securing climate finance andclimate finance and investment to
TRANSCRIPT
SECURING CLIMATE FINANCE ANDCLIMATE FINANCE AND
INVESTMENT TO SUPPORT LOW CARBON ANDTO SUPPORT LOW-CARBON AND
CLIMATE-RESILIENT GROWTH
H l M tf dHelen MountfordDeputy Director, OECD Environment Directorate4 June 20134 June 2013Paris
Closing the emission gapClosing the emission gap
GHG emissions projection – 2010-2050
120130GtCO2e
Outlook Baseline 450 ppm Core3-6°C by 2100
90100110
607080
20304050
2°C by 2100
01020
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
2 C by 2100
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
2Source: OECD (2012), OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050, Image model
Delaying action is costly! I l k i b i i i fIt locks-in carbon-intensive infrastructure
Real income in 2050 (% deviation from baseline)
0%450 ppm Core 450 ppm delayed action
-3%-2%-1%0%
-6%-5%-4%3%
-9%-8%-7%
Delaying action to 2020 (ie the CPH/ Cancun pledges) will increase costs of a 450ppm pathway by nearly 50% in 2050
-10%
3
increase costs of a 450ppm pathway by nearly 50% in 2050
Source: OECD (2012), OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050, Baseline projection using ENV-Linkages model
Closing the investment gap to 2030Closing the investment gap to 2030
Global infrastructure in estments c ent
Global infrastructure investments needs BAU
Global infrastructure in estments needs 2°C 1 2
4
$2 tn $3.2 tn $2.7 – $3.5 tn
investments - current investments needs - BAU investments needs - 2°C scenario
1 2
3
3.5
ear
+60%?
2
2.5
D tn
/ ye +60%
?
1
1.5US
D
0.5
1
0
4
Source: Compilation based on OECD, IEA, ITF, Mc Kinsey, WEF, Kennedy,C.,Corfee-Morlot,J.Energy Policy(2013)Note: Infrastructure sectors including roads, rail, ports, airports, power, water and telecoms
1: Annual average based on global investments over the period 1996-20122. Annual average needs for the period 2012-2030
What can governments do? A Green Investment Policy Framework
1. Strategic goal setting and policy alignment
2. Enabling policies and incentives for LCR investment
4. Harness resources and build capacity
f LCR
5. Promote green business and
consumer b h i LCR investment
3. Financial policies and instruments
for an LCR economy
behaviour
Source: Corfee-Morlot et al., 2012.
How to integrate climate & investment policies in a green investment policy frameworkin a green investment policy framework
• Clear long-term and predictable policiesS Clear, long term and predictable policies• Align goals at all levels of governance• Engage the private sector
1. Strategic goal setting and policy alignment
• Put a price on carbon• Remove fossil fuel subsidies• Energy efficiency and product regulations
2. Enabling policies for green investment
• Financial regulations to drive long–term investments• Targeted subsidies with predictable phase-out • Leverage public finance (loans, guarantees, bonds)
3. Financial policies, tools and instruments g p ( g )
• R&D for green technology • Capacity building to support LCR innovation • Monitoring and enforcement
4. Harnessing resources and capacity • Monitoring and enforcement
• Climate risk and vulnerability assessmentand capacity
• Information policies• Consumer awareness programmes public outreach
5. Promoting green business and
6Source: Corfee-Morlot et al., 2012.
• Consumer awareness programmes, public outreach• Corporate reporting
business and consumers behaviours
Barriers to private sector engagementINCENTIVES
FOR CLEANER GROWTH
INCENTIVES TO LOCK-IN CARBON-
INTENSIVE GROWTH
Sources: OECD (2013), Inventory of Estimated Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels; IEA (2012), World Energy Outlook; IEA (2011) Clean Energy Progress Report; OECD (2013 forthcoming).
7
Preliminary analysis of effective carbon i i l t i it tiprices in electricity generation
400617 775800
300
350
bated
200
250
e of CO2ab
150
200
per ton
ne
50
100
2010
EUR
‐50
0
88Source: OECD (2013 forthcoming), Effective Carbon Prices
Institutional Investors as a source of di i l i fi inon-traditional private financing
70 000
80 000
$20.2 tn
$75.1 tnDirect investment in green infrastructure can deliver:- steady, inflation-linked, income
ith l l ti t th t
Pension funds50 000
60 000
lions
$20.2 tn- with low correlations to the returns of other investments
Insurance companies
30 000
40 000USD
bil
$24.3 tn
Investment funds20 000
30 000
$28.8 tn
0
10 000Other $1.8 tn
Source: OECD Global Pensions Statics and Institutional Investors databases 9
Challenges to scaling up institutional i t ti i ti li linvestor participation – policy lessons
Issues with ▪ Direct investing challenges infrastructure investments
1 ▪ Regulatory and policy issues- illiquidity and direct investment restrictions e.g. capital adequacy rules
(Solvency II, IORP II)- uncertain new policy application e.g. Solvency II for pension funds?p y pp g y p- accounting rules e.g. mark to market for illiquid assets
▪ Lack of project pipeline and quality historical data- Compounded by exit of banks (Basel III/deleveraging)
Issues particular to greeninvestments
2▪ Risk/return imbalance
- Market failures: insufficient carbon pricing and presence of fossil fuel subsidies
▪ Unpredictable, fragmented, complex and short duration policy supportp , g , p p y pp- Retroactive support cuts, switching incentives or start and stop (PTC)- Use of tax credits popular with insurers can discourage tax exempt
pension funds- Unrelated policy objective discouragement e.g. EU unbundling
▪ Special species of risk e g technology and volumetric require expertise and
Lack of suitable
▪ Special species of risk, e.g. technology and volumetric require expertise and resources
▪ Issues with fund and vehicle design▪ Nascent green bond markets no indices or funds no market for illiquid
10
Lack of suitable investment vehicles
3▪ Nascent green bond markets , no indices or funds, no market for illiquid
vehicles ▪ Challenges with securitisation▪ Credit and ratings issues
Green Bond Universe = USD $16 – 86 billionGreen Bond Universe USD $16 86 billion 4.0USD $ Billions
Moody's S&P Fitch
Long-term
Short-term
Long-term
Short-term
Long-term
Short-term
Aaa AAA AAA Prime
• Credit Rating Tiers
SovereignCorporate$30-70 Bn??
3.0
3.5
US Qualif ied EnergyConservation Bonds
USD $3.2 Billion
P-1
A-1+ F1+Aa1 AA+ AA+
High grade
Aa2 AA AA
Aa3 AA- AA-
A1 A+A-1
A+F1
Upper medium grade
A2 A A
A3P-2
A-A-2
A-F2
B 1 BBB+ BBB+ L
Supranational
2 0
2.5WorldBank
US Clean Renewable Energy Bonds $2.4
$2.3
Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ Lower medium grade
Baa2P-3
BBBA-3
BBBF3
Baa3 BBB- BBB-
Ba1 BB+
B
BB+
B
Non-investment gradespecul
Ba2 BB BB
Ba3 BB- BB-
1.5
2.0
EuropeanInvestment Bank
Asian
$1.6
B B ative
B1 B+ B+Highly speculative
B2 B B
B3 B- B-
Caa1 CCC+Substantial risks
ABS
0.5
1.0
CRC BreezeAlta Wind
s aDevelopmentBank
InternationalFinanceCorporation
AfricanDevelopmentBank
$0.7$0.6
$0 2
$0.7
$0.3
Not prime
C CCC C
Caa2 CCC
Extremely speculative
Caa3 CCC- In default with littleprospeCa
CC
0.01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8AAAAAABBBBBB BB-
S&P CreditRating.
Andromeda Solar Nordic
InvestmentBank
$0.2$0.2 prospe
ct for recovery
CaC
C
D /
DDD
/In default
/ DD
/ D
Source: Calculations derived through OECD analysis using the Climate Bonds Initiative database, Daiwa research, Bloomberg New Energy Finance and Energy Hedge Magazine
Next steps in OECD work
• Assessing experience with Green Investment Policies and
Next steps in OECD work
• Assessing experience with Green Investment Policies and Instruments for infrastructure – country case studies
• Assessing the scale & impact of policy restrictions on g p p yinternational investment in clean energy
• Further work on institutional investors: lessons learned from ifi di h “ ” d l (i i h i h specific case studies on how to structure “green” deals (i.e. with right
risk-return profile) and role of policies.
• Combining BNEF and OECD databases for empirical • Combining BNEF and OECD databases for empirical analysis of the impact of government policies on leveraging (“crowding in”) private finance to green infrastructure.
• Broadening the tracking of climate finance: non-concessional finance, export credits, loan guarantees; definitions of private finance flows; leveraging effect of bilateral ODAfinance flows; leveraging effect of bilateral ODA...
Th k !Thank you!
www oecd org/env/cc/financingwww.oecd.org/env/cc/financing