seismic interpretation of the eastern gippsland basin with application … · 2012-08-29 ·...

191
Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis in carbon dioxide storage leads by Jacques Sayers, M.Sc., B.Sc. Hons Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Adelaide Faculty of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences Australian School of Petroleum May 2011

Upload: others

Post on 06-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with

application to fault seal analysis in carbon dioxide storage

leads

by

Jacques Sayers, M.Sc., B.Sc. Hons

Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

The University of Adelaide

Faculty of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences

Australian School of Petroleum

May 2011

Page 2: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________ ___________________________

(i) Figure A1.1 illustrates the datasets used by well-location, and Tables A1.1–1.2 lists the data

availability. Table A1.1 also provides the well names for well abbreviations, the latter used in

structure and isopach maps enclosed in this thesis.

(ii) Figure A1.2 provides a palynology zonations chart for the Gippsland Basin: the chart is used

to relate the palynology to the stratigraphy (Chapter 2

PREFACE—APPENDICES 1–3 _________________________

Appendix-1 figures, tables and text support the geological context in this thesis, as follows:

).

(iii) Section A1.2 details the methodology used for interpreting age-depth plots (Figures A1.3–

1.33): the latter provide additional hiatus markers that tie to the seismic data (Chapter 3).

(iv) The NEW hiatus-markers interpreted from the age-depth plots are listed in Tables A1.3–1.16

(Chapter 3); thus, adding to markers and tops that are publicly available.

(v) Tables A1.17–1.95 list publicly available formation tops and hiatus markers interpreted in this

study for individual wells. The depths and TWTs provide well-tie information for cross-sections

and seismic sections enclosed in this thesis, as well as providing a ready-made database for

future studies.

(vi) Table A1.96 lists the top of volcanic horizons intersected in wells. Volcanic horizons help

identify the top of the Golden Beach Subgroup and provide input into the understanding of

tectonovolcanic evolution (Chapter 3) and sealing across-fault (Chapter 6).

Appendix-2 figures, tables and text support the geophysical context in this thesis, as follows:

(i) Section A2.1 describes and encloses pertinent information regarding the acquisition and

processing of the seismic 3-D cube used in this study.

(ii) Section A2.2 describes and encloses pertinent information regarding the seismic

interpretation; in particular, seismic resolution considerations as well as testing of the seismic

variance attribute (Chapter 3). Depth structure and time thickness maps are also enclosed

(Figures A2.6–2.11).

(iii) Section A2.3 shows the checkshot data and well-to-seismic tie information available to this

study (Tables A2.4–2.73). The checkshot data/plots provide gross depth-conversion

information for cross-sections and seismic sections enclosed herein; the data also forms a

fundamental input to the depth conversion performed in this study (Chapter 4).

271

Page 3: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Preface—Appendices 1–3

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

272

(iv) Section A2.4 summarises secondary geophysical programs used in the UNIX environment.

(v) Section A2.5 pertains to input parameters, methodology and outputs resulting from the depth

conversion performed in this study (Chapter 4). Included are:

a checkshot plot for all wells, thus illustrating the regional spread (Figure A2.12);

the front-ends to the WitosoftC depth-conversion software (Figure A2.13);

depth-error plots for well groupings (Figures A2.14–2.19); these illustrate the limitations of

the depth conversion, and;

the polynomial file that has the TWT-to-depth information input to the WitosoftC depth-

conversion software (Table A2.74).

Appendix-3 figures, tables and text support the fault seal analysis performed in this study, as

follows:

tables A3.1–3.2 show the log availability as well as the petrophysical parameters input to the

PetroViewPlusTM software that generated the Vshale curves (Chapter 6);

the available in situ state of stress interpretations used in Chapter 7 are shown in Table A3.3;

figures A3.1–3.2 show frequency-of-occurrence histograms of the gamma-ray; these were

used to calculate sand and shale lines (Chapter 6), and;

the gamma ray-to-core comparison of four wells is shown in Figures A3.3–3.4 (Chapter 6).

The abbreviations that follow are used herein and will not be duplicated in figure and table captions.

Abs absent Fm formation Gp Group KB kelly bushing MD measured depth MSL mean sea level

NA not applicable SS subsea TD total depth TWT two way travel time 3-D three dimensional seismic data & cube WD water depth

Page 4: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX 1—GEOLOGICAL DATASETS AND INTERPRETATION

________________________________________________________________________________

A1.1 Well datasets and data distribution

FigRed coloured well symbols haveSee Table A1.1 for well abbreviations.

ure A1.1. Maps showing wells no data. Yellow

that have (a) WCoutline—limit of

Rs, (b) well logseismi

s, (c grid, pink outline—limit oc) tops/markers, and (d) age

f full-fold seismi-depth plots.

c data.

273

Page 5: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 6: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well name Abbreviation UWI Latitude Longitude Operator Company Permit Spud date Released Deviated Shows Status Admiral-1 Ad-1 1000000110134 -38.152 148.649 ESSO Aust. Ltd VIC/P19 22-Nov-89 8-Dec-89 No Dry A Angelfish-1 Af-1 1000000110753 -38.244 148.381 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 11-Nov-85 23-Dec-85 No O & G A Athene-1 At-1 1000000111091 -38.596 148.457 Phillips Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P18 22-May-83 4-Sep-83 No Dry A Baleen-1 Ba-1 1000000111277 -38.009 148.437 Hudbay Oil Aust. Ltd VIC/P11 4-Nov-81 30-Nov-81 ? G S Baleen-2 Ba-2 1000002304752 -38.031 148.412 OMV Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/R5 11-Oct-99 19-Oct-99 No O & G A Baleen-3 Ba-3 200001805218 -38.004 148.444 OMV Aust.Pty Ltd VIC/L21 24-May-02 20-Jun-02 No G S Baleen-4 Ba-4 200004005444 -38.004 148.444 Basin Oil ? ? ? ? ? C Basker-1 Bk-1 1000000111853 -38.306 148.699 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 21-Apr-83 10-Sep-83 No O & G A Basker South-1 No Bksth-1 1000000111975 -38.318 148.691 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 23-Nov-83 6-Jan-84 Dry A Batfish-1 Bt-1 1000000112083 -38.225 148.405 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 6-Apr-70 27-May-70 No G A Bignose-1 BN-1 1000000112239 -38.354 148.603 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 16-Sep-83 21-Nov-83 No O & G A Blackback-1 Bb-1 1000000112358 -38.549 148.563 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P24 25-Mar-89 23-Jul-89 ? O A Blackback-2 Bb-2 1000000112482 -38.556 148.545 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P24 18-Sep-92 1-Nov-92 ? O & G A Blackback-3 Bb-3 1000000112591 -38.558 148.519 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P24 18-Mar-94 14-Apr-94 ? O & G A Chimaera-1 Ch-1 1000000113338 -38.264 148.723 Shell Dev. Aus. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 28-Mar-84 19-May-84 No Dry A Cobia-1 C-1 1000000113446 -38.456 148.285 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 4-Aug-72 27-Aug-72 ? O A Cobia-2 C-2 1000000113540 -38.457 148.306 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 2-May-77 24-May-77 ? O S Culverin-1 Cu-1 200004739730 -38.402 148.654 Nexus Energy Aust. NL VIC/P56 16-Dec-05 15-Jan-06 ? ? A Drummer-1 Du-1 1000000114078 -38.475 148.251 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 1-Oct-85 21-Oct-85 ? Dry A East Halibut-1 EH-1 1000000114166 -38.408 148.351 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 7-Sep-85 30-Sep-85 ? O A East Pilchard-1 EP-1 200001802742 -38.197 148.563 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L9 3-Jul-01 13-Aug-01 No O & G S Flathead-1 FH-1 1000000114542 -38.021 148.536 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 25-Apr-69 26-Jun-69 ? O A Flounder-1 F-1 1000000114631 -38.313 148.426 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 19-Jul-68 11-Oct-68 No O A Flounder-2 F-2 1000000114710 -38.32 148.449 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 18-Feb-69 ? ? O S Flounder-3 F-3 1000000114787 -38.315 148.474 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 24-Apr-69 ? ? O A Flounder-4 F-4 1000000114859 -38.305 148.498 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 28-Dec-72 27-Jan-73 ? O & G A Flounder-5 F-5 1000000114940 -38.305 148.45 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L11 2-Feb-75 19-Feb-75 No Dry S Flounder-6 F-6 1000000115011 -38.317 148.437 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L11 12-Jul-77 2-Jan-78 No O & G S Fortescue-1 Fr-1 1000000115154 -38.373 148.24 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 17-Jun-78 16-Jul-78 No Dry A Fortescue-2 Fr-2 1000000115246 -38.431 148.268 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 30-Oct-78 25-Nov-78 No O A Fortescue-3 Fr-3 1000000115337 -38.388 148.269 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 26-Nov-78 25-Dec-78 No O A Fortescue-4 Fr-4 1000000115430 -38.415 148.278 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 18-Mar-79 12-Apr-79 No O A Grayling-1 Gl-1 200004632869 -38.161 148.293 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P54 ? ? ? ? A Great white-1 Gi-1 1000000115736 -38.45 148.628 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P24 26-Dec-96 17-Jan-97 No Dry A

275

Page 7: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well name Abbreviation UWI Latitude Longitude Operator Company Permit Spud date Released Deviated Shows Status Grunter-1 Gr-1 1000000115968 -38.271 148.517 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L11 14-Sep-84 28-Nov-84 No O & G A Gudgeon-1 Gu-1 1000000116082 -38.514 148.469 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L6 10-Mar-95 11-May-95 No O S Gummy-1 Gm-1 1000000116190 -38.298 148.741 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 4-May-90 10-Jun-90 No G A Halibut-1 H-1 1000000116374 -38.398 148.317 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. PEP38 20-Jun-67 ? ? ? S Halibut-2 H-2 1000000116458 -38.394 148.331 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 16-Feb-94 10-Mar-94 ? ? A Hammerhead-1 Hh-1 1000000116550 -38.175 148.834 ? ? ? ? No Dry ? Hapuku-1 Hp-1 1000000116654 -38.554 148.55 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. ? ? ? ? ? A Judith-1 J-1 1000000117055 -38.154 148.557 Shell Dev. Aus. Pty Ltd VIC/P11 14-Oct-89 21-Nov-89 No Dry A Kahawai-1 Ka-1 1000000117163 -38.171 148.37 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 26-May-82 19-Jun-82 No Dry A Kipper-1 Kp-1 1000000118146 -38.175 148.598 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P19 5-Mar-86 11-Apr-86 No O & G A Kipper-2 Kp-2 1000000118256 -38.191 148.614 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P19 12-Mar-87 22-Apr-87 No O & G A Leatherjacket-1 Lj-1 1000000118452 -38.086 148.78 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P19 23-Feb-86 4-Mar-86 No O A Longtom-1 Lt-1 200006024675 -38.098 148.316 BHP Petroleum VIC/P1 12-May-95 14-Jun-95 Yes G A Longtom-2 Lt-2 20004673858 -38.103 148.317 Apache Petroleum VIC/P54 ? ? ? ? ? Maclean-1 Mc-1 200004742555 -38.046 148.548 Bass Strait Oil Co ? ? ? ? ? A Mackerel-1 Mk-1 1000000118784 -38.48 148.358 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 26-Mar-69 23-Apr-69 No O A Mackerel-2 Mk-2 1000000118862 -38.486 148.34 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 14-Feb-72 30-Mar-72 ? O A Mackerel-3 Mk-3 1000000118943 -38.472 148.364 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 1-Apr-72 26-Apr-72 ? O A Mackerel-4 Mk-4 1000000119022 -38.512 148.316 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 11-Feb-73 10-May73 No O A Manta-1 Ma-1 1000000119099 -38.273 148.723 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd VIC/P19 8-Jan-84 23-Mar-84 No O & G A Manta-2 Ma-2 200004951957 -38.277 148.716 Shell Dev. Aust. Pty Ltd ? 17-Jan-06 24-Feb-06 ? ? A Marlin-4 M-4 1000000119459 -38.239 148.269 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. Vic/L4 5-Oct-73 24-Oct-73 ? ? ? Moby-1 Mb-1 200004230993 -38.027 148.509 Bass Strait Oil Pty Ltd ? 7-Oct-04 17-Oct-04 ? ? A Morwong-1 Mr-1 1000000119931 -38.227 148.314 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 10-Dec-72 ? ? Dry A Opah-1 O-1 1000000120478 -38.528 148.280 ? ? 24/2/1977 ? ? ? ? Patricia-1 Pt-1 W3870014 -38.03 148.448 Lasmo Energy Aust. VIC/P11 26-Jun-87 18-Jul-87 ? G S Patricia-2 Pt-2 200001805219 -38.026 148.451 OMV Australia Pty Ltd VIC/L21 ? ? No G S Pilotfish-1A Pf-1A 1000000121240 -38.431 148.47 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L6 17-Dec-82 21-Jan-83 No Dry A Rockling-1 Rc-1 1000000121505 -38.458 148.231 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 27-Dec-78 15-Jan-79 No Dry A Scallop-1 Sc-1 200002248101 -38.214 148.591 Woodside Petroleum Ltd VIC/RL2 2-Feb-03 4-Mar-03 No O & G A Smiler-1 Sm-1 1000000122269 -38.48 148.389 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 2-Jul-95 16-Jul-95 No Dry A Sperm whale-1 SW-1 1000000123213 -38.056 148.366 Hudbay Oil (Aust) Ltd VIC/P11 26-Dec-81 22-Jan-82 No O & G A Stonefish-1 St-1 1000000123325 -38.249 148.561 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 26-Jul-73 29-Aug-73 No Dry A Sweep-1 Sw-1 1000000123607 -38.056 148.638 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 18-Jul-78 29-Jul-78 No Dry A

276

Page 8: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

277

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well name Abbreviation UWI Latitude Longitude Operator Company Permit Spud date Released Deviated Shows Status Tailor-1 Tl-1 1000000123964 -38.491 148.275 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 4-Nov-69 23-Nov-69 ? O A Teraglin-1 Tg-1 1000000124240 -38.379 148.343 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 30-Apr-83 2-Jun-83 No Dry A Terakihi-1 Te-1 1000000124342 -38.504 148.547 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P24 30-Mar-90 No O S 1-May-90 Trevally-1 Tv-1 1000000124706 -38.288 148.396 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 28-Jan-70 17-Feb-70 No Dry A Trumpeter-1 Tp-1 1000000124791 -38.412 148.351 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 8-Sep-89 12-Oct-89 No G A Tukari-1 Tu-1 1000000076657 -38.336 148.413 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 & 6 3-Jun-98 26-Jun-98 Yes G A Tuna-1 T-1 1000000124881 -38.172 148.419 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 7-May-68 ? ? O & G A Tuna-2 T-2 1000000124967 -38.18 148.388 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 30-Oct-68 9-Dec-69 ? O & G A Tuna-3 T-3 1000000125053 -38.168 148.448 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 18-Feb-70 ? ? O & G A Tuna-4 T-4 1000000125135 -38.188 148.37 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 18-May-84 31-Aug-84 No O & G A Turrum-1 Tr-1 1000000125253 -38.201 148.246 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L3 15-May-69 27-Jun-69 ? G A Turrum-3 Tr-3 1000000125423 -38.26 148.251 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L3 8-Mar-85 22-Apr-85 ? ? A Turrum-4 Tr-4 1000000000529 -38.276 148.264 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 28-Oct-92 15-Nov-92 ? Dry A Turrum-7 Tr-7 1000002305570 -38.263 148.265 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 24-Aug-99 20-Sep-99 ? O & G A Volador-1 Vo-1 1000000125970 -38.423 148.545 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P19 26-Dec-82 19-Apr-83 No O & G A West Fortescue-1 WF-1 1000000126157 -38.364 148.241 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/P1 30-Apr-84 16-May84 No O A West Halibut-1 WH-1 1000000126252 -38.402 148.284 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 3-Sep-78 27-Sep-78 No O A West Tuna-W8 WT-8 1000000077755 -38.189 148.37 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 29-Apr-97 15-Jun-97 Yes O C West Tuna-W31 WT-31 1000000077695 -38.192 148.389 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 4-May-98 20-Jun-98 Yes O C West Tuna-W32 WT-32 1000000077698 -38.192 148.383 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. ? ? ? ? ? C West Tuna-W37 WT-37 1000000077713 -38.194 148.373 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. ? ? ? ? ? C West Tuna-W39 WT-39 1000000077719 -38.193 148.387 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 16-Jul-97 21-Aug-97 ? O C West Tuna-W44 WT-44 1000000077737 -38.209 148.382 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 16-Dec-97 1/02/1998 Yes O C Whale-1 Wl-1 1000000126558 -38.02 148.561 Lasmo Energy Australia VIC/P11 1-Dec-81 25-Dec-81 No Dry A Wrasse-1 Wr-1 1000000127377 -38.323 148.277 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L4 27-Oct-83 25-Nov-83 No Dry A Yellowtail-1 Yt-1 1000000127559 -38.525 148.275 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 17-Oct-81 9-Nov-81 ? O A Yellowtail-2 Yt-2 1000000127675 -38.532 148.283 ESSO E & P Aust. Inc. VIC/L5 20-Jun-82 10-Jul-82 ? O P & A

Table A1.1. Basic well information. Latitude/longitude uses GDA-94. A—abandoned, C & S—cased and suspended, C—completed, G—gas, O—oil, UWI—unique well identifier.

Page 9: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 10: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well In/out

3-D Well (GA)

Well (DPIVIC)

WCR (DPIVIC)

Logs (ASP)

Logs loaded

Dev.

Checkshot (GA/DPIVIC)

Age- Tops depth

Ad-1 I y y y y y y y y y Af-1 I y y y MW y n y y y At-1 O y n y MW n n y n y Ba-1 O y n y y y n y y y Ba-2 I y y y MW n n y n y Ba-3 O y y n MW n n n n n Ba-4 O y y n n n n n n n Bk-1 O y y y y y n y y y

Bksth-1 O y y y y y n y y y Bt-1 I y y y MW y n y y y BN-1 I y y y y y n y y y Bb-1 O y n y y n y y y y Bb-2 O y n y n n n n y y Bb-3 O y n y y n n n y y Ch-1 O n n y y y y n y y C-1 I y n y y y n y y y C-2 I y n y y y n y y y

Cu-1 O y y n MW n n n n n Du-1 I n n y y y n y y y EH-1 I y n y y y n y y y EP-1 I y y y MW y y y n y FH-1 O y y y n n n y n y F-1 I y y y y y n y y y F-2 I y n y y y n y y y F-3 I y n y y y n y y y F-4 I y n y y y n y y y F-5 I y y y y y n y y y F-6 I y y y y y n y y y Fr-1 I y y y y y n y y y Fr-2 I y y y y y n y y y Fr-3 I y y y y y y y y y Fr-4 I y y y y y y y y y Gl-1 I y n n MW n n n n n Gi-1 O n y y MW n y y y y Gr-1 I n y y y y n y y y Gu-1 O n n y MW n y y y y Gm-1 O n y y y y n y n y H-1 I n n y y y n y y y H-2 I n n y y y y y y y

Hh-1 O n n y y n y y y y Hp-1 O n n y y y n y y y J-1 I n y y y y y y n y

Ka-1 I n y y MW n n y y y Kp-1 I n y y y y n y y y Kp-2 I n y y y y n y n y Lj-1 O n y y y y n y y y Lt-1 I n y y y n y y y y Lt-2 O y y n MW n n n n n Ma-1 O n y n n n n n n y Ma-2 O ? y n n n n n n n Mc-1 I ? ? y ? n ? ? n n Mk-1 I n y y y y n y y y Mk-2 O y n y y y n n y y Mk-3 I y n y y y n n y y Mk-4 O n y y MW n n y y y

279

Page 11: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well In/out 3-D

Well (GA)

Well (DPIVIC)

WCR (DPIVIC)

Logs (ASP)

Logs loaded

Dev.

Checkshot (GA/DPIVIC)

Age-depth

Tops

M-4 I y y y y y n y n y Mb-1 O n y n MW n n n n n Mr-1 I n n y y y n y y y O-1 O ? ? y ? n n n n n Pt-1 I n n y y n n y y y Pt-2 O n y n MW n n n n n

Pf-1A I n y y y y n y y y Rc-1 I n n y y y n y y y Sc-1 I n y y MW y n y n y Sm-1 I n y y MW n n y y y SW-1 I n y y MW n n y y y St-1 I n y y y y n y y y Sw-1 O n y y y y n y y y Tl-1 O n n n n y ? y n y Tg-1 I n y y y y n y y y Te-1 O n n y MW y y y y y Tv-1 I n y y y y n y y y Tp-1 I n y y y y n n y y Tu-1 I n y y MW n n n n n T-1 I y n y y y n y y y T-2 I y n y MW n n n y y T-3 I y n y y y n y y y T-4 I y y y y y y y y y Tr-1 O y y y y y n y n y Tr-3 I y y y y y n y n y Tr-4 I y y y y y y y n y Tr-7 I y y y n n y n n y Vo-1 I n y y y y n y n y WF-1 I n y y y y n y y y WH-1 I n y y y y n y y y WT-8 I n y n y y y n n y WT-31 I y y n y y y n n n WT-32 I y y n y n n n n n WT-37 I y y n y n n n n n WT-39 I y n n y y y n n n WT-44 I y y n y y y n n n Wl-1 O n y y MW n n y y y Wr-1 I n y y y y n y y y Yt-1 O y y n n n n y y y Yt-2 O y y n n n n Y n y

Table A1.2. Status of basic well-data availability. Column 1—see Table A1.1 for well abbreviations. Column 2—refers to whether well is inside (I) or outside (O) the 3-D seismic grid. Columns 3 to 5—source for data (GA—Geoscience Australia, www.ga.gov.au—data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications; DPIVIC—Department of Primary Industries Victoria, www.dpi.vic.gov.au/minpet/geovic). Column 6—source of data (Australian School of Petroleum (ASP); Mike Wiltshire (MW)). Dev.—well deviation data, n—no, data unavailable; y—yes, data available.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

280

Page 12: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

A1.2 Formation tops and hiatus mA com

drilled iffering tops nomenclatures: a

consistent nomenclature is thus publicly unavailable. As such, a robust process of iteration,

el

datab

H

over der to better meet research objectives

(C

(Chap oth Industry-based formation top data as well as

hiatus markers interpreted herein (Tables A1.17–1.95). The information in the ‘group’, ‘subgroup’ and

‘hiatus marker/formation top’ columns as well as the row colour scheme is compatible with the new

formation top/hiatus marker nomenclature. The process of iteration, elimination and verification was

used to ascertain the provenance and reasoning for inclusion of the formation tops and hiatus

marker data in the ‘Depth’, ‘TWT’ and ‘Source/remark’ columns of Tables A1.17–1.95. The process

is described below, in order of increased reliability.

(i) Formation tops were obtained from Partridge (1999), DPIVIC (2006), Geoscience Australia

(2006) and from individual WCRs. Any depth discrepancies noted were recorded and the most

reliable estimate taken; discrepancies were for the most part limited to a few meters. The low

level of discrepancy comes from the fact that both Partridge (1999) and DPIVIC (2006) worked

closely together, both being based in Victoria and closely associated with the Gippsland

Basins’ operators. Then, TWTs were estimated using checkshot data and subsequently cross-

checked against unconformities interpreted on the seismic data.

(ii) Age-depth plots were readily available from Geoscience Australia’s online petroleum

databases (www.ga.gov—data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells

applications) and these provided a quick and reliable estimation of key hiatus markers

(Figures A1.17–1.95).

(iii) Historically, palynological interpretations have been incorporated within Geoscience Australia’s

STRATDAT petroleum database (i.e. stratigraphic), with raw data originating from WCRs.

STRATDAT has its own language to precisely store well palynology including a dictionary for

all species zones and/or formations. The dictionary stores a maximum and minimum age

range for any one species zone as well as storing alternatives based on different age schemes

arkers prehensive tops database was set up based on a consistent nomenclature. Exploration wells

over 45 have resulted in formation tops recorded according to d

imination and verification was used to maximize and standardize formation tops across the well

ase as well as incorporate hiatus markers.

iatus markers were interpreted where possible and linked to seismic horizons; these were favored

reservoir or formation-based markers in or

hapter 1: Figure 1.3). The new formation top/hiatus marker nomenclature established in this study

ter 3: Figure 3.4) was required to account for b

281

Page 13: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

and/or charts (e.g. in Australia Roger Morgan, Partridge (1999), Monteil (2006), ESSO

Australia in the case of Gippsland Basin data). Quality of confidence ratings is also stored,

where quality is dependant on: (i) the uncertainty of the ages stored in the dictionary; (ii) gaps

in the fossil record; (iii) non-linear rates of deposition; (iv) which parts of the data the program

honors and rejects, mainly based on the quality ranking; (v) which time-scale is used; (vi) non-

entry of repeat sections, and (vii) incorrect entries due to operator error.

(iv) Depths to hiatus markers were estimated by downward and upward extrapolation from known

formation tops and where geologically warranted: such markers are classed as ‘inferred’ in the

‘Source/remarks’ column. An example would be where a ‘top Kingfish Fm’ top was originally

reported from one of the above three sources, but where the term Mackerel Unconformity is

not used; in such a case, the depths are equivalent and the top renamed.

(v) If no formation tops existed or if hiatuses could not be estimated from age-depth plots, such

cases were coined as ‘no well info’. Formation tops could also be estimated as being absent,

coined ‘abs.’, where the seismic interpretation showed an interval as being eroded out. Such

cases occurred within the Tuna-Flounder, Marlin and Hapuku Channels. Lastly, a ‘?’ was used

to portray cases where the formation tops were expected to be present but no information was

available (i.e. no tops, age-depth, TWT).

(vi) The TWTs for all seismic horizons were interpreted and recorded at all well locations, even in

cases where tops were unavailable: such cases were coined as ‘interpreted on 3-D’ in the

‘Source/remarks’ column. If hiatus boundaries had coalesced, and could therefore not be

uniquely interpreted, TWTs were coined as being ‘inferred on 3-D’ in the ‘Source/remarks’

column. The TWTs were occasionally coined as ‘jump-tie’ where the well was located just

outside the seismic grid, if the location was too distant that case was labeled as ‘outside 3-D

grid’. Depths were obtained from checkshot plots and cross-checked against age-depth plots

so as to assure that the TWT interpretation was consistent with the palynology.

(vii) Increased levels of confidence in the formation top or hiatus marker pick were represented,

respectively, as ‘?’, ‘~’, ‘inferred on 3-D’, ‘interpreted on 3-D’, ‘inferred’, and the source quoted.

Depths obtained from checkshot plots, and cross-checked against age-depth plots, resulted in

as robust a way that was available to provide the highest number of formation tops and hiatus

markers from disparate datasets.

(viii) Markers within the Seaspray Group are fewer in number and not as reliable as the Latrobe

Group picks, because of the associated under-sampling of the palynology in the upper section.

282

Page 14: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

283

Feary and Loutit (1998) carried out a seismic stratigraphy study of the Seaspray Group with a

total of 16 sequences interpreted along two transects; their TWTs were used for estimating

hiatus markers in the Seaspray Group. Their interpretation was also compared to Partridge’s

(1999) interpretation, where available, and with age-depth plots.

(ix) Markers within the Latrobe Group are deemed the most reliable, plentiful and most worked on

because of their association to petroleum-bearing reservoirs.

(x) Only TWTs are provided below total depth (TD); markers for the Golden Beach and Emperor

Subgroups and Otway Group, are less frequent.

(xi) Lastly, depths and TWTs of all volcanics intersected in wells are provided to enable

associations to be made with tectonic events.

Page 15: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 16: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

NOTE:

This figure is included on page 285 of the print copy of the thesis held in the University of Adelaide Library.

Page 17: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 18: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.3. Age-depth plot for (a) Admiral-1, and (b) Angelfish-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots— www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

287

Page 19: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.4. Age-depth plot for (a) Baleen-1, and (b) Basker-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

288

Page 20: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.5. Age-depth plot for (a) Basker South-1, and (b) Batfish-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

289

Page 21: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.6. Age-depth plot for (a) Bignose-1, and (b) Blackback-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

290

Page 22: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.7. Age-depth plot for (a) Blackback-2, and (b) Blackback-3. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

291

Page 23: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.8. Age-depth plot for (a) Chimaera-1, and (b) Cobia-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

292

Page 24: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.9. Age-depth plot for (a) Cobia-2, and (b) Drummer-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

293

Page 25: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.10. Age-depth plot for (a) East Halibut-1, and (b) Flounder-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

294

Page 26: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.11. Age-depth plot for (a) Flounder-2, and (b) Flounder-3. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

295

Page 27: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.12. Age-depth plot for (a) Flounder-4, and (b) Flounder-5. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

296

Page 28: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.13. Age-depth plot for (a) Flounder-6, and (b) Fortescue-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

297

Page 29: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.14. Age-depth plot for (a) Fortescue-2, and (b) Fortescue-3. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

298

Page 30: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.15. Age-depth plot for (a) Fortescue-4, and (b) Great White-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

299

Page 31: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.16. Age-depth plot for (a) Grunter-1, and (b) Gudgeon-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

300

Page 32: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.17. Age-depth plot for (a) Halibut-1, and (b) Halibut-2. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

301

Page 33: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.18. Age-depth plot for (a) Hammerhead-1, and (b) Hapuku-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

302

Page 34: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.19. Age-depth plot for (a) Kahawai-1, and (b) Kipper-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

303

Page 35: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.20. Age-depth plot for (a) Leatherjacket-1, and (b) Longtom-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

304

Page 36: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.21. Age-depth plot for (a) Mackerel-1, and (b) Mackerel-2. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

305

Page 37: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.22. Age-depth plot for (a) Mackerel-3, and (b) Mackerel-4. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

306

Page 38: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.23. Age-depth plot for (a) Morwong-1, and (b) Patricia-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

307

Page 39: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.24. Age-depth plot for (a) Pilotfish-1A, and (b) Rockling-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

308

Page 40: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.25. Age-depth plot for (a) Smiler-1, and (b) Sperm Whale-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

309

Page 41: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.26. Age-depth plot for (a) Stonefish-1, and (b) Sweep-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

________________________________________________________________________________________________

310

Page 42: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.27. Age-depth plot for (a) Teraglin-1, and (b) Terakihi-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

311

Page 43: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

) (a

(b)

Figure A1.28. Age-depth plot for (a) Trevally-1, and (b) Trumpeter-1. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

312

Page 44: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.29. Age-depth plot for (a) Tuna-1, and (b) Tuna-2. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

313

Page 45: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.30. Age-depth plot for (a) Tuna-3, and (b) Tuna-4. Age and sea level curve are after Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

314

Page 46: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.31. Age-depth plot fo t Fortesc (b) West ut-1. Age and sea level curve are afte t al. (1987 of age-d ots—www ov (data a pplications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications).

r (a) Wes ue-1, and Halibr Haq e ). Source epth pl .ga.g nd a

315

Page 47: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A1.32. Age-depth plot for (a) Whale-1, nd (b) Wrassurve are ter Haq et al. (1987). Source of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications, petroleum ells application ).

a e-1. Age and sea level cenergy, applications,

af w s

316

Page 48: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A1.33. Age-dep cur

th plot for Yellowtail-1. ve are af ource of age-depth plots—www.ga.gov (data and applications,

, petroleum w lls applicationsAge and sea level ter Haq et al. (1987). Senergy, applications

e ).

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Kipper-1 2196.5.0 2296.0 85.7 89.0 G Longtom-1 1510.0 1567.0 67 89.7 P Combined hiatus 67.0 89.7 LongSS hiatus ~ 85.7 ~ 89.0

Table -depth plot-derived arkers m Unco ity (Long n). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—p

A1.3. Age hiatus m —Longto nform SS horizooor.

Well Min. depth (m) Max. d e )pth (m Min. a a) ge (M Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Angelfish-1 3246.7 3324.0 69.2? 73.7? Av Hapuku-1 364 36 72.3 46.9 5.0 84.7 Av Kipper-1 189 19 75.0 95.0 5.0 80.5 P Longtom-1 151 15 60.0 67.0 7.0 89.7 P Stonefish-1 306 31 79.0 25.4 6.8 80.5 Av Tuna-3 215 23 73.7 4.0 84.7 80.5 P Combined hiatus Av, P, G 67 89.7 SeahSS hiatus ~ ~ 76.8 80.5 Av

Table -depth plot-derived rkers—Seahorse Unconformity (SeahSS horizon). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—poor. Outliers (?) ignored.

A1.4. Age hiatus ma

Well Min. depth (m) Max. ) depth (m Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Basker-1 31 3122.5 10.8 69.4? 69.8 Av. Batfish-1 24 2468.8 50.5 67.1 68.3 Av Batfish-1 26 2622.5 09.7 69.4? 73.7 Av Bignose-1 36 397.0 925.0 68.3? 73.7 P Chimaera-1 24 252 475.8 67.1 68.3 Av. Grunter-1 296 31.0 007.0 66.5 68.3 Av

317

Page 49: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

29 3Hapuku-1 90.0 009.9 67.0 72.0 VG Kipper-1 185 1895.0 5.0 67.0 75.0 Av Pilotfish-1A 34 300.1 424.5 66.9 69.5 G Stonefish-1 289 24.3 910.2 69.4? 73.7 G Tuna-3 19 2005.2 90.3 67.1 68.3 Av Tuna-4 22 2336.1 99.5 67.1 68.3 VG Combined hiatus 66.5 75.0 ILHalS hiatus 68.2 68.3

Table e-depth plot-derived rkers—ILHalS unconformity (ILHalS horizon). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—poor. Outliers (?) ignored.

A1.5. Ag hiatus ma

Well Min. depth m) ( Max. dep (m)th Min. a a) ge (M Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Angelfish-1 2505.0 2536.0 64.8? 65.7 G Bignose-1 2666.0 2745.0 59.5 64.3? G Flounder-1 2496.9 2519.7 64.5 65.7 G Flounder-2 2512.4? 2530.1 64.7? 65.7 P? Flounder-4 2467.6? 2509.1 64.5 65.7 P? Flounder-6 3 6 G 2449 2467. 64.7 5.7 Grunter-1 .0 .0 64.7? P 2425 2554 56.4 Hammerhead-1 1497 G 1509 62 66 Kahawai-1 1932.7 60.3 6 G 19 64.8 6.1 Kipper-1 1727.0 1733.5 64.8 66 G Tuna-3 1798.9 1833.3 63.8 66.1 G Tuna-4 2025.8 2067.2 63.6 66.1 G Combined hiatus 56.4 66.1 LHalSS hiatus 64.8 65.7

Table e-depth plot-derived arkers— unconformity (LHalSS horizon, base Kingfish Fm). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—poor. Outliers (?) ignored.

A1.6. Ag hiatus m LHalSS

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. ag ) e (Ma Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Admiral-1 1427 1437 64 6.0 .0 .0 7.5 G Basker-1 2495 2515 64 66.1 G .7 Blackback-2 2872.0 2899.5 59.5 65.7 G Blackback-3 2902.0 2971.0 65.0 65.7 Av Chimaera-1 2266 2272 64.9 66.1 Av. Gudgeon-1 3055.0 3064.0 63.0 66.0 G Mackerel-1 2954.7 3002.2 64.8 65.7 G Stonefish-1 2275.3 2484.1 63.3 66.1 P Combined hiatus 59.5 67.5 LHalSS hiatus 65 65.7

Table -depth plot-derive s marker lSS unconformity (LHalSS horizon, base Mackerel Fm). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—poor.

A1.7. Age d hiatu s—LHa

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Hiatus no Pick quality A G ngelfish-1 2188.0 2259 56.4? 59.5 1 K 54.1 2 G ahawai-1 1572.2 1577.6 53.1 K per-1 149 1 ip 3.0 1506.0 55.0 56.2 G Kipper-1 156 3 2.5 1603.0 56.6 61.0 Av Longtom 1358.8 1358.8 54.6 55.5 1 G -1 Tuna-3 1567.2 1682.5? 54.3 59.9? 1 P Tuna-4 1816.0 1917.9 54.6 59.9 1 P West Ha 2510.5 2510.5 53.3 55.0 2 G libut-1 Combin 54.3 59.5 1 ed hiatus (1) Combin 53.1 55.0 2 ed hiatus (2) Combin 3) 56.6 61.0 3 ed hiatus (IUHalS 55 55.5 1 hiatus (1) IUHalS 53.3 54.5 2 hiatus (2)

318

Page 50: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Table -depth plot-derive s markers—IUHalS unconformity (IUHalS horizon). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—poor. Outliers (?) ignored.

A1.8. Age d hiatu

Well Min. de th (m)p Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Angelfish-1 1988.7 2014 50.8 54.1 G Flounder-4 2056.7 2064.7 50.8 52.6 G

Table A1.9. Age-depth plot-derived hiatus markers—IFlouS unconformity. h is measured from ADept the kelly bushing. v—average, G—good, P—poor.

Well Min m). depth ( Max. )depth (m Min. ag a)e (M Max. age (Ma) Hiatus no Pick quality Baleen-1 538.0 551.7 18.2 20.7 1 G Baleen-1 623.0 627.0 22.5 22.9 2 G Batfish-1 1429.5 1447.8 17.6 18.8 1 G Cobia-2 2202.1 2215.9 18.4 20.7 1 G Cobia-2 2346.3 2357.9 23.1? 25.6 2 G Fortescue-1 2 18 20.7 1 G 2400 401 .7 Fortescue-2 2296.5 2 17 18.2? 1 G 327 .6 Fortescue-3 24 18 20.7 1 G 2415.0 17.0 .7 Fortescue-4 23 2 238 19 20.5 1 G 8 3 ? Mackerel-2 2215.9 2229 17.6 20.7 1 G Mackerel-3 234 .4 2359.1 22. 23.1 2 G 5 9? Patricia-1 66 0 670.0 20.7 23.2 2 G 5.Patricia-1 678.0 678.0 23.2 27.5 3 G Pilotfish-1A 2911.1 2915.0 18.1 18.8 1 G Wrasse-1 2680.0 2703.0 18.6 20.7 1 G Combined hiatus (1) 19 20.7 1 Combined 2 hiatus (2) 0.7 25.6 2 Combined hiatus (3) 2 3.2 27.5 3 ISworS hiatus (1) 18 .8 .7 18 1 ISworS hiatus (2) 22.5 22.9 2

Table A1.10. Age-depth pl ers—ISworS un formi . ed from th ge, G—good, P—poor. Outliers (?) or

ot-derived hiatus mark con tiesDepth is measur e kelly bushing. Av—avera ign ed in the averaging.

Well Min.depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Ma x. age (Ma) Pick quality Bale 524.0 6.3 en-1 514.0 1 17.6 G Bask 00 2025 2.1 er-1 20 1 16.3? Av. Batfi 5.7 sh-1 1371.6 1414.5 1 16.3? G Bign 3.9 ose-1 2400.0 2460.5 1 15.7? Av Cobi 2167.1 6.3 a-2 2154.9 1 16.3? G Flou 1905 5.7 nder-1 1835.2 1 29.0 P Flou 1955.6 4.5 nder-2 1916.8 1 16.3? Av Flou .9 1972.0 5.7 nder-3 1965 1 29.0 P Flou 0.9 1933.9 6.4 nder-4 193 1 29.0 P Flou 6.3 nder-5 1885.8 1910.4 1 25.8 G Flou 926.3 5.1 nder-6 1911.1 1 1 17.6 G Forte 277 2310 6.3 scue-1 2 1 17.6 Av. Forte 0.0 2381.0 6.3 scue-4 222 1 17.6 PGrun 6.3 ter-1 1750.0 1818.9 1 18.4 Av Halib 2194.5 5.7 ut-1 2179.3 1 20.7 GHam .5 1285 6.4merhead-1 1282 1 29 P Hap 752.3 2788.9 5.0 uku-1 2 1 16.3? G Kaha .2 1387.0 6.4 wai-1 1376 1 17.7 GMac 2240.2 5.7 kerel-1 2209.8 1 16.3? GMac 4.5 2215.9 6.3 kerel-2 219 1 17.6 GMac .6 2240.2 6.3 kerel-3 2222 1 17.6 PMac 3.6 2209.8 5.0 kerel-4 213 1 16.3? Av Morw 1641.6 5.0 ong-1 1617.5 1 16.3? G Patri 622.0 6.3 cia-1 589.0 1 16.3? G

319

Page 51: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2750.0 14.5 4?Pilotfish-1A 2400.0 16. Av Sperm Whale-1 787.0 799.0 6.3 1 17.6 GStonefish-1 1688.5 1743.4 15.1 16.3? Av Sweep-1 734.0 736.0 16.3 17.6 G Teraglin-1 2170.0 2199.0 14.5 17.6 G Trevally-1 1798.3 1905.0 15.7 17.6 P Tuna-1 1311.5 1315.2 16.4 48.6 P Tuna-2 1310.6 1325.8 16.3 17.6 G Tuna -3 1350.2 1353.9 16.4 34.0 G Tuna-4 1365.1 1370.0 P 16.4 24.7 Wrasse-1 2170.0 15.7 3? 2157.0 16. GCombined hiatus 13.9 .6 48 SworSS hiatus 16.4 .6 17

Table A1.11. Age-depth pl s—SworSS un formi (SworSS hoed from th , G—good, P—poor. Outliers ign d i

ot-derived hiatus marker con ty rizon). Depth is measur e kelly bushing. Av—average ore n the averaging.

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Ma (x. age Ma) Pick quality Flound 1889.7 .0 er-4 1874.5 15 15.7 G Patrici 0 a-1 573.0 589.0 15. 16.3 G Comb tus .0 ined hia 15 16.3 ICong 0 S hiatus 15. 15.7

Table A1.1 epth p gS u ormrom th . Av—average, G—good, or th gS

et ngSS

2. Age-d lot-derived hiag

tus markers—ICon nconf ity. Depth is measured f e kelly bushin P—po . Note— e ICon hiatus makers could alsobe interpr ed as Co and/or ICodSS markers.

Well Min. depth (m) Max.depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Ma x. age (Ma) Pick quality Cobi 93.9 2124.4 3. a-2 20 1 9 14.5 Av Flou .8 2. nder-5 1711.1 1749 1 1 14.5 G Kaha .0 3.5 wai-1 1110.0 1130 1 14.5 G Pilot 2400.0 2.1 fish-1A 2330.0 1 14.5 Av Sper .0 662.0 2. m Whale-1 638 1 1 14.5 Av Com 2. bined hiatus 1 1 14.5 Con 3. gSS hiatus 1 9 14.5

Table A1.13. Age-depth p rkers—CongSS u form (CongSS hoor. Note—the CongSS hiatus makers could

lot-derived hiatus ma ncon ity orizon). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—average, G—good, P—palso be interpreted as ICodSS markers.

Well Min. depth (m) Max.depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Batfish-1 1005.8 1036.3 12.0 13.0 Av Kahawai-1 1070.1 1096.2 12.0 13.0 Av Sweep-1 553.0 563.2 12.0 13.0 Av Teraglin-1 1929.9 1910.0 12.0 1 0 3. AvICodSS hiatus .0 13.0 12

Table A1.14. Age-depth p ers—ICodSS un nformi (ICodS . ed from th rage, G—good, P—poor.

lot-derived hiatus mark co ty S horizon)Depth is measur e kelly bushing. Av—ave

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age (Ma) Pick quality Bale 321.2 en-1 308.2 9.2 11.7 G Bign .0 1607.0 ose-1 1550 9.2 11.7 G Flou 579.1 nder-1 548.6 8.0 11.7 G Flou nder-2 527.3 557.7 7.1 11.7 G Flou 1358.1 nder-5 1324.9 9.2 11.7 G Forte 1100.0 3 scue-1 1040.0 10. 11.7 Av Halib 518.1 ut-1 499.8 9.2 11.7 G Hapu 2407.9 3 ku-1 2331.7 10. 13.0 AvSper -1 0 662.0 m Whale 638. 7.1 11.7 G

320

Page 52: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

e 1 Sw ep-1 498.2 507.5 7.1 1.7 G Tuna .2 -1 569.9 588 9.2 11.7 Av Com atus bined hi 7.1 13.0 Bull s 3 SS hiatu 10. 11.7

Table A1.1 epth pl llseye Un rmi llSS rgood, P—poor.

5. Age-d ot-derived hiatus markers—Buage, G—

K tars c oonf ty u (B ho izon). Depth is measured from the kelly bushing. Av—aver

Well Min. depth (m) Max. depth (m) Min. age (Ma) Max. age a) (M H tuia s no Pick quality Basker-1 1150 1250 3.2 5.8 1 P B 9.2 1 P ignose-1 1400.0 1550.0 3.2 Flounder-5 995.4 1027.7 3.2 4.6 2 G Flounder-5 1069.5 1100.0 4.9 6.9 1 G F 1 P lounder-6 664.4 710.7 3.2 5.8Flounder-6 731.5 800.1 6.1 9.2 3 P H 5apuku-1 1905.0? 1965.9? 4.6 .8 1 P Pilotfish-1A 955.0 960.0 G 3.9 5.8 1 S 405.0 5.8 G perm Whale-1 384.0 3.2 1 Sweep-1 397.0 3.2 5.8 1 410.5 G C s 9 ombined hiatu 3.2 .2 1 C s 3 4.6 2 ombined hiatu .2 C s 6 9.2 3 ombined hiatu .1 I 5 WhitS hiatus 4.9 .8 1

Table A1.16. Age-depth pl IWhitS un orm hi on from th G—good, P—poor.

ot-derived hiatus markers—erage,

conf ity (IW tS horiz ). Depth is measured e kelly bushing. Av—av Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D epth Depth

MD KB MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Whiting Fm/seabed 122 101 0 0.131 436/438 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.252 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.482 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.674 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.884 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1214 1193 1092 ~1.026 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1236 1215 1114 1.044 432/436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe a ard Fm 36 Cobi Gurn 1236 1215 1114 1.044 432/4Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1255 1234 1133 1.058 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1269 1248 1147 1.054 Inferred Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1269 1248 1147 1.067 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1273 1252 1151 1.068 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1423 1402 1301 1.169 Age-depth/infer’d Latrobe Halibut 1423 1402 1301 1. Kate Shale 169 432/436 Latrobe Halibut 1432 1411 1310 1. Volador Fm 175 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 1485 1464 1363 1.200 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 1492 1471 1370 1.215 436 Latrobe Golden Beach ed Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 1492 1471 1370 1.215 432/503 Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 1492 1471 1370 1.215 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 1503 1482 1381 1.222 432 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm 1503 1482 1381 1.222 436 Latrobe Emperor Kipper Shale 1598 1577 1476 1.282 436 Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm 2072 2051 1950 1.546 432/436 Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose 2117 2096 1995 1.570 432/436

321

Page 53: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

322

Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.616 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2162 2141 2040 1.589 436

Table A1.1 mark -1 (Adro tus ma r seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—et atabas r—Pers. Comm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.go ata a a gy, ns um we 0). Units—meters, seconds. See Pr

7. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Admiral -1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used foDPIVIC p roleum d e (T.Bernecke v (d nd pplications, enerapplicatio , petrole lls applications), 503—ESSO (199 eface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D epth

MD KB D epth

MD MSL D epthMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 91 70 0 0.094 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.278 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.528 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.756 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.050 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.236 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1648 1627 1557 1.277 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Cobia Abs. ed from topsGurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1648 1627 1557 1.277 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut 1648 1627 1557 1.277 Tuna-Flounder Channel Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2005 1984 1914 1.492 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from Latrobe Halibut 1 36 Kingfish Fm 2005 1984 1914 .492 432/4Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ~2188 ~2167 ~2097 ~1.598 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~2493 ~2472 ~2402 ~1.775 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2493 2472 2402 1 .775 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2550 2529 2459 1.806 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3297 3276 3206 2.186 436/age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach ed from topsAnemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 3297 3276 3206 2.186 436 NA NA TD 3421 3400 3330 2.246 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.470 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.000 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.1 mark ation tops—Angelfish-1 (ro tus ma on. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—et omm., May 200 8— ions, energy, ns eters, seconds Pre r a ati

8. Hiatus ers and form Af-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatiDPIVIC p roleum database (T.Bernecker—Pers. C

s—m6), 43 www.ga.gov (data and applicat

applicatio , petroleum wells applications). Unit . See face fo bbrevi ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 287 264 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2760 2737 2473 ? 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 2760 2737 2473 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2784 2761 2497 NA 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Abs. 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fromLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2836 2813 2549 ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut 2836 2813 2549 Mackerel Fm ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. A . Kingfish Fm bs Inferred

Page 54: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2856 2833 2569 ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2856 2833 2569 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2860 2837 2573 ? 436 NA NA TD 3385 3362 3098 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.1 mark (At r tus m rpretation n e/r ’: 4 — ( ker—P (d d tion en w lication ters, seconds. See Prefac br s.

9. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Athene-1 -1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic inte

, May 2006), 438—www.. Colum ‘Sourc emarks 36 DPIVIC petroleum

applications,database T.Bernec ers. Comm. ga.gov ata an applica s, ergy,petroleum ells app s). Units—me e for ab eviation Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 64.4 54.9 0 0.073 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~321.1 ~311.7 ~256.8 ~0.330 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 519 509.5 454.6 0.616 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity 545 535.5 471.1 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity 625 615.5 560.6 ? Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 638 628.5 573.6 0.629 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 638 628.5 573.6 0.629 436 Latrobe Cobia Burong Fm 653 643.5 588.6 0.643 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 Inferred from 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 707 697.5 642.6 0.703 436 NA NA TD 1 0 1020.5 965.5 0. 4 03 92 436

Table A1.2 s mark ation tops—Baleen-1 (Ba r atus m or seismic interpretation mn ce/r s’: (T ker—P ters, ds

0. Hiatu ers and form -1). Coloured ows—hi arkers used f . Colu ‘Sour emark 436—DPIVIC petroleum database .Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006). Units—me secon . See Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 81 55 0 0.074 440 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 735 709 654 0.672 440 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. topsInferred from Latrobe a ard Fm Cobi Gurn 735 709 654 0.672 440 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 780 754 699 0.711 440 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 780 754 699 0.711 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops

323

Page 55: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

324

Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Barracouta Fm 780 754 699 0.711 440 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm No information ? ? ? ? Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 845 819 764 0.760 440 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 845 819 764 0.760 440 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 845 819 764 0.760 440 NA NA TD 895 9 8 86 14 0.8 440

Table A1.2 s mark s—Baleen-2 (Ba-2). r atus m for seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/ s’

et onds. S abbreviations.

1. Hiatu ers and formation topColoured ows—hi arkers used remark : 440—Basin Oil (2000).Units—m ers, sec ee Preface for Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 187 162 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~1200 ~1175 ~1013 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2000 ~1975 ~1813 ? Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2120 2095 1933 NA 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. d from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Inferre Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2120 2095 1933 NA 370/436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel . d from 3-D Abs Abs. Abs. Abs. InferreLatrobe ut -Flounder Channel nt, 436 Halib Tuna ? ? ? ? PreseLatrobe Halibut Intra-Flounder Fm hiatus 20 1933 21 2095 NA 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2187 2162 2000 NA 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2187 2162 2000 NA 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2427 2402 2240 ? Inferred/agedepth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2427 2402 2240 ? 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2496 2471 2309 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~3117 ~3092 ~2930 ? Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3286 3261 3099 ? 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. ed from topsAnemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Golden Beach 3286 3261 3099 Volcanics ? 436 Latrobe Golden Beach 3286 3261 3099 Chimaera Fm ? 466/468 NA NA TD 3 3 3 991 966 804 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 s mark ation tops—Basker-1 (Bkro atus ma seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks 70—2 ge (19 ase ec ers m , 466—Moore 8 cker et meters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations.

2. Hiatu ers and form -1). Coloured ws—hi rkers used for ’: 3 Bernecker and Partridge (2005), 43 —Partrid 99), 436—DPIVIC petroleum datab (T.Bern ker—P . Com ., May 2006)(1989), 46 —Berne al. (2002). Units— Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 264 239 0 ? 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~800 ~775 ~613 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~1125 ~1100 ~938 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Page 56: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

325

Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2100 ~2075 ~1913 ? Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2210 2185 1946 ? 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2210 2185 1946 ? 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2460 2435 2196 ? 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2460 2435 2196 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2460 2435 2196 ? Inf’d tops, a-depth Latrobe Halibut 2196 Kate Shale 2460 2435 ? 432 Latrobe Halibut 2508 2483 2244 Volador Fm ? 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3363 3338 3099 ? 432 Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Anemone Fm Inferred Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 3363 3338 3099 NA 432 Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid NA NA TD 3420 3395 3156 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 mark Basker Sout st ro tus ma erpretation. Co o and Partridge 3 dge (1 IVIC petroleum databa e 2006), 438—o nd ap ergy, applications, petroleum ells a cation Units—meters, seconds. See

or tions.

3. Hiatus ers and formation tops— h-1 (Bk h-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic int lumn ‘S urce/remarks’: 370—Bernecker (2005), 4 2—Partri 999), 436—DP se (T.B rnecker—Pers. Comm., May www.ga.g v (data a plications, en w ppli s). Preface f abbrevia Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 77.4 68 0 0.091 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.276 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 618 608.6 540.6 ~0.458 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ~1021 ~1011.6 ~943.6 ~0.867 Age-depth Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ~1219.4 ~1210 ~1082.3 ~0.973 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1414.5 1405.1 1337.1 1.164 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1454 1444.6 1376.6 1.193 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1454 1444.6 1376.6 1.193 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el 1444.6 1376.6 1.193 ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann 1454 InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1893 1883.6 1815.6 1.450 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1893 1883.6 1815.6 1. Kingfish Fm 450 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1893 1883.6 1815.6 1.450 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2164 2154.6 2086.6 1.607 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut 2154.6 1. 36 Kate Shale 2164 2086.6 607 432/4Latrobe Halibut 2188.6 1. Volador Fm 2198 2120.6 620 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~2460 ~2450.6 ~2382.6 ~1.867 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~2616 ~2606.6 ~2538.6 ? Age-depth NA NA TD 29 29 6 2897.6 2. 75 65. 055 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ~ 2975 2965.6 2897.6 ~2.055 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.432 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.800 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.2 mark -1 (Bt-14. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Batfish ).

Page 57: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ro tus ma etation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—et atabas er—Pers. Comm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.go ata a a gy, ns um we s). Units—meters, seconds re r a tion

326

Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interprDPIVIC p roleum d e (T.Berneck v (d nd pplications, enerapplicatio , petrole lls application . See P face fo bbrevia s. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Dept D h MMSL (m)

De h ptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 379 354 0 0.478 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~1400 ~1375 ~1021 ~1.235 Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~1578 ~1553 ~1199 ~1.346 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.624 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.742 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2460.5 ~2435.5 ~2081.5 ~1.830 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2523 2498 2144 1.869 436/438/512 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2523 2498 2144 1.869 436/438/512 Latrobe Halibut A Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel bs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut 2523 2498 2144 1. Tuna-Flounder Channel 869 Possibly present Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2597 2572 2218 1.911 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs Ab Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm . s. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2597 2572 2218 1. Kingfish Fm 911 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2597 2572 2218 1.911 Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2722 2697 2343 1.981 Age-depth/3-D Latrobe Halibut 2722 2697 Kate Shale 2343 1.981 432/436 Latrobe Halibut 2762 2737 Volador Fm 2383 2.003 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~3811 ~3786 ~3432 ~2.568 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3908 3883 3529 2.615 Logs Latrobe Golden Beach A AAnemone Fm bs. bs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach 39 3 2.615 Chimaera Fm 08 883 3529 Logs NA NA TD 39 395 970 3616 2.650 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.000 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.624 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.2 tion to us markers—Bignose-1 (Bro tus ma r seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—et atabas ay 20 — a a a energy, ns ell (1994). Units—meters, seconds. See Pre breviations.

5. Forma ps and hiat N-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used foDPIVIC p roleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., M 06), 438 www.g .gov (data nd pplications, applicatio , petroleum wells applications), 512—Sh face for ab Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 439 418 0 0.565 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2897 2876 2458 2.191 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 2897 2876 2458 2.191 436 Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2998 2977 2559 2.244 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Outside 3-D grid ? ? ? ? Latrobe Halibut el Abs. ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2998 2977 2559 2.244 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. A . Mackerel Fm bs Abs. Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. A . Kingfish Fm bs Abs. Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2998 2977 2559 2.244 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2998 2977 2559 2.244 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut depth Kate Shale Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Age-Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2998 2977 2559 2.244 436

Page 58: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

327

NA NA TD 4401 4380 3962 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 mark ation tops—Blackback-1 b r tus m tation. C umn ‘S rce/re ks (T ker—P eters, s nds. S Prefac r a

6. Hiatus ers and form ST1 (B -1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic interpre

s—mol ou mar ’: 436—DPIVIC petroleum

database .Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006). Unit eco ee e fo bbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 392.7 370.4 0 0.500 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2779 2756.7 2386.3 2.049 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2779 2756.7 2386.3 2.049 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel No seismic data ? ? ? ? Latrobe Halibut el Abs. ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2796 2773.7 22403.3 2.060 436 Latrobe Halibut 2796 2773.7 22 .3 Mackerel Fm 403 2.060 436 Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2897 2874.7 2504.3 2.125 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut grid Kate Shale ? ? ? ? Outside 3-DLatrobe Halibut 2. Volador Fm 2897 2874.7 2504.3 125 436 NA NA TD 3160 3137.7 2767.3 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 mark Blackback-2 (Bb-2). r tus m interpretation n /r ’: 4 — m (T ker—P Units—meters, s. efa ab

7. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic

ay 2006).. Colum

‘Source r

emarks 36 DPIVIC petroleudatabase .Bernec ers. Comm., M second See P ce for breviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 343 318 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2821 2796 2478 ? 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 2821 2796 2478 ? 436 Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2878 2853 2535 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? No seismic data Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2878 2853 2535 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2878 2853 2 ic tie Mackerel Fm 535 ? SeismLatrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Page 59: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

328

Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~2914 ~2889 ~2571 ? Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut 2914 2889 2 Volador Fm 571 ? 436 NA NA TD 3125 3100 2782 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 mark Blackback-3 (Bb-3). r tus m r seismic interpretation. n e/r ’ IC petroleum

( ker—P May 2006), 438—www.g (d d ti applications, w lication reface bbre ns.

8. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Coloured ows—hia arkers used fo

Colum ‘Sourc emarks : 436—DPIV

database T.Bernec ers. Comm., a.gov a

ata anv o

applica ons, energy,petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. See P for iati Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 154.6 129.6 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1923 1898 1768.4 ? 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1923 1898 1768.4 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2003 1978 1848.4 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2003 1978 18 4 Kingfish Fm 48. ? 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2244 2219 2089.4 ? Inferred/age-depth Latrobe Halibut 2 36 Kate Shale 2244 2219 089.4 ? 432/4Latrobe Halibut 2 Volador Fm 2273 2248 118.4 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~2464 ~2439 ~2309.4 ? Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2817 2792 2662.4 ? 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach 2 Volcanics 2699 2674 544.4 ? 466 Latrobe Golden Beach 2662.4 Chimaera Fm 2817 2792 ? 436 NA NA TD 3826 3801 3 671.4 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.2 mark imaera-1 (Ch-1). ro tus ma on. Colu ‘Sour remark 432et ay 2006), 438—www.ga.go atns eters, seconds. e Prefa for abb via

9. Hiatus ers and formation tops—ChColoured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretati

omm., Mmn ce/ s’: — rtPa ridge (1999), 436—

DPIVIC p roleum databas we

e (T.Bernecker—Pers. C v (d a and applications, energy, applicatio , petroleum lls applications). Units—m Se ce re tions. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 82.6 72.8 0 0.097 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.322 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.518 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~1.134 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.192 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 2105 2095.2 2022.4 1.531 Logs Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2383 2373.2 2300.4 1.717 436 Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Turrum Fm Abs. Inferred from tops

Page 60: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

a Abs. Abs. Abs.

329

Latrobe Cobi Gurnard Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2383 2373.2 2300.4 1.717 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2389 2379.2 2306.4 1.72 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sMackerel Fm Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut 2389 2379.2 2306.4 1 Kingfish Fm .72 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.756 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.074 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2594 2584.2 2511.4 1.845 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.790 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.478 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.250 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark 1 (C-1 r tation n e (T Units—meters, ds. ref ab

0. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Cobia-interpre

). Coloured ows—hiatus markers used for seismic

y 2006). . Colums n

‘SourcS P

/remarks’ac r

: 436—b ia

DPIVIC petroleum database .Bernecker—Pers. Comm., Ma eco ee e fo rev tions. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 101.2 75.9 0 0.102 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.332 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.550 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.142 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ~2110 ~2084.7 ~2008.8 ~1.220 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Conger hiatus ~2124.4 ~2099.1 ~2023.2 ~1.546 Age-depth Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2160 ~2134.7 ~2058.8 ~1.576 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2209 2183.7 2183.7 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2352 2326.7 2326.7 ? Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity ~2383.5 ~2358.2 ~2282.3 ~1.716 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm ~2383.5 ~2358.2 ~2282.3 ~1.716 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Inf’d age-depth Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. A Tuna-Flounder Channel bs. Inf’d age-depth Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2393.2 2367.9 2292 ? Age-depth, 370 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2393.2Kingfish Fm 2367.9 2292 ? 370 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.730 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2571 2550 2476 1.807 519 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.048 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.768 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.442 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.266 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark ation tops—Cobia-2 (C-2 ro tus ma n. Column ‘Source/remark 70—3 IC pet Pers. C m., M 2006)

or tions.

1. Hiatus ers and form ). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatio

er—s’: 3 Bernecker and Partridge

(2005), 4 6—DPIV roleum database (T.Berneck om ay . Units—meters, seconds. SeePreface f abbrevia Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 95 74 0 0.064 519 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.322 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.492 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 61: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

330

Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.122 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.166 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.528 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2433 2412 2338 1.740 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2433 2412 2338 1.740 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. d from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. InferreLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2452 2431 2357 1.750 436 Latrobe Halibut 2452 2431 2 Mackerel Fm 357 1.750 436 Latrobe Halibut 2476 2455 2 Kingfish Fm 381 1.762 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.768 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2571 2550 2476 1.807 519 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.042 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.804 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.268 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.016 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark tion tops—Drummer-1 (Du-1). r tus m for seismic interpretation. n etroleum

( ker—P SSO (1986a). U ts—me s, o

2. Hiatus ers and formaColoured ows—hia arkers used Colum ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVIC pdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006), 519—E ni ter seconds. See Preface for abbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 106 85 0 0.098 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.318 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? NA Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.132 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.414 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 2189 2168 2083 1.520 Logs Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2394 2373 2288 1.655 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 2394 2373 2288 1.655 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2394 2373 2288 1.655 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2394 2373 2288 1.655 438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2394 2373 2288 1.655 438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.655 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 2 2 721 700 615 1.824 438 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.860 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.716 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.470 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.190 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark East Halibut 1r tus m interpretation. n m

( ker—P May 2006), 438—www.g (d d a tio w lication ters, seconds. See Prefac b s

3. Hiatus ers and formation tops— -1 (EH- ). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic Colum ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVIC petroleudatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., a.gov ata an pplica ns, energy, applications,petroleum ells app s). Units—me e for ab reviation . Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 116.3 91.3 0 0.121 521 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.302 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 62: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

331

Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.542 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.716 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.096 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1549.5 1524.5 1433.2 1.232 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1644 1619 1527.7 1.302 521 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1644 1619 1527.7 1.302 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1644 1619 1527.7 1.302 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred Latrobe Halibut 1527.7 Kingfish Fm 1644 1619 1.302 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1792.5 1767.5 1676.2 1.394 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2097 2072 1968.2 1.574 Logs Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 2288 2263 2171.7 1.690 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2430 2405 2313.7 1.849 521 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 3136.5 3111.5 3020.2 2.122 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor formation Kipper Shale ? ? ? ? No inLatrobe Emperor Admiral Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 3138 3113 3021.7 2.123 521 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.520 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark ation tops—East Pilchard-1 (EP-1 r tus ma r seismic interpretation. C S m 2 001). Units—ec e Pref

4. Hiatus ers and form ). Coloured ows—hia rkers used fo olumn ‘ ource/re arks’: 5 1—ESSO (2meters, s onds. Se ace for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 62.1 52.7 0 0.070 522 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 447 437.6 384.9 0.524 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 447 437.6 384.9 0.524 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 470 460.6 407.9 0.532 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 470 460.6 407.9 0.532 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm 470 460.6 4 07.9 0.532 436/438 Latrobe Halibut topsKingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 477 467.6 414.9 0.534 436/438 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 477 467.6 414.9 0.534 436/438 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 477 467.6 414.9 0.534 436/438 NA NA TD 1066 1056.6 1003.9 0.910 522

Page 63: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

.3 mark tion tops—Flathead-1 (Fr tus m for seismic interpretation. n roleum

( ker—P www.ga v (dat nd ap ati w lication s—meters d e a

332

Table A1 5. Hiatus ers and forma h-1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used Colum ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVIC petdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006), 438— .go a a plic ons, energy, applications, petroleum ells app s), 522—ESSO (1970a). Unit , secon s. See Pr face for bbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 115.8 87.5 0 0.106 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? 0.314 Logs Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~579.1 ~550.8 ~463.3 ~0.539 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.006 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.250 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1912 1883.7 1796.2 1.427 432, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1929 1900.7 1813.2 1.437 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1929 1900.7 1813.2 1.437 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 432 1929 1900.7 1813.2 1.437 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2206 2177.7 2090.2 1.611 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut sMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2206 2177.7 2090.2 1.611 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.611 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~2438 ~2409.7 ~2322.2 ~1.743 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Top Kate Shale 2438 2409.7 2322.2 1.743 432/436 Latrobe Halibut 2528 2499.7 2412.2 1.794 Top Volador Fm 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 3578 3549.7 346.2 2.350 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.352 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.790 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.284 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark n tops—Flounder-1 (ro tus ma erpretation. C oe datab . Comm., May ). m o

6. Hiatus ers and formatio F-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic int olumn ‘S urce/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC p troleum ase (T.Bernecker—Pers 2006 Units— eters, seconds. See Preface forabbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 129.6 99.4 0 0.133 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.332 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~557.7 ~527.5 ~428.1 ~0.531 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.008 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.304 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1955.6 ~1925.4 ~1826 ~1.474 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1968 1937.8 1838.4 1.481 432 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1968 1937.8 1838.4 1.481 432 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1968 1937.8 1838.4 1.481 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2282 2251.8 2152.4 1.665 Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 432 2282 2251.8 2152.4 1.665 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.665 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2454.5 2424.3 2324.9 1.760 Inferred,age-depth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2454.5 2424.3 2324.9 1.760 432 Latrobe Halibut 2533.5Volador Fm 25 3 24 .9 03. 03 1.803 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D

Page 64: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 28 8 2711.4 1

333

NA NA TD 841 10. .97 438 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.340 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.794 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.132 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark r-2 ( ro tus ma ismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e atabas mm., May 20 — an um we eters, seconds r ti

7. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Flounde F-2). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seDPIVIC p troleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Co 06), 438 www.ga.gov (dat and applications, energy, applicatio s, petrole lls applications). Units—m . See P eface for abbrevia ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 140.8 110.6 0 0.148 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.340 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.900 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.016 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.290 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1965.5 ~1935.3 ~1824.7 ~1.449 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1990 1959.8 1849.2 1.466 432 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounde 1990 1959.8 1849.2 1.466 432 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1990 1959.8 1849.2 1.466 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2227 2196.8 2086.2 1.606 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2227 2196.8 2086.2 1.606 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.606 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2465 2434.8 2324.2 1.730 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2465 2434.8 23 2 Kate Shale 24. 1.730 432 Latrobe Halibut 2554.5Volador Fm 25 3 24 7 24. 13. 1.784 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 26 8 24 2 632 01. 91. 1.834 438 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.220 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.678 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.150 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 s mark ation tops—Flounder-3 (F ro tus ma seismic interpretation. Co Sou ma 2e atabas 20 — a.g ta , energy, n um we r a ati

8. Hiatu ers and form -3). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for lumn ‘ rce/re rks’: 43 —Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC p troleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May

nits—meters, seconds. See Preface 06), 438 www.g

foov (dabb i

and apon

plicationsapplicatio s, petrole lls applications). U rev s. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 129.3 119.5 0 0.161 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.336 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.960 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.068 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.278 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray ~1889.7NA Intra-Conger hiatus ~1879.9 ~1 .4 760 ~1.428 Age-depth Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1930.9 ~1921.1 ~1801.6 ~1.455 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity ~1953 ~1943.2 ~1823.7 ~1.469 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1953 1943.2 1823.7 1.469 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1953 1943.2 1823.7 1.469 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-Flounder Fm hiatus ~2060 ~2050.2 ~1930.7 ~1.472 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2064.7 2054.9 1935.4 1.48 Seismic tie

Page 65: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

334

Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Seismic tie 2135 2125.2 2005.7 1.579 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? 1.579 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2432 2422.2 2302.7 1.751 Age-depth, inf’d Latrobe Halibut 2432 2422.2 23 .7 Kate Shale 02 1.751 432 Latrobe Halibut 2516 2506.2 23 .7 Volador Fm 86 1.794 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2623.7 26 9 24 .4 13. 94 1.85 438 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.252 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.744 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.500 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.3 mark r-4 (ro tus ma Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—et atabas mm., May 200 8— a.g ta ns um we eters, seconds re r

9. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Floundeismic interpretation.

F-4). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seDPIVIC p roleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Co 6), 43 www.g ov (da and applications, energy,applicatio , petrole lls applications). Units—m . See P face fo abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 105.1 96.6 0 0.131 436

Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~1027 ~1085

~1018.5 ~1076.5

~921.9 ~979.9

~0.863 ~0.880

Log/age-depth

Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~1341.5 ~1333 ~1236.4 ~1.056 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ~1736 ~1727.5 ~1630.9 ~1.222 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Conger hiatus ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1885.8 ~1877.3 ~1780.7 ~1.420 Age-depth Seaspray NA Marshall Paraconformity ~1919.6 ~1911.1 ~1814.4 ~1.444 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity ~1919.6 ~1911.1 ~1814.4 ~1.444 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm ~1919.6 ~1911.1 ~1814.4 ~1.444 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el 1919.6Tuna-Flounder Chann 1911.1 1814.4 reted on 3-D1.444 Interp Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2239 2230.5 2133.9 1.639 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut 2239 2230.5 21 .9 Kingfish Fm 33 1.639 370 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.639 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2468 2459.5 2362.9 1.770 Inferred from logs Latrobe Halibut 2362.9 Kate Shale 2468 2459.5 1.770 Logs Latrobe Halibut 2526.5 2 depth Volador Fm 2535 429.9 1.803 Age-Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2607 2 2 598.5 501.9 1.860 438 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.258 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.676 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.336 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 mark ounder-5 (ro tus ma seismic interpretation. Col ou ar 0 3 IC pet Pers. ., 200 38ns ns). Un et on e

0. Hiatus ers and forma tion tops—Fl F-5).

Coloured ws—hia rkers used for umn ‘SC m

rce/remM

ks’: 376 4

—Bernecker and Partridge(2005), 4

atio6—DPIV roleum database (T.Bernecker—

s, petroleum wells applicatioom ay ), —www

P.ga.gov (data and

bbreviations. applic , energy, application its—m ers, sec ds. Se reface for a Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 118.6 93.3 0 0.126 436

Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~704 ~770

~678.7 ~744.7

~585.4 ~651.4

~0.609 ~0.650

Log/age-depth

Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.952 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.006 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.274 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 66: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

335

Seaspray NA Intra-Conger hiatus ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1911.1 ~1885.8 ~1792.5 ~1.436 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1932 1906.7 1813.4 1.450 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1932 1906.7 1813.4 1.450 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut 1932 1906.7 18 4 Tuna-Flounder Channel 13. 1.450 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2262 2236.7 2143.4 1.644 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2262 2236.7 21 4 Kingfish Fm 43. 1.644 432/436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.644 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2395 2369.7 2276.4 1.724 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 36 Kate Shale 2395 2369.7 2276.4 1.724 370/4Latrobe Halibut 2486 2460.7 2367.4 1. Volador Fm 771 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2621 2595.7 2502.4 1.845 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.290 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.016 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.658 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 mark ation tops—Flounder-6 ro tus ma n. Column ‘Source/remark 70

), 43 artridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC petroleum databa e — o 2006), 438—o nd ap ns, petroleum ells a cation Units—meters, seconds. See

or tions.

1. Hiatus ers and form (F-6). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatio s’: 3 —Bernecker and Partridge (2005 2—P se (T.B rnecker Pers. C mm., May www.ga.g v (data a plications, energy, applicatio w ppli s). Preface f abbrevia Group Subgroup Hhiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 90 65 0 0.088 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.316 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~1075 ~1050 ~985 ~0.844 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.008 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.314 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2233 ~2208 ~2143 ~1.590 Age-depth/logs Seaspray ~NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2400 ~2375 ~2310 1.700 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2415 2390 2325 1.713 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Abs. ed from topsTurrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sGurnard Fm Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity (Flounder Fm) 2415 2390 2325 1.713 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Maybe present Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-DLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2459 2434 2369 1.736 370 Latrobe Halibut om topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2459 2434 2369 1.736 Seismic ties Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.856 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2691 2666 2601 1. 870 436 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.190 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.132 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.540 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.000 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 mark ue-1 ro tus ma r seismic interpretation. Col ou ar 0—3 IC pet ase (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.gov (data and n , applic ns). Unit meter econd

2. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Fortesc (Fr-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used fo umn ‘S rce/rem ks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge (2005), 4 6—DPIV roleum databapplicatio s, energy ations, petroleum wells applicatio s— s, s s.

Page 67: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

336

Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h eptMD KB

D h eptMD MSL

Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 99.7 68.7 0 0.093 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.324 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.528 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.172 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.206 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.566 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2312 ~2281 ~2212.3 ~1.58 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2440 2409 2340.3 1.715 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 2440 2409 2340.3 1.715 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2440 2409 2340.3 1.719 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2440 2409 2340.3 1.719 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2340.3 Kingfish Fm 2440 2409 1.719 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.800 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 2 2 602 577 509 1.81 438 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.100 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.822 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.430 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.118 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 mark 2 r tus m seismic interpretation mn ce/r s:

( ker—P ), 438—www.g (d d ti applications, w lication ds. See Prefac br s.

3. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Fortescue- (Fr-2). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for . Colu ‘Sour emark 436—DPIVIC petroleumdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006 a.gov ata an applica ons, energy,petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, secon e for ab eviation Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 100 69 0 0.093 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.306 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.500 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~0.877 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.262 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.540 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray unconformity 2416 epth NA Intra-Swordfish 2385 2316 1.56 Age-dLatrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2420 2389 2320 1.695 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2420 2389 2320 1.695 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Not main channel Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2464 2433 2364 1.723 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2464 2433 2364 1.723 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.798 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2602 2577 2509 1.81 438 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.150 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.070 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.550 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.050 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 s mark s—Fortescue-3 4. Hiatu ers and formation top (Fr-3).

Page 68: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ro tus ma seismic interpretation. Col ou ar 0—3 IC pet ers. ., 0 v (data and n , applic wells applications). Unit meter econd

337

Coloured ws—hia rkers used for umn ‘S rce/rem ks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge (2005), 4 6—DPIV roleum database (T.Bernecker—P Comm May 2 06), 438—www.ga.goapplicatio s, energy ations, petroleum s— s, s s. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 93 68 0 0.092 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.326 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~1.144 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.176 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.236 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2250 ~2225 ~2157 ~1.597 Age-depth/logs Seaspray ~2382 ~2357 ~2289 ~1.700NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2414.5 2389.5 2321.5 1.705 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm ~2420 ~2395 ~2327 ~1.708 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity ~2420 ~2395 ~2327 ~1.708 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm ~2420 ~2395 ~2327 ~1.708 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.778 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 438 2602 2577 2509 1.81 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.124 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.910 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.390 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.020 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 s mark —Fortescue-4 r atus m for seismic interpretation. n e/r s’: ( cker—P May 2006), 438—www.g (d d a tio w lication efac b s

5. Hiatu ers and formation tops (Fr-4). Coloured ows—hi arkers used Colum ‘Sourc emark 436—DPIVIC petroleum database T.Berne ers. Comm., a.gov ata an pplica ns, energy, applications, petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. See Pr e for ab reviation . Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 689 658.5 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 3222 3191.5 2533 NA 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sInferred from top Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 3222 3191.5 2533 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Maybe on edgesLatrobe ut -Flounder Channel e on edges Halib Tuna ? ? ? ? MaybLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 3241 3210.5 2552 ? 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 3241 3210.5 2552 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 3241 3210.5 2552 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 3241 3210.5 2552 NA 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information

Page 69: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ch Latrobe Golden Bea Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor formation Longtom Fm ? ? ? ? No inLatrobe Emperor Kipper Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor ion Admiral Fm ? ? ? ? No informatLatrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Inferred from tops NA NA TD 3472 3441.5 2783 ? 436

Table A1.4 s mark te-1 (Gi-1). ro atus ma seismic interpretation. Col ou ar 0— 3 IC pet ers. . 0ns , applic Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations. e .

6. Hiatu ers and formation tops—Great WhiColoured ws—hi rkers used for umn ‘S rce/rem ks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge

v (data and (2005), 4 6—DPIV roleum database (T.Bernecker—P wells applications).

Comm , May 2 06), 438—www.ga.goapplicatio , energy ations, petroleumWell ousid 3-D grid Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

Depth

MD KB MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 129 108 0 0.146 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.342 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.546 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~1.010 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.226 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1766 ~1745 ~1637 ~1.382 Logs/age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1853 1832 1724 1.445 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1853 1832 1 724 1.445 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1853 1832 1724 1.445 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1853 1832 1724 1.445 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1889 1868 1760 1.465 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1889 1868 1760 1.465 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1947 1926 1818 1.498 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2532 2511 2403 1.842 Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Halibut 2403 36 Kate Shale 2532 2511 1.842 432/4Latrobe Halibut 2604 2583 2 Volador Fm 475 1.879 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~2961 ~2940 ~2832 ~ 2070 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3498 3477 3369 2.358 Logs Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Anemone Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach 3498 3477 3369 Chimaera Fm 2.358 Logs NA NA TD 3809 3788 3680 2.56 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 3937 3916 3808 2.742 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.460 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.4 mark -1 (Grro tus ma rpretation. Col ou ar 0— 3 dge (1 oleum databaec e Pref

7. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Grunter -1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic inte umn ‘S rce/rem ks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge(2005), 4 2—Partri 999), 436—DPIVIC petr

ations. se (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006). Units—

meters, s onds. Se ace for abbrevi Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

D h ept

MD KB MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 304.4 279.4 0 0.377 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 1495 1470 1190.6 1.284 432 Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 3051 3026 2746.6 2.194 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops

338

Page 70: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 3051 3026 2746.6 2.194 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Maybe on edges Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 3062 3037 2757.6 2.200 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Present,VIMP80 ? ? ? ? Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. ed from topsKingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ~3062 ~3037 ~2757.6 ~2.200 Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~3062 ~3037 ~2757.6 ~2.200 Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kate Shale Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 3062 3037 2757.6 2. Volador Fm 200 436 NA NA TD 3837 3812 3532.6 2. 755 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.4 mark Gudgeon-1 ( ro tus ma erpretation. Co ou a 0—3 dge (1 IVIC petroleum databas ern P omec e Pref iations.

8. Hiatus ers and formation tops— Gu-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic int lumn ‘S rce/rem rks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge (2005), 4 2—Partri 999), 436—DP e (T.B ecker— ers. C m., May 2006). Units—meters, s onds. Se ace for abbrev Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

Depth

MD KB MD MSL Depth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 184.4 156 0 0.156 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2081 2052.6 1896.6 1.562 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. om topsInferred fr Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sInferred from top Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2081 2052.6 1896.6 1.562 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe ut -Flounder Channel Abs. om 3-D Halib Tuna Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2138 2109.6 1953.6 1.595 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2138 2109.6 1953.6 1.595 370 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2366 2337.6 2181.6 1.723 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2366 2337.6 2181.6 1.723 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2374 2345.6 2189.6 1.727 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3035.5 3007.1 2851.1 2.096 438 Latrobe Golden Beach on Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No informatiLatrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 3050 3021.6 2865.6 ? 468 Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 3563 3534.6 3378.6 2.354 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.4 s mark ation tops—Gummy-1 (G ro tus ma . Co o a e 3 C pet (T.Bernecker—Pers. ., M 006 — et nds. S ns.

9. Hiatu ers and form m-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretation lumn ‘S urce/rem rks’: 370—Bernecker and Partridg(2005), 4 6—DPIVI roleum database Comm ay 2 ), 468 Bernecker et al. (2002).Units—m ers, seco ee Preface for abbreviatio

339

Page 71: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

340

Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h eptMD KB

D h eptMD MSL

Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 77.7 68.3 0 0.091 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.304 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~518.1 ~508.7 ~440.4 ~0.492 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.170 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm 1765 1755.6 1687.3 1.280 432 Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 2137 2127.8 2059.3 1.503 432, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2282 2272.6 2204.3 1.601 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2282 2272.6 2204.3 1.601 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2282 2272.6 2204.3 1.601 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2282 2272.6 2204.3 1.601 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.618 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.920 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut 2842.6 27 .3 Kate Shale 2852 74 1.896 436 Latrobe Halibut 2864 2854.6 27 .3 Volador Fm 86 1.902 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 3 30 6 29 .3 051 41. 73 2.000 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.820 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.320 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.000 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.5 s mark tion tops—Halibut-1 (H-ro tus ma . Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e datab r—Pers. Comm., May ). me se o

0. Hiatu ers and forma 1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretationDPIVIC p troleum ase (T.Bernecke 2006 Units— ters, conds. See Preface forabbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 104.12 79.12 0 0.086 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.304 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.514 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~1.128 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.378 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.480 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2331 2306 2226.9 1.607 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 2331 2306 2226.9 1.607 438 Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2347 2322 2242.9 1.615 432 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel nt, 432 ? ? ? ? PreseLatrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel om 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2390.5 2365.5 2286.4 1.639 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sInferred from top Latrobe ut fish Fm 2Halib King 390.5 2365.5 2286.4 1.639 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.639 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2590 2565 2485.9 1.758 436 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.920 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.770 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.220 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.950 Interpreted on 3-D

Table atus markers ps—Halibut-2 (HA1.51. Hi and formation to -2).

Page 72: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

hiatus ma retation. Colu ‘Sour emark 43m databas omm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.go atroleum we eters, second r

Coloured rows— rkers used for seismic interp mn ce/r s’: 2—Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC petroleu e (T.Bernecker—Pers. C v (d a and applications, energy, applications, pet lls applications). Units—m s. See P eface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

Depth

MD KB MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 143 121 0 ? 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1284 1262 1141 ? Age depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1291 1269 1148 ? 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1291 1269 1148 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fromLatrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. D Inferred from 3-Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1291 1269 1148 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe ut kerel Fm ed from topsHalib Mac Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1291 1269 1 148 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1484 1462 1341 ? Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 1484 1462 1341 NA 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1502 1480 1359 NA 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 1646 1624 1503 ? 432/436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 1646 1624 1503 ? 432/436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm 432/436 1646 1624 1503 ? Latrobe Emperor 2025 1904 36 Kipper Shale 2047 ? 432/4Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid NA NA TD 2 2 1 130 108 987 ? 432/436

Table A1.5 s mark —Hammerhea -1 ro tus ma r seismic interpretation. Co Sou ma 2e databas r—Pers. Comm., May 20 — a.g ta ergy, n um we onds re r a ti

2. Hiatu ers and formation tops d-1 (Hh ). Coloured ws—hia rkers used fo lumn ‘ rce/re rks’: 43 —Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC p troleum e (T.Bernecke 06), 438 www.g ov (da and applications, enapplicatio s, petrole lls applications). Units—meters, sec . See P face fo bbrevia ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 392.5 384 0 0.519 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~1935 ~1926.5 ~1542.5 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~2331.7 ~2323.2 ~1939.2 ? Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm 2527 2518.5 2134.5 ? 432 Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 2747 2738.5 2354.5 2.080 432, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2810 2801.5 2417.5 2.120 Logs, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. om topsInferred fr Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2810 2801.5 2417.5 2.120 Logs, age-depth Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel rom 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fLatrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel om 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2810 2801.5 2417.5 2.120 Logs, age-depth Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm 2810 2801.5 2417.5 2.120 Logs Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred

341

Page 73: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe ut Shale formation Halib Kate ? ? ? ? No inLatrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2900 2891.5 25 .5 07 2.170 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~3000 ~2991.5 ~2607.5 ~2.228 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ~3644 ~3635.5 ~3251.5 ~2.547 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 3649 3640.5 3256.5 2.55 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.53. Hiatus markers and formation tops—Hapuku-1 (hiatus ma tation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—

um datab omm., May 6). U —met , s

Hp-1). Coloured rows— rkers used for seismic interpreDPIVIC petrole ase (T.Bernecker—Pers. C 200 nits ers econds. See Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 97.4 76.4 0 0.103 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.290 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.522 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.614 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.952 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1385.4 1364.4 1288 1.240 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1451 1430 1353.6 1.186 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1451 1430 1353.6 1.186 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1472 1451 1374.6 1.200 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel om 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1508 1487 1410.6 1.224 Inferred Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1508 1487 1410.6 1.224 370 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1568.4 1547.4 1471 1.264 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1742 1721 1644.6 1.374 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 1742 1721 1644.6 1.374 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1768 1747 1670.6 1.390 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 1844.4 1823.4 1747 1.180 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 1885 1864 1787.6 1.460 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Anemone Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 1885 1864 1787.6 1.460 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 1992 1971 1894.6 1.521 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm 1992 1971 1894.6 1.521 436 Latrobe Emperor Kipper Shale 2074 2053 1976.6 1.567 436 Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm 2637 2616 2539.6 1.865 432/436 Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 2958 2937 2860.6 2.026 432/436

Table A1.54. Hiatus mark dith-1 (J-1)hiatus ma retation. Column ‘Source/remarks 70—

artridge (1 roleum database (T.Bernecker—Pers. Com , ta and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, seconds. See eviations.

ers and formation tops—Jurkers used for seismic interp

. Coloured rows— ’: 3 Bernecker and Partridge (2005), 432—P 999), 436—DPIVIC pet m. May 2006), 438—www.ga.gov (daPreface for abbr Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D epth

MD KB D epth

MD MSL D epth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 80.2 59.2 0 0.048 436

342

Page 74: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

343

Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.248 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.546 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ~1085 ~1064 ~1004.8 0.588 Age-depth, on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ~1100 ~1079 ~1019.8 ~0.923 Age-depth Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1376.2 ~1355.2 ~1296 ~1.136 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1390 1369 1309.8 1.146 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1309.8 1. 1390 1369 146 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1400 1379 1319.8 1.153 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1400 1379 1319.8 1. 153 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1468 1447 1387.8 1.198 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm 1468 1447 1 387.8 1.198 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. A ed bs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1577.6 1556.6 1497.4 1.275 432/436;age-dep’ Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~1960.2 ~1939.2 ~1880 ~1.517 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ~1960.2 ~1939.2 ~1880 ~1.517 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2320 2299 2239.8 1.698 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.750 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.960 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.280 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.55. Hiatus markers and formation tops—Kahawai-1 (Ka-1). Coloured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—

pe bas y 20 — a. a , applications, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, second iDPIVIC troleum data e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., Ma 06), 438 www.g gov (dat and applications, energy

s. See Preface for abbreviat ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 115 94 0 0.127 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.284 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.709 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.626 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.010 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1396 1375 1281 1.126 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1420 1399 1305 1.120 370/436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1420 1399 1305 1.120 370/436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1437 1416 1322 1.132 370/436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel ed on 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity ~1459 ~1438 ~1344 ~1.148 Age-d’th Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1459 1438 1344 1.148 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1500 1479 1385 ? Age-depth,on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1593 1572 1478 1.260 Age-depth,on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ~1726 ~1705 ~1611 ~1.341 Inferred, age-d’th Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 1726 1705 1611 1.341 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1733 1712 1618 1. 347 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~1875 ~1854 ~1760 ~1.445 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Campanian volcanics 1893 1872 1778 ? 419/432 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 1900 1879 1785 ~1.460 Logs Latrobe Golden Beach ed Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Golden Beach 36 Chimaera Fm 1990 1969 1875 1.514 432/4Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 2279 2258 2164 1.671 436/438, age-d’th Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm 2279 2258 2164 1.671 436/438 Latrobe eror er Shale 36/438 Emp Kipp 2279 2258 2164 1.671 432/4

Page 75: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2821 2727 1.944 Logs

344

Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm 2842 Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 2875 2854 2760 1.960 436 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.090 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.5 rk 1 (KColoured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation. C — cker and Partridge

artridge (1 petroleum databa er r—Pe C 2006), 438—ta and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, seconds. See eviations.

6. Hiatus ma ers and formation tops—Kipper- p-1). olumn ‘Source/remarks’: 370 Berne

(2005), 432—P 999), 436—DPIVIC se (T.B necke rs. omm., May www.ga.gov (daPreface for abbr Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 129.3 107.3 0 0.146 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.300 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.526 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.668 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.060 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1476.3 1454.2 1347 1.212 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1539 1517 1409.7 1.258 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1539 1517 1 409.7 1.258 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1544 1522 1414.7 1.261 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel ed from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1568 1546 1438.7 1.277 Inferred from tops Latrobe ut kerel Fm ed from topsHalib Mac Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1568 1546 1438.7 1 .277 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1610.3 1588.3 1481 1.302 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1870 1848 1740.7 1.467 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 1870 1848 17 .7 40 1.467 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1890 1868 1760.7 1.479 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 2020 1998 1890.7 1.536 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2070 2048 1940.7 1.586 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 2070 2048 1940.7 1.586 468 Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 2070 2048 1940.7 1.586 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 2200 2178 2070.7 1.657 468 NA NA TD 436 2600 2578 2470.7 1.868 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 2615.3 2593.3 2486 ~1.872 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.300 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.57. Hiatus mark Kipper-2 (Kp-2hiatus ma rpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—m databas ., May 2 nergy, troleum w cker et al. 002). ts—me s, se ce for

ers and formation tops— ). Coloured rows— rkers used for seismic inteDPIVIC petroleu e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm 006), 438—www.ga.gov (data and applications, eapplications

o, pe ells applications), 468—Berne (2 Uni ter conds. See Prefa

abbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 127 106 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 745 724 618 ? 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 745 724 618 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 756 735 629 ? 436

Page 76: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 756 735 629 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 756 735 629 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 807 786 680 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 807 786 680 ? 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 812 791 685 ? 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 818 797 691 ? 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Chimaera Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 818 797 691 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor Abs. Abs. Abs. Longtom Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor Kipper Shale Abs. A bs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm 818 797 691 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor on Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No informatiStrzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 849 828 722 ? 436 NA NA TD 951 930 824 ? 436

Table A1.5 mark acke 1 ro tus ma ismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e atabas mm., May 200 8— a.g ta n um we eters, seconds r a ti

8. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Leatherj t-1 (Lj- ). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seDPIVIC p troleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Co 6), 43 www.g ov (da and applications, energy,applicatio s, petrole lls applications). Units—m . See P eface for bbrevia ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h ept TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 81.2 56.2 0 0.077 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA TConger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1112.5 1087.5 1031.3 0.946 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1245 1220 1163.8 1.043 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1245 1220 1163.8 1.043 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1256 1231 1174.8 1.050 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1256 1231 1174.8 1.050 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1256 11 8 Kingfish Fm 1231 74. 1.050 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1462 1437 1380.8 1.189 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1462 1437 1380.8 1.189 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1462 1437 1380.8 1. Kate Shale 189 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1467 1442 1385.8 1. 192 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? No well info. Latrobe Halibut volcanics 1520 1495 1438.8 ? 545 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 1533 1508 1451.8 1.234 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 1561 1536 1479.8 1.252 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Emperor Kipper Shale 1561 1536 1479.8 1.252 436 Latrobe Emperor Admiral Fm 1810 1785 1728.8 1.412 436 Latrobe Emperor e Kersop Arkos ? ? ? ? No information Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 1935 1910 1853.8 1.485 436 NA NA TD 2 2 2160.8 1 242 217 .63 436

345

Page 77: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

.5 mark gtom-1 (Ltr tus m tation. umn ‘ rce/rem rks’: 4 —

( ), 545—BHP (1996). Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for o

346

Table A1 9. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Lon -1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic interpre Col Sou a 36 DPIVIC petroleumdatabase T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006abbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 129.6 99.4 0 0.133 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 890 859.8 760.4 ~0.795 Jump-tie Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm 1829 1798.8 1699.4 ? 432 Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 2180 2149.8 2050.4 1.566 432, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2406 2375.8 2276.4 1.714 436 Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Turrum Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Gurnard Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2406 2375.8 2276.4 1.714 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut l Abs. om 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channe Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2406 2375.8 2276.4 1.714 436 Latrobe Halibut 2375.8 2 Mackerel Fm 2406 276.4 1.714 436 Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. om topsInferred fr Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2915 2884.8 2785.4 1.973 Inferred, age-d’th Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2915 2 1 884.8 2785.4 .973 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2957 2926.8 2 827.4 1.994 436 NA NA TD 3049 3018.8 2919.4 ~2.07 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.640 Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.400 Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.980 Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.6 Mackerel-1 (ro eismic interpretation. Co So ma 32e er—Pers. Comm., May 2006). Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for o

0. Hiatus markers and formation tops— Mk-1). Coloured ws—hiatus markers used for s lumn ‘ urce/re rks’: 4 —Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC p troleum database (T.Berneckabbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 102.5 92.7 0 0.124 438 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2205.2 ~2195.4 ~2102.7 ~1.596 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ? ? ? ? Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2310 2300.2 2207.5 1.664 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2310 2300.2 2207.5 1.664 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el Abs. ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2310 2300.2 2207.5 1.664 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2310 2300.2 2207.5 1 Mackerel Fm .664 432 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kingfish Fm Inferred from tops NA NA TD 2 25 2 2489.5 592 82. ? 438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Page 78: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

347

Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.6 mark Mackerel-2 ( ro tus ma eismic interpretation. Co Sou ma 2o nd ap rgy, applications, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, seconds. The th on for pth of Se ce re

1. Hiatus ers and formation tops— Mk-2). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for s

elumn ‘ rce/re rks’: 43 —Partridge (1999), 438—

www.ga.g v (data a plications, enTWT-dep conversi Mk-2 was made using the TWT-de M .k-1 e faPre fo bbr a v oniati s. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 111 101.2 0 0.137 438 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.560 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.256 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.318 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2231 ~2221.2 ~2120 ~1.612 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2352 ~2342.2 ~2241 ~1.700 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2379 2369.2 2268 1.710 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2379 2369.2 2268 1.710 438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2379 2369.2 2268 1.710 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2379 2369.2 2 Mackerel Fm 268 1.710 438/549 Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.710 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 26 2 2 632 22. 521 ? 438 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.942 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.650 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.400 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.960 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.6 mark Mackerel-3 (M r tus ma terpretation. C S m ov (data and n , appli s applications), ES 97 itth on for e using the TWT-depth of S r

2. Hiatus ers and formation tops— k-3). Coloured ows—hia rkers used for seismic in

eum wellolumn ‘ ource/re arks’: 43

n8—www.ga.g

applicatio s, energy cations, petrol 549— SO. (1 2b). U s—meters, seconds. The TWT-dep conversi Mk-3 was mad Mk-1. ee Preface for abb eviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 93 83.2 0 0.112 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2209.8 ~2200 ~2116.8 ~1.600 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2365 2355.2 2272 1.706 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2365 2355.2 2272 1.706 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2365 2355.2 2272 1.706 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2365 2355.2 2 Mackerel Fm 272 1.706 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kingfish Fm Inferred from tops NA NA TD 2 26 2 2 ~1.870652 42. 559 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Page 79: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.6 mark l-4 (Mr tus m seismic interpretation. n e/r s’:

(T ker—P nits—meters, ds. refa ab

3. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Mackere k-4). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for Colum ‘Sourc emark 436—DPIVIC petroleumdatabase .Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006). U secon See P ce for breviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 158.5 133.5 0 NA 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1956 1931 1797.5 ? 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformit/Flounder Fm 1956 1931 1797.5 ? 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2038 2013 1879.5 ? 370 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2038 2013 1879.5 ? 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2290 2265 2131.5 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 432/436 2290 2265 2131.5 ? Latrobe Halibut 21 .5 36 Volador Fm 2314 2289 55 ? 432/4Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2836 2811 2677.5 ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sAnemone Fm Inferred from top Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 2836 2811 2677.5 ? 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 2836 2811 2677.5 ? 466/467 Latrobe Golden Beach 3060 3035 2901.5 Volcanics ? 467 Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 3330 3305 3171.5 ? 467 Latrobe Golden Beach 3 Volcanics 3472 3447 313.5 ? 466/467 NA NA TD 3572 3547 3 413.5 ? 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.6 mark Manta-1 (Maro tus ma eismic interpretation. Col ou ar 0— 3 dge (1 PIVIC petroleum databa Ber r—P Coo and a petro el ic 4s ng (200 Prefac bbr ns

4. Hiatus ers and formation tops— -1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for s umn ‘S rce/rem ks’: 37 Bernecker and Partridge(2005), 4 2—Partri 999), 436—D se (T. necke ers. mm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.g v (data pplications, energy, applications,

See leum w ls appl ations), 66, Moore, 1989, 467—

Woodland and Wo 1). Units—meters, seconds. e for a eviatio . Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT Source/rMSL

emarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 71.1 61.3 0 0.082 552 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1601.7 1591.9 1530.6 1.194 438 Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1823 1813.2 1751.9 1.347 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 1823 1813.2 1751.9 1.347 436/438

348

Page 80: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

349

Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1890 1880.2 1818.9 1.390 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Bad interp. in 436 Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1890 1880.2 1818.9 1.390 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut 1880.2 18 9 Kingfish Fm 1890 18. 1.390 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2514 2504.2 2442.9 1.760 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2514 2504.2 24 9 Kate Shale 42. 1.760 436 Latrobe Halibut 2521 2511.2 24 9 Volador Fm 49. 1.764 436 NA NA TD 2 26 2 25 9 622 12. 50. 1.820 552 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.6 mark Marlin-4 (M-4 r tus m interpretation n e/r ’ ( ker—P May 2006), 438—www.g (d d a tio w lication O (1974a). Units—meters ds via

5. Hiatus ers and formation tops— ). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic . Colum ‘Sourc emarks : 436—DPIVIC petroleum database T.Bernec ers. Comm., a.gov ata an pplica ns, energy, applications, petroleum ells app s), 552—ESS , secon . Abbre tions in Preface. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 73.2 63.4 0 0.085 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.260 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.632 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.716 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.950 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1629.5 ~1619.7 ~1556.3 1.249 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1653 1643.2 1579.8 1.265 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1653 1643.2 1579.8 1.265 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1653 1643.2 1579.8 1.265 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1653 1643.2 15 8 Kingfish Fm 79. 1.265 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.512 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 24 2 23 8 439 29. 65. 1.76 436 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.806 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.220 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.520 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.880 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.6 mark Morwong-1 ( r tus m interpretation n IC petroleum (T ker—P ay 2006). Units—meters, s. refa ab

6. Hiatus ers and formation tops— Mr-1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic . Colum ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVdatabase .Bernec ers. Comm., M second See P ce for breviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 73 51 0 0.069 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.300 Jump-tie Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray atus 581 559 508 0.556 NA Intra-Conger hi Logs

Page 81: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

350

Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~604 ~582 ~531 0.600 Age-depth Seaspray mity NA Intra-Seaspray unconfor ~667 ~645 ~594 0.630 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Seaspray unconformity ~ ~656 ~ 678 605 0.640 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 700 678 627 0.670 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm ? ? ? ? Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 700 678 627 0.670 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 744 722 671 0.711 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 744 722 671 0.711 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kingfish Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 744 722 671 0 Barracouta Fm .711 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 744 722 671 0.711 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 800 778 727 0.751 436/438, age-d’th Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ~800 ~778 ~727 ~0.751 Age-depth Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ~800 ~778 ~727 ~0.751 Age-depth NA NA TD 900 878 827 0.830 436

Table A1.6 mark tion tops—Patricia-1 (Pr tus m for seismic interpretation. umn ‘ rce/rem rks’: 4 — m

ase ( rnecker—P Comm., May 2006), 438—www.g (d d ti applications, w lication reface abbrev ons.

7. Hiatus ers and forma t-1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used Col Sou a 36 DPIVIC petroleudatab T.Be ers. a.gov ata an applica ons, energy,petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. See P for iati Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/ormation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 226.6 205.6 0 0.277 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~958 ~937 ~731.4 ~0.905 Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~1.441 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ~2365 ~2344 ~2138.4 ~1.784 Age-depth Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2817 ~2796 ~2590.4 ? Logs, age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Abs. m topsGurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fro Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut sMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2915 2894 2688.4 2.143 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2966 2945 2 739.4 2.170 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~3412 ~3391 ~3185.4 ~2.397 Age-depth NA NA TD 3521 3500 3294.4 2.460 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.040 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.760 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.600 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.6 mark ation tops—Pilotfish-1A ). 8. Hiatus ers and form (Pf-1A

Page 82: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ro erpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e abas omm., May 200 8— a tions, energy,

e meters, seconds Pr ti

351

Coloured ws—hiatus markers used for seismic intDPIVIC p troleum dat e (T.Bernecker—Pers. C 6), 43 www.ga.gov (dat and applicaapplications, petroleum w lls applications). Units— . See eface for abbrevia ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 100 69 0 0.093 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.332 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.490 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.146 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.166 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.516 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2492 2461 2392 1.727 Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia sTurrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from top Latrobe Cobia 2492 2461 2 Gurnard Fm 392 1.727 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2533 2502 2433 1.748 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fromLatrobe Halibut l om 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channe Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred frLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2533 2502 2433 1.748 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut om topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2533 2502 2433 1.748 436 NA NA TD 2684 2653 2584 1.832 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.856 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.050 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.600 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.300 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.970 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.6 mark ation tops—Rockling-1 ( r tus m d for seismic interpretation n IC petroleum ( ker—P www ( o ations, w s. See Prefac b s

9. Hiatus ers and form Rk-1). Coloured ows—hia arkers use . Colum ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006), 438— .ga.gov data and applicati ns, energy, applicpetroleum ells applications). Units—meters, second e for ab reviation . Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 135.5 109.6 0 0.147 559 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.310 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.582 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~0.782 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.144 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1619.6 1593.7 1484.1 1.300 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1722.6 1696.7 1587.1 1.376 559 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1722.6 1696.7 1587.1 1.376 559 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fromLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1722.6 1696.7 1587.1 1.376 559 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. sMackerel Fm Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut 1722.6Kingfish Fm 1696.7 1587.1 ed from tops1.376 Inferr Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1824.5 1798.6 1689 1.436 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2186.5 2160.6 2051 1.658 Logs Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No informationLatrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 2405 2379.1 2269.5 1.782 Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2612.8 2586.9 2477.3 1.914 559 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information

Page 83: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

3 3

352

NA NA TD 3174 148.1 038.5 2.186 559 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 3350.5 3324.6 3215 ~2.250 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.740 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.7 mark allop-1 (Scr tus m for seismic interpretation mn ce/r s’:

et nds. S r abbreviations.

0. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Sc -1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used . Colu ‘Sour emark 559—Woodside (2003).Units—m ers, seco ee Preface fo Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D epth

MD KB D epth

MD MSL D epthMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 147 122 0 0.160 432 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2507 2482 2360 1.718 432 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2507 2482 2360 1.718 432 Latrobe Halibut Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2509 2484 2362 1.719 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2509 2484 2 Mackerel Fm 362 1.719 432 Latrobe Halibut ation Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No informNA NA TD 2 2 2 611 586 464 1.790 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.7 mark tion tops—Smiler-1 (Smr tus m for seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/re rks’: 2— 9).

—met econds. S eface for abbreviations.

1. Hiatus ers and forma -1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used ma 43 Partridge (199Units ers, s ee Pr Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 63.95 54.5 0 0.072 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? 0.391 Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 650 640.55 586.05 0.617 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.386 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm 650 640.55 586.05 0.617 Age-depth Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 793 783.55 729.05 0.730 436, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 801 791.55 737.05 0.735 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 801 791.55 737.05 0.735 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 805 795.55 741.05 0.737 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Inferred on 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut el Abs. ed on 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chann Abs. Abs. Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 805 795.55 741.05 0.737 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 805 795.55 741.05 0.737 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? 0.737 Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut om topsKate Shale Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fr Latrobe Halibut sVolador Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from top Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops

Page 84: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

353

Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 947 937.55 883.05 0.848 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 947 937.55 883.05 0.848 436 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 947 937.55 883.05 0.848 436 NA NA TD 1417 1407.55 1353.1 1.170 436

Table A1.7 mark ation tops—Sperm Whale-1 (SW-1 r tus m tation n e (T ker—P ace fo via

2. Hiatus ers and form ). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for seismic interpre

Pref. Colum ‘Sourc /remarks’: 436—DPIVIC petroleum

database .Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006). See r abbre tions. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 124.7 114.9 0 0.154 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity 404 394.2 279.3 ~0.322 Age-depth, 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 503 493.2 378.3 ~0.802 Age-depth, 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.886 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.218 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1743.4 1733.6 1618.7 1.396 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1803 1793.2 1678.3 1.438 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1803 1793.2 1678.3 1.438 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1804 1794.2 1679.3 1.438 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1877 1867.2 1752.3 1.483 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut 1877 1867.2 1752.3 1. Mackerel Fm 483 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kingfish Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1918 1908.6 1793.3 1.500 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2394 2384.2 2269.3 1.788 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2394 2384.2 2269.3 1. Kate Shale 788 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2434 2424.2 2309.3 1.810 432/436 Latrobe Halibut 2891.2 2 volcanics 2901 776.3 2.061 466 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 2671.2 2661.4 2546.5 2.061 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 3075 3065.2 2950.3 2.156 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Anemone Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach 3065.2 2950.3 Chimaera Fm 3075 2.156 436 NA NA TD 3184 3174.2 3059.3 2.210 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 3649.7 3639.9 3525 ~2.530 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.130 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.7 mark onefish-1 ro tus ma r seismic interpretation. Co Sou ma 2e atabas r—Pers. Comm., May 20 —n um we 9). Un ete on bbreviations.

3. Hiatus ers and formation tops—St (St-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used fo lumn ‘ rce/re rks’: 43 —Partridge (1999), 436—

ions, energy, DPIVIC p troleum d e (T.Bernecke 06), 438 www.ga.gov (data and applicatapplicatio s, petrole lls applications), 466—Moore (198 its—m rs, sec ds. See Preface for a Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 94 69 0 0.093 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ~404 ~379 ~310 ~0.396 Age-depth Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm 503 478 409 0.487 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? No information Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm 618 593 524 0.600 436 Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~734 ~709 ~640 ~0.701 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 756 731 662 0.721 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 432/436/438 756 731 662 0.721 Latrobe Cobia 678 38 Burong Fm 772 747 0.734 436/4Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 772 747 678 0.734 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D

Page 85: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

354

Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 772 747 678 0.734 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 772 747 678 0.734 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 817 792 723 0.769 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 817 792 723 0.769 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 842 817 748 0.786 432 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 842 817 748 0.786 432 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 842 817 748 0.786 436/438 NA NA TD 900 875 806 0.822 436

Table A1.7 mark eep-1 (Sw-1ro tus ma on. Colu ‘Sour remark 432— rtet ay 2006), 438—www.ga.go atns eters, seconds. e Prefa for abb via

4. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Sw ). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretati

omm., Mmn ve/ s’: Pa ridge (1999), 436—

DPIVIC p roleum databas we

e (T.Bernecker—Pers. C v (d a and applications, energy, applicatio , petroleum lls applications). Units—m Se ce re tions. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 85.9 76.5 0 0.102 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.330 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.510 Jump-tie Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.120 Jump-tie Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.180 Jump-tie Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.520 Jump-tie Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2406 2396.6 2320.1 1.735 436 Latrobe Cobia 2406 2396.6 23 1 Turrum Fm 20. 1.735 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Gurnard Fm Abs. Inf’d from 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2412 2402.6 2326.1 1.738 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Abs. Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2412 2402.6 2326.1 1.738 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2402.6 2 Mackerel Fm 2412 326.1 1.738 436 Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 2590 2 2580.6 504.1 1.850 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.7 mark ation tops—Tailor-1 (Tl-1r tus m for seismic interpretation. n e/r ’ etroleum

( ker—P www.g (d d a ti w Preface abbrev ons.

5. Hiatus ers and form ). Coloured ows—hia arkers used Colum

a v ‘Sourcat n

emarksp a

: 4 —36 DPIVIC pdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006), 438—

s. See .go a a plic ons, energy, applications,

petroleum ells applications). Units—meters, second for iati Group Subgroup Hatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 100.3 79.3 0 0.106 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.290 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.480 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ~1920 ~1899 ~1819.7 ~1.008 Age-depth Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.476 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2345 ~2324 ~2244.7 ~1.544 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2421 2400 2320.7 1.699 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 432/436/438 2421 2400 2320.7 1.699 Latrobe Cobia Abs. ed from topsGurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr

Page 86: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

355

Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2425 2404 2324.7 1.701 436/438 Latrobe Halibut 2 Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Present, 43Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2425 2404 2324.7 1.701 436/438 Latrobe Halibut topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2425 2404 2324.7 1.701 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2425 2404 2324.7 1.701 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2864 2843 2763.7 1.925 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2864 2843 2763.7 1.925 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2974 2953 2 873.7 1.978 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 3373 3352 3272.7 2.179 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.738 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.500 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.900 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.7 mark ation tops—Teraglin-1 (T ro tus ma seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e atabas ay 20 — an econds r ti

6. Hiatus ers and form g-1). Coloured ws—hia rkers used forDPIVIC p troleum d e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., M 06), 438 www.ga.gov (dat and applications, energy, applicatio s, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, s . See P eface for abbrevia ons. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 424 403 0 0.545 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2837 2816 2413 2.137 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm m topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fro Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2837 2816 2413 2.137 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2837 2816 2413 2.137 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2837 2816 2413 2.137 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2837 2816 2413 2.137 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Kate Shale Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2837 2816 2 Volador Fm 413 2.137 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 2945 2924 2521 2.210 437 NA NA TD 3 3 2 040 019 616 2.260 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.7 mark -1 (T r tus m ation. n e/ ’: cker— 6), 437—Tho t 0 — n , applic pplications). U e

7. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Terakihiseismic interpret

e-1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used for Colum ‘Sourc r semark 436—DPIVIC petroleum

anddatabase (T.Berne Pers. Comm., May 200 mas e al. (20 3), 438 www.ga.gov (data applicatio s, energy ations, petroleum wells a nits—m ters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 79.6 70.1 0 0.094 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.296 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.828 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.948 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 87: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

356

Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.168 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1851.5 ~1842 ~1771.9 ~1.377 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1934 1924.5 1854.4 1.433 436 Latrobe a m Fm Abs. sCobi Turru Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from top Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1934 1924.5 1854.4 1.433 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1934 1924.5 1854.4 1.433 Interpreted on3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1934 1924.5 1854.4 1.433 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1934 1924.5 1854.4 1.433 432/436 NA NA TD 2284 2274.5 2204.4 1.630 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.670 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.900 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.450 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.840 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.400 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.7 s mark s—Trevally-1 (Tr atus m for seismic interpretation. n e/r s’:

( cker—P May 2006), 438—www.g (d d a tio w lication efac b s

8. Hiatu ers and formation top v-1). Coloured ows—hi arkers used Colum ‘Sourc emark 436—DPIVIC petroleumdatabase T.Berne ers. Comm., a.gov ata an pplica ns, energy, applications,petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. See Pr e for ab reviation . Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 106 85 0 0.092 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.330 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.558 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.142 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.394 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.512 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2448 2427 2342 1.685 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm ed from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2448 2427 2342 1.685 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-DLatrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2448 2427 2342 1.685 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2448 2427 2342 1.685 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2448 2427 2342 1.685 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2892 2871 2786 ~1.900 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2892 2871 2786 ~1.900 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 3012 2991 2906 ? 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.220 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.580 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.300 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.770 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 3465.8 34 8 33 .8 44. 59 ? 436

Table A1.79. Hiatus mark Trumpeter-1 (T 1). hiatus ma rpretation. Colu ‘Sour remark 43m databas ., May 2 ailable

im h borrow See Preface for iat

ers and formation tops— p-Coloured rows— rkers used for seismic inte mn ce/ s’: 2—Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC petroleu e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm 006). Units—meters, seconds. No TWT-depth avfor Tp-1, t e-dept ed from East Halibut-1. abbrev ions. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 69.8 60.4 0 0.079 436

Page 88: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

357

Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.244 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ~572 ~562.6 ~502.2 ~0.507 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.610 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? 0.912 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1311 ~1301.6 ~1241.2 ~1.098 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1323 1313.6 1253.2 1.105 436/logs Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1323 1313.6 gs 1253.2 1.105 436/loLatrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity (Flounder Fm) 1323 1313.6 1253.2 1.105 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1313.6 1 1323 253.2 1.105 Present, 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1580 1570.6 1510.2 1.257 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm ed from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1580 1570.6 15 2 10. 1.257 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 1580 1570.6 1510.2 1.257 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1769 1759.6 1699.2 1.373 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 1769 1759.6 1699.2 1.373 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 1776 1766.6 1706.2 1.377 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 1990 1980.6 1920.2 ~ 1.5 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2231 2221.6 2161.2 1.641 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 2231 2221.6 2161.2 1.641 570 Latrobe Golden Beach Volcanics 2335 2325.6 2265.2 ? 570 Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 2247 2237.6 2177.2 ? 570 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 3140 3130.6 3070.2 2.130 436 Latrobe Emperor 3140 3130.6 3070.2 2.130 Longtom Fm 436 Latrobe Emperor 3230 3220.6 3160.2 2.179 Kipper Shale 436 Latrobe Emperor 3424 3414.6 3354.2 2.283 Admiral Fm 436 Latrobe Emperor Kersop Arkose ? ? ? ? No information Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 3641 3631.6 3571.2 ~2.500 436

Table A1.8 s mark ation tops—Tuna-1 (T-1). ro tus ma . Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e ataba Pers. Comm., May 2 570 O ). c reviatio

0. Hiatu ers and formColoured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretationDPIVIC p troleum d se (T.Bernecker— 006), —ESS (1968a Units—meters, seconds.See Prefa e for abb ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 68.8 59.4 0 0.079 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.252 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.494 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.576 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.924 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1318 ~1308.6 ~1249.2 ~1.099 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1330 1320.6 1261.2 1.108 Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1330 1320.6 1261.2 1.108 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel 1330 1320.6 1261.2 1.108 Present, 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1561 1551.6 1492.2 1.255 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 1561 1551.6 1492.2 1.255 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.276 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.430 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 1946 1936.6 1876.2 ? Logs

Page 89: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

358

Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.680 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.920 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.280 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2761 2 2 me-depth 751.6 692.2 ? No ti

Table A1.8 s mark tion tops—Tuna-2 (T-2). ro tus ma . Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e datab May ). me se o

1. Hiatu ers and formaColoured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretation

r—Pers. Comm., DPIVIC p troleum ase (T.Bernecke 2006 Units— ters, conds. See Preface forabbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 70.7 61.3 0 0.082 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.254 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.510 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.634 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.916 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1350.2 ~1340.6 ~1279.5 ~1.116 Age-depth Seaspray 1362.6 1301.3 NA Marshall Paraconformity 1372 1.131 Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1372 1362.6 1301.3 1.131 Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1372 1362.6 1301.3 1.131 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel ? ? ? ? Present, 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1405 1395.6 1334.3 1.153 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 432 1405 1395.6 1334.3 1.153 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ~1567.2 ~1557.8 ~1496.5 ~1.267 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 1822 1812.6 1751.3 1.434 Inf’d, age-depth Latrobe Halibut 1822 1812.6 17 .3 Kate Shale 51 1.434 Logs/age-depth Latrobe Halibut 1839 1829.6 17 3 Volador Fm 68. 1.442 Logs Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~1998 ~1988.6 ~1927.3 ~1.531 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut 2265 2203.7 21 .3 Volcanics 94 1.68 572 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2269 2259.6 2198.3 1.686 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.920 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2819.4 2810 2748.7 1.960 436 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.350 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 mark tion tops—Tuna-3 (T-3). ro tus ma seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e ataba ay 20 72 SO d

ac reviatio

2. Hiatus ers and forma Coloured ws—hia rkers used for

DPIVIC pref

troleum dabb

se (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., M 0 56). – ES (1 097 ). Units—meters, seconds. See P e for ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 81 60 0 0.081 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.246 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.490 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.570 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.930 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~1365.1 ~1344.1 ~1284.1 ~1.125 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1376 1355 1295 1.133 Logs/436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 1376 1355 1295 1.133 Logs/436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1376 1355 1295 1.133 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Inferr

Page 90: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ut 1376 1355 1

359

Latrobe Halib Tuna-Flounder Channel 295 1.133 Present, 432 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1559 1538 1476 1.246 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1559 1538 1 Kingfish Fm 476 1.246 432/436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ~1816 ~1795 ~1735 ~1.416 Age-depth Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2055 2034 1974 1.568 If’d tops, age-d’th Latrobe Halibut 2055 2034 1974 1. Kate Shale 568 436 Latrobe Halibut 2067 2046 1986 1. Volador Fm 575 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ~2336.1 ~2315.1 ~2255.1 ~1.728 Age-depth Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 2697 2676 2616 1.919 436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach 2697 2676 2616 Chimaera Fm 1.919 436 Latrobe Golden Beach 2700 2679 2619 1. Volcanics 920 573 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.036 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 3 3 3 321 300 240 2.202 436 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.330 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 mark ation tops—Tuna-4 (T-4). ro tus ma on. Colu ‘Sour emark 432— rte ay 2006), 438—www.ga.go atan SO (1985a). Unit meters conds ee

3. Hiatus ers and formColoured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretati

mm., Mmn ce/r s’: Pa ridge (1999), 436—

DPIVIC p troleum databas we

e (T.Bernecker—Pers. Co v (d and applications, energy, applicatio s, petroleum lls applications), 573–ES s— , se . S Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 88.7 58.5 0 0.078 574 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm 1620.1 1589.9 1531.4 1.200 574 Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1942 1911.8 1853.3 1.422 436 Latrobe Cobia 1942 1911.8 18 3 Turrum Fm 53. 1.422 436 Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Gurnard Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2055 2024.8 1966.3 1.493 436 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2055 2024.8 1966.3 1.493 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2024.8 1 Kingfish Fm 2055 966.3 1.493 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2435 2404.8 2346.3 1.72 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2435 2404.8 2 346.3 1.720 436 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2441 2410.8 2352.3 1.724 436 NA NA TD 3362 3 3 331.8 273.3 2.300 574 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.8 mark -1 (Tr r tation n e/r ’ troleum ( ), 574—ESSO b). : m so

4. Hiatus ers and formation tops—Turruminterpre

-1). Coloured ows—hiatus markers used for seismic

ay 2006. Colum ‘Sourc emarks : 436—DPIVIC pe

database T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., M (1970 Units eters, econds. See Preface for abbreviati ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 82 61 0 0.046 575 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.254 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.402 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 91: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.860 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.030 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.122 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity

________________________________________________________________________________________________

1571 1550 1489 1.191 432 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1571 1550 1489 1.191 432 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. InferrLatrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1571 1550 1489 1.191 432 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1571 1550 1 Kingfish Fm 489 1.191 432 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.444 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.860 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2 2 2 2 996 975 914 .060 575 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.360 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.670 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.060 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 atus mark formation tops—Turrum-3 (Trro tus ma n. Colu ‘Sour remark 439 meters bbreviations.

5. Hi ers and -3). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatio mn ce/ s’: 2—Partridge (1999), 575—BHP (198 ). Units— , seconds. See Preface for a Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 85 62 0 0.058 576 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.258 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.428 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.920 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.140 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.250 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1919 1896 1834 1.398 432/436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1919 1896 1834 1.398 432/436 Latrobe Halibut 1919 1896 1834 Marlin Channel 1.398 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 1978 1955 1893 1.434 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 1978 1955 1 Kingfish Fm 893 1.434 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.498 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2778 2755 2693 1.899 576 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.912 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.516 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.810 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.330 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 mark ation tops—Turrum-4 (Trro tus ma n. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—

IC pet m databas Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 200 8— ions, energy, ns um we 993). Units: ters, s nds. S Pr

6. Hiatus ers and form -4). Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatioDPIV roleu e (T. 6), 43 www.ga.gov (data and applicatapplicatio , petrole lls applications), 576—BHP (1 me eco ee eface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth TWT MD SS MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 88 62 0 0.050 577

360

Page 92: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

361

Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.254 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.416 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.898 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.126 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.196 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1765 1739 1677 1.322 577 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm No information ? ? ? ? Latrobe Cobia formation Gurnard Fm ? ? ? ? No inLatrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Maybe on edges Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity ? ? ? 1.326 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut formation Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No inLatrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? 1.414 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? 1.874 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.43 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.67 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.15 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD 2830 2804 2742 ? 577

Table A1.8 mark ation tops—Turrum-7 (Tr r tus ma r seismic interpretation. ‘ em 5 00). Units—ec e Pref

7. Hiatus ers and form -7). Coloured ows—hia rkers used fo Column Source/r arks’: 77—BHP (20meters, s onds. Se ace for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 285 260 0 0.351 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.646 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~1.148 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.710 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.874 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.952 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2938 2913 2653 2.186 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2938 2913 2653 2.186 436/438 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Present, 432 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2938 2913 2653 2.186 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Kingfish Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2938 2913 2653 2.186 Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 3020 2995 2735 2.232 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 3020 2995 2735 2.232 Seismic ties Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 3024 2999 2739 2.233 437 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity 3549 3524 3264 2.499 578 Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity 4360 4335 4075 2.963 Logs/436 Latrobe Golden Beach Anemone Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Golden Beach Chimaera Fm 4360 4335 4075 2.963 437 NA NA TD 4611 4586 4326 3.05 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 mark ation tops—Volador-1 (Vo-1). 8. Hiatus ers and form

Page 93: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ro tus ma on. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—e omm., May 2006), 437—Thomas et al. (2003), 438—www.ga.gov a , en eum wells applications), hel 3 ers, seconds.

tio

362

Coloured ws—hia rkers used for seismic interpretatiDPIVIC p troleum database (T.Bernecker—Pers. C(data and pplications ergy, applications, petrol 578—S l (198 ). Units—metSee Preface for abbrevia ns. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 86 65 0 0.088 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.310 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.492 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod Fm hiatus ? ? ? ~1.052 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.306 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.536 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2421 2400 2335 1.721 436/438 Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Turrum Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Gurnard Fm Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2421 2400 2335 1.721 436/438 Latrobe Halibut dges Marlin Channel ? ? ? ? Maybe on eLatrobe Halibut 3-D Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred fromLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2448 2427 2362 1.736 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut ed from topsMackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2448 2427 2362 1.736 436/438 NA NA TD 2671 2650 2585 1.850 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.854 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.230 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.744 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.120 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.630 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.100 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.8 mark ation tops—West Fortescu (WF-r tus m for seismic interpretation. umn ‘ rce/rem rks’: 4 — m

ase ( rnecker—P Comm., May 2006), 438—www.g (d d ti applications, w lication reface bbre ns.

9. Hiatus ers and form e-1 1). Coloured ows—hia arkers used Col Sou a 36 DPIVIC petroleudatab T.Be ers. a.gov

aata anv o

applica ons, energy,petroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. See P for iati Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB D h ept

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 93.3 68.3 0 0.090 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.308 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.518 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.152 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.242 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.530 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2372 2347 2278.7 1.678 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from topsGurnard Fm Abs. Inferr Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2372 2347 2278.7 1.678 438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2372 2347 2278.7 1.678 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut 2 depth Kingfish Fm 2372 2347 278.7 1.678 Age-Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ~2510.5 ~2485.5 ~2417.2 ~1.755 Age-depth NA NA TD 2577 2552 2483.7 1.790 438 Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.106 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~2.624 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.030 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.550 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~4.260 Interpreted on 3-D

Page 94: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

.9 mark ation tops—West Halibut-1 (WH-1). ured r hiatus m s used for seismic interpretation n e/r ’ IC petroleum

( ker—P www.ga v (dat en , w lication ee Preface abbrev ons.

363

Table A1 0. Hiatus ers and formColo ows— arker . Colum ‘Sourc emarks : 436—DPIVdatabase T.Bernec ers. Comm., May 2006), 438— .go a and applications, ergy, applicationspetroleum ells app s). Units—meters, seconds. S for iati Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops D h ept

MD KB De h pt

MD MSL D h eptMD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 100 61.1 0 0.050 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.246 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.494 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~0.568 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~0.936 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.102 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 1722.3 1683.4 1622.3 1.136 438 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Inferred from topsAbs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Latrobe Cobia Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. ed from topsGurnard Fm Inferr Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 1722.3 1683.4 1622.3 1.136 438 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Marlin Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Tuna-Flounder Channel Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2021.5 1982.6 1921.5 1.256 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Mackerel Fm Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 2021.5 1982.6 1921.5 1. 256 438 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity 2527 2488.1 2427 1.398 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity 2527 2488.1 2427 1.570 Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale 2527 2488.1 2427 1. 570 Logs/438 Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm 2535 2496.1 2435 1.572 Logs Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~1.800 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.030 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.400 Interpreted on 3-D NA NA TD ? ? ? ? ?

Table A1.9 mark est Tuna-8 ( -8). r tus m tation. C umn ‘S rce/re ks’: 4 — ( ), 438—www.ga v (dat en , onds. No time-depth data is available for -8 r

1. Hiatus ers and formation tops—W WTColoured ows—hia arkers used for seismic interpre ol ou mar 36 DPIVIC petroleumdatabase T.Bernecker—P

catioers. Comm., May 2006 .go a and applications, ergy, applications

petroleum wells appli ns). Units—meters, sec WT . See Preface foabbreviation

s.

Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth MD KB

Depth MD MSL

Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 62 52.5 0 0.071 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 439 429.5 377 0.479 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 439 429.5 377 0.479 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 459 449.5 397 0.499 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 459 449.5 397 0.499 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Halibut Kingfish Fm 459 449.5 397 0.499 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information

Page 95: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

364

Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse ormityUnconf 473 463.5 411 0.516 436 Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity 473 463.5 411 0.516 436 Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity 473 463.5 411 0.516 436 NA NA TD 810 800 0.780 6 .5 748 43

Table A1.92. Hiatus m -1 (WColoured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation So ’: 4database (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006). Units—meters ee bb

arkers and formation tops—Whale l-1). . Column ‘ urce/remarks 36—DPIVIC petroleum , seconds. S Preface for a reviations.

Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth MD KB

Depth MD MSL

Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 86 65 0 0.088 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ~0.270 Interpre n 3-Dted o Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ~0.448 Interpre n 3-Dted o Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ~1.022 Interpreted on 3-D Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ~1.328 Interpre n 3-Dted o Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ~2164 ~2143 ~2078 1.562 Age-depth Seaspray NA Intra-Swordfish unconformity ~2691 ~26 170 ~2605 .730 Age-depth Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2713 2692 2627 1.742 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm 2713 26 1.907 6 92 2627 43Latrobe Cobia bs. erredGurnard Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. A Inf from tops Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2868 2847 2782 1.858 436/438 Latrobe Halibut ? ? ? sen Marlin Channel ? Pre t, 432Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Ab Abs Abs. erred 3-D s. . Abs. Inf fromLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2868 2847 2782 1.858 Inferred tops from Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm 2868 284 1.858 6/4387 2782 43 Latrobe Halibut ? ? ? info n Kingfish Fm ? No rmatioLatrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ~1.858 Interpre n 3-Dted o Latrobe Halibut Lower Hal foibut uncon rmity ? ? ? ~2.094 Interpre n 3-Dted o Latrobe Halibut Kate Shale ? ? ? ? No information Latrobe Halibut Volador Fm ? ? ? ? No information NA NA TD 2984 2963 2898 2.180 436 Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ~2.800 Interpreted on 3-D Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.350 Interpreted on 3-D Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ~3.950 Interpreted on 3-D

Table A1.93. Hiatus markers and formation tops—Wrasse-1 (Wr-1). Coloured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 432—Partridge (1999), 436—DPIVIC petroleum database (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006), 438—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications). Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 98 77 0 0.104 436 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2405 2384 2307 1.713 436 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs Abs Abs Abs Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 2405 2384 2307 1.713 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2413 2392 2315 1.718 436 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Channel Abs Abs Abs Abs Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Tuna-Flounder Channel Abs Abs Abs Abs Inferred from 3-D Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2413 2392 2315 1.718 436 Latrobe Halibut Mackerel Fm 2413 2392 2315 1.718 436

Page 96: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Latrobe Ha formation libut Kingfish Fm ? ? ? ? No inNA NA TD 0 2473 1.816 436 2571 255Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.94. Hiatus markers and formation tops—Yellowtail-1 (Yt-1). Coloured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation. Column ‘Source/remarks’: 436—DPIVIC petroleum database (T.Bernecker—Pers. Comm., May 2006). Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations. Group Subgroup Hiatus markers/formation tops Depth

MD KB Depth

MD MSL Depth MD SS

TWT MSL

Source/remarks

Seaspray NA Seabed/Whiting Fm 99 78 0 ? 584 Seaspray NA Intra-Whiting unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Bullseye Karst/Cod Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Intra-Cod unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Conger unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Seaspray NA Swordfish unconformity/Fm ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Cobia Latrobe Unconformity 2414 2393 2315 ? 438/584 Latrobe Cobia Turrum Fm Abs. Abs. Abs. Abs. Inferred from tops Latrobe Cobia Gurnard Fm 2414 2393 2315 ? 438/584 Latrobe Halibut Marlin Unconformity/Flounder Fm 2423 2402 2324 ? 432/584 Latrobe Halibut Abs. Abs. Inferred on 3-D Marlin Channel Abs. Abs. Latrobe Halibut nel s. Abs. Abs. Inferred on 3-D Tuna-Flounder Chan Abs. AbLatrobe Halibut Mackerel Unconformity 2423 2402 2324 ? 432/584 Latrobe Halibut kerel Fm 2324 ? 432/584 Mac 2423 2402 Latrobe Halibut ? ? No information Kingfish Fm ? ? NA NA 2467 NA 584 TD 2566 2545 Latrobe Halibut Intra-upper Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Lower Halibut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Halibut Intra-lower Halbut unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Golden Beach Seahorse Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Latrobe Emperor Longtom Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid Strzelecki Korumburra Otway Unconformity ? ? ? ? Outside 3-D grid

Table A1.95. Hiatus ma tion tops—YellowtailColoured rows—hiatus markers used for seismic interpretation Partridge (1999), 438—www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, pet ). Units—meters, seconds. See Preface for abbreviations.

rkers and forma -2 (Yt-2). n ‘Source/remarks’: 432—. Colum

roleum wells applications), 584—ESSO (1982a

365

Page 97: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 1—Geological datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

366

Well Group Subgroup Litho-

name Spore-Pollen

zone Age (Ma)

Depth MD KB (m)

TWT MSL (s)

Source

Ad-1 Golden Beach Intra-T. lil 75.5–80.5liei 1492 ? 468 Ad-1 Halibut/G.Bea. Multiple ? ? ~ 1420–1565 ? 503 Bk-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 3286 2.25 466, 468 Bksth-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 3363 2.319 466 Ch-1 Halibut Volador T. Longus 68.5–75.5 2699–3826 1.905–2.44 466 Ch-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 2699–3826 1.905–2.44 466 Ch-1 Golden Beach Chimaera N. senect 80.5–83.5us 2699–3826 1.905–2.44 466 Ch-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. apoxyexinus 83.5–85.6 2699–3826 1.905–2.44 466 Gm-1 Golden Beach Chimaera NA ~ 3050 ? 468 ?Kp-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 1900–1989 1.46–1.514 466 Kp-2 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 ~ 2070–2200 ? 468 Kp-2 Golden Beach Chimaera N. senect 3.5us 80.5–8 ~ 2200–2300 ? 468 Lt-1 Golden Beach Chimaera ? 1520–1533 ? 468, 545 74–75 Lt-2

Latrobe

Golden Beach Chimaera? ? 74–75 1580–1640 ? 546 Lt-2 ? 2285–2422 ? 546 Strzelecki > 95? Ma-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 0.575.5–8 2836–3274 1.992–2.205 466, 467 Ma-1 Golden Beach Chimaera T. lilliei 75.5–80.5 ~ 3060–3100 ? 467 Ma-1 Golden Beach Chimaera N. senectus 80.5–83.5 ~ 3330–3370 ? 467 Ma-1 Golden Beach Chimaera N. senectus 80.5–83.5 ~3472,3460-3510 ? 466, 467 St-1 Golden Beach Chimaera N. senectus 80.5–83.5 2901–3183 2.058–2.208 466 St-1 Golden Beach Chimaera ? ? 3076–3108 ? 562 St-1 Golden Beach Chimaera ? 116 ? 562 ? 3111–3T1 Golden Beach Chimaera ? ? 2231–2247 ? 570 T1 Golden Beach Chimaera ? 2335–2345 ? 570 ? T3 Golden Beach Chimaera ? 2265–2622 ? 572 ? T4 Golden Beach Chimaera ? 2700–2750 ? 573 ? NA

Latrobe

Halibut Kingfish T. verruco ? 432 sus 65–61 ?

Table A1. d in wells. Column ‘S —Moore (198(2002), 50 ), 546—Apac ESSO (1968a), 572—ESSO (19 3—ESSO (1985a). See Preface for abbre

96. Volcanics intersecteource’: 432—Partridge (1999), 4663—ESSO (1990), 545—BHP (1996

9), 467—Woodlands and Wong (2001), 468—Bernecker et al. he (2005), 562—ESSO (1974b), 570—

70d), 57 viations.

Page 98: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

INTERPRETATION APPENDIX 2—GEOPHYSICAL DATASETS AND

________________________________________________________________________________

A2.1 Seismic acquisition and processing The Northern Fields Gippsland Basin 3-D seismic survey was acquired between Oct. 2001 and Jul.

2002. The crossline direction of the seismic grid was orientated WNW–ESE, approximately parallel

to the main basin depocentre axis and major basin-bounding fault systems (e.g. Rosedale, Lake

Wellington). The sail-line heading (inline direction) is orientated at 18°N; acquisition and survey

navigation parameters are provided in Tables A2.1–2.2. The objectives of the survey were to identify

potential infill drilling programs, improve existing reserves estimation, ascertain any wildcat potential

and identify any deeper intra-Latrobe and Golden Beach exploration potential. More detailed

information regarding survey acquisition and processing can be found in WesternGeco (2002) and

Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd (2002), respectively.

Survey parameter Parameter detail Acquisition company Western Geco Boat M/V Geco Beta Date Oct. 2001–Jul. 2002 Spheroid and datum parameters Parameter detail Geodetic datum WGS-84 Spheroid WGS-84 Semi-major axis (m) 6378137.000 Semi-minor axis (m) 6356752.314 Inverse flattening 298.2572236 Mapping projection parameter Parameter detail Projection type Universal Transverse Mercator Projection zone 55° S Origin of latitude 00° 00’ 00.00’’N Origin of longitude 147° 00’ 00.00’’E Grid origin (m) 500 000.00 E, 10 000 000.00 S Central meridian 147° 00’ 00.00’’E Scale factor at central meridian 0.9996

Table A2.1. Survey navigation parameters. Parameter information is from WesternGeco (2002). The geodetic datum and spheroid are those used by the seismic processing company. WGS—world geodetic spheroid.

Binning parameters Parameter detail Acquisition crosslines (WNW–ESE) 401–11240 Acquisition inlines (NNE–SSW) 801–5,184 Processing crosslines 401–11,240 Processing inlines 4,384–1 SW Corner X–Y coordinate (m) 529,695.88; 5,753,537.62 NW Corner X–Y coordinate (m) 550,629.8; 5,817,965.76

367

Page 99: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

NE Corner X–Y coordinate (m) 654,841.83; 5,784,105.29 SE Corner X–Y coordinate (m) 633,907.87; 5,719,677.17 Easting increment (m) 25 Northing increment (m) 6.25 C 1/1DP/Inline increment Map grid bearing (deg.) 18 Minimum offset (m) 355 Offset increment (m) 75 Maximum increment (m) 4,780

urvey size Size detail SN 3o lines ,988 CDP km processed 176654.175 Full fold CMP (km) ~ 3,900 Average line length (km) 39.251 Source parameters Parameter detail Energy source Bolt airguns Configuration Dual source, flip-flop S 2ource interval Shot interval (m) 37.5 per array, 18.75 on alternate array Source volume (cu. ins) / Airgun pressure 3,542/2,000 Gun depth/offset (m) 6 ± 1 average/150 nominal Source to antenna (m) 316.2 Streamer parameters Parameter detail Cable length/depth/separation (m) 4,600/7/100 Number of channels 8 X 368 Group interval (m) 12.5 Recording parameters Parameter detail Recording instrument/tape format TRIACQ ver. 1.6c/SEG-D 8015 rev.2 F ct to HC 180 Hz at 72 dB/Oct ilters LC 3 Hz at 18 dB/ORecord length (ms) 6,000 Sample rate (ms) 2

avigation Navigation system NPrimary TRINAV GPS Secondary Fugro Starfix

Table A2.2Parameter information is from WesternGeco (2002). CDP—common depth point, CMP—common mid point.

rocessin a (fast-track

(2002) quote structures having a TWT of 1–2.5 s and dips of up

. Ve

P ssin filter; (ii) linear and swell noise removal; (iii)

t dec

test after Qcomp, Tau-P DBS versus DBS on PSTM Stack; (v) Q-compensation; (vi) high resolution

de

. Seismic acquisition parameters—Northern Fields 3-D survey.

P g flow 1 (Table A2.3) was guided towards objectives in the select survey are

VO2, Snapper Field). WesternGeco

to 20º ritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd’s time migration processing routine based on the Stolt algorithm

was aimed appropriately to resolve these low angle dips.

roce g subroutines include: (i) dephase and low-cut

race imation; (iv) deconvolution before stack (i.e. conventional versus Tau-P deconvolution, DBS

Radon multiple (i.e. demultiple positioning); (vii) binning; (viii) FLOOD on offsets 355/430/505; (ix)

368

Page 100: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

amplitude compensation); (xi) Radon demultiple

ete

sin

tro h Subgroup targets. WesternGeco (2002) quote structures

a Pacific ’ time

n

processin (i.e. flow 3 in Table A2.3) include: (i) FXEDIT versus KLFLAT;

D n windows); (iii) acquisition footprint

o rameter, window length parameter, time gate length,

de ration,

m on

on

ut density velocity analysis (i.e. amplitude oriented

acquisition footprint removal, and; (x) post-stack

mutiple parameter, bin centering, thin AMO versus Fat

ion aperture; (iv) angular mute, and

e bincount was not included in the trace

headers to identify low fold in the 3-D seismic cube.

mudroll suppression; (x) Runtramp 3-D (i.e.

param r, and (xii) stack mute.

Proces g flows 3 (intermediate cube) and 4 (final cube) were guided towards imaging the deeper

be Group and Golden Beacintra-La

having TWT of 3–4 s and dips of up to 30°; Veritas DGC Asia Ltd’s ‘UTMOST

processing routine was used to resolve these dips. Processing subroutines run during the

g of the intermediate cube

migratio

(ii) FXE IT (threshold parameter, shallow and deep-water desig

(i.e. sm othing diameter, horizontal mix pa

amplitu map displays); (iv) Runtramp 3-D; (v) migration (i.e. conditioning of data prior to mig

igrati impulse response display, migration aperture length, migration dip); (vi) post-migration high

Radon demultiple (i.e. protection range, modelled multiple gathers); (vii) outer and inner resoluti

trace m e (i.e. shallow and deep water); (viii) high

kinematics (AOK) and GeoPressure); (ix) post-stack

Runmix.

Processing subroutines run during the processing of the final cube (i.e. flow 4 in Table A2.3) include:

(i) FXEDIT; (ii) migration smiles and artifacts mitigation (i.e. high resolution Radon versus Apha

Radon demultiple, high resolution Radon de

AMO, production flow, Runtramp, time-variant filter); (iii) migrat

(v) anisotropic pre-stack time migration.

The bin coverage and specifics of the trace mix contained within each bin are particularly important

for attribute work. Long (2005) described the concept of illumination as ‘every subsurface point at the

target should have reflected seismic energy with a uniform distribution of source–receiver offsets and

azimuths’. The ideal situation is that each bin within the 3-D grid has the same number of recorded

traces for any one offset and azimuth distribution (Brown, 2004; Long, 2005). In the non-ideal

situation, seismic processing will compensate by sharing traces from adjacent bins, thereby

smearing temporal and spatial resolution. However, th

369

Page 101: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

No Comments

Flow 1 – Output of Fast Track Areas, VO2 and Snapper

3.1.1 Reformat 6,144 ms record length (2 ms sample rate to Veritas DGC internal format)

3.1.2 Shot and trace editing

3.1.3 Merge seismic with navigation

3.1.4 Application of Dephase filter (i.e. filter provided by client)

3.1.5 Output near 96 channel to 3,590 SEGY tape

3.1.6 Resample from 2 to 4 ms using zero phase anti-alias filter 100 Hz–72 dB/octave

3.1.7 Spherical divergence (V*V*T) offset dependant (using one shallow and one deep water bottom average velocity derived from client provided vel)

3.1.8 Apply zero phase low cut filter 3 Hz–18 dB/octave

3.1.9 Mild mute (Trace/Time (ms) = 1/0, 170/1,000, 368/1,700)

3.1.10 Swell noise attenuation (FXEDIT) in common channel domain (Threshold tolerance–2.5, frequency range 2–20 Hz)

3.1.11 Linear noise removal (transform: -640 to 1,200, Signal: -200 to 370.7)

3.1.12 Adjacent trace sum from channel interval 12.5 to 25 m

3.1.13 Merge seismic with navigation

3.1.14 Q-compensation of phase (Q = 100 used at reference frequency 35 Hz)

3.1.15

Predictive deconvolution (Gap–36 ms, operator length–300 ms; design near offset gate at water bottom time 50 ms: 300–4,000 ms; design far offset gate at water bottom time 50 ms: 2,200–4,000 ms; design near offset gate at water bottom time 850 ms: 1,100–4,800 ms; design far offset gate at water bottom time 850 ms: 3,000–4,800 ms)

3.1.16 Generate near trace cube [a) NMO using one shallow & one deep-water bottom average velocity in process no 3.1.7; b) Stack from offset bin 355 to 880 m including 75 m; c) Migration using phase-shift plu

as defined s

Stolt algorithm, and d) Source and streamer depth static correction (i.e. total 8.66 ms)]

3.1.17 Output near trace cube to 3,590 SEGY tape

3.1.18 First pass velocity analyses at 1 X 1 km grid

3.1.19 3D offset binning (binned into 25 X 12.5 m grid to achieve 60 fold)

3.1.20 NMO using velocities from process no 3.1.18

Flow 3 – Output of intermediate cube, output grid at 25 X 25 m & 5000 ms of the whole survey

3.3.1

FXEDIT noise estimation and removal in offset–time CDP domain (Threshold tolerance–1.5, frequency range–2 to 90 Hz, application start time–wbt +600 ms; design window: at wbt = 0 ms (Offset (m)/Time (ms)) = (430/0, 2,155/0–1376, 4,780/0–3,408); at wbt = 300–800 ms (Offset (m)/Time (ms)) = (430/0–300, 2155/0–1676, 4780/0–3708)

3.3.2 FLOOD (bin redistribution program; applied over 60 common offset planes, 355–4,780 m at a 75 m increment)

3.3.3–23 Process steps not shown

Flow 4 – Output of final cube, output grid at 25 X 12.5 m & 6000 ms of the whole survey

3.4.1 Inverse NMO correction

3.4.2 NMO (using 3rd pass velocity generated from intermediate cube in process step 3.3.11)

3.4.3 FXEDIT (noise estimation and removal in offset plane domain; threshold tolerance–1.75, frequency range–2 to 60 Hz)

3.4.4 XRMULT (High resolution Radon Demultiple; applied from wbt +700, full on at wbt +1,200 ms, transform range: -200–3,000 ms, protection range: -200–100 ms)

3.4.5 Trim statics (shift limit – 12 ms)

3.4.6 Acquisition footprint removal (time window – 500 s, smoothing filter diameter – 900 m, length of inline averaging – 6,750 m)

3.4.7 RUNTRAMP (balancing of trace amplitudes; balancing over 801 traces, time gates 200–2,000, 2,004–3,700, 3,704–4,700, 4,704–6,000 ms)

3.4.8 FROID (bin centering on platform areas only)

370

Page 102: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

No Comments

3.4.9 Time variant filter (Time (ms)/Freq+1,000, 2/18–100/72; Top of Latrob

uency (Hz/dB per octave) (0–500, 2/18–100/72; Top of Latrobe Group e Group +1,200, 5/8–40/36; 5,000, 7/8–30/72; 6,000, 9/18–20/72)

3.4.10 Inverse NMO

11 Amplitude tapering (Time (ms) / Scalar (dB) – (0/0, 4,000/0, 6,000/-36; across ~ 2.5 km of the edges were tapered of 0 to -12 dB to the ends) 3.4.

3.4.12 Removal of spherical divergence

13 UTMOST (production ultimate time migration for optimum stacking; Input Grid—25 X 12.5 m, input data length—6,144 ms, migration aperture—3 km, dip—75 °, anti-alias filter—90 Hz, output grid—25 X 12.5 m, output data length—6,000 ms)

3.4.

3.4.14 Back off amplitude tapering applied at step 3.4.11

3.4.15 NMO (using 0.5 X 0.5 km velocity grid generated in step 3.3.11)

3.4.16 Angle mutes for full, near and far offsets

17 Stack using 3 volumes—full, near and far offsets (used 1/fold function for amplitude compensation) 3.4.

3.4.18 Output stack to SEGY tape for near and far offsets

Exponential gain [At wbt = 100 ms (Time (ms)/Gain (dB)) = 0/0, 4,000/24, 6,000/24); at wbt = 500 ms (Time (ms) / Gain (dB)) = (500/0, 4,500/24, 6,000/24); at wbt = 1,000 ms (Time (ms)/Gain (dB)) = (1,000/0, 5,000/24, 6,000/24)]

3.4.19

3.4.20 Source and streamer static correction (+8.66 ms)

3.4.21 Output to SEGY 3,590 tape – full stack

Table A2.3. Pr .

irregattenmid:

A2

Sei

The instantaneous amplitude, phase and

whil

eve

(Me

esti mm and White, 2002). The amplitude and phase

eit and Wood, 1982; Brown, 2001; Simm and White, 2002; Brown, 2005), and the

complex seismic trace (Barnes, 1998). Brown (2001) described the Australian polarity standard as

n increase in impedance (i.e. equivalent to compression of the wavelet) yielding negative

mplitudes on tape. The resultant high impedance boundary is interpreted as a white trough when

ocessing flow parameters for the near, far and full-offset stacks—Northern Fields 3-D surveyThe processing sequence is from Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd (2002). Veritas uses the following brand names for inhouse seismic processes: FLOOD—fold leveling for optimum offset distribution; FROID—Fourier regularization of

ular data; UTMOST—Ultimate time migration for optimum stacking; XRLIN—higher resolution linear noise uation, and XRMULT—high resolution Radon demultiple. Near offsets: 141–1,285 m; near-mid: 1,285–2,428 m; far-

2,428–3,572 m; far: 3,572–4,790 m. dB—decibels, ms—milliseconds, m—meter, NMO—normal moveout.

.2 Seismic interpretation

smic wavelet, polarity convention and phase

size and shape of a reflection can be represented by the

frequency (White, 1991). Amplitude and frequency are frequently used for hydrocarbon detection,

e instantaneous phase is used for showing up reflector continuity, including weaker coherent

nts (Leiphart and Hart, 2001). Also, flat spots have been imaged using instantaneous phase

yer et al., 2001). The source wavelet is normally required but rarely known and is usually

mated using both the seismic and well data (Si

spectra from the source wavelet should match the assumptions that are made in deconvolution (i.e.

minimum phase, flat amplitude spectrum; Brown, 2004).

Particular attention should be given to understanding the phase and polarity of the data (i.e.

character, Kallw

a

a

371

Page 103: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

eme, or as red, when using a red–blue color scheme. A decrease in using a black–white color sch

impedance yields positive amplitudes on tape and is normally displayed as a black peak or blue,

respectively. The standardization and importance of color was emphasized in Brown (2001) and

Brown (2004). The seismic interpretation contained within this study is based on the Australian

standard polarity (i.e. equivalent to reverse SEG standard; Figure A2.1a).

Figure A2.1. (a) Australian standard polarity and phase adopted in tudy, (b) Ricker phase wavelet. this s

Determination of polarity and phase

the interpreter is required to ascertain node marks (i.e. boundaries of known impedance) across the

he above are representative of the expected acoustic impedance

ontrasts although local conditions can cause deviations from that expected.

The acquisition and processing reports (WesternGeco, 2002; Veritas DGC Asia Pacific Ltd, 2002) for

the Northern Fields seismic 3-D survey did not define the phase and polarity of the dataset. The

polarity of the dataset was thus double-checked against known impedance contrasts. The trace

The Ricker phase wavelet is rotated by 30° phase lag increments (after Simms and White, 2002).

Zero phase is preferred in interpretation; however, the dominant loop should be zero phase in order

to accurately refer to the wavelet as zero phase (Simm and White, 2002). Confirming a wavelet’s

polarity and phase can be difficult, particularly at depth; it is rarely done comprehensively. However,

phase lag increments can occur (Figure A2.1b); thus, distorting the anticipated signature. Ultimately,

dataset so as to check the symmetry of the wavelet as well as any potential time shifts of the central

lobe. For example, the top of the high impedance layers can include igneous bodies, carbonate

layers, fluid contacts, basement, water bottom or salt (Brown, 2004). The top of low impedance

layers can include base of carbonate layers, top of thick hydrocarbon sand, shallow gas sand and

clean porous sand. On balance, t

c

372

Page 104: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

amplitude functionality of GeoFrameTM/IESX across the boundary was used to estimate the wavelet

(Figure A2.2d). Results are as follows.

i. The polarity and phase were checked at well locations where volcanic bodies are known

(Table A1.96). Results were inconclusive at Admiral-1, Kipper-1 and -2. Large positive and large

negative amplitudes were obtained flanked by low negative and low positive side lobes,

respectively. The seismic signature at the base of the volcanic body at Kipper-1 did, however,

correlate well with a quadrature phase wavelet having a -90º phase shift.

ii. The polarity and phase were checked at seismic locations where reflections are discordant with

layering (e.g. interpreted volcanic dykes/sills). Volcanic bodies are known to be present SSW of

the Kipper Field (O’Halloran and Johnstone, 2001). There, the phase ranged from -150 to -270º,

indicating that the wavelet was quadrature phase. The amplitude values clearly showed

asymmetry; small positive amplitudes were followed by large positive and intermediate positive

amplitudes. It was suspected that the discordant reflections might be representing the base of

the volcanic bodies, rather than the top, also in agreement with results found at Kipper-1.

iii. The polarity and phase were also checked at the water–rock interface for wells located in deeper

water (e.g. Volador-1, Pilotfish-1; Figures A2.2a–b), as results were inconclusive for wells drilled

in shallow water (~ 50–100 m). In the latter case, the fold is minimal as demonstrated from

calculating the critical angle; velocities assigned to near-surface sediments range from 1,700 to

2,000 m/s. The results confirmed the seismic data as associated with a quadrature phase normal

polarity wavelet with a -90º phase shift (Figures A2.2c–d).

cked at the base of the Tuna–Flounder and Marlin

underlying layers so that an inverse polarity is expected. On balance a quadrature phase normal

0º shift was obtained.

rpreted to be normal polarity

(Australian polarity standard); the wavelet deemed to be quadrature phase with a -90º phase shift.

pedance is reflected as a trough-to-peak zero crossing

(Figure A2.1b).

iv. The polarity and phase were also che

Channels where a sharp acoustic impedance would be expected (Partridge, 1999). The

sediment fill of the Tuna-Flounder and Marlin Channels has a high velocity with respect to

polarity wavelet with a -9

On balance, the Northern Fields 3-D seismic dataset was inte

For such a case, an increase in im

373

Page 105: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

ical conditions and depth of burial. The limits

of separability and visibility are both dependant on the input source wavelet, bandwidth and phase.

The vertical seismic resolution is best defined according to a range of values because of the varying

conditions across the study area.

The power spectra and extracted wavelet were obtained at different locations within the study area

and depths within the seismic cube; the dominant frequency is extracted using GeoFrameTM ‘power-

spectra’ tool, which together with the interval velocity allows the wavelength to be estimated (Brown,

2001).

The average dominant frequency is estimated at the centre of each of the 15 location blocks and for

each of the six seismic intervals (Figure A2.3). The interval velocity was subsequently estimated in

order to calculate the wavelength λ . Checkshots were plotted for all wells within the seismic grid to

obtain the regional trend (see Figure A2.12), and a second order polynomial fit obtained (Equations

A2.1–2.2).

Depth = 723.24OWT2 + 2068.9OWT, R2 = 0.9915 (Eq. A2.1)

t order derivative representing instantaneous interval velocity are

Vertical seismic resolution

The vertical seismic resolution is defined either by the: (i) limit of separability (i.e. λ/4), or by (ii) limit

of visibility (i.e. λ/8 to λ/30); it varies according to geolog

Depth = 885.15OWT2 + 2158.1OWT, R2 = 0.9944 (Eq. A2.2)

Depth and OWT are datumed to mean sea level (Equation A2.3), and subsea (Equation A2.4),

respectively. The firs

Interval velocity = 1446.48OWT + 2068.9 (Eq. A2.3)

Interval velocity = 1770.30OWT + 2158.1 (Eq. A2.4)

The interval velocity was calculated for each of the intervals where a dominant frequency could be

obtained. Calculating the limit of seperability (i.e. λ/4) for each of the intervals followed (EmpeSS,

GBeaSS, LHalSS1–2, UHalSS1–2, UHalSS3–CobiSS, SworSS). Estimates come to 55, 55, 35, 25,

25 and 15 m, respectively, for the mean-sea-level case (Figure A2.3) and are on average 10%

higher when datumed to subsea.

374

Page 106: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.2. Phase and polarity test at Volador-1. (a) Deep water bottom signature and seabed interpretation at inline—4894; (b) deep water bottom signature but zoomed

—4894, TWT—320 to 700 ms); (d) TWT—approximate amplitude extraction at the rock–

he lateral seismic resolution is dependent on both the inline/crossline spacing and fold of coverage

nd, represented by the Fresnel Zone radius (FZR, Equation A2.5),

and without the seabed interpretation (inline—4894); (c) power spectrum and wavelet extraction using a -90° phase shift, autocorrelation method (inlinewater interface.

Lateral seismic resolution

T

a

min2 F

TVFZR av (Eq. A2.5)

here Vav = average velocity datumed to MSL, T = TWT, and Fmin = dominant frequency. The

resnel Zone (i.e. twice the FZR) for the OtwaSS–LongSS, LongSS–SeahSS, SeahSS–LHalSS,

LHalSS–MackSS, MackSS–LatrSS and LatrSS–Seabed seismic intervals range from 554 to 209,

w

F

375

Page 107: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

297–225, 264–105, 181–115, 182–126 and 101–54 m, respectively. The higher value within each

range represents the deeper part of the intervals. The Fresnel Zone ranges for the same intervals

are on average 8% higher when Vav is datumed to SS.

Figure A2.3. Seismic resolution estimated across the study area for select seismic intervals. Seismic resolution was estimated at the centre of each location block (B1–B15). Red numbers 6–1 refer to the following seismic intervals: EmpeSS, GBeaSS, LHalSS1–2, UHalSS1–2, UHalSS3–CobiSS and SworSS, respectively. Red line represents the Latrobe Unconformity (LatrSS horizon). Not to scale, generic representation, m–meters, s–seconds.

Variance attribute

Different operator lengths (i.e. 26, 52, 100, 200 and 400 ms) were trialed to maximise the fault trace

resolution (Figure A2.4). Shorter versus longer operator lengths can be used according to the level of

smearing of small-scale faults that is deemed acceptable, and the depth of investigation being

considered. A shallow slice of the seismic variance attribute (1,764 ms) is used to represent the

near-top Mackerel Unconformity while a deep slice (3,200 ms) is used for the near-base of

reflectivity. Tests were run in location block B8. Shorter operators (26 and 52 ms) give a noisier

spectrum and highgrade small-scale fault traces whereas longer operators (100 and 200 ms) higrade

longer fault traces: an operator length of 140 ms was deemed optimal to use across the study area,

bearing in mind the depth of investigation being considered.

(3,200 ms). No noticeable difference in the quality of the outputs was noted. However, it was

Next in line, the averaging operator type ‘X’ (Figures A2.5a–d) was compared against the directional

operator type ‘+’ (Figures A2.5e–h) for both shallow (1,764 ms) and deep depths of investigation

376

Page 108: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

deemed prudent to use the operator type ‘X’ so as to not bias the averaging of the variance attribute

to any one direction—differing fault trends are known to exist in the Gippsland Basin (Power, 2003;

Power et al., 2003).

The parameter testing of the seismic variance attribute indicated that an averaging operator type ‘X’

with an operator length of L = 140 ms was optimum. The number of traces to be used in the

averaging (3, 5, 7, and 9) was also tested: in all cases, a trace number of three gave the highest

resolution (Figures A2.4–2.5). The seismic variance attribute was subsequently computed across the

seismic cube using the above parameters.

Figure A2.4. Optimizing the resolution of the fault trace—varying the operator length when computing the seismic variance attribute. (a) 26, (b) 52, (c) 100, and (d) 200 ms. Red circle—the continuity of the fault trace varies according to the operator length applied. Coloured squares—fault offsets on seismic profiles. Blanked area—undershoot area around the Tuna Field. Testing was carried out in location blocks B10–B11.

377

Page 109: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.5. Optimizing the resolution of the fault trace—varying the number of traces used in the averaging operator ‘X’ and directional operator ‘+’. (a) 3 X 3, (b) 5 X 5, (c) 7 X 7, (d) 9 X 9, (e) 3 + 3, (f) 5 + 5, (g) 7 + 7 and (h) 9 + 9 traces. Red circle—the continuity of the fault trace varies according to the operator length applied. Coloured squares—fault offsets on seismic profiles. Blanked area—undershoot area around the Tuna Field. Testing was carried out in location blocks B10–B11.

378

Page 110: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.6. TWT structure maps—(a) Otway (OtwaMS horizon) and, (b) Longtom Unconformities (LongSS horizon).

379

Page 111: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.7. Depth structure maps—(a) Seahorse (SeahSS horizon) and, (b) ILHalS unconformities (ILHalS horizon).

380

Page 112: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.8. Depth structure maps—(a) LHalSS (LHalSS horizon) and, (b) IUhorizon).

HalS unconformities (IUHalS

381

Page 113: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.9. Time thickness maps—(a) EmpeSS and, (b) GBeaSS intervals. Shows the depocentre of the (a) syn-rift and (b) later transition-rift sections.

382

Page 114: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.10. Time thickness maps—(a) LHalSS1 and, (b) LHalSS2 intervals. Shows the more (a) and less (b) pronounced depocentres of the early rift-drift section.

383

Page 115: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.11. Time thickness maps—(a) UHalSS1 and, b) UHalSS2 intervals. Shows localised thins and thicks of the late rift-drift section.

384

Page 116: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.3 Checkshot data Checks ata were a le fo y

area; h pies of geo , s ta

was qu ontroled to de r

Checkshot data were unavailable for Trumpeter-1 and Tuna-2 while other wells were located on the

edges of the 3-D seismic grid (i.e. Mackerel-2 and -3, Patricia-2, Turrum-7). In such instances,

checkshot data from adjacent wells were used (e.g. East Halibut-1 for Trumpeter-1, Mackerel-1 for

Mackerel-2 and -3, Patricia-1 for Patricia-2, Tuna-4 for Tuna-2 and, Turrum-3 for Turrum-7).

Ahot d vailab r 55 of the 71 wells located within the seismic grid part of the stud

ardco grams ynthetics and VSPs were available for 10 wells. The checkshot da

ality-c provi eliable horizon picking and depth conversion.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

101.0 0.131 210.2 0.267 814.0 0.737 894.0 0.796 993.0 0.876 1088.0 0.950 1215.0 1.044 1272.0 1.084 1327.0 1.122 1365.0 1.146 1409.0 1.174 1471.0 1.215 1483.0 1.222 1519.0 1.246 1579.0 1.283 1661.0 1.329 1710.0 1.357 1765.0 1.391 1838.0 1.432 2049.0 1.545 2096.0 1.570 2129.0 1.583 2139.0 1.588 2141.0 1.589

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1990) Formation at TD: Kersop Arkose Deviation data: have, applied Replacement velocity: 1540 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.4. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Admiral-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

385

Page 117: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (M SL, m) D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability stat s of seismic tie information u

0.0 0.000 70.0 0.094 579.0 0.544 879.0 0.748 1129.0 0.912 1329.0 1.060 1622.0 1.274 1885.0 1.420 1984.0 1.492 2129.0 1.576 2440.0 1.758 2729.0 1.914 3029.0 2.066 3400.0 2.246

Note: sh ells refer to vat seabed and TD.

rmation at TD: Chimaera Fm

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1986b) FoDeviation data: have, applied Replacement velocity: 1490 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: dont haveVelocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

aded c alues

Table A2.5. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Angelfish-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

386

Page 118: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (M SL, m)D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 264.0 0.357 477.0 0.559 727.0 0.769 827.0 0.837 957.0 0.925 1087.0 1 .0131177.0 1.069 1267.0 1.124 1377.0 1.184 1477.0 1.236 1577.0 1.286 1692.0 1.346 1777.0 1.390 1877.0 1.440 1977.0 1.492 2077.0 1.544 2152.0 1.584 2247.0 1.638 2347.0 1.706 2447.0 1.772 2527.0 1.830 2607.0 1.884 2692.0 1.942 2722.0 1.962 2759.0 1.986 28 0 38. 2.034 2915.0 2.076 2997.0 2.124 3094.0 2.174 3201.0 2.228 3276.0 2.266 3352.0 2.304 3362.0 2.310

Note: shaded cells refer to values atseabed and TD.

rmation at TD: Volador Fm Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

t have

Source for checkshots: Phillips (1983) FoDeviation data: have, applied Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A ckshot da tatus of seismic tie information—Athene-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.6. Che ta and availability seface for ns.

387

Page 119: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 54.9 0.074 90.6 0.112 140.6 0.163 190.6 0.214

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Gp Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: have

240.6 0.260 Velocity report: don’t have

300.6 0.320

Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

360.6 0.377 420.6 0.435 480.6 0.487 540.6 0.545 590.6 0.591 628.6 0.629 645.6 0.645 697.6 0.703 754.6 0.743 765.6 0.754 802.6 0.780 827.6 0.796 915.6 0.852 1010.6 0.916 1015.6 0.920

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

1020.5 0.924

Table A2.7. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Baleen-1. See Preface for abbreviations. Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 55.0 0.074 74.0 0.086 174.0 0.192 274.0 0.282 374.0 0.374 474.0 0.468 574.0 0.554 637.0 0.608 650.0 0.618 664.0 0.630 677.0 0.642 690.0 0.654 704.0 0.668 720.0 0.682 742.0 0.700 755.0 0.712 769.0 0.722 786.0 0.736 805.0 0.750 819.0 0.760 833.0 0.770 847.0 0.780 859.0 0.790 869.0 0.800

Source for checkshots: OMV (2000) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Gp Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: have

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.8. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Baleen-2. See Preface for abbreviations.

388

Page 120: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 162.0 0.219

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

250.0 0.300 850.0 0.800 1650.0 1.350

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don’t have, not critical, well outside 3-D grid Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have

2450.0 1.800 Synthetic: don’t have

3350.0 2.300 3966.0 ?

Velocity log: don’t have elocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

V

Note: shaded cells refer to values atseabed and TD.

Table A ckshot da tatus of seismic tie information—Basker-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.9. Che ta and availability seface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

240.0 0.324 570.0 0.630 750.0 0.790 970.0 0.930 1180.0 1.050 1380.0 1.170 1580.0 1.280 1780.0 1.400 1960.0 1.530 2180.0 1.670 2270.0 1.710 2370.0 1.760 2500.0 1.840 2570.0 1.880 2650.0 1.920 2690.0 1.940 2780.0 1.990 2880.0 2.040 3080.0 2.150 3130.0 2.190 3180.0 2.220 3230.0 2.240 3270.0 2.270 3350.0 2.300 3395.0 2.350

Source for checkshots: Shell (1984c) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don’t have, not critical, outside 3-D seismic grid Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have

c profile: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismi

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.10. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Basker South-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

389

Page 121: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 68.0 0.092 906.8 0.785 1066.8 0.910 1219.2 1.025 1440.2 1.190 1615.4 1.290 1828.8 1.420 1920.2 1.470 2095.5 1.585 2270.8 1.650 2354.6 1.730 2438.4 1.775 2590.8 1.855 2743.2 1.938 2895.6 2.015 2944.4 2.040 2965.6 2.055

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

ador FmSource for checkshots: ESSO (1970c) Formation at TD: Vol Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

Table A2.11. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Batfish-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

390

Page 122: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 354.0 0.478 370.0 0.490 660.0 0.730

Source for checkshots: Shell (1994) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

760.0 0.830 Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have

960.0 0.970 1260.0 1.160 1460.0 1.290 1660.0 1.410 1880.0 1.510 2070.0 1.610 2270.0 1.720 2420.0 1.820 2500.0 1.870 2570.0 1.910 2670.0 1.970 2720.0 1.990 2760.0 2.020 2870.0 2.080 2970.0 2.140 3070.0 2.190 3170.0 2.240

Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

3260.0 2.290

3370.0 2.340 3470.0 2.4

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

00 3570.0 2.460 3670.0 2.500 3770.0 2.560 3870.0 2.610 3970.0 2.650

TSee Pre r abbreviatio

able A2 Checkshot .12. d avaata and ilability status of seismic tie information—Bignose-1. face fo ns.

391

Page 123: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.705 418.0 1.050

Source for checkshots: WCR Formation at TD: Volador Fm

554.0 1.215 Deviation data: have but stops at an MD = 3348.1, not critical, outside 3-D

979.0 1.425 1224.0 1.521

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have

Vertical seismic profile: ? Velocity report: ? 1579.0 1.589

1749.0 1.645 1874.1 1.875 1979.1 2.138 2400.5 2.174 2784.4 2.274 2845.4 2.340 3033.5 2.411 3156.2 2.483 3285.2 2.529 3419.2 2.564 3516.1 2.571 3583.0 0.705 3599.0 1.050 4380.0 ?

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.13. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Blackback-1ST2. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 72.8 0.098 906.8 0.770 1021.1 0.850 1135.4 0.925 1318.3 1.035 1493.5 1.135 1630.7 1.220 1828.8 1.360 1981.2 1.460 2080.3 1.520 2202.2 1.610 2369.8 1.715 2552.7 1.820 2584.2 1.845

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO. (1972a) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.14. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Cobia-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

392

Page 124: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 75.9 0.103 858.6 0.779 1005.8 0.877 1172.6 0.985 1284.1 1.051 1397.5 1.113 1514.9 1.178 1627.0 1.246 1696.8 1.288 1803.5 1.357 1913.2 1.427 1986.4 1.474 2138.2 1.571 2275.9 1.663 2321.7 1.692 2358.8 1.716 2366.2 1.720 2395.4 1.736 2428.3 1.754 2472.5 1.777

Fm ment velocity: 1480 m/s

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1977) Formation at TD: Kingfish Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replace Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

ote: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. N

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information—Cobia-2. See Pr abbreviatio

2.15. Ch ata andeface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 74.0 0.100 219.0 0.240 278.0 0.298 494.0 0.476 799.0 0.694 1044.0 0.856 1306.0 1.018 1479.0 1.122 1779.0 1.322 2104.0 1.532 2303.0 1.668 2412.0 1.740 2539.0 1.806 2550.0 1.807

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1986a) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information—Drummer-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

2.16. Ch ata and

393

Page 125: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checksho va att plot and a ilability st us of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 85.0 0.115 209.3 0.242 429.3 0.438 683.9 0.631 882.3 0.771 1179.3 0.958 1389.3 1.072 1645.3 1.214 1884.3 1.342 2129.3 1.494 2374.3 1.656 2546.3 1.750 2699.3 1.824 2700.0 1.824

No d cel to valat nd TD

Source for chec SSO ion Kingfish Fmkshots: E (1987a) Format at TD: Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well ment y: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjuste don’t Synthetic: don’t have

Replace velocitd: have

Velocity log: don’t have Velocity repor don’t havet: Vertical seismic don’t

profile: have

te: shade ls refer ues seabed a .

Table A2.17. Checkshot data and availabili us of tie in on— ibut-1See Preface for abbreviations.

ty stat seismic formati East Hal .

394

Page 126: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 121.5 0.161 136.9 0.176 221.5 0.261 236.9 0.274 321.5 0.353 337.0 0.366 421.6 0.444 437.0 0.456 521.5 0.521 537.0 0.532 621.5 0.593 636.8 0.604 713.5 0.660 729.0 0.671 821.5 0.737 836.8 0.748 921.5 0.805 936.9 0.816 946.6 0.823 962.0 0.833 1021.5 0.872 1036.9 0.882 1053.4 0.893 1068.8 0.903 1121.6 0.939 1137.0 0.950 1221.5 1.014 1236.9 1.025 1303.4 1.075 1318.8 1.086 1336.9 1.098 1421.5 1.159 1435.5 1.169 1450.9 1.180 1521.6 1.231 1537.1 1.247 1551.6 1.252 1566.6 1.263 1582.0 1.276 1596.5 1.284 1603.6 1.290 1611.9 1.296 1619.0 1.302 1626.4 1.307 1641.9 1.314 1656.4 1.323 1671.8 1.332 1686.5 1.343 1701.9 1.352 1716.3 1.361 1731.6 1.366 1731.7 1.370

applied

Source for checkshots: ESSO (2001) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: have, but goes to MD = 2771,Replacement velocity: 1524 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t haveSynthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

ote: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. N

395

Page 127: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

1746.3 1.379 .5 2106 1.600 2451.7 1.791 2798.6 1.968 1761.8 1.395 .9 2121 1.608 2466.3 1.799 2814.0 1.979 1776.5 1.401 .1 2136 1.617 2481.7 1.806 2826.5 1.982 1791.9 1.410 .6 2151 1.626 2496.4 1.813 2842.0 1.988 1806.6 1.419 .3 2166 1.635 2511.8 1.821 2856.5 1.996 1822.1 1.428 .7 1.644 2526.4 1.828 2872.0 2.003 21811836.6 1.438 .3 1.653 2541.8 1.835 2886.5 2.011 21961852.0 1.447 .8 1.661 2556.4 1.844 2903.4 2.023 22111866.5 1.456 .4 1.670 2571.8 1.851 2916.6 2.027 22261881.9 1.465 .8 1.678 2586.4 1.859 2932.0 2.035 22411896.4 1.474 .6 1.687 2601.8 1.867 2946.4 2.044 22561911.9 1.483 .0 1.695 2616.5 1.875 2961.9 2.050 22721926.4 1.492 .4 1.703 2631.9 1.883 2976.5 2.056 22861941.8 1.502 .8 1.712 2646.6 1.891 2992.0 2.063 23011956.4 1.512 .5 1.720 2662.0 1.899 3006.5 2.070 23161971.8 1.520 .0 1.728 2676.5 1.908 3022.0 2.078 23321986.6 1.530 .3 1.738 2691.9 1.914 3036.5 2.085 23462002.0 1.541 2361.7 1.746 2706.6 1.923 3052.0 2.091 2016.6 1.550 2376.3 1.750 2722.0 1.931 3066.6 2.099 2032.0 1.558 2391.7 1.763 2736.6 1.938 3082.0 2.106 2046.5 1.566 2405.0 1.768 2752.0 1.946 3096.6 2.115 2061.9 1.573 2421.7 1.778 2766.6 1.953 3112.0 2.121 2076.5 1.583 2436.3 1.784 2782.0 1.960 3113.0 2.123 2091.9 1.593

Table A2.18. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—East Pilchard-1. ee Preface for abbreviations.

S

Depth ( L, m) MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 52.7 0.070

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1970a) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Group

61.0 0.084 D

91.5 0.120 122.0 0.190 152.0 0.228

eviation data: don’t have, not critical, outside 3-D seismic grid Replacement velocity: 1500 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

183.0 0.260 213.4 0.320 274.4 0.380 335.4 0.410 385.9 0.440 396.3 0.480 439.0 0.526 491.0 0.540 518.0 0.570 579.0 0.590 610.0 0.616 701.0 0.684 899.0 0.820 976.0 0.860

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

1056.6 0.910

Table A2.19. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flathead-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

396

Page 128: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 87.5 0.118

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1969a) Formation at TD: Volador Fm

304.8 0.340 Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well

457.2 0.465 609.6 0.585

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

762.0 0.700

944.9 0.820 1138.4 0.945 1341.1 1.060 1554.5 1.215 1706.9 1.320 1897.4 1.435 2080.3 1.550 2225.0 1.640 2476.5 1.780 2682.2 1.900 2743.2 1.924 2770.7 1.940 2822.5 1.968 2840.8 1.980 2886.5 2.004 2923.1 2.020 2962.7 2.044

3003.8 2.060 Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. 3026.7 2.074 3084.6 2.100 3170.0 2.140 3255.3 2.180 3331.5 2.220 3 410.8 2.260 3 505.2 2.310 3549.7 2.350

Table A heckshot d avaSee Pre abbreviatio

2.20. C ata and ilability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-1. face for ns.

397

Page 129: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 99.4 0.134

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1969b) Formation at TD: Volador Fm

259.1 0.300 Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well

411.5 0.440 640.1 0.620

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

746.8 0.710

1005.8 0.880 1196.3 1.000 1440.2 1.150 1615.4 1.280 1935.5 1.480 2095.5 1.575 2186.9 1.630 2507.0 1.805 2651.8 1.885 2728.0 1.925 2810.8 1.970

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.21. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-2. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 110.6 0.150 274.3 0.310 373.4 0.410

Sour Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s S

ce for checkshots: ESSO (1969c) Formation at TD: Volador

533.4 0.530

onic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have

609.6 0.585 Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

754.4 0.670 853.4 0.760 1043.9 0.880 1226.8 0.995 1447.8 1.120 1676.4 1.270 1958.3 1.465 2194.6 1.605 2453.6 1.740 2598.4 1.830 2601.8 1.834

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A2.22. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-3. See Preface for abbreviations.

398

Page 130: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 119.5 0.161 2 49.3 0.295 371.2 0.410 474.9 0.495 737.0 0.695 819.3 0.755 874.2 0.785 956.5 0.840 1131.4 0.945 1340.5 1.090 1489.9 1.165 1813.6 1.385 1920.5 1.455 2074.5 1.550 2310.7 1.685 2410.4 1.745 2508.2 1.795 2606.6 1.840 2613.9 1.850

Note: s lls refer to v

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1973a) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

at seabed and TD.

Table A2.23. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-4. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 96.6 0.131

Sourc re for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, ene gy,

345.0 0.370 457.2 0.462 609.6 0.580 762.0 0.694 957.6 0.826 1178.6 0.962

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

1382.0 1.086 1653.8 1.268 1828.8 1.382 1898.5 1.436 2164.5 1.598 2231.4 1.640 2423.2 1.752 2541.7 1.810 2598.5 1.860

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.24. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-5. See Preface for abbreviations.

399

Page 131: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 93.3 0.126 9 53.7 0.836 1 110.1 0.938 1282.3 1.044 1492.6 1.178 1635.9 1.272 1749.3 1.348 1907.2 1.450 2047.4 1.540 2218.7 1.634 2294.3 1.678 2327.8 1.702 2462.5 1.772 2500.0 1.790 2580.8 1.830 2595.7 1.845

Note: s lls refer to v

Source for che

ve

ckshots: ESSO (1978a) Formation at TD: Volador Fm tion data: don’t have, near vertical well Devia

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t haSynthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues at seabed and TD.

Table A2.25. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Flounder-6. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 65.0 0.088

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

849.7 0.718

applications, petroleum wells applications)

961.7 0.790 Formation at TD: K on data: don’t have, ningfish Fm Deviati ear vertical well

1040.7 0.838

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: d

1197.7 0.932

on’t have on’t have on’t have

Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: dVelocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: d

1312.7 1.002

1425.7 1.076 1597.7 1.180 1721.7 1.258 1924.7 1.392 2134.7 1.534 2226.7 1.604 2387.7 1.712 2525.7 1.784 2644.7 1.848 2666.0 1.870

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.26. Checkshot data aSee Preface for abbreviations.

nd availability status of seismic tie information—Fortescue-1.

400

Page 132: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth ( L, m)MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 68.7 0.093

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

854.0 0.722 921.0 0.772

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: don’t have, near vertical well

1079.0 0.874 Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have S

1231.0 0.968 1369.0 1.052

ynthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

1507.0 1.122 1648.0 1.204 1769.0 1.284 1919.0 1.388 2069.0 1.488 2219.0 1.586 2384.0 1.698 2410.0 1.716 2423.0 1.726 2493.0 1.762 2618.0 1.834 2621.0 1.838

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.27. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Fortescue-2. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (M SL, m)D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 69.0 0.093

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

849.0 0.722 999.0 0.824

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: have

1149.0 0.918 Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

1299.0 1.014 1494.0 1.122

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have ynthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have

Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

S

1599.0 1.184 1714.0 1.250 1864.0 1.350 2063.0 1.476 2209.0 1.578 2402.0 1.704 2431.0 1.722 2587.0 1.802 2594.0 1.808

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.28. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Fortescue-3. See Preface for abbreviations.

401

Page 133: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth ( L, m) MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 68.0 0.092 605.0 0.564 860.0 0.732 1037.0 0.852 1228.0 0.972 1395.0 1.070 1525.0 1.142 1659.0 1.222 1805.0 1.318 1965.0 1.424 2121.0 1.528 2274.0 1.630 2391.0 1.706 2470.0 1.754 2573.0 1.808 2577.0 1.815

s at

e Velocity log: don’t have

elocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1979a) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: have, applied, some deviation data missing near TD

Sonic log adjusted: don’t havReplacement velocity: 1480 m/s ynthetic: don’t have S

V

Note: shaded cellsseabed and TD.

refer to value

Table A2.29. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Fortescue-4.

See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth ( SL, m) MD M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

658.5 0.890 Source for checkshots: ESSO (1997) Formation at TD: ?

669.6 0.877 1419.6 1.555 2069.6 1.949 2571.6 2.226 2869.8 2.445 3210.7 2.676 3409.7 2.789 3416.5 2.799 3441.5 2.825

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

Velocity log: ? : ? Vertical seismic profile: ?

Deviation data: ? Sonic log adjusted: ? Replacement velocity: ?

ynthetic: ? SVelocity report

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot da ava ite-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.30. Ch ta and ilability status of seismic tie information—Great Wheface for ns.

402

Page 134: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 108.0 0.146

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

679.0 0.647 879.0 0.788

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don

1229.0 1.020 1579.0 1.264 1834.0 1.446

’t have t have

ave Velocity log: don’t have elocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’Synthetic: don’t hV

1869.0 1.466 2159.0 1.640 2429.0 1.800 2589.0 1.882 2784.0 1.986 2979.0 2.090 3229.0 2.216 3289.0 2.252 3484.0 2.362 3720.0 2.500 3788.0 2.560

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information—Grunter-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.31. Ch ata andeface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

279.4 0.378 328.7 0.434 1084.7 1.057 1514.7 1.311 2235.2 1.708 2835.3 2.097 3094.9 2.229 3374.8 2.349 3414.4 2.364 3415.9 2.365 3799.0 2.745 3812.0 2.755

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1995) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: have, applied Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.32. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Gudgeon-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

403

Page 135: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 155.4 0.210 1171.6 1.008 1371.6 1.128 1571.6 1.246 1726.6 1.342 1771.6 1.370 1971.6 1.508 2052.6 1.562 2171.6 1.630 2371.6 1.742 2571.6 1.854 2771.6 1.968 2971.6 2.080 3006.6 2.096 3171.6 2.182 3371.6 2.274 3534.6 2.354

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

lacement velocity: 1480 m/s e

Source for checkshots: Shell (1990a) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don’t have RepSonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t havVelocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot da ava bility status of seismic tie information—Gummy-1. 2.33. Ch ta and ilaSee Preface for abbreviations. Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 68.3 0.092 214.9 0.245 414.5 0.420 592.8 0.558 739.1 0.656 755.9 0.668 914.4 0.775 1065.3 0.870 1217.7 0.970 1330.5 1.032 1478.3 1.115 1633.7 1.198 1755.7 1.263 1973.6 1.406 2130.6 1.505 2270.8 1.600 2383.6 1.662 2453.7 1.695 2560.4 1.758 2636.6 1.792 2834.7 1.892 3032.8 1.992 3041.6 2.000

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1968b) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.34. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Halibut-A1. See Preface for abbreviations.

404

Page 136: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 79.1 0.107 205.0 0.229 405.0 0.410

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1994) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: have, applied Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have

605.0 0.570 Velocity log: have Velocity report: have

805.0 0.709 Vertical seismic profile: have

1005.0 0.840 1205.0 0.964 1405.0 1.074 1605.0 1.184 1805.0 1.294 2005.0 1.409 2205.0 1.539 2225.0 1.553 2245.0 1.565 2265.0 1.579 2285.0 1.593 2305.0 1.606 2325.0 1.616 2345.0 1.627 2365.0 1.639 2385.0 1.649 2405.0 1.661

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

2425.0 1.669 2445.0 1.682 2465.0 1.692 2485.0 1.702 2505.0 1.712 2525.0 1.722 25 0 45. 1.732 2 560.0 1.741 2542.0 1.745 2565.0 1.900

Table A heckshot d avaSee Pre abbreviatio

2.35. C ata and ilability status of seismic tie information—Halibut-2. face for ns.

405

Page 137: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 121.0 0.164

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

5 37.5 0.552 622.5 0.615 728.5 0.691 827.5 0.763

applic

e

e

ations, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Kipper Shale Deviation data: have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t havSynthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t haveVelocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t hav

927.5 0.831

1032.5 0.903 1127.5 0.976 1187.5 1.020 1266.5 1.076 1327.5 1.120 1417.5 1.172 1462.5 1.206 1527.5 1.248 1607.5 1.288 1652.5 1.312 1742.5 1.364 1797.5 1.394 1877.5 1.438 1947.5 1.474 2022.5 1.506 2097.5 1.548 2108.0 1.558

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

TS

able A2.36. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Hammerhead-1. ee Preface for abbreviations.

406

Page 138: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 384.0 0.519 1347.8 1.266 1510.0 1.360

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1975b) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm? Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

aveSonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t h

1674.0 1.454 Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have

1847.7 1.550 Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

1992.2 1.634 2147.0 1.716 2286.6 1.784 2416.5 1.856 2516.5 1.922 2667.0 2.032 2767.9 2.100 2801.8 2.120 2822.8 2.136 2859.7 2.152 3005.7 2.236 3062.4 2.256 3100.5 2.278 3173.6 2.310 3284.9 2.370

3425.7 2.450 3547.9 2.516

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

3638.1 2.548 3640.5 2.550

Table A2.37. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Hapuku-1. See Preface for abbreviations. Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 76.4 0.103 4 79.1 0.470 629.0 0.579 779.0 0.703 939.0 0.824 1079.0 0.932 1229.0 1.047 1430.0 1.186 1679.0 1.349 1867.0 1.462 2079.0 1.582 2229.0 1.661 2373.0 1.737 2474.0 1.793 2634.0 1.874 2749.0 1.933 2844.0 1.982 2936.6 2.026

2937.0 2.026

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Admiral Fm Deviation data: have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: Don’t have

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.38. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Judith-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

407

Page 139: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth ( SL, m) MD M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 59.2 0.080 479.0 0.458 729.0 0.646 929.0 0.808 1374.0 1.150 1456.0 1.204 1549.0 1.270 1629.0 1.326 1719.0 1.380 1829.0 1.450 1894.0 1.490 2079.0 1.600 2294.0 1.692 2299.0 1.698

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

hale ave Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

onic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1982c) Formation at TD: Kate SDeviation data: don’t hS

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot da availability status of seismic tie information—Kahawai-1 See Pr abbreviatio

2.39. Ch ta andeface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 94.0 0.127 95.0 0.128 224.0 0.256 400.0 0.420 817.0 0.736 1179.0 1.000 1399.0 1.120 1699.0 1.336 1774.0 1.398 1872.0 1.456 1969.0 1.514 2129.0 1.604 2259.0 1.672 2479.0 1.778 2679.0 1.872 2824.0 1.946 2849.0 1.956 2854.0 1.960

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1986c) Formation at TD: Admiral Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.40. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Kipper-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

408

Page 140: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 107.3 0.146

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1987b) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm

243.7 0.288 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1470 m/s

361.7 0.400 592.7 0.584

Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t h

have ave

Vertical seismic profile: don’t 807.7 0.746

1092.7 0.944 1516.7 1.258 1649.7 1.342 1788.7 1.432 1872.7 1.482 1899.7 1.498 2047.7 1.586 2188.7 1.662 2220.2 1.678 2244.2 1.690 2282.7 1.714 2411.7 1.782 2443.7 1.796 2499.7 1.822 2520.7 1.836 2547.7 1.848

te: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. No

2572.7 1.860 2577.7 1.866 2579.0 1.868

TS

able A2.41. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Kipper-2.

ee Preface for abbrev

iations.

Depth ( L, m)MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

106.0 0.143 599.3 0.629 724.3 0.737 790.3 0.791 836.3 0.827 930.0 0.877

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

Replacement velocity: 1470 m/s

onic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Source for checkshots: ESSO (198eviation data: don’t have

6d) Formation at TD: Admiral FmDS

haded ce alues

Table A2.42. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Leatherjacket-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

409

Page 141: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 56.2 0.074 56.3 0.074 75.0 0.092 225.0 0.238 375.0 0.372 525.0 0.493 675.0 0.613 825.0 0.736 975.0 0.857 1025.0 0.897 1079.0 0.937 1125.0 0.973 1176.0 1.010 1224.5 1.043 1244.0 1.057 1274.5 1.078 1328.0 1.116 1380.0 1.150 1425.0 1.179 1475.0 1.211 1501.0 1.227 1535.0 1.249 1575.0 1.274 1625.0 1.308 1675.0 1.339 1725.0 1.371 1775.0 1.403 1825.0 1.436 1875.0 1.467 1910.0 1.484 1925.0 1.490 1975.0 1.508 2025.0 1.532 2075.0 1.556 2110.0 1.574 2125.0 1.581 2175.0 1.605 2200.0 1.617 2221.0 1.630

Sour m ce for checkshots: ESSO (1987c) Formation at TD: Admiral FDeviation data: have, applied Replacement velocity: 1526 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: have

ote: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. N

Table A2.43. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Longtom-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

410

Page 142: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (M SL, m)D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 99.4 0.134

1024.1 0.875

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1969d) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

1661.2 1.272 2148.9 1.565

Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity report: have

2301.3 1.665 2377.5 1.715 3017.6 2.040 3049.0 2.070

Velocity log: have ertical seismic profile: have V

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A2.44. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Mackerel-1. See Preface for abbreviations. Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 83.2 0.112 858.9 0.756 1 028.1 0.870 1 231.7 0.998 1334.4 1.058 1593.5 1.204 1713.3 1.278 1829.4 1.358 2063.8 1.508 2155.6 1.570 2351.9 1.704 2475.3 1.772 2635.9 1.856 2652.0 1.870

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1973c) Formation at TD: Mackerel Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t haveVelocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

Table A2.45. ChecSee Preface for abb

kshot data and ava bility status of seismic tie information—Mackerel-4. reviations.

ila

411

Page 143: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 133.5 0.180

Source for checkshots: Shell (1984b) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm

470.0 0.510 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

670.0 0.670 Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t h

825.0 0.765

ave ave Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t h

Vertical seismic profile: don’t have 1095.0 0.960

1235.0 1.035 1370.0 1.110 1480.0 1.190 1620.0 1.285 1795.0 1.410 1910.0 1.480 2020.0 1.545 2125.0 1.610 2285.0 1.700 2375.0 1.755 2425.0 1.775 2565.0 1.860 2725.0 1.950 2810.0 1.990 2940.0 2.050 3040.0 2.100

3075.0 2.120 3155.0 2.165

3210.0 2.190 3245.0 2.210 3270.0 2.220 3300.0 2.230 3340.0 2.250 3410.0 2.280 3455.0 2.310 3480.0 2.320 3515.0 2.330 3547.0 2.340

Note: sh ells refer to vaded c alues at seabed and TD.

Table A2.46. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Manta-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

412

Page 144: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 61.3 0.082

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1974a) Formation at TD: Volador Fm

292.7 0.320 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1500 m/s

445.1 0.446 Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t ha

602.1 0.560

ve ve Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t ha

Vertical seismic profile: don’t have 750.0 0.661

904.9 0.760 1097.0 0.890 1327.1 1.020 1508.2 1.139 1631.1 1.220 1813.4 1.347 1941.5 1.430 2106.1 1.523 2218.0 1.595 2362.2 1.675 2382.0 1.690 2448.8 1.729 2511.6 1.764 2546.0 1.768 2608.2 1.814

2612.2 1.820 Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.47. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information—Marlin-4. ee Preface for abbreviations. S

Depth ( SL, m)MD M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 63.4 0.086 182.9

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1973b) Formation at TD: Volador Fm

0.215 289.6 0.310

Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1490 m/s Synthetic: don’t have

388.6 0.395

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have elocity log: don’t have V

V586.7 0.540

Velocity report: don’t have ertical seismic profile: don’t have

716.3 0.625 838.2 0.705 1035.1 0.832 1307.0 1.034 1419.8 1.112 1642.3 1.264 1736.8 1.332 2056.8 1.532 2125.1 1.570 2245.8 1.644 2404.9 1.742 2415.5 1.752 2430.2 1.765

Note: shaded cells rat seabed and TD.

efer to values

Table A2.48. Checkshot data See Preface for abbreviations.

and availability status of seismic tie information—Morwong-1.

413

Page 145: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (M SL, m) D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 51.0 0.069 198.0 0.232 423.0 0.436 438.0 0.451 453.0 0.463 468.0 0.477 483.0 0.491 498.0 0.505 513.0 0.517 528.0 0.529 543.0 0.541 558.0 0.555 573.0 0.567 588.0 0.581 603.0 0.595 618.0 0.610 634.0 0.626 648.0 0.640 663.0 0.654 678.0 0.670 693.0 0.684 708.0 0.698 723.0 0.712 738.0 0.724 752.0 0.734 768.0 0.744 783.0 0.754 798.0 0.766 813.0 0.780 828.0 0.790 843.0 0.802 858.0 0.814 873.0 0.828 878.0 0.835

Note: sh ells refer to vat seabed and TD.

mSource for checkshots: Lasmo (1987) Formation at TD: Barracouta F Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1478 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: have Velocity report: have

ertical seismic profile: have V

aded c alues

Table A heckshot da availability status of seismic tie information—Patricia-1. See Pre abbreviatio

2.49. C ta andface for ns.

414

Page 146: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability f se orm ostatus ismic tie inf ation

0.0 0.000 205.6 0.278 770.0 0.782 1100.0 1.026 1440.0 1.240 1940.0 1.522 2895.0 2.144 3023.0 2.210 3213.0 2.310 3242.0 2.324 3271.0 2.336 3301.0 2.356 3332.0 2.364 3361.0 2.382 3394.0 2.398 3421.0 2.412 3481.0 2.440 3500.0 2.460

Note: shaded cells refer to valuesat seabed and TD.

rce shot (198 tion Volador Fm viatio have aceme ity: 14nic log ted: have hetic: halocity city rep hartical s profile

Sou for check s: ESSO 3b) Forma at TD: De n data: don’t Repl nt veloc 80 m/s So adjus Synt ve Ve log: have Velo ort: ve Ve eismic : have

Table A2.50. Chec ta and availability s f seism format PilotfisSee Preface for abbreviations.

kshot da tatus o ic tie in ion for h-1A.

De MSL, pth (MD m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability of seis nforma status mic tie i tion 0.0 0.000 69.0 0.093 72.0 0.094 200.0 0.224 369.0 0.374 569.0 0.530 854.0 0.718 1054.0 0.848 1254.0 0.972 1404.0 1.054 1551.0 1.132 1624.0 1.176 1789.0 1.288 1969.0 1.406 2126.0 1.506 2277.0 1.610 2459.0 1.726 2532.0 1.764 2650.0 1.830 2653.0 1.835

Note: shaded cells refer to valuesat seabed and TD.

urce f (1979 mation Kingfish FmSo or checkshots: ESSO c ) For at TD: Deviatio have placem city: 1480 m/s

nic log ted: don’t have thetic don’t have locity have ocity r don’t have rtical s profile have

n data: don’t Re ent veloSo adjus Syn : Ve log: don’t Vel eport: Ve eismic : don’t

Table A2.51. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Rockling-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

415

Page 147: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 109.6 0.148

Source for checkshots: Woodside (2003) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm

147.7 0.190 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

162.2 0.206 176.6 0.222

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

191.1 0.236

205.6 0.251 220.1 0.266 234.5 0.281 249.0 0.295 263.5 0.309 278.0 0.323 292.6 0.337 307.1 0.351 321.5 0.365 336.0 0.377 350.5 0.391 365.0 0.404 379.3 0.418 393.8 0.430 408.3 0.443 422.8 0.455

437.4 0.466 451.8 0.478

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

466.3 0.490 480.8 0.501 495.3 0.513 509.7 0.525 524.2 0.536 538.7 0.547 553.2 0.557 567.7 0.567 582.2 0.578 596.7 0.589 611.1 0.600 625.6 0.611 640.1 0.621 654.6 0.632 669.0 0.643 683.5 0.653 698.0 0.663 712.5 0.674 726.9 0.685 741.4 0.695 755.8 0.705 770.3 0.715 784.9 0.726 799.3 0.737 813.8 0.748 828.2 0.759 842.8 0.769 857.3 0.780 871.8 0.791 886.3 0.801

416

Page 148: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

Depth (MD MSL, m)

TWT (MSL, s)

900.7 0.813 002.1 1 0.883 1755.0 1.412 2522.5 1.862 915.2 0.823 016.1 6 0.893 1769.5 1.420 2537.0 1.870 929.7 0.833 031.1 1 0.903 1784.0 1.429 2551.4 1.877 944.2 0.843 045. 1.438 2565.8 1.885 1 3 0.913 1798.5 958.6 0.853 059. 0.923 1812.9 1.447 2580.4 1.892 1 7 973.1 0.863 074.5 0.933 1827.4 1.456 2594.9 1.900 1987.6 0.873 089.0 0.942 1841.9 1.465 2609.4 1.906 1100 0.883 103.4 0.952 1856.4 1.474 2623.8 1.914 2.1 1101 0.893 117.9 0.962 1885.3 1.491 2638.3 1.921 6.6 1103 0.903 132.4 0.971 1899.8 1.500 2652.7 1.928 1.1 1104 0.913 146.8 0.981 1914.3 1.509 2667.3 1.935 5.3 1105 0.923 161.4 0.991 1928.8 1.517 2681.7 1.941 9.7 1107 0.933 175.8 1.000 1943.3 1.526 2696.2 1.948 4.5 1108 0.942 190.3 1.010 1957.7 1.534 2710.7 1.956 9.0 1110 0.952 204.8 1.020 1972.2 1.542 2725.2 1.963 3.4 1111 0.962 219.3 1.030 1986.6 1.551 2739.7 1.971 7.9 1113 0.971 233.8 1.040 2001.1 1.560 2754.2 1.978 2.4 1114 0.981 248.2 1.051 2015.6 1.569 2768.6 1.984 6.8 1116 0.991 262.7 1.062 2030.1 1.578 2783.1 1.991 1.4 1117 1.000 277.2 1.073 2044.6 1.586 2797.6 1.997 5.8 1119 1.010 291.7 1.084 2059.1 1.597 2812.1 2.005 0.3 1120 1.020 306.2 1.095 2073.6 1.607 2826.5 2.013 4.8 1121 1.030 320.7 1.106 2088.1 1.617 2841.0 2.019 9.3 1123 1.040 335. 1.116 2102.5 1.626 2855.5 2.027 3.8 1 1 124 1.051 349. 1.127 2117.0 1.635 2870.0 2.033 8.2 1 6 126 1.062 364.1 1.138 2131.4 1.643 2884.5 2.040 2.7 1127 1.073 378.6 1.148 2146.0 1.651 2899.0 2.047 7.2 1129 1.084 392.9 1.159 2160.5 1.658 2913.5 2.055 1.7 1130 1.095 407.4 1.169 2175.0 1.666 2927.9 2.062 6.2 1132 1.106 421.9 1.180 2189.4 1.674 2942.3 2.068 0.7 1133 1.116 436.4 1.190 2203.8 1.683 2956.9 2.076 5.1 1134 1.127 451.0 1.201 2218.3 1.691 2971.3 2.084 9.6 11364.1 1.138 1465.5 1.211 2232.8 1.699 2985.8 2.090 1378.6 1.148 1479.8 1.221 2247.3 1.708 3000.3 2.098 741.4 0.695 1494.3 1.231 2261.8 1.716 3014.8 2.105 755.8 0.705 1508.8 1.242 2276.3 1.724 3029.3 2.112 770.3 0.715 1523.3 1.252 2290.7 1.733 3043.8 2.119 784.9 0.726 1537.8 1.263 2305.2 1.741 3058.3 2.126 799.3 0.737 1552.1 1.273 2319.8 1.749 3072.7 2.131 813.8 0.748 1566.8 1.284 2334.2 1.757 3087.2 2.139 828.2 0.759 1581.3 1.294 2348.7 1.765 3101.7 2.146 842.8 0.769 1595.8 1.305 2363.2 1.773 3116.2 2.153 857.3 0.780 1610.2 1.315 2377.7 1.781 3130.6 2.160 871.8 0.791 1624.6 1.325 2392.1 1.789 3145.1 2.166 886.3 0.801 1639.1 1.336 2406.6 1.797 3174.0 2.186 900.7 0.813 1653.7 1.346 2421.1 1.805 915.2 0.823 1668.1 1.357 2435.5 1.813 929.7 0.833 1682.6 1.367 2450.0 1.821 944.2 0.843 1697.0 1.377 2464.6 1.829 958.6 0.853 1711.6 1.386 2479.1 1.837 973.1 0.863 1726.0 1.394 2493.5 1.846 987.6 0.873 1740.6 1.403 2508.0 1.855

Table A2.52. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Scallop-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

417

Page 149: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 122.0 0.160 717.0 0.675 821.0 0.746 1001.0 0.863 1116.0 0.939 1259.0 1.026 1447.0 1.131 1583.0 1.202 1648.0 1.235 1739.0 1.283 1810.0 1.319 2006.0 1.416 2220.0 1.545 2295.0 1.596 2315.0 1.610 2335.0 1.622 2355.0 1.636 2375.0 1.648 2395.0 1.662 2415.0 1.675 2435.0 1.687 2455.0 1.700 2475.0 1.712 2482.0 1.718 2495.0 1.724 2515.0 1.735 2535.0 1.746 2555.0 1.757 2575.0 1.767 2581.0 1.769 2611.0 1.790

N rat seabed and TD.

Sour l Fmce for checkshots: ESSO (1996b) Formation at TD: Mackere Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1520 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t haveVertical seismic profile: have

ote: sha cells refeded to values

Table A heckshot da avaSee Pre abbreviatio

2.53. C ta and ilability status of seismic tie information for Smiler-1. face for ns.

418

Page 150: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 54.5 0.074

Source for checkshots: Hudbay (1982) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Gp

90.6 0.117 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

140.6 0.168

180.6 0.207

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t haveVelocity log: have Velocity report: don’t haveVertical seismic profile: don’thave

240.6 0.264

290.6 0.306 340.6 0.351 390.6 0.396 440.6 0.441 490.6 0.485 540.6 0.529 590.6 0.573 640.6 0.617 690.6 0.657 740.6 0.697 790.6 0.735 795.6 0.737 840.6 0.779 890.6 0.818 916.6 0.836 940.6 0.850 990.6 0.888 1040.6 0.926 1090.6 0.960 1140.6 0.998

1190.6 1.034 1 230.6 1.056 1 255.6 1.074 1290.6 1.094 1340.6 1.126 1400.6 1.164 1407.6 1.170

Note: sh ells refer to vat seabed and TD.

aded c alues

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information for Sperm Whale-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.54. Ch ata andeface for ns.

419

Page 151: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 114.9 0.155 879.0 0.800

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1974b) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

1064.7 0.934 Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

1204.3 1.026 Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

1331.4 1.110 1501.4 1.230 1590.1 1.294 1699.0 1.372 1793.4 1.438 1976.3 1.550 2134.2 1.644 2206.8 1.686 2318.9 1.752 2424.1 1.810 2565.8 1.892 2665.8 1.940 2788.0 2.004 2903.2 2.068 3062.0 2.154 3172.7 2.206

3174.2 2.210

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot da availability status of seismic tie information for Stonefish-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.55. Ch ta andeface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 69.0 0.093 274.7 0.304 424.7 0.436 599.7 0.602 654.7 0.650 718.7 0.710 746.7 0.734 779.7 0.760 801.7 0.776 826.7 0.792 870.7 0.820 875.0 0.825

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1978b) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Gp Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

Table A2.56. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Sweep-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

420

Page 152: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 76.5 0.102 602.1 0.560 861.3 0.715 1067.1 0.872 1250.0 0.985 1676.8 1.260 1934.5 1.422 2061.0 1.503 2396.3 1.735 2536.6 1.806 2590.0 1.850

Note: s lls refer to v

placement velocity: 1500 m/s Source for checkshots: ESSO (1970e) Formation at TD: Mackerel Fm Deviation data: don’t have ReSonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues at seabed and TD.

Table A2.57. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Tailor-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 79.3 0.106 209.0 0.232 4 44.0 0.446 600.0 0.574 794.0 0.710 999.0 0.845 1200.0 0.970 1449.0 1.113 1600.0 1.204 1800.0 1.320 2064.0 1.477 2249.0 1.604 2399.0 1.699 2600.0 1.800 2759.0 1.882 2842.0 1.925 2899.0 1.952 2954.0 1.978 3027.0 2.011 3314.0 2.161 3351.0 2.178 3352.0 2.179

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1983a) Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1493 m/s Sonic e log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t havVelocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.58. Checkshot data See Preface for abbreviations.

and availability status of seismic tie information for Teraglin-1.

421

Page 153: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (M SL, m) D M TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000

403.0 0.545 1080.0 1.086

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy, applications, petroleum wells applications)

1099.0 1.099 1124.0 1.115

Formation at TD: Volador Fm Deviation data: have Sonic log adjusted: don’t have

1864.0 1.570

Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s ynthetic: have S

V

2456.0 1.897

Velocity log: don’t have elocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

2479.0 1.912 2499.0 1.926 2519.0 1.940 2539.0 1.955 2559.0 1.970 2579.0 1.985 2606.0 2.003 2624.0 2.014 2633.0 2.018 2659.0 2.042 2679.0 2.057 2699.0 2.071 2719.0 2.084 2739.0 2.098 2759.0 2.111

2779.0 2.125 2799.0 2.139 2819.0 2.153 2839.0 2.167 2859.0 2.178 28 0 79. 2.185 2 899.0 2.195 2919.0 2.207 2939.0 2.217 2959.0 2.226 3004.0 2.249 3009.0 2.251 3019.0 2.260

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot da availability status of seismic tie information for Terakihi-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.59. Ch ta andeface for ns.

422

Page 154: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 70.1 0.095

Source for checkshots: www.ga.gov.au (data and applications, energy,

716.3 0.640 861.1 0.725

applications, petroleum wells applications) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm Deviation data: don’t have

1028.7 0.840 Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

1348.7 1.040 1592.6 1.215

Velocity log: don’t have elocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

V

1729.7 1.300 1897.4 1.415 2026.9 1.500 2141.2 1.565 2247.9 1.620 2274.5 1.645

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

haded ce alues

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information for Trevally-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.60. Ch ata andeface for ns.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 59.4 0.080 813.5 0.720 1048.2 0.902 1301.2 1.098 1578.6 1.262 1929.1 1.476 2093.7 1.572 3631.6 ~ 2.5

Note: s lls refer to vat seabed and TD.

Sourc m

e for checkshots: ESSO (1968a) Formation at TD: Admiral FDeviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues

Table A2.61. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Tuna-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

423

Page 155: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 61.3 0.083

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1970d) Formation at TD: Chimaera Fm

632.5 0.600 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s

784.9 0.700

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

914.4 0.800

Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

1051.6 0.900

1181.1 1.000 1318.3 1.100 1463.0 1.200 1531.6 1.250 1638.3 1.320 1699.3 1.380 1866.9 1.460 2004.1 1.540 2156.5 1.630 2247.9 1.680 2423.2 1.770 2537.5 1.820 2667.0 1.880 2804.2 1.950

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD. 2810.0 1.960

Table A eckshot da availability status of seismic tie information for Tuna-3. See Pr abbreviatio

2.62. Ch ta andeface for ns.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 60.0 0.081 200.4 0.252 579.3 0.558 779.3 0.694 979.3 0.850 1179.3 1.004 1350.3 1.130 1544.3 1.250 1779.3 1.406 2019.3 1.560 2179.3 1.654 2379.3 1.764 2449.3 1.804 2664.3 1.914 2979.3 2.060 3009.3 2.074 3279.3 2.192 3300.3 2.202 3311.6 2.210

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

: Chimaera FmSource for checkshots: ESSO (1985a) Formation at TD Deviation data: have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

Table A2.63. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Tuna-4. See Preface for abbreviations.

424

Page 156: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 58.5 0.078

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1970b) Formation at TD: Volador Fm

228.7 0.262 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1500 m/s

282.0 0.313 404.0 0.413

Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’thave

533.5 0.513

708.8 0.636 872.0 0.740 968.0 0.800 1204.3 0.937 1341.5 1.030 1564.0 1.180 1676.8 1.266 1829.3 1.368 1943.6 1.443 2006.1 1.482 2094.5 1.535 2256.1 1.630 2359.8 1.693 2554.9 1.811 2682.9 1.876 2843.0 1.970

2997.0 2.068 3164.6 2.153

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

3331.8 2.300

Table A eckshot d availability status of seismic tie information for Turrum-1. See Pr abbreviatio

2.64. Ch ata andeface for ns.

Depth L, m) (MD MS TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information 0.0 0.000 61.0 0.082 242.0 0.260 579.0 0.542 764.0 0.670 979.0 0.814 1179.0 0.946 1379.0 1.072 1529.0 1.176 1852.0 1.400 2154.0 1.578 2319.0 1.678 2400.0 1.730 2564.0 1.830 2674.0 1.884 2975.0 2.060

Note: shaded cells refer to values atseabed and TD.

Source for checkshots: BHP (1989) Formation at TD: Volador Fm? Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1500 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.65. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Turrum-3. See Preface for abbreviations.

425

Page 157: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 63.0 0.083

Source for checkshots: BHP (1993) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm

173.1 0.197 Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1500 m/s

424.0 0.425 757.0 0.670 902.0 0.763 1220.0 0.969 1472.0 1.114 1505.0 1.135 1558.0 1.170 1702.0 1.262 1896.0 1.398 1940.0 1.425 2086.0 1.515 2197.0 1.579 2276.0 1.623 2376.0 1.679 2464.0 1.729 2511.0 1.758 2541.0 1.776 2577.0 1.798 2645.0 1.837 2708.0 1.871 2749.0 1.895 2755.0 1.899

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

have Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A heckshot da avaSee Pre abbreviatio

2.66. C ta and ilability status of seismic tie information for Turrum-4. face for ns.

426

Page 158: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 260.0 0.351 550.0

Sourc Fme for checkshots: Shell (1983) Formation at TD: Chimaera

0.646 975.0 0.970

Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

1295.0 1.178 1410.0 1.252

Velocity log: have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

1475.0 1.290 1675.0 1.412 1875.0 1.532 2075.0 1.648 2275.0 1.766 2475.0 1.884 2538.0 1.925 2675.0 2.026 2815.0 2.122 2875.0 2.162 2913.0 2.186 2915.0 2.188 2995.0 2.232 2999.0 2.233 3075.0 2.272 3225.0 2.350 3375.0 2.424

3475.0 2.474 3575.0 2.524 3675.0 2.576 3730.0 2.605 3775.0 2.630 3875.0 2.682 3965.0 2.770 4 075.0 2.790 4 174.0 2.842 4277.0 2.900 4325.0 2.960 4586.0 3.050

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Table A2.67. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Volador-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

427

Page 159: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 65.0 0.088 779.0 0.674 1014.0 0.824 1179.0 0.928 1379.0 1.052 1579.0 1.176 1779.0 1.302 1979.0 1.434 2199.0 1.588 2404.0 1.724 2489.0 1.768 2529.0 1.790 2650.0 1.850

Note: s lls refer to v

Sour Fm

e

ce for checkshots: ESSO (1985b) Formation at TD: KingfishDeviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1477 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t havVelocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

haded ce alues at seabed and TD.

Table A2.68. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for West Fortescue-1. ee Preface for abbreviations. S

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 68.3 0.090 2 13.0 0.242 275.0 0.300 375.0 0.384

Source for che

ckshots: ESSO (1979b) Formation at TD: Kingfish Fm tion data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1517 m/sDevia

Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t hav

543.0 0.518

eVertical seismic profile: don’t have

745.0 0.656 978.0 0.810 1093.0 0.886 1220.0 0.970 1367.0 1.052 1523.0 1.138 1671.0 1.228 1755.0 1.280 1851.0 1.346 1977.0 1.426 2106.0 1.516 2210.0 1.582 2352.0 1.682 2363.0 1.690 2396.0 1.710 2411.0 1.718 2500.0 1.762

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

2541.0 1.784 2552.0 1.790

Table A2.69. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for West Halibut-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

428

Page 160: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 52.5 0.071 100.6 0.123 150.6 0.179 200.6 0.234 250.6 0.286

Source for checkshots: Hudbay (1992) Formation at TD: Strzelecki Gp Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

300.6 0.338 350.6 0.391 390.6 0.435 410.6 0.453 433.6 0.485 453.6 0.503 465.6 0.519 500.6 0.551 545.6 0.589 570.6 0.609 600.6 0.631 645.6 0.669 695.6 0.709 745.6 0.739 795.6 0.775 800.5 0.780

Note: shaded cells refer to values

at seabed and TD.

Table A2.70. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Whale-1. See Preface for abbreviations. Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 65.0 0.088

2260.0 1.645 2650.0 1.880 2963.0 2.180

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

at TD: Mackerel FmSource for checkshots: ESSO (1984a) Formation Deviation data: don’t have ReplacemeSonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have

nt velocity: 1480 m/s

Vertical seismic profile: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: have

Table A2.71. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Wrasse-1. See Preface for abbreviations.

429

Page 161: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 77.0 0.104 479.0 0.468 729.0 0.650 829.0 0.716 1179.0 0.946 1479.0 1.120 1779.0 1.314 2079.0 1.508 2389.0 1.716 2429.0 1.738 2479.0 1.764 2547.0 1.800 2571.0 1.816

Note: Shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1982b) Formation at TD: Mackerel Fm Deviation data: don’t have Replacement velocity: 1480 m/s Sonic log adjusted: don’t have Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Table A2.72. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Yellowtail-1.

Depth (MD MSL, m) TWT (MSL, s) Checkshot plot and availability status of seismic tie information

0.0 0.000 78.0 0.104 279.0 0.202 429.0 0.428 579.0 0.550 729.0 0.654 884.0 0.750 1079.0 0.878 1204.0 0.956 1355.0 1.048 1514.0 1.136 1639.0 1.212 1817.0 1.330 1979.0 1.434 2144.0 1.542 2279.0 1.636 2393.0 1.712 2454.0 1.746 2535.0 1.790 2545.0 1.800

Note: shaded cells refer to values at seabed and TD.

Mackerel Fm : 1500 m/s

ave Synthetic: don’t have Velocity log: don’t have Velocity report: don’t have Vertical seismic profile: don’t have

Source for checkshots: ESSO (1982a) Formation at TD: don’t have Replacement velocityDeviation data:

Sonic log adjusted: don’t h

Table A2.73. Checkshot data and availability status of seismic tie information for Yellowtail-2. See Preface for abbreviations.

430

Page 162: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.4 Seismic workstation and software he seismic interpretation, carried out in the time domain, made use use of the GeoFrameTM/IESX

orkstation. The 3-D seismic data was imported as 8-bit format to contain the size of the seismic

project on the 300 Gb hard-disks provided—loading the seismic data as 32-bit was deemed

unwarranted in view of the research objectives, principally involving a structural interpretation.

The software Seismic ToolkitTM was used to read both the input and output SEGY headers from the

depth conversion. The software also allowed 3-D file volumes to be concatenated. The software was

written by Witold Severyn of PIRSA and donated for the purpose of this study.

The SeisView2TM software (freeware, version 2.25.4, released 2004) allows SEGY files (time or

depth domain) to be displayed prior to loading into the seismic workstation. The software was used

in conjunction with Seismic ToolkitTM to view the seismic sections (SEGY format) outputs from the

depth-conversion program ‘Depth-convert’ (WitosoftC software, see Chapter 4). The software was

written by Sergey Pavlukhin of Dalmorneftegeofizika Geophysical Company (DMNG) and is available

from the website www.dmng.ru/seisview/html/Eng.html.

Aspects of the depth conversion (WitosoftC software) and the fault seal analysis software

TrapTesterTM are described in chapters 4 and 6–7, respectively. Aspects of the depth conversion

program ‘Depth-convert’ are supported in Section A2.5 below.

A2.5 Depth conversion of SEGY and ASCII data Aspects of the depth conversion program ‘Depth-convert’ (WitosoftC software) are described below,

to the Witosoft depth-conversion software (Table A2.74).

AT

w

as follows:

the front-end menus of the program (Figure A2.13);

the depth error resulting between the polynomial and checkshot-derived depths for the 12 well

groupings considered (Figures A2.14–2.19), and;

the polynomial file enclosing the depth conversion parameters at each well position and input

C

431

Page 163: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.12. Checkshot data plotted for wells located within the extent of the 3-D seismic grid. MD – measured depth, OWT – one-way time, SS – subsea.

432

Page 164: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure A2.13. The front-end menus for the program ‘Depth convert’ (Witosoftc software)—depth conversion of SEGY and ASCII data. (a) The menus ‘Segy T to D, ASCII D-to-T, ASCII T to D’ are used to depth-convert 2-D seismic data. The menus ‘Segy mpoly’ and ‘ASCII mpoly’ are used to depth-convert 3-D seismic data. The menu ‘Spline’ can be used for either 2-D or 3-D seismic data. (b) This front-end shows the input required for depth converting an offshore time-domain SEGY cube to the depth domain—the onshore option of the program is built-in but was not used here. The program requires the seafloor horizon to be input; it is depth-converts using a water velocity of 1,500 m/s. One polynomial function per well, representing the fit to the checkshots that is datumed to seafloor, is used and, all seismic datapoints are depth-converted according to a weighted-distance function. In addition, each seafloor grid point can be averaged (averaging distance). (c) The Polynomial functions are input together with the respective well latitude and longitude. A ‘max. time’ is input if one chooses the option do depth-convert using a constant velocity ‘max time velocity’ below the maximum time provided.

433

Page 165: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A2.14. Depth error plotted against TWT for well groupings (a) A, and (b) B. See Table A2.74 for polynomial-function parameters input, see Figure 4.2 for well-grouping location, see Preface for abbreviations.

434

Page 166: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A2.15. Depth error plotted against TWT for well groupings (a) C, and (b) D wells. See Table A2.74 for polynomial-function parameters input, see Figure 4.2 for well-grouping location, see Preface for abbreviations.

435

Page 167: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A2.16. Depth error plotted against TWT for well groupings (a) E, and (b) F. See Table A2.74 for polynomial-function parameters input, see Figure 4.2 for well-grouping location, see Preface for abbreviations.

436

Page 168: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure A2.17. Depth error plotted against TWT for well groupings (a) G, and (b) H. See Table A2.74 for polynomial-function parameters input, see Figure 4.2 for well-grouping location, see Preface for abbreviations.

437

Page 169: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

(a)

(b)

Figure ASee Tab

2.18. Depth error plo inst TWT for well gro J. le A2.74 for polynomi put, s well-groupin Preface for tions.

tted aga upings (a) I, and (b) al-function parameters in ee Figure 4.2 for g location, see

abbrevia

438

Page 170: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

439

(a)

(b)

Figure A2.19. Depth error plo ro ) L. le A2.74 for polynomi t, s e 4.2 for well-groupin e for

Checkshot data -1 ca located f the other group L w te t sio

tted against TWT for well g upings (a) K, and (bSee Tab al-function parameters inpu ee Figur g location, see Prefacabbreviations. of Athene-1 and Blackback (group L) were not used be use these wells are outboard o ells and, would not contribu o an improved depth conver n.

Page 171: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

7247557951853

744414878

0000028569669

000006794

530

6786220001279

923939656

0000007919477

000001298

066

630106635

88927922

70121

000001503

109

1577016

109

3393397853653

068520152

0000011030926

0000001977

404

08294191817

003301192988829

3812351746

0000001764191

00000298

024

985277456

88765

000000094

404

30807507504

0012813132218525

541567576

00000020059627

000004666

637

0052045077036382

1754364474

00000050100647

00001079

686

0001483319544207

4044243501

00000012467739

000003274

595

0010827287936763

9247192466

00000021280279

000005025

430

6213767897142

03338991

0000010232366

0000001894

555

278936553

666222739

0951569

0000000908

109

7457319933385

667760553

0000007548054

000000122

876

953357267

6014

000000138

604

[Poly_Admiral1]

easting=644455.48

northing=5776052.6

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.51365320977493

t2d[2]=0.002

t2d[3]=-0.0000041

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1460

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Angelfish1]

easting=620890.51

northing=5766240.93

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.662638655910996

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000016

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2160

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Baleen1]

easting=626146.62

northing=5792253.29

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.885

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.0000019

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=850

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Baleen2]

easting=623894.12

northing=5789848.19

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.0042344031

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=730

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Baskersouth1]

easting=647789.6

northing=5757516.98

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.45070613612188

t2d[2]=0.002

t2d[3]=-0.0000023

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2030

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Batfish1]

easting=622970.53

northing=5768333.96

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=2.194

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.00000

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1970

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Bignose1]

easting=640045.87

northing=5753645.58

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.86569023027

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.0000004

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2180

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Cobia1]

easting=612115.79

northing=5742819.27

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.318

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000028

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1750

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Cobia2]

easting=613930.69

northing=5742638.35

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=2.26203201815952

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.000008

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1680

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Drummer1]

easting=609109.01

northing=5740786.98

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.02888834459191

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.000001

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1710

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Easthalibut1]

easting=617944.31

northing=5748046.66

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.17108231553357

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.000002

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1710

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Eastpilchard1]

easting=636878.04

northing=5771189.96

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.749141752075957

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000019

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1970

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Flathead1]

easting=634796.01

northing=5790747.24

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.495

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.00000

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=840

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Flounder1]

easting=624666.94

northing=5758505.15

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.60437374815956

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000016

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2240

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Flounder2]

easting=626690.93

northing=5757687.49

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.764399128927

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.0000005

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1840

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Flounder3]

easting=628889.69

440

Page 172: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

173949162

0781532

000000198

653

1742552096431

80720958

00000010253185

00000296

652

023071385

043247635

0653451

000000157

511

82671469

1296131

000000335

629

0012079640328

12672297094

0000001179532

000003101

548

62987820944

0033705124093331

714603063

00000036028596

000007906

625

22609989066

0050241478700173

686961738

00000048607616

000010555

713

0011250172361201

081355889

00000020379162

000004812

670

606936360

117726200

54795

0000000008

04068767465

0024750496272645

52484047

00000026295984

00000532

010

997976379993

0668338255803

595898687

0000010339404

0000001753

505

0649339668016182

6869041493048

981000199

000001727919

000002984

010

0081007780972868

3392814584659

30516181363

0000012599645

000001877

404

1468793328456

008063604

00000008162294

000002067

725

0012774959224942

598400628

00000023917531

000005766

631

northing=5758253.99

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.773330700106

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.00000

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1690

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Flounder4]

easting=630942.69

northing=5759273.36

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.921042730928093

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.0000009

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1690

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Flounder5]

easting=626795.7

northing=5759304.36

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.792

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.00000

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1730

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Flounder6]

easting=625636.63

northing=5758024.29

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.448371094903

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.00000

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1720

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Fortescue1]

easting=608315.62

northing=5752072.43

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.986509591253707

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.00000

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1790

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Fortescue2]

easting=610647.75

northing=5745607.8

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.890

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000056

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1750

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Fortescue3]

easting=610789.8

northing=5750349.03

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=2.334

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000078

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1720

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Fortescue4]

easting=611554.23

northing=5747416.74

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.2431661853479500

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000028

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1730

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Grayling1]

easting=613301.61

northing=5775511.3

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.092

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.0000000

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Greatwhite1]

easting=642095.26

northing=5742952.19

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.533

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000043

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1940

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Grunter1]

easting=632690.88

northing=5763023.76

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.527

t2d[2]=0.002

t2d[3]=-0.0000021

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2420

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Gudgeon1]

easting=628099.05

northing=5736182.36

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=-0.

t2d[2]=0.003

t2d[3]=-0.0000036

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2380

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Gummy1]

easting=652196.46

northing=5759649.77

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=-0.

t2d[2]=0.003

t2d[3]=-0.00000

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2150

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Halibut1]

easting=615012.68

northing=5749214.26

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.934765070938738

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.0000009

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1910

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Halibut2]

easting=616255.32

northing=5749582.55

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.2248305143512

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000032

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1640

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Hammerhead1]

easting=660679.298

northing=5773219.062

t2d[0]=0

441

Page 173: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

2350213851137

81127157

0000044486833

000010831

404

9517021487397

25550117

0000007744629

000001621

684

322684809

873627172

37886

000000301

124

879503140459

2895788100877

300487602

0000006494857

000001029

532

5026634367246

843305878

0000010003735

0000001924

628

0020137195

792

109

100678730405

808495371

00000003422774

000001385

109

689410298

541677031

77425

000000229

663

58379363106

0035411774249496

9360633349

00000037540083

000008228

663

124620646238

9002638342727

397594717

0000007481716

000001139

404

258553225372

1663078026913

607729406

0000000020783

000000598

643

007378565992

1070444617592

18646289

0000013880949

000002787

677

903482094

987763489

03478

000002156

109

37154663517

0003076178036281

12221954341

00000008218236

000001706

603

0003118330626677

286324195

00000015443172

000003912

595

4317271845172

t2d[1]=0.160199665653636

t2d[2]=0.004

t2d[3]=-0.0000064

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1400

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Judith1]

easting=636405.71

northing=5775998.6

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.897005772894772

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.0000012

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1930

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Kahawai1]

easting=620023.76

northing=5774333.73

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.891

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.0000008

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1620

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Kipper1]

easting=639935.21

northing=5773553.22

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.775

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000013

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1840

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Kipper2]

easting=641326.08

northing=5771809.74

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.726304072759376

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000017

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1730

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Leatherjacket1]

easting=656061.26

northing=5783094.54

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.5296914836

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000019

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=740

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Longtom1]

easting=615003.12

northing=5783058.69

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.03629372004434

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=0.0000002

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1560

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Mackerel1]

easting=618493.38

northing=5740037.18

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.548

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000009

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1940

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Mackerel4]

easting=614746.73

northing=5736518.36

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.882

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.000005

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1760

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Manta1]

easting=650753.21

northing=5762521.95

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.525

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000017

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2160

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Marlin4]

easting=611024.26

northing=5766951.96

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.704

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000005

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1740

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Morwong1]

easting=614998.74

northing=5768186.3

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.621

t2d[2]=0.002

t2d[3]=-0.0000025

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1680

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Patricia1]

easting=627057.71

northing=5789884.67

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.651

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000035

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=770

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Pilotfish1]

easting=628343.46

northing=5745315.78

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.043

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.00000

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2190

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=3

[Poly_Rockling1]

easting=607369.77

northing=5742641.99

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.04139508487606

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000018

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1750

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4

[Poly_Scallop1]

easting=639314.49

northing=5769299.33

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.709699237009772

t2d[2]=0.001

442

Page 174: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

14702421784

0000007125599

000001184

503

63960339595

0038485473580749

600928

00000038827845

000008178

t2d[3]=-0.0000004901

t2d[4]=0.000000000272

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1100

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5109

[Poly_Stonefish1]

easting=636584.66

northing=5765397.59

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.390992880711565

t2d[2]=0.0024349310709226

t2d[3]=-0.0000025989759405

t2d[4]=0.0000000012664914

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000002199

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2060

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5054

[Poly_Sweep1]

easting=643725.1

northing=5786717.07

4484

831012456023

639

921

169

740

1182.82

2

974487793

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.756211121437

t2d[2]=0.00102322499

t2d[3]=-0.000000548871

t2d[4]=0.000000000119

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2080

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4867

[Poly_Terakihi1]

easting=634856.1

northing=5737106.13

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=3.86038135562558

t2d[2]=-0.0111282479588226

t2d[3]=0.0000163730514346

t2d[4]=-0.0000000097445698

t2d[5]=0.0000000000020519

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1720

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4010

84633

207614874

808366

0000000512

0

21874

maxvel=0

[Poly_Tukari1]

easting=623477.61

northing=5756006.92

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.913312674814

t2d[2]=0.000386184964

t2d[3]=-0.000000059557

t2d[4]=0.000000000005

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=0

[Poly_Tuna1]

easting=624274.93

northing=5774142.47

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.572636755915

t2d[2]=-0.001312106969

t2d[3]=0.000001336822

t2d[4]=-0.000000000369

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1500

56

[Poly_Tuna3]

easting=626885.67

ing=5774564.59

maxtime=1880

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5310

[Poly_Tuna4]

easting=619993.64

northing=5772480.36

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.666035738253413

t2d[2]=0.0014221568789736

t2d[3]=-0.0000013960315992

t2d[4]=0.0000000006457389

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000001006

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2130

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5113

[Poly_Turrum1]

easting=609096.38

northing=5771123.04

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.472741023769231

t2d[2]=0.0023333199637321

t2d[3]=-0.0000024322600854

t2d[4]=0.0000000011677205

t2d[3]=-0.00000

t2d[4]=0.000

t2d[5]=-0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2040

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5

[Poly_Smiler1]

easting=621179.43

northing=5739960.47

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.942

t2d[2]=-0.

t2d[3]=0.0000063

t2d[4]=-0.00

t2d[5]=0.0000000

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1630

mintime=0 t2d[5]=0 t2d[2]=0.000454458213 north

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4663

[Poly_Spermwhale1]

easting=619809.89

northing=5787131.34

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.91029539247

t2d[2]=0.000508270469

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1750

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4595

[Poly_Teraglin1]

easting=617301.78

northing=5751245.88

t2d[3]=-0.000000110124

t2d[4]=0.000000000012

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.271757678681752

t2d[2]=0.0030894592620712

t2d[3]=-0.0000037930666012

t2d[4]=0.0000000020567997

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000003899

t2d[6]=0

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.70759571480

t2d[2]=0.001

t2d[3]=-0.0000027048561

t2d[4]=-0.0000000002614

t2d[5]=0.0000000000021

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5109

[Poly_Tailor1]

easting=61

northing=5738970.29

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.83226677664

t2d[2]=0.000

t2d[3]=-0.000000567938

t2d[4]=0.00000000012

[Poly_Trevally1]

easting=622061.34

northing=5761287.63

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.4419945

t2d[2]=0.002

t2d[3]=-0.000001

t2d[4]=0.00

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1550

mintime=

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4581

[Poly_Trumpeter1]

easting=617909.97

northing=5747614.28

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.0641252

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=53

[Poly_Tuna2]

easting=621610.17

northing=5773350.41

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9200157079

t2d[2]=0.0003699119

t2d[3]=-0.0000000256

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

443

Page 175: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000002044

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2230

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4680

[Poly_Turrum3]

easting=609446.71

northing=5764612.01

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.778371034653901

t2d[2]=0.0011449345585106

t2d[3]=-0.0000009057388641

t2d[4]=0.0000000003520209

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000000489

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1980

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4813

[Poly_Turrum4]

easting=610519.25

northing=5762792.93

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.726388932202

t2d[2]=0.001170748785

t2d[3]=-0.00000071735

t2d[4]=0.000000000167

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1820

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4584

[Poly_Turrum7]

easting=610662.712

northing=5764250.371

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.156989121780

t2d[2]=0.000312303762

t2d[3]=-0.000000055704

t2d[4]=0.000000000006

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Volador1]

easting=634848.61

northing=5746122.89

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.484686016032356

t2d[2]=0.0017687995456939

t2d[3]=-0.0000013543204682

t2d[4]=0.0000000004889121

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000000644

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=2700

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4417

[Poly_Westfortescue1]

easting=608435.01

northing=5753055.93

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.36126614868408

t2d[2]=-0.0014201506596692

t2d[3]=0.0000031638816844

t2d[4]=-0.0000000022685223

t2d[5]=0.0000000000005389

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1770

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4509

[Poly_Westhalibut1]

easting=612091.09

northing=5748783.98

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.0264211486774

t2d[2]=-0.0004224146177449

t2d[3]=0.000002005651372

t2d[4]=-0.0000000016552221

t2d[5]=0.0000000000004172

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=1700

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=4751

[Poly_Westtuna8]

easting=619975.7

northing=5772327.79

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9373405101

t2d[2]=0.0003356177

t2d[3]=-0.0000000197

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Westtuna31]

easting=621595.43

northing=5771980.71

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.8907964062

t2d[2]=0.0003587233

t2d[3]=-0.0000000230

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Westtuna32]

easting=621109.24

northing=5771977.99

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9114098239

t2d[2]=0.0003442692

t2d[3]=-0.0000000218

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Westtuna37]

easting=620230.21

northing=5771769.09

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9612704682

t2d[2]=0.0003159131

t2d[3]=-0.0000000176

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Westtuna39]

easting=621457.88

northing=5771861.79

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.8921578659

t2d[2]=0.0003584872

t2d[3]=-0.0000000230

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Westtuna44]

easting=620993.53

northing=5770092.92

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9630197418

t2d[2]=0.0003059903

t2d[3]=-0.0000000171

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_Whale1]

easting=636997.65

northing=5790827.57

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.9916539419

t2d[2]=-0.0005087012

t2d[3]=0.0000008484

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=710

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=1

maxvel=5109

[Poly_Wrasse1]

easting=611589.35

northing=5757594.41

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.0549803262565500

t2d[2]=0.0004993299604337

t2d[3]=-0.0000001826210900

t2d[4]=0.0000000000370495

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000000026

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_TFCeast]

easting=629615.07

northing=5762983.45

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.1949377336595700

t2d[2]=0.0000905779789857

t2d[3]=0.0000000783585398

t2d[4]=-0.0000000000171225

t2d[5]=0.0000000000000010

t2d[6]=0

444

Page 176: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 2—Geophysical datasets and interpretation

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

445

max

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

[Poly_TFCsouth]

easting=623547.82

northing=5762576.11

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.1303720309

t2d[2]=0.0002341825

t2d[3]=-0.0000000100

t2d[4]=0

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_TFCcentral]

northing=5766

t2d[0]=0

t2d[2]=0.000093438697

t2d[3]=0.000000070355

t2d[4]=-0.000000000010

t2d[5]=0

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_TFCnorth]

easting=626442.09

northing=5770958.78

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.1378770166738800

t2d[2]=-0.0000201841427110

000520038

000043

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

[Poly_MCnorth]

easting=611027.4

northing=5754943.8

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=1.0248649257318900

t2d[2]=0.0004944197507051

t2d[3]=-0.0000001662802666

t2d[4]=0.0000000000350460

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000000027

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

easting=621832.69

northing=5746453.93

t2d[0]=0

t2d[1]=0.8350683703215510

t2d[2]=0.0009176600914111

t2d[3]=-0.0000004701386782

t2d[4]=0.0000000001159586

t2d[5]=-0.0000000000000099

t2d[6]=0

maxtime=5000

mintime=0

maxvelcheck=0

maxvel=0

Table A2.74. Polynomial functions used for the depth conversion of SEGY and ASCII data. [Poly_????]—file name for each well. [Poly_TFC????]—Tuna-Flounder Channel. [Poly_MC????]—Marlin Channel. File format—easting/northing; polynomial coefficients (1st to 6th order)—t2d[1] to t2d[6]. Maxtime/mintime—generally taken just below well-TD if a constant velocity is used, if not maxtime = 5,000 ms. Maxvel—calculated from stacking velocities (also refer to Figure 4.2). Note 1: checkshot data from some wells (Athene-1, Basker-1, Blackback-1, Hapuku-1, Yellowtail-1 and -2) were not used as these are located outboard of other wells that adequately constrain the depth conversion. Note 2: a stacking velocity function was used for Wrasse-1 as the available checkshot data was incomplete. Note 3: a stacking velocity function was used in place of unavailable checkshot data for Trumpeter-1, Tuna-2 and Turrum-7; these wells are located within the 3-D seismic grid.

time=5000 easting=626377.77

585.21

t2d[3]=0.0000001965125391

t2d[4]=-0.0000000

t2d[5]=0.0000000000

mintime=0

maxvel=0 t2d[1]=1.164813916586 t2d[6]=0 [Poly_MCeast]

Page 177: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 178: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

447

PENDIX 3—GEOMECHANICAL DAT ET AND FAU T L

________________________________________________________________________________

AP AS S LSEAL ANA YSIS

Page 179: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis
Page 180: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault seal analysis _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ad-1 Bt-1 EP-1 Gr-1 J-1 Kp-1 Kp-2 Sc-1 St-1 T-1 T-3 Well interval of interest 1214–1503 1414 – 5297 1549–3136.5 1766–3937 1385.4–1992 6–2279 6–2616 19.6–335139 147 16 1 1743.4–3650 1311–3140 1350.2–2749 Wel-log information

CALI √ √ To 2953 To 3824 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ DT/DTCO √ 4 - √ o √ √ √√ √ To 382 √ T 3177 GR √ √ o √ √√ √ To 3824 √ √ T 3177 √ HART - - √ - - - - To 3177 - - - ILD/IND - √ - - - - - - - √ √ LLD √ - - To 3824 √ √ - - √ - - NPHI √ - √ To 3824 √ √ To √ - - √ 3177 NEUT - - - - - - - - √ √ - POTA/HLLK - - - 2947–3824 - - - To 3177 - - - RHOB/RHOZ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ To √ √ √3177 SFL - - - - - √ - - - - - THOR/HTHO 2947–3824 - - - To - - - - - - 3177 URAN/HURA - - √ 2947–3824 - - - To 3177 - - -

Vshale information

V (GR-derived2shale ) 29 241 √ √ - √ √√ - - 47–38 √ - V (proshale cessing3) √ √ - ? √ - - ? √ - ? Key borehole information Depth range (m) 819–2162 874–2424 873–3138 837–3394 796–2300 7 6 3 846–28 5 835–2 00 917– 174 868–2569 747–2119 837–1529 Open borehole diamet 12 ” ¼” 2 ¼” 12 ¼” 12 ¼” 12 ¼” 12 ¼ 12 er 12 ¼” ¼” 12 ¼” 12 ¼ 12 1 ” ¼” Mud weight at log run 9.5 1 35 –10.5 9.6 0.4 10.1 11.3 10. 9.2 10.3 9.7 ? 10.7 Depth range (m) 2424–2975 3394–3809 2300–2960 2569–31 2119–3 1529–2823 - - - - - 83 641 Open borehole diamet 8 ½” - - - 8 ½” 8 ½” 8 ½” er - 8 ½” - 8 ½” Mud weight at log run - 10.6 - 16 10.35 - - - 10.5 ? 10.5 Status of core runs Conventional cores No cores No cores No cores 3389–3452 No cores –1852 6–2439 No cores No core 1970–2 Ye1427 221 s 030 s Bottom hole temperat ure

Horner BHT (ºC)/depth 4 105.5/ 0 114 8 12 5224 4 2857.3 .6/2601.5 (m) 98/2146 297 /313 3.6/3 84.4/2241 120/ 1075 4 4 4 112.8/3170 94/3184 128/364 99/285 5 15 195

449

Page 181: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault seal analysis _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Table A3.1. Well log availability and key information required to calculate sand and shale-lines—substudy area wThe log descriptions below originate fro Schlumberger’s curve mnemonic’s online dictionary (http://www.slb.com/modul monics

ells. es/mnem ).

DT/DTCO (acoustic s it take al vel units–µsh mma adiation d from f ons cont radioactive elem assium, Thorium, and Uranium

ation resi ation resis (units–ohinduction resistivity, m ured by a duction log, hich repre s a meas ent made eral fee forma generally sidered a asurement he

d form on (units–ohm.m). r stivity, m red by g (or gu log) resist device, w represent measurem made several feet into the formation; generally consid d a f t n (u hm.m). h asur t deter ing the est pit. Th antity is a iat ral fo on hydrog oncentrat API units

eas d with a neutron ing devic nits–m3/m3

(p tration)—potas ration by weight (ppm) and percentage, respectively. , it is the density of the rock, including fluid-filled pore

lowness)—The time s for a compressional wave to traverse a fixed distance; reciprocal of compression ocity ( /ft). GR (gamma ray)—T e intensity of natural ga -ray r emitte ormati aining ents such as Pot (API units). HART (form stivity)—True form tivity m.m). ILD (deep resistivity)—The eas n in w sent urem sev t into the tion; con me of t

undisturbe atiLLD (deep lateralog esistivity)—The resi easu a laterolo ard ivity hich s a ent ere

measurement outron)—T

he undisturbed formation c ion me

nits–oe nNEUT (ne e Neutro alibrat me

emined us API t

gis que

ssoc)

ed with the natu rmati en c ion (n ). NPHI (thePOTA/HBHK

rmal neutron porosity)—Porosity as motassium concen

ursium concent

thermal log (u .

RHOB/RHOZ (bulk density)—Density of bulk material, including any void space or other materials contained in the subject volume. In well loggingspace, as measured with a "Gamma-Gamma" type logging device (units–gm/cm3).

SFL (spherically focussed resistivity)—The resistivity, measured by a spherically focused log, which represents the resistivity approximately one to two feet into the formation (units–ohm.m). THOR/HTHO (thorium concentration)—thorium concentration by weight (ppm) and %, respectively. URAN/HURA (uranium concentration)—uranium concentration by weight (ppm) and %, respectively. Vshale (volume of shale)—Volume fraction of shale as calculated, measured or inferred from formation properties (units–m3/m3). 1Only paper copy available. 2Industry-derived Vshale curves. 3Availability of data processing information relating to industry-derived Vshale curves. 4Temperature derived from Horner plot. 5Temperature derived from a non-Horner plot source. Parameter group Parameter type Ad-1 Bt-1 EP-1 Gr-1 J-1 Kp-1 Kp-2 Sc-1 St-1 T-1 T-3 PetroViewPlusTM gro d up an parameters Input equa oro -Wyllie Sonic-W e -Wylli Son e Sonic-Wylli Sonic- So e Wylli -Wylli Sonic-Wyll Sonic-Wyllie tions Main p sity Sonic ylli Sonic e ic-Wylli e Wyllie nic-Wylli Sonic- e Sonic e ie Input equa ole -Wyllie Sonic-W e -Wylli Son e Sonic-Wylli Sonic- So e ylli -Wyllie Sonic-Wyll Sonic-Wyllie tions Bad h porosity Sonic ylli Sonic e ic-Wylli e Wyllie nic-Wylli Sonic-W e Sonic ie Input equa ete On On On On On On On On On tions Coal d ction On On

Shaly/sand indicators GR Larionov-ol Larionov ld Larionov-ol Lar ld nov-old Larion La d v-old rionov-old Larionov-o Larionov-old d -o d ionov-o Lario ov-old rionov-ol Lariono La ld

Bad hole i rs nti On On On On On On On On On ndicato Differe al caliper On On

General p ers t 20 15 20 20 20 2 0 21 22 22 aramet Surface emp. (˚C) 0 20 2General p ers r m)aramet Temp. g adient (˚C/k 42.69 35 36.3 33.43 42.6 38 8 35.2 .5 .13 39.48 2 29.5 35.2 General p ers pt 98/2146 105.5/2970 4/313 105.5/2960 120/aramet BHT/de h (˚C/m) 11 8 123.6/3522 2857.3 107.6/2601.5 112.8/317 94/318 128/36 99/2819 0 4 4 1 General p ers m 0.2 0.93 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 aramet RMF (oh .m) 0.08 1 0.3 0.214 General p ers C) 20 15 20 20 20 0 21 20 20 aramet M (˚ST 20 17 2General s m. 0.02 0.026 0.035 0 26 0.03 0.025 0.03 parameter Rw (oh m) 0.03 8 0.025 .025 0.028 0.0General s 105. 114 2. 99 parameter R C)wt (˚ 98 5 123.6 84.4 120 107.6 11 8 94 128

450

Page 182: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault seal analysis _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Parameter group Parameter type Ad-1 Bt-1 EP-1 Gr-1 J-1 Kp-1 Kp-2 Sc-1 St-1 T-1 T-3 Borehole parameters P axhim ( 4 0.4 0.4 m3/m3) 0.4 0.4 0. 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

Zones

Zone depths (m) 1214–150 1414.5 75 9–313 1 80 –19 139 1 00 –317 743.4–3 1311–3 1350.2–2819.4Z1–Z7 3 –29 154 8 766–3 9 1385.4 92 6–2279 476.3–26 1619.6 4 1 184 140 Borehole 12 ¼ 8 12 ¼” ” ” 8 ½” 8 ½” 8 ½” Φ at TD ” ½” 8 ½” 8 ½ 12 ¼” 12 ¼” 12 ¼ TD (m) 216 29 313 5 2875 2600 3174 318 364 2819.4 2 75 8 3809 29 8 4 1 TD interval LongSS LHalSS1 BeaSS S gSS Lo S aSS G GBeaS Lon ngSS GBeaS GBe GBeaSS LongSS GBeaSS

Z1: SworSS 1214–123 1414.5 54 9–164 1 853 1385.4–14 139 1 39 –1693.6 –14 154 2 766–1 51 6–1420 476.3–15 1619.6 6 1743.4–1 1311–1 1350.2–1372 803 323

Set mineral prefer. c 1 135 135 135 135 135 135 Z1: DT oal (µs/ft) 135 35 135 135 135 Set mineral prefer. Z1: RHOB lms (gm/c3) 2. 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 71 Shale line (api) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Z1: GRshale 100 Sand line 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Z1: GRCL (api) 15 15

Z2:UHalSS biSS3–Co 3 54 93 2–16 1 89 150 1420–1 9 153 568 3.6–17 1803–187 1323–1 1372–1405 12 6–1269 14 –18 164 42 853–18 1451– 8 45 9–1 169 20 7 580

Set mineral prefer. Z2 DT coal (µ ft) 125 Absen 5 125 5 125 125 125 125 : s/ 125 t 125 12 12Set mineral prefer. OB 3) 2.71 Absent 1 71 2.71 2.71 2.71 Z2: RH lms (gm/c 2.71 2.71 2.7 2.71 2.71 2.Shale line shal 115 Absent 5 1 5 115 115 115 Z2: GR e (api) 115 115 11 15 115 11Sand line CL 15 15 Absent 5 5 15 15 15 Z2: GR (api) 15 1 15 15 1

Z3: UHalSS2 1269–127 1893–1893 2–1792.5 1 947 156 145 1 0.3 1824. 877–190 1580–1 1405–1567.2 3 164 889–1 –1508 8.4 9–1593 568–161 1720– 5 1 8.7 580

Set mineral prefer. co Absent 105 105 Absent 105 Z T 3: D al (µs/ft) 105 105 105 105 105 105 Set mineral prefer. O ) Absent 2.71 2.71 2.71 71 2.71 Abs 2.71 Z3: RH B lms (gm/c3 2.71 2.71 2.71 2. ent Shale line shal Abs t 5 135 Absent 135 Z3: GR e (api) 135 en 135 135 135 135 135 13Sand line CL 15 Abs t 5 15 Absent 15 Z3: GR (api) en 15 15 15 15 15 1

Z4: UHalSS1 127 93 64 1 2.5–2 1 32 –17 1593–1 6 161 70 –21 1908.7–2394 1580–1 1567.2–1822 3–1423 18 –21 79 099 947–25 1568.4 42 72 0. –183 1824.5 87 769

Set mineral prefer. co 105 5 5 105 105 105 Z4: DT al (µs/ft) 105 105 105 105 105 10 10Set mineral prefer. HO 3) 2.71 71 2.71 2.71 2.71 Z4: R B lms (gm/c 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.Shale line shal 135 5 135 135 135 Z4: GR e (api) 135 135 135 135 135 135 13Sand line CL 15 15 5 15 15 15 Z4: GR (api) 15 15 15 15 15 1

Z5: LHalSS2 23–1 2164 60 2 9–2 25 3.5 184 1726–1 5 187 986.3 7–257 4–2 1769– 1822–1998 14 437 –24 09 241.5 32–341 1742– 4.4 87 0–1 218 7.5 239 902 1946

Set mineral prefer. Z5 DT coal (µ ft) 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 : s/ 100 10Set mineral prefer. O 3) 2.75 75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Z5: RH B lms (gm/c 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.Shale line shal 145 5 145 145 145 Z5: GR e (api) 145 145 145 145 145 145 14Sand line CL 20 20 0 20 20 20 Z5: GR (api) 20 20 20 20 20 2

Z6: LHalSS1 1437–149 2460–2975 1.5–24 34 498 –18 187 1 70 –2652.2 224 30 13.5–3 1844.4 85 5–1990 986.3–20 2577.5 5 2902–3 1946–2 1998–2269 075 231

451

Page 183: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault seal analysis _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Parameter group Parameter type Ad-1 Bt-1 EP-1 Gr-1 J-1 Kp-1 Kp-2 Sc-1 St-1 T-1 T-3 Set mineral prefer. Z6: DT coal (µs/ft) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Set mineral prefer. OB 3) 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2 2 2.75 2.75 Z6: RH lms (gm/c 2.75 .75 2.75 2.75 .75 Shale line shal 145 5 145 145 145 Z6: GR e (api) 145 145 145 145 145 145 14Sand line CL 20 20 0 20 20 20 Z6: GR (api) 20 20 20 20 20 2

Z7: GBeaSS 1492–150 Absent 0–3136.5 3 809 199 199 2 0 –31 3075–318 2231–31 2269–2819.4 3 243 498–3 1885– 2 0–2279 0 6070–2 2652.6 74 4 40

Set mineral prefer. co 95 Absent 95 95 95 95 Z7: DT al (µs/ft) 95 95 95 95 95 Set mineral prefer. OB c3) Absent 2.75 2.75 2.75 75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Z7: RH lms (gm/ 2.75 2.75 2.75 2. Shale line sh Absent 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Z7: GR ale (api) 130 130 130 Sand line CL (api) 15 Abs 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 Z7: GR ent 15 15

Table A3. ophysi l parameters pert t to ulat of th shale e w si a TM dule. Paramete (param ter type s tched pu tions (flushed , w cut a l tion). haly/sand indicators (density thermal- ron, DT,

d (external, user-defined). E-centrene speed are unco ral parameters (no oil-based mud, Density Ф to RHOB, sonic Ф t T d— µs/ft ri andard—55 µs/ft (182 µs/m). The caliper p-1 w s used to scertain the Vshale of East vailable r the e inter intere Defau lue ta ca he s of sha (µs/ft) for bad hole poros to run the program—these were, however, not levant e ca ion of V le wn 7 are: 115, 11 om hole temperature, DT—acoustic slowness, GR—gamma ray, RHOB—bulk density, R —w sisti —mud filtrate, TD—t

2. Petr ca inen the calc ion e V c rvu hen u ng GeoFrnh a

m eTM’s PetroViewPlus mor group e wi off). In t equa z eon ater CMR, ydrite/h

ss and loggingite detec S neutron, SP, Thermal-neut

external, user defined, combine option). Bad hole indicators rrected. Geneo DT). D fluid s andart 1 98 (620 µs/m); DT mat x st of Scallo a a curve of East Pilchard-1 as the caliper curve

oint asPilchard-1 was not a fo ntire val of st. lt va s weresti lo

ken toa

lculate t acoustic lowness le ity and matrix p s so re to th lculat sha . The acou c s ess t

aken for shale (µs/ft) for zones 1 to 0, 100, 100, 95, 95 and 85, respectively. BHT—bott

W ter re v Fity, RM otal depth.

Well Depth (m)

Gr p/ ou

Type Log For tionma

Quality Count SD Sv

(MPa/km) SHmax

( )MPa/km S Hmaxθ

(ºN) Pressure (MPa/km)

Test type S n hmi

(MPa/km) Stress regime

Pp (MPa/km

Source )

Ad-1 1078 Seaspray 20 27.5 RLOT 25.5 RF ~ 1 At-1 507 Seaspray ~ 20 6.78 RLOT 13.37 SS 1 At-1 507 Seaspray ~ 20 6.49 RLOT 12.8 SS 9.8 3, 4 At-1 1170 Seaspray ~ 20 20.32 RLOT 17.37 SS 1 At-1 1170 Seaspray ~ 20 19.93 RLOT 17.03 SS 9.8 3 Ba-1 200.05 Seaspray ~ 20 3.55 RLOT 17.75 SS 1 Ba-1 200.05 Seaspray ~ 20 3.39 RLOT 16.95 SS 9.8 3, 4 Ba-1 556.55 Seaspray ~ 20 10.98 RLOT 19.71 SS 1 Ba-1 556.55 Seaspray ~ 20 10.8 RLOT 19.4 SS 9.8 3, 4 Bsk-1 1225 Seaspray ~ 20 20.99 RLOT 23 RF 1 Bsk-1 473 Seaspray ~ 20 7.18 RLOT 15.18 SS 9.8 3, 4

BskSth-1 1075 Seaspray ~ 20 17.44 RLOT 16.22 SS 1 BskSth-1 675 Seaspray ~ 20 10.05 RLOT 14.89 SS 9.8 3, 4

452

Page 184: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault seal analysis _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Well Depth (m)

Group/ Formation

Type Log Quality Count SD Sv

(MPa/km) SHmax

(MPa/km) SHmaxθ (ºN)

Pressure (MPa/km)

Test type Shmin

(MPa/km) Stress regime

Pp (MPa/km)

Source

Bb-1 473 Seaspray 22 39–43.7 7.56 RLOT 15.98 SS 1 Bb-1 1225 Seaspray ~ 20 20.57 RLOT 16.79 SS 9.8 3, 4 Bb-3 BO FMI C 5 9 ~ 201 39–43.7 168 1 Bb-3 BO FMI C 5 11.69 ~ 20 ~ 40.5 169.53 9.8 3, 4 Dr-1 805.5 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 21.26 LOT 26.39 RF 9.8 3, 4 EH-1 802 Seaspray ~ 20 16.48 RLOT 20.55 RF 9.8 3, 4 EP-1 2542 Gol. Beach BO FMI A 26 10 ~ 201 39–43.7 132 1 EP-1 BO FMI A 26 10.84 ~ 20 ~ 40.5 137.48 9.8 3, 4 EP-1 DITF FMI D 2 6.53 ~ 20 ~ 40.5 128.5 9.8 3 EP-1 2542,2813 Gol. Beach FMI 9.8,10.5 2 F-1 BO 4-arm cal. D 5 2 ~ 201 39–43.7 122 1, 2 Fr-1 BO 4-arm cal. B 5 15 ~ 201 39–43.7 80 1, 2

Gm-1 3528 EmpeSS ~ 20 39–43.7 80.92 RLOT 22.94 RF 1 Gm-1 528.6 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 7.21 RLOT 13.64 SS 1 Gm-1 528.6 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 6.84 RLOT 12.94 SS 9.8 3, 4 Gm-1 1165.6 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 18.73 RLOT 16.07 SS 9.8 3, 4 Gr-1 1165.6 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 19.19 RLOT 16.46 SS 1 Gr-1 834 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 15.18 RLOT 18.2 SS 9.8 3, 4 Gr-1 3528 Gol. Beach ~ 20 ~ 40.5 80.37 RLOT 22.78 RF 9.8 3, 4 Gu-1 834 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 15.22 RLOT 18.25 SS 1 H-1 2972 Halibut 22 39–43.7 51 RLOT 17.16 SS 1 Hp-1 BO 4-arm cal. C 6 19 ~ 201 39–43.7 135 1, 2 Kp 830 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 19.73 23.77 RF 9.8 3, 4 -1 Kp-1 809 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 16.38 LOT 20.25 RF 1 Lj-1 605 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 11.17 RLOT 18.46 SS 1 Lj 605 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 10.8 RLOT 17.85 SS 9.8 3, 4 -1 Lt-1 BO FMI C 5 2.33 ~ 201 ~ 40.5 103.6 9.8 1, 3, 4 Lt-1 DITF FMI D 1 0 ~ 201 ~ 40.5 139 9.8 1, 3 Ma-1 803.2 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 13.22 RLOT 16.46 SS 1 Ma-1 740 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 12.69 RLOT 17.15 SS 1 Pt-1 917 EmpeSS ~ 20 39–43.7 17.74 RLOT 19.35 SS 1 Pt 917 EmpeSS ~ 20 ~ 40.5 17.34 RLOT 18.91 SS 9.8 3, 4 -1 Te-1 2413 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 48 RLOT 19.89 SS 1

453

Page 185: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechnical datasets and fault se_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

454

al analysis

Well Depth (m)

Group/ Formation

Type Log Quality Count SD Sv

(MPa/km) SHmax

(MPa/km) SHmaxθ (ºN)

Pressure (MPa/km)

Test type Shmin

(MPa/km) Stress regime

Pp (MPa/km)

Source

Te-1 1103 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 20.73 RLOT 18.79 SS 9.8 3, 4 Tg-1 3198 Halibut ~ 20 39–43.7 63.13 RLOT 19.74 SS 1 Tp-1 1103 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 21.12 RLOT 19.15 SS 1 T-4 762 Seaspray ~ 20 39–43.7 12.97 LOT 17.18 SS 1 T-4 773 Seaspray ~ 20 ~ 40.5 16.7 RLOT 21.6 RF 9.8 3, 4 T-4 2413 Halibut ~ 20 ~ 40.5 47.58 RLOT 19.72 SS 9.8 3, 4 T-4 3198 Gol. Beach ~ 20 ~ 40.5 62.72 RLOT 19.6 SS 9.8 3, 4 T-4 A 20 8.82 21 9.8 3

WT-8 A 20 8.82 ~ 20 ~ 40.5 147.78 9.8 3, 4 WT-8 BO A 20 7 ~ 201 39–43.7FMI 153 1, 2 WT-8 DITF D 3 4.5 ~ 201 ~ 40.5 145.35 9.8 1, 3 FMI WT-8 2598-2710 ? 9.8 2 WT-32 BO C 4 2.86 ~ 201 ~ 40.5 126.25 9.8 1, 2, 3, 4 FMI WT-37 BO F A 19 5.96 ~ 20 ~ 40.5 146.56 9.8 3, 4 MI WT-37 BO A 19 6 ~ 201 39–43.7FMI 148 1, 2 WT-39 2154 ? ~ 20 ~ 40.5 20.31 LOT 20.31? RF 9.8 3, 4 WT-39 BO A 11 10.142FMI 22 ~ 40.5 132.51 10.14 9.8 1, 2, 3, 4 WT-39 2133 BO ~ 201 39–42 41.6, 43.3FMI LOT, clos 19.5,20.3 SS 2

WT field 1000, 3000 ? 20–221 39–42 138 20 SS/RF 9.8 2 WT-44 BO A 17 2 ~ 201 ~ 40.5 125.76 9.8 1, 2, 3, 4 FMI

Table A3.3. In situ principal stress (Sv, SHmax, Shmin – m tude and azimuth), pore pressure (PP), stress regime (NF, RF and SS) and source for wells in the study area. Well abbreviations–see Appendix 1 (Table 1.1). Seismic intervals—see Figure 3.4 for explanation of formations. Columns 1 to 5: ‘Quality’ (A to E) set according to international standards (see world stress map–www.world-stress-map.org). BO–borehole breakout; cal.—caliper; DITF–drilling induced tensile fracture; FMI – formation imager log; LOT—leak-off test; Pp—pore pressure; RF—reverse fault regime; SD – ?; SHmax—maximum horizontal shear stress; SHmin—minimum horizontal shear stress; Sv–vertical principal stress; SS—strike-slip regime. 1—Nelson et al. (2006b); 2—Nelson and Hillis (2005); 3—van Ruth and Nelson (2005). 4—van Ruth et al. (2006). 1—Taken at a depth of 1 km; Sv—22 MPa/km at 3 km.

agni

Page 186: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechanical datasets and fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

455

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure A3.1. Histogram of the GR log-curve response—application to estimating sand and shale lines for tratigraphic intervals (a) GBeaSS, (b) LHals

SSS1 and (c) LHalSS2.

ee Appendix 1 (Table A1.1) for well abbreviations.

Page 187: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechanical datasets and fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

456

) (a

(b)

Figure A3.2. Histogram of the GR log-curve response—application to estimating sand and shale lines for stratigraphic intervals (a) UHalSS2, and (b) combined UHalSS3/CobiSS. See Appendix 1 (Table A1.1) for well abbreviations.

Page 188: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechanical datasets and fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

3.3. Comparison of gamma ray and VFigure AGamma r alibrated to driller’s depth (e.g. cable stretch = 3.5 m for Grunter-1, 0.9 m for

ipper-1 and 4.5 m for Kipper-2. Depths are represented on a non-linear scale to avoid space redundancy. Inter.—eismic interval (see Figure 3.4 for intervals).

shale response to core—Grunter-1, Kipper-1 and -2. ay and V depths have been cshale

Ks

457

Page 189: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

Appendix 3—Geomechanical datasets and fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

458

Figure A3.4. Comparison of gamma ray and Vshale response to core—Tuna-1. Gamma ray and Vshale depths have been calibrated to driller’s depth (e.g. cable stretch = 0 m). Depths are represented on a non-linear scale to avoid space redundancy. Inter.—seismic interval (see Figure 3.4 for intervals).

Page 190: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis

________________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________

459

18BAPPENDIX 4—PUBLICATIONS ________________________________________________________________________________

A number of papers were published during the term of this Ph.D. study, as follows.

(i) Three papers were published during this Ph.D. but on a project that preceded this Ph.D.

(Sayers et al., 2006; Cinar et al., 2007, 2009)—the direction and contents of these works

formed part of the rational for conducting the research in this Ph.D. (i.e. understanding the

effect of faults on COR2R storage).

(ii) Two poster-abstract presentations were given at CO2CRC Research Symposiums held in

Western Australia and New Zealand (Sayers et al., 2007; Sayers et al., 2008)—these

symposiums were run by the organisation (CO2CRC) that financed this Ph.D. study; as

such, these works are unpublished.

(iii) Lastly, targeted components of Chapters 5–7 were presented and published as part of the

International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies (GHGT-10) in Amsterdam,

Holland (Sayers et al., in press).

249BRefereed journal papers

Cinar, Y., Neal, P.R., Allison, W.G., and Sayers, J., 2009. Geoengineering and economic assessment of a potential carbon capture and storage site in southeast Queensland, Australia. SPE Reservoir and Engineering–Formation evaluation, SPE108924.

Sayers, J., Marsh, C., Scott, A., Cinar, Y., Bradshaw, J., Hennig, A., Barclay, S., and Daniel, R., 2006. Assessment of a potential storage site for carbon dioxide: a case study, southeast Queensland, Australia. Environmental Geosciences, AAPG, 13(2), 123–142.

250BConference papers and poster abstracts

Cinar, Y., Sayers, J., Neal, P.R., and Allison, W.G., 2007. Geoengineering and economic assessment of a potential carbon capture and storage site in southeast Queensland, Australia. Paper (SPE108924) given at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas conference and exhibition, 30 Oct.–1 Nov. 2007, Djakarta, Indonesia.

Sayers, J., Daniel, R.F., Hillis, R.R., and Spencer, L., In press. Carbon dioxide storage leads of the eastern Gippsland Basin, Australia – terminology, seal and structure considerations in trap integrity assessments. Proceedings of the 10 P

thP International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Technologies (GHGT-10), 19–23 Sep. 2010,

Amsterdam, Holland, paper to be published in Energy Procedia, Elsevier Science B.V. (Publishers).

Sayers, J., Hillis, R.R., and Boult, P.J., 2008. Faults, traps, compartmentalization and carbon dioxide storage leads–eastern Gippsland Basin. Paper (abstract) given at the CO2CRC Research Symposium, 2–4 Dec. 2008, Queenstown New Zealand, unpublished.

Sayers, J., Hillis, R.R., Boult, P.J., and Cinar, Y., 2007. Understanding fault system–hiatus links: phase 1 results eastern Gippsland Basin. Paper (abstract) given at the CO2CRC Research Symposium, 6–8 Nov. 2007, Swan Valley, Western Australia, unpublished.

Page 191: Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application … · 2012-08-29 · Seismic interpretation of the eastern Gippsland Basin with application to fault seal analysis