sections in this presentation us samples (except straus studies)

1

Sections In This Presentation

US samples (except Straus studies) Straus et al 1975 and 1985 National Family Violence Surveys Other nation samples Other nation samples in International Parenting Study Specific populations and clinical samples Partner violence between parents as reported by child Intimate Terrorism Dyadic Concordance Types

Male-Only Female-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

8

17

74Chart Title

%

Dyadic Concordance Types of Physical Assault By 202 CouplesIn First Year Of Marriage

2

Couple Prevalence: 37%

Note:Prevalence and DTs based on of the partner who reported a greater frequency of physical assault

Panuzio, J., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Intimate Partner Aggression Among Newlywed Couples: Longitudinal Prediction of Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 25(7), 689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9328-2


10

20

30

40

50

60

16

54

30

Chart Title

%

Dyadic Concordance Types of Physical Assault Using Data Provided by 1,026 Men Presenting at An Emergency Room

3


Rhodes, Karin V., Houry, Debra, Cerulli, Catherine, Straus, Helen, Kaslow, Nadine J., & McNutt, Louise-Anne. (2009). Intimate Partner Violence and Comorbid Mental Health Conditions Among Urban Male Patients. Annals of Family Medicine, 7(1), 47-55. doi: 10.1370/afm.936

4

Dyadic Concordance Types for Minor AssaultU.S. National Comorbidity Study (N=8,098)*

%

* Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 24(4-5), 487-508.

** Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of Bidirectional Versus Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Across \Samples, Sexual Orientations, and Race/Ethnicities: A Comprehensive Review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199-230. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199

One of more than 50 studies** which found:Predominant Pattern Is Both-ViolentMale-Only and Female-

Only about same %

Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was an assault *

*Couple Prevalence for MINOR assault according to:Males: 21%Females: 23%

Male-only Female-only Both0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

12

26

63

22 23

54

Male Respondents Female Respondents

5

Dyadic Concordance Types for Severe AssaultU.S. National Comorbidity Study (N=8,098)*

%

* Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 24(4-5), 487-508.

** Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Selwyn, C., & Rohling, M. L. (2012). Rates of Bidirectional Versus Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Across \Samples, Sexual Orientations, and Race/Ethnicities: A Comprehensive Review. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 199-230. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.199

One of more than 50 studies** which found:Predominant Pattern Is Both-ViolentMale-Only and Female-

Only about same %

Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was an assault*

* Couple Prevalence for SEVERE Assault according to: Males: 6%Females: 8%


10

20

30

40

50

60

2

54

44

2320

57


6

Dyadic Concordance Types for Minor and Severe AssaultU.S. National Comorbidity Study (N=8,098)*

• Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. International Journal Of Law And Psychiatry, 24(4-5), 487-508.

SEVERE ASSAULT


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2

54

44

2320

57



10

20

30

40

50

60

70

12

26

63

22 23

54


MINOR ASSAULT*Couple Prevalence according to:

Males: 21%Females: 23%

* Couple Prevalence according to: Males: 6%

Females: 8%

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For Assault By 7,395 Married & Cohabiting CouplesWave 1 of the National Survey of Families and Households

7

Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim? Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(4), 851-863

Couple Prevalence according to: Males: 10%Females: 9%

Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was assault


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

10

20

70

11

22

67


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Any Assault As Reported By Men And Women Age 24-33 (National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health N=4,795)

8

Couple Prevalence according to:


Tillyer, M. S., & Wright, E. M. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence and the Victim-Offender Overlap. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(1), 29-55. doi: 10.1177/0022427813484315

Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was assault


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

5

67

282932

39


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault between Partners As Reported By 453 Couples with Children Age 3-8

9Smith Slep, A. M. & O’Leary, S. G. (2009). Distinguishing risk profiles among parent-only, partner-only, and dually perpetrating physical aggressors. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(5), 705-716. doi:10.1037/a0016474

Couple Prevalence by Type: Any: 49%Severe: 24%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

20

10

70

2924

47

Any Assault Severe Assault

Note: DTs as reported by Partners

%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault between Partners As Reported By 453 Couples with Children Age 3-8

10Smith Slep, A. M. & O’Leary, S. G. (2009). Distinguishing risk profiles among parent-only, partner-only, and dually perpetrating physical aggressors. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(5), 705-716. doi:10.1037/a0016474

Couple Prevalence by Type: Any: 87%Severe: 13%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

19

12

69

4246

12


Note: DTs as reported by Parent of the Child

11

Student CouplesExcept Straus samples

%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault As Reported By 481 University Students

12Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tatics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217.



10

20

30

40

50

60

21

26

54

8

37

55


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Partner Assault By High School Students(1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey, N = 5,414)

13


Coker, A. L., McKeown, R. E., Sanderson, M., Davis, K. E., Valois, R. F., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Severe dating assault and quality of life among South Carolina high school students. American journal of preventive medicine, 19(4), 220-227.

Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was an assault


5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

4541

33

25

38

33

29


14

Comparison Of CTS full form with short form

%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Any Assault As Reported By 1,157 University Students

15Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520.

Prevalence for ANY assault:Short Form: 19%Full Form: 31%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

9.4

28

63

8.9

20

72

Short Form Full Form

%

Comparison of Dyadic Concordance Types for Any Assault Using the Short Form and Full Conflict Tactics Scales

(Data From 1,157 University Students)


Prevalence for ANY assault:Short Form: 19%Full Form: 31%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

9.4

28

63

8.9

20

72Short Form Full Form

17

Comparison Of CTS full form with short form

%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Severe Assault As Reported By 1,157 University Students


Prevalence for SEVERE assault: Short Form: 6%Full Form: 12%


10

20

30

40

50

60

16

34

51

15

37

46


Dyadic Concordance Types for Any and Severe Assault As Reported By 1,157 University Students



10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

9.4

28

63

8.9

20

72


*Couple Prevalence according to:Short Form: 19%Full Form: 31%

ANY ASSAULT


10

20

30

40

50

60

16

34

51

15

37

46


SEVERE ASSAULT*Couple Prevalence according to:

Short Form: 6%Full Form: 12%

Dyadic Concordance Types of Assault Among Student Couples

In The 15-Nation International Parenting Study

20

%

Dyadic Assault Types For Dating RelationshipsAmong 11,408 University Students in 15 Nations - Any Assault

As Reported By Men and Women

21Straus, M. A., & Winstok, Z. (2014). Relation of Dyadic Concordance-Discordance Types of Partner Violence to Depression of Male and Female University Students in 15 Nations. Unpublished Manuscript. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory

Couple Prevalence according to:



10

20

30

40

50

60

9

41

50

10

49

41


22


Straus, M. A., & Winstok, Z. (2013). Gender Differences in the Relation Of Dyadic Concordance Types Of Partner Violence To Depression Among University students in 15 nations. Paper presented at the Society For The Study Of Social Problems Annual Meeting, New York.

%


5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

10

47

43Couple Prevalence: 17%

23


%

Figure 1. Dyadic Assault Types For Dating RelationshipsAmong 11,408 University Students in 15 Nations

Straus, M. A., & Winstok, Z. (2013). Gender Differences in the Relation Of Dyadic Concordance Types Of Partner Violence To Depression Among University students in 15 nations. Paper presented at the Society For The Study Of Social Problems Annual Meeting, New York.

17%

37.6%

45.4%

11.9%

44.6%

43.7%Cannot find where “severe data” comes from – not in source provided (neither paper nor presentation)

Dyadic Concordance Types For Physical Assault By University Student Couples In 15 Nations

Region NationPrevalence Dyadic Concordance Types For

AssaultMale-Only Female-Only Both

Total 17 10 47 44

Asia Taiwan 6 6 53 41Hong Kong 6 14 50 36

Europe Belgium 17 9 46 45 Greece 24 15 32 53 Italy 18 5 61 35 Poland 18 8 36 56 Russia 24 6 48 46 Scotland 20 12 36 52 Slovenia 12 11 47 42 Switzerland 17 0 59 41 Norway 12 9 56 35 Spain 10 8 49 43Middle East Israel 6 17 33 50N. America Canada 13 12 46 43 United States 18 9 51 40

24

Straus, M. A., & Winstok, Z. (2013). Gender Differences in the Relation Of Dyadic Concordance Types Of Partner Violence To Depression Among University students in 15 nations. Presented at the Society For the Study Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .

Dyadic Concordance Types Of Perpetration Of Severe Assault As Reported By Male And Female Respondents

In 1985 National Family Violence Survey

Husband-only Wife-only Both0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

8

72

20

31 3336

Male Respondents Female RespondentsCouple Prevalence:7%

26Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)

Mal

e-on

ly

Femal

e-on

lyBot

h0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

21

30

50

2427

48

Dyadic Concordance Types For Asaulting A Partner (Any & Severe)Coupled in the 2nd National Family Violence Survey (N = 6,002)

%

Dyadic Concordance Types Type

Any AssaultCouple Prevalence:17%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

8

72

20

31 3336

Assault SevereCouple Prev.:7%

Male

Female

27

Other nations, except for Straus Samples

Male-Only Female-Only

Both-Vio-lent


Both-Vio-lent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

49.5

11.2

39.3

69.4

13.3

17.3


%

Dyadic Assault Types Among a National Sample Of Korean CouplesNote: Male-Only Type Predominates

28Marital Power, Conflict, Norm Consensus, and Marital Violence in a Nationally Representative Sample of Korean Couples (Kim, Jae-Yop and Emery, Clifton. 2003.) Journal of Interpersonal Violence 18:197-219

Assault Assault

Create chart of Korena students

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Assault

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1921

60

20

24

57

Chart Title


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault, Previous Year Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

29Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9

Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 20%Women: 18%

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Assault

Male-Only

Female-Only

Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

18 19

63

21 21

59Chart Title


%

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault, Lifetime Probability sample of 3,496 adults Age 18-64 In Six European Cities

30Costa, Diogo, Hatzidimitriadou, Eleni, Ioannidi-Kapolou, Elli, Lindert, Jutta, Soares, Joaquim, Sundin, Örjan, . . . Barros, Henrique. (2014). Intimate partner violence and health-related quality of life in European men and women: findings from the DOVE study. Quality of Life Research, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0766-9

Couple Prevalence According to: Men: 29%Women: 27%

%

Dyadic Assault Types As Reported By Men And Women In A National Sample of 11,425 Canadian Couples

31Graham, K., Bernards, S., Flynn, A., Tremblay, P. F., & Wells, S. (2012). Does the Relationship Between Depression and Intimate Partner Aggression Vary by Gender, Victim–Perpetrator Role, and Aggression Severity? Violence & Victims, 27(5), 730-743. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.5.730



10

20

30

40

50

60

70

12

59

28

36 38

26


%

Dyadic Assault Types for Perpetration Of Physical Assault As Reported By 5,219 Spanish High School Students

32

Fernández-González, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Muñoz-Rivas, M. J. (2014). Age-Related Changes in Dating Aggression in Spanish High School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(6), 1132-1152. doi: 10.1177/0886260513506057 dy Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .

Couple Prevalence according to:Males: 46%Females: 53%

Male Prevalence:39%

Female Prevalence: 48%


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

14 16

71

8.6

21

71


% Who Assaulted

Figure 1. Dyadic Concordance Types for Partner Assault PerpetrationAs Reported By 3,642 Men And Women In The World Mental Health Study

33

Couple Prevalence according to:Males: 22%Females 22%

Miller, E., Breslau, J., Petukhova, M., Fayyad, J., Green, J. G., Kola, L., Kessler, R. C. (2011). Premarital mental disorders and physical violence in marriage: cross-national study of married couples. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(4), 330-337. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084061


5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

39

19

42

36

21

43


34

Kim, J.-Y., & Emery, C. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 197-219.

Kei contacted author about DTs


Both-Vio-lent


Both-Vio-lent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

49.5

11.2

39.3

69.4

13.317.3


%

Dyadic Assault Types Among a National Sample Of Korean Couples

35Kim, J.-Y., & Emery, C. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 197-219.

Create chart of Korea students

Kei contacted author about DTS (check coding notes for more detail)


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

22

5

73Chart Title

%

Dyadic Concordance Types of Physical Assault Perpetration Among Parents Of A Swedish National Sample Age 20-24 (N=703)

36

Couple Prevalence:28%

Miller, L. E., Cater, A. A. K., Howell, K. H., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (2014). Perpetration patterns and environmental contexts of IPV in Sweden: Relationships with adult mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(1), 147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.023

37

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1975 NATIONAL 1985 NATIONAL 98-00 STUDENTS

MALE PARTBER ONLY

FEMALE PARTNER ONLY

BOTH VIOLENT

MUTUALITY OF PARTNER VIOLENCE, AS REPORTED BY WOMEN

IN THREE SURVEYS

V67C BY FEMALE RESPONDENTS

Same as slides 33 and 34, appear to be correct. Checked only for Female respondents from National Survey 1985

38

Same as slides 34, 35, and 44, appear to be correct. Checked only for Female respondents from National Survey 1985

39

Same as slides 31 and 32, Rates for 1985 National Survey for “Any Assault” appear to be incorrect

40

Same as slides 35 and 36, Rates for Male 1985 National Survey appear to be incorrect

Male

Only Fem

ale

Only

Both

Mal

e Onl

y

Fem

ale

Only

Both

IDV12 E1a

Dyadic Dating Assault Types As Reported By Male And Female University students in the Nine ?? Most Male-Dominant Nations in the IDVS *

41* India, Iran, Guatamala, etc

Slide seems unfinished. Unsure where data is from

Kim, J.-Y., & Emery, C. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 197-219. 42


Both-Assault


Both-Assault

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

9

41

50 49

10

41


%


As Reported By Men and Women

43Straus, M. A., & Winstok, Z. (2013). Gender Differences in the Relation Of Dyadic Concordance Types Of Partner Violence To Depression Among University students in 15 nations. Presented at the Society For the Study Of Social Problems annual meeting, New York 8 August 2013. .

Prevalence MenWomen

44

Dyadic Assault Types For University Student Dating Couples In 32 Nations (N=14,252)

SEVERE ASSAULT


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

14

26

60

14

28

58



10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

13 14

73

11

20

69


ANY ASSAULT

* Couple Prevalence for SEVERE assault according to: Males: 8%Females: 11%

*Couple Prevalence for ANY assault according to:Males: 24%Females: 32%

Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children

and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.

45

Old format, same data/study as slide 16


Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.

*Couple Prevalence for ANY assault according to:Males: 24%Females: 32%

* Couple Prevalence for SEVERE assault according to: Males: 8%Females: 11%

46Straus, M. A. (2007). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.

14,252 students in a dating relationship. This chart is for the 4,239 who reported one or more incidents of assault.

Dyadic Concordance Types For Assault Perpetration In Dating Relationships Of University Students In 32 Nations

Male

Only

Female

Only

Both

Mal

e Onl

y

Fem

ale

Only Bot

h

Dyadic Perpetration Types As Reported By Male And Female University Students in the Seven Most Male-Dominant Nations in 32 Nations *

47

According to the United Nations Gender Inequality Index: Brazil, Guatemala, India, Iran, Mexico. South Africa, Venezuela

Straus, Murray A., & Mickey, Ethel L. (2012). Reliability, validity, and prevalence of partner violence measured by the conflict tactics scales in male-dominant nations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 463-474. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.004


Both-Vio-lent


Both-Vio-lent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

10.413.9

76

13.8

20

66.2

7.1

17.9

75

17.3

25.5

57.1

Male Respo...


%

Dyadic Aggression Types In The Seven Most Male-Dominant Nations* In The International Dating Violence Study

48

ID71Straus, M. A., & Mickey, E. L. (2012). Reliability, validity, and prevalence of partner violence measured by the conflict tactics scales in male-dominant nations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 463-474. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.004

* According to the United Nations Gender Inequality Index: Brazil, Guatemala, India, Iran, Mexico. South Africa, Venezuela


Straus, M. A. (2008). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275. 49

PrevalenceMale:Female:

50Straus, Murray A. (2014). Dyadic Concordance Types And Discordance In Three Partner Abuse Behaviors And Other Problematic Behavior By Male And Female Partners In A National Sample Of American Couples. Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire. Durham, NH. (For sample description, see Gelles, R., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.)

Couple Prevalence:

13%


10

20

30

40

50

60

24 24

52

19

41 40


Dyadic Concordance Types For Witnessing Violence Between Parents

Of Couples in the 2nd National Family Violence Survey (N = 6,002)

%

Dyadic Concordance Types Type

51Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (In press). Mutuality, Severity, And Chronicity Of Violence Between Parents Experienced By University Students In 15 Nations. Child Abuse and Neglect.


Note:DTs as reported by Parents in a Violent Relationship

Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations* 14% of parents had one or more violent incidents when student was 10* Among this 14%: ~ Predominant pattern was Both-Violent

~ Next was Father-Only, ~ Mother-Only almost as high

Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2522

52

%

52Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (In press). Mutuality, Severity, And Chronicity Of Violence Between Parents Experienced By University Students In 15 Nations. Child Abuse and Neglect.

Dyadic Aggression Types Between Parents Of University Students in 15 Nations: * Predominant Pattern Is Both-Violent.

* Next Is Father-only. * Followed Closely By Mother-only

Father-only Mother-only Both0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2622

52

30

17

53


CouplePrevalence by Type: Any: 13%Severe: 7%

53

Previous Studies Which Measured Dyadic Aggression Types

54

Not child report

Dyadic Concordance Types of Assault Between Parents of University

Students In 15-Nations

55

56Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2013). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004


Note:Data for parents as reported by students

Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations* 14% of parents had one or more violent incidents when student was 10* Among this 14%: ~ Predominant pattern was Both-Violent

~ Next was Father-Only, ~ Mother-Only almost as high

Father-Only Mother-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2522

52

Same as slide 11

%

57

Dyadic Concordance Types for Physical Assault Between ParentsOf University Students in 15 Nations

Father-only Mother-only Both0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2622

52

30

17

53Any Assault Severe Assault

Parents WhoAssaultedAny assault: 14%Severe: 7%

Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2013). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004

Any Assault Severe Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25

30

22

17

5453

Father Only Mother Only Both ViolentP

erce

ntag

e

58

.

Same as previous, but different format

Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2013). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004

* In All Regions Predominant Pattern Is Both-violent, Next Is Father-only, Followed By Mother-only

* This Applies To Both Any Assault And Severe Assaults

Region NFather-

OnlyMother-

OnlyBoth-

ViolentA. Any Assault

All regions 1485 25.4% 22.4% 52.3%Asia 110 30.9% 14.5% 54.5%

Europe 655 28.5% 21.7% 49.8%Israel 48 60.4% 6.3% 33.3%

North America 672 18.9% 25.4% 55.7%A. Severe Assault

Region N

Father-Only

Mother-Only

Both-Violent

All regions 733 30.2% 16.5% 53.3%Asia 81 32.1% 18.5% 49.4%

Europe 313 38.3% 15.7% 46.0%Israel 18 38.9% 0.0% 61.1%

North America 321 21.2% 17.8% 61.1%

59Straus, M. A., & Michel-Smith, Y. (2013). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by Father-Only, Mother-Only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse Negl. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.10.004

Conflict Tactics Scales – short form Answered for what happened when they were 10 years old

Percent Of Parents Violent

Fathers 10.5Mothers 13.1Either Parent 14.5

• Similar to rates of US community studies

Of the 14% of violent parents• 53% both parents violent• 25% Father-Only• 22% Mother-Only

Violence Between Parents Of University Students In 15 Nations

60

61

Specific Population and Clinical Samples

62


10

20

30

40

50

60

70

11

27

62

Dyadic Concordance Types Of Abuse (either physical assault or sexual coercion)1044 high-risk African-American pregnant women

%

Shneyderman, Y., & Kiely, M. (2013). Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: victim or perpetrator? Does it make a difference? Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 120(11), 1375-1385. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12357


Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was violence

Dyadic Concordance Types for Frequent Assault 159 Couples From High Crime Neighborhoods

63

Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. D. (2001). Physical aggression in a community sample of at-risk young couples: Gender comparisons for high frequency, injury, and fear. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(3), 425-440.

Frequent: 19 or more times in past 12 months

Couple Prevalence 14%


10

20

30

40

50

60

9

35

57

%

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For AssaultUrban Gays, Lesbians, And Bisexuals, By Gender Of Respondent

Kelly, B. C., Izienicki, H., Bimbi, D. S., & Parsons, J. T. (2011). The intersection of mutual partner violence and substance use among urban gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Deviant Behavior, 32(5), 379-404.doi:10.1080/01639621003800158


Respon-dent-Only

Partner-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

9

37

53Chart Title

Respondent-Only

Partner-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

17

40

51

Chart TitleMale Female


Respondent-Only Partner-Only Both-Assault0

10

20

30

40

50

60

22

28

50Chart Title

%

Dyadic Type of Intimate Violence in Male Same-Sex Relationships

65


Note: The sample consisted of (N = 68) gay and bisexual men who reported at least 1 violent episode in their intimate relationships

Stanley, J. L., Bartholomew, K., Taylor, T., Oram, D., & Landolt, M. (2006). Intimate violence in male same-sex relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 21(1), 31-41. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-9008-9

66

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

18

32

50

Male Only Female Only Both

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For Intimate TerroristIn Dating Relationships Of University Students in 32 Nations

Straus, M. A., & Gozjolko, K. L. (2014). Intimate terrorism and injury of dating partners by male and female university students. Journal of Family Violence 29:51-65.


Need to be checked and updated

67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

18

32

50

Male Only Female Only Both “Terrorist”

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For Intimate Terrorism• 33% physically assaulted partner in the previous 12 months• Among those who assaulted, 29% percent were “Intimate Terrorists”• Among the Intimate Terrorists, the percent in each Dyadic Type was:

Straus, M. A., & Gozjolko, K. L. (In Press). Intimate terrorism and injury of dating partners by male and female university students. Journal of Family Violence

Male Only Female Only

Both Ter-rorist

Male Only Female Only

Both Ter-rorist

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14

37

49

30

19

51

As reported by men As reported by women

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For Intimate Terrorism• 29% of the men in this sample and 34% of the women physically assaulted

partner in previous 12 months• Among them, the percent who were classified as Intimate Terrorists was:

68

:

Straus, M. A., & Gozjolko, K. L. (In Press). Intimate terrorism and injury of dating partners by male and female university students. Journal of Family Violence.

%

Dyadic Concordance Types For Intimate TerrorismIn Dating Relationships Of University Students in 32 Nations

69

:

Straus, M. A., & Gozjolko, K. L. (2014). Intimate terrorism and injury of dating partners by male and female university students. Journal of Family Violence 29:51-65.

Couple Prevalence according to:Males: 29% Females: 34%

Male-only Female-only Both "Terrorist"0

10

20

30

40

50

60

14

37

49

30

19

51


Need to be checked and updated

sections in this presentation us samples (except straus studies)

Documents