separation
TRANSCRIPT
Merger And SeparationMerger And Separation
Merger and Separation
•Singapore’s reason for Separation•Malaysia’s reluctance•Malaysia’s willingness to take Singapore•Points of negotiation•Reasons for Separation•Analysis of merger and separation.
Road to Merger
•Singapore’s reason for Separation
1959 elections PAP promiseIndependence from BritishUnemployment problemLarge HinterlandCommon MarketSo the PAP did everything to give Singapore a Malayan outlook
•Malay was promoted as the national language•A Malay Singaporean, Yusof Ishak was made the head of state in Singapore
Road to Merger
Although the PAP made these overtures, yet Malaysia was not very keen on taking Singapore in.
ReasonsMalays will lose their dominant position in Malaysia
•Chinese in Malaya and Singapore-3.6 million•Malays in Malaya and Singapore-3.4 million
Communist threatStrong communist influence in SingaporeSecond China that had very strong links with china rather than as a part of SEA.
Road to Merger
However the Tenku changed his mind later and proposed that Singapore be included into Malaysia becauseCommunist FearDid not want Singapore to become a second Cuba whereby Singapore becomes a communist base Racial BalanceThe racial equation could be solved by including the people of Sabah and Sarawak as MalaysOther benefitslarge reserves of SingaporeAdditional territory from Sabah and SarawakRevenue from Singapore-40 % taxes
Road to Merger
Singapore’s response
•Welcomed the proposal•The Malayan hinterland and the raw materials were thought to
be beneficial for Singapore’s economy•Through Merger Singapore will gain independence from the
British•Singapore’s unemployment problem also would be solved if the merger goes ahead due to the large market
Road to Merger
But the communists were totally opposed to the idea of merger.
Reasons
The Malayan government was vehemently anti-communist
If the merger goes ahead, the communists will be finished as the federal government will mobilise all resources to eradicate them.
Thus the PAP was split into two groups.
Pro-communists called as Barisan Sosialis andThe PAP that was against the communists
As a result of this the PAP was further weakened.
Road to Merger
Referendum
Thus in order to solve the issue of whether to merge or not with Malaya, the PAP came out with a referendum. All citizens of Singapore were asked to vote on the issue.
There was intense propaganda between the two groups, with the communists and the PAP both trying to convince the voters to make the right choice.
However in the end the PAP was successful in the referendum with 71% of the people voting for merger. Thus Singapore was merged with Malaya.
Road to Merger
Merger as a marriage of convenience
Both Malaya and Singapore had different views with regard to the merger and separation.
Singapore wanted the merger badly because it would be the best way to solve her economic problems and to gain independence.
Malaya on the other hand wanted to go with the merger because she did not want a strong communist country at her doorstep and so she saw the merger as a convenient way of getting rid of the communist problem.
Thus merger was doomed to fail from the start itself.
Road to Merger
Points of dispute
Common Market
Singapore wanted to confirm the common market first and then go ahead with the merger, but Malaya wanted the merger first and then settle the common market issue later.
In the end a compromise was agreed upon whereby the common market would be established in stages.
Road to Merger
Revenue
Singapore wanted to pay a lower revenue and Malaysia wanted a higher amount.
Both sides agreed that Singapore would pay 40 % of its annual revenue to the Federal Government
Pioneer certificates
Pioneer certificates were to be granted to certain types of new industries which would exempt them from taxes for between five and ten years.
Both sides agreed that KL would grant these certificates after Malaysia was formed.
Road to Merger
Points of dispute
Borneo Loan
Malaysia wanted a gift of 50 million dollars.
Singapore insisted that it would give a loan and not an outright gift.
In the end Singapore was to provide a loan of M$ 150 million.
The loan was to be repaid in 15 years without charging any interest for 100 million dollars.
Road to Merger
Constitutional matters
Singapore was to have 24 seats
But she was given only 15 seats
Singapore wanted full control over education and labour policies.
Road to Merger
Citizenship issues
Singapore citizens would retain their citizenship and become nationals of Malaya
They will not be allowed to vote Malaysian elections and vice-versa.
However political parties from both sides could continue to take part in the elections provided the candidates must be citizens of the respective countries.
Road to Merger
Malay rights
Special privileges enjoyed by the Malays in Malaya would be extended to Singapore
Privileges to be extended to Malays and their special indigenous position would be recognised
Free education to Malays until their university level
In July 1963 the Malaysia Agreement was signed by Malaya, Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak. Brunei did not join and Indonesia and the Philippines opposed the formation as a neo-colonial plot.
Reasons for Separation
1963 Singapore GE
UMNO contested in the Singapore elections
Tenku came to support to garner support for the SA.
But the SUMNO or SA did not win a single seat
1964 Federal election
The PAP sent 17 candidates to participate in the Federal elections
The Alliance saw the PAP as a direct challenge
PAP won only one seat of the contested 14 seats
UMNO leaders were unhappy with the PAP and stepped up their criticism.
Ruined the relationship between the two countries
Political Economic Ideological Social
Factors Responsible for Separation
Personality
Special rightsor Meritocracy
Common Market
Import duties
Increased Revenue Racial Riots63,64 Elections
Malayan SolidarityConvention
What were the advantages of separation?
We could follow our own policies of meritocracy
We could promote racial harmony and equality among races.
We also became independent
What were the disadvantages of separation?
Loss of hinterland
Loss of common market
Disharmonious relationship between the two countries.
Can you think anymore aspects on this issue?