GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1

(Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS.

4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be

done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission. 9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary

performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts,

analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content,

writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements

and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal

grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written

expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-001

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: KYFER DANE NABUA Asst. Lead Researcher: ANGELICA CHARIZ RECAMARA Research Associate: KIERTHLEEN JOY ABSIN Research Associate: NIKKY ALVAREZ CORSINO Research Associate: MICHELLE MARILAO Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-002

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: JERALUNA BELTRAN Asst. Lead Researcher: MA. MILKHIELYN ENRIQUEZ Research Associate: ANGEL KAYE OPORTO Research Associate: HANIE GRACE TORREGOSA Research Associate: NECIL JANE JIMENEZ Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-003

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: MARIANNE MARIE ALIBO Asst. Lead Researcher: JOSHNIELLE BACALTOS Research Associate: VERGIE SURBAN Research Associate: KENNETH MANGILA Research Associate: KAYE MAE MONTEJO Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-004

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: KYLE JALALON Asst. Lead Researcher: DANICA BRIAN Research Associate: ALLIAH MRIFER CATORCE Research Associate: JESSA MARIE FLORES Research Associate: SIALYN SOLON Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-005

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: JAMAICA TANJAY Asst. Lead Researcher: ASTIR SHEERY BACARON Research Associate: SHANE OPOLENTISIMA Research Associate: MARIA KAYE ENRIQUEZ Research Associate: CHRIESLEN CORALES Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-006

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: MARGARET LOUISSE JANUARIO Asst. Lead Researcher: ALLYSA FRANZ ONG Research Associate: JULIANNE SAYSON Research Associate: BROGETTE ANNE ISRAEL Research Associate: MARK OPIGAL Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-007

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: ROSELLE JOY MEDIDA Asst. Lead Researcher: BRIX NATHAN BAYLON Research Associate: ANN GELINE DANLAG Research Associate: JUAN MIKA ARALCA Research Associate: KIMBERLY ARTUYO Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-008

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: CHRISTINE ANN VERDIDA Asst. Lead Researcher: ROSE DIANE LOPENA Research Associate: LYRA MAY LINGCOPINES Research Associate: JHEZIL GAY ABAY Research Associate: CRISLYN MALAZARTE Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination in Practical Research 1 (Qualitative).

2. The total score for Review of Related Literature and Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery

Examination composed of eight (8) areas.

3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN TASKS. 4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.

5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except for

suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.

6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The lead

researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.

8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.

9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.

10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.

11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.

Excellent (30-27 points):

Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the

instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully

addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements

and explanations

Good: (26-23 points):

Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in

relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts,

analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited,

but above average quality

Average: (22-18 points):

Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many

areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear

statements or explanations

Below Average (17 points

below):

Confusing, lacks explanation or

completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures;

overall, below professional quality standards; not quality

work

Areas of Assessment Points Earned

Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)

The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable

under study.

Research Design. (Area 2)

Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers

following the content in each area.

Research Setting. (Area 3)

The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner

and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.

Sampling. (Area 4)

The sampling technique used of the study is described and explains why the sampling

method is fit to the study.

Data Collection. (Area 5)

Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting

necessary information needed in the study.

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION RUBRICS IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1 (QUALITATIVE)

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

Data Analysis. (Area 6)

Uses a technique in data analysis from a source in the conduct of analysis the various data

from the interview.

Ethical Considerations and Researchers’ Reflexivity. (Area 7)

Enumerates and discusses the various ethical considerations in the conduct of the study

and provides course of action and ways to establish validity of the data gathered.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.

Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:

_______/240

RC CODE SH-ABM-E11-SH205-009

PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Area 4

Area 5

Area 6

Area 7

Area

8

Total Score

Lead Researcher: RED Z PIELAGO Asst. Lead Researcher: MA. VINCE JASSUNTA Research Associate: ABEGAIL SAYSON Research Associate: ANA KATRINA TIU Research Associate: VINCENT HAYAG Research Associate: Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT, MAED – ELLT (Candidate)

Research Lecturer