section 5 structures · ident engin e plan revi view. final detail ckage and dot brid ja s shall be...
TRANSCRIPT
January 31, 2013 Structures
SECTION 5
STRUCTURES
Structures January 31, 2013
January
5.01
This secfor buildsystems
Major stretainingheight aroadwayOverheatraffic), t
Refer toMajor stcosts forstructureconstrucconstrucenvironm
For bridgManual.hydraulienginee
The Resthe preli
1. Cfo
2. Bra
3. A
4. A
5. R
6. Ca
7. Ra
y 31, 2013
MAJO
ction providings, bridge
s or ground
tructures arg walls witht any sectio
y for bridgead sign strutunnels and
the CDOTtructures shr deviationse selection ction of a brction and mmental cons
ges over w Hydraulic c engineer,r with a P.E
sident Enginminary info
Current and or both upp
Bridge situaailroads (br
Any hydraul
Any region d
Requiremen
Corridor aespplicable.
Request a foccess, traff
R STRU
es guidances, snow shimproveme
re bridges ah both a totaon of over 5s and culve
uctures (sigd high mast
T Bridge Dehould be ans from the mprocess anridge rather
maintenancesiderations
aterways redesign of th, or by a hyE. license.
neer is respormation inc
proposed er and lowe
tion sheet wridge site da
ics report, r
design reco
nts for elect
sthetics, en
oundation rfic control, a
UCTURE
ce for prelimheds, tunneent systems
and culvertsal length gre5 feet. The erts, and alon bridges, ct light stand
sign Manuanalyzed indimost econond must be r than a large costs, stru.
equirementhe bridge o
ydraulic eng
ponsible forcluding the
roadway aner features,
with all topoata).
right-of-way
ommendatio
rical condu
vironmenta
report from and the loc
5-1
E – BRID
minary enginels, geotechs, and hydr
s with a totaeater than length is mong the topcantilevers
dards also a
al, Section vidually for
omical desigagreed to bge culvert isuctural aest
ts, please reopening shagineer unde
r submittingfollowing:
nd waterwa, with alignm
ography inc
y restriction
ons, includi
it, lighting,
al considera
the Geotecations for d
DGE
neering plahnical strucraulic struct
al length of 100 feet an
measured alp of the wal
and butterfare major st
3, for minimr the optimagn need to by the Resis determinethetics, hyd
efer to the Call be comper the super
g to the Pro
ay plans, prment data.
cluding con
ns, and sele
ng deviatio
and utility l
ation, and a
chnical groudrilling to be
an submittactures featutures.
f 20 feet or nd a maximong the cel for retaininflies extendtructures.
mum designal design. Abe consideident Engined from estdraulic need
CDOT Draileted by a lrvision of a
oject Structu
rofiles, and
tours, utiliti
ected guard
ons from M
locations.
architectura
up and arrae surveyed.
Struct
l and approuring wall
greater andmum expose
nterline of ng walls. ding over
n loading. Any substanered in the neer. The timated ds, and
inage Desiglicensed hydraulic
ural Engine
cross-secti
es, and
drail types.
Standards.
al concepts,
ange for .
tures
oval
d ed
ntial
gn
eer
ions
.
, if
Structur Any subthe Proje
The Proj
1. R
2. Pe
3. Ps
4. P
5. R
For a coDesign M
The follorespons
1. Sabcd
2. P
abcdef.
3. F
abcd
e
res
bsequent reect Structur
ject Structu
Review preli
Prepare struconomic st
Prepare struize, and loc
Prepare stru
Request fou
omplete desManual.
owing is a bibilities of t
Structure co. Attend D. Obtain a. Review p. Determin
Preliminary . Review b. Prepare . Prepare . Prepare . Prepare Attend F
Final bridge . Design a. Prepare . Provide i. Attend F
SpecificaFinal Offprior to th
. Provide findependSubsecti
visions to tral Enginee
ural Engine
iminary alig
ucture conctudies.
ucture layoucation.
ucture selec
undation rep
scription of
brief overviehe Project S
oncept studyDesign Scop
nd review bpreliminary ne conceptu
bridge desibridge site dengineeringgeneral layselection redrawings foield Inspec
design all structuraall structuraindependeninal Office
ation. At thefice Reviewhe overall pfinal structudent designons 19.1.4
he roadwayer without d
er’s respon
gnments an
cept study, i
uts and spe
ction report
port from th
responsibil
ew of the bStructural E
y ping Reviewbridge site dalignment
ual structur
ign data. g and econ
youts and seport. or foundatiotion Review
l elements.al plans andnt design, dReview ande discretion
w or a structproject Finaural submittn check noteD and 19.1
5-2
y alignmentelay.
nsibilities inc
nd bridge sit
including ap
ecific details
s and/or wa
he Resident
lities, see S
ridge desigEngineer:
w meeting.data. to determin
re layout an
nomic recompecial deta
on investigaw (FIR) and
d specificat
detail, and qd make req of the Resure advanc
al Office Retal (i.e., the es, field pa.4E of the C
ts or profile
clude:
te data.
ppropriate e
s that reflec
all selection
t Engineer.
Section 19.1
gn process o
ne structurend alternativ
mmendationails.
ations. d make requ
tions. quantity chequired revissident Engince plan revieview.
final detail ckage and CDOT Brid
Ja
es shall be t
engineering
ct a specific
n reports.
See Secti
1 of the CD
outlining th
e location. ve structure
ns.
uired revisio
eck. ions to Planneer, a sepew meeting
letter, finalrating pack
dge Design
anuary 31, 2
transmitted
g and
c structure t
on 5.06.
DOT Bridge
e
e types.
ons to layo
ns and parate strucg may be h
l design nokage), see Manual.
2013
d to
type,
ut.
cture eld
tes,
January
f.
The Resalignme
Addition1. CDO2. AAS3. AAS4. CDO5. CDO
y 31, 2013
Provide rconstruc
sident Enginnt and clea
nal RefereOT Bridge D
HTO LRFDHTO Manu
OT Bridge ROT Drainage
revised plantion.
neer shouldarances.
nces: Design ManD Bridge Deual for BridgRating Manue Design M
ns and spe
d compare
nual esign Specige Evaluatioual
Manual
5-3
ecifications a
the roadwa
ifications on
as per the
ay and bridg
FOR comm
ge plans to
Struct
ments for
o verify grad
tures
de,
Structur
5.02
A culvercosts, w
A culverof the rolines of acenterlinmore.(S1.4-3, -4
http://wwmanual/
For strucProject Sbe useddetermin
All culveProject Sexplorat
For culvManual.
HydraulicompletHoweveLarger dchannel
The folloconcrete
1. WC
2. Fbd
res
MAJO
rt is used inwhen either
rt is consideoadway of 2arches. It mnes of the eee CDOT B
4, -5 & -6.)
ww.colorado/01_genera
ctures equaStructural E. If the M Sne if a struc
erts not inclStructural Etion and fou
verts over th
ic design ofed by a qua
er, this knowdrainage str
improveme
owing procee box culve
When selectCDOT Pipe
For major stoth a culveetermine th
R STRU
n lieu of a balternative
ered a majo20 feet or mmay also incexterior pipeBridge Deta
odot.info/libl_instructio
al to or exceEngineer foStandard Plactural selec
uded in theEngineer. Tundation rep
he waterwa
f a drainagealified enginwledge requructures, foents, shall b
edures andrt on the pr
ting pipe mMaterial Se
tructures, thert or bridgehe most eco
UCTURE
ridge basedis viable hy
or structuremore betweeclude multipes plus the ail Manual,
brary/bridgeons.pdf/view
eeding 20 fr a structurans do apption report
e CDOT M&The Project port.
ys requirem
e structure,neer with kuirement vaor example, be designe
documentaroject:
aterial, deselection Po
he hydraulice alternativeonomical al
5-4
E – CULV
d on estimaydraulically
if it has anen the insidple pipes, wradius of eSection 1.4
e/bridge-maw
feet, the Rere selectionply, it is up twould be b
&S StandardStructural E
ments, refer
, such as a nowledge oaries accordconcrete bd by an eng
ation are re
signers shalicy.
c designer wes. The roalternative.
VERT
ated construy.
n opening mde faces of where the ceach of the e4 Structure
anuals/bridg
esident Eng report if thto the Residbeneficial.
rd Plans shaEngineer w
r to the CD
concrete bof hydrologyding to the box culvertsgineer spec
equired whe
all use the re
will provideadway and
Ja
uction and
measured athe outside
clear distancexterior pipNumber, F
ge-detail-
gineer musthe M Standadent Engine
all be desigwill request a
DOT Drainag
box culvert, y and hydracomplexity
s, storm sewcialized in t
en designin
ecommend
e adequate structural d
anuary 31, 2
maintenanc
long the cee walls or spce between
pes is 20 feeFigures
t contact thard Plans ceer to
gned by thea foundatio
ge Design
shall be aulics. of design.
wers and that field.
ng a culvert
dations of th
designs fordesigners w
2013
ce
enter pring n the et or
e can’t
e on
t or
he
r will
January
3. Abth
Addition1. CDO2. CDO3. CDO4. AAS5. CDO
y 31, 2013
A cost compest choice he cost com
nal RefereOT RoadwayOT DrainageOT Bridge D
HTO LRFDOT Pipe Ma
parison shoto be const
mparison alt
nces: y Design Ge Design M
Design ManD Bridge Deterial Selec
ould be madtructed. Proternatives.
Guide Manual nual esign Speciction Policy
5-5
de to determoject grade
ifications .
mine what sadjustmen
structure altnts should b
Struct
ternative isbe included
tures
s the in
Structur
5.03
An unusnew or clong bridacceptaarch, sethat devhighwaydesign; exceedinconcrete
Unusual
1. b
2. s
3. tu
4. gim
5. hd
6. usy
FHWA Wbridges,Selectioaid projethe prevsquare fand maj
The ResInspectioEngineestructureforward
The ResStructur
res
MAJO
sual bridge complex dedge spans, ble practicegmental co
viate from Ay bridges subridges using 500 feete or steel.
l structures
uildings;
now sheds
unnels;
eotechnicamprovemen
ydraulic stresigns, or d
nusual hydystems, sto
Washington tunnels, hyn Report shects, the FHvious sentenfeet and all or geotech
sident Enginon Review
er will provides, and tunthem to the
sident Enginal Engineer
R STRU
is one invoesigns with
or (4) desiges. Exampleoncrete, moAASHTO bruch as: bridng three-dit; and bridg
are:
;
al structuresnt systems;
ructures thadesign tech
draulic strucormwater pu
n Headquarydraulic struhould be suHWA Divisonce) that habridges onnical featur
neer shall sand Final Ode the Resinels. The loe Washingt
neer must cr. The Struc
UCTURE
olving: (1) dunique opegns with proes of unusu
ovable, or tridge design
dges requirimensional
ges with ma
s featuring n
at involve cohniques tha
ctures, suchumping fac
rters shall auctures, anubmitted to on Office shave an estim
n the Nationres.
submit a StOffice Revieident Enginocal FHWAon Headqu
coordinate cture Selec
5-6
E – UNUS
ifficult or unerational or ocedures thual bridges russ bridgesn standardsng abnormcomputer a
ajor support
new or com
omplex streat are atypic
h as those scilities, dam
approve all nd geotechn
the FHWAhall approvemated total
nal Highway
ructure Selew plans toneer with plaA Division wuarters for a
the requirection Report
SUAL
nique founddesign fea
hat depart finclude ca
s. Other exs or AASHTal dynamicanalysis; brting elemen
mplex wall s
eam stabilitcal or uniqu
serving largs or levees
movable brnical structu
A for review e all other bl deck areay System, m
lection Repo the FHWAans for brid
will review thapproval as
ed submittat submitted
Ja
dation charatures, (3) efrom currenble-stayed,
xamples areTO guide spc analysis foridges with nts of “ultra”
systems or
ty countermue; or
ge storm drs.
ridges and ures. A Struand approv
bridges (not greater tha
major hydra
port as well A. The Projedges, earth hose submis appropriat
ls with the d with the in
anuary 31, 2
acteristics, exceptionallntly recogni, suspensioe bridge typpecificationor seismic spans ” high stren
ground
measures,
rainage
unusual ucture val. On fedt included ian 125,000aulic structu
as the Fielect Structurretaining ittals and mte.
Project nitial reques
2013
(2) y zed
on, pes s for
ngth
eral-n
0 ures,
d ral
may
st for
January review ameasure
Addition1. CDO2. AAS
y 31, 2013
and approvaes, and stud
nal RefereOT Bridge D
HTO LRFD
al shall incldies of alte
nces: Design ManD Bridge De
ude environrnate spans
nual esign Speci
5-7
nmental cos and bridg
ifications
oncerns andge types.
d suggested
Struct
d mitigation
tures
n
Structur
5.04
Pedestriother codistricts,centers.
Pedestrifreewayimpose traffic. Totherwis
When dethe samarchitectThe Resthe prelithe strucelectron
The Projproposegeneral accommrequest
The desaccessib
Public sincludedare in th
Addition1. AAS2. CDO3. Desi
Publ
res
PEDES
ian facilitiesonditions me, factory are
ian separats or expresan extreme
They are alsse warrante
esigning pee as for antural considsident Enginminary geocture. Additic format.
ject Structued alignmen
layout for tmodations fo
that the ap
sign of pedebility for the
afety featurd in the deshe CDOT R
nal RefereHTO Policy
OT Bridge Dign of Pedeication N50
STRIAN
s should beerit their useas, school
tion, either ssways whee inconvenieso desirableed and the s
edestrian ovy other highderations shneer is respometric layotionally, top
ural Enginents submittehe selectedor the phys
ppropriate fo
estrian overe physically
res such asign of the soadway De
nces: y on GeomeDesign Manestrian Over040.38, FHW
OVERP
e provided wse. These fal zones, ath
over or undere cross stence or safe at locationseparation
verpasses ahway structhould be coponsible forout, verticalpography of
er is responed and prepd structure ically handoundation in
rpasses andhandicapp
s vertical clestructures. Design Guide
etric Designnual rpass and UWA
5-8
PASSES
where pedeacilities are hletic fields,
der the roadtreets are tefety hazardns where this economi
and underpture where onsidered (sr providing profiles, an
f the surrou
nsible for reparing a strwith appropicapped. Thnvestigation
d underpasped, and bic
earance, feDesign critee.
n of Highwa
Underpass
S AND UN
estrian voluusually loc
, parks, and
dway, is userminated o to pedestr
he need forcally and e
passes, thethe same gsee Sectionthe Projectnd cross se
unding area
eviewing anructure selepriate widthhe Project Sns be comp
sses shouldcycle traffic
encing and eria for ove
ays and Str
to Accomm
Ja
NDERPA
ume, traffic cated in cend other maj
ually desiraor where corians due tor a pedestriaenvironment
e requiremegeometric an 5.01 of tht Structural ections for ta should be
nd commenection reporhs, clearancStructural Epleted.
d accommoc, where wa
lighting shoerpasses an
reets
modate the
anuary 31, 2
ASSES
volume, or ntral busineor activity
able at onditions o heavy vehan crossingtally feasib
ents should and his manual)
Engineer wthe locationprovided in
nting on thert including ces, and Engineer sh
odate arranted.
ould be nd underpas
Handicapp
2013
ess
hicle g is le.
be
. with n of n
e a
hall
sses
ped,
January 4. Pede
Regu5. AAS6. AAS7. AAS8. AAS9. CDO
y 31, 2013
estrian and ulations, TitHTO LRFDHTO GuideHTO GuideHTO LRFD
OT Roadway
Bicycle Actle 23, High
D Bridge Dee for the Plae SpecificatD Guide Spey Design G
ccommodatihways, Partesign Specianning, Destions for Deecifications
Guide
5-9
ions and Prt 652 ifications sign and Opesign of FRPs for the Des
rojects, Cod
peration of P Pedestriasign of Ped
de of Fede
f Pedestrianan Bridges destrian Bri
Struct
ral
n Facilities
idges
tures
Structur
5.05
Aesthetiinclude fincorporstructure
CorridorNEPA PResidenguideline
PreliminSelectio
Visually commenstructurein a struand treastructure
Addition1. CDO2. Bridg
Rese3. Bridg
res
ARCH
ically pleasfeatures anrating archites could be
rs typically hProcess or fnt Engineer es. An arch
nary design n Report (s
appealing nces becaue design hacture at low
atments mue. Aesthetic
nal RefereOT Bridge Dge Aesthetiearch Coungescape –
ITECTU
ing structurnd treatmentectural fea
e in service
have an exfrom a localwill determ
hitect may b
and architesee Section
structures suse inclusioas begun. Sw cost whilest be thoro
cs are impo
nces: Design Manics Around ncil, 1991 The Art of D
RAL AN
res should nt that proveatures and a
50 to 75 ye
xisting archil entity pref
mine the strube consulte
ectural detan 5.07 of thi
should be an of these d
Some aesthe others incughly inves
ortant in hig
nual the World,
Designing B
5-10
ND AEST
be compatie to be endaesthetic treears.
tectural-aeference. Thucture spec
ed for ideas
ails must bes manual.)
adopted andetails is no
hetically plecrease cost stigated befh-profile, fr
Transporta
Bridges, Fre
THETIC
ible with theduring. Careeatment in
sthetic themhe Project Scific architeon feature
e document
d developeot easily acasing featusignificant
fore they arrequently vi
ation Resea
ederick Got
Ja
TREATM
eir surrounde must be ea structure
me developStructural Ectural treats and treat
ted in the S
ed early befccomplishedures can bely. New or ure incorporaiewed struc
arch Board
ttemoeller,
anuary 31, 2
MENTS
dings and exercised we because s
ped during tngineer anment ments.
Structure
fore final ded after the
e incorporatuntried featated into a ctures.
(TRB) Nati
1998
2013
when some
the d
esign
ted tures
onal
January
5.06
The founbased obridges,and retastructureinclusion
When a send a fResidenlocations
The Resor survecompletGeotechEnginee
Any quebe addrerespons
The Geogeology
The Geoshould p
Addition1. CDO2. AAS
y 31, 2013
FOUNRECO
ndation inven existing s major conc
aining wallse design son in the Stru
boring or afoundation int Engineers for the str
sident Enginey crew will ed the accehnical Enginer will have
estions the Gessed to thible for exa
otechnical Eplan sheet
otechnical Eparticipate i
nal RefereOT Bridge D
HTO LRFD
DATIONMMEND
estigation gsubsurface crete box c. Investigat
o that prelimucture Sele
a geotechniinvestigatio. A copy of ructure bori
neer will bearrange for
ess and traneer and ththe final bo
Geotechnice Project S
amining the
Engineer wt and geote
Engineer shn the follow
nces: Design ManD Bridge De
N INVESTDATION
gathers dataconditions.
culverts, higtion requestminary foundection Repo
cal study ison request,
the requesings will be
e responsibr traffic conffic control
he Project Soring locatio
cal EngineeStructural En
site and sc
will analyze sechnical rep
hould be incw-up and re
nual esign Speci
5-11
TIGATIO
a and provi. Typical re
gh-mast lights should bdation reco
ort prepared
s required, tincluding th
st and the gsent to the
ble for obtaintrol. When has been a
Structural Eons surveye
er may havengineer. Thcheduling u
subsurfaceport.
cluded in thesolution of
ifications
ON AND
ides foundaequests inclhting, sign se made at
ommendatiod by the Pro
the Projecthe propose
general layoe Geotechn
ning accesthe Reside
arranged, hngineer in wed for inclus
e related tohe Geotechutility locate
e data and p
he Design Sany structu
ation recomude foundastructures, the concepons are avaoject Struct
t Structural ed General out with appnical Progra
s. The Resent Engineehe shall notiwriting. Thesion in the
o the boringhnical Engines, as requir
provide an
Scoping Reural problem
Struct
mmendationation studiesound walls
ptual stageailable for tural Engine
Engineer wLayout, to t
proximate am Manage
sident Enginer has ify the e Resident report.
locations sneer is red.
engineering
eview and ms identifie
tures
ns es for s, of
eer.
will the
er.
neer
shall
g
ed.
Structur
5.07
A structurecommwill proc
During tEngineewith Secmajor cu
Selectiobut othe
1. S
2. S
3. S
4. E
5. C
6. H
7. L
8. O
The ResrequiredSection
Prior to prepare the Resiand to thto the Fi
res
STRUC
ure selectiomended seleceed.
he concepter shall devection 19 of tulverts, see
n of the beer requireme
Site requirem
Safety (durin
Structural (fu
Environmen
Construction
Hydraulics (
ife cycle co
Other (comm
sident Engind to prepare5.01 of this
commencinand distrib
ident Enginhe FHWA. Tield Inspect
CTURE
on report doection and e
tual and preelop a structhe CDOT B
e Section 5.
st structureents to be c
ments (topo
ng construc
uture widen
tal (appear
n (ease of c
stream flow
osts (mainte
mitments to
neer will pre a structures manual.
ng the final ute a struct
neer. The RThe structution Review
SELECT
ocuments thestablishes
eliminary decture selectBridge Des02.
e type alternconsidered
ography, al
ction, traffic
ning, founda
rance, wetla
construction
w, bank and
enance, du
o officials an
ovide the Pe layout, st
structure dture selecti
Resident Enure selectiow meeting.
5-12
TION RE
he importanthe basis u
esign stagetion report f
sign Manual
native may include:
ignment)
c, detours)
ation condit
ands, public
n, false wor
d pier protec
rability)
nd commun
Project Struructure sele
design, the on report, igineer shan report sho
EPORT
nt factors thupon which
es of a projefor all majol. For a stru
be based i
tions)
c exposure
rk, season)
ction, culve
nity, team s
ctural Engiection repo
Project Struncluding anll make distould be rev
Ja
hat lead to th the final st
ect, the Proor structuresucture selec
n part on th
)
ert alternate
studies)
neer the infort, and fina
uctural Engn economictribution witviewed and
anuary 31, 2
the tructure des
oject Structus in accordaction report
he lowest c
es, scour)
formation al design. Se
gineer will c analysis, tthin the Reapproved
2013
sign
ural ance t for
ost,
ee
to egion prior
January
5.08
Retainingrade chthe avai
Retaininretention
1. A
2. As
3. Ast
Factors
1. S
2. B
3. E
Retaininenvironmshould b
The Projresponsalternatia founda
The requDesign M
The defaStructur
1. Dp
2. DC
y 31, 2013
RETAI
ng walls arehange. Thelable R.O.W
ng walls aren and sourc
An externall
An internallyelf-supporti
A hybrid or mtabilized sy
affecting th
Spatial cons
Behavior co
Economic co
ng walls shomental factobe designed
ject Structuible for the ve wall desation invest
uired documManual, Se
ault wall deal Engineer
Default desirocess (see
Design alterCDOT Bridg
INING W
e used primey are also W, as well a
e classified ce of suppo
y stabilized
y stabilized ing.
mixed systeystems.
he selection
straints -- Fu
nstraints --
onsideratio
ould be desors comprod for a mini
ural Engineselection a
signs may btigation and
mentation fection 5.
esign and der will includ
gn -- Definee the CDOT
rnatives -- Tge Design M
WALLS
arily for retused whenas other ap
into three cort:
d system us
system use
em combine
n of a retain
unctions of
Earth pres
ns -- Enviro
signed to reomising the mum servic
er in coopeand design be developed foundation
for the wall
esign alterne:
ed to meanT Bridge De
The productManual, Sub
5-13
aining soilsit is necess
plications.
categories a
ses a physic
es soil reinf
es element
ning wall are
f a wall, spa
ssure, water
onmental, a
esist corrosidurability o
ce life of 75
eration with of the best-ed. The Pron report.
selection re
native docu
n the best wesign Manu
ts of the debsections 5
s or roadwasary to con
according t
cal structur
forcement t
ts of both ex
e:
ace limitatio
r table, foun
aesthetic.
ion, deterioof the wall. 5 to 100 yea
the Reside-suited waloject Struct
eport is out
umentation
wall obtaineual, Subsec
esign select5.4 and 5.5)
ay cuts and ntain the roa
to basic me
re to hold th
to make the
xternally an
ons, propos
ndation pre
oration, andPermanentars.
ent Engineel type. Whetural Engine
tlined in the
provided b
d from the ction 5.6).
tion proces).
Struct
fills to creaadway fill w
echanisms o
he retained
e retained s
nd internally
sed profile.
essure.
d other t retaining w
er will be ere appropreer will requ
e CDOT Bri
y the Proje
selection
s (see the
tures
ate a within
of
soil.
soil
y
walls
riate, uest
idge
ct
Structur For a pr
Addition1. CDO2. AAS
res
oprietary w
nal RefereOT Bridge DSHTO LRFD
wall, refer to
nces: Design ManD Bridge De
o Section 2.
ual esign Spec
5-14
24 Propriet
cifications
tary Items i
Ja
n this manu
anuary 31, 2
ual.
2013
January
5.09
The Resresponsthe Resiheight, astructurawill need
Addition1. CDO2. AAS3. AAS
y 31, 2013
NOISE
sident Enginible for the ident Enginand configual design and to review
nal RefereOT Bridge D
HTO LRFDHTO Guide
E WALLS
neer, in cooselection o
neer will prouration. Thend requestithe structu
nces: Design ManD Bridge Dee Specificat
S
operation wof the best-sovide the Pre Project Stng the founral plans fo
nual esign Specitions for Str
5-15
with the Projsuited wall roject Strucructural En
ndation inveor any poten
ifications ructural Des
oject Structutype. Base
ctural Enginngineer will estigation. Tntial conflic
sign of Sou
ural Engineed on the noneer with thbe responsThe Reside
cts with buri
und Barriers
Struct
er, will be oise analyshe alignmensible for theent Engineeied utilities.
s
tures
is, nt, e er
Structur
5.10
A structumay afferail heigcan be pthicknes
The ResEnginee
The ProjResidenresurfacwater pr
The Resresurfac
Addition1. CDO
res
ANALY
ural analysiect the loadht, its bridgplaced on ass of aspha
sident Enginer for resurf
ject Structunt Engineercing, recomroofing mem
sident Engincing method
nal RefereOT Bridge D
YSIS OF
is is performd carrying cge expansioa structure ilt after resu
neer will refacing of str
ural Engine. The memomended re
mbrane, an
neer will infd.
nces: Design Man
F STRUC
med beforeapacity of t
on devices, f there is ad
urfacing sha
quest recomructures.
er will sendo will includpairs to mad bridge ra
form the Pr
nual
5-16
CTURES
e a structurethe structuror a combidequate loaall be limite
mmendatio
d a surfacinde conditionaintain the iil upgrades
roject Struc
S TO BE
e is resurfacre, its verticination therad carryingd to 3 inche
ons from the
ng recommens related tntegrity of t
s to maintai
ctural Engin
Ja
RESUR
ced becauscal clearancreof. Additiog capacity. Tes on the s
e Project St
endation mto the structthe riding sn roadway
neer of the f
anuary 31, 2
RFACED
se resurfacce, its bridgonal pavemThe total
structure.
tructural
emo to the ture
surface, exissafety.
final propos
2013
D
ing e
ment
sting
sed
January
5.11
An existleft in pla
The Resinvolving
The ResEngineedocume
The Resthe Form
The decdocume
Addition1. For f
http:/2. CDO
y 31, 2013
DETER
ting structurace.
sident Enging the existin
sident Enginer regardingntation acc
sident Enginm 463, Des
cision to leanted.
nal Refereforms, see C//www.colo
OT Bridge D
RMINE E
re must me
neer will furng structure
neer shall rg the adequcording to th
neer shall cign Standa
ave bridges
nces: CDOT on-liradodot.info
Design Man
EXISTIN
eet criteria a
rnish the Pes and prop
request recuacy of the he CDOT B
compare thrds, to dete
that are na
ine forms lio/library/forual
5-17
G STRU
as establish
roject Strucposed desig
ommendatexisting str
Bridge Desig
e bridge wiermine adeq
arrower tha
brary rms
UCTURA
hed by FHW
ctural Engingn.
ions from thructure andgn Manual
idth with thequacy of th
n the propo
AL ADEQ
WA and CD
neer pertine
he Project S recommenfor repair o
e requiremehe bridge wi
osed roadw
Struct
QUACY
DOT, if it is t
ent data
Structural ndations anor replacem
ents shownidth.
way should
tures
to be
nd ment.
n on
be
Structur
5.12
FHWA aRehabilirail unlecriteria p
CrashwoHighwayHardwarto crash
The ProjEngineeresponsbridge ra
Approve
The folloroadway
1. Th
2. Tlimtoh
When a than 45 bridge e
WorkingDesign a
DetailedConstru
res
CRAS
approved critated bridgss a varianpresented in
orthy rail is y Researchre (MASH),-tested rail
ject Structuer regardingible for deteail in place.
ed documen
owing bridgy classificat
Type 7 or Tyighways pr
Type 3 or anmited applio use type 1ighway sys
bridge alsomph, a bar
edge may b
g drawings wand Manag
d drawings oction Plans
HWORT
rashworthy es on all prce is appron the CDO
defined ash Program R, or rail whic.
ural Engineg the replacermining w
ntation for v
ge rails are tions:
ype 10M onrojects.
ny approvedcations bec10M for all stem.
o serves perrier to shiee warranted
with currengement Bra
of bridge ras as determ
THY BRI
bridge railrojects, regoved. The vT Bridge De
s crash testeReport 350,ch has bee
er will provcement of ehether to in
variances a
required fo
n National H
d crash tescause of itsnew constr
edestrians old them frod as determ
tly approvench.
ail with revisined by the
5-18
DGE RA
must be prardless of f
variance shaesign Manu
ed in accor, AASHTO
en approved
ide a recomexisting bridnstall new b
and design d
r new or re
Highway Sy
sted bridge s 27-inch heruction requ
or cyclists am the trave
mined by th
ed bridge ra
sions or moe Resident E
AIL
rovided on funding, shall include aual, Section
rdance withManual for
d by the FH
mmendationdge rail. Thebridge rail o
decisions s
ehabilitated
ystem (NHS
rail on locaeight. Thereuiring a stee
and the poseled way ane Resident
ail are availa
odifications Engineer.
Ja
all new bridall use crasan analysisn 2.
h the Nationr Assessing
HWA as bei
n to the Ree Resident or to leave t
shall be in t
bridges on
S) and non-
al roads. Tyefore, CDOel bridge ra
sted speed nd a pedestt Engineer o
able from th
are to be in
anuary 31, 2
dges. shworthy brs based on
nal Cooperag Safety ng equivale
sident Engineer is
the existing
he project f
the followi
-NHS state
ype 3 has OT has electail on the sta
limit is greatrian rail at or Staff Brid
he Bridge
ncluded in
2013
ridge
ative
ent
s
file.
ng
ted ate
ater the dge.
the
January Addition1. 23 C2. AAS3. AAS4. AAS5. AAS
y 31, 2013
nal RefereCFR Part 62
HTO GuideHTO LRFDHTO RoadHTO Stand
nces: 25, Design Se for SelectD Bridge Dedside Designdard Specifi
Standards fting, Locatinesign Specin Guide fications for
5-19
for Highwayng, and Desifications
r Highway B
ys signing Tra
Bridges
affic Barriers
Struct
rs
tures
Structur
5.13
All highwguidelineoverpasfacilitieschannelappropri
Vertical wideningis achiev
Minimum
The Restraffic shconsiderapproprithe high
Addition1. 23 C2. AAS3. AAS4. AAS5. AAS6. CDO
res
VERTI
way projectes set by thses, under, overhead s, and canaiate clearan
clearance ag and overlved.
m vertical c
sident Enginhifts. Clearared. If minimiate signingway constr
nal RefereCFR Part 62
HTO PolicyHTO GuideHTO LFRDHTO Stand
OT Bridge D
ICAL CL
ts shall meehe FHWA apasses, railines, sign
als. The Rences.
applies to tay. A forma
learances a
neer must vances to falmum clearag shall be inruction plan
nces: 25, Design Sy on Geomee for the DeD Bridge Dedards SpeciDesign Man
LEARAN
et or exceedand CDOT.lroad and tbridges, si
esident Eng
he full paveal variance
are listed in
verify verticse work an
ances cannncluded in tns for all str
Standards fetric Designevelopmentesign Speciifications fo
nual (Sectio
5-20
NCE OF S
d minimumThese clearansportatiognal mast a
gineer is res
ement widthis required
n the CDOT
cal clearancnd shoring dot be mainthe plans. Vuctures.
for Highwayn of Highwat of Bicycle ifications or Highway n 2)
STRUCT
m vertical clearances shaon facilitiesarms, navigsponsible fo
h, includingd if less clea
T Roadway
ces for all pduring constained durin
Vertical clea
ys ays and StrFacilities
Bridges
Ja
TURE
earances aall pertain ts, bicycle angational streor determin
g provisionsarance than
Design Gu
phases on dstruction shng construcarances sha
reets
anuary 31, 2
ccording too all nd pedestrieams,
ning the
s for future n the minim
uide, Chapte
detours andould be ction, all be show
2013
o
an
mum
er 6.
d
wn on
January
5.14
For consfor evaluor not th
The matThe matsave the
http://int
The accwill contmust betechniqucompletdesignatABC ma
The docprocesswhetherevaluatio
This cur“CDOT_evaluatiomay moto determin-depthspecialtyTraffic, Hthe softw
The abodiagram
y 31, 2013
ACCE
struction pruating Accehey are app
terials for Aterials are ce files to yo
tranet/engin
celerated brtain one or written and
ue will be used during thted Staff Br
aterials.
cument “CD. The proce
r or not ABCon as to wh
rsory evalua_Prescopingon show thve on to a mine which
h evaluationy groups inHydraulics, ware are to
ove informam that is incl
LERATE
rojects that elerated Bripropriate for
ABC evaluacompressedur local com
neering/staf
ridge constrmore bridgd added to sed on the he ABC evaridge Engin
DOT_ABC_Sess is a twoC is approphat type of A
ation is to bg_ABC_Raat an ABC more in-de
h ABC methn is requiredcluding butetc. to exebecome pa
tion is repreuded in the
ED BRID
include onedge Constrr any given
tion can bed in a Zip fimputer.
ff-bridge/ac
ruction metes. After cothe projectproject. Thaluation. Th
neer for guid
Selection_Oo-phase appriate for a gABC techni
be done durating_Attachtechnique ipth evaluat
hod best med, the desigt not limitedecute the ABart of the pr
esented grae document
5-21
DGE CON
e or more bruction (ABproject.
e downloadele. Downloa
ccelerated-b
hodology isompletion o file explaine justificatiohe design tedance and
Overview” cproach. Ongiven projecique will be
ring the scohment_B.” Iis appropriation using theets the progn team shad to: Staff BBC Decisioroject files.
aphically int titled, “AB
NSTRUC
bridges, CDC) techniqu
ed at the inad the mate
bridge-cons
s to be evaof the evaluning why oron letter sheam may cinformation
contains ane phase is ct. The sec
e employed
oping phaseIf the resultate for the phe “ABC Deoject’s goalall scheduleridge, Utilitn Making S
n Figure 5-1C_Workflow
CTION (A
DOT has deues, to dete
nternet link erials, unzip
struction/vie
luated for aation, a jus
r why not anhould includchoose to wn regarding
n overview a cursory e
cond phase .
e using the ts of the cuproject, theecision Maks and conse a meetingties, EnvironSoftware. T
1. This is thw_Attachm
Struct
ABC)
eveloped a ermine whe
given belowp the files,
ew
all projects tstification len ABC de materialswork with th
the use of
of the ABCevaluation ais an in-de
spreadshersory
e design teaking Softwa
straints. If thg with all nmental, he results o
e same ment _A.”
tures
tool ether
w. and
that etter
s e the
C as to
epth
eet
am are” he
of
Structur
res
ABBC EvaluatF
tion and De
5-22
igure 5-1 ecision Makking Matrix
Ja
Workflow
anuary 31, 22013