sensitivity of soil moisture to terrain and snow cover at watershed to plot scales in the rocky...
DESCRIPTION
Sensitivity of soil moisture to terrain and snow cover at watershed to plot scales in the Rocky Mountain Front Range, Colorado, USA. Presented by Stephanie Kampf at the "Perth II: Global Change and the World's Mountains" conference in Perth, Scotland in September 2010.TRANSCRIPT
Sensitivity of soil moisture to terrain
and snow cover
What’s happening below the surface?
the ‘black box’ in hydrologic models
Discharge
Climate
(Precipitation,
Temperature,
Radiation)
Subsurface flow
& storage
Soil moisture:
model state variable for
water in the subsurface
How should we measure and model
soil moisture in steep terrain?
Catchment Hillslope Point/plot
Measurement scale
Model theory scale
Model calibration and
prediction scale
Example soil moisture measurements
Loch Vale hillslopes
Sky
Pond
Andrews Creek
Icy B
rook
The Loch
Denver
Loch
Vale
Colorado
0 0.5 1 Kilometer
contour interval = 50 meters
Transect 1
Transect 2
Mean annual precipitation 1000 mm
Snowmelt-dominated runoff
Conceptual model
Vertical infiltration of snow melt water
Lateral subsurface flow
Variable source area runoff generation
HILLSLOPE FLOW PROCESSES
Drier upslope than downslope
Local variability relates to snow and vegetation distribution
POINT MOISTURE DISTRIBUTION
Point sampling scheme
Hillslope 1: Andrews
3220
3230
3240
3250
3260
3270
3280
3290
0 100 200
Length (m)
Elevatio
n (m
)
10 m intervals
Snow depth and surface soil moisture
~weekly surveys
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 50 100 150 200
Sn
ow
de
pth
(m
)
Distance downslope (m)
4-May
14-Jun
29-Jun
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 50 100 150 200
VW
C (
%)
Distance downslope (m)
21-Jun
29-Jun
6-Jul
13-Jul
20-Jul
27-Jul
Point sampling results
Emergent groundwater, localized
Likely reinfiltrates
Emergent groundwater, flowing
Likely connected to stream
Point sampling results
• Points near channel do not have the highest soil moisture
• Upslope generally drier than downslope, but localized
wet areas midslope
• Spatial moisture distribution unrelated to snow
distribution
Drier upslope than downslope
Local variability relates to snow and vegetation distribution
MOISTURE DISTRIBUTION
New conceptual model
Vertical infiltration of melt water upslope
Shallow lateral subsurface flow
Bedrock and slope breaks force exfiltration
midslope
FLOW PROCESSES
Relates to lateral flow and microtopography
MOISTURE DISTRIBUTION
Continuous sampling Hillslope 1: Andrews
3220
3230
3240
3250
3260
3270
3280
3290
0 100 200
Length (m)
Elevatio
n (m
)
0
1
2
3
90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230
Day of Year
Sn
ow
de
pth
(m
)
snow 1
snow 3
snow 12
snow 13
20
25
30
35
40
90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230
Day of Year
VW
C (
%)
moisture 1
moisture 3
moisture 12
moisture 13
Vertical supply of moisture
from snow
Downslope export of
moisture through subsurface
Upslope source of moisture
Downslope export
surface runoff to channel
Hillslope 1: Andrews
3220
3230
3240
3250
3260
3270
3280
3290
0 100 200
Length (m)
Elevatio
n (m
)
R2 = 0.9285
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
30 32 34 36
VWC (%)
Sta
ge (
m)
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230
Day of Year
VW
C (
%)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Sta
ge (
m)
R2 = 0.7787
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
22 27 32
VWC (%)
Sta
ge (
m)
22
24
26
28
30
32
90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230
Day of Year
VW
C (
%)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Sta
ge (
m)
Point measurements
vs. catchment response
Point 1,
upslope
moisture
supply
zone
Point 12,
midslope
exfiltration
zone
Sky
Pond
Andrews Creek
Icy B
rook
The Loch
Denver
Loch
Vale
Colorado
0 0.5 1 Kilometer
contour interval = 50 meters
Transect 1
Transect 2
Hillslope Measurement Summary
• Hillslope flow:
– Shallow lateral downslope flow during
snowmelt
– Exfiltration at bedrock and topographic
breaks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 50 100 150 200
Distance downslope (m)
VW
C (
%) 21-Jun
29-Jun
6-Jul
13-Jul
20-Jul
27-Jul
R2 = 0.9285
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
30 32 34 36
VWC (%)
Sta
ge (
m)
• Point soil moisture:
– Locally variable, no apparent
relationship to snow distribution
• Catchment response
– Exfiltration Rapid pathways for melt
water to reach stream
– Neither moisture distribution nor runoff
source regions would be predicted by
most catchment-scale hydrologic models
How should we measure and model soil moisture
in steep terrain?
• Measurement networks designed to sample gradients
in flow & moisture
• Flexible model structure to incorporate evolving
understanding of subsurface flow mechanisms
Catchment Hillslope Point/plot
Measurement scale
Model theory scale
Model calibration and
prediction scale
Acknowledgements: Colorado State University,
Western Mountain Initiative. Cara Moore, Katie
Williams, Eric Richer, Jill Baron, Julie Markus, Jared
Heath & many others!
Soil moisture / Water content (θ) model state variable for water in the subsurface
Land surface model
Each cell = single value of θ 1D (vertical) exchange with
atmosphere
Distributed hydrologic model
Each cell = one or more values of θ 1D (vertical) exchange with atmosphere
2D or 3D redistribution of moisture
Hillslope 1: Andrews
3220
3230
3240
3250
3260
3270
3280
3290
0 100 200
Length (m)
Elevatio
n (m
)
NE-facing aspect
Average slope 31%
Hillslope characteristics