talks...)

– What is a valid (unique) role?: If one participant “disappears” with its task, can the project be successfully implemented?

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Page 25: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management.

– Consortium of 5 or 20 members: different management (structures) needed

– ‘Innovative’ management techniques are not necessary; it needs to work!– Tips:

• explicitly mention / describe risk and innovation management...• ...and include ‘real’ risks and mitigation measures• Low – medium – high (?)Examples:

– Low interest from external stakeholders to be involved in the project – WPs' estimated resources not well enough balanced – Slow or inefficient communication between project management and consortium

H2020 subcriteria (all actions)

Page 26: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Soundness of thebusiness case and business plan

– Why? IAs are close to market => business case and business plan are needed

– How to present? See Guide for Applicants and proposal template (bullet points describing business case & plan requirements)

– FAQ: how much info is needed? • “(Further) details can be provided in part B –

sections 4-5” (= not included in 70-page limit) • (Only) for Flagships: clarifications via hearings

BBI JU-specific subcriterion (IAs)

Page 27: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

BBI JU-specific subcriteria (IAs)

• Readiness of the technology– Tip (bis): clearly indicate the start and end TRLs – “In particular, for flagships applicants must demonstrate

that by the time of the submission of their application they have been operating relative demonstration scale plants at a significant production capacity (justification shall be provided in the proposal).”

e.g. Technology TRL at project start TRL that will be achieved at the end of the project

Page 28: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Significance of ImplementationCall 2017 case

Successful proposals (invited to GAP)

Proposals on reserve list (= passing all thresholds)

Proposals not passing ≥ 1 threshold(s)

‘Excellence’ 4.85 4.27 2.86

‘Impact’ 4.85 4.24 3.39

‘Implementation’ 4.91 4.1 3.12

• Biggest ‘difference to 5’ in ‘implementation’

Page 29: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

How to write a good proposal

• Ensure that all information is explicitly described in order to allow the expert-evaluators to assess against the evaluation subcriteria.

• How?– Be aware of the evaluation subcriteria of ‘your’ type of action (CSA,

RIA, IA)... – ...and provide (explicit) answers to these subcriteria in your

proposal... – ...using the proposal structure / template described in the Guide

For Applicants (GfA)

Page 30: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

Where to find more info

• BBI JU website– https://www.bbi-europe.eu/participate/call-proposals-2018– Links to Guide for Applicants, FAQ, National Contact Points (NCPs),

European IPR helpdesk, BIC, EEN (Enterprise Europe Network),...– Overview (incl. URLs): see Q0.1 of Call 2018 ‘FAQ for Applicants’

• Participant Portal, Horizon 2020 online manual (find a call, register organisations, submit proposal)

[email protected]

Page 31: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

The recipe for success

Excellence

Implementation

Impact

Impact

Page 32: Session 3 | Participating in the 2018 Call for proposals How to ......From main to sub criteria • Different ‘types’ of evaluation subcriteria – ‘Standard’ Horizon 2020

WI-FIuser: xicb510 | password: Meeting

Thank you!