senior design poster.pptx

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015 www.PosterPresentations.com PROBLEM STATEMENT & SCOPE OF PROJECT TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Table 1: Feed Composition and Conditions Figure 1: Bioconversion Process Overview The Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Fatty Alcohols Rose Holbrook, Michael Buckner, Matthew Cackovic, James McCall, Michael Stein Advisor: Jennifer Markham Figure 3: Piping & Instrumentation Diagram Figure 4: Gantt Chart for Bioconversion Process & Reactor Schedule SUMMARY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS The purpose of this project is to minimize the production cost of fatty alcohols using a biological synthesis pathway. Solubilized Hydrolysate 356000 Insoluble Solids (IS) <0.05% Soluble Solids (SS) 15% 43 Pressure [atm] 1 Vapor Fraction 0 Free Fatty Acids (FFA) 0 Water 303000 Glucose (SS) 29300 Xylose (SS) 16100 Other sugars (SS) 4000 Figure 5: Object Oriented Code Reactor Effluent Dodecanol (C 12 H 26 O) 5,120 Tetradecanol (C 14 H 30 O) 5,120 Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) 27,400 Water (H 2 O) 70,600 Cellular Solids (C 5 H 7 O 2 N) 20,800 Bicarbonate (HCO 3 - ) 935 Ammonium (NH 4 + ) 276 Glucose (C 6 H 12 O 6 ) 2,430 Oxygen (O 2 ) 144 Total 133,000 Table 2: Feed Composition and Conditions Figure 2: Dodecanol (Fatty Alcohol) Chemical Structure Mechanical vapor recompression evaporators (x4) Agitated, aerated bioreactors (x20) Incremental seed reactors (x5) Centrifuge (x16) Filter Equipment Used Global Selling Price: $2.50/kg Required Minimum Selling Price: $4.25/kg* * Best case scenario Figure 6: Cost Contributors 3 C 6 H 12 O 6 →6 CO 2 + 5 H 2 O + C 12 H 26 O 7 C 6 H 12 O 6 → 14 CO 2 + 12 H 2 O + 2 C 14 H 30 O 0.0125 O 2 + 0.03748 C 6 H 12 O 6 + 0.0425 HCO 3 - + 0.0425 NH 4 + →0.1825 H 2 O + 0.055 CO 2 + 0.0425 C 5 H 7 O 2 N PROCESS SIMULATION & DESIGN RESULTS Reactor Specifications Reactor Q (m 3 /hr) 97.2 Min. Volume (m 3 ) 11,539 Turnaround Time (hr) 10 Accumulated Vol. over turnaround time (m 3 ) 972 Total Volume (m 3 ) 12,500 Total # of reactors 20 Reaction time (hr) 129 Residence time (hr) 119 Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant and mostly underutilized source for fermentable sugars produced via hydrolytic conversion. Fatty alcohols can be used as detergents, industrial solvents, emulsifiers, and may be further refined into biofuels. Currently, most fatty alcohols are derived from palm kernel oil, coconut oil, or petrochemical sources (sustainability issues). Process: lignocellulosic hydrolysate → (genetically modified microorganism) → fatty alcohols Economic sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the factors affecting the selling price and production costs Table 3: Reactor Specifications Purchase Cost Operating Cost Utilities Cost MSP vs Feed Cost Y=5.3x+2 .4 MSP vs Productivity vs Yield (gal) MSP vs Productivity vs Yield (kg) Number of Reactors vs Productivity vs Yield Yiel d Yie l d Yiel d Productiv ity Productiv ity Produ ctiv ity MSP ($) MSP ($) MSP ($) MSP ($) Feed Cost Compressor Evaporator Heat X Reactors Reactor Aeration Seed Reactors Centrifuge Reactors Compressor Centrifuge Seed Reactors Feed Cost / Year General Admin Expenses Solids Treatment Tax / Insurance Overhead Maintenance Labor Utilities

Upload: james-mccall

Post on 12-Apr-2017

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Senior Design Poster.pptx

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015

www.PosterPresentations.com

PROBLEM STATEMENT & SCOPE OF PROJECT TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Table 1: Feed Composition and Conditions

Figure 1: Bioconversion Process Overview

The Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Fatty Alcohols

Rose Holbrook, Michael Buckner, Matthew Cackovic, James McCall, Michael SteinAdvisor: Jennifer Markham

Figure 3: Piping & Instrumentation Diagram

Figure 4: Gantt Chart for Bioconversion Process & Reactor Schedule

SUMMARY

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The purpose of this project is to minimize the production cost of fatty alcohols using a biological

synthesis pathway.

 Solubilized Hydrolysate356000

Insoluble Solids (IS) <0.05%Soluble Solids (SS) 15%

43Pressure [atm] 1Vapor Fraction 0

Free Fatty Acids (FFA) 0Water 303000Glucose (SS) 29300Xylose (SS) 16100Other sugars (SS) 4000

Figure 5: Object Oriented Code Structure

Reactor EffluentDodecanol (C12H26O) 5,120Tetradecanol (C14H30O) 5,120Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 27,400Water (H2O) 70,600Cellular Solids (C5H7O2N) 20,800

Bicarbonate (HCO3-) 935

Ammonium (NH4+) 276

Glucose (C6H12O6) 2,430Oxygen (O2) 144Total 133,000Table 2: Feed Composition and Conditions

Figure 2: Dodecanol (Fatty Alcohol) Chemical Structure

• Mechanical vapor recompression evaporators (x4)• Agitated, aerated bioreactors (x20)

• Incremental seed reactors (x5)• Centrifuge (x16)• Filter

Equipment Used

Global Selling Price: $2.50/kgRequired Minimum Selling Price:

$4.25/kg* * Best case scenario

Figure 6: Cost Contributors

3 C6H12O6 →6 CO2 + 5 H2O + C12H26O

7 C6H12O6 → 14 CO2 + 12 H2O + 2 C14H30O

0.0125 O2 + 0.03748 C6H12O6 + 0.0425 HCO3- +

0.0425 NH4+→0.1825 H2O + 0.055 CO2 + 0.0425

C5H7O2N

PROCESS SIMULATION & DESIGN

RESULTS

Reactor SpecificationsReactor Q (m3/hr) 97.2Min. Volume (m3) 11,539

Turnaround Time (hr) 10Accumulated Vol. over turnaround time (m3) 972

Total Volume (m3) 12,500Total # of reactors 20Reaction time (hr) 129Residence time (hr) 119

• Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant and mostly underutilized source for fermentable sugars produced via hydrolytic conversion.

• Fatty alcohols can be used as detergents, industrial solvents, emulsifiers, and may be further refined into biofuels.

• Currently, most fatty alcohols are derived from palm kernel oil, coconut oil, or petrochemical sources (sustainability issues).

• Process: lignocellulosic hydrolysate → (genetically modified microorganism) → fatty alcohols

• Economic sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the factors affecting the selling price and production costs

Table 3: Reactor Specifications

Purchase Cost

Operating Cost

Utilities Cost

MSP vs Feed Cost

Y=5.3x+2.4

MSP vs Productivity vs Yield (gal)

MSP vs Productivity vs Yield (kg)

Number of Reactors vs Productivity vs Yield

Yield

Yield

YieldProductivity

Productivity

Productivity

MSP ($)

MSP ($)

MSP ($)

MSP ($)

Feed Cost

Compressor

EvaporatorHeat X

Reactors

Reactor AerationSeed ReactorsCentrifuge

Reactors

CompressorCentrifuge

Seed Reactors

Feed Cost / YearGeneral Admin ExpensesSolids

TreatmentTax / InsuranceOverhead

Maintenance

Labor

Utilities