*section 1 - poursafe · 2015. 2. 16. · jefferson davis highway, suite 1204, arlington, va...
TRANSCRIPT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
1997
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEM
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757
CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
JANUARY 1997
PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency SALLY R. REED Director
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE January 1997
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
1997 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System
6. AUTHOR(S) Helen N. Tashima and Clifford J Helander
5. FUNDING NUMBERS
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
California Department of Motor Vehicles Research and Development Section P.O. Box 932382 Sacramento, CA 94232-3820
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER CAL-DMV-RSS-97-165
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) In this sixth annual legislatively mandated report, 1994 and 1995 DUI data from several diverse sources were compiled and cross-referenced for the purpose of developing a single comprehensive DUI data and monitoring system. This report presents crosstabulated information on DUI arrests, convictions, court sanctions, administrative actions and alcohol-involved accidents. In addition, this report provides an evaluation of the effectiveness of alternative court and administrative sanctions (including alcohol treatment programs and license actions) upon the postconviction records of first and second DUI offenders. The postconviction driving records of DUI offenders arrested in 1989, 1992, and 1994 were evaluated for six-, three-, and one-year periods, respectively.
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
136 14. SUBJECT TERMS
Drinking drivers, DUI tracking data system, DUI reporting system, DUI countermeasures, DUI recidivism, alcohol education and rehabilitation, driver license disqualification
16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT
Unclassified
18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
None NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (2-89)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 298-102
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
i
DU
I SU
MM
AR
Y S
TATI
STIC
S:
1985
- 19
95
YEA
R
%
of t
otal
fata
litie
s 48
.9
48.7
50
.1
46.6
46
.6
46.0
44
.1
43.8
37
.7
35.3
32
.2
%
of t
otal
inju
ries
20
.7
20.1
19
.1
18.2
17
.6
17.5
15
.9
14.5
13
.6
12.5
12
.1
Felo
ny D
UI a
rres
ts
7316
80
34
8488
86
04
1044
8 12
948
1122
0 98
03
8738
75
67
6642
Alc
ohol
-invo
lved
fata
litie
s 24
12
2543
27
54
2510
25
09
2382
20
48
1832
15
69
1488
13
43
Post
conv
ictio
n su
sp/r
ev
7654
1 78
006
7815
6 79
022
9023
7 91
155
1008
58
7960
9 68
441
5960
0 52
462
Tota
l rec
kles
s driv
ing
conv
ictio
ns4
4438
6 44
063
4172
4 39
926
4045
6 39
617
3938
6 34
186
2783
5 27
374
2451
6
A
lcoh
ol-in
volv
ed re
ckle
ss
2716
3 26
316
2492
2 24
013
2564
6 26
960
2709
3 23
675
1864
5 18
246
1632
9
Alc
ohol
-invo
lved
inju
ries
66
667
6987
6 68
816
6503
3 63
937
6384
7 55
779
4896
9 42
936
3943
7 36
961
19
85
1986
19
8 7
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
19
93
1994
19
95
Tota
l DU
I arr
ests
1 34
7797
34
7286
34
9576
32
7186
33
6059
36
6834
31
2571
26
0150
23
3673
20
8844
20
0754
Mis
dem
eano
r DU
I arr
ests
34
0481
33
9252
34
1088
31
8582
32
5611
35
3886
30
1351
25
0347
22
4935
20
1277
19
4112
DU
I con
vict
ions
rece
ived
to d
ate
(b
y ye
ar o
f arr
est)2
2443
54
2392
57
2425
05r
2196
25r
2258
41r
2573
59r
2232
31r
1865
19r
1649
12r
1444
02r
1389
54
Pe
rcen
t con
vict
ed o
f DU
I as o
f
Sept
embe
r 199
6 70
%
69%
69
%
67%
67
%
70%
71
%
72%
r 71
%r
69%
r 69
%
Es
timat
ed fi
nal D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n
rate
70
%
69%
69
%
67%
r 67
%
70%
r 72
%r
72%
r 72
%r
72%
r 73
%
3083
99
2774
47
2436
45
2319
54
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
1794
92
1 Thes
e to
tals
wer
e re
port
ed b
y th
e D
epar
tmen
t of J
ustic
e, L
aw E
nfor
cem
ent I
nfor
mat
ion
Cen
ter,
and
incl
ude
a sm
all n
umbe
r of d
uplic
ates
(0.9
% i
n 19
95).
2 Thes
e da
ta re
pres
ent a
DM
V m
aste
r file
cou
nt o
f the
num
ber o
f DU
I abs
trac
ts re
ceiv
ed (b
y ye
ar o
f vio
latio
n), m
inus
dup
licat
es.
Thes
e to
tals
do
not i
nclu
de c
onvi
ctio
n ab
stra
cts
not
yet r
ecei
ved.
Thu
s, fo
r the
mos
t rec
ent y
ears
, the
se fi
gure
s w
ill s
ubst
antia
lly u
nder
estim
ate
the
final
con
vict
ion
tota
ls.
3 Th
ese
data
incl
ude
a pr
ojec
ted
num
ber o
f abs
trac
ts n
ot y
et re
ceiv
ed.
This
num
ber i
s ba
sed
on a
n em
piri
cally
der
ived
func
tion
of th
e co
urt a
bstr
act r
epor
ting
rate
.
4 Thes
e to
tals
wer
e ta
ken
from
the
DM
V a
nnua
l Sus
pens
ion
and
Revo
catio
n re
port
s an
d in
clud
e la
te re
port
ing
of c
onvi
ctio
ns fr
om p
rior
yea
rs.
5 Sinc
e 19
91, t
otal
man
dato
ry su
spen
sion
/rev
ocat
ion
exce
eds t
he n
umbe
r of D
UI a
rres
ts b
ecau
se m
any
offe
nder
s now
rece
ive
both
an
APS
and
pos
tcon
vict
ion
susp
ensi
on/r
evoc
atio
n.
r Revi
sed
from
1881
16r
1678
34r
1489
43
1472
91
Estim
ated
fina
l DU
I con
vict
ions
3 24
4384
r 23
9322
r 24
2396
r 21
9767
r 22
6135
r 25
9810
r 22
5748
r
Tota
l man
dato
ry s
usp/
rev5
10
5849
10
4333
10
3630
10
1779
11
1703
23
3680
37
3131
r
Adm
in p
er se
/ref
usal
susp
/rev
29
308
2632
7 25
474
2275
7 21
466
1425
25
2722
73r
prio
r rep
orts
.
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
ii
DU
I SU
MM
AR
Y ST
ATI
STIC
S: 1
985
- 199
5 (c
ontin
ued)
YE
AR
PREC
ON
VIC
TIO
N
Adm
in p
er s
e (A
PS) a
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1196
10
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
1794
92
Ze
ro to
lera
nce
susp
ensi
ons
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9971
87
00
Fi
rst-o
ffend
er su
spen
sion
s n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a 82
503
1875
27
1575
45
1443
21
1205
82
1212
18
Re
peat
-off
ende
r sus
pens
ions
n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a 34
792
7435
1 62
656
5727
9 47
429
4419
3
Repe
at-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2315
10
395
8589
74
06
6063
53
81
Com
mer
cial
dri
ver a
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3739
79
76
6449
58
29
5038
49
21
Che
mic
al te
st re
fusa
l act
ions
29
308
2632
7 25
474
2275
7 21
466
2291
5 21
296r
1796
3r 15
662
1326
4 12
308
Te
st re
fusa
l sus
pens
ions
25
485
1635
2 14
877
1372
0 12
390
1512
8 10
901r
9374
r 82
56
7022
67
54
Te
st re
fusa
l rev
ocat
ions
38
23
9975
10
597
9037
90
76
7787
10
395r
8589
r 74
06
6063
53
81
TOTA
L A
PS/R
EFU
SAL
AC
TIO
NS
2930
8 26
327
2547
4 22
757
2146
6 14
2525
27
2273
22
8790
20
9006
18
4045
17
9492
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
POST
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
Juve
nile
DU
I sus
pens
ions
22
00
2219
23
74
1823
19
95
1478
15
76
1202
92
2 87
9 67
7
Firs
t-off
ende
r sus
pens
ions
70
57
7384
72
78
6626
76
79
1040
8 13
575
1067
3 10
208
8696
72
66
M
isde
mea
nor
5346
55
92
5558
50
50
5658
84
67
1154
7 89
89
8607
71
88
5806
Felo
ny
1711
17
92
1720
15
76
2021
19
41
2028
16
84
1601
15
08
1460
Seco
nd-o
ffen
der S
/R a
ctio
ns
4683
5 45
234
4360
8 47
698
5392
7 52
334
5735
0 45
478
3884
9 34
300
3148
9
Mis
dem
eano
r 46
292
4460
1 42
964
4709
3 53
238
5159
3 56
583
4475
6 38
285
3379
4 30
955
Fe
lony
54
3 63
3 64
4 60
5 68
9 74
1 76
7 72
2 56
4 50
6 53
4
Thir
d-of
fend
er re
voca
tions
14
970
1694
6 17
118
1399
1 18
514
1865
0 19
963
1555
3 12
908
1119
3 94
71
M
isde
mea
nor
1497
0 16
946
1711
8 13
671
1818
2 18
219
1959
5 15
233
1264
4 10
974
9261
Felo
ny
n/a
n/a
n/a
320
332
431
368
320
264
219
210
Four
th-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
5479
62
23
7778
88
84
8122
82
85
8394
67
03
5554
45
32
3559
TOTA
L PO
STC
ON
VIC
TIO
N A
CTI
ON
S 76
541
7800
6 78
156
7902
2 90
237
9115
5 10
0858
79
609
6844
1 59
600
5246
2
19
85
1986
19
87
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
19
93
1994
19
95
TOTA
L M
AN
DA
TORY
SU
SPEN
SIO
N/
REV
OC
ATI
ON
(S/R
) AC
TIO
NS
1058
49
1043
33
1036
30
1017
79
1117
03
2336
80
3731
31
3083
99
2774
47
2436
45
2319
54
port
s.
prio
r re
r Revi
sed
from
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
iii
HIGHLIGHTS OF 1997 CALIFORNIA DUI-MIS REPORT
Alcohol-involved traffic fatalities continued to decrease substantially in 1995 (-9.7%), and have dropped by over half since 1987 (-51% overall).
The decline in DUI arrests which began in 1991 continued through 1995, although
at a much slower rate (-3.7%) than in previous years. FY 95/96 administrative per se (APS) actions increased by 10.7%, however, possibly indicating that the recent trend in declining DUI arrests may have reversed during 1996. DUI arrests have fallen 45% since 1990.
The number of persons injured in alcohol-involved accidents during 1995 declined
(-6.3%) for the ninth consecutive year, resulting in a 46.3% reduction in alcohol-involved injuries over the 9-year time period.
13.2% of all 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,
compared to 13.1% in 1993 and 11.1% in 1991 and 1992. Almost half (49.5%) of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.
The average blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of a convicted DUI offender, as
reported by law enforcement on APS forms, was .168% in 1994, which is more than double the California illegal per se BAC limit of .08%. The average BAC reported on 1994 DUI abstracts of conviction was 0.166%, the same as in each of the prior three years.
Requests for APS hearings declined 27% in FY 95/96 (from 11.8% to only 8.6% of all
APS actions), reversing a trend of increasing hearing requests each year since APS was implemented in FY 90/91. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing continued to decline, however, dropping from 87% in FY 90/91 to 68% in 94/95.
Among 1995 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (45.5%) again constituted the largest
racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate that is almost twice that of their percentage of California’s adult population (26%).
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
iv
The average age of a DUI offender in 1995 was 33.3 years. Less than 1% of arrested DUI offenders are juveniles (under age 18).
Among convicted DUI offenders in 1994, 68.8% were first offenders and 31.2% were
repeat offenders (one or more prior convictions within the previous 7 years). The proportion of repeat offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989, when it stood at 37%.
18.0% of 1994 DUI arrest cases did not show any corresponding conviction on DMV
records. This rate is down slightly from 18.8% in 1993 and 19.2% in 1992. This reduction could reflect system improvements initiated by the department to improve the effectiveness of DUI adjudication and to increase the reporting of DUI convictions.
Alcohol treatment, in conjunction with license restriction, was the most effective
postconviction sanction in reducing subsequent DUI incidents among DUI offenders, by a minimum of 12.6% over other sanction alternatives (1989-1994).
License suspension was the most effective postconviction sanction in reducing
subsequent accidents for first offenders, producing reductions of at least 13.3% across the years (1989-1994). With the imposition of preconviction APS suspensions, beginning in July 1990, the postconviction total accident rates of all sanction groups were reduced. Because all DUI offenders were now suspended under the APS law, the incremental impact of postconviction suspension actions became less distinct.
Jail, in the absence of treatment or postconviction suspension, was the least effective
sanction for first offenders in terms of DUI recidivism; offenders sentenced to jail had up to 19.8% more DUI incidents than the second least effective sanction.
Statewide, 4.6% of 1994 DUI offenders were required to install an ignition interlock
device in combination with attending SB 38 alcohol treatment programs. Although there is a positive trend, there is no evidence, as of yet, that ignition interlock increases the incremental effectiveness of other DUI sanctions.
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge with appreciation the many individuals who have contributed to the success of this project. In particular, we wish to acknowledge the cooperation of the Department of Justice, Statistical Analysis Center, in providing annual DUI arrest data and documentation. The contributions of Debbie McKenzie, Associate Government Program Analyst, in transforming mainframe computer files into readable data tables and figures, as well as her general assistance in the production of this report, are acknowledged with appreciation. We also would like to acknowledge the contributions of Patrice Rogers, Research Analyst II, Pat Timmons, Staff Programmer Analyst, and the administrative direction and report review efforts of Raymond C. Peck, Chief, Research and Development Branch. Report Authors: Helen N. Tashima, Research Analyst II, Principal Investigator Clifford J. Helander, Research Manager I, Project Manager
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE DUI SUMMARY STATISTICS: 1985-1995 i HIGHLIGHTS OF 1997 DUI-MIS REPORT iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS 4 SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS 10 SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS 22 SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS 29 EVALUATION METHOD AND RESULTS 34 Subject Selection and Data Collection 34 Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures 37 Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation 38 Total Accidents 38 DUI Incidents 38 Results of the Second Offender Sanction Evaluation 40 Total Accidents 40 DUI Incidents 40 One-Year Recidivism Rates for First and Second Offenders from 1989-1994 43 SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS 45 SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL 49 DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS 56 REFERENCES 57 GLOSSARY 58
APPENDICES
NUMBER
A ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 757 - FRIEDMAN CHAPTER 450 60 B1 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY, AGE, SEX AND RACE/ETHNICITY 61 B2 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX AND AGE 76
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
APPENDICES (continued) NUMBER PAGE
B3 TOTAL CONVICTION DATA FOR 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY COURT 86
B4 1994 DUI SANCTIONS BY COUNTY, COURT AND OFFENDER STATUS 96
B5 DEMOGRAPHIC 2-YEAR PRIOR DRIVER RECORD VARIABLES BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR FIRST DUI OFFENDERS 131
B6 DEMOGRAPHIC 2-YEAR PRIOR DRIVER RECORD VARIABLES BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR SECOND DUI OFFENDERS 132
B7 ZIP CODE CENSUS VARIABLES (COVARIATES) BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR FIRST AND SECOND DUI OFFENDERS 133
LIST OF TABLES 1 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1993-1995 7 2 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST 8 3a 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY AGE, SEX AND RACE/ETHNICITY 9 3b 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY SEX, AGE AND RACE/ETHNICITY 9 4 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX 15 5 MATCHABLE 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE, RACE/ETHNICITY AND SEX 16 6 ADJUSTED 1994 DUI CONVICTION RATES AND RELATIVE LIKELIHOOD OF CONVICTION BY AGE AND RACE/ETHNICITY 16
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
NUMBER PAGE
7 TOTAL CONVICTION DATA FOR 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 17 8 ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY 19 9 1994 REPORTED BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION (BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS 20
10 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE REPORTED BAC LEVEL 21
11 1994 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS 25
12 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS 26
13 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - REPEAT OFFENDERS 27
14 FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR 39
15 SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR 41
16 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1992, AND 1994 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS BY OUTCOME MEASURES 42
17 MANDATORY DUI LICENSE DISQUALIFICATION ACTIONS, 1985-1995 47
18 ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES 48
19 RACE/ETHNICITY BY SOBRIETY CODE OF ACCIDENT- INVOLVED 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 52
20 FATAL AND INJURY ACCIDENTS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND TYPE OF ARREST 52
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
LIST OF TABLES (continued) NUMBER PAGE
21 ADJUDICATION STATUS BY SOBRIETY CODE FOR ACCIDENT-INVOLVED 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 53
22 FATAL AND INJURY ACCIDENTS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY TYPE OF ARREST AND ADJUDICATION STATUS 53
23 1994 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST 54
24 1-, 3- AND 6-YEAR TOTAL, FATAL/INJURY AND ALCOHOL-RELATED ACCIDENT MEANS BY OFFENDER STATUS 55
LIST OF FIGURES 1 DUI management information system 2 2 DUI arrests 1985-1995 4 3 Percentage of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 projected population (age 15 and over) by race/ethnicity 6 4 DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rate estimates, 1985-1995 12 5 Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity 15 6 Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1994) 23 7 Adjusted 6-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 30 8 Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction 30
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
LIST OF FIGURES (continued) NUMBER PAGE
9 Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction 30
10 Adjusted 6-year DUI incident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 31 11 Adjusted 3-year DUI incident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction 31 12 Adjusted 1-Year DUI incident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction 31 13 Adjusted 6-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offenders by type of sanction 33 14 Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1992 second offenders by type of sanction 33 15 Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1994 second offenders by type of sanction 33 16 Proportion of DUI offenders arrested in 1989-1994 reoffending (DUI incidents) one year after conviction 44 17 Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1985-1995 46 18 Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that were alcohol-involved, 1985-1995 50
x
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
This report is the sixth Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System, produced in response to Assembly Bill 757 (Friedman), Chapter 450, 1989 legislative session (see Appendix A). This bill required the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to "establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted" of DUI in order to provide "accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics" to enhance "the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions." The need for such a data system had long been documented by numerous authorities, including the 1983 Presidential Commission on Drunk Driving. In responding to this legislative mandate, this report combines and cross-references DUI data from diverse sources and presents them in a single reference. Data sources drawn upon include the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for accident data, Department of Justice (DOJ) for arrest data, and the DMV driver record database. Each of these reporting agencies, however, initially draw their data from diffuse primary sources such as individual law enforcement agencies (arrest and accident reports) and the courts (abstracts of conviction). The general conceptual design of the California DUI management information system (DUI-MIS) is presented in Figure 1. The basic theme of the DUI-MIS is to track the processing of offenders through the DUI system from the point of arrest and to identify the frequency with which offenders flow through each branch of the system process (from law enforcement through adjudication to treatment and license control actions). Figure 1 also illustrates the relationship between offender flow and data collection at each point of the process. The initiating data source for the DUI-MIS is the DUI arrest report, as compiled by the DOJ Law Enforcement Information Center's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. Another major objective of this report is to evaluate the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions on convicted DUI offenders. This is accomplished by examining the postconviction recidivism records (alcohol/drug-related accidents and traffic convictions) of offenders assigned to alternative sanctions, as detailed in the section on "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness."
1
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
2
DU
I IN
CID
ENTS
Arr
este
d?C
hem
ical
Te
st
Ref
used
?A
ccid
ent
Invo
lved
?C
ompl
aint
Fi
led?
Plea
- B
arga
in?
DU
I C
onvi
ctio
n?R
efer
red
to
Trea
tmen
t?
Lice
nse
Susp
ende
d/
Rev
oked
?
Lice
nse
Rei
nsta
ted?
Trea
tmen
t N
ot
Com
plet
ed?
Arr
est
Rep
ort
Rei
nsta
tem
ent o
n D
river
Rec
ord
Con
vict
ion
of
Less
er O
ffen
seTr
eatm
ent
Dro
pout
Trea
tmen
t R
efer
ral
DU
I C
onvi
ctio
n
Susp
ensi
on/
Rev
ocat
ion
onD
river
Rec
ord
Cou
rt D
ocke
t Es
tabl
ishe
dA
ccid
ent
Rep
ort
Adm
inis
trativ
e Pe
r Se
Sus
pens
ion
Rep
ort
Mon
thly
Arr
est
and
Cita
tion
Reg
iste
r
Aut
omat
ed N
ame
Inde
x Sy
stem
Lice
nse
Susp
ensi
on
and
DU
I Pr
oces
sing
Stat
ewid
e In
tegr
ated
Tra
ffic
R
ecor
d Sy
stem
Abs
tract
of
Con
vict
ion
Driv
er R
ecor
d M
aste
r File
DU
I Dat
a Ex
tract
ion
Mod
ule
DU
I-M
IS
LAW
EN
FOR
CEM
ENT
AD
JUD
ICA
TIV
ETR
EATM
ENT
LIC
ENSE
CO
NTR
OL
Figu
re 1
. D
UI m
anag
emen
t inf
orm
atio
n sy
stem
.
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
It should again be noted that it is not an objective of this report to interpret, analyze or make recommendations based on the data presented. Rather, the primary purpose of a reporting system such as the DUI-MIS is to provide objective data on the operating and performance characteristics of the system for others to assess in making policy decisions, formulating improvements and conducting more in-depth evaluations. The DUI-MIS data system and report has led to numerous improvements in the California DUI system, from the identification of inappropriate dismissals in a small central valley court to major initiatives currently underway to improve the tracking and reporting of DUI cases. The success of the California DUI-MIS has also contributed to a national initiative to design a model DUI reporting system, currently being developed under contract to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
3
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS The information presented below on DUI arrests is based primarily on data collected annually by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. These data are the most current nonaggregated data available on DUI arrests. Table 1: DUI Arrests By County and Annual Percentage Change from 1993-1995. The number of DUI arrests by county for the years 1993-1995 and the percentage changes from 1994 to 1995 are shown in Table 1. Table 2: 1995 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows a breakdown of 1995 DUI arrests by felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile arrest type, by county. This table also shows county and statewide DUI arrest rates per 100 licensed drivers. Tables 3a-3b: 1995 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity. Table 3a crosstabulates age by sex and age by race/ethnicity of 1995 DUI arrestees statewide. The same tabulations by county are found in Appendix Table B1. Table 3b shows the same data crosstabulated by sex and age within race/ethnicity. Figure 2 below displays the trend in DUI arrests from 1985 to 1995.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
NU
MB
ER O
F D
UI A
RR
ESTS
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Figure 2 . DUI arrests 1985-1995.
MisdemeanorFelonyTotal
YEAR
4
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Based on the data shown in Figure 2 and Tables 1, 2, 3a, and 3b, the following statements can be made about DUI arrests in California: Statewide Parameters:
DUI arrests decreased by only 3.7% in 1995, following declines of 10.8% and 10.3% in 1994 and 1993, respectively. Since 1990, DUI arrests have dropped by 45%.
The 1995 DUI arrest rate was the same as in 1994, 1.0 arrests per 100 licensed
drivers. This compares to rates of 1.1 in 1993, 1.3 in 1992, 1.5 in 1991, and 1.8 in 1990.
Felony DUI arrests (involving bodily injury or death) constitute a relatively small
proportion (3.3% in 1995) of all DUI arrests. County Variation:
25% of all 1995 California DUI arrests occurred in Los Angeles County. Four counties (Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino) had over 10,000 DUI arrests each, and accounted for almost half (46%) of all arrests.
The 1995 county per capita DUI arrest rates ranged from 0.3 to 9.0 DUI arrests per
100 licensed drivers. Eleven counties had rates below 1.0: San Francisco (0.3), Alameda and Contra Costa (0.7), Mariposa and Santa Clara (0.8), and Amador, Marin, Orange, San Mateo, Solano, and Ventura (0.9). Nine counties had rates of 2.0 or higher and, of these, 3 had rates higher than 2.5: Imperial (2.6), Colusa (2.9), and Alpine (9.0). The extremely high rate for Alpine must be viewed with caution because of the extremely small population size of Alpine County (N = 800 licensed drivers in 1995).
Many counties again showed a decline in DUI arrests in 1995. Among the larger
counties, the greatest declines occurred in Alameda (-22.4%), Kern (-17.8%), San Francisco (-15.0%), and Ventura (-13.8%). Among other counties, the largest decreases in DUI arrests occurred in Modoc (-40.9%), Mariposa (-17.9%), and Mono (-17.8%). Among counties showing increases in DUI arrests were Nevada (34.7%), El Dorado (27.8%), San Benito (24.8%), Alpine (22.0%), and Tuolumne (20.0%).
Demographic Characteristics:
The average age of a DUI arrestee in 1995 was 33.3 years. Roughly half (46.9%) of all arrestees were age 30 or younger and over three-quarters (77.6%) were age 40 or younger. Less than 1% of all DUI arrests involved juveniles (under age 18). 2.3% of all arrestees were over age 60.
5
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Males comprised 87.8% of all 1995 DUI arrests.
Among 1995 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (45.5%) continued to be the largest racial/ethnic group, being arrested at a rate substantially higher than their 1995 population parity of 26.0% (Department of Finance, Demographic Research and Census Data Center). All other racial/ethnic groups were underrepresented among DUI arrestees, relative to their estimated 1995 population parity: Blacks (6.3% of arrests, 6.7% of the population), Whites (42.8% of arrests, 56.7% of the population), and Other (5.4% of arrests, an estimated 10.6% of the population). Figure 3 below shows the percentages of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 estimated census adult population by race/ethnicity.
Among male 1995 DUI arrestees, 49.1% were Hispanic, 39.2% were White, 6.2%
were Black, and 5.4% were "Other." Among female DUI arrestees, 68.8% were White, 19.0% were Hispanic, 7.1% were Black, and 5.1% were "Other."
In the following 8 counties, Hispanics comprised over 60% of those arrested for DUI
during 1995: Tulare (75.6%), Imperial (72.9%), Fresno (71.1%), Madera (71.0%), San Benito (69.4%), Merced (65.9%), Los Angeles (61.3%), and Monterey (60.2%). In most other counties, the majority of arrestees were White.
The average age of a DUI arrestee varied considerably by race: Blacks were the
oldest with a mean age of 35.9 years, while Hispanics were the youngest, with a mean age of 30.9 years.
56.7
26.0
6.710.6
42.8 45.5
6.3 5.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PER
CEN
TAG
E
White Hispanic Black Other
Figure 3 . Percentage of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 projected population (age 15 and over) by race/ethnicity.
1995 projected population
DUI arrests
6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 1: DUI ARRESTS* BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1993-1995
COUNTY 1993 1994 1995 % CHANGE 1994-1995 STATEWIDE 231696 206583 198982 -3.7 ALAMEDA 7820 7208 5596 -22.4 ALPINE 54 59 72 22.0 AMADOR 305 183 197 7.7 BUTTE 1580 1297 1293 -0.3 CALAVERAS 334 287 309 7.7 COLUSA 326 302 323 7.0 CONTRA COSTA 4492 4124 3990 -3.2 DEL NORTE 401 303 295 -2.6 EL DORADO 1122 983 1256 27.8 FRESNO 8158 6860 6593 -3.9 GLENN 310 310 339 9.4 HUMBOLDT 1258 1234 1333 8.0 IMPERIAL 2148 1645 1899 15.4 INYO 383 346 306 -11.6 KERN 6443 5095 4188 -17.8 KINGS 1477 1143 1038 -9.2 LAKE 690 662 656 -0.9 LASSEN 251 252 241 -4.4 LOS ANGELES 58710 51607 49570 -3.9 MADERA 1452 1159 1025 -11.6 MARIN 1940 1664 1542 -7.3 MARIPOSA 146 112 92 -17.9 MENDOCINO 1033 960 880 -8.3 MERCED 2431 2138 2174 1.7 MODOC 120 137 81 -40.9 MONO 175 157 129 -17.8 MONTEREY 4968 4423 3931 -11.1 NAPA 1203 1085 1011 -6.8 NEVADA 511 481 648 34.7 ORANGE 15476 15659 15925 1.7 PLACER 1885 1629 1636 0.4 PLUMAS 217 189 178 -5.8 RIVERSIDE 9109 8182 9190 12.3 SACRAMENTO 9316 7904 7225 -8.6 SAN BENITO 342 254 317 24.8 SAN BERNARDINO 11000 10699 10474 -2.1 SAN DIEGO 17047 15815 15530 -1.8 SAN FRANCISCO 1885 1690 1436 -15.0 SAN JOAQUIN 4444 3936 4122 4.7 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2444 2351 2264 -3.7 SAN MATEO 5163 4622 4254 -8.0 SANTA BARBARA 4591 3837 3402 -11.3 SANTA CLARA 10871 9164 8685 -5.2 SANTA CRUZ 3206 2645 2444 -7.6 SHASTA 1070 1036 1044 0.8 SIERRA 67 38 37 -2.6 SISKIYOU 410 356 349 -2.0 SOLANO 2050 1809 1905 5.3 SONOMA 4075 3245 2913 -10.2 STANISLAUS 3324 2822 2839 0.6 SUTTER 1039 898 913 1.7 TEHAMA 451 477 415 -13.0 TRINITY 220 255 222 -12.9 TULARE 4336 3820 3552 -7.0 TUOLUMNE 316 320 384 20.0 VENTURA 5050 4971 4285 -13.8 YOLO 1363 1202 1441 19.9 YUBA 688 542 594 9.6 *DOJ DUI arrest totals with duplicates removed.
7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 2: 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST TOTAL TYPE OF ARREST DUI ARRESTS COUNTY (100%) FELONY JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR PER 100 N N % N % N % LICENSED DRIVERS STATEWIDE 198982 6520 3.3 1654 0.8 190808 95.9 1.0 ALAMEDA 5596 77 1.4 44 0.8 5475 97.8 0.7 ALPINE 72 2 2.8 1 1.4 69 95.8 9.0 AMADOR 197 7 3.6 1 0.5 189 95.9 0.9 BUTTE 1293 33 2.6 22 1.7 1238 95.7 1.0 CALAVERAS 309 19 6.1 5 1.6 285 92.2 1.1 COLUSA 323 12 3.7 4 1.2 307 95.0 2.9 CONTRA COSTA 3990 111 2.8 44 1.1 3835 96.1 0.7 DEL NORTE 295 21 7.1 3 1.0 271 91.9 1.9 EL DORADO 1256 69 5.5 7 0.6 1180 93.9 1.2 FRESNO 6593 265 4.0 88 1.3 6240 94.6 1.6 GLENN 339 12 3.5 3 0.9 324 95.6 2.0 HUMBOLDT 1333 60 4.5 26 2.0 1247 93.5 1.6 IMPERIAL 1899 44 2.3 16 0.8 1839 96.8 2.6 INYO 306 12 3.9 3 1.0 291 95.1 2.2 KERN 4188 168 4.0 44 1.1 3976 94.9 1.2 KINGS 1038 28 2.7 14 1.3 996 96.0 1.9 LAKE 656 24 3.7 14 2.1 618 94.2 1.7 LASSEN 241 8 3.3 1 0.4 232 96.3 1.4 LOS ANGELES 49570 1676 3.4 225 0.5 47669 96.2 1.0 MADERA 1025 40 3.9 10 1.0 975 95.1 1.8 MARIN 1542 29 1.9 8 0.5 1505 97.6 0.9 MARIPOSA 92 4 4.3 1 1.1 87 94.6 0.8 MENDOCINO 880 30 3.4 16 1.8 834 94.8 1.6 MERCED 2174 73 3.4 19 0.9 2082 95.8 2.1 MODOC 81 2 2.5 3 3.7 76 93.8 1.3 MONO 129 2 1.6 1 0.8 126 97.7 1.7 MONTEREY 3931 93 2.4 51 1.3 3787 96.3 1.9 NAPA 1011 51 5.0 16 1.6 944 93.4 1.3 NEVADA 648 16 2.5 3 0.5 629 97.1 1.0 ORANGE 15925 316 2.0 70 0.4 15539 97.6 0.9 PLACER 1636 64 3.9 21 1.3 1551 94.8 1.1 PLUMAS 178 5 2.8 5 2.8 168 94.4 1.1 RIVERSIDE 9190 314 3.4 105 1.1 8771 95.4 1.2 SACRAMENTO 7225 397 5.5 53 0.7 6775 93.8 1.0 SAN BENITO 317 19 6.0 4 1.3 294 92.7 1.3 SAN BERNARDINO 10474 322 3.1 68 0.6 10084 96.3 1.2 SAN DIEGO 15530 317 2.0 122 0.8 15091 97.2 1.0 SAN FRANCISCO 1436 111 7.7 6 0.4 1319 91.9 0.3 SAN JOAQUIN 4122 137 3.3 45 1.1 3940 95.6 1.5 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2264 67 3.0 22 1.0 2175 96.1 1.5 SAN MATEO 4254 112 2.6 39 0.9 4103 96.5 0.9 SANTA BARBARA 3402 100 2.9 57 1.7 3245 95.4 1.4 SANTA CLARA 8685 461 5.3 51 0.6 8173 94.1 0.8 SANTA CRUZ 2444 30 1.2 37 1.5 2377 97.3 1.6 SHASTA 1044 46 4.4 16 1.5 982 94.1 1.0 SIERRA 37 2 5.4 0 0.0 35 94.6 1.5 SISKIYOU 349 15 4.3 4 1.1 330 94.6 1.1 SOLANO 1905 63 3.3 28 1.5 1814 95.2 0.9 SONOMA 2913 91 3.1 46 1.6 2776 95.3 1.0 STANISLAUS 2839 157 5.5 34 1.2 2648 93.3 1.2 SUTTER 913 26 2.8 0 0.0 887 97.2 2.0 TEHAMA 415 16 3.9 6 1.4 393 94.7 1.3 TRINITY 222 7 3.2 1 0.5 214 96.4 2.4 TULARE 3552 119 3.4 41 1.2 3392 95.5 2.0 TUOLUMNE 384 19 4.9 4 1.0 361 94.0 1.1 VENTURA 4285 126 2.9 47 1.1 4112 96.0 0.9 YOLO 1441 53 3.7 23 1.6 1365 94.7 1.6 YUBA 594 20 3.4 6 1.0 568 95.6 1.7
8
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
9
TABL
E 3a
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y A
GE,
SEX
AN
D R
AC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y*
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
ST
ATE
WID
E 19
8982
10
0.0
1747
57
87.8
24
225
12.2
85
170
42.8
90
497
45.5
12
610
6.3
1070
5 5.
4 U
ND
ER 1
8 16
54
0.8
1402
84
.8
252
15.2
87
7 53
.0
650
39.3
69
4.
2 58
3.
5 18
-20
1257
3 6.
3 11
354
90.3
12
19
9.7
4920
39
.1
6667
53
.0
464
3.7
522
4.2
21-3
0 79
141
39.8
70
878
89.6
82
63
10.4
27
454
34.7
43
801
55.3
39
41
5.0
3945
5.
0 31
-40
6110
2 30
.7
5268
9 86
.2
8413
13
.8
2709
1 44
.3
2602
1 42
.6
4519
7.
4 34
71
5.7
41-5
0 29
623
14.9
25
241
85.2
43
82
14.8
15
744
53.1
97
18
32.8
22
41
7.6
1920
6.
5 51
-60
10
352
5.2
91
38
88.3
12
14
11.7
60
89
58.8
27
32
26.4
94
2 9.
1 58
9 5.
7 61
-70
3553
1.
8 31
81
89.5
37
2 10
.5
2273
64
.0
759
21.4
35
0 9.
9 17
1 4.
8 71
& A
BOV
E 98
4 0.
5 87
4 88
.8
110
11.2
72
2 73
.4
149
15.1
84
8.
5 29
2.
9 M
EAN
AG
E (Y
EARS
) 33
.3
33.1
34
.2
35.3
30
.9
35.9
34
.1
*Tab
ulat
ions
for D
UI a
rres
ts b
y ag
e, s
ex, r
ace/
ethn
icity
and
cou
nty
are
foun
d in
App
endi
x Ta
ble
B1.
TABL
E 3b
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y SE
X, A
GE
AN
D R
AC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) SE
X A
GE
TOTA
L W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
19
8982
10
0.0
8517
0 42
.8
9049
7 45
.5
1261
0 6.
3 10
705
5.4
MA
LE
UN
DER
18
1402
0.
8 69
5 49
.6
590
42.1
65
4.
6 52
3.
7
18-2
0 11
354
6.5
4100
36
.1
6381
56
.2
417
3.7
456
4.0
21-3
0 70
878
40.
6 22
025
31.1
41
982
59.2
34
20
4.8
3451
4.
9
31-4
0
5268
9 30
.1
2130
7 40
.4
2448
9 46
.5
3808
7.
2 30
85
5.9
41
-50
2524
1 14
.4
1261
7 50
.0
9008
35
.7
1902
7.
5 17
14
6.8
51
-60
9138
5.
2 51
55
56.4
25
77
28.2
87
3 9.
6 53
3 5.
8
61-7
0 31
81
1.8
1978
62
.2
718
22.6
32
7 10
.3
158
5.0
71
& A
BOV
E 87
4 0.
5 62
5 71
.5
148
16.9
74
8.
5 27
3.
1
TOTA
L
1747
57
100.
0 68
502
39.2
85
893
49.1
10
886
6.2
9476
5.
4 FE
MA
LE
UN
DER
18
252
1.0
182
72.2
60
23
.8
4 1.
6 6
2.4
18
-20
1219
5.
0 82
0 67
.3
286
23.5
47
3.
9
66
5.4
21
-30
8263
34
.1
5429
65
.7
1819
22
.0
521
6.3
494
6.0
31
-40
8413
34
.7
5784
68
.8
1532
18
.2
711
8.5
386
4.6
41
-50
4382
18
.1
3127
71
.4
710
16.2
33
9 7.
7 20
6 4.
7
51-6
0 12
14
5.0
934
76.9
15
5 12
.8
69
5.7
56
4.6
61
-70
372
1.5
295
79.3
41
11
.0
23
6.2
13
3.5
71
& A
BOV
E 11
0 0.
5 97
88
.2
1 0.
9 10
9.
1 2
1.8
TO
TAL
2422
5 10
0.0
1666
8 68
.8
4604
19
.0
1724
7.
1 12
29
5.1
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS Data on convictions resulting from court adjudication of DUI arrests are reported directly to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on court abstracts of conviction. The following tables compile and crosstabulate these conviction data by demographic, geographic, and adjudicative categories. Table 4: 1994 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex. This table crosstabulates statewide DUI conviction information by age and sex. Corresponding county-specific conviction data are presented in Appendix Table B2. Table 5: Matchable 1994 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex. This table displays DUI conviction information by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. "Matchable" DUI convictions are those which are traceable to a DUI arrest appearing on the MACR system. Because not all arrests could be matched to an existing record, these conviction totals underestimate the total number of actual convictions. Table 6: Adjusted 1994 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity. This table shows the relative probability of a DUI arrest leading to a DUI conviction, by age and race/ethnicity. DUI conviction totals from categories in Table 5 ("matchable DUI convictions") were increased by the proportion which matchable convictions constituted of "total DUI convictions," shown in Table 7, to arrive at the adjusted DUI conviction rates. Without this adjustment DUI conviction rates would be underestimated using the conviction data from Table 5 because not all reported convictions are "matchable" to an arrest. Table 7: Total Conviction Data for 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table portrays county and statewide DUI-related conviction data as reported to the DMV on court abstracts of conviction. Corresponding court-specific data are shown in Appendix Table B3. Convictions not reported to DMV are considered nonconvictions for the purposes of this report. Actual nonconvictions include cases where the DUI arrest was not filed, not prosecuted, or resulted in a not guilty verdict. The DUI conviction rates by county were calculated by comparing the county conviction totals with DOJ arrest totals. Because not all 1994 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these conviction totals and rates will slightly underestimate the "final" figures. The DUI conviction rates shown in the "DUI Summary Statistics: 1985-1995" table at the very beginning of this report include an estimate of these late convictions, and thus are slightly higher than those shown in
10
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Tables 7 and 8. Conviction variables include felony and misdemeanor DUI convictions, alcohol- and nonalcohol-related reckless driving convictions, convictions of "other" lesser offenses, and DUI convictions dismissed or found unconstitutional. DUI arrest dates from the DOJ MACR system were matched to driver record violation dates to identify nonalcohol-related reckless driving and "other" convictions. The average (mean) adjudication time lags from DUI arrest to conviction, and from conviction to update on the DMV database, were calculated for each county. Table 8: Adjudication Status of 1994 DUI Arrests by County. This table shows the adjudication status (court disposition) of 1994 DUI arrests, by county. Included are the percentages of arrests which have resulted in DUI convictions (misdemeanor or felony), reckless driving convictions (alcohol-related or nonalcohol-related), convictions of "other" offenses, or no reported conviction, as of the date of writing. Again, because not all 1994 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these rates will slightly underestimate the "final" rate for each category, excepting the category "no record of any conviction," which will be slightly reduced (approximately 1-2%) by the eventual adjudication of these few late cases. Table 9: 1994 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions. This table shows the frequency of reported positive BAC levels for DUI convictions. Because of more complete reporting of BAC levels on APS reporting forms (73%), those reports are used (beginning with last year's report) to calculate statewide BAC levels. Abstracts of conviction, which were used in prior evaluations, report BAC levels in only 51% of cases. However, the two sources yield almost identical estimates of BAC levels. Table 10: 1994 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level. This table displays the proportions of convicted DUI offenders by offender status (number of prior convictions), and the average (mean) BAC level from APS reporting forms and abstracts of conviction, for each offense level. Figure 4 (below) shows, for the years 1985 to 1995, the number of DUI abstracts received to date by DMV from the courts, the estimated final number of DUI convictions which will ultimately be received, and the estimated final DUI conviction rate.
11
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
125000
150000
175000
200000
225000
250000
275000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
YEAR
Estimated final conviction rate 70% 69% 69% 67% 67% 70% 72% 72% 72% 72% 73%
Note . Estimated DUI convictions = see footnote 3 to "DUI Summary Statistics: 1985-1995."
Figure 4 . DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rateestimates, 1985-1995.
Estimated final DUI convictions
DUI convictions received to date
Based on these data, the following statements can be made: Statewide Adjudication Parameters:
The estimated DUI conviction rate for 1995 (73%) is slightly higher than the estimated conviction rate of each of the previous 4 years (all at 72%).
Among 1994 DUI arrests, 70.6% have resulted to date in DUI convictions (felony or
misdemeanor). This is slightly higher than the corresponding DUI conviction rate for 1993 arrests (70.0%), as reported last year.
8.9% of 1994 DUI arrests resulted in reckless driving convictions, with 18% of these
not correctly reported as alcohol-related. Both of these rates are similar to the corresponding 1993 rates.
2.4% of 1994 DUI arrests have resulted in convictions of offenses other than DUI or
reckless driving, the same rate as for 1993 DUI arrests.
18.0% of 1994 DUI arrests have not yet resulted in any conviction on DMV’s records, compared to 18.8% in 1993 and 19.2% in 1992. As additional cases are adjudicated and reported by the courts, this figure will decrease slightly.
12
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The average reported BAC level for all convicted DUI offenders in 1994, using APS reporting forms as the data source, was 0.168%, very slightly down from the 1993 level of 0.169%, yet still more than double the illegal per se BAC limit of 0.08%. The average BAC level of these offenders, using court abstracts of conviction as the data source, was 0.166%, the same as for 1993 and 1992 offenders.
Average BAC levels increase slightly as a function of the number of prior DUI
convictions, from 0.164% BAC for a first offense to 0.187% BAC for a fourth or subsequent offense.
Among 1994 convicted DUI offenders, 68.8% were first offenders, 21.7% were
second offenders, 6.8% were third offenders, and 2.7% were on their fourth or more offense. (The statutorily defined time period for counting priors in California is seven years.) The proportion of repeat offenders (31.2%) among all convicted DUI offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989 (at which time 37% of all convictions were repeat offenses).
The average adjudication time lags were 2.8 months from DUI arrest to conviction
and 3.2 months from conviction to update on the DMV database, totalling 6.0 months from arrest to update on the offender's driving record. These time lags have increased slightly in each of the last two years.
Variation by County:
Among the larger counties, 1994 DUI conviction rates varied from a high of 87.4% in Ventura to lows of 56.5% in San Bernardino and 56.9% in Fresno. Los Angeles County, which accounted for almost 25% of all DUI arrests in the state, had a DUI conviction rate of 68.4%.
Among the smaller counties, 1994 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 87.7%
in Nevada and 87.4% in Amador, to a low of 42.0% in Trinity.
The rates at which DUI arrests were plea-bargained to alcohol-related reckless driving convictions varied from 19.3% in Humboldt County to 0% in Marin and Ventura counties.
The percentage of DUI arrests that were improperly adjudicated as nonalcohol-
related reckless driving convictions varied from 0% to 6.6%. Three counties had rates of 4% or more: Imperial, Calaveras, and San Francisco.
13
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The percentage of DUI arrests adjudicated as minor convictions ("other" convictions) varied from 0% to 5.7%. San Luis Obispo, Marin, Los Angeles, Calaveras, and Del Norte counties had rates of 4% or more.
In seven counties, the proportion of arrestees not showing a conviction of any
offense exceeded 30%. These counties were Trinity, Sutter, Fresno, Yolo, Tulare, San Bernardino, and Imperial. Nine counties had nonconviction rates of less than 10%: Nevada, San Benito, San Mateo, Kern, El Dorado, Napa, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Amador.
Variation by Court:
As was true for prior years, the 1994 superior court time lags were generally longer than municipal court time lags, presumably due to the type of DUI case (felony) being adjudicated.
Municipal court time lags from arrest to conviction (for courts with more than a
handful of reported convictions) varied from a high of 5.0 months in the Fontana (San Bernardino County) court to a low of 1.3 months for the Los Angeles Metro court, which is also the busiest court in the state.
Statewide, the proportion of reckless driving convictions (alcohol and nonalcohol),
relative to DUI convictions, was about 11% in 1994. Among the courts which substantially exceeded this statewide average were Malibu and Sacramento, which adjudicated 33% and 22% of their DUI cases, respectively as reckless driving.
Statewide, 18% of all DUI-related reckless driving convictions are designated as
nonalcohol. In Riverside County, however, the Superior Court reported 98% (145 out of 147) of its DUI-related reckless driving convictions as nonalcohol.
Demographic Characteristics:
The average age of a convicted DUI offender in 1994 was 33.9 years.
44.2% of 1994 DUI convictees were aged 30 years or younger and 76.4% were 40 years or younger.
Females comprised 12.2% of all 1994 convicted DUI offenders, compared to 12.3%
in 1993, 12.1% in 1992, 12.2% in 1991, 11.7% in 1990, and 11.4% in 1989.
14
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The racial/ethnic distribution of 1994 DUI convictions (White = 43.3%; Hispanic = 45.1%; Black = 6.5%; Other = 5.1%) generally paralleled that of 1994 arrests, although Whites were somewhat more likely, and other groups somewhat less likely, to be convicted of the offense (as shown in Figure 5 below).
1.040.97 0.97 0.99
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
REL
ATI
VE
PRO
BA
BIL
ITY
White OtherBlackHispanic
Figure 5 . Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity. (Adjustedconviction rate by ethnicity ÷ overall conviction rate.)
TABLE 4: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX*
TOTAL MALE FEMALE AGE N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 145923 100.0 128182 87.8 17741 12.2
UNDER 18 421 0.3 370 87.9 51 12.1
18-20 6323 4.3 5765 91.2 558 8.8
21-30 57838 39.6 51889 89.7 5949 10.3
31-40 47000 32.2 40447 86.1 6553 13.9
41-50 22646 15.5 19400 85.7 3246 14.3
51-60 8132 5.6 7138 87.8 994 12.2
61-70 2820 1.9 2506 88.9 314 11.1
71 & ABOVE 743 0.5 667 89.8 76 10.2
MEAN AGE (YEARS) 33.9 33.8 35.0
*County-specific tabulations of 1994 DUI convictions by age and sex are shown in Appendix Table B2.
15
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
16
TABL
E 5:
MA
TCH
ABL
E 19
94 D
UI C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
BY A
GE,
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
AN
D S
EX
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
AG
E TO
TAL
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
M
ALE
FE
MA
LE
TOTA
L BY
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
0.71
1.
00
0.73
1.
04
0.68
0.
97
0.68
0.
97
0.70
0.
99
71 &
ABO
VE
0.71
1.
00
0.70
1.
00
0.78
1.
10
0.69
0.
98
0.61
0.
87
UN
DER
18
0.45
0.
64
0.56
0.
79
0.36
0.
52
0.29
0.
41
0.38
0.
54
18-2
0 0.
62
0.88
0.
66
0.93
0.
61
0.87
0.
54
0.76
0.
58
0.82
21-3
0 0.
68
0.96
0.
73
1.03
0.
65
0.92
0.
66
0.94
0.
68
0.96
31-4
0 0.
73
1.04
0.
74
1.05
0.
73
1.03
0.
70
1.00
0.
74
1.04
41-5
0 0.
76
1.08
0.
76
1.07
0.
78
1.11
0.
70
1.00
0.
73
1.04
51-6
0 0.
77
1.09
0.
78
1.10
0.
79
1.12
0.
75
1.06
0.
70
0.99
61-7
0 0.
77
1.09
0.
76
1.08
0.
82
1.16
0.
73
1.03
0.
75
1.06
0.5
392
64.9
56
9.
3 89
14
.7
0 0.
0 51
8.
4 1
0.2
15
2.5
0 0.
0
0.5
308
44.3
83
11
.9
254
36.5
7
1.0
20
2.9
1 0.
1 15
2.
2 7
1.0
100.
0 44
326
34.8
10
879
8.5
5455
0 42
.8
2973
2.
3 72
29
5.7
1062
0.
8 58
78
4.6
659
0.5
39.9
14
675
28.8
36
43
7.2
2623
3 51
.5
1190
2.
3 24
47
4.8
352
0.7
2132
4.
2 26
9 0.
5
31.0
13
921
35.2
38
02
9.6
1579
2 39
.9
1025
2.
6 23
91
6.0
436
1.1
2009
5.
1 21
5 0.
5
1.9
1317
54
.4
212
8.8
524
21.7
30
1.
2 23
3 9.
6 18
0.
7 77
3.
2 9
0.4
15.0
81
49
42.6
20
14
10.5
59
48
31.1
46
6 2.
4 12
41
6.5
181
0.9
1040
5.
4 10
3 0.
5
5.7
2173
29
.9
407
5.6
3958
54
.5
165
2.3
246
3.4
26
0.4
258
3.6
28
0.4
5.4
3391
49
.1
662
9.6
1752
25
.4
90
1.3
600
8.7
47
0.7
332
4.8
28
0.4
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
1275
56
UN
DER
18
695
18-2
0 72
61
21-3
0 50
941
31-4
0 39
591
41-5
0 19
142
51-6
0 69
02
61-7
0 24
20
71 &
ABO
VE
604
TA
BLE
6: A
DJU
STED
199
4 D
UI C
ON
VIC
TIO
N R
ATE
S1 AN
D R
ELA
TIV
E LI
KEL
IHO
OD
2 OF
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
BY
AG
E A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
R
AC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y
TOTA
L BY
AG
E W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
AG
E A
DJU
STED
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
RATE
REL
ATI
VE
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
AD
JUST
ED
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
R
ATE
RELA
TIV
E LI
KEL
IHO
OD
AD
JUST
ED
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
RA
TE
RELA
TIV
E LI
KEL
IHO
OD
AD
JUST
ED
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
R
ATE
REL
ATI
VE
LIK
ELIH
OO
D
AD
JUST
ED
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
R
ATE
RELA
TIV
E LI
KEL
IHO
OD
Adj
uste
d D
UI
Con
vict
ion
Rat
es=
The
mat
chab
le D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n ra
te p
ropo
rtion
ally
adj
uste
d to
the
over
all D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n ra
te.
1 Rel
ativ
e Li
kelih
ood
= A
djus
ted
DU
I Con
vict
ion
Rat
e O
vera
ll To
tal D
UI C
onvi
ctio
n R
ate
2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
17
TABL
E 7:
TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES*
DU
I
DU
I A
VER
AG
E D
UI A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
MIS
D
FELO
NY
ALC
OH
OL
NO
NA
LCO
HO
L O
THER
D
ISM
ISSE
D**
/ TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
DU
I D
UI
REC
KLE
SS
REC
KLE
SS
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S U
NC
ON
ST**
* V
IOLA
TIO
N
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
DM
V U
PDA
TE
STA
TEW
IDE
70.6
14
3794
21
29
1517
1 32
44
4983
49
/411
2.
8 3.
2
ALA
MED
A
69.0
49
30
47
589
71
273
0/22
3.
5 2.
4 A
LPIN
E 62
.7
37
0 9
1 0
0/0
4.7
1.2
AM
AD
OR
87.4
15
5 5
2 2
1 0/
1 2.
8 2.
8 BU
TTE
73.1
93
8 10
17
0 9
10
0/10
3.
3 3.
1 C
ALA
VER
AS
63.4
18
1 1
27
14
12
1/0
2.2
2.2
CO
LUSA
68
.9
206
2 32
8
1 1/
1 2.
2 2.
9 C
ON
TRA
CO
STA
69
.8
2852
28
38
5 35
59
0/
28
4.0
2.5
DEL
NO
RTE
62.4
18
1 8
55
9 12
0/
0 3.
1 6.
1 EL
DO
RAD
O
85.7
82
1 21
50
10
11
0/
3 2.
7 5.
4 FR
ESN
O
56.9
37
74
132
515
56
48
3/3
4.2
5.9
GLE
NN
74
.8
228
4 25
4
8 0/
3 2.
5 5.
1 H
UM
BOLD
T 48
.0
576
16
238
38
47
0/3
3.2
3.3
IMPE
RIA
L 56
.2
921
3 10
5 10
9 12
0/
1 3.
2 3.
0 IN
YO
69.9
24
0 2
45
5 2
3/0
3.4
3.9
KER
N
81.1
40
71
60
391
55
173
3/19
2.
5 4.
4 K
ING
S 66
.4
745
14
54
7 15
0/
4 2.
3 4.
1 LA
KE
69.3
45
2 7
27
8 16
0/
1 3.
8 4.
3 LA
SSEN
78
.6
195
3 8
2 4
0/0
2.4
2.3
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
68.4
34
817
475
3576
90
7 21
42
4/89
2.
3 2.
6 M
AD
ERA
59
.7
672
20
103
11
9 1/
2 3.
6 5.
5 M
ARI
N
77.9
12
80
16
0 1
87
0/3
2.8
4.4
MA
RIPO
SA
62.7
****
15
1 4
21
0 1
0/0
2.8
2.1
MEN
DO
CIN
O
71.4
68
0 5
74
17
19
1/3
2.8
5.2
MER
CED
57
.9
1225
13
22
5 77
37
0/
1 3.
8 6.
1 M
OD
OC
52
.6
71
1 25
0
0 0/
1 3.
2 1.
7 M
ON
O
64.3
10
1 0
18
5 1
0/0
2.4
3.2
MO
NTE
REY
75.1
32
72
50
437
72
71
0/5
1.6
5.5
*Con
vict
ion
data
by
cour
t are
foun
d in
App
endi
x Ta
ble
B3.
**Th
ese
may
incl
ude
dism
issa
ls o
f pri
or fa
ilure
to a
ppea
r (FT
A) a
bstr
acts
. **
*The
se 1
994
arre
stee
s sho
wed
pri
or D
UIs
dec
lare
d un
cons
titut
iona
l on
thei
r rec
ords
. Th
e co
untie
s re
port
ed h
ere
are
thos
e in
whi
ch th
e cu
rren
t DU
I con
vict
ion
occu
rred
and
no
t nec
essa
rily
thos
e in
whi
ch a
pri
or c
onvi
ctio
n w
as d
ecla
red
unco
nstit
utio
nal.
****
The
calc
ulat
ion
of th
e co
nvic
tion
rate
was
bas
ed o
n to
tal a
rres
ts in
clud
inst
em.
yg
fede
ral D
UI a
rres
ts (Y
osem
ite N
atio
nal P
ark)
not
repo
rted
in th
e D
OJ M
AC
R s
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
YUBA
71
.0
383
2 78
12
8
0/3
2.5
2.1
YOLO
55
.2
653
10
107
19
6 0/
2 2.
3 2.
6
18
TABL
E 7:
TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES* -
con
tinue
d
D
UI
D
UI
AV
ERA
GE
DU
I AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
NA
PA
85.6
90
6 2 3
51
16
9
1/3
2.3
3.2
SIER
RA
60.5
23
0
6 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 3.
6
SUTT
ER
52.2
45
9 10
6 3
3
4 0/
1 2.
2 4.
1
PLA
CER
82
.0
130 8
27
33
18
16
0/
2 3.
1 3.
1
SHA
STA
68
.0
688
16
151
16
8 0/
0 3.
4 2.
9
TULA
RE
63.7
23
89
43
63
24
31
3/8
3.0
3.7
TRIN
ITY
42.0
10
3 4
22
1 1
0/0
3.6
2.9
PLU
MA
S 66
.7
122
4 28
4
3 0/
0 2.
4 3.
6
SOLA
NO
72
.1
1291
14
18
7 29
28
1/
7 2.
4 6.
5
ORA
NG
E 79
.9
124 0
2 11
4 62
2 10
7 28
4 4/
24
3.0
2.1
NEV
AD
A
87.7
41
1 11
41
8
4 0/
0 2.
5 5.
1
TEH
AM
A
70.9
32
5 13
54
4
8 1/
1 2.
7 4.
9
SON
OM
A
73.0
23
35
35
455
33
58
0/22
3.
0 4.
8
SISK
IYO
U
72.5
25
4 4
45
3 4
1/0
2.7
3.8
VEN
TURA
87
.4
4308
38
0
2 84
2/
4 2.
2 3.
5
RIV
ERSI
DE
64.8
51
82
121
320
257
145
6/5
3.8
2.7
TUO
LUM
NE
71.6
22
1 8
31
0 5
0/0
2.9
5.0
STA
NIS
LAU
S 72
.1
2002
33
28
7 59
32
0/
10
2.9
2.3
SAC
RAM
ENTO
66
.0
5053
16
4 11
50
223
104
3/12
3.
3 2.
0
UN
CO
NST
***
VIO
LATI
ON
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
UN
TY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DIS
MIS
SED
**/
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RATE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
TO C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
TO D
MV
UPD
ATE
SAN
BEN
ITO
80
.7
202
3 36
5
4 0/
11
2.8
7.2
SAN
BER
NA
RDIN
O
56.5
59
56
91
647
238
276
3/15
3.
7 3.
0 SA
N D
IEG
O
77.1
12
118
83
824
203
204
0/17
2.
6 3.
9 SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
61
.0
1020
11
18
8 68
16
0/
5 3.
1 1.
2 SA
N JO
AQ
UIN
71
.5
2772
42
21
6 50
11
6 1/
5 2.
2 2.
5 SA
N L
UIS
OBI
SPO
68
.7
1602
13
38
0 45
13
3 2/
7 2.
4 5.
6 SA
N M
ATE
O
80.9
36
91
46
494
28
75
3/6
2.5
4.0
SAN
TA B
ARB
ARA
71
.8
2719
36
57
1 10
8 99
1/
2 2.
0 4.
4 SA
NTA
CLA
RA
81.0
72
76
151
542
89
136
0/13
3.
7 2.
5 SA
NTA
CR
UZ
70.3
18
48
12
273
39
29
0/22
2.
3 5.
8
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 8: ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY*
COUNTY
DUI CONVICTIONS
RECKLESS DRIVING CONVICTIONS
% OTHER
% NO RECORD
% MISDEMEANOR
% FELONY
% ALCOHOL RELATED
% NONALCOHOL RELATED
CONVICTIONS OF ANY CONVICTION
STATEWIDE 69.6 1.0 7.3 1.6 2.4 18.0 ALAMEDA 68.4 0.7 8.2 1.0 3.8 18.0 ALPINE 62.7 0.0 15.3 1.7 0.0 20.3 AMADOR 84.7 2.7 1.1 1.1 0.5 9.8 BUTTE 72.3 0.8 13.1 0.7 0.8 12.3 CALAVERAS 63.1 0.3 9.4 4.9 4.2 18.1 COLUSA 68.2 0.7 10.6 2.6 0.3 17.5 CONTRA COSTA 69.2 0.7 9.3 0.8 1.4 18.5 DEL NORTE 59.7 2.6 18.2 3.0 4.0 12.5 EL DORADO 83.5 2.1 5.1 1.0 1.1 7.1 FRESNO 55.0 1.9 7.5 0.8 0.7 34.0 GLENN 73.5 1.3 8.1 1.3 2.6 13.2 HUMBOLDT 46.7 1.3 19.3 3.1 3.8 25.9 IMPERIAL 56.0 0.2 6.4 6.6 0.7 30.1 INYO 69.4 0.6 13.0 1.4 0.6 15.0 KERN 79.9 1.2 7.7 1.1 3.4 6.8 KINGS 65.2 1.2 4.7 0.6 1.3 26.9 LAKE 68.3 1.1 4.1 1.2 2.4 23.0 LASSEN 77.4 1.2 3.2 0.8 1.6 15.9 LOS ANGELES 67.5 0.9 6.9 1.8 4.2 18.8 MADERA 58.0 1.7 8.9 0.9 0.8 29.7 MARIN 76.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 16.8 MARIPOSA** 62.7 1.7 8.7 0.0 0.4 26.5 MENDOCINO 70.8 0.5 7.7 1.8 2.0 17.2 MERCED 57.3 0.6 10.5 3.6 1.7 26.2 MODOC 51.8 0.7 18.2 0.0 0.0 29.2 MONO 64.3 0.0 11.5 3.2 0.6 20.4 MONTEREY 74.0 1.1 9.9 1.6 1.6 11.8 NAPA 83.5 2.1 4.7 1.5 0.8 7.4 NEVADA 85.4 2.3 8.5 1.7 0.8 1.2 ORANGE 79.2 0.7 4.0 0.7 1.8 13.6 PLACER 80.3 1.7 2.0 1.1 1.0 13.9 PLUMAS 64.6 2.1 14.8 2.1 1.6 14.8 RIVERSIDE 63.3 1.5 3.9 3.1 1.8 26.4 SACRAMENTO 63.9 2.1 14.5 2.8 1.3 15.3 SAN BENITO 79.5 1.2 14.2 2.0 1.6 1.6 SAN BERNARDINO 55.7 0.9 6.0 2.2 2.6 32.6 SAN DIEGO 76.6 0.5 5.2 1.3 1.3 15.1 SAN FRANCISCO 60.4 0.7 11.1 4.0 0.9 22.9 SAN JOAQUIN 70.4 1.1 5.5 1.3 2.9 18.8 SAN LUIS OBISPO 68.1 0.6 16.2 1.9 5.7 7.6 SAN MATEO 79.9 1.0 10.7 0.6 1.6 6.2 SANTA BARBARA 70.9 0.9 14.9 2.8 2.6 7.9 SANTA CLARA 79.4 1.6 5.9 1.0 1.5 10.6 SANTA CRUZ 69.9 0.5 10.3 1.5 1.1 16.8 SHASTA 66.4 1.5 14.6 1.5 0.8 15.2 SIERRA 60.5 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 23.7 SISKIYOU 71.3 1.1 12.6 0.8 1.1 12.9 SOLANO 71.4 0.8 10.3 1.6 1.5 14.4 SONOMA 72.0 1.1 14.0 1.0 1.8 10.1 STANISLAUS 70.9 1.2 10.2 2.1 1.1 14.5 SUTTER 51.1 1.1 7.0 0.3 0.4 40.0 TEHAMA 68.1 2.7 11.3 0.8 1.7 15.3 TRINITY 40.4 1.6 8.6 0.4 0.4 48.6 TULARE 62.5 1.1 1.6 0.6 0.8 33.2 TUOLUMNE 69.1 2.5 9.7 0.0 1.6 17.2 VENTURA 86.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.7 10.8 YOLO 54.3 0.8 8.9 1.6 0.5 33.9 YUBA 70.7 0.4 14.4 2.2 1.5 10.9
*The percentages total to 100 by row (county). **The calculation of the conviction rates was based on total arrests including federal DUI arrests (Yosemite National Park) not reported in the DOJ
MACR system.
19
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 9: 1994 REPORTED* BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION (BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS
DUI CONVICTIONS ALCOHOL-RECKLESS CONVICTIONS
BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT
.01 63 0.1 .01 5 0.0
.02 45 0.0 .02 5 0.0
.03 52 0.0 .03 12 0.1
.04 58 0.1 .04 18 0.2
.05 81 0.1 .05 27 0.3
.06 106 0.1 .06 94 0.9
.07 248 0.2 .07 320 3.0
.08 1309 1.2 .08 2268 21.0
.09 2319 2.2 .09 2990 27.7
.10 4738 4.4 .10 2476 22.9
.11 6656 6.2 .11 1220 11.3
.12 7968 7.5 .12 496 4.6
.13 8160 7.6 .13 255 2.4
.14 8437 7.9 .14 148 1.4
.15 8401 7.9 .15 98 0.9
.16 8236 7.7 .16 95 0.9
.17 7665 7.2 .17 57 0.5
.18 6905 6.5 .18 51 0.5
.19 6159 5.8 .19 40 0.4
.20 5684 5.3 .20 23 0.2
.21 4769 4.5 .21 17 0.2
.22 3990 3.7 .22 16 0.1
.23 3275 3.1 .23 16 0.1
.24 2687 2.5 .24 11 0.1
.25 2092 2.0 .25 9 0.1
.26 1587 1.5 .26 6 0.1
.27 1270 1.2 .27 3 0.0
.28 927 0.9 .28 2 0.0
.29 730 0.7 .29 3 0.0
.30 564 0.5 .30 3 0.0
.31 396 0.4 .31 1 0.0
.32 309 0.3 .32 1 0.0
.33 245 0.2 .36 2 0.0
.34 169 0.2 .39 2 0.0
.35 139 0.1 .50+ 2 0.0
.36 80 0.1
.37 60 0.1
.38 60 0.1
.39 45 0.0
.40 31 0.0
.41 22 0.0
.42 21 0.0
.43 9 0.0
.44 2 0.0
.45 4 0.0
.46 4 0.0
.47 2 0.0
.49 1 0.0
.50+ 2 0.0 -------- ------- ---------- -------- -------
TOTAL 106782 100.0 TOTAL 10792 100.0 MEAN BAC .168 MEAN BAC .098
*The source of BAC data is the APS reporting form for convicted DUI offenders, rather than the abstract of conviction for those offenders, which was the data source in prior reports. This change in data source was made because of the more complete BAC reporting on APS forms (73% of total) versus court abstracts (with only 51% showing BAC levels).
20
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 10: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE
REPORTED BAC LEVEL
DUI OFFENDER STATUS
PERCENT
AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM APS REPORTING
FORM (%)
AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM CONVICTION
ABSTRACT (%)
STATEWIDE 100.0 .168 .166
1ST DUI 68.8 .164 .163
2ND DUI 21.7 .175 .174
3RD DUI 6.8 .181 .181
4TH+ DUI 2.7 .187 .185
21
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS Data on court sanctions assigned to convicted DUI offenders were taken from DUI abstracts of conviction for offenders arrested in 1994. Also included are counts of postconviction DMV license actions for selected offender groups, while total counts of all license actions, including administrative per se (APS) license suspensions and revocations, are shown in the Administrative Actions Section. APS actions (effective July 1990) are initiated by law enforcement immediately upon arrest for DUI, and are administered independent of the criminal adjudication process. This section includes the following tables: Table 11: 1994 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status. This table shows the frequency of specific court sanctions statewide by number of prior DUI convictions. The specific court sanctions tallied include percentages of probation, jail, alcohol treatment programs (first offender, SB 38 second offender, and 30-month third offender programs), license restriction, court suspension, and ignition interlock. Crosstabulations of sanctions by county, court, and number of prior convictions appear in Appendix Table B4. Table 12: 1994 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders. This table displays the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations (such as first offender alcohol program plus license restriction) by county for first DUI offenders. License suspensions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) suspensions. The sanction combination groups portrayed in this table, as well as Table 13, were defined according to the conventions described in the "Evaluation Methods and Results" portion of Section 4: "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness." Table 13: 1994 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders. This table shows the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations by county for second, third, and fourth (or subsequent) DUI offenders. License actions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) license suspensions and revocations. From the data in these and the Appendix tables, it is evident that the use of alternative sanctions continued to vary widely by county, court, and offender status in 1994. For example:
22
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Statewide Parameters:
The most frequently applied court sanction among all convicted DUI offenders was probation (96.1%), while the least frequently used court sanction was ignition interlock (4.6%). DUI offenders were sentenced to jail in 77.6% of the cases. (However, in many jurisdictions, jail is often served as community service rather than actual jail time.)
Figure 6 (below) graphically displays the statewide data from Table 11 showing the frequency of specific types of court-ordered sanctions among all convicted DUI offenders. Because virtually all offenders receive more than one type of sanction, the cumulative percentage adds to more than 100%.
96.1
77.6 77.3
42.3
6.7 4.6
0
25
50
75
100
PER
CEN
TAG
E
Figure 6 . Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1994).
Probation Jail Treatmentprogram
Licenserestriction
Court licensesuspension
Ignitioninterlock
County Variation:
The proportion of first DUI offenders sentenced to jail varied by county from less than 10% in Marin to 100% in Tuolumne.
Counties such as Calaveras, Lassen, Napa, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Shasta,
Sierra, and Tuolumne preferred to assign first offenders to treatment program and jail (over 85%) rather than treatment program and license restriction (less than 7%). Humboldt, Marin, Plumas, and San Bernardino counties assigned treatment program and jail to less than 2% of their first offenders. Inyo, Marin, and Orange
23
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
counties assigned treatment program and license restriction to over 80% of first offenders.
Counties departing from using typical first offender sanction combinations were
Imperial, Mariposa, Riverside, and San Bernardino, as shown by relatively high percentages (over 10%) in the "other" category. ("Other" includes license restriction without treatment program assignment, probation only, and other unofficial nonstatutory sanction combinations.)
Court Variation:
In Los Angeles County, two municipal courts (Lancaster and Burbank) used jail as a sanction in 95% or more of their DUI sentences. At the other extreme, three courts (Santa Monica, Malibu, and Avalon) used jail as a sanction in less than a third of their DUI sentences.
Although courts required about 14% of repeat offenders to install the interlock
device statewide, the Oakland court required three-fourths of such offenders to use interlock.
All of the municipal courts in Contra Costa and Alameda counties required jail in
95% or more of their DUI sentences, while Marin’s San Rafael court used jail in only 27.7% of their cases.
7 out of 11 municipal courts in Fresno sentenced over 95% of their DUI offenders to
jail, while 6 out of 12 municipal courts in San Bernardino county used jail for less than a third of their DUI sentences.
Variation by Offender Status:
70% of 1994 first DUI offenders were sentenced to jail, compared to over 90% of all repeat offenders.
83% of first DUI offenders were assigned to alcohol treatment programs, along with
78% of second offenders, 42% of third offenders, and 19% of fourth or more DUI offenders. (By statute, however, all repeat offenders must eventually complete
24
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
specified alcohol treatment programs in order to be eligible for license reinstatement.)
10% of first DUI offenders and 25% of second DUI offenders received DMV or court
license suspensions after adjudication. Since July 1990, of course, all DUI offenders with BAC levels of 0.08% or more are also subject to 30 days to one-year administrative license suspension/revocation under the APS law.
Only 14% of repeat DUI offenders were assigned ignition interlock in 1994, in spite
of the mandatory interlock law for all repeat offenders (AB 2851 - Freidman), which took effect on July 1, 1993.
TABLE 11: 1994 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS*
DUI
OFFENDER STATUS
TOTAL
PROBATION
JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROGRAM
SB 38 ALCOHOL PROGRAM
30-MONTH PROGRAM
LICENSE
RESTRICTION
COURT
SUSPENSION
IGNITION
INTERLOCK
% % % % % % % %
STATEWIDE 145926 96.1 77.6 57.3 19.8 0.2 42.3 6.7 4.6
1ST DUI 100339 97.7 70.2 80.6 2.3 0.0 37.7 4.8 0.3
2ND DUI 31675 96.9 94.4 7.2 70.3 0.2 66.1 9.4 16.1
3RD DUI 9902 92.0 91.5 3.0 37.3 1.4 26.3 16.2 11.7
4TH+ DUI 4007 60.5 94.8 2.5 16.1 0.4 7.0 10.4 3.2
*Entries represent percentages of 1994 DUI convictees receiving each sanction by offender status. Sanctions within each offender status group (row) are not independent; therefore, row percentages always add to more than 100%. Percentages of sanctions by county and court appear in Appendix Table B4.
25
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 12: 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS
COUNTY
TOTAL (100%)
DMV OR COURT
SUSPENSION
JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL
PROG + JAIL
1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROG + RESTRICTION
SB 38 ALCOHOL PROG +
RESTRICTION*
OTHER
N % % % % % % STATEWIDE 100339 9.8 5.1 46.0 31.2 4.8 3.1 ALAMEDA 3297 12.9 5.0 76.8 1.9 3.2 0.3 ALPINE 26 3.8 0.0 19.2 69.2 3.8 3.8 AMADOR 104 8.7 49.0 40.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 BUTTE 608 25.8 2.6 69.2 1.2 0.7 0.5 CALAVERAS 129 2.3 3.1 89.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 COLUSA 115 8.7 10.4 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 CONTRA COSTA 1898 7.3 9.8 77.9 2.2 2.1 0.8 DEL NORTE 130 17.7 9.2 68.5 0.8 3.1 0.8 EL DORADO 542 8.7 29.2 36.9 22.3 0.7 2.2 FRESNO 2439 14.6 5.8 49.0 25.3 2.7 2.7 GLENN 132 9.8 3.8 75.0 1.5 8.3 1.5 HUMBOLDT 401 13.2 3.0 1.0 74.8 0.5 7.5 IMPERIAL 672 1.3 9.5 20.7 56.1 1.5 10.9 INYO 139 4.3 1.4 7.2 84.2 0.7 2.2 KERN 2532 12.4 16.8 65.7 1.8 0.9 2.4 KINGS 486 22.0 11.3 63.2 0.4 2.7 0.4 LAKE 278 10.4 4.7 79.9 2.5 2.5 0.0 LASSEN 143 11.9 0.7 86.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 LOS ANGELES 25264 9.4 2.8 24.2 59.4 1.8 2.5 MADERA 436 13.3 4.6 77.8 1.6 1.8 0.9 MARIN 945 6.8 0.1 0.5 89.2 1.1 2.3 MARIPOSA 118 29.7 5.1 39.0 7.6 0.0 18.6 MENDOCINO 437 10.3 4.1 70.0 9.6 4.6 1.4 MERCED 755 8.3 3.3 78.5 4.4 3.8 1.6 MODOC 55 14.5 1.8 74.5 7.3 1.8 0.0 MONO 63 0.0 4.8 69.8 6.3 12.7 6.3 MONTEREY 2143 15.5 4.3 77.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 NAPA 618 4.7 5.8 86.4 1.0 1.3 0.8 NEVADA 284 9.9 4.6 70.1 9.5 3.9 2.1 ORANGE 9205 4.8 0.8 9.2 81.8 1.6 1.8 PLACER 927 7.2 5.9 73.1 10.1 1.8 1.7 PLUMAS 87 11.5 1.1 1.1 75.9 5.7 4.6 RIVERSIDE 3783 5.7 10.2 25.2 33.2 1.4 24.2 SACRAMENTO 3329 8.2 4.2 78.4 2.3 4.8 2.1 SAN BENITO 125 43.2 9.6 44.0 0.8 2.4 0.0 SAN BERNARDINO 4314 11.5 10.1 0.3 0.2 65.5** 12.5 SAN DIEGO 9089 7.8 3.5 53.9 30.8 3.1 0.9 SAN FRANCISCO 770 7.3 1.7 80.9 8.8 0.8 0.5 SAN JOAQUIN 1772 10.7 12.1 74.2 0.5 1.9 0.7 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1043 4.1 3.2 91.1 0.0 1.2 0.4 SAN MATEO 2579 6.2 2.7 88.3 0.8 1.5 0.5 SANTA BARBARA 1814 13.9 1.7 20.0 58.5 0.4 5.5 SANTA CLARA 4790 20.3 4.3 63.5 8.6 2.0 1.4 SANTA CRUZ 1237 11.1 2.9 80.8 3.8 0.4 1.0 SHASTA 425 6.1 3.1 88.5 2.1 0.2 0.0 SIERRA 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 SISKIYOU 176 10.2 7.4 77.3 1.1 2.3 1.7 SOLANO 822 10.2 4.4 79.9 2.8 1.5 1.2 SONOMA 1452 8.6 32.2 56.1 1.0 0.3 1.9 STANISLAUS 1308 7.1 7.1 80.9 0.6 3.8 0.5 SUTTER 296 9.8 4.4 83.1 2.4 0.3 0.0 TEHAMA 237 20.3 2.5 68.8 7.6 0.4 0.4 TRINITY 75 14.7 2.7 77.3 2.7 2.7 0.0 TULARE 1557 8.2 8.2 75.2 1.5 6.2 0.8 TUOLUMNE 123 8.9 1.6 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 VENTURA 3110 12.2 2.7 82.3 0.7 1.8 0.4 YOLO 453 4.6 2.0 76.8 1.8 14.1 0.7 YUBA 237 10.5 1.7 84.4 0.4 0.0 3.0
Note: The vast majority of convicted DUI offenders also receive fine and probation. *Includes referral to alcohol clinics and 30-month programs. **The majority of these are referrals to alcohol clinics.
26
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
NA
PA
311
14.0
30
.6
55.5
22
9 43
.9
54.4
1.
8 57
80
.0
4.0
16.0
25
KIN
GS
273
49. 7
30
.7
19.6
17
9 89
.6
7.5
3.0
67
88.9
0.
0 11
.1
27
MO
NTE
REY
1179
52
.3
4.0
43.7
77
8 81
.1
15.0
3.
9 28
0 97
.5
2.5
0.0
121
KER
N
1599
69
.2
7.2
23.6
10
00
91.3
3.
7 5.
0 38
0 95
.0
0.0
5.0
219
27
TABL
E 13
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
CO
MBI
NA
TIO
NS
BY C
OU
NTY
-
GLE
NN
10
0 39
.0
40.7
20
.3
59
87.5
12
.5
0.0
24
82.4
5.
9 11
.8
17
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
1002
8 19
.8
45.3
34
.9
7253
55
.7
36.8
7.
4 20
45
85.9
7.
8 6.
3 73
0
BUTT
E 34
0 47
.2
36.2
16
.7
246
82.1
16
.4
1.5
67
88.9
7.
4 3.
7 27
ALA
MED
A
1680
13
.3
53.9
32
.8
1141
37
.9
56.9
5.
2 38
3 69
.9
25.0
5.
1 15
6
STA
TEW
IDE
4558
4 25
.1
41.1
33
.8
3167
5 58
.8
35.8
5.
4 99
02
79.8
15
.2
4.9
4007
IMPE
RIA
L 25
2 36
.7
35.0
28
.2
177
76.7
16
.7
6.7
60
73.3
13
.3
13.3
15
HU
MBO
LDT
191
22.5
57
.2
20.3
13
8 66
.7
30.6
2.
8 36
82
.4
11.8
5.
9 17
CO
NTR
A C
OST
A
982
18.7
45
.2
36.1
65
7 63
.1
32.8
4.
0 19
8 71
.7
26.8
1.
6 12
7
MA
RIPO
SA
37
41.7
12
.5
45.8
24
90
.0
10.0
0.
0 10
66
.7
0.0
33.3
3
MER
CED
48
3 16
.2
47.5
36
.3
314
60.0
32
.0
8.0
125
84.1
13
.6
2.3
44
NEV
AD
A
138
15.6
54
.2
30.2
96
43
.8
53.1
3.
1 32
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
10
LAK
E 18
1 24
.2
41.9
33
.9
124
44.2
53
.5
2.3
43
57.1
35
.7
7.1
14
AM
AD
OR
56
41.0
12
.8
46.2
39
75
.0
25.0
0.
0 12
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
5
MA
RIN
35
1 14
.8
64.4
20
.8
264
60.9
37
.5
1.6
64
91.3
8.
7 0.
0 23
MEN
DO
CIN
O
248
24.0
35
.3
40.7
16
7 50
.8
47.6
1.
6 63
61
.1
22.2
16
.7
18
FRES
NO
14
67
28.4
41
.4
30.2
94
0 59
.3
34.2
6.
5 35
4 87
.3
5.8
6.9
173
EL D
OR
AD
O
300
22.8
31
.0
46.2
19
7 66
.3
25.0
8.
8 80
78
.3
13.0
8.
7 23
MA
DER
A
256
34.0
31
.5
34.6
16
2 77
.8
19.4
2.
8 72
90
.9
0.0
9.1
22
CO
LUSA
93
30
.6
45.2
24
.2
62
87.5
4.
2 8.
3 24
85
.7
0.0
14.3
7
DEL
NO
RTE
59
54.1
2.
7 43
.2
37
37.5
56
.3
6.3
16
66.7
16
.7
16.7
6
LASS
EN
55
11.9
23
.8
64.3
42
57
.1
42.9
0.
0 7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6
ALP
INE
11
50.0
16
.7
33.3
6
80.0
20
.0
0.0
5 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0
MO
DO
C
17
15.4
46
.2
38.5
13
50
.0
50.0
0.
0 4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
MO
NO
38
6.
7 46
.7
46.7
30
57
.1
42.9
0.
0 7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 1
CA
LAV
ERA
S 53
9.
7 9.
7 80
.6
31
50.0
50
.0
0.0
16
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6
INYO
10
3 5.
2 63
.8
31.0
58
68
.2
27.3
4.
5 22
95
.7
4.3
0.0
23
REP
EAT
OFF
END
ERS
2N
D O
FFEN
DER
S 3R
D O
FFEN
DER
S 4T
H+
OFF
END
ERS
CO
UN
TY
TOTA
LRE
PEA
TD
UI
LIC
ENSE
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
SB 3
8 PR
OG
RAM
+
REST
RIC
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL*
PR
OG
RAM
+
REV
OC
ATI
ON
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
GRA
M +
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
Not
e: T
he v
ast m
ajor
ity o
f con
vict
ed o
ffend
ers a
lso
rece
ive
fine
and
prob
atio
n.
*Inc
lude
s re
ferr
al to
alc
ohol
clin
ics a
nd 3
0-m
onth
ra
ms.
pr
og
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
28
TABL
E 13
: 199
4 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
CO
MBI
NA
TIO
NS
BY C
OU
NTY
- RE
PEA
T O
FFEN
DER
S - c
ontin
ued
2N
D O
FFEN
DER
S 3R
D O
FFEN
DER
S 4T
H+
OFF
END
ERS
YUBA
14
8 43
.0
9.7
47.3
93
90
.5
7.1
2.4
42
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 13
SUTT
ER
173
23.5
51
.3
25.2
11
5 70
.0
27.5
2.
5 40
66
.7
33.3
0.
0 18
SAN
TA C
LARA
26
37
31.4
51
.5
17.2
17
14
84.9
11
.8
3.3
628
68.5
26
.8
4.7
295
S AN
BER
NA
RDIN
O
1733
25
.8
32.3
41
.9
1231
64
.9
28.7
6.
4 36
2 80
.7
15.0
4.
3 14
0
SAN
TA B
AR B
ARA
94
1 50
.7
13.9
35
.4
619
59.2
39
.0
1.8
223
80.8
15
.2
4.0
99
STA
NIS
LAU
S 72
7 21
.1
25.5
53
.4
459
39.2
53
.2
7.6
171
77.3
19
.6
3.1
97
SAN
DIE
GO
31
12
21.0
41
.4
37.5
23
74
51.0
40
.8
8.2
598
74.3
15
.7
10.0
14
0
P LA
CER
40
8 20
.6
47.4
32
.0
291
35.8
57
.9
6.3
95
68.2
27
.3
4.5
22
SAN
BEN
ITO
80
44
.7
29.8
25
.5
47
85.2
11
.1
3.7
27
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6
S AC
RAM
ENTO
18
88
25.2
55
.0
19.8
12
42
63.5
31
.4
5.2
405
58.9
39
.0
2.1
241
TULA
RE
875
33.0
32
.1
34.9
53
6 59
.0
37.1
3.
8 21
0 82
.2
14.0
3.
9 12
9
RIV
ERSI
DE
1520
34
.2
33.2
32
.6
1111
72
.5
23.0
4.
5 28
7 82
.8
11.5
5.
7 12
2
TUO
LUM
NE
106
11.1
37
.5
51.4
72
87
.0
13.0
0.
0 23
72
.7
18.2
9.
1 11
TEH
AM
A
101
45.2
29
.0
25.8
62
78
.6
21.4
0.
0 28
90
.9
9.1
0.0
11
SAN
MA
TEO
11
58
13.0
15
.9
71.2
82
6 32
.4
60.7
6.
9 24
7 63
.5
31.8
4.
7 85
P LU
MA
S 39
60
.9
21.7
17
.4
23
69.2
30
.8
0.0
13
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3
SISK
IYO
U
82
26.4
28
.3
45.3
53
19
.0
66.7
14
.3
21
75.0
12
.5
12.5
8
VEN
TURA
12
36
20.3
54
.8
24.9
87
8 57
.1
38.7
4.
2 28
7 83
.1
12.7
4.
2 71
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
261
21.0
39
.0
40.0
20
0 59
.6
36.5
3.
8 52
88
.9
0.0
11.1
9
S OLA
NO
48
3 20
.0
17.5
62
.5
315
46.3
50
.0
3.7
108
60.0
31
.7
8.3
60
SON
OM
A
918
37.9
37
.7
24.4
57
3 84
.5
10.0
5.
5 21
9 96
.8
0.0
3.2
126
YOLO
21
0 14
.3
59.3
26
.4
140
63.3
30
.0
6.7
60
60.0
30
.0
10.0
10
OR
AN
GE
3311
10
.8
56.1
33
.1
2569
18
.9
76.3
4.
8 58
6 78
.2
16.7
5.
1 15
6
SHA
STA
27
9 19
.7
53.9
26
.4
178
41.2
55
.9
2.9
68
69.7
30
.3
0.0
33
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
1042
17
.2
49.5
33
.3
658
46.7
48
.3
5.0
259
81.6
14
.4
4.0
125
SAN
TA C
RU
Z
623
48.8
35
.2
16.0
42
6 92
.5
3.4
4.1
147
90.0
8.
0 2.
0 50
SIER
RA
8 33
.3
50.0
16
.7
6 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
TRIN
ITY
32
27
.3
40.9
31
.8
22
40.0
60
.0
0.0
5 80
.0
20.0
0.
0 5
CO
UN
TY
TOTA
LRE
PEA
TD
UI
LIC
ENSE
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
SB 3
8 PR
OG
RAM
+
REST
RIC
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL*
PR
OG
RAM
+
REV
OC
ATI
ON
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
LIC
ENSE
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
+ JA
IL
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
GRA
M +
RE
VO
CA
TIO
N
O
THER
TO
TAL
100%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
%
%
%
N
SAN
LU
IS O
BISP
O
572
12.9
55
.4
31.7
37
9 27
.0
69.3
3.
6 13
7 58
.9
39.3
1.
8 56
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS
This section presents and describes the results of an evaluation assessing the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions applied to first and second DUI offenders1. The effectiveness of alternative sanctions is evaluated in terms of postconviction driving record as measured by: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents, including alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, also reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Displayed below in Figures 7-15 are failure proportions from the sanction analyses for 1989, 1992, and 1994 first and second offenders (grouped by sanction assignment) with follow-up time periods of 6-years, 3-years, and 1-year, respectively. (The 1990, 1991, and 1993 offenders were not included in this year's report in order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results.) These figures show the proportion of accident- or DUI incident-involved drivers following their conviction. They are followed by a narrative description of the evaluation design, subject selection, data collection, analytical procedures, and evaluation results. The reader is cautioned that license suspension refers to postconviction suspensions only, and does not include preconviction administrative per se license suspensions (which are applied to all offender groups). Based on the data represented in Figures 7-12, the following conclusions can be drawn about first offender sanctions:
The 1989, 1992 and 1994 suspended first offender groups had significantly fewer subsequent accident-involved drivers than did any other first offender sanction group. The suspended group had 20%, 13.3% and 18.5% fewer accidents than the group with the next lowest accident rates (program with jail) among drivers convicted in 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively.
1 Third or more offenders were not included because a previous study (Tashima & Marelich, 1989) indicated serious confounding due to group differences on prior interventions. In addition, sanctions for third and subsequent offenders do not vary much, due to the statutorily prescribed sanction requirements.
29
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
3.525.82 4.32 4.35 4.67
05
10
1520
253035
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 9 . Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction.
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
19.69
25.85 24.57 24.73 24.67
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35PR
OPO
RTI
ON
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
EMEN
TPE
R 1
00 D
RIV
ERS
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 7 . Adjusted 6-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction.
10.2713.40 11.84 12.15 12.04
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
FA
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 8 . Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction.
30
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
27.85
34.35
27.2323.79
27.40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F D
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Figure 10 . Adjusted 6-year DUI incident* rates of 1989 first offenders by typeof sanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).
4.789.01
5.25 4.516.88
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F D
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 12 . Adjusted 1-year DUI incident* rates of 1994 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
15.95
21.94
14.2012.35
14.58
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F D
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 11 . Adjusted 3-year DUI incident* rates of 1992 first offenders by typeof sanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).
Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &
jail
1st offenderprogram &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
31
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
First offenders assigned to first offender treatment programs plus license restriction in 1989 and 1992 had significantly fewer DUI incidents in the postconviction period than did any other first offender sanction group and, in 1994, had fewer DUI incidents than all groups except the suspended group. The first offender treatment plus license restriction group had 12.6% and 13.1% fewer DUI incidents in 1989 and 1992, respectively, than the group with the next lowest DUI incident rate (program with jail).
In all three years, first offenders sentenced to jail without treatment or
postconviction suspension were significantly more likely to be involved in DUI incidents (at least 5%, 9.3%, and 19.8% higher in 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively) in the postconviction period than any other first offender sanction group.
Based on the data represented in Figures 13-15, the following conclusions can be drawn about second offender sanctions:
The 1989 suspended second offender group had 15.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups over the 6-year postconviction period.
Contrary to prior California studies including the first annual DUI-MIS report (1989
offenders), second offenders suspended in 1992 and 1994 do not have significantly lower total accident rates than do those assigned to SB 38 treatment programs during the first year following suspension or SB 38 assignment. This change is likely due to the implementation of administrative per se (APS) license suspensions beginning in July, 1990, whereby all second offenders are suspended for one year.
Although license suspension and SB 38 treatment programs with APS suspensions
are equally effective in their short-term impact on accidents (post 1-year), license suspension is more effective over a longer time window (6 years).
In 1989, 1992, and 1994, second offenders who were suspended had a significantly
higher proportion of DUI incidents in the subsequent 1-year period than did those who received the SB 38 and license restriction sanction. The respective percentage increases associated with the license suspension group for the three years (1989, 1992 & 1994) were 18.1%, 45.0%, and 40.2%.
32
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
3.24 2.82 2.85 3.32
8.275.90 5.60 7.24
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F A
CC
IDEN
T- O
RD
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
Figure 15 . Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1994 second offenders by type of sanction.
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Other Other
9.12 9.80 9.72
15.31
10.5613.24
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PRO
POR
TIO
N O
F A
CC
IDEN
T- O
RD
UI-
INC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVEM
ENT
PER
100
DR
IVER
S
20.1623.80
35.54
30.09
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35PR
OPO
RTI
ON
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
OR
DU
I-IN
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
EMEN
TPE
R 1
00 D
RIV
ERS
Figure 13 . Adjusted 6-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offendersby type of sanction.
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction
SB 38 &restriction
Other Other
Figure 14 . Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1992 second offendersby type of sanction.
SB 38/restriction& interlock
SB 38/restriction& interlock
33
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The SB 38 program plus restriction sanction for second offenders (with and without
the addition of the ignition interlock) had significantly lower 1-year subsequent DUI incident rates than those of the other 1994 sanction groups.
EVALUATION METHODS AND RESULTS Subject Selection and Data Collection Convicted DUI offenders were identified from monthly abstract update tapes which contain all DUI conviction data reported to DMV by the courts. In the present study, follow-up data from three sets of offenders were evaluated for sanction effectiveness: 1) A 6-year follow-up period for the convicted 1989 DUI offenders who were
evaluated in the first DUI-MIS report. 2) A 3-year follow-up period for convicted 1992 offenders who were evaluated in the
1995 DUI-MIS report. 3) A 1-year follow-up period for convicted DUI offenders who were arrested for DUI
in 1994. For each year's annual DUI-MIS report, an additional year of DUI data is added to the sanction analyses. In order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results, the 1990, 1991, and 1993 DUI offenders were not included in this year's evaluation. The conviction date in all cases was considered to be the "treatment date" for defining prior and subsequent driving record data, because the penalties and sanctions for the DUI conviction are typically effective as of that date. Since DUI penalties and sanctions are enhanced as a function of the number of prior DUI and alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, subjects were selected based on the number of such convictions within the seven years prior to their entry DUI arrest. For the 1989, 1992, and 1994 drivers, two groups were selected for this evaluation: 1) first DUI offenders––drivers who had no DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, and 2) second DUI offenders––drivers who had one DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving conviction within the previous seven years. DUI offenders with felony convictions and chemical test refusal suspensions were not included because their license control penalties are more severe than those of the other groups within their respective prior offender group. Also excluded were drivers who did not have a full one-year subsequent time period because of late conviction dates, drivers with “X” license numbers (no California license
34
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
number could be found), drivers with out-of-state ZIP Codes and irregular or unofficial sanction codes (first offenders). Altogether, the excluded cases came to 22% of the original convicted offenders. Court sanctions are reported to and recorded by DMV in the form of disposition codes on the abstract of conviction. A convicted DUI offender, especially a first offender, might receive any one of many combinations of individual sanctions, including jail, fine, license restriction or suspension, alcohol treatment program, or probation. Therefore, in defining postconviction sanction combination groups for the purpose of this analysis, the following conventions were used for first offenders: 1) if suspension (non-APS) was one of the sanctions imposed by DMV or the court,
then the offender was included in the suspension group; 2) if suspension (non-APS) was not imposed, but the offender was assigned to an
alcohol treatment program, then the offender was included in one of the treatment groups, according to the type of treatment program (first offender or SB 38) and whether they were also sentenced to license restriction or jail; and
3) if neither suspension nor treatment was imposed, but the offender was sentenced to
jail, then the offender was included in the jail-only group. Fine and probation are generally imposed on most DUI offenders (except that probation is not usually granted to court-suspended first offenders), and for that reason are not included as sanctions evaluated in this report. Also, since July, 1990, all DUI offenders have had their licenses administratively suspended upon DUI arrest. It should be noted that the definition of the sanction combination groups was not an arbitrary analytical convention, but rather a reflection of the most common naturally occurring sanction combinations assigned by the courts. Based on the above taxonomy, five first-offender sanction combination groups are used in this analysis: 1) license suspension, 2) jail, 3) first offender treatment program plus jail, 4) first offender treatment program plus license restriction, and 5) SB 38 (second offender) treatment program plus license restriction (some courts assign this sanction to a small number of first offenders). One limitation of the above hierarchical grouping scheme is that it does not allow for an evaluation of the independent and interactive effects of each sanction as a treatment factor. Taking first offender treatment program plus jail as an example, the approach we used does not allow analysis of the separate effects of jail from the effects of the treatment program.
35
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
A similar convention was used for grouping second offenders with various sanction combinations; the groups used in this analysis are: 1) license suspension, 2) SB 38 treatment program plus license restriction, 3) a group of 1992 and 1994 second offenders ("other") who did not meet the selection criteria of groups 1 or 2, and 4) a fourth group of 1994 second offenders who were ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicles as mandated by AB 2851 (effective July, 1993). This device requires that the offender blow into it prior to starting the vehicle, which will not start if he/she has a BAC of 0.02% or greater. This group was identified by certain vehicle code designations on their abstract of conviction. In examining these abstract disposition codes, it was found that 88% of interlock cases were also referred to SB 38 treatment programs (along with license restrictions), while 38% had their licenses suspended (non-APS); of those that were suspended, 72% were assigned to SB 38 treatment programs. All second offenders who were assigned to install interlock are included in this evaluation, irrespective of other sanctions and regardless of actual installation. This is reflective of the “real world” conditions under which interlock is assigned and is an integral part of assessing the total impact of this sanction. Most of the offenders in the group designated as "other" were originally referred to an SB 38 treatment program, but were suspended as well, either by intent (court sentence to both treatment program and suspension), or omission (court misreporting of disposition codes and/or the offender's lack of compliance with required procedures, such as failure to provide proof of insurance, program enrollment, pay fees, etc.). Even if the courts amend the mistaken abstracts of conviction, the offenders still need to meet the insurance and program enrollment requirements. The final sanctions ultimately received by this group are unclear, which makes interpretation difficult. The "other" group was not included in the first DUI-MIS 1989 arrest cohort analysis and, therefore, was not included in subsequent reanalyses of the 1989 arrestees. Prior driver record data were extracted for the two years preceding an offender's DUI conviction date for all offenders. Appendix Tables B5, B6, and B7 list these prior driver record variables, which were used as covariates in the analyses. The evaluation period for the postconviction driving measures, starting from the conviction date, was six years for the 1989 drivers, three years for the 1992 drivers, and one year for the 1994 drivers. A buffer period of six months was allowed between the end of the evaluation period and the data extraction date to allow for processing and reporting the most recent data to DMV. DUI offenders who had less than the full follow-up time period (from conviction date to the buffer period) were excluded. The outcome driving record measures consisted of the proportion of offenders who were involved in: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents (alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions, APS/refusal suspensions, or DUI failures to appear).
36
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences in the proportion of accident- and DUI-incident-involved drivers in each sanction group at the end of the evaluation period. Only the first accident or DUI incident or "failure" was evaluated. This is not an important limitation with these data because the incidence of repeat failures (two or more accidents or DUI incidents) was low over the study time window. More importantly, analysis of repeat failures would be subject to confounding by court sanctions received in connection with the first failure incident. This type of confounding is avoided because multiple incidents were not included in this analysis. Since it was not possible to randomly assign drivers to the various sanction groups, potential biases due to preexisting group differences were statistically controlled by entering into the analyses as covariates biographical data, prior driving record data, and ZIP Code indices (accident and traffic conviction averages of each driver's ZIP Code area, and selected ZIP Code variables from the 1990 census data for the 1992 and 1994 drivers). (Tables B5, B6, and B7 show significant group differences on most of these variables.) While this "quasi-experimental" design is subject to a number of limitations in assessing cause-effect relationships, the statistical control of group differences removes at least part of the bias in group assignment and provides a more precise estimate of the relationship between type of sanction and subsequent record. It is likely, of course, that the groups also differ on characteristics not measured by, or reflected in, the covariates. The possibility of uncontrolled biases becomes particularly problematic if sanctions are commonly received by atypical offenders through self- or judicial-selectivity (e.g., drivers of higher socio-economic status might be more likely to receive program with restriction and less likely to receive jail than those of lower status). In all of the analyses for accidents (except 1992 and 1994 second offenders) and DUI incidents for both first and second offenders in all three years, several significant (p<.01) covariate by sanction interactions were evident (statistical significance at p<x means that a differential effect between groups would occur by chance less than x% of the time). These significant interactions indicated that the relationship between the covariates and the outcome measure varied across sanction groups, and therefore the covariates were included in the initial analyses for all three data sets to determine the magnitude of the interactions. In all analyses, except three (1989, 1992, and 1994 first offender subsequent accidents) where sanction differences were significant (p<.03), the interaction effect was generally one-fourth or less than the main effect of sanction (chi squares were divided by their respective degrees of freedom to provide an approximate measure of effect size). Since the sanction main effect had substantially greater magnitude than the interaction effects, conclusions about sanction differences were based on analyses that did not include the interactions. The interaction effects of the
37
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
remaining three analyses were examined and found not to create a serious impact on the sanction main effect. Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation Total Accidents: Figures 7, 8, and 9, and Table 14 display the results of the logistic regression analysis of total accidents for 1989, 1992, and 1994 first offenders. Among first offenders in all three years, the suspended group continued to have the significantly lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers relative to the other sanction groups, with 19.69 (1989), 10.27 (1992) and 3.52 (1994) accident involvements per 100 drivers (see Table 16 for a summary of significant results by sanction groups). These accident rates are 20%, 13.3%, and 18.5% lower than the next lowest group's rates (program with jail) for the three time periods, respectively. First offenders sentenced to jail-only had a significantly higher accident rate than that of most groups for all three years, except when compared to the SB 38 group in 1989, and in 1992 where significant differences in rates did not occur. (It should be noted that the jail-only sanction may actually be a less aversive punishment than other sanctions when community service is substituted for jail time, which is frequently the case.) In all three year’s analyses of first offenders on accidents, while there were fairly strong interactions between sanctions and covariates (age and prior minor convictions in 1989, age in 1992, and prior accidents in 1994), there still remained a strong main effect of sanction differences on accidents; the suspended group continued to have the lowest accident rates overall, while the jail-only group had the highest accident rates. DUI Incidents: Figures 10, 11, and 12 and Tables 14 and 16 show that among the first offender groups in 1989, 1992, and 1994, the (statistically significant) lowest proportions of reoffending drivers were in the groups assigned to first-offender treatment program plus license restriction, with failure rates of 23.79, 12.35, and 4.51 per 100 drivers, respectively. This group had 12.6% and 13.1% fewer DUI incidents in 1989 and 1992, respectively, than the group with the next lowest recidivism rate (program with jail). In contrast, the highest recidivism rates occurred with the jail-only groups for all years (34.35, 21.94, and 9.01 for 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively). An overall trend in the decline of percentage differences in DUI incidents between the best group (first-offender treatment program plus restriction) and the next lowest group is evident over the years for the 1989 group. It would be expected that sanction differences between groups would diminish as the time window increases, particularly to a six-year period. Differences in failure proportions among the other three sanction groups were again not significant for the 1989 offenders, but were significantly different among the three groups in 1992 and 1994. The first offender treatment program with jail group in 1994 had lower recidivism rates than that of the SB 38 group, and lower
38
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
rates than that of the 1992 suspended group; however, the 1994 suspended group had significantly lower rates than the SB 38 group. Because of variations in the suspended group’s rates, there is no totally consistent pattern in the DUI incident rates among these three groups over the three years. Overall, however, participation in the first-offender treatment program with license restriction continues to rank first in its effect on DUI incidents, while the jail-only sanction continues to have the least impact. Results from the first offender sanction analyses on DUI incidents continue to replicate those from previous research studies for all three analyses. Sanction group differences on accidents in this year's analyses continued to be consistent for 1989, 1992, and 1994.
TABLE 14: FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR
YEAR
SANCTION GROUP
SAMPLE
SIZE
NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
NUMBER OF DUI- INCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
1989 Suspension (5,638) 19.69 27.85
(follow-up period = 6 years) Jail (7,199) 25.85 34.35
1st DUI program & jail
(43,626) 24.57 27.23
1st DUI program & license restriction
(41,223) 24.73 23.79
SB 38 program & license restriction
(4,422) 24.67 27.40
1992 Suspension (8,265) 10.27 15.95
(follow-up period = 3 years) Jail (4,769) 13.40 21.94
1st DUI program & jail
(49,591) 11.84 14.20
1st DUI program & license restriction
(32,476) 12.15 12.35
SB 38 program & license restriction
(5,538) 12.04 14.58
1994 Suspension (5,520) 3.52 4.78
(follow-up period = 1 year) Jail (3,825) 5.82 9.01
1st DUI program & jail
(37,527) 4.32 5.25
1st DUI program & license restriction
(26,945) 4.35 4.51
SB 38 program & license restriction
(3,709) 4.67 6.88
39
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Results of the Second Offender Sanction EvaluationTotal Accidents: Among the 1989 second offenders, license suspension continued to be significantly more effective than treatment program plus restriction in reducing total accident risk (see Figure 13, and Tables 15 and 16), six years subsequent to their convictions. The 1989 suspended group, with a failure rate (per 100 drivers) of 20.16, had 15.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program group. This finding is consistent with those of most prior studies of second offenders on total accidents. As noted below, the post 1989 cohorts show a different pattern. Results of the 1992 and 1994 analyses (see Figures 14 and 15, Tables 15 and 16) were similar to those of the 1990, 1991, and 1992 one-year analyses (reported in the previous three DUI-MIS evaluations) in that significant differences were not evident among second offenders in their total accident rates. It has been noted in recent reports that since license suspension has been consistently effective in reducing accident risk, it was likely that the lack of significant group differences in the one-year period was due to the immediate short-term positive effect of the imposition of one-year APS license suspensions on all second offenders. It was found in the previous two analyses and in this year’s analysis that the accident rates of the SB 38 participants have declined and were actually lower than those of the suspended group. Since the one-year follow-up period covers the time window when all second offenders are under APS suspension, it was reasoned that APS suspension would be expected to have a larger effect on the accident rates of previously nonsuspended SB 38 participants than it did on those who were suspended upon conviction. The data continue to support this interpretation. In comparing accident rates between first and second offenders, Tables 14 and 15 show that, across all years, first offenders continue to experience higher accident rates than second offenders, a finding that has been apparent in previous DUI studies on accidents, even prior to DUI-MIS evaluations. As noted in recent DUI-MIS reports, the fact that second offenders have longer-term sanctions than do first offenders (18-month postconviction suspension or 18-month SB 38 treatment programs) may explain this difference. DUI Incidents: Figures 13, 14, and 15 and Tables 15 and 16 show that in all three years, the suspended groups had significantly higher failure rates (by 18.1%, 45.0%, and 40.2% for 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively) than corresponding rates for the SB 38 program participants. The much smaller difference (18.1%) between the two sanctions for the 1989 groups compared to the more recent cohorts on subsequent DUI incidents may also be attributable to the much longer (6 year) followup period. As noted in connection with first offenders, one would expect treatment effects to lessen with the passage of time.
40
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The third group ("other") in the 1992 and 1994 analyses had failure rates midway between the other two groups. Failure rates of all three groups in 1992 were significantly different from each other. In the 1994 analysis, recidivism rates were significantly different between all groups except between the SB 38 program participants and the SB 38 program plus ignition interlock group; both groups had lower reoffense rates than the suspended or the “other” groups, and this finding was also evident in last year’s 1993 one-year analysis. An additional analysis was conducted which included the same groups, but with the interlock group divided into those who were suspended and those who were not suspended (75% and 96% of those groups, respectively, were assigned to the SB 38 program plus license restriction). Although the results showed that the interlock group without suspension had the lowest reoffense rate, the results are somewhat limited by the fact that the number of cases for both groups remains insufficient, particularly in the presence of a nonrandom design, where self-selectivity and uncontrolled group biases may be influencing these results. A preferable approach to investigating the effectiveness of the interlock device would be a randomized design involving equivalent groups; such an effort is being considered in the foreseeable future, and may provide more clarification on the effect of interlock.
TABLE 15: SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR
YEAR
SANCTION GROUP
SAMPLE SIZE
NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
PERCENTAGE EFFECT
(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2
X 100
GRP 2
NUMBER OF DUI
INCIDENT-INVOLVED,
PER 100 DRIVERS
PERCENTAGE EFFECT
(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2
X 100
GRP 2 1989 1) Suspension (9,482) 20.16 35.54
(follow-up period = 6 years)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(23,927) 23.80 -15.3% 30.09 18.1%
1992 1) Suspension (9,230) 9.12 15.31 (follow-up period = 3 years)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(15,971) 9.80 -10.0% 10.56 45.0%
3) Other (10,170) 9.72 13.24 1994 1) Suspension (5,461) 3.24 8.27
(follow-up period = 1 year)
2) SB 38 program & license restriction
(8,595) 2.82 14.9%
5.90 40.2%
3) SB 38 program/ restriction interlock
(4,340) 2.85 5.60
4) Other (7,273) 3.32 7.24
41
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1992, AND 1994 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS BY OUTCOME MEASURES
FIRST OFFENDER YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS
GROUP (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1989 (6-year follow up)
(1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1992 (3-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 S3 S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1994 (1-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns ns S1 (2) Jail na S3 S4 S5 na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na
SECOND OFFENDER
YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS GROUP (1) (2) (1) (2)
1989 (6-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 na S2 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na na
1992 (3-year follow up) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)
(1) Suspension na ns ns na S2 S3 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns na S2 (3) Other na na
1994 (1-year follow up) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
(1) Suspension na ns ns ns na S2 S3 S4 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns ns na ns S2 (3) SB 38 program & interlock na ns na S3 (4) Other na na
Note: A significant (p<.03 for 1st offenders and p<.06 for 2nd offenders) difference between sanction groups relative to the proportion of accident-involved or DUI incident-involved drivers is represented by an "S." The group number with the “S” indicates the group with the better (lower) rate. A nonsignificant difference is indicated by "ns." "na" means not applicable. Blanks appear in the lower half of each matrix, since the halves are identical.
Overall, findings for the 1989 second offenders on accidents replicate previous evaluations indicating that postconviction license suspension continues to be more effective than SB 38 treatment program plus restriction in reducing accidents over the 6-
42
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
year follow-up period. However, it should be recalled that these 1989 results pertain to a sanction structure that is quite different from the current one; there are now tougher requirements for insurance and program participation, lengthier suspension periods, more fees and the imposition of APS suspensions on all offenders. Findings from the 1992 and 1994 second offender analyses were similar to previous post-APS one-year evaluations of second offenders in showing no evidence of significant differences between the sanction groups on subsequent accident rates. The fact that the 1-year accident rates for both the SB 38 treatment program participants and the interlock group were lower (14.9%) than that of the suspended group is likely attributable to the impact of APS suspensions. This is supported by the fact that this trend reverses (-10%) when more than a one-year time period is included. Because all second offenders since 1990 are suspended under APS for the duration of the one-year follow-up period, the differences between groups is more likely a measure of the incremental impact of alternative sanctions given in addition to suspension. The results on reoffense rates for second offenders continue to be consistent with the findings of prior studies on alcohol-related incidents, indicating that SB 38 programs with license restriction are associated with a reduction in subsequent DUI incidents over all three follow-up periods. One-Year Recidivism Rates for First and Second Offenders from 1989-1994The one-year subsequent DUI-incident reoffense rates for both first and second offenders were compiled from the six annual DUI-MIS reports and configured onto a single graph to display these rates over time. Figure 16 shows the proportion of DUI offenders arrested each year between 1989 and 1994 who reoffended one-year after conviction. The DUI incidents include alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions (not included in the 1989 cases), and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Figure 16 shows a noticeable decline in the one-year recidivism rates of second offenders from 9.8% to 6.8% and for first offenders from 9.3% to 6.1% between 1989 to 1994. This decline translates into a 34.4% reduction for first offenders, and a 30.6% decrease for second offenders, in DUI incidents. Previous DUI-MIS reports have suggested that while many factors may be associated with this overall decline in DUI incidents, the reduction is likely attributable to the implementation of APS suspensions in 1990. Another DMV study, which is designed to investigate the specific deterrent
43
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
effects of the APS law, will be released soon and may present further information on the effectiveness of this law.
9.89.6 9.7
9.3
7.9
6.8
9.3
8.6 8.6
7.6
7.0
6.1
5
6
7
8
9
10
PRO
POR
TIO
N R
EOFF
END
ING
IN 1
YEA
R
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
YEAR
Figure 16 . Proportion of DUI offenders arrested in 1989-1994 reoffending(DUI incidents) one-year after conviction.
Second Offenders
First Offenders
44
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
Data on DMV administrative license disqualification actions (license suspension or revocation––S/R) taken in DUI cases are presented below. These statutorily mandated actions are initiated by the receipt of either a law enforcement APS report (.08% BAC, zero tolerance, or chemical test refusal) or court abstract of conviction. It should be noted that multiple actions can result from a single DUI incident––for example, a single DUI arrest frequently will result in both an APS suspension and a mandatory postconviction suspension action. This section includes the following tables and figure: Table 17: Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1985-1995. This table shows preconviction (APS) and postconviction license disqualification totals from 1985 through 1995. The postconviction totals include juvenile suspensions, first-offender suspensions, second-offender suspensions and revocations, and third- and fourth-offender revocations. Table 18: Administrative Per Se Process Measures. This table presents APS process measure data for fiscal years 93/94 through 95/96. Figure 17 graphically portrays mandatory DUI license disqualification totals from 1985 through 1995. The following statements are based on the data shown in Tables 17-18 and Figure 17.
During 1991, the first full calendar year of APS license suspension, the total number of DMV DUI suspension/revocation actions increased by 60% over 1990. Each year since then these numbers have declined, by an overall 38%, mirroring the 36% decline in DUI arrests over the same period.
In 1995, 179,492 APS license actions were taken. Of these actions, 71% were first-
offender actions and 29% were repeat-offender actions.
In FY 95/96, APS actions increased by 10.7%, breaking the recent consistent downward trend in DUI arrests and APS actions.
45
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Chemical test refusal actions have steadily continued to decline, and have decreased by 58% since 1985.
The number of mandatory postconviction license actions decreased by 12% in 1995,
and has dropped virtually in half since 1991.
Since APS was implemented in July 1990, over 1 million (1,383,175) APS suspension or revocation actions had been taken through June 1996.
During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings increased
each year, rising from 6.8% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 11.8% in 94/95. In 95/96 this trend stopped, with requests for hearing dropping 27% to 8.6% of all APS actions. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing continued to decline, however, dropping to only 68% in 95/96, compared to 80% in 94/95.
During the first 30 months after implementation (on January 1, 1994) of the "zero
tolerance" law for minors, 23,465 suspension actions were taken.
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Figure 17 . Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1985-1995.
46
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
47
TABL
E 17
: M
AN
DA
TORY
DU
I LIC
ENSE
DIS
QU
ALI
FIC
ATI
ON
AC
TIO
NS,
198
5-19
95
YEA
R
PREC
ON
VIC
TIO
N
Adm
in P
er S
e (A
PS) A
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1196
10
2722
73
2287
90
2090
06
1840
45
1794
92
Ze
ro to
lera
nce
susp
ensi
ons
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
9971
87
00
Fi
rst-o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
8250
3 18
7527
15
7545
14
4321
12
0582
12
1218
Repe
at-o
ffen
der s
uspe
nsio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3479
2 74
351
6265
6 57
279
4742
9 44
193
Re
peat
-off
ende
r rev
ocat
ions
n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a n/
a 23
15
1039
5 85
89
7406
60
63
5381
Com
mer
cial
dri
ver a
ctio
ns
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
3739
79
76
6449
58
29
5038
49
21
Che
mic
al te
st re
fusa
l act
ions
29
308
2632
7 25
474
2275
7 21
466
2291
5 21
296r
1796
3r 15
662
1326
4 12
308
Te
st re
fusa
l sus
pens
ions
25
485
1635
2 14
877
1372
0 12
390
1512
8 10
901r
9374
r 82
56
7022
67
54
Te
st re
fusa
l rev
ocat
ions
38
23
9975
10
597
9037
90
76
7787
10
395r
8589
r 74
06
6063
53
81
TOTA
L A
PS/R
EFU
SAL
AC
TIO
NS
2930
8 26
327
2547
4 22
757
2146
6 14
2525
27
2273
22
8790
20
9006
18
4045
17
9492
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
– –
POST
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
Juve
nile
DU
I sus
pens
ions
22
00
2219
23
74
1823
19
95
1478
15
76
1202
92
2 87
9 67
7
Firs
t-off
ende
r sus
pens
ions
70
57
7384
72
78
6626
76
79
1040
8 13
575
1067
3 10
208
8696
72
66
M
isde
mea
nor
5346
55
92
5558
50
50
5658
84
67
1154
7 89
89
8607
71
88
5806
Felo
ny
1711
17
92
1720
15
76
2021
19
41
2028
16
84
1601
15
08
1460
Seco
nd-o
ffen
der S
/R a
ctio
ns
4683
5 45
234
4360
8 47
698
5392
7 52
334
5735
0 45
478
3884
9 34
300
3148
9
Mis
dem
eano
r 46
292
4460
1 42
964
4709
3 53
238
5159
3 56
583
4475
6 38
285
3379
4 30
955
Fe
lony
54
3 63
3 64
4 60
5 68
9 74
1 76
7 72
2 56
4 50
6 53
4
Thir
d-of
fend
er re
voca
tions
14
970
1694
6 17
118
1399
1 18
514
1865
0 19
963
1555
3 12
908
1119
3 94
71
M
isde
mea
nor
1497
0 16
946
1711
8 13
671
1818
2 18
219
1959
5 15
233
1264
4 10
974
9261
Felo
ny
n/a
n/a
n/a
320
332
431
368
320
264
219
210
Four
th-o
ffen
der r
evoc
atio
ns
5479
62
23
7778
88
84
8122
82
85
8394
67
03
5554
45
32
3559
TOTA
L PO
STC
ON
VIC
TIO
N A
CTI
ON
S 76
541
7800
6 78
156
7902
2 90
237
9115
5 10
0858
79
609
6844
1 59
600
5246
2
19
85
1986
19
87
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
19
93
1994
19
95
T OTA
L M
AN
DA
TORY
SU
SPEN
SIO
N/
REV
OC
ATI
ON
(S/R
) AC
TIO
NS
1058
49
1043
33
1036
30
1017
79
1117
03
2336
80
3731
31
3083
99
2774
47
2436
45
2319
54
orts
. p
rior
rep
r Revi
sed
from
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 18. ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES
7/93-6/94 7/94-6/95 7/95-6/96 Total APS actions taken (including actions later set aside) 211,380 185,266 205,173 Total .081 APS actions set aside 14,052 13,323 14,113 Total .012 suspensions set aside 137 441 494 Net total APS actions taken (excluding actions later set aside) 197,191 171,502 190,566 Net total .08 APS actions 192,997 161,991 181,878 Net total .01 suspensions 4,194 9,511 8,688
APS Actions by Offender Status/License Classification:3 Total APS actions, noncommercial drivers 191,748 166,807 185,246 Total commercial driver (CDL) APS actions taken 5,443 4,695 5,320 Number of APS actions of commercial drivers in commercial vehicles 28 28 11 APS .08 suspensions for drivers with no prior DUI convictions4 133,166 114,365 129,642 4-month license suspensions 116,563 95,288 105,726 30-day suspensions plus 3-month restrictions 5,584 4,254 1,681 30-day suspensions plus 5-month COE5 restrictions N/A 5,022 11,278 First-offender chemical test refusals 7,546 6,527 7,063 CDL first offender suspensions/restrictions 3,473 3,274 3,894 Total APS .08 actions taken for drivers with prior DUI convictions 59,831 47,626 52,236 Suspensions 53,025 42,373 46,704 Revocations 6,806 5,253 5,532
APS Chemical Test Refusal Process Measures: Total .08 and .01 APS refusal actions taken (including actions later set aside) 15,145 12,696 13,395 Total .08 refusal actions set aside 724 716 641 Total .01 refusal actions set aside 2 12 6 Net total .08 and .01 APS refusal actions (excluding actions later set aside) 14,419 11,968 12,748 Net total .08 refusal actions 14,352 11,780 12,595 Net total .01 refusal actions 67 188 153 Chemical test refusal rate (excluding actions later set aside) 7.31% 6.98% 6.69% Net .08 APS refusal suspensions for subjects with no prior DUIs 7,546 6,527 7,063 Net .08 APS refusal actions for subjects with prior DUIs 6,806 5,253 5,532
APS Hearings Total .08 and .01 APS hearings scheduled6 21,682 21,774 17,697 Proportion of total APS actions 10.3% 11.8% 8.6% .08 hearings held and/or completed 21,264* 18,300 15,248 .08 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 15,481* 14,657 10,418 .08 hearing action sustain rate 72.8% 80.1% 68.3% .01 hearings held and/or completed – – – 888 775 .01 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing – – – 743 615 .01 hearing action sustain rate – – – 83.7% 79.4%
APS Chemical Test Refusal Hearings Total .08 and .01 APS refusal hearings scheduled 2,343 2,133 1,705 .08 APS refusal hearings held and/or completed 2,260* 1,836 1,513 .08 APS refusal actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 1,758* 1,326 1,108
*Figures corrected. 1.08 refers to APS actions taken subsequent to obtaining evidence of a BAC equal to or in excess of the .08% per se level. Such an action is taken in
conjunction with a DUI arrest. 2.01 refers to APS suspensions taken against drivers under the age of 21 with BACs in excess of .01%, or on the basis of a chemical test refusal, and are not
necessarily taken in conjunction with a DUI arrest. 3All entries in this category exclude actions later set aside but, where possible, include actions taken on the basis of either a chemical test refusal or a BAC
test result. This category does not include .01 actions, which are not varied by offender status or occupation. 4Prior DUI convictions consist of any such conviction where the violation occurred within the seven years prior to the current violation. 5Introduced 1/1/95 this restriction allows driving to, from, and during the course-of-employment. 6This figure excludes subsequent APS dismissal hearings and departmental review hearings or procedures. Both numerator and denominator include
those actions later set aside as a result of the hearing.
48
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL
This section presents data on alcohol-involved accidents, as compiled and reported by the California Highway Patrol, as well as accident data which have been crosstabulated with Department of Justice DUI arrest data. Drivers identified as being under the influence of drugs other than alcohol are also included in the "alcohol-involved accident" category, but typically comprise less than 1% of the total (only 3 total cases for 1994 data). This section includes the following tables: Table 19: Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table shows the law enforcement officer’s determination of sobriety for accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity. Table 20: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1994 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest. This table portrays the fatal/injury accident involvement of DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity and type of arrest (felony, juvenile, or misdemeanor). Table 21: Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table crosstabulates accident sobriety codes (from law enforcement accident reports) with the court disposition of the 1994 DUI arrests associated with those accidents. Table 22: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1994 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status. This table displays the adjudication status of fatal and injury accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees, by type of arrest. Table 23: 1994 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows the number of accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees without a corresponding recorded conviction, by type of DUI arrest, by county. Table 24: 1-, 3-, and 6-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status. This table shows the average number of total, fatal/injury, and alcohol-related accidents for 1994, 1992, and 1989 DUI arrestees for time periods of 1, 3, and 6 years subsequent to their arrests, respectively, by offender status (number of prior offenses).
49
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Figure 18 (below) shows the annual percentages of traffic injuries and fatalities that were alcohol-involved from 1985 to 1995. The numerical data for this graph are shown on the DUI summary statistics sheet at the beginning of this report.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PER
CEN
TAG
E O
F TO
TAL
INJU
RIE
S A
ND
FA
TALI
TIES
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995YEAR
Figure 18 . Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that werealcohol-involved, 1985-1995.
InjuriesFatalities
Based on these data, the following statements can be made:
The number of alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased by 9.7% in 1995, and has declined by over half (51%) since 1987. The proportion of fatalities which are alcohol-involved declined from 50.1% in 1987 to 32.2% in 1995.
The proportion of traffic accident injuries that are alcohol-involved has also
declined each year since 1987. Alcohol-involved injuries dropped 6.3% during 1995 and 46.3% from 1987 to 1995.
13.2% of all 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,
compared to 13.1% in 1993 and 11.1% in 1992 and 1991. 49.5% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.
In 25% of cases where a DUI offender was arrested in connection with a reported
traffic accident, there is no record of any corresponding conviction. In 91.5% of
50
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
these nonconvicted cases, the accident report indicated that the drivers had been drinking and that their ability was impaired.
Of all 1994 accident-involved DUI arrestees with no record of conviction, 17.9% had
been arrested for felony DUI, down from 18.5% in 1993, 19.0% in 1992, and 19.4% in 1991.
6.5% (13,632) of 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a fatal or injury accident, up
from 6.4% the previous year. Of these fatal/injury accidents, only 29.6% (4,031) led to an arrest for felony DUI, and only 10% (1,371) led to a conviction of felony DUI. Over 27% (3,704) of DUI arrests stemming from a fatal/injury accident did not result in a reported conviction.
The fatal/injury and total accident risk of DUI offenders generally decreases with
the number of prior DUI convictions for periods up to five years after arrest, while, conversely, the risk of involvement in an alcohol-related accident generally increases with number of priors over the same time periods. This is not surprising because as the number of prior DUIs increases, the time period of the suspension/revocation lengthens, and prior research has demonstrated that suspension/revocation has a larger impact on reducing non-DUI accidents than DUI accidents.
51
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TOTA
L 13
632
100.
0 65
16
47.8
53
47
39.2
98
5 7.
2 78
4 5.
8
52
TABL
E 19
: RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
BY S
OBR
IETY
CO
DE
OF
AC
CID
ENT-
INV
OLV
ED 1
994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES*
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
) SO
BRIE
TY C
OD
E TO
TAL
WH
ITE
HIS
PAN
IC
BLA
CK
O
THER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
TOTA
L 27
560
100.
0 12
167
44.1
11
878
43.1
19
20
7.0
1595
5.
8
HBD
-ABI
LITY
IMPA
IRED
(BA
C .0
8% &
ABO
VE)
25
941
94.1
11
267
43.4
11
374
43.8
18
00
6.9
1500
5.
8
HBD
-NO
T IM
PAIR
ED
(B
AC
.01%
-.049
%)
78
0.3
29
37.2
35
44
.9
4 5.
1 10
12
.8
HBD
-NO
T K
NO
WN
IF
IM
PAIR
ED (.
05-.0
79)
484
1.8
248
51.2
18
3 37
.8
28
5.8
25
5.2
HN
BD-H
AD
NO
T BE
EN
D
RIN
KIN
G
185
0.7
92
49.7
66
35
.7
14
7.6
13
7.0
NO
T RE
PORT
ED
869
3.2
529
60.9
22
0 25
.3
74
8.5
46
5.3
UN
DER
INFL
UEN
CE
OF
DRU
GS
3 0.
0 2
66.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
33.3
*For
eac
h so
brie
ty c
ode,
per
cent
ages
are
bas
ed o
n ro
w to
tals
.
TABL
E 20
: FA
TAL
AN
D IN
JURY
AC
CID
ENTS
OF
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
AN
D T
YPE
OF
ARR
EST*
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
SOBR
IETY
CO
DE
TOTA
L W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
FELO
NY
DU
I 40
31
29.6
17
69
43.9
17
01
42.2
34
6 8.
6 21
5 5.
3
MIS
DEM
EAN
OR
DU
I 94
21
69.1
46
50
49.4
35
75
37.9
63
2 6.
7 56
4 6.
0 JU
VEN
ILE
DU
I 18
0 1.
3 97
53
.9
71
39.4
7
3.9
5
2.8
es a
re b
ased
on
row
tota
ls.
g*F
or e
ach
type
of a
rres
t, pe
rcen
ta
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
53
TABL
E 21
: AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N S
TATU
S BY
SO
BRIE
TY C
OD
E FO
R A
CC
IDEN
T-IN
VO
LVED
199
4 D
UI A
RRES
TEES
*
TYPE
OF
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TOTA
L 27
5 60
100.
0 17
163
62.3
13
93
5.1
1088
3.
9 32
2 1.
2 66
0 2.
4 69
34
25.2
TOTA
L 13
6 32
100.
0 75
38
55.3
13
71
10.1
49
7 3.
6 17
5 1.
3 34
7 2.
5 37
04
27.2
HN
BD-H
AD
NO
T BE
EN
D
RIN
KIN
G
185
0.7
75
40.5
5
2.7
9 4.
9 5
2.7
23
12.4
68
36
.8
HBD
-NO
T IM
PAIR
ED
(B
AC
.01%
-.049
%)
78
0.3
18
23.1
1
1.3
0 0.
0 3
3.8
9 11
.5
47
60.3
FELO
NY
DU
I 40
31
29.6
14
12
35.0
12
07
29.9
76
1.
9 32
0.
8 98
2.
4 12
06
29.9
HBD
-NO
T K
NO
WN
IF
IM
PAIR
ED (.
05-.0
79)
484
1.8
272
56.2
25
5.
2 16
3.
3 6
1.2
20
4.1
145
30.0
UN
DER
INFL
UEN
CE
OF
DR
UG
S 3
0.0
0 0.
0 2
66.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
1 33
.3
HBD
-ABI
LITY
IMPA
IRED
( BA
C .0
8% &
ABO
VE)
25
941
94.1
16
432
63.3
13
19
5.1
1016
3.
9 28
7 1.
1 54
1 2.
1 63
46
24.5
JUV
ENIL
E D
UI
180
1.3
61
33.9
18
10
.0
1 0.
6 2
1.1
4 2.
2 94
52
.2
NO
T R
EPO
RTE
D
869
3.2
366
42.1
41
4.
7 47
5.
4 21
2.
4 67
7.
7 32
7 37
.6
MIS
DEM
EAN
OR
DU
I 94
21
69.1
60
65
64.4
14
6 1.
5 42
0 4.
5 14
1 1.
5 24
5 2.
6 24
04
25.5
SOBR
IETY
CO
DE
TOTA
L M
ISD
EMEA
NO
R
DU
I FE
LON
Y D
UI
ALC
OH
OL-
REC
KLE
SS
NO
NA
LCO
HO
L-RE
CK
LESS
O
THER
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
NO
REC
OR
D O
F A
NY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
*For
eac
h so
brie
ty c
ode,
per
cent
ages
are
bas
ed o
n ro
w to
tals
.
TABL
E 22
: FA
TAL
AN
D IN
JURY
AC
CID
ENTS
OF
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y TY
PE O
F A
RRE
ST A
ND
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N S
TATU
S*
TY
PE O
F C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
SOBR
IETY
CO
DE
TOTA
L M
ISD
EMEA
NO
R
DU
I FE
LON
Y D
UI
ALC
OH
OL-
REC
KLE
SS
NO
NA
LCO
HO
L-RE
CK
LESS
O
THER
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
NO
REC
OR
D O
F A
NY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
es a
re b
ased
on
row
tota
ls.
*For
eac
h ty
pe o
f arr
est,
perc
enta
g
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE 23: 1994 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED* DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST
TYPE OF ARREST COUNTY TOTAL
(100%) FELONY
DUI JUVENILE
DUI MISDEMEANOR
DUI N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 6347 1133 17.9 151 2.4 5063 79.8 ALAMEDA 206 20 9.7 5 2.4 181 87.9 AMADOR 6 3 50.0 0 0.0 3 50.0 BUTTE 37 10 27.0 1 2.7 26 70.3 CALAVERAS 10 4 40.0 1 10.0 5 50.0 COLUSA 5 2 40.0 0 0.0 3 60.0 CONTRA COSTA 114 16 14.0 3 2.6 95 83.3 DEL NORTE 12 2 16.7 0 0.0 10 83.3 EL DORADO 22 6 27.3 2 9.1 14 63.6 FRESNO 261 50 19.2 4 1.5 207 79.3 GLENN 7 1 14.3 0 0.0 6 85.7 HUMBOLDT 41 9 22.0 3 7.3 29 70.7 IMPERIAL 47 11 23.4 1 2.1 35 74.5 KERN 166 25 15.1 4 2.4 137 82.5 KINGS 16 2 12.5 2 12.5 12 75.0 LAKE 21 2 9.5 0 0.0 19 90.5 LASSEN 8 2 25.0 0 0.0 6 75.0 LOS ANGELES 1972 271 13.7 53 2.7 1648 83.6 MADERA 46 5 10.9 1 2.2 40 87.0 MARIN 60 8 13.3 1 1.7 51 85.0 MARIPOSA 4 1 25.0 0 0.0 3 75.0 MENDOCINO 29 3 10.3 0 0.0 26 89.7 MERCED 67 12 17.9 1 1.5 54 80.6 MODOC 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 100.0 MONO 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 100.0 MONTEREY 63 9 14.3 5 7.9 49 77.8 NAPA 26 13 50.0 3 11.5 10 38.5 NEVADA 11 1 9.1 0 0.0 10 90.9 ORANGE 429 34 7.9 14 3.3 381 88.8 PLACER 48 10 20.8 0 0.0 38 79.2 PLUMAS 8 2 25.0 0 0.0 6 75.0 RIVERSIDE 330 76 23.0 5 1.5 249 75.5 SACRAMENTO 236 91 38.6 5 2.1 140 59.3 SAN BENITO 14 2 14.3 0 0.0 12 85.7 SAN BERNARDINO 507 132 26.0 8 1.6 367 72.4 SAN DIEGO 449 105 23.4 11 2.4 333 74.2 SAN FRANCISCO 75 18 24.0 2 2.7 55 73.3 SAN JOAQUIN 110 12 10.9 2 1.8 96 87.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 36 4 11.1 0 0.0 32 88.9 SAN MATEO 84 21 25.0 1 1.2 62 73.8 SANTA BARBARA 45 6 13.3 1 2.2 38 84.4 SANTA CLARA 125 18 14.4 1 0.8 106 84.8 SANTA CRUZ 35 3 8.6 0 0.0 32 91.4 SHASTA 27 11 40.7 0 0.0 16 59.3 SISKIYOU 9 2 22.2 0 0.0 7 77.8 SOLANO 57 13 22.8 0 0.0 44 77.2 SONOMA 52 5 9.6 2 3.8 45 86.5 STANISLAUS 71 17 23.9 2 2.8 52 73.2 SUTTER 10 3 30.0 0 0.0 7 70.0 TEHAMA 17 5 29.4 2 11.8 10 58.8 TRINITY 7 2 28.6 1 14.3 4 57.1 TULARE 132 12 9.1 2 1.5 118 89.4 TUOLUMNE 11 3 27.3 1 9.1 7 63.6 VENTURA 100 19 19.0 1 1.0 80 80.0 YOLO 43 15 34.9 0 0.0 28 65.1 YUBA 12 4 33.3 0 0.0 8 66.7
*These cases include only arrestees whose accidents showed alcohol or drug-impaired sobriety codes.
54
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
55
TABL
E 24
: 1-
, 3- A
ND
6-Y
EAR
TOTA
L, F
ATA
L/IN
JURY
AN
D A
LCO
HO
L-RE
LATE
D
AC
CID
ENT
MEA
NS
BY O
FFEN
DER
STA
TUS
TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
FA
TAL/
INJU
RY A
CC
IDEN
TS
ALC
OH
OL-
RELA
TED
AC
CID
ENTS
ALL
.0
382
.116
1 .2
664
.013
7 .0
429
.098
9 .0
113
.032
3 .0
703
1ST
DU
I .0
426
.124
1 .2
778
.014
8 .0
445
.100
0 .0
107
.029
5 .0
631
2ND
DU
I .0
312
.105
1 .2
684
.012
2 .0
409
.102
2 .0
131
.035
6 .0
787
3RD
DU
I .0
248
.093
2 .2
053
.010
5 .0
393
.086
5 .0
128
.045
0 .0
875
4TH
+ D
UI
.015
7 .0
794
.194
3 .0
072
.033
4 .0
870
.007
7 .0
390
.101
4
DU
I O
FFEN
DER
ST
ATU
S
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
4 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
2 A
RRES
TEES
)
6-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
4 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
2 A
RRES
TEES
)
6-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
4 A
RRES
TEES
)
3-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(199
2 A
RRES
TEES
)
6-YE
AR
SUBS
EQU
ENT
(198
9 A
RRES
TEES
)
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS
DUI Arrest Data: Arrest data are reported to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, by individual law enforcement agencies throughout the state. As such, these data are subject to reporting errors such as incorrect names, birthdates or arrest dates. Nonreporting of arrest data due to error or omission can also occur; for example, in 1995 the Oakland Police Department reported no DUI arrests, after reporting 960 such arrests in 1994. In addition, when data are entered into DOJ's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system, only the highest-order offense is included. Therefore, in cases where a DUI arrest is made in conjunction with, for example, an auto theft arrest, that DUI arrest will not be included in the database. This results in a slight but systematic underreporting of the number of DUI arrests annually. DUI Conviction Data: Abstracts of conviction for DUI and other traffic-related offenses are reported to the DMV by courts throughout the state. As abstracts are received (either hard copy, magnetic tape or through direct electronic access from the courts) they are entered onto the DMV driver record database. Abstracts without an identifying driver license number are run through the automated name index (ANI) system in order to match the abstract with an existing driver record; in cases where no such match can be made, an "X" numbered record is created to store the abstract. The total number of DUI abstracts of conviction received by DMV from the courts is tallied monthly and annually. Since this workload total includes abstracts which amend, correct or dismiss prior abstracts of conviction, it tends to overestimate the actual number of convictions which have occurred. Conviction data are also subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those for DUI arrests. For example, the 1993 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System documented that thousands of DUI convictions showing in court records do not appear on the DMV driver record database. Alcohol-Involved Accident Data: Accident data are reported to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) by local law enforcement agencies and district offices of the CHP. As such, these data are subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those occurring in both DUI arrest and conviction data. While most local law enforcement agencies will investigate and file reports on accidents involving injury or death, the investigation and reporting of property-damage-only accidents varies widely by local jurisdiction. Data are entered onto CHP's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and output in annual published reports.
56
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
REFERENCES
California Department of Finance. (1991). California statistical abstract, 1991.
Sacramento, CA: Author. California Department of Motor Vehicles. (1984-87). An evaluation of the California
drunk driving countermeasure system. Volumes 1-8. Sacramento, CA: Author. California Highway Patrol. (1995). 1994 annual report of fatal and injury motor vehicle
traffic collisions. Sacramento, CA: Author. Helander, C. J. (1989). Development of a California DUI management information
system. Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles. Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1992). Annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 134). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1994). 1994 Annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 143). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1995). 1995 annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 145). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1996). 1996 annual report of the California DUI
management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 159). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Tashima, H. N., Marowitz, L. A., DeYoung, D. J., & Helander, C. J. (1993). Annual
report of the California DUI management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 138). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.
57
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
GLOSSARY
ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE (APS) Administrative per se ("on-the-spot") license suspension or revocation occurs immediately pursuant to lawful arrest of a person driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more, or one who refuses a chemical test. Upon arrest, the driver's license is immediately confiscated by the law enforcement officer and an order of suspension or revocation served. The driver is issued a temporary license and allowed due process through administrative review. In July 1990, California became the 28th state to implement APS. In January 1994, California enacted a "zero tolerance" statute which requires the administrative suspension of any driver under age 21 with a BAC of 0.01% or greater, or who refuses to be tested.
ALCOHOL-INVOLVED ACCIDENT
Alcohol-involved accidents are those in which the investigating law enforcement officer indicates on the accident report that the driver "had been drinking (HBD)." Accidents involving drivers who are determined to be under the influence of drugs other than alcohol (typically less than 1% of all accidents) are also included in the alcohol-involved accident category.
ALCOHOL-RELATED RECKLESS DRIVING
Commonly called a "wet" reckless, alcohol-related reckless driving refers to an arrest/conviction incident which originated as a DUI arrest. DUI arrests involving drugs which are reduced to reckless driving are also referred to as alcohol-involved or "wet" reckless driving. "Wet" reckless convictions count as priors for the purposes of enhanced penalties upon subsequent conviction of DUI.
ALPHA
Alpha is the investigator's acceptable risk or probability level of making a Type 1 error (generally chosen to be small–e.g., 1% or .01, 5% or .05). There is always some risk of a Type 1 error, so alpha cannot be zero. Alpha is also called the significance level, because it is the criterion for claiming statistical significance.
BAC
Blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, is a measure of the percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person's blood. Statutorily, BAC is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or per 210 liters of breath.
CONVICTION Conviction of an offense, as used in this report, refers to the receipt by DMV of a court abstract of conviction. In a small proportion of cases, an offender may be
58
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
convicted of an offense but that conviction is not reported to DMV. Such cases would functionally be treated by DMV as though the offender had not been convicted. Because convictions can be amended, corrected, dismissed or simply not reported at all, the conviction totals reported herein are dynamic and subject to change.
COVARIATE A variable used to statistically adjust the results of an analysis for differences (on that variable) existing among subjects prior to the comparison of treatment effects.
DUI
DUI is an acronym for "driving under the influence" of alcohol and/or drugs, a violation of Sections 23152 or 23153 of the California Vehicle Code.
LOGISTIC REGRESSION
Logistic regression analysis is a statistical procedure evaluating the linear relationship between various factors and the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an outcome event. In this study, the procedure was used to explain the relationship between the various sanctions and the proportion of DUI offenders who incurred accidents and/or DUI incidents.
MAJOR CONVICTION Major convictions include primarily DUI convictions, but also reckless driving and hit-and-run convictions.
p
p stands for probability. For example, if p<.05, the probability is less than 5 chances in 100 that the difference you found is by chance alone.
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
Quasi-experimental designs refer to analyses where the comparison groups are not equivalent on characteristics other than the treatment conditions because random assignment was not used. Caution should be excercised when interpreting the results because of possible confounding of group bias with treatment effects. Covariates are used to statistically reduce group differences prior to the comparison of treatment effects.
SIGNIFICANT (STATISTICALLY)
If the result of a statistical test is significant, this means that the difference found is very unlikely by chance alone. How unlikely is determined by alpha.
59
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
APPENDIX A
Assembly Bill No. 757
CHAPTER 450 An act to add Section 1821 to the Vehicle Code. relating to driving offenses.
(Approved by Governor September 14, 1989. Filed with Secretary of State September 15, 1989.)
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 757, Friedman. Driving offenses: intervention programs: evaluation. Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles maintains records of driver's offenses reported by the courts. Including violations of the prohibitions against driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, any drug, or both, driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration, or driving while addicted to any drug. This bill would, additionally, require the department to establish and maintain a data and monitoring system, as specified, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of those violations relating to alcohol and drugs, and to report thereon annually to the Legislature. The bill would declare legislative findings. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (a) Drivers under the influence of drugs or alcohol continue to present a grave danger to the citizens of this state. (b) The Legislature has taken stern action to deter this crime and punish its offenders and has provided a range of sanctions available to the courts to use at their discretion. (c) No system exists to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of these measures or to determine the achievement of the Legislature's goals. (d) This lack of accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics hampers the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions. (e) It is essential that the Legislature acquire this information, from available resources, as soon as practicable, and that this information be updated and transmitted annually to the Legislature. SEC. 2. Section 1821 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 1821: The department shall establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The system may include a recidivism tracking system. The recidivism tracking system may include, but not be limited to, jail sentencing, license restriction, license suspension. Level I (first offender) and II (multiple offender) alcohol and drug education and treatment program assignment, alcohol and drug education treatment program readmission and dropout rates, adjudicating court, length of jail term, actual jail or alternative sentence served, type of treatment program assigned, actual program compliance status, subsequent accidents related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and subsequent convictions of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The department shall submit an annual report of its evaluations to the Legislature. The evaluations shall include a ranking of the relative efficacy of criminal penalties, other sanctions, and intervention programs and the various combinations thereof.
60
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
61
APP
END
IX B
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
SEX
(100
%)
RAC
E/ET
HN
ICIT
Y (1
00%
)
ALP
INE
UN
DER
18
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0
AM
AD
OR
UN
DER
18
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
STA
TEW
IDE
19
8982
17
4757
87
.8
2422
5 12
.2
8517
0 42
.8
9049
7 45
.5
1261
0 6.
3 10
705
5.4
ALA
MED
A
UN
DER
18
44
36
81.8
8
18.2
19
43
.2
12
27.3
12
27
.3
1 2.
3
18-2
0 31
5 28
3 89
.8
32
10.2
13
2 41
.9
113
35.9
38
12
.1
32
10.2
21-3
0 20
08
1720
85
.7
288
14.3
74
8 37
.3
632
31.5
34
2 17
.0
286
14.2
31-4
0 18
31
1538
84
.0
293
16.0
82
3 44
.9
379
20.7
34
6 18
.9
283
15.5
41-5
0 89
3 74
0 82
.9
153
17.1
43
6 48
.8
156
17.5
17
6 19
.7
125
14.0
51-6
0 34
5 28
3 82
.0
62
18.0
17
1 49
.6
56
16.2
73
21
.2
45
13.0
61-7
0 13
1 12
0 91
.6
11
8.4
71
54.2
8
6.1
37
28.2
15
11
.5
71
& A
BOV
E 29
26
89
.7
3 10
.3
20
69.0
3
10
.3
3 10
.3
3 10
.3
TO
TAL
5596
47
46
84.8
85
0 15
.2
2420
43
.2
1359
24
.3
1027
18
.4
790
14.1
18
-20
4 4
100.
0 0
0.
0 4
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
16
12
75.0
4
25.0
11
68
.8
2 12
.5
1 6.
3 2
12.5
31-4
0 24
21
87
.5
3 12
.5
20
83.3
1
4.2
1 4.
2 2
8.3
41
-50
21
19
90.5
2
9.5
19
90.5
1
4.8
1 4.
8 0
0.0
51
-60
6 5
83.3
1
16.7
5
83.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
16.7
TOTA
L 72
62
86
.1
10
13.9
59
81
.9
4 5.
6 3
4.2
6 8.
3
18
-20
5 5
100.
0 0
0.0
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 46
43
93
.5
3 6.
5 38
82
.6
6 13
.0
0 0.
0 2
4.3
31
-40
72
62
86.1
10
13
.9
67
93.1
3
4.2
0 0.
0 2
2.8
41
-50
43
33
76.7
10
23
.3
40
93.0
3
7.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
51
-60
18
14
77.8
4
22.2
15
83
.3
3 16
.7
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
9 6
66.7
3
33.3
9
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 3
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
1293
10
87
84.1
20
6 15
.9
1003
77
.6
238
18.4
23
1.
8 29
2.
2
21
- 30
478
410
85.8
68
14
.2
326
68.2
13
8 28
.9
7 1.
5 7
1.5
TO
TAL
197
167
84.8
30
15
.2
178
90.4
15
7.
6 0
0.0
4 2.
0 BU
TTE
UN
DER
18
22
16
72.7
6
27.3
21
95
.5
1 4.
5 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 12
0 10
3 85
.8
17
14.2
86
71
.7
28
23.3
1
0.8
5 4.
2
31
-40
330
275
83.3
55
16
.7
271
82.1
43
13
.0
8 2.
4 8
2.4
41
-50
230
194
84.3
36
15
.7
198
86.1
22
9.
6 5
2.2
5 2.
2
61
- 70
23
19
82.6
4
17.4
17
73
.9
3 13
.0
1 4.
3 2
8.7
51
-60
76
58
76.3
18
23
.7
71
93.4
3
3.9
1 1.
3 1
1.3
71
& A
BOV
E 14
12
85
.7
2 14
.3
13
92.9
0
0.0
0 0.
0 1
7.1
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
62
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
CA
LAV
ERA
S U
ND
ER 1
8 5
4 80
.0
1 20
.0
4 80
.0
1 20
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
10
9 90
.0
1 10
.0
9 90
.0
1 10
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
21
-30
64
49
76.6
15
23
.4
57
89.1
4
6.3
0 0.
0 3
4.7
31
-40
95
77
81.1
18
18
.9
84
88.4
10
10
.5
0 0.
0 1
1.1
41
-50
87
75
86.2
12
13
.8
82
94.3
4
4.6
1 1.
1 0
0.0
51
-60
33
31
93.9
2
6.1
31
93.9
2
6.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
10
7 70
.0
3 30
.0
10
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 5
3 60
.0
2 40
.0
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 30
9 25
5 82
.5
54
17.5
28
2 91
.3
22
7.1
1 0.
3 4
1.3
CO
LUSA
U
ND
ER 1
8 4
3 75
.0
1 25
.0
2 50
.0
2 50
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
26
24
92.3
2
7.7
7 26
.9
19
73.1
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 11
1 10
5 94
.6
6 5.
4 43
38
.7
63
56.8
1
0.9
4 3.
6
31-4
0 83
77
92
.8
6 7.
2
40
48.2
39
47
.0
2 2.
4 2
2.4
41
-50
61
54
88.5
7
11.5
36
59
.0
18
29.5
4
6.6
3 4.
9
51-6
0 21
21
10
0.0
0 0.
0 13
61
.9
8 38
.1
0 0.
0 0
0.0
61
-70
14
13
92.9
1
7.1
11
78.6
3
21.4
0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
3 3
100.
0 0
0.0
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 32
3 30
0 92
.9
23
7.1
155
48.0
15
2 47
.1
7
2.2
9 2.
8 C
ON
TRA
U
ND
ER 1
8 44
38
86
.4
6 13
.6
27
61.4
13
29
.5
3 6.
8 1
2.3
C
OST
A
18-2
0 25
4 23
3 91
.7
21
8.3
143
56.3
74
29
.1
19
7.5
18
7.1
21
-30
1337
11
53
86.2
18
4 13
.8
714
53.4
41
0 30
.7
150
11.2
63
4.
7
31-4
0 12
38
1011
81
.7
227
18.3
73
3 59
.2
223
18.0
20
2 16
.3
80
6.5
41
-50
705
583
82.7
12
2 17
.3
439
62.3
10
6 15
.0
122
17.3
38
5.
4
51-6
0 27
8 24
4 87
.8
34
12.2
18
4 66
.2
33
11.9
47
16
.9
14
5.0
61
-70
105
95
90.5
10
9.
5 67
63
.8
8 7.
6 24
22
.9
6 5.
7
71 &
ABO
VE
29
26
89.7
3
10.3
21
72
.4
0 0.
0 8
27.6
0
0.0
TO
TAL
3990
33
83
84.8
60
7 15
.2
2328
58
.3
867
21.7
57
5 14
.4
220
5.5
DEL
NO
RTE
UN
DER
18
3 3
100.
0 0
0.0
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 21
18
85
.7
3 14
.3
15
71.4
1
4.8
0 0.
0 5
23.8
21-3
0 74
62
83
.8
12
16.2
46
62
.2
18
24.3
1
1.4
9 12
.2
31
-40
104
81
77.9
23
22
.1
86
82.7
9
8.7
0
0.0
9 8.
7
41-5
0 64
55
85
.9
9 14
.1
51
79.7
6
9.4
2 3.
1 5
7.8
51
-60
20
18
90.0
2
10.0
17
85
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
3 15
.0
61
-70
8 7
87.5
1
12.5
8
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E 1
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
295
245
83.1
50
16
.9
227
76.9
34
11
.5
3 1.
0 31
10
.5
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
63
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
EL D
ORA
DO
U
ND
ER 1
8 7
5 71
.4
2 28
.6
7 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 75
64
85
.3
11
14.7
68
90
.7
7 9.
3 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 37
4 31
1 83
.2
63
16.8
30
4 81
.3
57
15.2
2
0.5
11
2.9
31
-40
447
358
80.1
89
19
.9
409
91.5
31
6.
9 0
0.0
7 1.
6
41-5
0 24
2 19
9 82
.2
43
17.8
22
6 93
.4
10
4.1
3 1.
2 3
1.2
51
-60
67
58
86.6
9
13.4
65
97
.0
1 1.
5 1
1.5
0 0.
0
61-7
0 32
32
10
0.0
0 0.
0 32
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
71 &
ABO
VE
12
9 75
.0
3 25
.0
11
91.7
0
0.0
1 8.
3 0
0.0
TO
TAL
1256
10
36
82.5
22
0 17
.5
1122
89
.3
106
8.4
7 0.
6 21
1.
7 FR
ESN
O
UN
DER
18
88
76
86.4
12
13
.6
26
29.5
56
63
.6
3 3.
4 3
3.4
18
-20
521
484
92.9
37
7.
1 10
9 20
.9
392
75.2
11
2.
1 9
1.7
21
-30
2805
25
94
92.5
21
1 7.
5 46
0 16
.4
2205
78
.6
77
2.7
63
2.2
31
-40
1954
17
40
89.0
21
4 11
.0
514
26.3
13
13
67.2
69
3.
5 58
3.
0
41-5
0 89
0 78
7 88
.4
103
11.6
26
7 30
.0
550
61.8
42
4.
7 31
3.
5
51-6
0 23
5 21
2 90
.2
23
9.8
81
34.5
12
9 54
.9
18
7.7
7 3.
0
61-7
0 83
74
89
.2
9 10
.8
40
48.2
36
43
.4
6 7.
2 1
1.2
71
& A
BOV
E 17
14
82
.4
3 17
.6
10
58.8
5
29.4
1
5.9
1 5.
9
TOTA
L 65
93
5981
90
.7
612
9.3
1507
22
.9
4686
71
.1
227
3.4
173
2.6
GLE
NN
U
ND
ER 1
8 3
3 10
0.0
0 0.
0 1
33.3
2
66.7
0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 30
29
96
.7
1 3.
3 15
50
.0
15
50.0
0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 11
2 10
1 90
.2
11
9.8
48
42.9
62
55
.4
0 0.
0 2
1.8
31
-40
108
93
86.1
15
13
.9
60
55.6
43
39
.8
2 1.
9 3
2.8
41
-50
58
52
89.7
6
10.3
46
79
.3
9 15
.5
2 3.
4 1
1.7
51
-60
20
19
95.0
1
5.0
13
65.0
5
25.0
0
0.0
2 10
.0
61
-70
8 8
100.
0 0
0.0
6 75
.0
2 25
.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
339
305
90.0
34
10
.0
189
55.8
13
8 40
.7
4 1.
2 8
2.4
HU
MBO
LDT
UN
DER
18
26
18
69.2
8
30.8
21
80
.8
1 3.
8 0
0.0
4 15
.4
18
-20
119
100
84.0
19
16
.0
102
85.7
8
6.7
1 0.
8 8
6.7
21
- 30
436
364
83.5
72
16
.5
356
81.7
32
7.
3 8
1.8
40
9.2
31
-40
411
325
79.1
86
20
.9
346
84.2
22
5.
4 8
1.9
35
8.5
41
-50
228
177
77.6
51
22
.4
207
90.8
6
2.6
0 0.
0 15
6.
6
51- 6
0 75
60
80
.0
15
20.0
70
93
.3
0 0.
0 1
1.3
4 5.
3
61-7
0 27
24
88
.9
3 11
.1
23
85.2
1
3.7
0 0.
0 3
11.1
71 &
ABO
VE
11
9 81
.8
2 18
.2
11
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
1333
10
77
80.8
25
6 19
.2
1136
85
.2
70
5.3
18
1.4
109
8.2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
64
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
IMPE
RIA
L U
ND
ER 1
8 16
14
87
.5
2 12
.5
3 18
.8
13
81.3
0
0.0
0 0.
0
T O
TAL
1899
17
48
92.0
15
1 8.
0 38
6 20
.3
1385
72
.9
61
3.2
67
3.5
41
-50
328
299
91.2
29
8.
8 69
21
.0
244
74.4
7
2.1
8 2.
4
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
18
-20
93
84
90.3
9
9.7
16
17.2
71
76
.3
2 2.
2 4
4.3
21
-30
593
549
92.6
44
7.
4 10
3 17
.4
448
75.5
18
3.
0 24
4.
0
31-4
0 65
6 59
6 90
.9
60
9.1
129
19.7
48
3 73
.6
21
3.2
23
3.5
51
-60
142
137
96.5
5
3.5
39
27.5
94
66
.2
5 3.
5 4
2.8
61
- 70
56
54
96.4
2
3.6
21
37.5
26
46
.4
5 8.
9 4
7.1
71
& A
BOV
E 15
15
10
0.0
0 0.
0 6
40.0
6
40.0
3
20.0
0
0.0
INYO
U
ND
ER 1
8
3
1
3
3.3
2
6
6.7
2
6
6.7
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1 33
.3
18
-20
14
12
8
5.7
2
14
.3
6
4
2.9
6
42
.9
0
0
.0
2
14.3
21-3
0
8
8
81
92.
0
7
8.0
55
62.
5
20
22.7
0
0.0
13
14
.8
31
-40
10
3
88
85.
4
15
14.
6
76
73.
8
14
13.
6
1
1.0
12
11
.7
41
-50
51
45
8
8.2
6
1
1.8
43
8
4.3
4
7
.8
0
0
.0
4
7
.8
51
-60
2
9
26
89.
7
3
10.
3
28
96.
6
1
3.4
0
0.0
0
0.0
61-7
0
1
3
12
92.
3
1
7.7
13
1
00.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
5
5
100.
0
0
0.0
3
60.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
40.0
TOTA
L
306
270
88.
2
36
11.
8
226
73.
9
45
14.
7
1
0.3
34
11.
1 K
ERN
U
ND
ER 1
8
44
40
9
0.9
4
9
.1
23
5
2.3
19
4
3.2
2
4
.5
0
0
.0
18
-20
3
11
2
83
9
1.0
28
9
.0
1
05
3
3.8
1
95
6
2.7
9
2
.9
2
0
.6
21
-30
15
75
14
50
9
2.1
1
25
7
.9
4
96
3
1.5
9
72
6
1.7
7
3
4.6
34
2.2
31-4
0
133
6
1176
88.
0
160
12.0
533
39.
9
704
52.
7
76
5.7
23
1.7
41-5
0
601
543
90.
3
58
9.7
299
49.
8
256
42.
6
33
5.5
13
2.2
51-6
0
220
1
97
8
9.5
23
10
.5
1
31
59
.5
68
3
0.9
17
7
.7
4
1
.8
61
-70
7
8
72
92.
3
6
7.7
61
78.2
12
15.
4
3
3.8
2
2.6
71 &
ABO
VE
23
23
100.
0
0
0.0
15
65.
2
6
26.
1
1
4.3
1
4.3
TOTA
L
418
8
378
4
90.4
404
9.6
1663
39.
7 22
32
5
3.3
2
14
5
.1
79
1
.9
KIN
GS
UN
DER
18
1
4
13
92.
9
1
7.1
4
28.
6
10
71.
4
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
1
00
89
8
9.0
11
1
1.0
40
4
0.0
58
5
8.0
2
2
.0
0
0
.0
21
-30
4
48
4
12
9
2.0
36
8
.0
1
36
30.4
284
63.
4
20
4.5
8
1.8
31-4
0
2
84
2
48
8
7.3
36
1
2.7
93
3
2.7
1
56
5
4.9
26
9
.2
9
3
.2
41
-50
136
109
80.
1
27
19.
9
49
36.
0
70
51.
5
12
8.8
5
3.7
51-6
0
44
40
9
0.9
4
9
.1
17
3
8.6
2
0
45.
5
6
13.
6
1
2.3
61-7
0
10
10
1
00.0
0
0.0
4
40.
0
4
40.
0
2
20.
0
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
2
2
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
1
00.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
038
9
23
8
8.9
1
15
1
1.1
3
43
3
3.0
604
58.
2
68
6.6
23
2.2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
65
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
LAK
E U
ND
ER 1
8
14
12
8
5.7
2
1
4.3
12
8
5.7
1
7
.1
1
7
.1
0
0
.0
18
-20
40
3
7
92.5
3
7.5
28
70.
0
9
22.
5
0
0.0
3
7.5
21-3
0
158
1
34
8
4.8
24
1
5.2
1
16
7
3.4
33
2
0.9
3
1
.9
6
3
.8
31
-40
2
17
1
60
7
3.7
57
2
6.3
1
87
8
6.2
17
7
.8
8
3
.7
5
2
.3
41
-50
133
1
08
8
1.2
25
1
8.8
1
16
8
7.2
8
6
.0
4
3
.0
5
3
.8
51
-60
55
51
9
2.7
4
7
.3
47
8
5.5
1
1
.8
3
5
.5
4
7
.3
61
-70
31
27
8
7.1
4
1
2.9
29
9
3.5
0
0
.0
2
6
.5
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
8
8
10
0.0
0
0
.0
6
7
5.0
1
1
2.5
1
1
2.5
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
6
56
5
37
8
1.9
1
19
1
8.1
5
41
8
2.5
70
1
0.7
22
3
.4
23
3
.5
LASS
EN
UN
DER
18
1
1
10
0.0
0
0.
0
1
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
14
10
7
1.4
4
2
8.6
12
8
5.7
1
7
.1
0
0
.0
1
7
.1
21
-30
79
63
7
9.7
16
2
0.3
63
7
9.7
10
12
.7
1
1
.3
5
6
.3
31
-40
73
63
86
.3
10
1
3.7
59
8
0.8
8
1
1.0
2
2
.7
4
5
.5
41
-50
49
43
87
.8
6
1
2.2
44
8
9.8
0
0
.0
1
2
.0
4
8.2
51-6
0
17
15
88.
2
2
11.8
17
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
61
-70
7
6
8
5.7
1
1
4.3
6
8
5.7
1
1
4.3
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
1
1
1
00.0
0
0.0
1
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
2
41
2
02
8
3.8
39
1
6.2
2
03
8
4.2
20
8
.3
4
1
.7
14
5
.8
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
UN
DER
18
225
197
87.
6
28
12.
4
82
36.4
122
54.
2
11
4.9
10
4.4
18-2
0
257
4 23
88
9
2.8
1
86
7
.2
4
36
1
6.9
1
869
7
2.6
1
29
5
.0
1
40
5
.4
21
-30
210
67
1930
9
91.
7
1758
8.3
375
8
17.
8 14
848
7
0.5
1
265
6
.0
11
96
5
.7
31
-40
156
36
1404
7
89.
8
158
9
10.
2
392
7
25.
1 9
044
5
7.8
1
617
1
0.3
1
048
6
.7
41
-50
6
837
603
2
88.
2
805
11.
8
2099
30.
7
331
9
48.
5
798
11.
7
621
9.1
51-6
0
234
8 21
32
9
0.8
2
16
9
.2
8
68
3
7.0
9
02
3
8.4
3
96
1
6.9
1
82
7
.8
61
-70
72
7
661
90.
9
66
9.1
314
43.
2
229
31.
5
139
19.
1
45
6.2
71 &
ABO
VE
156
141
90.
4
15
9.6
87
55.
8
40
25.
6
27
17.
3
2
1.3
TOTA
L 49
570
4490
7
90.
6 4
663
9
.4
1157
1
23.
3 30
373
6
1.3
438
2
8.8
324
4
6.5
M
AD
ERA
U
ND
ER 1
8
10
8
8
0.0
2
2
0.0
7
7
0.0
3
3
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
84
78
9
2.9
6
7
.1
19
2
2.6
64
7
6.2
1
1
.2
0
0
.0
21
-30
45
1
434
96.
2
17
3.8
69
15.
3
369
81.
8
7
1.6
6
1.3
31-4
0
296
270
91.
2
26
8.8
83
28.
0
203
68.
6
5
1.7
5
1.7
41-5
0
115
101
87.
8
14
12.
2
47
40.
9
60
52.
2
4
3.5
4
3.5
51-6
0
3
6
35
97.
2
1
2.8
14
38.
9
16
44.
4
6
16.
7
0
0.0
61-7
0
2
6
23
88.
5
3
11.
5
15
57.
7
10
38.
5
0
0.0
1
3.8
71 &
ABO
VE
7
6
8
5.7
1
1
4.3
3
4
2.9
3
4
2.9
1
1
4.3
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
102
5
955
93.
2
70
6.8
257
25.
1
728
71.
0
24
2.3
16
1.6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
66
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
MA
RIN
U
ND
ER 1
8
8
7
8
7.5
1
1
2.5
7
8
7.5
1
1
2.5
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
6
8
59
86.
8
9
13.2
37
54.
4
21
30.
9
1
1.5
9
13.
2
21-3
0
527
427
81.
0
100
19.
0
296
56.
2
164
31.
1
16
3.0
51
9.7
31-4
0
478
366
76.
6
112
23.
4
343
71.
8
54
11.
3
29
6.1
52
10.
9
41-5
0 3
06
2
15
7
0.3
91
2
9.7
2
37
7
7.5
22
7
.2
5
1
.6
42
1
3.7
51
-60
1
03
80
7
7.7
23
2
2.3
97
9
4.2
1
1
.0
1
1
.0
4
3
.9
61
-70
4
1
33
80.
5
8
19.
5
38
92.
7
1
2.4
2
4.9
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
11
11
100
.0
0
0
.0
9
8
1.8
1
9
.1
0
0
.0
1
9
.1
TO
TAL
15
42
1198
77.
7
344
22.
3 1
064
6
9.0
2
65
1
7.2
54
3
.5
1
59
1
0.3
MA
RIPO
SA
UN
DER
18
1
1
1
00.0
0
0.0
1
1
00.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
6
6
10
0.0
0
0
.0
5
8
3.3
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1
1
6.7
21
-30
29
27
9
3.1
2
6
.9
25
8
6.2
3
1
0.3
1
3
.4
0
0
.0
31
-40
21
16
7
6.2
5
2
3.8
17
8
1.0
2
9
.5
0
0
.0
2
9
.5
41
-50
19
15
7
8.9
4
2
1.1
17
8
9.5
1
5
.3
0
0
.0
1
5
.3
51
-60
8
4
5
0.0
4
5
0.0
6
7
5.0
2
2
5.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
61
-70
7
5
7
1.4
2
2
8.6
5
7
1.4
1
1
4.3
0
0
.0
1
1
4.3
71
& A
BOV
E
1
1
1
00.0
0
0.0
1
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
92
75
8
1.5
17
1
8.5
77
8
3.7
9
9
.8
1
1
.1
5
5
.4
MEN
DO
CIN
O
UN
DER
18
1
6
16
1
00.0
0
0.0
12
75.
0
1
6.3
0
0.0
3
18.
8
18-2
0
63
55
87.
3
8
12.
7
36
57.
1
21
33.
3
0
0.0
6
9.5
21-3
0
289
255
88.
2
34
11.
8
165
57.
1
111
38.
4
2
0.7
11
3.8
31-4
0
28
0
222
79.
3
58
20.
7
215
76.
8
45
16.
1
4
1.4
16
5.7
41-5
0
14
8
128
86.
5
20
13.
5
127
85.
8
11
7.4
1
0.7
9
6.1
51-6
0
4
9
45
91.
8
4
8.2
45
91.
8
3
6.1
1
2.0
0
0.0
61-7
0
26
22
84.
6
4
15.
4
24
92.
3
0
0.0
1
3.8
1
3.8
71 &
ABO
VE
9
8
8
8.9
1
1
1.1
9
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
880
7
51
8
5.3
1
29
1
4.7
6
33
7
1.9
1
92
2
1.8
9
1
.0
46
5
.2
MER
CED
U
ND
ER 1
8
19
18
9
4.7
1
5
.3
10
5
2.6
6
3
1.6
2
1
0.5
1
5
.3
18
-20
1
52
1
39
9
1.4
13
8
.6
23
1
5.1
1
18
7
7.6
5
3
.3
6
3
.9
21
-30
8
78
8
17
9
3.1
61
6
.9
1
74
1
9.8
6
45
7
3.5
34
3
.9
25
2
.8
31
-40
658
5
80
8
8.1
78
1
1.9
1
76
2
6.7
4
16
63
.2
47
7
.1
19
2
.9
41
-50
2
94
2
59
8
8.1
35
1
1.9
94
3
2.0
1
69
5
7.5
21
7
.1
10
3
.4
51
-60
1
15
1
11
9
6.5
4
3
.5
46
4
0.0
58
5
0.4
9
7
.8
2
1
.7
61
-70
45
43
9
5.6
2
4
.4
23
5
1.1
17
3
7.8
3
6
.7
2
4
.4
TO
TAL
217
4 1
980
9
1.1
1
94
8
.9
5
54
2
5.5
1
433
6
5.9
1
22
5
.6
65
3
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
1
3
13
1
00.0
0
0.0
8
61.
5
4
30.
8
1
7.7
0
0.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
67
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
MO
DO
C
UN
DER
18
3
2
66.
7
1
33.
3
2
66.
7
1
33.
3
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
6
4
66.
7
2
33.
3
5
83.
3
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1
1
6.7
21
-30
21
18
8
5.7
3
1
4.3
17
81
.0
3
1
4.3
0
0
.0
1
4
.8
31
-40
19
15
7
8.9
4
2
1.1
14
7
3.7
2
1
0.5
0
0
.0
3
1
5.8
41
-50
21
16
7
6.2
5
23.
8
16
76.
2
3
14.
3
1
4.8
1
4.8
51-6
0
6
5
83.
3
1
16.
7
6
1
00.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
61-7
0
2
2
1
00.0
0
0.0
2
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
3
3
1
00.0
0
0.0
3
1
00.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
8
1
65
80.
2
16
19.
8
65
80.
2
9
11.
1
1
1.2
6
7.4
M
ON
O
UN
DER
18
1
1
10
0.0
0
0
.0
1
100
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
6
4
66.
7
2
33.3
5
83.
3
1
16.
7
0
0.0
0
0.0
21-3
0
37
36
9
7.3
1
2
.7
14
3
7.8
6
1
6.2
0
0
.0
1
7
45.9
31-4
0
39
33
84.
6
6
15.
4
23
59.
0
3
7.7
0
0.0
13
33.
3
41-5
0
3
0
27
90.
0
3
10.0
15
50.
0
2
6.7
0
0.0
13
43.
3
51-6
0
9
8
8
8.9
1
11
.1
5
5
5.6
1
1
1.1
0
0
.0
3
3
3.3
61
-70
4
4
100
.0
0
0
.0
2
5
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
2
5
0.0
71
& A
BOV
E
3
2
66.
7
1
33.3
1
33.
3
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
66.
7
TOTA
L 1
29
1
15
8
9.1
14
10
.9
66
5
1.2
13
1
0.1
0
0
.0
50
3
8.8
MO
NTE
REY
UN
DER
18
5
1
49
96.
1
2
3.9
16
31.
4
35
68.
6
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
341
319
93.
5
22
6.5
76
22.
3
255
74.
8
3
0.9
7
2.1
21-3
0
160
7 14
68
9
1.4
1
39
8
.6
3
40
2
1.2
1
188
7
3.9
44
2
.7
35
2
.2
31
-40
11
38
9
76
8
5.8
1
62
14.
2
428
37.
6
601
52.
8
62
5.4
47
4.1
41-5
0
53
2
435
81.
8
97
18.2
281
52.
8
211
39.
7
23
4.3
17
3.2
51-6
0
169
147
87.
0
22
13.0
107
63.
3
50
29.
6
6
3.6
6
3.6
61-7
0
72
65
90.
3
7
9.7
44
61.
1
19
26.
4
7
9.7
2
2.8
71 &
ABO
VE
21
14
6
6.7
7
33
.3
14
6
6.7
6
2
8.6
1
4
.8
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
39
31
3473
88.
3
458
11.7
1
306
3
3.2
236
5
60.
2
146
3.7
114
2.9
N
APA
U
ND
ER 1
8
16
12
7
5.0
4
25
.0
10
6
2.5
6
3
7.5
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
74
66
8
9.2
8
10
.8
40
5
4.1
32
4
3.2
2
2
.7
0
0
.0
21
-30
3
73
3
36
9
0.1
37
9
.9
1
73
46
.4
1
95
5
2.3
3
0
.8
2
0
.5
31
-40
280
223
79.
6
57
20.4
186
66.4
87
31.
1
5
1.8
2
0.7
41-5
0
157
135
86.
0
22
14.
0
115
73.
2
33
21.
0
7
4.5
2
1.3
51-6
0
6
5
54
83.
1
11
16.
9
57
87.
7
7
10.
8
0
0.0
1
1.5
61-7
0
3
6
32
88.
9
4
11.
1
31
86.
1
5
13.
9
0
0.0
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
10
9
9
0.0
1
1
0.0
10
100
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
10
11
8
67
8
5.8
1
44
1
4.2
6
22
6
1.5
3
65
3
6.1
17
1
.7
7
0
.7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
68
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
NEV
AD
A
UN
DER
18
3
3
100.
0
0
0.0
2
66.
7
1
33.
3
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
4
8
42
87.
5
6
12.
5
41
85.
4
5
10.
4
1
2.1
1
2.1
21-3
0
171
146
85.
4
25
14.
6
145
84.
8
21
12.
3
3
1.8
2
1.2
31-4
0
203
160
78.
8
43
21.
2
181
89.
2
13
6.4
7
3.4
2
1.0
41-5
0
16
0
134
83.
8
26
16.
2
154
96.
3
3
1.9
1
0.6
2
1.2
51-6
0 4
2
32
76.
2
10
23.
8
41
97.
6
0
0.0
1
2.4
0
0.0
61-7
0
15
13
8
6.7
2
1
3.3
13
8
6.7
1
6
.7
1
6
.7
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
6
6
10
0.0
0
0
.0
5
8
3.3
0
0
.0
1
1
6.7
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
6
48
5
36
8
2.7
1
12
1
7.3
5
82
8
9.8
44
6
.8
15
2
.3
7
1
.1
ORA
NG
E U
ND
ER 1
8
70
58
8
2.9
12
1
7.1
42
6
0.0
24
3
4.3
1
1
.4
3
4
.3
18
-20
85
0
749
88.
1
101
11.
9
389
45.
8
392
46.
1
14
1.6
55
6.5
21-3
0 6
980
620
3
88.
9
777
11.
1
267
1
38.
3
368
4
52.
8
110
1.6
515
7.4
31-4
0
474
2
410
7
86.
6
635
13.
4
226
9
47.
8
197
0
41.
5
117
2.5
386
8.1
41-5
0
2178
181
7
83.
4
361
16.
6
124
1
57.
0
647
29.
7
65
3.0
225
10.
3
51-6
0
77
7
668
86.
0
109
14.
0
531
68.
3
164
21.
1
9
1.2
73
9.4
61-7
0
25
2
224
88.
9
28
11.
1
179
71.
0
53
21.
0
5
2.0
15
6.0
71 &
ABO
VE
76
65
8
5.5
11
1
4.5
64
8
4.2
8
1
0.5
0
0
.0
4
5
.3
TO
TAL
159
25
1389
1
87.
2 20
34
1
2.8
7386
46.
4
694
2
43.
6
321
2.0
127
6
8.0
PL
AC
ER
UN
DER
18
2
1
17
81.
0
4
19.
0
19
90.
5
2
9.5
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
108
101
93.
5
7
6.5
98
90.
7
8
7.4
1
0.9
1
0.9
21-3
0
60
0
516
86.
0
84
14.
0
506
84.
3
77
12.
8
9
1.5
8
1.3
31-4
0
504
390
77.
4
114
22.
6
442
87.
7
49
9.7
8
1.6
5
1.0
41-5
0
264
215
81.
4
49
18.
6
240
90.
9
21
8.0
1
0.4
2
0.8
51-6
0
92
82
8
9.1
10
1
0.9
78
8
4.8
11
1
2.0
2
2
.2
1
1.1
61-7
0
38
33
86.
8
5
13.
2
36
94.
7
1
2.6
1
2.6
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
9
7
7
7.8
2
2
2.2
8
8
8.9
0
0
.0
1
1
1.1
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
1
636
1
361
8
3.2
2
75
1
6.8
1
427
8
7.2
1
69
1
0.3
23
1
.4
17
1
.0
PLU
MA
S U
ND
ER 1
8
5
3
6
0.0
2
4
0.0
5
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
1
0
10
10
0.0
0
0
.0
9
9
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1
1
0.0
21
-30
42
36
8
5.7
6
1
4.3
38
9
0.5
3
7
.1
0
0
.0
1
2
.4
31
-40
58
48
8
2.8
10
1
7.2
49
8
4.5
3
5
.2
4
6
.9
2
3
.4
41
-50
33
28
8
4.8
5
1
5.2
30
9
0.9
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
3
9
.1
51
-60
16
12
7
5.0
4
2
5.0
16
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
61-7
0
1
4
10
71.
4
4
28.
6
13
92.
9
0
0.0
1
7.1
0
0.0
TOTA
L
17
8
147
82.
6
31
17.
4
160
89.
9
6
3
.4
5
2
.8
7
3
.9
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
69
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
RIV
ERSI
DE
UN
DER
18
10
5
91
86.
7
14
13.
3
55
52.
4
45
42.
9
3
2.9
2
1.9
18-2
0
659
611
92.
7
48
7.3
251
38.
1
370
56.
1
22
3.3
16
2.4
21-3
0
3382
304
2
89.
9
340
10.
1
113
1
33.
4
193
0
57.
1
211
6.2
110
3.3
31-4
0 2
797
2
429
8
6.8
3
68
1
3.2
1
247
4
4.6
1
282
4
5.8
1
72
6
.1
96
3
.4
41
-50
14
10
1
186
8
4.1
2
24
1
5.9
7
51
5
3.3
4
91
3
4.8
1
12
7
.9
56
4
.0
51
-60
5
75
5
08
8
8.3
67
1
1.7
3
70
6
4.3
1
33
2
3.1
43
7
.5
29
5
.0
61
-70
2
00
1
73
8
6.5
27
1
3.5
1
44
7
2.0
32
1
6.0
10
5
.0
14
7
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
6
2
52
83.
9
10
16.
1
51
82.
3
7
11.
3
3
4.8
1
1.6
TOTA
L
919
0
809
2
88.
1 10
98
1
1.9
4
000
4
3.5
4
290
4
6.7
5
76
6
.3
3
24
3
.5
SAC
RAM
ENTO
U
ND
ER 1
8
53
45
8
4.9
8
1
5.1
34
6
4.2
12
2
2.6
3
5
.7
4
7
.5
18
-20
4
27
3
65
8
5.5
62
1
4.5
2
78
6
5.1
1
02
2
3.9
36
8
.4
11
2
.6
21
-30
292
5
247
9
84.
8
446
15.
2
183
4
62.
7
678
23.
2
313
10.
7
100
3.4
31-4
0
2186
174
1
79.
6
445
20.
4
149
2
68.
3
334
15.
3
286
13.
1
74
3.4
41-5
0
10
86
9
09
8
3.7
1
77
1
6.3
7
53
6
9.3
1
48
1
3.6
1
45
1
3.4
40
3
.7
51
-60
3
61
3
21
8
8.
40
1
1.1
2
53
7
0.1
48
1
3.3
44
1
2.2
16
4
.4
61
-70
1
44
1
23
8
5.4
21
1
4.6
1
01
7
0.1
22
1
5.3
18
1
2.5
3
2
.1
71
& A
BOV
E
4
3
40
93.
0
3
7.0
31
72.
1
5
11.
6
5
11.
6
2
4.7
TOTA
L
722
5
602
3
83.
4 1
202
1
6.6
4
776
6
6.1
1
349
1
8.7
8
50
1
1.8
2
50
3
.5
SAN
BEN
ITO
U
ND
ER 1
8
4
3
7
5.0
1
2
5.0
1
2
5.0
3
7
5.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
2
8
28
10
0.0
0
0
.0
6
2
1.4
19
6
7.9
2
7
.1
1
3
.6
21
-30
1
27
1
19
93
.7
8
6
.3
18
1
4.2
1
07
8
4.3
0
0
.0
2
1
.6
31
-40
91
78
8
5.7
13
1
4.3
29
3
1.9
60
6
5.9
0
0
.0
2
2
.2
41
-50
41
37
9
0.2
4
9
.8
21
51
.2
20
4
8.8
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
51
-60
17
14
8
2.4
3
1
7.6
10
5
8.8
6
3
5.3
0
0
.0
1
5
.9
61
-70
9
9
100
.0
0
0
.0
4
4
4.4
5
5
5.6
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
3
17
2
88
9
0.9
29
9
.1
89
2
8.1
2
20
6
9.4
2
0
.6
6
1
.9
SAN
U
ND
ER 1
8
68
58
8
5.3
10
1
4.7
33
4
8.5
29
4
2.6
4
5
.9
2
2
.9
BER
NA
RDIN
O
18-2
0
638
596
93.
4
42
6.6
265
41.
5
325
50.
9
21
3.3
27
4
.2
21
-30
4070
370
7
91.
1
363
8.9
131
3
32.
3
235
7
57.
9
233
5.7
167
4.1
31-4
0
3235
284
0
87.
8
395
12.
2
131
8
40.
7
146
1
45.
2
315
9.7
141
4.4
41-5
0
166
1
144
0
86.
7
221
13.
3
865
52.
1
579
34.
9
139
8.4
78
4.7
51-6
0
574
515
89.
7
59
10.
3
318
55.
4
170
29.
6
54
9.4
32
5.6
61-7
0
176
162
92.
0
14
8.0
106
60.
2
40
22.
7
20
11.
4
10
5.7
71 &
ABO
VE
52
49
9
4.2
3
5
.8
36
6
9.2
8
1
5.4
6
1
1.5
2
3
.8
TO
TAL
1047
4
936
7
89.
4
110
7
10.
6
425
4
40.
6
496
9
47.
4
792
7.6
459
4.4
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
70
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
SAN
U
ND
ER 1
8 6
5 83
.3
1 16
.7
2 33
.3
1 16
.7
0 0.
0 3
50.0
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SAN
DIE
GO
U
ND
ER 1
8
122
1
02
8
3.6
20
1
6.4
71
5
8.2
44
3
6.1
6
4
.9
1
0
.8
18
-20
11
00
9
64
8
7.6
1
36
1
2.4
5
89
5
3.5
4
30
3
9.1
45
4
.1
3
6
3.3
21-3
0
658
7
577
1
87.
6
816
12.
4
331
5
50.
3
263
0
39.
9
421
6.4
221
3.4
31-4
0 4
546
3
866
8
5.0
6
80
1
5.0
2
421
5
3.3
1
631
3
5.9
3
28
7
.2
1
66
3
.7
41
-50
2
125
1
782
8
3.9
3
43
1
6.1
1
343
6
3.2
5
88
2
7.7
1
26
5
.9
68
3
.2
51
-60
7
61
6
67
8
7.6
94
1
2.4
5
12
6
7.3
1
70
2
2.3
48
6
.3
31
4
.1
61
-70
221
194
87.
8
27
12.
2
155
70.
1
53
24.
0
9
4.1
4
1
.8
71
& A
BOV
E
6
8
59
86.
8
9
13.
2
53
77.
9
12
17.
6
2
2.9
1
1.5
TOTA
L
1553
0 1
3405
86.
3
212
5
13.
7
845
9
54.
5
555
8
35.
8
985
6.3
528
3.4
FR
AN
CIS
CO
18
-20
55
51
9
2.7
4
7
.3
18
3
2.7
15
2
7.3
10
1
8.2
12
2
1.8
21
-30
573
479
83.
6
94
16.
4
300
52.
4
113
19.
7
65
11.
3
9
5
16.
6
31-4
0
474
399
84.
2
75
15.
8
273
57.
6
66
13.
9
62
13.
1
73
15.
4
41-5
0
23
3
193
82.
8
40
17.
2
147
63.
1
12
5.2
38
16.
3
36
15.5
51-6
0
5
9
52
88.
1
7
11.
9
35
59.
3
4
6.8
13
22.
0
7
11.
9
61-7
0
2
8
27
96.
4
1
3.6
14
5
0.0
1
3
.6
9
3
2.1
4
1
4.3
71
& A
BOV
E
8
7
8
7.5
1
1
2.5
5
6
2.5
0
0
.0
3
3
7.5
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
1
436
1
213
8
4.5
2
23
1
5.5
7
94
5
5.3
2
12
1
4.8
2
00
1
3.9
2
30
1
6.0
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
UN
DER
18
4
5
35
77.
8
10
22.
2
18
40.
0
25
5
5.6
1
2
.2
1
2
.2
18
-20
2
92
2
70
9
2.5
22
7
.5
1
10
3
7.7
1
65
5
6.5
7
2
.4
10
3
.4
21
-30
158
9
143
1
90.
1
158
9.9
544
34.
2
910
57.
3
63
4.0
72
4.5
31-4
0
118
4
105
1
88.
8
133
11.
2
524
44.
3
538
45.
4
78
6.6
44
3.7
41-5
0
656
567
86.
4
89
13.
6
366
55.
8
210
32.
0
49
7.5
31
4.7
51-6
0
242
214
88.
4
28
11.
6
158
65.
3
56
23.
1
19
7.9
9
3.7
61-7
0
9
0
84
93.
3
6
6.7
47
52.
2
33
36.
7
7
7.8
3
3.3
71 &
ABO
VE
24
21
8
7.5
3
1
2.5
18
7
5.0
3
1
2.5
3
1
2.5
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
4
122
3
673
8
9.1
4
49
1
0.9
1
785
4
3.3
1
940
4
7.1
2
27
5
.5
1
70
4
.1
SAN
LU
IS
UN
DER
18
2
2
16
72.
7
6
27.
3
16
72.
7
6
27.
3
0
0.0
0
0.0
OBI
SPO
18
-20
20
5
181
88.
3
24
11.
7
147
71.
7
57
27.
8
0
0.0
1
0.5
21-3
0
80
8
699
86.
5
109
13.
5
502
62.
1
280
34.
7
13
1.6
13
1.6
31-4
0
686
5
72
8
3.4
1
14
1
6.6
5
03
7
3.3
1
59
2
3.2
17
2
.5
7
1
.0
41
-50
3
66
2
96
8
0.9
70
1
9.1
2
96
8
0.9
51
1
3.9
11
3
.0
8
2
.2
51
-60
1
17
99
8
4.6
18
1
5.4
87
7
4.4
24
2
0.5
5
4
.3
1
0
.9
61
-70
40
35
8
7.5
5
1
2.5
34
8
5.0
3
7
.5
1
2
.5
2
5
.0
TO
TAL
22
64
1
915
8
4.6
3
49
1
5.4
1
604
7
0.8
5
81
2
5.7
47
2
.1
32
1
.4
71
& A
BOV
E
2
0
17
8
5.0
3
1
5.0
19
9
5.0
1
5
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
71
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SAN
MA
TEO
U
ND
ER 1
8
39
31
7
9.5
8
2
0.5
23
5
9.0
11
2
8.2
2
5
.1
3
7
.7
18
-20
2
24
1
94
8
6.6
30
1
3.4
74
3
3.0
1
08
4
8.2
18
8
.0
24
1
0.7
21
-30
154
5
133
6
86.
5
209
13.
5
647
41.
9
683
44.
2
62
4.0
153
9.9
31-4
0
138
3
114
6
82.
9
237
17.
1
711
51.
4
363
26.
2
141
10.
2
168
12.
1
41-5
0
698
580
83.
1
118
16.
9
435
62.
3
114
16.
3
64
9.2
85
12.
2
51-6
0
245
209
85.
3
36
14.
7
164
66.
9
36
14.
7
21
8.6
24
9.8
61-7
0
99
90
9
0.9
9
9
.1
75
7
5.8
7
7
.1
13
1
3.1
4
4
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
2
1
20
95.
2
1
4.8
15
71.
4
1
4.8
3
14.
3
2
9.5
TOTA
L
425
4
3606
84.
8
648
15.
2
214
4
50.
4
132
3
31.
1
324
7.6
463
10.
9 SA
NTA
U
ND
ER 1
8
57
49
8
6.0
8
1
4.0
31
5
4.4
24
4
2.1
2
3
.5
0
0
.0
BA
RBA
RA
18-2
0
27
5
222
80.
7
53
1
9.3
1
58
5
7.5
1
01
3
6.7
4
1
.5
12
4
.4
21
-30
14
39
1
240
8
6.2
1
99
1
3.8
5
87
4
0.8
7
79
5
4.1
34
2
.4
39
2
.7
31
-40
9
59
7
80
8
1.3
1
79
1
8.7
5
05
5
2.7
3
82
3
9.8
48
5
.0
24
2
.5
41
-50
442
3
59
8
1.2
83
1
8.8
2
87
6
4.9
1
26
2
8.5
13
2
.9
16
3
.6
51
-60
1
56
1
27
8
1.4
29
1
8.6
1
04
6
6.7
39
2
5.0
10
6
.4
3
1
.9
61
-70
5
6
48
85.
7
8
14.
3
39
69.
6
14
25.
0
2
3.6
1
1.8
71 &
ABO
VE
18
14
7
7.8
4
2
2.2
16
8
8.9
1
5
.6
1
5
.6
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
3
402
2
839
8
3.5
5
63
1
6.5
1
727
5
0.8
1
466
4
3.1
1
14
3
.4
95
2
.8
SAN
TA C
LARA
U
ND
ER 1
8
51
43
8
4.3
8
1
5.7
24
4
7.1
21
4
1.2
3
5
.9
3
5
.9
18
-20
4
05
3
79
9
3.6
26
6
.4
1
18
2
9.1
2
57
6
3.5
14
3
.5
16
4
.0
21
-30
34
19
3
042
8
9.0
3
77
1
1.0
1
120
3
2.8
1
864
5
4.5
1
12
3
.3
3
23
9
.4
31
-40
291
0
249
9
85.
9
411
14.
1
1275
43.
8
116
5
40.
0
153
5.3
317
10.
9
41-5
0
131
4
111
0
84.
5
204
15.
5
669
50.
9
414
31.
5
71
5.4
160
12.
2
51-6
0
43
8
389
88.
8
49
11.
2
241
55.
0
142
32.
4
24
5.5
31
7.1
61-7
0
123
114
92.
7
9
7.3
80
65.
0
30
24.
4
4
3.3
9
7.3
71 &
ABO
VE
25
24
9
6.0
1
4
.0
17
6
8.0
5
2
0.0
1
4
.0
2
8
.0
TO
TAL
868
5
760
0
87.
5 1
085
1
2.5
3
544
4
0.8
3
898
4
4.9
3
82
4
.4
8
61
9
.9
SAN
TA C
RU
Z U
ND
ER 1
8
37
31
8
3.8
6
1
6.2
21
5
6.8
13
3
5.1
1
2
.7
2
5
.4
18
-20
216
1
88
8
7.0
28
1
3.0
1
02
4
7.2
1
07
4
9.5
5
2
.3
2
0
.9
21
-30
9
24
8
14
8
8.1
1
10
1
1.9
3
90
4
2.2
5
07
5
4.9
8
0
.9
19
2
.1
31
-40
7
22
6
04
8
3.7
1
18
1
6.3
4
41
6
1.1
2
60
3
6.0
10
1
.4
11
1
.5
41
-50
4
12
3
36
8
1.6
76
1
8.4
2
94
7
1.4
1
03
2
5.0
9
2
.2
6
1
.5
51
-60
1
01
84
8
3.2
17
1
6.8
73
7
2.3
26
2
5.7
1
1
.0
1
1
.0
61
-70
24
20
8
3.3
4
1
6.7
19
7
9.2
4
1
6.7
0
0
.0
1
4
.2
71
& A
BOV
E
8
6
75.
0
2
25.
0
7
87.
5
1
12.
5
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
24
44
2
083
8
5.2
3
61
1
4.8
1
347
5
5.1
1
021
4
1.8
34
1
.4
42
1
.7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
72
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SHA
STA
U
ND
ER 1
8
16
14
8
7.5
2
12.
5
14
87.
5
0
0.0
2
12.
5
0
0.0
18-2
0
7
1
58
81.
7
13
18.
3
63
88.
7
4
5.6
0
0.0
4
5.6
21-3
0
3
02
2
51
8
3.1
51
1
6.9
2
72
9
0.1
19
6
.3
2
0
.7
9
3
.0
31
-40
3
47
2
90
8
3.6
57
1
6.4
3
18
9
1.6
20
5
.8
3
0
.9
6
1
.7
41
-50
21
1
179
84.
8
32
15.
2
193
91.
5
9
4.3
0
0.0
9
4.3
51-6
0
6
1
52
85.
2
9
14.
8
58
95.
1
1
1.6
0
0.0
2
3.3
61-7
0
2
9
28
96.
6
1
3.4
27
93.
1
2
6.9
0
0.0
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
7
7
100
.0
0
0
.0
7
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
104
4
879
84.
2
165
15.
8
952
91.
2
55
5.3
7
0.7
30
2.9
SI
ERRA
18
-20
1
1
100
.0
0
0
.0
1
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
21-3
0
9
6
66.
7
3
33.
3
9
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
31
-40
14
12
8
5.7
2
1
4.3
14
100.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
41-5
0
1
2
12
1
00.0
0
0.0
11
91.
7
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
8.3
51-6
0
1
1
1
00.0
0
0.0
1
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
37
32
86
.5
5
1
3.5
36
9
7.3
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
2.7
SI
SKIY
OU
U
ND
ER 1
8
4
4
100
.0
0
0
.0
3
7
5.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1
2
5.0
18
-20
28
2
5
89.
3
3
10.
7
22
78.
6
4
14.
3
0
0.0
2
7.1
21-3
0
7
9
71
89.
9
8
10.
1
63
79.
7
6
7.6
0
0.0
10
12.
7
31-4
0
104
82
78.
8
22
21.
2
84
80.
8
8
7.7
2
1.9
10
9.6
41-5
0
8
7
72
82.
8
15
17.
2
73
83.
9
4
4.6
2
2.3
8
9.2
51-6
0
27
21
77.
8
6
22.
2
23
85.
2
1
3.7
2
7.4
1
3.7
61-7
0
1
6
14
87.
5
2
12.
5
15
93.
8
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
6.3
71 &
ABO
VE
4
3
7
5.0
1
2
5.0
3
7
5.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
1
2
5.0
TO
TAL
3
49
2
92
8
3.7
57
1
6.3
2
86
8
1.9
23
6
.6
6
1
.7
3
4
9.7
SO
LAN
O
UN
DER
18
2
8
24
85.
7
4
14.
3
17
60.
7
5
17.
9
6
21.
4
0
0.0
18-2
0
134
1
19
8
8.8
15
1
1.2
60
4
4.8
48
3
5.8
22
1
6.4
4
3
.0
21
-30
624
554
88.
8
70
11.
2
282
45.
2
233
37.
3
82
13.
1
27
4.3
31-4
0 5
91
4
96
8
3.9
95
1
6.1
3
23
5
4.7
1
27
2
1.5
1
13
1
9.1
28
4
.7
41
-50
33
2
284
85.
5
48
14.
5
197
59.
3
53
16.
0
62
18.
7
20
6.0
51-6
0
138
1
19
8
6.2
19
1
3.8
88
6
3.8
7
5
.1
34
2
4.6
9
6
.5
61
-70
3
9
35
89.
7
4
10.
3
28
71.
8
2
5.1
9
23.
1
0
0.0
71 &
ABO
VE
19
19
100
.0
0
0
.0
14
7
3.7
1
5
.3
3
1
5.8
1
5
.3
TO
TAL
19
05
1
650
8
6.6
2
55
1
3.4
10
09
5
3.0
4
76
2
5.0
3
31
1
7.4
89
4
.7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
73
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
SON
OM
A
UN
DER
18
4
6
36
78.
3
10
21.
7
41
89.
1
5
10.
9
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
18
-20
2
13
1
78
8
3.6
35
1
6.4
1
23
5
7.7
80
3
7.6
4
1
.9
6
2
.8
21
-30
102
2
893
87.
4
129
12.
6
583
57.
0
415
40.
6
6
0.6
18
1.8
31-4
0
874
706
80.
8
168
19.
2
651
74.
5
188
21.
5
16
1.8
19
2.2
41-5
0
511
410
80.
2
101
19.
8
435
85.
1
63
12.
3
6
1.2
7
1.4
51-6
0
177
151
85.
3
26
14.
7
153
86.
4
16
9.0
5
2.8
3
1.7
61-7
0
51
42
82.
4
9
17.
6
44
86.
3
5
9.8
1
2.0
1
2.0
71 &
ABO
VE
19
18
94.
7
1
5.3
18
94.
7
1
5.3
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
2913
243
4
83.
6
479
16.
4
204
8
70.
3
773
26.
5
38
1.3
54
1.9
ST
AN
ISLA
US
UN
DER
18
3
4
26
76.
5
8
23.
5
14
41.
2
18
52.9
0
0.0
2
5.9
18-2
0
195
179
91.
8
16
8.2
70
35.
9
122
62.
6
1
0.5
2
1.0
21-3
0
111
2
998
89.
7
114
10.
3
433
38.
9
631
56.
7
21
1.9
27
2.4
31-4
0
878
745
84.
9
133
15.
1
437
49.
8
394
44.
9
28
3.2
19
2.2
41-5
0
410
356
86.
8
54
13.
2
230
56.
1
152
37.
1
14
3.4
14
3.4
51-6
0
152
141
92.
8
11
7.2
102
67.
1
41
27.
0
4
2.6
5
3.3
61-7
0
46
39
8
4.8
7
1
5.2
34
7
3.9
10
2
1.7
2
4
.3
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
1
2
12
1
00.0
0
0.0
9
75.
0
3
25.
0
0
0.0
0
0.0
TOTA
L
2839
249
6
87.
9
343
12.
1
132
9
46.
8
137
1
48.
3
70
2.5
69
2.4
SU
TTER
18
-20
77
67
8
7.0
10
1
3.0
42
5
4.5
28
3
6.4
1
1
.3
6
7
.8
21
-30
3
25
2
96
9
1.1
29
8
.9
1
58
4
8.6
1
41
4
3.4
5
1
.5
21
6
.5
31
-40
2
76
2
32
8
4.1
44
1
5.9
1
75
6
3.4
66
2
3.9
4
1.4
31
11.
2
41-5
0
148
124
83.
8
24
16.
2
100
67.
6
29
19.
6
2
1.4
17
11.
5
51-6
0
6
2
60
96.
8
2
3.2
46
74.
2
9
14.
5
0
0.0
7
11.
3
61-7
0
1
9
19
1
00.0
0
0.0
10
52.
6
0
0.0
0
0.0
9
47.
4
71 &
ABO
VE
6
6
100
.0
0
0
.0
4
6
6.7
0
0
.0
2
3
3.3
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
9
13
8
04
8
8.1
1
09
1
1.9
5
35
5
8.6
2
73
2
9.9
14
1
.5
91
1
0.0
TEH
AM
A
UN
DER
18
6
6
1
00.0
0
0.0
5
83.
3
1
16.
7
0
0.0
0
0.0
18-2
0
2
4
21
87.
5
3
12.
5
15
62.
5
9
37.
5
0
0.0
0
0.0
21-3
0
14
3
129
90.
2
14
9.8
77
53.
8
62
43.
4
1
0.7
3
2.1
31-4
0
119
1
00
8
4.0
19
1
6.0
93
7
8.2
24
2
0.2
0
0
.0
2
1
.7
41
-50
69
62
8
9.9
7
1
0.1
55
7
9.7
11
1
5.9
2
2
.9
1
1
.4
51
-60
28
24
8
5.7
4
1
4.3
26
92
.9
1
3
.6
0
0
.0
1
3
.6
61
-70
21
18
8
5.7
3
1
4.3
19
9
0.5
2
9
.5
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
71
& A
BOV
E
5
5
1
00.0
0
0.0
5
10
0.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
0
0
.0
TO
TAL
4
15
3
65
88
.0
50
1
2.0
2
95
7
1.1
1
10
2
6.5
3
0
.7
7
1
.7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
74
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
TRIN
ITY
UN
DER
18
1 1
100.
0 0
0.0
1 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
18-2
0 15
14
93
.3
1 6.
7 14
93
.3
1 6.
7 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 39
31
79
.5
8 20
.5
37
94.9
1
2.6
0 0.
0 1
2.6
31
-40
78
62
79.5
16
20
.5
75
96.2
2
2.6
0 0.
0 1
1.3
41
-50
57
51
89.5
6
10.5
52
91
.2
1 1.
8 0
0.0
4 7.
0
51-6
0 17
16
94
.1
1 5.
9 17
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
61-7
0 15
14
93
.3
1 6.
7 15
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 22
2 18
9 85
.1
33
14.9
21
1 95
.0
5 2.
3 0
0.0
6 2.
7 TU
LARE
U
ND
ER 1
8 41
38
92
.7
3 7.
3 11
26
.8
28
68.3
0
0.0
2 4.
9
18-2
0
344
329
95
.6
15
4.4
76
22.1
26
3 76
.5
3 0.
9 2
0.6
21
-30
1521
14
30
94.0
91
6.
0 24
6 16
.2
1252
82
.3
12
0.8
11
0.7
31
-40
986
900
91
.3
86
8.7
229
23.2
73
7 74
.7
7 0.
7 13
1.
3
41-5
0 43
3 38
7 89
.4
46
10.6
13
8 31
.9
283
65.4
4
0.9
8 1.
8
51-6
0 15
8 15
0 94
.9
8 5.
1 62
39
.2
86
54.4
6
3.8
4 2.
5
61-7
0 52
47
90
.4
5 9.
6 20
38
.5
29
55.8
1
1.9
2 3.
8
71 &
ABO
VE
17
15
88.2
2
11.8
8
47.1
9
52.9
0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 35
52
3296
92
.8
256
7.2
790
22.2
26
87
75.6
33
0.
9 42
1.
2 TU
OLU
MN
E U
ND
ER 1
8 4
4 10
0.0
0 0.
0 4
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
18
-20
20
18
90.0
2
10.0
20
10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
21-3
0 99
91
91
.9
8 8.
1 96
97
.0
3 3.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
31-4
0 12
6 97
77
.0
29
23.0
12
6 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
41-5
0 93
75
80
.6
18
19.4
91
97
.8
2 2.
2 0
0.0
0 0.
0
51-6
0 25
19
76
.0
6 24
.0
21
84.0
2
8.0
0 0.
0 2
8.0
61
-70
12
11
91.7
1
8.3
12
100.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
VEN
TURA
U
ND
ER 1
8 47
38
80
.9
9 19
.1
28
59.6
17
36
.2
1 2.
1 1
2.1
71
& A
BOV
E 5
4 80
.0
1 20
.0
5 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
TOTA
L 38
4 31
9 83
.1
65
16.9
37
5 97
.7
7 1.
8 0
0.0
2 0.
5
18
-20
301
260
86.4
41
13
.6
101
33.6
18
9 62
.8
4 1.
3 7
2.3
21
-30
1873
16
85
90.0
18
8 10
.0
610
32.6
11
72
62.6
58
3.
1 33
1.
8
31-4
0 11
97
1010
84
.4
187
15.6
54
2 45
.3
583
48.7
34
2.
8 38
3.
2
41-5
0 58
2 48
1 82
.6
101
17.4
34
2 58
.8
208
35.7
14
2.
4 18
3.
1
51-6
0 20
1 16
8 83
.6
33
16.4
13
6 67
.7
53
26.4
4
2.0
8 4.
0
61-7
0 62
51
82
.3
11
17.7
42
67
.7
18
29.0
1
1.6
1 1.
6
71 &
ABO
VE
22
17
77.3
5
22.7
16
72
.7
6 27
.3
0 0.
0 0
0.0
TO
TAL
4285
37
10
86.6
57
5 13
.4
1817
42
.4
2246
52
.4
116
2.7
106
2.5
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
75
TABL
E B1
: 19
95 D
UI A
RRES
TS B
Y C
OU
NTY
, AG
E, S
EX A
ND
RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
- con
tinue
d
SE
X (1
00%
) RA
CE/
ETH
NIC
ITY
(100
%)
CO
UN
TY
AG
E TO
TAL
MA
LE
FEM
ALE
W
HIT
E H
ISPA
NIC
BL
AC
K
OTH
ER
YUBA
U
ND
ER 1
8 6
5 83
.3
1 16
.7
6 10
0.0
0 0.
0 0
0.0
0 0.
0
61
- 70
13
11
84.6
2
15.4
8
61.5
3
23.1
2
15.4
0
0.0
41
- 50
216
191
88.4
25
11
.6
137
63.4
60
27
.8
13
6.0
6 2.
8
21
- 30
188
154
81.9
34
18
.1
100
53.2
75
39
.9
10
5.3
3 1.
6
31
-40
191
156
81.7
35
18
.3
137
71.7
46
24
.1
7 3.
7 1
0.5
18
- 20
119
109
91.6
10
8.
4 48
40
.3
65
54.6
2
1.7
4 3.
4
31
-40
430
354
82.3
76
17
.7
265
61.6
13
5 31
.4
18
4.2
12
2.8
TO
TAL
594
49
6 83
.5
98
16.5
40
4 68
.0
153
25.8
27
4.
5 10
1.
7
51
- 60
82
74
90.2
8
9.8
62
75.6
19
23
.2
1 1.
2 0
0.0
61
-70
18
17
94.4
1
5.6
14
77.8
3
16.7
1
5.6
0 0.
0
18
-20
45
36
80.0
9
20.0
28
62
.2
14
31.1
3
6.7
0 0.
0
21
-30
543
489
90.1
54
9.
9 27
6 50
.8
240
44.2
11
2.
0 16
2.
9
41
- 50
104
90
86.5
14
13
.5
83
79.8
12
11
.5
3 2.
9 6
5.8
51
-60
41
39
95.1
2
4.9
37
90.2
3
7.3
1 2.
4 0
0.0
TO
TAL
1441
12
62
87.6
17
9 12
.4
822
57.0
53
1 36
.8
47
3.3
41
2.8
YOLO
U
ND
ER 1
8 23
20
87
.0
3 13
.0
11
47.8
9
39.1
0
0.0
3 13
.0
N
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
71
& A
BOV
E 10
8
80.0
2
20.0
9
90.0
0
0.0
1 10
.0
0 0.
0
71
& A
BOV
E 6
5 83
.3
1 6.
7 5
83.3
0
0.0
1 16
.7
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
STATEWIDE 145923 100.0 128182 100.0 17741 100.0 ALAMEDA UNDER 18 20 0.4 18 0.4 2 0.3
18-20 169 3.4 152 3.6 17 2.4 21-30 1788 35.9 1597 37.3 191 27.3 31-40 1720 34.6 1431 33.5 289 41.3 41-50 830 16.7 677 15.8 153 21.9 51-60 298 6.0 263 6.1 35 5.0 61-70 127 2.6 116 2.7 11 1.6 71 & ABOVE 25 0.5 23 0.5 2 0.3 TOTAL 4977 100.0 4277 100.0 700 100.0
ALPINE 21-30 11 29.7 10 32.3 1 16.7 31-40 11 29.7 8 25.8 3 50.0 41-50 8 21.6 7 22.6 1 16.7 51-60 6 16.2 5 16.1 1 16.7 71 & ABOVE 1 2.7 1 3.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 37 100.0 31 100.0 6 100.0
AMADOR 18-20 7 4.4 7 5.6 0 0.0 21-30 38 23.7 34 27.0 4 11.8 31-40 47 29.4 28 22.2 19 55.9 41-50 41 25.6 33 26.2 8 23.5 51-60 15 9.4 12 9.5 3 8.8 61-70 8 5.0 8 6.3 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 2.5 4 3.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 160 100.0 126 100.0 34 100.0
BUTTE UNDER 18 8 0.8 8 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 57 6.0 52 6.5 5 3.5 21-30 339 35.8 301 37.3 38 26.8 31-40 292 30.8 235 29.2 57 40.1 41-50 154 16.2 126 15.6 28 19.7 51-60 64 6.8 54 6.7 10 7.0 61-70 26 2.7 22 2.7 4 2.8 71 & ABOVE 8 0.8 8 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 948 100.0 806 100.0 142 100.0
CALAVERAS 18-20 7 3.8 7 4.7 0 0.0 21-30 37 20.3 32 21.6 5 14.7 31-40 58 31.9 40 27.0 18 52.9 41-50 43 23.6 37 25.0 6 17.6 51-60 20 11.0 18 12.2 2 5.9 61-70 13 7.1 11 7.4 2 5.9 71 & ABOVE 4 2.2 3 2.0 1 2.9 TOTAL 182 100.0 148 100.0 34 100.0
COLUSA 18-20 8 3.8 8 4.2 0 0.0 21-30 73 35.1 70 36.8 3 16.7 31-40 66 31.7 58 30.5 8 44.4 41-50 39 18.8 35 18.4 4 22.2 51-60 15 7.2 14 7.4 1 5.6 61-70 7 3.4 5 2.6 2 11.1 TOTAL 208 100.0 190 100.0 18 100.0
76
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
CONTRA COSTA UNDER 18 10 0.3 10 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 124 4.3 111 4.6 13 2.9 21-30 925 32.1 812 33.3 113 25.6 31-40 953 33.1 780 32.0 173 39.1 41-50 525 18.2 429 17.6 96 21.7 51-60 239 8.3 203 8.3 36 8.1 61-70 78 2.7 71 2.9 7 1.6 71 & ABOVE 26 0.9 22 0.9 4 0.9 TOTAL 2880 100.0 2438 100.0 442 100.0
DEL NORTE UNDER 18 1 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 11 5.8 10 6.5 1 2.9 21-30 62 32.8 51 33.1 11 31.4 31-40 62 32.8 50 32.5 12 34.3 41-50 33 17.5 28 18.2 5 14.3 51-60 12 6.3 9 5.8 3 8.6 61-70 6 3.2 3 1.9 3 8.6 71 & ABOVE 2 1.1 2 1.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 189 100.0 154 100.0 35 100.0
EL DORADO UNDER 18 6 0.7 5 0.7 1 0.6 18-20 37 4.4 36 5.3 1 0.6 21-30 247 29.3 202 29.8 45 27.3 31-40 301 35.7 227 33.5 74 44.8 41-50 175 20.8 141 20.8 34 20.6 51-60 56 6.7 49 7.2 7 4.2 61-70 16 1.9 13 1.9 3 1.8 71 & ABOVE 4 0.5 4 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 842 100.0 677 100.0 165 100.0
FRESNO UNDER 18 9 0.2 9 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 203 5.2 188 5.4 15 3.5 21-30 1589 40.7 1431 41.2 158 36.8 31-40 1262 32.3 1109 31.9 153 35.7 41-50 560 14.3 483 13.9 77 17.9 51-60 201 5.1 181 5.2 20 4.7 61-70 62 1.6 56 1.6 6 1.4 71 & ABOVE 20 0.5 20 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 3906 100.0 3477 100.0 429 100.0
GLENN 18-20 12 5.2 12 5.8 0 0.0 21-30 84 36.2 76 36.9 8 30.8 31-40 71 30.6 60 29.1 11 42.3 41-50 45 19.4 40 19.4 5 19.2 51-60 13 5.6 11 5.3 2 7.7 61-70 6 2.6 6 2.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 232 100.0 206 100.0 26 100.0
HUMBOLDT 18-20 42 7.1 39 7.9 3 3.1 21-30 194 32.8 159 32.1 35 36.1 31-40 178 30.1 149 30.1 29 29.9 41-50 116 19.6 93 18.8 23 23.7 51-60 37 6.3 34 6.9 3 3.1 61-70 16 2.7 14 2.8 2 2.1 71 & ABOVE 9 1.5 7 1.4 2 2.1 TOTAL 592 100.0 495 100.0 97 100.0
77
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
IMPERIAL UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 18-20 30 3.2 29 3.4 1 1.6 21-30 282 30.5 262 30.4 20 32.8 31-40 341 36.9 320 37.1 21 34.4 41-50 169 18.3 154 17.8 15 24.6 51-60 52 5.6 49 5.7 3 4.9 61-70 35 3.8 34 3.9 1 1.6 71 & ABOVE 14 1.5 14 1.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 924 100.0 863 100.0 61 100.0
INYO 18-20 12 5.0 12 5.7 0 0.0 21-30 59 24.4 48 23.0 11 33.3 31-40 86 35.5 73 34.9 13 39.4 41-50 48 19.8 42 20.1 6 18.2 51-60 26 10.7 24 11.5 2 6.1 61-70 8 3.3 7 3.3 1 3.0 71 & ABOVE 3 1.2 3 1.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 242 100.0 209 100.0 33 100.0
KERN UNDER 18 30 0.7 29 0.8 1 0.2 18-20 223 5.4 209 5.7 14 2.8 21-30 1546 37.4 1373 37.7 173 35.2 31-40 1413 34.2 1201 33.0 212 43.1 41-50 588 14.2 520 14.3 68 13.8 51-60 208 5.0 191 5.2 17 3.5 61-70 96 2.3 89 2.4 7 1.4 71 & ABOVE 27 0.7 27 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 4131 100.0 3639 100.0 492 100.0
KINGS UNDER 18 10 1.3 7 1.0 3 3.3 18-20 43 5.7 39 5.8 4 4.4 21-30 287 37.8 261 39.0 26 28.9 31-40 240 31.6 204 30.5 36 40.0 41-50 134 17.7 117 17.5 17 18.9 51-60 34 4.5 30 4.5 4 4.4 61-70 8 1.1 8 1.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 3 0.4 3 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 759 100.0 669 100.0 90 100.0
LAKE UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 19 4.1 17 4.6 2 2.2 21-30 114 24.8 97 26.2 17 19.1 31-40 161 35.1 126 34.1 35 39.3 41-50 94 20.5 73 19.7 21 23.6 51-60 34 7.4 27 7.3 7 7.9 61-70 30 6.5 24 6.5 6 6.7 71 & ABOVE 6 1.3 5 1.4 1 1.1 TOTAL 459 100.0 370 100.0 89 100.0
LASSEN UNDER 18 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 18-20 11 5.6 9 5.2 2 7.7 21-30 58 29.3 49 28.5 9 34.6 31-40 61 30.8 54 31.4 7 26.9 41-50 40 20.2 37 21.5 3 11.5 51-60 17 8.6 12 7.0 5 19.2 61-70 8 4.0 8 4.7 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 198 100.0 172 100.0 26 100.0
78
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
LOS ANGELES UNDER 18 15 0.0 15 0.0 0 0.0 18-20 1290 3.7 1214 3.8 76 2.4 21-30 15051 42.6 13854 43.1 1197 37.9 31-40 11556 32.7 10437 32.5 1119 35.4 41-50 5045 14.3 4502 14.0 543 17.2 51-60 1705 4.8 1542 4.8 163 5.2 61-70 508 1.4 460 1.4 48 1.5 71 & ABOVE 122 0.3 106 0.3 16 0.5 TOTAL 35292 100.0 32130 100.0 3162 100.0
MADERA 18-20 34 4.9 33 5.2 1 1.7 21-30 282 40.8 267 42.2 15 25.0 31-40 201 29.0 177 28.0 24 40.0 41-50 130 18.8 118 18.7 12 20.0 51-60 26 3.8 24 3.8 2 3.3 61-70 15 2.2 10 1.6 5 8.3 71 & ABOVE 4 0.6 3 0.5 1 1.7 TOTAL 692 100.0 632 100.0 60 100.0
MARIN UNDER 18 3 0.2 3 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 46 3.5 37 3.6 9 3.4 21-30 444 34.3 377 36.5 67 25.4 31-40 419 32.3 327 31.7 92 34.8 41-50 265 20.4 189 18.3 76 28.8 51-60 88 6.8 70 6.8 18 6.8 61-70 24 1.9 22 2.1 2 0.8 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 7 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 1296 100.0 1032 100.0 264 100.0
MARIPOSA 18-20 7 4.5 6 4.7 1 3.6 21-30 48 31.0 39 30.7 9 32.1 31-40 59 38.1 46 36.2 13 46.4 41-50 27 17.4 24 18.9 3 10.7 51-60 12 7.7 10 7.9 2 7.1 61-70 2 1.3 2 1.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 155 100.0 127 100.0 28 100.0
MENDOCINO UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 33 4.8 31 5.5 2 1.7 21-30 234 34.2 204 36.2 30 24.8 31-40 207 30.2 157 27.8 50 41.3 41-50 142 20.7 117 20.7 25 20.7 51-60 43 6.3 33 5.9 10 8.3 61-70 20 2.9 17 3.0 3 2.5 71 & ABOVE 5 0.7 4 0.7 1 0.8 TOTAL 685 100.0 564 100.0 121 100.0
MERCED UNDER 18 11 0.9 10 0.9 1 0.9 18-20 76 6.1 72 6.4 4 3.8 21-30 457 36.9 426 37.6 31 29.2 31-40 383 30.9 341 30.1 42 39.6 41-50 209 16.9 189 16.7 20 18.9 51-60 72 5.8 65 5.7 7 6.6 61-70 27 2.2 26 2.3 1 0.9 71 & ABOVE 3 0.2 3 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 1238 100.0 1132 100.0 106 100.0
79
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
MODOC 18-20 3 4.2 2 3.1 1 14.3 21-30 13 18.1 12 18.5 1 14.3 31-40 24 33.3 21 32.3 3 42.9 41-50 18 25.0 17 26.2 1 14.3 51-60 7 9.7 7 10.8 0 0.0 61-70 7 9.7 6 9.2 1 14.3 TOTAL 72 100.0 65 100.0 7 100.0
MONO 18-20 7 6.9 6 6.5 1 12.5 21-30 28 27.7 27 29.0 1 12.5 31-40 35 34.7 33 35.5 2 25.0 41-50 22 21.8 19 20.4 3 37.5 51-60 6 5.9 5 5.4 1 12.5 61-70 2 2.0 2 2.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 1.0 1 1.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 101 100.0 93 100.0 8 100.0
MONTEREY UNDER 18 14 0.4 13 0.4 1 0.3 18-20 206 6.2 191 6.3 15 5.0 21-30 1492 44.9 1402 46.4 90 30.0 31-40 976 29.4 860 28.5 116 38.7 41-50 433 13.0 376 12.4 57 19.0 51-60 137 4.1 122 4.0 15 5.0 61-70 53 1.6 48 1.6 5 1.7 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 10 0.3 1 0.3 TOTAL 3322 100.0 3022 100.0 300 100.0
NAPA UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 56 6.0 51 6.3 5 4.0 21-30 368 39.6 336 41.7 32 25.8 31-40 265 28.5 225 28.0 40 32.3 41-50 144 15.5 112 13.9 32 25.8 51-60 57 6.1 49 6.1 8 6.5 61-70 27 2.9 20 2.5 7 5.6 71 & ABOVE 7 0.8 7 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 929 100.0 805 100.0 124 100.0
NEVADA UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 21 5.0 16 4.7 5 5.9 21-30 107 25.4 93 27.6 14 16.5 31-40 143 33.9 101 30.0 42 49.4 41-50 97 23.0 75 22.3 22 25.9 51-60 30 7.1 28 8.3 2 2.4 61-70 18 4.3 18 5.3 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 5 1.2 5 1.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 422 100.0 337 100.0 85 100.0
ORANGE UNDER 18 19 0.2 15 0.1 4 0.2 18-20 436 3.5 385 3.5 51 3.2 21-30 5370 42.9 4770 43.8 600 37.1 31-40 4007 32.0 3451 31.7 556 34.4 41-50 1780 14.2 1508 13.8 272 16.8 51-60 651 5.2 557 5.1 94 5.8 61-70 205 1.6 179 1.6 26 1.6 71 & ABOVE 48 0.4 34 0.3 14 0.9 TOTAL 12516 100.0 10899 100.0 1617 100.0
80
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
PLACER UNDER 18 6 0.4 4 0.4 2 0.8 18-20 73 5.5 65 6.0 8 3.1 21-30 483 36.2 402 37.2 81 31.9 31-40 438 32.8 342 31.6 96 37.8 41-50 227 17.0 178 16.5 49 19.3 51-60 78 5.8 64 5.9 14 5.5 61-70 22 1.6 19 1.8 3 1.2 71 & ABOVE 8 0.6 7 0.6 1 0.4 TOTAL 1335 100.0 1081 100.0 254 100.0
PLUMAS 18-20 7 5.6 7 6.6 0 0.0 21-30 33 26.2 24 22.6 9 45.0 31-40 38 30.2 31 29.2 7 35.0 41-50 27 21.4 24 22.6 3 15.0 51-60 11 8.7 10 9.4 1 5.0 61-70 10 7.9 10 9.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 126 100.0 106 100.0 20 100.0
RIVERSIDE UNDER 18 18 0.3 16 0.3 2 0.3 18-20 231 4.4 215 4.7 16 2.4 21-30 1863 35.1 1658 35.9 205 30.1 31-40 1657 31.2 1400 30.3 257 37.8 41-50 960 18.1 830 18.0 130 19.1 51-60 373 7.0 324 7.0 49 7.2 61-70 148 2.8 133 2.9 15 2.2 71 & ABOVE 53 1.0 47 1.0 6 0.9 TOTAL 5303 100.0 4623 100.0 680 100.0
SACRAMENTO UNDER 18 17 0.3 15 0.3 2 0.2 18-20 217 4.2 187 4.3 30 3.3 21-30 2064 39.6 1726 40.1 338 37.2 31-40 1620 31.1 1307 30.3 313 34.5 41-50 834 16.0 669 15.5 165 18.2 51-60 313 6.0 274 6.4 39 4.3 61-70 120 2.3 104 2.4 16 1.8 71 & ABOVE 32 0.6 27 0.6 5 0.6 TOTAL 5217 100.0 4309 100.0 908 100.0
SAN BENITO UNDER 18 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 14 6.8 13 7.0 1 5.3 21-30 86 42.0 82 44.1 4 21.1 31-40 64 31.2 54 29.0 10 52.6 41-50 29 14.1 25 13.4 4 21.1 51-60 6 2.9 6 3.2 0 0.0 61-70 5 2.4 5 2.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 205 100.0 186 100.0 19 100.0
SAN BERNARDINO
UNDER 18 17 0.3 16 0.3 1 0.2
18-20 245 4.1 228 4.2 17 2.7 21-30 2229 36.9 2029 37.5 200 31.4 31-40 1895 31.3 1660 30.7 235 36.9 41-50 1046 17.3 939 17.4 107 16.8 51-60 410 6.8 356 6.6 54 8.5 61-70 161 2.7 142 2.6 19 3.0 71 & ABOVE 44 0.7 41 0.8 3 0.5 TOTAL 6047 100.0 5411 100.0 636 100.0
81
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SAN DIEGO UNDER 18 24 0.2 18 0.2 6 0.4 18-20 508 4.2 450 4.2 58 4.0 21-30 5329 43.7 4764 44.4 565 38.5 31-40 3786 31.0 3269 30.5 517 35.2 41-50 1759 14.4 1530 14.3 229 15.6 51-60 567 4.6 499 4.6 68 4.6 61-70 178 1.5 155 1.4 23 1.6 71 & ABOVE 50 0.4 49 0.5 1 0.1 TOTAL 12201 100.0 10734 100.0 1467 100.0
SAN FRANCISCO UNDER 18 7 0.7 5 0.5 2 1.7 18-20 21 2.0 16 1.8 5 4.3 21-30 397 38.5 360 39.4 37 31.6 31-40 338 32.8 298 32.6 40 34.2 41-50 165 16.0 140 15.3 25 21.4 51-60 69 6.7 63 6.9 6 5.1 61-70 30 2.9 28 3.1 2 1.7 71 & ABOVE 4 0.4 4 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1031 100.0 914 100.0 117 100.0
SAN JOAQUIN UNDER 18 15 0.5 13 0.5 2 0.6 18-20 167 5.9 146 5.9 21 6.4 21-30 987 35.1 888 35.7 99 30.2 31-40 896 31.8 773 31.1 123 37.5 41-50 472 16.8 413 16.6 59 18.0 51-60 193 6.9 174 7.0 19 5.8 61-70 63 2.2 58 2.3 5 1.5 71 & ABOVE 21 0.7 21 0.8 0 0.0 TOTAL 2814 100.0 2486 100.0 328 100.0
SAN LUIS OBISPO UNDER 18 3 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.4 18-20 82 5.1 74 5.5 8 3.0
21-30 594 36.8 505 37.4 89 33.8 31-40 507 31.4 416 30.8 91 34.6 41-50 279 17.3 221 16.3 58 22.1 51-60 103 6.4 92 6.8 11 4.2 61-70 38 2.4 34 2.5 4 1.5 71 & ABOVE 9 0.6 8 0.6 1 0.4 TOTAL 1615 100.0 1352 100.0 263 100.0
SAN MATEO UNDER 18 22 0.6 21 0.7 1 0.2 18-20 159 4.3 144 4.5 15 2.9 21-30 1374 36.8 1201 37.3 173 33.3 31-40 1213 32.5 1030 32.0 183 35.3 41-50 619 16.6 505 15.7 114 22.0 51-60 243 6.5 213 6.6 30 5.8 61-70 82 2.2 81 2.5 1 0.2 71 & ABOVE 25 0.7 23 0.7 2 0.4 TOTAL 3737 100.0 3218 100.0 519 100.0
SANTA BARBARA UNDER 18 10 0.4 9 0.4 1 0.3 18-20 164 6.0 139 5.9 25 6.3 21-30 1227 44.5 1085 46.0 142 35.9 31-40 835 30.3 683 29.0 152 38.4 41-50 350 12.7 299 12.7 51 12.9 51-60 111 4.0 95 4.0 16 4.0 61-70 46 1.7 39 1.7 7 1.8 71 & ABOVE 12 0.4 10 0.4 2 0.5 TOTAL 2755 100.0 2359 100.0 396 100.0
82
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SANTA CLARA UNDER 18 29 0.4 25 0.4 4 0.4 18-20 248 3.3 228 3.5 20 2.1 21-30 2933 39.5 2635 40.6 298 31.8 31-40 2541 34.2 2174 33.5 367 39.2 41-50 1137 15.3 977 15.1 160 17.1 51-60 418 5.6 348 5.4 70 7.5 61-70 100 1.3 85 1.3 15 1.6 71 & ABOVE 21 0.3 19 0.3 2 0.2 TOTAL 7427 100.0 6491 100.0 936 100.0
SANTA CRUZ UNDER 18 7 0.4 3 0.2 4 1.4 18-20 124 6.7 108 6.9 16 5.5 21-30 707 38.0 611 38.9 96 33.0 31-40 603 32.4 501 31.9 102 35.1 41-50 302 16.2 245 15.6 57 19.6 51-60 78 4.2 70 4.5 8 2.7 61-70 31 1.7 24 1.5 7 2.4 71 & ABOVE 8 0.4 7 0.4 1 0.3 TOTAL 1860 100.0 1569 100.0 291 100.0
SHASTA 18-20 23 3.3 18 3.1 5 4.1 21-30 171 24.3 138 23.8 33 26.8 31-40 263 37.4 215 37.0 48 39.0 41-50 159 22.6 131 22.5 28 22.8 51-60 63 8.9 56 9.6 7 5.7 61-70 20 2.8 18 3.1 2 1.6 71 & ABOVE 5 0.7 5 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 704 100.0 581 100.0 123 100.0
SIERRA 21-30 2 8.7 2 9.1 0 0.0 31-40 7 30.4 7 31.8 0 0.0 41-50 10 43.5 9 40.9 1 100.0 51-60 4 17.4 4 18.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 23 100.0 22 100.0 1 100.0
SISKIYOU 18-20 10 3.9 8 3.7 2 4.9 21-30 73 28.3 64 29.5 9 22.0 31-40 93 36.0 73 33.6 20 48.8 41-50 56 21.7 49 22.6 7 17.1 51-60 18 7.0 16 7.4 2 4.9 61-70 4 1.6 4 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 1.6 3 1.4 1 2.4 TOTAL 258 100.0 217 100.0 41 100.0
SOLANO UNDER 18 10 0.8 8 0.7 2 1.1 18-20 70 5.4 60 5.3 10 5.6 21-30 456 34.9 411 36.5 45 25.3 31-40 412 31.6 344 30.5 68 38.2 41-50 223 17.1 186 16.5 37 20.8 51-60 99 7.6 90 8.0 9 5.1 61-70 28 2.1 25 2.2 3 1.7 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 3 0.3 4 2.2 TOTAL 1305 100.0 1127 100.0 178 100.0
83
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
SONOMA UNDER 18 14 0.6 11 0.6 3 0.8 18-20 107 4.5 97 4.9 10 2.6 21-30 854 36.0 751 37.9 103 26.3 31-40 722 30.5 573 29.0 149 38.1 41-50 419 17.7 338 17.1 81 20.7 51-60 170 7.2 141 7.1 29 7.4 61-70 63 2.7 50 2.5 13 3.3 71 & ABOVE 21 0.9 18 0.9 3 0.8 TOTAL 2370 100.0 1979 100.0 391 100.0
STANISLAUS UNDER 18 11 0.5 10 0.6 1 0.4 18-20 116 5.7 111 6.2 5 2.0 21-30 766 37.6 686 38.4 80 32.0 31-40 651 32.0 554 31.0 97 38.8 41-50 305 15.0 257 14.4 48 19.2 51-60 130 6.4 116 6.5 14 5.6 61-70 48 2.4 43 2.4 5 2.0 71 & ABOVE 8 0.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 2035 100.0 1785 100.0 250 100.0
SUTTER UNDER 18 4 0.9 4 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 29 6.2 28 6.8 1 1.8 21-30 160 34.1 142 34.3 18 32.7 31-40 162 34.5 136 32.9 26 47.3 41-50 76 16.2 67 16.2 9 16.4 51-60 31 6.6 30 7.2 1 1.8 61-70 5 1.1 5 1.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 0.4 2 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 469 100.0 414 100.0 55 100.0
TEHAMA 18-20 10 3.0 10 3.5 0 0.0 21-30 112 33.1 100 35.1 12 22.6 31-40 110 32.5 88 30.9 22 41.5 41-50 68 20.1 57 20.0 11 20.8 51-60 20 5.9 14 4.9 6 11.3 61-70 12 3.6 10 3.5 2 3.8 71 & ABOVE 6 1.8 6 2.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 338 100.0 285 100.0 53 100.0
TRINITY 18-20 2 1.9 2 2.2 0 0.0 21-30 21 19.6 17 18.7 4 25.0 31-40 39 36.4 33 36.3 6 37.5 41-50 28 26.2 24 26.4 4 25.0 51-60 13 12.1 12 13.2 1 6.3 61-70 4 3.7 3 3.3 1 6.3 TOTAL 107 100.0 91 100.0 16 100.0
TULARE UNDER 18 18 0.7 17 0.8 1 0.5 18-20 157 6.5 152 6.9 5 2.3 21-30 969 39.8 899 40.6 70 32.6 31-40 797 32.8 704 31.8 93 43.3 41-50 321 13.2 291 13.1 30 14.0 51-60 120 4.9 109 4.9 11 5.1 61-70 39 1.6 34 1.5 5 2.3 71 & ABOVE 11 0.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 2432 100.0 2217 100.0 215 100.0
84
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued
COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %
TUOLUMNE 18-20 6 2.6 6 3.3 0 0.0 21-30 61 26.6 50 27.8 11 22.4 31-40 72 31.4 53 29.4 19 38.8 41-50 58 25.3 44 24.4 14 28.6 51-60 22 9.6 19 10.6 3 6.1 61-70 6 2.6 4 2.2 2 4.1 71 & ABOVE 4 1.7 4 2.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 229 100.0 180 100.0 49 100.0
VENTURA UNDER 18 17 0.4 14 0.4 3 0.5 18-20 243 5.6 217 5.8 26 4.4 21-30 1894 43.6 1665 44.4 229 38.7 31-40 1308 30.1 1122 29.9 186 31.4 41-50 588 13.5 484 12.9 104 17.6 51-60 215 4.9 179 4.8 36 6.1 61-70 72 1.7 65 1.7 7 1.2 71 & ABOVE 9 0.2 8 0.2 1 0.2 TOTAL 4346 100.0 3754 100.0 592 100.0
YOLO UNDER 18 3 0.5 3 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 38 5.7 35 6.1 3 3.5 21-30 234 35.3 208 36.0 26 30.6 31-40 199 30.0 168 29.1 31 36.5 41-50 119 17.9 103 17.8 16 18.8 51-60 48 7.2 43 7.4 5 5.9 61-70 18 2.7 14 2.4 4 4.7 71 & ABOVE 4 0.6 4 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 663 100.0 578 100.0 85 100.0
YUBA UNDER 18 1 0.3 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 22 5.7 20 6.1 2 3.5 21-30 132 34.3 114 34.8 18 31.6 31-40 136 35.3 110 33.5 26 45.6 41-50 56 14.5 47 14.3 9 15.8 51-60 25 6.5 23 7.0 2 3.5 61-70 9 2.3 9 2.7 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 1.0 4 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 385 100.0 328 100.0 57 100.0
85
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
86
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT
DU
I
AV
ERA
GE
AD
JUD
ICA
TIO
N
CO
UN
TY
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
C
OU
RT
MIS
D
FELO
NY
ALC
OH
OL
NO
N-A
LCO
HO
L O
THER
D
UI D
ISM
*/
TIM
ES (M
ON
THS)
RATE
DU
I D
UI
REC
KLE
SS
REC
KLE
SS
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S U
NC
ON
ST**
V
IOLA
TIO
N T
O
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
TO
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
D
MV
UPD
ATE
BUTT
E 73
.1%
SU
P BU
TTE
26
4 0
0 1
0/0
3.9
2.7
ALP
INE
62.7
%
SUP
ALP
INE
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 9.
9 8.
4
CO
LUSA
68
.9%
SU
P C
OLU
SA
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
4 1.
1
AM
AD
OR
87.4
%
SUP
AM
AD
OR
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
2 1.
1
ALA
MED
A
69.0
%
SUP
OA
KLA
ND
94
16
0
0 2
0/1
4.2
5.1
STA
TEW
IDE
70.6
%
14
3794
21
29
1517
1 32
44
4983
49
/411
2.
8 3.
2
CA
LAV
ERA
S 63
.4%
SU
P C
ALA
VER
AS
5 0
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
9 5.
3
JUV
SA
N L
EAN
DRO
41
0
1 0
4 0/
0 3.
4 4.
2
A
LAM
EDA
20
2 3
30
6 6
0/0
1.6
1.4
BERK
ELEY
20
2 0
14
6 11
0/
0 2.
4 2.
4
FR
EMO
NT
1142
4
93
14
48
0/4
3.7
2.5
PLEA
SAN
TON
69
6 6
134
26
63
0/6
3.2
2.2
OA
KLA
ND
10
13
14
112
7 20
0/
4 3.
1 2.
0
H
AYW
ARD
15
40
4 20
5 12
11
9 0/
8 4.
2 2.
6
TO
TAL
4930
47
58
9 71
27
3 0/
23
---
---
MA
RKLE
EVIL
LE
36
0 9
1 0
0/0
4.6
1.0
TOTA
L 37
0
9 1
0 0/
0 --
- --
-
JAC
KSO
N
154
5 2
2 1
0/1
2.9
2.8
TOTA
L 15
5 5
2 2
1 0/
1 --
- --
-
JUV
BU
TTE
7 1
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
0 0.
6
G
RID
LEY
MU
NI
470
0 11
4 7
7 0/
0 2.
9 3.
2
G
RID
LEY
56
0 5
0 0
0/4
3.7
3.2
ORO
VIL
LE
225
5 26
1
0 0/
6 3.
6 2.
6
PA
RAD
ISE
154
0 25
1
2 0/
0 3.
3 4.
2
TO
TAL
938
10
170
9 10
0/
10
---
---
SAN
AN
DRE
AS
176
1 27
14
12
1/
0 2.
1 2.
1
TO
TAL
181
1 27
14
12
1/
0 --
- --
-
CO
LUSA
20
3 2
32
8 1
1/1
2.2
2.9
WIL
LIA
MS
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 0.
9 2.
3
TO
TAL
206
2 32
8
1 1/
1 --
- --
- C
ON
TRA
CO
STA
69
.8%
SU
P C
CO
STA
13
2 15
2
0 1
0/3
6.2
1.8
JUV
C C
OST
A
22
1 1
1 0
0/0
3.5
2.4
CO
NC
ORD
61
5 0
51
4 13
0/
8 3.
7 2.
3
RI
CH
MO
ND
82
5 4
134
6 25
0/
7 4.
4 3.
2
PI
TTSB
URG
49
9 6
76
8 13
0/
3 4.
9 2.
8
W
ALN
UT
CRE
EK
759
2 12
1 16
7
0/7
3.0
2.0
TOTA
L 28
52
28
385
35
59
0/28
--
- --
- D
EL N
ORT
E 62
.4%
SU
P D
EL N
ORT
E 14
3
0 0
1 0/
0 2.
2 3.
4
C
RESC
ENT
CIT
Y 16
7 5
55
9 11
0/
0 3.
2 6.
3
TO
TAL
181
8 55
9
12
0/0
---
---
prio
r con
vict
ion
y th
ose
in w
hich
a
*The
se m
ay in
clud
e ab
stra
ct d
elet
ions
due
to fa
ilure
to a
ppea
r (FT
A) a
t the
cou
rt h
eari
ng.
**Th
ese
1994
arr
este
es s
how
ed p
rior
DU
Is d
ecla
red
unco
nstit
utio
nal o
n th
eir r
ecor
ds.
The
cour
ts re
port
ed h
ere
are
thos
e of
the
curr
ent D
UI c
onvi
ctio
n an
d no
t nec
essa
ril
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
87
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
EL D
ORA
DO
85
.7%
SU
P EL
DO
RAD
O
16
3 0
0 1
0/0
4.0
3.9
SUP/
JUV
PLA
CR
VL
0 0
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
9 1.
3
C
AM
ERO
N P
AR
K
277
1 14
8
3 0/
2 2.
2 6.
1
SO
LA
KE
TAH
OE
252
5 22
0
5 0/
1 3.
3 5.
4
PL
AC
ERV
ILLE
27
5 12
14
2
0 0/
0 2.
5 4.
9
TO
TAL
821
21
50
10
9 0/
3 --
- --
- FR
ESN
O
56.9
%
SUP
FRES
NO
18
1 98
1
1 2
0/1
4.2
4.8
JUV
FRE
SNO
28
0
3 0
0 0/
0 7.
9 3.
0
FR
ESN
O
2093
21
33
8 29
23
1/
2 4.
6 6.
1
C
LOV
IS
220
0 51
7
5 0/
0 4.
5 6.
2
C
OA
LIN
GA
23
0 1
9 2
3 0/
0 2.
8 6.
2
FI
REBA
UG
H
215
2 32
2
6 0/
0 3.
2 7.
2
FO
WLE
R 11
8 2
15
0 1
1/0
4.3
4.8
KER
MA
N
102
2 7
3 0
0/0
3.5
6.7
KIN
GSB
URG
55
0
8 3
3 0/
0 4.
6 6.
8
RE
EDLE
Y M
UN
I 16
6 2
10
1 0
0/0
2.9
7.9
RIV
ERD
ALE
23
0
7 1
0 0/
0 4.
3 6.
9
SA
NG
ER
146
1 18
0
2 1/
0 3.
4 5.
6
SE
LMA
MU
NI
197
3 16
7
3 0/
0 3.
9 2.
6
TO
TAL
3774
13
2 51
5 56
48
3/
3 --
- --
- G
LEN
N
74.8
%
SUP
GLE
NN
11
2
1 0
1 0/
0 2.
9 4.
4
JU
V G
LEN
N
0 1
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
4 0.
6
O
RLA
ND
14
2 0
13
4 5
0/2
2.1
5.4
WIL
LOW
S 75
1
11
0 2
0/1
3.0
4.6
TOTA
L 22
8 4
25
4 8
0/3
---
---
HU
MBO
LDT
48.0
%
SUP/
JUV
HM
B-EU
R 0
2 0
0 1
0/0
7.1
3.0
JUV
HU
MBO
LDT
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 20
.0
1.4
EURE
KA
22
1 14
78
11
19
0/
1 2.
9 3.
4
A
RCA
TA
160
0 74
15
13
0/
0 2.
8 3.
8
FO
RTU
NA
96
0
46
6 8
0/1
2.7
1.7
GA
RBER
VIL
LE
61
0 27
5
5 0/
1 4.
5 2.
9
H
OO
PA
29
0 13
1
1 0/
0 4.
0 5.
8
TO
TAL
576
16
238
38
47
0/3
---
---
IMPE
RIA
L 56
.2%
SU
P IM
PERI
AL
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
7 10
.9
JUV
IMPE
RIA
L 2
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.4
10.3
BR
AW
LEY
178
1 21
19
4
0/1
3.0
2.3
CA
LEXI
CO
40
9 0
39
58
6 0/
0 3.
1 1.
7
EL
CEN
TRO
32
9 2
45
32
2 0/
0 3.
5 4.
9
W
INTE
RHA
VEN
1
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.3
1.0
TOTA
L 92
1 3
105
109
12
0/1
---
---
INYO
69
.9%
SU
P IN
YO
21
1 0
0 0
1/0
2.2
2.6
BISH
OP
210
0 42
4
2 2/
0 3.
5 4.
1
IN
DEP
END
ENC
E 9
1 3
1 0
0/0
4.1
1.8
TOTA
L 24
0 2
45
5 2
3/0
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
88
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
KER
N
81.1
%
SUP
KER
N
265
29
0 2
3 0/
2 2.
4 2.
0
JU
V K
ERN
25
0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 3.
3
A
RVIN
-LA
MO
NT
319
4 10
4
20
0/0
2.3
3.5
BAK
ERSF
IELD
20
25
13
189
8 17
0/
13
2.6
5.2
DEL
AN
O
284
1 36
3
26
1/1
2.8
3.5
LKE
ISA
BELL
A
79
2 1
1 3
0/0
2.5
2.7
TAFT
21
2 2
33
9 21
0/
1 2.
0 4.
6
SH
AFT
ER
303
6 34
3
26
1/1
2.6
4.3
MO
JAV
E 30
4 2
60
21
45
1/1
2.4
3.5
RID
GEC
REST
25
5 1
28
4 12
0/
0 2.
6 4.
6
TO
TAL
4071
60
39
1 55
17
3 3/
19
---
---
KIN
GS
66.4
%
SUP
KIN
GS
19
3 0
0 0
0/0
2.2
0.7
JUV
KIN
GS
14
2 0
1 0
0/0
2.8
1.6
HA
NFO
RD
411
5 35
0
8 0/
3 2.
4 6.
0
A
VEN
AL
70
1 7
2 2
0/1
2.3
1.7
CO
RCO
RAN
56
1
1 0
2 0/
0 3.
1 3.
1
LE
MO
ORE
17
5 2
11
4 3
0/0
1.7
1.7
TOTA
L 74
5 14
54
7
15
0/4
---
---
LAK
E 69
.3%
SU
P LA
KE
11
2 0
0 1
0/0
6.8
4.6
JUV
LA
KE
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 5.
5 1.
3
C
LEA
RLA
KE
237
3 13
2
7 0/
1 4.
6 5.
4
LA
KEP
ORT
20
0 2
14
6 8
0/0
2.7
3.2
TOTA
L 45
2 7
27
8 16
0/
1 --
- --
- LA
SSEN
78
.6%
SU
P LA
SSEN
0
1 0
0 0
0/0
3.3
2.5
JUV
LA
SSEN
5
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.6
6.7
SUSA
NV
ILLE
19
0 2
8 2
4 0/
0 2.
4 2.
2
TO
TAL
195
3 8
2 4
0/0
---
---
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
68.4
%
SUP
LA
130
49
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
5 2.
6
SU
P PO
MO
NA
17
9 34
0
1 6
0/1
3.4
2.0
SUP
LAN
CST
R 18
16
0
0 0
0/0
3.0
2.2
SUP
VA
N N
UYS
96
22
0
0 0
0/0
3.4
2.4
SUP
PASA
DEN
A
71
16
0 0
2 0/
1 4.
3 2.
1
SU
P V
AN
NU
YS
46
19
0 0
2 0/
0 4.
2 1.
6
SU
P LO
NG
BEA
CH
26
14
0
0 0
0/1
4.6
2.7
SUP
CO
MPT
ON
32
15
0
0 0
0/0
5.4
2.3
SUP
NO
RWA
LK
99
19
1 1
1 0/
1 3.
8 2.
3
SU
P SA
NTA
MO
NIC
A
31
8 0
0 0
0/0
4.1
2.6
JUV
LA
CO
1
0 1
0 1
0/0
0.1
0.7
LA JV
CEN
TRL
16
1 1
0 1
0/0
6.4
1.0
ALH
AM
BRA
85
5 7
71
23
32
0/3
2.8
2.5
LAN
CA
STER
61
4 10
49
21
15
1/
0 2.
7 1.
8
BE
VER
LY H
ILLS
27
5 0
41
25
6 0/
0 2.
8 1.
6
BU
RBA
NK
45
2 1
58
37
9 0/
0 1.
9 1.
9
W
EST
CO
VIN
A
2516
13
13
6 20
45
1/
3 2.
9 1.
6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
89
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
C
OM
PTO
N
1168
2
146
41
38
0/8
3.1
2.7
cont
inue
d
CU
LVER
CIT
Y 26
2 4
32
8 5
0/1
3.2
4.1
DO
WN
EY
732
9 8
12
30
0/2
2.9
3.3
EAST
LA
12
43
5 10
1 58
44
0/
1 2.
7 1.
7
EL
MO
NTE
12
80
15
50
9 31
1/
1 2.
4 2.
5
G
LEN
DA
LE
665
3 88
12
12
0/
4 1.
9 4.
6
IN
GLE
WO
OD
10
71
5 16
0 33
28
1/
6 3.
1 2.
3
LO
NG
BEA
CH
18
36
16
274
118
54
0/6
1.9
3.2
LA M
ETRO
71
78
16
648
96
772
0/8
1.3
2.1
BELL
FLO
WER
40
8 4
19
3 20
0/
0 2.
5 2.
9
V
ALE
NC
IA
840
8 80
58
41
0/
1 2.
3 2.
8
PA
SAD
ENA
83
3 8
152
48
40
0/3
4.1
2.7
MA
LIBU
26
4 4
102
32
25
0/1
4.1
3.5
POM
ON
A
1082
13
58
8
37
0/3
2.7
2.9
HU
NTN
GTO
N P
K
1055
7
13
1 33
0/
1 2.
0 2.
3
M
ON
ROV
IA
356
3 20
6
12
0/2
3.0
2.9
SAN
TA M
ON
ICA
33
4 5
82
14
15
0/1
2.1
2.5
TORR
AN
CE
1314
14
25
9 64
94
0/
15
2.5
1.7
SOU
THG
ATE
66
4 4
17
0 11
0/
4 3.
0 3.
5
W
HIT
TIER
76
5 10
29
5
22
0/3
3.4
4.0
HO
LLYW
OO
D
162
0 7
7 8
0/0
1.7
1.6
SAN
FER
NA
ND
O
1880
10
26
1 39
12
1 0/
1 1.
7 3.
3
SA
N P
EDRO
45
6 4
58
8 24
0/
2 2.
3 4.
4
V
AN
NU
YS
2861
59
42
3 49
36
6 0/
2 1.
5 2.
9
LO
S A
NG
ELES
63
2 3
129
50
137
0/3
2.2
1.7
AV
ALO
N
8 0
2 0
0 0/
0 2.
5 7.
0
U
S M
AG
BA
KSF
LD
9 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 1.
6
U
S D
IST
CT
LA
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 10
.5
2.5
TOTA
L 34
817
475
3576
90
7 21
40
4/89
--
- --
- M
AD
ERA
59
.7%
SU
P M
AD
ERA
20
8
0 1
1 0/
0 2.
4 1.
9
JU
V M
AD
ERA
3
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.2
1.3
CH
OW
CH
ILLA
14
5 1
13
3 0
0/0
3.6
6.9
BORD
EN
160
3 40
1
0 0/
0 3.
5 5.
3
M
AD
ERA
27
2 8
34
5 8
0/1
3.7
5.4
BASS
LA
KE
72
0 16
1
0 1/
1 3.
6 5.
7
TO
TAL
672
20
103
11
9 1/
2 --
- --
- M
ARI
N
77.9
%
SUP
SA
N R
AFA
EL
19
7 0
0 1
0/0
3.3
4.8
JUV
SA
N R
AFA
EL
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 1.
3
SA
N R
AFA
EL
1257
9
0 1
86
0/3
2.8
4.4
TOTA
L 12
80
16
0 1
87
0/3
---
---
MA
RIPO
SA
100.
0%
SUP
MA
RIPO
SA
2 2
0 0
0 0/
0 16
.3
0.9
MA
RIPO
SA
62
2 8
0 1
0/0
4.2
1.8
US
MA
G Y
OSE
MIT
E 87
0
13
0 0
0/0
1.2
2.3
TOTA
L 15
1 4
21
0 1
0/0
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
90
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
MEN
DO
CIN
O
71.4
%
SUP
UK
IAH
14
1
0 0
0 0/
0 6.
8 4.
1
JU
V U
KIA
H
4 0
1 0
0 1/
0 1.
1 0.
2
W
ILLI
TS
83
0 19
10
6
0/1
3.0
3.5
UK
IAH
40
1 1
30
5 9
0/2
2.5
6.5
BOO
NV
ILLE
10
1
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
1 4.
9
PT
. ARE
NA
9
0 1
0 1
0/0
1.6
9.9
LEG
GET
T 26
0
6 2
3 0/
0 3.
5 5.
5
C
OV
ELO
8
0 4
0 0
0/0
2.7
2.1
FORT
BRA
GG
12
1 2
13
0 0
0/0
3.1
2.7
UK
IAH
4
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.4
1.2
TOTA
L 68
0 5
74
17
19
1/3
---
---
MER
CED
57
.9%
SU
P M
ERC
ED
32
4 0
0 0
0/0
4.1
4.2
JUV
MER
CED
18
1
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
1 6.
7
M
ERC
ED
933
8 15
7 52
26
0/
0 4.
2 6.
4
LO
S BA
NO
S 24
2 0
68
25
11
0/1
2.2
5.2
TOTA
L 12
25
13
225
77
37
0/1
---
---
MO
DO
C
52.6
%
SUP
MO
DO
C
2 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
9 5.
3
A
LTU
RAS
69
1 25
0
0 0/
1 3.
3 1.
6
TO
TAL
71
1 25
0
0 0/
1 ---
---
M
ON
O
64.3
%
BRID
GEP
ORT
34
0
2 5
0 0/
0 1.
8 3.
8
M
AM
MO
TH L
AK
ES
67
0 16
0
1 0/
0 2.
7 2.
9
TO
TAL
101
0 18
5
1 0/
0 --
- --
- M
ON
TERE
Y 75
.1%
SU
P M
ON
TERE
Y 11
7 18
2
0 0
0/0
2.1
2.9
JUV
SA
LIN
AS
15
3 0
1 1
0/0
2.5
3.6
MO
NTE
REY
915
8 19
5 25
24
0/
2 1.
9 4.
9
SA
LIN
AS
1623
17
13
2 34
31
0/
2 1.
4 5.
9
K
ING
CIT
Y 60
2 4
108
12
15
0/1
1.6
6.3
TOTA
L 32
72
50
437
72
71
0/5
---
---
NA
PA
85.6
%
SUP
NA
PA
48
14
1 0
0 0/
0 3.
2 4.
3
JU
V N
APA
0
0 1
0 0
0/0
---
---
NA
PA
858
9 49
16
9
1/3
2.3
3.1
TOTA
L 90
6 23
51
16
9
1/3
---
---
NEV
AD
A
87.7
%
SUP
NEV
AD
A
14
5 0
0 0
0/0
3.0
3.4
NEV
AD
A C
ITY
255
6 27
4
0 0/
0 2.
3 4.
9
TR
UC
KEE
MU
NI
142
0 14
4
4 0/
0 2.
9 5.
8
TO
TAL
411
11
41
8 4
0/0
---
---
ORA
NG
E 79
.9%
SU
P SA
NTA
AN
A
138
46
0 0
3 0/
1 4.
2 2.
7
JU
V O
RAN
GE
50
0 0
0 3
0/0
5.2
1.8
FULL
ERTO
N
3258
11
13
0 14
84
3/
3 2.
5 2.
4
W
ESTM
INST
ER
2665
15
91
46
44
1/
4 3.
0 2.
1
LA
GU
NA
HIL
LS
1978
7
193
18
37
0/7
3.9
2.4
NEW
PORT
BEA
CH
18
88
16
133
24
44
0/7
2.7
1.5
SAN
TA A
NA
MU
NI
2425
19
75
5
69
0/2
3.2
2.1
TOTA
L 12
402
114
622
107
284
4/24
--
- --
-
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
91
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
PLA
CER
82
.0%
SU
P PL
AC
ER
21
10
0 0
1 0/
0 5.
5 3.
4
JU
V P
LAC
ER
8 0
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
4 5.
8
JU
V T
AH
OE
VIS
TA
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
6 11
.7
AU
BURN
42
9 5
11
6 3
0/1
3.2
2.9
LIN
CO
LN
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 --
- --
-
RO
SEV
ILLE
51
7 6
12
0 7
0/1
3.1
3.8
AU
BURN
(89)
1
0 0
0 0
0/0
5.1
10.0
TA
HO
E C
ITY
330
6 10
12
3
0/0
2.7
2.0
TOTA
L 13
08
27
33
18
14
0/2
---
---
PLU
MA
S 66
.7%
SU
P PL
UM
AS
3 1
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
6 1.
8
C
HES
TER
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
3 12
.4
QU
INC
Y 11
8 3
28
4 3
0/0
2.4
3.6
TOTA
L 12
2 4
28
4 3
0/0
---
---
RIV
ERSI
DE
64.8
%
SUP
RIV
ERSI
DE
1318
60
2
145
26
2/0
3.7
1.8
SUP
IND
IO
1641
29
14
8 55
52
0/
1 4.
1 3.
3
JU
V R
IVER
SID
E 20
2
1 0
0 0/
0 3.
9 2.
8
JU
V IN
DIO
10
0
1 0
0 0/
0 3.
4 1.
6
C
ORO
NA
41
2 6
35
16
17
0/1
3.2
1.8
HEM
ET
493
10
63
3 11
2/
1 3.
3 2.
4
BA
NN
ING
32
1 3
31
7 9
0/0
3.6
4.6
IND
IO
22
0 0
1 5
0/0
1.4
6.6
MO
REN
O V
ALL
EY
210
1 4
20
11
0/0
3.4
3.5
PALM
SPR
ING
S 9
0 2
0 1
0/0
3.1
1.9
BLYT
HE
24
0 0
0 0
0/0
2.5
6.3
PERR
IS
696
10
33
10
13
2/2
4.1
2.4
EL S
INO
RE
4 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
6 1.
0
TC
MA
RCH
AFB
2
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.2
8.0
TOTA
L 51
82
121
320
257
145
6/5
---
---
SAC
RAM
ENTO
66
.0%
SU
P SA
CRA
MEN
TO
211
72
3 0
2 0/
0 3.
1 2.
0
JU
V S
AC
TO T
RF
40
2 0
0 4
0/0
2.6
4.9
SAC
RAM
ENTO
45
98
89
1125
21
1 90
3/
10
3.3
1.8
ELK
GRO
VE
88
1 12
10
1
0/0
2.9
5.9
GA
LT
70
0 6
1 4
0/0
2.6
4.4
WA
LNU
T G
ROV
E 32
0
2 1
3 0/
2 1.
6 7.
7
U
S C
T SA
CTO
14
0
2 0
0 0/
0 6.
8 6.
0
TO
TAL
5053
16
4 11
50
223
104
3/12
--
- --
- SA
N B
ENIT
O
80.7
%
SUP
S BE
NIT
O
6 3
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
7 3.
9
JU
V H
OLL
ISTE
R 4
0 0
0 0
0/0
8.8
4.5
HO
LLIS
TER
192
0 36
5
4 0/
11
2.6
7.4
TOTA
L 20
2 3
36
5 4
0/11
--
- --
- SA
N B
ERN
ARD
INO
56
.7%
SU
P SA
N B
ERN
DO
31
20
0
0 1
0/1
6.1
5.0
SUP
R C
UC
AM
NG
A
38
9 0
0 4
0/0
5.4
3.6
SUP
VIC
TOR
VL
21
2 0
0 1
0/0
5.8
2.9
SUP
BARS
TOW
14
9
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
4 4.
5
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
92
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
SAN
BER
NA
RDIN
O
SU
P JS
HU
A T
REE
7 0
0 0
0 0/
0 8.
0 3.
0 co
ntin
ued
JU
V T
F SN
BER
ND
O
24
0 0
0 2
2/0
2.7
4.9
JUV
SA
N B
ERN
DO
2
0 0
0 0
0/0
3.8
3.9
SUP
R C
UC
AM
NG
A
17
0 0
0 1
0/0
3.6
10.2
C
HIN
O
429
3 3
10
7 0/
1 3.
9 2.
3
BA
RSTO
W
249
2 60
34
16
0/
1 3.
9 3.
7
RE
DLA
ND
S 23
5 3
3 26
13
0/
0 2.
7 2.
4
SA
N B
ERN
-CEN
TRA
L 14
15
16
85
16
40
0/2
3.9
2.3
FON
TAN
A
634
8 12
0 25
25
0/
4 5.
0 2.
8
V
ICTO
RVIL
LE
664
4 95
25
64
0/
1 3.
8 4.
8
RA
NC
HO
C
UC
MN
GA
16
56
8 93
61
64
1/
1 3.
0 2.
4
BIG
BEA
RLA
KE
113
2 50
18
4
0/0
3.9
4.4
TWIN
PEA
KS
96
1 36
2
7 0/
1 3.
1 0.
9
N
EED
LES
135
0 32
5
16
0/0
3.9
4.3
TRO
NA
3
1 2
0 2
0/0
3.9
5.3
29 P
ALM
S 17
3 3
68
16
9 0/
3 3.
1 7.
3
TO
TAL
5956
91
64
7 23
8 27
6 3/
15
---
---
SAN
DIE
GO
77
.1%
SU
P SA
N D
IEG
O
20
4 0
0 0
0/0
3.2
9.2
SUP
VIS
TA
37
13
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
6 3.
4
SU
P C
HU
LA V
ISTA
43
13
0
0 0
0/0
3.2
4.7
SUP
EL C
AJO
N
41
14
0 0
0 0/
0 4.
6 4.
2
JU
V S
AN
DIE
GO
47
1
0 0
2 0/
0 3.
8 4.
4
EL
CA
JON
21
09
8 28
0 89
23
0/
2 2.
2 6.
0
V
ISTA
39
29
16
242
45
19
0/10
2.
1 3.
1
SA
N M
ARC
OS
2 0
0 0
9 0/
0 15
.8
1.1
SAN
DIE
GO
MU
NI
4362
3
288
61
129
0/4
3.2
3.1
CH
ULA
VIS
TA
1528
11
14
8
22
0/1
2.2
5.0
TOTA
L 12
118
83
824
203
204
0/17
--
- --
- SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
61
.0%
SU
P SA
N F
RAN
12
5
0 0
0 0/
1 8.
1 2.
9
JU
V S
AN
FRA
N
8 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
7 11
.0
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
1000
6
188
68
16
0/4
3.0
1.1
TOTA
L 10
20
11
188
68
16
0/5
---
---
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
71.5
%
SUP
FRN
CH
CA
MP
46
11
0 0
2 0/
0 4.
3 4.
1
JU
V F
RNC
H C
AM
P 11
0
0 1
0 0/
0 3.
6 3.
3
LO
DI
577
5 43
12
51
0/
1 2.
0 3.
2
M
AN
TEC
A
383
7 26
4
16
1/2
2.5
2.1
TRA
CY
228
3 10
9
3 0/
0 2.
0 2.
2
ST
OC
KTO
N
1527
16
13
7 24
44
0/
2 2.
2 2.
4
TO
TAL
2772
42
21
6 50
11
6 1/
5 --
- --
- SA
N L
UIS
OBI
SPO
68
.7%
SU
P SA
N L
OBI
SPO
49
6
6 3
4 0/
1 3.
4 4.
0
SA
N L
UIS
OBI
SPO
15
52
7 37
2 42
12
9 2/
6 2.
4 5.
7
PA
SO R
OBL
ES
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
2 1.
2
U
S M
AG
S L
OBI
SPO
0
0 2
0 0
0/0
---
---
TOTA
L 16
02
13
380
45
133
2/7
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
93
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
SAN
MA
TEO
80
.9%
SU
P SA
N M
ATE
O
95
16
0 0
0 0/
1 4.
0 2.
1
JU
V S
AN
MA
TEO
36
1
3 1
0 0/
0 3.
3 2.
0
SO
SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
17
39
20
199
8 20
2/
2 2.
3 4.
5
RE
DW
OO
D C
ITY
1821
9
292
19
53
1/3
2.5
3.7
TOTA
L 36
91
46
494
28
73
3/6
---
---
SAN
TA B
ARB
ARA
71
.8%
SU
P SN
TA B
ARB
30
4
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
7 1.
8
SU
P SA
NTA
MA
RIA
35
2
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
3 2.
0
JU
V S
AN
TA B
ARB
13
0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
3 2.
9
JU
V L
OM
POC
10
0
0 0
2 0/
0 1.
7 2.
0
SA
NTA
BA
RBA
RA
1402
19
39
7 84
74
0/
1 2.
0 3.
8
SA
NTA
MA
RIA
82
3 9
91
18
13
1/0
1.9
5.1
LOM
POC
23
1 1
47
4 6
0/0
1.8
6.0
SOLV
AN
G
175
1 36
2
4 0/
1 2.
0 4.
8
TO
TAL
2719
36
57
1 10
8 99
1/
2 ---
---
SA
NTA
CLA
RA
81.0
%
SUP
SAN
TA C
LAR
A
426
106
0 0
3 0/
0 3.
6 4.
0
JU
V S
AN
TA C
LARA
53
3
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
4 6.
1
LO
S G
ATO
S 0
0 1
0 1
0/0
---
---
PALO
ALT
O
555
3 50
5
6 0/
1 3.
1 2.
2
SA
N JO
SE
4786
30
38
6 72
92
0/
8 3.
9 2.
6
SA
NTA
CLA
RA
82
1 5
0 1
0/0
2.3
3.1
SUN
NY
VA
LE
707
4 52
7
13
0/2
3.6
1.8
GIL
ROY
667
4 48
5
14
0/2
3.4
1.5
TOTA
L 72
76
151
542
89
130
0/13
--
- --
- SA
NTA
CR
UZ
70.3
%
SUP
SAN
TA C
RUZ
23
4 1
0 1
0/0
2.1
3.6
JUV
SA
NTA
CRU
Z 18
0
3 0
0 0/
0 4.
2 1.
2
SA
NTA
CRU
Z 11
14
6 19
9 34
20
0/
12
2.3
6.1
WA
TSO
NV
ILLE
69
3 2
70
5 8
0/10
2.
2 5.
5
TO
TAL
1848
12
27
3 39
29
0/
22
---
---
SHA
STA
68
.0%
SU
P RE
DD
ING
18
4
1 0
0 0/
0 6.
8 3.
0
JU
V S
HA
STA
0
0 1
0 1
0/0
---
---
BURN
EY
46
0 9
2 0
0/0
3.0
4.1
RED
DIN
G
624
12
140
14
5 0/
0 3.
3 2.
8
TO
TAL
688
16
151
16
6 0/
0 --
- --
- SI
ERRA
60
.5%
SU
P SI
ERR
A
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 7.
8 6.
7
D
OW
NIE
VIL
LE
22
0 6
0 0
0/0
2.0
3.4
TOTA
L 23
0
6 0
0 0/
0 --
- --
- SI
SKIY
OU
72
.5%
SU
P SI
SKIY
OU
3
2 0
0 0
0/0
2.4
3.2
JUV
SIS
KIY
OU
0
0 1
0 0
0/0
---
---
DO
RRIS
7
0 2
0 0
0/0
5.7
1.1
WEE
D
101
0 14
1
1 0/
0 3.
0 4.
3
TU
LELA
KE
7 0
1 1
0 0/
0 4.
2 3.
2
YR
EKA
13
6 2
27
1 2
1/0
2.2
3.7
TOTA
L 25
4 4
45
3 3
1/0
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
94
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
SOLA
NO
72
.1%
SU
P SO
LAN
O
65
7 0
1 0
0/1
2.7
3.8
JUV
SO
LAN
O
24
2 2
1 0
0/0
4.4
4.0
FAIR
FIEL
D
891
2 16
5 11
17
1/
5 2.
3 7.
6
BE
NIC
IA
3 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
1 1.
1
V
ALL
EJO
30
8 3
20
16
11
0/1
2.4
4.3
TOTA
L 12
91
14
187
29
28
1/7
---
---
SON
OM
A
73.0
%
SUP
SON
OM
A
63
7 1
0 5
0/1
5.5
3.2
JUV
SO
NO
MA
26
1
0 2
1 0/
0 2.
4 3.
2
SA
NTA
RO
SA
2245
27
45
4 31
52
0/
21
2.9
4.9
PETA
LUM
A
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
6 4.
1
TO
TAL
2335
35
45
5 33
58
0/
22
---
---
STA
NIS
LAU
S 72
.1%
SU
P ST
AN
ISLA
US
74
7 0
0 0
0/0
3.8
2.4
JUV
STA
NIS
LAU
S 37
0
1 0
0 0/
0 3.
2 5.
5
M
OD
ESTO
16
48
24
255
53
23
0/8
2.9
2.2
TURL
OC
K
243
2 31
6
9 0/
2 2.
4 2.
2
TO
TAL
2002
33
28
7 59
32
0/
10
---
---
SUTT
ER
52.2
%
SUP
SUTT
ER
23
8 1
0 0
0/0
2.1
4.8
JUV
SU
TTER
4
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.7
9.2
YUBA
CIT
Y 43
2 2
62
3 4
0/1
2.2
4.0
TOTA
L 45
9 10
63
3
4 0/
1 --
- --
- TE
HA
MA
70
.9%
SU
P TE
HA
MA
7
7 0
0 0
0/0
3.8
2.3
JUV
TEH
AM
A
1 0
0 0
0 0/
0 1.
2 2.
8
C
ORN
ING
84
0
22
1 3
1/1
3.3
4.8
RED
BLU
FF
233
6 32
3
5 0/
0 2.
5 5.
0
TO
TAL
325
13
54
4 8
1/1
---
---
TRIN
ITY
42.0
%
SUP
TRIN
ITY
1 1
0 0
0 0/
0 8.
7 2.
8
W
EAV
ERV
ILLE
10
2 3
22
1 1
0/0
3.5
2.9
TOTA
L 10
3 4
22
1 1
0/0
---
---
TULA
RE
63.7
%
SUP
TULA
RE
113
13
0 0
0 0/
0 2.
9 3.
7
JU
V T
ULA
RE
25
1 0
0 1
0/0
2.1
3.8
DIN
UBA
MU
NI
491
2 13
7
5 2/
2 3.
0 3.
4
EX
ETER
MU
NI
109
0 3
0 3
0/0
3.3
4.1
LIN
DSY
-EXE
TER
157
0 2
1 1
0/0
3.1
2.6
PORT
ERV
ILLE
46
2 11
14
5
4 1/
1 2.
7 3.
1
TU
LARE
35
1 0
14
0 2
0/1
3.1
5.5
VIS
ALI
A
620
16
14
11
14
0/4
3.2
3.6
WO
OD
LKE-
EXET
ER
61
0 3
0 1
0/0
4.3
3.8
TOTA
L 23
89
43
63
24
31
3/8
---
---
TUO
LUM
NE
71.6
%
SUP
TUO
LUM
NE
11
4 0
0 0
0/0
5.0
10.1
SO
NO
RA
174
4 27
0
5 0/
0 2.
9 5.
4
JA
MES
TOW
N
36
0 4
0 0
0/0
2.4
1.1
TOTA
L 22
1 8
31
0 5
0/0
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
95
TABL
E B3
: TO
TAL
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
DA
TA F
OR
1994
DU
I ARR
ESTE
ES B
Y C
OU
RT -
cont
inue
d
D
UI
A
VER
AG
E A
DJU
DIC
ATI
ON
C
OU
NTY
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
M
ISD
FE
LON
Y A
LCO
HO
L N
ON
-ALC
OH
OL
OTH
ER
DU
I DIS
M*/
TI
MES
(MO
NTH
S)
RA
TE
D
UI
DU
I RE
CK
LESS
RE
CK
LESS
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
UN
CO
NST
**
VIO
LATI
ON
TO
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N T
O
C
ON
VIC
TIO
N
DM
V U
PDA
TE
YUBA
71
.0%
SU
P YU
BA
11
1 0
0 0
0/0
3.7
4.9
YOLO
55
.2%
SU
P W
OO
DLA
ND
2
1 1
0 0
0/0
3.0
1.6
VEN
TURA
87
.4%
JU
V V
ENTU
RA
21
2 0
0 0
0/0
2.9
3.3
MA
RYSV
ILLE
36
3 1
78
12
8 0/
3 2.
5 2.
1
JU
V Y
UBA
2
0 0
0 0
0/0
1.6
5.5
WES
T SA
CTO
7
0 2
1 0
0/0
1.1
3.3
TC B
EALE
AFB
7
0 0
0 0
0/0
0.7
1.1
VEN
TURA
JUST
42
87
36
0 2
84
2/4
2.2
3.5
WO
OD
LAN
D
641
9 10
4 18
5
0/2
2.3
2.5
JUV
YO
LO
3 0
0 0
0 0/
0 3.
2 11
.9
TOTA
L 38
3 2
78
12
8 0/
3 --
- --
-
TOTA
L 65
3 10
10
7 19
5
0/2
---
---
TOTA
L 43
08
38
0 2
84
2/4
---
---
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
96
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S*
CO
UN
TY
C
OU
RT
DU
I O
FFEN
DER
TOTA
L PR
OBA
TIO
N
JAIL
1S
T O
FFEN
DER
A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
SB
38
A
LCO
HO
L PR
OG
30
-MO
NTH
PR
OG
RAM
LI
CEN
SE
REST
RIC
TIO
N
CO
URT
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
IGN
ITIO
N
INTE
RLO
CK
ST
ATU
S N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ALA
MED
A
SUP
OA
KLA
ND
1S
T D
UI
21
61.9
90
.5
14.3
9.
5 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 ST
ATE
WID
E
14
5923
96
.1
77.6
57
.3
19.8
0.
2 42
.3
6.7
4.6
2ND
DU
I 3
66.7
33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
60.0
10
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 81
59
.3
90.1
0.
0 19
.8
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
TOTA
L 11
0 60
.0
89.1
2.
7 19
.1
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
JU
V S
AN
1S
T D
UI
39
61.5
5.
1 51
.3
2.6
0.0
0.0
87.2
0.
0
L
EAN
DRO
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 41
63
.4
4.9
53.7
2.
4 0.
0 0.
0 87
.8
0.0
A
LAM
EDA
1S
T D
UI
141
100.
0 99
.3
94.3
1.
4 0.
0 2.
1 0.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
51
100.
0 10
0.0
11.8
82
.4
0.0
76.5
5.
9 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
11
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
18.2
0.
0 27
.3
63.6
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
205
100.
0 99
.5
67.8
22
.4
0.0
22.0
5.
9 0.
0
BERK
ELEY
1S
T D
UI
134
100.
0 10
0.0
71.6
13
.4
0.0
1.5
3.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 43
10
0.0
97.7
4.
7 53
.5
0.0
53.5
0.
0 2.
3
3R
D D
UI
18
100.
0 88
.9
0.0
27.8
0.
0 27
.8
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
202
100.
0 98
.5
48.5
22
.8
0.0
14.9
2.
5 0.
5
FREM
ON
T 1S
T D
UI
759
100.
0 98
.6
90.1
5.
8 0.
0 3.
2 0.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
285
99.6
99
.3
3.5
89.8
0.
0 56
.5
0.4
4.9
3RD
DU
I 87
98
.9
97.7
1.
1 74
.7
0.0
10.3
3.
4 2.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 15
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
TOTA
L 11
46
99.8
98
.7
60.6
32
.7
0.0
16.9
1.
0 1.
4
PLEA
SAN
TON
1S
T D
UI
484
99.8
94
.6
94.2
1.
4 0.
0 3.
9 7.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
159
100.
0 98
.7
4.4
92.5
0.
6 89
.9
2.5
0.6
3RD
DU
I 54
10
0.0
96.3
0.
0 79
.6
0.0
38.9
48
.1
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 40
.0
40.0
0.
0 20
.0
40.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
702
99.7
95
.7
66.2
28
.3
0.1
26.2
9.
7 0.
1
OA
KLA
ND
1S
T D
UI
714
99.7
99
.3
87.7
2.
5 0.
0 3.
6 2.
5 1.
8
2N
D D
UI
226
100.
0 97
.3
8.0
85.0
0.
0 89
.8
0.4
77.0
3R
D D
UI
72
100.
0 81
.9
1.4
68.1
0.
0 86
.1
4.2
75.0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
10
0.0
73.3
0.
0 53
.3
0.0
80.0
0.
0 60
.0
TOTA
L 10
27
99.8
97
.3
62.8
26
.0
0.0
29.5
2.
1 24
.3
H
AYW
ARD
1S
T D
UI
1005
93
.8
98.1
72
.3
3.2
0.0
5.4
6.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 37
2 79
.3
98.1
4.
0 62
.6
0.0
61.6
6.
7 1.
1
3R
D D
UI
136
94.1
10
0.0
1.5
47.1
0.
0 14
.0
8.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
31
74.2
96
.8
0.0
19.4
0.
0 0.
0 16
.1
0.0
TOTA
L 15
44
90.0
98
.3
48.2
21
.7
0.0
19.6
6.
7 0.
3
y, c
ourt
and
offe
nder
stat
us.
y co
unt
g ea
ch sa
nctio
n b
ges o
f 199
4 D
UI c
onvi
ctee
s rec
eivi
npe
rcen
tapr
esen
t *E
ntri
es re
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
97
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ALP
INE
SUP
ALP
INE
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
M
ARK
LEEV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
26
100.
0 23
.1
88.5
3.
8 0.
0 76
.9
3.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 6
100.
0 33
.3
16.7
50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 75
.0
50.0
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
36
97.2
27
.8
66.7
13
.9
0.0
66.7
2.
8 0.
0 A
MA
DO
R SU
P A
MA
DO
R 4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
JA
CK
SON
1S
T D
UI
104
98.1
98
.1
43.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
39
94.9
94
.9
0.0
59.0
0.
0 28
.2
59.0
7.
7
3R
D D
UI
12
91.7
10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 16
.7
75.0
8.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
159
96.9
97
.5
28.3
16
.4
0.0
8.2
25.8
2.
5 BU
TTE
SUP
BUTT
E 1S
T D
UI
8 62
.5
87.5
25
.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
18
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
TOTA
L 30
46
.7
96.7
10
.0
13.3
0.
0 3.
3 10
.0
0.0
JU
V B
UTT
E 1S
T D
UI
8 10
0.0
87.5
12
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 8
100.
0 87
.5
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
GRI
DLE
Y M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
331
95.5
96
.1
89.1
0.
3 0.
0 1.
8 10
.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
4 93
.0
97.4
6.
1 64
.9
0.0
62.3
15
.8
2.6
3RD
DU
I 22
81
.8
100.
0 4.
5 18
.2
0.0
4.5
77.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
470
94.0
96
.6
64.5
16
.8
0.0
16.6
15
.5
0.6
G
RID
LEY
1ST
DU
I 36
50
.0
100.
0 47
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
13
30.8
10
0.0
7.7
15.4
0.
0 15
.4
61.5
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 16
.7
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 56
41
.1
100.
0 32
.1
5.4
0.0
3.6
58.9
0.
0
ORO
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 12
3 50
.4
98.4
46
.3
2.4
0.0
1.6
48.8
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
81
33.3
10
0.0
2.5
27.2
0.
0 21
.0
66.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
23
21.7
10
0.0
0.0
17.4
0.
0 0.
0 82
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
230
40.9
99
.1
25.7
12
.6
0.0
8.3
59.1
0.
0
PARA
DIS
E 1S
T D
UI
102
99.0
95
.1
97.1
0.
0 0.
0 1.
0 9.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
35
94.3
10
0.0
8.6
62.9
0.
0 57
.1
17.1
2.
9
3R
D D
UI
15
73.3
10
0.0
0.0
13.3
0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 15
4 95
.5
96.8
66
.2
15.6
0.
0 13
.6
17.5
0.
6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
CA
LAV
ERA
S SU
P C
ALA
VER
AS
4TH
+ D
UI
5 40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
5 40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SAN
AN
DRE
AS
1ST
DU
I 12
9 10
0.0
98.4
93
.8
1.6
0.0
2.3
0.8
1.6
2ND
DU
I 31
93
.5
100.
0 19
.4
71.0
0.
0 32
.3
0.0
16.1
3R
D D
UI
16
100.
0 93
.8
0.0
50.0
0.
0 18
.8
0.0
6.3
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
7 98
.3
98.3
71
.8
18.1
0.
0 9.
0 0.
6 4.
5 C
OLU
SA
SUP
CO
LUSA
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
CO
LUSA
1S
T D
UI
113
96.5
96
.5
82.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
9 3.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
61
96.7
95
.1
6.6
60.7
0.
0 54
.1
11.5
1.
6
3R
D D
UI
24
91.7
10
0.0
4.2
8.3
0.0
0.0
20.8
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
85.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
42.9
0.
0
TO
TAL
205
95.6
96
.6
47.8
19
.0
0.0
16.6
9.
3 0.
5
WIL
LIA
MS
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CO
NTR
A C
OST
A
SUP
C C
OST
A
1ST
DU
I 28
82
.1
89.3
14
.3
21.4
0.
0 3.
6 7.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
66.7
91
.7
8.3
33.3
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
8.3
3RD
DU
I 14
42
.9
100.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
93
59.1
95
.7
0.0
32.3
0.
0 1.
1 3.
2 1.
1
TO
TAL
147
62.6
94
.6
3.4
28.6
0.
0 2.
7 4.
1 1.
4
JUV
C C
OST
A
1ST
DU
I 23
91
.3
17.4
8.
7 0.
0 0.
0 4.
3 65
.2
0.0
TOTA
L 23
91
.3
17.4
8.
7 0.
0 0.
0 4.
3 65
.2
0.0
C
ON
CO
RD
1ST
DU
I 42
7 99
.8
97.7
63
.0
2.1
0.0
3.3
4.0
0.7
2ND
DU
I 13
3 99
.2
98.5
3.
8 83
.5
0.0
81.2
6.
8 60
.2
3RD
DU
I 46
97
.8
95.7
2.
2 26
.1
0.0
21.7
4.
3 13
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
11.1
22
.2
0.0
TOTA
L 61
5 99
.5
97.7
44
.7
21.6
0.
0 21
.6
4.9
14.5
RIC
HM
ON
D
1ST
DU
I 53
1 97
.7
98.7
87
.6
3.2
0.0
2.4
1.5
0.4
2ND
DU
I 22
5 93
.8
99.1
7.
6 73
.8
0.0
72.9
1.
8 16
.9
3RD
DU
I 58
98
.3
98.3
3.
4 62
.1
0.0
31.0
8.
6 13
.8
4TH
+ D
UI
15
93.3
10
0.0
0.0
26.7
0.
0 20
.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
829
96.6
98
.8
58.4
26
.9
0.0
23.9
2.
4 5.
8
PITT
SBU
RG
1ST
DU
I 33
6 92
.9
98.5
85
.1
0.3
0.3
3.9
8.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
8 85
.9
100.
0 5.
5 63
.3
0.0
64.8
23
.4
7.0
3RD
DU
I 34
20
.6
100.
0 0.
0 14
.7
0.0
14.7
17
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 50
5 85
.0
99.0
58
.0
17.2
0.
2 20
.0
12.7
1.
8
WA
LNU
T C
REEK
1S
T D
UI
553
99.6
95
.8
95.8
1.
1 0.
0 5.
6 3.
4 0.
4
2N
D D
UI
159
100.
0 98
.7
5.0
87.4
0.
0 45
.9
15.1
22
.0
3RD
DU
I 46
10
0.0
97.8
2.
2 26
.1
0.0
13.0
37
.0
6.5
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
761
99.6
96
.6
71.0
20
.6
0.0
14.5
8.
1 5.
3
98
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
99
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
DEL
NO
RTE
SUP
DEL
NO
RTE
1ST
DU
I 11
63
.6
90.9
18
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
47
.1
94.1
17
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.5
0.
0
CRE
SCEN
T C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 11
9 93
.3
96.6
77
.3
4.2
0.0
2.5
1.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
86
.1
100.
0 36
.1
41.7
0.
0 19
.4
2.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
85
.7
100.
0 7.
1 71
.4
0.0
35.7
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
66.7
33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
172
91.3
97
.7
62.8
18
.0
0.0
9.3
1.7
0.0
EL D
ORA
DO
SU
P EL
DO
RAD
O
1ST
DU
I 14
14
.3
14.3
7.
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
15
.8
31.6
5.
3 5.
3 0.
0 0.
0 10
.5
0.0
JU
V/S
UP
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PLA
CER
VIL
LE
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C
AM
ERO
N P
AR
K
1ST
DU
I 17
5 98
.3
98.9
81
.1
0.6
0.0
0.6
2.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 66
98
.5
95.5
9.
1 69
.7
0.0
77.3
0.
0 43
.9
3RD
DU
I 28
10
0.0
50.0
3.
6 21
.4
0.0
75.0
0.
0 60
.7
4TH
+ D
UI
9 88
.9
77.8
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 22
.2
0.0
33.3
TO
TAL
278
98.2
92
.4
53.6
19
.1
0.0
27.0
1.
4 17
.6
SO
LA
KE
TAH
OE
1ST
DU
I 17
6 98
.3
97.7
13
.1
2.3
0.0
1.7
1.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 61
96
.7
95.1
1.
6 59
.0
0.0
60.7
1.
6 21
.3
3RD
DU
I 18
83
.3
94.4
0.
0 38
.9
0.0
27.8
5.
6 5.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
TO
TAL
257
96.9
96
.5
9.3
18.7
0.
0 17
.9
1.9
5.8
PL
AC
ERV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
177
99.4
97
.7
91.0
1.
1 0.
0 72
.9
2.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 69
98
.6
98.6
11
.6
78.3
0.
0 82
.6
1.4
2.9
3RD
DU
I 33
10
0.0
97.0
9.
1 30
.3
0.0
48.5
30
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
12.5
12
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 28
7 97
.9
97.9
59
.9
23.7
0.
0 70
.7
5.9
0.7
FRES
NO
SU
P FR
ESN
O
1ST
DU
I 95
65
.3
91.6
1.
1 2.
1 0.
0 1.
1 2.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
40
52.5
90
.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
2.5
2.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 27
29
.6
96.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
7 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
7 29
.9
98.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
279
45.2
94
.6
0.4
1.1
0.0
0.7
1.4
0.0
JU
V F
RESN
O
1ST
DU
I 25
96
.0
16.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
0 60
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 28
96
.4
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7.
1 64
.3
0.0
FR
ESN
O
1ST
DU
I 13
26
99.5
94
.4
86.3
2.
8 0.
0 40
.4
0.0
0.2
2ND
DU
I 55
1 98
.9
96.7
9.
3 70
.1
0.0
71.7
0.
0 4.
7
3R
D D
UI
201
98.5
84
.6
2.0
42.8
0.
0 29
.9
0.0
2.5
4TH
+ D
UI
36
91.7
83
.3
2.8
22.2
0.
0 8.
3 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2114
99
.1
93.9
56
.8
24.5
0.
0 47
.0
0.0
1.6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
100
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
FRES
NO
C
LOV
IS
1ST
DU
I 14
6 97
.9
76.7
84
.9
2.7
0.0
29.5
0.
0 0.
0
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 57
96
.5
93.0
15
.8
68.4
0.
0 68
.4
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 16
93
.8
100.
0 6.
3 18
.8
0.0
18.8
0.
0 6.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
220
97.3
82
.3
60.9
20
.9
0.0
38.6
0.
0 0.
5
CO
ALI
NG
A
1ST
DU
I 17
5 98
.3
97.7
88
.0
2.9
0.0
6.9
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 35
97
.1
94.3
20
.0
65.7
0.
0 25
.7
2.9
2.9
3RD
DU
I 19
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 63
.2
0.0
10.5
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 23
1 98
.3
97.4
69
.7
18.2
0.
0 10
.4
1.3
0.4
FI
REBA
UG
H
1ST
DU
I 15
0 99
.3
99.3
78
.7
0.7
0.0
44.7
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
44
100.
0 95
.5
2.3
54.5
0.
0 54
.5
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
10
0.0
94.4
11
.1
27.8
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
217
99.5
98
.2
55.8
13
.8
0.0
44.7
0.
0 0.
0
FOW
LER
1ST
DU
I 69
97
.1
100.
0 82
.6
4.3
0.0
4.3
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 35
10
0.0
97.1
11
.4
71.4
0.
0 60
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 12
10
0.0
100.
0 8.
3 25
.0
0.0
16.7
8.
3 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
120
98.3
99
.2
51.7
25
.8
0.0
21.7
3.
3 0.
0
KER
MA
N
1ST
DU
I 68
97
.1
97.1
75
.0
5.9
0.0
8.8
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 26
96
.2
96.2
0.
0 73
.1
0.0
42.3
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
9 10
0.0
88.9
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
4 97
.1
96.2
49
.0
26.0
0.
0 16
.3
0.0
0.0
K
ING
SBU
RG
1ST
DU
I 37
97
.3
94.6
94
.6
0.0
0.0
2.7
2.7
0.0
2ND
DU
I 14
10
0.0
85.7
7.
1 92
.9
0.0
78.6
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 55
98
.2
90.9
65
.5
27.3
0.
0 25
.5
1.8
0.0
RE
EDLE
Y 1S
T D
UI
114
96.5
95
.6
88.6
1.
8 0.
0 6.
1 0.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
41
97.6
97
.6
14.6
75
.6
0.0
26.8
2.
4 17
.1
3RD
DU
I 13
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 53
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 16
8 97
.0
96.4
63
.7
23.8
0.
0 10
.7
1.2
4.2
RI
VER
DA
LE
1ST
DU
I 18
94
.4
94.4
94
.4
0.0
0.0
11.1
5.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 23
95
.7
95.7
73
.9
17.4
0.
0 17
.4
4.3
0.0
SA
NG
ER
1ST
DU
I 92
98
.9
95.7
83
.7
4.3
0.0
8.7
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 42
10
0.0
97.6
7.
1 76
.2
0.0
57.1
2.
4 2.
4
3R
D D
UI
11
90.9
90
.9
0.0
27.3
9.
1 27
.3
9.1
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
147
98.6
95
.9
54.4
26
.5
0.7
23.8
1.
4 0.
7
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
101
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
FRES
NO
SE
LMA
1S
T D
UI
124
90.3
90
.3
65.3
4.
0 0.
0 10
.5
0.0
0.0
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 50
10
0.0
84.0
6.
0 76
.0
0.0
70.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
23
100.
0 69
.6
0.0
34.8
0.
0 13
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 33
.3
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
200
93.0
86
.0
42.0
25
.5
0.0
25.5
0.
0 0.
0 G
LEN
N
SUP
GLE
NN
1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
11
45.5
90
.9
0.0
9.1
0.0
9.1
18.2
9.
1
TO
TAL
13
53.8
92
.3
7.7
7.7
0.0
7.7
15.4
7.
7
JUV
GLE
NN
1S
T D
UI
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
ORL
AN
D
1ST
DU
I 83
96
.4
94.0
77
.1
13.3
0.
0 2.
4 6.
0 1.
2
2N
D D
UI
41
95.1
92
.7
9.8
53.7
0.
0 58
.5
24.4
22
.0
3RD
DU
I 15
10
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 40
.0
46.7
33
.3
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
2 96
.5
90.1
47
.9
23.2
0.
0 23
.2
15.5
10
.6
W
ILLO
WS
1ST
DU
I 46
10
0.0
95.7
95
.7
0.0
0.0
2.2
4.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 18
10
0.0
100.
0 5.
6 72
.2
0.0
72.2
16
.7
55.6
3R
D D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
33.3
55
.6
33.3
4T
H+
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 76
98
.7
97.4
60
.5
21.1
0.
0 22
.4
14.5
17
.1
HU
MBO
LDT
SUP/
JUV
HM
BLT-
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EU
REK
A
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
42.9
85
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
50
.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
HU
MBO
LDT
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
EU
REK
A
1ST
DU
I 16
8 94
.6
25.6
67
.3
1.2
0.0
78.0
15
.5
0.6
2ND
DU
I 42
92
.9
92.9
4.
8 52
.4
0.0
71.4
14
.3
7.1
3RD
DU
I 16
87
.5
81.3
6.
3 0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
37.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 9
55.6
88
.9
0.0
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 55
.6
0.0
TOTA
L 23
5 92
.3
43.8
49
.4
10.6
0.
0 69
.4
18.3
1.
7
ARC
ATA
1S
T D
UI
118
93.2
23
.7
86.4
0.
8 0.
0 84
.7
8.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 38
92
.1
97.4
5.
3 81
.6
0.0
89.5
7.
9 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
160
92.5
43
.1
65.0
21
.2
0.0
83.8
9.
4 0.
0
FORT
UN
A
1ST
DU
I 54
88
.9
18.5
87
.0
0.0
0.0
85.2
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
34
94.1
79
.4
17.6
73
.5
2.9
91.2
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
8 87
.5
75.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
96
90.6
44
.8
55.2
30
.2
1.0
82.3
0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
102
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
HU
MBO
LDT
GA
RBER
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 40
95
.0
5.0
90.0
0.
0 0.
0 92
.5
0.0
0.0
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 16
93
.8
100.
0 0.
0 93
.8
0.0
93.8
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 61
95
.1
37.7
59
.0
31.1
0.
0 88
.5
3.3
0.0
H
OO
PA
1ST
DU
I 19
84
.2
10.5
78
.9
0.0
0.0
78.9
5.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
7 85
.7
100.
0 0.
0 85
.7
0.0
71.4
14
.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
66.7
33
.3
66.7
33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 29
86
.2
37.9
51
.7
27.6
3.
4 75
.9
10.3
0.
0 IM
PERI
AL
SUP
IMPE
RIA
L 1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
IMPE
RIA
L 1S
T D
UI
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
BRA
WLE
Y 1S
T D
UI
107
99.1
54
.2
81.3
0.
9 0.
0 50
.5
0.0
0.9
2ND
DU
I 45
10
0.0
86.7
17
.8
64.4
0.
0 68
.9
0.0
17.8
3R
D D
UI
23
100.
0 82
.6
4.3
21.7
0.
0 39
.1
4.3
17.4
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
75.0
TO
TAL
179
99.4
65
.9
53.6
20
.7
0.0
54.7
0.
6 8.
9
CA
LEXI
CO
1S
T D
UI
323
100.
0 35
.9
87.3
2.
5 0.
0 78
.6
0.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 70
10
0.0
85.7
15
.7
57.1
0.
0 61
.4
2.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 15
10
0.0
93.3
6.
7 20
.0
0.0
26.7
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 40
9 10
0.0
46.7
71
.9
12.5
0.
0 73
.6
1.0
0.0
EL
CEN
TRO
1S
T D
UI
238
99.6
37
.0
63.0
0.
4 0.
0 50
.4
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 62
98
.4
93.5
8.
1 62
.9
0.0
53.2
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
22
100.
0 95
.5
9.1
13.6
0.
0 18
.2
9.1
4.5
4TH
+ D
UI
9 77
.8
88.9
0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 33
1 98
.8
52.9
47
.4
13.0
0.
3 47
.4
0.6
0.3
W
INTE
RHA
VEN
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 IN
YO
SUP
INYO
1S
T D
UI
3 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
66.7
33
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
16
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
22
9.1
86.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
BISH
OP
1ST
DU
I 13
4 97
.0
22.4
94
.8
0.0
0.0
88.1
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
51
96.1
96
.1
2.0
94.1
0.
0 86
.3
2.0
9.8
3RD
DU
I 18
77
.8
66.7
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 85
.7
42.9
0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 21
0 94
.8
44.8
61
.0
26.2
0.
0 77
.1
1.0
2.4
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
103
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
INYO
IN
DEP
END
ENC
E 1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
28.6
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
10
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 90
.0
0.0
20.0
K
ERN
SU
P K
ERN
1S
T D
UI
102
75.5
75
.5
23.5
1.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
32
53.1
96
.9
3.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
33
.3
94.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 14
2 36
.6
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
294
51.7
90
.8
8.5
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JU
V K
ERN
1S
T D
UI
24
95.8
0.
0 45
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
96
.0
0.0
48.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
ARV
IN-L
AM
ON
T 1S
T D
UI
224
88.8
75
.4
67.0
0.
4 0.
0 0.
4 0.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
77
94.8
87
.0
20.8
26
.0
0.0
16.9
3.
9 5.
2
3R
D D
UI
18
72.2
94
.4
5.6
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
75.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
323
89.2
78
.9
51.7
7.
1 0.
0 4.
6 1.
2 1.
2
BAK
ERSF
IELD
1S
T D
UI
1258
98
.3
98.2
78
.5
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.6
1.0
2ND
DU
I 52
3 97
.1
73.0
5.
4 14
.3
0.0
41.7
1.
3 27
.2
3RD
DU
I 21
5 94
.9
65.6
4.
2 0.
9 0.
0 34
.0
4.2
30.2
4T
H+
DU
I 42
92
.9
83.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 16
.7
2.4
11.9
TO
TAL
2038
97
.5
88.0
50
.2
3.8
0.0
15.9
1.
2 11
.0
D
ELA
NO
1S
T D
UI
158
100.
0 72
.8
84.2
2.
5 0.
0 1.
9 1.
9 0.
6
2N
D D
UI
81
98.8
87
.7
17.3
51
.9
0.0
44.4
7.
4 23
.5
3RD
DU
I 35
10
0.0
65.7
2.
9 8.
6 0.
0 37
.1
14.3
8.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 11
90
.9
72.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 27
.3
45.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
285
99.3
76
.1
51.9
17
.2
0.0
19.3
6.
7 8.
1
LAK
E IS
ABE
LLA
1S
T D
UI
54
98.1
10
0.0
55.6
9.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
19
100.
0 10
0.0
10.5
36
.8
0.0
26.3
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
81
98.8
10
0.0
39.5
16
.0
0.0
6.2
0.0
0.0
TA
FT
1ST
DU
I 15
2 98
.0
50.0
53
.3
0.7
0.0
25.0
24
.3
4.6
2ND
DU
I 51
98
.0
68.6
0.
0 56
.9
0.0
76.5
13
.7
60.8
3R
D D
UI
10
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
30.0
0.
0 80
.0
0.0
60.0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 21
4 98
.1
54.7
37
.9
15.4
0.
0 39
.7
20.6
20
.6
SH
AFT
ER
1ST
DU
I 18
1 99
.4
98.9
75
.7
6.1
0.0
2.2
0.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 82
98
.8
89.0
8.
5 47
.6
0.0
52.4
1.
2 19
.5
3RD
DU
I 35
91
.4
97.1
0.
0 11
.4
0.0
8.6
5.7
2.9
4TH
+ D
UI
11
72.7
90
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.2
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
309
97.4
95
.8
46.6
17
.5
0.0
16.8
1.
3 5.
5
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
104
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
KER
N
MO
JAV
E 1S
T D
UI
192
99.0
95
.8
68.8
0.
5 0.
0 1.
6 6.
8 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
78
94.9
98
.7
3.8
41.0
1.
3 42
.3
16.7
1.
3
3R
D D
UI
29
93.1
10
0.0
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
65.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
85.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
57.1
0.
0
TO
TAL
306
97.1
97
.1
44.4
10
.8
0.3
11.8
16
.0
0.3
RI
DG
ECRE
ST
1ST
DU
I 18
7 99
.5
95.7
74
.3
1.6
0.0
1.6
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 56
92
.9
100.
0 1.
8 41
.1
0.0
39.3
1.
8 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
13
100.
0 10
0.0
15.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
256
98.0
96
.9
55.5
10
.2
0.0
9.8
0.4
0.0
KIN
GS
SUP
KIN
GS
1ST
DU
I 5
60.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
13
7.7
92.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 30
.8
0.0
TOTA
L 22
22
.7
95.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 45
.5
0.0
JU
V K
ING
S 1S
T D
UI
15
86.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
7 80
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
16
87.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
3 75
.0
0.0
H
AN
FORD
1S
T D
UI
269
87.4
98
.9
72.1
2.
6 0.
0 1.
5 10
.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
6 83
.0
98.1
4.
7 49
.1
0.0
50.9
16
.0
0.9
3RD
DU
I 33
54
.5
97.0
3.
0 6.
1 0.
0 6.
1 36
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 41
6 82
.0
98.6
48
.1
14.7
0.
0 14
.4
13.7
0.
2
AV
ENA
L 1S
T D
UI
43
97.7
97
.7
74.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 2.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
20
100.
0 95
.0
15.0
75
.0
5.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 16
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 71
90
.1
97.2
49
.3
22.5
1.
4 23
.9
1.4
0.0
C
ORC
ORA
N
1ST
DU
I 35
94
.3
100.
0 65
.7
2.9
0.0
2.9
20.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
14
71.4
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
28.6
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
57
84.2
10
0.0
40.4
15
.8
0.0
17.5
22
.8
0.0
LE
MO
ORE
1S
T D
UI
119
85.7
99
.2
63.9
4.
2 0.
0 2.
5 13
.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 36
69
.4
94.4
19
.4
11.1
0.
0 13
.9
33.3
2.
8
3R
D D
UI
20
65.0
95
.0
0.0
10.0
5.
0 15
.0
20.0
10
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
7 79
.7
97.7
46
.9
6.2
0.6
6.2
18.6
1.
7 LA
KE
SUP
LAK
E 1S
T D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 42
.9
100.
0 0.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
38
.5
92.3
0.
0 7.
7 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
105
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
LAK
E JU
V L
AK
E 1S
T D
UI
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
cont
.
TOTA
L 4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
CLE
ARL
AK
E 1S
T D
UI
140
100.
0 10
0.0
85.0
4.
3 0.
0 2.
1 1.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
70
100.
0 10
0.0
22.9
65
.7
0.0
41.4
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
26
92.3
10
0.0
0.0
84.6
0.
0 26
.9
3.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 24
0 98
.8
100.
0 56
.3
32.1
0.
0 16
.2
1.2
0.0
LA
KEP
ORT
1S
T D
UI
132
99.2
94
.7
90.9
3.
8 0.
0 6.
8 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
52
100.
0 98
.1
7.7
86.5
0.
0 84
.6
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 15
40
.0
100.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 20
2 95
.0
96.0
61
.4
25.7
0.
0 27
.2
0.0
0.0
LASS
EN
SUP
LASS
EN
1ST
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JU
V L
ASS
EN
1ST
DU
I 5
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 80
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 5
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 80
.0
0.0
SU
SAN
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 13
7 97
.8
98.5
94
.9
2.2
0.0
1.5
2.2
0.7
2ND
DU
I 42
97
.6
100.
0 11
.9
81.0
0.
0 73
.8
4.8
50.0
3R
D D
UI
7 42
.9
100.
0 0.
0 42
.9
0.0
42.9
0.
0 28
.6
4TH
+ D
UI
6 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
2 92
.7
99.0
70
.3
20.8
0.
0 18
.8
2.6
12.5
LO
S A
NG
ELES
SU
P LA
CEN
TRA
L 1S
T D
UI
66
69.7
95
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
53
.3
100.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
12
41.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
86
27.9
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
TOTA
L 17
9 46
.4
98.3
0.
0 0.
6 0.
0 0.
6 1.
7 0.
0
SUP
POM
ON
A
1ST
DU
I 70
70
.0
95.7
0.
0 14
.3
0.0
2.9
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 24
50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 4.
2 0.
0 4.
2 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
20
30.0
10
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
15.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 99
15
.2
100.
0 0.
0 6.
1 0.
0 1.
0 8.
1 1.
0
TO
TAL
213
38.5
98
.6
0.0
8.5
0.0
1.9
5.6
0.5
SU
P LA
NC
AST
ER
1ST
DU
I 12
50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 5
80.0
80
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
40
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 15
6.
7 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
34
32.4
97
.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
32.4
0.
0
SUP
VA
N N
UYS
1S
T D
UI
78
60.3
85
.9
1.3
0.0
0.0
2.6
15.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
50.0
83
.3
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
10
10.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 83
12
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 14
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 18
3 35
.0
92.9
0.
5 0.
5 0.
0 1.
1 14
.8
0.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
106
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
SUP
PASA
DEN
A
1ST
DU
I 25
72
.0
80.0
4.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.0
12.0
0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
12
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
0.0
8.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 9
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
41
46.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.9
0.0
TOTA
L 87
58
.6
94.3
1.
1 1.
1 0.
0 3.
4 6.
9 0.
0
SUP
LON
G B
CH
1S
T D
UI
20
70.0
90
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 4
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
20.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
11
36.4
81
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 40
52
.5
90.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 5.
0 2.
5 0.
0
SUP
CO
MPT
ON
1S
T D
UI
16
81.3
31
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.3
6.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 5
100.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 24
58
.3
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 0.
0
TO
TAL
47
72.3
38
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
4.3
0.0
SU
P N
ORW
ALK
1S
T D
UI
34
73.5
91
.2
2.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 11
45
.5
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 9.
1 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 66
18
.2
98.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 3.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
118
41.5
96
.6
0.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
0.0
SU
P SA
NTA
1S
T D
UI
13
84.6
76
.9
46.2
0.
0 0.
0 7.
7 15
.4
0.0
MO
NIC
A
2ND
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 25
.0
25.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
18
55.6
94
.4
0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 39
69
.2
89.7
15
.4
5.1
2.6
5.1
7.7
0.0
JU
V L
A C
O
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
LA
JUV
CEN
TRA
L 1S
T D
UI
17
94.1
41
.2
23.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
17
94.1
41
.2
23.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
ALH
AM
BRA
1S
T D
UI
615
92.7
57
.6
78.7
0.
5 0.
0 51
.2
0.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 17
6 89
.2
96.0
4.
5 40
.9
0.6
38.1
1.
1 3.
4
3R
D D
UI
65
81.5
90
.8
1.5
3.1
4.6
9.2
0.0
3.1
4TH
+ D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 33
.3
16.7
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 86
2 91
.2
68.2
57
.4
9.0
0.5
45.2
0.
6 0.
9
LAN
CA
STER
1S
T D
UI
440
99.1
99
.8
95.2
2.
0 0.
0 2.
0 0.
2 0.
5
2N
D D
UI
141
97.2
97
.9
5.7
88.7
1.
4 87
.9
0.0
31.9
3R
D D
UI
35
91.4
40
.0
0.0
22.9
54
.3
20.0
2.
9 2.
9
4T
H+
DU
I 8
100.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
624
98.2
95
.0
68.4
22
.8
4.3
22.4
0.
3 7.
7
BEV
ERLY
HIL
LS
1ST
DU
I 22
1 99
.5
66.1
94
.1
1.4
0.0
94.6
0.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
39
100.
0 97
.4
23.1
64
.1
0.0
84.6
7.
7 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
13
100.
0 53
.8
23.1
30
.8
15.4
15
.4
46.2
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
275
99.6
70
.2
80.0
12
.4
0.7
88.7
4.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
107
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
BURB
AN
K
1ST
DU
I 33
0 99
.4
97.0
90
.3
0.6
0.3
60.3
6.
4 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
98
94.9
96
.9
6.1
70.4
1.
0 61
.2
20.4
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
21
90.5
90
.5
4.8
4.8
9.5
0.0
85.7
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
453
97.8
96
.7
67.3
15
.9
0.9
57.2
13
.5
0.0
W
EST
CO
VIN
A
1ST
DU
I 18
47
99.1
68
.2
93.9
1.
7 0.
1 54
.5
3.9
0.2
2ND
DU
I 53
6 98
.5
97.4
7.
1 83
.2
0.4
82.3
4.
1 35
.4
3RD
DU
I 12
8 93
.0
83.6
3.
1 46
.1
14.1
21
.1
2.3
10.9
4T
H+
DU
I 18
83
.3
94.4
11
.1
44.4
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
11.1
TO
TAL
2529
98
.5
75.3
70
.3
21.5
0.
8 58
.5
3.8
8.3
C
OM
PTO
N
1ST
DU
I 84
8 98
.9
77.5
87
.0
2.1
0.1
83.8
2.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
238
99.2
90
.8
12.2
69
.3
0.4
85.7
4.
6 7.
6
3R
D D
UI
75
94.7
96
.0
2.7
44.0
2.
7 29
.3
18.7
2.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 9
88.9
10
0.0
0.0
22.2
0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 11
70
98.6
81
.5
65.7
18
.6
0.3
80.1
4.
4 1.
7
CU
LVER
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
201
97.5
24
.4
88.1
2.
0 0.
0 46
.8
9.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 50
98
.0
74.0
18
.0
62.0
8.
0 48
.0
8.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
85
.7
78.6
14
.3
35.7
14
.3
14.3
21
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
266
97.0
36
.8
71.1
15
.0
2.3
45.5
9.
8 0.
0
DO
WN
EY
1ST
DU
I 53
1 99
.2
26.4
90
.6
2.1
0.2
80.2
9.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
172
98.8
91
.3
10.5
75
.0
2.9
73.8
11
.0
2.9
3RD
DU
I 34
97
.1
85.3
5.
9 44
.1
11.8
35
.3
35.3
5.
9
4T
H+
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
741
98.9
44
.5
67.6
20
.9
1.3
76.2
11
.3
0.9
EA
ST L
A
1ST
DU
I 88
3 99
.5
50.6
87
.7
1.1
0.0
76.2
7.
4 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
284
98.9
92
.3
7.4
69.7
0.
7 67
.3
15.1
14
.4
3RD
DU
I 74
10
0.0
94.6
2.
7 16
.2
2.7
12.2
10
.8
1.4
4TH
+ D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1248
99
.4
63.0
63
.9
17.6
0.
3 70
.0
9.3
3.4
EL
MO
NTE
1S
T D
UI
920
99.1
59
.7
86.4
2.
5 0.
0 54
.0
11.7
0.
2
2N
D D
UI
284
98.9
89
.8
6.3
76.8
0.
4 68
.3
14.8
19
.4
3RD
DU
I 87
96
.6
88.5
2.
3 33
.3
9.2
11.5
2.
3 5.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
95
98.9
68
.3
62.9
20
.8
0.7
54.1
11
.7
4.8
G
LEN
DA
LE
1ST
DU
I 47
0 99
.1
40.9
90
.9
3.2
0.0
75.7
0.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
152
100.
0 89
.5
10.5
77
.0
0.0
76.3
0.
0 11
.8
3RD
DU
I 38
97
.4
86.8
2.
6 31
.6
5.3
28.9
2.
6 2.
6
4T
H+
DU
I 8
87.5
10
0.0
0.0
37.5
0.
0 25
.0
12.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
668
99.1
55
.2
66.5
22
.0
0.3
72.6
0.
4 2.
8
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
108
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
ING
LEW
OO
D
1ST
DU
I 76
8 91
.8
33.9
81
.8
2.0
0.0
78.0
6.
8 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
246
93.9
88
.2
13.4
71
.5
1.2
80.1
9.
3 1.
2
3R
D D
UI
57
86.0
89
.5
1.8
42.1
8.
8 36
.8
3.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 40
.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
1076
91
.7
49.4
61
.5
20.0
0.
8 75
.9
7.2
0.3
LO
NG
BEA
CH
1S
T D
UI
1296
98
.7
42.7
87
.0
1.8
0.0
63.2
0.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
398
99.0
92
.5
11.3
69
.6
0.0
55.0
0.
3 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
128
96.9
93
.0
5.5
25.8
4.
7 20
.3
0.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
30
26.7
10
0.0
0.0
13.3
0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1852
97
.5
57.8
63
.7
18.2
0.
3 57
.5
0.2
0.0
LA
MET
RO
1ST
DU
I 53
68
99.9
60
.0
93.4
2.
0 0.
0 66
.2
1.5
0.5
2ND
DU
I 14
37
99.4
97
.1
7.5
87.7
0.
1 88
.0
3.4
43.0
3R
D D
UI
346
95.4
88
.2
2.0
42.8
2.
6 44
.8
0.9
33.5
4T
H+
DU
I 43
86
.0
88.4
7.
0 27
.9
2.3
37.2
2.
3 32
.6
TOTA
L 71
94
99.5
68
.9
71.3
21
.2
0.2
69.3
1.
9 10
.8
BE
LLFL
OW
ER
1ST
DU
I 29
2 99
.3
25.0
82
.5
0.3
0.0
52.7
9.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
97
100.
0 93
.8
3.1
75.3
0.
0 68
.0
11.3
9.
3
3R
D D
UI
21
100.
0 90
.5
0.0
23.8
0.
0 19
.0
14.3
4.
8
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 41
2 99
.5
44.9
59
.2
19.2
0.
0 54
.4
10.0
2.
4
VA
LEN
CIA
1S
T D
UI
581
93.3
37
.9
80.6
2.
9 0.
0 57
.5
2.2
0.2
2ND
DU
I 19
4 92
.8
96.4
3.
6 75
.8
0.0
62.4
3.
6 26
.8
3RD
DU
I 59
71
.2
88.1
1.
7 22
.0
3.4
15.3
1.
7 11
.9
4TH
+ D
UI
14
14.3
10
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
7.1
0.0
7.1
TOTA
L 84
8 90
.3
55.8
56
.1
21.0
0.
2 54
.8
2.5
7.2
PA
SAD
ENA
1S
T D
UI
620
98.1
50
.8
86.1
2.
3 0.
0 88
.1
2.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 14
9 95
.3
86.6
12
.8
71.1
0.
7 74
.5
7.4
0.0
3RD
DU
I 58
96
.6
100.
0 1.
7 36
.2
0.0
27.6
13
.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
14
64.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
841
96.9
61
.4
65.9
16
.8
0.1
80.0
4.
6 0.
0
MA
LIBU
1S
T D
UI
178
97.8
15
.2
88.2
1.
1 0.
6 85
.4
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 63
98
.4
73.0
12
.7
77.8
0.
0 92
.1
0.0
3.2
3RD
DU
I 20
95
.0
35.0
20
.0
30.0
35
.0
45.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
100.
0 57
.1
14.3
14
.3
28.6
14
.3
14.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
268
97.8
31
.3
63.4
21
.6
3.7
82.1
1.
1 0.
7
POM
ON
A
1ST
DU
I 78
0 96
.9
39.5
87
.3
2.9
0.0
57.6
4.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
244
96.7
91
.0
9.8
72.5
0.
0 65
.6
4.5
2.0
3RD
DU
I 64
87
.5
92.2
4.
7 31
.3
3.1
10.9
21
.9
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
7 85
.7
100.
0 14
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.6
0.
0
TO
TAL
1095
96
.3
54.4
64
.7
20.1
0.
2 56
.3
5.3
0.5
H
UN
TIN
GTN
PK
1S
T D
UI
771
99.2
50
.3
82.0
2.
2 0.
1 25
.3
6.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 21
6 99
.1
94.4
9.
7 69
.0
0.0
29.2
4.
6 4.
6
3R
D D
UI
65
100.
0 92
.3
4.6
35.4
4.
6 9.
2 7.
7 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
10
0.0
90.0
10
.0
40.0
10
.0
10.0
20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
62
99.2
62
.2
61.9
18
.2
0.5
25.0
6.
2 0.
9
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
109
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
MO
NRO
VIA
1S
T D
UI
256
100.
0 29
.3
85.9
0.
8 0.
0 80
.9
5.1
0.0
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 77
10
0.0
92.2
10
.4
64.9
0.
0 63
.6
16.9
6.
5
3R
D D
UI
26
100.
0 96
.2
0.0
30.8
3.
8 15
.4
26.9
3.
8
TO
TAL
359
100.
0 47
.6
63.5
16
.7
0.3
72.4
9.
2 1.
7
SAN
TA M
ON
ICA
1S
T D
UI
252
96.4
13
.9
91.7
2.
0 0.
0 87
.7
4.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 67
98
.5
89.6
10
.4
74.6
0.
0 95
.5
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 18
94
.4
77.8
5.
6 50
.0
11.1
38
.9
11.1
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 33
9 96
.8
32.7
70
.5
19.2
0.
6 86
.4
3.8
0.0
TO
RRA
NC
E 1S
T D
UI
996
98.8
20
.8
92.3
1.
3 0.
0 87
.9
2.2
0.1
2ND
DU
I 24
6 98
.0
84.6
15
.4
74.0
0.
4 87
.0
4.9
0.0
3RD
DU
I 63
88
.9
74.6
7.
9 20
.6
12.7
23
.8
11.1
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 23
69
.6
95.7
0.
0 13
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
28
97.7
36
.4
72.4
15
.9
0.7
83.1
3.
1 0.
1
SOU
THG
ATE
1S
T D
UI
474
98.3
42
.2
84.4
3.
2 0.
0 54
.4
3.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
0 98
.7
83.3
13
.3
64.0
0.
0 64
.7
14.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
38
84.2
86
.8
2.6
23.7
2.
6 28
.9
5.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 83
.3
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
668
97.6
54
.5
63.0
18
.7
0.1
55.4
5.
8 0.
0
WH
ITTI
ER
1ST
DU
I 51
7 95
.6
29.0
89
.2
1.0
0.0
78.9
4.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
195
94.9
94
.9
6.7
76.9
0.
5 74
.9
9.7
3.1
3RD
DU
I 57
82
.5
93.0
1.
8 33
.3
5.3
28.1
12
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 16
.7
0.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
775
94.2
50
.8
61.3
22
.6
0.5
73.7
6.
3 0.
8
HO
LLYW
OO
D
1ST
DU
I 12
2 98
.4
41.8
86
.9
2.5
0.0
67.2
1.
6 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
32
100.
0 96
.9
0.0
81.3
0.
0 78
.1
3.1
3.1
3RD
DU
I 6
83.3
83
.3
0.0
33.3
16
.7
16.7
16
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
162
98.1
54
.9
65.4
19
.1
0.6
66.7
2.
5 0.
6
SAN
FER
NA
ND
O
1ST
DU
I 14
08
99.7
50
.9
85.2
2.
3 0.
1 45
.8
16.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
367
100.
0 94
.8
9.3
75.2
0.
3 57
.2
22.1
0.
8
3R
D D
UI
109
97.2
95
.4
1.8
37.6
3.
7 22
.9
7.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 16
.7
16.7
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 18
90
99.6
62
.2
65.4
18
.5
0.3
46.6
16
.9
0.2
SA
N P
EDRO
1S
T D
UI
322
100.
0 48
.1
91.6
2.
2 0.
0 58
.1
2.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
1 99
.1
94.6
9.
9 82
.9
0.0
61.3
13
.5
1.8
3RD
DU
I 25
96
.0
92.0
4.
0 40
.0
4.0
12.0
8.
0 4.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
460
99.6
62
.0
66.7
23
.9
0.2
56.1
5.
7 0.
7
VA
N N
UY
S 1S
T D
UI
2123
99
.2
40.9
92
.3
2.8
0.0
59.7
0.
5 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
583
97.1
92
.8
8.1
82.0
0.
5 68
.4
3.8
11.3
3R
D D
UI
181
93.4
89
.5
3.3
57.5
5.
0 39
.8
3.3
7.7
4TH
+ D
UI
33
39.4
93
.9
0.0
6.1
3.0
9.1
0.0
3.0
TOTA
L 29
20
97.7
54
.9
68.9
22
.1
0.5
59.7
1.
3 2.
9
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
110
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
LOS
AN
GEL
ES
1ST
DU
I 46
6 98
.5
29.8
84
.1
3.6
0.0
74.7
1.
1 0.
6 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
120
98.3
90
.8
5.0
78.3
0.
8 71
.7
1.7
44.2
3R
D D
UI
45
91.1
84
.4
4.4
40.0
13
.3
26.7
4.
4 20
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 63
5 97
.8
45.7
63
.0
20.3
1.
1 70
.2
1.7
10.2
AV
ALO
N
1ST
DU
I 6
100.
0 0.
0 83
.3
16.7
0.
0 83
.3
16.7
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
8 10
0.0
25.0
62
.5
37.5
0.
0 75
.0
12.5
0.
0
US
MA
G
1ST
DU
I 8
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
B
AK
ERSF
IELD
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
9 10
0.0
11.1
88
.9
11.1
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
U
S D
IST
CT
LA
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MA
DER
A
SUP
MA
DER
A
1ST
DU
I 8
87.5
62
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 13
53
.8
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 38
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 28
67
.9
89.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 35
.7
0.0
JU
V M
AD
ERA
1S
T D
UI
3 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
3 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0
CH
OW
CH
ILLA
1S
T D
UI
98
98.0
96
.9
88.8
3.
1 0.
0 0.
0 9.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
37
100.
0 10
0.0
8.1
70.3
0.
0 75
.7
16.2
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
77.8
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
146
98.6
97
.9
61.6
20
.5
0.0
19.2
16
.4
0.0
BO
RDEN
1S
T D
UI
106
98.1
96
.2
83.0
6.
6 0.
0 0.
9 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
35
80.0
91
.4
11.4
60
.0
0.0
37.1
2.
9 2.
9
3R
D D
UI
19
78.9
94
.7
0.0
15.8
0.
0 10
.5
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 16
3 90
.2
95.1
56
.4
19.0
0.
0 9.
8 0.
6 0.
6
MA
DER
A
1ST
DU
I 17
8 97
.2
93.8
86
.5
4.5
0.0
1.7
2.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 67
95
.5
97.0
17
.9
61.2
0.
0 31
.3
4.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 32
87
.5
93.8
6.
3 25
.0
0.0
6.3
12.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
280
95.4
94
.6
60.0
20
.4
0.0
9.3
4.3
0.0
BA
SS L
AK
E 1S
T D
UI
43
100.
0 79
.1
88.4
0.
0 0.
0 14
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 20
10
0.0
90.0
20
.0
55.0
0.
0 40
.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
37.5
0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
72
100.
0 84
.7
58.3
19
.4
0.0
19.4
1.
4 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
111
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
MA
RIN
SU
P SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 7
57.1
57
.1
42.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 57
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
66.7
33
.3
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 13
76
.9
92.3
23
.1
15.4
0.
0 15
.4
30.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
26
73.1
76
.9
26.9
19
.2
3.8
7.7
38.5
0.
0
JUV
SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 4
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
SA
N R
AFA
EL
1ST
DU
I 93
4 99
.8
6.0
94.8
1.
2 0.
0 94
.0
5.1
0.9
2ND
DU
I 26
1 10
0.0
91.2
5.
4 80
.8
0.0
93.9
5.
0 67
.0
3RD
DU
I 61
98
.4
77.0
3.
3 34
.4
0.0
73.8
24
.6
52.5
3RD
DU
I 41
90
.2
95.1
7.
3 58
.5
0.0
31.7
29
.3
14.6
4TH
+ D
UI
10
100.
0 10
0.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
1266
99
.8
27.7
71
.2
19.2
0.
0 92
.4
6.4
17.0
M
ARI
POSA
SU
P M
ARI
POSA
1S
T D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
MEN
DO
CIN
O
SUP
UK
IAH
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
50.0
10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
M
ARI
POSA
1S
T D
UI
49
98.0
98
.0
91.8
0.
0 0.
0 10
.2
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 9
100.
0 10
0.0
11.1
88
.9
0.0
55.6
11
.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 6
83.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
TO
TAL
64
96.9
98
.4
71.9
12
.5
0.0
15.6
4.
7 0.
0
US
MA
G
1ST
DU
I 66
51
.5
28.8
16
.7
0.0
0.0
10.6
0.
0 0.
0
Y
OSE
MIT
E 2N
D D
UI
15
73.3
60
.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
25.0
75
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
87
54.0
36
.8
12.6
8.
0 0.
0 13
.8
1.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 50
.0
87.5
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
15
73.3
80
.0
13.3
13
.3
0.0
0.0
13.3
0.
0
JUV
UK
IAH
1S
T D
UI
4 75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
4 75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
WIL
LITS
1S
T D
UI
58
96.6
82
.8
87.9
0.
0 0.
0 17
.2
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 18
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 72
.2
0.0
72.2
5.
6 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 83
94
.0
88.0
61
.4
20.5
0.
0 31
.3
1.2
0.0
U
KIA
H M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
262
91.6
87
.4
80.9
6.
5 0.
0 15
.3
0.8
1.1
2ND
DU
I 95
93
.7
98.9
5.
3 74
.7
0.0
55.8
8.
4 7.
4
4TH
+ D
UI
4 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 40
2 91
.5
91.0
54
.7
27.9
0.
0 26
.4
6.0
4.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
112
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
MEN
DO
CIN
O
BOO
NV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
8 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
37.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 11
81
.8
100.
0 36
.4
36.4
0.
0 9.
1 0.
0 0.
0
PT. A
REN
A
1ST
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
9 10
0.0
100.
0 77
.8
22.2
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
LE
GG
ETT
1ST
DU
I 14
92
.9
92.9
78
.6
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 60
.0
0.0
40.0
20
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
26
96.2
96
.2
42.3
23
.1
0.0
19.2
11
.5
0.0
C
OV
ELO
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
33.3
33
.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 8
100.
0 10
0.0
62.5
12
.5
0.0
12.5
12
.5
0.0
FO
RT B
RAG
G
1ST
DU
I 75
10
0.0
96.0
90
.7
4.0
0.0
5.3
8.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 35
10
0.0
82.9
5.
7 68
.6
0.0
71.4
22
.9
2.9
3RD
DU
I 11
10
0.0
54.5
0.
0 27
.3
0.0
63.6
36
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
3 10
0.0
88.6
56
.9
25.2
0.
0 30
.1
15.4
0.
8
UK
IAH
JUST
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 25
.0
25.0
25
.0
MER
CED
SU
P M
ERC
ED
1ST
DU
I 6
83.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 50
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
26
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.8
11.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
36
55.6
97
.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.6
13.9
0.
0
JUV
MER
CED
1S
T D
UI
15
13.3
0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
19
10.5
5.
3 5.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 5.
3 0.
0
MER
CED
1S
T D
UI
580
99.1
97
.6
87.4
4.
7 0.
0 4.
3 2.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
259
100.
0 99
.6
7.7
79.9
0.
4 63
.7
8.9
1.5
3RD
DU
I 89
96
.6
97.8
1.
1 36
.0
0.0
20.2
28
.1
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
13
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
46.2
0.
0 46
.2
7.7
0.0
TOTA
L 94
1 99
.1
98.2
56
.1
28.9
0.
1 22
.7
6.5
0.4
LO
S BA
NO
S 1S
T D
UI
154
100.
0 84
.4
89.6
3.
9 0.
0 18
.8
0.6
0.6
2ND
DU
I 52
98
.1
96.2
7.
7 82
.7
1.9
71.2
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
32
96.9
96
.9
9.4
43.8
0.
0 21
.9
3.1
6.3
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
242
99.2
88
.8
59.9
26
.4
0.4
30.2
1.
2 1.
2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
113
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
MO
DO
C
SUP
MO
DO
C
1ST
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
ALT
URA
S 1S
T D
UI
54
92.6
96
.3
87.0
1.
9 0.
0 9.
3 11
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 13
92
.3
100.
0 0.
0 84
.6
0.0
69.2
23
.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 70
92
.9
97.1
67
.1
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
15.7
0.
0 M
ON
O
BRID
GEP
ORT
1S
T D
UI
26
100.
0 73
.1
50.0
30
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
33.3
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
TO
TAL
34
97.1
76
.5
38.2
41
.2
0.0
14.7
0.
0 8.
8
MA
MO
TH L
AK
ES
1ST
DU
I 37
10
0.0
54.1
94
.6
0.0
0.0
10.8
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
24
95.8
91
.7
0.0
87.5
4.
2 83
.3
0.0
58.3
3R
D D
UI
5 80
.0
80.0
0.
0 60
.0
0.0
80.0
0.
0 60
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 67
95
.5
70.1
52
.2
35.8
1.
5 41
.8
0.0
25.4
M
ON
TERE
Y SU
P M
ON
TERE
Y 1S
T D
UI
24
91.7
83
.3
16.7
0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 54
.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
86
.7
93.3
0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0 26
.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 13
76
.9
76.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 53
.8
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
83
75.9
94
.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
0.0
54.2
0.
0
TO
TAL
135
80.0
90
.4
3.0
1.5
0.0
0.7
51.1
0.
0
JUV
SA
LIN
AS
1ST
DU
I 16
10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 18
10
0.0
55.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 22
.2
0.0
M
ON
TERE
Y 1S
T D
UI
644
99.2
93
.3
83.2
1.
7 0.
0 1.
1 7.
1 0.
3
2N
D D
UI
212
99.1
97
.2
5.7
65.1
0.
0 25
.5
52.4
6.
6
3R
D D
UI
58
98.3
91
.4
0.0
15.5
0.
0 10
.3
74.1
10
.3
4TH
+ D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
77.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
923
99.1
94
.1
59.4
17
.2
0.0
7.3
22.4
2.
4
SALI
NA
S 1S
T D
UI
1076
99
.1
98.6
85
.0
1.9
0.0
1.4
12.3
1.
2
2N
D D
UI
391
99.0
93
.4
7.4
48.1
0.
0 29
.2
45.5
20
.5
3RD
DU
I 15
1 99
.3
84.8
3.
3 22
.5
0.0
19.2
38
.4
14.6
4T
H+
DU
I 22
90
.9
100.
0 9.
1 4.
5 0.
0 0.
0 40
.9
0.0
TOTA
L 16
40
99.0
96
.1
58.0
14
.8
0.0
9.6
23.0
7.
0
KIN
G C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 38
3 99
.2
99.2
78
.3
0.5
0.0
0.8
23.8
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
158
99.4
10
0.0
7.0
17.1
0.
0 11
.4
74.7
1.
3
3R
D D
UI
58
96.6
10
0.0
0.0
5.2
0.0
0.0
94.8
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 85
.7
14.3
TO
TAL
606
99.0
99
.5
51.5
5.
3 0.
0 3.
5 44
.6
0.5
NA
PA
SUP
NA
PA
1ST
DU
I 25
80
.0
72.0
28
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.0
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
12
66.7
91
.7
0.0
25.0
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 22
27
.3
100.
0 0.
0 4.
5 0.
0 4.
5 0.
0 4.
5
TO
TAL
62
58.1
87
.1
11.3
8.
1 0.
0 4.
8 4.
8 1.
6
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
114
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
NA
PA
NA
PA
1ST
DU
I 59
3 99
.0
97.8
91
.6
1.3
0.0
1.7
0.2
0.0
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 21
7 10
0.0
100.
0 6.
5 85
.3
0.0
64.1
0.
0 2.
3
3R
D D
UI
54
94.4
10
0.0
1.9
57.4
0.
0 40
.7
5.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
867
99.0
98
.4
64.4
25
.8
0.0
19.7
0.
5 0.
6 N
EVA
DA
SU
P N
EVA
DA
1S
T D
UI
9 77
.8
66.7
11
.1
0.0
0.0
22.2
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 9
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 19
73
.7
84.2
5.
3 0.
0 0.
0 10
.5
0.0
0.0
N
EVA
DA
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
173
98.8
94
.8
80.9
5.
8 0.
0 17
.3
2.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 67
95
.5
98.5
6.
0 82
.1
0.0
76.1
1.
5 1.
5
3R
D D
UI
20
90.0
10
0.0
0.0
30.0
0.
0 10
.0
25.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 26
1 97
.3
96.2
55
.2
27.2
0.
0 31
.8
4.2
0.4
TR
UC
KEE
MU
NI
1ST
DU
I 10
2 97
.1
91.2
90
.2
2.0
0.0
8.8
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 28
92
.9
96.4
14
.3
78.6
0.
0 57
.1
0.0
14.3
3R
D D
UI
12
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
8.3
TOTA
L 14
2 96
.5
93.0
67
.6
25.4
0.
0 20
.4
0.0
3.5
ORA
NG
E SU
P SA
NTA
AN
A
1ST
DU
I 47
72
.3
91.5
2.
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
23
69.6
91
.3
0.0
8.7
0.0
8.7
8.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
71.4
71
.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
107
70.1
96
.3
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
2.8
0.0
TOTA
L 18
4 70
.7
93.5
0.
5 1.
6 0.
0 1.
1 4.
9 0.
0
JUV
ORA
NG
E 1S
T D
UI
50
96.0
28
.0
80.0
2.
0 0.
0 16
.0
76.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
50
96.0
28
.0
80.0
2.
0 0.
0 16
.0
76.0
0.
0
FULL
ERTO
N
1ST
DU
I 24
08
99.5
28
.4
94.7
1.
4 0.
0 78
.8
1.2
0.5
2ND
DU
I 68
6 98
.5
91.1
8.
5 81
.5
0.0
73.8
0.
6 25
.8
3RD
DU
I 15
9 98
.7
95.6
1.
9 77
.4
0.0
32.7
0.
0 24
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
16
81.3
10
0.0
12.5
50
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 18
.8
TOTA
L 32
69
99.2
45
.2
71.7
22
.1
0.0
75.2
1.
0 7.
1
WES
TMIN
STER
1S
T D
UI
1976
99
.1
11.1
92
.5
2.4
0.0
93.8
1.
2 0.
6
2N
D D
UI
562
98.0
92
.0
4.6
84.3
0.
0 93
.1
1.6
37.7
3R
D D
UI
133
94.7
91
.7
0.0
75.2
0.
0 45
.9
0.8
36.8
4T
H+
DU
I 9
100.
0 88
.9
0.0
77.8
0.
0 55
.6
11.1
44
.4
TOTA
L 26
80
98.7
32
.3
69.2
23
.4
0.0
91.2
1.
3 10
.3
LA
GU
NA
HIL
LS
1ST
DU
I 14
65
99.9
8.
9 92
.2
1.3
0.0
92.4
6.
1 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
424
100.
0 97
.2
2.8
89.2
0.
0 89
.9
8.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 92
10
0.0
96.7
1.
1 81
.5
0.0
13.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1985
99
.9
32.0
68
.7
23.8
0.
0 88
.0
6.2
0.0
N
EWPO
RT B
CH
1S
T D
UI
1438
99
.9
16.2
95
.1
1.5
0.0
91.4
6.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
377
99.7
97
.6
3.2
90.5
0.
0 66
.3
31.6
6.
1
3R
D D
UI
77
100.
0 98
.7
1.3
85.7
0.
0 10
.4
11.7
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 12
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 58
.3
0.0
8.3
41.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
1904
99
.9
36.2
72
.5
22.9
0.
0 82
.7
11.9
1.
2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
115
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ORA
NG
E SA
NTA
AN
A
1ST
DU
I 18
21
99.6
34
.4
95.5
1.
5 0.
0 76
.6
2.1
0.6
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 49
7 99
.4
94.8
6.
4 87
.9
0.0
87.5
3.
2 41
.2
3RD
DU
I 11
8 99
.2
95.8
2.
5 89
.0
0.0
52.5
0.
8 44
.9
4TH
+ D
UI
8 10
0.0
100.
0 12
.5
75.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
37.5
TO
TAL
2444
99
.5
49.8
72
.6
23.5
0.
0 77
.5
2.3
11.1
PL
AC
ER
SUP
PLA
CER
1S
T D
UI
13
76.9
61
.5
7.7
7.7
0.0
0.0
46.2
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 83
.3
83.3
16
.7
33.3
0.
0 33
.3
16.7
33
.3
3RD
DU
I 3
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
9 44
.4
88.9
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.
0
TO
TAL
31
64.5
77
.4
6.5
16.1
0.
0 6.
5 25
.8
6.5
JU
V P
LAC
ER
1ST
DU
I 8
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
12.5
0.
0
TO
TAL
8 12
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.5
12
.5
0.0
JU
V T
AH
OE
VST
A
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
A
UBU
RN M
UN
I 1S
T D
UI
279
100.
0 95
.3
93.9
1.
8 0.
0 6.
1 3.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
116
99.1
98
.3
7.8
77.6
0.
0 67
.2
3.4
15.5
3R
D D
UI
29
96.6
86
.2
0.0
55.2
0.
0 51
.7
27.6
13
.8
4TH
+ D
UI
10
80.0
10
0.0
0.0
40.0
0.
0 20
.0
20.0
10
.0
TOTA
L 43
4 99
.1
95.6
62
.4
26.5
0.
0 25
.8
5.3
5.3
LI
NC
OLN
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0
ROSE
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 36
0 99
.7
94.2
80
.0
2.8
0.0
7.2
2.8
0.0
2ND
DU
I 10
9 95
.4
93.6
6.
4 76
.1
0.0
77.1
5.
5 45
.0
3RD
DU
I 53
10
0.0
88.7
1.
9 69
.8
1.9
58.5
5.
7 24
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 52
3 98
.9
93.5
56
.6
25.0
0.
2 27
.0
3.6
11.9
AU
BURN
JUST
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TAH
OE
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
265
100.
0 10
0.0
97.0
1.
5 0.
0 26
.4
3.0
0.4
2ND
DU
I 59
98
.3
98.3
5.
1 83
.1
0.0
84.7
10
.2
11.9
3R
D D
UI
10
100.
0 90
.0
0.0
60.0
10
.0
30.0
60
.0
10.0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
336
99.7
99
.4
77.4
17
.6
0.3
36.6
6.
5 2.
7 PL
UM
AS
SUP
PLU
MA
S 1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
100.
0 75
.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
C
HES
TER
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
Q
UIN
CY
1ST
DU
I 84
97
.6
96.4
82
.1
6.0
0.0
85.7
1.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
21
95.2
95
.2
19.0
42
.9
0.0
52.4
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
13
84.6
10
0.0
0.0
30.8
0.
0 30
.8
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
121
95.0
96
.7
61.2
14
.9
0.0
72.7
0.
8 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
116
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
RIV
ERSI
DE
SUP
RIV
ERSI
DE
1ST
DU
I 10
12
97.3
68
.2
41.6
0.
5 0.
1 20
.1
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
8 97
.7
91.9
2.
3 41
.5
3.9
60.5
0.
0 0.
4
3R
D D
UI
68
95.6
95
.6
2.9
14.7
1.
5 10
.3
1.5
1.5
4TH
+ D
UI
40
62.5
10
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
2.5
0.0
TOTA
L 13
78
96.3
74
.9
31.1
9.
0 0.
9 26
.7
0.1
0.1
SU
P IN
DIO
1S
T D
UI
1143
98
.4
10.8
36
.7
0.7
0.0
93.8
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
362
98.6
84
.3
5.8
58.3
0.
0 90
.3
0.6
0.8
3RD
DU
I 11
6 99
.1
90.5
2.
6 18
.1
0.0
88.8
0.
9 1.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 49
55
.1
89.8
6.
1 10
.2
0.0
36.7
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1670
97
.2
34.6
26
.7
14.7
0.
0 91
.0
0.2
0.3
JU
V R
IVER
SID
E 1S
T D
UI
22
81.8
13
.6
4.5
0.0
0.0
18.2
27
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 22
81
.8
13.6
4.
5 0.
0 0.
0 18
.2
27.3
0.
0
JUV
IND
IO
1ST
DU
I 10
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
10
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
C
ORO
NA
1S
T D
UI
308
100.
0 41
.2
95.5
0.
6 0.
0 65
.6
1.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 87
10
0.0
96.6
26
.4
72.4
0.
0 87
.4
0.0
5.7
3RD
DU
I 22
10
0.0
100.
0 18
.2
27.3
0.
0 13
.6
72.7
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
418
100.
0 56
.0
76.8
17
.0
0.0
67.2
5.
0 1.
2
HEM
ET
1ST
DU
I 36
6 98
.6
70.8
83
.3
6.6
0.0
76.8
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
105
99.0
10
0.0
8.6
79.0
0.
0 85
.7
1.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 18
10
0.0
100.
0 16
.7
44.4
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 50
3 98
.8
78.7
63
.0
24.3
0.
0 75
.0
0.2
0.0
BA
NN
ING
1S
T D
UI
233
98.7
70
.4
85.8
2.
6 0.
0 29
.2
1.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 73
97
.3
93.2
13
.7
75.3
0.
0 78
.1
6.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 15
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 73
.3
0.0
20.0
6.
7 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 32
4 98
.5
77.2
64
.8
22.2
0.
0 39
.5
2.8
0.0
IN
DIO
1S
T D
UI
4 10
0.0
75.0
25
.0
50.0
0.
0 75
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 17
10
0.0
94.1
17
.6
82.4
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
5.9
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 22
10
0.0
90.9
18
.2
77.3
0.
0 95
.5
0.0
4.5
M
ORE
NO
VLY
1S
T D
UI
153
96.7
72
.5
90.8
0.
0 0.
0 2.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
43
100.
0 88
.4
30.2
48
.8
11.6
41
.9
0.0
11.6
3R
D D
UI
10
100.
0 80
.0
70.0
0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
20.0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
100.
0 80
.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
211
97.6
76
.3
77.3
10
.0
2.4
10.9
0.
0 3.
3
PALM
SPR
ING
S 1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 7
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
85.7
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 9
100.
0 10
0.0
11.1
66
.7
0.0
77.8
0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
117
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
RIV
ERSI
DE
BLYT
HE
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
19
100.
0 89
.5
10.5
78
.9
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
24
100.
0 83
.3
12.5
75
.0
0.0
95.8
0.
0 0.
0
PERR
IS
1ST
DU
I 52
4 98
.9
53.8
95
.2
1.9
0.0
56.5
0.
6 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
140
98.6
95
.0
17.1
73
.6
0.0
68.6
1.
4 1.
4
3R
D D
UI
37
94.6
94
.6
8.1
43.2
0.
0 18
.9
5.4
2.7
4TH
+ D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
706
98.4
64
.4
74.5
18
.3
0.0
56.5
1.
0 0.
6
ELSI
NO
RE
1ST
DU
I 3
100.
0 33
.3
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 4
100.
0 50
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 75
.0
0.0
0.0
TC
MA
RCH
AFB
1S
T D
UI
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 SA
CRA
MEN
TO
SUP
SAC
TO
1ST
DU
I 63
76
.2
98.4
41
.3
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 4.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
28
85.7
10
0.0
3.6
28.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
31
64.5
10
0.0
0.0
16.1
0.
0 9.
7 3.
2 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 16
1 66
.5
99.4
1.
2 46
.6
0.0
0.0
1.2
0.0
TOTA
L 28
3 70
.3
99.3
10
.2
33.6
0.
0 1.
1 2.
1 0.
0
JUV
SA
CTO
TRA
F 1S
T D
UI
39
43.6
41
.0
7.7
0.0
0.0
2.6
28.2
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 33
.3
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 42
42
.9
40.5
7.
1 0.
0 0.
0 2.
4 28
.6
0.0
SA
CRA
MEN
TO
1ST
DU
I 30
98
99.3
96
.7
87.8
3.
6 0.
0 4.
6 0.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1153
99
.4
99.0
4.
2 72
.0
0.1
67.9
0.
5 2.
2
3R
D D
UI
361
97.8
99
.4
1.7
36.3
0.
0 12
.5
0.8
1.1
4TH
+ D
UI
75
96.0
97
.3
0.0
29.3
0.
0 5.
3 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4687
99
.1
97.5
59
.2
23.4
0.
0 20
.8
0.4
0.6
EL
K G
ROV
E 1S
T D
UI
60
100.
0 96
.7
90.0
1.
7 0.
0 3.
3 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
20
100.
0 10
0.0
15.0
70
.0
0.0
70.0
5.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
7 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
89
100.
0 97
.8
65.2
16
.9
0.0
18.0
1.
1 0.
0
GA
LT
1ST
DU
I 43
10
0.0
95.3
2.
3 79
.1
0.0
2.3
2.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 23
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 78
.3
0.0
73.9
17
.4
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
70
100.
0 97
.1
1.4
74.3
0.
0 25
.7
12.9
0.
0
WA
LNU
T G
ROV
E 1S
T D
UI
19
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
94.7
0.
0 5.
3 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
9 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
88.9
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
25.0
25
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 32
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 87
.5
0.0
31.3
3.
1 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
118
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAC
RAM
ENTO
U
S C
T SA
CTO
1S
T D
UI
7 85
.7
42.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
6 10
0.0
66.7
0.
0 66
.7
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
92
.9
57.1
0.
0 28
.6
0.0
28.6
0.
0 0.
0 SA
N B
ENIT
O
SUP
SAN
BEN
ITO
1S
T D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
9 88
.9
88.9
11
.1
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 22
.2
0.0
JU
V H
OLL
ISTR
1S
T D
UI
4 75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
4 75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
HO
LLIS
TER
1ST
DU
I 11
5 99
.1
99.1
51
.3
2.6
0.0
2.6
30.4
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
46
97.8
69
.6
6.5
45.7
0.
0 78
.3
8.7
67.4
3R
D D
UI
27
96.3
33
.3
0.0
11.1
0.
0 77
.8
0.0
81.5
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
TOTA
L 19
2 98
.4
81.8
32
.3
14.1
0.
0 32
.3
20.3
28
.6
SAN
SU
P SA
N B
ERN
O
1ST
DU
I 21
61
.9
95.2
4.
8 4.
8 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
BER
NA
RDIN
O
2N
D D
UI
5 60
.0
100.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 23
47
.8
95.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
51
54.9
94
.1
2.0
3.9
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
SU
P RA
NC
HO
1S
T D
UI
38
92.1
55
.3
50.0
2.
6 0.
0 5.
3 5.
3 0.
0
C
UC
AM
NG
A
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
21
33.3
10
0.0
0.0
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 64
71
.9
73.4
29
.7
7.8
0.0
4.7
3.1
0.0
SU
P V
ICTO
RV
ILE
1ST
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 14
21
.4
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
23
47.8
10
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SU
P BA
RSTO
W
1ST
DU
I 7
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
4 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 23
0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SU
P JO
SHU
A
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
T
REE
4TH
+ D
UI
6 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 42
.9
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
JUV
TRF
SA
N
1ST
DU
I 24
58
.3
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 16
.7
0.0
BER
NA
RDIN
O
TOTA
L 24
58
.3
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 16
.7
0.0
JU
V S
AN
BER
NO
1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
119
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
SAN
C
HIN
O
1ST
DU
I 32
1 97
.8
9.7
0.0
2.5
0.0
88.2
1.
9 0.
3
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
B
ERN
ARD
INO
2ND
DU
I 87
97
.7
81.6
1.
1 78
.2
0.0
87.4
4.
6 6.
9 co
nt.
3R
D D
UI
18
94.4
77
.8
0.0
66.7
0.
0 77
.8
11.1
22
.2
4TH
+ D
UI
6 83
.3
83.3
0.
0 83
.3
0.0
50.0
0.
0 33
.3
TOTA
L 43
2 97
.5
28.0
0.
2 21
.5
0.0
87.0
2.
8 3.
0
BARS
TOW
1S
T D
UI
182
96.7
46
.7
0.0
2.2
0.0
54.9
4.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
54
98.1
75
.9
0.0
83.3
0.
0 70
.4
20.4
5.
6
3R
D D
UI
14
64.3
10
0.0
0.0
21.4
0.
0 14
.3
28.6
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 25
1 95
.2
55.8
0.
0 20
.7
0.4
55.8
9.
6 1.
2
RED
LAN
DS
1ST
DU
I 17
0 97
.1
5.3
0.0
0.6
0.0
90.0
1.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
54
98.1
46
.3
0.0
35.2
0.
0 81
.5
0.0
1.9
3RD
DU
I 12
91
.7
75.0
8.
3 16
.7
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 23
8 97
.1
18.9
0.
4 9.
2 0.
0 85
.3
0.8
0.4
S
BERN
CEN
TRL
1ST
DU
I 10
27
98.1
29
.7
0.5
1.9
0.0
67.9
22
.6
0.1
2ND
DU
I 29
7 95
.6
80.1
0.
7 54
.2
0.0
67.7
20
.9
11.4
3R
D D
UI
89
91.0
91
.0
0.0
30.3
0.
0 48
.3
16.9
7.
9
4T
H+
DU
I 18
88
.9
94.4
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
33.3
5.
6 0.
0
TO
TAL
1431
97
.0
44.8
0.
5 14
.7
0.0
66.2
21
.7
2.9
FO
NTA
NA
1S
T D
UI
438
99.5
8.
9 0.
0 1.
8 0.
0 88
.1
0.5
0.0
2ND
DU
I 15
3 98
.7
65.4
0.
0 70
.6
1.3
88.2
0.
7 3.
9
3R
D D
UI
40
97.5
87
.5
0.0
35.0
0.
0 45
.0
35.0
2.
5
4T
H+
DU
I 11
90
.9
90.9
0.
0 27
.3
0.0
27.3
45
.5
0.0
TOTA
L 64
2 99
.1
28.7
0.
0 20
.7
0.3
84.4
3.
4 1.
1
VIC
TORV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
486
98.8
22
.2
0.4
2.7
0.0
77.4
1.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
137
99.3
86
.1
0.0
79.6
0.
0 87
.6
1.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 35
97
.1
65.7
0.
0 31
.4
0.0
65.7
5.
7 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
90
.0
90.0
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
668
98.7
38
.6
0.3
20.7
0.
0 78
.6
1.6
0.0
RA
NC
HO
1S
T D
UI
1213
97
.3
17.2
0.
2 1.
4 0.
0 77
.4
1.0
0.0
CU
CA
MN
GA
2N
D D
UI
338
95.9
89
.6
0.3
79.0
0.
0 88
.2
1.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 10
2 67
.6
89.2
0.
0 34
.3
0.0
36.3
10
.8
2.0
4TH
+ D
UI
11
54.5
63
.6
0.0
18.2
0.
0 18
.2
9.1
0.0
TOTA
L 16
64
94.9
36
.7
0.2
19.3
0.
0 76
.7
1.7
0.1
BI
G B
EAR
LAK
E 1S
T D
UI
79
98.7
12
.7
0.0
1.3
0.0
89.9
2.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
30
100.
0 83
.3
0.0
83.3
0.
0 83
.3
10.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
83.3
16
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 11
5 99
.1
35.7
0.
0 25
.2
0.0
87.8
5.
2 0.
0
TWIN
PEA
KS
1ST
DU
I 69
10
0.0
15.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 79
.7
1.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 16
10
0.0
93.8
0.
0 81
.3
0.0
43.8
43
.8
0.0
3RD
DU
I 10
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
.0
0.0
10.0
10
.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
97
100.
0 39
.2
0.0
14.4
0.
0 64
.9
9.3
0.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
120
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
SAN
N
EED
LES
1ST
DU
I 10
2 98
.0
11.8
2.
0 2.
9 0.
0 58
.8
22.5
0.
0
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
B
ERN
ARD
INO
2ND
DU
I 21
10
0.0
76.2
0.
0 61
.9
0.0
71.4
9.
5 0.
0 co
nt.
3R
D D
UI
10
90.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 13
5 97
.8
28.9
1.
5 11
.9
0.0
55.6
20
.0
0.0
TR
ON
A
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
2 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4 10
0.0
25.0
50
.0
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
JO
SHU
A T
REE
1ST
DU
I 13
0 97
.7
7.7
0.8
2.3
0.0
90.0
2.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
32
100.
0 62
.5
0.0
78.1
0.
0 84
.4
6.3
3.1
3RD
DU
I 12
10
0.0
91.7
0.
0 41
.7
0.0
25.0
8.
3 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
6 98
.3
24.4
0.
6 18
.8
0.0
83.5
3.
4 0.
6 SA
N D
IEG
O
SUP
SAN
DIE
GO
1S
T D
UI
12
75.0
10
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
60
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
24
62.5
10
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 4.
2 0.
0
SUP
VIS
TA
1ST
DU
I 18
83
.3
100.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 9
77.8
10
0.0
0.0
22.2
0.
0 11
.1
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
71.4
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.3
0.
0 14
.3
4TH
+ D
UI
16
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 50
70
.0
100.
0 4.
0 4.
0 0.
0 4.
0 0.
0 2.
0
SUP
CH
ULA
1S
T D
UI
32
71.9
96
.9
3.1
25.0
0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
VIS
TA
2ND
DU
I 8
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 12
.5
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
14
64.3
92
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 56
67
.9
96.4
1.
8 19
.6
0.0
19.6
0.
0 0.
0
SUP
EL C
AJO
N
1ST
DU
I 26
76
.9
96.2
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 7.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
8 87
.5
87.5
0.
0 12
.5
0.0
12.5
12
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
80.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
16
37.5
93
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 55
67
.3
94.5
0.
0 1.
8 0.
0 1.
8 5.
5 0.
0
JUV
SA
N D
IEG
O
1ST
DU
I 46
2.
2 6.
5 2.
2 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 52
.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 48
6.
3 10
.4
4.2
2.1
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
EL C
AJO
N
1ST
DU
I 15
34
97.2
97
.5
85.9
3.
6 0.
0 5.
6 1.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
460
94.6
98
.3
5.4
69.3
0.
0 70
.4
2.4
10.0
3R
D D
UI
112
92.9
99
.1
1.8
40.2
0.
0 22
.3
26.8
2.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 11
72
.7
100.
0 0.
0 18
.2
0.0
9.1
9.1
0.0
TOTA
L 21
17
96.3
97
.7
63.5
19
.9
0.0
20.6
3.
4 2.
3
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
121
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAN
DIE
GO
V
ISTA
1S
T D
UI
2873
97
.7
99.3
84
.2
2.6
0.0
2.0
9.5
0.3
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 82
9 96
.7
97.6
9.
5 71
.3
0.0
41.7
17
.5
18.3
3R
D D
UI
209
92.3
98
.1
4.3
34.0
0.
0 10
.5
46.9
5.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 34
73
.5
100.
0 5.
9 20
.6
0.0
5.9
50.0
2.
9
TO
TAL
3945
97
.0
98.9
63
.6
18.9
0.
0 10
.8
13.5
4.
4
SAN
MA
RCO
S 2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
50
.0
0.0
SA
N D
IEG
O
1ST
DU
I 33
69
99.2
97
.7
91.8
3.
6 0.
0 81
.0
1.6
1.5
2ND
DU
I 77
5 98
.3
93.3
7.
7 79
.0
0.0
89.0
0.
9 50
.3
3RD
DU
I 19
6 98
.0
85.7
1.
5 64
.8
0.0
66.3
1.
0 46
.9
4TH
+ D
UI
25
80.0
92
.0
0.0
48.0
4.
0 32
.0
0.0
16.0
TO
TAL
4365
98
.9
96.3
72
.3
20.0
0.
0 81
.5
1.4
12.3
CH
ULA
VIS
TA
1ST
DU
I 11
79
97.5
87
.0
87.4
3.
7 0.
1 16
.7
4.7
0.2
MU
NI
2ND
DU
I 28
3 97
.2
94.7
13
.1
73.5
0.
4 60
.1
6.0
11.7
3R
D D
UI
63
82.5
10
0.0
3.2
46.0
0.
0 30
.2
27.0
6.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 14
85
.7
92.9
7.
1 35
.7
0.0
35.7
42
.9
0.0
TOTA
L 15
39
96.7
89
.0
69.5
18
.6
0.1
25.4
6.
2 2.
5 SA
N F
RAN
CIS
CO
SU
P SA
N F
RAN
1S
T D
UI
8 50
.0
87.5
12
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
66.7
10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 33
.3
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
5 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
41
.2
94.1
11
.8
11.8
0.
0 5.
9 5.
9 0.
0
JUV
SA
N F
RAN
1S
T D
UI
8 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
8 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
SAN
FRA
NC
ISC
O
1ST
DU
I 75
4 97
.3
98.5
93
.2
1.1
0.0
10.1
0.
0 0.
1
2N
D D
UI
197
96.4
98
.5
12.2
76
.1
0.0
57.4
0.
0 16
.8
3RD
DU
I 51
96
.1
90.2
5.
9 37
.3
0.0
27.5
0.
0 13
.7
4TH
+ D
UI
4 75
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
25.0
TO
TAL
1006
97
.0
98.0
72
.6
17.6
0.
0 20
.3
0.0
4.2
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
SUP
FREN
CH
1S
T D
UI
24
29.2
50
.0
4.2
0.0
0.0
4.2
41.7
0.
0
C
AM
P 2N
D D
UI
8 75
.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
50
.0
50.0
4T
H+
DU
I 23
56
.5
82.6
0.
0 0.
0 4.
3 0.
0 21
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 57
49
.1
66.7
1.
8 0.
0 1.
8 3.
5 29
.8
1.8
JU
V F
REN
CH
1S
T D
UI
11
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
C
AM
P TO
TAL
11
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
LOD
I 1S
T D
UI
385
97.9
96
.6
75.1
1.
0 0.
0 2.
3 18
.7
1.8
2ND
DU
I 13
9 10
0.0
91.4
5.
0 65
.5
0.0
73.4
18
.7
50.4
3R
D D
UI
44
100.
0 68
.2
0.0
29.5
0.
0 56
.8
47.7
50
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
14
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
57.1
50
.0
50.0
TO
TAL
582
98.6
92
.1
50.9
18
.7
0.0
24.7
21
.6
18.2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
122
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAN
JOA
QU
IN
MA
NTE
CA
1S
T D
UI
255
100.
0 99
.6
87.1
2.
4 0.
0 1.
2 3.
9 0.
8 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
84
96.4
97
.6
3.6
81.0
0.
0 82
.1
8.3
58.3
3R
D D
UI
38
100.
0 60
.5
5.3
18.4
0.
0 57
.9
36.8
47
.4
4TH
+ D
UI
13
92.3
61
.5
0.0
7.7
0.0
46.2
30
.8
46.2
TO
TAL
390
99.0
94
.1
58.2
21
.0
0.0
25.6
9.
0 19
.2
TR
AC
Y 1S
T D
UI
145
100.
0 99
.3
27.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 4.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
50
100.
0 94
.0
0.0
86.0
0.
0 88
.0
2.0
64.0
3R
D D
UI
22
100.
0 72
.7
0.0
63.6
0.
0 81
.8
13.6
72
.7
4TH
+ D
UI
14
78.6
92
.9
0.0
57.1
0.
0 50
.0
14.3
35
.7
TOTA
L 23
1 98
.7
95.2
17
.3
28.1
0.
0 29
.9
5.6
22.9
STO
CK
TON
1S
T D
UI
952
99.7
99
.6
89.0
2.
5 0.
0 1.
8 4.
8 0.
4
2N
D D
UI
377
99.7
98
.9
7.7
82.8
0.
0 84
.6
1.3
44.0
3R
D D
UI
153
99.3
94
.1
15.7
62
.7
0.0
41.2
27
.5
27.5
4T
H+
DU
I 61
82
.0
96.7
32
.8
14.8
0.
0 14
.8
19.7
11
.5
TOTA
L 15
43
99.0
98
.8
59.6
28
.6
0.0
26.4
6.
8 14
.2
SAN
LU
IS
SUP
S L
OBI
SPO
1S
T D
UI
12
91.7
33
.3
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
O
BISP
O
2N
D D
UI
7 85
.7
100.
0 14
.3
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 57
.1
0.0
3RD
DU
I 6
16.7
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 30
53
.3
96.7
3.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 26
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 55
61
.8
83.6
10
.9
1.8
0.0
0.0
41.8
0.
0
S LU
IS O
BISP
O
1ST
DU
I 10
30
98.3
98
.9
93.7
1.
3 0.
0 0.
4 0.
3 0.
2
2N
D D
UI
372
98.1
97
.8
4.8
83.3
0.
3 76
.3
0.5
8.1
3RD
DU
I 13
1 97
.7
98.5
5.
3 74
.8
0.0
19.1
3.
8 10
.7
4TH
+ D
UI
26
96.2
10
0.0
0.0
84.6
0.
0 15
.4
0.0
3.8
TOTA
L 15
59
98.2
98
.7
63.5
28
.4
0.1
20.3
0.
6 3.
0
PASO
RO
BLES
1S
T D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 SA
N M
ATE
O
SUP
SAN
MA
TEO
1S
T D
UI
31
77.4
10
0.0
61.3
9.
7 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
14
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
78.6
0.
0 35
.7
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 58
56
.9
98.3
0.
0 29
.3
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.7
TOTA
L 11
1 69
.4
99.1
17
.1
33.3
0.
0 5.
4 0.
0 0.
9
JUV
SA
N M
ATE
O
1ST
DU
I 36
72
.2
13.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 5.
6 33
.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
37
73.0
13
.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.4
32.4
0.
0
SO S
AN
FRA
NSC
O
1ST
DU
I 12
32
98.7
98
.1
93.6
1.
9 0.
0 1.
3 0.
7 0.
5
2N
D D
UI
411
98.1
95
.1
4.4
83.9
0.
0 72
.7
5.8
53.8
3R
D D
UI
101
86.1
96
.0
1.0
63.4
0.
0 44
.6
0.0
35.6
4T
H+
DU
I 15
73
.3
100.
0 6.
7 33
.3
0.0
26.7
0.
0 20
.0
TOTA
L 17
59
97.6
97
.3
66.7
24
.8
0.0
20.7
1.
9 15
.1
RE
DW
OO
D C
ITY
1ST
DU
I 12
80
98.7
98
.9
93.4
1.
9 0.
0 2.
0 0.
0 0.
8
2N
D D
UI
400
96.5
96
.0
4.8
84.3
0.
0 64
.3
0.3
49.8
3R
D D
UI
138
84.1
92
.0
2.9
64.5
0.
0 52
.2
0.0
46.4
4T
H+
DU
I 12
58
.3
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
41.7
0.
0 41
.7
TOTA
L 18
30
96.8
97
.8
66.6
24
.9
0.0
19.6
0.
1 15
.2
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
123
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAN
TA
SUP
SAN
TA
1ST
DU
I 5
80.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0
BA
RBA
RA
B
ARB
ARA
2N
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
5 40
.0
80.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
21
47.6
66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
9.
5 19
.0
TOTA
L 34
55
.9
76.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 23
.5
8.8
11.8
SUP
SAN
TA
1ST
DU
I 3
33.3
66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
M
ARI
A
2ND
DU
I 5
100.
0 60
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 20
.0
3RD
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
27
33.3
92
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.4
0.0
7.4
TOTA
L 37
43
.2
86.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
1 2.
7 8.
1
JUV
SA
NTA
1S
T D
UI
13
30.8
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 76
.9
0.0
BA
RBA
RA
TOTA
L 13
30
.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
76.9
0.
0
JUV
LO
MPO
C
1ST
DU
I 10
60
.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
60
.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
SA
NTA
BA
RBA
RA
1ST
DU
I 99
8 97
.2
98.1
90
.5
0.3
0.0
84.3
12
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 32
0 96
.6
95.6
3.
4 27
.8
0.0
33.4
64
.4
4.7
3RD
DU
I 92
92
.4
93.5
2.
2 66
.3
0.0
15.2
76
.1
10.9
4T
H+
DU
I 11
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 90
.9
0.0
0.0
81.8
0.
0
TO
TAL
1421
96
.8
97.3
64
.5
11.5
0.
0 67
.7
28.6
1.
8
SAN
TA M
AR
IA
1ST
DU
I 54
0 98
.7
84.3
79
.6
1.5
0.0
42.2
12
.6
0.9
2ND
DU
I 18
9 97
.9
97.4
8.
5 72
.5
0.0
51.9
39
.7
28.0
3R
D D
UI
72
95.8
91
.7
0.0
20.8
0.
0 22
.2
76.4
15
.3
4TH
+ D
UI
31
61.3
87
.1
0.0
16.1
0.
0 16
.1
22.6
16
.1
TOTA
L 83
2 96
.9
88.0
53
.6
19.8
0.
0 41
.7
24.6
8.
9
LOM
POC
1S
T D
UI
145
99.3
4.
1 92
.4
0.0
0.0
4.8
3.4
0.0
2ND
DU
I 56
98
.2
78.6
8.
9 60
.7
0.0
73.2
10
.7
48.2
3R
D D
UI
28
100.
0 75
.0
7.1
21.4
3.
6 35
.7
35.7
25
.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 23
2 98
.7
31.9
60
.8
17.2
0.
4 25
.0
9.9
14.7
SOLV
AN
G
1ST
DU
I 10
0 10
0.0
17.0
88
.0
0.0
0.0
91.0
9.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
46
97.8
87
.0
6.5
67.4
0.
0 76
.1
19.6
4.
3
3R
D D
UI
24
100.
0 87
.5
4.2
25.0
0.
0 41
.7
54.2
8.
3
4T
H+
DU
I 6
66.7
66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
16
.7
33.3
TO
TAL
176
98.3
46
.6
52.3
21
.0
0.0
78.4
18
.2
3.4
SAN
TA C
LARA
SU
P SN
TA C
LARA
1S
T D
UI
175
71.4
93
.7
44.0
5.
1 0.
0 8.
6 1.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
74
71.6
10
0.0
5.4
56.8
0.
0 10
.8
4.1
1.4
3RD
DU
I 59
52
.5
98.3
0.
0 42
.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
224
50.4
98
.7
0.0
35.7
0.
0 0.
9 0.
0 0.
4
TO
TAL
532
60.5
97
.2
15.2
29
.3
0.0
4.7
1.1
0.4
JU
V S
NTA
CLA
RA
1S
T D
UI
53
98.1
64
.2
88.7
0.
0 0.
0 9.
4 7.
5 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 56
98
.2
66.1
89
.3
0.0
0.0
8.9
7.1
0.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
124
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SAN
TA C
LARA
PA
LO A
LTO
1S
T D
UI
378
99.5
96
.3
84.9
1.
6 0.
0 5.
0 1.
1 0.
8 co
nt.
2N
D D
UI
137
98.5
94
.9
4.4
75.9
0.
0 81
.8
2.2
41.6
3R
D D
UI
41
92.7
65
.9
2.4
17.1
0.
0 41
.5
0.0
43.9
4T
H+
DU
I 2
100.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 50
.0
TOTA
L 55
8 98
.7
93.5
58
.8
21.0
0.
0 26
.7
1.3
14.2
SAN
JOSE
1S
T D
UI
3177
97
.1
95.2
73
.8
2.3
0.0
7.7
15.5
0.
3
2N
D D
UI
1166
96
.6
97.9
2.
6 60
.5
0.1
61.7
27
.1
8.5
3RD
DU
I 41
8 96
.4
95.9
1.
0 8.
1 0.
0 9.
6 11
.0
4.5
4TH
+ D
UI
55
90.9
94
.5
1.8
1.8
0.0
7.3
5.5
5.5
TOTA
L 48
16
96.9
95
.9
49.4
16
.9
0.0
20.9
17
.8
2.7
SA
NTA
CLA
RA
1ST
DU
I 55
94
.5
96.4
74
.5
0.0
0.0
3.6
14.5
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
17
88.2
10
0.0
0.0
58.8
0.
0 58
.8
17.6
23
.5
3RD
DU
I 11
54
.5
72.7
0.
0 18
.2
0.0
45.5
0.
0 36
.4
TOTA
L 83
88
.0
94.0
49
.4
14.5
0.
0 20
.5
13.3
9.
6
SUN
NY
VA
LE
1ST
DU
I 51
1 98
.2
53.2
85
.9
2.3
0.0
47.2
4.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
152
95.4
98
.0
10.5
78
.3
0.0
80.3
2.
6 30
.3
3RD
DU
I 40
97
.5
92.5
2.
5 17
.5
0.0
15.0
40
.0
10.0
4T
H+
DU
I 8
87.5
75
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0
25
.0
25.0
TO
TAL
711
97.5
65
.3
64.1
19
.4
0.0
52.2
6.
2 7.
3
GIL
ROY
1ST
DU
I 44
1 98
.4
97.7
90
.2
2.5
0.0
7.5
6.3
0.0
2ND
DU
I 16
8 99
.4
99.4
2.
4 78
.0
0.0
79.2
4.
8 2.
4
3R
D D
UI
56
100.
0 98
.2
3.6
12.5
0.
0 14
.3
1.8
1.8
4TH
+ D
UI
6 10
0.0
83.3
0.
0 16
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 67
1 98
.8
98.1
60
.2
22.4
0.
0 25
.9
5.5
0.7
SAN
TA C
RU
Z SU
P SA
NTA
CRU
Z 1S
T D
UI
5 10
0.0
100.
0 60
.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 17
64
.7
88.2
0.
0 5.
9 0.
0 0.
0 41
.2
0.0
TOTA
L 27
74
.1
92.6
11
.1
7.4
0.0
0.0
37.0
0.
0
JUV
SA
NTA
CRU
Z 1S
T D
UI
17
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.8
88
.2
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
18
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.1
88
.9
0.0
SA
NTA
CR
UZ
1ST
DU
I 74
9 99
.6
94.9
88
.5
0.4
0.0
4.1
5.9
0.0
2ND
DU
I 25
2 99
.2
98.8
4.
8 53
.2
0.0
53.2
31
.3
0.8
3RD
DU
I 92
10
0.0
100.
0 1.
1 9.
8 0.
0 9.
8 53
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
27
85.2
10
0.0
7.4
3.7
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0
TO
TAL
1120
99
.2
96.3
60
.5
13.1
0.
0 15
.5
17.0
0.
2
WA
TSO
NV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
466
100.
0 98
.5
88.8
0.
4 0.
0 4.
9 9.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
171
100.
0 10
0.0
2.9
43.3
0.
0 42
.7
55.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
52
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
1.9
0.0
3.8
96.2
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 6
100.
0 10
0.0
16.7
33
.3
0.0
16.7
83
.3
0.0
TOTA
L 69
5 10
0.0
99.0
60
.4
11.4
0.
0 14
.2
27.6
0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
125
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SHA
STA
SU
P RE
DD
ING
1S
T D
UI
6 83
.3
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
4 75
.0
75.0
25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 11
18
.2
100.
0 0.
0 9.
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
22
45.5
95
.5
22.7
4.
5 0.
0 4.
5 0.
0 0.
0
BURN
EY
1ST
DU
I 29
96
.6
96.6
89
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 12
91
.7
100.
0 16
.7
75.0
0.
0 75
.0
16.7
16
.7
3RD
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 46
95
.7
97.8
60
.9
28.3
0.
0 19
.6
8.7
4.3
RE
DD
ING
1S
T D
UI
390
97.9
98
.2
94.6
0.
3 0.
0 2.
3 2.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
162
95.7
97
.5
12.3
79
.0
0.0
71.0
2.
5 8.
0
3R
D D
UI
64
98.4
93
.8
0.0
57.8
0.
0 25
.0
26.6
4.
7
4T
H+
DU
I 20
75
.0
90.0
10
.0
35.0
0.
0 30
.0
15.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
636
96.7
97
.3
61.5
27
.2
0.0
23.0
5.
2 2.
5 SI
ERRA
SU
P SI
ERR
A
4TH
+ D
UI
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
DO
WN
IEV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
15
100.
0 10
0.0
93.3
0.
0 0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
6 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 22
10
0.0
100.
0 63
.6
18.2
0.
0 18
.2
4.5
0.0
SISK
IYO
U
SUP
SISK
IYO
U
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 2
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 5
40.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
D
ORR
IS
1ST
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 10
0.0
100.
0 57
.1
14.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
WEE
D
1ST
DU
I 71
10
0.0
94.4
88
.7
2.8
0.0
2.8
4.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 19
10
0.0
100.
0 21
.1
78.9
0.
0 57
.9
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 9
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
88.9
0.
0 22
.2
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 50
.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
101
100.
0 96
.0
67.3
25
.7
0.0
14.9
3.
0 0.
0
TULE
LAK
E 1S
T D
UI
5 10
0.0
100.
0 60
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
7 10
0.0
100.
0 42
.9
28.6
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
YREK
A
1ST
DU
I 96
97
.9
100.
0 80
.2
2.1
0.0
2.1
11.5
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
30
96.7
90
.0
6.7
70.0
0.
0 63
.3
16.7
36
.7
3RD
DU
I 8
87.5
87
.5
0.0
87.5
0.
0 50
.0
0.0
50.0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
50.0
10
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
138
95.7
97
.1
58.0
21
.7
0.0
18.1
11
.6
10.9
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
126
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
SOLA
NO
SU
P SO
LAN
O
1ST
DU
I 11
81
.8
90.9
27
.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
18.2
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
5 10
0.0
100.
0 20
.0
60.0
0.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 7
57.1
10
0.0
0.0
42.9
0.
0 0.
0 28
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
49
63.3
98
.0
0.0
28.6
2.
0 0.
0 36
.7
0.0
TOTA
L 72
68
.1
97.2
5.
6 27
.8
1.4
0.0
33.3
0.
0
JUV
SO
LAN
O
1ST
DU
I 26
65
.4
3.8
61.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 69
.2
0.0
TOTA
L 26
65
.4
3.8
61.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 69
.2
0.0
FA
IRFI
ELD
1S
T D
UI
584
97.8
97
.3
87.8
1.
4 0.
0 0.
7 5.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
225
97.3
97
.8
4.9
77.8
0.
0 22
.7
6.2
4.4
3RD
DU
I 78
85
.9
94.9
1.
3 59
.0
0.0
10.3
10
.3
3.8
4TH
+ D
UI
6 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 89
3 96
.4
97.2
58
.8
26.0
0.
0 7.
1 5.
7 1.
5
BEN
ICIA
1S
T D
UI
2 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
100.
0 10
0.0
66.7
33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
VA
LLEJ
O
1ST
DU
I 19
9 98
.0
86.4
89
.4
4.0
0.0
14.1
0.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
84
100.
0 98
.8
17.9
78
.6
0.0
66.7
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
23
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
39.1
0.
0 17
.4
17.4
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
100.
0 80
.0
20.0
60
.0
0.0
20.0
60
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 31
1 98
.7
90.7
62
.4
27.7
0.
0 28
.6
2.6
0.0
SON
OM
A
SUP
SON
OM
A
1ST
DU
I 8
62.5
10
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
5 80
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 54
50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
70
54.3
10
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JU
V S
ON
OM
A
1ST
DU
I 25
4.
0 0.
0 4.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 12
.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 27
3.
7 0.
0 3.
7 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 11
.1
0.0
SA
NTA
RO
SA
1ST
DU
I 14
18
97.5
97
.0
59.3
0.
4 0.
0 2.
7 1.
3 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
566
95.9
99
.8
3.5
56.7
0.
0 56
.4
0.4
0.5
3RD
DU
I 21
6 88
.4
99.1
0.
0 10
.6
0.0
9.3
1.4
0.9
4TH
+ D
UI
72
80.6
98
.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
1.4
0.0
TOTA
L 22
72
95.7
98
.0
37.9
15
.4
0.0
16.6
1.
1 0.
2
PETA
LUM
A
1ST
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
STA
NIS
LAU
S SU
P ST
AN
ISLA
US
1ST
DU
I 14
92
.9
92.9
28
.6
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 8
62.5
87
.5
12.5
12
.5
0.0
12.5
12
.5
0.0
3RD
DU
I 6
50.0
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
53
64.2
10
0.0
1.9
7.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 81
67
.9
97.5
7.
4 6.
2 0.
0 2.
5 1.
2 0.
0
JUV
STA
NIS
LAU
S 1S
T D
UI
34
38.2
38
.2
29.4
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 97
.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 3
100.
0 10
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 37
43
.2
43.2
29
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
97.3
0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
127
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
STA
NIS
LAU
S M
OD
ESTO
1S
T D
UI
1089
98
.8
99.3
87
.4
2.5
0.0
0.9
0.3
0.0
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 39
4 98
.7
98.7
12
.7
74.9
0.
0 44
.2
4.1
3.8
3RD
DU
I 14
9 94
.0
96.6
5.
4 58
.4
0.0
14.1
3.
4 2.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 40
87
.5
92.5
0.
0 37
.5
0.0
10.0
0.
0 5.
0
TO
TAL
1672
98
.1
98.7
60
.4
25.4
0.
0 12
.5
1.4
1.2
TU
RLO
CK
1S
T D
UI
171
98.2
98
.2
78.9
16
.4
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.0
2ND
DU
I 54
10
0.0
100.
0 9.
3 81
.5
0.0
27.8
0.
0 5.
6
3R
D D
UI
16
100.
0 93
.8
0.0
56.3
0.
0 12
.5
18.8
12
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 24
5 98
.8
98.4
57
.1
33.5
0.
0 7.
3 1.
6 2.
0 SU
TTER
SU
P SU
TTER
1S
T D
UI
9 77
.8
100.
0 44
.4
11.1
0.
0 0.
0 22
.2
0.0
2ND
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 25
.0
50.0
0.
0
3R
D D
UI
4 75
.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 14
57
.1
100.
0 0.
0 28
.6
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
31
67.7
10
0.0
12.9
25
.8
0.0
3.2
45.2
0.
0
JUV
SU
TTER
1S
T D
UI
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
4 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
YUBA
CIT
Y 1S
T D
UI
283
97.2
97
.5
91.2
0.
0 0.
0 2.
5 1.
8 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
111
97.3
99
.1
9.9
75.7
0.
9 65
.8
11.7
0.
9
3R
D D
UI
36
88.9
94
.4
0.0
30.6
0.
0 8.
3 69
.4
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
4 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0
TO
TAL
434
96.5
97
.7
62.0
22
.4
0.2
19.1
10
.6
0.2
TEH
AM
A
SUP
TEH
AM
A
1ST
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
1 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 7
14.3
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 14
35
.7
100.
0 14
.3
7.1
0.0
14.3
0.
0 0.
0
JUV
TEH
AM
A
2ND
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
1 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
C
ORN
ING
1S
T D
UI
54
98.1
94
.4
92.6
0.
0 0.
0 25
.9
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 19
78
.9
100.
0 15
.8
63.2
0.
0 26
.3
5.3
0.0
3RD
DU
I 10
30
.0
100.
0 20
.0
10.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
84
84.5
96
.4
65.5
15
.5
0.0
22.6
1.
2 0.
0
RED
BLU
FF
1ST
DU
I 17
9 83
.2
97.8
75
.4
0.6
0.0
3.4
20.1
0.
0
2N
D D
UI
40
57.5
95
.0
7.5
50.0
0.
0 47
.5
35.0
5.
0
3R
D D
UI
17
35.3
10
0.0
11.8
23
.5
0.0
17.6
17
.6
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 33
.3
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
239
74.9
97
.5
58.6
10
.9
0.0
12.1
22
.2
0.8
TRIN
ITY
SUP
TRIN
ITY
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
128
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TRIN
ITY
WEA
VER
VIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 73
95
.9
95.9
87
.7
4.1
0.0
4.1
9.6
0.0
cont
.
2ND
DU
I 22
90
.9
100.
0 18
.2
68.2
0.
0 59
.1
9.1
9.1
3RD
DU
I 5
80.0
10
0.0
0.0
60.0
0.
0 20
.0
80.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 5
20.0
80
.0
0.0
20.0
0.
0 0.
0 20
.0
0.0
TOTA
L 10
5 90
.5
96.2
64
.8
21.0
0.
0 16
.2
13.3
1.
9 TU
LARE
SU
P TU
LARE
1S
T D
UI
49
79.6
95
.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 11
72
.7
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 9.
1 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
7 71
.4
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 59
44
.1
100.
0 0.
0 1.
7 0.
0 0.
0 3.
4 1.
7
TO
TAL
126
61.9
98
.4
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.8
JU
V T
ULA
RE
1ST
DU
I 25
44
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
68.0
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
26
46.2
3.
8 0.
0 3.
8 0.
0 0.
0 65
.4
0.0
D
INU
BA
1ST
DU
I 32
9 98
.8
99.7
88
.1
1.2
0.0
0.9
0.3
0.3
2ND
DU
I 11
6 95
.7
90.5
9.
5 45
.7
0.0
52.6
0.
9 23
.3
3RD
DU
I 40
90
.0
90.0
7.
5 22
.5
0.0
32.5
0.
0 17
.5
4TH
+ D
UI
8 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 25
.0
0.0
25.0
0.
0 12
.5
TOTA
L 49
3 97
.4
96.8
61
.7
13.8
0.
0 16
.0
0.4
7.3
EX
ETER
1S
T D
UI
70
100.
0 10
0.0
92.9
5.
7 0.
0 0.
0 2.
9 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
27
100.
0 10
0.0
3.7
77.8
0.
0 37
.0
3.7
0.0
3RD
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
12.5
62
.5
0.0
0.0
12.5
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
75.0
10
0.0
0.0
75.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
109
99.1
10
0.0
61.5
30
.3
0.0
9.2
3.7
0.0
LI
ND
SAY-
1S
T D
UI
85
100.
0 97
.6
91.8
4.
7 0.
0 3.
5 2.
4 0.
0
E
XETE
R 2N
D D
UI
46
100.
0 10
0.0
17.4
71
.7
0.0
37.0
4.
3 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
14
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
57.1
0.
0 7.
1 14
.3
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
12
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 8.
3 0.
0
TO
TAL
157
100.
0 98
.7
54.8
32
.5
0.0
13.4
4.
5 0.
0
PORT
ERV
ILLE
1S
T D
UI
293
98.3
98
.3
86.7
2.
7 0.
0 1.
0 0.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
110
98.2
97
.3
10.0
68
.2
0.0
46.4
9.
1 1.
8
3R
D D
UI
60
98.3
93
.3
1.7
33.3
0.
0 15
.0
25.0
5.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
90
.0
100.
0 20
.0
40.0
0.
0 40
.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 47
3 98
.1
97.5
56
.7
22.6
0.
0 14
.2
5.7
1.1
TU
LARE
1S
T D
UI
227
95.6
94
.3
64.3
24
.2
0.0
22.5
0.
4 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
93
96.8
96
.8
10.8
60
.2
0.0
61.3
6.
5 7.
5
3R
D D
UI
27
100.
0 10
0.0
18.5
37
.0
0.0
29.6
0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
25.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
351
96.3
95
.4
46.2
34
.5
0.0
33.0
2.
0 2.
0
VIS
ALI
A
1ST
DU
I 44
3 97
.5
96.4
83
.1
6.3
0.0
6.3
0.5
0.9
2ND
DU
I 11
9 96
.6
97.5
14
.3
74.8
0.
0 51
.3
1.7
25.2
3R
D D
UI
44
97.7
86
.4
2.3
50.0
0.
0 47
.7
2.3
36.4
4T
H+
DU
I 30
53
.3
100.
0 3.
3 10
.0
0.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
TOTA
L 63
6 95
.3
96.1
60
.8
22.3
0.
0 17
.5
0.9
8.0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
129
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
TULA
RE
WO
OD
LAK
E-
1ST
DU
I 36
10
0.0
100.
0 86
.1
5.6
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.0
cont
.
EXE
TER
2ND
DU
I 14
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 92
.9
0.0
42.9
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
10
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 1
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 61
10
0.0
100.
0 50
.8
41.0
0.
0 11
.5
0.0
0.0
TUO
LUM
NE
SUP
TUO
LUM
NE
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
3 66
.7
100.
0 0.
0 33
.3
0.0
33.3
0.
0 0.
0
3R
D D
UI
2 50
.0
100.
0 0.
0 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
8 25
.0
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
15
46.7
10
0.0
6.7
13.3
0.
0 6.
7 0.
0 0.
0
SON
ORA
1S
T D
UI
98
99.0
10
0.0
96.9
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 8.
2 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
61
100.
0 10
0.0
1.6
86.9
0.
0 68
.9
0.0
1.6
3RD
DU
I 16
10
0.0
100.
0 6.
3 12
.5
0.0
6.3
0.0
0.0
4TH
+ D
UI
3 10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 17
8 99
.4
100.
0 54
.5
32.0
0.
0 24
.2
4.5
0.6
JA
MES
TOW
N
1ST
DU
I 23
10
0.0
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 8
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
87.5
0.
0 87
.5
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
40.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
36
100.
0 10
0.0
69.4
19
.4
0.0
19.4
0.
0 0.
0 V
ENTU
RA
JUV
VEN
TURA
1S
T D
UI
22
95.5
40
.9
18.2
0.
0 0.
0 4.
5 4.
5 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
1 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
TO
TAL
23
91.3
39
.1
17.4
0.
0 0.
0 4.
3 4.
3 0.
0
VEN
TURA
MU
NI
1ST
DU
I 30
88
98.1
98
.8
88.7
2.
1 0.
0 2.
2 9.
6 0.
3
2N
D D
UI
877
98.9
98
.5
14.4
68
.0
0.0
74.8
15
.6
18.5
3R
D D
UI
287
95.1
95
.5
7.3
40.8
0.
0 34
.8
52.3
21
.3
4TH
+ D
UI
71
62.0
78
.9
23.9
12
.7
0.0
2.8
26.8
2.
8
TO
TAL
4323
97
.5
98.2
67
.2
18.2
0.
0 19
.1
13.9
5.
4 YO
LO
SUP
WO
OD
LAN
D
1ST
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3RD
DU
I 1
100.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
100.
0 66
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.
0
JUV
YO
LO
1ST
DU
I 3
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 3
66.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
W
EST
SAC
TO
1ST
DU
I 5
100.
0 10
0.0
60.0
40
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2ND
DU
I 2
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
100.
0 10
0.0
42.9
57
.1
0.0
28.6
0.
0 0.
0
WO
OD
LAN
D
1ST
DU
I 44
3 99
.5
98.4
82
.6
14.0
0.
0 4.
3 0.
7 0.
0
2N
D D
UI
138
100.
0 98
.6
8.0
83.3
0.
0 83
.3
0.7
1.4
3RD
DU
I 59
10
0.0
100.
0 11
.9
32.2
0.
0 18
.6
18.6
0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 10
10
0.0
100.
0 0.
0 40
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 65
0 99
.7
98.6
59
.1
30.8
0.
0 22
.3
2.3
0.3
YUBA
SU
P YU
BA
1ST
DU
I 3
100.
0 66
.7
33.3
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
4T
H+
DU
I 9
44.4
10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 12
58
.3
91.7
8.
3 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
TOTA
L 36
4 99
.2
79.4
58
.2
14.6
0.
0 7.
7 29
.7
3.0
130
TABL
E B4
: 19
94 D
UI S
AN
CTI
ON
S BY
CO
UN
TY, C
OU
RT A
ND
OFF
END
ER S
TATU
S* -
cont
inue
d
C
OU
NTY
CO
URT
D
UI
OFF
END
ER
TO
TAL
PRO
BATI
ON
JA
IL
1ST
OFF
END
ER
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
SB 3
8
ALC
OH
OL
PRO
G
30-M
ON
TH
PRO
GRA
M
LIC
ENSE
RE
STRI
CTI
ON
C
OU
RT
SUSP
ENSI
ON
IG
NIT
ION
IN
TERL
OC
K
STA
TUS
N
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
YUBA
JU
V Y
UBA
1S
T D
UI
2 50
.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
cont
.
TOTA
L 2
50.0
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
M
ARY
SVIL
LE
1ST
DU
I 22
5 99
.1
67.1
92
.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
7.1
0.0
2ND
DU
I 93
98
.9
98.9
4.
3 53
.8
0.0
26.9
55
.9
10.8
3R
D D
UI
42
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
7.1
0.0
4.8
85.7
2.
4
4T
H+
DU
I 4
100.
0 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.
0 0.
0
BE
ALE
AFB
1S
T D
UI
7 85
.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTA
L 7
85.7
0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0 0.
0
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
131
TABL
E B5
: D
EMO
GRA
PHIC
2-Y
EAR
PRIO
R D
RIV
ER R
ECO
RD V
ARI
ABL
ES
BY
YEA
R A
ND
SA
NC
TIO
N G
ROU
P FO
R FI
RST
DU
I OFF
END
ERS
YE
AR
SA
MPL
E PE
RCEN
T M
EAN
PE
RC
ENT
2-YE
AR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S Z
IP C
OD
E A
CC
IDEN
T A
ND
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
IND
ICES
**
GRO
UP
SI
ZE
FE
MA
LE
A
GE
CO
MM
ERC
IAL
DRI
VER
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
A
LCO
HO
L A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
MIN
OR
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
IN
JURY
A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
VIO
LATI
ON
S M
OV
ING
V
IOLA
TIO
NS
1989
Susp
ensi
on
5,63
8 12
.3
25.9
1.
4 3.
74
1.90
.3
4 16
.07
2.86
.8
7 .2
2 6.
64
Jail
7,19
9 13
.6
31.9
3.
4 3.
19
1.60
.2
1 11
.29
2.95
.9
5 .2
4 6.
79
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
43,6
26
14.9
32
.7
3.6
2.88
1.
45
.15
10.7
5 2.
84
.86
.22
6.68
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
41,2
23
15.5
32
.8
2.9
3.06
1.
48
.12
9.31
3.
11
.91
.21
6.47
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
4,42
2 14
.0
33.7
3.
6 3.
27
1.79
.3
2 8.
98
3.01
.9
5 .2
5 6.
25
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
54.2
* F
= 57
1.2*
X
2 =
94.
1*
F =
34.4
* F
= 26
.2*
F =
52.0
* F
= 27
7.1*
F
= 80
2.2*
F
= 45
1.3*
F
= 21
7.3*
F
= 20
0.3*
1992
Susp
ensi
on
8,26
5 11
.6
28.2
1.
8 2.
35
1.54
.6
7 7.
46
1.54
.4
6 .1
0 3.
45
Jail
4,76
9 13
.1
32.2
3.
5 2.
23
1.41
.2
2 6.
27
1.53
.4
6 .1
0 3.
33
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
49,5
91
16.4
33
.3
3.3
2.00
1.
31
.11
4.97
1.
52
.45
.10
3.35
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
32,4
76
15.6
33
.1
2.6
2.11
1.
29
.08
4.99
1.
67
.47
.09
3.49
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
5,53
8 14
.4
33.4
3.
6 2.
00
1.30
.2
9 4.
56
1.60
.4
8 .1
0 3.
22
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
151.
4*
F =
439.
7*
X2
= 86
.9*
F =
13.4
* F
= 9.
3*
F =
385.
2*
F =
156.
7*
F =
1123
.3*
F =
254.
9*
F =
277.
3*
F =
386.
6*
1994
Susp
ensi
on
5,52
0 12
.3
28.3
1.
8 3.
45
1.76
.7
3 12
.80
1.51
.4
4 .0
9 3.
28
Jail
3,82
5 14
.6
33.3
3.
3 3.
07
1.71
.2
4 10
.74
1.50
.4
5 .0
9 3.
20
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
37,5
27
16.3
34
.4
3.4
2.73
1.
48
.13
8.61
1.
49
.44
.09
3.18
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
26,9
45
15.3
34
.0
2.7
3.04
1.
71
.10
8.41
1.
63
.46
.09
3.35
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
3,70
9 13
.1
34.5
3.
8 2.
87
1.58
.3
5 8.
40
1.56
.4
7 .0
9 3.
11
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
82.9
* F
= 37
5.2*
X
2 =
67.3
* F
= 29
.1*
F =
2.8*
F
= 27
4.2*
F
= 26
7.6*
F
= 92
9.3*
F
= 21
3.9*
F
= 22
1.5*
F
= 35
2.1*
*St
atis
tical
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
4 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
the
1989
and
199
2 dr
iver
s ar
e ba
sed
on 5
yea
rs o
f dat
a.
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
132
TABL
E B6
: D
EMO
GRA
PHIC
2-Y
EAR
PRIO
R D
RIV
ER R
ECO
RD V
ARI
ABL
ES
BY
YEA
R A
ND
SA
NC
TIO
N G
ROU
P FO
R SE
CO
ND
DU
I OFF
END
ERS
YE
AR
SA
MPL
E PE
RCEN
T M
EAN
PE
RC
ENT
2-YE
AR
PRIO
R IN
CID
ENTS
PER
100
DRI
VER
S ZI
P C
OD
E A
CC
IDEN
T A
ND
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
IND
ICES
**
GR
OU
P
SIZE
FEM
ALE
AG
E C
OM
MER
CIA
L D
RIV
ERS
TOTA
L A
CC
IDEN
TS
ALC
OH
OL
AC
CID
ENTS
M
AJO
R C
ON
VIC
TIO
NS
MIN
OR
CO
NV
ICTI
ON
S TO
TAL
AC
CID
ENTS
IN
JURY
A
CC
IDEN
TS
MA
JOR
VIO
LATI
ON
S M
OV
ING
V
IOLA
TIO
NS
1989
Susp
ensi
on
9,48
2 8.
9 32
.0
2.4
3.81
2.
35
5.04
13
.75
2.86
.8
9 .2
3 6.
57
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
23,9
27
10.4
34
.7
3.7
3.37
1.
89
3.37
10
.21
2.97
.8
9 .2
2 6.
63
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
17.8
* F
= 46
2.2*
X
2 =
36.7
* F
= 37
.1*
F =
73.1
* F
= 75
3.7*
F
= 36
3.8*
F
= 15
7.9*
F
= 1.
7 F
= 34
.7*
F =
8.8*
1992
Susp
ensi
on
9,23
0 9.
0 33
.2
2.5
2.06
1.
49
2.77
5.
87
1.50
.4
6 .1
0 3.
40
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
15,9
71
10.3
34
.5
3.1
2.01
1.
38
1.50
4.
75
1.58
.4
6 .1
1 3.
40
Oth
er
10,1
70
9.5
34.3
3.
4 2.
16
1.49
2.
31
5.16
1.
55
.46
.10
3.36
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
12.6
* F
= 51
.7*
X2
= 14
.6*
F =
3.6*
F
= 3.
8*
F =
295.
0*
F =
45.8
* F
= 21
6.3*
F
= 15
.2*
F =
166.
5*
F =
11.8
*
1994
Susp
ensi
on
5,46
1 9.
1 34
.1
2.3
3.0
1.85
4.
02
10.1
1.
46
.44
.10
3.27
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
8,59
5 11
.2
35.4
2.
6 3.
0 1.
90
2.97
8.
1 1.
55
.45
.09
3.24
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
Inte
rloc
k 4,
340
8.7
35.7
2.
6 3.
4 2.
12
2.97
8.
6 1.
56
.45
.09
3.32
Oth
er
7,27
3 9.
4 35
.2
2.7
3.1
1.88
3.
57
9.16
1.
52
.44
.09
3.25
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
X
2 =
27.6
* F
= 39
.3*
X2
= 2.
7 F
= 7.
67*
F =
5.54
* F
= 88
.1*
F =
40.4
* F
= 18
2.1*
F
= 39
.6*
F =
191.
9*
F =
22.6
*
*
Stat
istic
ally
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
4 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
the
1989
and
199
2 dr
iver
s ar
e ba
sed
on 5
yea
rs o
f dat
a.
1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
133
TABL
E B7
: ZI
P C
OD
E C
ENSU
S V
ARI
ABL
ES (C
OV
ARI
ATE
S) B
Y YE
AR
AN
D S
AN
CTI
ON
GRO
UP
FOR
FIRS
T A
ND
SEC
ON
D D
UI O
FFEN
DER
S
YEA
R FI
RST
OFF
END
ERS
Jail
3,82
5 20
.6
NA
N
A
27.6
13
.3
4.8
42.8
26
.6
Oth
er
10,1
70
44.0
N
A
34,4
68
88.6
14
.5
NA
N
A
NA
Susp
ensi
on
5,52
0 20
.4
NA
N
A
29.0
14
.9
4.9
44.5
26
.3
Susp
ensi
on
9,23
0 44
.0
NA
32
,540
28
.8
16.0
N
A
NA
N
A
GR
OU
P
SAM
PLE
SI
ZE
MO
NTH
S IN
ST
UD
Y
PER
CEN
T O
THER
TR
AN
SPO
RTA
TIO
N
MED
IAN
INC
OM
E PE
RCEN
T SI
NG
LE
PER
CEN
T EL
EM.
EDU
CA
TIO
N
PER
CEN
T U
NEM
PLO
YED
PE
RC
ENT
REN
TIN
G
TRA
VEL
TIM
E TO
W
ORK
(MIN
.)
1992
Susp
ensi
on
8,26
5 43
.9
10.6
N
A
NA
16
.1
NA
N
A
NA
Ja
il 4,
769
44.2
9.
8 N
A
NA
15
.2
NA
N
A
NA
1s
t DU
I pro
gram
& ja
il 49
,591
44
.5
10.6
N
A
NA
13
.3
NA
N
A
NA
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
32,4
76
44.3
11
.4
NA
N
A
14.8
N
A
NA
N
A
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
5,53
8 44
.1
7.7
NA
N
A
11.5
N
A
NA
N
A
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 54
.9*
F =
224.
5*
F =
207.
8*
1994
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
jail
37,5
27
20.5
N
A
NA
27
.9
13.0
4.
7 43
.3
25.8
1st D
UI p
rogr
am
&
rest
rict
ion
26,9
45
20.5
N
A
NA
31
.7
14.5
4.
6 48
.1
27.6
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
3,70
9 20
.0
NA
N
A
27.4
12
.1
4.9
41.4
28
.5
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 20
.8*
F =
1153
.3*
F =
96.1
* F
= 54
.7*
F =
419.
1*
F =
729.
8*
SEC
ON
D O
FFEN
DER
S
1992
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m
&
rest
rict
ion
15,9
71
44.1
N
A
35,4
57
29.2
13
.4
NA
N
A
NA
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 4.
6*
F
= 20
6.1*
F
= 20
.4*
F =
129.
4*
1994
Oth
er
7,27
3 20
.2
NA
N
A
NA
N
A
NA
44
.5
26.4
Susp
ensi
on
5,46
1 20
.4
NA
N
A
NA
N
A
NA
45
.2
25.5
SB
38
prog
ram
& re
stri
ctio
n 8,
595
20.0
N
A
NA
N
A
NA
N
A
44.2
26
.6
SB 3
8 pr
ogra
m/
rest
rict
ion
& in
terl
ock
4,34
0 20
.0
NA
N
A
NA
N
A
NA
46
.5
26.8
Stat
istic
al
si
gnifi
canc
e te
st
F
= 15
.4*
F
= 29
.7*
F =
115.
9*
*St
atis
tical
sig
nific
ance
at p
<.05
, (tw
o-ta
iled)
. **
The
ZIP
Cod
e in
dice
s fo
r the
199
4 ca
ses a
re b
ased
on
3.25
yea
rs o
f dri
ver r
ecor
d da
ta w
here
as th
e in
dice
s for
199
2 dr
iver
s are
bas
ed o
n 5
year
s of
dat
a. T
hese
cen
sus
vari
able
s wer
e no
t app
lied
to th
e 19
89 d
rive
rs
si
nce
thes
e va
riab
les w
ere
not a
vaila
ble
until
afte
r 199
0.