serious injury claims · • the bus driver has crush injuries to both legs. • there were 15...
TRANSCRIPT
Serious Injury Claims
James Arrowsmith Browne Jacobson LLP
Session Objectives
A brief introduction to how we: • Make good early reserving decisions • Identify reserving risks • Select tactical options to suit the case • Deal with problem opponents • Build a case from day 1 to get the best outcomes
The Ogden effect
• Female, age 30: Discount Rate 2.5% Minus 0.75% % change
Care/CM £250k pa
£7.7 million £19.2 million + 150%
Earnings £30k pa £0.6 million £1.1 million + 83%
Real Life
• PH’s car collided with a bus this morning.
• Since his call to the broker, nobody has managed to contact him.
• It looks like a serious incident, and so we need a reserve for Monday!
Initial investigations
Injuries
Information comes in that: • The bus driver has crush injuries to both legs. • There were 15 passengers on the bus of which 5
were admitted to hospital, one overnight • A child from the car is in ITU with a head injury • Their mother (a passenger in the car) was taken
away on a spinal board
Traumatic brain injury
Mechanism of injury
• Sudden external trauma causing damage to brain tissue = Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
• Open head injury – skull/brain tissue penetrated • Closed head injury – may have been a skull fracture
but no penetration of brain tissue
Mechanism of injury
• Primary brain damage – occurs at time of injury: – Haematomas, haemorrhages, bruising – Diffuse Axonal Injury
• Secondary brain damage
– Oedema, hypoxia, ischemia, pressure/herniation – the aftermath of the initial injury and results in a
large proportion of deaths/long term complications (immediate treatment key)
Severity of brain damage Early indicators: • Characteristics of accident or assault • MRI/CT scan undertaken? Are they on ITU? • Unconsciousness - depth and length • GCS Later on: • Results of brain scans and functional tests • Post traumatic amnesia • GCS
Postconcussional Syndrome
ICD 10 – A: syndrome that occurs following head trauma (usually sufficiently severe to result in loss of consciousness) and includes a number of disparate symptoms such as headache, dizziness, fatigue, irritability, difficulty in concentration and performing mental tasks, impairment of memory, insomnia, and reduced tolerance to stress, emotional excitement, or alcohol.
Core Evidence
• Neurologist – the nature of the brain injury sustained
• Neuropsychologist –impact on psychological processes such as emotion, perception, memory, language, intelligence and behaviour
• Care expert – will assess and cost reasonable care
needs (and, ideally, Occupational Therapy)
Further Evidence
• Neuropsychiatrist –mental disorders related to diseases of the nervous system.
• Psychiatrist – pure psychiatric disorders
• Accommodation expert
• Employment expert
Amputations
Overview
• Immediate loss of limb, or risk of loss
• Upper Limb Amputation: – Hand – Above/below elbow
• Lower limb Amputation.
– Above/below knee
Risk Factors
(a) Infection/Reduction; (b) Swelling; (c) Sensory loss or change; (d) Pain (e) Tumours (usually stemming from nerve damage); (f) Overuse of remaining limbs; (g) Disturbance in gait; (h) Further injury.
Impact
• Affects on daily living can be life changing:- (a) Self-Care; (b) Mobility; (c) Employment. (d) Accommodation
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Discount rate: 2.5% -0.75% • Prosthetic £300,000 £545,000 Potential Savings: • Earnings £450,000 £762,000 • Accommodation/adaptation £150,000 £150,000 • Activities/leisure £ 25,000 £45,000 • Alternative prosthetic £ 25,000 £45,000
Spinal Injuries
Spinal and back injuries
Level of Spinal Cord Injury
What decides quantum?
• Medical treatment –ventilation, bladder/bowel. • Therapy – pressure sore management, physio. • Care – transfers, turning • Mobility – wheelchair, driving, adapted vehicle • Self care – hygiene, nutrition • Accommodation – bungalow, automation, facilities • Social/recreational • Earnings
Extracting Information
• Investigation – press stories, employer (in EL), local knowledge.
• Cooperation – early communication • Rehabilitation – INA and insist on access to rehab
reports. • Strategy – use of court process, ADR process,
litigation, management of interim payments.
Chronic Pain
Which condition is it?
• Chronic Pain (any pain lasting over 6 months) • Neurogenic pain • Complex Regional Pain syndrome • Fibromyalgia • Somatoform conditions • Factitious Disorder • Malingering • Hypochondriasis
Identifying the condition
• Medical history and risk factors • Clinical Investigation– radiology, nerve conduction
studies • Explore the simple explanations
– orthopaedic, neurology • Cautious exploration of non-organic pain
– psychiatry, rheumatology • In patient investigation, monitoring and treatment
Real Pain or Real Fraud?
• Deliberate exaggeration, unconscious exaggeration or a pain condition?
• Look for evidence to rule claim in as well as out • Records can be critical • Social media investigation (third party feeds too) • Surveillance (multiple, good recordings are needed) • Explore all the evidence with your experts
Secondary Victims
Secondary Victims
The unexpected claim
• You receive a letter of claim from solicitors for the grandparents/parents.
• At the hospital they saw their daughter/grandson in pain and with visible injuries.
• They remained while treatment was carried out and supported their daughter while complications arose in their grandson’s treatment
• They have continued to care for the grandson. • Both allege psychiatric injury.
Primary and secondary victims
• Primary victim: – “Within the zone of foreseeable physical harm” – Can recover for psychiatric injury
• Secondary victim: – “Suffers psychiatric injury through seeing hearing or
learning of physical harm tortiously inflicted on others”
– Must satisfy additional control mechanisms
The control mechanisms
• Close tie of love and affection • Proximity in time and space (Event or immediate
aftermath) • Direct perception • Shock– sudden assault on the nervous system • Causation • Diagnosable psychiatric disorder
Ronayne v Liverpool Women's Hospital • Shocking event – exceptional, sudden, horrifying
(objective standard) • Expect unpleasant scenes in hospital • Sudden appreciation – not a series of events
So what do we do?
• Deny legal basis of claim • Highlight risks/attack funding • On issue apply for strike out • Utilise exception to QOCS for strike out
Wrap up
Tactical toolkit
• How strong is my case? • Collaborative or adversarial approach? • Then you can begin to formulate a strategy, eg:
rehab evidential control robust fraud
Investigation cycle
Range of possible
claims/injuries
Range of associated risks
Information needed to narrow the
ranges
How to obtain the information
Strategy
Questions
Contact us
James Arrowsmith Partner t: 0121 237 3981 e: [email protected] James Arrowsmith @brownejacobson