semi-quantitative modeling for the effect of oxygen level.pdf

Upload: jenjavier

Post on 02-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    1/8

    Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level

    on the Metabolism inEscherichia coli

    Yu Matsuoka1, Kazuyuki Shimizu1,21Dept. of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology,

    Iizuka, Fukuoka 820-8502, Japan2Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata 997-0017, Japan

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Abstract

    Mathematical models for the main metabolic

    pathways such as glycolysis, pentose phosphate

    pathway, TCA cycle, fermentation pathway etc. were

    considered for the enzyme level regulation in E.coli. Itis quite important to develop a model which can

    simulate the effect of oxygen level on the metabolism in

    practice. For this, the effect of oxygen level on the

    expressions of the global regulators such as arcA/B

    and fnr was modeled based on the experimental data.

    Then the effects of these gene expressions on the

    metabolic pathway gene expressions were

    incorporated in the model, where the effects of oxygen

    levels on PDHc and Pfl fluxes as well as the

    respiratory pathway flux were expressed based on the

    experimental data. Thus, the model could express the

    increase in the redox ratio, NADH/NAD as the oxygen

    level decreases, and in turn the activation of the

    fermentation pathways. The semi-quantitative modeldeveloped in the present research enables us to

    simulate the effect of changing the oxygen level on the

    cell growth and the production of the variety of

    metabolites such as lactate, ethanol etc.

    1. Introduction

    One of the most challenging goals of metabolic

    engineering and bioprocess engineering is to design the

    cell metabolism based on metabolic regulation analysis

    and to find the optimal culture condition for the cell

    growth and the specific metabolite production. For this,

    it is strongly desired to develop a mathematical model

    which can describe the dynamic behavior of the cell

    metabolism in response to culture environment and/or

    genetic modifications.

    Some of the kinetic models have been developed in

    the past for Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1-3]. The

    dynamics of the intracellular metabolite concentrations

    in response to the pulse addition of glucose-limited

    continuous culture have been investigated [2, 4-6].

    The kinetic equations for the glycolysis and pentose

    phosphate (PP) pathway in E.coli have also beendeveloped by Chassagnole et al. [7] to simulate the

    dynamics of the intracellular metabolite concentrations

    in response to the pulse change in the feed glucose

    concentration in glucose-limited continuous culture.

    This model does not contain kinetic equations for the

    TCA cycle as well as fermentation pathways, and thus

    cannot simulate the typical batch cultivation.

    In the present investigation, we considered the

    kinetic model equations for the glycolysis, PP

    pathweay, TCA cycle and the fermentation pathways.

    Moreover, most of the kinetic models developed so far

    can express only enzyme level regulation due to the

    change in the concentrations of substrate, product aswell as various effectors. Thus, the conventional model

    cannot express the metabolic changes in relation to the

    change in culture environment such as dissolved

    oxygen and/or the genetic changes, where those affect

    the cell metabolism via gene level regulation. Although

    it is not easy to express gene level regulation by

    mathematical equations, we considered a semi-

    quantitative approach by utilizing some of the

    experimental data and the knowledge on gene level

    regulation.

    2. Modeling

    2.1. Dynamic Equations

    Referring to Fig.1, the dynamic equations may be

    described based on mass balances as follows:

    ( ) ][][ XGlcdt

    Xd ex=

    (1a)

    Digital Object Identifier inserted by IEEE

    International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems

    978-0-7695-3575-3/09 $25.00 2009 IEEE

    DOI 10.1109/CISIS.2009.179

    215

    International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems

    978-0-7695-3575-3/09 $25.00 2009 IEEE

    DOI 10.1109/CISIS.2009.179

    215

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    2/8

    ][][

    Xvdt

    GlcdPTS

    ex

    =(1b)

    ]6[]6[

    6 PGvvvdt

    PGdPDHGPfkPTS =

    (1c)

    ][][

    FDPvvdt

    FDPdAldPfk =

    (1d)

    ][2

    ][

    GAPvvdt

    GAPd

    GAPDHAld =

    (1e)

    ][][

    PGPvvdt

    PGPdPgkGAPDH =

    (1f)

    ]3[]3[

    PGvvdt

    PGdEnoPgk =

    (1g)

    ][][

    PEPvvvvvdt

    PEPdPTSPpcPykPckEno +=

    (1h)

    ][][

    PYRvvvvvdt

    PYRdPflLDHPDHPTSPyk +=

    (1i)

    ][][

    LACvdt

    LACdLDH =

    (1j)

    ][][

    AcCoAvvvvvdt

    AcCoAdCSALDHPtaPflPDH +=

    (1k)

    ][

    ][

    AcAldvvdt

    AcAlddADHALDH

    =(1l)

    ][][

    ETHvdt

    ETHdADH =

    (1m)

    ][][

    AcPvvdt

    AcPdAckPta =

    (1n)

    ]])[[(][

    XACEvdt

    ACEd exAck

    ex

    =(1o)

    ][][

    CITvvdt

    CITdICDHCS =

    (1p)

    ]2[]2[

    2 KGvvdt

    KGdKGDHICDH =

    (1q)

    ][][

    2SUCvvv

    dt

    SUCdSDHFrdKGDH

    +=(1r)

    ][

    ][

    FUMvvvdt

    FUMdFrdFumSDH

    =(1s)

    ][][

    MALvvdt

    MALdMDHFum =

    (1t)

    ][][

    OAAvvvvdt

    OAAdPckCSPpcMDH +=

    (1u)

    where [.] denotes the concentration. is the specific

    growth rate, and iv are the kinetic rate equations in

    mmol/gDCW.h.

    As shown in Fig.1, G6P and F6P were lumped

    together, since Pgi reaction is well in equilibrium. In

    the same reason, GAP and DHAP were also lumped

    together. A sequence of enzymatic reactions by Gpm,

    and Eno may be considered to be in equilibrium, andwas assumed to be one reaction from 3PG to PEP. As

    for the PP pathway, only G6PDH and PGDH were

    considered in view of NADPH production.

    Here, Mez, Icl, MS, Acs, Pps, Fbp etc. were not

    considered in the present study, since the focus of the

    current attention is fermentation under micro-aerobic

    or anaerobic condition.

    Fig.1 Metabolic Pathways

    2.2.Kinetic equationsSome of the important kinetic equations used for the

    various enzyme-catalyzed reactions are as follows:

    2.2.1. Cell growth

    The specific growth rate was assumed to be the

    following simple Monod model:

    ( )][

    ][

    ,

    ex

    Glcm

    ex

    mex

    GlcK

    GlcGlc

    ex +

    =

    (2a)

    2.2.2. Phosphotransferase system (PTS)

    The glucose transport via phosphotransferase

    system (PTS) has been extensively investigated and is

    catalyzed by a sequence of enzymes such as EI, HPr,

    EIIAGlc and the rate-limiting step to the final step of

    glucose transport and phosphorylation from PEP.

    Those were encoded by such genes as ptsHI, crr and

    ptsG. The kinetic rate equation for PTS may be

    expressed as [7]

    +

    +++

    =

    PGPTS

    n

    exexaPTSaPTSaPTS

    exPTS

    PTS

    K

    PG

    PYR

    PEPGlcGlcKPYR

    PEPKK

    PYR

    PEPGlcv

    vPGPTS

    6,

    3,2,1,

    max

    6,]6[1][

    ][][][][

    ][

    ][

    ][][

    (2b)

    Fig.2a shows the effect of [PEP] onPTSv

    with respect to

    glucose concentration, wherePTSv

    increases as [PEP]

    increases.

    216216

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    3/8

    Fig.2a Effect of [PEP] on PTSv

    2.2.3. PhosphofructokinaseThe phosphofructokinase (Pfk) is encoded by pfkA

    and pfkB in E.coli, where Pfk-1 encoded by pfkA is

    dominant, accounting for 90 % of the total activity [8].

    Here, we considered only Pfk-1, where it is inhibited

    by PEP [9], and its reaction rate may be expressed as

    [7]

    +

    +

    +

    ++

    =

    Pfkn

    sPFPfk

    Pfk

    sPFPfk

    cADPPfk

    sATPPfk

    Pfk

    Pfk

    AK

    BPF

    L

    B

    AKPF

    K

    ADPKATP

    PFATPvv

    ,6,

    ,6,

    ,,

    ,,

    max

    ]6[1

    1]6[][

    1][

    ]6][[

    (2c)

    where

    ,][][][

    1,,,,, bAMPPfkbADPPfkPEPPfk K

    AMP

    K

    ADP

    K

    PEPA +++=

    aAMPPfkaADPPfk K

    AMP

    K

    ADPB

    ,,,,

    ][][1 ++=

    2.2.4. GAPDH

    The rate equation for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate

    dehydrogenase (GAPDH) may be expressed as [7]

    +

    +

    +

    +

    =

    1][

    ][1

    ][

    1][

    ][1

    ][

    ][][][

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    max

    NAD

    NADH

    KNADKGAP

    K

    PGPK

    NAD

    NADH

    K

    PGPGAPv

    v

    NADHGAPDH

    NADGAPDH

    PGPGAPDH

    GAPGAPDH

    eqGAPDH

    GAPDH

    GAPDH (2d)

    whereGAPDHv becomes small as [NADH] increases as

    shown in Fig.2b, whereGAPDHv decreases as

    [NADH]/[NAD] increases.

    Fig.2b Effect of NADH/NAD on GAPDHv

    2.2.5. Pyruvate kinaseThe pyruvate kinase (Pyk) reaction is catalyzed by

    two isoenzymes such as PykI and PykII each encoded

    by pykF and pykA, respectively. PykI is dominant and

    activated by FDP and inhibited by ATP, whereas

    minor PykII is activated by AMP. Here, we lumped

    these together, and the rate equation may be expressed

    as [7]

    ( )ADPPyk

    n

    PEPPyk

    n

    AMPPykFDPPyk

    ATPPyk

    PykPEPPyk

    n

    PEPPyk

    Pyk

    Pyk

    KADPK

    PEP

    K

    AMP

    K

    FDP

    K

    ATP

    LK

    ADPK

    PEPPEPv

    v

    Pyk

    Pyk

    Pyk

    ,

    ,

    ,,

    ,

    ,

    1

    ,

    max

    ][1][

    1][][

    ][1

    ][1][

    ][

    +

    ++

    ++

    +

    +

    =

    (2e)

    wherePykv increases as [FDP] increases. Fig.2c shows

    the effect of [FDP] on Pykv with respect to [PEP] at theconstant value of [ATP], [ADP] and [AMP], where

    Pykv increases little as [FDP] increases in the range of

    concern.

    Fig.2c Effect of [FDP] on Pykv

    2.2.6. PEP carboxylase

    It is quite important to correctly simulate the fluxes

    at the branch point of PEP, where the enzyme activities

    of Pyk and Ppc determine the fluxes. It has been

    known that Ppc exhibits a hyperbolic function with

    respect to PEP, and that the reaction rate is usually low

    without any activator, where AcCoA is a very potent

    activator, and FDP alone exhibits no activation, but it

    gives strong synergistic activation with AcCoA [10].

    Those may be taken into account for the rate equation

    [11] as

    +++

    +++=

    ][

    ][

    ][][1

    ]][[][][

    65

    4321

    PEPK

    PEP

    FDPKAcCoAK

    FDPAcCoAKFDPKAcCoAKKv

    m

    Ppc (2f)

    Although CO2 is the cosubstrate in Ppc reaction, the

    effect of CO2 was not considered in Ppcv . Fig.2e shows

    the effect of [AcCoA] onPpcv with respect to [PEP],

    where it shows thatPpcv increases as [AcCoA]

    increases.

    The reverse reaction to Ppc, Pck may be considered

    [12, 13], but not shown here.

    2.2.7. PDHFor the rate equation of pyruvate dehydrogenase

    complex (PDHc) encoded by aceE, F and lpdA, the

    hyperbolic function with respect to PYR was

    considered, and the inhibition by NADH/NAD was

    also taken into account [14]

    217217

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    4/8

    ++

    ++

    +

    +

    =

    AcCoAmCoAmNADHmNADmPYRm

    CoAmNADmPYRmi

    PDH

    PDH

    K

    AcCoA

    K

    CoA

    NAD

    NADH

    KKNADK

    PYR

    K

    CoA

    KK

    PYR

    NAD

    NADHK

    v

    v

    ,,,,,

    ,,,

    max

    ][][1

    ][

    ][11

    ][

    1][1

    ][1][

    ][

    ][1

    1

    (2g)

    2.2.8. Acetate formation

    The acetate formation is of important concern in thecell growth and the specific metabolite production in

    E.coli. The main pathway for acetate production is Pta-

    Ack pathway, where the reaction catalyzed by Pta and

    Ack proceeds through an unstable, high energy acetyl

    phosphate (Ace-P). For Pta reaction, the following

    equation was considered [14] based on Hankin and

    Abales [15]:

    ++++++

    =

    CoAiACPmPmAcCoAiCoAiACPiPiAcCoAi

    eqpmAcCoAi

    Pta

    Pta

    KK

    CAOACP

    KK

    PAcCoA

    K

    CoA

    K

    ACP

    K

    P

    K

    AcCoA

    K

    CoAACPPAcCoA

    KKv

    v

    ,,,,,,,,

    ,,

    max

    ]][[]][[][][][][1

    ]][[]][[

    1

    (2h)

    The rate equation for Ack reaction was assumed to be

    expressed as follows [14]:

    ++

    ++

    =

    ATPmADPmACmACPm

    eqACPmADPm

    Ack

    Ack

    K

    ATP

    K

    ADP

    K

    AC

    K

    ACP

    K

    ATPACADPACP

    KKv

    v

    ,,,,

    ,,

    max

    ][][1

    ][][1

    ]][[]][[

    1

    (2i)

    2.2.9. ICDH

    In E.coli, NADPH is formed in ICDH reaction, and

    the activity is inhibited by NADPH. The following

    equation was considered [16] in the present study:

    1

    ][

    2,

    ,

    ][]][2][[]][[

    A

    ICDHK

    COKGNADPHNADPICIK

    K

    k

    v

    ICDH

    eq

    NADPd

    ICIm

    f

    ICDH

    =

    (2j)

    where

    2

    2

    2

    22

    2

    2

    2

    2

    22

    2

    ,

    2

    ,,

    ,,,,

    ,,

    ,,,

    ,2

    ,

    2

    ,

    ,,

    ,

    ,,,,

    ,,

    ,

    2

    ,,,

    ,,

    ,,,

    ,

    ,,,,,,

    ,

    1

    ][][][

    ][][]][[][][

    ][][][][][

    ][][]][[][][1

    COdKGmNADPHenhe

    NADPeknCOdNADPHenheKGm

    COekeNADPHm

    COdNADPHenheKGm

    NADPHm

    COdNADPHenhe

    COdNADPHenhe

    COm

    KGmCOdNADPHenheKGm

    COekeNADPHm

    COdCOdNADPHenheKGm

    COmKGeknh

    NADPHemhNADPdICIm

    NADPm

    ICIdNADPdICImNADPdNADPdICIm

    NADPm

    K

    CO

    K

    KG

    K

    NADPH

    K

    NADPH

    KKK

    KKKG

    KKK

    KCOKG

    K

    CO

    K

    NADPH

    KK

    KNADPH

    K

    KG

    KKK

    KKKG

    K

    CO

    KKK

    KKNADPH

    KKK

    KNADPH

    K

    ICI

    KK

    NADPICI

    K

    NADP

    KK

    KICIA

    +

    +++

    ++++

    ++++=

    2.2.10. Fermentative pathway

    The following equation was used for LDH reaction

    [14]:

    ++

    ++

    =

    NADmNADHmLACmPYRm

    eqNADHmPYRm

    LDH

    LDH

    KNAD

    NADH

    KNADK

    LAC

    K

    PYR

    K

    LAC

    NAD

    NADHPYR

    KKV

    v

    ,,,,

    ,,

    max

    1

    ][

    ][1

    ][

    1][][1

    ][

    ][

    ][][

    1

    (2k)

    whereLDHv iscreases as NADH/NAD increases. Fig.2d

    shows the effect of NADH/NAD onLDHv with respect

    to [PYR], whereLDHv increases as NADH/NAD

    increases.

    Fig.2d Effect of NADH/NAD on LDHv

    The equations for ethanol formation from AcCoA

    was expressed as [14]

    ++++

    ++

    =

    CoAmAcAldmAcAldmCoAmAcCoAmNADHmNADm

    eqNADHmAcCoAm

    AALDH

    AALDH

    KK

    CoAAcAld

    K

    AcAld

    K

    CoA

    K

    AcCoA

    NAD

    NADH

    KKNAD

    K

    AcAldCoA

    NAD

    NADHAcCoA

    KKV

    v

    ,,,,,,,

    ,,

    max

    ]][[][][][1

    ][

    ][11

    ][

    1

    ]][[

    ][

    ][][

    1

    (2l)

    and

    ++

    ++

    =

    ETHmAcAldmNADHmNADm

    eqNADHmAcAldm

    ADH

    ADH

    K

    ETH

    K

    AcAld

    NAD

    NADH

    KKNAD

    K

    ETH

    NAD

    NADHAcAld

    KKV

    v

    ,,,,

    ,,

    max

    ][][1

    ][

    ][11

    ][

    1

    ][

    ][

    ][][

    1

    (2m)

    where those increase as NADH/NAD increases. Fig.2eshows the effect of NADH/NAD on

    ADHv with respect

    to [AcAld], whereADHv increases as NADH/NAD

    increases.

    Fig.2e Effect of NADH/NAD on ADHv

    2.2.11. PP pathway

    For G6PDH and PGDH in the PP pathway, the

    following equations [7] were employed:

    ( )

    +

    +

    ++

    =

    ][][

    1][

    1]6[

    ]][6[

    ,,6

    ,6

    6,,6

    6,6

    max

    66

    NADPK

    NADPHK

    K

    NADPHKPG

    NADPPGVv

    NADPHinhNADPHPDHG

    NADPPDHG

    PinhGNADPHPDHG

    PGPDHG

    PDHGPDHG

    (2n)

    and

    ( )

    +

    +++

    =

    ATPinhPGDHNADPHinhPGDH

    NADPPGDHPGPGDH

    PGDHPGDH

    K

    ATP

    K

    NADPHKNADPKPG

    NADPPGVv

    ,,

    ,6,

    max

    ][1

    ][1][]6[

    ]][6[

    (2o)

    2.2.12. Other rate equationsOther rate equations for Ald, Pgk, CS, 2KGDH,

    SDH, Fum, MDH were also considered but not shown

    here due to space limitation.

    2.3. Effect of oxygen level on the metabolism

    It is quite important to grasp the relationship

    between oxygen level and the metabolism, since the

    oxygen level affects both cell growth and the specific

    metabolite production. For example, the following

    218218

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    5/8

    strategy is often employed in practice: Initially aerobic

    condition was employed to enhance the cell growth,

    and then changed to micro-aerobic or anaerobic

    condition for the efficient metabolite production. It is,

    therefore, desired to simulate the effect of oxygen level

    on the metabolism. Escherichia coli possesses the

    specific sensing/regulation systems for the rapidresponse to the availability of oxygen and the presence

    of other electron acceptors [17-22]. The adaptive

    responses are coordinated by a group of global

    regulators, which includes two-component ArcA

    (anoxic redox control) system and one-component Fnr

    (fumarate, nitrate reduction). It has been known that

    although the concentration of Fnr protein is similar in

    both aerobic and anaerobic conditions [18, 23], it

    becomes active only in the anaerobic growth condition.

    On the other hand, ArcA/B system works at micro-

    aerobic condition. The cytoplasmic ArcA regulator

    with its cognate sensor kinase ArcB regulates such

    genes that encode several dehydrogenases of theflavoprotein, terminal oxidases, TCA cycle enzymes,

    glyoxylate enzymes etc. in response to deprivation of

    oxygen [24-26].

    Under micro-aerobic or anaerobic condition, PYR is

    the important branch point, where LDH, PDHc, and Pfl

    compete for it. As the oxygen level decreases, the

    redox ratio NADH/NAD increases, and it affects the

    flux through LDH and PDH by enzyme level

    regulation. Since PDHc is repressed whereas Pfl is

    activated by both ArcA and Fnr as the oxygen level

    decreases, the effect of oxygen level on these fluxes

    may be expresses by the relationship as given in Fig.3a,

    where it indicates gene level regulation [27].

    0 10 20 30 40

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    [m

    m

    olg-

    1h-

    1]

    % of aerobiosis

    PFL flux

    PD H flux

    Fig.3a Effect of oxygen level on PDH and Pfl fluxes

    (symbols are the experimental data)

    The effect of oxygen level on arcA and fnr gene

    expressions may be obtained as given in Fig.3b [28].

    The effects of ArcA and Fnr on the metabolic pathway

    genes such asgltA, acnA,B, icdA, sucABCD, sdhCDAB,

    fumA,C, mdh, cyo, cydetc. may be obtained (data not

    shown). Those relationships were reflected to modulate

    maxv in the reaction rate equations.

    0 2 4 6 8 10

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    arcA

    expression

    relative

    to

    10

    %

    O

    2

    % of aerobiosis

    fnrexpression

    relative

    to

    10

    %

    O

    2

    Fig.3b Effect of oxygen level on arcA and fnrgene

    ecpressions

    In order to simulate the effect of oxygen level on

    the TCA cycle activation, it is critical to model the

    respiratory chain reactions. It may be able to calculate

    the distributions of the respiratory flux for the

    cytochrome bd and bo terminal oxidases. The kinetic

    parameters for Cyd is as follows: Km=0.024 MO2,

    vm=42 mol of O2.nmol of Cyd-1.h-1, while those of

    Cyo is as follows: Km=0.2 MO2, vm=66 mol of

    O2.nmol of Cyo-1.h-1 [29]. Then the flux of electrons to

    oxygen (qO2) may be estimated as given in Fig.4 [24],

    where qO2 decreases as the oxygen level decreases, and

    the amount of NADH utilized for ATP production

    reduces. Thus NADH/NAD ratio tends to increase as

    the oxygen level decreases, which in turn forces the

    fermentative pathways to be activated.

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    qO

    2

    [m

    m

    olg-

    1h-

    1]

    % of aerobiosis

    Fig.4 Effect of oxygen level on qO2

    3. Result

    Figure 5 shows part of the simulation result for the

    batch culture ofE.coli, where the parameter values

    used for the simulation is listed in Table 1. The kinetic

    parameter values were employed from the literature as

    given in Table 1 exceptmax

    v , where denotes the

    enzyme name.

    max

    v was estimated from the flux dataand the measured intracellular metabolite concentration

    in the chemostat culture [7,30-33].

    219219

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    6/8

    Table 1 Model Parameters

    Enzyme Kinetic parameter valuesOriginalsource

    Cell

    growth1

    max 25.0

    = h , mMKs 0.1=

    PTShgDCWmolmv

    PTS./739.25max = mMK aPTS 11, =

    mMK aPTS 01.02, = 13, =aPTSK

    46, =PGPTSn

    mMK PGPTS 5.06, =

    [7]

    G6PDH

    hgDCWmolmv PDHG ./979.0max

    6 =

    mMK PGPDHG 07.06,6 =

    mMK NADPPDHG 015.0,6 =

    mMK NADPHinhNADPHPDHG 01.0,,6 =

    mMK PinhGNADPHPDHG 18.06,,6 =

    [7]

    PGDHhgDCWmolmvPGDH ./81.1

    max=

    mMK PGPGDH 1.06, = mMK NADPPGDH 028.0, = mMK NADPHinhPGDH 01.0, =

    mMK ATPinhPGDH 3, = [7]

    PfkhgDCWmolmv

    Pfk./936.26max =

    mMK sPFPfk 14.0,6, = mMK sATPPfk 16.0,, =

    mMK aADPPfk 239,, = mMK bADPPfk 25.0,, =

    mMK cADPPfk 36.0,, =

    mMK aAMPPfk 74.8,, =

    mMKbAMPPfk

    01.0,, =

    mMKPEPPfk

    25.0, =

    4000000=Pfk

    L 4=Pfkn

    [7]

    AldhgDCWmolmvAld ./461.64

    max=

    mMK FDPAld 133.0, = mMK DHAPAld 088.0, =

    mMK GAPAld 088.0, = mMK GAPinhAld 6.0, =

    2, =blfAldV mMK eqAld 1.0, =

    [7]

    GAPDH

    hgDCWmolmvGAPDH ./582.10max

    =

    mMK GAPGAPDH 15.0, = mMK PGPGAPDH 1.0, =

    mMK NADGAPDH 45.0, = mMK NADHGAPDH 02.0, =

    63.0, =eqGAPDHK

    [7]

    Pgk

    hgDCWmolmvPgk ./84.158max

    = 1800, =eqPgkK

    mMK PGPPgk 006.0, = mMK PGPgk 17.03, =

    mMK ADPPgk 18.0, = mMK ATPPgk 24.0, =

    [7]

    EnohgDCWmolmvEno ./439.12

    max=

    4, =eqEnoK

    mMK PGEno 1.02, = mMK PEPEno 135.0, =

    [7]

    Pyk

    hgDCWmolmvPyk ./085.1max

    = 1000=PykL

    mMK PEPPyk 31.0, = mMK ADPPyk 26.0, =

    mMK ATPPyk 5.22, = mMK FDPPyk 19.0, =

    mMKAMPPyk

    2.0, =

    4=Pykn

    [7]

    PDHhgDCWmolmvPDH ./

    max= mMK PYRm 1, =

    mMK NADm 4.0, = mMK CoAm 014.0, =

    mMK AcCoAm 008.0, = mMK

    NADHm1.0, =

    mMKi 4.46=

    [14]

    LDH

    hgDCWmolmvLDH ./762.7max

    = 7.21120=eqK

    mMK NADHm 08.0, = mMK PYRm 5.1, = mMK NADm 4.2, =

    mMK LACm 100, =

    [14]

    Pta

    hgDCWmolmvPta ./665.45max

    = 0281.0=eqK

    mMK AcCoAi 2.0, =

    mMK Pm 6.2, =

    mMK Pi 6.2, =

    mMK AcPm 7.0, = mMK AcPi 2.0, =

    mMK CoAi 029.0, = mMK CoAm 12.0, =

    [14]

    AckhgDCWmolmvAck ./36.875

    max=

    mMK AcPm 16.0, = mMK ADPm 5.0, =

    [14]

    mMK ACm 7, = mMK ATPm 07.0, =

    2.174=eqK

    ALDH

    hgDCWmolmvALDH ./69001.0max

    =

    mMK AcCoAm 007.0, = mMK NADHm 025.0, =

    mMK NADm 08.0, = mMK CoAm 008.0, =

    mMK AcAldm 10, = 1=eqK

    [14]

    ADHhgDCWmolmvADH ./928.12

    max=

    mMK AcAldm 03.0, = mMK NADHm 05.0, =

    mMK NADm 08.0, = mMK ETHm 1, = 9.12354=eqK

    [14]

    CShgDCWmolmvCS ./0675.1

    max=

    mMK AcCoACS 01.0, = mMK OAACS 007.0, =

    mMK CoAi 11.0, =

    [33]

    ICDH

    mMKeq 1000=1min4830 =fk

    mMKiCiT

    m0059.0= mMK

    NADP

    d0013.0=

    mMKNADPm

    0227.0= mMKNADPH

    d12.0=

    mMKiCITd 03.0= mMK

    KG

    m038.02 =

    mMKiCiTm

    0059.0= mMKKG

    eknh5.52 =

    mMKCO

    d6.12 = mMK

    CO

    eke6.12 =

    mMKNADPekn

    00016.0= mMKNADPH

    m0036.0=

    mMKNADPH

    enhe 028.0=

    [16]

    2KGDH

    hgDCWmolmv KGDH ./3677.2max

    2 = 5.1=KZ

    mMK KGKGDH 00.12,2 = mMK CoAKGDH 002.0,2 =

    mMK NADKGDH 07.0,2 = mMK KGi 75.02, =

    mMK SUCi 0.1, = mMK NADHi 018.0, =

    [33]

    SDHhgDCWmolmVSDH ./5622.1

    max

    1 =

    hgDCWmolmVSDH ./max

    2 =

    mMK SUCSDH 10.0, = 0.10, =eqSDHK

    [33]

    FumhgDCWmolmVFum ./98636.0

    max

    1 =

    hgDCWmolmVFum ./max

    2 =

    mMK FUMFum 10.0, = 0.10, =eqFumK

    [33]

    MDH

    hgDCWmolmVMDH ./444.62max

    1 =

    hgDCWmolmVMDH ./max

    2 =

    mMK NADMDH 10.0, = mMK MALMDH 33.1, = mMK NADHMDH 04.0, =

    mMK OAAMDH 27.0, =

    mMK NADi 31.0, = mMK MALi 30.3, =

    mMK NADHi 04.0, = mMK OAAi 27.0, =

    31.0, =lAiK 17.0, =lQiK

    0.1, =eqMDHK

    [33]

    Ppc

    hgDCWmolmvPpc ./max

    =mMK

    PEP

    m3231.0=

    03176.01 =k mMk 2878.12 =

    mMk 05425.03= mMk 8139.0

    4=

    mMk 0939.05= mMk 2693.0

    6=

    [11]

    Fig.5 shows that cells grow exponentially in

    response to the glucose consumption, and how the

    intracellular metabolite concentrations change. Fig.5indicates that [PEP] is low throughout batch culture

    due to its utilization in PTS. Moreover, all the

    intracellular metabolite concentrations were on the

    order of 0.1~2.5, which are quite reasonable from the

    view point of experimental data. Although the

    changing alters of intracellular metabolite

    concentration in the glycolysis are reasonable, those in

    220220

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    7/8

    the TCA cycle may be somewhat different from the

    real behavior. This has to be refined in the near future.

    Fig.5 Simulation result for the batch culture

    4. Discussion

    Although semi-quantitative models were considered

    using some experimental data, the developed model

    could simulate how the decrease in oxygen level

    affects the fermentation patterns in view of

    NADH/NAD ratio. Moreover, the overall ATP

    produced can be also computed and this can be used to

    estimate the cell growth rate by taking into account the

    biosynthetic equation as well. The present modeling

    approach is new and can be used in practice for

    performance improvement and the design of cell

    metabolism.

    5. Conclusion

    It was shown that the kinetic models considered in

    the present research can be used for the simulation of

    the batch culture of both aerobic and anaerobic

    conditions.

    6. References

    [1] M. Rizzi, M. Baltes, U. Theobald, M. Reuss, In vivoanalysis of metabolic dynamic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae:II. Mathematical model, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 55, pp.592-

    608, 1997.

    [2] U. Theobald, W. Mailinger, M. Baltes, M. Rizzi, M.Reuss, In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamic inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: I. Experimental observations,Biotechnol. Bioeng. pp.305-316, 1997.

    [3] S. Vaseghi, A. Baumeister, M. Rizzi, M. Reuss, In vivodynamics of the pentose phosphate pathway inSaccharomyces cerevisiae, Metabolic Eng. 1, pp.128-140,1999.

    [4] S. Buziol, I. Bashir, A. Baumeister, W. Claassen, M.

    Rizzi, W. Mailinger, M. Reuss, A new bioreactor coupledrapid stopped-flow sampling technique for measurement oftransient metabolites in time windows of milliseconds, InProceeding of the Fourth International Congress on

    Biochemical Engineering. Stuggart: Fraunhofer IRB, pp.79-83, 2000.

    [5] S. Buziol, I. Bashir, A. Baumeister, W. Claassen, N.Noisommit-Rizzi, W. Mailinger, M. Reuss, A newbioreactor coupled rapid stopped-flow sampling techmique

    for measurement of metabolite dynamics on a subsecondtime scale, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 80, pp.632-636, 2001.

    [6] U. Theobald, W. Mailinger, M.Reuss, M. Rizzi, In vivoanalysis of glucose induced fast changes in yeast adeninenucleotide pool applying a rapid sampling technique, Anal.

    Biochem. 214, pp.31-37, 1993.

    [7] C. Chassagnole, N. Noisommit-Rizzi, J. W. Schmid, K.Mauch, M. Reuss, Dynamic modeling of the central carbonmetabolism of Eschrichia coli, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 79,

    pp.53-73, 2002.

    [8] P. Karp, M. Riley, S. Paley, A. Pellegrini-Toole, M.Krummenacker, EcoCyc: Electronic encyclopedia ofE-coli

    genes and metabolism, Nucl. Acids Res. pp.27-55, 1999.

    [9] D. Kotlarz, H. Garreau, H. Buc, Regulation of theamount and of the activity of phosphofructokinase and

    pyruvate kinase in Escherichia coli , Biochem. Biophys.

    Acta. pp.257-268, 1975.

    [10] K. Izui, M. Taguchi, M. Morioka, H. Katsuki,

    Regulation of Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate

    221221

  • 7/27/2019 Semi-quantitative Modeling for the Effect of Oxygen Level.pdf

    8/8

    carboxylase by multiple effectors in vivo. Kinetic studieswith a reaction system containing physiologicalconcentrations of ligands, J. Biochem. 90, pp.1321-1331,

    1981.

    [11] B. Lee, J. Yen, L. Yang, J. C. Liao, Incorporatingqualitative knowledge in enzyme kinetic models using fuzzy

    logic, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 62, pp.722-729, 1999.

    [12] A. Krebs, W. A. Bridger, The kinetic properties ofphosphoenolpyruvate calboxykinase ofEscherichia coli , J.Biochem. 58, pp.309-318, 1980.

    [13] C. Yang, Q. Hua, T. Baba, H. Mori, K. Shimizu,Analysis ofEscherichia coli anaplerotic metabolism and its

    regulation mechanisms from the metabolic responses toaltered dilution rates and phosphoenolpyruvatecalboxykinase knockout, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84, pp.129-144, 2003.

    [14] M. N. Hoefnagel, M. J. C. Starrenburg, D. E. Martens, J.Hugenholtz, M. Kleerebezem, I. V. Swam, R. Bongers, H. V.

    Westerhoff, J. L. Snoep, Metabolic engineering of lacticacid bacteria, the combined approach: kinetic modeling,metabolic control and experimental analysis, Microbiology.148, pp.1003-1013, 2002.

    [15] J. Henkin, R. H. Abales, Evidence against an acyl-enzyme intermediate in the reaction catalyzed by clostridial

    phosphotransacetylase, Biochemistry. 15, pp.3475-3479,1976.

    [16] E. A. Mogilevskaya, G. V. Lebedeva, I. I. Goryanin,O.V. Demin, Kinetic model of functioning and regulation of

    Escherichia coli isocitrate dehydrogenase, Biophysics, 52,pp.30-39, 2007.

    [17] J. R. Guest, J. Green, A. S. Irvine, S. Spiro, The FNRmodulon and FNR-regulated gene expression, Chapman andHall, New York, pp.317-342, 1996.

    [18] R. P. Gunsalus, Control of electron flow inEscherichiacoli: coordinated transcription of respiratory pathway genes,J. Bacteriol. 174, pp.7069-7074, 1992.

    [19] E. C. C. Lin, S. Iuchi, Regulation of gene expression infermentative and respiratory systems inEscherichia coli andrelated bacteria, Annu. Rev.Genet. 25, pp.361-387, 1991.

    [20] A. S. Lynch, E. C. C. Lin, Transcriptional controlmediated by the ArcA two-component response regulator

    protein ofEscherichia coli: characterization of DNA bindingat target promoters, J. Bacteriol. 178, pp.6238-6249, 1996.

    [21] S. J. Park, C. P. Tseng, R. P. Gunsalus, Regulation of

    succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCDAB) operon expression inEscherichia coli in response to carbon supply andanaerobiosis: role of ArcA and Fnr, Mol. Microbiol. 15,

    pp.473-482, 1995.

    [22] G. Unden, S. Becker, J. Bongaerts, J. Holighaus, J.Schirawski, S. Six, O2-sensing and O2-dependent generegulation in facultatively anaerobic bacteria, Arch.

    Microbiol. 164, pp.81-90, 1995.

    [23] S. Becker, U. Holighaus, T. Gabrielczyk, G. Unden, O2as the regulatory signal for FNR-dependent gene regulation

    inEscherichia coli , J. Bacteriol. 178, pp.4515-4521, 1996.

    [24] S. Alexeeva, K. J. Hellingwerf, M. J. T.Mattos, Requirement of ArcA for redox regulation in

    Escherichia coli under microaerobic but not anaerobic or

    aerobic conditions, J. Bacteriol. 185, pp.204-209, 2003.

    [25] B. J. Bachmann, Linkage map ofEscherichia coli K-

    12, Microbiol. 47, pp.180-230, 1983.

    [26] R. S. Buxton, L. S. Drury, Cloning and insertionalinactivation of the dye (sfrA) gene, mutation of which affectssex factor F expression and dye sensitivity ofEscherichia

    coli K-12, J. Bacteriol. 154, pp.1309-1314, 1983.

    [27] S. Alexeeva, B. Kort, G. Sawers, K. J. Hellingwerf, M. J.T. Mattos, Effects of limited aeration and of the ArcABsystem on intermediary pyruvate catabolism in Escherichiacoli , J. Bacteriol. 182, pp.4934-4940, 2000.

    [28] S. Shalel-Levanon, K. San, G. N. Bennett, Effect ofArcA and FNR on the expression of genes related to theoxygen regulation and the glycolysis pathway in Escherichiacoli under microaerobic growth conditions, Biotechnol.Bioeng. 92, pp.147-159, 2005.

    [29] C. W. Rice, W. P. Hempfling, Oxygen-limitedcontinuous culture and respiratory energy conservation in

    Escherichia coli , J. Bacteriol. 134, pp.115-124, 1978.

    [30] N. Ishii et al, Multiple high-throughput analysesmonitor the response ofE.coli to perturbations, Science. 316,

    pp.593-597, 2007.

    [31] J. Zhu, K. Shimizu, Effect of a single-gene knockout

    on the metabolic regulation in Escherichia coli for D-lactateproduction under microaerobic condition, Metabolic Eng. 7,

    pp.104-115, 2005.

    [32] S. J. Berrios-Rivera, G. N. Bennett, K. San, The effectof increasing NADH availability on the redistribution ofmetabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli chemostat cultures,

    Metabolic Eng. 4, pp.230-237, 2002.

    [33] B. E. Wright, M. H. Butler, K. R. Albe, Systemsanalysis of the Tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyosteliumdiscoideum, J. Biochem. 267, pp.3101-3105, 1992.

    222222