securing the nation january 07
TRANSCRIPT
Securing the Nation:The Case for Safer
Homes
Jane MilneHead of Property and Creditor
January 2007
What is the issue?
• 655,000 households experienced at least one burglary within last 12 months
= 1.6m people
• Insurers pay out £1m per day to burglary victims and £1.5m per day to arson victims
What is the issue?
• Lack of security is the main reason a property is targeted
• There are significant social equity issues
• Burglary levels are falling
– do we really need to do anything?
• The total social and economic cost of a burglary has increased to £3,267 on average
Where does the burden lie?• Inner city areas and the very poor are 60-70% more likely to be burgled
• Young households are 163% more likely to be burgled
•Single parent households are 148% more likely to be burgled
• But each of these groups rank as the least likely to have insurance
•Less than half have insurance
•They also have least control over their housing security standards
The opportunities for action• Sustainable and Secure Buildings
Act 2004 gives legal basis for Building Regulations on security
• Regulation should be risk-based and proportionate
• Full benefits of regulatory action should be taken into account
• Voluntary approaches such as the code for Sustainable Homes do not deliver
Methodology
• Focused on: •target hardening (SBD as a
benchmark)•new builds and major
refurbishments
• Tested model using:•burglary rates of 5% with
sensitivity analysis of 3% and 7%•burglary reduction rates of 50%
with sensitivity analysis of 25% and 75%
• Average cost of a burglary £3,300
Key Findings
• Average cost of measures = £630 per home
• Benefits:•£1,173 per home over 20 years•Year One 400,000 households
benefit = £215m net savings•Over 20 years the regulations
would save the economy over £3.2bn
What next?
• Building Regulations based on SBD to protect people living in social and private housing
• Strengthening of the Code for Sustainable Homes • No opt out
on security• Greater weighting
of security