sensing –seizing -reconfiguring · sensing –seizing -reconfiguring the critical role of sensing...
TRANSCRIPT
Sensing– Seizing- Reconfiguring
Thecriticalroleofsensingindynamiccapabilitiesanditsinteractionwithorganizationstructure
ZurShapiraCCCFacultyDay2016Bocconi University
CCC2016Bocconi1
FollowingTeece’s (2007)Vision:
Sense Seize Reconfigure
TheSourceoftheProcess MostoftheResearch
CCC2016Bocconi2
A“Biased”SnapshotofPastResearch:
• Teece,Pisano&Shuen (1997).• Eisenhardt &Martin(2000)• Bingham,Eisenhadt &Furr (2007)• Winter(2003).• Teece (2007).• Helfat &Winter(2011).• Helfat &Peteraf (2015).
CCC2016Bocconi3
Sensing– Perceiving– Interpreting:• Examples:Pictureanoldoryoungwoman.• Necker’sCube.• CEOcognitionandmentalactivities.• Connie’swritingoncognition;Kathy’swritingon
simplerules.• Heuristicsvs.DualProcessTheory.• FastEnvironmentalChanges.• CEOsasexperts.• BillSimon:Buying–>Sellingbonds.
CCC2016Bocconi4
Thepaomnnehil pweor ofthehmuan mnid
Aoccdrnig toarscheearch atCmabrigdeUinervtisy,itdeosn't mttaer inwhatoredr theltteers inawrod are,theolny iprmoetnt tihng istaht thefrist andlsat ltteer beattherghit pclae.Therset canbeatotalmses andyoucansitllraed itwouthit aporbelm.Tihs isbcuseae thehuamn mnid deos notraed ervey lteter byistlef,
butthewrod asawlohe.
Purple
Red
Orange
Blue
Blue
Black
Green
Yellow
Red
Blue
Brown
Purple
TheStyleofExpertise:
• Simon’sfocusonPatternRecognition• Theroleofmemory• Degroot’s StudyofChess• AQualitativeFormulaofIntuition• SensingandOrganizationalStructure
CCC2016Bocconi8
ExpertiseinChessTask: 25 pieces on board
Shown for 10 secondsExperts and laypersons try to reconstruct the board
Condition 1: Pieces spread randomly on boardFinding: No difference between Novices and Grand
Masters. Both reconstruct about 6 pieces correctly.
Condition 2: Pieces on the board reflect a meaningfulsituation.
Finding: Novices reconstruct 6 pieces, Grand Masters 23-24 pieces.
Intuition=Intelligence+alotofexperience
• Dynamiccapabilities:sense->perceive->seize->configure• Howshouldorganizationsbestructuredforaccurateand
timelysensingofshiftsintheenvironment?
HierarchicalSensingModelElad Green&ZurShapira
CCC2016Bocconi11
CEO
Level2
Level1
Env
• Structureishierarchical(nooverlapinspanofcontrol)
CCC2016Bocconi12
Level1
Env
• AshiftintheenvironmentismodeledasashockofextentS:S%oftheenvironmentalattributeschange.Attributesthatchangearerandomlyselected.
CCC2016Bocconi13
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
• EachDM(DecisionMaker)intheorganization:Ø Perceives correctlyachangeineachenvironmentalattribute
withaprobability(Pi)thatdecreaseswiththeno.ofattributessheisresponsiblefor(Span):
SpanPP i
i
max
=
iP
(insimulations:Pimax =0.8)
CCC2016Bocconi14
• EachDM(DecisionMaker)intheorganization:Ø Updatesherbeliefsaccordingtoherperceptionofthe
environmentalattributes‒ Ifanattributehasbeenperceivedtochange,the
correspondingbeliefisupdatedtoreflectthechange‒ Beliefsarerepeatedlyupdatedduringthesimulationastime
advances
CCC2016Bocconi15
• EachDM(DecisionMaker):Ø Interpretsherupdatedbeliefsand decides whethertoalert
hersuperior:DecisionD istoalertifthemagnitudeofinterpretedchangeexceedsathresholdT%
D
>=
otherwisechangedinterpreteofmagnitudeif %Talert
D
CCC2016Bocconi16
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
No. of DMs Attempting Communication
P(R
ecei
ve A
ttent
ion)
• EachDM(DecisionMaker):Ø Ifthedecisionistoalert,theDMgetsthesuperior’sattention
withaprobability(Qa)thatdecreaseswiththeno.ofotherDMs(d)thataremakingconcurrentattempts:
aQ
)Q(Qk)(dQQ aaaa
minmaxmax 1=
d =no.ofDMsattemptingtoalertthesuperior
k =aconstantthatdependsontheno.ofDMsinthatlevel(k>d)
(insimulations:Qa
min =0.2,Qamax =0.7)CCC2016Bocconi
17
• TheprocessrepeatsforeachDMintheorganization,frombottomtotop:Ø Perception ofsignalsfromsubordinates
andupdateofDMsbeliefsØ Interpretationanddecision whetherto
alertthesuperiorØ Ifdecisionistoalert- attempttoget
superior’sattention
D
aP
iP
CCC2016Bocconi18
• TheprocessrepeatsforeachDMintheorganization,frombottomtotop:Ø Perception ofsignalsfromsubordinatesØ Decision whethertoalertthesuperiorØ Ifdecisionistoalert- attempttoget
superior’sattention• TheprocessendswiththeCEO,who
makesthefinalevaluationwhetheranenvironmentalshockhasoccurred.
CCC2016Bocconi19
HierarchicalSensingModel• Weinduceenvironmentalshocksinarangearoundthe
thresholdT% thattheorganizationistunedtosense.
• Modelparameters:– Variousorganizationaldesigns
E.g.:[1641]denotesanorg.designof16 DMsatlevel1(bottomlevel),4 DMsatlevel2,andthe1 CEO
– Foreachorg.design:multiplelevelsofenv.shockaroundthethresholdT=40%– Foreachenv.shock:500 simulations(resultsareaveragedacrosssimulations)– Eachsimulationlasts:100 rounds(eachroundDMsperceive,updatebeliefs,
interpret,andalert;roundsreflecttime)– #env.attributes:512– DMsthresholdtoidentifyenv.change:40%– Probabilityparameters:
2.0
7.0
8.0
min
max
max
=
=
=
a
a
i
QQP
CCC2016Bocconi20
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Structure: 32 8 2 1
RoundsP(
Sens
ing)
0.300.330.360.390.420.450.48
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Structure: 32 4 2 1
Rounds
P(Se
nsin
g)
0.300.330.360.390.420.450.48
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Structure: 32 4 1
Rounds
P(Se
nsin
g)
0.300.330.360.390.420.450.48
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Structure: 32 2 1
Rounds
P(Se
nsin
g)
0.300.330.360.390.420.450.48
0 20 40 60 80 1000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1Structure: 32 1
Rounds
P(Se
nsin
g)
0.300.330.360.390.420.450.48
• P(sensing)overtime
• Plotperstructure• Curveperlevelof
env.change
• Probabilityofsensingincreaseswithlevelofenv.change,andsensingdelaydecreases
Notation:Structure[1641]denotesanorg.designof16 DMsatlevel1(bottomlevel),4 DMsatlevel2,andtheCEO
CCC2016Bocconi21
• Whatistheprobability ofsensingachangeintheenvironment,fordifferentlevelsofenvironmentalshocks?
• Theidealisastepfunction:nosensingbelowthethreshold(zerofalse-alarms),andperfectsensingabovethethreshold(100%truedetections)
P(Sensing)
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
CCC2016Bocconi22
P(Sensing)• Plotsbyorganizationalsize(totalno.ofDMs)• Curveperorganizationalstructure• P(Sensing)iscomputedatRound=100and
averagedacrosssimulations
Notation:[1641]denotesanorg.designof16 DMsatlevel1(bottomlevel),4 DMsatlevel2,andtheCEO
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
CCC2016Bocconi23
P(Sensing)• Plotsbyorganizationalsize(totalno.ofDMs)• Curveperorganizationalstructure• P(Sensing)iscomputedatRound=100and
averagedacrosssimulations
Ø Widerspansofcontrol(flatterorgs.)increaseprobabilityofsensing,butalsoincreasefalse-alarms
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
64 16 4 164 8 2 164 8 164 4 164 2 164 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
32 8 2 132 4 2 132 4 132 2 132 1
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Env. Change [%]
P(Se
nsin
g)
16 4 2 116 4 116 2 116 1
CCC2016Bocconi24
EnhancingSensing• TheCEOmayreceiveanindicationthat“somethingisgoingon”,yet
evidenceofanenvironmentalshockisinconclusive.• Inthiscase,theCEOmaybypasshisimmediatesubordinates(Level
2or3),anddirectly inquirewithDMsatLevel1.
• Configuration:– Org.istunedfora40%env.change– CEOinquireswhen20%ofhis
immediatesubordinatesindicatechange– CEOinquires20%ofDMsatL1
(onlyunderVPswhodidnotindicatechange)– CEO’sperceptionoftheinquiredDMs’
evaluationsiserrorless
CCC2016Bocconi25
Summary
• Increased competition necessitates targeting top quality projects
• An important determinant of DC is early detection of opportunities and environmental changes hence the need to attract top management’s attention
• CEO’s SDM is an associative rather than a linear process. We need a better understanding of this process.
• Dynamic capabilities application processSense->Perceive->Infer->Seize->Reconfigure
CCC2016Bocconi26
ALooktotheFuture:
• Themostimportantprogressin(human)scienceoverthelasttwodecades.
• Studyofthebrain• AI
CCC2016Bocconi27
CCC2016Bocconi
ThankyouDavidforintroducingustodynamiccapabilities.
Andthankstoallofyouforlistening!
28