septic systems: rumors, rules, and research questions
DESCRIPTION
Septic Systems: Rumors, Rules, and Research Questions. By Eberhard Roeder, Ph.D., P.E. Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs FL Dept. of Health, Division of Environmental Health. WSE Seminar FAMU/FSU College of Engineering February 25, 2005. Black Box Rumors. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Septic Systems: Rumors, Rules, and Research Questions
By Eberhard Roeder, Ph.D., P.E.Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs
FL Dept. of Health, Division of Environmental Health
WSE Seminar FAMU/FSU College of EngineeringFebruary 25, 2005
2
Black Box Rumors
• If you don’t know where the pollution is coming from, it is the septic system
3
Black Box Rumors
• (Failing) septic systems are responsible for pathogen indicators in surface water
• Watershed Management Model Version 4.1 (1998)
– 10% of septic systems are failing
– Failing septic systems contribute nitrogen and phosphorus, but no pathogen indicators and oxygen demand to stormwater
4
• How many septic systems are there in Florida?
• What are septic systems and how do they work?
• What about nitrogen?
• What is the Karst Study?
• How can septic systems be managed?
Outline of the Presentation
5
Florida’s Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
• > 2. 3 million septic systems (2001)
• 7.3 million housing units (2000)
• 31% served by septic systems
6
Septic Systems treat Sewage Onsite– wastewater that is treated and disposed of at the
location where it is generated (on your property)
– In contrast to central sewer– Treatment and Disposal is achieved by an
“onsite sewage treatment and disposal system” (OSTDS)
7
What is coming into Septic Systems?
• oxygen-consuming material (~300 mg/L measured in carbonaceous oxygen consumption)
• suspended solids (~250 mg/L)• Nutrients
– nitrogen ~50 mg/L (~23 lbs/year and household of three at 50 gal/cap day )
– phosphorus ~25 mg/L
• Pathogens among the Bacteria (~1 billion/L) and virus (~50-7k PFU/L)
• Traces of organics, and other elements
8
What is a standard septic system?
2 feet between bottom of drainfield and seasonal high water tableGroundwater
9
What’s happening in the septic tank?• Septic tank (anaerobic):
– Collects solids (~60lbs/year TSS)-> must be pumped regularly
– Consumes a third of biodegradable material anaerobically (without oxygen)
– Nitrogen from protein is converted into ammonia
• Rules: Approval testing for water tightness and structural integrity required since mid-1990s
10
What’s happening in the drainfield?
Groundwater
• Drainfield (aerobic): – Consumes biodegradable material (cBOD5, TSS) using oxygen– Removes/filters pathogens, cBOD, suspended solids in the unsaturated
zone above groundwater (2 feet minimum separation to water table is foundation of system design)
– Converts ammonia to nitrate– Disposes of water
• Rules: Built from gravel or alternative materials (chambers, pipes, artificial gravel)
11
What’s happening in an ATU?
• ATU=aerobic treatment unit– Brings sewage (usually pretreated by septic
tank) mechanically into contact with air for aerobic treatment, before discharging to drainfield
– Reduces cBOD and TSS– Can be used for drainfield size reduction,
drainfield repair
12
Standard Septic Systems and Aerobic Treatment Units as secondary wastewater treatment plants
• Primary treatment=settling of solids
• Secondary treatment= removal of oxygen-consuming material
• Tertiary treatment= removal of nutrients
13
(Average) Treatment Expectations
cBOD5 (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L) TN (mg/L) TP (mg/L)
Below drainfield at groundwater interface
<5 <5 25-40 <5
Secondary Treatment
<20 <20
Florida Keys <10 <10 <10 <1
14
What is failure?
Failures per 1000 SystemsGoal: <15
56789
101112131415
Fai
lure
s pe
r T
hous
and
• System does not function in a sanitary manner: Loss of flush, or discharge of untreated or partially treated wastewater onto ground surface, into ground water, into surface water (64E-6.001, FAC)
• Tracked as number of repair permits divided by all systems accounted for
15
What’s happening to nitrogen?
• 1) Ammonification in the septic tank
Organic N + microorganisms -> NH3/NH4
+ + microorganisms
• 2) Nitrification in the presence of oxygen (drainfield)
NH4+ + 2O2 -> NO3
- + 2 H+ + 2 H2O
16
• 3) The removal step: Denitrification
NO3- + organic matter -> N2 +CO2 +OH- +H2O
• Problem: little organic matter left after drainfield(need extra carbon for denitrification)
• Solutions:– Recycle nutrients to vegetation via drip-irrigation (generally in conjunction
with an ATU, effectiveness unclear)
– Tertiary treatment at onsite scale. Recirculate aerated effluent to septic tank or add carbon.
• Overall: about 20-40% of nitrogen is removed from when sewage reaches the septic tank to when effluent reaches the groundwater
17
Nitrogen Management Approaches: technically
• No sewage
• Limit flow and/or number of OSTDS per acre. This approach has been in Florida OSTDS rules for at least 30 years.
• Increased Treatment: – drip-irrigation (generally in conjunction with an ATU)– tertiary treatment at onsite scale (tested in Keys Demonstration Study,
proposed for Wekiva).
• Natural attenuation: – In some areas, nitrogen and phosphorus decrease subsequent to the
drainfield in the groundwater and don’t appear to affect surface water (St George Island Study, Indian River Lagoon Study).
– In some areas this natural attenuation process appears to be less important (Lake Okeechobee Study, Karst Study)
18
What is the (OSTDS in) Karst Study• Observations:
– karst is widespread and allows rapid groundwater transport (Karst =landscape of dissolving limestone)
– Springs experience increasing nitrate-nitrogen concentrations (eutrophication)• Question: What are the impacts of OSTDS on groundwater in karst areas?
Wakulla Springs N
19
Karst Study
• Project: University Project
– Monitor Groundwater downstream of OSTDS for chemical tracers, nutrients and fecal coliforms
River Front On top of Cave System
20
Magnolia II Tracer Experiment
Well M3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
Days After Injection
nM S
F6
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
mg/
L F
luor
esce
in
M3 SF6
M3 Fl
Tracers at Magnolia II
Magnolia II Tracer ExperimentWell M1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360
Days After Injection
nM S
F6
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
mg/
L F
luor
esce
in
M1 SF6
M1 Fl
M-1: 75 feet from injection pointFl arrival in 2.5 days
M-3: 135 feet from injection pointFl arrival in 1.4 days
21
Conceptual Flow Model: Upland
??????
???
???
???
???
Drainfield
Cave
Sue Sink
Manatee Spring
0.4 0.6 12 21 0.6 0.1Average Nitrate Concentration (mg/L)
~60 feet
22
M-4 Core
poor recovery, washout30 medium sand
washout, poor recovery15 medium sand
34.4 packstone
Screen 16.2’-26.2’
M-2 Core
25.5 packstone
Screen 7’-17’8.1 7.0
6.0 fine, medium sand6.5 wackestone
12.5 packstone
3 ft of washout 6.5’-11.5’
19 medium sand
4.5 fine, medium sand
M-1 Core
25.7 packstone26.5 wackestone
31.5 packstone
6.6 poor recoveryrubbly limestone
???
???
???
???
???
???
???K=4.4E-4cm/s
K=3.4E-4cm/s
K=1.7E-4 cm/s
K=9.6E-5 cm/s
K=5.7E-5 cm/s
K=4.0E-4 cm/s
K=5.2E-7cm/s
K=2.7E-4cm/s
K=1.3E-4cm/s
K=5.2E-6cm/s
K=1.9E-4cm/s
M-3 Core 8.0 medium sand
8.6 packstoneScreen 10’-20’ 8.4 fine, medium sand
poor recovery 22.5 packstone
35 wackestone
Screen 19.3’-29.3’
4.55.9
10 medium sand
30.0 packstone
M-4 Core
11.7 packstone
17 wackestone
25 wackestone
K=1.0E-7cm/s
K=2.8E-4 cm/s
K=1.5E-5 cm/s
K=5.0E-6 cm/sK=failed due to channeling
K=1.4E-5 cm/s
K=4.4E-4 cm/s
K=3.3E-5 cm/s
K=3.2E-5 cm/s
K=6.0E-3cm/s
???????????????
Conceptual Flow Model: River Front
M-2 CoreM-1 Core???
???
M-3 Core
???????????????
Drainfield
Groundwater
~30 feet
Average Nitrate Concentration (mg/L) 29 23 15 0.3
Suwannee River
23
http://www.state.fl.us/nwfwmd/pubs/nitrate/lowspeed/nitrate_fig53.pdf
OSTDS and Wakulla
• Estimates for number of systems in 2000
• 28,400 in Leon
• 8,900 in Wakulla
• Estimate for Nitrate loading (mid-range of septic tank effluent, without accounting for losses in groundwater)
• 4kg /year and capita
• ~25 lbs/year and household
NW Florida Water Management District Study (Chellette, Pratt and Katz, 2002)
24
Residual Disposal 12%
Commercial Fertilizer
27%WWTF
29%
OSTDS 22%
Livestock 12%
Estimated Contributors of anthropogenic Nitrogen to Wakulla Karst Plain
(yearly average 1990-1999: 1.3 million kg –N)Data from Chellette, Pratt and Katz, 2002
Missing?
25
Delta N-15 as indicator of N-source in monitoring wells in the Wakulla Springs area<3 artifical fertilizer>10 animals/sewage
Data from Chellette, Pratt and Katz, 2002
Wakulla Springs
Delta N-15 as indicator of N-Source
26
• EPA March 2003 Voluntary Guidelines provide a framework for discussion
http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic/pubs/septic_guidelines.pdf
How to Manage Onsite Systems?
27
How to Manage Onsite Systems?
• Levels of Management will depend on:– severety of expected impacts (protection zones) – technical complexity of onsite systems, – amount and type of available funding– enforcement capabilities
28
EPA’s Management Models
• Homeowner Awareness
• Maintenance Contracts
• Operating Permits
• Responsible Management Entity Operation and Maintenance
• Responsible Management Entity Ownership
http://www.epa.gov/owm/septic/pubs/septic_guidelines.pdf
29
How does Florida manage?
• Standard Septic Systems: – Level 1 homeowner awareness; – also: design, construction and training certification and standards,
(e.g. water tightness)
• Aerobic treatment units: – Level 2/3 operating permit to homeowner requires contract with
qualified maintenance entity. Regular inspection required
• Performance-based systems:– Level 2/3 engineer-designed; operating permit to homeowner
requires contract with qualified maintenance entity. More frequent inspection and sampling required.
30
Summary
• About 30% of households in Florida are served by onsite systems• The standard septic system consists of a septic tank and a drainfield.
The purpose of such a system is to remove solids, oxygen-consuming material and pathogens from the sewage, and dispose of the water without contacting people.
• Standard septic systems and aerobic treatment units remove only some phosphorus and nitrogen. Some additional removal can occur in the groundwater depending on site conditions. Additional technical or institutional measures can further reduce nutrient loads.
• The OSTDS Karst Study suggests that nutrients from OSTDS travel quickly and far (~100 feet). Direction depends on local conditions.
• Levels of OSTDS management range from homeowner ownership and control to utility ownership and control. More complicated systems and higher standards require higher levels of management.