session 1 intro & comp adv (1)

Upload: kopal-bansal

Post on 07-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    1/33

    1

    Comparative AdvantageInternational Trade Session 1

    Daniel TRAA

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    2/33

    |2

    Globalization I:Increased trade in goods and services

    Trade has grown faster than GDP

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    1980 1985 1990 1995

    Trade(%G

    DP)

    World High income Low & middle income

    mostly for East Asia; it has fallen for Africa

    0

    15

    30

    45

    E-Asia &

    Pac.

    Lat. Am. &

    Carib.

    Mid East, N

    Af

    South Asia Sub-S.

    Africa

    Exports(%G

    DP)

    1960 1970 1980 1990 1998

    International Trade involves mostly exchanges among high income

    countries.

    Developing countries have increased their relevance, particularly East

    Asia, but are still a small part.

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    3/33

    |3

    Trade in services andmerchandise

    Most of world trade is ingoods (merchandise) 82%.

    Services trail behind, butare the fastest growingcomponent.

    Outsourcing is the latesttrend

    Share of goods and commercial services in total trade

    (Percentages, based on balance of payments data)

    Export Shares Import Shares

    Goods CommercialServices

    Goods CommercialServices

    World 81.4 18.6 81.4 18.6

    North America 77.2 22.8 85.9 14.1

    Latin America 86.0 14.0 84.1 15.9

    Western Europe 78.8 21.2 79.4 20.6

    Africa 81.5 18.5 76.8 23.2

    Egypt 42.5 57.8 68.2 31.8

    Nigeria 93.8 6.2 71.1 28.9

    Asia 85.7 14.3 81.3 18.7

    India 71.4 28.6 73.4 26.6

    Indonesia 92.8 7.2 72.3 27.7

    Japan 87.1 12.9 74.8 25.2

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    4/33

    |4

    Globalization II:Foreign Investment - complexstrategies of multinationals

    Global FDI Flows 2000 1995 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970

    FDI in millions of dollars 1,270,764 331,068 202,297 56,583 54,725 25,850 12,542

    FDI per capita (dollars) 210.3 58.8 41.4 12.8 13.6 9.8 5.3

    FDI as percentage of GDP 3.12 1.13 0.96 0.48 0.52 0.49 0.48

    FDI as percentage of exports 19.99 6.45 6.05 3.10 2.95 3.33 4.56

    Gross foreign direct investment (% of GD

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1976 1981 1986 1991 1996

    World High income Low & middle incom

    Share of FDI flows, by grou

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    1980 1985 1990 1995

    Low income

    Middle income

    High income

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    5/33

    |5

    Drivers of Modern Globalization

    Lower transport and

    communication costs

    Development of international

    institutions

    The WTO

    Regional Trade Agreements

    Political decisions toward de-

    regulation and liberalization oftrade and FDI regulations

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    6/33

    |6

    Theory and practice of internationaltrade and foreign investmentWHAT WE WILL LEARN

    Why do countries export certain goods and imports others?

    What do countries and populations gain and loose from trade?

    Why do multinationals exist and what are their effects?

    Why do governments protect their industries and what are the

    costs and benefits?

    What are the effects of different protectionist instruments?

    How do the institutions that regulate global trade work?

    What have been the economic and social consequences of the rise

    in trade and foreign investment with developing nations?

    What has globalization brought to developing countries?

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    7/33|7

    Organization of the course

    Theories of international trade

    Comparative advantage

    Gains from trade: static anddynamic

    Losers and winners

    Trade policy

    Policy Instruments

    The case for free-trade and

    exceptions

    Policies for Strategic sectors

    Political economy and therealist view

    The effects of modernglobalization

    Trade and thedeveloping countries

    Multinationals and FDI The effects in

    industrialized countries

    Institutions of global

    trade The W.T.O

    Regional agreements

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    8/33|8

    Materials and exams

    course website: www.danieltraca.com

    Download class slides before class from website

    Also available at GES

    Practice exams and answer keys available at website.List of required sections available from website

    Recommended textbook

    International Economics, 7th edby Krugman P. and Obstfeld M., Addison-Wesley

    Available in French

    Additional readings available at website

    http://www.danieltraca.com/http://www.danieltraca.com/
  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    9/339

    The theory of ComparativeAdvantage

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    10/33|10

    Absolute Advantage

    It is the maxim of every prudent master ofthe family, never attempt to make at homewhat it will cost him more to make than buy What is prudent in the conduct of every familycan scarce be folly in that of a great kingdomIf a foreign country can supply us with acommodity cheaper than we ourselves canmake it, better buy it of them

    Adam Smith 1776

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    11/33|11

    Absolute Advantage

    Output per worker(productivity)

    93SOUTH

    810NORTH

    Food(bushels)

    Manufacturing(pieces)

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    12/33|12

    Gains from specialization

    Output

    before after

    1 northerner(FOOD toMANUF)

    8 Food 10 Manuf

    1 southerner

    (MANUF toFOOD)

    3 Manuf 9 Food

    North specializes inManufacturing and South inFood

    There is more of bothgoods, if specializationfollows absolute advantage

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    13/33|13

    Comparative Advantage

    "A country enabled to manufacturecommodities with much less labour thather neighbours may, in return for suchcommodities, import a fraction of the cornrequired for its consumption, even if

    corn could be grown with much less labourthan in the country from which it wasimported."

    David Ricardo

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    14/33|14

    Output per worker(Productivity)

    Manuf

    (pieces)

    Food

    (bushels)

    NORTH 10 10

    SOUTH 3 9

    Comparative AdvantageNorth is MORE productive in both goods

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    15/33|15

    Even so, there are gains fromspecialization

    2 x 918 Food

    2 x 36

    Manuf

    2 southerners(Manuf toFood)

    10Manuf

    10Food

    1 northerner(Food toManuf)

    afterbefore

    Output A country hasComparative Advantagein a given good if itsrelative productivity in

    that good is higher than inother goods

    Specialization according

    to ComparativeAdvantage createsvalue, by increasingoutput.

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    16/33|16

    How does the market work?

    Does the decentralized international market achieve this patternof specialization? How?

    Who benefits and who looses from international trade in the free-

    market? Among individuals within a country?

    Among countries?

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    17/33

    |17

    In Autarky...

    Food

    Manuf

    North

    Northern workerThey work in bothsectors, and tradeamong them at theautarky relative

    price

    The relative price

    P=pManuf /pFoodIn equilibrium,workers must beindifferent betweenthe two sectors.They must get thesame wage

    South

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    18/33

    |18

    The prices in autarky (closedeconomy)

    The relative price of Manuf (P) denotes how manybushels of Food for one piece of Manuf.

    9

    10

    Food(bushels)

    9/3 = 33SOUTH

    10/10 = 110NORTH

    PManuf

    (pieces)

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    19/33

    |19

    Relative prices, relative supply,relative demand

    1

    Manuf/Agro

    Relative demand (RDW)It is the same in both countries

    if preferences are the same

    P

    Relative Supply(RSN)NorthPN=

    3Relative Supply (RSs)SouthPS=

    [Manuf/Agro]S [Manuf/Agro]N

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    20/33

    |20

    In Autarky...

    Food

    Manuf

    North

    Northern worker Southern worker

    The Northernerstrade amongthem at theautarky price PN= 1

    Food

    Manuf

    South

    The Southerners

    trade amongthem at theautarky price PS=3

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    21/33

    |21

    Wages and productivity

    Are the wages the same in both sectors? Why? If not, where are they higher? Why?

    Are they the same in both countries? Why? If not, where are they higher? Why?

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    22/33

    |22

    The Production PossibilityFrontier and Welfare

    NorthManuf

    +1

    -1

    UN

    10

    10 Agro

    The choice of consumersdetermines the allocation of labor

    MRS=MUFood / MUManuf = 1/P =1

    Production

    Possibility

    Frontier

    -1/PN = -1

    Equilibrium P=1,

    So that both

    goods are

    produced

    Slope =

    -ProdF / ProdM

    Northern

    Workers in

    Agro

    N

    orthernW

    orkers

    inManuf

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    23/33

    |23

    The beginnings of Trade

    Manuf is relatively cheaper in the North. An enterprising Northerner takes 1 Manuf to the South

    and exchange it for 3 Foods.

    Back in the North, she could sell 1 Foods for 1 Manufwith a net gain of 1 Food.

    There are gains from exchange because pricesare different: Trade occurs!

    What happens to the relative price of Manuf in North? And in the South?

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    24/33

    |24

    Openness in the Short Run...

    Food Food

    Manuf Manuf

    1 . Trade

    starts due to

    arbitrage

    2 . Prices adjust to

    new scarcityP rises in the North and

    falls in the South

    SouthNorth

    PS < 9/3PN >10/10

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    25/33

    |25

    In the Long-Run, there is re-allocation

    Food Food

    Manuf Manuf

    North SouthEach country specializes

    completely in, and exports,the good in which it hascomparative advantage

    There is one worldprice, which is between

    the initial prices10/10 < PW 10/10

    3 . Factors (workers) respond to new prices and profitability -- specialization

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    26/33

    |26

    In the Long-Run, there is re-allocation

    Food Food

    Manuf Manuf

    North SouthEach country specializes

    completely in, and exports,the good in which it hascomparative advantage

    There is one worldprice, which is between

    the initial prices10/10 < PW 10/10

    3 . Factors (workers) respond to new prices and profitability -- specialization

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    27/33

    |27

    How to determine the worldprice?

    1

    3

    Manuf/Food

    Relative Supply (RSW)World

    South produces Food only

    North produces both

    North produces Manuf only

    South produces both

    NorthandSo

    uthspecialize

    completely

    NorthandSo

    uthprod

    uce

    onlyManuf

    North and

    South

    produce

    only Food

    Relative Demand (RDW)World

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    28/33

    |28

    The Gains from Trade accordingto Comparative Advantage

    North South

    10

    10 Food

    Manuf

    Food

    Manuf

    9

    3

    UN

    US

    PN=1

    PS=3

    US(Food)

    UN(Manuf)

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    29/33

    |29

    The Gains from Trade accordingto Comparative Advantage

    North South

    10

    10 Food

    Manuf

    Food

    Manuf

    9

    3

    UN

    US

    PN=1

    PS=3

    US(Food)

    UN(Manuf)

    1

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    30/33

    |30

    Some unrealistic features of themodel, so far

    What if there are transport costs?

    What if there are more than two goods?

    What if factors cannot adjust to other sectors?

    What if there are more than one factor?

    Why is there always complete specialization?

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    31/33

    |31

    Transport Costs and Non-tradedgoods

    If there are transport costs, the competitiveness edge of a

    country must more than make up for this transport cost.

    Otherwise, the good will not be traded, even if it is cheaperto produce in one country. This good is called non-tradable.

    In reality, economies spend large proportions of their income in

    these type of goods.

    It can become tradable, if transport costs fall or the

    productivity advantages widen (globalization).

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    32/33

    |32

    Global markets vs. local marketsTRADABLES and NON-TRADABLES

    Tradable goods can travelacross borders and haveinternational markets that setprices.

    Non-tradable goods have their

    prices set by supply anddemand in local markets. Often, the same good exists in

    different countries because itis produced locally.

    With globalization, manygoods and services havebecome tradable.

    Consulting

    Banking Telecoms

    Tourism

    Hairdressers

    Government

    services Auto-repair

    Almost allservices

    Services

    Textiles

    Machinery

    Almost allgoods

    Cement

    Housing

    McDonaldsHamburger

    Goods

    TradablesNon-

    tradables

  • 8/6/2019 Session 1 Intro & Comp Adv (1)

    33/33

    Summary

    Comparative advantage: Consumers react to price differences and buy from lower

    price foreign producers the goods in which their countrydoes not have comparative advantage (gains from

    exchange). Producers react to price differences and allocate

    resources to industries where relative productivity ishigher, exporting those goods (gains from specialization).

    Every country always has an industry in which ithas Comparative Advantage and it is competitivein world markets for that industry.