senator and executive board elections second reading a€¦ · 20/03/2018 · jared kubicka-miller...

8045 East Chapman (714) 628-4831 Orange, CA 92869 [email protected]

Agenda 6 March 2018

1:30 – 2:45 p.m. Academic Senate Room A-211

I Welcome II Approval of the Minutes A 3 March 2018 III Public Comments (2 minute limit per person) IV AS Executive Board Reports (5 minutes) V ASG Report (5 minutes) VI Summary Report Discussion (5 minutes) VII Discussion Items

A Senator and Executive Board Elections (10 minutes) Vice President Mettler will lead a discussion about the senate voting process.

VIII Action Items (10 minutes) Second Reading

A Resolution S2018.04 – Adoption of the 2018-2019 Santiago Canyon College Plan for the California Community Colleges Pathways Program

First Reading (30 minutes)

A Resolution S2018.05 – Adoption of Changes to the Academic Senate Discipline Groupings

B Resolution S2018.06 – Application for Santiago Canyon College to Become a

Consortium Member in the Online Education Initiative Course Exchange

Santiago Canyon College is an innovative learning community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth. Our purpose is to foster student success and to help students achieve these core outcomes: to learn, to act, to communicate and to think critically. We are committed to maintaining standards of excellence and providing the following to our diverse community: courses, certificates, and degrees that are accessible, applicable, and engaging. (Approved 12/05/17)

BP 2410 Board Policies and Administrative Regulations Reference: Education Code Section 70902; ACCJC Accreditation Standards IV.C.7, IV.D.4, I.B.7, and I.C.5 (formerly IV.B.1.b & e)

The Board may adopt such policies as are authorized by law or determined by the Board to be necessary for the efficient operation

of the District. Board policies are intended to be statements of intent by the Board on a specific issue within its subject matter jurisdiction. The policies have been written to be consistent with provisions of law, but do not encompass all laws relating to District activities.

All District employees are expected to know of and observe all provisions of law pertinent to their job responsibilities. Policies of the Board may be adopted, revised, added to, or amended at any regular board meeting by a majority vote. Any adoption

and/or approval of new Board policies or changes to existing Board policies must take place as part of a two meeting approval process. The first meeting will be considered the "FIRST READING, INFORMATION ONLY" of the policy or change to existing policy for the purpose of review, questions and answers, and other considerations of the recommendation. At the second meeting, it will be considered the "SECOND READING, ACTION ITEM." The Board will consider the item for action, which may have been modified at either the first or second reading. If the modification at the second reading is major, as determined by the Board, such a reading will be termed a first reading and introduced at a subsequent Board meeting as a second reading. The Board shall regularly assess its policies for effectiveness in fulfilling the District's mission.

The RSCCD Board of Trustees believes that a major trustee role is to set policy for the District. In setting policy, the Board wants to create and work within a participatory environment with respect for students and all employee groups. For developing policies regarding the academic and professional matters numbered 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8, the Board will consult collegially with the faculty by relying primarily on the advice and judgment of the Academic Senate (per previous agreement with the Senate).*

For developing policy regarding the other five academic and professional matters, the Board will consult with the faculty through the mutual agreement process previously agreed upon. At RSCCD, the mutual agreement process is the use of the shared governance structure consisting of councils, committees, and the District Council. Further, representatives of staff and student groups are encouraged to work within the established processes to address the issues of the District. The Board of Trustees values consensus building; however, it realizes its legal responsibility to make final decisions regarding policy.

*For the following items the Board of Trustees will rely primarily upon the advice of the Academic Senate: 1) Curriculum, including establishing prerequisites and placing courses within disciplines; 2) Degree and certificate requirements; 3) Grading policies; 5) Standard or policies regarding student preparation and success; 8) Policies for faculty professional development activities;

For the following items, the Board of Trustees will come to mutual agreement with the Academic Senate: 4) Educational program development; 6) District and college governance structures, as related to faculty roles; 7) Faculty roles and involvement in accreditation processes, including self study and annual reports; 9) Processes for program review; 10) Processes for institutional planning and budget development.

Administrative regulations are to be issued by the Chancellor as statements of method to be used in implementing Board Policy. Such administrative regulations shall be consistent with the intent of Board Policy. Administrative regulations may be revised as deemed necessary by the Chancellor. The Board reserves the right to direct revisions of the administrative regulations should they, in the Board's judgment, be inconsistent with the Board's own policies. Copies of all board policies and administrative regulations shall be readily available to District employees through the District website.

Revised and Retitled: June 15, 2015 (Previously BP9001 and BP9023)

SCC Academic Senate Minutes - DRAFT March 6, 2018 1:30 – 3:00 A-211

Senators Present Nena Baldizon-Rios Emma Breeden Ricardo Chavez Cale Crammer Shawn Cummins Lisa Dela Cusack Alicia Frost Alana Gates Song Graham Scott Howell Vanessa Jones Daniel Oase Eden Quimzon Andy Salcido Randy Scott Shereen Siddiqui Barbara Sproat Christine Umali Kopp Jeffrey Wada

Senators Absent Phillip Crabill Steven Deeley Jared Kubicka-Miller Senate Executive Board Present President Michael DeCarbo Vice President Mary Mettler Secretary/Treasurer Mike Taylor CIC Chair Darlene Diaz ASG Representative Christian Vargas Guests Toni Bland Scott James Linda Martin Manny Pacheco Mark Smith

II. Approval of the Minutes

A. Approval of the minutes from the February 20, 2018 senate meeting (Scott/Frost). Passed, no dissent

III. Public Comments

A. Professor Dela Cusack read a letter from Professor Evett concerning Guided Pathways and resolution 2018.04, asking for editions.

B. Professor Siddiqui continued reading the letter with points of concern regarding the metrics in the Guided Pathways proposed plan.

C. Professor Smith asked for an update on the resolution regarding funds saved from the switch to Canvas that were to be spent on faculty compensation for the migration.

D. Professor Wada performed an experiment to promote Community Science Night that is on March 23.

***Motion to change the order of the agenda to allow Public Safety to make their presentation immediately after public comments (Mettler/Oase); Passed, no dissent.

IV. Academic Senate Executive Board Reports President:

A. The Senate Business Meeting agendas are created by the executive board; the Executive Board serves the faculty and is open to requests for discussion topics.

B. President DeCarbo reminded the tenure review task force that their charge is still open and requested a report to senate be forthcoming.


C. The D-building will be vacated over the summer to replace the HVAC system. Facilities is

planning where faculty and classes will be moved to. Offices and classrooms will not be available, but furnishings and items that will not be needed over the summer do not need to be removed.

D. A draft of the IPEI rubric to be used for software demonstrations was released, any feedback should be sent to President DeCarbo by March 12. The dates for the demonstrations will be Friday March 16 from 9 – 12:30, Tuesday March 20 from 1:30 – 5, and Wednesday March 21 from 1:30 – 5; specifics will be forthcoming.

E. Budget: New funding model is coming (50% FTES, 25% on certificates and degrees awarded, and 25% on student need [Pell Grants and BOGS]). The exact funded amount for next year is uncertain, but there is currently a structural deficit. To prepare, the Chancellor has directed that $3M be cut from the entire district; about $700k in on-going cuts will affect SCC, $200,000 have been identified in unfilled positions.

Vice President: A. Discussion on faculty position replacement. A PowerPoint presentation was shown detailing

historical information since 2012 that detailed the position separations, eliminated positions, replacement patterns, and new positions created. Both the Psychology Department and Library noted that they had positions prior to 2012 that took years to replace. It has been in recent years that most positions are replaced within 2 years.

B. Thanks went out for voting for the Academic Senate executive board elections.

Secretary/Treasurer A. No report

CIC A. A permanent Curriculum Specialist is coming.

V. ASG Report

A. Town Hall is scheduled for March 14 from 10:30 – 2:00; Administrators have been invited for a Q&A.

B. March for our Lives is on March 24 (10-2 in Los Angeles), in support of shooting victims and against gun violence. This event is formally endorsed by ASG.

C. Student walkout on March 14 (about 10am); students have been asked to communicate with their professors ahead of time. This event is formally endorsed by ASG.

VI. Summary Report Discussions

A. The math sequencing is shortened to comply with AB705. Starting fall 2018, all students are given the opportunity to enroll in Math 080/086 or a transfer-level course that offers support. Math N48 and Math N60 will be offered on a limited basis. Math N06, Math 030, and Math N55 (and corresponding MaSH labs, N06L, 030L, N55L) have been approved by CIC for deactivations. Support courses are available with courses Math 080, Math 170, and Math 219 starting fall to satisfy the AB705 requirements.

B. Guided Pathways is being discussed within the Honors Committee. C. Budget committee reports that the college is operating within budgeted funds.


VII. Action Items First Reading

A. Resolution 2018.04 – Adoption of the 2018-2019 Santiago Canyon College Plan for the California Community Colleges Pathways Program (DeCarbo/Taylor) Discussion: President DeCarbo reviewed the California Community College Guided Pathways Action Plan, Timeline, and Allocation Summary. Data have not yet been made available from the State that will populate this plan. Many of the metrics will be left blank since in the first year SCC will only explore metric one and two.

President DeCarbo reviewed the first metric and the information located there. The statement on the senate passing a resolution in support of pursuing another year will be changed to a conditional statement, such as “if the first year of inquiry is successful, a senate resolution in support of another year may be passed”.

Regarding the second metric of benchmarks it was proposed and agreed to change the first plan item to read “collectively explore what benchmarks are being tracked” and change the second item to “Devise process by which benchmarks in specific initiatives will be shared across the college.” Consequently, the corresponding portion in the section asking how that success will be measured was changed to: “process by which benchmarks may be shared will have been explored.”

In response to the inclusion of all specified groups in the formation of the plan, President DeCarbo explained that there has been (and continues to be) an open invitation to anyone that would like to participate in the guided pathways proposal. Additionally, he pointed out that the plan proposal allows for input from all groups in the actualization of the plan. Further, that the nature of the resolution process allows for those groups to provide input. Finally, that the resolution in support of the plan stipulates that the Senate leadership has ensured that all constituent groups may participate in the design and implementation of the activities.

Student focus groups will be meeting on Friday, March 9 from 9-12. An invitation was extended to all to join and help.

President DeCarbo offered to come and speak to any group regarding Guided Pathways and encouraged anyone with questions to seek him out.

**Motion to extend the meeting by 10 minutes (Mettler/Quimzon); Passed, no dissent.

Second Reading A. Resolution S2018.02 – Affirmation to the Student Success and Equity Committee Collegial

Governance Handbook Membership (Baldizon-Rios/Umali Kopp) Discussion: no discussion

Vote: Passed, no dissent

VIII. Discussion Items A. Public Safety – Chief Brand reported that new door locks, door hooks, and magnetic strips have

been ordered and the campus is awaiting delivery. It was clear that these devices will not work on all of the campus doors, but other measures will be assessed. Items have already been piloted and tested. Questions and Responses from Chief Brand and Lieutenant Pacheco:

What is being done to allow for blocking windows (of all sizes) with shades in both the classroom and offices? Shades are coming for some rooms.


What is being done about issuing keys to adjuncts and other faculty so they can lock doors?

This is a district/campus issue, not a public safety issue, although Campus Safety mentioned their support for issuing keys.

Will more active shooter training will be forthcoming? There are training seminars offered every semester; Lieutenant Pacheco is asking for more participation. He also mentioned the importance of showing the 5-minute Run/Hide/Fight video to classes at the beginning of the semester. The video is on the District Safety Web page at https://www.rsccd.edu/Departments/Security-and-Public-Safety/Pages/Run-Hide-Fight.aspx

What about having a campus-wide drill or use a large-scale audience like Convocation as a method of information delivery? A large scale drill is being planned. There was not a response as to providing a training at a large-scale audience, such as at Convocation.

Why is information about potential threats that happen on other local campuses not being delivered to our campus in a timely manner? This was answered with two questions; what information would we like? and how would we like the information delivered? If any faculty member has suggestions/requests, please send them to Chief Bland or to the SCC Facilities/Safety Committee.

Look for an email that was sent by District Safety regarding enrollment into the phone app for district notifications.

B. Senator and Executive Board Elections – Item postponed to a later date

C. Online Education Consortium – The OEI is not the same thing as 115th community college. This is to increase student completion of transfer degrees by working together to increase access to quality online courses and support services for students.

The exchange, essentially, is a warehouse of distance education courses taught throughout the State that have agreed to be part of the exchange. To offer a course, requirements of accessibility, rigor, and standardization must be met.

SCC success rates are consistent with those of the state and the Online Education Consortium.

SCC has been invited to join the Online Education Consortium. This participation will also allow SCC to be in the decision-making processes in relation to the OEI. A self-assessment is due on March 9. Subsequently, in order to participate, a Senate resolution in support must be passed. This would then lead to a non-binding contract. There is an opt-out provision should the OEI not work for SCC. If SCC chooses not to pursue this right now, there will be opportunity apply at this time again next year.

One benefit is that low-enrolling courses could gain students through the exchange and therefore SCC gets the FTES for those students.

A straw poll of those present, requesting who was in favor of sending in the self-assessment indicated the faculty was in favor (three dissents – Sproat, DeCarbo, Salcido). President DeCarbo requested that Professor James send out the PowerPoint presentation delivered in Senate to all SCC Faculty informing them of the opportunity and then, once complete, asked Professor James to send out the assessment to all faculty for review.

IX. Moved to adjourn (Scott/Frost). Passed, no dissent.

https://www.rsccd.edu/Departments/Security-and-Public-Safety/Pages/Run-Hide-Fight.aspx

POSITION TYPE

Eliminated

New

Categorical Funding

Separations Replacement New Hires

Water Utility Science 2 years Art

Chemisty Same Year Biology

Math 1 year Chemistry

Chemistry

Music

Psychologist


Music - Prior Prior Counselor

CE - High School Subjects Eliminated Sociology

Sociology - Same Same Math


Academic Success Center Eliminated American Sign Language

Accounting - 1 years 1 year Distance Education

Math

Water Utility Science


ACE Eliminated Counselor - Categorical

Anthropology 2 years Counselor - Categorical

Counselor - Gen Fund Eliminated Counselor - Categorical

Counselor - Gen Fund Eliminated Counselor - Non-Tenure Categorical

Library - Same Same Year DSPS Counselor - Categorical

CTE Eliminated English

Accounting

Psychology

Math

Chemistry

Biology

Geography

Library

Position Replacement

2012

2013

2014

2015


Biology 1 year Accounting

CE Cordinator - Gen Fund Eliminated Adults w/ Disabilities Cont. Ed. - Categorical

CE Cordinator - Gen Fund Eliminated Cont. Ed. ABE/HS - Categorical

Counseling - Gen Fund Eliminated Cont. Ed. ABE/HS - Categorical

English - Same Same Year Cont. Ed. Business Skills - Categorical

Library Same Year Cont. Ed. Counselor Bilingual - Categorical

Math Prior Year Cont. Ed. ESL - Categorical

Math Same Year English

Math Same Year EOPS/CARE Counselor - Categorical

Math Same Year Library

Reading Same Year Math

Women's Studies Same Year Math

Math

Political Science

Political Science

Reading

Sociology

Women's Studies

Women's Studies


Biology 1 year Anthropology

Reading Prior Year Biology

Spanish Eliminated Counseling - Categorical

English

Chemistry


DSPS Coordinator Eliminated Biology

Political Science 2 Years Prior Child Dev.

2018

2017

2016

Summary Reports

Web Committee Meeting date: 3/8/2018 Discussion items: [limit to 3-4 bullets maximum] • Sub-committee created a page for the Web Accessibility Statement and Guidelines.

• Web Committee is correcting errors in PDF’s on the website

• Training for Accessibility, Siteimprove and Sharepoint will be offered through Faculty

Development in future Actions proposed: N/A

Events Planned: N/A Resources needed/acquired/allocated: N/A

Technology Meeting date: March 15, 2018 Discussion items: [limit to 3-4 bullets maximum] • Reviewed the Resource Request Rankings procedure. • Accessibilty webpages with Statement and Guidelines was approved to go live. • Blackboard will be cut off on the last day of this semester. • OEI Application Senate Resolution was voted to be supported by the committee.

Actions proposed: N/A

Events Planned: N/A Resources needed/acquired/allocated: N/A

Professional Development Meeting date: 2-27-18 Discussion items: [limit to 3-4 bullets maximum]

• Need for recruitment for new faculty member.

• First class for fall professional development will be week #7.

• Committee charged Martin Stringer to write a resolution in support of classified

professional day to be sent to Michael De Carbo and president Hernandez (college council).

• All flex session evaluation forms reviewed with no reported issues.

Actions proposed: Outreach for recruitment of a faculty member.

Events Planned: First call for professional development will be emailed week #7.

Resources needed/acquired/allocated: n/a

Facilities and Safety Committee Meeting date: February 26, 2018 Discussion items: [limit to 3-4 bullets maximum] • Manny Pacheco presented the latest idea for securing classroom door with magnetic

stipes. • Chuck Wales, discussed D-building issues replacing the fan-colil units. $2 million

dollars of ADA work is to be performed this next fiscal year. • Beth Hoffman discussed the success of the Food Bank with a request for a permanent

location. Consideration of healthy cooking classes. • OEC building renovation iis getting closer to meeting funding requirements

Actions proposed: None.

Events Planned: None. Resources needed/acquired/allocated: None.

Re


Resolution S2018.04 Adoption of the 2018-19 Santiago Canyon College Plan for the California

Community Colleges Pathways Program Moved: Professor DeCarbo Seconded: Professor Taylor Whereas, The Faculty of Santiago Canyon College committed to a single year of open, formal exploration into the California Community Colleges Guided Pahtways Program with the adoption of Resolution S2018.03 Support for Committing to Exploration in the California Community Colleges Guided Pathways Program for One Year; Whereas, The proposed plan is devoted solely to a year of inquiry; the plan neither institutes change nor obligates Santiago Canyon College into any further participation beyond the 2018-19 academic year; and Whereas, The leadership of the Academic Senate of Santiago Canyon College has ensured that the proposed plan allows for recommendations from faculty as to how the resources shall be allocated; Resolved, That the Academic Senate of Santiago Canyon College adopt the 2018-19 Santiago Canyon Plan for the California Community Colleges Pathways Program.

Date Presented: March 6, 2018 Date Passed:


3/7/2018 NOVA: Invest & Plan for Student Success

https://nova.cccco.edu/#/gp/preview/2745 1/4

PRODUCED: MAR 6, 2018, 7:18 PM PSTFUND: GUIDED PATHWAYS, YEAR: SPRING 2018-SUMMER 2019

Santiago Canyon College - Guided PathwaysDescription

COLLEGE: Santiago Canyon College

PLAN TIMEFRAME: Spring 2018-Summer 2019

READ DEADLINES AND THE GUIDED PATHWAYS DOCUMENTATION AND GOALS: Yes

Project Contacts

Point of Contact

Dr. Marilyn Flores Vice President, Academic Affairs [email protected]

Alternate Point of Contact

Michael DeCarbo Academic Senate President [email protected] (714) 628-4725

Approver Contacts

Chancellor/President

John Hernandez [email protected]

President, Academic Senate

Michael DeCarbo Academic Senate President [email protected] (714) 628-4725

Timeline

K E Y E L E M E N TSS P R I N G 2 0 1 8 - S U M M E R 2 0 1 9

FA L L 2 0 1 9 - S U M M E R 2 0 2 0

FA L L 2 0 2 0 - S U M M E R 2 0 2 1

FA L L 2 0 2 1 - S U M M E R 2 0 2 2

I N Q U I RY ( 1 - 3 )

1. Cross Functional Inquiry

2. Shared Metrics

3. Integrated Planning

D E S I G N (4 - 8 )

4. Inclusive Decision-Making Structures

5. Intersegmental Alignment

6. Guided Major and Career Exploration

7. Improved Basic Skills

8. Clear Program Requirements

I M P L E M E N TAT I O N (9 - 1 4 )

9. Proactive and Integrated Student Supports

10. Integrated Technology Infrastructure

11. Strategic Professional Development

12. Aligned Learning Outcomes

13. Assessing and Documenting Learning

14. Applied Learning Outcomes

Inquiry

1. CROSS FUNCTIONAL INQUIRY

College constituents (including staff, faculty across disciplines and counselors, administrators, and students) examine research and local data on student success and discuss overarchingstrategies to improve student success.

College engages in broad, deep and inclusive discussion and inquiry about the Guided Pathways approach, framework and evidence.

CURRENT SCALE OF ADOPTION: Early Adoption

ANTICIPATED CHANGE IN SCALE OF ADOPTION DURING TIMEFRAME: Early Adoption

MAJOR ACTIVITIES: DATA: Contract a research analyst and identify research queries for examination Identify software to disaggregate and perform queries DISCUSSION: Web platform dedicated to sharing

pathway information College workshops and retreats Conferences Guest Speakers Formation of formal pathways team and/or subgroups inclusive of all constituent groups Collectively de�ne student successmetrics and nomenclature Development of student focus groups Place GP as standing agenda items on college governance committees Create opportunities for exploration and dialogue across service areas EXISTING EFFORTS: IEPI TIE team visit to secure software National Student Clearing House Enrollment Management Plan Educational Master Plan Integrated Plan (SSSP, BSI & Student Equity)

MAJOR OUTCOMES: Designated research support for GP inquiry College constituents will have readily available access to student success data A web-platform will be created College workshops and retreatsFaculty and staff will attend workshops, conference and/or participate in events related to GP A work team and subgroups will be formed representing all constituent group Initial de�nitions of student



success metrics and nomenclature will be de�ned If the year of inquiry successfully satis�es all concerns the Senate may pass a resolution in support of another year Discussions occur across collegegovernance committees Disseminate information regarding focus group results to support data

2. SHARED METRICS

College is using clearly identi�ed benchmarks and student data to track progress on key activities and student academic and employment outcomes. Those benchmarks are shared acrosskey initiatives.

CURRENT SCALE OF ADOPTION: Scaling in Progress

ANTICIPATED CHANGE IN SCALE OF ADOPTION DURING TIMEFRAME: Scaling in Progress

MAJOR ACTIVITIES: Collectively (credit/noncredit) explore what benchmarks are being tracked Devise process by which benchmarks used in speci�c initiatives will be shared across the college Create ITS

platform by which data can be accessed and shared Purchase software that will allow for the inputting and warehousing of student data, program reviews, and resource requests EXISTING EFFORTS: Integrated Plan (SSSP, BSI & Student Equity)BSI MMAP Student Success Scorecard IEPI TIE team visit SWP CCCCO Metric Simpli�cation Task Force

MAJOR OUTCOMES: Process by which benchmarks will be shared will have been explored Mechanism for tracking benchmarks developed A process will be created that allows for the sharing of benchmarksAn ITS platform will be created Software will be purchased

3. INTEGRATED PLANNING

College-wide discussions are happening with all stakeholders and support/commitment has been expressed by key stakeholders to utilize the Guided Pathways framework as anoverarching structure for the college’s main planning and resource allocation processes, leveraging existing initiatives and programs.

This item will not be addressed in the current time period. Please refer to the timeline above for more information.

Design

4. INCLUSIVE DECISION-MAKING STRUCTURES

College has identi�ed key leaders that represent diverse campus constituents to steer college-wide communication, input and decisions regarding the Guided Pathways framework.

Constituents have developed transparent cross-functional work-teams to provide the Guided Pathways effort with momentum and regularly provide opportunities for broad college-wideinput. In addition, this plan strategically engages college governance bodies college-wide.


5. INTERSEGMENTAL ALIGNMENT

College engages in systematic coordination with K-12, four-year institutions and industry partners to inform program requirements.


6. GUIDED MAJOR AND CAREER EXPLORATION

College has structures in place to scale major and career exploration early on in a student’s college experience.


7. IMPROVED BASIC SKILLS

College is implementing evidence-based practices to increase access and success in college and/or transfer-level math and English.


8. CLEAR PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

College is clarifying course sequences for programs of study (including key milestones) and creating predictable schedules so that students can know what they need to take, plan courseschedules over an extended period of time, and easily see how close they are to completion. College offers courses to meet student demand.

In order to meet these objectives, college is engaging in backwards design with desired core competencies and/or student outcomes in mind (including time-to-goal completion andenhanced access to relevant transfer and career outcomes).


Implementation

9. PROACTIVE AND INTEGRATED STUDENT SUPPORTS

College provides academic and non-academic support services in a way that is proactive and aligned with instruction, so that all students are explicitly engaged in these services.


10. INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE

College has the technology infrastructure to provide tools for students as well as instructional, counseling, and student support faculty and staff to support planning, tracking, andoutcomes for Guided Pathways.


11. STRATEGIC PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Professional Development (PD) is strategically, frequently, and consistently offered for staff, faculty and administrators and aligned with the college’s strategic goals, needs and prioritiesidenti�ed in integrated plans, program review, and other intentional processes.


12. ALIGNED LEARNING OUTCOMES



Learning outcomes are aligned with the requirements targeted by each program and across all levels (i.e., course, program, institutional) to ensure students’ success in subsequenteducational, employment, and career goals.


13. ASSESSING AND DOCUMENTING LEARNING

The college tracks attainment of learning outcomes and that information is easily accessible to students and faculty. Consistent and ongoing assessment of learning is taking place toassess whether students are mastering learning outcomes and building skills across each program and using results of learning outcomes assessment to improve the effectiveness ofinstruction in their programs.


14. APPLIED LEARNING OUTCOMES

Students have ample opportunity for applied/contextualized learning and practice. Opportunities have been coordinated strategically within and/or amongst programs.


Performance Indicators

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS CURRENT KPI DATA

PARTICIPATION

TRANSFERRABLE MATH & ENGLISH COMPLETION

FIRST TERM MOMENTUM

Budget TotalsTotal Budget

$197,822Code Amount Percent of Budget

1000 - Instructional Salaries $12,000 6.07%

2000 - Non-Instructional Salaries $12,000 6.07%

2000 - Non-Instructional Salaries $8,000 4.04%

5000 - Other Operating Expenses and Services $60,000 30.33%

5000 - Other Operating Expenses and Services $30,000 15.17%

6000 - Capital Outlay $75,822 38.33%

Santiago Canyon College Total $197,822 100%

Efforts & Support

EFFORTS: English Placement: Multiple measures including high school GPA Math Placement: Multiple measures including high school GPA and speci�c high school math course grade

CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE SUPPORT: Continue to provide low-cost professional development opportunities

Certi�cation

CHANCELLOR/PRESIDENT

John [email protected]

PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC SENATE

Michael DeCarboAcademic Senate [email protected](714) 628-4725

SEND REMINDER

Awaiting Submi�al

SEND REMINDER

Awaiting Submi�al

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Re


Resolution S2018.05 Adoption of Changes to the Academic Senate Discipline Groupings Moved: Professor Kubicka-Miller Seconded: Professor Whereas, The Academic Senate Discipline Groupings were created in a time when division compilations were in flux; Whereas, There is no longer a designated Fine and Performing Art and Communication member on the Educational Master Planning Committee; and Whereas, The Library is now within the division of Library and Institutional Effectiveness; Resolved, That the Academic Senate of Santiago Canyon College adopt the proposed changes to the Academic Senate Discipline Groupings. ii. The Discipline Groupings shall be:

a. Business and Career Education b. Continuing Education c. Counseling and Student Services d. Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences e. Fine and Performing Arts and Communication ef. Library and Institutional Effectiveness fg. Mathematics and Sciences



Re


Resolution S2018.06 Application for Santiago Canyon College to Become a Consortium Member in

the Online Education Initiative Course Exchange Moved: Professor Deeley Seconded: Whereas, Students encounter barriers when attempting to complete degrees and certificates when courses are impacted, or are not offered in a format, time, or place that meets a student’s complex scheduling needs, and are able to take these classes at other accredited community colleges and transfer those units to Santiago Canyon College; Whereas, Community College funding is now partially based upon student completion; Whereas, Enrolling in classes at other community colleges is challenging due to the lack of an efficient cross-college application and registration process; Whereas, The Online Education Initiative Exchange has created a single, effective application and registration process whereby students are able to enroll once at Santiago Canyon while also joining the Exchange, allowing our students to register for CI-D aligned classes, through the OEI Course Exchange, with their current registration processes, increasing the likelihood that they are able to complete degrees and certificates; Whereas, Offering classes through the OEI Course Exchange provides our faculty with enrollment management options, including increasing enrollment for classes that cancel due to low enrollment, offering low-enrollment, or niche, classes more frequently, and increasing the flexibility of a professor’s load; and

Re


Resolution S2018.06 Whereas, The Online Education Initiative’s 2018 cohort will be defining how Student Equity is incorporated into online course design and Santiago Canyon would like to help shape Student Equity design for online classes; and Whereas, The Technology Committee supports applying to be a member of the 2018 OEI Cohort; and Resolved, The Academic Senate of Santiago supports the application to become a consortium member the Online Education Initiative Course Exchange for the 2018 OEI Cohort.



senator and executive board elections second reading a€¦ · 20/03/2018 · jared kubicka-miller...

Documents