section g data analysis graphical presentation

8/3/2019 Section g Data Analysis Graphical Presentation

1/52

3.60%4.39%

5.30%

12.30%

16.70%

28.20%

21.80%

4.60%

1.80%0.50%

Age

0-1 years old

2-3 years old

4-6 years old

7-14 years old

15-20 years old

21-40 years old

41-65% years old

66-74% years old

75-84 years old

85 and above

I. Demographic Variable

50.80%49.20%

Sex

Male

Female


2/52

33.50%

25.70%

37.10%

0.90%

1.80%1.00%

Civil Status

C

S

M

MS

W

Wr.

90.10%

2.10%

3.60%1.60%

1.90% 0.10%

0.60%

Religion

RC

P

INC

BAC

JW

M

Others


3/52

2.60%

14.20%

12.30%

24.00%

19.60%

4.40%

1.20%

2.60%8.30%

10.80%

Education

P

EL

EG

HL

HG

V

SC

None

CL

CG

8.60%

81.00%

2.10%

2.60%3.40% 2.30%

Place of Origin

NCRCL

NL

SL

V

M


4/52

13.80%3.30%

0.60%

4.10%

3.70%0.90%

8.60%

0.30%

32.40%

32.30%

Type of Work

E

RF

RP

C

CW

CE

SE

SE

UE

DEPENDENT

38.60%

23.70%

29.30%

8.40%

Place of Work: Location

I

IM/C

O

OFW


5/52

27.20%

24.40%

48.40%

Place of Work

OF

FC

FL

57.30%

17.00%

18.02%

7.20%

0.30%

Type of Family

Nuclear

Extended

Single Parent

Dyad

Cohabiting


6/52

34.00%

45.70%

20.30%

Type of Family

Matriarchal

Patriarchal

Egalitarian

44.20%

45.70%

Type of Family

Matricentric

Patricentric


7/52

37.60%

49.30%

13.10%

Type of Family

Matrilocal

Patrilocal

Neolocal

94.90%

78.20%

95.50%

100.00%

96.10%

Services in the Community

Religious services

Livelihood seminar

Health services

Garbage collection

Peace and order

II..Socio-economic, cultural, and environmental

1. Social Indicators


8/52

66.00%

66.90%66.60%

65.70%

Institutional facilities

Brgy. Hall

Health Station

Church

School

80.60%

77.00%

Organizations

Senior Citizens

Youth


9/52

49.90%

7.78%

82.70%

51.30%

2.70%

1.80%

44.50%

Values/Traditions/Custom

Bayanihan

Pakikisama

Fiestas

Respect for elderly

Palabra de Honor

Ningas Kugon

Close family ties

76.40%

41.80%

51.00%

Recreational facilities

Volleyball/ Basketball court

Plaza

Playground


10/52

100.00%31.90%

22.70%

13.70%

Mode of Transporation

Tricycle

Jeep

Bicycle

Pivate vehicle

6.00%

87.20%

22.70%

13.70%

Mode of Communication

Postal System

Cellphone

Internet

Telephone

2. Economic Indicator


11/52

28.40%

34.00%

20.60%

9.00%

3.00%

200.00%

0.30%

0.90%

1.20%0.30%

30.00%

Monthly Family Income

Less than 5,000

5k-10k

10,001-15k

15,001-20k

20,001-25k

25,001-30k

30,000-35k

35,000-40k

40,000-45k

45,000-50k

50,000 and above

58.20%

21.50%

15.50%

4.80%

3.00%

Financial source for family expenditures

Employment

Help from relatives/friends

Business

Pension

Others


12/52

36.40%

40.30%

12.20%

6.90%

2.10%

1.50% 0.00%

0.00%

1.60% 0.00%0.00%

Monthly family expenditure

Less than 5,000

5k-10k

10,001-15k

15,001-20k

20,001-25k

25,001-30k

30,000-35k

35,000-40k

40,000-45k

45,000-50k

50,000 and above

36.40%

40.30%

12.20%

6.90%

2.10%1.50%

0.00%

Priorities and expenditures

Prioritization

Food

Health

Clothing

Rcreation

Education

Savings


13/52

80.60%

19.40%

Adequacy of family Income

Adequate

Not Adequate

22.10%

33.70%

31.90%

5.40%

6.90%

Decision Maker in terms of financial aspect

Father

Mother

Both

Family

Others


14/52

55.20%

11.00%

4.20%1.50%

28.10%

Cultural orientation regarding illness

Illness is caused by physilolgic

factors

Illness is caused by supernatutral

phenomenon

Illness is punished of God

Illness is caused by the others

Illness is caused by the change of

the weather

18.80%

1.80%

12.50%

66.90%

Cultural Belief

Health can be restored by God

Health can be restored by faith

healers

Health can be restored by

supernatural powers

Health can be restored by health

personel

3. Cultural Indicators


15/52

34.30%

56.10%

9.60%

Cultural practices

Always Practice local cultural

practices about health matters

Sometimes practice local cultural


Do not practice local cultural


72.50%

27.50%

Community involvement

Actively join fiesta, religious,

procession, etc.

Do not actively join


16/52

83.90%

14.30%

1.50% 0.30%

Ownership

Owned

Rented

Rent-free

Least to own

8.40%

52.20%

39.40%

Construction Material Used

Light

Mixed

Strong

4. Environmental Indicator


17/52

40.30%

33.70%

19.70%

5.10%

1.30%

Number of rooms for sleeping

1

2

3

4

5

82.40%

17.60%

Adequacy of Space

Adequate

Not Adequate


18/52

97.60%

2.40%

Lighting facility

Electricity

Kerosene

95.20%

4.80%

Adequacy of Lighting

Adequate

Not Adequate


19/52

95.20%

4.80%

Ventilation

Adequate

Not Adequate

84.50%

15.50%

General Sanitation Condition

Adequate

Not Adequate


20/52

56.40%

43.60%

Drinking Water Supply: Ownership

Private/Own Household

Public

4.50%

85.40%

10.10%

Drinking Water Supply: Source

Deep Well

Local water district

Commercial


21/52

70.40%

29.60%

Drinking Water Supply: Potability

Yes

No

63.90%

34.00%

2.10%

Drinking Water Supply: Storage

None

Large Covered ContainerLarge Uncovered Container


22/52

58.50%

10.50%

13.10%

Food Storage/Cooking Facilities: Storage

Ref

Cabinet

Basket

Table

83.30%

16.70%

Food Storage/Cooking Facilities: Storage

Covered

Uncovered


23/52

3.30%

75.50%

21.20%

Cooking Facility

Electric Stove

Gas Stove

Firewood/Charcoal

87.50%

12.50%

Food Storage/Cooking Facilities: Sanitary

Condition

Good

Poor


24/52

22.10%

75.80%

13.10%

Refuse and Garbage: Storage

Container

Plastic Bag

None

53.40%

46.60%

Refuse and Garbage: Storage

Covered

Open


25/52

81.40%

8.60%

2.20%7.80%

Waste Segregation: Practiced Method of

Disposal

Collected

Open Dumping

Composting

Burial in Pit

17.80%

81.40%

7.80%

Waste Segregation: Reason for Practicing

Environmentally friendly

Brgy. Ordinance w/c is directly

monitored

Others


26/52

Waste

Segregation:

Practiced

Method ofDisposal,

15.20%

Waste Segregation:Practiced Method of

Disposal, 37.90%

Waste Segregation:

Practiced Method of

Disposal, 22.70%Waste Segregation:

Practiced Method of

Disposal, 12.10%

Waste Segregation:

Practiced Method of

Disposal, 12.10%

Waste Segregation: Not Practiced Method of

Disposal

Collected

Open Dumping

Composting

Burial in Pit

Open Burning

6.10%

46.90%39.40%

7.60%

Waste Segregation: Reason for not Practicing

Not Aware of Effect

Lonbg time to do it

No time to do itNot a Brgy. Ordinance


27/52

98.50%

1.50%

Toilet Facilities: Ownership

Owned

Public/Shared

100.00%

Toilet Facilities: Type

Water Sealed


28/52

58.20%

41.80%

Toilet Facilities: Location from source of water

less than 20 ft.

20 feet beyond

90.80%

9.20%

Toilet Facilities: Sanitary Condition

Good

Poor


29/52

62.10%

19.40%

18.50%

Toilet Facilities: Drainage System

Open Drainage

Blind Drainage

None

67.00%

23.00%

Toilet Facilities: Condition

Flowing

Stagnant


30/52

70.20%

29.80%

Animal Raised: Kind

Dog

Cat

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Kept inside the

yard

Free/Outside With regular

vaccination

Without regular

vaccination

Dog

Cat


31/52

8.40% 41.80%36.10%

5.10%

860.00%

Practice to control insects/vectors of disease

Fumigation

Cleaning the yard

Insecticides

Setting traps

None

37.00%

63.00%

Presence of Breeding Sites

None

With


32/52

21.50%

78.50%

Housing Congestion

Yes

No

27.20%

72.80%

Presence of Industrial Establishments

Yes

No


33/52

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Practiced

Not Practiced

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Atleast 8hrs a day Takes a nap

Practiced

Not Practiced


34/52

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Performs regular exercise

everyday

Performs recreational activities

Practiced

Not Practiced

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Has regular medical check-up Has regular dental check-up

Practiced

Not Practiced


35/52

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Used safety devices whenever necessary

Practiced

Not Practiced


36/52

55%

45%

Cigarette Smoker

Yes

No

0%

100%

Prohibited Drugs

Yes

No


37/52

55.50%

45.50%

Alcoholic Beverages

Yes

No

10.40%

32.20%

15.60%

41.50%

0.30%

Foods usually taken: First Choice

Meat only

Fish only

Vegetable only

Mixed

Others


38/52

27.50%

62.00%

10.40%

Foods usually taken: Number of Servings

1

2 to 3

4 to 5 and above

20.30%

34.30%

24.50%

20.90%

Foods usually taken: Second Choice

Meat only

Fish only

Vegetable only

Mixed


39/52

32.20%

57.60%

10.20%

No. Of Servings

1

2 to 3

4 to 5

41.50%

7.80%

39.70%

4.80%6.20%

Reason for Choices

Think it's healthy

Personal belief/practice

Own Preference

Health Condition

Affordable


40/52

24.80%

7.80%

54.60%

3.30% 9.50%

Reason for not choosing other options

Think it's healthy

Personal belief/practice

Own Preference

Health Condition

Not Affordable

63.30%

24.50%

12.20%

How frequent is the intake

Everyday

Every 3 days

Once a week


41/52

88.00%

5.10%

6.90%

How often?

Everyday

Every 3 days

Once a week

21.50%

71.90%

6.60%

If bought outside, is it from the:

Restaurant/fast food

Carinderia

Food Cart


42/52

50.40%

31.40%

2.50%

15.70%

Reason for the above option

Convenience

Cheaper

Healthy

Variety of choices

14.00%

24.80%

20.60%

39.70%

0.90%

Takes/Eat Canned/Preserved food

Everday

Every other day

Every week

Sometimes

Never


43/52

14.00%

24.80%

20.60%

39.70%

0.90%

Takes/Eat fried foods

Everyday

Every other day

Every week

Sometimes

Never

76.10%

11.70%

12.20%

Drinks Carbonated Beverages

Occasionally

Weekly

Everyday


44/52

77.30%

1.50%

2.70%

5.70%

1.80%11.00%

Personnel mostly consulted in times of

sickness/illness

Doctor

Albularyo

Nurse

Midwife

Elderly

Hilot

77.30%

1.50%

2.70%

5.70%

1.80%11.00%

Personnel mostly consulted in times of

sickness/illness

Doctor

Albularyo

Nurse

Midwife

Elderly

Hilot


45/52

42.10%

33.70%

4.80%

19.40%

1.80%

Measures taken in times of sickness

Consult a private health worker

Consult a rural health team

See a known communitry healer

Self medicate

none

48.90%

8.70%

42.40%

0.00%

Medication/ treatment taken in times of

sickness

Prescribed by doctors

Herbals

OTC/Self medicate

Others


46/52

100.00%

Family Planning

Acceptor

52.10%

7.60%

33.30%

2.30%4.70%

Reason

Good for health of family

Religious belief

Personal belief

Influence of others

others


47/52

100.00%

Family Planning

Non-acceptor

7.90%

7.90%

54.30%

0.60%

29.30%

Reason

Bad for health of family

Religious belief

Personal belief

Influence of others

Others


48/52

83.10%

12.30%

4.60%

Methods used

Natural

Arteficial

Permanent

84.20%

15.80%

Awareness of health services offered by the

RHC/RHU

Aware

Unaware


49/52

76.40%

23.60%

Formal/elected

Captain

Kagawad

41.80%

5.40%2.10%

37.30%

13.40%

Non-formal

Elderly

Influential person

Neighbor

BHW

Religious


50/52

28.30%

59.70%

7.80%

0.00% 4.20% 0.00%

Conditions/events/issues that cause social

conflicts/Upheavals within the community

Gossip

Alcohol drinking

Personal/familial conflict

Drugs

Riot

Others

55.80%

44.20%

0.00% 0.00%

Practices/approaches which are effective in

setting issues and concerns within the

community

Settlement among involved

parties

Brgy.Hearing

Endorsed to local police

Others


51/52

1

3

7

3

Morbidity

UTI

Contamination of food, water,

weather

Change in weather

Familial incidence (arthritis and

hypertension)

1

3

7

3

Mortality

CVA

MI

Complication of disease

Lung cancer


52/52

7

78

19

83

5

2 1

6

11

11

1

History of non communicable disease

Cardiac disease

HTN

DM

Cancer

Kidney Disease

Asthma

Arthritis

Cataract

stroke

Anemic

Tonsilitis

Hyperthyroidism

Goiter

RHD

section g data analysis graphical presentation

Documents