select the right technique for metals analysis in your ... … · lead 10 0.1 inorganic mercury 15...

1
Imminent guidelines for measuring elemental impurities in drug products Select the Right Technique for Metals Analysis in your Pharma QA/QC Lab The USP (United States Pharmacopeia) will soon be implementing new guidelines for measuring elemental impurities in drug products sold in the United States. Selecting a technique to use in your laboratory for Chapter <232> and <233> compliance requires consideration of these criteria: 1. Detection limits and measurement range 2. Analysis speed 3. The economics of ownership 1 ppq 1 ppt 1 ppb 1 ppm 1000 ppm 100% Measurement Range HR-ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP-OES AA: Graphite Furnace AA: Flame Detection Limits Consider the required detection limits for metals you will need to analyze. Will one technique cover all the metals you need to test, or will you require multiple techniques? Detection limits and measurement range Analysis speed Why the speed differences? The analysis speed is related to how each technique works. AAS (atomic absorption spectroscopy) Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, and atomized with either a flame or a graphite furnace. The gaseous atoms pass through a beam of light that is emitted from a radiation source at a single wavelength. The element for that wavelength absorbs an amount of light directly related to the concentration of the element in the sample. The process is repeated for each element. ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectroscopy) Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, atomized, and excited in an argon plasma. When the excited atoms relax back to the ground state, they emit characteristic wavelengths of light. A solid state detector collects all the emitted wavelengths of light simultaneously. For each wavelength, the amount of emitted light is directly proportional to the concentration of the element in the sample. ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry) Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, atomized, and ionized in an argon plasma. Each element has a different mass; once ionized, each element forms its own characteristic mass spectrum. An ion counting detector counts the number of ions at each mass-to-charge ratio, which is directly proportional to the concentration of each element in the sample. Consider the analysis time for each technique, and the number of samples you will need to test in a day. Which technique will fit into your production timelines? Does the same technique that supports your timeline also support the detection limits you require? The instrumentation you select must also work within your lab’s budget. Not just your budget for the initial purchase, but also for maintenance, consumables, training, and service. When you consider overall instrument performance (detection limits, linearity, target analytes) as well as your timelines and budget, which technique is right for your lab? ICP-OES 1-3 minutes per sample ICP-MS 1-3 minutes per sample AA: Graphite Furnace 2-3 minutes per element per sample replicate AA: Flame 15 seconds per element per sample Analysis Speed per Technique Faster Speed Lower Detection Limits ICP-MS ICP-OES AA Thermo Scientific iCE 3300 Series AA: Flame Thermo Scientific iCE 3500 Series AA: Graphite Furnace + Flame Thermo Scientific iCAP 7000 Series ICP-OES Thermo Scientific iCAP Q ICP-MS Thermo Scientific ELEMENT 2/XR High-Resolution ICP-MS Investment Performance The economics of ownership 3. For more information about the right technique for your lab, go to www.thermoscientific.com/usp232-233 or contact your Thermo Fisher Scientific sales person today. Need help? © 2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. PO90001-EN 1214S 1. 2. Element Daily Dose Permitted Daily Exposures μg/g Large Volume Parenteral Component Limit μg/g Compulsory elemental impurities Inorganic Arsenic 15 0.15 Cadmium 5.0 0.05 Lead 10 0.1 Inorganic Mercury 15 0.15 Elemental impurities (if used in the drug manufacturing process) Chromium 250 2.5 Copper 2500 25 Manganese 2500 25 Molybdenum 250 2.5 Nickel 250 2.5 Palladium 100 1.0 Platinum 100 1.0 Vanadium 250 2.5 Osmium 100 (combination not to exceed) 1.0 (combination not to exceed) Rhodium Ruthenium Iridium • The first 4 elements are mandatory. All laboratories must analyze for them.The remaining 12 elements must be analyzed if a laboratory uses them during their drug manufacturing process. • The maximum Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) is outlined for the two methods by which drugs are administered: enteral (oral, sublingual, rectal) and parenteral (intravenous) and is calculated based upon the recommended daily dosage for the drug. • J: The concentration (w/w) of the element(s) of interest at the Target Limit, appropriately diluted to the working range of the instrument. • Calibration and validation solutions must be prepared at concentrations that are at multiples of the calculated “J” value.

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Select the Right Technique for Metals Analysis in your ... … · Lead 10 0.1 Inorganic Mercury 15 0.15 Elemental impurities (if used in the drug manufacturing process) Chromium 250

Imminent guidelines for measuring elemental impurities in drug products

Select the Right Technique for Metals Analysis in your Pharma QA/QC Lab

The USP (United States Pharmacopeia) will soon be implementing new guidelines for measuring elemental impurities in drug products sold in the United States. Selecting a technique to use in your laboratory for Chapter <232> and <233> compliance

requires consideration of these criteria:

1. Detection limits and measurement range 2. Analysis speed 3. The economics of ownership

1 ppq 1 ppt 1 ppb 1 ppm 1000 ppm 100%

Measurement Range

HR-ICP-MS

ICP-MS

ICP-OES

AA: Graphite Furnace

AA: Flame

Detection Limits

Consider the required detection limits for metals you will need to analyze. Will one technique cover all the metals you need to test, or will you require multiple techniques?

Detection limits and measurement range

Analysis speed Why the speed differences?The analysis speed is related to how each technique works.

AAS (atomic absorption spectroscopy)• Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, and atomized with either a flame or a graphite furnace.• The gaseous atoms pass through a beam of light that is emitted from a radiation source at a single wavelength.• The element for that wavelength absorbs an amount of light directly related to the concentration of the element in the sample. The process is repeated for each element.

ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectroscopy)• Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, atomized, and excited in an argon plasma.• When the excited atoms relax back to the ground state, they emit characteristic wavelengths of light.• A solid state detector collects all the emitted wavelengths of light simultaneously.• For each wavelength, the amount of emitted light is directly proportional to the concentration of the element in the sample.

ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry)• Liquid samples are desolvated, vaporized, atomized, and ionized in an argon plasma.• Each element has a different mass; once ionized, each element forms its own characteristic mass spectrum.• An ion counting detector counts the number of ions at each mass-to-charge ratio, which is directly proportional to the concentration of each element in the sample.

Consider the analysis time for each technique, and the number of samples you will need to test in a day. Which technique will fit into your production timelines? Does the same technique that supports your timeline also support the detection limits you require?

The instrumentation you select must also work within your lab’s budget. Not just your budget for the initial purchase, but also for maintenance, consumables, training, and service. When you consider overall instrument performance (detection limits, linearity, target analytes) as well as your timelines and budget, which technique is right for your lab?

ICP-OES1−3 minutes per sample

ICP-MS1−3 minutes per sample

AA: Graphite Furnace2−3 minutes per element per sample replicate

AA: Flame15 seconds per element per sample

Analysis Speed per Technique

Fast

er S

pee

d

Lower Detection Limits

ICP-MSICP-OESAA

Thermo Scientific™ iCE™ 3300 SeriesAA: Flame

Thermo Scientific™ iCE™ 3500 SeriesAA: Graphite Furnace + Flame

Thermo Scientific™ iCAP™ 7000 SeriesICP-OES

Thermo Scientific™ iCAP™ Q

ICP-MS

Thermo Scientific™ ELEMENT™ 2/XRHigh-Resolution ICP-MS

Investment

Per

form

ance

The economics of ownership

3.

For more information about the right technique for your lab, go to

www.thermoscientific.com/usp232-233

or contact your Thermo Fisher Scientific sales person today.

Need help?

© 2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved.

PO90001-EN 1214S

1.

2.

ElementDaily Dose Permitted Daily Exposures μg/g

Large Volume Parenteral Component Limit μg/g

Compulsory elemental impurities

Inorganic Arsenic 15 0.15

Cadmium 5.0 0.05

Lead 10 0.1

Inorganic Mercury 15 0.15

Elemental impurities (if used in the drug manufacturing process)

Chromium 250 2.5

Copper 2500 25

Manganese 2500 25

Molybdenum 250 2.5

Nickel 250 2.5

Palladium 100 1.0

Platinum 100 1.0

Vanadium 250 2.5

Osmium100 (combination not to

exceed)1.0 (combination not to

exceed)RhodiumRutheniumIridium

• The first 4 elements are mandatory. All laboratories must analyze for them.The remaining 12 elements must be analyzed if a laboratory uses them during their drug manufacturing process.

• The maximum Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) is outlined for the two methods by which drugs are administered: enteral (oral, sublingual, rectal) and parenteral (intravenous) and is calculated based upon the recommended daily dosage for the drug.

• J: The concentration (w/w) of the element(s) of interest at the Target Limit, appropriately diluted to the working range of the instrument.

• Calibration and validation solutions must be prepared at concentrations that are at multiples of the calculated “J” value.