session 11 deviance
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
按一下以編輯母片副標題樣式
Session 11Crime and Deviance: Defining Normality and Outsiders
Lecturer: Dr. Cheris Shun-Ching Chan
What is Deviance?
What is deviance? Behaviors deviate from a socially acceptable
mode, from norms and social expectations of a particular social group
Can receive negative or positive sanctions Vary temporally and spatially, e.g.
homosexuals Socially constructed, e.g. killings
Since the 1950s: mass conformity to middle-class values & lifestyles the concept of “deviance” became prominent
Definition
How to explain Deviance?
Functionalist PerspectiveMarxian PerspectiveSymbolic Interactionist Perspective2
3
1
Functionalist Perspective
Anomie Theory (Robert Merton)
Theory of Status Frustration (Albert Cohen)
1. Anomie Theory (Robert Merton) Builds on Durkheim’s anomie but broader
and more specific: crime, delinquency, mental disorder, alcoholism,
drug addiction, and many others Frequency and pattern of deviant behaviors vary
within different social structures Key ideas: discrepancy b/w culturally defined
goals and availability of institutionalized (legitimate) means to achieve such goals
Deviant acts due to two conditions: i) pressure to achieve the culturally defined goals + ii) not available of legitimate means
Functionalist Perspective
Different types of adaptation in different positions in a social structure
Conclusion: Different distribution of legitimate opportunities different rate
of deviance among different social classes Deviance is a normal reaction to an abnormal social situation
Functionalist Perspective
Conformity
Culturally defined goals
Legitimate means
Ritualism
Retreatism or Rebellion
Innovation
Yes
No
Yes No
Functionalist Perspective2. Theory of Status Frustration (Albert Cohen)
As a critique of Merton’s Anomie Theory Gradual process of deviant adaptation Crimes are in collective, in gang, rather than individualistic
Advancement of Merton’s Theory Dominant set of middle-class values, e.g. rational,
postponing gratification, individualistic, respect for property, control of physical aggression
Working class has another set of characteristics Working class children in middle-class school setting: value
conflict → status frustration, they behave in a way that middle class school think problematic
Status frustration → delinquent subculture: redefines the criteria of status, turning disvalued characteristics into status-giving assets(they are valued in these subculture)(e.g those who dare enough to challenge the teacher will get their status)
Equivalent to “rebellion” in Merton’s theory → they don't buy into the culturally defined goal and also they don't use the legitimate means to achieve the goal, they set up their own goal, but more specific
Marxian Perspective
Critical Theory
Marxian Perspective Concept of Society: conflict of interests
(composed of diff social groups, ow which interests are in conflict)
Questions: why crime and deviance are found more in lower class? Who define what is deviant and what is not?
Answers: socially and economically powerful groups have
more influence in defining crime and problem more capable of escaping from a charge, they can hire best
lawyers to defend them, they could gain sympathy not about ethically right or wrong
Major Concerns:
The formation and enforcement of certain rules and lawspolitical, economic, and social structures
Critical Theory1. Crime in Capitalist Society (Richard Quinney)
Role of the state: to protect the interests of the dominant class
Role of the law: coercive force of the state, serving the interests of the dominant class, e.g. private property in capitalist society → primary duty of the state
Different types of crimes produced by capitalismi) Crimes of economic domination, e.g. price fixing, monopoly, importation of labor(suppress wage of labour force) marxian perspective, they are crimeii) Crimes of control, e.g. violence used by police force and armies(physical violence against suspects) iii) Crimes of social injuries, e.g. pollution, harsh working environmentiv) Crimes of accommodation, e.g. burglary, robbery, assault, murder(commonly defined)v) Crimes of resistance, e.g. strike, protest(sometimes commonly defined)
What are commonly defined as crimes? Which crimes receive most attention?
Other types are for the interest of the dominant class, those with economic and political capital, they are committed to the adv of the dominant class, not defined as crime in our society
Critical Theory2. A Study of Law Enforcement in Seattle (William
Chambliss) What are crimes
bribery, gambling, prostitutes, illegal liquor selling, other consensus crimes
What are the most common crimes? Bribery in gambling industry, loan sharks, drugs(involved ppl
with money and power), pornography, vice and prostitute What did get arrested?
70% of all arrests (in 1962-1972) were for public drunkenness → working class plp
Conclusion Everyone commits crime of some sorts; crime is a matter of
who can pin the label on whom Criminal acts serving the interests of the ruling class
usually go unsanctioned Enforcement of law is biased against ppl who are powerless
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
Labeling Theory Outsiders (Howard Becker)Primary and Secondary Deviation (Edwin Lemert)
1. Labeling Theory Why some killings are “homicides” and others are not?
Is a police officer killed by an ex-convict a homicide? yes
Is a robber killed by a police officer a homicide? no
Is stabbing an old lady in the back a homicide? yes
Is stabbing one’s enemy in wartime a homicide? no
Is someone poisoned by someone a homicide? yes
Is someone dying slowly of cancer caused by polluting factor a homicide?
No
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Homicide or not → social reactions → punishments or
awards What is homicide is not the behavior per se, but the manner of
reaction to a killing, based on the perceived motives of the killings
Focus How people define situations, persons, processes, or events as
problematic and deviant Major concerns
Conditions under which control agents successfully label others Social contingencies under which potential deviants resist or
escape the labeling(other factors involved that lead to the results) The power behind the labeling process: different power related to
age, sex, ethnicity, class, occupation… The symbolic and practical consequences of the labeling
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Critique of official statistics
Perceptual biases of control agents(like the police)
Appearance and socio-economic backgrounds Situational dynamics of the labeling process
Cooperative posture Complaints, quota
Visibility of potential deviants Numerous invisible crimes
Organizational characteristics of control bureaucracies
Strict vs lenient, e.g. Russia → corruption of police is normal
Political agenda of the official data Asking for more resources vs being a tourist paradise Report more crimes in order to get more resources Under reported crime in hawaii → create image of
crime free city
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
2. Outsiders (Howard Becker) Deviance is created by society
By making rules Reaction to someone's behaviour → deviance
Variation of reactions to an act Who commits the act Who feels being harmed by the act The consequence of the act
Symbolic Interactionist Perspective3. Primary and Secondary Deviation (Edwin Lemert)
Primary deviation Initial acts of deviation that calls societal reaction Causes: random, diverse factors
Secondary deviation Acts of deviation as a reaction to societal
reaction Traumatization of self-concept: looking glass self
(Cooley) → when I see other ppl's reaction, I will perceive myself in this lense
Deviant role: recurring deviant acts(some ex-convicts deliberately commit crimes in order to get back to the prison)
E.g. paranoia Self-fulfilling prophecy