section 4.4 more ways to prove triangles congruent
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SECTION 4.4
MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT
![Page 2: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
POSTULATE 19
• Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) Congruence Postulate
• If two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
A B
C
<A = <D; AC = DF; <C =<F; D E
F
∆ABC≌∆DEF
![Page 3: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
THEOREM 4.7
• Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) Congruence Theorem
• If two angles and a non-included side one triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of a second triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
A B
C
D E
F
<A ≌<D, <B ≌<E, BC ≌ EF then ∆ABC ≌∆DEF
![Page 4: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
EXAMPLE 1:
Is it possible to prove these triangles are congruent? If so, state the postulate or theorem you would use. Explain your reasoning.
![Page 5: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EXAMPLE 2:Is it possible to prove these triangles are congruent? If so, state the postulate or theorem you would use. Explain your reasoning.
![Page 6: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EXAMPLE 2:In addition to the congruent segments that are marked, NP NP. Two pairs of corresponding sides are congruent. This is not enough information to prove the triangles are congruent.
![Page 7: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PROVE
• Given: KL LA, KJ JA, AK bisects <LAJ
• Prove: L
A
J
K
![Page 8: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EX. 2 PROVING TRIANGLES ARE CONGRUENT
Given: AD ║EC, BD BC
Prove: ∆ABD ∆EBC
Plan for proof: Notice that ABD and EBC are congruent. You are given that BD BC
. Use the fact that AD ║EC
to identify a pair of congruent
angles.
B
A
ED
C
![Page 9: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROOF:
Statements:
1. BD BC
2. AD ║ EC
3. D C
4. ABD EBC
5. ∆ABD ∆EBC
Reasons:
1.
B
A
ED
C
![Page 10: SECTION 4.4 MORE WAYS TO PROVE TRIANGLES CONGRUENT](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072005/56649cee5503460f949bc639/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PROOF:
Statements:
1. BD BC
2. AD ║ EC
3. D C
4. ABD EBC
5. ∆ABD ∆EBC
Reasons:
1. Given
2. Given
3. Alternate Interior Angles
4. Vertical Angles Theorem
B
A
ED
C