semi-annual social monitoring report · this report was prepared by project management consultants,...

Semi-Annual Social Monitoring Report

Project number: 42486-016

Period: August 2018 – January 2019

Submission Date: April 2019

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Program

This report was prepared by Project Management Consultants, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank. This document is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy and does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

i

MADHYA PRADESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED

MADHYA PRADESH URBAN SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK LOAN ASSISTANCE

(LOAN NO. 3528-IND)

SEMI ANNUAL SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT (SSMR) ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS

(Phase 1)

Period: August 2018 to January 2019

Submitted by:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT COUNSULTANTS, BHOPAL (TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED J/V JPS ASSOCAITES PVT. LTD)

ii

ABBREVIATION

ADB Asian Development Bank

AH

AP

Affected Household

Affected Person

BPL Below Poverty Line

CAPP Community Action and Participation Program

CPR

EA

Common Property Resources

Executing Agency

GoI Government of India

GRC

GRM

Grievance Redress Committee

Grievance Redress Mechanism

IP Indigenous Peoples

IR

IR

Income Restoration

Involuntary Resettlement

ISA Initial Social Assessment

LA Land Acquisition

LAA Land Acquisition Act

LIG Lower Income Group

M&E Monitoring and Evaluation

PAF Project Affected Family

PAH Project Affected Household

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit

MPUDCL

MPUSIP

Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited

Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project

ROR Record of Rights

RoW Right of Way

RP Resettlement Plan

R&R

SSMR

Resettlement and Rehabilitation

Semi Annual Social Monitoring Report

SC Scheduled Caste

ST

TH

Scheduled Tribe

Titleholder

UDHD Urban Development and Housing Department

WHH Women Headed Household

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1

B. BACKGROUND OF REPORT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................... 3

C. SCOPE OF SOCIAL SAFEGUARD IMPACTS .............................................................. 5

D. COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION ................................................................ 35

E. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOUSRE .......................................... 36

F. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM) ........................................................... 40

G. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................... 46

H. MONITORING RESULTS/FINDING ............................................................................ 48

I. COMPLIANCE OF SAFEGUARD LOAN COVENANTS ............................................. 49

J. FOLLOW UP, ACTION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCLOUSRE ........................ 54

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: structure and process of GRM ........................................................................................ 42

Figure 2: Map Showing Sub-Project Towns ................................................................................... 55

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Status of Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and Indigenous People (IP) Reports of

Subprojects under Phase 1 ................................................................................................................ 7

Table 2: List of Awarded Packages and Name of DBO Contractor along with Progress of

design Submitted (in %) .................................................................................................................... 12

Table 3: Safeguard issues and Mitigation Measures .................................................................... 16

Table 4: Town-wise Progress of the Household Survey (up to January 2019) ........................ 17

Table 5: Social Issues Town-wise & Package-wise ...................................................................... 19

Table 6: Details of APs and Status of compensation payment during reporting period (August

2017 to January 2018 ........................................................................................................................ 35

Table 7: Record of Awareness Raising Events/Consultations .................................................... 38

Table 8: Status of GRC Formation .................................................................................................. 42

Table 9: Detail of Grievances during the Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) .............. 44

iv

Table 10: Deployment of Social Safeguards officials during Reporting Period (August 2018 –

January 2019) ..................................................................................................................................... 47

Table 11: Status of Compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard Issues ...... 50

Table 12: Status of Compliance of Resettlement & Social Safeguard Issues .......................... 54

LIST OF APPENDIX

Appendix 1:Package-wise and Town-wise Progress of Drawing Design and Physical Progress

up to January 2019 ............................................................................................................................ 56

Appendix 2: Photographs of Disclosure of IR & IP Report in Hindi Language at respective

urban local body (ULBs) office ......................................................................................................... 67

Appendix 3:Copy of the Household Survey ................................................................................... 69

Appendix 4: Details of Consultations during Subproject Implementation (August 2018 to

January 2019) ..................................................................................................................................... 71

Appendix 5: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level ............................. 95

Appendix 6: List of the Towns Package-wise (Both Phase 1 and Phase 2) ............................. 99

Appendix 7: Details about Land Ownership, Status of Land and Transfer of proposed land/site

............................................................................................................................................................ 102

Appendix 8: Corrigendum Appendix.............................................................................................. 245

1

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. The Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) of Government of Madhya Pradesh launched Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) with the loan assistance from Asian Development Bank (LOAN NO. 3528-IND). The Urban Development and Housing Department is an executing agency for the Project. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the nodal implementing agency (IA) through a central Project Management Unit (PMU) for implementation of the Project with further supported by Project Implementation Units (PIUs). The PMU has been assisted by Project Management Consultant (PMC) namely M/S TATA Consulting Engineers Limited in association with JPS Associates Private Limited, New Delhi. The Project intends to ensure:

a) Continuous, pressurized, safe and sustainable drinking water through private household metered connections in 128 towns; and

b) Sewage and storm water collection and treatment systems are proposed in 12 identified towns including national heritage towns Sanchi and Khajuraho & Rajnagar.

c) The Project also includes component of non -physical investment (GIS, MIS, M&E and Social Safeguards) for system strengthening.

2. List of the towns is depicted in Appendix 6. The entire project is planned to be implemented in three periods i.e (i) preparatory and procurement; (ii) construction and (iii) operations and maintenance. Prior to implementation of the project, design Consultants were hired by IA to develop Detailed Project Report (DPR) of each subproject town. In regard to social safeguard, subprojects are classified as category ‘B’ for involuntary resettlement (IR) and indigenous peoples (IP) as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). Each subproject has been screened to assess the social impacts likely to be occurred due to project interventions. These projects come under either ‘Category B’ or ‘Category C’. Although Resettlement Plan (RP) is also prepared to address the negative impacts. A resettlement plan is developed using approved Resettlement Framework (RF) and Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF). It is presumed that a significant number of subprojects will not

make any IR impact, so Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) has been prepared in avoiding resettlement impacts.

3. Project interventions have been managed by the Executing Agency (MPUDCL) with the technical support of PMC at Bhopal and PMC PIUs located at regional levels i.e. Bhopal,

Major Achievements • Compliance of the ADB observations on IR

DDR and IP DDR, • Summary of IR and IP reports in Hindi were

prepared for 67 towns under 25 packages to display at respective ULBs and PIUs,

• All IR and IP reports were reviewed, • Visited towns for land verifications and other

social issues, • RP was prepared for subproject towns

Khajuraho & Rajnagar under sewerage management plan.

• IR DDR and IP DDR were prepared for 4 towns namely Anjad, Barwaha, Sanavad and Saikheda under sewerage management plan,

• Compensation paid to all five APs of WSS town Sohagpur under Package 1C

• Order issued for formation of GRC, nomination of CDO at ULB and Nomination of GRC person in each town

• Community Action and Participation Plan has been developed,

• Conducted consultations with ULBs and other stakeholders including local inhabitatnt in particular indigenous people,

• State Gender Action Plan has been developed and facilitated to all awarded towns for development of town level Gender Action Plan.

2

Indore, Sagar, Jabalpur and Gwalior. Apart from technical (engineering) and managerial (procurement and contract management) components, safeguard issues are also important component. It includes activities of (i) Resettlement, (ii) Environment and (iii) social and gender. The key experts/officials are deployed at PMC and PMC (PIU) to assist PMU and PIUs in compliance with the environment, social and gender requirements of the Project Safeguards System (PSS).

4. Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report (SSMR) on social safeguards is required to be submitted under Safeguard component of MPUSIP. This is the 3rd semi-annual social monitoring report (SSMR) which present progress of the subprojects of 69 towns of water supply scheme and 4 towns of sewerage under Phase 1 of MPUSIP from August 2018 to January 2019.

5. Social safeguard reports such as involuntary resettlement (IR) due diligence report (DDR) & Resettlement Plan (RP) and indigenous peoples (IP) DDR are prepared for the subproject towns under packages having nil or insignificant temporary IR and IP impacts. Altogether, 69 subproject towns of water supply scheme (WSS) and 4 subproject towns of sewerage under Phase 1 are considered under category ‘B’ because of insignificant involuntary resettlement impact. It is confirmed that none of the sub project is identified up to now, which will make the negative impact on Indigenous People (IP). Apart from WSS town Sohagpur under package 1C where private land has been acquired, for more details refer to para 37, no issue of private land acquisition emerged till date. Private lands have been obtained through land donation in 3 towns (Amla, Dhamnod and Mauganj), for which third party needs to be appointed and certification obtained.Temporary economic impacts are also being avoided through mitigation measures mentioned in the respective IR DDR of WSS towns. A Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for subproject water supply town i.e Khajuraho & Rajnagar, although significant impact is not expected. Land proposed for subproject components belongs to government and allotment of the identified land for subproject components is in progress, refer to Appendix 7.

6. Summary of IR and IP reports were prepared in vernacular language Hindi for disclosure at the notice board of respective urban local body (ULB)s and project implementation unit (PIU)s. Selected sub project towns were visited to identify the social risks and impacts due to subproject components and verified the status of land ownership from local revenue or ULB office. Resettlement Plan (RP) was prepared for the sub project towns Khajuraho and Rajnagar (Package 6A and 6E) while IR DDR and IP DDR were prepared for town Anjad (Package 2F), Barwaha (Package 2G), Sanavad (Package 2H) and Saikheda (Package 5G) under sewerage management component.

7. The overall project is classified as category ‘B’ in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). ADB's SPS covers both temporary and permanent impacts. One parcel of land for approach road to intake well had been acquired during the implementation period for WSS town Sohagpur under Package 1C. Altogether 5 affected persons (APs) were reported under land acquisition and all five APs had received compensation amount for the loss of their land. Although, land has also been donated voluntarily by private land owners for subproject components in WSS subproject town Amla under pkg 1C, Dhamnod under pkg 2C and Mauganj under pkg 7C. Social issues, in particular related to the land proposed for components under subproject towns are presented in Table 5 of Chapter C.

8. Significant number of consultative meeting were held in community about subproject and to address the compliance of grievance, if any, related social issues. The meeting covered issues of land as well as compensation and other related to project activities. The regular meeting with community are conducted throughout the implementation phase in continuous manner. For more details, refer to Appendix 4 under chapter E.

3

9. Grievance Redressal Mechanism (GRM): grievance redress committee has been established at awarded subproject towns on the basis of government order issued for formation of grievance redress committee at ULB, refer to Appendix 5. Grievance registers are placed at subproject town and grievances are registered and resolved. For more details, refer to table 9 under chapter F.

10. a) State level Gender Action Plan has been developed; b) Concept note for establishing Gender Budget Cell and conducting safety audit was submitted to PMU; c) Workshop are organized for project stakeholders to sensitize on gender issues and ULB officials were facilitated for developing Gender Action Plan; d) nomination of Community Development Officer at ULB level for overseeing implementation of gender and social activities and nomination of GRC person from contractors to all towns. Prerak and Sakhi are also identified at awarded towns.

11. In this SSMR, we have included an Corrigendum Appendix with list of error in the previous SSMRs and the actual status/correction, refer to Appendix 8.

B. BACKGROUND OF REPORT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

12. The Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) has been implementing the Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) with financial assistance (loan) of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which is being effective from August 2017. The Project aims to improve urban services, particularly water supply in the 128 towns and wastewater management in the selected 12 towns of the state Madhya Pradesh (refer to Figure 1). The towns were selected based on certain criteria’s like having reliable water resource, sound engineering feasibility, available land and commitment for operations and maintenance (O&M). These selected towns are further divided into two phases. As per revised procurement plan, MPUSIP’s physical components include (a) improvements to water supply scheme in 69 subproject towns, and (b) sewage collection and treatment services proposed in four (4) identified towns namely Saikheda, Sanawad, Anjad and Barwaha under Phase 1 while in Phase 2 – water supply scheme in 59 subproject towns and sewage collection and treatment services proposed in eight towns namely Sanchi, Dhamnod, Mandsaur, Nagda, Jabalpur (part-II), Maihar, Khajuraho & Rajnagar. List of the towns is attached as Appendix 6. The entire Project envisages to deliver:

• Continuous, pressurized, safe and sustainable drinking water through private household metered connections in 69 and 59 towns under Phase 1 and Phase 2 respectively;

• Sewage water collection and treatment systems are proposed in 4 and 8 identified towns under Phase 1 and Phase 2 respectively and;

• Non-physical investments comprising of establishing GIS system, capacity building of participating urban local bodies in contract management, improving local operators’ capability through global partnership and building capacity of the implementing agency, urban local bodies and services utilities for ensuring long term sustainability of services.

13. The State’s Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) is the Executing Agency (EA) for the Project. The Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the nodal implementing agency (IA) through a central Project Management Unit (PMU), who is mainly responsible for implementation of the Project with further supported by Project Implementation Units (PIUs). The PMU and PIUs both have been assisted by Project Management Consultant (PMC) namely M/s TATA Consulting Engineers Limited in

4

association with JPS Associates Private Limited, New Delhi for subproject towns under Phase 1. The PMC PIUs are located at regional levels i.e Bhopal, Indore, Jabalpur, Sagar and Gwalior,. These regional PIUs are playing an important role in the supervision of execution, safeguard compliance, reporting and coordination.

14. The entire Project is planned to be implemented in three phases - (i) preparatory and procurement; (ii) construction and (iii) operations and maintenance (O&M). The project preparatory activities include preparation of design and procurement of consultants. Design Consultants were hired to prepare preliminary project report of each subproject town. Each component is being carefully addressed in terms of its involuntary resettlement (IR) and indigenous people (IP) impacts in the preliminary project report. Design, build and operate (DBO) model is adopted during construction and O&M phase and this will include (i) finalization of design of each subproject components (ii) construction of water supply facilities, using DBO model in all project towns the facilities will include raw water intakes, water treatment plants (WTP), overhead tanks (OHT), distribution networks including the metered household connections. After the construction (expected to be completed in 2 years), the DBO Contractors of the civil works packages will continue to operate and provide continuous water supply service for subproject towns for a period of 10 years. The DBO contractor will also ensure proper metering and volumetric billing, adequate water pressure is maintained at the consumer end and supplied water complies with national quality standards for drinking water.

15. All subprojects are classified as category ‘B’ under the MPUSIP for impact on involuntary resettlement (IR) and for indigenous peoples (IP) as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009. Social impacts of each subproject are being screened to assess the likely impacts on the project which are categorized as either ‘Category B’ or ‘Category C’. If required, a Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared to address the negative impacts of proposed works as per approved Resettlement Framework (RF) and Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF). It is perceived that the significant number of subprojects would not make impact on any physical or economic displacement. Therefore, Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) is being prepared in absence of any private land acquisition and resettlement impact.

16. The Loan Agreement was signed between Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) and ADB in the month of August 2017. As per the agreement, State government is responsible for execution of the project works according to the budget line. Total estimated cost of the project is US$ 829 Million. Out of total estimated cost, US $399 Million is sectioned for Phase 1 and US $430 Million is sectioned for Phase 2 of MPUSIP.

17. Purpose of the Report - This semi-annual social monitoring report (SSMR) on social safeguards of subproject towns under Phase 1 aims to review and ensure project implementation in view of the objectives and ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement 2009. Before preparing this report compliance status of IR and IP reports were

FINANCIAL PLAN

Total Estimated Project Cost and Financing Plan

Estimated Project Cost US $829 million

Financing Plan: ADB share 70%; State Share 30%

(75% of the loan will be repaid by the state and

remaining 25% by ULB)

Phase ADB Loan State Share Total

Phase 1 275 Million 124 Million 399

Phase 2 300 Million 130 Million 430

5

reviewed against the total approved Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and IP documents such as Resettlement Plan (RP), Due Diligence Report (DDR) on involuntary resettlement and indigenous people (IP) screening.

18. PMU/PMC has the responsibility to oversee an implementation and monitoring of safeguards issues of each subproject towns. As required, this report covers involuntary resettlement and other social safeguard monitoring results to comply with the spirit of ADB policy in order to ‘enhance stakeholders trust’ and ability to engage with ADB, and thereby increase the development impact (of sub-projects) in which disclosure of safeguard monitoring is an important aspect. This Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report (SSMR) highlights MPUSIP progress of water supply and sewerage scheme towns under Phase 1 on Social Safeguard components from August 2018 to January 2019 in this report. The report is outlined on the basis of the structure presented in the project administration manual (PAM) and includes information on – the scope of impact, compensation, rehabilitations, public participation, consultations, grievance redress mechanism (GRM), institutional arrangement, monitoring results, compliance status, follow up actions, recommendations and disclosure etc..

C. SCOPE OF SOCIAL SAFEGUARD IMPACTS

19. ADB's classification system - Prior to civil works implementation, all the subprojects selected for implementation is to be screened and classified using ADB's classification system. The classification system is presented below for more understanding:

➢ Category A: Subprojects proposed for construction or development, will fall under this category, if, it caused a significant involuntary resettlement impacts with a physical displacement of 200 or more persons from their residences, or 200 or more persons lose 10% or more of their productive or income generating assets, or more persons or 200 or more persons experience a combination of both.

➢ Category B: Any proposed subproject that includes involuntary resettlement impacts but are not deemed significant considering loss of shelter/houses or productive or income generating assets will be considered for category B.

➢ Category C: A proposed subproject that has no involuntary resettlement impact.

20. Involuntary resettlement (IR) - This Project under MPUSIP is classified as category ‘B’ for its involuntary resettlement (IR) impacts and impacts on indigenous peoples (IP) residing in the sub-project area in considerations of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement-2009 during preparation. However, none of the subproject towns which are selected for implementation are likely to have any adverse involuntary resettlement impact. Mostly, land identified for the subproject components for construction or interventions is owned by State government and its local government departments. The transmission/distribution line will be laid with in the right of way (RoW) of the existing roads. However, if any minor land acquisition and involuntary resettlement is involved in form of either temporarily physical or economic displacement, or temporary restrictions to land use that will be duly addressed with ADB policy on involuntary resettlement.

21. Indigenous people (IP) - According to ADB SPS, 2009, the indigenous people safeguard requirements triggered if a project directly or indirectly affects the dignity, human rights, livelihood system, or culture of IP or affects the territories, natural, or cultural resources that they own, use, occupy, or claim as their ancestral property. The requirements also apply to MPUSIP subprojects and its components. It also covers action conducted by the executing and implementing agencies in anticipation of ADB project. Under Phase 1 of MPUSIP, 11 subprojects towns (11 under WSS and 1 under sewerage) are reported under fifth Schedule as per Constitution of India, which deals with administration and control of scheduled areas

6

and scheduled tribes. These towns are reported under Package 2B, 2C, 2D, 2F and 7B. But It is important to mention here that none of the proposed subproject facilities are located on land belonging to scheduled tribes (ST) / indigenous people (IP). However, improvement of proposed water supply is not only important for the people living in the locality but also for Indigenous peoples living in the same locality. So, a significant number of IP households under subproject area would be benefitted. MPUSIP will ensure that these populations receive the whole benefits of the Project.

22. Social safeguard reports such as Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) & resettlement plan (RP) and indigenous peoples (IP) DDR are prepared for the subproject towns under packages having nil or insignificant temporary IR and IP impacts. Altogether, 69 subproject towns of water supply scheme (WSS) and 4 subproject towns of sewerage under Phase 1 are considered under category ‘B’ because of insignificant IR and IP impact. It is confirmed that none of the sub project is identified up to now, which will make the negative impact on IP community. No issue of private land acquisition emerged till date where the livelihood of the people would get impacted. A Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for subproject water supply town i.e Khajuraho & Rajnagar, although significant impact is not expected.

23. Status of each IR and IP report is duly illustrated in Table 1.

7

Table 1: Status of Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and Indigenous People (IP) Reports of Subprojects under Phase 1

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the subproject

town

District Social Safeguard Reports Remarks

IR DDR IP DDR

Subproject Water Supply Scheme

1 1A

Boda Rajgarh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 2 Kurawar Rajgarh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 3 Kothri Sehore Approved by ADB No separate IP DDR is prepared 4

1B Amla Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

5 Betul-Bazar Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 6 Sarni Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 7

1C Bankhedi Hoshangabad Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

8 Sohagpur Hoshangabad Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 9

2A Betma Indore Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB

10 Depalpur Indore Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

11 Gautampura Indore Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

12

2B

Pansemal Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 13 Rajpur Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 14 Karhi Padliya Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 15 Kasrawad Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 16

2C Dhamnod Dhar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

17 Mandav Dhar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 18

2D Bhavra Alirajpur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

19 Meghnagar Jhabua Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 20 Petlawad Jhabua Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 21

3A

Kukdeshwar Neemuch Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 22 Nayagoan Neemuch Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 23 Sarwaniya

Maharaj Neemuch Approval awaited from ADB Approved by ADB Subject to compliance of ADB

observations (in progress) 24 Nagri Mandsaur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 25

3B Susner Aagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

26 Pankhedi Shajapur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 27 Makdone Ujjain Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 28 4A Alampur Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB

8

Sl. No.

Package No.


town


IR DDR IP DDR

29 Daboh Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 30 Mihona Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 31 Phuphkalan Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 32 4B Bhind Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approved by ADB 33

4D

Karera Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 34 Bairad Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 35 Pichhore Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 36 Isagarh Ashoknagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 37 Aron Guna Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

38 Vijaypur Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

39 4F

Gormi Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 40 Lahar Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 41 Mehgaon Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 42

4I

Shadora Ashoknagar

Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB

ADB observations are being addressed (in progress)

43 Raghogarh Guna Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB same as above 44 Badarwas Shivpuri Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB same as above 45 5A Barhi Katni Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 46

5B

Katangi Jabalpur

Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

47 Bhedaghat Jabalpur 48 Majholi Jabalpur 49 Panagar Jabalpur 50 Patan Jabalpur 51 Sihora Jabalpur 52 Tendukheda Damoh 53

6A Khajuraho Chhatarpur

Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

54 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 55

6B Sagar Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

56 Makroniya Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 57 6C Rahatgarh Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 58

6D Buxwaha Chhatarpur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

59 Hatta Damoh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

9

Sl. No.

Package No.


town


IR DDR IP DDR

60 Pawai Panna Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 61

6G

Harpalpur Chhatarpur Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are addressed and submitted on

24 09 2018. 62 Badagaon Tikamgarh Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are

addressed and submitted on 24 09 2018.

63 Ghuwara Chhatarpur

64 7A Mauganj Rewa Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 65

7B Jaithari Anuppur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

66 Khand Shahdol Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 67 Chandia Umaria Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 68

7D

Amarpatan Satna Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are addressed and submitted in

September 2018 69 New Ram nagar Satna Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are

addressed and submitted in September 2018

Subproject Sewerage

70 2F Anjad Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 71 2G Barwaha Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 72 2H Sanawad Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 73 5G Saikheda Narsinghpur Approved by ADB IP was covered in IR DDR.

11

24. MPUSIP has been implementing the subprojects since February 2017, as letter of award (LoA) has been issued to DBO Contractor since February 2017 aiming to improve the overall of water supply and wastewater systems in the selected subproject towns. Although, loan agreement with ADB under MPUSIP was signed in August 2017, which requires that Resettlement Framework (RF) documents be complied during the implementation of project in accordance with ADB's SPS 2009 and RF prepared for the project and agreed between the Borrower (MPUSIP) and ADB. Any subprojects that involve land acquisition and resettlement impacts to be prepared RPs and other safeguard reports as required under the scope of approved RP. No impact will be resulted by the construction activities under the project. Efforts have been continued to minimize environmental and social team in design the project activities. There will be no displacement of people, other than temporary relocation of hawkers and mobile vendors during construction. However, during the implementing phase there will be temporary inconveniences such as increased vehicle movements that affect the pedestrians of the immediate vicinity of the work. The social safeguard reports will be updated and submitted to ADB. The project activities don't displace to any persons and no indigenous people will be affected by the subproject components.

25. The Project (MPUSIP) interventions are expected to improve living conditions of people in the subproject towns after completion of the project. The expected outcome is envisaged as inclusive of gender-focused, pro poor and sustainable WSS in the towns. The sub-projects are in progress. The input provided during the reporting period is -establishment of PIUs, mobilization of experts/ human resources, development of checklist and guidelines to review IP and IR reports, develop understanding and Contract Agreement with design built and operate (DBO) Contractors on project requirements in relation to social safeguard through workshop and personal interactions, prepared summary of IP and IR reports in local Hindi language to disclose the project interventions at respective ULBs office. Under Phase 1, there are 73 WSS subproject towns covered under 24 packages while 4 sewerage towns are split into four packages. Input ensures the possibility to deliver intended results on time. Out of 24 Packages of WSS, 4 more packages are awarded during reporting period while out of four packages of sewerage, three packages are awarded ( August 2018 to January 2019). Total number of packages awarded are 25 (22 of WSS and 3 of sewerage management) as on 31st January 2019. During the reporting period, all the DBO Contractors were engaged in submission of the designs of structures, hydraulics and electro-mechanical of subproject components for approval and civil works was started accordingly. List of the awarded packages to DBO Contractors along with their submission of final design (in %) is as follows in the Table 2 while details about progress of drawing design and physical progress of each town package-wise is depicted as Appendix 1.

12

Table 2: List of Awarded Packages and Name of DBO Contractor along with Progress of design Submitted (in %) Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the subproject town

Date of Award

Name of the DBO Contractor Progress of Design Submitted by DBO Contractor

(from August 2018 to January 2019) in % Hydraulics Structure Electro-mechanical

Subproject Water Supply Scheme 1

1A Boda

04.08.2017 M/s Rean Watertech Pvt. Ltd and P C

Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta

90 60 10 2 Kurawar 40 20 15 3 Kothri 60 30 10 4

1B Amla

07.06.2017 M/S Laxmi Civil Engineering Service Pvt.

Ltd., Kolhapur (Maharashtra)

70 40 10 5 Betul-Bazar 100 70 20 6 Sarni 100 75 10 7

1C Bankhedi

27.04.2017 M/s Central India Engineering Private Ltd,

Nagpur (Maharashtra) 80 60 20

8 Sohagpur 100 80 40 9

2A Betma

05.03.2018 M/s Adroit Associates, Alpha Projects,

Indore (Madhya Pradesh)

35 10 0 10 Gautampura 30 10 0 11 Depalpur 35 10 0 12

2B

Pansemal


Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta (West Bengal)

10 5 10 13 Rajpur 70 30 10 14 Karhi Padliya 70 40 10 15 Kasrawad 80 50 30 16

2C Dhamnod

18.09.2017 M/s Bansal Construction Company,

Gurugram (Haryana) 60 20 10

17 Mandav 80 40 10 18

2D Bhavra

18.09.2017 M/s P.C Snehal -REAN(JV), Ahmedabad

(Gujarat)

100 80 20 19 Meghnagar 80 30 10 20 Petlawad 80 40 20 21

3A

Kukdeshwar

05.03.2018 M/s Engineering Professional Co Pvt Ltd,

Surat (Gujrat)

40 20 10 22 Nayagaon 40 10 10

23 Sarwaniya Maharaj

45 35 15

24 Nagri 40 20 10 25

3B Susner

17.06.2017 M/s Multiurban Infra Services Pvt. Ltd.,

Nagpur (Maharshtra)

80 60 10 26 Pankhedi 60 40 10 27 Makdone 60 35 10 28

4A Alampur

28.05.2018 M/s Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd, Indore

(Madhya Pradesh)

0 0 0 29 Daboh 0 0 0 30 Mehona 0 0 0

13

Sl. No.

Package No.


Date of Award



31 Phuphkalan 0 0 0 32 4B Bhind 12.09.2018 M/s TATA Projects Ltd. 10 0 0 33

4D

Karera


Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta

30 10 10 34 Bairad 90 20 10 35 Pichhore 0 0 0 36 Isagarh 80 50 20 37 Aron 30 10 10 38 Vijaypur 70 40 10 39

4F Lahar

15.09.2018 M/s Jayantisuper Construction Pvt. Ltd. and M/s P. C Snehal Construction Pvt.

Ltd. (JV), Mehsana (Gujrat)

30 0 0 40 Mehgaon 20 0 0 41 Gormi 10 0 0 42

4I Raghogarh

19.12.2018 M/s Jayantisuper Construction Pvt. Ltd. and M/s P. C Snehal Construction Pvt.

Ltd. (JV), Mehsana (Gujrat)

10 0 0 43 Badarwas 0 0 0 44 Shadora 0 0 0

45 5A Barhi 15.02.2017 M/s CMR Infrastructure Private Ltd,

Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) 100 70 40

46

5B

Katangi

04.09.2017 The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., Bhopal

(Madhya Pradesh)

100 60 10 47 Bhedaghat 100 80 10 48 Majholi 0 0 0 49 Panagar 100 70 10 50 Patan 100 70 20 51 Sihora 80 50 10 52 Tendukheda 80 60 10 53

6A Khajuraho


Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta (West Bengal)

70 40 20 54 Rajnagar

55 6B

Sagar 23.08.2018 M/s TATA Projects Ltd.

30 10 0 56 Makroniya 90 NA 0

57 6C Rahatgarh 21.03.2017 M/s Jay Varudi Construction Company & Ranjit Buildcon Ltd. (JV), Himmat Nagar

(Gujarat) 100 80 30

58 6D

Buxwaha 21.03.2017

M/s Jay Varudi Construction Company & Ranjit Buildcon Ltd. (JV), Himmat Nagar

(Gujarat)

40 50 15 59 Hatta 70 40 10 60 Pawai 100 80 20

14

Sl. No.

Package No.


Date of Award



61 7A Mauganj 15.02.2017 M/s KNK projects Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad

(Haryana) 100 70 30

62 7B

Jaithari 22.01.2018

M/s SMC Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., Thane (Maharashtra)

30 10 5 63 Khand 30 10 10 64 Chandia 30 10 5

65 2F Anjad (SWG) 01.01.2019 M/s Annu Infra Construct India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Nobal Construction Company.

(JV), New Delhi 0 0 0

66 2G Barwaha (SWG) 01.01.2019 M/s Annu Infra Construct India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Nobal Construction Company.

(JV), New Delhi 0 0 0

67 5G Saikheda (SWG) 05.08.2018 M/s Engineering Professional Co Pvt Ltd,

Surat (Gujrat) 30 0 0

15

26. MPUSIP (Phase 1) subprojects are categorized under ‘B’ category as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS)-2009. All these subprojects may cause limited involuntary resettlement impact. The impact will mostly be temporary in nature during the civil works. There is no need to acquire private land as government land is available. Currently, majority of proposed subproject components are located on the existing facilities or government’s right of way (RoW). Therefore, it is pertinent to mention that no IR impacts are envisaged due to the proposed subprojects. Although, a Resettlement Framework (RF) has been developed for the MPUSIP in accordance with (i) the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013”; (ii) State laws and regulations; and (iii) ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009. The RF guides the screening and planning for all subprojects that have resettlement impacts, for more details about resettlement framework, please visit http://www.mpudc.co.in/mpusip-adb-funded.html. Accordingly, displaced persons (titleholders and non-titleholders) will be compensated at replacement cost and rates for different categories of losses and norms of special assistance are detailed in the RF. If there would be any IR impact reported during the implementation period, then people would be compensated as per the agreed Resettlement Framework (RF).

27. As mentioned earlier (refer to Table 1), MPUSIP has engaged DPR Consultant to prepare detailed project report including social and environment safeguard reports before the implementation of subprojects. Although, these reports will be reconfirmed again after completion of detailed design and detailed measurement surveys (DMS) which will be conducted by Design Build & Operate (DBO) Contractor before initiation of civil works during implementation1. Updation of the reports are under process during reporting period (August 2018 to January 2019) as final design for subproject is under progress during reporting period. No construction work will commence before the updated social safeguard document for the package is reviewed and approved by ADB and compensation to affected persons, if any. These final IR / IP reports of subproject towns will also be reviewed and disclosed on website of urban local body (ULB), IA and ADB. The IA is responsible to hand over the project lands/sites to the contractor which should be free from all encumbrances.

28. During the reporting period, IR and IP reports of all awarded packages were reviewed and ADB’s observations were also addressed of packages 4I and 7D under Phase 1 and 2E, 3D, 4C, 4H, 5E, 5F, 6H, 6J, 7C, 7F,7G and 1F under Phase 2. In addition, updation of social safeguard reports of package 5B and 6E under Phase 1 was carried out and submitted to ADB. Status of the land proposed for subproject components are verified and updated with the help from ULBs and revenue officials. Proposal for allotment of the land has been submitted to concerned District Collector/Tehsildar.

29. No involuntarily resettlement impact is resulted by the construction activities under the project during reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019). Efforts have been continued to minimize environmental and social team in design the project activities. The social parameters are regularly monitored during project construction activities. There will be no displacement of people, other than temporary relocation of hawkers and mobile vendors during construction. However, during the construction phase there will be temporary inconveniences such as

1 Detailed measurement survey will be jointly conducted by safeguards personnel of project implementation unit,

consultants and contractors prior to implementation at each site/stretch of alignment. Report (IR DDR / RP for different sites/stretches will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval; prior payment of compensation to permanent and/or temporarily impacted persons is mandatory before start of civil work at each site/alignment stretch. Social safeguards document for the package will be updated by PMC in coordination with DBO contractor.

16

increased vehicle movements that affect the pedestrians of the immediate vicinity of the work. The social safeguard reports (IR DDR and IP DDR) are likely to be updated periodically and submitted to ADB. The project activities don't displace to any persons and no indigenous people will be affected.

30. The following safeguard issues were identified and mitigation measures were undertaken:

Table 3: Safeguard issues and Mitigation Measures

Sl. No. Identified Safeguard Issues Mitigation Measures

1 Demarcation of the proposed land/site by revenue official locally called Patwari

Social Safeguard team of respective PIUs and PMC (PIU) are directed to coordinate with respective ULB prior to start of any civil activities

2 Proposal sent to concerned District Collector for allotment and transfer of the proposed land/site in favour of respective urban local body (ULB)

Social Safeguard team of respective PIUs and PMC (PIU) are directed to coordinate with the office of the respective CMOs/ULBs

3 Apply or obtain no objection certificate (NoC) from Water Resource Department (WRD), Madhya Pradesh State Pollution Control Board, Forest Department, Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Public Works Department (PWD), Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC), Indian Railways, irrigation department etc., if any

Social Safeguard team of respective PMU, PIU (PMU) and PIU (PMC) are directed to coordinate with respective ULBs to obtain NoC from other departments

4 Disclosures of the summary of social safeguard reports in vernacular language Hindi

Disclosed summary of social safeguard reports in vernacular language Hindi at respective ULB and PIU office after issuance of letter of award (LoA)

5 Grievances GRM has been developed and Grievance Redress Committee at town level has been formed to handle such case.

6 Change of the location of subproject components

Impact assessment including transect walk and land ownership detail is required and being done.

7 Unanticipated Impacts: (i) on property or structure, (ii) on livelihood, (iii) any other specify………

Such type of Impacts must be reported to PIU/PMU/PMC and will be complied as per Resettlement Framework (RF)

8 Orientation of subproject components with regard to ADB Safeguard policy and its compliances to ULBs

Town level orientation programme/meetings are conducted

31. Office of the urban local body (ULB) of each subproject town is in the process of transferring of the proposed land to its own name / ownership. Adverse effects due to involuntary resettlement as well as physical and economic displacement are not anticipated due to proposed subproject components at the time of approval of IP and IR reports.

32. Hence, Safeguard reports were reviewed, documented and submitted to PMU. During planning phase of the Project, detailed project report of the proposed subprojects along with

17

IEE, IR and IP reports were prepared by the DPR Consultant and submitted to ADB for approval whereas during implementation phase DBO Contractors will be responsible to validate the data. Apart from that, DBO Contractor has conducted household (HHs) survey of their subproject towns. In this regard, PMC has organized orientation program for the survey team. Household survey is verified by the field engineer, communication assistant and resettlement coordinator of PIU (PMC) and PIU (PMU) both. After completion of the household survey, DBO Contractors will prepare the data in excel and this data will be integrated with GIS Map along with topographic survey drawing (Auto Cad) with zero referencing and covering with complete network of road/lane & by lanes under the jurisdiction of the subproject town. During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), household survey of packages 1B (Sarni), 2A, 2F, 2G, 3A, 4A and 5B (town Katangi, Majholi, Patan, Sihora & Tendukheda) is completed during the reporting period while package no. 4B, 4D, 4F and 4I is in progress during reporting period. Copy of the household survey format is attached as Appendix 3 while progress of the HHs survey is as follows in Table 4.

Table 4: Town-wise Progress of the Household Survey (up to January 2019) Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of Household survey

1 1A

Boda Completed 2 Kurawar Completed 3 Kothri Completed 4

1B Amla Completed

5 Betul-Bazar Completed 6 Sarni Completed 7

1C Bankhedi Completed

8 Sohagpur Completed 9

2A Betma Completed

10 Depalpur Completed 11 Gautampura Completed 12

2B

Pansemal Completed 13 Rajpur Completed 14 Karhi Padliya Completed 15 Kasrawad Completed 16

2C Dhamnod Completed

17 Mandav Completed 18

2D Bhavra Completed

19 Meghnagar Completed 20 Petlawad Completed 21

3A

Kukdeshwar Completed 22 Nayagaon Completed 23 Sarwaniya Maharaj Completed 24 Nagri Completed 25

3B Susner Completed

26 Pankhedi Completed 27 Makdone Completed 28

4A

Alampur Completed 29 Daboh Completed 30 Mihona Completed 31 Phuphkalan Completed 32 4B Bhind In progress 33

4D

Karera In Progress 34 Bairad In Progress 35 Pichhore In Progress 36 Isagarh In Progress 37 Aron In Progress 38 Vijaypur In Progress 39 4F Lahar In Progress

18

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of Household survey

40 Mehgaon In Progress 41 Gormi In Progress 42

4I Raghogarh In Progress

43 Badarwas In Progress 44 Shadora In Progress 45 5A Barhi Completed 46

5B

Katangi Completed 47 Bhedaghat Competed 48 Majholi Completed 49 Panagar Completed 50 Patan Completed 51 Sihora Completed 52 Tendukheda Completed 53

6A Khajuraho Completed

54 Rajnagar Completed 55

6B Sagar Completed

56 Makronia Completed 57 6C Rahatgarh Completed 58

6D Buxwaha Completed

59 Hatta Completed 60 Pawai Completed 61 7A Mauganj Completed 62

7B Jaithari Completed

63 Khand Completed 64 Chandia Completed 65 2F Anjad (SWG) Completed 66 2G Barwaha (SWG) Completed 67 5G Saikheda (SWG) Completed

33. Generally, sites / land parcels proposed for subproject components are owned by revenue department under Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoM), or any other government department land for which the No Objection Certificate (NoC) is required from concerned department. Besides that, private land is also considered for subproject components in a few instances. But in this regard, either donation of the land is absolutely voluntary (without any coercion) or purchased through negotiated settlement or land acquisition act/procedures as per Resettlement Framework (RF). The subproject components such as Anicut, Intake well, water treatment plant (WTP) overhead tank (OHT) are proposed within the land owned by Government and the transmission / distribution network will be laid down within existing right-of-way (ROW) of the road network.

34. Social issues, in particular related to the land proposed for subproject components for subproject towns are depicted below in Table 5:

19

Table 5: Social Issues Town-wise & Package-wise

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

1

1A

Boda No issues reported. NoC has been issued by District Collector-Rajgarh, refer to Appendix 7.1a

2 Kurawar

Raw water rising main (RWRM): DBO Contractor has explored new alignment of RWRM, because DPR Consultant had proposed RWRM alignment which passes through private agricultural land. WTP: Inadequate approach and insufficient size of land led to change the proposed location. New location/land has been provided by Nagar Parishad (NP)-Kurawar which is under possession of NP-Kurawar. Overhead Tank (OHT)-900 KL: As per DPR, proposed land/site belongs to Krishi Upaj Mandi (KUM) and KUM had refused to provide land. So, proposed OHT has been shifted at the premises of newly WTP site. OHT (250 KL): As per DPR, proposed site belongs to Police department. Later on, shifted to new location which is also government land but under possession of NP-Kurawar. Note: Now, all proposed sites belong to government and under possession of Nagar Parishad-Kurawar. A certification and NoC has been issued by Chief Municipality Officer (CMO)-Kurawar, refer to Appendix 7.1b

3 Kothri

OHT (60 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. GLSR (150 KL): Location changed and shifted to another government land which is under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. GLSR (200 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. Note: No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.1c

4

1B

Amla

Anicut: Anicut to be built on river Bel. Location changed and about 500m away from previous site towards downstream of the river. Private land may likely to be acquired to reach at site and increase of the length of structure (Anicut). About 7-8 private land owners may be affected. WTP (3.60 MLD): Proposed site is government land. Proposal has been sent to District Collector-Betul and Tehsildar-Amla to transfer the land. As per Tehsildar letter, proposed site belongs to forest area, therefore, forest permission is required. Refer to Appendix 7.2a OHT (200 KL): Proposed land belongs to Krishi Upaj Mandi (KUM) and they have refused to provide land. Now, a private land owner has voluntarily donated land to NP-Amla.

5 Betul-Bazar

Sump Well: Proposed site of sump well comes under three departments and NoC has been issued by all three departments. Issue resolved. WTP: Proposed site is government land and NoC has been obtained from District Collector-Betul. No issue reported. OHT (200 KL): Proposed site is government land. NoC has been obtained from District Collector-Betul. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.2b

20

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

6 Sarni

All the proposed components such as WTP and OHTs (5 in no.) are located at land belongs to either Western Coalfield Limited (WCL) or Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company Limited (MPGCL) and forest department. WTP (20 MLD): Location changed. Now, proposed site belongs to MPGCL near Satpura Reservoir. MPGCL has issued NoC to construct WTP but mentioned that it may take back the land, if required. This matter has been discussed at MPUDC, and it is in process of resolution. OHT (1500 KL): Proposed site belongs to WCL/forest department under ward no. 28 at Pathakheda. A permission is required from forest department. It has been applied in the first week of January 2018. Consent of 2/3rd households has been taken and submitted to Collector (tribal affair office). NoC has been issued. OHT (1500 KL): Proposed site belongs to MPGCL under ward no.7. NoC is required from forest department. Although, MPGCL has issued NoC to construct OHT. OHT (1500 KL): Location changed and now proposed site belongs to NP-Sarni under ward no.35. OHT (1000 KL): Location changed and now proposed site belongs to WCL under ward no.22. But this site has already been allotted for Government Sanjay Nikunj Nursery. Officials from government nursery has issued verbal NoC to construct OHT. OHT (300 KL): Location changed. Because WCL had refused to provide land. Now, this OHT has been shifted to government college ground at Bagdona. NoC has been obtained from Office of the Government College, Bagdona Sarni.

7

1C

Bankhedi

OHT (150 KL).Location changed and now proposed at Andhyarbawdi. New proposed site is also government land. No issue reported. OHT (700 KL) + Sump well (70 KL): Both the components are proposed at government land which under possession of NP-Bankhedi at ward no 6. No issue reported. OHT (100 KL): Location changed and now proposed at Thaini on Manakwara Road which is also government land. No issue reported OHT (200 KL) + sump well (20 KL): Both the components are proposed at Chhilod ward no.1. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. OHT (200 KL): at Dahalwara Kalan. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported Note: All the proposed sites are government (revenue) land. A letter has been written by CMO-Bankheri to District Collector-Hoshangabad for transfer of the land in the name of ULB, Refer to Appendix 7.3a

8 Sohagpur

Jack Well cum Pump House at river Narmada: Private land needs to be acquired to construct approach road to reach at Jack Well cum Pump House. Five affected persons (APs) are reported. Compensation has been paid to all APs. WTP (5.5 MLD) and OHT (900 KL): Both the components are proposed in the same compound. Proposed site is under possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record. OHT (600 KL): Proposed site is under possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record. OHT (250 KL): Proposed site is under possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record.

21

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.3b

9

2A

Betma

Source: river Gambir. No impact envisaged. Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Gambir. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported WTP: Proposed site is government land (survey no. 329-1/1/1/1) belongs to MP Aoudhogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (AKVN). Joint verification and demarcation is to be done in the presence of revenue officials, M.P. AKVN and ULB officials (in process). Although, verbal permission has been given by officials of AKVN. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.4a.

10 Depalpur

Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Chambal. WTP: Proposed site is government land under possession of NP-Depalpur. A defunct WTP is reported at site. No issue reported. OHT: Proposed site is government land under possession of NP-Depalpur. No issue reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.4b

11 Gautampura

Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Chambal. WTP and OHT: Both the components are proposed at same location. Proposed site is government land. Verbal NoC has been given by district administration. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.4c.

12 2B Pansemal

Source: Earlier it was river Gomai but now it has been shifted to Gomai dam which is about 10-12 Kms away from Pansemal town. NoC from WRD yet to be obtained. Local villagers have shown their reluctance to abstract water because proposed dam site is built for irrigation purpose only, as per villagers. Intake well cum pump house: Earlier proposed at Gomai river but now shifted to Gomai dam. Proposed site at Gomai dam is government land. No issue reported. WTP: Due to change of the Source, new site is identified which is government land (survey no. 11/1) which is located near Gomai dam. Proposal has been submitted to District collector-Barwani and land has been allotted to ULB-Pansemal. In this regard, transfer of the identified site for WTP in the name of ULB-Pansemal has been done. No issue reported. Refer to Appendix 7.5a OHT: Proposed site of OHT has been shifted to campus of existing OHT under ward no. 1. Refer to Appendix 7.5a Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5a

22

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

13 Rajpur

Intake well cum pump house: Earlier proposed at river Narbhada but now clubbed with WSS Anjad. WTP: (1.50 MLD): Proposed site is government land which is under possession of NP-Rajpur. No issues reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5b.

14 Karhi Padliya

Source: River Narbhada Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. WTP: Proposed site is government land. Possession has been given and process of the transfer of land is in progress. No issue reported. OHT: Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5c

15 Kasrawad

Source: River Narbhada Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. Transfer of the land in the name of NP-Kasrawad is in progress. OHT (115 KL): Proposed site is government land. Transfer of the land in the name of NP-Kasrawad is in progress. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5d

16

2C

Dhamnod

Intake well cum pump house: It has been decided that it will be merged with town Prithampura WS scheme, built by Urban Administration and Development Department (UADD). WTP: Proposed at existing WTP. Additional land is required and adjoining government land is available. Possession has been given but transfer of the land in the name of ULB-Dhamnod is in progress. OHT (360 KL): Another Khasra No. 9/2/2 under ward no. 10 at Muktanand parisar is identified which is private and land owner has voluntarily donated the land to NP-Dhamnod. For Consent letter, refer to Appendix 7.6a OHT (700 KL): Another Khasra No. 200 under ward no. 4 is identified which is government land. RWRM: Small section of private land likely to be affected during laying. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.6a

17 Mandav

OHT-1 (535 KL): Another land is identified with details are Khasra No. 820, Halka 155 Mandav, Area: 0.734ha belongs to revenue department and under possession of NP - Mandav. ASI monument namely Sarai Kothi is reported within 110 M. NoC from State ASI has been received, refer to Appendix 7.6b. OHT-2 (200 KL): Another land is identified with details are Khasra No. 176 Halka 155 Area: 4.945 ha belongs to revenue department. Letter has been written to District collector-Dhar, refer to Appendix 7.6b IPS: Permission from Forest department has been obtained, refer to Appendix 7.6b.

23

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.6b.

18

2D

Bhavra

Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. Proposal has been sent to District Collector for NoC and transfer of the land in the name of NP-Bhavra. No issue reported. WTP (1.60 MLD) and Clear water sump (100 KL): Both are proposed at same compound. Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Bhavra. No issue reported. OHT (150 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Bhavra. No issues reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7a.

19 Meghnagar

Weir (6 m height and 200m wide): During implementation, location of the proposed weir is changed due to some local issues. Now it is being constructed at downstream of the river Anas about 150 meter away from previous site. No issue reported. Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. No issue reported. WTP (2.30 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Meghnagar. During implementation it come under notice that land belongs to forest department. NoC from forest department has been obtained. No issue reported. OHT (200 KL): Location changed and shifted to premises of WTP. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7b

20 Petlawad

Intake well cum pump house: WRD Land WTP (1.20 MLD) and OHT (120 KL): Another site for WTP along with clear water sump (100 KL) and OHT (120 KL) has been identified because proposed site is technically improper. New site is identified and this proposed site is government land. Land has been allotted to ULB-Petlawad. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7c

21 3A

Kukdeshwar WTP (2.00 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession and in the name of ULB-Kukdeshwar, refer to Appendix 7.8a OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of ULB-Kukdeshwar, refer to Appendix 7.8a. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8a

24

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

22

Nayagoan Source: water filled at Limestone mine of CCI (Cement Corporation of India). WTP (1.50 MLD): Proposed site is government land and District Collector has issued order in the name of NP-Nayagaon, refer to Appendix 7.8b OHT (200 KL): Earlier site was proposed at government land (survey no. 1547) but later on it has been shifted to the premises of WTP (survey no. 1756/8), refer to Appendix 7.8b. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8b

23

Sarwaniya Maharaj

WTP (1.5 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Meghnagar. District Collector has issued order to transfer of the land, refer to Appendix 7.8c OHT (250 KL): Earlier It was proposed at survey no. 499 but later on It was decided to construct at survey no. 501/1 which is found adjacent to 499 and enough land is there which belongs to government. District Collector has issued order to transfer of the land, refer to Appendix 7.8c. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8c

24

Nagri Intake well: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD WTP (1.15 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Nagri, refer to Appendix 7.8d Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8d

25

3B

Susner

Intake well: As per DPR, proposed site is government land (WRD). Later on, It has been decided that existing Intake Well on Keetkheri dam will be used for water supply. OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1865) at Janpad office, Later on construction of the OHT (100 KL) at this survey number is dropped and decided to increase the capacity of OHT proposed at survey no. 2004 WTP (2.00 MLD): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1220) at Police Ground. Later on a new Survey no. 2004 is identified which is government land and located near police ground. Secondly, It is decided that in place of construct two OHTs at different place, construct one OHT and increase the capacity (200 KL). Therefore, only one OHT of 200KL is constructed within the premises of WTP. refer to Appendix 7.9a Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9a

26 Pankhedi

Source: Open well at Silodha Dam WTP (2.25 MLD) and OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 560/2) Both the components are proposed at same survey no..

25

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

OHT (350 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 372/6) at ward no. 15 but later on, shifted to another site which is also government land (survey no. 175/3 & 175/4) at ward no. 6 near veterinary hospital. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9b

27 Makdone

Source: Tillar Dam/Pacheti Dam on Tiller River Intake well: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. NoC has been given by WRD to construct Intake well at dam site, refer to Appendix 7.9c. WTP (2.00 MLD): Proposed site is government land. OHT (400 KL): proposed to be constructed at the location of present 180KL OHT that to be dismantled. Proposal has been sent to District Collector-Ujjain for transfer of the proposed land and approved by District Collector-Ujjain, refer to Appendix 7.9c Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9c

28

4A

Alampur Source: Sindh river near Ratagarh Mata Mandir and construction of the weir across the Sindh River, NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.10a Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. While alignment of proposed Intake approach bridge found under forest area, therefore, NoC to be obtained (in progress). CMO-Alampur has applied for NoC and allotment of the land to DFO-Datia, refer to Appendix 7.10a. WTP: As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 85). Location of the proposed site is slightly changed and now identified land (survey no. 81/1) is also government land. OHT (220 KL): Government land which is under possession of NP-Alampur. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.10a. No issue reported.

29

Daboh Source: Pahuj river, Construction of weir across the Sindh River. During implementation, it has been decided to take clear water from WSS Alampur. Intake well cum pump house: near bridge at Samthar road. During implementation, it has been decided to take potable water from WSS Alampur. This proposed component is discarded now. WTP (2.70 MLD): As per DPR, proposed site is government land located on Samthar road. During implementation, it has been decided to take potable water from WSS Alampur. This proposed component is discarded now OHT (220 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 1169). It may change No issues reported.

26

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

30

Mihona Source: Pahuj river, Construction of anicut across the Pahuj River at village Aehroli. NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.10c Intake well cum pump house: at village Aehroli . For Approach Bridge, survey no. 352 and land has been allotted by District Collector-Bhind, refer to Appendix 7.10c WTP (2.26 MLD): Proposed site is government land. District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10c OHT (340 KL): Proposed site is government land. District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10c Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.10c. No issue reported.

31

Phuphkalan Source of Intake of water is from 7 existing Tube wells across the town WTP and OHT-1 (325 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 60). District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10d OHT-2 (325 KL): Enough land is available near existing OHT and Land is under possession of ULB-Phuphkalan. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.10d. No issue reported.

32 4B

Bhind OHT-1 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed location is survey no. 137 Green wood Academy, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to Mata deen ka pura at survey no. 181. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Waqf board. OHT-2 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location survey no. 753 Govind Nagar, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to Old Galla Mandi survey no. 851,852. Land has been under possession of ULB-Bhind. OHT-3 (2300 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location survey no. 1450 near Vinayak Dharam Kanta but it has been shifted to near Vinayak Dharam Kanta 17th Battalion SAF campus survey no. 1578, 1584, 1585, 1586. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to 17th Battalion SAF. OHT-4 (2400 KL): As per DPR, proposed site belongs to Ganga Dham Trust, Bhim Nagar. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC. OHT-5 (800 KL): Proposed OHT location survey no. 175 Veerendra Nagar, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to veterinary hospital survey no. 224, 225. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. OHT-6 (500 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is located at Shashtri Nagar survey no. 501. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. OHT-7 (1600 KL): As per DPR, location of the OHT is at Krishna Nagar survey no. 970. But approach to this site is found quite incontrollable, therefore, it has been shifted to Sundar Nagar survey no. 319, 335, 336. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind.

27

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

OHT-8 (1200 KL): As per DPR, proposed location is at Bharoli tiraha survey no. 530, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to New Gall Mandi survey no. 515 belongs to Mandi Board. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Mandi Board. OHT-9 (1700 KL): As per DPR, proposed site location is Hazi Nagar survey no. 3996. But it has been shifted to 200 M away in front of Jamuna School survey no. 3483, 3484, 3485 belongs to Police Department. ULB-Bhind has been applied for NoC. OHT-10 (300 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Yadunath Nagar survey no. 2986. But it has been shifted to nearby at survey no. 2979 belongs to Industrial department. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Industrial department. OHT-11 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT site is located Near Bharat Petrol pump Lahar Road survey no. 3277 belongs to Industrial department. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC. CWR-1 (1800 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Chambal Colony Etawah Road survey no. 807. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC. CWR-2 (2500 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Government School No. 2 survey no. 111. But School Authority has refused to provide land for CWR, therefore, it has been shifted to Sundar Pura survey no. 319, 335, 336. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. CWR-3 (1600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is near stadium survey no. 2794. But, it has been shifted to MJS College Ground survey no. 2727. ULB-Bhind has been applied for NoC.

33 4D Karera

Intake well cum pump house: Earlier, it was proposed at western bank of Samoha dam that comes under Son Chiraiya Bird Sanctuary. Therefore, new location on eastern bank side of Samoha Dam at village Khaira Modi under Panchayat Machhawali is identified. NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.11a WTP: As per DPR, proposed WTP site was located on western bank of river Mahuwar at town Karera. Some social issues are also come under notice that locals have encroached upon part of the proposed site and secondly an approach road (CC road) is there to access the temple located there. Keeping in view, it is decided to construct new WTP within the campus of existing WTP. OHT (1000 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1521) at PWD rest house. Location changed and shifted to back side of the PWD rest house at another government land (survey no. 1537) near Mandi which is under possession of ULB-Karera OHT (700 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1590/1) at Nagar Parishad campus. OHT (500 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 475) at Krishi Upaj Mandi. Location changed and shifted to another government land (survey no. 1882) near highway. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector-Shivpuri Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.11a. No issue reported.

28

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

34 Bairad

Intake well and approach bridge: Proposed at Pachhipura dam. No issue reported WTP (2.54 MLD) at Ward No.15 at Pachhipura. Proposed site is government land (survey no. 398). District Collector has allotted the proposed land to ULB-Bairad, refer to Appendix 7.11b OHT-1 (300 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 444). District Collector has allotted the proposed land to ULB-Bairad, refer to Appendix 7.11b OHT-2 (300 KL): As per DPR, proposed at Tehsil office but now it has been shifted to campus of the Nagar Parishad office. Land under possession of ULB-Bairad OHT-3 (225 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 398), within the campus of WTP Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.11b. No issue reported.

35 Pichhore

Source: As per DPR, Futiwar dam but it has been decided to get water from Futiwar and Nagdha dam, both in the rotation system. WTP: As per DPR, Khasra No. 1639/3 was proposed but another new location/land with Khasra No. 1653/1/3 near Hazira Pahari is identified. Transfer of land is required. OHT (200 KL): It is decided that in place of two GSR (250 KL each) at Hazira Pahari and Kali Mata Mandir Pahari, OHT (100 KL) is being proposed at Hazira Pahari within the campus of WTP because two OHTs had been constructed recently by Nagar parishad-Pichhore

36 Isagarh Two sump wells 160 KL and 180 KL are proposed at the campus of existing OHTs which are already under possession of Nagar parishad-Isagarh. No issues reported

37 Aron

Source: river Sindh Intake well and approach bridge WTP (4.50 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 950, 952, 954 and 955, located at Aron-Barod road. OHT (700 KL): Earlier Proposed at government survey no 1216 but later on shifted to another survey no. 643 due to insufficient land at 1216. But it may change Note: District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11e. No issue reported.

38 Vijaypur

Source: river Kunwari Intake well cum pump house: Site for intake well cum pump house is being proposed at anicut constructed by WRD on river Kunwari. WTP: Another government land with survey no. 11/1 is identified which is under possession of Nagar Parishad-Vijaypur for WTP and clear water sump. Earlier survey no. was 22/1.

29

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

OHT-1 (315 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 660) which is under possession of ULB-Vijaypur. District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11f. OHT-2 (240 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 57). District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11f. No issue reported.

39

4F

Lahar

Weir: on river Sindh near Madori village Intake well cum pump house: Sindh River WTP (8.50 MLD): in Madori village. Sump well: 235KL within WTP campus OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 5424), near BSNL under ward no. 15. OHT (450 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 5533), near MSGM Academy school under ward no. 14. OHT (350 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 2629/2), near Shivaji temple under ward no. 10. OHT (500 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 3238/1 & 3238/2), near Kali temple under ward no. 8. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.12a. No issue reported.

40 Mehgaon

Source: Ground water, using 8 existing tube wells. WTP (3.10 MLD) with sump well (85 KL) and OHT (320 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 1295, 1296, 1297, 1308, 1309 and 1316), near Sulabh Complex under ward no. 6. OHT (300 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 162, 163 and 164), at Veterinary Hospital under ward no. 1

41 Gormi

Source: It may change from surface water to ground water. WTP (2.65 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 2870 & 2872. Due to change of the source proposed component is discarded, earlier it was proposed near bridge on Kunwari River at Budhara village. OHT (300 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 3126 located at Man kapura, Ward No. 15 OHT (275 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1419 located at Muktidham, Ward No. 2.

42 4I Raghogarh

Source: Gopikrishan Sagar dam Intake well and approach bridge: Gopikrishan Sagar dam WTP (17 MLD): reported under forest, NoC has been obtained from forest department. OHT: About 5200 KL capacity is required in town. 21 OHTs (existing) are there in town and out of that 13 OHTs are taken into consideration while 12 new OHTs/GLSRs are proposed under WSS, Raghogarh. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13a. No issue reported.

30

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

43 Badarwas

Source: Ground water. Six number of Tube wells are proposed. 2 OHTs of capacity 300 KL each: (i) Proposed at government survey no. 172 at BRC ground and (ii) Proposed at government survey no. 614 near police station Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13b. No issue reported.

44 Shadora

Source & Intake well and approach bridge: Piproda Keshraj Barrage Stop Dam on Sindh River at Siran Charoda WTP (1.10 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 737/min 1. OHT (250 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1060/1 OHT (100 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1418 Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13c. No issue reported.

45 5A Barhi

Intake well cum pump house: Proposed at government survey no. 1 which is located on right bank of River Mahanadi at Koniya Village near Kali ji Temple. WTP (3.5 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 1193/1 in ward no. 4 for 3.5 MLD. OHT (650 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 493/20 ka Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.14. No issue reported.

46

5B

Katangi

Note: Group water supply scheme for seven towns Katangi, Bhedaghat, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda. Source, Intake well and WTP is common for all seven towns, proposed at Bhedaghat. OHT (120 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 136/3 and 137/3. Proposal has been submitted to District collector-Jabalpur. No issues reported, refer to Appendix 7.15a

47 Bhedaghat

Source: Narmada river Common Intake well cum pump house: Location changed and now shifted to Lamhetaghat. Common WTP (31 MLD): Location changed and now shifted to Lamhetaghat. Proposed at government survey no. 171, 173, 175 and 176. No issue reported Note: As per DPR, proposed location has been changed now as ADB strongly objected on the proposed site of Intake and WTP, therefore, new site has been identified at another location on downstream side locally called Lamhetaghat on river Narmada. OHT (220 KL) at Bhedaghat: As per DPR, proposed at Khsara 153/1, it is typing error and actually it is 153/2. OHT (200 KL) at Bhedaghat: As per DPR, proposed at Khsara no. 72, it is typing error and actually it is 74 which comes under the corridor of impact (CoI) of ASI’s structure called Chousath Yogini Mandir. NoC has been obtained from ASI.

31

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15b.

48 Majholi Sump well (35 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 401. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15c

49 Panagar

OHTs (700 KL, 600 KL and 200 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 344/1 & 344/2, 1112 and 1421/2 Which are under possession of NP-Panagar Note: Application from ULB-Panagar has been submitted to District Collector to transfer of the proposed land/site. All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issues reported, refer to Appendix 7.15d.

50 Patan No issues reported

51 Sihora

OHTs (4 in number): Proposed at government survey no. 197/2, 230/1, 1488 and 275/7. Due to insufficient area, another land is provided by NP-Sihora (Govt. khasra no. 1488/2 in front of PHED workshop) Clear Water Sump well: Proposed at government survey no.117/2. Note: Application from ULB-Sihora has been submitted to District Collector to transfer of the proposed land/site. All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issue reported , refer to Appendix 7.15f.

52 Tendukheda

Sump Well: Proposed at government survey no. 80, BPT: Proposed at government survey no. 23/377 OHT (300 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 685/3 in ward no. 9 OHT (325 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 579/1 in ward no. 11 Note: Application from ULB-Tendukheda has been submitted to Tehsildar-Patan for sump well and Tehsildar-Tendukheda for BPT and OHTs for transfer of the proposed land/site. All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15g.

53 6A

Khajuraho Field monitoring visit revealed the need for fresh third party certification, consultations and consideration of the nontitleholders for project construction work, as revealed during consultations. refer to Appendix 7.16

54 Rajnagar

55 6B Sagar No issues reported

32

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

56 Makroniya No issues reported

57 6C Rahatgarh

Weir: Weir is to be built on river Bina (length 130 M and height 3 M) Intake well cum pump house (7.0 MLD): at Bina river WTP (7.0 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 19 near existing WTP. Proposed site comes under the CoI of ASI structure, fort locally called Qila. NoC from ASI has been obtained. Refer to Appendix 7.17a Clear Water sump of 2.51 Lakhs Litre capacity within campus of WTP OHT (1200 KL capacity for Zone-2A & 2B): Proposed at government survey no. 860 and 861/1 under ward no. 6 inside the campus of Nagar Parishad-Rahatgarh. OHT (600 KL for Zone-3): Proposed at government survey no. 76/1 under ward no. 3 Shamshan ghat There is no land issue reported at proposed components, refer to Appendix 7.18.

58

6D

Buxwaha

Intake well at Buxwaha tank (Bhad Bhada talab) for 2 MLD WTP (1.30 MLD) near Buxwaha tank/Bhad Bhada talab: Proposed at government survey no. 349/1. OHT (200 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. near police housing board colony but during Implementation, it is changed to Ashok Vatika in front of government hospital. Now, new identified proposed location is at government survey no. 701/8. Note: CMO-Buxwaha issued a certificate which clearly states that proposed sites are government land and under possession of NP-Buxwaha, refer to Appendix 7.19A.

59 Hatta

Location of Intake Well cum pump house: Intake well was proposed on the bank of Sonar river at village Harat. Sarpanch and local villagers of village Harat and other villages has objected the proposed location of Intake Well at Sonar river and alignment of RWRM pipeline. Therefore, shifted to another site which is located at downstream of Sonar river near WTP (proposed) at Gaddiya Hatta at government survey no. 44/1. WTP (3.50 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 44/1 OHT (1100 KL): within the campus of WTP Note: CMO-Hatta issued a certificate which clearly states that proposed sites are government land and transfer of the land is in process, refer to Appendix 7.19A. Now, there is no land issue reported at proposed components

60 Pawai

Weir on Patne river (length 88 m and height 5m) Intake well for 3.92 MLD at Patne river WTP (3.9 MLD): about 800 m away from intake well Clear Water sump for 3.5 Lakh litre capacity at WTP GSR of 350 KL capacity

33

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

GSR of 100 KL: shifted to new location Hanuman Bhata main gate about 200m away from previous site. Proposed at government survey no. 5814 near Hanuman Bhatta. NoC has been obtained for both the GSRs from forest department. Land proposed for subproject components belongs to government, a letter has been submitted to Tehsildar-Pawai for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.19C.

61 7A Mauganj

First River Ponding Structure: at River Nihayi near existing Intake Well. Proposed site is under possession of NP-Mauganj. Second River Ponding Structure: is proposed at right bank of Odda nala at Village Khatkari. Proposed intake well of 8.25 MLD Capacity on Odda nala right bank at Village Khatkari US side of Existing Stop dam. Although, government land is available on both the side of the river but some part of the private land is required to construct the Anicut and access to anicut. Two private land owner have voluntarily donated their land. No issue reported WTP ( 8.30 MLD): near Existing Intake well at river Nihayi. Clear Water sump for 4.00 Lac.Lit capacity proposed within campus of WTP. Proposed site is under possession of NP-Mauganj. OHT (1800 KL): Earlier dispute reported in between a local resident and Office of the CMO on the proposed land of OHT to get approach road for his land. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.20

62 7B

Jaithari

Anicut: Anicut to be built on river Tipan. A small portion of proposed site/location comes under forest area, applied to forest department for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7.21a. Intake well cum pump house: Location is downside of bridge on right bank of river Tipan. Proposed at government survey no. 304 which comes under forest area. Applied to forest department for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7/21a, applied to DFO-Anuppur for NoC and allotment. Other survey no. 2077/1 which is government, small portion of the land is required as both the survey no. 2077/1 and 304 are located adjacent to each other. WTP: As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 2077/1 at existing WTP. But during implementation, it came to notice that apart from survey no. 2077/1 another survey no. 304 which belongs to forest department is also required as both the survey no. 2077/1 and 304 are located adjacent to each other. Propose site/location comes under forest area as well as revenue department. Applied to forest department and District Collector both for NoC and allotment. Refer to Appendix 7/21a. OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 209/4. But during implementation, new site is identified and proposed at government survey no. 289. No issue reported. Note: NoC is to be required from railway, PWD and MPRDC to lay the pipeline within the RoW. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.21a.

63 Khand Source: Ban Sagar Dam GLSR (100 KL): Land belongs to forest department. Applied for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7.21b.

34

Sl. No.

Package No.

Name of the Town

Land related Issues

RWRM: Total length of proposed alignment of RWRM is 6 Kms., about 4 kms (from source to GLSR-100 KL) and 2 Kms is from GLSR-100 KL to WTP. Proposed alignment passes through forest area, PMGSY road and irrigation department road. Applied for NoC to forest department while it is in process to apply for NoC to PMGSY and irrigation department. WTP (1.5 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 91/1 at ward no. 15. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21b. GLSR (200 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 209/4, proposed location of GLSR is far away from the town area. Actually identified location of the site is government survey no. 209/10/kha under ward no. 12. Refer to Appendix 7.21b written to District Collector for allotment. No issue reported.

64 Chandia

Source: river Chhoti Mahanadi Anicut: During implementation, it came to notice that no approach road is there to proposed site/location of Anicut, therefore, another site is identified on the downstream of Chhoti Mahanadi. At new site, natural pooling of large quantity of water is always there throughout the year. Thus, Anicut is not required. Intake well cum pump house: Location of the site belongs to WRD under Jogia Irrigation Project. A letter has been written to WRD to obtain NoC, refer to Appendix 7.21c written to WRD. WTP (2 MLD): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 11/1/4. But during implementation, it came to notice that no approach road to proposed site. Therefore, new site is identified in the town and proposed at government survey no. 1167/1 and 1439/1 near cremation ground. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector-Umariya for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21c. OHT (170 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 2459/1 OHT (350 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 359 but during implementation it was shifted to new survey no. 2236. For both the OHTs, proposal has been submitted to Tehsildar-Chandia for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21c.

65 2F Anjad (SWG) No issue reported during reporting period.

66 2G Barwaha (SWG)

No issue reported during reporting period.

67 5G Saikheda (SWG)

No issue reported during reporting period.

35

35. At WSS town Amla under package 1B, it came to notice that private land is to be acquired for Anicut. In this regard, identification of the land owners is in progress with the help of local revenue officials (patwari). While for another component (OHT-200 KL)of WSS town Amla, a private land owner has voluntarily donated his land to NP-Amla. In another package 2C and 7A, private land owner voluntarily donated their land for OHT-360 KL in WSS town Dhamnod and for Anicut in WSS town Mauganj respectively. Keeping in view, third party verification is required to address the ADB Policy. In WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar under package 6A, seven affected persons (APs) were identified in RP at proposed site of WTP near Kutni dam as this site is encroached by these APs from adjacent village. As per RP, these seven farmers had been cultivating crops in the encroached government land for their own consumption. But during implementation period, these APs had given a consent cum certificate letter which clearly states that they had willingly not grown any crop on the encroached land since 2016-17 because WTP has been proposed and significant number of households will get potable water supply from there. This is pious work and APs decided not to grow crops in the encroached land for public interest, refer to Appendix 7.16.

36. Apart from the above issues, NoC needs to be obtained from water resource department (WRD), archaeological survey of India (ASI), forest department, national highways authority of India (NHAI), public works department (PWD) etc., if required for subproject components. Based on the data collected and progress reported periodically, the physical progress of awarded packages under Phase I is depicted in Appendix 1.

D. COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION

37. The overall project is classified as category ‘B’ in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). ADB's SPS covers both temporary and permanent impacts. As mentioned earlier, proposed site/land for subproject components belongs to government, but in one of the subprojects WSS town Sohagpur under Package 1C, small piece of land needs to acquire. As per DBO Contractor, after detailed measurement survey it was found that private land needs to be acquired to construct approach road to reach at Jack Well cum Pump House proposed at Narmada river. Five affected persons (APs) are reported and land acquisition is done through negotiated settlement under consent land purchase policy of government of Madhya Pradesh. Under this policy, department or undertakings will pay the value of the land after calculating prevalent collector guideline rates of lands plus value of available assets on the land (trees, well, house etc.) and will also pay an equal rehabilitation grant to land owner. Keeping in view of ADB policy, socio-economic profile of APs along with a third-party verification has been done and attached in the updated IR DDR of town Sohagpur by Client. All the five APs have received compensation amount, details are as follows:

Table 6: Details of APs and Status of compensation payment during reporting period (August 2017 to January 2018

Sl. No.

Name of the AP (Land Owner)

Amount to be paid (in INR) including rehabilitation grant

Other Charges including stamp duty & registry charge

Total Amount

Remarks

1 Vinay Kumar/Jiwan Singh 7,26,000 52,998 7,78,998 Amount disbursed

2 Neelam/Sunil Kumar 2,40,000 17,520 2,57,520 -do- 3 Kripal Singh/Roop Singh 96,000 7,008 1,03,008 -do- 4 Manoj Kumar/Ravishankar 4,83,000 35,259 5,18,259 -do- 5 Ram Bharose/Sarvan Singh 1,92,000 14,016 2,06,016 -do-

36

Sl. No.

Name of the AP (Land Owner)

Amount to be paid (in INR) including rehabilitation grant

Other Charges including stamp duty & registry charge

Total Amount

Remarks

Total 17,37,000 1,26,801 18,63,801

E. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOUSRE

38. During implementation of the subprojects, an extensive consultation program is carried out with different type of stakeholders such as respective ULBs, other line departments, general public, vendors and land owner etc., in line with the requirements pertaining to disseminate the project information, in particular agreed resettlement framework. General public, business owners mainly shopkeepers and likely to be affected people were informed about the possibility of disruption due to subproject. The consultation is focused on about subproject and on entitlement matrix of the project and compensation receiving procedure. The tools used for consultations were stakeholder workshops and meetings, interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). These consultations provided inputs for identification of the felt needs of the communities, and the relevant stakeholders. Meaningful consultations have been continued with local inhabitants which include all section of society particularly Vulnerable Groups1, IP community, affected people (APs), elected representative and other stakeholders to ensure their participation in all phases of subprojects i.e Design, implementation and monitoring. Meaningful consultation is defined as a process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and expected to carry out throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people (APs); (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of APs and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues. Consultations is being carried out in a manner commensurate with the impacts on affected communities.

39. The consultation process and its results will be documented in the updated / revised Involuntary Resettlement / Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP) Due Diligence Report of each subproject. The consultations with APs, local community particularly vulnerable groups were informed about the subproject components/activities to ensure that it adequately deal with their needs, priorities, and preferences. The outcome of the social assessment and mitigation measures were discussed with local inhabitants. The Executing Agency has made available the summary of Initial Environment Examination (IEE) and IR/IP reports of awarded subproject towns to the ULB, affected persons and local public. Subproject information was made available in a local language i.e Hindi. Summary of awarded subprojects was disclosed at notice board of the concerned Urban Local Body (ULB) / PIU (refer to Appendix 2). EA shall also post the documents and their summaries on its website. This will also be disclosed on ADB website.

1 vulnerable groups / households, defined as women-headed households(WHH) and households below the poverty line (BPL), scheduled caste (SC) / scheduled tribe (ST) households, disabled/elderly headed households.

37

40. A draft Community Action and Participation Plan (CAPP) was prepared and submitted to PMU. As involvement of the local community under the urban water supply sub-project is highly desirable, because of variations in community characteristics and degree of significance of the project need. Therefore, awareness and participation of the community are very much required to ensure widespread, ongoing, and meaningful participation of the key stakeholders with a focus on the poor and the vulnerable group. Awareness drive program are conducted and record of awareness raising events/consultations are as follows:

38

Table 7: Record of Awareness Raising Events/Consultations

Sl. No.

Town Package Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) Total as on 31st January 2019

No of

consultations Total

participants Male

participants Female

participants No of

consultations Total

participants Male

participants Female

participants

1 Boda 1A 3 26 20 6 3 26 20 6 2 Kurawar 1A 3 32 25 7 3 32 25 7 3 Sarni 1B 4 81 67 14 4 81 67 14 4 Amla 1B 2 60 20 40 2 60 20 40 5 Betul Bazar 1B 2 23 18 5 2 23 18 5 6 Bankhedi 1C 0 0 0 0 2 20 12 8 7 Sohagpur 1C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Betma 2A 1 10 6 4 10 175 67 108 9 Depalpur 2A 1 13 11 2 6 111 54 57 10 Gotampura 2A 0 0 0 0 6 112 52 60

11 Karhi Padliya

2B 0 0 0 0 5 55 51 4

12 Kasrawad 2B 2 20 0 20 9 155 49 106 13 Pansemal 2B 0 0 0 0 6 61 56 5 14 Dhamnod 2C 2 20 5 15 24 260 136 124 15 Mandav 2C 1 14 14 10 18 296 114 182 16 Meghnagar 2D 1 7 4 3 2 17 10 7 17 Petlawad 2D 4 56 9 47 11 145 39 106 18 Bhavara 2D 0 0 0 0 2 22 8 14 19 Kukdeshwar 3A 1 22 11 11 1 22 11 11 20 Makdone 3B 0 0 0 0 3 37 24 13 21 Susner 3B 2 49 7 42 3 61 13 48 22 Pankhedi 3B 4 47 11 36 4 47 11 36 23 Alampur 4A 7 72 62 10 7 72 62 10 24 Daboh 4A 5 38 33 5 5 38 33 5 25 Mihona 4A 3 40 36 4 3 40 36 4 26 Phuphkalan 4A 5 64 49 5 5 64 49 5 27 Aron 4D 0 0 0 0 2 16 16 0 28 Bairad 4D 0 0 0 0 3 24 24 0 29 Karera 4D 0 0 0 0 3 28 28 0 30 Vijaypur 4D 0 0 0 0 2 18 18 0

39

Sl. No.

Town Package Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) Total as on 31st January 2019

No of

consultations Total

participants Male

participants Female

participants No of

consultations Total

participants Male

participants Female

participants

31 Issagarh 4D 0 0 0 0 1 13 12 1 32 Barhi-Katni 5A 0 0 0 0 13 114 72 42 33 Katangi 5B 0 0 0 0 3 18 13 5 34 Tendukheda 5B 0 0 0 0 6 47 0 47

35 Bhedaghat-Jabalpur

5B 0 0 0 0

2 20 8 12

36 Majholi Jabalpur

5B 0 0 0 0

2 26 0 26

37 Sihora-Jabalpur

5B 0 0 0 0

2 14 8 6

38 Patan Jabalpur

5B 0 0 0 0

2 13 5 8

39 Panagar Jabalpur

5B 0 0 0 0

2 20 12 8

40 Khajuraho Rajnagar

6A 0 0 0 0

2 60 25 35

41 Hatta 6D 0 0 0 0 1 29 29 0 42 Mauganj 7A 0 0 0 0 5 45 26 19 43 Chandia 7B 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 1 44 Khand 7B 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 1

45 Anjad (SWG)

2F 0 0 0 0

12 153 80 73

46 Barwaha (SWG)

2G 0 0 0 0

12 156 70 86

47 Sanawad (SWG)

2H 0 0 0 0

14 205 83 122

48 Saikheda (SWG)

5G 0 0 0 0

3 36 22 14

Total 53 694 408 286 240 3099 1598 1491

40

41. PMC’s PIUs level staff under guidance of PMU and PMC experts had conducted various consultations with the local populace of subproject towns to understand their views on existing water supply and proposed water supply scheme. At the same time, the communities were informed about the Resettlement Framework and GRM under MPUSIP in detailed along with proposed water supply infrastructure of the town. During consultations, community enquired about the tariff and perceived benefits of water supply scheme. During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), there has been consultations on project design, features, implementation procedures, sewerage scheme, health and sanitation, formation of GRC, land transfer, resettlement framework and rehabilitation of affected households, possible positive & negative impacts of the project and other social safeguard issues. There is great acceptance among community about Project as there is only positive impact on the daily life of community. The people mainly raised the issue of timing and supply hours of water supply, timely road restoration and completion of the project, traffic management during business hours at the time of civil activities, O&M procedures and community participation. Apart from that local inhabitant also asked about sanitation which will be resolved after availability of safe water. The summary of consultation is attached as Appendix 4.

F. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM)

42. A Project-specific grievance redress mechanism (GRM) has been established to receive, evaluate, and facilitate the resolution of AP’s concerns, complaints, and grievances about the social and environmental performance at the level of the project. The following GRM provides a time-bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked to the project. In this regard, a common GRM is in place for social, environmental, or any other grievances related to the Project. The GRM will provide an accessible and trusted platform for receiving and facilitating resolution of affected persons’ grievances related to the project. The multi-tier (three tier) GRM for the project is outlined below:

43. 1st tier (At Town Level) and Composition of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC):

• A representative of Chief Municipal Officer associated with Urban Local Body, Chairperson;

• CDO of ULB designated/nominated by ULB. • Field Engineer of Project Management Consultants; • Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town; • Field Engineer of concerned ULB designated by the respective PIU, Secretary;

44. Major Functions: The major functions of town level GRC is as follows:

• Registration of Grievances by the Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town Sorting of Grievances by Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town and Chairperson;

• Forwarding grievances to concerned authorities i.e Site Engineer for resolution; • Information to the complainant on the decision taken to address registered complaint

and expected time to resolve issue; • Resolution of issues emerged due to construction; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and • seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-ULB or forwarding of complaint to PIU GRC if grievance

remains unresolved.

45. 2nd Tier (At PIU Level): Composition of the PIU level GRC:

41

• Project Manager, associated with Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited - Chairperson

• An elected member nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body (ULB).

• A Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body.

• Commissioner of associated Urban Local Body/Chief Municipal Officer or Community Development Officer/Community Organizer of Urban Local Body.

• Community Development Officer CDO-PIU - Secretary

46. Major Functions: The following functions will be performed by the PIU level GRC:

• Registration of complaints by CDO-PIU from the 1st tier GRC and/or affected people; • Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC Chairperson; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Grievance Redress Committee meetings to discuss grievances and action required; • Ensuring collection of detailed information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint, draw conclusion from discussions and make

recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned

authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and • seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-PIU or forwarding of complaint to PMU GRC if

grievance remains unresolved.

47. 3rd Tier (At PMU-State Level): Composition of State Level GRC

• Engineer in Chief, MPUDC – Chairperson • Deputy Project Director (T) • Deputy Project Director (A) (Secretary) • Project Officer • Community Development Officer CDO-PMU • PMC TL or representative Advisor

48. Major Functions: The state level GRC will be responsible to perform the following functions:

• Registration of complaints received from GRC PIU and/or affected people; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC PMU chairperson with support of the

Secretary of state GRC- – whether grievance is eligible for consideration or not at the state level;

• Ensuring collection of required information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint to draw conclusion from discussions and make

recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned

authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline; • Closing complaint after all actions taken as per recommendations and feedback to the

complainant.

42

• Advise to complainants about approach /appeal to the concerned department in case the complainant is not satisfied or complaint is beyond the scope of the GRC PMU.

49. The structure and process of GRM is presented below for detailed understanding in Figure 2:

Figure 1: structure and process of GRM

50. The GRM is envisaged to provide a time bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked with the project. In this regard, MPUSIP had issued an official order along with the guideline to all PIUs and ULBs to establish grievance redress committee (GRC) at all awarded subproject towns. Copy of government order to establish GRC at each subproject town is enclosed as Appendix 5. Status of the formation of GRC at town level (awarded subproject towns) is as follows in the Table 8:

Table 8: Status of GRC Formation

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation

1 1A

Boda GRC formed on 22.01.2018 2 Kurawar GRC formed on 01.12.2017 3 Kothri GRC formed on 01.12.2017

43


4 1B

Amla GRC formed on 11.12.2017 5 Betul-Bazar GRC formed on 24.11.2018) 6 Sarni GRC formed on 11.12.2017 7

1C Bankhedi GRC formed on 16.02.2018)

8 Sohagpur GRC formed on 08.02.2018) 9

2A Betma GRC formed on 20.07.2018

10 Depalpur GRC formed on 28.06.2018 11 Gotampura GRC formed on 30.07.2018 12

2B

Pansemal GRC formed on 23.01.2018 13 Rajpur GRC formed on 10.02.2018 14 Karhi Padliya GRC formed on 01.09.2017 15 Kasrawad GRC formed on 12.10.2017 16

2C Dhamnod GRC formed on 21.02.2018

17 Mandav GRC formed on 06.12.2017

18 2D

Bhavra (Chander Shekhar Azad Nagar)

GRC formed on 06.12.2017.

19 Meghnagar GRC formed on 17.01.2018 20 Petlawad GRC formed on 07.11.2017 21

3A

Kukdeswar GRC formed on 17.04.2018 22 Nayagaon GRC formed on 08.01.2018 23 Sarvaniya maharaj GRC formed on 08.02.2018 24 Nagri GRC formed on 24.07.2018 25

3B Susner GRC formed on 05.12.2017

26 Pankhedi GRC formed on 06.01.2018 27 Makdone GRC formed on 06.12.2017 28

4A

Alampur GRC formed on 08.06.2018 29 Daboh GRC formed on 18.07.2018 30 Mihona GRC formed on 08.06.2018 31 Phuphkalan GRC formed on 08.06.2018 32 4B Bhind GRC formed on 24.09.2018 33

4D

Karera GRC formed on 20.11.2017 34 Bairad GRC formed on 03.10.2017 35 Pichhore GRC formed on 18.07.2017 36 Isagarh GRC formed on 27.12.2017 37 Aron GRC formed on 06.12.2017 38 Vijaypur GRC formed on 27.10.2017 39

4F Lahar GRC formed on 04.10.2018

40 Mehgaon GRC formed on 18.10.2018 41 Gormi GRC formed on 27.09.2018 42

4I Raghogarh Formation of GRC in progress

43 Badarwas Formation of GRC in progress 44 Shadora Formation of GRC in progress 45 5A Barhi GRC formed on 29.07.2017 46

5B

Katangi GRC formed on 11.10.2017 47 Bhedaghat GRC formed on 10.07.2017 48 Majholi GRC formed on 12.05.2017 49 Panagar GRC formed on 10.07.2017 50 Patan GRC formed on 30.11.2017 51 Sihora GRC formed on 24.11.2017 52 Tendukheda GRC formed on 12.06.2017 53

6A Khajuraho GRC formed on 12.12.2017

54 Rajnagar GRC formed on 23.11.2017 55

6B Sagar Formation of GRC in progress

56 Makroniya Formation of GRC in progress 57 6C Rahatgarh GRC formed on 22.09.2017 58 6D Buxwaha GRC formed on 23.11.2017

44


59 Hatta GRC formed on 22.09.2017 60 Pawai GRC formed on 22.09.2017 61 7A Mauganj GRC formed on 26.07.2017 62

7B Jaithari GRC formed on 12.06.2018

63 Khand GRC formed on 22.08.2018 64 Chandia GRC formed on 09.08.2018 65 2F Anajd (SWG) Formation of GRC in progress 66 2G Barwaha (SWG) Formation of GRC in progress 67 5G Saikheda (SWG) GRC formed on 02.01.2019

51. It is important to mention that most of the awarded subprojects towns have established GRC except towns namely Anjad (pkg 2F), Barwaha (2G), Sagar & Makroniya (pkg 6B) and Raghogarh, Badarwas and Shadora (pkg 4I). During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), GRC is formed at towns namely Betul Bazar (pkg 1B), Bhind (pkg 4B), Lahar, Mehgaon & Gormi (pkg 4F), Khand & Chandia (pkg 7B) and Saikheda (pkg 5G). Process of the formation of GRC at remaining towns are also in progress.

52. The GRM aims to provide a trusted way to voice and resolve concerns linked to the Project, and to be an effective way to address affected people’s concerns. 38 numbers of grievances are reported during this reporting period and all are resolved. These grievances are related to breakage of the existing pipeline, poor housekeeping during civil works and excavation of the road occurred by project activities. Other grievances reported during period are spreading around the dust due to civil works/excavation, excess excavation and removal of excavated material. As mentioned in the previous SSMR, resistance from the villagers (farming community) residing in and around of the Gomai dam is reported due to abstraction of water from Gomai dam for WSS town Pansemal. In this regard, consultations are being conducted with villagers by Nagar Parishad-Pansemal, District administration and MPUSIP officials.

53. Details of grievances reported during August 2018 to January 2019 are depicted below in Table no. 9.

Table 9: Detail of Grievances during the Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019)

Sl. No.

Subproject Town (Pkg

No.)

Name of Person/Address Type of Grievance Status

1 Sarni (1B) Mr. Dhurvay Sir (Chief Engg.) MPPGCL (10/11/2018)

Regarding DI pipe Line Resolved

2 Sarni (1B) Pradeep Kumar Ward No-31, (05/12/2018)

Breakage of the old pipe line (existing) during excavation works.

Resolved

3 Sarni (1B) Saddam Husain Ward -33, (08/12/2018)

Dust reported during backfilling of the tranches

Resolved

4 Sarni (1B) Shoiel Khan, (28/12/2018)

Old pipe Break Resolved

5 Sarni (1B) Gautam Kumar Sarni (10/01/2019)

Breakage/Damage of the old GI pipe line (existing) during excavation works.

Resolved

6 Sarni (1B) Raju Yadav Bagdona (12/01/2019)

Delay in removing the excess material due to excavation

Resolved

7 Karhi Padliya (2B)

CMO, Nagar Parishad, Karhi Padliya (06/10/2018)

Regarding soil filling in trench at ward no. 04

Resolved

45

Sl. No.


No.)




Timely completion of road restoration works near Krishi Mandi

Resolved



Breakdown of tap connection (Ward-04)

Resolved




Resolved




Resolved




Resolved




Resolved



Breakdown of tap connection and soil filling in trench (Ward-06)

Resolved


CMO, Nagar Parishad, Karhi Padliya i (17/01/2019)

Regarding soil filling in trench (Ward-15)

Resolved



Regarding soil filling in trench (Ward-13)

Resolved

18 Kasrawad (2B)

Manish Kanade, Ward no. 05, Mob. 9826319296 (09/08/2018)

Breakdown of tap connection Resolved

19 Kasrawad (2B)

Lalita Dabade, Ward 05, (08/12/2018)

Breakdown of tap connection Resolved

20 Kasrawad (2B)

Kishorlal and Babu Kushwaha, Ward 11, (20/12/2018)

Existing Tap connection damaged and delay in soil filling of the tranche

Resolved

21 Mandav (2C) Anita, Upayan, Mandav, Mob. 9589501207 (16/12/2018)


Resolved

22 Karera (4D) Smt. Usha Jain (03/12/2018)


Resolved

23 Barhi (5A) Suresh Mali, Near Dangi talab, ward-5 (22/12/2018)

Old WS connection damaged during new household connection

Resolved

24 Barhi (5A) Suresh Tamakar, Sarafa Market Ward-08 (04/01/2019)

Old WS connection damaged during breaking of the CC road.

Resolved

25 Barhi (5A) Saptmi Barman, Near Ram Mandir (11/01/2019)

Damage of Sewage pipe of new house

Resolved

26 Sihora (5B) Mr. Ramlal Mishra, Sihora –ward-04 (10/01/2019)

Dust, mud and sludge is reported at the time of laying of CWRM-DI pipes

Resolved

27 Tendukheda (5B)

Jitendra Shrivastav, Ward-12,13,14 (Mob. 8319903432)

Road restoration Resolved

46

Sl. No.


No.)


(13/11/2018) 28 Katangi (5B) Ms. Chanda Agrawal,

Prem Nagar, Ward No 3. Mob. No.- 7415311351 (11/12/2018)

Trench hasn’t been backfilled properly in front of house and poor housekeeping by Contractor.

Resolved

29 Katangi (5B) Mr. Imroj Khan, Mohammadi Gate, Ward No. 11, Mob-7987000063 (30/12/2018)

Trench hasn’t been backfilled properly in front of house and poor housekeeping by Contractor.

Resolved

30 Bhedaghat (5B)

Somnath Yadav, Ward-03, Mob,-8223010456 (23/01/2019)

House connection Breakage of the old pipe line (existing) during excavation works.

Resolved

31 Bhedaghat (5B)

Subham, Ward-03 Mo-6261119291 (27/01/2019)


32 Panagar (5B) Kanti Bai, Village- Balkhadu (23/11/2018)


33 Mauganj (7A) Chhedi Lal, Ward-5 (03/01/2019)


34 Khajuraho (6A)

Mr. Kalyan Singh (CDO) Nagar Parishad , mob.9425878217 (04/01/2019)

Breakage of Tap (nal), Dust and mud on Road at the time of laying of CWRM-DI pipes

Resolved

35 Rajnagar (6A)

Mr. Murlidhar Shukla (CMO), mob 9406731179 (08/01/2019)

Breakage of Tap (nal), Dust and mud on Road at the time of laying of CWRM-DI pipes

Resolved

36 Rahatgarh (6C)

Miss. Rajani Kori , ward no. 09, mob 9303238590 (18/12/2018)

Hand injury while collecting pieces of rock stones as rock stones are reported in town during excavated materials.

Resolved

37 Pawai (6D)

Miss Jyoti Nagayach ward no.03 mob.999307738 (28/12/2018)

Breakage of Tap (nal), Resolved

38 Buxwaha (6D)

Miss Kushum Soni (Social worker) ward no.05 mob.9424345004 (20/12/2018)

Dust and mud on Road at the time of laying of CWRM-DI pipes

Resolved

G. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

54. The State’s Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) is the executing agency of the Project and Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the Nodal implementing agency (IA). Both the agencies are also responsible to ensure compliance with safeguard requirements of the State Government, Government of India (GoI) and ADB and for day-to-day monitoring of project progress, including the implementation of resettlement provisions in the project and produce progress report on all aspects concerning to planning, implementation and monitoring of the land acquisition and resettlement issues. In this regard, the EA has already set up a state - level Project Management Unit (PMU) headed by the Managing Director. Implementing Agency has also set up 13 Project Implementation Units (PIUs) to manage implementation of subproject packages in their respective towns. The

47

PIUs are located at regional levels i.e Bhopal, Indore, Jabalpur, Sagar, Gwalior, Riwa, Chhindwara, Shahdol, Chhatarpur, Morena, Ujjain, Khargone and Hoshangabad. Institutional arrangement and human resources are described below to ensure effective implementation of social safeguard issues:

➢ PMU: Social safeguard component is headed by the Technical Officer at PMU. The Technical Officer-Safeguards is being supported by one Environment Engineer, one Community Development Officer (CDO) and one Gender and Social Officer to plan, manage and supervise social activities under leadership of Managing Director and Engineer in Chief (EnC).

➢ PIU: Each PIU has a Project Manager (PM) who is overall responsible to plan and, manage technical as well as social components of their jurisdiction. Project Manager is supported by one Dy. Project Manager (DPM), one Assistant Project Manager (APM) and one Procurement Officer. In addition, a post of Civil Engineer for each package under PIU is also sanctioned and officials are in place. One Community Development Officer (CDO) is posted at each PIU to plan and manage social safeguard issues.

➢ PMC: PMC has a Social Safeguard Expert, an Environment Expert and a Gender and Communication Expert to plan and manage activities related to Social Safeguards. PMC experts are also responsible to provide technical assistance to PMU and PIUs during implementation of the project by conceptualisation of the activities, building their capacity for effective implementation and documentation. PMC also has positions of Resettlement Coordinator, Environmental Coordinator and Communication Assistant to support at each PIUs (One position for each PIU). Position of Resettlement Coordinator and Environment Coordinator are posted on intermittent basis. Communication Assistants are placed at Sagar, Bhopal, Indore and Jabalpur.

➢ Design Built Operate Contractor (DBOC): One Safeguard Expert (Environment and Social expert) may likely to be appointed by contractor for safeguard compliances and preparation/updation of DDR/RP and its implementation etc.

55. During the reporting period, safeguard officials at PMU and PIUs are positioned on regular basis while PMC has deployed their safeguard experts on intermittent basis. Deployment details of these Social Safeguard Officials is depicted below in the Table 10.

Table 10: Deployment of Social Safeguards officials during Reporting Period (August 2018 – January 2019)

Sl. No.

Name of Institution

Designation Position Filled In

Remarks

1 PMU Technical Officer-Safeguards

Yes

-do- Environment Engineer

Yes

-do- Community Development Officer

Yes

-do- Social and Gender Officer

No

2 PIUs (PMU)

Community Development Officer (5 in no., one at each PIU)

Yes

3 PMC Safeguard Expert-Resettlement

Yes In position since January 2017

-do- Environment Expert Yes In position since April 2017

48

Sl. No.

Name of Institution

Designation Position Filled In

Remarks

-do- Gender and Communication Expert

Yes In position since May 2017

4 PIU (PMC)

Resettlement Coordinators (5 in no., one at each PIU)

Yes, all five

PMC (PIU)-Sagar, Bhopal and Jabalpur: In position since March 2018 PMC (PIU)-Gwalior: In position since May 2018 PMC (PIU)-Indore: In position since June 2018

-do- Communication Assistant (5 in no., one at each PIU)

Yes, all five

PMC (PIU)- Bhopal: In position since May 2017 PMC (PIU)-Sagar, Jabalpur and Indore: In position since September 2017 PMC (PIU)- Gwalior: In position since October 2018

-do- Environment Engineer (5 in no., one at each PIU)

Yes, three mobilized

PMC (PIU)- Bhopal: In position since May 2018 PMC (PIU)- Sagar: In position since August 2018 PMC (PIU)- Jabalpur: In position since December 2018 Note: two CVs are submitted to Client

56. PMU, PMC and PIUs -all social safeguards are expected to work in close coordination. State level social safeguards are mainly responsible to conceptualize design/interventions, develop plan, manage and monitor interventions while PIU officials are responsible to ensure implementation of works with quality. PIUs has been established to assist PMU, facilitate day-to-day implementation and management of the Project. One CDO has been deployed at each PIU to look after the social safeguard issues. Although, the civil engineer is also deployed at the subproject (Package) wise as Nodal Safeguard Officer and working closely with the Urban Local Bodies, to expedite the safeguard compliance and payments of assistance to AHs, if any.

57. MPUSIP entrusted with the responsibilities for planning, design, and implementation of the Project and also responsible to ensure compliance with safeguard requirements of Asian development bank (ADB), Government and for day-to-day monitoring of project progress, including the implementation of resettlement provisions in the project and produce progress report on all aspects concerning to planning, implementation and monitoring of the land acquisition and resettlement issues. DBO Contractor for each package is responsible for detailed design and detailed measurement surveys (DMS). Therefore, IR and IP impacts will be reconfirmed again after completion of detailed design. The final IR and IP report will be reviewed and disclosed on website of urban local body (ULB), IA and ADB. No construction work will commence before the updated social safeguard document for the packages is reviewed and approved by ADB.

H. MONITORING RESULTS/FINDING

58. Up to the reporting period, the implementation of RP is continuing. The safeguard team has been working closely with technical design team so to avoid the adverse impact. The

49

grievances related to social safeguard is treated immediately within the project entitlement framework and the numbers of grievances related to social safeguard are minimal. The assessment, monitoring, evaluation and reporting of the resettlement activities will be undertaken by the Project. The monitoring and assessment / evaluation of the contractors’ resettlement activities has been carried out by using formats to each subproject and visiting the sites during working hours. The format presents the status of work, problems, mitigation measures adopted by the Contractors etc. Such information is expected in Consultant’s monthly report on Environmental and Social Safeguards. Resettlement Plans will be prepared/updated with the entitlements, assistance and benefits, institutional arrangements, tasks and responsibilities of each level of the agencies involved in resettlement planning for the project.

59. Social safeguards are being monitored through – physical verification in the field, seeking community feedback, monthly and quarterly progress report. PMU with the assistance of PMC safeguard experts has been consolidating reports/data and inputting into quarterly monitoring report. The same has been shared with the ADB. These reports have been stating the progress of the implementation of resettlement activities, compliance issues and corrective actions. PMC Safeguard Expert-Resettlement has visited few subproject towns namely, Alampur, Daboh, Mihona, Bhind, Khajuraho & Rajnagar etc. and interacted with ULB officials, community leaders, community of vulnerable groups, contractor’s staff to understand and resolve social issues, if any.

I. COMPLIANCE OF SAFEGUARD LOAN COVENANTS

60. The status of compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard issues is shown below:

50

Table 11: Status of Compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard Issues

Item Loan Covenants Status

Involuntary Resettlement

13. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that all land and all set forth in the RP, and any corrective or preventative actions rights-of-way required for a subproject are made available to the Works contractor in accordance with the schedule agreed under the related Works contract and all land acquisition and resettlement activities are implemented in compliance with (a) all applicable laws and regulations of the Borrower relating to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement; (b) the Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards; (c) the RF; and (d) all measures and requirements set forth in the Safeguards Monitoring Report.

Being Complied IR DDR/Resettlement Plan (RP) of all packages under Phase 1 has been prepared and approved. Requirement of land has been identified and verification of final requirement after detailed measurement survey (DMS) by DBO Contractor for fixing up is under process. All acquisition process is complying with relevant State and National Laws, SPS (2009) of ADB and agreed Resettlement Framework (RF) for MPUSIP. All measures and compliance requirements as mentioned in resettlement plan (RP) / involuntary resettlement (IR) due diligence report (DDR) will be considered during implementation. Updation of reports as per service improvement plan (SIP) of each package under Phase 1, in case of any change impact on community in particular temporary loss of livelihood and land related aspects are being taken care as per all applicable laws and regulations. Corrective or preventive action plans which will be reflected in Safeguard monitoring report and project implementation authority will take care of the same.

14. Without limiting the application of the Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards, RF or the RP, Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that no physical or economic displacement takes place in connection with the subprojects until: (c) compensation and other entitlements have been provided to affected people in accordance with the RP; and

Being Complied As per RP and RF -before physical or economic displacement, compensation needs to be paid to Affected Persons (AP) as per “Entitlement Matrix”. Verification of the APs has been done and compensation amount paid.

(d) a comprehensive income and livelihood restoration program have been established in accordance with the RP.

Being Complied As per requirement, ILRP (Income and Livelihood Restoration Program) will be initiated as per prescribed guideline under RP and Gender Action Plan (GAP).

51


Indigenous Peoples

15. The Borrower shall ensure and cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that the preparation, design, construction, implementation and operation of the Project, each subproject and all Project facilities comply with (a) all applicable laws and regulations of the Borrower relating to indigenous peoples; (b) the Indigenous Peoples Safeguards; (c) the IPPF; and (d) all measures and requirements set forth in the respective IPP, and any corrective or preventative actions set forth in a Safeguards Monitoring Report.

Being Complied Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) prepared for MPUDC. As per social survey indigenous people are not affected from sub projects under Phase 1. In subsequent program, social screening will be done to find out any impact on Indigenous People (IP) by complying all relevant State and National Laws, SPS (2009) of ADB, IPPF. All measures and requirements if emerge in project in respect to IP impact will be addressed accordingly. Corrective or preventive action plans which reflected in safeguard monitoring report will be addressed by Project Implementation Agency.

Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements

16. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP, the IPP and the RP.

Being Complied Budgetary provisions have been included in RPs. Social and Gender Officer of Implementation Agency at PMU is not in place but expected to be placed soon, but Community Development Officer (CDO) at PMU level is in position. At each PIU, CDOs are in position. Human resources (Safeguard Expert-Resettlement from PMC for implementation of RPs are in place at Bhopal for compliance. To assist the Safeguard Expert-Resettlement for implementation of RP and other social issues, Resettlement Coordinators at PIUs level are also in place.

Safeguards related Provisions in Bidding Documents and Works Contracts

17. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that all bidding documents and contracts for Works contain provisions that require contractors to: (a) comply with the measures relevant to the contractor set forth in the IEE, the EMP, the IPP and the RP (to the extent they concern impacts on affected people during construction), and any corrective or preventative actions set forth in a Safeguards Monitoring Report;

Being Complied Approved RPs and IR/IP DDR are attached in Bidding documents. This will be followed for all the sub projects. In case of any change of scope, revised RPs / IR DDR will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval and corrective measures will be disclosed to DBO Contractor and same will be reflected in the in subsequent Social Monitoring Report.

(b) make available a budget for all such environmental and social measures;

Being Complied Budget has been made available for each sub project.

(c) provide the State and/or MPUDC with a written notice of any unanticipated environmental, resettlement or indigenous peoples

Being Complied

52


risks or impacts that arise during construction, implementation or operation of the Project that were not considered in the lEE, the EMP, the IPP and the RP;

With the development of sub projects and implementation, in case of additional impacts/risks due to change in scope/area, that will be reflected in the revised RPs and Safeguard Monitoring Report and accordingly project Executing Agency will inform the DBO Contractor for taking relevant corrective measures. Regular monitoring at field level by safeguard team (both by PMU and PMC) is being done to address unanticipated impacts.

(d) adequately record the condition of roads, agricultural land and other infrastructure prior to starting to transport materials and construction and

Being properly taken care under EMP.

(e) reinstate pathways, other local infrastructure, and agricultural land to at least their pre-project condition upon the completion of construction.

Being Complied Suitable provision has been made for this in Contract document.

Safeguards Monitoring and Reporting

18. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to do the following: submit semiannual Safeguards Monitoring Reports (SSMR) to ADB and disclose relevant information from such reports to affected persons promptly upon submission;

Being Complied. 1st SSMR (reporting period August 2017 to January 2018) and 2nd SSMR (reporting period February 2018 to July 2018) has been submitted to ADB and approved. This is 3rd Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report. Relevant information are disclosed to Affected Persons.

if any unanticipated environmental and/or social risks and impacts arise during construction, implementation or operation of the Project that were not considered in the lEE, the EMP, the IPP and the RP, promptly inform ADB of the occurrence of such risks or impacts, with detailed description of the event and proposed corrective action plan; and report any actual or potential breach of compliance with the measures and requirements set forth in the EMP, the lPP and the RP promptly after becoming aware of the breach.

With the development of Project and implementation, in case of additional impacts/risks due to change in scope/area, will be reflected in revised RPs and accordingly Executing Agency (EA) will inform the ADB along with corrective action plan which will be reflected in Safeguard Monitoring Report.

Prohibited List of Investments

19. The Borrower, the State and MPUDC shall ensure that no proceeds of the Loan are used to finance any activity included in the list of prohibited investment activities provided in Appendix 5 of the SPS.

Being Complied.

53


Gender

20. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that (a) the GESI is implemented in accordance with its terms; (b) the bidding documents and contracts include relevant provisions for contractors to comply with the measures set forth in the GESI; (c) adequate resources are allocated for implementation of the GESI; and (d) progress on implementation of the GESI, including progress toward achieving key gender outcome and output targets, are regularly monitored and reported to ADB.

Being Complied Gender Action Plan covering all aspects have been prepared and Implementation of Gender Action Plan as per approved GAP is being implemented. Action plan has been prepared as ADB indicators for gender and social inclusion which includes participation of women, linkages with government schemes, development of women networks, community mobilization and awareness program like behavior change, health & hygiene and save water etc

54

61. Safeguard team at PMU/PIUs and the expert from PMC along with support staff at PIUs have been mobilized for the implementation of RP and monitoring of safeguard activities. Compliance related to resettlement safeguard up to the reporting period are listed in Table 12 below:

Table 12: Status of Compliance of Resettlement & Social Safeguard Issues

Safeguard Applicability Status of Compliance

Project (MPUSIP) involves Social Safeguard Reports (IR DDR, IP DDR and Resettlement Plan), have been prepared as per agreed Resettlement Framework (RF) and ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement (2009)

Being Complied

Updation and revision of the Social Safeguard Reports (IR DDR, IP DDR and Resettlement Plan)

The IR DDR/RP are prepared based on agreed RF and being updated and forwarded to ADB for approval, In progress

Through public participation, affected persons are given adequate opportunity to participate in the resettlement planning and implementation

Being Complied

As per RF, RP will be disclosed to the affected persons, who are compensated and assisted prior to displacement from their house, land and assets, before commencement of any works

Being Complied

Implementation of the RP is monitored internally by the PMU and reported to ADB semi-annually

Complied in the SSMR

Formation of GRC at each subproject town Being Complied

J. FOLLOW UP, ACTION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCLOUSRE

62. The monitoring of social safeguard activities and implementation will be continued during the project implementation. The project will involve in following action for the implementation of RP.

• Facilitate Compensation distribution: The regular distribution of compensation payment will be facilitated from PID KUKL office.

• Facilitate Grievance Management: It will be facilitated through GRC formed at each subproject town to address the claims, obstruction and grievances. Respective GRC will verify the case related to compensation claims and resettlement close collaboration with project affected families.

• Organize GRC Meetings: The meeting will be organized as and when required. • Facilitate for Title Transfer: It will be facilitated to follow up activities to be carried

out to collect Land Ownership details form revenue department that have been transferred to concerned ULBs.

• Monitoring of Safeguard Compliance: The regular follow up and monitoring of safeguard compliance will be continued. The PMU safeguard team and PMC will be involved in monitoring and provide instructions to DBO Contractor for the compliance of safeguard issues and

• Consultation and dissemination: It will be conducted regular consultative meeting with ULB, Local residents and APs to overcome the possible social problems and right information dissemination.

55

Figure 2: Map Showing Subproject Towns

56

Appendix 1:Package-wise and Town-wise Progress of Drawing Design and Physical Progress up to January 2019

Sl. No.

Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List of completed components as on 31st January 2019

1 1A Boda Detailed design in progress (95%) Completed: - WTP - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - Intake (50%)

37%

No component completed

2 Kurawar Detailed design in progress (90%) Completed: - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Under Progress: - Intake - 50%

16%


3 Kothri Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - 60 KL OHT - 400 KL OHT - 200 KL Sump -150 KL Sump - Distribution Network

12%


4 1B Amla Detailed design in progress (91%) Completed: - Intake well: G.A. Completed Structure 10% - Anicut - RWRM - WTP -CWRM - OHTs - Distribution network - Thrust Block

24 %


5 Betul Bazar Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Raw Water Main - WTP - Clear Water Main - OHT - Distribution Network.

32%


6 Sarni Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake Well

21%


57

Sl. No.


- RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network

7 1C Sohagpur Detailed design in progress

(100%) Completed: - Intake well - Raw Water Rising Main - WTP - Clear Water Rising Main - OHTs - Distribution Network

43%


8 Bankhedi Detailed design in progress (92%) Completed: - CWRM. - Distribution Network. - OHT /GLSR: 71%

41%


9

2A

Betma

Detailed design in progress (35%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHT: Existing to be used. - Distribution Network

6%


10 Depalpur

Detailed design in progress (38%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHT

11%


11 Gautampura

Detailed design in progress (56%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHT 150 KL - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed, Structure yet to submitted

5%


12

2B Pansemal Detailed design in progress (60%) Completed: - OHT - Distribution - WTP: G.A. Completed, Structural drawing partially Completed

07%


58

Sl. No.


13

Rajpur Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake Well: Clubbed with Anjad Intake Well - Raw Water Rising Main - WTP - CWRM - OHT: Existing to be used. - Distribution Network

14%


14

Karhi –Padliya

Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHT 300 KL - Distribution Network

26%


15

Kasrawad Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM - CWRM - OHT - Distribution

27%


16

2C Dhamnod Detailed design in progress (93%) Completed: - WTP: GAD Completed, Structural drawing Partially Completed - CWRM - OHT - RWRM - Distribution system - Intake Well: Clubbed with Pithampur Intake Well.

29%


17

Mandav Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network

47%


18

2D Meghnagar Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Anicut - Intake Well - RWRM - WTP

14%


59

Sl. No.


- CWRM - 200 KL OHT - Distribution Network

19

Bhavra Detailed design in progress (90%) Completed: - OHT - Intake well - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed Structural Drawing Partially Cleared

18%


20

Petlawad Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHT - Distribution Network

25%


21

3A Kukdeshwar Detailed design in progress (58%) Completed: - Distribution Network - OHT: GAD completed - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared

3%


22

Nayagaon Detailed design in progress (66%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHT - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared

5%


23

Sarwaniya Maharaj

Detailed design in progress (66%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution Network - OHT GAD Completed - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared

6%


24 Nagri

Detailed design in progress (61%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared

3%


25 3B Susner Detailed design in progress

(88%) 44%

60

Sl. No.


Completed: - OHT - Raw Water Rising Main(RWRM) - Clear Water Rising Main CWRM) - Distribution network - WTP (2.25 MLD): GAD completed Structured Partially Completed


26

Makdone Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake well - Raw Water Main - Clear Water Main - Distribution network - OHT - WTP (2.0 MLD): GAD Completed Structure 90%

46%


27

Pankhedi Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - OHTs - WTP - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution

29%


28

4A Alampur Detailed design in progress (61%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - Intake: GAD Completed - WTP: GAD. 60% Structured 5% - OHT- GAD Completed

7%


29

Daboh Detailed design in progress (52%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution

6%


30

Mihona Detailed design in progress (49%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - Anicut: GAD Partially Completed - Intake: GAD Partially Completed

6%


61

Sl. No.


- WTP: GAD Partially Completed, Structured 5%

31

Phuphkalan Detailed design in progress (60%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - Tube well- 10%

9%


32

4B Bhind Detailed design in progress (1%) No component completed - CWRM (10%)

0%


33

4D Bairad Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM -.WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution

10%


34

Karera Detailed design in progress (92%) Completed: - Intake - WTP - OHTs - Distribution

8%


35

Vijaypur Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake well - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network.

5%

No component completed.

36

Pichore Detailed design in progress (80%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - OHT - Distribution - WTP: GAD Completed, Structured 65% - Intake- GAD 10%

5%


62

Sl. No.


37

Isagarh Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Sump - Distribution network

20%


38

Aron Detailed design in progress (50%) Completed: - RWRM - OHT - Distribution network: 50% - WTP: G.A.D Completed, Structure 45% - Intake: GAD 30 %, - Anicut: GAD 10%

5%


39

4F Lahar Detailed design in progress (14%) Completed: - CWRM - Distribution - WTP: GAD 10% - RWRM: 10% - OHT (4): GAD 10% - Intake: 10%

0%


40

Mehgaon Detailed design in progress (14%) Completed: - CWRM - Distribution

0%


41

Gormi Detailed design in progress (8%) No component completed - CWRM: - 30% - RWRM: - 10% - Distribution: 30%

0%


42

4I Raghogarh Detailed design in progress (5%) No component completed - OHT- (100 KL, 150 KL,250 KL): GAD 90% & Structured 20% - GSR: 2 No.: GAD 10% & Structured 20%

0%


43

Badarwas Detailed design in progress (0%) No component completed

0%


63

Sl. No.


44

Shadora Detailed design in progress (0%) No component completed

0%


45

5A Barhi Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - WTP - Raw Water Main - Clear Water Main - OHT (650KL) - Distribution

90%

OHT work completed

46

5B Bhedaghat Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake well - RWRM - WTP - CWFM - OHT 200 KL & 220KL - Distribution Network

16%


47

Patan Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Distribution Network - Clear water feeder main

49%


48

Katangi Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Clear water feeder main - OHT 120 KL - Distribution Network

23%


49

Panagar Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Clear water feeder main - OHTs - Distribution Network

28%


50

Sihora Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - OHTs (4 nos.) - Distribution network - Clear water feeder main - Clear Water Sump- GAD Completed & Structural drawing pending

24%


51 Majholi Detailed design in progress

(100%)

17%

64

Sl. No.


Completed: - Sump - Clear water feeder main - Distribution Network


52

Tendukheda Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - OHT - Sump - BPT - Clear water feeder main. - Distribution

20%


53

6A Khajuraho Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - CWFM - OHT - GLSR /Sump - Distribution System

30%


54

Rajnagar Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM - WTP - CWFM - OHT - GLSR Sump - Distribution System

30%


55

6B Sagar Detailed design in progress (18%) No component completed - WTP: GAD Complete Structure (15%) - OHT (2 nos.): GAD 10%, Structure (5%) - CWRM : 90% - Distribution: 10%

0%


56

Makroniya Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - CWRM - Distribution

0%


57

6C Rahatgarh Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Existing Anicut - Anicut - Intake - Raw Water Main - Clear Water Main.

67%


65

Sl. No.


- WTP - OHT 1200 KL & 600 KL - Distribution System

58

6D Hatta Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM & Raw water pump - WTP (3.5 MLD) - Clear Water Main & CW Pump - OHT - Distribution Network

46%


59

Pawai Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed: - Anicut - Intake well - RWRM. - WTP - CWRM - GSLR 350 KL - 100 KL Sump - Distribution Network

55.38%


60

Baxwaha Detailed design in progress (82%) Completed: - Intake - RWRM - CWRM - 200 KL OHT - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD completed Structure (40%)

56.23%


61

7A Mauganj Detailed design in progress (100%) Completed - Anicut: at Nihayi River - Anicut at Odda Nallah - Intake - Raw Water Main - WTP - Clear Water Main - OHT (1800 KL) - Distribution System

56%


62

7B Jaithari Detailed design in progress (55%) Completed - CWRM - RWRM - Distribution

6%


66

Sl. No.


- WTP- GAD Completed Structure (67%) - Intake: GAD (30%), Structure yet to be submitted

63

Khand Detailed design in progress (81%) Completed: - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - GSR 100 KL & 200 KL - WTP: GAD Completed & Structure 93%

8%


64

Chandia Detailed design in progress (47%) Completed: - OHT (2 nos) - Distribution - Intake : GAD (10%)

6%


65

2F Anjad (SWG)

Detailed design in progress (0%) No component completed

0%


66

2G Barwaha (SWG)


0%


67

5G Saikheda (SWG)


0%


67

Appendix 2: Photographs of Disclosure of IR & IP Report in Hindi Language at respective urban local body (ULBs) office

Page 1 of 2

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Lahar (Package 4F)

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Gormi (Package 4F)

68

Page 2 of 2

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Mehgaon (Package 4F)

At the notice board of ULB office of sewerage town Sanawad (Package 2H)

69

Appendix 3: Copy of the Household Survey

Page 1 of 2

70

Page 2 of 2

71

Appendix 4: Details of Consultations during Subproject Implementation (August 2018 to January 2019)

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

1 1A Boda 18/12/2018

21/12/2018

(l) Ward No.9

(ll) Ward No.11

(lll) At ULB

office

Total=26

(M= 20, F=

06)

Local Residents

ULB officials

• Briefing on project objectives probable implementation procedures

• Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation

• Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation;

• Facing water severe crisis and requested to officials for speedy construction work.

• Traffic management during business hours in the market area of the town.

• Timely road restoration after excavation.

2 1A Kurawar 18/12/2018

21/12/2018

(l)Ward No-11,

(ll)Ward No.14

(lll)At ULB

office

Total=32

(M=25,

F=07)

local inhabitants

ULB officials,

and



• Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and

• During excavation for dust and traffic management assurance given to the Business community, People are facing severe water crisis.

72

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

community participation;

3 1B Sarni 10/01/2019 (l)At ULB office,

(ll)Ward No-32,

(lll)Ward No-1,

(lV)Ward No-4,

5

Total= 81

(M-67,F- 14)

ULB officials,

and local

inhabitants

• Briefing on project objectives, activities, implementation procedures, benefits & possible negative impacts of the project.

• Status of land transfer for proposed components.

• Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation

• There is a lot of water problem, people have to go very far for drinking water.



4 1B Amla 09/01/2019 (l)Ward No-3

(ll)Ward No 12

Total=60 (M-

20,

F-40)

Local Residents • Briefing on project objectives, activities, implementation procedures, benefits & possible negative impacts of the project.


• Operation and maintenance of

• There is a lot of water problem, people have to go very far for drinking water.



73

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

the facilities developed under the project and community participation

5 1B Betul Bazar 10/01/2019 (l)Ward No 1

(ll)Ward No 5

Total=23 (M-

18,

F-5)

Local Residents • Briefing on project activities, implementation procedures and relevant information and benefits of the project

• Status of land transfer for proposed components

• People were concerned about the monthly water tariff

• Elected representative informed about poor water supply in the town in terms of quality of water as well as connectivity of water supply network




6 2A Betma 05-01-2019 ULB Office,

Betma

Total=10

M=06, F=04

Elected

representatives,

Officials of

• Present drinking water supply source and its condition

• Explained the Elected Representatives about the Scheme and time frame by

74

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

ULB,& GRC

Members

• Need of improvement of the present situation.



which the project will be completed.

7 2A Depalpur 11-01-2019 ULB Office, Total=,13,

M=11, F=02

Elected

representatives,

Officials of

ULB,& GRC

Members


• Need of improvement of the present situation

• Briefing on project objectives probable implementation procedures.

• Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation.

• Land use and area to be covered under the project.



8 2B Kasrawad 11-09-2018 Ward No. 01 &

05,

Total=20,

M=00, F=20

SC Community

members (Low

income

• Status of existing drinking water supply system;

• Need for

• The area has insufficient and inadequate drinking water supply. Water from two tube wells is presently supplied to the area/community.

75

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

group and the

women are

housewives)

improvements to present system;

• Relevant information of the upcoming project and benefits of the project.


• Ensuring no income loss

• The area faces severe water crisis during the summer season when the ground water level drops.

9 2C Dhamnod 24-08-2018 ward-04, OHT

Site,

Total=08,

M=05, F=03

Slumdwellers • Briefing on project objectives probable implementation procedures


• None of the people knew about the proposed project. On learning about the project, they expressed that they were happy that the entire community would be benefited from the upgraded water supply.

10 2C Dhamnod 31-08-2018 Contractor

Office,

Total=12,

M=00, F=12

Local

Community

• Experiences sharing on – livelihood activities, Resettlement and

• Slum dwellers showed willingness to take water connections but demanded relaxation in user charges.

76

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security scheme etc.

• Grievance Redressal procedures

• People were briefed about the complaint redressal mechanism.

11 2C Mandav 04-08-2018 Ward No. 05, Total=14,

M=04, F=10

Local

Community

• Experiences sharing on – livelihood activities, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc.

• Grievance Redressal

• Slum dwellers showed willingness to take water connections but demanded relaxation in user charges.

• People were briefed about the complaint redressal mechanism.



77

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

procedures

12 2D Meghnagar 17-10-2018 ULB Office, Total=07

M=04, F=03

Chief Municipal

Officer and

Officials





• Land use and area to be covered under the project

• Explained the Elected Representatives about the Scheme and time frame by which the project will be completed.

• The prime concern and apprehension of the ULB Chairman regarding the project was whether it will be completed.

13 2D Petlavad 08-08-2018 Ward No. 02 &

13,

Total=36,

M=03, F=33

Community

Members


• Experiences sharing on –livelihood activities,

• The community welcomed the project and expressed need for it. However, they were apprehensive that their economic condition would prevent them from paying water user charges.

• Possibility of exempting the poor and vulnerable from user charge payment.

78

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc.

• Grievance Redressal procedures

14 2D Petlavad 08-08-2018 Ward No. 03 &

08

Total=20,

M=06, F=14

Slumdwellers • Present drinking water supply source and its condition



• Potential positive and negative impacts due to

• Most of the participants don’t know about the proposed project. On learning about the project, they expressed that they were happy that the entire community would be benefited from the proposed water supply.



79

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

project implementation


15 3A Kukdeshwar 04-12-2018 ward 14,

Total=22

M=11, F=11,

Local residents • Knowledge of project

• Present water supply situation: only half an hours of supply alternate day

• Drinking water user charge

• Women had heard about the proposed project and welcomed it as women are facing many problem in fetching water for hours.

16 3B Susner 03-10-2018

20-11-2018

At Parishad

hall,

Total=,49,

M=07, F=42

Elected

representatives,

Officials of ULB,

SHG Members



•



17 3B Pankhedi 01-10-2018 Ward No. 01 &

Anganwadi

Kendra,

Total=36,

M=03, F=33

Slumdwellers,

WCD Workers


• Need for improvements to present system;

• Relevant information of

• The area has insufficient and inadequate drinking water supply. Water from two tube wells is presently supplied to the area/community.

80

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

the upcoming project and benefits of the project.


18 3B Pankhedi 21-09-2018 Ward No. 01,

WTP Site

Total=11,

M=08, F=03

Community

Members


• Experiences sharing on - women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc.

• Possibility of exempting the poor and vulnerable from user charge payment.


• Land use and area to be covered under the project.

19 4A Alampur 03-08-2018, 10-08-2018 14-09-2018 22-10-2018 23-10-2018 24-10-2018

ULB Office and ward no. 01, 02, 05, 08, 09 and 13

Total=72, Male=62, Female=10

ULB officials and Local Community

• Project information

• Issue of door to door survey, WTP land issue

81

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

06-11-2018 20-12-2018

20 4A Daboh 16-08-2018 11-09-2018

ULB Office and ward no. 4, 14

Total=38, Male=33, Female-05



• Issue of door to door survey

21 4A Mihona 26-10-2018, 31-10-2018 14-11-2018

ULB Office and ward no. 15

Total=40, Male=36, Female-04



• Issue of door to door survey and Land demarcation issue

22 4A Phuphkalan 12-09-2018 13-08-2018 24-08-2018 12-09-2018 17-10-2018

At ward no. 04, 06, 09, 10 and 13

Total= 54, Male-49, Female-05

Local Community



23 4B Bhind 11-12-2018 13-12-2018 24-12-2018 28-12-2018

ULB office Total=37, Male=33, Female=04

ULB officials • Project information

• Land issue

24 4D Aron 14-09-2018 22-11-2018

ULB office and ward no. 03

Total=17, Male-17, Female-0



• Regarding OHT Land issue

25 4D Karera 20-08-2018 22-12-2018

ULB Office and ward no. 12

Total=25, Male=16 Female=09



• Forest issue at intake well

26 4D Bairad 17-10-2018 At ward no. 10 Total-07 Male-06, Female-01

Local Community


• Water problem, people have to go very far for drinking water

27 4F Gormi 18.12.18 Ward No. 11 & 12

Total=40, Male-21, Female-19

Local Community

• About Project and potential positive impact


28 4F Lahar 18.12.18 Ward no. 14 Total=13, Male=13, Female- 0

Local Community


• Water problem, people have to go very far for drinking water

29 5A Barhi 10-01-2019,

11-01-2019

Ward-01, Total-87 At ULB official

Local Residents

• Quality of existing drinking water supply.

• People were concerned about the monthly water tariff.

82

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

Ward-03 Ward-

04 Ward-09,

ward-15

Male-45

Female-42

• Briefing on project activities probable implementation procedure.

• Community participation in project implementation.

• Need for improvements to present system.

• Community is ready to pay water tariff.

• Community people showed their willingness to take water connections agree to pay user charges an amount of Rs. 50 to 150/- per month.

• Discussion with Nal connection.

30 5 B Bhedaghat 10-12-2018 Ward-13,

Ward-15

Total-30

Male-09

Female-21

Local Residents • Status of existing drinking water supply system;





• Potential positive and


• Community was glad to hear about the new water supply scheme.

• Assured full support during construction phase.

83

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

negative impacts due to project implementation.

31 5 B Katangi 09-12-2018 Ward-1, Ward-

5

Total-36

Male-07

Female-29













32 5 B Majholi 08-12-2018 Ward-1, Ward-

5

Total-30

Male-13

Female-17


• Quality of

• None of the people knew about the proposed project. On learning about the project, they expressed that they were happy that the entire community would

84

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

existing drinking water supply.



be benefited from the upgraded water supply.

•

33 5B Panagar 09-12-2018,

19-12-2018,

13-02-2019

Ward-06,

Ward-4,

Ward-05

Total-103

Male-12

Female-91

At ULB office,

Local Residents






• Potential positive and negative impacts due to





85

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

project implementation.

34 5 B Patan 09-12-2018,

Ward-02,

Ward-04,

Total-27

Male-12

Female-15

Local Residents • Quality of existing drinking water supply.




•



• Community people showed their willingness to take water connections agree to pay user charges.

35 5 B Sihora 07-12-2018,

Ward-09,

Ward-13,

Total-33

Male-06

Female-27







• Community people showed their willingness to take water connections agree to pay user charges an amount of Rs. 50 to 150/- per month.

86

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

•

36 5 B Tendukheda 07-12-2018,

Ward-05,

Ward-09,

Total-35

Male-09

Female-26

At ULB official

Local Residents











37 5G Saikheda 25-09-2018

15-02-2019

14-02-2019

Ward-04,

Ward-13

Ward-14

Ward-15

Ward-11 to,

Ward-05

Total-229

Male-83

Female-146

At ULB official &

NGO, Satya

Sai Samiti,

Local Residents



• Briefing on


87

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

Ward-06 Ward-

08,

Ward-10

project activities probable implementation procedure.








38 6A Khajuraho 01.10.2018 (l) At Children

Park Site

Total=11

(M= 11, F=

00)

Local labour,

EHS Supervisor

& Contractor

staff

• Labor were concerned about their Safety during the Construction work & Safety tolls.

• Payment of Labors.

• Insurance of Labour.


• Facing water severe crisis and requested to officials for speedy construction work

88

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

39 6A Khajuraho 04/01/2019 (l) At ward no

02

(ll)At Ward No-

02,04

(lll)At Ward No

-01,02

Total=64

(M= 19, F=

45)

ST/SC

Community&

Ward Parshads,

EHS &

Contractor staff


• •Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation;

•

• Facing water severe crisis and requested to officials for speedy construction work



40 6A Rajnagar 02.10.2018

to

05.10.2018

OHT Site,

village

Khajuva, WTP

Site,

ULB office

FoujdarMuhalla

ward.no.04

Total=156

(M=83,F=73)

Preraks,

Sakhies SC/ST

Ward, EHS &

Contractor staff

Local

Residents, ULB

officials




• During excavation for dust and traffic management assurance given to the Business community, People are facing severe water crisis

41 6A Rajnagar 03.01.2019

to

05.01.2019

(i)At Nagar

Parishad office

Total=50

(M=19,F=31)

Preraks,

Sakhies SC/ST

Ward, EHS &

Contractor staff

• Briefing on project objectives, activities, implementation procedures,


89

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

(ii)At Fouj dar

Mohalla

ward.no.04

Local

Residents, ULB

officials

benefits & possible negative impacts of the project.



• There is a lot of water problem, people have to go very far for drinking water

42 6C Rahatgarh 16.08.2018 (i)At Nagar

Parishad office

Total = 35

(M-05,F- 30)

Preraks

,Sakhies

• Discussion on resolved to local community issues

• Social & Gender activities



43 6C Rahatgarh 18.12.2018 (i)At Nagar

Parishad office

(ii) At Site 1200

KL OHT

Total = 28

(M-06,F- 22)

SC/ST

Community,

Parshads, EHS

& Contractor

staff ,SHG’s Members







44 6D Baxwaha 20/08/2018 (i)At Nagar

Parishad office

Total = 31

(M-06,F- 25)

Preraks,

Sakhies EHS &

Contractor



90

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised


45 6D Baxwaha 20/12/2018

to

22.12.2018

(l) At Azard

ward no 03,

ll) At Ambedkar

Ward No-14,

(lll)Ambedkar

46 Ward No-14

Total = 124

(M-55,F- 69)

SC/ST Ward

EHS&

Contractor and

Local Residents

Preraks,

Sakhies SHG’s




• Social & Gender



45 6D Hatta 21.08.2018to

22.08.2018

(i)At Nagar

Parishad office

(ii)At WTP Site

Total = 50

(M-25,F- 25)

Preraks

,Sakhies Local

labour, EHS &

Contractor staff



• Labor were concerned about their Safety during the Construction work & Safety tolls.

• Payment of Labors.

• Insurance of Labour



91

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

46 6D Hatta 21.12.2018 l) At Gouri

Shankar ward

no 01

Total = 16

(M-02,F- 14)

SHG’s Members EHS&

Contractor staff



•


47 6D Pawai 23/08/2018 (i)At Nagar

Parishad office

Total = 12

(M-01,F- 11)

Preraks,

Sakhies EHS &

Contractor staff

,





• Timely road restoration after excavtion

48 6D Pawai 29/12/2018 (i)At Nagar

Parishad office

(ii)AHIRWAR

Basti ward

no.05

(iii)At

NayaKhera

ward no.06

Total = 56

(M-32,F- 24)

SC/ST Ward

Parshads,

Preraks,

Sakhies EHS

Supervisor &

Contractor staff

,




• Social & Gender



92

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

49 7A Mauganj 03-01-2019,

Ward-03,

Ward-08,

ward-13,

ward-14

Total-59

Male-16

Female-43







• Community people showed their willingness to take water connections agree to pay user charges.



50 7 B Chandia 05-01-2019,

Ward-04,

Ward-07 Ward-

10

Total-61

Male-23

Female-38






• Potential positive and negative impacts



• Assured full support during construction

93

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

51 7 B Khand 05-01-2019,

Ward-05,

Ward-07

Total-39

Male-20

Female-19

At ULB official

Local Residents












52 7 B Jaithari 27-01-2019

28-01-2019

Ward-04,

Ward-05

Ward-10

Ward-11

Total-80

Male-43

Female-37

At ULB official

Local Residents




• Community participation in




94

Sl.

No.

Package

No.

Name of

town

Date Place No of

Participants

Nature of

participants

Details of

discussion

Issue raised

project implementation.







95

Appendix 5: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level

(Page 1 of 4)

96

(Page 2 of 4)

97

(Page 3 of 4)

98

(Page 4 of 4)

99

Appendix 6: List of the Towns Package-wise (Both Phase 1 and Phase 2)

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the subproject town District

Subproject Water Supply Scheme under Phase 1

1 1A Boda Rajgarh 2 Kurawar Rajgarh 3 Kothri Sehore 4 1B Amla Betul 5 Betul-Bazar Betul 6 Sarni Betul 7 1C Bankhedi Hoshangabad 8 Sohagpur Hoshangabad 9 2A Betma Indore

10 Depalpur Indore 11 Gautampura Indore 12 2B Pansemal Badwani 13 Rajpur Badwani 14 Karhi Padliya Khargone 15 Kasrawad Khargone 16 2C Dhamnod Dhar 17 Mandav Dhar 18 2D Bhavra Alirajpur 19 Meghnagar Jhabua 20 Petlawad Jhabua 21 3A Kukdeshwar Neemuch 22 Nayagoan Neemuch 23 Sarwaniya Maharaj Neemuch 24 Nagri Mandsaur 25 3B Susner Aagar 26 Pankhedi Shajapur 27 Makdone Ujjain 28 4A Alampur Bhind 29 Daboh Bhind 30 Mihona Bhind 31 Phuphkalan Bhind 32 4B Bhind Bhind 33 4D Karera Shivpuri 34 Bairad Shivpuri 35 Pichhore Shivpuri 36 Isagarh Ashoknagar 37 Aron Guna 38 Vijaypur Shivpuri 39 4F Gormi Bhind 40 Lahar Bhind 41 Mehgaon Bhind 42 4I Shadora Ashoknagar 43 Raghogarh Guna 44 Badarwas Shivpuri 45 5A Barhi Katni 46 5B Katangi Jabalpur 47 Bhedaghat Jabalpur 48 Majholi Jabalpur 49 Panagar Jabalpur 50 Patan Jabalpur 51 Sihora Jabalpur 52 Tendukheda Damoh 53 6A Khajuraho Chhatarpur

100


54 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 55 6B Sagar Sagar 56 Makroniya Sagar 57 6C Rahatgarh Sagar 58 6D Buxwaha Chhatarpur 59 Hatta Damoh 60 Pawai Panna 61 6G Harpalpur Chhatarpur 62 Badagaon Tikamgarh 63 Ghuwara Chhatarpur 64 7A Mauganj Rewa 65 7B Jaithari Anuppur 66 Khand Shahdol 67 Chandia Umaria 68 7D Amarpatan Satna 69 New Ram nagar Satna

Subproject Sewerage under Phase 1 1 2F Anjad Badwani 2 2G Barwaha Khargone 3 2H Sanawad Khargone 4 5G Saikheda Narsinghpur

Subproject Water Supply Scheme under Phase 2 1 1D Jawar Sehore 2 1E Pachore Rajgarh 3 Sanchi ( C ) Raisen 4 2E Shahpur Burhanpur 5 Chhanera Khandwa 6 2J Nepanagar Burhanpur 7 3C Polay Kalan Shajapur 8 Bagli Dewas 9 Hatpipliya Dewas

10 3D Loharda Dewas 11 Kantaphod Dewas 12 Khategaon Dewas 13 Nemawar Dewas 14 3E Dhamnod Ratlam 15 3F Athana Neemach 16 4C Gohad Bhind 17 4E Antari Gwalior 18 Bilaua Gwalior 19 Pichhore Gwalior 20 4G Kailaras Morena 21 Jhundpura Morena 22 Jaura Morena 23 4H Badoda Sheopur 24 4J Akoda Bhind 25 5C Chand Chhindwara 26 5D Kymore Katni 27 Vijayraghavgarh Katni 28 5E Barela Jabalpur 29 Bamhanibanjar Mandla 30 Niwas Mandla 31 5F Chichali Narsinghpur 32 Saikheda Narsinghpur 33 Salichauka

(Babai Kalan) Narsinghpur

101


34 5H Malaj khand Balaghat 35 Baihar Balaghat 36 6F Barigarh Chhatarpur 37 Chandla Chhatarpur 38 Maharajpur Chhatarpur 39 Gadimalhara Chhatarpur 40 Ajaigarh Panna 41 Devendranagar Panna 42 6H Jeron Khalsa Tikamgarh 43 Kari Tikamgarh 44 Lidhora Khas Tikamgarh 45 6I Shahpur 46 6J Satai Chhatarpur 47 Bijawar Chhatarpur 48 Khargapur Tikamgarh 49 Jatara Tikamgarh 50 6L Patera Damoh 51 6K Bada Malhara Chhatarpur 52 7C Kotar Satna 53 Birsinghpur Satna 54 Jaitwara Satna 55 Kothi Satna 56 7E Mangawan Rewa 57 Rampur Naikin Sidhi 58 7G Maihar Satna 59 7H Pasan Anuppur

Subproject Sewerage under Phase 2 1 1F Sanchi Raisen 2 2I Dhamnod Dhar 3 3G Mandsaur Mandsaur 4 3H Nagda Ujjain 5 5I Jabalpur (Part II) Jabalpur 6 6E Khajuraho Chhatarpur 7 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 8 7F Maihar Satna

102

Appendix 7: Details about Land Ownership, Status of Land and Transfer of proposed land/site

Appendix 7.1a WSS town Boda

(Khasra No. 1251/2 of WTP for WSS Town Boda under Pkg 1A)

103

Appendix 7.1b WSS town Kurawar

(Khasra No. 1058/2 of WTP and OHT (900 KL) for WSS Town Kurawar under Pkg 1A) Certification of Possession about Proposed Site/Land and NoC Issued by CMO-

Kurawar

104

Appendix 7.1b WSS town Kurawar

(Khasra No. 658/3 of OHT (250 KL) for WSS Town Kurawar under Pkg 1A) Certification of Possession about Proposed Site/Land and NoC Issued by CMO-

Kurawar

105

Appendix 7.1c WSS town Kotri

(Khasra No. 100 for OHT (60 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

(Khasra No. 600 for OHT (400 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

106

Appendix 7.1c WSS town Kotri (Khasra No. 1177 of GLSR (150 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

(Khasra No. 600 of GLSR (200 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

107

Appendix 7.2a WSS town Amla

(Khasra No. 250 of WTP for WSS Town Amla under Pkg 1B) Letter written to District Collector and Tehsildar

(Page 1 of 3)

108

(Page 2 of 3)

109

(Page 3 of 3)

110

Appendix 7.2b WSS town Betul Bazar

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B) No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 1 of 3)

111

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B)

No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 2 of 3)

112

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B) No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 3 of 3)

113

Appendix 7.2b WSS town Betul Bazar NoC Issued by PWD and Letter Written to Tehsildar for Demarkation of the Proposed

Site of Sump Well

114

Appendix 7.3a WSS town Bankheri (Khasra No. 71, 233, 23 and 87/1 of OHTs 200 KL, 200 KL, 100 KL and 150 KL

respectively for WSS Town Bankheri under Pkg 1C) Letter Sent to District Collector-Hoshangabad by CMO-Bankheri for transfer of the Proposed

Land in the name of ULB-Bankheri

115

Appendix 7.3a WSS town Bankheri A Certificate Issued by CMO-Bankheri on the Status of Land Prop[osed for Subproject

Component

116

Appendix 7.3b WSS town Sohagpur (Khasra No. 24 B Plot No. 132 & 134 of WTP and OHT-900KL, Khasra No. 412/2 of OHT

(250 KL) and Khasra No. 16B plot No. 2 of OHT (600 KL) for WSS Town Sohagpur under Pkg 1C

118

Appendix 7.4a WSS town Betma Letter written to District Collector-Indore to allot the land for Anicut and Intake well

(town Betma Pkg 2A)

Page 1 of 2

119

Page 2 of 2

120

Appendix 7.4a WSS town Betma Letter written to MD, M.P. Aoudhogik Kendra Vikas Nigam, Indore to allot the land for

WTP (town Betma Pkg 2A) Page 1 of 2

121

Page 2 of 2

122

Appendix 7.4b WSS town Depalpur A Certificate Issued by CMO-Depalpur about land proposed for subproject

components (town Depalpur Pkg 2A) Page No. 1 of 3

123

Khasra No. 121/1 and 121/2 for WTP

Page No. 2 of 3

124

Khasra No. 652 for OHT

Page No. 3 of 3

125

Appendix 7.4c WSS town Gautampura Letter written to SDO (revenue) to allot the land for WTP & OHT (town Gautampura

Pkg 2A)

126

Appendix 7.5a WSS town Pansemal Order of the District Collector-Barwani to allot the land for WTP (town Pansemal Pkg

2B)

Page 1 of 2

127

Page 2 of 2

128

Appendix 7.5a WSS town Pansemal Letter written to Commissioner, UADD, Directorate-Bhopal about order of the District

collector-Barwani to allot the land to ULB-Pansemal (town Pansemal Pkg 2B)

Page 1 of 2

129

Page 2 of 2

130

Appendix 7.5b WSS town Rajpur Identified Land for WTP is Khasra No. 110, Government land for WSS town Rajpur

131

Appendix 7.5c WSS town Karhi Padliya Order of the Collector-Khargone to allot the land for subproject WSS components (survey no. 251 for Intake well, Survey no. 6/2 for WTP and Survey no. 202/1/2/3/4/2 for

OHT) for WSS town Karhi Padliya

132

Appendix 7.5c WSS town Karhi Padliya Letter of Tehsildar written to CMO-Karhi Padliya about allotment of the land (survey

no. 251) proposed for Intake well cum pump house (town Karhi Padliya Pkg 2B)

133

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad Order of the Upper Collector to Tehsildar-Kasrawad about the proposal of WSS town

kasrawad submitted by ULB-Kasrawad

134

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad Order of the court of Tehsildar to provide details of proposed identified land for WSS

Kesrawad

135

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad CMO-Kasrawad submitted details of identified land for proposed components to office

of Tehsildar

136

Appendix 7.6a WSS town Dhamnod Office of the CMO-Dhamnod sent Proposal to District Collector about identified land

proposed for WSS components (WSS town Dhamnod pkg 2C)

137

Appendix 7.6a WSS town Dhamnod Consent Letter of Private Land Owner on the donation of the land for OHT (WSS town

Dhamnod pkg 2C)

138

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Mandav (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

139

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav Letter written to District Collector-Dhar to allot the land for OHT 200KL (WSS town

Mandav pkg 2C)

140

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav NoC Issued by Forest department to build IPS (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

141

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav NoC Issued by Directorate, Archeological Survey of India-Bhopal (WSS town Mandav

pkg 2C)

142

Appendix 7.7a WSS town Bhavra

Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Bhavra (Chander Shekhar Azad Nagar) for

WSS Town Bhavra

143

Appendix 7.7a WSS town Bhavra Letter Written to District Collector-Dhar to Allot the Identified land for Intake Well cum

pump house by CMO-Bhavra (Chander Shekhar Azad Nagar) for WSS Town Bhavra

144

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Meghnagar for proposed components under

WSS Town Meghnagar

145

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for Intake well at Gram

Kachhla by CMO-Meghnagar for proposed components under WSS Town Meghnagar

146

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for WTP/OHT by CMO-

Meghnagar for proposed components under WSS Town Meghnagar

147

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Petlawad for proposed components under

WSS Town Petlawad

148

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for WTP/OHT by CMO-

Petlawad for proposed components under WSS Town Petlawad

149

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Order of the Madhya Pradesh Government (revenue department) to allotment of the

Proposed Land to ULB -Petlawad for proposed components under WSS Town Petlawad

Page 1 of 3

150

Page 2 of 3

151

Page 3 of 3

152

Appendix 7.8a WSS town Kukdeshwar Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Kukdeshwar for proposed components under

WSS Town Kukdeshwar

153

Appendix 7.8a WSS town Kukdeshwar Letter Written by CMO-Kukdeshwar to MD, MPUSI about Land Status of proposed

components under WSS Town Kukdeshwar

154

Appendix 7.8b WSS town Nayagaon Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Nayagaon for proposed components under

WSS Town Nayagaon

155

Appendix 7.8b WSS town Nayagaon Order of the District Collector-Nimach to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB -

Nayagaon for proposed components under WSS Town Nayagaon

Page 1 of 3

156

Page 2 of 3

157

Page 3 of 3

158

Appendix 7.8c WSS town Sarwaniya Maharaj Order of the District Collector-Nimach to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB -

Sarwaniya Maharaj for proposed components under WSS Town Sarwaniya Maharaj Page 1 of 2

159

Page 2 of 2

160

Appendix 7.8d WSS town Nagri Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Nagri for proposed components under WSS

Town Nagri

161

Appendix 7.8d WSS town Nagri Revenue record of Survey No. 1825/1

162

Appendix 7.9a WSS town Susner Order of the District Collector-Agar Malwa to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB -

Susner for proposed components under WSS Town Susner

Page 1 of 2

163

Page 1 of 2

164

Appendix 7.9b WSS town Pankhedi Letter written to Tehsildar-Pankhedi (Kalapipal) to allot the land for WTP/OHTs by

CMO-Pankhedi for proposed components under WSS Town Pankhedi

165

Appendix 7.9b WSS town Pankhedi Panchnama (collection of evidence from site) prepared by revenue officials along with

other government officials on identified government land proposed for subproject components under WSS Town Pankhedi

Page 1 of 2

166

Page 2 of 2

167

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon NoC issued by WRD to construct Intake well at dam site

Page 1 of 2

168

Page 2 of 2

169

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Letter written to Collector-Ujjain to allot the land for WTP and OHT by CMO-Makdone

for proposed components under WSS Town Makdone

170

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Makdone for proposed components under

WSS Town Makdone

171

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Letter of The District Collector-Ujjain to Commisioner-Ujjain about recommendation of

the land proposed for subproject components under WSS Makdone

172

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur NoC Issued by WRD

Page 1 of 2

173

Page 2 of 2

174

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written to DFO-Datia to allot the land for Approach Bridge from Intake well by

CMO-Alampur under WSS Town Alampur

175

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written to Collector-Datia to allot the land for WTP by CMO-Alampur for

proposed components under WSS Town Alampur

176

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written by Collector-Datia to SDO-Sewda to allot the land for WTP for proposed

components under WSS Town Alampur

177

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona NoC Issued by WRD

Page 1 of 2

178

Page 2 of 2

179

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under

WSS Town Mihona

180

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land Approach Bridge with Intake Well

under WSS Town Mihona Page 1 of 2

181

Page 2 of 2

182

Appendix 7.10d WSS town Phuphkalan Certificate Issued by CMO-Phuph about Identified site proposed for subproject

components under WSS-Phuphkalan

184

Appendix 7.10d WSS town Phuphkalan Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land proposed for WTP, OHT-1 (325 KL)

under WSS Town Mihona

186

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera NoC Issued by WRD

188

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera Letter written to Tehsildar-Karera to allot the land for OHT (500 KL) by CMO-Karera for

proposed components under WSS Town Karera

189

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Karera for all proposed components under

WSS Town Karera

190

Appendix 7.11b WSS town Bairad NoC Issued by WRD

Page 1 of 2

191

Page 2 of 2

192

Appendix 7.11b WSS town Bairad Order of Collector-Shivpuri to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under

WSS Town Bairad

Page 1 of 2

193

Page 2 of 2

194

Appendix 7.11e WSS town Aron Order of Collector-Guna to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under

WSS Town Aron

Page 1 of 2

195

Page 2 of 2

196

Appendix 7.11f WSS town Vijaypur Order of Collector-Sheopur to allotment of the land proposed for WTP under WSS

Town Vijaypur

197

Appendix 7.11f WSS town Vijaypur Order of Collector-Sheopur to allotment of the land proposed for OHT under WSS

Town Vijaypur

198

Appendix 7.12a WSS town Lahar Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Lahar for proposed components under

WSS Town Lahar

199

Appendix 7.12b WSS town Mehgaon Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Mehgaon for proposed components under

WSS Town Mehgaon

200

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh NoC issued by WRD

201

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh NoC issued by Forest department

202

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Raghogarh for proposed components

under WSS Town Raghogarh

204

Appendix 7.13b WSS town Badarwas Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Badarwas for proposed components under

WSS Town Badarwas

205

Appendix 7.13c WSS town Shadora Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Shadora for proposed components under WSS

Town Shadora

206

Appendix 7.14 WSS town Barhi Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Barhi for proposed components under WSS

Town Barhi

207

Appendix 7.15a WSS town Katangi Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for

Subproject Component OHT

208

Appendix 7.15b WSS town Bhedaghat Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for

Subproject Components

209

Appendix 7.15b WSS town Bhedaghat NoC Issued by ASI

211

Appendix 7.15c WSS town Majholi Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for

Subproject Components

212

Appendix 7.15d WSS town Panagar

Letter to District Collector-Jabalpur from Nagar Parishad-Panagar for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components OHTs under WSS

213

Appendix 7.15f WSS town Sihora Letter to District Collector-Jabalpur from Nagar Parishad-Sihora for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components OHTs and clear water sump well under

WSS

214

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Tendukheda for proposed components under

WSS Town Tendukheda

215

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Letter to Tehsildar-Patan from Nagar Parishad-Tendukheda for allotment of the land

proposed for Subproject Component Sump well under WSS

216

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Letter to Tehsildar-Tendukheda from Nagar Parishad-Tendukheda for allotment of the

land proposed for Subproject Components BPT and OHTs under WSS

217

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar Consent cum Certificate Given By Affected Persons that They had not been grown

crops on the land voluntarily since 2016-17.

218

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar

Office Order of the District Collector-Chhatarpur for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components

Page 1 of 2

219

Page 2 of 2

220

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar NoC Issued by ASI

Page 1 of 2

221

Page 2 of 2

222

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar NoC Issued by ASI

223

Appendix 7.18 WSS town Rahatgarh Letter to Tehsildar-Rahatgarh from Nagar Parishad-Rahatgarh for allotment of the

land proposed for Subproject Components under WSS

224

Appendix 7.19A WSS town Buxwaha

Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Buxwaha

225

Appendix 7.19B WSS town Hatta Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Hatta

226

Appendix 7.19C WSS town Pawai Letter to Tehsildar-Pawai from Nagar Parishad-Pawai for allotment of the land

proposed for Subproject Components under WSS

227

Appendix 7.20 WSS town Mauganj

Order of District Collector for Land allotment to Nagar parishad

228

Appendix 7.20 WSS town Mauganj Consent letter given by two private land owner

Page 1 of 4

229

Page 2 of 4

230

Page 3 of 4

231

Page 4 of 4

232

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to DFO-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari to issue NoC for

construction of WSS Components in forest area under WSS

233

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to DFO-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari for allotment of the

identified site/land for construction of WSS Components in forest area under WSS

234

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Submission of the Proposal On-line for NoC and Allotment of the Forest land

235

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to Collector-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari for allotment of the

identified site/land for construction of WSS Components under WSS

236

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Applied for NoC to PWD-Anippur for pipe lying

237

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter to Collector-Shahdol from Nagar Parishad-Khand for allotment of the land

proposed for Subproject Components WTP and sumpwell under WSS

238

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter to DFO-Shahdol from Nagar Parishad-Khand to issue NoC for construction of

Sumpwell (GSR) and lying of the pipeline in forest area under WSS

239

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter from Revenue Officer (Nazul Adhikari) to CMO, Nagar Parishad-Khand to

provide three copies of side plan and map of identified survey no. 91/1 for WTP and 209/10/kha for sumpwell (200 KL) for allotment of the land under WSS

240

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter written to Tehsildar-Baiohari from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Khand to provide three copies of side plan and map of identified survey no. 91/1 for WTP and 209/10/kha for sumpwell (200 KL) as demanded by Collector office (Nazul) for allotment of the land

under WSS

241

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter Written to Executive Engineer, WRD to obtain NoC for Construction of Intake

well cum pump house

242

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter to Collector-Umariya from Nagar Parishad-Chandia for allotment of the land

proposed for Subproject Components WTP and OHT under WSS

243

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter to Tehsildar-Chandia from Nagar Parishad-Chandia for allotment of the land

proposed for Subproject Components OHTs under WSS

244

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Chandia

245

Appendix 8: Corrigendum Appendix

Corrigendum to the SSMRs submitted for August 2017 - January 2018 and February 2018 -

July 2018

Table 5 of SSMR (August 2017 - January 2018) with heading ‘Town-wise Land Related Issues’ – refer to its serial number 27 of Table-5 under package 5A town Barhi

and

under Table 5 of SSMR (February 2018 - July 2018) with heading ‘Town-wise Land Related

Issues’ – refer to serial number 45 of Table-5 under package 5A town Barhi, Statement in the

table which reads as;

OHT (1800 KL): A dispute reported between a local resident and Office of the CMO on a proposed land for OHT (1800 KL) to get approach road to his land. Although, land is under possession of Nagar Parishad-Barhi.

Should be read as;

OHT (650 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 493/20 ka. Proposed site belongs to government land which is reported vacant and without any encroachment.