sem index - judicial academy
TRANSCRIPT
Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal Implications during Trial, coveringSC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds
16th
A. RELEVANT STATUTES
S. No. Title 1. Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732. Constitution of India, 19503. Indian Evidence Act, 18724. Indian Penal Code, 18605. Information Technology Act, 20006. Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 2009
7. Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 & Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2014)
8. National Security Act, 1980
9. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 200210. SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989
1. NATIONAL SECURITY ACT, 1980
A. CASE LAW
S.No. Title A. Objective of the Act
Other High Court 1. Munni Lal v. Superintendent of Central Jail
B. Delay in Sending Report to be explained, Report to be Sent
At Earliest Supreme Court
1. Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur
For Internal Circulation Only.
INDEX
Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal Implications during Trial, covering- NDPS, MCOCA, NSA, SC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds
and Cheating
th & 17th September, 2019
A. RELEVANT STATUTES
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Constitution of India, 1950 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Information Technology Act, 2000 Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 2009
Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (as amended by the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2014) National Security Act, 1980
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989
NATIONAL SECURITY ACT, 1980
Citation Objective of the Act
v. Superintendent of Central Jail (¶¶13-24, 35) 1985 ACR 373
Delay in Sending Report to be explained, Report to be Sent
Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur (¶¶6-12) 2018 (9) SC
1
Workshop on loopholes in investigation and legal NDPS, MCOCA, NSA,
SC&ST(Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989, Banking Frauds
(as amended by the Narcotic Drugs
Citation
1985 ACR 373
2018 (9) SCALE 56
2. NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985
A. RULES
S. No. Title 1. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and
Members) Rules, 1989 2. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Fees) Rules, 19893. Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Procedure) Rules, 19894. Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 19895. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Amendment) Rules, 20176. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,
2013 7. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)
Rules, 2006 8. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 19929. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 198810. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addi
Rules, 1985 11. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985
B. HANDBOOK
S. No. Title 1. Drug Law Enforcement Field Officers Handbook by NCB
C. REPORTS
S. No. Title a) Law Commission Report1. 155th Law Commission Report
Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances, 1985
b) Parliamentary Standing
Committee Report 1. Report No. 50- NDPS (Amendment)
Bill, 2011
For Internal Circulation Only.
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES
Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and
Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Fees) Rules, 1989 Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Procedure) Rules, 1989 Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 1989Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 as amended by (First Amendment) Rules, 2017 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 1992Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 1988Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addi
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985
Drug Law Enforcement Field Officers Handbook by NCB
Author SourceLaw Commission Report
Law Commission Report- Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic
Law Commission of India http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101169/Report155.pdf
Parliamentary Standing
NDPS (Amendment) Standing Committee on Finance, (2011-12) Fifteenth Lok Sabha
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/10169/Report166.pdf
2
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES
Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property (Conditions of Service of Chairman and
Illegally Acquired Property (Receipt, Management and Disposal) Rules, 1989 Rules, 1985 as amended by (First
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order,
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (National Fund for Control of Drug Abuse)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Authentication of Documents) Rules, 1992 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Consultative Committee Rules, 1988 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Execution of Bond by Convicts or Addicts)
Source http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-169/Report155.pdf
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/101-69/Report166.pdf
c) Other Reports 1. Drug Abuse Among Children in Delhi
2. From Addict To ConvictWorking of NDPS Act in Punjab (2018) (Volume-1)
3. From Addict To ConvictWorking of NDPS Act in Punjab (2018) (Volume-2)
4. International Narcotic Control BoardAnnual Report, 2018
5. World Drug Report, 2018
6. World Drug Perception Problem Report, 2017
7. Narcotics Control BureauReport, 2017
D. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
S. No Title 1. Single Convention on Narcotic Drug,
For Internal Circulation Only.
Drug Abuse Among Children in Delhi Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy https://static1.squaresp
ace.com/static/551ea026e4b0adba21a8f9df/t/57b2b9c337c581c6e8599f28/1471330810419/Drug+Abuse+Among+Children+in+Delhi.pdf
From Addict To Convict- The Working of NDPS Act in Punjab
Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy htty.in/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume1English.pdf
From Addict To Convict- The Working of NDPS Act in Punjab
Vidhi- Centre for Legal Policy https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume2English.pdf
International Narcotic Control Board- United Nations
https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2018/Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2018_E_.pdf
World Drug Report, 2018 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
https://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf
Drug Perception Problem Global Commission on Drug Policy
http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/GCDP2017_PerceptionsENGLISH.pdf
Narcotics Control Bureau- Annual Narcotics Control Bureau, India
https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=D210US678G0&p=Narcotics+Control+Bureau+Annual+Report%2C+2017
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
Author Source Single Convention on Narcotic Drug, United Nations http://www.unodc.org/
3
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/551ea026e4b0adba21a8f9df/t/57b2b9c337c581c6e8599f28/1471330810419/Drug+Abuse+Among+Children+in+Delhi.pdf https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume1English.pdf https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/FATCVolume2English.pdf https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/AnnualReports/AR2018/Annual_Report/Annual_Report_2018_E_.pdf https://www.unodc.org/wdr2018/prelaunch/WDR18_Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/GCDP-Report-2017_Perceptions-ENGLISH.pdf https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=D210US678G0&p=Narcotics+Control+Bureau-+Annual+Report%2C+2017
Source http://www.unodc.org/
1961
2. Convention on Psychotropic Substances,1971
3. SAARC Convention on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances,1990
4. United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic In Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna Convention)
E. CASE LAW
1. Combating Illicit Drug Traffic and Drug Abuse
S. No Title Supreme Court
1. Bachpan Bachao Andolan
2. Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
S. No Title A. Bhang is not a Narcotic Drug
Other High Court 1. Promodh Jha v. State of West Bengal
B. Determination of Drug Quantity by Courts Supreme Court
1. Hira Singh v. Union of India
2. Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab
3. State of NCT of Delhi v. Ashif Khan
4. E. Micheal Raj v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau
C. Chemical Examination Report (Production and Proof) Supreme Court
1. Rajesh Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
For Internal Circulation Only.
unodc/en/treaties/index.html
Convention on Psychotropic United Nations
http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html
SAARC Convention on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
SAARC
http://www.saarcsec.org
United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic In Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna
United Nations Convention http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html
Combating Illicit Drug Traffic and Drug Abuse
Citation
Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India (¶¶1-22) (2017) 1 SCC 653
Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
CitationBhang is not a Narcotic Drug
. State of West Bengal (¶3) 2008 (1) CLJ(CAL)
685
Determination of Drug Quantity by Courts
. Union of India (¶¶9-12) (2017) 8 SCC 162
. State of Punjab (¶¶21,22,25-26) (2011) 4
. Ashif Khan (¶¶6-7) (2009) 4 SCC 42
. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau (¶15) (2008) 5 SCC 161
Chemical Examination Report (Production and Proof)
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi (¶¶ 6, 9) (2008) 4 SCC 493
4
unodc/en/treaties/index.html http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html http://www.saarc-sec.org
http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/index.html
Citation (2017) 1 SCC 653
Understanding Concepts of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Citation 2008 (1) CLJ(CAL) 685
(2017) 8 SCC 162
(2011) 4 SCC 441
(2009) 4 SCC 42
(2008) 5 SCC 161
(2008) 4 SCC 493
2. Bhupinder Singh v. State of Punjab High Court of Delhi
1. Amarjit Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) Other High Courts
1. State of H.P. v. Mehboon Khan
2. Gajanand Alias Rajinder Prashad v. State of Himachal Pradesh 11, 13, )
D. Disposal of Contraband Supreme Court
1. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab 2. Union of India v. Mohanlal 3. Thana Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics 4. Union of India v. Mohanlal 5. Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal 6. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab 7. Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai
High Court of Delhi
1. Mohd. Anwar @ Annu v.
2. Manjit Singh v. State (¶¶ 3, 22) Other High Court
1. State of Himachal Pradesh
E. Rehabilitation of Addicts Other High Court
1. Sanjiv Bhatnagar v. State
3. Procedure under NDPS Act
S. No Title A. Procedure under NDPS Act
a) Possession & Presumption of Culpable Mental State Supreme Court
1. Mohan Lal v State of Punjab
2. Baldev v. State of Haryana 3. Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan 4. Bhola Singh v. State of Punjab 5. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab
For Internal Circulation Only.
State of Punjab (¶¶ 12, 13, 29-31) AIR 1988 SC 1011
State (Delhi Administration) (¶¶ 17, 18, 21) 1995 CriLJ 1623
State of H.P. v. Mehboon Khan (¶¶ 26, 30, 32, 35, 41, 42, 52, 53) 2013 SCC Online HP 4080
Gajanand Alias Rajinder Prashad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (¶¶ 7, 8, 2001 (3) ShimLC 54
Disposal of Contraband
State of Punjab (¶¶12-17) (2018) 18 SCC 540
. Mohanlal (¶¶10-14,16-17, 27-31) (2016) 3 SCC 379. Central Bureau of Narcotics (¶¶26-27) (2013) 2 SCC 590
Mohanlal (¶¶ 7) AIR 2012 SC 2653Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal v. State of M.P. (¶¶ 10, 12, 16) AIR 2011 SC 1335
State of Punjab (¶¶ 128, 129, 135) (2008) 16 SCC 417Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 7, 8, 14, 18) (2002) 10 SCC 283
State (¶¶ 9, 11, 15-17) 2011 SCC Online Del 1047
(¶¶ 3, 22) 214 (2014) DLT 646
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ivor Fleitcher (¶ 19, 24) 2005 (2) Shim LC 431
Addicts
. State (¶¶11-12) Criminal Revision Case No. 1278 of 2015 Dated: 27.01.2016
Procedure under NDPS Act
CitationProcedure under NDPS Act Possession & Presumption of Culpable Mental State
State of Punjab (¶¶17-18,20-30)
State of Haryana (¶¶ 12, 17, 19) 2016 CriLJ 154. State of Rajasthan (¶¶16, 22, 29-31) (2015) 6 SCC 222
Punjab (¶¶ 5, 8) (2011) 11 SCC 653Punjab (¶¶ 44-48, 122, 130, 138, 151, 155, 157, (2008) 16 SCC 417
5
AIR 1988 SC 1011 1995 CriLJ 1623 2013 SCC Online HP 4080 2001 (3) ShimLC 54
(2018) 18 SCC 540 (2016) 3 SCC 379 (2013) 2 SCC 590 AIR 2012 SC 2653 AIR 2011 SC 1335 (2008) 16 SCC 417 (2002) 10 SCC 283 2011 SCC Online Del 1047 214 (2014) DLT 646 2005 (2) Shim LC 431 Criminal Revision Case No. 1278 of 2015 Dated: 27.01.2016
Citation 2016 CriLJ 154 (2015) 6 SCC 222 (2011) 11 SCC 653 (2008) 16 SCC 417
158, 160, 162, 163) Delhi High Court
1. Narcotic Control Bureau
b) Section 41,42 and 43- Supreme Court
1.
Naresh Kumar @ Nitu v.
2. State of Rajasthan v. Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa3. Jagat Singh v. State of Uttarakhand4. State of Rajasthan v. Jagraj Singh 5. Sekhar Suman Verma v. The Superintendent of N.C.B.6. Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana 7. Kishan Chand v. State of Haryana 8. Gurjant Singh @ Janta v.9. Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana 10. State through Narcotics Control Bureau
22, 26, 30) 11. M Prabhulal v. Assistant Director 12. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 13. Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri
14. State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
Delhi High Court
1. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Virender Singh
2. Narcotics Control Bureau
3. Union of India v. Steaphen Andreas Hofman 4. Utpal Mishra v. Nicelai Christensen
5. Lachho Devi v. State (¶¶ 17, 18, 21
c) Section 50- Notice before Personal Search
Supreme Court 1. Arif Khan v. State of Uttarakhand
of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)2. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab 3. Makhan Singh v. State of Haryana
4. Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab 5. Yasihey Yobin and Anr. v
For Internal Circulation Only.
Narcotic Control Bureau v. Allauddin (¶¶ 9-11, 13, 15) 2010 SCC Online Del 4457
- Search & Seizure
v. State of Himachal Pradesh (¶ 10) Crl. App. No. 1053/2016D.O.D:
Jag Raj Singh @ Hansa (¶¶ 13-15, 17-19, 25) (2016) 11 SCC 687. State of Uttarakhand (¶¶12-15) (2016) 13 SCC 119
. Jagraj Singh (¶¶9-30) (2016) 11 SCC 687. The Superintendent of N.C.B. (¶¶12-13) (2016) 11 SCC 368
State of Haryana (¶¶ 10-12) 2015 (12) SCALE 579State of Haryana (¶¶ 17, 19, 20, 27, 28) (2013) 2 SCC 502
v. State of Punjab (¶¶ 16-21, 23, 24, 26) (2014) 13 SCC 603State of Haryana (¶¶ 12, 15, 16) (2009) 8 SCC 539
State through Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kulwant Singh (¶¶ 13, 14, 20, (2003) 9 SCC 193
Assistant Director (¶¶7,14) AIR 2003 SC 4311State of Kerala (¶¶ 10-12) AIR 2001 SC 3190
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 16, 17, 21-24) (2000) 2 SCC 513
Balbir Singh (¶¶ 17, 23, 25-28) (1994) 3 SCC 299
Virender Singh (¶¶ 9, 10) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6775
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kulwant Singh (¶¶ 8-10, 12, 13) 2013 SCC Online Del 2140
Steaphen Andreas Hofman (¶ 8) 2007 (97) DRJ 410Nicelai Christensen (¶¶ 3, 8, 9) 1997 SCC Online Del
655(¶¶ 17, 18, 21-23) 1990 SCC Online Del
198
Notice before Personal Search
State of Uttarakhand (¶¶ 25, 26, 29, 30) (Where the person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)
2018 (6) SCALE 456
State of Punjab (¶9) (2018) 18 SCC 540State of Haryana (¶¶ 10-12, 16, 17) 2015 SCC Online SC
374State of Punjab (¶¶ 8, 13, 14, 22) (2015) 6 SCC 674
v. The Dept. of Customs, Shillong (¶¶9,11) (2014) 13 SCC 344
6
2010 SCC Online Del 4457 Crl. App. No. 1053/2016 D.O.D: 27/07/2017 (2016) 11 SCC 687 (2016) 13 SCC 119 (2016) 11 SCC 687 (2016) 11 SCC 368 2015 (12) SCALE 579 (2013) 2 SCC 502 (2014) 13 SCC 603 (2009) 8 SCC 539 (2003) 9 SCC 193
AIR 2003 SC 4311 AIR 2001 SC 3190 (2000) 2 SCC 513
(1994) 3 SCC 299
2018 SCC OnLine Del 6775 2013 SCC Online Del 2140 2007 (97) DRJ 410 1997 SCC Online Del 655 1990 SCC Online Del 198 2018 (6) SCALE 456
(2018) 18 SCC 540 2015 SCC Online SC 374 (2015) 6 SCC 674 (2014) 13 SCC 344
6. State of HP v. Sunil Kumar 7. State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand
person is searched without there being any search of his person, Section 50 of the NDPS Act will have no
8. Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana 9. Ram Swaroop v. State (Govt. NCT) of Delhi 10. State of Delhi v. Ram Avtar @ Rama 11. Nirmal Singh Pehalwan v.12. Narcotics Central Bureau 13. Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja
rejected the theory of “substantial 14. Dilip and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act applies)
15. State of Punjab v. Balwant Rai 16. State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram 17. State of Himachal Pradesh
“person” under the Act means a human being with appropriate coverings and clothing and also footwear.)
18. Prabha Shankar Dubey (suspect) has to be told in a way that he becomes aware that the choice is his and not of the officer concerned, even though there is no specific form.)
19. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 20. Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana
from Search of Premises)21. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh 22. Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyed
officer conducting the search must specifically depose that he had informed the person to be searched about his right to demand that the search be carried out in the presence of a GazettedMagistrate.)
Delhi High Court
1. Sumit Rai v. State (¶¶20-21)
2. Irwin Bin Hassim v. Anil Kumar, Air Customs Officer, IGI Airport24)
3. Munnu Khan v. State (¶ 6)
4. Mansoor Ahamad Khan v.5. Sunday Emegha v. State (¶¶ 10, 14, 16, 17, 20, 24, 34)6. Amarjit Singh v. State of Delhi Administration
Other High Court
1. Mohammed Shabir Shaikh Bhikan
For Internal Circulation Only.
Sunil Kumar (¶¶15,17) (Chance Recovery) AIR 2014 SC 2564State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand (¶¶15-20) (If merely a bag carried by a person is searched without there being any search of his person, Section 50 of the NDPS Act will have no application.)
AIR 2014 SC 1384
State of Haryana (¶¶ 14, 15) (2013) 6 SCC 595. State (Govt. NCT) of Delhi (¶¶7,10,13,15-16) (2013) 14 SCC 235Ram Avtar @ Rama (¶¶ 12, 22-27) AIR 2011 SC 2699
v. Inspector Customs (¶¶ 8, 10, 11) (2011) 12 SCC 298 Narcotics Central Bureau v. Sukh Dev Raj Sodhi (¶¶ 5-7) (2011) 6 SCC 392Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 20-22) (The SC rejected the theory of “substantial compliance”.)
(2011) 1 SCC 609
. State of Madhya Pradesh (¶¶6,12,16,22) (Where the person of accused is searched with the baggage, Section 50 NDPS Act
(2007) 1 SCC 450
Balwant Rai (¶¶ 5, 6, 8, 9) (2005) 3 SCCDaulat Ram (¶¶ 5-7) (2005) 7 SCC 36
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Pawan Kumar (¶¶ 12, 13, 22, 23) (The term “person” under the Act means a human being with appropriate coverings and clothing and also footwear.)
(2004) 7 SCC
Prabha Shankar Dubey v. State of M.P (¶¶7-10,12,15) (The accused (suspect) has to be told in a way that he becomes aware that the choice is his and not of the officer concerned, even though there is no specific
2004(2) SC 56
State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 10, 11, 13) (2001) 6 SCC 692. State of Haryana (¶7) (Search of Person distinguished
from Search of Premises) (2001) 3 SCC 28
Baldev Singh (¶¶ 47, 52-54, 56) (1999) 6 SCC 172Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyed v. State of Gujarat (¶¶6-8,10) (The officer conducting the search must specifically depose that he had informed the person to be searched about his right to demand that the search be carried out in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a
(1995) 3 SCC 610
21) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9364
Anil Kumar, Air Customs Officer, IGI Airport (¶¶ 18, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10940
(¶ 6) 2013 SCC Online Del 1816
v. State (¶ 3) 121 (2005) DLT 84(¶¶ 10, 14, 16, 17, 20, 24, 34) 194 (2012) DLT 3
State of Delhi Administration (¶¶ 27, 29-33) 1994 SCC Online Del 739
Mohammed Shabir Shaikh Bhikan v. The State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 11, 2002 (104(1))
7
AIR 2014 SC 2564 AIR 2014 SC 1384
(2013) 6 SCC 595 (2013) 14 SCC 235 AIR 2011 SC 2699 (2011) 12 SCC 298 (2011) 6 SCC 392 (2011) 1 SCC 609
(2007) 1 SCC 450
(2005) 3 SCC 164 (2005) 7 SCC 36 (2004) 7 SCC 735
2004(2) SC 56
(2001) 6 SCC 692 (2001) 3 SCC 28
(1999) 6 SCC 172 (1995) 3 SCC 610
2019 SCC OnLine Del 9364 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10940 2013 SCC Online Del 1816 121 (2005) DLT 84 194 (2012) DLT 3 1994 SCC Online Del 739 2002 (104(1))
13, 14, 16-18)
d) Sections 52-A, 55 & 57Report of Arrest and Seizure
Supreme Court 1. Union of India v. Jarooparan2. Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab
3. Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan 4. Ashok v. State of Madhya Pradesh5. Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana 6. Hardip Singh v. State of Punjab 7. Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union8. Babubhai Odhavji Patel v.9. Khet Singh v. Union of India
10. Sajan Abraham v. State of Kerala 11. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
e) Section 60- Liability of Illicit Drugs, to Confiscation
Supreme Court 1. Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd.
f) Section 64 & 64A- Immunity from Prosecution
Supreme Court 1. Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi High Court
2. Fardeen Feroz Khan v. Union
g)
Section 67- Power to Examine any Person/ Retraction from Confession
Supreme Court 1. Surinder Kumar Khanna
Intelligence (¶¶ 11, 13-15)2. Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu 3. Kanhaiyalal v. Union of India4. Ram Kumar v. Central Bureau of Narcotics 5. Narcotics Control Bureau Delhi High Court 1. Vishal Puri v. Union of India 2. Narcotics Control Bureau
For Internal Circulation Only.
BOMLR 820
A, 55 & 57- Disposal of Seized Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure
Jarooparan (¶¶ 8-11) (2018) 4 SCC 334
State of Punjab (¶¶ 11, 16, 17) 2018 SCC OnLine SC 973
. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 16, 22, 29, 30, 31) (2015) 6 SCC 222State of Madhya Pradesh (¶¶ 9, 15) (2011) 5 SCC
State of Haryana (¶ 2) (2011) 8 SCC 130. State of Punjab (¶ 13) (2008) 8 SCC 557
Union of India (¶¶ 10, 12, 20-22) (2008) 8 SCC 557v. State of Gujarat (¶ 5) (2005) 8 SCC 725
India (¶¶ 6, 16) (2002) 4 SCC 380State of Kerala (¶¶ 9-13) (2001) 6 SCC 692Baldev Singh (¶¶ 13, 17) (1999) 6 SCC 172
Liability of Illicit Drugs, Substances, Plants, etc.
Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Punjab (¶¶ 2, 3) (1999) 5 SCC 670
Immunity from Prosecution
Vipin Kumar Jaggi (¶¶ 28-33, 36, 38, 39) AIR 2001 SC 2734
Union of India (¶¶ 26, 27, 29) 2007 SCC Online Bom 110
Power to Examine any Person/ Retraction from
v. Intell. Officer, Directorate of Revenue
15) 2018 SCC Online SC 757
State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶ 26, 40, 41) (2013) 16 SCC 31India (¶¶ 35-38, 40) AIR 2008 SC 1044
Central Bureau of Narcotics (¶ 7) (2008) 5 SCC 385Narcotics Control Bureau v. Murlidhar Soni (¶¶ 4, 5) (2004) 5 SCC 151
Union of India (¶¶ 25, 28, 29) 40 (2017) DLT 500 Narcotics Control Bureau v. Ramesh Kumar (¶¶ 21) 2013 SCC Online Del
2194
8
BOMLR 820
(2018) 4 SCC 334 2018 SCC OnLine SC 973 (2015) 6 SCC 222 (2011) 5 SCC 123 (2011) 8 SCC 130 (2008) 8 SCC 557 (2008) 8 SCC 557 (2005) 8 SCC 725 (2002) 4 SCC 380 (2001) 6 SCC 692 (1999) 6 SCC 172
(1999) 5 SCC 670 AIR 2001 SC 2734 2007 SCC Online Bom 110
2018 SCC Online SC 757 (2013) 16 SCC 31 AIR 2008 SC 1044 (2008) 5 SCC 385 (2004) 5 SCC 151 40 (2017) DLT 500 2013 SCC Online Del 2194
Other High Court 1. Gunjan Dudani v. Union of India
h) Section 68A- Application of Forfeiture or Illegally Acquired
Property High Court of Delhi
1. Shri Zahid Parwez v. Union of India
B. Irregularity in Investigation: Impact on Court Proceedings
a) Recording of Secret Information Supreme Court
1. Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana
2. Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana
b) Evidentiary Value of Confessional Statements under NDPS Act
Supreme Court 1. Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
2. Ram Singh v. Centre Bureau of Narcotics
3. Noor Aga v. State of Punjab
4. Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar
c) Non-compliance of Sections 52, 55 & 57Seized Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure
Supreme Court 1. Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana
d) Illegal Search Supreme Court
1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh person of accused during provided in Section 50 cannot be itself used as admissible evidence of proof of unlawful possession of contraband on accused.)
2. State of H.P. v. Pirthi Chandof search and seizure in violation of mandatory requirement of the Section 50 does not become inadmissible.)
3. Ali Mustafa Abdul Rahman Moosa proof of unlawful possession of the same a person under the NDPS Act.)
e) IO and Complainant, if same person
For Internal Circulation Only.
Union of India (¶¶ 7, 12, 13) (2018) 185 AIC (Sum
28) 14
Application of Forfeiture or Illegally Acquired
Union of India (¶¶ 21) 191 (2012) DLT 235
Irregularity in Investigation: Impact on Court
Recording of Secret Information
Darshan Singh v. State of Haryana (¶¶13-15) (2016) 14 SCC 658
Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana (¶¶12-13,17,22-23,25-27,35-36) (2009) 8 SCC 539
Evidentiary Value of Confessional Statements under
Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶42-45) (2013) 16 SCC 31
Ram Singh v. Centre Bureau of Narcotics (¶¶9-14) (2011) 11 SCC 347
Noor Aga v. State of Punjab (¶¶72, 75-77) (2008) 16 SCC 417
Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar (¶1) (2001) 9 SCC 578
compliance of Sections 52, 55 & 57- Disposal of Property & Report of Arrest and Seizure
Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana (¶9) (2001) 3 SCC 28
. Baldev Singh (¶¶44,47) (Illicit article seized from person of accused during search conducted in violation of safeguards provided in Section 50 cannot be itself used as admissible evidence of proof of unlawful possession of contraband on accused.)
AIR 1999 SC 2378
. Pirthi Chand (¶¶5, 7, 14) (Evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure in violation of mandatory requirement of the Section 50 does not become inadmissible.)
1996 (2) SCC 37
Ali Mustafa Abdul Rahman Moosa v. State of Kerala (¶8) (In absence of proof of unlawful possession of the same a person cannot be held guilty
(1994) 6 SCC 569
IO and Complainant, if same person
9
(2018) 185 AIC (Sum 28) 14
191 (2012) DLT 235
(2016) 14 SCC 658 (2009) 8 SCC 539
(2013) 16 SCC 31
(2011) 11 SCC 347
(2008) 16 SCC 417
(2001) 9 SCC 578
(2001) 3 SCC 28
AIR 1999 SC 2378
1996 (2) SCC 37
(1994) 6 SCC 569
Supreme Court 1. Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab
High Court of Delhi
1. Gurtej Singh Batth v. State
2. Annabelle Analista Malibago
F. SUGGESTED READINGS
S. No. Title 1. A Century of International Drug
Control
2. Critical Analysis of Section 41, 42, 50 of NDPS Act : Procedural Safeguards
3. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Ignoring Health; Infringing Rights
4. History and Development of the Leading International Drug Conventions
5. India’s Anti-Narcotics Law is in Urgent Need of Rehab
6. International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic Solution
7. Parliament Passes the NDPS Bill, 2014: Many Gains; Some Losses
8. Appraisal of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2014
9. Guidelines for the Control of Narcotics
For Internal Circulation Only.
State of Punjab (¶¶ 3, 11, 14-15, 21-22, 24-25) AIR 2018 SC 3853
State (¶¶21-25) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12562
Annabelle Analista Malibago v. DRI (¶¶18-21) 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12114
SUGGESTED READINGS
Author SourceA Century of International Drug United Nations
http://www.incb.org/incb/en/ainternationalcontrol.html
Critical Analysis of Section 41, 42, 50 of NDPS Act : Procedural Safeguards
Payal Batham, NLU, Odisha
http://www.nja.nic.in/NJA%20Report%20on%20NDPS%20Act%20(1).pdf
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ignoring Health;
Lawyer’s Collective http://www.lawyerscollective.org/files/Fact%20Sheet%20NDPS%20Act%201985.pdf
History and Development of the Leading International Drug
Parliament Research Branch, Canada
http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history
Narcotics Law is in Urgent Neha Singhal and Sakshi, The Wire
http://thewire.in/19907/indiaslawof
International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic
Matthew S. Jenner http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&context=ijgl
Parliament Passes the NDPS Bill, 2014: Many Gains; Some Losses
Lawyer’s Collective http://www.lawyerscollective.org/updates/parliamentamendmentgains
Appraisal of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment)
Satyakam Mohapatra, Asian Journal of Psychiatry
https://www.asianjournalofpsychiatry.com/article/S18762018(15)000416/fulltext
Guidelines for the Control of Narcotics Professor Bror Rexed, Dr K. http://apps.who.int/iri
10
AIR 2018 SC 3853 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12562 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12114
Source http://www.incb.org/incb/en/a-century-of -international-drug-control.html http://www.nja.nic.in/NJA%20Report%20on%20NDPS%20Act%20(1).pdf http://www.lawyerscollective.org/files/Fact%20Sheet%20NDPS%20Act%201985.pdf http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history-e.htm http://thewire.in/19907/indias-anti-narcotics-law-is-in-urgent-need-of-rehab/ http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1465&context=ijgls http://www.lawyerscollective.org/updates/parliament-passes-ndps-amendment-bill-2014-gains-losses.html https://www.asianjournalofpsychiatry.com/article/S1876-2018(15)00041-6/fulltext http://apps.who.int/iri
and Psychotropic Substances
10. How Alcoholics Anonymous & Narcotics Anonymous Work
11. Drug Laws in India
12. Narcontrol- A Journal on Control Bureau (2015 Issue)
13. National Policy on Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances
14. Substance Use and Abuse in India Comparative Study with Other Countries
15. The History and Development of the Leading International Drug Control Conventions
16. The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act- Ignoring Health, Infringing Rights
17. Drug Policy in India
For Internal Circulation Only.
and Psychotropic Substances Edmondson and others, World Health Organisation
s/bitstream/handle/10665/39299/9241541725_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
How Alcoholics Anonymous & Narcotics Anonymous Work
Amy R. Krentzman, Elizabeth A. R. Robinson and others, US PubMed Centre
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140338/
Centre for Narcotics Training National Academy of Customs, Excise and Narcotics, Faridabad
http://www.antidrugs.gov.il/download/files/indian_drug
A Journal on Narcotics Control Bureau (2015 Issue)
Narcotics Control Bureau http://www.narcoticsindia.nic.in/upload/download/document_idd5cec1027063b70c834c16a86baca424.pdf
National Policy on Narcotic and
Department of Revenue, India https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/National%20Policy%20on%20NDPS%20published.pdf
Substance Use and Abuse in India – A Comparative Study with Other
Dr. Sangita Laha, Intl. Journal of Arts, Humanities, and Management Studies
http://www.ijahms.com/upcomingissue/01.07.2016.pdf
The History and Development of the Leading International Drug Control
Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, Canada
https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Ignoring Health,
Lawyer’s Collective http://fileserver.idpc.net/library/Thenarcoticpsychotropic.pdf
Tripti Tandon, Deputy Director, Lawyers Collective
International Drug Policy Consortium, Briefing Paper, Feb 2015
11
s/bitstream/handle/10665/39299/9241541725_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140338/ http://www.antidrugs.gov.il/download/files/indian_drug-laws.pdf http://www.narcoticsindia.nic.in/upload/download/document_idd5cec1027063b70c834c16a86baca424.pdf https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/National%20Policy%20on%20NDPS%20published.pdf http://www.ijahms.com/upcomingissue/01.07.2016.pdf
https://sencanada.ca/content/sen/committee/371/ille/library/history-e.htm http://fileserver.idpc.net/library/The-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic.pdf International Drug Policy Consortium, Briefing Paper, Feb 2015
3. MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED 2009
A. REPORTS
S. No. Name of the Report
1. 277th Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies, 2018
2. Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, 2018
3. Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019Common Cause, Lok Niti.
4. Chapter-4, “Socio Economic Profile”, Death Penalty I
B. SCHEMES S. No. Name of the Scheme
1. Witness Protection Scheme, 2019
C. INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS S. No. Name of the Scheme
1. International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment
D. CASE LAW
S. NO. Title A. Object of MCOCA, 1999
Supreme Court 1. Prasad Shrikant Purohit
(¶38) 2. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman
(¶¶40,54) 3. State of Maharashtra v.4. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma
Another (¶¶ 24)
B. Protection of Witness Supreme Court
1. Mahender Chawla v. UOI
For Internal Circulation Only.
MAHARASHTRA CONTROL OF ORGANISED CRIME ACT,
Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice): Legal Remedies, 2018
Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative,
Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019Common Cause, Lok Niti.
4, “Socio Economic Profile”, Death Penalty India Report, 2016 Pg. 90
Name of the Scheme
Witness Protection Scheme, 2019
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS Name of the Scheme
International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment and Punishment
CitationObject of MCOCA, 1999
Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. (2015) 7 SCC
Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 5 SCC 246
v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (¶7) (2008) 13 SCC 5Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294
Protection of Witness
Mahender Chawla v. UOI(¶25) (2018) SCCOnline
12
CRIME ACT,
Law Commission of India Report on Wrongful Prosecution (Miscarriage of Justice):
Muslim Voices: Perceptions of Policing in India, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative,
Status of Policing in India Report: Police Adequacy and Working Conditions, 2019-
ndia Report, 2016 Pg. 90-124
International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Citation (2015) 7 SCC 440
(2010) 5 SCC 246 (2008) 13 SCC 5 (2005) 5 SCC 294
(2018) SCCOnline
C. Wrongful Prosecution and Compensation in Terror Cases
Supreme Court 1. Adambhai Suleman Bhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujrat 2. Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar
Delhi High Court 1. Prempal v. The Commissioner of Police
D. UAPA and MCOCA
Supreme Court 1. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman
(¶¶ 9,55-65)
E. Essential Commodities Act and MCOCA Supreme Court
1. State of Maharashtra v. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal
F. MCOCA and ITP Act Delhi High Court
1. Kamaljit v. State of NCT of Delhi
G. Constitutional Validity Supreme Court
1. Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman (¶¶9, 40-47, 54)
2. State of Maharashtra v. Delhi High Court 1. Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava
Delhi (¶¶ 4, 21-36)
H. Retrospective application of MCOCA Delhi High Court
1. Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava Delhi (¶¶ 4, 21-36)
Other High Courts 1. Jai Singh v. State of Maharashtra
I. Bail under MCOCA
Supreme Court 1. Rambeer Shaukeen v. State of NCT Delhi 2. Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan v. State of Maharashtra
3. Prasad Srikant Purohit
For Internal Circulation Only.
3155
Wrongful Prosecution and Compensation in Terror Cases
Adambhai Suleman Bhai Ajmeri v. State of Gujrat (2014) 7 SCC 716Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar AIR 1983 SC 1086
Prempal v. The Commissioner of Police (¶¶18-22, 30-36) 2010 ILR 4 Del. 416
Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 5 SCC 246
Essential Commodities Act and MCOCA
State of Maharashtra v. Lalit Somdatta Nagpal (¶¶35-41) (2007) 4 SCC 171
MCOCA and ITP Act
State of NCT of Delhi (¶¶ 41-43, 45,48-58) 148 (2008) DLT 170
Constitutional Validity
Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 5 SCC 246
v. Bharat Shantilal Shah (¶¶ 21, 33-51) (2008) 13 SCC 5
Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava v. State of NCT of (2009) 164 DLT 218
Retrospective application of MCOCA
Om Prakash Shrivastava @Babloo Shrivastava v. State of NCT of (2009) 164 DLT 218
State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 6, 7, 8, 9) (2003) 3 MahLJ 866
Rambeer Shaukeen v. State of NCT Delhi (¶¶22-29) (2018) 4 SCC 405Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan v. State of Maharashtra (2016) 10 SCALE
306Prasad Srikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (¶¶ 19, (2015) 7 SCC 440
13
3155 (2014) 7 SCC 716 AIR 1983 SC 1086 2010 ILR 4 Del. 416 (2010) 5 SCC 246 (2007) 4 SCC 171 148 (2008) DLT 170 (2010) 5 SCC 246 (2008) 13 SCC 5 (2009) 164 DLT 218 (2009) 164 DLT 218 (2003) 3 MahLJ 866 (2018) 4 SCC 405 (2016) 10 SCALE 306 (2015) 7 SCC 440
23, 24, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 57, 58, 59)4. State of Maharashtra v.
(¶21) 5. Mustaq Ahmed Mohammad Isak
12, 15, 16) 6. Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav
15) 7. C.B.I. v. Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr.8. Dattatray Krishnaji Ghule
(¶¶ 9,11,13) 9. Gokul Bhagaji Patil v. 10. Babanrao Tukaram Ranjane 11. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma
Another (¶¶36,49-58) 12. Uday Mohan Lal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra 13. Sanjay Dutt v. State (¶¶45
High Court of Delhi 1. Zohra Sheikh v. State (Govt. of NCT of
Other High Court 1. Sadhwi Pragya Singh Thakur
J. “Organised Crime”
Supreme Court 1. Mahipal Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2. State of Maharashtra v.
28, 45, 47, 48) 3. C.B.I . v. Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr.4. Shridhar Sumant Vagal
10) 5. Ranjitsing Brahmajeet Sing
Another (¶¶31)
High Court of Delhi 1. Kamaljeet Singh v. State of Delhi (N.C.T) Other High Courts 1. Jai Singh S/o Ashrafilal Yadav and Ors
7, 8, 9, 18, 19) 2. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe
K. “Continuing Unlawful Activity”
Supreme Court
For Internal Circulation Only.
23, 24, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41, 57, 58, 59) v. Vishwanath Marana Shetty (2012) 2 SCC 634
Mustaq Ahmed Mohammad Isak v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 10, 11, (2009) 7 SCC 480
Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 9, 14, (2007) 1 SCC 242
Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr. (¶5) 2007 (10) SCALE 69Dattatray Krishnaji Ghule v. State of Maharashtra (2007) 4 SCC 113
State of Maharashtra (¶¶10,11,12,14) (2007) 2 SCC 475Babanrao Tukaram Ranjane v. State of Maharashtra (¶9) (2006) 9 SCC 422Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294
Uday Mohan Lal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶5-13) AIR 2001 SC 1910(¶¶45-54) (1994) 5 SCC 410
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2017 SCC OnLine
Del 7061
Sadhwi Pragya Singh Thakur v. NIA (¶¶16,17, 20, 23) 2012 BomCR (Cri) 752
Central Bureau of Investigation (¶¶ 12-15) (2014) 11 SCC 282v. Bharat Shanti Lal Shah and ors. (¶¶ 10, 19, 2008 (12) SCALE
167Pradeep Bhalchandra Sawant and anr. (¶5) 2007 (10) SCALE 69
Shridhar Sumant Vagal v. State of Maharashtra and anr. (¶¶ 7, 9, 2007 (4) SCALE 556
Singh Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294
State of Delhi (N.C.T) (¶¶ 20, 38, 49, 53) 148 (2008) DLT 170
Jai Singh S/o Ashrafilal Yadav and Ors v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 2003 BomCr (Crl.) 1606
Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶32-38) 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903
“Continuing Unlawful Activity”
14
(2012) 2 SCC 634
(2009) 7 SCC 480
(2007) 1 SCC 242
2007 (10) SCALE 69 (2007) 4 SCC 113
(2007) 2 SCC 475 (2006) 9 SCC 422 (2005) 5 SCC 294
AIR 2001 SC 1910 (1994) 5 SCC 410 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7061 2012 BomCR (Cri) 752 (2014) 11 SCC 282 2008 (12) SCALE 167 2007 (10) SCALE 69 2007 (4) SCALE 556
(2005) 5 SCC 294
148 (2008) DLT 170 2003 BomCr (Crl.) 1606 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903
1. State v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar 2. State of Maharashtra v.
Other High Courts 1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal
2. State v. Satya Prakash (¶¶ 38, 39, 63, 64)3. State of Maharashtra v.
4. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe
5. Jai Singh v. State of Maharashtra
L. “Member” Other High Courts
1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal
M. “Competent Court”
Supreme Court State v. Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar
N. Abetment in MCOCA Cases
Supreme Court 1. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma
Another (¶¶30-34) 2. Madan Singh v. State of Bihar Other High Courts 1. Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe
17,20)
O. Conspiracy Delhi High Court
1. State v. Sajjan Kumar
P. Private Complaint Under MCOCA
Supreme Court 1. Jamiruddin Ansari v. CBI
Q. Confession under Section 18
Supreme Court 1. State of Maharashtra v.
Ors. (¶¶ 40, 41) 2. Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra
For Internal Circulation Only.
Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar (¶¶ 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34) AIR 2017 SC 236v. Shiva and Ors. (¶¶ 1, 3, 8, 9) AIR 2015 SC 2947
Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶26-32) 2014 CriLJ 4217
(Bom.)(¶¶ 38, 39, 63, 64) (2011) 3 SCC 684
v. Rahul Ramchandra Darud (¶¶ 7, 15) 2011 (SCC) Online Bom 605
Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶32-38) 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903
State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 7-9,18, 19) 2003 (3) MahLJ 866
Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶34-39) 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.)
Brijesh Singh @ Arun Kumar (¶¶ 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 34) AIR 2017 SC 236
Abetment in MCOCA Cases
Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294
State of Bihar (¶¶10-15) (2004) 4 SCC 622
Govind Sakha Ram Ubhe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 6, 7, 8, 9, 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 12930
Private Complaint Under MCOCA
Jamiruddin Ansari v. CBI (¶¶26,35-43) (2009) 6 SCC 316
Confession under Section 18
v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & (2013) 12 SCC 17
Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 14 SCC 641
15
AIR 2017 SC 236 AIR 2015 SC 2947 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) (2011) 3 SCC 684 2011 (SCC) Online Bom 605 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 2003 (3) MahLJ 866 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) AIR 2017 SC 236 (2005) 5 SCC 294
(2004) 4 SCC 622 2009 ALLMR (Cri) 1903 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 12930 (2009) 6 SCC 316 (2013) 12 SCC 17 (2010) 14 SCC 641
3. Devender Pal Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi4. Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
R. Cognizance under Section 23
Other High Courts 1. Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal
27, 31, 32, 40)
S. Section 24- Failure in Discharge of duty by Public Servant Supreme Court
1. Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma Another (¶¶43-53)
T. Section 313, Cr.P.C. and MCOCA
Supreme Court 1. Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra
U. Mandatory Imposing of Fine in MCOCA
Delhi High Court 1. Mohd. Irfan v. State of NCT Of Delhi
V. Police Custody
Supreme Court 1. HDFC Securities Limited and Others
Another(¶16) 2. Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani and Another
3. Rohit Tandon v. ED 4. Kamal Khanna and Another
W. Use of Section 161 Statement
Supreme Court 1. Rameshwar Dayal v. State of UP
2. Tori Singh v. State of UP
X. Presence of IO in Court During Examination of Witness Supreme Court
1. Zahira Sheikh v. State of Gujarat Delhi High Court
2. Asif Balwa v. CBI(¶¶4-7)
For Internal Circulation Only.
. State of NCT of Delhi (2002) 5 SCC 234. State of Punjab (1994) 3 SCC 569
Cognizance under Section 23
Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶19, 20, 21, 26, 2014 CriLJ 4217
(Bom.)
Failure in Discharge of duty by Public Servant
Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Mahrashtra and (2005) 5 SCC 294
Section 313, Cr.P.C. and MCOCA
Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v. State of Maharashtra (2010) 14 SCC 641
Mandatory Imposing of Fine in MCOCA
Mohd. Irfan v. State of NCT Of Delhi (2018) SCCOnline
Del. 13223
HDFC Securities Limited and Others v. State of Maharashtra and (2017) 1 SCC 640
. P.L. Dani and Another(¶77) 1978
(2018) 11 SCC 46Kamal Khanna and Another v. State and Another 2010 (1)AD (Delhi)
606
Use of Section 161 Statement
. State of UP (1978) 2 SCC 518.
. State of UP AIR 1962
Presence of IO in Court During Examination of Witness
. State of Gujarat AIR 2004 SC 3114
7) 2012 SCC OnLine Del 903
16
(2002) 5 SCC 234 (1994) 3 SCC 569 2014 CriLJ 4217 (Bom.) (2005) 5 SCC 294
(2010) 14 SCC 641 (2018) SCCOnline Del. 13223 (2017) 1 SCC 640
1978 (2) SCC 424
(2018) 11 SCC 46 2010 (1)AD (Delhi) 606 (1978) 2 SCC 518. AIR 1962 SC 399 AIR 2004 SC 3114 2012 SCC OnLine Del 903
E. SUGGESTED READINGS
S.No. Title
1. Death in Custody : The Breach of Trust and Its Price
4. SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989
A. RULES S. No.
Title
1. SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Rules, 1995
B. CASE LAWS S. No. Title
A. Emerging Issues Supreme Court
1. Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors17)
2. Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.24,39-40)
3. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.4. Lata Singh v. State of U .P. and Anr.5. Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi)
B. Constitutional Validity
Supreme Court 1. State of M.P. and Another
3, 6, 8, 9, 11) Other High Courts
1. Jai Singh and Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
C. Offences of Atrocities (Section 3)
Mere Knowledge of Caste of Victim is Enough Supreme Court
1. Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh2. Gorige Pentaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh
For Internal Circulation Only.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Citation Death in Custody : The Breach of Trust and Its Price Zia Mody, 10
Judgments That Changed India (Penguin Books)
SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989
SC & ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Rules, 1995
Citation
Kodungallur Film Society & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors(¶¶15-
Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (¶¶19-21, (2018)9SC C 501
. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.(¶53) Lata Singh v. State of U .P. and Anr. (¶¶14-18) ( 2006 ) 5 SCC 475Bhagwan Dass v. State (NCT of Delhi) (¶8) ( 2011 ) 6 SCC 396
Constitutional Validity
State of M.P. and Another v. Ram Kishna Balothia and Another (¶¶
. Union of India & Ors. (¶¶ 50, 51, 66, 81) AIR 1993 Raj 177
(Rajasthan HC)
Offences of Atrocities (Section 3) Mere Knowledge of Caste of Victim is Enough
Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶ 5-6) (2018) 1 SCC 742Gorige Pentaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh 2008 Cr.L.J. 350 SC
17
Citation Zia Mody, 10 Judgments That Changed India (Penguin Books)
SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989
Citation (2018)10SCC713
(2018)9SC C 501
(2018)7SCC192 ( 2006 ) 5 SCC 475 ( 2011 ) 6 SCC 396 (1995)3SCC221
AIR 1993 Raj 177 (Rajasthan HC) (2018) 1 SCC 742 2008 Cr.L.J. 350 SC
Delhi High Court 1. Rameez v. The State NCT of Delhi
Other High Court 1. Taranath V State of AP
D. Use of Objectionable Terms and Section 3
Supreme Court 1. Arumugam Servai v. State of Tamil Nadu2. Swaran Singh and Ors. v. State
3. Masumaha Hasanasha Musalman v State of Maharashtra Delhi High Court
1. Pappu Singh v. State of UP
E. “Public View” under Section 3 Delhi High Court
1. Daya Bhatnagar and Ors2. Kanhaiya Paswan v. State & Ors.
3. Karam Veer Singh & Ors
4. Mukesh Kumar Saini & Ors. Other High Court
1. Mahesh Saksham Patole v The State of Maharashtra
F. Common Intention under Section 3
1. Ratikant Ray v State of Odisha
G. Non Presentation of Caste Certificate: Cannot be Ground for
Acquittal Supreme Court
1. Kailas and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
H. Delay in FIR
Supreme Court 1. Vidyadharan v. State of Kerala
I. Section 3: Various Facets
For Internal Circulation Only.
. The State NCT of Delhi (¶¶21-22)
469
State of AP 1999 (1) Crimes 188(A.P.)
Use of Objectionable Terms and Section 3
State of Tamil Nadu(¶¶10,14) (2011)6SC C 405Swaran Singh and Ors. v. State (¶¶24,25) MANU/SC/7954/20
08Masumaha Hasanasha Musalman v State of Maharashtra(¶9) AIR 2000 SC 1876
Pappu Singh v. State of UP 2002CriLJ1251
“Public View” under Section 3
Daya Bhatnagar and Ors. v. State (¶¶ 10, 15, 21, 23, 25) 109 (2004) DLT 915
State & Ors. (¶¶ 5, 6) (2012) ILR 4 Delhi 509
Karam Veer Singh & Ors. v. State (¶¶ 5-10) 12
Mukesh Kumar Saini & Ors. v. State ( Delhi Adm.) (¶¶ 7, 8) 94 (2001) DLT 241
Mahesh Saksham Patole v The State of Maharashtra(¶5) 2010 (1) RCR 39 (Bom.)
ention under Section 3 State of Odisha 2015(1)ILR917
Non Presentation of Caste Certificate: Cannot be Ground for
State of Maharashtra(¶¶15-16) (2011)1SC C
(Cri)401
State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 12, 16, 23, 24) (2004) 1 SCC 215
Section 3: Various Facets
18
2018 I VAD(Delhi) 469 1999 (1) Crimes 188(A.P.) (2011)6SC C 405 MANU/SC/7954/2008 AIR 2000 SC 1876 2002CriLJ1251 109 (2004) DLT 915 (2012) ILR 4 Delhi 509 MANU/DE/1972/2012 94 (2001) DLT 241 2010 (1) RCR 39 (Bom.) 2015(1)ILR917
(2011)1SC C (Cri)401 (2004) 1 SCC 215
Delhi High Court 1. Kulwinder and Ors. v.
(¶¶50, 53,57,65, 66-70, 74,76, 79225, 267, 302, 305, 336, 349,350)
2. Sh. M.A. Rashid v. Sh. Gopal Chandra & Anr. 3. Shri Ghasi Ram v. NCT of Delhi and Anr.
4. Shri. D.P. Vats v. State and Ors. Other High Courts
1. State of Bihar v. Ajay Singh, Manoj Singh and Narendra Singh @ Nagendra Singh Sanjay Singh v. State of Bihar
2. Balkeshwar Maurya v. State of U.P.
3. Nabab v. State of U.P.
J. Investigation
a) Preliminary Inquiry Supreme Court
1. Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan
b) Power of National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Investigation SC/ST (POA) Act
Supreme Court 1. Ishwar Pratap Singh v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Other High Courts 1. Tutu v. State(¶5) (Orissa High Court)2. Shatrughna v. State (¶15) (Bombay High Court)
c) Investigation Only by Person of Rank of DSP
Other High Court 1. Manoj kumar Giri v State of Jharkhand
K. Cognizance
Supreme Court
1. Sri A.M.C.S. Swamy, ADE/DPE/Hyd (Central) v. Mehdi Agah Karbalai & Anr.
2. Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
For Internal Circulation Only.
Kulwinder and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
70, 74,76, 79-80, 83, 102, 109-110, 133-134, 225, 267, 302, 305, 336, 349,350)
252(2018)DLT1
. Sh. Gopal Chandra & Anr. (¶¶ 13, 18, 24, 25) 189 (2012) DLT 180NCT of Delhi and Anr. (¶¶ 12-14) (2008) ILR 1 Delhi
426State and Ors. (¶¶ 10-13) 99 (2003) DLT 167
. Ajay Singh, Manoj Singh and Narendra Singh @
Sanjay Singh v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court)
2012 (2) PLJR 601
Balkeshwar Maurya v. State of U.P. (¶¶4-5) 2002 CriLJ 4565(Allahabad HC)
Nabab v. State of U.P. 2002 (Allahabad HC)
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra CND.O.D2018
Power of National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Investigation SC/ST (POA) Act
Ishwar Pratap Singh v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶8-9) (2018)13SCC612
(¶5) (Orissa High Court) 2003CriLJ 722
(¶15) (Bombay High Court) 2003CriLJ
Investigation Only by Person of Rank of DSP
Manoj kumar Giri v State of Jharkhand(¶9) 2004 CrLJ 3434
Sri A.M.C.S. Swamy, ADE/DPE/Hyd (Central) v. Mehdi Agah Cr Appeal /2019 [S.L.P.(Cr) No.2073/ 2019]Dated 23/7/2019
Asharfi v. The State Of Uttar Pradesh (¶¶ 5-6) (2018) 1 SCC 742
19
252(2018)DLT1
189 (2012) DLT 180 (2008) ILR 1 Delhi 426 99 (2003) DLT 167 2012 (2) PLJR 601
2002 CriLJ 4565 (Allahabad HC) 2002 CriLJ 4580 (Allahabad HC) CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO. 416 OF 2018 D.O.D-20 MARCH
2018
(2018)13SCC612 2003CriLJ 722 2003CriLJ 790 2004 CrLJ 3434
Cr Appeal No.1102 /2019 [S.L.P.(Cr) No.2073/ 2019] Dated 23/7/2019 (2018) 1 SCC 742
3. Gangula Ashok and Ors.
4. Vidyadharan v. State of Kerala
Other High Courts
1. In Re: Provision of Section 14a of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015(¶¶103
2. Ujjagar Singh and Ors.
3. Ranjit Singh Motta v. Harmel Kaur
L. Sentencing
Supreme Court 1. State of Madhya Pradesh
Other High Courts 2. Moti Chand and Anr. v
M. Bail (Section 18)
Supreme Court 1. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan
(¶¶ 42, 53, 59, 67,68, 75, 81)2. Vilas Pandurang Pawar and Ors.
(¶¶8-9)
N. Anticipatory Bail Supreme Court
1. Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan
2. Vikas Pandurang Pawar v. State of Maharashtra 3. State of M.P. and Ors.
Delhi High Court 1. Rameez v. The State NCT of Delhi
2. Dr. R.K. Sangwan &Anr.
3. Sajjan Kumar v. The State &
For Internal Circulation Only.
Gangula Ashok and Ors. v. State of A.P. (¶16) AIR 2000 SC 740
State of Kerala (¶¶ 8, 12, 16, 23, 24) (2004) 1 SCC
In Re: Provision of Section 14a of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) (¶¶103-109)
2018CriLJ5010(Allahabad HC)
Ujjagar Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr. (¶¶7) 2003 CriLJ2204(Punjab & Haryana HC)
. Harmel Kaur (¶¶6-7) 2002CriLJ449(Punjab & Haryana HC)
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vikram Das (¶¶8) (2019)4SCC125
v. State of Rajasthan(¶¶48) 2001CriLJ1916(Rajasthan HC)
Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 42, 53, 59, 67,68, 75, 81)
2018
Vilas Pandurang Pawar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra CND.O.D2018
Vikas Pandurang Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 8,9) (2012)State of M.P. and Ors. v. Ram Kishna Balothia and Ors. (¶¶5)
. The State NCT of Delhi (¶¶21-22)
69Dr. R.K. Sangwan &Anr. v. State (Delhi) (¶¶ 11, 13) Cr Ref. 01/2008
Dated 18/3/2009The State & Anr. (¶¶ 15-17) 132 (2006) DLT 18
20
AIR 2000 SC 740
(2004) 1 SCC 215
2018CriLJ5010 (Allahabad HC) 2003 CriLJ2204 (Punjab & Haryana HC) 2002CriLJ449 (Punjab & Haryana HC) (2019)4SCC125 2001CriLJ1916 (Rajasthan HC) 2018 (4) SCALE 661
CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO. 416 OF 2018 D.O.D-20 MARCH
2018 (2012) 8 SCC 795 (1995)3SCC221 2018IVAD(Delhi)469 Cr Ref. 01/2008 Dated 18/3/2009 132 (2006) DLT 18
C. SUGGESTED READINGS S.No. Title
1. Judicial Pronouncement and Caste
2. Rising Pendency, Falling Convictions: What Data on SC/ST Act Trials Show
D. MOVIE RECOMMENDATIONS
S.No. Details 1. Ardh Satya, Govind Nihlani, Manmohan Shetty, 1983
The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights manychallenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,custodial torture and in general working of highlighted in the movie.
2. Article 15, Anubhav Sinha, Zee Studios, 2019 The movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The movie maybe relevant for understanding the caste hurdles in access to justice for victims of atrocities.
3. Shahid, Hansal Mehta, Anurag Kashyap, 2013 Based on the life of human rights lawyer Shahid Azmi defending various accused in tCourt in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution and religion based prejudices.
4. Bandit Queen, Shekhar Kapoor, Bobby Bedi, 1994 The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account of deep seated struggles of caste and gender violence in India.
For Internal Circulation Only.
SUGGESTED READINGS Citation
Judicial Pronouncement and Caste Rakesh Shukla, Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 41, Issue No. 42, 21 Oct, 2006; Pp.4403
Rising Pendency, Falling What Data on SC/ST
Shalini Nair, http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/risingpendency-falling-convictions-whatact-trials-show-prevention-of-atrocities5113689/
MOVIE RECOMMENDATIONS
, Govind Nihlani, Manmohan Shetty, 1983
The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights manychallenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,custodial torture and in general working of police machinery of the country have beenhighlighted in the movie.
, Anubhav Sinha, Zee Studios, 2019
he movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The movie maybe relevant for understanding the caste and gender prejudices which work as hurdles in access to justice for victims of atrocities.
, Hansal Mehta, Anurag Kashyap, 2013
Based on the life of human rights lawyer Shahid Azmi who was assassinated in 2010 for defending various accused in terror cases. The movie is in spirit of judgment of Supreme Court in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution and religion based prejudices.
, Shekhar Kapoor, Bobby Bedi, 1994
The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account of deep seated struggles of caste and gender violence in India.
21
Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 41, Issue No. 42, 21 Oct, 2006; Pp.4403-4406
http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/rising-what-data-on-sc-st-atrocities-act-
The movie highlights struggles faced by police man, Anant (Om Puri) fights many challenges both internally and with the system as a police cop. Themes of masculinity,
police machinery of the country have been
he movie highlights the challenges of investigation in caste based gender violence. The and gender prejudices which work as
assassinated in 2010 for error cases. The movie is in spirit of judgment of Supreme
Court in Adam Bhai Suleman Bhai case. It highlights the challenges wrongful prosecution
The movie is based on life of Phoolan Devi. The movie is relevant for SEMs as an account
5. BANKING FRAUDS AND CHEATING
A. CASE LAWS
A. Quashing the Criminal Proceedings
Banking and Corporate Frauds Supreme Court
1. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh2. State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi 3. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit4. Nikhil Merchant v CBI (¶¶18,24)
B. Specimen writing- During Police Investigation
Indian Evidence Act, 1872) Supreme Court
1. State(Delhi Administartion)
C. Voice Samples, Bodily Fluids Supreme Court
1. Ritesh Sinha v. State of U.P.
2. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad
D. Handwriting Expert Supreme Court
1. Sonvir vs. The State of NCT of Delhi High Court of Delhi
1. Sapan Haldar v State
6. SAFEGUARD AND PRECAUTION
INVESTIGATION
A. REPORTS S.No. Reports
1. 198th Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness Protection Programme, 2006
2. Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with Witnesses, Centre for Civil and Criminal Justice Administration,2009
B. CASE LAWS
S.No. Title
For Internal Circulation Only.
BANKING FRAUDS AND CHEATING
Quashing the Criminal Proceedings-a Misplaced Sympathy?
Banking and Corporate Frauds
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh (¶¶10,12) (2016) 1 SCC 389State of Maharashtra v. Vikram Anantrai Doshi (¶23) 2014 (10) SCALE 690Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh (¶¶14-15) 2013 (10) SCC 686
(¶¶18,24) (2008 ) 9 SCC 677
During Police Investigation (Section 73 Indian Evidence Act, 1872)
State(Delhi Administartion) v. Pali Ram (¶¶25-26,28-30) (1979) 2 SCC 158
s, Bodily Fluids During Investigation
. State of U.P. 2019 SCC OnLine SC 956
Kathi Kalu Oghad A.I.R. 1961 SC 1808
Sonvir vs. The State of NCT of Delhi (¶¶27,39,51,52,54,60) AIR
(¶30) 191
SAFEGUARD AND PRECAUTIONS DURING THE
Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness Protection Programme, 2006 Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with Witnesses, Centre for Civil and Criminal Justice Administration, NLIU
Citation
22
(2016) 1 SCC 389 2014 (10) SCALE 690 2013 (10) SCC 686 (2008 ) 9 SCC 677
(1979) 2 SCC 158
2019 SCC OnLine SC 956 A.I.R. 1961 SC 1808
AIR 2018 SC 3131
191 (2012) DLT 225
Law Commission of India Report on Witness Identity Protection and Witness
Witness in Criminal Justice Process: A Study of Hostility and Problems Associated with NLIU- Bhopal- BPRD,
Citation
A. Informant and IO Cannot be The Same Supreme Court
1. Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab
B. Right to Fair Investigation Supreme Court
1. Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab 2. Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State of NCT Delhi
C. Court Cannot Interfere with Investigative Process
Supreme Court 1. UOI v. Prakash P. Hinduja
D. Further Investigation
Supreme Court 1. Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (2. Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali
E. Defective Investigation
1. State of Gujrat v. Kishanbhai 2. Dinesh Borathakur v. State of Assam
F. Witnesses
1. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat2. PUCL v. Union of India
G. Protection of Witness
Supreme Court 1. Mahender Chawla v. UOI
H. Case Diary
Supreme Court 1. P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
2. Mukund Lal v. UOI (¶¶2
I. Content of Case Diary Supreme Court
1. Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police
J. Accused Does Not Have Unfettered Right to Case Diary Supreme Court
1. Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand
For Internal Circulation Only.
Informant and IO Cannot be The Same
Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab (¶¶13-14) AIR 2018 SC 3853
Right to Fair Investigation
Nirmal Singh Kahlon v. State of Punjab (¶¶26-27) (2009) 1 SCC 441Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State of NCT Delhi (2010) 6 SCC 1
Court Cannot Interfere with Investigative Process
UOI v. Prakash P. Hinduja (2003) 6 SCC 195
Further Investigation
Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police (¶4) (1985)
Irshad Ali (2013) 5 SCC 762
Defective Investigation State of Gujrat v. Kishanbhai (2014) 5 SCC 108 Dinesh Borathakur v. State of Assam (2008) 5 SCC 697
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat 2004 Cri LJ 205PUCL v. Union of India 2003(10) SCALE
Protection of Witness
Mahender Chawla v. UOI (¶25) (2018) SCCOnline
3155
Directorate of Enforcement (¶¶45-53) CA No. 1340 of 2019 Dated:05.09.2019
(¶¶2-4) AIR 1989 SC 144
Content of Case Diary
Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police(¶17) AIR 1983 SC 826
Accused Does Not Have Unfettered Right to Case Diary
Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand (¶¶8-19) AIR 2017 SC 2375
23
AIR 2018 SC 3853
(2009) 1 SCC 441 (2010) 6 SCC 1
(2003) 6 SCC 195
(1985) 2 SCC 537 (2013) 5 SCC 762
(2014) 5 SCC 108 (2008) 5 SCC 697
2004 Cri LJ 205 2003(10) SCALE 967
(2018) SCCOnline 3155
CA No. 1340 of 2019 Dated:05.09.2019 AIR 1989 SC 144
AIR 1983 SC 826
AIR 2017 SC 2375
K. Recording of Confessions and Statements
Supreme Court 1. Sonvir @ Somvir v. The State of NCT of Delhi 2. Somasundaram v. State 3. Nagaraj v. State (¶¶ 14, 16)4. R. Shaji v. State of Kerala 5. Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab
Maharashtra (¶¶ 426, 452, 454, 467, 485)6. Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan 7. Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh
(¶¶ 19, 22-29) 8. S. Arul Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu 9. Utpal Das v. State of West Bengal 10. State of Punjab v. Harjagdev Singh 11. Ram Singh v. Sonia and Others 12. Aloke Nath Dutta v. State of West Bengal
(¶¶ 31-33, 44-46, 48, 50, 5213. Babubhai Udesinh Parmar 14. Bishnu Prasad Sinha and Another
(¶¶ 18-23, 25, 26, 36, 37)15. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh 16. State of Tamil Nadu v.17. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde 18. Jogendra Nahak and Others v. State of Orissa and Others
(¶¶ 7, 10, 13, 15, 21-25)19. Shivappa v. State of Karnataka 20. Shankaria v. State of Rajasthan 21. State of UP v. Singhara Singh and Others
20) 22. Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab
High Court of Delhi1. State v. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and Kuljeet Singh @ Ranga
173)
L. Disposal of Unclaimed Case Property Supreme Court
1. Indian Timber and Plywood Corporation Limited and Others State of Kerala and Others
2. State of Bombay v. Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam High Court of Delhi
1. Manjit Siugh v. State Other High Courts
1. Abhay Shrenikbhai Gandhi
For Internal Circulation Only.
Recording of Confessions and Statements
The State of NCT of Delhi (¶ 6) 2018 Indlaw SC 431
. State (¶ 61) (2016) 16 SCC 355(¶¶ 14, 16) (2015) 4 SCC 739
R. Shaji v. State of Kerala (¶¶ 13-16) (2013) 14 SCC 266Mohammad Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab v. State of
(¶¶ 426, 452, 454, 467, 485) AIR 2012 SC 3565
Ajay Kumar Parmar v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 5-7) (2012) 12 SCC 406Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh v. Republic of India (2011) 2 SCC 490
. State of Tamil Nadu (¶¶ 43-45, 47-54) (2010) 8 SCC 233. State of West Bengal (¶ 13) AIR 2010 SC 1894
. Harjagdev Singh (¶¶ 7, 9, 11) (2009) 8 SCALE 568Ram Singh v. Sonia and Others (¶¶ 16, 17, 21, 23-25, 28, 48) AIR 2007 SC 1218Aloke Nath Dutta v. State of West Bengal
46, 48, 50, 52-55, 64, 65, 70, 72) (2007) 12 SCC 2
Babubhai Udesinh Parmar v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 8-11) AIR 2007 SC 420Bishnu Prasad Sinha and Another v. State of Assam
23, 25, 26, 36, 37) AIR 2007 SC 848
Bhagwan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (¶ 28) (2003) 3 SCC 21v. Kutty @ Lakshmi Narsimhan (¶ 13) (2001) 6 SCC 550
State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Shinde (¶¶ 25, 26) (2000) 6 SCC 269Jogendra Nahak and Others v. State of Orissa and Others
25) AIR 1999 SC 2565
Shivappa v. State of Karnataka (¶¶ 6, 7) (1995) 2 SCC 76Shankaria v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 36, 40, 43) (1978) 4 SCC 453
Singhara Singh and Others (¶¶ 7-9, 11-13, 16- AIR 1964 SC 358
Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab (¶ 10) AIR 1957 SC 637High Court of Delhi
Jasbir Singh @ Billa and Kuljeet Singh @ Ranga (¶ 17 (1980) DLT 404
Disposal of Unclaimed Case Property
Indian Timber and Plywood Corporation Limited and Others v. State of Kerala and Others (¶ 7)
1994 (2) SCALE 385
. Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam (¶ 8) AIR 1967 SC 1885High Court of Delhi
(¶¶ 3, 8-10, 19, 28, 35, 57, 83, 84) 214 (2014) DLT 646
Abhay Shrenikbhai Gandhi v. State of Gujarat (¶¶ 40, 62, 63, (2016) 3 GLR 2602
24
2018 Indlaw SC 431 (2016) 16 SCC 355 (2015) 4 SCC 739 (2013) 14 SCC 266 AIR 2012 SC 3565
(2012) 12 SCC 406 (2011) 2 SCC 490
(2010) 8 SCC 233 AIR 2010 SC 1894 (2009) 8 SCALE 568 AIR 2007 SC 1218 (2007) 12 SCC 230
AIR 2007 SC 420 AIR 2007 SC 848
(2003) 3 SCC 21 (2001) 6 SCC 550 (2000) 6 SCC 269 AIR 1999 SC 2565
(1995) 2 SCC 76 (1978) 4 SCC 453 AIR 1964 SC 358
AIR 1957 SC 637
17 (1980) DLT 404
1994 (2) SCALE 385
AIR 1967 SC 1885
214 (2014) DLT 646
(2016) 3 GLR 2602
66, 67) 2. Yousoof Marakair v. State of Mysore and Another
M. Release of Articles on Superdari
Supreme Court 1. Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujrat
21) 2. B. Saha v. M.S. Kochar
High Court of Delhi
1. Manjit Singh v. State 2. Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh
Other High Courts 1. Naottam Singh Dhillon and Another
16, 18)
N. Material/Documents filed by Police along with the Charge sheet
Supreme Court 1. Amanullah and Others 2. V.K. Sasikala v. State Represented by Superintendent of Police
(¶¶ 11-16) 3. Sidhartha Vashisht @Manu Sharma
(¶¶ 79, 84, 91) 4. Satya Narain Musadi and Others
High Court of Delhi
1. Yoginder Singh Verma
Other High Courts 1. Paras Jain and Others
O. Material/Documents collected by Police, but not filed along
with the Charge sheet Supreme Court
1. Manjeet Singh Khera 2. Fakhruddin Ahmad v.
10, 18) High Court of Delhi
1. Shri D.K. Gupta v. Punjab National Bank
2. Suresh Kumar Pathrella
For Internal Circulation Only.
Yousoof Marakair v. State of Mysore and Another (¶ 11) AIR 1969 Kant 203
Release of Articles on Superdari
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujrat (¶¶7-9, 11-15, 17- AIR 2003 SC 638
M.S. Kochar (¶¶ 3-5) (1979) 4 SCC 177High Court of Delhi
(¶¶ 3, 22) 214 (2014) DLT 646Rajesh Tyagi v. Jaibir Singh (¶¶8-11) ILR(2009)Supp.(1)Del
hi471
Naottam Singh Dhillon and Another v. State of Haryana (¶¶ 15, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 669
Material/Documents filed by Police along with the Charge
Amanullah and Others v. State of Bihar and Others (¶¶ 27, 28) (2016) 6 SCC 699
State Represented by Superintendent of Police AIR 2013 SC 613
Sidhartha Vashisht @Manu Sharma v. State (NCT Of Delhi) AIR 2010 S
Satya Narain Musadi and Others v. State of Bihar (¶¶ 9-12) (1980) 3 SCC 152
High Court of Delhi Yoginder Singh Verma v. CBI (¶ 8) 2016 (2) JCC 1214
Paras Jain and Others v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶ 18-23) 2016 (2)(Raj)
Material/Documents collected by Police, but not filed along with the Charge sheet
Manjeet Singh Khera v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 7, 8, 11) (2013) 9 SCC 276
v. State of Uttaranchal and Another (¶¶ 8- (2008) 17 SCC 157
High Court of Delhi . Punjab National Bank (¶¶ 7, 10) 2013 SCC Online Del
3020Suresh Kumar Pathrella v. State through CBI (¶¶ 7, 9, 10, 13) 2010 SCC Online Del
3120
25
AIR 1969 Kant 203
AIR 2003 SC 638
(1979) 4 SCC 177
214 (2014) DLT 646 ILR(2009)Supp.(1)Delhi471
2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 669
(2016) 6 SCC 699 AIR 2013 SC 613
AIR 2010 SC 2352
(1980) 3 SCC 152
2016 (2) JCC 1214
2016 (2) RLW 945 (Raj)
(2013) 9 SCC 276 (2008) 17 SCC 157
2013 SCC Online Del 3020 2010 SCC Online Del 3120
Other High Courts 3. Akhilesh Kumar v. State of Maharashtra
P. Stock Witness Supreme Court
1. Prem Chanda(Paniwala)
C. SUGGESTED READINGS
S.No. Title 1. What Witnesses Really Need
7. ELECTRONIC RECORD/EVIDENCE
A. CASE LAWS
A. Necessity Of Certificate Under Section 65B Of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Supreme Court 1. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal
(¶Matter Referred to Larger Bench)
2. Shafhi Mohammad v State of Himachal Pradesh
3. Sonu v. Stae of Haryana 4. Anvar P. V. v P. K. Basheer
High Court of Delhi
1. Rakesh Kumar v State (¶¶196
Other High Court
1. Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B.
B. Stage of Submitting the Certificate
For Internal Circulation Only.
State of Maharashtra (¶¶ 16-18) 2017 SCC Online
Bom 3867
Prem Chanda(Paniwala) v. UOI (¶¶4-10) (1981) 1 SCC 639
SUGGESTED READINGS
Citation What Witnesses Really Need G.S. Bajpai, 12 February 2019, The Indian
Express https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/india-witness-protection-scheme5578921/
ELECTRONIC RECORD/EVIDENCE
Necessity Of Certificate Under Section 65B Of The Indian
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (¶Matter Referred to Larger Bench)
Civil Appeal No(s). 20825-20826 OF 2017 Order Dated 26.07.2019
Shafhi Mohammad v State of Himachal Pradesh (¶¶ 11-12) SLP(Crl.)No.2302 of 2017 Order Dated: 30.01.2
Sonu v. Stae of Haryana (¶¶27,32) AIR 2017 SC 3441
Anvar P. V. v P. K. Basheer (¶¶ 19,31,34,37,41) AIR 2015 SC 180
(¶¶196-207) 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2609
Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B. (¶¶64-70) 2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal HC)
Stage of Submitting the Certificate
26
2017 SCC Online Bom 3867
(1981) 1 SCC 639
G.S. Bajpai, 12 February 2019, The Indian
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columnsscheme-supreme-court-
Civil Appeal No(s). 20825-20826 OF 2017 Order Dated 26.07.2019 SLP(Crl.)No.2302 of 2017 Order Dated: 30.01.2018 AIR 2017 SC 3441 AIR 2015 SC 180
2009 SCC OnLine Del
2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal
Supreme Court 1. State of Karnataka v. M. R. Hiremath
High Court of Delhi 1. Kundan Singh v State (¶¶48
Other High Courts
1. Avadut Waman Kushe v. State of Maharashtra
2. K. Ramajayam v. Inspector of Police
3. Paras Jain and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
C. Admissibility of Call Records1. Tomas Bruno v State of UP2. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu and Ors
D. Admissibility of CD/DVDs
High Court of Delhi 1. Ankur Chawla v. Central Bureau of Investigation
2. M/s. P. R. Transport Agency v. Union of India
Other High Court 1. Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and Ors.
2. Paras Jain v. State of Rajasthan 3. State of Gujarat v. Shailendra Kamalkishor Pande and Ors.
(¶¶3,6,7)
E. Admissibility of e-Mails Other High Court
1. Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B
F. Admissibility of Interview Transcripts Supreme Court
1. Jagjit singh v. State of Haryana High Court of Delhi
1. Sharad Yadav and Ors. v
For Internal Circulation Only.
. M. R. Hiremath(¶¶13-17) AIR 2019 SC 2377
(¶¶48-51,62) 2015 SCC OnLine Del
13647
Avadut Waman Kushe v. State of Maharashtra (¶¶1,10) 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 3236
K. Ramajayam v. Inspector of Police (¶¶33,35) 2016 SCC OnLine Mad 451
. State of Rajasthan (¶¶18-23) 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 8331
Admissibility of Call Records Tomas Bruno v State of UP(¶¶24,40) (2015) 7 SCC 178State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu and Ors(¶¶15-16) AIR 2005 SC 3820
Admissibility of CD/DVDs
Ankur Chawla v. Central Bureau of Investigation (¶¶18-19) 2014
6461 M/s. P. R. Transport Agency v. Union of India (¶8) AIR 2006 All 23
. State of Haryana and Ors. (¶¶8-11,13,15) 2015(2) RCR(Criminal)
289 P&HParas Jain v. State of Rajasthan (¶¶18-23) (2016) 2 RLW 945 (Raj)
. Shailendra Kamalkishor Pande and Ors. 2008 CriLJ 953 Guj
Mails
Abdul Rahaman Kunji v. State of W.B (¶¶66,71) 2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal
HC) Admissibility of Interview Transcripts
. State of Haryana (¶¶39-41) (2006) 11 SCC 1
v. Union of India (UOI) (¶¶15-17) 82 (1999) DLT 13
27
AIR 2019 SC 2377
2015 SCC OnLine Del 13647
2016 SCC OnLine Bom
2016 SCC OnLine Mad
2015 SCC OnLine Raj
(2015) 7 SCC 178 AIR 2005 SC 3820
SCC OnLine Del
AIR 2006 All 23
2015(2) RCR(Criminal) 289 P&H (2016) 2 RLW 945 (Raj) 2008 CriLJ 953 Guj
2016 CriLJ 1159 (Cal
(2006) 11 SCC 1
82 (1999) DLT 13
Other High Court 1. Sajidbeg Asifbeg Mirza v
G. Admissibility of Tape Recorded Conversations
Supreme Court
1. Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari and Ors (¶¶19)
2. R.M. Malkani v State of Maharashtra 3. N. Sri Rama Reddy and Ors. 4. Yusufalli Esmail Nagree
H. Electronic Evidence in Matrimonial Proceedings
High Court of Delhi 1. Archana v. Himanshu Bahl
2. A v. T
Other High Court
1. Pramod E. K. v. Louna V.C.
2. Karuppasamy v. State of T.N
3. Preeti Jain v. Kunal Jain
4. Vishal Kaushik v. Family Court &Anr.
5. Mrs. Havovi Kersi Sethna v. Mr. Kersi Gustad Sethna 25-28)
B. SUGGESTED READINGSA. Admissibility of electronic evidence1. Electronic Evidence- The Great Indian
Quagmire 2. Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
3. Rethinking Admissibility of Electronic Evidence
For Internal Circulation Only.
v State Of Gujarat (¶¶5-7,9) 2007 GLH (1) 400
(Gujarat)
Admissibility of Tape Recorded Conversations
Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra AIR 1975 SC 1788
R.M. Malkani v State of Maharashtra (¶¶23,27,29) AIR 1973 SC 157N. Sri Rama Reddy and Ors. v. V.V. Giri (¶¶23,27) AIR 1971 SC 1162Yusufalli Esmail Nagree v. The State of Maharashtra (¶6) AIR 1968 SC 147
Electronic Evidence in Matrimonial Proceedings
Archana v. Himanshu Bahl(¶¶22) I (2017) DMC 638 (DB)
(Del.)Del HC CM(M) 207/2018 Date of Decision: 28.05.2018
v. Louna V.C.(¶¶ 10, 11) 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 165
Karuppasamy v. State of T.N. (¶¶6,7) III (2017) DMC 525 (Mad.)
Kunal Jain (¶¶ 8, 9) 2016 SCC OnLine Raj 2838
Vishal Kaushik v. Family Court &Anr.(¶¶ 25) 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 7851
Mrs. Havovi Kersi Sethna v. Mr. Kersi Gustad Sethna (¶¶ 21, 2011 (3) Bom Cr 100
SUGGESTED READINGS Admissibility of electronic evidence
The Great Indian N. S. Nappinai
Electronic Evidence Justice Kurian Joseph
Rethinking Admissibility of Electronic Aradhya Sethia
28
2007 GLH (1) 400 (Gujarat)
AIR 1975 SC 1788
AIR 1973 SC 157 AIR 1971 SC 1162 AIR 1968 SC 147
I (2017) DMC 638 (DB) (Del.) Del HC CM(M) 207/2018 Date of Decision: 28.05.2018
2019 SCC OnLine Ker
III (2017) DMC 525 (Mad.) 2016 SCC OnLine Raj
2015 SCC OnLine Raj
2011 (3) Bom Cr 100
(2019) 3 SCC J-41 (2009) 3 SCC J-32 24 IJLIT 229-250 (2016)
Disclaimer- The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of
respective authors and producers. The views therein do not represent views of Delhi Judicial Academy.
For Internal Circulation Only.
The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of producers. The views therein do not represent views of
29
The suggested readings and suggested movies represent views of producers. The views therein do not represent views of