*section 1 - poursafe · 2015. 2. 16. · jefferson davis highway, suite 1204, arlington, va...

145
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757 CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION JANUARY 1997 PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency SALLY R. REED Director

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

1997

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION SYSTEM

ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN ACCORD WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 757

CHAPTER 450, 1989 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

JANUARY 1997

PETE WILSON Governor DEAN R. DUNPHY, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency SALLY R. REED Director

Page 2: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE January 1997

3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

1997 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System

6. AUTHOR(S) Helen N. Tashima and Clifford J Helander

5. FUNDING NUMBERS

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

California Department of Motor Vehicles Research and Development Section P.O. Box 932382 Sacramento, CA 94232-3820

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER CAL-DMV-RSS-97-165

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) In this sixth annual legislatively mandated report, 1994 and 1995 DUI data from several diverse sources were compiled and cross-referenced for the purpose of developing a single comprehensive DUI data and monitoring system. This report presents crosstabulated information on DUI arrests, convictions, court sanctions, administrative actions and alcohol-involved accidents. In addition, this report provides an evaluation of the effectiveness of alternative court and administrative sanctions (including alcohol treatment programs and license actions) upon the postconviction records of first and second DUI offenders. The postconviction driving records of DUI offenders arrested in 1989, 1992, and 1994 were evaluated for six-, three-, and one-year periods, respectively.

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

136 14. SUBJECT TERMS

Drinking drivers, DUI tracking data system, DUI reporting system, DUI countermeasures, DUI recidivism, alcohol education and rehabilitation, driver license disqualification

16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT

Unclassified

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE

Unclassified

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT

Unclassified

20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

None NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18 298-102

Page 3: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

i

DU

I SU

MM

AR

Y S

TATI

STIC

S:

1985

- 19

95

YEA

R

%

of t

otal

fata

litie

s 48

.9

48.7

50

.1

46.6

46

.6

46.0

44

.1

43.8

37

.7

35.3

32

.2

%

of t

otal

inju

ries

20

.7

20.1

19

.1

18.2

17

.6

17.5

15

.9

14.5

13

.6

12.5

12

.1

Felo

ny D

UI a

rres

ts

7316

80

34

8488

86

04

1044

8 12

948

1122

0 98

03

8738

75

67

6642

Alc

ohol

-invo

lved

fata

litie

s 24

12

2543

27

54

2510

25

09

2382

20

48

1832

15

69

1488

13

43

Post

conv

ictio

n su

sp/r

ev

7654

1 78

006

7815

6 79

022

9023

7 91

155

1008

58

7960

9 68

441

5960

0 52

462

Tota

l rec

kles

s driv

ing

conv

ictio

ns4

4438

6 44

063

4172

4 39

926

4045

6 39

617

3938

6 34

186

2783

5 27

374

2451

6

A

lcoh

ol-in

volv

ed re

ckle

ss

2716

3 26

316

2492

2 24

013

2564

6 26

960

2709

3 23

675

1864

5 18

246

1632

9

Alc

ohol

-invo

lved

inju

ries

66

667

6987

6 68

816

6503

3 63

937

6384

7 55

779

4896

9 42

936

3943

7 36

961

19

85

1986

19

8 7

1988

19

89

1990

19

91

1992

19

93

1994

19

95

Tota

l DU

I arr

ests

1 34

7797

34

7286

34

9576

32

7186

33

6059

36

6834

31

2571

26

0150

23

3673

20

8844

20

0754

Mis

dem

eano

r DU

I arr

ests

34

0481

33

9252

34

1088

31

8582

32

5611

35

3886

30

1351

25

0347

22

4935

20

1277

19

4112

DU

I con

vict

ions

rece

ived

to d

ate

(b

y ye

ar o

f arr

est)2

2443

54

2392

57

2425

05r

2196

25r

2258

41r

2573

59r

2232

31r

1865

19r

1649

12r

1444

02r

1389

54

Pe

rcen

t con

vict

ed o

f DU

I as o

f

Sept

embe

r 199

6 70

%

69%

69

%

67%

67

%

70%

71

%

72%

r 71

%r

69%

r 69

%

Es

timat

ed fi

nal D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n

rate

70

%

69%

69

%

67%

r 67

%

70%

r 72

%r

72%

r 72

%r

72%

r 73

%

3083

99

2774

47

2436

45

2319

54

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

1794

92

1 Thes

e to

tals

wer

e re

port

ed b

y th

e D

epar

tmen

t of J

ustic

e, L

aw E

nfor

cem

ent I

nfor

mat

ion

Cen

ter,

and

incl

ude

a sm

all n

umbe

r of d

uplic

ates

(0.9

% i

n 19

95).

2 Thes

e da

ta re

pres

ent a

DM

V m

aste

r file

cou

nt o

f the

num

ber o

f DU

I abs

trac

ts re

ceiv

ed (b

y ye

ar o

f vio

latio

n), m

inus

dup

licat

es.

Thes

e to

tals

do

not i

nclu

de c

onvi

ctio

n ab

stra

cts

not

yet r

ecei

ved.

Thu

s, fo

r the

mos

t rec

ent y

ears

, the

se fi

gure

s w

ill s

ubst

antia

lly u

nder

estim

ate

the

final

con

vict

ion

tota

ls.

3 Th

ese

data

incl

ude

a pr

ojec

ted

num

ber o

f abs

trac

ts n

ot y

et re

ceiv

ed.

This

num

ber i

s ba

sed

on a

n em

piri

cally

der

ived

func

tion

of th

e co

urt a

bstr

act r

epor

ting

rate

.

4 Thes

e to

tals

wer

e ta

ken

from

the

DM

V a

nnua

l Sus

pens

ion

and

Revo

catio

n re

port

s an

d in

clud

e la

te re

port

ing

of c

onvi

ctio

ns fr

om p

rior

yea

rs.

5 Sinc

e 19

91, t

otal

man

dato

ry su

spen

sion

/rev

ocat

ion

exce

eds t

he n

umbe

r of D

UI a

rres

ts b

ecau

se m

any

offe

nder

s now

rece

ive

both

an

APS

and

pos

tcon

vict

ion

susp

ensi

on/r

evoc

atio

n.

r Revi

sed

from

1881

16r

1678

34r

1489

43

1472

91

Estim

ated

fina

l DU

I con

vict

ions

3 24

4384

r 23

9322

r 24

2396

r 21

9767

r 22

6135

r 25

9810

r 22

5748

r

Tota

l man

dato

ry s

usp/

rev5

10

5849

10

4333

10

3630

10

1779

11

1703

23

3680

37

3131

r

Adm

in p

er se

/ref

usal

susp

/rev

29

308

2632

7 25

474

2275

7 21

466

1425

25

2722

73r

prio

r rep

orts

.

Page 4: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

ii

DU

I SU

MM

AR

Y ST

ATI

STIC

S: 1

985

- 199

5 (c

ontin

ued)

YE

AR

PREC

ON

VIC

TIO

N

Adm

in p

er s

e (A

PS) a

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1196

10

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

1794

92

Ze

ro to

lera

nce

susp

ensi

ons

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

9971

87

00

Fi

rst-o

ffend

er su

spen

sion

s n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a 82

503

1875

27

1575

45

1443

21

1205

82

1212

18

Re

peat

-off

ende

r sus

pens

ions

n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a 34

792

7435

1 62

656

5727

9 47

429

4419

3

Repe

at-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2315

10

395

8589

74

06

6063

53

81

Com

mer

cial

dri

ver a

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3739

79

76

6449

58

29

5038

49

21

Che

mic

al te

st re

fusa

l act

ions

29

308

2632

7 25

474

2275

7 21

466

2291

5 21

296r

1796

3r 15

662

1326

4 12

308

Te

st re

fusa

l sus

pens

ions

25

485

1635

2 14

877

1372

0 12

390

1512

8 10

901r

9374

r 82

56

7022

67

54

Te

st re

fusa

l rev

ocat

ions

38

23

9975

10

597

9037

90

76

7787

10

395r

8589

r 74

06

6063

53

81

TOTA

L A

PS/R

EFU

SAL

AC

TIO

NS

2930

8 26

327

2547

4 22

757

2146

6 14

2525

27

2273

22

8790

20

9006

18

4045

17

9492

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

POST

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

Juve

nile

DU

I sus

pens

ions

22

00

2219

23

74

1823

19

95

1478

15

76

1202

92

2 87

9 67

7

Firs

t-off

ende

r sus

pens

ions

70

57

7384

72

78

6626

76

79

1040

8 13

575

1067

3 10

208

8696

72

66

M

isde

mea

nor

5346

55

92

5558

50

50

5658

84

67

1154

7 89

89

8607

71

88

5806

Felo

ny

1711

17

92

1720

15

76

2021

19

41

2028

16

84

1601

15

08

1460

Seco

nd-o

ffen

der S

/R a

ctio

ns

4683

5 45

234

4360

8 47

698

5392

7 52

334

5735

0 45

478

3884

9 34

300

3148

9

Mis

dem

eano

r 46

292

4460

1 42

964

4709

3 53

238

5159

3 56

583

4475

6 38

285

3379

4 30

955

Fe

lony

54

3 63

3 64

4 60

5 68

9 74

1 76

7 72

2 56

4 50

6 53

4

Thir

d-of

fend

er re

voca

tions

14

970

1694

6 17

118

1399

1 18

514

1865

0 19

963

1555

3 12

908

1119

3 94

71

M

isde

mea

nor

1497

0 16

946

1711

8 13

671

1818

2 18

219

1959

5 15

233

1264

4 10

974

9261

Felo

ny

n/a

n/a

n/a

320

332

431

368

320

264

219

210

Four

th-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

5479

62

23

7778

88

84

8122

82

85

8394

67

03

5554

45

32

3559

TOTA

L PO

STC

ON

VIC

TIO

N A

CTI

ON

S 76

541

7800

6 78

156

7902

2 90

237

9115

5 10

0858

79

609

6844

1 59

600

5246

2

19

85

1986

19

87

1988

19

89

1990

19

91

1992

19

93

1994

19

95

TOTA

L M

AN

DA

TORY

SU

SPEN

SIO

N/

REV

OC

ATI

ON

(S/R

) AC

TIO

NS

1058

49

1043

33

1036

30

1017

79

1117

03

2336

80

3731

31

3083

99

2774

47

2436

45

2319

54

port

s.

prio

r re

r Revi

sed

from

Page 5: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

iii

HIGHLIGHTS OF 1997 CALIFORNIA DUI-MIS REPORT

Alcohol-involved traffic fatalities continued to decrease substantially in 1995 (-9.7%), and have dropped by over half since 1987 (-51% overall).

The decline in DUI arrests which began in 1991 continued through 1995, although

at a much slower rate (-3.7%) than in previous years. FY 95/96 administrative per se (APS) actions increased by 10.7%, however, possibly indicating that the recent trend in declining DUI arrests may have reversed during 1996. DUI arrests have fallen 45% since 1990.

The number of persons injured in alcohol-involved accidents during 1995 declined

(-6.3%) for the ninth consecutive year, resulting in a 46.3% reduction in alcohol-involved injuries over the 9-year time period.

13.2% of all 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,

compared to 13.1% in 1993 and 11.1% in 1991 and 1992. Almost half (49.5%) of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.

The average blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of a convicted DUI offender, as

reported by law enforcement on APS forms, was .168% in 1994, which is more than double the California illegal per se BAC limit of .08%. The average BAC reported on 1994 DUI abstracts of conviction was 0.166%, the same as in each of the prior three years.

Requests for APS hearings declined 27% in FY 95/96 (from 11.8% to only 8.6% of all

APS actions), reversing a trend of increasing hearing requests each year since APS was implemented in FY 90/91. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing continued to decline, however, dropping from 87% in FY 90/91 to 68% in 94/95.

Among 1995 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (45.5%) again constituted the largest

racial/ethnic group, and were arrested at a rate that is almost twice that of their percentage of California’s adult population (26%).

Page 6: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

iv

The average age of a DUI offender in 1995 was 33.3 years. Less than 1% of arrested DUI offenders are juveniles (under age 18).

Among convicted DUI offenders in 1994, 68.8% were first offenders and 31.2% were

repeat offenders (one or more prior convictions within the previous 7 years). The proportion of repeat offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989, when it stood at 37%.

18.0% of 1994 DUI arrest cases did not show any corresponding conviction on DMV

records. This rate is down slightly from 18.8% in 1993 and 19.2% in 1992. This reduction could reflect system improvements initiated by the department to improve the effectiveness of DUI adjudication and to increase the reporting of DUI convictions.

Alcohol treatment, in conjunction with license restriction, was the most effective

postconviction sanction in reducing subsequent DUI incidents among DUI offenders, by a minimum of 12.6% over other sanction alternatives (1989-1994).

License suspension was the most effective postconviction sanction in reducing

subsequent accidents for first offenders, producing reductions of at least 13.3% across the years (1989-1994). With the imposition of preconviction APS suspensions, beginning in July 1990, the postconviction total accident rates of all sanction groups were reduced. Because all DUI offenders were now suspended under the APS law, the incremental impact of postconviction suspension actions became less distinct.

Jail, in the absence of treatment or postconviction suspension, was the least effective

sanction for first offenders in terms of DUI recidivism; offenders sentenced to jail had up to 19.8% more DUI incidents than the second least effective sanction.

Statewide, 4.6% of 1994 DUI offenders were required to install an ignition interlock

device in combination with attending SB 38 alcohol treatment programs. Although there is a positive trend, there is no evidence, as of yet, that ignition interlock increases the incremental effectiveness of other DUI sanctions.

Page 7: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

v

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge with appreciation the many individuals who have contributed to the success of this project. In particular, we wish to acknowledge the cooperation of the Department of Justice, Statistical Analysis Center, in providing annual DUI arrest data and documentation. The contributions of Debbie McKenzie, Associate Government Program Analyst, in transforming mainframe computer files into readable data tables and figures, as well as her general assistance in the production of this report, are acknowledged with appreciation. We also would like to acknowledge the contributions of Patrice Rogers, Research Analyst II, Pat Timmons, Staff Programmer Analyst, and the administrative direction and report review efforts of Raymond C. Peck, Chief, Research and Development Branch. Report Authors: Helen N. Tashima, Research Analyst II, Principal Investigator Clifford J. Helander, Research Manager I, Project Manager

Page 8: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE DUI SUMMARY STATISTICS: 1985-1995 i HIGHLIGHTS OF 1997 DUI-MIS REPORT iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v INTRODUCTION 1 SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS 4 SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS 10 SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS 22 SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS 29 EVALUATION METHOD AND RESULTS 34 Subject Selection and Data Collection 34 Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures 37 Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation 38 Total Accidents 38 DUI Incidents 38 Results of the Second Offender Sanction Evaluation 40 Total Accidents 40 DUI Incidents 40 One-Year Recidivism Rates for First and Second Offenders from 1989-1994 43 SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS 45 SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL 49 DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS 56 REFERENCES 57 GLOSSARY 58

APPENDICES

NUMBER

A ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 757 - FRIEDMAN CHAPTER 450 60 B1 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY, AGE, SEX AND RACE/ETHNICITY 61 B2 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX AND AGE 76

Page 9: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

APPENDICES (continued) NUMBER PAGE

B3 TOTAL CONVICTION DATA FOR 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY COURT 86

B4 1994 DUI SANCTIONS BY COUNTY, COURT AND OFFENDER STATUS 96

B5 DEMOGRAPHIC 2-YEAR PRIOR DRIVER RECORD VARIABLES BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR FIRST DUI OFFENDERS 131

B6 DEMOGRAPHIC 2-YEAR PRIOR DRIVER RECORD VARIABLES BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR SECOND DUI OFFENDERS 132

B7 ZIP CODE CENSUS VARIABLES (COVARIATES) BY YEAR AND SANCTION GROUP FOR FIRST AND SECOND DUI OFFENDERS 133

LIST OF TABLES 1 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1993-1995 7 2 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST 8 3a 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY AGE, SEX AND RACE/ETHNICITY 9 3b 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY SEX, AGE AND RACE/ETHNICITY 9 4 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX 15 5 MATCHABLE 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE, RACE/ETHNICITY AND SEX 16 6 ADJUSTED 1994 DUI CONVICTION RATES AND RELATIVE LIKELIHOOD OF CONVICTION BY AGE AND RACE/ETHNICITY 16

Page 10: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

LIST OF TABLES (continued)

NUMBER PAGE

7 TOTAL CONVICTION DATA FOR 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 17 8 ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY 19 9 1994 REPORTED BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION (BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS 20

10 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE REPORTED BAC LEVEL 21

11 1994 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS 25

12 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS 26

13 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - REPEAT OFFENDERS 27

14 FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR 39

15 SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR 41

16 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1992, AND 1994 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS BY OUTCOME MEASURES 42

17 MANDATORY DUI LICENSE DISQUALIFICATION ACTIONS, 1985-1995 47

18 ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES 48

19 RACE/ETHNICITY BY SOBRIETY CODE OF ACCIDENT- INVOLVED 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 52

20 FATAL AND INJURY ACCIDENTS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND TYPE OF ARREST 52

Page 11: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

LIST OF TABLES (continued) NUMBER PAGE

21 ADJUDICATION STATUS BY SOBRIETY CODE FOR ACCIDENT-INVOLVED 1994 DUI ARRESTEES 53

22 FATAL AND INJURY ACCIDENTS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTEES BY TYPE OF ARREST AND ADJUDICATION STATUS 53

23 1994 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST 54

24 1-, 3- AND 6-YEAR TOTAL, FATAL/INJURY AND ALCOHOL-RELATED ACCIDENT MEANS BY OFFENDER STATUS 55

LIST OF FIGURES 1 DUI management information system 2 2 DUI arrests 1985-1995 4 3 Percentage of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 projected population (age 15 and over) by race/ethnicity 6 4 DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rate estimates, 1985-1995 12 5 Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity 15 6 Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1994) 23 7 Adjusted 6-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 30 8 Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction 30

Page 12: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

LIST OF FIGURES (continued) NUMBER PAGE

9 Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction 30

10 Adjusted 6-year DUI incident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction 31 11 Adjusted 3-year DUI incident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction 31 12 Adjusted 1-Year DUI incident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction 31 13 Adjusted 6-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offenders by type of sanction 33 14 Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1992 second offenders by type of sanction 33 15 Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1994 second offenders by type of sanction 33 16 Proportion of DUI offenders arrested in 1989-1994 reoffending (DUI incidents) one year after conviction 44 17 Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1985-1995 46 18 Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that were alcohol-involved, 1985-1995 50

x

Page 13: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

INTRODUCTION

This report is the sixth Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System, produced in response to Assembly Bill 757 (Friedman), Chapter 450, 1989 legislative session (see Appendix A). This bill required the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to "establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted" of DUI in order to provide "accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics" to enhance "the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions." The need for such a data system had long been documented by numerous authorities, including the 1983 Presidential Commission on Drunk Driving. In responding to this legislative mandate, this report combines and cross-references DUI data from diverse sources and presents them in a single reference. Data sources drawn upon include the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for accident data, Department of Justice (DOJ) for arrest data, and the DMV driver record database. Each of these reporting agencies, however, initially draw their data from diffuse primary sources such as individual law enforcement agencies (arrest and accident reports) and the courts (abstracts of conviction). The general conceptual design of the California DUI management information system (DUI-MIS) is presented in Figure 1. The basic theme of the DUI-MIS is to track the processing of offenders through the DUI system from the point of arrest and to identify the frequency with which offenders flow through each branch of the system process (from law enforcement through adjudication to treatment and license control actions). Figure 1 also illustrates the relationship between offender flow and data collection at each point of the process. The initiating data source for the DUI-MIS is the DUI arrest report, as compiled by the DOJ Law Enforcement Information Center's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. Another major objective of this report is to evaluate the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions on convicted DUI offenders. This is accomplished by examining the postconviction recidivism records (alcohol/drug-related accidents and traffic convictions) of offenders assigned to alternative sanctions, as detailed in the section on "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness."

1

Page 14: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

2

DU

I IN

CID

ENTS

Arr

este

d?C

hem

ical

Te

st

Ref

used

?A

ccid

ent

Invo

lved

?C

ompl

aint

Fi

led?

Plea

- B

arga

in?

DU

I C

onvi

ctio

n?R

efer

red

to

Trea

tmen

t?

Lice

nse

Susp

ende

d/

Rev

oked

?

Lice

nse

Rei

nsta

ted?

Trea

tmen

t N

ot

Com

plet

ed?

Arr

est

Rep

ort

Rei

nsta

tem

ent o

n D

river

Rec

ord

Con

vict

ion

of

Less

er O

ffen

seTr

eatm

ent

Dro

pout

Trea

tmen

t R

efer

ral

DU

I C

onvi

ctio

n

Susp

ensi

on/

Rev

ocat

ion

onD

river

Rec

ord

Cou

rt D

ocke

t Es

tabl

ishe

dA

ccid

ent

Rep

ort

Adm

inis

trativ

e Pe

r Se

Sus

pens

ion

Rep

ort

Mon

thly

Arr

est

and

Cita

tion

Reg

iste

r

Aut

omat

ed N

ame

Inde

x Sy

stem

Lice

nse

Susp

ensi

on

and

DU

I Pr

oces

sing

Stat

ewid

e In

tegr

ated

Tra

ffic

R

ecor

d Sy

stem

Abs

tract

of

Con

vict

ion

Driv

er R

ecor

d M

aste

r File

DU

I Dat

a Ex

tract

ion

Mod

ule

DU

I-M

IS

LAW

EN

FOR

CEM

ENT

AD

JUD

ICA

TIV

ETR

EATM

ENT

LIC

ENSE

CO

NTR

OL

Figu

re 1

. D

UI m

anag

emen

t inf

orm

atio

n sy

stem

.

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Page 15: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

It should again be noted that it is not an objective of this report to interpret, analyze or make recommendations based on the data presented. Rather, the primary purpose of a reporting system such as the DUI-MIS is to provide objective data on the operating and performance characteristics of the system for others to assess in making policy decisions, formulating improvements and conducting more in-depth evaluations. The DUI-MIS data system and report has led to numerous improvements in the California DUI system, from the identification of inappropriate dismissals in a small central valley court to major initiatives currently underway to improve the tracking and reporting of DUI cases. The success of the California DUI-MIS has also contributed to a national initiative to design a model DUI reporting system, currently being developed under contract to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

3

Page 16: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 1: DUI ARRESTS The information presented below on DUI arrests is based primarily on data collected annually by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system. These data are the most current nonaggregated data available on DUI arrests. Table 1: DUI Arrests By County and Annual Percentage Change from 1993-1995. The number of DUI arrests by county for the years 1993-1995 and the percentage changes from 1994 to 1995 are shown in Table 1. Table 2: 1995 DUI Arrests by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows a breakdown of 1995 DUI arrests by felony, misdemeanor, and juvenile arrest type, by county. This table also shows county and statewide DUI arrest rates per 100 licensed drivers. Tables 3a-3b: 1995 DUI Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity. Table 3a crosstabulates age by sex and age by race/ethnicity of 1995 DUI arrestees statewide. The same tabulations by county are found in Appendix Table B1. Table 3b shows the same data crosstabulated by sex and age within race/ethnicity. Figure 2 below displays the trend in DUI arrests from 1985 to 1995.

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

NU

MB

ER O

F D

UI A

RR

ESTS

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Figure 2 . DUI arrests 1985-1995.

MisdemeanorFelonyTotal

YEAR

4

Page 17: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Based on the data shown in Figure 2 and Tables 1, 2, 3a, and 3b, the following statements can be made about DUI arrests in California: Statewide Parameters:

DUI arrests decreased by only 3.7% in 1995, following declines of 10.8% and 10.3% in 1994 and 1993, respectively. Since 1990, DUI arrests have dropped by 45%.

The 1995 DUI arrest rate was the same as in 1994, 1.0 arrests per 100 licensed

drivers. This compares to rates of 1.1 in 1993, 1.3 in 1992, 1.5 in 1991, and 1.8 in 1990.

Felony DUI arrests (involving bodily injury or death) constitute a relatively small

proportion (3.3% in 1995) of all DUI arrests. County Variation:

25% of all 1995 California DUI arrests occurred in Los Angeles County. Four counties (Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino) had over 10,000 DUI arrests each, and accounted for almost half (46%) of all arrests.

The 1995 county per capita DUI arrest rates ranged from 0.3 to 9.0 DUI arrests per

100 licensed drivers. Eleven counties had rates below 1.0: San Francisco (0.3), Alameda and Contra Costa (0.7), Mariposa and Santa Clara (0.8), and Amador, Marin, Orange, San Mateo, Solano, and Ventura (0.9). Nine counties had rates of 2.0 or higher and, of these, 3 had rates higher than 2.5: Imperial (2.6), Colusa (2.9), and Alpine (9.0). The extremely high rate for Alpine must be viewed with caution because of the extremely small population size of Alpine County (N = 800 licensed drivers in 1995).

Many counties again showed a decline in DUI arrests in 1995. Among the larger

counties, the greatest declines occurred in Alameda (-22.4%), Kern (-17.8%), San Francisco (-15.0%), and Ventura (-13.8%). Among other counties, the largest decreases in DUI arrests occurred in Modoc (-40.9%), Mariposa (-17.9%), and Mono (-17.8%). Among counties showing increases in DUI arrests were Nevada (34.7%), El Dorado (27.8%), San Benito (24.8%), Alpine (22.0%), and Tuolumne (20.0%).

Demographic Characteristics:

The average age of a DUI arrestee in 1995 was 33.3 years. Roughly half (46.9%) of all arrestees were age 30 or younger and over three-quarters (77.6%) were age 40 or younger. Less than 1% of all DUI arrests involved juveniles (under age 18). 2.3% of all arrestees were over age 60.

5

Page 18: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Males comprised 87.8% of all 1995 DUI arrests.

Among 1995 DUI arrestees, Hispanics (45.5%) continued to be the largest racial/ethnic group, being arrested at a rate substantially higher than their 1995 population parity of 26.0% (Department of Finance, Demographic Research and Census Data Center). All other racial/ethnic groups were underrepresented among DUI arrestees, relative to their estimated 1995 population parity: Blacks (6.3% of arrests, 6.7% of the population), Whites (42.8% of arrests, 56.7% of the population), and Other (5.4% of arrests, an estimated 10.6% of the population). Figure 3 below shows the percentages of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 estimated census adult population by race/ethnicity.

Among male 1995 DUI arrestees, 49.1% were Hispanic, 39.2% were White, 6.2%

were Black, and 5.4% were "Other." Among female DUI arrestees, 68.8% were White, 19.0% were Hispanic, 7.1% were Black, and 5.1% were "Other."

In the following 8 counties, Hispanics comprised over 60% of those arrested for DUI

during 1995: Tulare (75.6%), Imperial (72.9%), Fresno (71.1%), Madera (71.0%), San Benito (69.4%), Merced (65.9%), Los Angeles (61.3%), and Monterey (60.2%). In most other counties, the majority of arrestees were White.

The average age of a DUI arrestee varied considerably by race: Blacks were the

oldest with a mean age of 35.9 years, while Hispanics were the youngest, with a mean age of 30.9 years.

56.7

26.0

6.710.6

42.8 45.5

6.3 5.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

PER

CEN

TAG

E

White Hispanic Black Other

Figure 3 . Percentage of 1995 DUI arrests and 1995 projected population (age 15 and over) by race/ethnicity.

1995 projected population

DUI arrests

6

Page 19: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 1: DUI ARRESTS* BY COUNTY AND ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM 1993-1995

COUNTY 1993 1994 1995 % CHANGE 1994-1995 STATEWIDE 231696 206583 198982 -3.7 ALAMEDA 7820 7208 5596 -22.4 ALPINE 54 59 72 22.0 AMADOR 305 183 197 7.7 BUTTE 1580 1297 1293 -0.3 CALAVERAS 334 287 309 7.7 COLUSA 326 302 323 7.0 CONTRA COSTA 4492 4124 3990 -3.2 DEL NORTE 401 303 295 -2.6 EL DORADO 1122 983 1256 27.8 FRESNO 8158 6860 6593 -3.9 GLENN 310 310 339 9.4 HUMBOLDT 1258 1234 1333 8.0 IMPERIAL 2148 1645 1899 15.4 INYO 383 346 306 -11.6 KERN 6443 5095 4188 -17.8 KINGS 1477 1143 1038 -9.2 LAKE 690 662 656 -0.9 LASSEN 251 252 241 -4.4 LOS ANGELES 58710 51607 49570 -3.9 MADERA 1452 1159 1025 -11.6 MARIN 1940 1664 1542 -7.3 MARIPOSA 146 112 92 -17.9 MENDOCINO 1033 960 880 -8.3 MERCED 2431 2138 2174 1.7 MODOC 120 137 81 -40.9 MONO 175 157 129 -17.8 MONTEREY 4968 4423 3931 -11.1 NAPA 1203 1085 1011 -6.8 NEVADA 511 481 648 34.7 ORANGE 15476 15659 15925 1.7 PLACER 1885 1629 1636 0.4 PLUMAS 217 189 178 -5.8 RIVERSIDE 9109 8182 9190 12.3 SACRAMENTO 9316 7904 7225 -8.6 SAN BENITO 342 254 317 24.8 SAN BERNARDINO 11000 10699 10474 -2.1 SAN DIEGO 17047 15815 15530 -1.8 SAN FRANCISCO 1885 1690 1436 -15.0 SAN JOAQUIN 4444 3936 4122 4.7 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2444 2351 2264 -3.7 SAN MATEO 5163 4622 4254 -8.0 SANTA BARBARA 4591 3837 3402 -11.3 SANTA CLARA 10871 9164 8685 -5.2 SANTA CRUZ 3206 2645 2444 -7.6 SHASTA 1070 1036 1044 0.8 SIERRA 67 38 37 -2.6 SISKIYOU 410 356 349 -2.0 SOLANO 2050 1809 1905 5.3 SONOMA 4075 3245 2913 -10.2 STANISLAUS 3324 2822 2839 0.6 SUTTER 1039 898 913 1.7 TEHAMA 451 477 415 -13.0 TRINITY 220 255 222 -12.9 TULARE 4336 3820 3552 -7.0 TUOLUMNE 316 320 384 20.0 VENTURA 5050 4971 4285 -13.8 YOLO 1363 1202 1441 19.9 YUBA 688 542 594 9.6 *DOJ DUI arrest totals with duplicates removed.

7

Page 20: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 2: 1995 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST TOTAL TYPE OF ARREST DUI ARRESTS COUNTY (100%) FELONY JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR PER 100 N N % N % N % LICENSED DRIVERS STATEWIDE 198982 6520 3.3 1654 0.8 190808 95.9 1.0 ALAMEDA 5596 77 1.4 44 0.8 5475 97.8 0.7 ALPINE 72 2 2.8 1 1.4 69 95.8 9.0 AMADOR 197 7 3.6 1 0.5 189 95.9 0.9 BUTTE 1293 33 2.6 22 1.7 1238 95.7 1.0 CALAVERAS 309 19 6.1 5 1.6 285 92.2 1.1 COLUSA 323 12 3.7 4 1.2 307 95.0 2.9 CONTRA COSTA 3990 111 2.8 44 1.1 3835 96.1 0.7 DEL NORTE 295 21 7.1 3 1.0 271 91.9 1.9 EL DORADO 1256 69 5.5 7 0.6 1180 93.9 1.2 FRESNO 6593 265 4.0 88 1.3 6240 94.6 1.6 GLENN 339 12 3.5 3 0.9 324 95.6 2.0 HUMBOLDT 1333 60 4.5 26 2.0 1247 93.5 1.6 IMPERIAL 1899 44 2.3 16 0.8 1839 96.8 2.6 INYO 306 12 3.9 3 1.0 291 95.1 2.2 KERN 4188 168 4.0 44 1.1 3976 94.9 1.2 KINGS 1038 28 2.7 14 1.3 996 96.0 1.9 LAKE 656 24 3.7 14 2.1 618 94.2 1.7 LASSEN 241 8 3.3 1 0.4 232 96.3 1.4 LOS ANGELES 49570 1676 3.4 225 0.5 47669 96.2 1.0 MADERA 1025 40 3.9 10 1.0 975 95.1 1.8 MARIN 1542 29 1.9 8 0.5 1505 97.6 0.9 MARIPOSA 92 4 4.3 1 1.1 87 94.6 0.8 MENDOCINO 880 30 3.4 16 1.8 834 94.8 1.6 MERCED 2174 73 3.4 19 0.9 2082 95.8 2.1 MODOC 81 2 2.5 3 3.7 76 93.8 1.3 MONO 129 2 1.6 1 0.8 126 97.7 1.7 MONTEREY 3931 93 2.4 51 1.3 3787 96.3 1.9 NAPA 1011 51 5.0 16 1.6 944 93.4 1.3 NEVADA 648 16 2.5 3 0.5 629 97.1 1.0 ORANGE 15925 316 2.0 70 0.4 15539 97.6 0.9 PLACER 1636 64 3.9 21 1.3 1551 94.8 1.1 PLUMAS 178 5 2.8 5 2.8 168 94.4 1.1 RIVERSIDE 9190 314 3.4 105 1.1 8771 95.4 1.2 SACRAMENTO 7225 397 5.5 53 0.7 6775 93.8 1.0 SAN BENITO 317 19 6.0 4 1.3 294 92.7 1.3 SAN BERNARDINO 10474 322 3.1 68 0.6 10084 96.3 1.2 SAN DIEGO 15530 317 2.0 122 0.8 15091 97.2 1.0 SAN FRANCISCO 1436 111 7.7 6 0.4 1319 91.9 0.3 SAN JOAQUIN 4122 137 3.3 45 1.1 3940 95.6 1.5 SAN LUIS OBISPO 2264 67 3.0 22 1.0 2175 96.1 1.5 SAN MATEO 4254 112 2.6 39 0.9 4103 96.5 0.9 SANTA BARBARA 3402 100 2.9 57 1.7 3245 95.4 1.4 SANTA CLARA 8685 461 5.3 51 0.6 8173 94.1 0.8 SANTA CRUZ 2444 30 1.2 37 1.5 2377 97.3 1.6 SHASTA 1044 46 4.4 16 1.5 982 94.1 1.0 SIERRA 37 2 5.4 0 0.0 35 94.6 1.5 SISKIYOU 349 15 4.3 4 1.1 330 94.6 1.1 SOLANO 1905 63 3.3 28 1.5 1814 95.2 0.9 SONOMA 2913 91 3.1 46 1.6 2776 95.3 1.0 STANISLAUS 2839 157 5.5 34 1.2 2648 93.3 1.2 SUTTER 913 26 2.8 0 0.0 887 97.2 2.0 TEHAMA 415 16 3.9 6 1.4 393 94.7 1.3 TRINITY 222 7 3.2 1 0.5 214 96.4 2.4 TULARE 3552 119 3.4 41 1.2 3392 95.5 2.0 TUOLUMNE 384 19 4.9 4 1.0 361 94.0 1.1 VENTURA 4285 126 2.9 47 1.1 4112 96.0 0.9 YOLO 1441 53 3.7 23 1.6 1365 94.7 1.6 YUBA 594 20 3.4 6 1.0 568 95.6 1.7

8

Page 21: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

9

TABL

E 3a

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y A

GE,

SEX

AN

D R

AC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y*

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

ST

ATE

WID

E 19

8982

10

0.0

1747

57

87.8

24

225

12.2

85

170

42.8

90

497

45.5

12

610

6.3

1070

5 5.

4 U

ND

ER 1

8 16

54

0.8

1402

84

.8

252

15.2

87

7 53

.0

650

39.3

69

4.

2 58

3.

5 18

-20

1257

3 6.

3 11

354

90.3

12

19

9.7

4920

39

.1

6667

53

.0

464

3.7

522

4.2

21-3

0 79

141

39.8

70

878

89.6

82

63

10.4

27

454

34.7

43

801

55.3

39

41

5.0

3945

5.

0 31

-40

6110

2 30

.7

5268

9 86

.2

8413

13

.8

2709

1 44

.3

2602

1 42

.6

4519

7.

4 34

71

5.7

41-5

0 29

623

14.9

25

241

85.2

43

82

14.8

15

744

53.1

97

18

32.8

22

41

7.6

1920

6.

5 51

-60

10

352

5.2

91

38

88.3

12

14

11.7

60

89

58.8

27

32

26.4

94

2 9.

1 58

9 5.

7 61

-70

3553

1.

8 31

81

89.5

37

2 10

.5

2273

64

.0

759

21.4

35

0 9.

9 17

1 4.

8 71

& A

BOV

E 98

4 0.

5 87

4 88

.8

110

11.2

72

2 73

.4

149

15.1

84

8.

5 29

2.

9 M

EAN

AG

E (Y

EARS

) 33

.3

33.1

34

.2

35.3

30

.9

35.9

34

.1

*Tab

ulat

ions

for D

UI a

rres

ts b

y ag

e, s

ex, r

ace/

ethn

icity

and

cou

nty

are

foun

d in

App

endi

x Ta

ble

B1.

TABL

E 3b

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y SE

X, A

GE

AN

D R

AC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) SE

X A

GE

TOTA

L W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

19

8982

10

0.0

8517

0 42

.8

9049

7 45

.5

1261

0 6.

3 10

705

5.4

MA

LE

UN

DER

18

1402

0.

8 69

5 49

.6

590

42.1

65

4.

6 52

3.

7

18-2

0 11

354

6.5

4100

36

.1

6381

56

.2

417

3.7

456

4.0

21-3

0 70

878

40.

6 22

025

31.1

41

982

59.2

34

20

4.8

3451

4.

9

31-4

0

5268

9 30

.1

2130

7 40

.4

2448

9 46

.5

3808

7.

2 30

85

5.9

41

-50

2524

1 14

.4

1261

7 50

.0

9008

35

.7

1902

7.

5 17

14

6.8

51

-60

9138

5.

2 51

55

56.4

25

77

28.2

87

3 9.

6 53

3 5.

8

61-7

0 31

81

1.8

1978

62

.2

718

22.6

32

7 10

.3

158

5.0

71

& A

BOV

E 87

4 0.

5 62

5 71

.5

148

16.9

74

8.

5 27

3.

1

TOTA

L

1747

57

100.

0 68

502

39.2

85

893

49.1

10

886

6.2

9476

5.

4 FE

MA

LE

UN

DER

18

252

1.0

182

72.2

60

23

.8

4 1.

6 6

2.4

18

-20

1219

5.

0 82

0 67

.3

286

23.5

47

3.

9

66

5.4

21

-30

8263

34

.1

5429

65

.7

1819

22

.0

521

6.3

494

6.0

31

-40

8413

34

.7

5784

68

.8

1532

18

.2

711

8.5

386

4.6

41

-50

4382

18

.1

3127

71

.4

710

16.2

33

9 7.

7 20

6 4.

7

51-6

0 12

14

5.0

934

76.9

15

5 12

.8

69

5.7

56

4.6

61

-70

372

1.5

295

79.3

41

11

.0

23

6.2

13

3.5

71

& A

BOV

E 11

0 0.

5 97

88

.2

1 0.

9 10

9.

1 2

1.8

TO

TAL

2422

5 10

0.0

1666

8 68

.8

4604

19

.0

1724

7.

1 12

29

5.1

Page 22: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 2: CONVICTIONS Data on convictions resulting from court adjudication of DUI arrests are reported directly to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on court abstracts of conviction. The following tables compile and crosstabulate these conviction data by demographic, geographic, and adjudicative categories. Table 4: 1994 DUI Convictions by Age and Sex. This table crosstabulates statewide DUI conviction information by age and sex. Corresponding county-specific conviction data are presented in Appendix Table B2. Table 5: Matchable 1994 DUI Convictions by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex. This table displays DUI conviction information by age, race/ethnicity, and sex. "Matchable" DUI convictions are those which are traceable to a DUI arrest appearing on the MACR system. Because not all arrests could be matched to an existing record, these conviction totals underestimate the total number of actual convictions. Table 6: Adjusted 1994 DUI Conviction Rates and Relative Likelihood of Conviction, by Age and Race/Ethnicity. This table shows the relative probability of a DUI arrest leading to a DUI conviction, by age and race/ethnicity. DUI conviction totals from categories in Table 5 ("matchable DUI convictions") were increased by the proportion which matchable convictions constituted of "total DUI convictions," shown in Table 7, to arrive at the adjusted DUI conviction rates. Without this adjustment DUI conviction rates would be underestimated using the conviction data from Table 5 because not all reported convictions are "matchable" to an arrest. Table 7: Total Conviction Data for 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table portrays county and statewide DUI-related conviction data as reported to the DMV on court abstracts of conviction. Corresponding court-specific data are shown in Appendix Table B3. Convictions not reported to DMV are considered nonconvictions for the purposes of this report. Actual nonconvictions include cases where the DUI arrest was not filed, not prosecuted, or resulted in a not guilty verdict. The DUI conviction rates by county were calculated by comparing the county conviction totals with DOJ arrest totals. Because not all 1994 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these conviction totals and rates will slightly underestimate the "final" figures. The DUI conviction rates shown in the "DUI Summary Statistics: 1985-1995" table at the very beginning of this report include an estimate of these late convictions, and thus are slightly higher than those shown in

10

Page 23: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Tables 7 and 8. Conviction variables include felony and misdemeanor DUI convictions, alcohol- and nonalcohol-related reckless driving convictions, convictions of "other" lesser offenses, and DUI convictions dismissed or found unconstitutional. DUI arrest dates from the DOJ MACR system were matched to driver record violation dates to identify nonalcohol-related reckless driving and "other" convictions. The average (mean) adjudication time lags from DUI arrest to conviction, and from conviction to update on the DMV database, were calculated for each county. Table 8: Adjudication Status of 1994 DUI Arrests by County. This table shows the adjudication status (court disposition) of 1994 DUI arrests, by county. Included are the percentages of arrests which have resulted in DUI convictions (misdemeanor or felony), reckless driving convictions (alcohol-related or nonalcohol-related), convictions of "other" offenses, or no reported conviction, as of the date of writing. Again, because not all 1994 DUI arrests have yet been adjudicated, these rates will slightly underestimate the "final" rate for each category, excepting the category "no record of any conviction," which will be slightly reduced (approximately 1-2%) by the eventual adjudication of these few late cases. Table 9: 1994 Reported Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Levels of DUI Convictions. This table shows the frequency of reported positive BAC levels for DUI convictions. Because of more complete reporting of BAC levels on APS reporting forms (73%), those reports are used (beginning with last year's report) to calculate statewide BAC levels. Abstracts of conviction, which were used in prior evaluations, report BAC levels in only 51% of cases. However, the two sources yield almost identical estimates of BAC levels. Table 10: 1994 DUI Convictions by Offender Status and Average Reported BAC Level. This table displays the proportions of convicted DUI offenders by offender status (number of prior convictions), and the average (mean) BAC level from APS reporting forms and abstracts of conviction, for each offense level. Figure 4 (below) shows, for the years 1985 to 1995, the number of DUI abstracts received to date by DMV from the courts, the estimated final number of DUI convictions which will ultimately be received, and the estimated final DUI conviction rate.

11

Page 24: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

125000

150000

175000

200000

225000

250000

275000

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

YEAR

Estimated final conviction rate 70% 69% 69% 67% 67% 70% 72% 72% 72% 72% 73%

Note . Estimated DUI convictions = see footnote 3 to "DUI Summary Statistics: 1985-1995."

Figure 4 . DUI abstracts received by DMV and DUI conviction volume and rateestimates, 1985-1995.

Estimated final DUI convictions

DUI convictions received to date

Based on these data, the following statements can be made: Statewide Adjudication Parameters:

The estimated DUI conviction rate for 1995 (73%) is slightly higher than the estimated conviction rate of each of the previous 4 years (all at 72%).

Among 1994 DUI arrests, 70.6% have resulted to date in DUI convictions (felony or

misdemeanor). This is slightly higher than the corresponding DUI conviction rate for 1993 arrests (70.0%), as reported last year.

8.9% of 1994 DUI arrests resulted in reckless driving convictions, with 18% of these

not correctly reported as alcohol-related. Both of these rates are similar to the corresponding 1993 rates.

2.4% of 1994 DUI arrests have resulted in convictions of offenses other than DUI or

reckless driving, the same rate as for 1993 DUI arrests.

18.0% of 1994 DUI arrests have not yet resulted in any conviction on DMV’s records, compared to 18.8% in 1993 and 19.2% in 1992. As additional cases are adjudicated and reported by the courts, this figure will decrease slightly.

12

Page 25: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The average reported BAC level for all convicted DUI offenders in 1994, using APS reporting forms as the data source, was 0.168%, very slightly down from the 1993 level of 0.169%, yet still more than double the illegal per se BAC limit of 0.08%. The average BAC level of these offenders, using court abstracts of conviction as the data source, was 0.166%, the same as for 1993 and 1992 offenders.

Average BAC levels increase slightly as a function of the number of prior DUI

convictions, from 0.164% BAC for a first offense to 0.187% BAC for a fourth or subsequent offense.

Among 1994 convicted DUI offenders, 68.8% were first offenders, 21.7% were

second offenders, 6.8% were third offenders, and 2.7% were on their fourth or more offense. (The statutorily defined time period for counting priors in California is seven years.) The proportion of repeat offenders (31.2%) among all convicted DUI offenders has decreased slightly each year since 1989 (at which time 37% of all convictions were repeat offenses).

The average adjudication time lags were 2.8 months from DUI arrest to conviction

and 3.2 months from conviction to update on the DMV database, totalling 6.0 months from arrest to update on the offender's driving record. These time lags have increased slightly in each of the last two years.

Variation by County:

Among the larger counties, 1994 DUI conviction rates varied from a high of 87.4% in Ventura to lows of 56.5% in San Bernardino and 56.9% in Fresno. Los Angeles County, which accounted for almost 25% of all DUI arrests in the state, had a DUI conviction rate of 68.4%.

Among the smaller counties, 1994 DUI conviction rates varied from highs of 87.7%

in Nevada and 87.4% in Amador, to a low of 42.0% in Trinity.

The rates at which DUI arrests were plea-bargained to alcohol-related reckless driving convictions varied from 19.3% in Humboldt County to 0% in Marin and Ventura counties.

The percentage of DUI arrests that were improperly adjudicated as nonalcohol-

related reckless driving convictions varied from 0% to 6.6%. Three counties had rates of 4% or more: Imperial, Calaveras, and San Francisco.

13

Page 26: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The percentage of DUI arrests adjudicated as minor convictions ("other" convictions) varied from 0% to 5.7%. San Luis Obispo, Marin, Los Angeles, Calaveras, and Del Norte counties had rates of 4% or more.

In seven counties, the proportion of arrestees not showing a conviction of any

offense exceeded 30%. These counties were Trinity, Sutter, Fresno, Yolo, Tulare, San Bernardino, and Imperial. Nine counties had nonconviction rates of less than 10%: Nevada, San Benito, San Mateo, Kern, El Dorado, Napa, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Amador.

Variation by Court:

As was true for prior years, the 1994 superior court time lags were generally longer than municipal court time lags, presumably due to the type of DUI case (felony) being adjudicated.

Municipal court time lags from arrest to conviction (for courts with more than a

handful of reported convictions) varied from a high of 5.0 months in the Fontana (San Bernardino County) court to a low of 1.3 months for the Los Angeles Metro court, which is also the busiest court in the state.

Statewide, the proportion of reckless driving convictions (alcohol and nonalcohol),

relative to DUI convictions, was about 11% in 1994. Among the courts which substantially exceeded this statewide average were Malibu and Sacramento, which adjudicated 33% and 22% of their DUI cases, respectively as reckless driving.

Statewide, 18% of all DUI-related reckless driving convictions are designated as

nonalcohol. In Riverside County, however, the Superior Court reported 98% (145 out of 147) of its DUI-related reckless driving convictions as nonalcohol.

Demographic Characteristics:

The average age of a convicted DUI offender in 1994 was 33.9 years.

44.2% of 1994 DUI convictees were aged 30 years or younger and 76.4% were 40 years or younger.

Females comprised 12.2% of all 1994 convicted DUI offenders, compared to 12.3%

in 1993, 12.1% in 1992, 12.2% in 1991, 11.7% in 1990, and 11.4% in 1989.

14

Page 27: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The racial/ethnic distribution of 1994 DUI convictions (White = 43.3%; Hispanic = 45.1%; Black = 6.5%; Other = 5.1%) generally paralleled that of 1994 arrests, although Whites were somewhat more likely, and other groups somewhat less likely, to be convicted of the offense (as shown in Figure 5 below).

1.040.97 0.97 0.99

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

REL

ATI

VE

PRO

BA

BIL

ITY

White OtherBlackHispanic

Figure 5 . Relative likelihood of conviction by race/ethnicity. (Adjustedconviction rate by ethnicity ÷ overall conviction rate.)

TABLE 4: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY AGE AND SEX*

TOTAL MALE FEMALE AGE N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 145923 100.0 128182 87.8 17741 12.2

UNDER 18 421 0.3 370 87.9 51 12.1

18-20 6323 4.3 5765 91.2 558 8.8

21-30 57838 39.6 51889 89.7 5949 10.3

31-40 47000 32.2 40447 86.1 6553 13.9

41-50 22646 15.5 19400 85.7 3246 14.3

51-60 8132 5.6 7138 87.8 994 12.2

61-70 2820 1.9 2506 88.9 314 11.1

71 & ABOVE 743 0.5 667 89.8 76 10.2

MEAN AGE (YEARS) 33.9 33.8 35.0

*County-specific tabulations of 1994 DUI convictions by age and sex are shown in Appendix Table B2.

15

Page 28: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

16

TABL

E 5:

MA

TCH

ABL

E 19

94 D

UI C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

BY A

GE,

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

AN

D S

EX

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

AG

E TO

TAL

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

M

ALE

FE

MA

LE

TOTA

L BY

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

0.71

1.

00

0.73

1.

04

0.68

0.

97

0.68

0.

97

0.70

0.

99

71 &

ABO

VE

0.71

1.

00

0.70

1.

00

0.78

1.

10

0.69

0.

98

0.61

0.

87

UN

DER

18

0.45

0.

64

0.56

0.

79

0.36

0.

52

0.29

0.

41

0.38

0.

54

18-2

0 0.

62

0.88

0.

66

0.93

0.

61

0.87

0.

54

0.76

0.

58

0.82

21-3

0 0.

68

0.96

0.

73

1.03

0.

65

0.92

0.

66

0.94

0.

68

0.96

31-4

0 0.

73

1.04

0.

74

1.05

0.

73

1.03

0.

70

1.00

0.

74

1.04

41-5

0 0.

76

1.08

0.

76

1.07

0.

78

1.11

0.

70

1.00

0.

73

1.04

51-6

0 0.

77

1.09

0.

78

1.10

0.

79

1.12

0.

75

1.06

0.

70

0.99

61-7

0 0.

77

1.09

0.

76

1.08

0.

82

1.16

0.

73

1.03

0.

75

1.06

0.5

392

64.9

56

9.

3 89

14

.7

0 0.

0 51

8.

4 1

0.2

15

2.5

0 0.

0

0.5

308

44.3

83

11

.9

254

36.5

7

1.0

20

2.9

1 0.

1 15

2.

2 7

1.0

100.

0 44

326

34.8

10

879

8.5

5455

0 42

.8

2973

2.

3 72

29

5.7

1062

0.

8 58

78

4.6

659

0.5

39.9

14

675

28.8

36

43

7.2

2623

3 51

.5

1190

2.

3 24

47

4.8

352

0.7

2132

4.

2 26

9 0.

5

31.0

13

921

35.2

38

02

9.6

1579

2 39

.9

1025

2.

6 23

91

6.0

436

1.1

2009

5.

1 21

5 0.

5

1.9

1317

54

.4

212

8.8

524

21.7

30

1.

2 23

3 9.

6 18

0.

7 77

3.

2 9

0.4

15.0

81

49

42.6

20

14

10.5

59

48

31.1

46

6 2.

4 12

41

6.5

181

0.9

1040

5.

4 10

3 0.

5

5.7

2173

29

.9

407

5.6

3958

54

.5

165

2.3

246

3.4

26

0.4

258

3.6

28

0.4

5.4

3391

49

.1

662

9.6

1752

25

.4

90

1.3

600

8.7

47

0.7

332

4.8

28

0.4

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

1275

56

UN

DER

18

695

18-2

0 72

61

21-3

0 50

941

31-4

0 39

591

41-5

0 19

142

51-6

0 69

02

61-7

0 24

20

71 &

ABO

VE

604

TA

BLE

6: A

DJU

STED

199

4 D

UI C

ON

VIC

TIO

N R

ATE

S1 AN

D R

ELA

TIV

E LI

KEL

IHO

OD

2 OF

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

BY

AG

E A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

R

AC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y

TOTA

L BY

AG

E W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

AG

E A

DJU

STED

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

RATE

REL

ATI

VE

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

AD

JUST

ED

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

R

ATE

RELA

TIV

E LI

KEL

IHO

OD

AD

JUST

ED

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

RA

TE

RELA

TIV

E LI

KEL

IHO

OD

AD

JUST

ED

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

R

ATE

REL

ATI

VE

LIK

ELIH

OO

D

AD

JUST

ED

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

R

ATE

RELA

TIV

E LI

KEL

IHO

OD

Adj

uste

d D

UI

Con

vict

ion

Rat

es=

The

mat

chab

le D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n ra

te p

ropo

rtion

ally

adj

uste

d to

the

over

all D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n ra

te.

1 Rel

ativ

e Li

kelih

ood

= A

djus

ted

DU

I Con

vict

ion

Rat

e O

vera

ll To

tal D

UI C

onvi

ctio

n R

ate

2

Page 29: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

17

TABL

E 7:

TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES*

DU

I

DU

I A

VER

AG

E D

UI A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

MIS

D

FELO

NY

ALC

OH

OL

NO

NA

LCO

HO

L O

THER

D

ISM

ISSE

D**

/ TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

DU

I D

UI

REC

KLE

SS

REC

KLE

SS

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S U

NC

ON

ST**

* V

IOLA

TIO

N

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

DM

V U

PDA

TE

STA

TEW

IDE

70.6

14

3794

21

29

1517

1 32

44

4983

49

/411

2.

8 3.

2

ALA

MED

A

69.0

49

30

47

589

71

273

0/22

3.

5 2.

4 A

LPIN

E 62

.7

37

0 9

1 0

0/0

4.7

1.2

AM

AD

OR

87.4

15

5 5

2 2

1 0/

1 2.

8 2.

8 BU

TTE

73.1

93

8 10

17

0 9

10

0/10

3.

3 3.

1 C

ALA

VER

AS

63.4

18

1 1

27

14

12

1/0

2.2

2.2

CO

LUSA

68

.9

206

2 32

8

1 1/

1 2.

2 2.

9 C

ON

TRA

CO

STA

69

.8

2852

28

38

5 35

59

0/

28

4.0

2.5

DEL

NO

RTE

62.4

18

1 8

55

9 12

0/

0 3.

1 6.

1 EL

DO

RAD

O

85.7

82

1 21

50

10

11

0/

3 2.

7 5.

4 FR

ESN

O

56.9

37

74

132

515

56

48

3/3

4.2

5.9

GLE

NN

74

.8

228

4 25

4

8 0/

3 2.

5 5.

1 H

UM

BOLD

T 48

.0

576

16

238

38

47

0/3

3.2

3.3

IMPE

RIA

L 56

.2

921

3 10

5 10

9 12

0/

1 3.

2 3.

0 IN

YO

69.9

24

0 2

45

5 2

3/0

3.4

3.9

KER

N

81.1

40

71

60

391

55

173

3/19

2.

5 4.

4 K

ING

S 66

.4

745

14

54

7 15

0/

4 2.

3 4.

1 LA

KE

69.3

45

2 7

27

8 16

0/

1 3.

8 4.

3 LA

SSEN

78

.6

195

3 8

2 4

0/0

2.4

2.3

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

68.4

34

817

475

3576

90

7 21

42

4/89

2.

3 2.

6 M

AD

ERA

59

.7

672

20

103

11

9 1/

2 3.

6 5.

5 M

ARI

N

77.9

12

80

16

0 1

87

0/3

2.8

4.4

MA

RIPO

SA

62.7

****

15

1 4

21

0 1

0/0

2.8

2.1

MEN

DO

CIN

O

71.4

68

0 5

74

17

19

1/3

2.8

5.2

MER

CED

57

.9

1225

13

22

5 77

37

0/

1 3.

8 6.

1 M

OD

OC

52

.6

71

1 25

0

0 0/

1 3.

2 1.

7 M

ON

O

64.3

10

1 0

18

5 1

0/0

2.4

3.2

MO

NTE

REY

75.1

32

72

50

437

72

71

0/5

1.6

5.5

*Con

vict

ion

data

by

cour

t are

foun

d in

App

endi

x Ta

ble

B3.

**Th

ese

may

incl

ude

dism

issa

ls o

f pri

or fa

ilure

to a

ppea

r (FT

A) a

bstr

acts

. **

*The

se 1

994

arre

stee

s sho

wed

pri

or D

UIs

dec

lare

d un

cons

titut

iona

l on

thei

r rec

ords

. Th

e co

untie

s re

port

ed h

ere

are

thos

e in

whi

ch th

e cu

rren

t DU

I con

vict

ion

occu

rred

and

no

t nec

essa

rily

thos

e in

whi

ch a

pri

or c

onvi

ctio

n w

as d

ecla

red

unco

nstit

utio

nal.

****

The

calc

ulat

ion

of th

e co

nvic

tion

rate

was

bas

ed o

n to

tal a

rres

ts in

clud

inst

em.

yg

fede

ral D

UI a

rres

ts (Y

osem

ite N

atio

nal P

ark)

not

repo

rted

in th

e D

OJ M

AC

R s

Page 30: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

YUBA

71

.0

383

2 78

12

8

0/3

2.5

2.1

YOLO

55

.2

653

10

107

19

6 0/

2 2.

3 2.

6

18

TABL

E 7:

TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES* -

con

tinue

d

D

UI

D

UI

AV

ERA

GE

DU

I AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

NA

PA

85.6

90

6 2 3

51

16

9

1/3

2.3

3.2

SIER

RA

60.5

23

0

6 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 3.

6

SUTT

ER

52.2

45

9 10

6 3

3

4 0/

1 2.

2 4.

1

PLA

CER

82

.0

130 8

27

33

18

16

0/

2 3.

1 3.

1

SHA

STA

68

.0

688

16

151

16

8 0/

0 3.

4 2.

9

TULA

RE

63.7

23

89

43

63

24

31

3/8

3.0

3.7

TRIN

ITY

42.0

10

3 4

22

1 1

0/0

3.6

2.9

PLU

MA

S 66

.7

122

4 28

4

3 0/

0 2.

4 3.

6

SOLA

NO

72

.1

1291

14

18

7 29

28

1/

7 2.

4 6.

5

ORA

NG

E 79

.9

124 0

2 11

4 62

2 10

7 28

4 4/

24

3.0

2.1

NEV

AD

A

87.7

41

1 11

41

8

4 0/

0 2.

5 5.

1

TEH

AM

A

70.9

32

5 13

54

4

8 1/

1 2.

7 4.

9

SON

OM

A

73.0

23

35

35

455

33

58

0/22

3.

0 4.

8

SISK

IYO

U

72.5

25

4 4

45

3 4

1/0

2.7

3.8

VEN

TURA

87

.4

4308

38

0

2 84

2/

4 2.

2 3.

5

RIV

ERSI

DE

64.8

51

82

121

320

257

145

6/5

3.8

2.7

TUO

LUM

NE

71.6

22

1 8

31

0 5

0/0

2.9

5.0

STA

NIS

LAU

S 72

.1

2002

33

28

7 59

32

0/

10

2.9

2.3

SAC

RAM

ENTO

66

.0

5053

16

4 11

50

223

104

3/12

3.

3 2.

0

UN

CO

NST

***

VIO

LATI

ON

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

UN

TY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DIS

MIS

SED

**/

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RATE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

TO C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

TO D

MV

UPD

ATE

SAN

BEN

ITO

80

.7

202

3 36

5

4 0/

11

2.8

7.2

SAN

BER

NA

RDIN

O

56.5

59

56

91

647

238

276

3/15

3.

7 3.

0 SA

N D

IEG

O

77.1

12

118

83

824

203

204

0/17

2.

6 3.

9 SA

N F

RAN

CIS

CO

61

.0

1020

11

18

8 68

16

0/

5 3.

1 1.

2 SA

N JO

AQ

UIN

71

.5

2772

42

21

6 50

11

6 1/

5 2.

2 2.

5 SA

N L

UIS

OBI

SPO

68

.7

1602

13

38

0 45

13

3 2/

7 2.

4 5.

6 SA

N M

ATE

O

80.9

36

91

46

494

28

75

3/6

2.5

4.0

SAN

TA B

ARB

ARA

71

.8

2719

36

57

1 10

8 99

1/

2 2.

0 4.

4 SA

NTA

CLA

RA

81.0

72

76

151

542

89

136

0/13

3.

7 2.

5 SA

NTA

CR

UZ

70.3

18

48

12

273

39

29

0/22

2.

3 5.

8

Page 31: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 8: ADJUDICATION STATUS OF 1994 DUI ARRESTS BY COUNTY*

COUNTY

DUI CONVICTIONS

RECKLESS DRIVING CONVICTIONS

% OTHER

% NO RECORD

% MISDEMEANOR

% FELONY

% ALCOHOL RELATED

% NONALCOHOL RELATED

CONVICTIONS OF ANY CONVICTION

STATEWIDE 69.6 1.0 7.3 1.6 2.4 18.0 ALAMEDA 68.4 0.7 8.2 1.0 3.8 18.0 ALPINE 62.7 0.0 15.3 1.7 0.0 20.3 AMADOR 84.7 2.7 1.1 1.1 0.5 9.8 BUTTE 72.3 0.8 13.1 0.7 0.8 12.3 CALAVERAS 63.1 0.3 9.4 4.9 4.2 18.1 COLUSA 68.2 0.7 10.6 2.6 0.3 17.5 CONTRA COSTA 69.2 0.7 9.3 0.8 1.4 18.5 DEL NORTE 59.7 2.6 18.2 3.0 4.0 12.5 EL DORADO 83.5 2.1 5.1 1.0 1.1 7.1 FRESNO 55.0 1.9 7.5 0.8 0.7 34.0 GLENN 73.5 1.3 8.1 1.3 2.6 13.2 HUMBOLDT 46.7 1.3 19.3 3.1 3.8 25.9 IMPERIAL 56.0 0.2 6.4 6.6 0.7 30.1 INYO 69.4 0.6 13.0 1.4 0.6 15.0 KERN 79.9 1.2 7.7 1.1 3.4 6.8 KINGS 65.2 1.2 4.7 0.6 1.3 26.9 LAKE 68.3 1.1 4.1 1.2 2.4 23.0 LASSEN 77.4 1.2 3.2 0.8 1.6 15.9 LOS ANGELES 67.5 0.9 6.9 1.8 4.2 18.8 MADERA 58.0 1.7 8.9 0.9 0.8 29.7 MARIN 76.9 1.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 16.8 MARIPOSA** 62.7 1.7 8.7 0.0 0.4 26.5 MENDOCINO 70.8 0.5 7.7 1.8 2.0 17.2 MERCED 57.3 0.6 10.5 3.6 1.7 26.2 MODOC 51.8 0.7 18.2 0.0 0.0 29.2 MONO 64.3 0.0 11.5 3.2 0.6 20.4 MONTEREY 74.0 1.1 9.9 1.6 1.6 11.8 NAPA 83.5 2.1 4.7 1.5 0.8 7.4 NEVADA 85.4 2.3 8.5 1.7 0.8 1.2 ORANGE 79.2 0.7 4.0 0.7 1.8 13.6 PLACER 80.3 1.7 2.0 1.1 1.0 13.9 PLUMAS 64.6 2.1 14.8 2.1 1.6 14.8 RIVERSIDE 63.3 1.5 3.9 3.1 1.8 26.4 SACRAMENTO 63.9 2.1 14.5 2.8 1.3 15.3 SAN BENITO 79.5 1.2 14.2 2.0 1.6 1.6 SAN BERNARDINO 55.7 0.9 6.0 2.2 2.6 32.6 SAN DIEGO 76.6 0.5 5.2 1.3 1.3 15.1 SAN FRANCISCO 60.4 0.7 11.1 4.0 0.9 22.9 SAN JOAQUIN 70.4 1.1 5.5 1.3 2.9 18.8 SAN LUIS OBISPO 68.1 0.6 16.2 1.9 5.7 7.6 SAN MATEO 79.9 1.0 10.7 0.6 1.6 6.2 SANTA BARBARA 70.9 0.9 14.9 2.8 2.6 7.9 SANTA CLARA 79.4 1.6 5.9 1.0 1.5 10.6 SANTA CRUZ 69.9 0.5 10.3 1.5 1.1 16.8 SHASTA 66.4 1.5 14.6 1.5 0.8 15.2 SIERRA 60.5 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 23.7 SISKIYOU 71.3 1.1 12.6 0.8 1.1 12.9 SOLANO 71.4 0.8 10.3 1.6 1.5 14.4 SONOMA 72.0 1.1 14.0 1.0 1.8 10.1 STANISLAUS 70.9 1.2 10.2 2.1 1.1 14.5 SUTTER 51.1 1.1 7.0 0.3 0.4 40.0 TEHAMA 68.1 2.7 11.3 0.8 1.7 15.3 TRINITY 40.4 1.6 8.6 0.4 0.4 48.6 TULARE 62.5 1.1 1.6 0.6 0.8 33.2 TUOLUMNE 69.1 2.5 9.7 0.0 1.6 17.2 VENTURA 86.7 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.7 10.8 YOLO 54.3 0.8 8.9 1.6 0.5 33.9 YUBA 70.7 0.4 14.4 2.2 1.5 10.9

*The percentages total to 100 by row (county). **The calculation of the conviction rates was based on total arrests including federal DUI arrests (Yosemite National Park) not reported in the DOJ

MACR system.

19

Page 32: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 9: 1994 REPORTED* BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION (BAC) LEVELS OF DUI CONVICTIONS

DUI CONVICTIONS ALCOHOL-RECKLESS CONVICTIONS

BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT BAC LEVEL FREQUENCY PERCENT

.01 63 0.1 .01 5 0.0

.02 45 0.0 .02 5 0.0

.03 52 0.0 .03 12 0.1

.04 58 0.1 .04 18 0.2

.05 81 0.1 .05 27 0.3

.06 106 0.1 .06 94 0.9

.07 248 0.2 .07 320 3.0

.08 1309 1.2 .08 2268 21.0

.09 2319 2.2 .09 2990 27.7

.10 4738 4.4 .10 2476 22.9

.11 6656 6.2 .11 1220 11.3

.12 7968 7.5 .12 496 4.6

.13 8160 7.6 .13 255 2.4

.14 8437 7.9 .14 148 1.4

.15 8401 7.9 .15 98 0.9

.16 8236 7.7 .16 95 0.9

.17 7665 7.2 .17 57 0.5

.18 6905 6.5 .18 51 0.5

.19 6159 5.8 .19 40 0.4

.20 5684 5.3 .20 23 0.2

.21 4769 4.5 .21 17 0.2

.22 3990 3.7 .22 16 0.1

.23 3275 3.1 .23 16 0.1

.24 2687 2.5 .24 11 0.1

.25 2092 2.0 .25 9 0.1

.26 1587 1.5 .26 6 0.1

.27 1270 1.2 .27 3 0.0

.28 927 0.9 .28 2 0.0

.29 730 0.7 .29 3 0.0

.30 564 0.5 .30 3 0.0

.31 396 0.4 .31 1 0.0

.32 309 0.3 .32 1 0.0

.33 245 0.2 .36 2 0.0

.34 169 0.2 .39 2 0.0

.35 139 0.1 .50+ 2 0.0

.36 80 0.1

.37 60 0.1

.38 60 0.1

.39 45 0.0

.40 31 0.0

.41 22 0.0

.42 21 0.0

.43 9 0.0

.44 2 0.0

.45 4 0.0

.46 4 0.0

.47 2 0.0

.49 1 0.0

.50+ 2 0.0 -------- ------- ---------- -------- -------

TOTAL 106782 100.0 TOTAL 10792 100.0 MEAN BAC .168 MEAN BAC .098

*The source of BAC data is the APS reporting form for convicted DUI offenders, rather than the abstract of conviction for those offenders, which was the data source in prior reports. This change in data source was made because of the more complete BAC reporting on APS forms (73% of total) versus court abstracts (with only 51% showing BAC levels).

20

Page 33: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 10: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY OFFENDER STATUS AND AVERAGE

REPORTED BAC LEVEL

DUI OFFENDER STATUS

PERCENT

AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM APS REPORTING

FORM (%)

AVERAGE BAC LEVEL FROM CONVICTION

ABSTRACT (%)

STATEWIDE 100.0 .168 .166

1ST DUI 68.8 .164 .163

2ND DUI 21.7 .175 .174

3RD DUI 6.8 .181 .181

4TH+ DUI 2.7 .187 .185

21

Page 34: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 3: POSTCONVICTION SANCTIONS Data on court sanctions assigned to convicted DUI offenders were taken from DUI abstracts of conviction for offenders arrested in 1994. Also included are counts of postconviction DMV license actions for selected offender groups, while total counts of all license actions, including administrative per se (APS) license suspensions and revocations, are shown in the Administrative Actions Section. APS actions (effective July 1990) are initiated by law enforcement immediately upon arrest for DUI, and are administered independent of the criminal adjudication process. This section includes the following tables: Table 11: 1994 DUI Court Sanctions by DUI Offender Status. This table shows the frequency of specific court sanctions statewide by number of prior DUI convictions. The specific court sanctions tallied include percentages of probation, jail, alcohol treatment programs (first offender, SB 38 second offender, and 30-month third offender programs), license restriction, court suspension, and ignition interlock. Crosstabulations of sanctions by county, court, and number of prior convictions appear in Appendix Table B4. Table 12: 1994 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - First Offenders. This table displays the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations (such as first offender alcohol program plus license restriction) by county for first DUI offenders. License suspensions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) suspensions. The sanction combination groups portrayed in this table, as well as Table 13, were defined according to the conventions described in the "Evaluation Methods and Results" portion of Section 4: "Postconviction Sanction Effectiveness." Table 13: 1994 DUI Sanction Combinations by County - Repeat Offenders. This table shows the frequency of commonly assigned court sanction combinations by county for second, third, and fourth (or subsequent) DUI offenders. License actions include both court and DMV postconviction (non-APS) license suspensions and revocations. From the data in these and the Appendix tables, it is evident that the use of alternative sanctions continued to vary widely by county, court, and offender status in 1994. For example:

22

Page 35: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Statewide Parameters:

The most frequently applied court sanction among all convicted DUI offenders was probation (96.1%), while the least frequently used court sanction was ignition interlock (4.6%). DUI offenders were sentenced to jail in 77.6% of the cases. (However, in many jurisdictions, jail is often served as community service rather than actual jail time.)

Figure 6 (below) graphically displays the statewide data from Table 11 showing the frequency of specific types of court-ordered sanctions among all convicted DUI offenders. Because virtually all offenders receive more than one type of sanction, the cumulative percentage adds to more than 100%.

96.1

77.6 77.3

42.3

6.7 4.6

0

25

50

75

100

PER

CEN

TAG

E

Figure 6 . Frequency of court-ordered DUI sanctions (1994).

Probation Jail Treatmentprogram

Licenserestriction

Court licensesuspension

Ignitioninterlock

County Variation:

The proportion of first DUI offenders sentenced to jail varied by county from less than 10% in Marin to 100% in Tuolumne.

Counties such as Calaveras, Lassen, Napa, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Shasta,

Sierra, and Tuolumne preferred to assign first offenders to treatment program and jail (over 85%) rather than treatment program and license restriction (less than 7%). Humboldt, Marin, Plumas, and San Bernardino counties assigned treatment program and jail to less than 2% of their first offenders. Inyo, Marin, and Orange

23

Page 36: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

counties assigned treatment program and license restriction to over 80% of first offenders.

Counties departing from using typical first offender sanction combinations were

Imperial, Mariposa, Riverside, and San Bernardino, as shown by relatively high percentages (over 10%) in the "other" category. ("Other" includes license restriction without treatment program assignment, probation only, and other unofficial nonstatutory sanction combinations.)

Court Variation:

In Los Angeles County, two municipal courts (Lancaster and Burbank) used jail as a sanction in 95% or more of their DUI sentences. At the other extreme, three courts (Santa Monica, Malibu, and Avalon) used jail as a sanction in less than a third of their DUI sentences.

Although courts required about 14% of repeat offenders to install the interlock

device statewide, the Oakland court required three-fourths of such offenders to use interlock.

All of the municipal courts in Contra Costa and Alameda counties required jail in

95% or more of their DUI sentences, while Marin’s San Rafael court used jail in only 27.7% of their cases.

7 out of 11 municipal courts in Fresno sentenced over 95% of their DUI offenders to

jail, while 6 out of 12 municipal courts in San Bernardino county used jail for less than a third of their DUI sentences.

Variation by Offender Status:

70% of 1994 first DUI offenders were sentenced to jail, compared to over 90% of all repeat offenders.

83% of first DUI offenders were assigned to alcohol treatment programs, along with

78% of second offenders, 42% of third offenders, and 19% of fourth or more DUI offenders. (By statute, however, all repeat offenders must eventually complete

24

Page 37: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

specified alcohol treatment programs in order to be eligible for license reinstatement.)

10% of first DUI offenders and 25% of second DUI offenders received DMV or court

license suspensions after adjudication. Since July 1990, of course, all DUI offenders with BAC levels of 0.08% or more are also subject to 30 days to one-year administrative license suspension/revocation under the APS law.

Only 14% of repeat DUI offenders were assigned ignition interlock in 1994, in spite

of the mandatory interlock law for all repeat offenders (AB 2851 - Freidman), which took effect on July 1, 1993.

TABLE 11: 1994 DUI COURT SANCTIONS BY DUI OFFENDER STATUS*

DUI

OFFENDER STATUS

TOTAL

PROBATION

JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROGRAM

SB 38 ALCOHOL PROGRAM

30-MONTH PROGRAM

LICENSE

RESTRICTION

COURT

SUSPENSION

IGNITION

INTERLOCK

% % % % % % % %

STATEWIDE 145926 96.1 77.6 57.3 19.8 0.2 42.3 6.7 4.6

1ST DUI 100339 97.7 70.2 80.6 2.3 0.0 37.7 4.8 0.3

2ND DUI 31675 96.9 94.4 7.2 70.3 0.2 66.1 9.4 16.1

3RD DUI 9902 92.0 91.5 3.0 37.3 1.4 26.3 16.2 11.7

4TH+ DUI 4007 60.5 94.8 2.5 16.1 0.4 7.0 10.4 3.2

*Entries represent percentages of 1994 DUI convictees receiving each sanction by offender status. Sanctions within each offender status group (row) are not independent; therefore, row percentages always add to more than 100%. Percentages of sanctions by county and court appear in Appendix Table B4.

25

Page 38: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 12: 1994 DUI SANCTION COMBINATIONS BY COUNTY - FIRST OFFENDERS

COUNTY

TOTAL (100%)

DMV OR COURT

SUSPENSION

JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL

PROG + JAIL

1ST OFFENDER ALCOHOL PROG + RESTRICTION

SB 38 ALCOHOL PROG +

RESTRICTION*

OTHER

N % % % % % % STATEWIDE 100339 9.8 5.1 46.0 31.2 4.8 3.1 ALAMEDA 3297 12.9 5.0 76.8 1.9 3.2 0.3 ALPINE 26 3.8 0.0 19.2 69.2 3.8 3.8 AMADOR 104 8.7 49.0 40.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 BUTTE 608 25.8 2.6 69.2 1.2 0.7 0.5 CALAVERAS 129 2.3 3.1 89.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 COLUSA 115 8.7 10.4 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 CONTRA COSTA 1898 7.3 9.8 77.9 2.2 2.1 0.8 DEL NORTE 130 17.7 9.2 68.5 0.8 3.1 0.8 EL DORADO 542 8.7 29.2 36.9 22.3 0.7 2.2 FRESNO 2439 14.6 5.8 49.0 25.3 2.7 2.7 GLENN 132 9.8 3.8 75.0 1.5 8.3 1.5 HUMBOLDT 401 13.2 3.0 1.0 74.8 0.5 7.5 IMPERIAL 672 1.3 9.5 20.7 56.1 1.5 10.9 INYO 139 4.3 1.4 7.2 84.2 0.7 2.2 KERN 2532 12.4 16.8 65.7 1.8 0.9 2.4 KINGS 486 22.0 11.3 63.2 0.4 2.7 0.4 LAKE 278 10.4 4.7 79.9 2.5 2.5 0.0 LASSEN 143 11.9 0.7 86.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 LOS ANGELES 25264 9.4 2.8 24.2 59.4 1.8 2.5 MADERA 436 13.3 4.6 77.8 1.6 1.8 0.9 MARIN 945 6.8 0.1 0.5 89.2 1.1 2.3 MARIPOSA 118 29.7 5.1 39.0 7.6 0.0 18.6 MENDOCINO 437 10.3 4.1 70.0 9.6 4.6 1.4 MERCED 755 8.3 3.3 78.5 4.4 3.8 1.6 MODOC 55 14.5 1.8 74.5 7.3 1.8 0.0 MONO 63 0.0 4.8 69.8 6.3 12.7 6.3 MONTEREY 2143 15.5 4.3 77.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 NAPA 618 4.7 5.8 86.4 1.0 1.3 0.8 NEVADA 284 9.9 4.6 70.1 9.5 3.9 2.1 ORANGE 9205 4.8 0.8 9.2 81.8 1.6 1.8 PLACER 927 7.2 5.9 73.1 10.1 1.8 1.7 PLUMAS 87 11.5 1.1 1.1 75.9 5.7 4.6 RIVERSIDE 3783 5.7 10.2 25.2 33.2 1.4 24.2 SACRAMENTO 3329 8.2 4.2 78.4 2.3 4.8 2.1 SAN BENITO 125 43.2 9.6 44.0 0.8 2.4 0.0 SAN BERNARDINO 4314 11.5 10.1 0.3 0.2 65.5** 12.5 SAN DIEGO 9089 7.8 3.5 53.9 30.8 3.1 0.9 SAN FRANCISCO 770 7.3 1.7 80.9 8.8 0.8 0.5 SAN JOAQUIN 1772 10.7 12.1 74.2 0.5 1.9 0.7 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1043 4.1 3.2 91.1 0.0 1.2 0.4 SAN MATEO 2579 6.2 2.7 88.3 0.8 1.5 0.5 SANTA BARBARA 1814 13.9 1.7 20.0 58.5 0.4 5.5 SANTA CLARA 4790 20.3 4.3 63.5 8.6 2.0 1.4 SANTA CRUZ 1237 11.1 2.9 80.8 3.8 0.4 1.0 SHASTA 425 6.1 3.1 88.5 2.1 0.2 0.0 SIERRA 15 0.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 SISKIYOU 176 10.2 7.4 77.3 1.1 2.3 1.7 SOLANO 822 10.2 4.4 79.9 2.8 1.5 1.2 SONOMA 1452 8.6 32.2 56.1 1.0 0.3 1.9 STANISLAUS 1308 7.1 7.1 80.9 0.6 3.8 0.5 SUTTER 296 9.8 4.4 83.1 2.4 0.3 0.0 TEHAMA 237 20.3 2.5 68.8 7.6 0.4 0.4 TRINITY 75 14.7 2.7 77.3 2.7 2.7 0.0 TULARE 1557 8.2 8.2 75.2 1.5 6.2 0.8 TUOLUMNE 123 8.9 1.6 89.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 VENTURA 3110 12.2 2.7 82.3 0.7 1.8 0.4 YOLO 453 4.6 2.0 76.8 1.8 14.1 0.7 YUBA 237 10.5 1.7 84.4 0.4 0.0 3.0

Note: The vast majority of convicted DUI offenders also receive fine and probation. *Includes referral to alcohol clinics and 30-month programs. **The majority of these are referrals to alcohol clinics.

26

Page 39: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

NA

PA

311

14.0

30

.6

55.5

22

9 43

.9

54.4

1.

8 57

80

.0

4.0

16.0

25

KIN

GS

273

49. 7

30

.7

19.6

17

9 89

.6

7.5

3.0

67

88.9

0.

0 11

.1

27

MO

NTE

REY

1179

52

.3

4.0

43.7

77

8 81

.1

15.0

3.

9 28

0 97

.5

2.5

0.0

121

KER

N

1599

69

.2

7.2

23.6

10

00

91.3

3.

7 5.

0 38

0 95

.0

0.0

5.0

219

27

TABL

E 13

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

CO

MBI

NA

TIO

NS

BY C

OU

NTY

-

GLE

NN

10

0 39

.0

40.7

20

.3

59

87.5

12

.5

0.0

24

82.4

5.

9 11

.8

17

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

1002

8 19

.8

45.3

34

.9

7253

55

.7

36.8

7.

4 20

45

85.9

7.

8 6.

3 73

0

BUTT

E 34

0 47

.2

36.2

16

.7

246

82.1

16

.4

1.5

67

88.9

7.

4 3.

7 27

ALA

MED

A

1680

13

.3

53.9

32

.8

1141

37

.9

56.9

5.

2 38

3 69

.9

25.0

5.

1 15

6

STA

TEW

IDE

4558

4 25

.1

41.1

33

.8

3167

5 58

.8

35.8

5.

4 99

02

79.8

15

.2

4.9

4007

IMPE

RIA

L 25

2 36

.7

35.0

28

.2

177

76.7

16

.7

6.7

60

73.3

13

.3

13.3

15

HU

MBO

LDT

191

22.5

57

.2

20.3

13

8 66

.7

30.6

2.

8 36

82

.4

11.8

5.

9 17

CO

NTR

A C

OST

A

982

18.7

45

.2

36.1

65

7 63

.1

32.8

4.

0 19

8 71

.7

26.8

1.

6 12

7

MA

RIPO

SA

37

41.7

12

.5

45.8

24

90

.0

10.0

0.

0 10

66

.7

0.0

33.3

3

MER

CED

48

3 16

.2

47.5

36

.3

314

60.0

32

.0

8.0

125

84.1

13

.6

2.3

44

NEV

AD

A

138

15.6

54

.2

30.2

96

43

.8

53.1

3.

1 32

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

10

LAK

E 18

1 24

.2

41.9

33

.9

124

44.2

53

.5

2.3

43

57.1

35

.7

7.1

14

AM

AD

OR

56

41.0

12

.8

46.2

39

75

.0

25.0

0.

0 12

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

5

MA

RIN

35

1 14

.8

64.4

20

.8

264

60.9

37

.5

1.6

64

91.3

8.

7 0.

0 23

MEN

DO

CIN

O

248

24.0

35

.3

40.7

16

7 50

.8

47.6

1.

6 63

61

.1

22.2

16

.7

18

FRES

NO

14

67

28.4

41

.4

30.2

94

0 59

.3

34.2

6.

5 35

4 87

.3

5.8

6.9

173

EL D

OR

AD

O

300

22.8

31

.0

46.2

19

7 66

.3

25.0

8.

8 80

78

.3

13.0

8.

7 23

MA

DER

A

256

34.0

31

.5

34.6

16

2 77

.8

19.4

2.

8 72

90

.9

0.0

9.1

22

CO

LUSA

93

30

.6

45.2

24

.2

62

87.5

4.

2 8.

3 24

85

.7

0.0

14.3

7

DEL

NO

RTE

59

54.1

2.

7 43

.2

37

37.5

56

.3

6.3

16

66.7

16

.7

16.7

6

LASS

EN

55

11.9

23

.8

64.3

42

57

.1

42.9

0.

0 7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6

ALP

INE

11

50.0

16

.7

33.3

6

80.0

20

.0

0.0

5 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0

MO

DO

C

17

15.4

46

.2

38.5

13

50

.0

50.0

0.

0 4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0

MO

NO

38

6.

7 46

.7

46.7

30

57

.1

42.9

0.

0 7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 1

CA

LAV

ERA

S 53

9.

7 9.

7 80

.6

31

50.0

50

.0

0.0

16

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6

INYO

10

3 5.

2 63

.8

31.0

58

68

.2

27.3

4.

5 22

95

.7

4.3

0.0

23

REP

EAT

OFF

END

ERS

2N

D O

FFEN

DER

S 3R

D O

FFEN

DER

S 4T

H+

OFF

END

ERS

CO

UN

TY

TOTA

LRE

PEA

TD

UI

LIC

ENSE

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

SB 3

8 PR

OG

RAM

+

REST

RIC

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL*

PR

OG

RAM

+

REV

OC

ATI

ON

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

GRA

M +

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

Not

e: T

he v

ast m

ajor

ity o

f con

vict

ed o

ffend

ers a

lso

rece

ive

fine

and

prob

atio

n.

*Inc

lude

s re

ferr

al to

alc

ohol

clin

ics a

nd 3

0-m

onth

ra

ms.

pr

og

Page 40: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

28

TABL

E 13

: 199

4 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

CO

MBI

NA

TIO

NS

BY C

OU

NTY

- RE

PEA

T O

FFEN

DER

S - c

ontin

ued

2N

D O

FFEN

DER

S 3R

D O

FFEN

DER

S 4T

H+

OFF

END

ERS

YUBA

14

8 43

.0

9.7

47.3

93

90

.5

7.1

2.4

42

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 13

SUTT

ER

173

23.5

51

.3

25.2

11

5 70

.0

27.5

2.

5 40

66

.7

33.3

0.

0 18

SAN

TA C

LARA

26

37

31.4

51

.5

17.2

17

14

84.9

11

.8

3.3

628

68.5

26

.8

4.7

295

S AN

BER

NA

RDIN

O

1733

25

.8

32.3

41

.9

1231

64

.9

28.7

6.

4 36

2 80

.7

15.0

4.

3 14

0

SAN

TA B

AR B

ARA

94

1 50

.7

13.9

35

.4

619

59.2

39

.0

1.8

223

80.8

15

.2

4.0

99

STA

NIS

LAU

S 72

7 21

.1

25.5

53

.4

459

39.2

53

.2

7.6

171

77.3

19

.6

3.1

97

SAN

DIE

GO

31

12

21.0

41

.4

37.5

23

74

51.0

40

.8

8.2

598

74.3

15

.7

10.0

14

0

P LA

CER

40

8 20

.6

47.4

32

.0

291

35.8

57

.9

6.3

95

68.2

27

.3

4.5

22

SAN

BEN

ITO

80

44

.7

29.8

25

.5

47

85.2

11

.1

3.7

27

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6

S AC

RAM

ENTO

18

88

25.2

55

.0

19.8

12

42

63.5

31

.4

5.2

405

58.9

39

.0

2.1

241

TULA

RE

875

33.0

32

.1

34.9

53

6 59

.0

37.1

3.

8 21

0 82

.2

14.0

3.

9 12

9

RIV

ERSI

DE

1520

34

.2

33.2

32

.6

1111

72

.5

23.0

4.

5 28

7 82

.8

11.5

5.

7 12

2

TUO

LUM

NE

106

11.1

37

.5

51.4

72

87

.0

13.0

0.

0 23

72

.7

18.2

9.

1 11

TEH

AM

A

101

45.2

29

.0

25.8

62

78

.6

21.4

0.

0 28

90

.9

9.1

0.0

11

SAN

MA

TEO

11

58

13.0

15

.9

71.2

82

6 32

.4

60.7

6.

9 24

7 63

.5

31.8

4.

7 85

P LU

MA

S 39

60

.9

21.7

17

.4

23

69.2

30

.8

0.0

13

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3

SISK

IYO

U

82

26.4

28

.3

45.3

53

19

.0

66.7

14

.3

21

75.0

12

.5

12.5

8

VEN

TURA

12

36

20.3

54

.8

24.9

87

8 57

.1

38.7

4.

2 28

7 83

.1

12.7

4.

2 71

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

261

21.0

39

.0

40.0

20

0 59

.6

36.5

3.

8 52

88

.9

0.0

11.1

9

S OLA

NO

48

3 20

.0

17.5

62

.5

315

46.3

50

.0

3.7

108

60.0

31

.7

8.3

60

SON

OM

A

918

37.9

37

.7

24.4

57

3 84

.5

10.0

5.

5 21

9 96

.8

0.0

3.2

126

YOLO

21

0 14

.3

59.3

26

.4

140

63.3

30

.0

6.7

60

60.0

30

.0

10.0

10

OR

AN

GE

3311

10

.8

56.1

33

.1

2569

18

.9

76.3

4.

8 58

6 78

.2

16.7

5.

1 15

6

SHA

STA

27

9 19

.7

53.9

26

.4

178

41.2

55

.9

2.9

68

69.7

30

.3

0.0

33

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

1042

17

.2

49.5

33

.3

658

46.7

48

.3

5.0

259

81.6

14

.4

4.0

125

SAN

TA C

RU

Z

623

48.8

35

.2

16.0

42

6 92

.5

3.4

4.1

147

90.0

8.

0 2.

0 50

SIER

RA

8 33

.3

50.0

16

.7

6 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

1

TRIN

ITY

32

27

.3

40.9

31

.8

22

40.0

60

.0

0.0

5 80

.0

20.0

0.

0 5

CO

UN

TY

TOTA

LRE

PEA

TD

UI

LIC

ENSE

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

SB 3

8 PR

OG

RAM

+

REST

RIC

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL*

PR

OG

RAM

+

REV

OC

ATI

ON

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

LIC

ENSE

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

+ JA

IL

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

GRA

M +

RE

VO

CA

TIO

N

O

THER

TO

TAL

100%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

%

%

%

N

SAN

LU

IS O

BISP

O

572

12.9

55

.4

31.7

37

9 27

.0

69.3

3.

6 13

7 58

.9

39.3

1.

8 56

Page 41: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 4: POSTCONVICTION SANCTION EFFECTIVENESS

This section presents and describes the results of an evaluation assessing the effectiveness of court and administrative sanctions applied to first and second DUI offenders1. The effectiveness of alternative sanctions is evaluated in terms of postconviction driving record as measured by: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents, including alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, also reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Displayed below in Figures 7-15 are failure proportions from the sanction analyses for 1989, 1992, and 1994 first and second offenders (grouped by sanction assignment) with follow-up time periods of 6-years, 3-years, and 1-year, respectively. (The 1990, 1991, and 1993 offenders were not included in this year's report in order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results.) These figures show the proportion of accident- or DUI incident-involved drivers following their conviction. They are followed by a narrative description of the evaluation design, subject selection, data collection, analytical procedures, and evaluation results. The reader is cautioned that license suspension refers to postconviction suspensions only, and does not include preconviction administrative per se license suspensions (which are applied to all offender groups). Based on the data represented in Figures 7-12, the following conclusions can be drawn about first offender sanctions:

The 1989, 1992 and 1994 suspended first offender groups had significantly fewer subsequent accident-involved drivers than did any other first offender sanction group. The suspended group had 20%, 13.3% and 18.5% fewer accidents than the group with the next lowest accident rates (program with jail) among drivers convicted in 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively.

1 Third or more offenders were not included because a previous study (Tashima & Marelich, 1989) indicated serious confounding due to group differences on prior interventions. In addition, sanctions for third and subsequent offenders do not vary much, due to the statutorily prescribed sanction requirements.

29

Page 42: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

3.525.82 4.32 4.35 4.67

05

10

1520

253035

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 9 . Adjusted 1-year accident rates of 1994 first offenders by type of sanction.

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

19.69

25.85 24.57 24.73 24.67

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35PR

OPO

RTI

ON

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

EMEN

TPE

R 1

00 D

RIV

ERS

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 7 . Adjusted 6-year accident rates of 1989 first offenders by type of sanction.

10.2713.40 11.84 12.15 12.04

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

FA

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 8 . Adjusted 3-year accident rates of 1992 first offenders by type of sanction.

30

Page 43: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

27.85

34.35

27.2323.79

27.40

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F D

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Figure 10 . Adjusted 6-year DUI incident* rates of 1989 first offenders by typeof sanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).

4.789.01

5.25 4.516.88

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F D

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 12 . Adjusted 1-year DUI incident* rates of 1994 first offenders by type ofsanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

15.95

21.94

14.2012.35

14.58

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F D

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 11 . Adjusted 3-year DUI incident* rates of 1992 first offenders by typeof sanction (*alcohol-related accident or violation).

Suspension Jail 1st offenderprogram &

jail

1st offenderprogram &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

31

Page 44: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

First offenders assigned to first offender treatment programs plus license restriction in 1989 and 1992 had significantly fewer DUI incidents in the postconviction period than did any other first offender sanction group and, in 1994, had fewer DUI incidents than all groups except the suspended group. The first offender treatment plus license restriction group had 12.6% and 13.1% fewer DUI incidents in 1989 and 1992, respectively, than the group with the next lowest DUI incident rate (program with jail).

In all three years, first offenders sentenced to jail without treatment or

postconviction suspension were significantly more likely to be involved in DUI incidents (at least 5%, 9.3%, and 19.8% higher in 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively) in the postconviction period than any other first offender sanction group.

Based on the data represented in Figures 13-15, the following conclusions can be drawn about second offender sanctions:

The 1989 suspended second offender group had 15.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program groups over the 6-year postconviction period.

Contrary to prior California studies including the first annual DUI-MIS report (1989

offenders), second offenders suspended in 1992 and 1994 do not have significantly lower total accident rates than do those assigned to SB 38 treatment programs during the first year following suspension or SB 38 assignment. This change is likely due to the implementation of administrative per se (APS) license suspensions beginning in July, 1990, whereby all second offenders are suspended for one year.

Although license suspension and SB 38 treatment programs with APS suspensions

are equally effective in their short-term impact on accidents (post 1-year), license suspension is more effective over a longer time window (6 years).

In 1989, 1992, and 1994, second offenders who were suspended had a significantly

higher proportion of DUI incidents in the subsequent 1-year period than did those who received the SB 38 and license restriction sanction. The respective percentage increases associated with the license suspension group for the three years (1989, 1992 & 1994) were 18.1%, 45.0%, and 40.2%.

32

Page 45: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

3.24 2.82 2.85 3.32

8.275.90 5.60 7.24

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F A

CC

IDEN

T- O

RD

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

Figure 15 . Adjusted 1-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1994 second offenders by type of sanction.

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Other Other

9.12 9.80 9.72

15.31

10.5613.24

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PRO

POR

TIO

N O

F A

CC

IDEN

T- O

RD

UI-

INC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVEM

ENT

PER

100

DR

IVER

S

20.1623.80

35.54

30.09

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35PR

OPO

RTI

ON

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

OR

DU

I-IN

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

EMEN

TPE

R 1

00 D

RIV

ERS

Figure 13 . Adjusted 6-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1989 second offendersby type of sanction.

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

Suspension SuspensionSB 38 &restriction

SB 38 &restriction

Other Other

Figure 14 . Adjusted 3-year accident and DUI incident rates of 1992 second offendersby type of sanction.

SB 38/restriction& interlock

SB 38/restriction& interlock

33

Page 46: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The SB 38 program plus restriction sanction for second offenders (with and without

the addition of the ignition interlock) had significantly lower 1-year subsequent DUI incident rates than those of the other 1994 sanction groups.

EVALUATION METHODS AND RESULTS Subject Selection and Data Collection Convicted DUI offenders were identified from monthly abstract update tapes which contain all DUI conviction data reported to DMV by the courts. In the present study, follow-up data from three sets of offenders were evaluated for sanction effectiveness: 1) A 6-year follow-up period for the convicted 1989 DUI offenders who were

evaluated in the first DUI-MIS report. 2) A 3-year follow-up period for convicted 1992 offenders who were evaluated in the

1995 DUI-MIS report. 3) A 1-year follow-up period for convicted DUI offenders who were arrested for DUI

in 1994. For each year's annual DUI-MIS report, an additional year of DUI data is added to the sanction analyses. In order to simplify the analyses and reporting of results, the 1990, 1991, and 1993 DUI offenders were not included in this year's evaluation. The conviction date in all cases was considered to be the "treatment date" for defining prior and subsequent driving record data, because the penalties and sanctions for the DUI conviction are typically effective as of that date. Since DUI penalties and sanctions are enhanced as a function of the number of prior DUI and alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, subjects were selected based on the number of such convictions within the seven years prior to their entry DUI arrest. For the 1989, 1992, and 1994 drivers, two groups were selected for this evaluation: 1) first DUI offenders––drivers who had no DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving convictions within the previous seven years, and 2) second DUI offenders––drivers who had one DUI or alcohol-related reckless driving conviction within the previous seven years. DUI offenders with felony convictions and chemical test refusal suspensions were not included because their license control penalties are more severe than those of the other groups within their respective prior offender group. Also excluded were drivers who did not have a full one-year subsequent time period because of late conviction dates, drivers with “X” license numbers (no California license

34

Page 47: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

number could be found), drivers with out-of-state ZIP Codes and irregular or unofficial sanction codes (first offenders). Altogether, the excluded cases came to 22% of the original convicted offenders. Court sanctions are reported to and recorded by DMV in the form of disposition codes on the abstract of conviction. A convicted DUI offender, especially a first offender, might receive any one of many combinations of individual sanctions, including jail, fine, license restriction or suspension, alcohol treatment program, or probation. Therefore, in defining postconviction sanction combination groups for the purpose of this analysis, the following conventions were used for first offenders: 1) if suspension (non-APS) was one of the sanctions imposed by DMV or the court,

then the offender was included in the suspension group; 2) if suspension (non-APS) was not imposed, but the offender was assigned to an

alcohol treatment program, then the offender was included in one of the treatment groups, according to the type of treatment program (first offender or SB 38) and whether they were also sentenced to license restriction or jail; and

3) if neither suspension nor treatment was imposed, but the offender was sentenced to

jail, then the offender was included in the jail-only group. Fine and probation are generally imposed on most DUI offenders (except that probation is not usually granted to court-suspended first offenders), and for that reason are not included as sanctions evaluated in this report. Also, since July, 1990, all DUI offenders have had their licenses administratively suspended upon DUI arrest. It should be noted that the definition of the sanction combination groups was not an arbitrary analytical convention, but rather a reflection of the most common naturally occurring sanction combinations assigned by the courts. Based on the above taxonomy, five first-offender sanction combination groups are used in this analysis: 1) license suspension, 2) jail, 3) first offender treatment program plus jail, 4) first offender treatment program plus license restriction, and 5) SB 38 (second offender) treatment program plus license restriction (some courts assign this sanction to a small number of first offenders). One limitation of the above hierarchical grouping scheme is that it does not allow for an evaluation of the independent and interactive effects of each sanction as a treatment factor. Taking first offender treatment program plus jail as an example, the approach we used does not allow analysis of the separate effects of jail from the effects of the treatment program.

35

Page 48: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

A similar convention was used for grouping second offenders with various sanction combinations; the groups used in this analysis are: 1) license suspension, 2) SB 38 treatment program plus license restriction, 3) a group of 1992 and 1994 second offenders ("other") who did not meet the selection criteria of groups 1 or 2, and 4) a fourth group of 1994 second offenders who were ordered to install an ignition interlock device in their vehicles as mandated by AB 2851 (effective July, 1993). This device requires that the offender blow into it prior to starting the vehicle, which will not start if he/she has a BAC of 0.02% or greater. This group was identified by certain vehicle code designations on their abstract of conviction. In examining these abstract disposition codes, it was found that 88% of interlock cases were also referred to SB 38 treatment programs (along with license restrictions), while 38% had their licenses suspended (non-APS); of those that were suspended, 72% were assigned to SB 38 treatment programs. All second offenders who were assigned to install interlock are included in this evaluation, irrespective of other sanctions and regardless of actual installation. This is reflective of the “real world” conditions under which interlock is assigned and is an integral part of assessing the total impact of this sanction. Most of the offenders in the group designated as "other" were originally referred to an SB 38 treatment program, but were suspended as well, either by intent (court sentence to both treatment program and suspension), or omission (court misreporting of disposition codes and/or the offender's lack of compliance with required procedures, such as failure to provide proof of insurance, program enrollment, pay fees, etc.). Even if the courts amend the mistaken abstracts of conviction, the offenders still need to meet the insurance and program enrollment requirements. The final sanctions ultimately received by this group are unclear, which makes interpretation difficult. The "other" group was not included in the first DUI-MIS 1989 arrest cohort analysis and, therefore, was not included in subsequent reanalyses of the 1989 arrestees. Prior driver record data were extracted for the two years preceding an offender's DUI conviction date for all offenders. Appendix Tables B5, B6, and B7 list these prior driver record variables, which were used as covariates in the analyses. The evaluation period for the postconviction driving measures, starting from the conviction date, was six years for the 1989 drivers, three years for the 1992 drivers, and one year for the 1994 drivers. A buffer period of six months was allowed between the end of the evaluation period and the data extraction date to allow for processing and reporting the most recent data to DMV. DUI offenders who had less than the full follow-up time period (from conviction date to the buffer period) were excluded. The outcome driving record measures consisted of the proportion of offenders who were involved in: 1) total accidents and 2) DUI incidents (alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions, APS/refusal suspensions, or DUI failures to appear).

36

Page 49: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Evaluation Design and Analytical Procedures Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences in the proportion of accident- and DUI-incident-involved drivers in each sanction group at the end of the evaluation period. Only the first accident or DUI incident or "failure" was evaluated. This is not an important limitation with these data because the incidence of repeat failures (two or more accidents or DUI incidents) was low over the study time window. More importantly, analysis of repeat failures would be subject to confounding by court sanctions received in connection with the first failure incident. This type of confounding is avoided because multiple incidents were not included in this analysis. Since it was not possible to randomly assign drivers to the various sanction groups, potential biases due to preexisting group differences were statistically controlled by entering into the analyses as covariates biographical data, prior driving record data, and ZIP Code indices (accident and traffic conviction averages of each driver's ZIP Code area, and selected ZIP Code variables from the 1990 census data for the 1992 and 1994 drivers). (Tables B5, B6, and B7 show significant group differences on most of these variables.) While this "quasi-experimental" design is subject to a number of limitations in assessing cause-effect relationships, the statistical control of group differences removes at least part of the bias in group assignment and provides a more precise estimate of the relationship between type of sanction and subsequent record. It is likely, of course, that the groups also differ on characteristics not measured by, or reflected in, the covariates. The possibility of uncontrolled biases becomes particularly problematic if sanctions are commonly received by atypical offenders through self- or judicial-selectivity (e.g., drivers of higher socio-economic status might be more likely to receive program with restriction and less likely to receive jail than those of lower status). In all of the analyses for accidents (except 1992 and 1994 second offenders) and DUI incidents for both first and second offenders in all three years, several significant (p<.01) covariate by sanction interactions were evident (statistical significance at p<x means that a differential effect between groups would occur by chance less than x% of the time). These significant interactions indicated that the relationship between the covariates and the outcome measure varied across sanction groups, and therefore the covariates were included in the initial analyses for all three data sets to determine the magnitude of the interactions. In all analyses, except three (1989, 1992, and 1994 first offender subsequent accidents) where sanction differences were significant (p<.03), the interaction effect was generally one-fourth or less than the main effect of sanction (chi squares were divided by their respective degrees of freedom to provide an approximate measure of effect size). Since the sanction main effect had substantially greater magnitude than the interaction effects, conclusions about sanction differences were based on analyses that did not include the interactions. The interaction effects of the

37

Page 50: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

remaining three analyses were examined and found not to create a serious impact on the sanction main effect. Results of the First Offender Sanction Evaluation Total Accidents: Figures 7, 8, and 9, and Table 14 display the results of the logistic regression analysis of total accidents for 1989, 1992, and 1994 first offenders. Among first offenders in all three years, the suspended group continued to have the significantly lowest proportion of accident-involved drivers relative to the other sanction groups, with 19.69 (1989), 10.27 (1992) and 3.52 (1994) accident involvements per 100 drivers (see Table 16 for a summary of significant results by sanction groups). These accident rates are 20%, 13.3%, and 18.5% lower than the next lowest group's rates (program with jail) for the three time periods, respectively. First offenders sentenced to jail-only had a significantly higher accident rate than that of most groups for all three years, except when compared to the SB 38 group in 1989, and in 1992 where significant differences in rates did not occur. (It should be noted that the jail-only sanction may actually be a less aversive punishment than other sanctions when community service is substituted for jail time, which is frequently the case.) In all three year’s analyses of first offenders on accidents, while there were fairly strong interactions between sanctions and covariates (age and prior minor convictions in 1989, age in 1992, and prior accidents in 1994), there still remained a strong main effect of sanction differences on accidents; the suspended group continued to have the lowest accident rates overall, while the jail-only group had the highest accident rates. DUI Incidents: Figures 10, 11, and 12 and Tables 14 and 16 show that among the first offender groups in 1989, 1992, and 1994, the (statistically significant) lowest proportions of reoffending drivers were in the groups assigned to first-offender treatment program plus license restriction, with failure rates of 23.79, 12.35, and 4.51 per 100 drivers, respectively. This group had 12.6% and 13.1% fewer DUI incidents in 1989 and 1992, respectively, than the group with the next lowest recidivism rate (program with jail). In contrast, the highest recidivism rates occurred with the jail-only groups for all years (34.35, 21.94, and 9.01 for 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively). An overall trend in the decline of percentage differences in DUI incidents between the best group (first-offender treatment program plus restriction) and the next lowest group is evident over the years for the 1989 group. It would be expected that sanction differences between groups would diminish as the time window increases, particularly to a six-year period. Differences in failure proportions among the other three sanction groups were again not significant for the 1989 offenders, but were significantly different among the three groups in 1992 and 1994. The first offender treatment program with jail group in 1994 had lower recidivism rates than that of the SB 38 group, and lower

38

Page 51: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

rates than that of the 1992 suspended group; however, the 1994 suspended group had significantly lower rates than the SB 38 group. Because of variations in the suspended group’s rates, there is no totally consistent pattern in the DUI incident rates among these three groups over the three years. Overall, however, participation in the first-offender treatment program with license restriction continues to rank first in its effect on DUI incidents, while the jail-only sanction continues to have the least impact. Results from the first offender sanction analyses on DUI incidents continue to replicate those from previous research studies for all three analyses. Sanction group differences on accidents in this year's analyses continued to be consistent for 1989, 1992, and 1994.

TABLE 14: FIRST OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR

YEAR

SANCTION GROUP

SAMPLE

SIZE

NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

NUMBER OF DUI- INCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

1989 Suspension (5,638) 19.69 27.85

(follow-up period = 6 years) Jail (7,199) 25.85 34.35

1st DUI program & jail

(43,626) 24.57 27.23

1st DUI program & license restriction

(41,223) 24.73 23.79

SB 38 program & license restriction

(4,422) 24.67 27.40

1992 Suspension (8,265) 10.27 15.95

(follow-up period = 3 years) Jail (4,769) 13.40 21.94

1st DUI program & jail

(49,591) 11.84 14.20

1st DUI program & license restriction

(32,476) 12.15 12.35

SB 38 program & license restriction

(5,538) 12.04 14.58

1994 Suspension (5,520) 3.52 4.78

(follow-up period = 1 year) Jail (3,825) 5.82 9.01

1st DUI program & jail

(37,527) 4.32 5.25

1st DUI program & license restriction

(26,945) 4.35 4.51

SB 38 program & license restriction

(3,709) 4.67 6.88

39

Page 52: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Results of the Second Offender Sanction EvaluationTotal Accidents: Among the 1989 second offenders, license suspension continued to be significantly more effective than treatment program plus restriction in reducing total accident risk (see Figure 13, and Tables 15 and 16), six years subsequent to their convictions. The 1989 suspended group, with a failure rate (per 100 drivers) of 20.16, had 15.3% fewer accident-involved drivers than did the SB 38 program group. This finding is consistent with those of most prior studies of second offenders on total accidents. As noted below, the post 1989 cohorts show a different pattern. Results of the 1992 and 1994 analyses (see Figures 14 and 15, Tables 15 and 16) were similar to those of the 1990, 1991, and 1992 one-year analyses (reported in the previous three DUI-MIS evaluations) in that significant differences were not evident among second offenders in their total accident rates. It has been noted in recent reports that since license suspension has been consistently effective in reducing accident risk, it was likely that the lack of significant group differences in the one-year period was due to the immediate short-term positive effect of the imposition of one-year APS license suspensions on all second offenders. It was found in the previous two analyses and in this year’s analysis that the accident rates of the SB 38 participants have declined and were actually lower than those of the suspended group. Since the one-year follow-up period covers the time window when all second offenders are under APS suspension, it was reasoned that APS suspension would be expected to have a larger effect on the accident rates of previously nonsuspended SB 38 participants than it did on those who were suspended upon conviction. The data continue to support this interpretation. In comparing accident rates between first and second offenders, Tables 14 and 15 show that, across all years, first offenders continue to experience higher accident rates than second offenders, a finding that has been apparent in previous DUI studies on accidents, even prior to DUI-MIS evaluations. As noted in recent DUI-MIS reports, the fact that second offenders have longer-term sanctions than do first offenders (18-month postconviction suspension or 18-month SB 38 treatment programs) may explain this difference. DUI Incidents: Figures 13, 14, and 15 and Tables 15 and 16 show that in all three years, the suspended groups had significantly higher failure rates (by 18.1%, 45.0%, and 40.2% for 1989, 1992, and 1994, respectively) than corresponding rates for the SB 38 program participants. The much smaller difference (18.1%) between the two sanctions for the 1989 groups compared to the more recent cohorts on subsequent DUI incidents may also be attributable to the much longer (6 year) followup period. As noted in connection with first offenders, one would expect treatment effects to lessen with the passage of time.

40

Page 53: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

The third group ("other") in the 1992 and 1994 analyses had failure rates midway between the other two groups. Failure rates of all three groups in 1992 were significantly different from each other. In the 1994 analysis, recidivism rates were significantly different between all groups except between the SB 38 program participants and the SB 38 program plus ignition interlock group; both groups had lower reoffense rates than the suspended or the “other” groups, and this finding was also evident in last year’s 1993 one-year analysis. An additional analysis was conducted which included the same groups, but with the interlock group divided into those who were suspended and those who were not suspended (75% and 96% of those groups, respectively, were assigned to the SB 38 program plus license restriction). Although the results showed that the interlock group without suspension had the lowest reoffense rate, the results are somewhat limited by the fact that the number of cases for both groups remains insufficient, particularly in the presence of a nonrandom design, where self-selectivity and uncontrolled group biases may be influencing these results. A preferable approach to investigating the effectiveness of the interlock device would be a randomized design involving equivalent groups; such an effort is being considered in the foreseeable future, and may provide more clarification on the effect of interlock.

TABLE 15: SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION EFFECTS ON TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND DUI INCIDENTS BY YEAR

YEAR

SANCTION GROUP

SAMPLE SIZE

NUMBER OF ACCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

PERCENTAGE EFFECT

(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2

X 100

GRP 2

NUMBER OF DUI

INCIDENT-INVOLVED,

PER 100 DRIVERS

PERCENTAGE EFFECT

(DIFFERENCE IN FAILURE RATES) GRP 1 - GRP 2

X 100

GRP 2 1989 1) Suspension (9,482) 20.16 35.54

(follow-up period = 6 years)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(23,927) 23.80 -15.3% 30.09 18.1%

1992 1) Suspension (9,230) 9.12 15.31 (follow-up period = 3 years)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(15,971) 9.80 -10.0% 10.56 45.0%

3) Other (10,170) 9.72 13.24 1994 1) Suspension (5,461) 3.24 8.27

(follow-up period = 1 year)

2) SB 38 program & license restriction

(8,595) 2.82 14.9%

5.90 40.2%

3) SB 38 program/ restriction interlock

(4,340) 2.85 5.60

4) Other (7,273) 3.32 7.24

41

Page 54: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FOR 1989, 1992, AND 1994 FIRST AND SECOND OFFENDER SANCTION GROUPS BY OUTCOME MEASURES

FIRST OFFENDER YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS

GROUP (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1989 (6-year follow up)

(1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1992 (3-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 S3 S4 ns (2) Jail na S3 S4 ns na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 ns (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1994 (1-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 S1 S1 S1 na S1 ns ns S1 (2) Jail na S3 S4 S5 na S3 S4 S5 (3) 1st DUI program & jail na ns ns na S4 S3 (4) 1st DUI program & restriction na ns na S4 (5) SB 38 program & restriction na na

SECOND OFFENDER

YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS DUI INCIDENTS GROUP (1) (2) (1) (2)

1989 (6-year follow up) (1) Suspension na S1 na S2 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na na

1992 (3-year follow up) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)

(1) Suspension na ns ns na S2 S3 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns na S2 (3) Other na na

1994 (1-year follow up) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)

(1) Suspension na ns ns ns na S2 S3 S4 (2) SB 38 program & restriction na ns ns na ns S2 (3) SB 38 program & interlock na ns na S3 (4) Other na na

Note: A significant (p<.03 for 1st offenders and p<.06 for 2nd offenders) difference between sanction groups relative to the proportion of accident-involved or DUI incident-involved drivers is represented by an "S." The group number with the “S” indicates the group with the better (lower) rate. A nonsignificant difference is indicated by "ns." "na" means not applicable. Blanks appear in the lower half of each matrix, since the halves are identical.

Overall, findings for the 1989 second offenders on accidents replicate previous evaluations indicating that postconviction license suspension continues to be more effective than SB 38 treatment program plus restriction in reducing accidents over the 6-

42

Page 55: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

year follow-up period. However, it should be recalled that these 1989 results pertain to a sanction structure that is quite different from the current one; there are now tougher requirements for insurance and program participation, lengthier suspension periods, more fees and the imposition of APS suspensions on all offenders. Findings from the 1992 and 1994 second offender analyses were similar to previous post-APS one-year evaluations of second offenders in showing no evidence of significant differences between the sanction groups on subsequent accident rates. The fact that the 1-year accident rates for both the SB 38 treatment program participants and the interlock group were lower (14.9%) than that of the suspended group is likely attributable to the impact of APS suspensions. This is supported by the fact that this trend reverses (-10%) when more than a one-year time period is included. Because all second offenders since 1990 are suspended under APS for the duration of the one-year follow-up period, the differences between groups is more likely a measure of the incremental impact of alternative sanctions given in addition to suspension. The results on reoffense rates for second offenders continue to be consistent with the findings of prior studies on alcohol-related incidents, indicating that SB 38 programs with license restriction are associated with a reduction in subsequent DUI incidents over all three follow-up periods. One-Year Recidivism Rates for First and Second Offenders from 1989-1994The one-year subsequent DUI-incident reoffense rates for both first and second offenders were compiled from the six annual DUI-MIS reports and configured onto a single graph to display these rates over time. Figure 16 shows the proportion of DUI offenders arrested each year between 1989 and 1994 who reoffended one-year after conviction. The DUI incidents include alcohol-involved accidents, major convictions (primarily DUI, reckless driving and hit-and-run), APS (0.08% BAC or chemical test refusal) suspensions (not included in the 1989 cases), and DUI failure-to-appear notices (FTA). Figure 16 shows a noticeable decline in the one-year recidivism rates of second offenders from 9.8% to 6.8% and for first offenders from 9.3% to 6.1% between 1989 to 1994. This decline translates into a 34.4% reduction for first offenders, and a 30.6% decrease for second offenders, in DUI incidents. Previous DUI-MIS reports have suggested that while many factors may be associated with this overall decline in DUI incidents, the reduction is likely attributable to the implementation of APS suspensions in 1990. Another DMV study, which is designed to investigate the specific deterrent

43

Page 56: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

effects of the APS law, will be released soon and may present further information on the effectiveness of this law.

9.89.6 9.7

9.3

7.9

6.8

9.3

8.6 8.6

7.6

7.0

6.1

5

6

7

8

9

10

PRO

POR

TIO

N R

EOFF

END

ING

IN 1

YEA

R

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994

YEAR

Figure 16 . Proportion of DUI offenders arrested in 1989-1994 reoffending(DUI incidents) one-year after conviction.

Second Offenders

First Offenders

44

Page 57: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

Data on DMV administrative license disqualification actions (license suspension or revocation––S/R) taken in DUI cases are presented below. These statutorily mandated actions are initiated by the receipt of either a law enforcement APS report (.08% BAC, zero tolerance, or chemical test refusal) or court abstract of conviction. It should be noted that multiple actions can result from a single DUI incident––for example, a single DUI arrest frequently will result in both an APS suspension and a mandatory postconviction suspension action. This section includes the following tables and figure: Table 17: Mandatory DUI License Disqualification Actions, 1985-1995. This table shows preconviction (APS) and postconviction license disqualification totals from 1985 through 1995. The postconviction totals include juvenile suspensions, first-offender suspensions, second-offender suspensions and revocations, and third- and fourth-offender revocations. Table 18: Administrative Per Se Process Measures. This table presents APS process measure data for fiscal years 93/94 through 95/96. Figure 17 graphically portrays mandatory DUI license disqualification totals from 1985 through 1995. The following statements are based on the data shown in Tables 17-18 and Figure 17.

During 1991, the first full calendar year of APS license suspension, the total number of DMV DUI suspension/revocation actions increased by 60% over 1990. Each year since then these numbers have declined, by an overall 38%, mirroring the 36% decline in DUI arrests over the same period.

In 1995, 179,492 APS license actions were taken. Of these actions, 71% were first-

offender actions and 29% were repeat-offender actions.

In FY 95/96, APS actions increased by 10.7%, breaking the recent consistent downward trend in DUI arrests and APS actions.

45

Page 58: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Chemical test refusal actions have steadily continued to decline, and have decreased by 58% since 1985.

The number of mandatory postconviction license actions decreased by 12% in 1995,

and has dropped virtually in half since 1991.

Since APS was implemented in July 1990, over 1 million (1,383,175) APS suspension or revocation actions had been taken through June 1996.

During the first five years of APS implementation, requests for hearings increased

each year, rising from 6.8% of all APS actions in FY 90/91 to 11.8% in 94/95. In 95/96 this trend stopped, with requests for hearing dropping 27% to 8.6% of all APS actions. The rate at which APS suspension/revocation actions are upheld after hearing continued to decline, however, dropping to only 68% in 95/96, compared to 80% in 94/95.

During the first 30 months after implementation (on January 1, 1994) of the "zero

tolerance" law for minors, 23,465 suspension actions were taken.

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Figure 17 . Mandatory DUI license disqualification actions, 1985-1995.

46

Page 59: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

47

TABL

E 17

: M

AN

DA

TORY

DU

I LIC

ENSE

DIS

QU

ALI

FIC

ATI

ON

AC

TIO

NS,

198

5-19

95

YEA

R

PREC

ON

VIC

TIO

N

Adm

in P

er S

e (A

PS) A

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1196

10

2722

73

2287

90

2090

06

1840

45

1794

92

Ze

ro to

lera

nce

susp

ensi

ons

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

9971

87

00

Fi

rst-o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

8250

3 18

7527

15

7545

14

4321

12

0582

12

1218

Repe

at-o

ffen

der s

uspe

nsio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3479

2 74

351

6265

6 57

279

4742

9 44

193

Re

peat

-off

ende

r rev

ocat

ions

n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a n/

a 23

15

1039

5 85

89

7406

60

63

5381

Com

mer

cial

dri

ver a

ctio

ns

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

3739

79

76

6449

58

29

5038

49

21

Che

mic

al te

st re

fusa

l act

ions

29

308

2632

7 25

474

2275

7 21

466

2291

5 21

296r

1796

3r 15

662

1326

4 12

308

Te

st re

fusa

l sus

pens

ions

25

485

1635

2 14

877

1372

0 12

390

1512

8 10

901r

9374

r 82

56

7022

67

54

Te

st re

fusa

l rev

ocat

ions

38

23

9975

10

597

9037

90

76

7787

10

395r

8589

r 74

06

6063

53

81

TOTA

L A

PS/R

EFU

SAL

AC

TIO

NS

2930

8 26

327

2547

4 22

757

2146

6 14

2525

27

2273

22

8790

20

9006

18

4045

17

9492

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

– –

POST

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

Juve

nile

DU

I sus

pens

ions

22

00

2219

23

74

1823

19

95

1478

15

76

1202

92

2 87

9 67

7

Firs

t-off

ende

r sus

pens

ions

70

57

7384

72

78

6626

76

79

1040

8 13

575

1067

3 10

208

8696

72

66

M

isde

mea

nor

5346

55

92

5558

50

50

5658

84

67

1154

7 89

89

8607

71

88

5806

Felo

ny

1711

17

92

1720

15

76

2021

19

41

2028

16

84

1601

15

08

1460

Seco

nd-o

ffen

der S

/R a

ctio

ns

4683

5 45

234

4360

8 47

698

5392

7 52

334

5735

0 45

478

3884

9 34

300

3148

9

Mis

dem

eano

r 46

292

4460

1 42

964

4709

3 53

238

5159

3 56

583

4475

6 38

285

3379

4 30

955

Fe

lony

54

3 63

3 64

4 60

5 68

9 74

1 76

7 72

2 56

4 50

6 53

4

Thir

d-of

fend

er re

voca

tions

14

970

1694

6 17

118

1399

1 18

514

1865

0 19

963

1555

3 12

908

1119

3 94

71

M

isde

mea

nor

1497

0 16

946

1711

8 13

671

1818

2 18

219

1959

5 15

233

1264

4 10

974

9261

Felo

ny

n/a

n/a

n/a

320

332

431

368

320

264

219

210

Four

th-o

ffen

der r

evoc

atio

ns

5479

62

23

7778

88

84

8122

82

85

8394

67

03

5554

45

32

3559

TOTA

L PO

STC

ON

VIC

TIO

N A

CTI

ON

S 76

541

7800

6 78

156

7902

2 90

237

9115

5 10

0858

79

609

6844

1 59

600

5246

2

19

85

1986

19

87

1988

19

89

1990

19

91

1992

19

93

1994

19

95

T OTA

L M

AN

DA

TORY

SU

SPEN

SIO

N/

REV

OC

ATI

ON

(S/R

) AC

TIO

NS

1058

49

1043

33

1036

30

1017

79

1117

03

2336

80

3731

31

3083

99

2774

47

2436

45

2319

54

orts

. p

rior

rep

r Revi

sed

from

Page 60: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 18. ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE PROCESS MEASURES

7/93-6/94 7/94-6/95 7/95-6/96 Total APS actions taken (including actions later set aside) 211,380 185,266 205,173 Total .081 APS actions set aside 14,052 13,323 14,113 Total .012 suspensions set aside 137 441 494 Net total APS actions taken (excluding actions later set aside) 197,191 171,502 190,566 Net total .08 APS actions 192,997 161,991 181,878 Net total .01 suspensions 4,194 9,511 8,688

APS Actions by Offender Status/License Classification:3 Total APS actions, noncommercial drivers 191,748 166,807 185,246 Total commercial driver (CDL) APS actions taken 5,443 4,695 5,320 Number of APS actions of commercial drivers in commercial vehicles 28 28 11 APS .08 suspensions for drivers with no prior DUI convictions4 133,166 114,365 129,642 4-month license suspensions 116,563 95,288 105,726 30-day suspensions plus 3-month restrictions 5,584 4,254 1,681 30-day suspensions plus 5-month COE5 restrictions N/A 5,022 11,278 First-offender chemical test refusals 7,546 6,527 7,063 CDL first offender suspensions/restrictions 3,473 3,274 3,894 Total APS .08 actions taken for drivers with prior DUI convictions 59,831 47,626 52,236 Suspensions 53,025 42,373 46,704 Revocations 6,806 5,253 5,532

APS Chemical Test Refusal Process Measures: Total .08 and .01 APS refusal actions taken (including actions later set aside) 15,145 12,696 13,395 Total .08 refusal actions set aside 724 716 641 Total .01 refusal actions set aside 2 12 6 Net total .08 and .01 APS refusal actions (excluding actions later set aside) 14,419 11,968 12,748 Net total .08 refusal actions 14,352 11,780 12,595 Net total .01 refusal actions 67 188 153 Chemical test refusal rate (excluding actions later set aside) 7.31% 6.98% 6.69% Net .08 APS refusal suspensions for subjects with no prior DUIs 7,546 6,527 7,063 Net .08 APS refusal actions for subjects with prior DUIs 6,806 5,253 5,532

APS Hearings Total .08 and .01 APS hearings scheduled6 21,682 21,774 17,697 Proportion of total APS actions 10.3% 11.8% 8.6% .08 hearings held and/or completed 21,264* 18,300 15,248 .08 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 15,481* 14,657 10,418 .08 hearing action sustain rate 72.8% 80.1% 68.3% .01 hearings held and/or completed – – – 888 775 .01 actions sustained or upheld following a hearing – – – 743 615 .01 hearing action sustain rate – – – 83.7% 79.4%

APS Chemical Test Refusal Hearings Total .08 and .01 APS refusal hearings scheduled 2,343 2,133 1,705 .08 APS refusal hearings held and/or completed 2,260* 1,836 1,513 .08 APS refusal actions sustained or upheld following a hearing 1,758* 1,326 1,108

*Figures corrected. 1.08 refers to APS actions taken subsequent to obtaining evidence of a BAC equal to or in excess of the .08% per se level. Such an action is taken in

conjunction with a DUI arrest. 2.01 refers to APS suspensions taken against drivers under the age of 21 with BACs in excess of .01%, or on the basis of a chemical test refusal, and are not

necessarily taken in conjunction with a DUI arrest. 3All entries in this category exclude actions later set aside but, where possible, include actions taken on the basis of either a chemical test refusal or a BAC

test result. This category does not include .01 actions, which are not varied by offender status or occupation. 4Prior DUI convictions consist of any such conviction where the violation occurred within the seven years prior to the current violation. 5Introduced 1/1/95 this restriction allows driving to, from, and during the course-of-employment. 6This figure excludes subsequent APS dismissal hearings and departmental review hearings or procedures. Both numerator and denominator include

those actions later set aside as a result of the hearing.

48

Page 61: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

SECTION 6: ACCIDENTS INVOLVING ALCOHOL

This section presents data on alcohol-involved accidents, as compiled and reported by the California Highway Patrol, as well as accident data which have been crosstabulated with Department of Justice DUI arrest data. Drivers identified as being under the influence of drugs other than alcohol are also included in the "alcohol-involved accident" category, but typically comprise less than 1% of the total (only 3 total cases for 1994 data). This section includes the following tables: Table 19: Race/Ethnicity by Sobriety Code of Accident-Involved 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table shows the law enforcement officer’s determination of sobriety for accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity. Table 20: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1994 DUI Arrestees by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Arrest. This table portrays the fatal/injury accident involvement of DUI arrestees, by race/ethnicity and type of arrest (felony, juvenile, or misdemeanor). Table 21: Adjudication Status by Sobriety Code for Accident-Involved 1994 DUI Arrestees. This table crosstabulates accident sobriety codes (from law enforcement accident reports) with the court disposition of the 1994 DUI arrests associated with those accidents. Table 22: Fatal and Injury Accidents of 1994 DUI Arrestees by Type of Arrest and Adjudication Status. This table displays the adjudication status of fatal and injury accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees, by type of arrest. Table 23: 1994 Accident-Involved DUI Arrestees With No Record of Conviction, by County and Type of Arrest. This table shows the number of accident-involved 1994 DUI arrestees without a corresponding recorded conviction, by type of DUI arrest, by county. Table 24: 1-, 3-, and 6-Year Total, Fatal/Injury, and Alcohol-Related Accident Means by Offender Status. This table shows the average number of total, fatal/injury, and alcohol-related accidents for 1994, 1992, and 1989 DUI arrestees for time periods of 1, 3, and 6 years subsequent to their arrests, respectively, by offender status (number of prior offenses).

49

Page 62: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Figure 18 (below) shows the annual percentages of traffic injuries and fatalities that were alcohol-involved from 1985 to 1995. The numerical data for this graph are shown on the DUI summary statistics sheet at the beginning of this report.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

PER

CEN

TAG

E O

F TO

TAL

INJU

RIE

S A

ND

FA

TALI

TIES

1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995YEAR

Figure 18 . Percentage of total injuries and total fatalities that werealcohol-involved, 1985-1995.

InjuriesFatalities

Based on these data, the following statements can be made:

The number of alcohol-involved traffic fatalities decreased by 9.7% in 1995, and has declined by over half (51%) since 1987. The proportion of fatalities which are alcohol-involved declined from 50.1% in 1987 to 32.2% in 1995.

The proportion of traffic accident injuries that are alcohol-involved has also

declined each year since 1987. Alcohol-involved injuries dropped 6.3% during 1995 and 46.3% from 1987 to 1995.

13.2% of all 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a reported traffic accident,

compared to 13.1% in 1993 and 11.1% in 1992 and 1991. 49.5% of these accidents involved an injury or fatality.

In 25% of cases where a DUI offender was arrested in connection with a reported

traffic accident, there is no record of any corresponding conviction. In 91.5% of

50

Page 63: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

these nonconvicted cases, the accident report indicated that the drivers had been drinking and that their ability was impaired.

Of all 1994 accident-involved DUI arrestees with no record of conviction, 17.9% had

been arrested for felony DUI, down from 18.5% in 1993, 19.0% in 1992, and 19.4% in 1991.

6.5% (13,632) of 1994 DUI arrests were associated with a fatal or injury accident, up

from 6.4% the previous year. Of these fatal/injury accidents, only 29.6% (4,031) led to an arrest for felony DUI, and only 10% (1,371) led to a conviction of felony DUI. Over 27% (3,704) of DUI arrests stemming from a fatal/injury accident did not result in a reported conviction.

The fatal/injury and total accident risk of DUI offenders generally decreases with

the number of prior DUI convictions for periods up to five years after arrest, while, conversely, the risk of involvement in an alcohol-related accident generally increases with number of priors over the same time periods. This is not surprising because as the number of prior DUIs increases, the time period of the suspension/revocation lengthens, and prior research has demonstrated that suspension/revocation has a larger impact on reducing non-DUI accidents than DUI accidents.

51

Page 64: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TOTA

L 13

632

100.

0 65

16

47.8

53

47

39.2

98

5 7.

2 78

4 5.

8

52

TABL

E 19

: RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

BY S

OBR

IETY

CO

DE

OF

AC

CID

ENT-

INV

OLV

ED 1

994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES*

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

) SO

BRIE

TY C

OD

E TO

TAL

WH

ITE

HIS

PAN

IC

BLA

CK

O

THER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

TOTA

L 27

560

100.

0 12

167

44.1

11

878

43.1

19

20

7.0

1595

5.

8

HBD

-ABI

LITY

IMPA

IRED

(BA

C .0

8% &

ABO

VE)

25

941

94.1

11

267

43.4

11

374

43.8

18

00

6.9

1500

5.

8

HBD

-NO

T IM

PAIR

ED

(B

AC

.01%

-.049

%)

78

0.3

29

37.2

35

44

.9

4 5.

1 10

12

.8

HBD

-NO

T K

NO

WN

IF

IM

PAIR

ED (.

05-.0

79)

484

1.8

248

51.2

18

3 37

.8

28

5.8

25

5.2

HN

BD-H

AD

NO

T BE

EN

D

RIN

KIN

G

185

0.7

92

49.7

66

35

.7

14

7.6

13

7.0

NO

T RE

PORT

ED

869

3.2

529

60.9

22

0 25

.3

74

8.5

46

5.3

UN

DER

INFL

UEN

CE

OF

DRU

GS

3 0.

0 2

66.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

33.3

*For

eac

h so

brie

ty c

ode,

per

cent

ages

are

bas

ed o

n ro

w to

tals

.

TABL

E 20

: FA

TAL

AN

D IN

JURY

AC

CID

ENTS

OF

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

AN

D T

YPE

OF

ARR

EST*

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

SOBR

IETY

CO

DE

TOTA

L W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

FELO

NY

DU

I 40

31

29.6

17

69

43.9

17

01

42.2

34

6 8.

6 21

5 5.

3

MIS

DEM

EAN

OR

DU

I 94

21

69.1

46

50

49.4

35

75

37.9

63

2 6.

7 56

4 6.

0 JU

VEN

ILE

DU

I 18

0 1.

3 97

53

.9

71

39.4

7

3.9

5

2.8

es a

re b

ased

on

row

tota

ls.

g*F

or e

ach

type

of a

rres

t, pe

rcen

ta

Page 65: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

53

TABL

E 21

: AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N S

TATU

S BY

SO

BRIE

TY C

OD

E FO

R A

CC

IDEN

T-IN

VO

LVED

199

4 D

UI A

RRES

TEES

*

TYPE

OF

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TOTA

L 27

5 60

100.

0 17

163

62.3

13

93

5.1

1088

3.

9 32

2 1.

2 66

0 2.

4 69

34

25.2

TOTA

L 13

6 32

100.

0 75

38

55.3

13

71

10.1

49

7 3.

6 17

5 1.

3 34

7 2.

5 37

04

27.2

HN

BD-H

AD

NO

T BE

EN

D

RIN

KIN

G

185

0.7

75

40.5

5

2.7

9 4.

9 5

2.7

23

12.4

68

36

.8

HBD

-NO

T IM

PAIR

ED

(B

AC

.01%

-.049

%)

78

0.3

18

23.1

1

1.3

0 0.

0 3

3.8

9 11

.5

47

60.3

FELO

NY

DU

I 40

31

29.6

14

12

35.0

12

07

29.9

76

1.

9 32

0.

8 98

2.

4 12

06

29.9

HBD

-NO

T K

NO

WN

IF

IM

PAIR

ED (.

05-.0

79)

484

1.8

272

56.2

25

5.

2 16

3.

3 6

1.2

20

4.1

145

30.0

UN

DER

INFL

UEN

CE

OF

DR

UG

S 3

0.0

0 0.

0 2

66.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

1 33

.3

HBD

-ABI

LITY

IMPA

IRED

( BA

C .0

8% &

ABO

VE)

25

941

94.1

16

432

63.3

13

19

5.1

1016

3.

9 28

7 1.

1 54

1 2.

1 63

46

24.5

JUV

ENIL

E D

UI

180

1.3

61

33.9

18

10

.0

1 0.

6 2

1.1

4 2.

2 94

52

.2

NO

T R

EPO

RTE

D

869

3.2

366

42.1

41

4.

7 47

5.

4 21

2.

4 67

7.

7 32

7 37

.6

MIS

DEM

EAN

OR

DU

I 94

21

69.1

60

65

64.4

14

6 1.

5 42

0 4.

5 14

1 1.

5 24

5 2.

6 24

04

25.5

SOBR

IETY

CO

DE

TOTA

L M

ISD

EMEA

NO

R

DU

I FE

LON

Y D

UI

ALC

OH

OL-

REC

KLE

SS

NO

NA

LCO

HO

L-RE

CK

LESS

O

THER

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

NO

REC

OR

D O

F A

NY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

*For

eac

h so

brie

ty c

ode,

per

cent

ages

are

bas

ed o

n ro

w to

tals

.

TABL

E 22

: FA

TAL

AN

D IN

JURY

AC

CID

ENTS

OF

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y TY

PE O

F A

RRE

ST A

ND

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N S

TATU

S*

TY

PE O

F C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

SOBR

IETY

CO

DE

TOTA

L M

ISD

EMEA

NO

R

DU

I FE

LON

Y D

UI

ALC

OH

OL-

REC

KLE

SS

NO

NA

LCO

HO

L-RE

CK

LESS

O

THER

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

NO

REC

OR

D O

F A

NY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

es a

re b

ased

on

row

tota

ls.

*For

eac

h ty

pe o

f arr

est,

perc

enta

g

Page 66: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE 23: 1994 ACCIDENT-INVOLVED* DUI ARRESTEES WITH NO RECORD OF CONVICTION, BY COUNTY AND TYPE OF ARREST

TYPE OF ARREST COUNTY TOTAL

(100%) FELONY

DUI JUVENILE

DUI MISDEMEANOR

DUI N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 6347 1133 17.9 151 2.4 5063 79.8 ALAMEDA 206 20 9.7 5 2.4 181 87.9 AMADOR 6 3 50.0 0 0.0 3 50.0 BUTTE 37 10 27.0 1 2.7 26 70.3 CALAVERAS 10 4 40.0 1 10.0 5 50.0 COLUSA 5 2 40.0 0 0.0 3 60.0 CONTRA COSTA 114 16 14.0 3 2.6 95 83.3 DEL NORTE 12 2 16.7 0 0.0 10 83.3 EL DORADO 22 6 27.3 2 9.1 14 63.6 FRESNO 261 50 19.2 4 1.5 207 79.3 GLENN 7 1 14.3 0 0.0 6 85.7 HUMBOLDT 41 9 22.0 3 7.3 29 70.7 IMPERIAL 47 11 23.4 1 2.1 35 74.5 KERN 166 25 15.1 4 2.4 137 82.5 KINGS 16 2 12.5 2 12.5 12 75.0 LAKE 21 2 9.5 0 0.0 19 90.5 LASSEN 8 2 25.0 0 0.0 6 75.0 LOS ANGELES 1972 271 13.7 53 2.7 1648 83.6 MADERA 46 5 10.9 1 2.2 40 87.0 MARIN 60 8 13.3 1 1.7 51 85.0 MARIPOSA 4 1 25.0 0 0.0 3 75.0 MENDOCINO 29 3 10.3 0 0.0 26 89.7 MERCED 67 12 17.9 1 1.5 54 80.6 MODOC 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 100.0 MONO 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 100.0 MONTEREY 63 9 14.3 5 7.9 49 77.8 NAPA 26 13 50.0 3 11.5 10 38.5 NEVADA 11 1 9.1 0 0.0 10 90.9 ORANGE 429 34 7.9 14 3.3 381 88.8 PLACER 48 10 20.8 0 0.0 38 79.2 PLUMAS 8 2 25.0 0 0.0 6 75.0 RIVERSIDE 330 76 23.0 5 1.5 249 75.5 SACRAMENTO 236 91 38.6 5 2.1 140 59.3 SAN BENITO 14 2 14.3 0 0.0 12 85.7 SAN BERNARDINO 507 132 26.0 8 1.6 367 72.4 SAN DIEGO 449 105 23.4 11 2.4 333 74.2 SAN FRANCISCO 75 18 24.0 2 2.7 55 73.3 SAN JOAQUIN 110 12 10.9 2 1.8 96 87.3 SAN LUIS OBISPO 36 4 11.1 0 0.0 32 88.9 SAN MATEO 84 21 25.0 1 1.2 62 73.8 SANTA BARBARA 45 6 13.3 1 2.2 38 84.4 SANTA CLARA 125 18 14.4 1 0.8 106 84.8 SANTA CRUZ 35 3 8.6 0 0.0 32 91.4 SHASTA 27 11 40.7 0 0.0 16 59.3 SISKIYOU 9 2 22.2 0 0.0 7 77.8 SOLANO 57 13 22.8 0 0.0 44 77.2 SONOMA 52 5 9.6 2 3.8 45 86.5 STANISLAUS 71 17 23.9 2 2.8 52 73.2 SUTTER 10 3 30.0 0 0.0 7 70.0 TEHAMA 17 5 29.4 2 11.8 10 58.8 TRINITY 7 2 28.6 1 14.3 4 57.1 TULARE 132 12 9.1 2 1.5 118 89.4 TUOLUMNE 11 3 27.3 1 9.1 7 63.6 VENTURA 100 19 19.0 1 1.0 80 80.0 YOLO 43 15 34.9 0 0.0 28 65.1 YUBA 12 4 33.3 0 0.0 8 66.7

*These cases include only arrestees whose accidents showed alcohol or drug-impaired sobriety codes.

54

Page 67: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

55

TABL

E 24

: 1-

, 3- A

ND

6-Y

EAR

TOTA

L, F

ATA

L/IN

JURY

AN

D A

LCO

HO

L-RE

LATE

D

AC

CID

ENT

MEA

NS

BY O

FFEN

DER

STA

TUS

TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

FA

TAL/

INJU

RY A

CC

IDEN

TS

ALC

OH

OL-

RELA

TED

AC

CID

ENTS

ALL

.0

382

.116

1 .2

664

.013

7 .0

429

.098

9 .0

113

.032

3 .0

703

1ST

DU

I .0

426

.124

1 .2

778

.014

8 .0

445

.100

0 .0

107

.029

5 .0

631

2ND

DU

I .0

312

.105

1 .2

684

.012

2 .0

409

.102

2 .0

131

.035

6 .0

787

3RD

DU

I .0

248

.093

2 .2

053

.010

5 .0

393

.086

5 .0

128

.045

0 .0

875

4TH

+ D

UI

.015

7 .0

794

.194

3 .0

072

.033

4 .0

870

.007

7 .0

390

.101

4

DU

I O

FFEN

DER

ST

ATU

S

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

4 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

2 A

RRES

TEES

)

6-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

4 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

2 A

RRES

TEES

)

6-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

1-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

4 A

RRES

TEES

)

3-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(199

2 A

RRES

TEES

)

6-YE

AR

SUBS

EQU

ENT

(198

9 A

RRES

TEES

)

Page 68: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS

DUI Arrest Data: Arrest data are reported to the Department of Justice (DOJ), Law Enforcement Information Center, by individual law enforcement agencies throughout the state. As such, these data are subject to reporting errors such as incorrect names, birthdates or arrest dates. Nonreporting of arrest data due to error or omission can also occur; for example, in 1995 the Oakland Police Department reported no DUI arrests, after reporting 960 such arrests in 1994. In addition, when data are entered into DOJ's Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) system, only the highest-order offense is included. Therefore, in cases where a DUI arrest is made in conjunction with, for example, an auto theft arrest, that DUI arrest will not be included in the database. This results in a slight but systematic underreporting of the number of DUI arrests annually. DUI Conviction Data: Abstracts of conviction for DUI and other traffic-related offenses are reported to the DMV by courts throughout the state. As abstracts are received (either hard copy, magnetic tape or through direct electronic access from the courts) they are entered onto the DMV driver record database. Abstracts without an identifying driver license number are run through the automated name index (ANI) system in order to match the abstract with an existing driver record; in cases where no such match can be made, an "X" numbered record is created to store the abstract. The total number of DUI abstracts of conviction received by DMV from the courts is tallied monthly and annually. Since this workload total includes abstracts which amend, correct or dismiss prior abstracts of conviction, it tends to overestimate the actual number of convictions which have occurred. Conviction data are also subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those for DUI arrests. For example, the 1993 Annual Report of the California DUI Management Information System documented that thousands of DUI convictions showing in court records do not appear on the DMV driver record database. Alcohol-Involved Accident Data: Accident data are reported to the California Highway Patrol (CHP) by local law enforcement agencies and district offices of the CHP. As such, these data are subject to reporting and nonreporting errors similar to those occurring in both DUI arrest and conviction data. While most local law enforcement agencies will investigate and file reports on accidents involving injury or death, the investigation and reporting of property-damage-only accidents varies widely by local jurisdiction. Data are entered onto CHP's Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and output in annual published reports.

56

Page 69: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

REFERENCES

California Department of Finance. (1991). California statistical abstract, 1991.

Sacramento, CA: Author. California Department of Motor Vehicles. (1984-87). An evaluation of the California

drunk driving countermeasure system. Volumes 1-8. Sacramento, CA: Author. California Highway Patrol. (1995). 1994 annual report of fatal and injury motor vehicle

traffic collisions. Sacramento, CA: Author. Helander, C. J. (1989). Development of a California DUI management information

system. Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles. Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1992). Annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 134). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1994). 1994 Annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 143). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1995). 1995 annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 145). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., & Helander, C. J. (1996). 1996 annual report of the California DUI

management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 159). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tashima, H. N., Marowitz, L. A., DeYoung, D. J., & Helander, C. J. (1993). Annual

report of the California DUI management information system. Annual report to the Legislature of the State of California (Report No. 138). Sacramento: California Department of Motor Vehicles.

57

Page 70: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

GLOSSARY

ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE (APS) Administrative per se ("on-the-spot") license suspension or revocation occurs immediately pursuant to lawful arrest of a person driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or more, or one who refuses a chemical test. Upon arrest, the driver's license is immediately confiscated by the law enforcement officer and an order of suspension or revocation served. The driver is issued a temporary license and allowed due process through administrative review. In July 1990, California became the 28th state to implement APS. In January 1994, California enacted a "zero tolerance" statute which requires the administrative suspension of any driver under age 21 with a BAC of 0.01% or greater, or who refuses to be tested.

ALCOHOL-INVOLVED ACCIDENT

Alcohol-involved accidents are those in which the investigating law enforcement officer indicates on the accident report that the driver "had been drinking (HBD)." Accidents involving drivers who are determined to be under the influence of drugs other than alcohol (typically less than 1% of all accidents) are also included in the alcohol-involved accident category.

ALCOHOL-RELATED RECKLESS DRIVING

Commonly called a "wet" reckless, alcohol-related reckless driving refers to an arrest/conviction incident which originated as a DUI arrest. DUI arrests involving drugs which are reduced to reckless driving are also referred to as alcohol-involved or "wet" reckless driving. "Wet" reckless convictions count as priors for the purposes of enhanced penalties upon subsequent conviction of DUI.

ALPHA

Alpha is the investigator's acceptable risk or probability level of making a Type 1 error (generally chosen to be small–e.g., 1% or .01, 5% or .05). There is always some risk of a Type 1 error, so alpha cannot be zero. Alpha is also called the significance level, because it is the criterion for claiming statistical significance.

BAC

Blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, is a measure of the percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person's blood. Statutorily, BAC is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or per 210 liters of breath.

CONVICTION Conviction of an offense, as used in this report, refers to the receipt by DMV of a court abstract of conviction. In a small proportion of cases, an offender may be

58

Page 71: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

convicted of an offense but that conviction is not reported to DMV. Such cases would functionally be treated by DMV as though the offender had not been convicted. Because convictions can be amended, corrected, dismissed or simply not reported at all, the conviction totals reported herein are dynamic and subject to change.

COVARIATE A variable used to statistically adjust the results of an analysis for differences (on that variable) existing among subjects prior to the comparison of treatment effects.

DUI

DUI is an acronym for "driving under the influence" of alcohol and/or drugs, a violation of Sections 23152 or 23153 of the California Vehicle Code.

LOGISTIC REGRESSION

Logistic regression analysis is a statistical procedure evaluating the linear relationship between various factors and the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an outcome event. In this study, the procedure was used to explain the relationship between the various sanctions and the proportion of DUI offenders who incurred accidents and/or DUI incidents.

MAJOR CONVICTION Major convictions include primarily DUI convictions, but also reckless driving and hit-and-run convictions.

p

p stands for probability. For example, if p<.05, the probability is less than 5 chances in 100 that the difference you found is by chance alone.

QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS

Quasi-experimental designs refer to analyses where the comparison groups are not equivalent on characteristics other than the treatment conditions because random assignment was not used. Caution should be excercised when interpreting the results because of possible confounding of group bias with treatment effects. Covariates are used to statistically reduce group differences prior to the comparison of treatment effects.

SIGNIFICANT (STATISTICALLY)

If the result of a statistical test is significant, this means that the difference found is very unlikely by chance alone. How unlikely is determined by alpha.

59

Page 72: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

APPENDIX A

Assembly Bill No. 757

CHAPTER 450 An act to add Section 1821 to the Vehicle Code. relating to driving offenses.

(Approved by Governor September 14, 1989. Filed with Secretary of State September 15, 1989.)

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 757, Friedman. Driving offenses: intervention programs: evaluation. Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles maintains records of driver's offenses reported by the courts. Including violations of the prohibitions against driving while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, any drug, or both, driving with an excessive blood-alcohol concentration, or driving while addicted to any drug. This bill would, additionally, require the department to establish and maintain a data and monitoring system, as specified, to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of those violations relating to alcohol and drugs, and to report thereon annually to the Legislature. The bill would declare legislative findings. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares as follows: (a) Drivers under the influence of drugs or alcohol continue to present a grave danger to the citizens of this state. (b) The Legislature has taken stern action to deter this crime and punish its offenders and has provided a range of sanctions available to the courts to use at their discretion. (c) No system exists to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of these measures or to determine the achievement of the Legislature's goals. (d) This lack of accurate and up-to-date comprehensive statistics hampers the ability of the Legislature to make informed and timely policy decisions. (e) It is essential that the Legislature acquire this information, from available resources, as soon as practicable, and that this information be updated and transmitted annually to the Legislature. SEC. 2. Section 1821 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 1821: The department shall establish and maintain a data and monitoring system to evaluate the efficacy of intervention programs for persons convicted of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The system may include a recidivism tracking system. The recidivism tracking system may include, but not be limited to, jail sentencing, license restriction, license suspension. Level I (first offender) and II (multiple offender) alcohol and drug education and treatment program assignment, alcohol and drug education treatment program readmission and dropout rates, adjudicating court, length of jail term, actual jail or alternative sentence served, type of treatment program assigned, actual program compliance status, subsequent accidents related to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and subsequent convictions of violations of Section 23152 or 23153. The department shall submit an annual report of its evaluations to the Legislature. The evaluations shall include a ranking of the relative efficacy of criminal penalties, other sanctions, and intervention programs and the various combinations thereof.

60

Page 73: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

61

APP

END

IX B

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

SEX

(100

%)

RAC

E/ET

HN

ICIT

Y (1

00%

)

ALP

INE

UN

DER

18

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0

AM

AD

OR

UN

DER

18

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

STA

TEW

IDE

19

8982

17

4757

87

.8

2422

5 12

.2

8517

0 42

.8

9049

7 45

.5

1261

0 6.

3 10

705

5.4

ALA

MED

A

UN

DER

18

44

36

81.8

8

18.2

19

43

.2

12

27.3

12

27

.3

1 2.

3

18-2

0 31

5 28

3 89

.8

32

10.2

13

2 41

.9

113

35.9

38

12

.1

32

10.2

21-3

0 20

08

1720

85

.7

288

14.3

74

8 37

.3

632

31.5

34

2 17

.0

286

14.2

31-4

0 18

31

1538

84

.0

293

16.0

82

3 44

.9

379

20.7

34

6 18

.9

283

15.5

41-5

0 89

3 74

0 82

.9

153

17.1

43

6 48

.8

156

17.5

17

6 19

.7

125

14.0

51-6

0 34

5 28

3 82

.0

62

18.0

17

1 49

.6

56

16.2

73

21

.2

45

13.0

61-7

0 13

1 12

0 91

.6

11

8.4

71

54.2

8

6.1

37

28.2

15

11

.5

71

& A

BOV

E 29

26

89

.7

3 10

.3

20

69.0

3

10

.3

3 10

.3

3 10

.3

TO

TAL

5596

47

46

84.8

85

0 15

.2

2420

43

.2

1359

24

.3

1027

18

.4

790

14.1

18

-20

4 4

100.

0 0

0.

0 4

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

16

12

75.0

4

25.0

11

68

.8

2 12

.5

1 6.

3 2

12.5

31-4

0 24

21

87

.5

3 12

.5

20

83.3

1

4.2

1 4.

2 2

8.3

41

-50

21

19

90.5

2

9.5

19

90.5

1

4.8

1 4.

8 0

0.0

51

-60

6 5

83.3

1

16.7

5

83.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

16.7

TOTA

L 72

62

86

.1

10

13.9

59

81

.9

4 5.

6 3

4.2

6 8.

3

18

-20

5 5

100.

0 0

0.0

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 46

43

93

.5

3 6.

5 38

82

.6

6 13

.0

0 0.

0 2

4.3

31

-40

72

62

86.1

10

13

.9

67

93.1

3

4.2

0 0.

0 2

2.8

41

-50

43

33

76.7

10

23

.3

40

93.0

3

7.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

51

-60

18

14

77.8

4

22.2

15

83

.3

3 16

.7

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

9 6

66.7

3

33.3

9

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 3

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

1293

10

87

84.1

20

6 15

.9

1003

77

.6

238

18.4

23

1.

8 29

2.

2

21

- 30

478

410

85.8

68

14

.2

326

68.2

13

8 28

.9

7 1.

5 7

1.5

TO

TAL

197

167

84.8

30

15

.2

178

90.4

15

7.

6 0

0.0

4 2.

0 BU

TTE

UN

DER

18

22

16

72.7

6

27.3

21

95

.5

1 4.

5 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 12

0 10

3 85

.8

17

14.2

86

71

.7

28

23.3

1

0.8

5 4.

2

31

-40

330

275

83.3

55

16

.7

271

82.1

43

13

.0

8 2.

4 8

2.4

41

-50

230

194

84.3

36

15

.7

198

86.1

22

9.

6 5

2.2

5 2.

2

61

- 70

23

19

82.6

4

17.4

17

73

.9

3 13

.0

1 4.

3 2

8.7

51

-60

76

58

76.3

18

23

.7

71

93.4

3

3.9

1 1.

3 1

1.3

71

& A

BOV

E 14

12

85

.7

2 14

.3

13

92.9

0

0.0

0 0.

0 1

7.1

Page 74: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

62

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

CA

LAV

ERA

S U

ND

ER 1

8 5

4 80

.0

1 20

.0

4 80

.0

1 20

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

10

9 90

.0

1 10

.0

9 90

.0

1 10

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

21

-30

64

49

76.6

15

23

.4

57

89.1

4

6.3

0 0.

0 3

4.7

31

-40

95

77

81.1

18

18

.9

84

88.4

10

10

.5

0 0.

0 1

1.1

41

-50

87

75

86.2

12

13

.8

82

94.3

4

4.6

1 1.

1 0

0.0

51

-60

33

31

93.9

2

6.1

31

93.9

2

6.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

10

7 70

.0

3 30

.0

10

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 5

3 60

.0

2 40

.0

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 30

9 25

5 82

.5

54

17.5

28

2 91

.3

22

7.1

1 0.

3 4

1.3

CO

LUSA

U

ND

ER 1

8 4

3 75

.0

1 25

.0

2 50

.0

2 50

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

26

24

92.3

2

7.7

7 26

.9

19

73.1

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 11

1 10

5 94

.6

6 5.

4 43

38

.7

63

56.8

1

0.9

4 3.

6

31-4

0 83

77

92

.8

6 7.

2

40

48.2

39

47

.0

2 2.

4 2

2.4

41

-50

61

54

88.5

7

11.5

36

59

.0

18

29.5

4

6.6

3 4.

9

51-6

0 21

21

10

0.0

0 0.

0 13

61

.9

8 38

.1

0 0.

0 0

0.0

61

-70

14

13

92.9

1

7.1

11

78.6

3

21.4

0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

3 3

100.

0 0

0.0

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 32

3 30

0 92

.9

23

7.1

155

48.0

15

2 47

.1

7

2.2

9 2.

8 C

ON

TRA

U

ND

ER 1

8 44

38

86

.4

6 13

.6

27

61.4

13

29

.5

3 6.

8 1

2.3

C

OST

A

18-2

0 25

4 23

3 91

.7

21

8.3

143

56.3

74

29

.1

19

7.5

18

7.1

21

-30

1337

11

53

86.2

18

4 13

.8

714

53.4

41

0 30

.7

150

11.2

63

4.

7

31-4

0 12

38

1011

81

.7

227

18.3

73

3 59

.2

223

18.0

20

2 16

.3

80

6.5

41

-50

705

583

82.7

12

2 17

.3

439

62.3

10

6 15

.0

122

17.3

38

5.

4

51-6

0 27

8 24

4 87

.8

34

12.2

18

4 66

.2

33

11.9

47

16

.9

14

5.0

61

-70

105

95

90.5

10

9.

5 67

63

.8

8 7.

6 24

22

.9

6 5.

7

71 &

ABO

VE

29

26

89.7

3

10.3

21

72

.4

0 0.

0 8

27.6

0

0.0

TO

TAL

3990

33

83

84.8

60

7 15

.2

2328

58

.3

867

21.7

57

5 14

.4

220

5.5

DEL

NO

RTE

UN

DER

18

3 3

100.

0 0

0.0

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 21

18

85

.7

3 14

.3

15

71.4

1

4.8

0 0.

0 5

23.8

21-3

0 74

62

83

.8

12

16.2

46

62

.2

18

24.3

1

1.4

9 12

.2

31

-40

104

81

77.9

23

22

.1

86

82.7

9

8.7

0

0.0

9 8.

7

41-5

0 64

55

85

.9

9 14

.1

51

79.7

6

9.4

2 3.

1 5

7.8

51

-60

20

18

90.0

2

10.0

17

85

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

3 15

.0

61

-70

8 7

87.5

1

12.5

8

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E 1

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

295

245

83.1

50

16

.9

227

76.9

34

11

.5

3 1.

0 31

10

.5

Page 75: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

63

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

EL D

ORA

DO

U

ND

ER 1

8 7

5 71

.4

2 28

.6

7 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 75

64

85

.3

11

14.7

68

90

.7

7 9.

3 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 37

4 31

1 83

.2

63

16.8

30

4 81

.3

57

15.2

2

0.5

11

2.9

31

-40

447

358

80.1

89

19

.9

409

91.5

31

6.

9 0

0.0

7 1.

6

41-5

0 24

2 19

9 82

.2

43

17.8

22

6 93

.4

10

4.1

3 1.

2 3

1.2

51

-60

67

58

86.6

9

13.4

65

97

.0

1 1.

5 1

1.5

0 0.

0

61-7

0 32

32

10

0.0

0 0.

0 32

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

71 &

ABO

VE

12

9 75

.0

3 25

.0

11

91.7

0

0.0

1 8.

3 0

0.0

TO

TAL

1256

10

36

82.5

22

0 17

.5

1122

89

.3

106

8.4

7 0.

6 21

1.

7 FR

ESN

O

UN

DER

18

88

76

86.4

12

13

.6

26

29.5

56

63

.6

3 3.

4 3

3.4

18

-20

521

484

92.9

37

7.

1 10

9 20

.9

392

75.2

11

2.

1 9

1.7

21

-30

2805

25

94

92.5

21

1 7.

5 46

0 16

.4

2205

78

.6

77

2.7

63

2.2

31

-40

1954

17

40

89.0

21

4 11

.0

514

26.3

13

13

67.2

69

3.

5 58

3.

0

41-5

0 89

0 78

7 88

.4

103

11.6

26

7 30

.0

550

61.8

42

4.

7 31

3.

5

51-6

0 23

5 21

2 90

.2

23

9.8

81

34.5

12

9 54

.9

18

7.7

7 3.

0

61-7

0 83

74

89

.2

9 10

.8

40

48.2

36

43

.4

6 7.

2 1

1.2

71

& A

BOV

E 17

14

82

.4

3 17

.6

10

58.8

5

29.4

1

5.9

1 5.

9

TOTA

L 65

93

5981

90

.7

612

9.3

1507

22

.9

4686

71

.1

227

3.4

173

2.6

GLE

NN

U

ND

ER 1

8 3

3 10

0.0

0 0.

0 1

33.3

2

66.7

0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 30

29

96

.7

1 3.

3 15

50

.0

15

50.0

0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 11

2 10

1 90

.2

11

9.8

48

42.9

62

55

.4

0 0.

0 2

1.8

31

-40

108

93

86.1

15

13

.9

60

55.6

43

39

.8

2 1.

9 3

2.8

41

-50

58

52

89.7

6

10.3

46

79

.3

9 15

.5

2 3.

4 1

1.7

51

-60

20

19

95.0

1

5.0

13

65.0

5

25.0

0

0.0

2 10

.0

61

-70

8 8

100.

0 0

0.0

6 75

.0

2 25

.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

339

305

90.0

34

10

.0

189

55.8

13

8 40

.7

4 1.

2 8

2.4

HU

MBO

LDT

UN

DER

18

26

18

69.2

8

30.8

21

80

.8

1 3.

8 0

0.0

4 15

.4

18

-20

119

100

84.0

19

16

.0

102

85.7

8

6.7

1 0.

8 8

6.7

21

- 30

436

364

83.5

72

16

.5

356

81.7

32

7.

3 8

1.8

40

9.2

31

-40

411

325

79.1

86

20

.9

346

84.2

22

5.

4 8

1.9

35

8.5

41

-50

228

177

77.6

51

22

.4

207

90.8

6

2.6

0 0.

0 15

6.

6

51- 6

0 75

60

80

.0

15

20.0

70

93

.3

0 0.

0 1

1.3

4 5.

3

61-7

0 27

24

88

.9

3 11

.1

23

85.2

1

3.7

0 0.

0 3

11.1

71 &

ABO

VE

11

9 81

.8

2 18

.2

11

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

1333

10

77

80.8

25

6 19

.2

1136

85

.2

70

5.3

18

1.4

109

8.2

Page 76: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

64

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

IMPE

RIA

L U

ND

ER 1

8 16

14

87

.5

2 12

.5

3 18

.8

13

81.3

0

0.0

0 0.

0

T O

TAL

1899

17

48

92.0

15

1 8.

0 38

6 20

.3

1385

72

.9

61

3.2

67

3.5

41

-50

328

299

91.2

29

8.

8 69

21

.0

244

74.4

7

2.1

8 2.

4

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

18

-20

93

84

90.3

9

9.7

16

17.2

71

76

.3

2 2.

2 4

4.3

21

-30

593

549

92.6

44

7.

4 10

3 17

.4

448

75.5

18

3.

0 24

4.

0

31-4

0 65

6 59

6 90

.9

60

9.1

129

19.7

48

3 73

.6

21

3.2

23

3.5

51

-60

142

137

96.5

5

3.5

39

27.5

94

66

.2

5 3.

5 4

2.8

61

- 70

56

54

96.4

2

3.6

21

37.5

26

46

.4

5 8.

9 4

7.1

71

& A

BOV

E 15

15

10

0.0

0 0.

0 6

40.0

6

40.0

3

20.0

0

0.0

INYO

U

ND

ER 1

8

3

1

3

3.3

2

6

6.7

2

6

6.7

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1 33

.3

18

-20

14

12

8

5.7

2

14

.3

6

4

2.9

6

42

.9

0

0

.0

2

14.3

21-3

0

8

8

81

92.

0

7

8.0

55

62.

5

20

22.7

0

0.0

13

14

.8

31

-40

10

3

88

85.

4

15

14.

6

76

73.

8

14

13.

6

1

1.0

12

11

.7

41

-50

51

45

8

8.2

6

1

1.8

43

8

4.3

4

7

.8

0

0

.0

4

7

.8

51

-60

2

9

26

89.

7

3

10.

3

28

96.

6

1

3.4

0

0.0

0

0.0

61-7

0

1

3

12

92.

3

1

7.7

13

1

00.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

5

5

100.

0

0

0.0

3

60.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

40.0

TOTA

L

306

270

88.

2

36

11.

8

226

73.

9

45

14.

7

1

0.3

34

11.

1 K

ERN

U

ND

ER 1

8

44

40

9

0.9

4

9

.1

23

5

2.3

19

4

3.2

2

4

.5

0

0

.0

18

-20

3

11

2

83

9

1.0

28

9

.0

1

05

3

3.8

1

95

6

2.7

9

2

.9

2

0

.6

21

-30

15

75

14

50

9

2.1

1

25

7

.9

4

96

3

1.5

9

72

6

1.7

7

3

4.6

34

2.2

31-4

0

133

6

1176

88.

0

160

12.0

533

39.

9

704

52.

7

76

5.7

23

1.7

41-5

0

601

543

90.

3

58

9.7

299

49.

8

256

42.

6

33

5.5

13

2.2

51-6

0

220

1

97

8

9.5

23

10

.5

1

31

59

.5

68

3

0.9

17

7

.7

4

1

.8

61

-70

7

8

72

92.

3

6

7.7

61

78.2

12

15.

4

3

3.8

2

2.6

71 &

ABO

VE

23

23

100.

0

0

0.0

15

65.

2

6

26.

1

1

4.3

1

4.3

TOTA

L

418

8

378

4

90.4

404

9.6

1663

39.

7 22

32

5

3.3

2

14

5

.1

79

1

.9

KIN

GS

UN

DER

18

1

4

13

92.

9

1

7.1

4

28.

6

10

71.

4

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

1

00

89

8

9.0

11

1

1.0

40

4

0.0

58

5

8.0

2

2

.0

0

0

.0

21

-30

4

48

4

12

9

2.0

36

8

.0

1

36

30.4

284

63.

4

20

4.5

8

1.8

31-4

0

2

84

2

48

8

7.3

36

1

2.7

93

3

2.7

1

56

5

4.9

26

9

.2

9

3

.2

41

-50

136

109

80.

1

27

19.

9

49

36.

0

70

51.

5

12

8.8

5

3.7

51-6

0

44

40

9

0.9

4

9

.1

17

3

8.6

2

0

45.

5

6

13.

6

1

2.3

61-7

0

10

10

1

00.0

0

0.0

4

40.

0

4

40.

0

2

20.

0

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

2

2

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

1

00.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

038

9

23

8

8.9

1

15

1

1.1

3

43

3

3.0

604

58.

2

68

6.6

23

2.2

Page 77: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

65

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

LAK

E U

ND

ER 1

8

14

12

8

5.7

2

1

4.3

12

8

5.7

1

7

.1

1

7

.1

0

0

.0

18

-20

40

3

7

92.5

3

7.5

28

70.

0

9

22.

5

0

0.0

3

7.5

21-3

0

158

1

34

8

4.8

24

1

5.2

1

16

7

3.4

33

2

0.9

3

1

.9

6

3

.8

31

-40

2

17

1

60

7

3.7

57

2

6.3

1

87

8

6.2

17

7

.8

8

3

.7

5

2

.3

41

-50

133

1

08

8

1.2

25

1

8.8

1

16

8

7.2

8

6

.0

4

3

.0

5

3

.8

51

-60

55

51

9

2.7

4

7

.3

47

8

5.5

1

1

.8

3

5

.5

4

7

.3

61

-70

31

27

8

7.1

4

1

2.9

29

9

3.5

0

0

.0

2

6

.5

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

8

8

10

0.0

0

0

.0

6

7

5.0

1

1

2.5

1

1

2.5

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

6

56

5

37

8

1.9

1

19

1

8.1

5

41

8

2.5

70

1

0.7

22

3

.4

23

3

.5

LASS

EN

UN

DER

18

1

1

10

0.0

0

0.

0

1

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

14

10

7

1.4

4

2

8.6

12

8

5.7

1

7

.1

0

0

.0

1

7

.1

21

-30

79

63

7

9.7

16

2

0.3

63

7

9.7

10

12

.7

1

1

.3

5

6

.3

31

-40

73

63

86

.3

10

1

3.7

59

8

0.8

8

1

1.0

2

2

.7

4

5

.5

41

-50

49

43

87

.8

6

1

2.2

44

8

9.8

0

0

.0

1

2

.0

4

8.2

51-6

0

17

15

88.

2

2

11.8

17

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

61

-70

7

6

8

5.7

1

1

4.3

6

8

5.7

1

1

4.3

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

1

1

1

00.0

0

0.0

1

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

2

41

2

02

8

3.8

39

1

6.2

2

03

8

4.2

20

8

.3

4

1

.7

14

5

.8

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

UN

DER

18

225

197

87.

6

28

12.

4

82

36.4

122

54.

2

11

4.9

10

4.4

18-2

0

257

4 23

88

9

2.8

1

86

7

.2

4

36

1

6.9

1

869

7

2.6

1

29

5

.0

1

40

5

.4

21

-30

210

67

1930

9

91.

7

1758

8.3

375

8

17.

8 14

848

7

0.5

1

265

6

.0

11

96

5

.7

31

-40

156

36

1404

7

89.

8

158

9

10.

2

392

7

25.

1 9

044

5

7.8

1

617

1

0.3

1

048

6

.7

41

-50

6

837

603

2

88.

2

805

11.

8

2099

30.

7

331

9

48.

5

798

11.

7

621

9.1

51-6

0

234

8 21

32

9

0.8

2

16

9

.2

8

68

3

7.0

9

02

3

8.4

3

96

1

6.9

1

82

7

.8

61

-70

72

7

661

90.

9

66

9.1

314

43.

2

229

31.

5

139

19.

1

45

6.2

71 &

ABO

VE

156

141

90.

4

15

9.6

87

55.

8

40

25.

6

27

17.

3

2

1.3

TOTA

L 49

570

4490

7

90.

6 4

663

9

.4

1157

1

23.

3 30

373

6

1.3

438

2

8.8

324

4

6.5

M

AD

ERA

U

ND

ER 1

8

10

8

8

0.0

2

2

0.0

7

7

0.0

3

3

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

84

78

9

2.9

6

7

.1

19

2

2.6

64

7

6.2

1

1

.2

0

0

.0

21

-30

45

1

434

96.

2

17

3.8

69

15.

3

369

81.

8

7

1.6

6

1.3

31-4

0

296

270

91.

2

26

8.8

83

28.

0

203

68.

6

5

1.7

5

1.7

41-5

0

115

101

87.

8

14

12.

2

47

40.

9

60

52.

2

4

3.5

4

3.5

51-6

0

3

6

35

97.

2

1

2.8

14

38.

9

16

44.

4

6

16.

7

0

0.0

61-7

0

2

6

23

88.

5

3

11.

5

15

57.

7

10

38.

5

0

0.0

1

3.8

71 &

ABO

VE

7

6

8

5.7

1

1

4.3

3

4

2.9

3

4

2.9

1

1

4.3

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

102

5

955

93.

2

70

6.8

257

25.

1

728

71.

0

24

2.3

16

1.6

Page 78: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

66

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

MA

RIN

U

ND

ER 1

8

8

7

8

7.5

1

1

2.5

7

8

7.5

1

1

2.5

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

6

8

59

86.

8

9

13.2

37

54.

4

21

30.

9

1

1.5

9

13.

2

21-3

0

527

427

81.

0

100

19.

0

296

56.

2

164

31.

1

16

3.0

51

9.7

31-4

0

478

366

76.

6

112

23.

4

343

71.

8

54

11.

3

29

6.1

52

10.

9

41-5

0 3

06

2

15

7

0.3

91

2

9.7

2

37

7

7.5

22

7

.2

5

1

.6

42

1

3.7

51

-60

1

03

80

7

7.7

23

2

2.3

97

9

4.2

1

1

.0

1

1

.0

4

3

.9

61

-70

4

1

33

80.

5

8

19.

5

38

92.

7

1

2.4

2

4.9

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

11

11

100

.0

0

0

.0

9

8

1.8

1

9

.1

0

0

.0

1

9

.1

TO

TAL

15

42

1198

77.

7

344

22.

3 1

064

6

9.0

2

65

1

7.2

54

3

.5

1

59

1

0.3

MA

RIPO

SA

UN

DER

18

1

1

1

00.0

0

0.0

1

1

00.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

6

6

10

0.0

0

0

.0

5

8

3.3

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1

1

6.7

21

-30

29

27

9

3.1

2

6

.9

25

8

6.2

3

1

0.3

1

3

.4

0

0

.0

31

-40

21

16

7

6.2

5

2

3.8

17

8

1.0

2

9

.5

0

0

.0

2

9

.5

41

-50

19

15

7

8.9

4

2

1.1

17

8

9.5

1

5

.3

0

0

.0

1

5

.3

51

-60

8

4

5

0.0

4

5

0.0

6

7

5.0

2

2

5.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

61

-70

7

5

7

1.4

2

2

8.6

5

7

1.4

1

1

4.3

0

0

.0

1

1

4.3

71

& A

BOV

E

1

1

1

00.0

0

0.0

1

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

92

75

8

1.5

17

1

8.5

77

8

3.7

9

9

.8

1

1

.1

5

5

.4

MEN

DO

CIN

O

UN

DER

18

1

6

16

1

00.0

0

0.0

12

75.

0

1

6.3

0

0.0

3

18.

8

18-2

0

63

55

87.

3

8

12.

7

36

57.

1

21

33.

3

0

0.0

6

9.5

21-3

0

289

255

88.

2

34

11.

8

165

57.

1

111

38.

4

2

0.7

11

3.8

31-4

0

28

0

222

79.

3

58

20.

7

215

76.

8

45

16.

1

4

1.4

16

5.7

41-5

0

14

8

128

86.

5

20

13.

5

127

85.

8

11

7.4

1

0.7

9

6.1

51-6

0

4

9

45

91.

8

4

8.2

45

91.

8

3

6.1

1

2.0

0

0.0

61-7

0

26

22

84.

6

4

15.

4

24

92.

3

0

0.0

1

3.8

1

3.8

71 &

ABO

VE

9

8

8

8.9

1

1

1.1

9

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

880

7

51

8

5.3

1

29

1

4.7

6

33

7

1.9

1

92

2

1.8

9

1

.0

46

5

.2

MER

CED

U

ND

ER 1

8

19

18

9

4.7

1

5

.3

10

5

2.6

6

3

1.6

2

1

0.5

1

5

.3

18

-20

1

52

1

39

9

1.4

13

8

.6

23

1

5.1

1

18

7

7.6

5

3

.3

6

3

.9

21

-30

8

78

8

17

9

3.1

61

6

.9

1

74

1

9.8

6

45

7

3.5

34

3

.9

25

2

.8

31

-40

658

5

80

8

8.1

78

1

1.9

1

76

2

6.7

4

16

63

.2

47

7

.1

19

2

.9

41

-50

2

94

2

59

8

8.1

35

1

1.9

94

3

2.0

1

69

5

7.5

21

7

.1

10

3

.4

51

-60

1

15

1

11

9

6.5

4

3

.5

46

4

0.0

58

5

0.4

9

7

.8

2

1

.7

61

-70

45

43

9

5.6

2

4

.4

23

5

1.1

17

3

7.8

3

6

.7

2

4

.4

TO

TAL

217

4 1

980

9

1.1

1

94

8

.9

5

54

2

5.5

1

433

6

5.9

1

22

5

.6

65

3

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

1

3

13

1

00.0

0

0.0

8

61.

5

4

30.

8

1

7.7

0

0.0

Page 79: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

67

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

MO

DO

C

UN

DER

18

3

2

66.

7

1

33.

3

2

66.

7

1

33.

3

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

6

4

66.

7

2

33.

3

5

83.

3

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1

1

6.7

21

-30

21

18

8

5.7

3

1

4.3

17

81

.0

3

1

4.3

0

0

.0

1

4

.8

31

-40

19

15

7

8.9

4

2

1.1

14

7

3.7

2

1

0.5

0

0

.0

3

1

5.8

41

-50

21

16

7

6.2

5

23.

8

16

76.

2

3

14.

3

1

4.8

1

4.8

51-6

0

6

5

83.

3

1

16.

7

6

1

00.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

61-7

0

2

2

1

00.0

0

0.0

2

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

3

3

1

00.0

0

0.0

3

1

00.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

8

1

65

80.

2

16

19.

8

65

80.

2

9

11.

1

1

1.2

6

7.4

M

ON

O

UN

DER

18

1

1

10

0.0

0

0

.0

1

100

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

6

4

66.

7

2

33.3

5

83.

3

1

16.

7

0

0.0

0

0.0

21-3

0

37

36

9

7.3

1

2

.7

14

3

7.8

6

1

6.2

0

0

.0

1

7

45.9

31-4

0

39

33

84.

6

6

15.

4

23

59.

0

3

7.7

0

0.0

13

33.

3

41-5

0

3

0

27

90.

0

3

10.0

15

50.

0

2

6.7

0

0.0

13

43.

3

51-6

0

9

8

8

8.9

1

11

.1

5

5

5.6

1

1

1.1

0

0

.0

3

3

3.3

61

-70

4

4

100

.0

0

0

.0

2

5

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

2

5

0.0

71

& A

BOV

E

3

2

66.

7

1

33.3

1

33.

3

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

66.

7

TOTA

L 1

29

1

15

8

9.1

14

10

.9

66

5

1.2

13

1

0.1

0

0

.0

50

3

8.8

MO

NTE

REY

UN

DER

18

5

1

49

96.

1

2

3.9

16

31.

4

35

68.

6

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

341

319

93.

5

22

6.5

76

22.

3

255

74.

8

3

0.9

7

2.1

21-3

0

160

7 14

68

9

1.4

1

39

8

.6

3

40

2

1.2

1

188

7

3.9

44

2

.7

35

2

.2

31

-40

11

38

9

76

8

5.8

1

62

14.

2

428

37.

6

601

52.

8

62

5.4

47

4.1

41-5

0

53

2

435

81.

8

97

18.2

281

52.

8

211

39.

7

23

4.3

17

3.2

51-6

0

169

147

87.

0

22

13.0

107

63.

3

50

29.

6

6

3.6

6

3.6

61-7

0

72

65

90.

3

7

9.7

44

61.

1

19

26.

4

7

9.7

2

2.8

71 &

ABO

VE

21

14

6

6.7

7

33

.3

14

6

6.7

6

2

8.6

1

4

.8

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

39

31

3473

88.

3

458

11.7

1

306

3

3.2

236

5

60.

2

146

3.7

114

2.9

N

APA

U

ND

ER 1

8

16

12

7

5.0

4

25

.0

10

6

2.5

6

3

7.5

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

74

66

8

9.2

8

10

.8

40

5

4.1

32

4

3.2

2

2

.7

0

0

.0

21

-30

3

73

3

36

9

0.1

37

9

.9

1

73

46

.4

1

95

5

2.3

3

0

.8

2

0

.5

31

-40

280

223

79.

6

57

20.4

186

66.4

87

31.

1

5

1.8

2

0.7

41-5

0

157

135

86.

0

22

14.

0

115

73.

2

33

21.

0

7

4.5

2

1.3

51-6

0

6

5

54

83.

1

11

16.

9

57

87.

7

7

10.

8

0

0.0

1

1.5

61-7

0

3

6

32

88.

9

4

11.

1

31

86.

1

5

13.

9

0

0.0

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

10

9

9

0.0

1

1

0.0

10

100

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

10

11

8

67

8

5.8

1

44

1

4.2

6

22

6

1.5

3

65

3

6.1

17

1

.7

7

0

.7

Page 80: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

68

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

NEV

AD

A

UN

DER

18

3

3

100.

0

0

0.0

2

66.

7

1

33.

3

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

4

8

42

87.

5

6

12.

5

41

85.

4

5

10.

4

1

2.1

1

2.1

21-3

0

171

146

85.

4

25

14.

6

145

84.

8

21

12.

3

3

1.8

2

1.2

31-4

0

203

160

78.

8

43

21.

2

181

89.

2

13

6.4

7

3.4

2

1.0

41-5

0

16

0

134

83.

8

26

16.

2

154

96.

3

3

1.9

1

0.6

2

1.2

51-6

0 4

2

32

76.

2

10

23.

8

41

97.

6

0

0.0

1

2.4

0

0.0

61-7

0

15

13

8

6.7

2

1

3.3

13

8

6.7

1

6

.7

1

6

.7

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

6

6

10

0.0

0

0

.0

5

8

3.3

0

0

.0

1

1

6.7

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

6

48

5

36

8

2.7

1

12

1

7.3

5

82

8

9.8

44

6

.8

15

2

.3

7

1

.1

ORA

NG

E U

ND

ER 1

8

70

58

8

2.9

12

1

7.1

42

6

0.0

24

3

4.3

1

1

.4

3

4

.3

18

-20

85

0

749

88.

1

101

11.

9

389

45.

8

392

46.

1

14

1.6

55

6.5

21-3

0 6

980

620

3

88.

9

777

11.

1

267

1

38.

3

368

4

52.

8

110

1.6

515

7.4

31-4

0

474

2

410

7

86.

6

635

13.

4

226

9

47.

8

197

0

41.

5

117

2.5

386

8.1

41-5

0

2178

181

7

83.

4

361

16.

6

124

1

57.

0

647

29.

7

65

3.0

225

10.

3

51-6

0

77

7

668

86.

0

109

14.

0

531

68.

3

164

21.

1

9

1.2

73

9.4

61-7

0

25

2

224

88.

9

28

11.

1

179

71.

0

53

21.

0

5

2.0

15

6.0

71 &

ABO

VE

76

65

8

5.5

11

1

4.5

64

8

4.2

8

1

0.5

0

0

.0

4

5

.3

TO

TAL

159

25

1389

1

87.

2 20

34

1

2.8

7386

46.

4

694

2

43.

6

321

2.0

127

6

8.0

PL

AC

ER

UN

DER

18

2

1

17

81.

0

4

19.

0

19

90.

5

2

9.5

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

108

101

93.

5

7

6.5

98

90.

7

8

7.4

1

0.9

1

0.9

21-3

0

60

0

516

86.

0

84

14.

0

506

84.

3

77

12.

8

9

1.5

8

1.3

31-4

0

504

390

77.

4

114

22.

6

442

87.

7

49

9.7

8

1.6

5

1.0

41-5

0

264

215

81.

4

49

18.

6

240

90.

9

21

8.0

1

0.4

2

0.8

51-6

0

92

82

8

9.1

10

1

0.9

78

8

4.8

11

1

2.0

2

2

.2

1

1.1

61-7

0

38

33

86.

8

5

13.

2

36

94.

7

1

2.6

1

2.6

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

9

7

7

7.8

2

2

2.2

8

8

8.9

0

0

.0

1

1

1.1

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

1

636

1

361

8

3.2

2

75

1

6.8

1

427

8

7.2

1

69

1

0.3

23

1

.4

17

1

.0

PLU

MA

S U

ND

ER 1

8

5

3

6

0.0

2

4

0.0

5

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

1

0

10

10

0.0

0

0

.0

9

9

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1

1

0.0

21

-30

42

36

8

5.7

6

1

4.3

38

9

0.5

3

7

.1

0

0

.0

1

2

.4

31

-40

58

48

8

2.8

10

1

7.2

49

8

4.5

3

5

.2

4

6

.9

2

3

.4

41

-50

33

28

8

4.8

5

1

5.2

30

9

0.9

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

3

9

.1

51

-60

16

12

7

5.0

4

2

5.0

16

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

61-7

0

1

4

10

71.

4

4

28.

6

13

92.

9

0

0.0

1

7.1

0

0.0

TOTA

L

17

8

147

82.

6

31

17.

4

160

89.

9

6

3

.4

5

2

.8

7

3

.9

Page 81: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

69

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

RIV

ERSI

DE

UN

DER

18

10

5

91

86.

7

14

13.

3

55

52.

4

45

42.

9

3

2.9

2

1.9

18-2

0

659

611

92.

7

48

7.3

251

38.

1

370

56.

1

22

3.3

16

2.4

21-3

0

3382

304

2

89.

9

340

10.

1

113

1

33.

4

193

0

57.

1

211

6.2

110

3.3

31-4

0 2

797

2

429

8

6.8

3

68

1

3.2

1

247

4

4.6

1

282

4

5.8

1

72

6

.1

96

3

.4

41

-50

14

10

1

186

8

4.1

2

24

1

5.9

7

51

5

3.3

4

91

3

4.8

1

12

7

.9

56

4

.0

51

-60

5

75

5

08

8

8.3

67

1

1.7

3

70

6

4.3

1

33

2

3.1

43

7

.5

29

5

.0

61

-70

2

00

1

73

8

6.5

27

1

3.5

1

44

7

2.0

32

1

6.0

10

5

.0

14

7

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

6

2

52

83.

9

10

16.

1

51

82.

3

7

11.

3

3

4.8

1

1.6

TOTA

L

919

0

809

2

88.

1 10

98

1

1.9

4

000

4

3.5

4

290

4

6.7

5

76

6

.3

3

24

3

.5

SAC

RAM

ENTO

U

ND

ER 1

8

53

45

8

4.9

8

1

5.1

34

6

4.2

12

2

2.6

3

5

.7

4

7

.5

18

-20

4

27

3

65

8

5.5

62

1

4.5

2

78

6

5.1

1

02

2

3.9

36

8

.4

11

2

.6

21

-30

292

5

247

9

84.

8

446

15.

2

183

4

62.

7

678

23.

2

313

10.

7

100

3.4

31-4

0

2186

174

1

79.

6

445

20.

4

149

2

68.

3

334

15.

3

286

13.

1

74

3.4

41-5

0

10

86

9

09

8

3.7

1

77

1

6.3

7

53

6

9.3

1

48

1

3.6

1

45

1

3.4

40

3

.7

51

-60

3

61

3

21

8

8.

40

1

1.1

2

53

7

0.1

48

1

3.3

44

1

2.2

16

4

.4

61

-70

1

44

1

23

8

5.4

21

1

4.6

1

01

7

0.1

22

1

5.3

18

1

2.5

3

2

.1

71

& A

BOV

E

4

3

40

93.

0

3

7.0

31

72.

1

5

11.

6

5

11.

6

2

4.7

TOTA

L

722

5

602

3

83.

4 1

202

1

6.6

4

776

6

6.1

1

349

1

8.7

8

50

1

1.8

2

50

3

.5

SAN

BEN

ITO

U

ND

ER 1

8

4

3

7

5.0

1

2

5.0

1

2

5.0

3

7

5.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

2

8

28

10

0.0

0

0

.0

6

2

1.4

19

6

7.9

2

7

.1

1

3

.6

21

-30

1

27

1

19

93

.7

8

6

.3

18

1

4.2

1

07

8

4.3

0

0

.0

2

1

.6

31

-40

91

78

8

5.7

13

1

4.3

29

3

1.9

60

6

5.9

0

0

.0

2

2

.2

41

-50

41

37

9

0.2

4

9

.8

21

51

.2

20

4

8.8

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

51

-60

17

14

8

2.4

3

1

7.6

10

5

8.8

6

3

5.3

0

0

.0

1

5

.9

61

-70

9

9

100

.0

0

0

.0

4

4

4.4

5

5

5.6

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

3

17

2

88

9

0.9

29

9

.1

89

2

8.1

2

20

6

9.4

2

0

.6

6

1

.9

SAN

U

ND

ER 1

8

68

58

8

5.3

10

1

4.7

33

4

8.5

29

4

2.6

4

5

.9

2

2

.9

BER

NA

RDIN

O

18-2

0

638

596

93.

4

42

6.6

265

41.

5

325

50.

9

21

3.3

27

4

.2

21

-30

4070

370

7

91.

1

363

8.9

131

3

32.

3

235

7

57.

9

233

5.7

167

4.1

31-4

0

3235

284

0

87.

8

395

12.

2

131

8

40.

7

146

1

45.

2

315

9.7

141

4.4

41-5

0

166

1

144

0

86.

7

221

13.

3

865

52.

1

579

34.

9

139

8.4

78

4.7

51-6

0

574

515

89.

7

59

10.

3

318

55.

4

170

29.

6

54

9.4

32

5.6

61-7

0

176

162

92.

0

14

8.0

106

60.

2

40

22.

7

20

11.

4

10

5.7

71 &

ABO

VE

52

49

9

4.2

3

5

.8

36

6

9.2

8

1

5.4

6

1

1.5

2

3

.8

TO

TAL

1047

4

936

7

89.

4

110

7

10.

6

425

4

40.

6

496

9

47.

4

792

7.6

459

4.4

Page 82: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

70

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

SAN

U

ND

ER 1

8 6

5 83

.3

1 16

.7

2 33

.3

1 16

.7

0 0.

0 3

50.0

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SAN

DIE

GO

U

ND

ER 1

8

122

1

02

8

3.6

20

1

6.4

71

5

8.2

44

3

6.1

6

4

.9

1

0

.8

18

-20

11

00

9

64

8

7.6

1

36

1

2.4

5

89

5

3.5

4

30

3

9.1

45

4

.1

3

6

3.3

21-3

0

658

7

577

1

87.

6

816

12.

4

331

5

50.

3

263

0

39.

9

421

6.4

221

3.4

31-4

0 4

546

3

866

8

5.0

6

80

1

5.0

2

421

5

3.3

1

631

3

5.9

3

28

7

.2

1

66

3

.7

41

-50

2

125

1

782

8

3.9

3

43

1

6.1

1

343

6

3.2

5

88

2

7.7

1

26

5

.9

68

3

.2

51

-60

7

61

6

67

8

7.6

94

1

2.4

5

12

6

7.3

1

70

2

2.3

48

6

.3

31

4

.1

61

-70

221

194

87.

8

27

12.

2

155

70.

1

53

24.

0

9

4.1

4

1

.8

71

& A

BOV

E

6

8

59

86.

8

9

13.

2

53

77.

9

12

17.

6

2

2.9

1

1.5

TOTA

L

1553

0 1

3405

86.

3

212

5

13.

7

845

9

54.

5

555

8

35.

8

985

6.3

528

3.4

FR

AN

CIS

CO

18

-20

55

51

9

2.7

4

7

.3

18

3

2.7

15

2

7.3

10

1

8.2

12

2

1.8

21

-30

573

479

83.

6

94

16.

4

300

52.

4

113

19.

7

65

11.

3

9

5

16.

6

31-4

0

474

399

84.

2

75

15.

8

273

57.

6

66

13.

9

62

13.

1

73

15.

4

41-5

0

23

3

193

82.

8

40

17.

2

147

63.

1

12

5.2

38

16.

3

36

15.5

51-6

0

5

9

52

88.

1

7

11.

9

35

59.

3

4

6.8

13

22.

0

7

11.

9

61-7

0

2

8

27

96.

4

1

3.6

14

5

0.0

1

3

.6

9

3

2.1

4

1

4.3

71

& A

BOV

E

8

7

8

7.5

1

1

2.5

5

6

2.5

0

0

.0

3

3

7.5

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

1

436

1

213

8

4.5

2

23

1

5.5

7

94

5

5.3

2

12

1

4.8

2

00

1

3.9

2

30

1

6.0

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

UN

DER

18

4

5

35

77.

8

10

22.

2

18

40.

0

25

5

5.6

1

2

.2

1

2

.2

18

-20

2

92

2

70

9

2.5

22

7

.5

1

10

3

7.7

1

65

5

6.5

7

2

.4

10

3

.4

21

-30

158

9

143

1

90.

1

158

9.9

544

34.

2

910

57.

3

63

4.0

72

4.5

31-4

0

118

4

105

1

88.

8

133

11.

2

524

44.

3

538

45.

4

78

6.6

44

3.7

41-5

0

656

567

86.

4

89

13.

6

366

55.

8

210

32.

0

49

7.5

31

4.7

51-6

0

242

214

88.

4

28

11.

6

158

65.

3

56

23.

1

19

7.9

9

3.7

61-7

0

9

0

84

93.

3

6

6.7

47

52.

2

33

36.

7

7

7.8

3

3.3

71 &

ABO

VE

24

21

8

7.5

3

1

2.5

18

7

5.0

3

1

2.5

3

1

2.5

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

4

122

3

673

8

9.1

4

49

1

0.9

1

785

4

3.3

1

940

4

7.1

2

27

5

.5

1

70

4

.1

SAN

LU

IS

UN

DER

18

2

2

16

72.

7

6

27.

3

16

72.

7

6

27.

3

0

0.0

0

0.0

OBI

SPO

18

-20

20

5

181

88.

3

24

11.

7

147

71.

7

57

27.

8

0

0.0

1

0.5

21-3

0

80

8

699

86.

5

109

13.

5

502

62.

1

280

34.

7

13

1.6

13

1.6

31-4

0

686

5

72

8

3.4

1

14

1

6.6

5

03

7

3.3

1

59

2

3.2

17

2

.5

7

1

.0

41

-50

3

66

2

96

8

0.9

70

1

9.1

2

96

8

0.9

51

1

3.9

11

3

.0

8

2

.2

51

-60

1

17

99

8

4.6

18

1

5.4

87

7

4.4

24

2

0.5

5

4

.3

1

0

.9

61

-70

40

35

8

7.5

5

1

2.5

34

8

5.0

3

7

.5

1

2

.5

2

5

.0

TO

TAL

22

64

1

915

8

4.6

3

49

1

5.4

1

604

7

0.8

5

81

2

5.7

47

2

.1

32

1

.4

71

& A

BOV

E

2

0

17

8

5.0

3

1

5.0

19

9

5.0

1

5

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

Page 83: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

71

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SAN

MA

TEO

U

ND

ER 1

8

39

31

7

9.5

8

2

0.5

23

5

9.0

11

2

8.2

2

5

.1

3

7

.7

18

-20

2

24

1

94

8

6.6

30

1

3.4

74

3

3.0

1

08

4

8.2

18

8

.0

24

1

0.7

21

-30

154

5

133

6

86.

5

209

13.

5

647

41.

9

683

44.

2

62

4.0

153

9.9

31-4

0

138

3

114

6

82.

9

237

17.

1

711

51.

4

363

26.

2

141

10.

2

168

12.

1

41-5

0

698

580

83.

1

118

16.

9

435

62.

3

114

16.

3

64

9.2

85

12.

2

51-6

0

245

209

85.

3

36

14.

7

164

66.

9

36

14.

7

21

8.6

24

9.8

61-7

0

99

90

9

0.9

9

9

.1

75

7

5.8

7

7

.1

13

1

3.1

4

4

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

2

1

20

95.

2

1

4.8

15

71.

4

1

4.8

3

14.

3

2

9.5

TOTA

L

425

4

3606

84.

8

648

15.

2

214

4

50.

4

132

3

31.

1

324

7.6

463

10.

9 SA

NTA

U

ND

ER 1

8

57

49

8

6.0

8

1

4.0

31

5

4.4

24

4

2.1

2

3

.5

0

0

.0

BA

RBA

RA

18-2

0

27

5

222

80.

7

53

1

9.3

1

58

5

7.5

1

01

3

6.7

4

1

.5

12

4

.4

21

-30

14

39

1

240

8

6.2

1

99

1

3.8

5

87

4

0.8

7

79

5

4.1

34

2

.4

39

2

.7

31

-40

9

59

7

80

8

1.3

1

79

1

8.7

5

05

5

2.7

3

82

3

9.8

48

5

.0

24

2

.5

41

-50

442

3

59

8

1.2

83

1

8.8

2

87

6

4.9

1

26

2

8.5

13

2

.9

16

3

.6

51

-60

1

56

1

27

8

1.4

29

1

8.6

1

04

6

6.7

39

2

5.0

10

6

.4

3

1

.9

61

-70

5

6

48

85.

7

8

14.

3

39

69.

6

14

25.

0

2

3.6

1

1.8

71 &

ABO

VE

18

14

7

7.8

4

2

2.2

16

8

8.9

1

5

.6

1

5

.6

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

3

402

2

839

8

3.5

5

63

1

6.5

1

727

5

0.8

1

466

4

3.1

1

14

3

.4

95

2

.8

SAN

TA C

LARA

U

ND

ER 1

8

51

43

8

4.3

8

1

5.7

24

4

7.1

21

4

1.2

3

5

.9

3

5

.9

18

-20

4

05

3

79

9

3.6

26

6

.4

1

18

2

9.1

2

57

6

3.5

14

3

.5

16

4

.0

21

-30

34

19

3

042

8

9.0

3

77

1

1.0

1

120

3

2.8

1

864

5

4.5

1

12

3

.3

3

23

9

.4

31

-40

291

0

249

9

85.

9

411

14.

1

1275

43.

8

116

5

40.

0

153

5.3

317

10.

9

41-5

0

131

4

111

0

84.

5

204

15.

5

669

50.

9

414

31.

5

71

5.4

160

12.

2

51-6

0

43

8

389

88.

8

49

11.

2

241

55.

0

142

32.

4

24

5.5

31

7.1

61-7

0

123

114

92.

7

9

7.3

80

65.

0

30

24.

4

4

3.3

9

7.3

71 &

ABO

VE

25

24

9

6.0

1

4

.0

17

6

8.0

5

2

0.0

1

4

.0

2

8

.0

TO

TAL

868

5

760

0

87.

5 1

085

1

2.5

3

544

4

0.8

3

898

4

4.9

3

82

4

.4

8

61

9

.9

SAN

TA C

RU

Z U

ND

ER 1

8

37

31

8

3.8

6

1

6.2

21

5

6.8

13

3

5.1

1

2

.7

2

5

.4

18

-20

216

1

88

8

7.0

28

1

3.0

1

02

4

7.2

1

07

4

9.5

5

2

.3

2

0

.9

21

-30

9

24

8

14

8

8.1

1

10

1

1.9

3

90

4

2.2

5

07

5

4.9

8

0

.9

19

2

.1

31

-40

7

22

6

04

8

3.7

1

18

1

6.3

4

41

6

1.1

2

60

3

6.0

10

1

.4

11

1

.5

41

-50

4

12

3

36

8

1.6

76

1

8.4

2

94

7

1.4

1

03

2

5.0

9

2

.2

6

1

.5

51

-60

1

01

84

8

3.2

17

1

6.8

73

7

2.3

26

2

5.7

1

1

.0

1

1

.0

61

-70

24

20

8

3.3

4

1

6.7

19

7

9.2

4

1

6.7

0

0

.0

1

4

.2

71

& A

BOV

E

8

6

75.

0

2

25.

0

7

87.

5

1

12.

5

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

24

44

2

083

8

5.2

3

61

1

4.8

1

347

5

5.1

1

021

4

1.8

34

1

.4

42

1

.7

Page 84: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

72

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SHA

STA

U

ND

ER 1

8

16

14

8

7.5

2

12.

5

14

87.

5

0

0.0

2

12.

5

0

0.0

18-2

0

7

1

58

81.

7

13

18.

3

63

88.

7

4

5.6

0

0.0

4

5.6

21-3

0

3

02

2

51

8

3.1

51

1

6.9

2

72

9

0.1

19

6

.3

2

0

.7

9

3

.0

31

-40

3

47

2

90

8

3.6

57

1

6.4

3

18

9

1.6

20

5

.8

3

0

.9

6

1

.7

41

-50

21

1

179

84.

8

32

15.

2

193

91.

5

9

4.3

0

0.0

9

4.3

51-6

0

6

1

52

85.

2

9

14.

8

58

95.

1

1

1.6

0

0.0

2

3.3

61-7

0

2

9

28

96.

6

1

3.4

27

93.

1

2

6.9

0

0.0

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

7

7

100

.0

0

0

.0

7

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

104

4

879

84.

2

165

15.

8

952

91.

2

55

5.3

7

0.7

30

2.9

SI

ERRA

18

-20

1

1

100

.0

0

0

.0

1

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

21-3

0

9

6

66.

7

3

33.

3

9

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

31

-40

14

12

8

5.7

2

1

4.3

14

100.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

41-5

0

1

2

12

1

00.0

0

0.0

11

91.

7

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

8.3

51-6

0

1

1

1

00.0

0

0.0

1

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

37

32

86

.5

5

1

3.5

36

9

7.3

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

2.7

SI

SKIY

OU

U

ND

ER 1

8

4

4

100

.0

0

0

.0

3

7

5.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1

2

5.0

18

-20

28

2

5

89.

3

3

10.

7

22

78.

6

4

14.

3

0

0.0

2

7.1

21-3

0

7

9

71

89.

9

8

10.

1

63

79.

7

6

7.6

0

0.0

10

12.

7

31-4

0

104

82

78.

8

22

21.

2

84

80.

8

8

7.7

2

1.9

10

9.6

41-5

0

8

7

72

82.

8

15

17.

2

73

83.

9

4

4.6

2

2.3

8

9.2

51-6

0

27

21

77.

8

6

22.

2

23

85.

2

1

3.7

2

7.4

1

3.7

61-7

0

1

6

14

87.

5

2

12.

5

15

93.

8

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

6.3

71 &

ABO

VE

4

3

7

5.0

1

2

5.0

3

7

5.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

1

2

5.0

TO

TAL

3

49

2

92

8

3.7

57

1

6.3

2

86

8

1.9

23

6

.6

6

1

.7

3

4

9.7

SO

LAN

O

UN

DER

18

2

8

24

85.

7

4

14.

3

17

60.

7

5

17.

9

6

21.

4

0

0.0

18-2

0

134

1

19

8

8.8

15

1

1.2

60

4

4.8

48

3

5.8

22

1

6.4

4

3

.0

21

-30

624

554

88.

8

70

11.

2

282

45.

2

233

37.

3

82

13.

1

27

4.3

31-4

0 5

91

4

96

8

3.9

95

1

6.1

3

23

5

4.7

1

27

2

1.5

1

13

1

9.1

28

4

.7

41

-50

33

2

284

85.

5

48

14.

5

197

59.

3

53

16.

0

62

18.

7

20

6.0

51-6

0

138

1

19

8

6.2

19

1

3.8

88

6

3.8

7

5

.1

34

2

4.6

9

6

.5

61

-70

3

9

35

89.

7

4

10.

3

28

71.

8

2

5.1

9

23.

1

0

0.0

71 &

ABO

VE

19

19

100

.0

0

0

.0

14

7

3.7

1

5

.3

3

1

5.8

1

5

.3

TO

TAL

19

05

1

650

8

6.6

2

55

1

3.4

10

09

5

3.0

4

76

2

5.0

3

31

1

7.4

89

4

.7

Page 85: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

73

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

SON

OM

A

UN

DER

18

4

6

36

78.

3

10

21.

7

41

89.

1

5

10.

9

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

18

-20

2

13

1

78

8

3.6

35

1

6.4

1

23

5

7.7

80

3

7.6

4

1

.9

6

2

.8

21

-30

102

2

893

87.

4

129

12.

6

583

57.

0

415

40.

6

6

0.6

18

1.8

31-4

0

874

706

80.

8

168

19.

2

651

74.

5

188

21.

5

16

1.8

19

2.2

41-5

0

511

410

80.

2

101

19.

8

435

85.

1

63

12.

3

6

1.2

7

1.4

51-6

0

177

151

85.

3

26

14.

7

153

86.

4

16

9.0

5

2.8

3

1.7

61-7

0

51

42

82.

4

9

17.

6

44

86.

3

5

9.8

1

2.0

1

2.0

71 &

ABO

VE

19

18

94.

7

1

5.3

18

94.

7

1

5.3

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

2913

243

4

83.

6

479

16.

4

204

8

70.

3

773

26.

5

38

1.3

54

1.9

ST

AN

ISLA

US

UN

DER

18

3

4

26

76.

5

8

23.

5

14

41.

2

18

52.9

0

0.0

2

5.9

18-2

0

195

179

91.

8

16

8.2

70

35.

9

122

62.

6

1

0.5

2

1.0

21-3

0

111

2

998

89.

7

114

10.

3

433

38.

9

631

56.

7

21

1.9

27

2.4

31-4

0

878

745

84.

9

133

15.

1

437

49.

8

394

44.

9

28

3.2

19

2.2

41-5

0

410

356

86.

8

54

13.

2

230

56.

1

152

37.

1

14

3.4

14

3.4

51-6

0

152

141

92.

8

11

7.2

102

67.

1

41

27.

0

4

2.6

5

3.3

61-7

0

46

39

8

4.8

7

1

5.2

34

7

3.9

10

2

1.7

2

4

.3

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

1

2

12

1

00.0

0

0.0

9

75.

0

3

25.

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

TOTA

L

2839

249

6

87.

9

343

12.

1

132

9

46.

8

137

1

48.

3

70

2.5

69

2.4

SU

TTER

18

-20

77

67

8

7.0

10

1

3.0

42

5

4.5

28

3

6.4

1

1

.3

6

7

.8

21

-30

3

25

2

96

9

1.1

29

8

.9

1

58

4

8.6

1

41

4

3.4

5

1

.5

21

6

.5

31

-40

2

76

2

32

8

4.1

44

1

5.9

1

75

6

3.4

66

2

3.9

4

1.4

31

11.

2

41-5

0

148

124

83.

8

24

16.

2

100

67.

6

29

19.

6

2

1.4

17

11.

5

51-6

0

6

2

60

96.

8

2

3.2

46

74.

2

9

14.

5

0

0.0

7

11.

3

61-7

0

1

9

19

1

00.0

0

0.0

10

52.

6

0

0.0

0

0.0

9

47.

4

71 &

ABO

VE

6

6

100

.0

0

0

.0

4

6

6.7

0

0

.0

2

3

3.3

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

9

13

8

04

8

8.1

1

09

1

1.9

5

35

5

8.6

2

73

2

9.9

14

1

.5

91

1

0.0

TEH

AM

A

UN

DER

18

6

6

1

00.0

0

0.0

5

83.

3

1

16.

7

0

0.0

0

0.0

18-2

0

2

4

21

87.

5

3

12.

5

15

62.

5

9

37.

5

0

0.0

0

0.0

21-3

0

14

3

129

90.

2

14

9.8

77

53.

8

62

43.

4

1

0.7

3

2.1

31-4

0

119

1

00

8

4.0

19

1

6.0

93

7

8.2

24

2

0.2

0

0

.0

2

1

.7

41

-50

69

62

8

9.9

7

1

0.1

55

7

9.7

11

1

5.9

2

2

.9

1

1

.4

51

-60

28

24

8

5.7

4

1

4.3

26

92

.9

1

3

.6

0

0

.0

1

3

.6

61

-70

21

18

8

5.7

3

1

4.3

19

9

0.5

2

9

.5

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

71

& A

BOV

E

5

5

1

00.0

0

0.0

5

10

0.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

0

0

.0

TO

TAL

4

15

3

65

88

.0

50

1

2.0

2

95

7

1.1

1

10

2

6.5

3

0

.7

7

1

.7

Page 86: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

74

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

TRIN

ITY

UN

DER

18

1 1

100.

0 0

0.0

1 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

18-2

0 15

14

93

.3

1 6.

7 14

93

.3

1 6.

7 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 39

31

79

.5

8 20

.5

37

94.9

1

2.6

0 0.

0 1

2.6

31

-40

78

62

79.5

16

20

.5

75

96.2

2

2.6

0 0.

0 1

1.3

41

-50

57

51

89.5

6

10.5

52

91

.2

1 1.

8 0

0.0

4 7.

0

51-6

0 17

16

94

.1

1 5.

9 17

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

61-7

0 15

14

93

.3

1 6.

7 15

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 22

2 18

9 85

.1

33

14.9

21

1 95

.0

5 2.

3 0

0.0

6 2.

7 TU

LARE

U

ND

ER 1

8 41

38

92

.7

3 7.

3 11

26

.8

28

68.3

0

0.0

2 4.

9

18-2

0

344

329

95

.6

15

4.4

76

22.1

26

3 76

.5

3 0.

9 2

0.6

21

-30

1521

14

30

94.0

91

6.

0 24

6 16

.2

1252

82

.3

12

0.8

11

0.7

31

-40

986

900

91

.3

86

8.7

229

23.2

73

7 74

.7

7 0.

7 13

1.

3

41-5

0 43

3 38

7 89

.4

46

10.6

13

8 31

.9

283

65.4

4

0.9

8 1.

8

51-6

0 15

8 15

0 94

.9

8 5.

1 62

39

.2

86

54.4

6

3.8

4 2.

5

61-7

0 52

47

90

.4

5 9.

6 20

38

.5

29

55.8

1

1.9

2 3.

8

71 &

ABO

VE

17

15

88.2

2

11.8

8

47.1

9

52.9

0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 35

52

3296

92

.8

256

7.2

790

22.2

26

87

75.6

33

0.

9 42

1.

2 TU

OLU

MN

E U

ND

ER 1

8 4

4 10

0.0

0 0.

0 4

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

18

-20

20

18

90.0

2

10.0

20

10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

21-3

0 99

91

91

.9

8 8.

1 96

97

.0

3 3.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

31-4

0 12

6 97

77

.0

29

23.0

12

6 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

41-5

0 93

75

80

.6

18

19.4

91

97

.8

2 2.

2 0

0.0

0 0.

0

51-6

0 25

19

76

.0

6 24

.0

21

84.0

2

8.0

0 0.

0 2

8.0

61

-70

12

11

91.7

1

8.3

12

100.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

VEN

TURA

U

ND

ER 1

8 47

38

80

.9

9 19

.1

28

59.6

17

36

.2

1 2.

1 1

2.1

71

& A

BOV

E 5

4 80

.0

1 20

.0

5 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

TOTA

L 38

4 31

9 83

.1

65

16.9

37

5 97

.7

7 1.

8 0

0.0

2 0.

5

18

-20

301

260

86.4

41

13

.6

101

33.6

18

9 62

.8

4 1.

3 7

2.3

21

-30

1873

16

85

90.0

18

8 10

.0

610

32.6

11

72

62.6

58

3.

1 33

1.

8

31-4

0 11

97

1010

84

.4

187

15.6

54

2 45

.3

583

48.7

34

2.

8 38

3.

2

41-5

0 58

2 48

1 82

.6

101

17.4

34

2 58

.8

208

35.7

14

2.

4 18

3.

1

51-6

0 20

1 16

8 83

.6

33

16.4

13

6 67

.7

53

26.4

4

2.0

8 4.

0

61-7

0 62

51

82

.3

11

17.7

42

67

.7

18

29.0

1

1.6

1 1.

6

71 &

ABO

VE

22

17

77.3

5

22.7

16

72

.7

6 27

.3

0 0.

0 0

0.0

TO

TAL

4285

37

10

86.6

57

5 13

.4

1817

42

.4

2246

52

.4

116

2.7

106

2.5

Page 87: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

75

TABL

E B1

: 19

95 D

UI A

RRES

TS B

Y C

OU

NTY

, AG

E, S

EX A

ND

RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

- con

tinue

d

SE

X (1

00%

) RA

CE/

ETH

NIC

ITY

(100

%)

CO

UN

TY

AG

E TO

TAL

MA

LE

FEM

ALE

W

HIT

E H

ISPA

NIC

BL

AC

K

OTH

ER

YUBA

U

ND

ER 1

8 6

5 83

.3

1 16

.7

6 10

0.0

0 0.

0 0

0.0

0 0.

0

61

- 70

13

11

84.6

2

15.4

8

61.5

3

23.1

2

15.4

0

0.0

41

- 50

216

191

88.4

25

11

.6

137

63.4

60

27

.8

13

6.0

6 2.

8

21

- 30

188

154

81.9

34

18

.1

100

53.2

75

39

.9

10

5.3

3 1.

6

31

-40

191

156

81.7

35

18

.3

137

71.7

46

24

.1

7 3.

7 1

0.5

18

- 20

119

109

91.6

10

8.

4 48

40

.3

65

54.6

2

1.7

4 3.

4

31

-40

430

354

82.3

76

17

.7

265

61.6

13

5 31

.4

18

4.2

12

2.8

TO

TAL

594

49

6 83

.5

98

16.5

40

4 68

.0

153

25.8

27

4.

5 10

1.

7

51

- 60

82

74

90.2

8

9.8

62

75.6

19

23

.2

1 1.

2 0

0.0

61

-70

18

17

94.4

1

5.6

14

77.8

3

16.7

1

5.6

0 0.

0

18

-20

45

36

80.0

9

20.0

28

62

.2

14

31.1

3

6.7

0 0.

0

21

-30

543

489

90.1

54

9.

9 27

6 50

.8

240

44.2

11

2.

0 16

2.

9

41

- 50

104

90

86.5

14

13

.5

83

79.8

12

11

.5

3 2.

9 6

5.8

51

-60

41

39

95.1

2

4.9

37

90.2

3

7.3

1 2.

4 0

0.0

TO

TAL

1441

12

62

87.6

17

9 12

.4

822

57.0

53

1 36

.8

47

3.3

41

2.8

YOLO

U

ND

ER 1

8 23

20

87

.0

3 13

.0

11

47.8

9

39.1

0

0.0

3 13

.0

N

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

71

& A

BOV

E 10

8

80.0

2

20.0

9

90.0

0

0.0

1 10

.0

0 0.

0

71

& A

BOV

E 6

5 83

.3

1 6.

7 5

83.3

0

0.0

1 16

.7

0 0.

0

Page 88: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

STATEWIDE 145923 100.0 128182 100.0 17741 100.0 ALAMEDA UNDER 18 20 0.4 18 0.4 2 0.3

18-20 169 3.4 152 3.6 17 2.4 21-30 1788 35.9 1597 37.3 191 27.3 31-40 1720 34.6 1431 33.5 289 41.3 41-50 830 16.7 677 15.8 153 21.9 51-60 298 6.0 263 6.1 35 5.0 61-70 127 2.6 116 2.7 11 1.6 71 & ABOVE 25 0.5 23 0.5 2 0.3 TOTAL 4977 100.0 4277 100.0 700 100.0

ALPINE 21-30 11 29.7 10 32.3 1 16.7 31-40 11 29.7 8 25.8 3 50.0 41-50 8 21.6 7 22.6 1 16.7 51-60 6 16.2 5 16.1 1 16.7 71 & ABOVE 1 2.7 1 3.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 37 100.0 31 100.0 6 100.0

AMADOR 18-20 7 4.4 7 5.6 0 0.0 21-30 38 23.7 34 27.0 4 11.8 31-40 47 29.4 28 22.2 19 55.9 41-50 41 25.6 33 26.2 8 23.5 51-60 15 9.4 12 9.5 3 8.8 61-70 8 5.0 8 6.3 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 2.5 4 3.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 160 100.0 126 100.0 34 100.0

BUTTE UNDER 18 8 0.8 8 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 57 6.0 52 6.5 5 3.5 21-30 339 35.8 301 37.3 38 26.8 31-40 292 30.8 235 29.2 57 40.1 41-50 154 16.2 126 15.6 28 19.7 51-60 64 6.8 54 6.7 10 7.0 61-70 26 2.7 22 2.7 4 2.8 71 & ABOVE 8 0.8 8 1.0 0 0.0 TOTAL 948 100.0 806 100.0 142 100.0

CALAVERAS 18-20 7 3.8 7 4.7 0 0.0 21-30 37 20.3 32 21.6 5 14.7 31-40 58 31.9 40 27.0 18 52.9 41-50 43 23.6 37 25.0 6 17.6 51-60 20 11.0 18 12.2 2 5.9 61-70 13 7.1 11 7.4 2 5.9 71 & ABOVE 4 2.2 3 2.0 1 2.9 TOTAL 182 100.0 148 100.0 34 100.0

COLUSA 18-20 8 3.8 8 4.2 0 0.0 21-30 73 35.1 70 36.8 3 16.7 31-40 66 31.7 58 30.5 8 44.4 41-50 39 18.8 35 18.4 4 22.2 51-60 15 7.2 14 7.4 1 5.6 61-70 7 3.4 5 2.6 2 11.1 TOTAL 208 100.0 190 100.0 18 100.0

76

Page 89: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

CONTRA COSTA UNDER 18 10 0.3 10 0.4 0 0.0 18-20 124 4.3 111 4.6 13 2.9 21-30 925 32.1 812 33.3 113 25.6 31-40 953 33.1 780 32.0 173 39.1 41-50 525 18.2 429 17.6 96 21.7 51-60 239 8.3 203 8.3 36 8.1 61-70 78 2.7 71 2.9 7 1.6 71 & ABOVE 26 0.9 22 0.9 4 0.9 TOTAL 2880 100.0 2438 100.0 442 100.0

DEL NORTE UNDER 18 1 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 11 5.8 10 6.5 1 2.9 21-30 62 32.8 51 33.1 11 31.4 31-40 62 32.8 50 32.5 12 34.3 41-50 33 17.5 28 18.2 5 14.3 51-60 12 6.3 9 5.8 3 8.6 61-70 6 3.2 3 1.9 3 8.6 71 & ABOVE 2 1.1 2 1.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 189 100.0 154 100.0 35 100.0

EL DORADO UNDER 18 6 0.7 5 0.7 1 0.6 18-20 37 4.4 36 5.3 1 0.6 21-30 247 29.3 202 29.8 45 27.3 31-40 301 35.7 227 33.5 74 44.8 41-50 175 20.8 141 20.8 34 20.6 51-60 56 6.7 49 7.2 7 4.2 61-70 16 1.9 13 1.9 3 1.8 71 & ABOVE 4 0.5 4 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 842 100.0 677 100.0 165 100.0

FRESNO UNDER 18 9 0.2 9 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 203 5.2 188 5.4 15 3.5 21-30 1589 40.7 1431 41.2 158 36.8 31-40 1262 32.3 1109 31.9 153 35.7 41-50 560 14.3 483 13.9 77 17.9 51-60 201 5.1 181 5.2 20 4.7 61-70 62 1.6 56 1.6 6 1.4 71 & ABOVE 20 0.5 20 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 3906 100.0 3477 100.0 429 100.0

GLENN 18-20 12 5.2 12 5.8 0 0.0 21-30 84 36.2 76 36.9 8 30.8 31-40 71 30.6 60 29.1 11 42.3 41-50 45 19.4 40 19.4 5 19.2 51-60 13 5.6 11 5.3 2 7.7 61-70 6 2.6 6 2.9 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.4 1 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 232 100.0 206 100.0 26 100.0

HUMBOLDT 18-20 42 7.1 39 7.9 3 3.1 21-30 194 32.8 159 32.1 35 36.1 31-40 178 30.1 149 30.1 29 29.9 41-50 116 19.6 93 18.8 23 23.7 51-60 37 6.3 34 6.9 3 3.1 61-70 16 2.7 14 2.8 2 2.1 71 & ABOVE 9 1.5 7 1.4 2 2.1 TOTAL 592 100.0 495 100.0 97 100.0

77

Page 90: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

IMPERIAL UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 18-20 30 3.2 29 3.4 1 1.6 21-30 282 30.5 262 30.4 20 32.8 31-40 341 36.9 320 37.1 21 34.4 41-50 169 18.3 154 17.8 15 24.6 51-60 52 5.6 49 5.7 3 4.9 61-70 35 3.8 34 3.9 1 1.6 71 & ABOVE 14 1.5 14 1.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 924 100.0 863 100.0 61 100.0

INYO 18-20 12 5.0 12 5.7 0 0.0 21-30 59 24.4 48 23.0 11 33.3 31-40 86 35.5 73 34.9 13 39.4 41-50 48 19.8 42 20.1 6 18.2 51-60 26 10.7 24 11.5 2 6.1 61-70 8 3.3 7 3.3 1 3.0 71 & ABOVE 3 1.2 3 1.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 242 100.0 209 100.0 33 100.0

KERN UNDER 18 30 0.7 29 0.8 1 0.2 18-20 223 5.4 209 5.7 14 2.8 21-30 1546 37.4 1373 37.7 173 35.2 31-40 1413 34.2 1201 33.0 212 43.1 41-50 588 14.2 520 14.3 68 13.8 51-60 208 5.0 191 5.2 17 3.5 61-70 96 2.3 89 2.4 7 1.4 71 & ABOVE 27 0.7 27 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 4131 100.0 3639 100.0 492 100.0

KINGS UNDER 18 10 1.3 7 1.0 3 3.3 18-20 43 5.7 39 5.8 4 4.4 21-30 287 37.8 261 39.0 26 28.9 31-40 240 31.6 204 30.5 36 40.0 41-50 134 17.7 117 17.5 17 18.9 51-60 34 4.5 30 4.5 4 4.4 61-70 8 1.1 8 1.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 3 0.4 3 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 759 100.0 669 100.0 90 100.0

LAKE UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 19 4.1 17 4.6 2 2.2 21-30 114 24.8 97 26.2 17 19.1 31-40 161 35.1 126 34.1 35 39.3 41-50 94 20.5 73 19.7 21 23.6 51-60 34 7.4 27 7.3 7 7.9 61-70 30 6.5 24 6.5 6 6.7 71 & ABOVE 6 1.3 5 1.4 1 1.1 TOTAL 459 100.0 370 100.0 89 100.0

LASSEN UNDER 18 2 1.0 2 1.2 0 0.0 18-20 11 5.6 9 5.2 2 7.7 21-30 58 29.3 49 28.5 9 34.6 31-40 61 30.8 54 31.4 7 26.9 41-50 40 20.2 37 21.5 3 11.5 51-60 17 8.6 12 7.0 5 19.2 61-70 8 4.0 8 4.7 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 0.5 1 0.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 198 100.0 172 100.0 26 100.0

78

Page 91: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

LOS ANGELES UNDER 18 15 0.0 15 0.0 0 0.0 18-20 1290 3.7 1214 3.8 76 2.4 21-30 15051 42.6 13854 43.1 1197 37.9 31-40 11556 32.7 10437 32.5 1119 35.4 41-50 5045 14.3 4502 14.0 543 17.2 51-60 1705 4.8 1542 4.8 163 5.2 61-70 508 1.4 460 1.4 48 1.5 71 & ABOVE 122 0.3 106 0.3 16 0.5 TOTAL 35292 100.0 32130 100.0 3162 100.0

MADERA 18-20 34 4.9 33 5.2 1 1.7 21-30 282 40.8 267 42.2 15 25.0 31-40 201 29.0 177 28.0 24 40.0 41-50 130 18.8 118 18.7 12 20.0 51-60 26 3.8 24 3.8 2 3.3 61-70 15 2.2 10 1.6 5 8.3 71 & ABOVE 4 0.6 3 0.5 1 1.7 TOTAL 692 100.0 632 100.0 60 100.0

MARIN UNDER 18 3 0.2 3 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 46 3.5 37 3.6 9 3.4 21-30 444 34.3 377 36.5 67 25.4 31-40 419 32.3 327 31.7 92 34.8 41-50 265 20.4 189 18.3 76 28.8 51-60 88 6.8 70 6.8 18 6.8 61-70 24 1.9 22 2.1 2 0.8 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 7 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 1296 100.0 1032 100.0 264 100.0

MARIPOSA 18-20 7 4.5 6 4.7 1 3.6 21-30 48 31.0 39 30.7 9 32.1 31-40 59 38.1 46 36.2 13 46.4 41-50 27 17.4 24 18.9 3 10.7 51-60 12 7.7 10 7.9 2 7.1 61-70 2 1.3 2 1.6 0 0.0 TOTAL 155 100.0 127 100.0 28 100.0

MENDOCINO UNDER 18 1 0.1 1 0.2 0 0.0 18-20 33 4.8 31 5.5 2 1.7 21-30 234 34.2 204 36.2 30 24.8 31-40 207 30.2 157 27.8 50 41.3 41-50 142 20.7 117 20.7 25 20.7 51-60 43 6.3 33 5.9 10 8.3 61-70 20 2.9 17 3.0 3 2.5 71 & ABOVE 5 0.7 4 0.7 1 0.8 TOTAL 685 100.0 564 100.0 121 100.0

MERCED UNDER 18 11 0.9 10 0.9 1 0.9 18-20 76 6.1 72 6.4 4 3.8 21-30 457 36.9 426 37.6 31 29.2 31-40 383 30.9 341 30.1 42 39.6 41-50 209 16.9 189 16.7 20 18.9 51-60 72 5.8 65 5.7 7 6.6 61-70 27 2.2 26 2.3 1 0.9 71 & ABOVE 3 0.2 3 0.3 0 0.0 TOTAL 1238 100.0 1132 100.0 106 100.0

79

Page 92: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

MODOC 18-20 3 4.2 2 3.1 1 14.3 21-30 13 18.1 12 18.5 1 14.3 31-40 24 33.3 21 32.3 3 42.9 41-50 18 25.0 17 26.2 1 14.3 51-60 7 9.7 7 10.8 0 0.0 61-70 7 9.7 6 9.2 1 14.3 TOTAL 72 100.0 65 100.0 7 100.0

MONO 18-20 7 6.9 6 6.5 1 12.5 21-30 28 27.7 27 29.0 1 12.5 31-40 35 34.7 33 35.5 2 25.0 41-50 22 21.8 19 20.4 3 37.5 51-60 6 5.9 5 5.4 1 12.5 61-70 2 2.0 2 2.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 1 1.0 1 1.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 101 100.0 93 100.0 8 100.0

MONTEREY UNDER 18 14 0.4 13 0.4 1 0.3 18-20 206 6.2 191 6.3 15 5.0 21-30 1492 44.9 1402 46.4 90 30.0 31-40 976 29.4 860 28.5 116 38.7 41-50 433 13.0 376 12.4 57 19.0 51-60 137 4.1 122 4.0 15 5.0 61-70 53 1.6 48 1.6 5 1.7 71 & ABOVE 11 0.3 10 0.3 1 0.3 TOTAL 3322 100.0 3022 100.0 300 100.0

NAPA UNDER 18 5 0.5 5 0.6 0 0.0 18-20 56 6.0 51 6.3 5 4.0 21-30 368 39.6 336 41.7 32 25.8 31-40 265 28.5 225 28.0 40 32.3 41-50 144 15.5 112 13.9 32 25.8 51-60 57 6.1 49 6.1 8 6.5 61-70 27 2.9 20 2.5 7 5.6 71 & ABOVE 7 0.8 7 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 929 100.0 805 100.0 124 100.0

NEVADA UNDER 18 1 0.2 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 21 5.0 16 4.7 5 5.9 21-30 107 25.4 93 27.6 14 16.5 31-40 143 33.9 101 30.0 42 49.4 41-50 97 23.0 75 22.3 22 25.9 51-60 30 7.1 28 8.3 2 2.4 61-70 18 4.3 18 5.3 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 5 1.2 5 1.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 422 100.0 337 100.0 85 100.0

ORANGE UNDER 18 19 0.2 15 0.1 4 0.2 18-20 436 3.5 385 3.5 51 3.2 21-30 5370 42.9 4770 43.8 600 37.1 31-40 4007 32.0 3451 31.7 556 34.4 41-50 1780 14.2 1508 13.8 272 16.8 51-60 651 5.2 557 5.1 94 5.8 61-70 205 1.6 179 1.6 26 1.6 71 & ABOVE 48 0.4 34 0.3 14 0.9 TOTAL 12516 100.0 10899 100.0 1617 100.0

80

Page 93: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

PLACER UNDER 18 6 0.4 4 0.4 2 0.8 18-20 73 5.5 65 6.0 8 3.1 21-30 483 36.2 402 37.2 81 31.9 31-40 438 32.8 342 31.6 96 37.8 41-50 227 17.0 178 16.5 49 19.3 51-60 78 5.8 64 5.9 14 5.5 61-70 22 1.6 19 1.8 3 1.2 71 & ABOVE 8 0.6 7 0.6 1 0.4 TOTAL 1335 100.0 1081 100.0 254 100.0

PLUMAS 18-20 7 5.6 7 6.6 0 0.0 21-30 33 26.2 24 22.6 9 45.0 31-40 38 30.2 31 29.2 7 35.0 41-50 27 21.4 24 22.6 3 15.0 51-60 11 8.7 10 9.4 1 5.0 61-70 10 7.9 10 9.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 126 100.0 106 100.0 20 100.0

RIVERSIDE UNDER 18 18 0.3 16 0.3 2 0.3 18-20 231 4.4 215 4.7 16 2.4 21-30 1863 35.1 1658 35.9 205 30.1 31-40 1657 31.2 1400 30.3 257 37.8 41-50 960 18.1 830 18.0 130 19.1 51-60 373 7.0 324 7.0 49 7.2 61-70 148 2.8 133 2.9 15 2.2 71 & ABOVE 53 1.0 47 1.0 6 0.9 TOTAL 5303 100.0 4623 100.0 680 100.0

SACRAMENTO UNDER 18 17 0.3 15 0.3 2 0.2 18-20 217 4.2 187 4.3 30 3.3 21-30 2064 39.6 1726 40.1 338 37.2 31-40 1620 31.1 1307 30.3 313 34.5 41-50 834 16.0 669 15.5 165 18.2 51-60 313 6.0 274 6.4 39 4.3 61-70 120 2.3 104 2.4 16 1.8 71 & ABOVE 32 0.6 27 0.6 5 0.6 TOTAL 5217 100.0 4309 100.0 908 100.0

SAN BENITO UNDER 18 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 14 6.8 13 7.0 1 5.3 21-30 86 42.0 82 44.1 4 21.1 31-40 64 31.2 54 29.0 10 52.6 41-50 29 14.1 25 13.4 4 21.1 51-60 6 2.9 6 3.2 0 0.0 61-70 5 2.4 5 2.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 205 100.0 186 100.0 19 100.0

SAN BERNARDINO

UNDER 18 17 0.3 16 0.3 1 0.2

18-20 245 4.1 228 4.2 17 2.7 21-30 2229 36.9 2029 37.5 200 31.4 31-40 1895 31.3 1660 30.7 235 36.9 41-50 1046 17.3 939 17.4 107 16.8 51-60 410 6.8 356 6.6 54 8.5 61-70 161 2.7 142 2.6 19 3.0 71 & ABOVE 44 0.7 41 0.8 3 0.5 TOTAL 6047 100.0 5411 100.0 636 100.0

81

Page 94: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SAN DIEGO UNDER 18 24 0.2 18 0.2 6 0.4 18-20 508 4.2 450 4.2 58 4.0 21-30 5329 43.7 4764 44.4 565 38.5 31-40 3786 31.0 3269 30.5 517 35.2 41-50 1759 14.4 1530 14.3 229 15.6 51-60 567 4.6 499 4.6 68 4.6 61-70 178 1.5 155 1.4 23 1.6 71 & ABOVE 50 0.4 49 0.5 1 0.1 TOTAL 12201 100.0 10734 100.0 1467 100.0

SAN FRANCISCO UNDER 18 7 0.7 5 0.5 2 1.7 18-20 21 2.0 16 1.8 5 4.3 21-30 397 38.5 360 39.4 37 31.6 31-40 338 32.8 298 32.6 40 34.2 41-50 165 16.0 140 15.3 25 21.4 51-60 69 6.7 63 6.9 6 5.1 61-70 30 2.9 28 3.1 2 1.7 71 & ABOVE 4 0.4 4 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 1031 100.0 914 100.0 117 100.0

SAN JOAQUIN UNDER 18 15 0.5 13 0.5 2 0.6 18-20 167 5.9 146 5.9 21 6.4 21-30 987 35.1 888 35.7 99 30.2 31-40 896 31.8 773 31.1 123 37.5 41-50 472 16.8 413 16.6 59 18.0 51-60 193 6.9 174 7.0 19 5.8 61-70 63 2.2 58 2.3 5 1.5 71 & ABOVE 21 0.7 21 0.8 0 0.0 TOTAL 2814 100.0 2486 100.0 328 100.0

SAN LUIS OBISPO UNDER 18 3 0.2 2 0.1 1 0.4 18-20 82 5.1 74 5.5 8 3.0

21-30 594 36.8 505 37.4 89 33.8 31-40 507 31.4 416 30.8 91 34.6 41-50 279 17.3 221 16.3 58 22.1 51-60 103 6.4 92 6.8 11 4.2 61-70 38 2.4 34 2.5 4 1.5 71 & ABOVE 9 0.6 8 0.6 1 0.4 TOTAL 1615 100.0 1352 100.0 263 100.0

SAN MATEO UNDER 18 22 0.6 21 0.7 1 0.2 18-20 159 4.3 144 4.5 15 2.9 21-30 1374 36.8 1201 37.3 173 33.3 31-40 1213 32.5 1030 32.0 183 35.3 41-50 619 16.6 505 15.7 114 22.0 51-60 243 6.5 213 6.6 30 5.8 61-70 82 2.2 81 2.5 1 0.2 71 & ABOVE 25 0.7 23 0.7 2 0.4 TOTAL 3737 100.0 3218 100.0 519 100.0

SANTA BARBARA UNDER 18 10 0.4 9 0.4 1 0.3 18-20 164 6.0 139 5.9 25 6.3 21-30 1227 44.5 1085 46.0 142 35.9 31-40 835 30.3 683 29.0 152 38.4 41-50 350 12.7 299 12.7 51 12.9 51-60 111 4.0 95 4.0 16 4.0 61-70 46 1.7 39 1.7 7 1.8 71 & ABOVE 12 0.4 10 0.4 2 0.5 TOTAL 2755 100.0 2359 100.0 396 100.0

82

Page 95: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SANTA CLARA UNDER 18 29 0.4 25 0.4 4 0.4 18-20 248 3.3 228 3.5 20 2.1 21-30 2933 39.5 2635 40.6 298 31.8 31-40 2541 34.2 2174 33.5 367 39.2 41-50 1137 15.3 977 15.1 160 17.1 51-60 418 5.6 348 5.4 70 7.5 61-70 100 1.3 85 1.3 15 1.6 71 & ABOVE 21 0.3 19 0.3 2 0.2 TOTAL 7427 100.0 6491 100.0 936 100.0

SANTA CRUZ UNDER 18 7 0.4 3 0.2 4 1.4 18-20 124 6.7 108 6.9 16 5.5 21-30 707 38.0 611 38.9 96 33.0 31-40 603 32.4 501 31.9 102 35.1 41-50 302 16.2 245 15.6 57 19.6 51-60 78 4.2 70 4.5 8 2.7 61-70 31 1.7 24 1.5 7 2.4 71 & ABOVE 8 0.4 7 0.4 1 0.3 TOTAL 1860 100.0 1569 100.0 291 100.0

SHASTA 18-20 23 3.3 18 3.1 5 4.1 21-30 171 24.3 138 23.8 33 26.8 31-40 263 37.4 215 37.0 48 39.0 41-50 159 22.6 131 22.5 28 22.8 51-60 63 8.9 56 9.6 7 5.7 61-70 20 2.8 18 3.1 2 1.6 71 & ABOVE 5 0.7 5 0.9 0 0.0 TOTAL 704 100.0 581 100.0 123 100.0

SIERRA 21-30 2 8.7 2 9.1 0 0.0 31-40 7 30.4 7 31.8 0 0.0 41-50 10 43.5 9 40.9 1 100.0 51-60 4 17.4 4 18.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 23 100.0 22 100.0 1 100.0

SISKIYOU 18-20 10 3.9 8 3.7 2 4.9 21-30 73 28.3 64 29.5 9 22.0 31-40 93 36.0 73 33.6 20 48.8 41-50 56 21.7 49 22.6 7 17.1 51-60 18 7.0 16 7.4 2 4.9 61-70 4 1.6 4 1.8 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 1.6 3 1.4 1 2.4 TOTAL 258 100.0 217 100.0 41 100.0

SOLANO UNDER 18 10 0.8 8 0.7 2 1.1 18-20 70 5.4 60 5.3 10 5.6 21-30 456 34.9 411 36.5 45 25.3 31-40 412 31.6 344 30.5 68 38.2 41-50 223 17.1 186 16.5 37 20.8 51-60 99 7.6 90 8.0 9 5.1 61-70 28 2.1 25 2.2 3 1.7 71 & ABOVE 7 0.5 3 0.3 4 2.2 TOTAL 1305 100.0 1127 100.0 178 100.0

83

Page 96: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

SONOMA UNDER 18 14 0.6 11 0.6 3 0.8 18-20 107 4.5 97 4.9 10 2.6 21-30 854 36.0 751 37.9 103 26.3 31-40 722 30.5 573 29.0 149 38.1 41-50 419 17.7 338 17.1 81 20.7 51-60 170 7.2 141 7.1 29 7.4 61-70 63 2.7 50 2.5 13 3.3 71 & ABOVE 21 0.9 18 0.9 3 0.8 TOTAL 2370 100.0 1979 100.0 391 100.0

STANISLAUS UNDER 18 11 0.5 10 0.6 1 0.4 18-20 116 5.7 111 6.2 5 2.0 21-30 766 37.6 686 38.4 80 32.0 31-40 651 32.0 554 31.0 97 38.8 41-50 305 15.0 257 14.4 48 19.2 51-60 130 6.4 116 6.5 14 5.6 61-70 48 2.4 43 2.4 5 2.0 71 & ABOVE 8 0.4 8 0.4 0 0.0 TOTAL 2035 100.0 1785 100.0 250 100.0

SUTTER UNDER 18 4 0.9 4 1.0 0 0.0 18-20 29 6.2 28 6.8 1 1.8 21-30 160 34.1 142 34.3 18 32.7 31-40 162 34.5 136 32.9 26 47.3 41-50 76 16.2 67 16.2 9 16.4 51-60 31 6.6 30 7.2 1 1.8 61-70 5 1.1 5 1.2 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 2 0.4 2 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 469 100.0 414 100.0 55 100.0

TEHAMA 18-20 10 3.0 10 3.5 0 0.0 21-30 112 33.1 100 35.1 12 22.6 31-40 110 32.5 88 30.9 22 41.5 41-50 68 20.1 57 20.0 11 20.8 51-60 20 5.9 14 4.9 6 11.3 61-70 12 3.6 10 3.5 2 3.8 71 & ABOVE 6 1.8 6 2.1 0 0.0 TOTAL 338 100.0 285 100.0 53 100.0

TRINITY 18-20 2 1.9 2 2.2 0 0.0 21-30 21 19.6 17 18.7 4 25.0 31-40 39 36.4 33 36.3 6 37.5 41-50 28 26.2 24 26.4 4 25.0 51-60 13 12.1 12 13.2 1 6.3 61-70 4 3.7 3 3.3 1 6.3 TOTAL 107 100.0 91 100.0 16 100.0

TULARE UNDER 18 18 0.7 17 0.8 1 0.5 18-20 157 6.5 152 6.9 5 2.3 21-30 969 39.8 899 40.6 70 32.6 31-40 797 32.8 704 31.8 93 43.3 41-50 321 13.2 291 13.1 30 14.0 51-60 120 4.9 109 4.9 11 5.1 61-70 39 1.6 34 1.5 5 2.3 71 & ABOVE 11 0.5 11 0.5 0 0.0 TOTAL 2432 100.0 2217 100.0 215 100.0

84

Page 97: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABLE B2: 1994 DUI CONVICTIONS BY COUNTY, SEX, AND AGE - continued

COUNTY AGE TOTAL MALE FEMALE N % N % N %

TUOLUMNE 18-20 6 2.6 6 3.3 0 0.0 21-30 61 26.6 50 27.8 11 22.4 31-40 72 31.4 53 29.4 19 38.8 41-50 58 25.3 44 24.4 14 28.6 51-60 22 9.6 19 10.6 3 6.1 61-70 6 2.6 4 2.2 2 4.1 71 & ABOVE 4 1.7 4 2.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 229 100.0 180 100.0 49 100.0

VENTURA UNDER 18 17 0.4 14 0.4 3 0.5 18-20 243 5.6 217 5.8 26 4.4 21-30 1894 43.6 1665 44.4 229 38.7 31-40 1308 30.1 1122 29.9 186 31.4 41-50 588 13.5 484 12.9 104 17.6 51-60 215 4.9 179 4.8 36 6.1 61-70 72 1.7 65 1.7 7 1.2 71 & ABOVE 9 0.2 8 0.2 1 0.2 TOTAL 4346 100.0 3754 100.0 592 100.0

YOLO UNDER 18 3 0.5 3 0.5 0 0.0 18-20 38 5.7 35 6.1 3 3.5 21-30 234 35.3 208 36.0 26 30.6 31-40 199 30.0 168 29.1 31 36.5 41-50 119 17.9 103 17.8 16 18.8 51-60 48 7.2 43 7.4 5 5.9 61-70 18 2.7 14 2.4 4 4.7 71 & ABOVE 4 0.6 4 0.7 0 0.0 TOTAL 663 100.0 578 100.0 85 100.0

YUBA UNDER 18 1 0.3 1 0.3 0 0.0 18-20 22 5.7 20 6.1 2 3.5 21-30 132 34.3 114 34.8 18 31.6 31-40 136 35.3 110 33.5 26 45.6 41-50 56 14.5 47 14.3 9 15.8 51-60 25 6.5 23 7.0 2 3.5 61-70 9 2.3 9 2.7 0 0.0 71 & ABOVE 4 1.0 4 1.2 0 0.0 TOTAL 385 100.0 328 100.0 57 100.0

85

Page 98: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

86

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT

DU

I

AV

ERA

GE

AD

JUD

ICA

TIO

N

CO

UN

TY

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

C

OU

RT

MIS

D

FELO

NY

ALC

OH

OL

NO

N-A

LCO

HO

L O

THER

D

UI D

ISM

*/

TIM

ES (M

ON

THS)

RATE

DU

I D

UI

REC

KLE

SS

REC

KLE

SS

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S U

NC

ON

ST**

V

IOLA

TIO

N T

O

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

TO

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

D

MV

UPD

ATE

BUTT

E 73

.1%

SU

P BU

TTE

26

4 0

0 1

0/0

3.9

2.7

ALP

INE

62.7

%

SUP

ALP

INE

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 9.

9 8.

4

CO

LUSA

68

.9%

SU

P C

OLU

SA

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

4 1.

1

AM

AD

OR

87.4

%

SUP

AM

AD

OR

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

2 1.

1

ALA

MED

A

69.0

%

SUP

OA

KLA

ND

94

16

0

0 2

0/1

4.2

5.1

STA

TEW

IDE

70.6

%

14

3794

21

29

1517

1 32

44

4983

49

/411

2.

8 3.

2

CA

LAV

ERA

S 63

.4%

SU

P C

ALA

VER

AS

5 0

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

9 5.

3

JUV

SA

N L

EAN

DRO

41

0

1 0

4 0/

0 3.

4 4.

2

A

LAM

EDA

20

2 3

30

6 6

0/0

1.6

1.4

BERK

ELEY

20

2 0

14

6 11

0/

0 2.

4 2.

4

FR

EMO

NT

1142

4

93

14

48

0/4

3.7

2.5

PLEA

SAN

TON

69

6 6

134

26

63

0/6

3.2

2.2

OA

KLA

ND

10

13

14

112

7 20

0/

4 3.

1 2.

0

H

AYW

ARD

15

40

4 20

5 12

11

9 0/

8 4.

2 2.

6

TO

TAL

4930

47

58

9 71

27

3 0/

23

---

---

MA

RKLE

EVIL

LE

36

0 9

1 0

0/0

4.6

1.0

TOTA

L 37

0

9 1

0 0/

0 --

- --

-

JAC

KSO

N

154

5 2

2 1

0/1

2.9

2.8

TOTA

L 15

5 5

2 2

1 0/

1 --

- --

-

JUV

BU

TTE

7 1

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

0 0.

6

G

RID

LEY

MU

NI

470

0 11

4 7

7 0/

0 2.

9 3.

2

G

RID

LEY

56

0 5

0 0

0/4

3.7

3.2

ORO

VIL

LE

225

5 26

1

0 0/

6 3.

6 2.

6

PA

RAD

ISE

154

0 25

1

2 0/

0 3.

3 4.

2

TO

TAL

938

10

170

9 10

0/

10

---

---

SAN

AN

DRE

AS

176

1 27

14

12

1/

0 2.

1 2.

1

TO

TAL

181

1 27

14

12

1/

0 --

- --

-

CO

LUSA

20

3 2

32

8 1

1/1

2.2

2.9

WIL

LIA

MS

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 0.

9 2.

3

TO

TAL

206

2 32

8

1 1/

1 --

- --

- C

ON

TRA

CO

STA

69

.8%

SU

P C

CO

STA

13

2 15

2

0 1

0/3

6.2

1.8

JUV

C C

OST

A

22

1 1

1 0

0/0

3.5

2.4

CO

NC

ORD

61

5 0

51

4 13

0/

8 3.

7 2.

3

RI

CH

MO

ND

82

5 4

134

6 25

0/

7 4.

4 3.

2

PI

TTSB

URG

49

9 6

76

8 13

0/

3 4.

9 2.

8

W

ALN

UT

CRE

EK

759

2 12

1 16

7

0/7

3.0

2.0

TOTA

L 28

52

28

385

35

59

0/28

--

- --

- D

EL N

ORT

E 62

.4%

SU

P D

EL N

ORT

E 14

3

0 0

1 0/

0 2.

2 3.

4

C

RESC

ENT

CIT

Y 16

7 5

55

9 11

0/

0 3.

2 6.

3

TO

TAL

181

8 55

9

12

0/0

---

---

prio

r con

vict

ion

y th

ose

in w

hich

a

*The

se m

ay in

clud

e ab

stra

ct d

elet

ions

due

to fa

ilure

to a

ppea

r (FT

A) a

t the

cou

rt h

eari

ng.

**Th

ese

1994

arr

este

es s

how

ed p

rior

DU

Is d

ecla

red

unco

nstit

utio

nal o

n th

eir r

ecor

ds.

The

cour

ts re

port

ed h

ere

are

thos

e of

the

curr

ent D

UI c

onvi

ctio

n an

d no

t nec

essa

ril

Page 99: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

87

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

EL D

ORA

DO

85

.7%

SU

P EL

DO

RAD

O

16

3 0

0 1

0/0

4.0

3.9

SUP/

JUV

PLA

CR

VL

0 0

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

9 1.

3

C

AM

ERO

N P

AR

K

277

1 14

8

3 0/

2 2.

2 6.

1

SO

LA

KE

TAH

OE

252

5 22

0

5 0/

1 3.

3 5.

4

PL

AC

ERV

ILLE

27

5 12

14

2

0 0/

0 2.

5 4.

9

TO

TAL

821

21

50

10

9 0/

3 --

- --

- FR

ESN

O

56.9

%

SUP

FRES

NO

18

1 98

1

1 2

0/1

4.2

4.8

JUV

FRE

SNO

28

0

3 0

0 0/

0 7.

9 3.

0

FR

ESN

O

2093

21

33

8 29

23

1/

2 4.

6 6.

1

C

LOV

IS

220

0 51

7

5 0/

0 4.

5 6.

2

C

OA

LIN

GA

23

0 1

9 2

3 0/

0 2.

8 6.

2

FI

REBA

UG

H

215

2 32

2

6 0/

0 3.

2 7.

2

FO

WLE

R 11

8 2

15

0 1

1/0

4.3

4.8

KER

MA

N

102

2 7

3 0

0/0

3.5

6.7

KIN

GSB

URG

55

0

8 3

3 0/

0 4.

6 6.

8

RE

EDLE

Y M

UN

I 16

6 2

10

1 0

0/0

2.9

7.9

RIV

ERD

ALE

23

0

7 1

0 0/

0 4.

3 6.

9

SA

NG

ER

146

1 18

0

2 1/

0 3.

4 5.

6

SE

LMA

MU

NI

197

3 16

7

3 0/

0 3.

9 2.

6

TO

TAL

3774

13

2 51

5 56

48

3/

3 --

- --

- G

LEN

N

74.8

%

SUP

GLE

NN

11

2

1 0

1 0/

0 2.

9 4.

4

JU

V G

LEN

N

0 1

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

4 0.

6

O

RLA

ND

14

2 0

13

4 5

0/2

2.1

5.4

WIL

LOW

S 75

1

11

0 2

0/1

3.0

4.6

TOTA

L 22

8 4

25

4 8

0/3

---

---

HU

MBO

LDT

48.0

%

SUP/

JUV

HM

B-EU

R 0

2 0

0 1

0/0

7.1

3.0

JUV

HU

MBO

LDT

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 20

.0

1.4

EURE

KA

22

1 14

78

11

19

0/

1 2.

9 3.

4

A

RCA

TA

160

0 74

15

13

0/

0 2.

8 3.

8

FO

RTU

NA

96

0

46

6 8

0/1

2.7

1.7

GA

RBER

VIL

LE

61

0 27

5

5 0/

1 4.

5 2.

9

H

OO

PA

29

0 13

1

1 0/

0 4.

0 5.

8

TO

TAL

576

16

238

38

47

0/3

---

---

IMPE

RIA

L 56

.2%

SU

P IM

PERI

AL

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

7 10

.9

JUV

IMPE

RIA

L 2

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.4

10.3

BR

AW

LEY

178

1 21

19

4

0/1

3.0

2.3

CA

LEXI

CO

40

9 0

39

58

6 0/

0 3.

1 1.

7

EL

CEN

TRO

32

9 2

45

32

2 0/

0 3.

5 4.

9

W

INTE

RHA

VEN

1

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.3

1.0

TOTA

L 92

1 3

105

109

12

0/1

---

---

INYO

69

.9%

SU

P IN

YO

21

1 0

0 0

1/0

2.2

2.6

BISH

OP

210

0 42

4

2 2/

0 3.

5 4.

1

IN

DEP

END

ENC

E 9

1 3

1 0

0/0

4.1

1.8

TOTA

L 24

0 2

45

5 2

3/0

---

---

Page 100: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

88

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

KER

N

81.1

%

SUP

KER

N

265

29

0 2

3 0/

2 2.

4 2.

0

JU

V K

ERN

25

0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 3.

3

A

RVIN

-LA

MO

NT

319

4 10

4

20

0/0

2.3

3.5

BAK

ERSF

IELD

20

25

13

189

8 17

0/

13

2.6

5.2

DEL

AN

O

284

1 36

3

26

1/1

2.8

3.5

LKE

ISA

BELL

A

79

2 1

1 3

0/0

2.5

2.7

TAFT

21

2 2

33

9 21

0/

1 2.

0 4.

6

SH

AFT

ER

303

6 34

3

26

1/1

2.6

4.3

MO

JAV

E 30

4 2

60

21

45

1/1

2.4

3.5

RID

GEC

REST

25

5 1

28

4 12

0/

0 2.

6 4.

6

TO

TAL

4071

60

39

1 55

17

3 3/

19

---

---

KIN

GS

66.4

%

SUP

KIN

GS

19

3 0

0 0

0/0

2.2

0.7

JUV

KIN

GS

14

2 0

1 0

0/0

2.8

1.6

HA

NFO

RD

411

5 35

0

8 0/

3 2.

4 6.

0

A

VEN

AL

70

1 7

2 2

0/1

2.3

1.7

CO

RCO

RAN

56

1

1 0

2 0/

0 3.

1 3.

1

LE

MO

ORE

17

5 2

11

4 3

0/0

1.7

1.7

TOTA

L 74

5 14

54

7

15

0/4

---

---

LAK

E 69

.3%

SU

P LA

KE

11

2 0

0 1

0/0

6.8

4.6

JUV

LA

KE

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 5.

5 1.

3

C

LEA

RLA

KE

237

3 13

2

7 0/

1 4.

6 5.

4

LA

KEP

ORT

20

0 2

14

6 8

0/0

2.7

3.2

TOTA

L 45

2 7

27

8 16

0/

1 --

- --

- LA

SSEN

78

.6%

SU

P LA

SSEN

0

1 0

0 0

0/0

3.3

2.5

JUV

LA

SSEN

5

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.6

6.7

SUSA

NV

ILLE

19

0 2

8 2

4 0/

0 2.

4 2.

2

TO

TAL

195

3 8

2 4

0/0

---

---

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

68.4

%

SUP

LA

130

49

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

5 2.

6

SU

P PO

MO

NA

17

9 34

0

1 6

0/1

3.4

2.0

SUP

LAN

CST

R 18

16

0

0 0

0/0

3.0

2.2

SUP

VA

N N

UYS

96

22

0

0 0

0/0

3.4

2.4

SUP

PASA

DEN

A

71

16

0 0

2 0/

1 4.

3 2.

1

SU

P V

AN

NU

YS

46

19

0 0

2 0/

0 4.

2 1.

6

SU

P LO

NG

BEA

CH

26

14

0

0 0

0/1

4.6

2.7

SUP

CO

MPT

ON

32

15

0

0 0

0/0

5.4

2.3

SUP

NO

RWA

LK

99

19

1 1

1 0/

1 3.

8 2.

3

SU

P SA

NTA

MO

NIC

A

31

8 0

0 0

0/0

4.1

2.6

JUV

LA

CO

1

0 1

0 1

0/0

0.1

0.7

LA JV

CEN

TRL

16

1 1

0 1

0/0

6.4

1.0

ALH

AM

BRA

85

5 7

71

23

32

0/3

2.8

2.5

LAN

CA

STER

61

4 10

49

21

15

1/

0 2.

7 1.

8

BE

VER

LY H

ILLS

27

5 0

41

25

6 0/

0 2.

8 1.

6

BU

RBA

NK

45

2 1

58

37

9 0/

0 1.

9 1.

9

W

EST

CO

VIN

A

2516

13

13

6 20

45

1/

3 2.

9 1.

6

Page 101: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

89

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

C

OM

PTO

N

1168

2

146

41

38

0/8

3.1

2.7

cont

inue

d

CU

LVER

CIT

Y 26

2 4

32

8 5

0/1

3.2

4.1

DO

WN

EY

732

9 8

12

30

0/2

2.9

3.3

EAST

LA

12

43

5 10

1 58

44

0/

1 2.

7 1.

7

EL

MO

NTE

12

80

15

50

9 31

1/

1 2.

4 2.

5

G

LEN

DA

LE

665

3 88

12

12

0/

4 1.

9 4.

6

IN

GLE

WO

OD

10

71

5 16

0 33

28

1/

6 3.

1 2.

3

LO

NG

BEA

CH

18

36

16

274

118

54

0/6

1.9

3.2

LA M

ETRO

71

78

16

648

96

772

0/8

1.3

2.1

BELL

FLO

WER

40

8 4

19

3 20

0/

0 2.

5 2.

9

V

ALE

NC

IA

840

8 80

58

41

0/

1 2.

3 2.

8

PA

SAD

ENA

83

3 8

152

48

40

0/3

4.1

2.7

MA

LIBU

26

4 4

102

32

25

0/1

4.1

3.5

POM

ON

A

1082

13

58

8

37

0/3

2.7

2.9

HU

NTN

GTO

N P

K

1055

7

13

1 33

0/

1 2.

0 2.

3

M

ON

ROV

IA

356

3 20

6

12

0/2

3.0

2.9

SAN

TA M

ON

ICA

33

4 5

82

14

15

0/1

2.1

2.5

TORR

AN

CE

1314

14

25

9 64

94

0/

15

2.5

1.7

SOU

THG

ATE

66

4 4

17

0 11

0/

4 3.

0 3.

5

W

HIT

TIER

76

5 10

29

5

22

0/3

3.4

4.0

HO

LLYW

OO

D

162

0 7

7 8

0/0

1.7

1.6

SAN

FER

NA

ND

O

1880

10

26

1 39

12

1 0/

1 1.

7 3.

3

SA

N P

EDRO

45

6 4

58

8 24

0/

2 2.

3 4.

4

V

AN

NU

YS

2861

59

42

3 49

36

6 0/

2 1.

5 2.

9

LO

S A

NG

ELES

63

2 3

129

50

137

0/3

2.2

1.7

AV

ALO

N

8 0

2 0

0 0/

0 2.

5 7.

0

U

S M

AG

BA

KSF

LD

9 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 1.

6

U

S D

IST

CT

LA

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 10

.5

2.5

TOTA

L 34

817

475

3576

90

7 21

40

4/89

--

- --

- M

AD

ERA

59

.7%

SU

P M

AD

ERA

20

8

0 1

1 0/

0 2.

4 1.

9

JU

V M

AD

ERA

3

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.2

1.3

CH

OW

CH

ILLA

14

5 1

13

3 0

0/0

3.6

6.9

BORD

EN

160

3 40

1

0 0/

0 3.

5 5.

3

M

AD

ERA

27

2 8

34

5 8

0/1

3.7

5.4

BASS

LA

KE

72

0 16

1

0 1/

1 3.

6 5.

7

TO

TAL

672

20

103

11

9 1/

2 --

- --

- M

ARI

N

77.9

%

SUP

SA

N R

AFA

EL

19

7 0

0 1

0/0

3.3

4.8

JUV

SA

N R

AFA

EL

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 1.

3

SA

N R

AFA

EL

1257

9

0 1

86

0/3

2.8

4.4

TOTA

L 12

80

16

0 1

87

0/3

---

---

MA

RIPO

SA

100.

0%

SUP

MA

RIPO

SA

2 2

0 0

0 0/

0 16

.3

0.9

MA

RIPO

SA

62

2 8

0 1

0/0

4.2

1.8

US

MA

G Y

OSE

MIT

E 87

0

13

0 0

0/0

1.2

2.3

TOTA

L 15

1 4

21

0 1

0/0

---

---

Page 102: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

90

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

MEN

DO

CIN

O

71.4

%

SUP

UK

IAH

14

1

0 0

0 0/

0 6.

8 4.

1

JU

V U

KIA

H

4 0

1 0

0 1/

0 1.

1 0.

2

W

ILLI

TS

83

0 19

10

6

0/1

3.0

3.5

UK

IAH

40

1 1

30

5 9

0/2

2.5

6.5

BOO

NV

ILLE

10

1

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

1 4.

9

PT

. ARE

NA

9

0 1

0 1

0/0

1.6

9.9

LEG

GET

T 26

0

6 2

3 0/

0 3.

5 5.

5

C

OV

ELO

8

0 4

0 0

0/0

2.7

2.1

FORT

BRA

GG

12

1 2

13

0 0

0/0

3.1

2.7

UK

IAH

4

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.4

1.2

TOTA

L 68

0 5

74

17

19

1/3

---

---

MER

CED

57

.9%

SU

P M

ERC

ED

32

4 0

0 0

0/0

4.1

4.2

JUV

MER

CED

18

1

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

1 6.

7

M

ERC

ED

933

8 15

7 52

26

0/

0 4.

2 6.

4

LO

S BA

NO

S 24

2 0

68

25

11

0/1

2.2

5.2

TOTA

L 12

25

13

225

77

37

0/1

---

---

MO

DO

C

52.6

%

SUP

MO

DO

C

2 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

9 5.

3

A

LTU

RAS

69

1 25

0

0 0/

1 3.

3 1.

6

TO

TAL

71

1 25

0

0 0/

1 ---

---

M

ON

O

64.3

%

BRID

GEP

ORT

34

0

2 5

0 0/

0 1.

8 3.

8

M

AM

MO

TH L

AK

ES

67

0 16

0

1 0/

0 2.

7 2.

9

TO

TAL

101

0 18

5

1 0/

0 --

- --

- M

ON

TERE

Y 75

.1%

SU

P M

ON

TERE

Y 11

7 18

2

0 0

0/0

2.1

2.9

JUV

SA

LIN

AS

15

3 0

1 1

0/0

2.5

3.6

MO

NTE

REY

915

8 19

5 25

24

0/

2 1.

9 4.

9

SA

LIN

AS

1623

17

13

2 34

31

0/

2 1.

4 5.

9

K

ING

CIT

Y 60

2 4

108

12

15

0/1

1.6

6.3

TOTA

L 32

72

50

437

72

71

0/5

---

---

NA

PA

85.6

%

SUP

NA

PA

48

14

1 0

0 0/

0 3.

2 4.

3

JU

V N

APA

0

0 1

0 0

0/0

---

---

NA

PA

858

9 49

16

9

1/3

2.3

3.1

TOTA

L 90

6 23

51

16

9

1/3

---

---

NEV

AD

A

87.7

%

SUP

NEV

AD

A

14

5 0

0 0

0/0

3.0

3.4

NEV

AD

A C

ITY

255

6 27

4

0 0/

0 2.

3 4.

9

TR

UC

KEE

MU

NI

142

0 14

4

4 0/

0 2.

9 5.

8

TO

TAL

411

11

41

8 4

0/0

---

---

ORA

NG

E 79

.9%

SU

P SA

NTA

AN

A

138

46

0 0

3 0/

1 4.

2 2.

7

JU

V O

RAN

GE

50

0 0

0 3

0/0

5.2

1.8

FULL

ERTO

N

3258

11

13

0 14

84

3/

3 2.

5 2.

4

W

ESTM

INST

ER

2665

15

91

46

44

1/

4 3.

0 2.

1

LA

GU

NA

HIL

LS

1978

7

193

18

37

0/7

3.9

2.4

NEW

PORT

BEA

CH

18

88

16

133

24

44

0/7

2.7

1.5

SAN

TA A

NA

MU

NI

2425

19

75

5

69

0/2

3.2

2.1

TOTA

L 12

402

114

622

107

284

4/24

--

- --

-

Page 103: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

91

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

PLA

CER

82

.0%

SU

P PL

AC

ER

21

10

0 0

1 0/

0 5.

5 3.

4

JU

V P

LAC

ER

8 0

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

4 5.

8

JU

V T

AH

OE

VIS

TA

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

6 11

.7

AU

BURN

42

9 5

11

6 3

0/1

3.2

2.9

LIN

CO

LN

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 --

- --

-

RO

SEV

ILLE

51

7 6

12

0 7

0/1

3.1

3.8

AU

BURN

(89)

1

0 0

0 0

0/0

5.1

10.0

TA

HO

E C

ITY

330

6 10

12

3

0/0

2.7

2.0

TOTA

L 13

08

27

33

18

14

0/2

---

---

PLU

MA

S 66

.7%

SU

P PL

UM

AS

3 1

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

6 1.

8

C

HES

TER

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

3 12

.4

QU

INC

Y 11

8 3

28

4 3

0/0

2.4

3.6

TOTA

L 12

2 4

28

4 3

0/0

---

---

RIV

ERSI

DE

64.8

%

SUP

RIV

ERSI

DE

1318

60

2

145

26

2/0

3.7

1.8

SUP

IND

IO

1641

29

14

8 55

52

0/

1 4.

1 3.

3

JU

V R

IVER

SID

E 20

2

1 0

0 0/

0 3.

9 2.

8

JU

V IN

DIO

10

0

1 0

0 0/

0 3.

4 1.

6

C

ORO

NA

41

2 6

35

16

17

0/1

3.2

1.8

HEM

ET

493

10

63

3 11

2/

1 3.

3 2.

4

BA

NN

ING

32

1 3

31

7 9

0/0

3.6

4.6

IND

IO

22

0 0

1 5

0/0

1.4

6.6

MO

REN

O V

ALL

EY

210

1 4

20

11

0/0

3.4

3.5

PALM

SPR

ING

S 9

0 2

0 1

0/0

3.1

1.9

BLYT

HE

24

0 0

0 0

0/0

2.5

6.3

PERR

IS

696

10

33

10

13

2/2

4.1

2.4

EL S

INO

RE

4 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

6 1.

0

TC

MA

RCH

AFB

2

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.2

8.0

TOTA

L 51

82

121

320

257

145

6/5

---

---

SAC

RAM

ENTO

66

.0%

SU

P SA

CRA

MEN

TO

211

72

3 0

2 0/

0 3.

1 2.

0

JU

V S

AC

TO T

RF

40

2 0

0 4

0/0

2.6

4.9

SAC

RAM

ENTO

45

98

89

1125

21

1 90

3/

10

3.3

1.8

ELK

GRO

VE

88

1 12

10

1

0/0

2.9

5.9

GA

LT

70

0 6

1 4

0/0

2.6

4.4

WA

LNU

T G

ROV

E 32

0

2 1

3 0/

2 1.

6 7.

7

U

S C

T SA

CTO

14

0

2 0

0 0/

0 6.

8 6.

0

TO

TAL

5053

16

4 11

50

223

104

3/12

--

- --

- SA

N B

ENIT

O

80.7

%

SUP

S BE

NIT

O

6 3

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

7 3.

9

JU

V H

OLL

ISTE

R 4

0 0

0 0

0/0

8.8

4.5

HO

LLIS

TER

192

0 36

5

4 0/

11

2.6

7.4

TOTA

L 20

2 3

36

5 4

0/11

--

- --

- SA

N B

ERN

ARD

INO

56

.7%

SU

P SA

N B

ERN

DO

31

20

0

0 1

0/1

6.1

5.0

SUP

R C

UC

AM

NG

A

38

9 0

0 4

0/0

5.4

3.6

SUP

VIC

TOR

VL

21

2 0

0 1

0/0

5.8

2.9

SUP

BARS

TOW

14

9

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

4 4.

5

Page 104: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

92

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

SAN

BER

NA

RDIN

O

SU

P JS

HU

A T

REE

7 0

0 0

0 0/

0 8.

0 3.

0 co

ntin

ued

JU

V T

F SN

BER

ND

O

24

0 0

0 2

2/0

2.7

4.9

JUV

SA

N B

ERN

DO

2

0 0

0 0

0/0

3.8

3.9

SUP

R C

UC

AM

NG

A

17

0 0

0 1

0/0

3.6

10.2

C

HIN

O

429

3 3

10

7 0/

1 3.

9 2.

3

BA

RSTO

W

249

2 60

34

16

0/

1 3.

9 3.

7

RE

DLA

ND

S 23

5 3

3 26

13

0/

0 2.

7 2.

4

SA

N B

ERN

-CEN

TRA

L 14

15

16

85

16

40

0/2

3.9

2.3

FON

TAN

A

634

8 12

0 25

25

0/

4 5.

0 2.

8

V

ICTO

RVIL

LE

664

4 95

25

64

0/

1 3.

8 4.

8

RA

NC

HO

C

UC

MN

GA

16

56

8 93

61

64

1/

1 3.

0 2.

4

BIG

BEA

RLA

KE

113

2 50

18

4

0/0

3.9

4.4

TWIN

PEA

KS

96

1 36

2

7 0/

1 3.

1 0.

9

N

EED

LES

135

0 32

5

16

0/0

3.9

4.3

TRO

NA

3

1 2

0 2

0/0

3.9

5.3

29 P

ALM

S 17

3 3

68

16

9 0/

3 3.

1 7.

3

TO

TAL

5956

91

64

7 23

8 27

6 3/

15

---

---

SAN

DIE

GO

77

.1%

SU

P SA

N D

IEG

O

20

4 0

0 0

0/0

3.2

9.2

SUP

VIS

TA

37

13

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

6 3.

4

SU

P C

HU

LA V

ISTA

43

13

0

0 0

0/0

3.2

4.7

SUP

EL C

AJO

N

41

14

0 0

0 0/

0 4.

6 4.

2

JU

V S

AN

DIE

GO

47

1

0 0

2 0/

0 3.

8 4.

4

EL

CA

JON

21

09

8 28

0 89

23

0/

2 2.

2 6.

0

V

ISTA

39

29

16

242

45

19

0/10

2.

1 3.

1

SA

N M

ARC

OS

2 0

0 0

9 0/

0 15

.8

1.1

SAN

DIE

GO

MU

NI

4362

3

288

61

129

0/4

3.2

3.1

CH

ULA

VIS

TA

1528

11

14

8

22

0/1

2.2

5.0

TOTA

L 12

118

83

824

203

204

0/17

--

- --

- SA

N F

RAN

CIS

CO

61

.0%

SU

P SA

N F

RAN

12

5

0 0

0 0/

1 8.

1 2.

9

JU

V S

AN

FRA

N

8 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

7 11

.0

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

1000

6

188

68

16

0/4

3.0

1.1

TOTA

L 10

20

11

188

68

16

0/5

---

---

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

71.5

%

SUP

FRN

CH

CA

MP

46

11

0 0

2 0/

0 4.

3 4.

1

JU

V F

RNC

H C

AM

P 11

0

0 1

0 0/

0 3.

6 3.

3

LO

DI

577

5 43

12

51

0/

1 2.

0 3.

2

M

AN

TEC

A

383

7 26

4

16

1/2

2.5

2.1

TRA

CY

228

3 10

9

3 0/

0 2.

0 2.

2

ST

OC

KTO

N

1527

16

13

7 24

44

0/

2 2.

2 2.

4

TO

TAL

2772

42

21

6 50

11

6 1/

5 --

- --

- SA

N L

UIS

OBI

SPO

68

.7%

SU

P SA

N L

OBI

SPO

49

6

6 3

4 0/

1 3.

4 4.

0

SA

N L

UIS

OBI

SPO

15

52

7 37

2 42

12

9 2/

6 2.

4 5.

7

PA

SO R

OBL

ES

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

2 1.

2

U

S M

AG

S L

OBI

SPO

0

0 2

0 0

0/0

---

---

TOTA

L 16

02

13

380

45

133

2/7

---

---

Page 105: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

93

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

SAN

MA

TEO

80

.9%

SU

P SA

N M

ATE

O

95

16

0 0

0 0/

1 4.

0 2.

1

JU

V S

AN

MA

TEO

36

1

3 1

0 0/

0 3.

3 2.

0

SO

SA

N F

RAN

CIS

CO

17

39

20

199

8 20

2/

2 2.

3 4.

5

RE

DW

OO

D C

ITY

1821

9

292

19

53

1/3

2.5

3.7

TOTA

L 36

91

46

494

28

73

3/6

---

---

SAN

TA B

ARB

ARA

71

.8%

SU

P SN

TA B

ARB

30

4

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

7 1.

8

SU

P SA

NTA

MA

RIA

35

2

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

3 2.

0

JU

V S

AN

TA B

ARB

13

0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

3 2.

9

JU

V L

OM

POC

10

0

0 0

2 0/

0 1.

7 2.

0

SA

NTA

BA

RBA

RA

1402

19

39

7 84

74

0/

1 2.

0 3.

8

SA

NTA

MA

RIA

82

3 9

91

18

13

1/0

1.9

5.1

LOM

POC

23

1 1

47

4 6

0/0

1.8

6.0

SOLV

AN

G

175

1 36

2

4 0/

1 2.

0 4.

8

TO

TAL

2719

36

57

1 10

8 99

1/

2 ---

---

SA

NTA

CLA

RA

81.0

%

SUP

SAN

TA C

LAR

A

426

106

0 0

3 0/

0 3.

6 4.

0

JU

V S

AN

TA C

LARA

53

3

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

4 6.

1

LO

S G

ATO

S 0

0 1

0 1

0/0

---

---

PALO

ALT

O

555

3 50

5

6 0/

1 3.

1 2.

2

SA

N JO

SE

4786

30

38

6 72

92

0/

8 3.

9 2.

6

SA

NTA

CLA

RA

82

1 5

0 1

0/0

2.3

3.1

SUN

NY

VA

LE

707

4 52

7

13

0/2

3.6

1.8

GIL

ROY

667

4 48

5

14

0/2

3.4

1.5

TOTA

L 72

76

151

542

89

130

0/13

--

- --

- SA

NTA

CR

UZ

70.3

%

SUP

SAN

TA C

RUZ

23

4 1

0 1

0/0

2.1

3.6

JUV

SA

NTA

CRU

Z 18

0

3 0

0 0/

0 4.

2 1.

2

SA

NTA

CRU

Z 11

14

6 19

9 34

20

0/

12

2.3

6.1

WA

TSO

NV

ILLE

69

3 2

70

5 8

0/10

2.

2 5.

5

TO

TAL

1848

12

27

3 39

29

0/

22

---

---

SHA

STA

68

.0%

SU

P RE

DD

ING

18

4

1 0

0 0/

0 6.

8 3.

0

JU

V S

HA

STA

0

0 1

0 1

0/0

---

---

BURN

EY

46

0 9

2 0

0/0

3.0

4.1

RED

DIN

G

624

12

140

14

5 0/

0 3.

3 2.

8

TO

TAL

688

16

151

16

6 0/

0 --

- --

- SI

ERRA

60

.5%

SU

P SI

ERR

A

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 7.

8 6.

7

D

OW

NIE

VIL

LE

22

0 6

0 0

0/0

2.0

3.4

TOTA

L 23

0

6 0

0 0/

0 --

- --

- SI

SKIY

OU

72

.5%

SU

P SI

SKIY

OU

3

2 0

0 0

0/0

2.4

3.2

JUV

SIS

KIY

OU

0

0 1

0 0

0/0

---

---

DO

RRIS

7

0 2

0 0

0/0

5.7

1.1

WEE

D

101

0 14

1

1 0/

0 3.

0 4.

3

TU

LELA

KE

7 0

1 1

0 0/

0 4.

2 3.

2

YR

EKA

13

6 2

27

1 2

1/0

2.2

3.7

TOTA

L 25

4 4

45

3 3

1/0

---

---

Page 106: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

94

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

SOLA

NO

72

.1%

SU

P SO

LAN

O

65

7 0

1 0

0/1

2.7

3.8

JUV

SO

LAN

O

24

2 2

1 0

0/0

4.4

4.0

FAIR

FIEL

D

891

2 16

5 11

17

1/

5 2.

3 7.

6

BE

NIC

IA

3 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

1 1.

1

V

ALL

EJO

30

8 3

20

16

11

0/1

2.4

4.3

TOTA

L 12

91

14

187

29

28

1/7

---

---

SON

OM

A

73.0

%

SUP

SON

OM

A

63

7 1

0 5

0/1

5.5

3.2

JUV

SO

NO

MA

26

1

0 2

1 0/

0 2.

4 3.

2

SA

NTA

RO

SA

2245

27

45

4 31

52

0/

21

2.9

4.9

PETA

LUM

A

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

6 4.

1

TO

TAL

2335

35

45

5 33

58

0/

22

---

---

STA

NIS

LAU

S 72

.1%

SU

P ST

AN

ISLA

US

74

7 0

0 0

0/0

3.8

2.4

JUV

STA

NIS

LAU

S 37

0

1 0

0 0/

0 3.

2 5.

5

M

OD

ESTO

16

48

24

255

53

23

0/8

2.9

2.2

TURL

OC

K

243

2 31

6

9 0/

2 2.

4 2.

2

TO

TAL

2002

33

28

7 59

32

0/

10

---

---

SUTT

ER

52.2

%

SUP

SUTT

ER

23

8 1

0 0

0/0

2.1

4.8

JUV

SU

TTER

4

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.7

9.2

YUBA

CIT

Y 43

2 2

62

3 4

0/1

2.2

4.0

TOTA

L 45

9 10

63

3

4 0/

1 --

- --

- TE

HA

MA

70

.9%

SU

P TE

HA

MA

7

7 0

0 0

0/0

3.8

2.3

JUV

TEH

AM

A

1 0

0 0

0 0/

0 1.

2 2.

8

C

ORN

ING

84

0

22

1 3

1/1

3.3

4.8

RED

BLU

FF

233

6 32

3

5 0/

0 2.

5 5.

0

TO

TAL

325

13

54

4 8

1/1

---

---

TRIN

ITY

42.0

%

SUP

TRIN

ITY

1 1

0 0

0 0/

0 8.

7 2.

8

W

EAV

ERV

ILLE

10

2 3

22

1 1

0/0

3.5

2.9

TOTA

L 10

3 4

22

1 1

0/0

---

---

TULA

RE

63.7

%

SUP

TULA

RE

113

13

0 0

0 0/

0 2.

9 3.

7

JU

V T

ULA

RE

25

1 0

0 1

0/0

2.1

3.8

DIN

UBA

MU

NI

491

2 13

7

5 2/

2 3.

0 3.

4

EX

ETER

MU

NI

109

0 3

0 3

0/0

3.3

4.1

LIN

DSY

-EXE

TER

157

0 2

1 1

0/0

3.1

2.6

PORT

ERV

ILLE

46

2 11

14

5

4 1/

1 2.

7 3.

1

TU

LARE

35

1 0

14

0 2

0/1

3.1

5.5

VIS

ALI

A

620

16

14

11

14

0/4

3.2

3.6

WO

OD

LKE-

EXET

ER

61

0 3

0 1

0/0

4.3

3.8

TOTA

L 23

89

43

63

24

31

3/8

---

---

TUO

LUM

NE

71.6

%

SUP

TUO

LUM

NE

11

4 0

0 0

0/0

5.0

10.1

SO

NO

RA

174

4 27

0

5 0/

0 2.

9 5.

4

JA

MES

TOW

N

36

0 4

0 0

0/0

2.4

1.1

TOTA

L 22

1 8

31

0 5

0/0

---

---

Page 107: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

95

TABL

E B3

: TO

TAL

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

DA

TA F

OR

1994

DU

I ARR

ESTE

ES B

Y C

OU

RT -

cont

inue

d

D

UI

A

VER

AG

E A

DJU

DIC

ATI

ON

C

OU

NTY

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

M

ISD

FE

LON

Y A

LCO

HO

L N

ON

-ALC

OH

OL

OTH

ER

DU

I DIS

M*/

TI

MES

(MO

NTH

S)

RA

TE

D

UI

DU

I RE

CK

LESS

RE

CK

LESS

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

UN

CO

NST

**

VIO

LATI

ON

TO

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N T

O

C

ON

VIC

TIO

N

DM

V U

PDA

TE

YUBA

71

.0%

SU

P YU

BA

11

1 0

0 0

0/0

3.7

4.9

YOLO

55

.2%

SU

P W

OO

DLA

ND

2

1 1

0 0

0/0

3.0

1.6

VEN

TURA

87

.4%

JU

V V

ENTU

RA

21

2 0

0 0

0/0

2.9

3.3

MA

RYSV

ILLE

36

3 1

78

12

8 0/

3 2.

5 2.

1

JU

V Y

UBA

2

0 0

0 0

0/0

1.6

5.5

WES

T SA

CTO

7

0 2

1 0

0/0

1.1

3.3

TC B

EALE

AFB

7

0 0

0 0

0/0

0.7

1.1

VEN

TURA

JUST

42

87

36

0 2

84

2/4

2.2

3.5

WO

OD

LAN

D

641

9 10

4 18

5

0/2

2.3

2.5

JUV

YO

LO

3 0

0 0

0 0/

0 3.

2 11

.9

TOTA

L 38

3 2

78

12

8 0/

3 --

- --

-

TOTA

L 65

3 10

10

7 19

5

0/2

---

---

TOTA

L 43

08

38

0 2

84

2/4

---

---

Page 108: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

96

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S*

CO

UN

TY

C

OU

RT

DU

I O

FFEN

DER

TOTA

L PR

OBA

TIO

N

JAIL

1S

T O

FFEN

DER

A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

SB

38

A

LCO

HO

L PR

OG

30

-MO

NTH

PR

OG

RAM

LI

CEN

SE

REST

RIC

TIO

N

CO

URT

SU

SPEN

SIO

N

IGN

ITIO

N

INTE

RLO

CK

ST

ATU

S N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ALA

MED

A

SUP

OA

KLA

ND

1S

T D

UI

21

61.9

90

.5

14.3

9.

5 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 ST

ATE

WID

E

14

5923

96

.1

77.6

57

.3

19.8

0.

2 42

.3

6.7

4.6

2ND

DU

I 3

66.7

33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

60.0

10

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 81

59

.3

90.1

0.

0 19

.8

0.0

0.0

2.5

0.0

TOTA

L 11

0 60

.0

89.1

2.

7 19

.1

0.0

0.0

1.8

0.0

JU

V S

AN

1S

T D

UI

39

61.5

5.

1 51

.3

2.6

0.0

0.0

87.2

0.

0

L

EAN

DRO

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 41

63

.4

4.9

53.7

2.

4 0.

0 0.

0 87

.8

0.0

A

LAM

EDA

1S

T D

UI

141

100.

0 99

.3

94.3

1.

4 0.

0 2.

1 0.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

51

100.

0 10

0.0

11.8

82

.4

0.0

76.5

5.

9 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

11

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

18.2

0.

0 27

.3

63.6

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

205

100.

0 99

.5

67.8

22

.4

0.0

22.0

5.

9 0.

0

BERK

ELEY

1S

T D

UI

134

100.

0 10

0.0

71.6

13

.4

0.0

1.5

3.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 43

10

0.0

97.7

4.

7 53

.5

0.0

53.5

0.

0 2.

3

3R

D D

UI

18

100.

0 88

.9

0.0

27.8

0.

0 27

.8

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

202

100.

0 98

.5

48.5

22

.8

0.0

14.9

2.

5 0.

5

FREM

ON

T 1S

T D

UI

759

100.

0 98

.6

90.1

5.

8 0.

0 3.

2 0.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

285

99.6

99

.3

3.5

89.8

0.

0 56

.5

0.4

4.9

3RD

DU

I 87

98

.9

97.7

1.

1 74

.7

0.0

10.3

3.

4 2.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 15

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

6.7

0.0

TOTA

L 11

46

99.8

98

.7

60.6

32

.7

0.0

16.9

1.

0 1.

4

PLEA

SAN

TON

1S

T D

UI

484

99.8

94

.6

94.2

1.

4 0.

0 3.

9 7.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

159

100.

0 98

.7

4.4

92.5

0.

6 89

.9

2.5

0.6

3RD

DU

I 54

10

0.0

96.3

0.

0 79

.6

0.0

38.9

48

.1

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 40

.0

40.0

0.

0 20

.0

40.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

702

99.7

95

.7

66.2

28

.3

0.1

26.2

9.

7 0.

1

OA

KLA

ND

1S

T D

UI

714

99.7

99

.3

87.7

2.

5 0.

0 3.

6 2.

5 1.

8

2N

D D

UI

226

100.

0 97

.3

8.0

85.0

0.

0 89

.8

0.4

77.0

3R

D D

UI

72

100.

0 81

.9

1.4

68.1

0.

0 86

.1

4.2

75.0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

10

0.0

73.3

0.

0 53

.3

0.0

80.0

0.

0 60

.0

TOTA

L 10

27

99.8

97

.3

62.8

26

.0

0.0

29.5

2.

1 24

.3

H

AYW

ARD

1S

T D

UI

1005

93

.8

98.1

72

.3

3.2

0.0

5.4

6.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 37

2 79

.3

98.1

4.

0 62

.6

0.0

61.6

6.

7 1.

1

3R

D D

UI

136

94.1

10

0.0

1.5

47.1

0.

0 14

.0

8.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

31

74.2

96

.8

0.0

19.4

0.

0 0.

0 16

.1

0.0

TOTA

L 15

44

90.0

98

.3

48.2

21

.7

0.0

19.6

6.

7 0.

3

y, c

ourt

and

offe

nder

stat

us.

y co

unt

g ea

ch sa

nctio

n b

ges o

f 199

4 D

UI c

onvi

ctee

s rec

eivi

npe

rcen

tapr

esen

t *E

ntri

es re

Page 109: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

97

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ALP

INE

SUP

ALP

INE

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

M

ARK

LEEV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

26

100.

0 23

.1

88.5

3.

8 0.

0 76

.9

3.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 6

100.

0 33

.3

16.7

50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 75

.0

50.0

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

36

97.2

27

.8

66.7

13

.9

0.0

66.7

2.

8 0.

0 A

MA

DO

R SU

P A

MA

DO

R 4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

JA

CK

SON

1S

T D

UI

104

98.1

98

.1

43.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

39

94.9

94

.9

0.0

59.0

0.

0 28

.2

59.0

7.

7

3R

D D

UI

12

91.7

10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 16

.7

75.0

8.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

159

96.9

97

.5

28.3

16

.4

0.0

8.2

25.8

2.

5 BU

TTE

SUP

BUTT

E 1S

T D

UI

8 62

.5

87.5

25

.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

18

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

TOTA

L 30

46

.7

96.7

10

.0

13.3

0.

0 3.

3 10

.0

0.0

JU

V B

UTT

E 1S

T D

UI

8 10

0.0

87.5

12

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 8

100.

0 87

.5

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

GRI

DLE

Y M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

331

95.5

96

.1

89.1

0.

3 0.

0 1.

8 10

.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

4 93

.0

97.4

6.

1 64

.9

0.0

62.3

15

.8

2.6

3RD

DU

I 22

81

.8

100.

0 4.

5 18

.2

0.0

4.5

77.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

470

94.0

96

.6

64.5

16

.8

0.0

16.6

15

.5

0.6

G

RID

LEY

1ST

DU

I 36

50

.0

100.

0 47

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

13

30.8

10

0.0

7.7

15.4

0.

0 15

.4

61.5

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 16

.7

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 56

41

.1

100.

0 32

.1

5.4

0.0

3.6

58.9

0.

0

ORO

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 12

3 50

.4

98.4

46

.3

2.4

0.0

1.6

48.8

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

81

33.3

10

0.0

2.5

27.2

0.

0 21

.0

66.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

23

21.7

10

0.0

0.0

17.4

0.

0 0.

0 82

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

230

40.9

99

.1

25.7

12

.6

0.0

8.3

59.1

0.

0

PARA

DIS

E 1S

T D

UI

102

99.0

95

.1

97.1

0.

0 0.

0 1.

0 9.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

35

94.3

10

0.0

8.6

62.9

0.

0 57

.1

17.1

2.

9

3R

D D

UI

15

73.3

10

0.0

0.0

13.3

0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 15

4 95

.5

96.8

66

.2

15.6

0.

0 13

.6

17.5

0.

6

Page 110: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

CA

LAV

ERA

S SU

P C

ALA

VER

AS

4TH

+ D

UI

5 40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

5 40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SAN

AN

DRE

AS

1ST

DU

I 12

9 10

0.0

98.4

93

.8

1.6

0.0

2.3

0.8

1.6

2ND

DU

I 31

93

.5

100.

0 19

.4

71.0

0.

0 32

.3

0.0

16.1

3R

D D

UI

16

100.

0 93

.8

0.0

50.0

0.

0 18

.8

0.0

6.3

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

7 98

.3

98.3

71

.8

18.1

0.

0 9.

0 0.

6 4.

5 C

OLU

SA

SUP

CO

LUSA

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

CO

LUSA

1S

T D

UI

113

96.5

96

.5

82.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

9 3.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

61

96.7

95

.1

6.6

60.7

0.

0 54

.1

11.5

1.

6

3R

D D

UI

24

91.7

10

0.0

4.2

8.3

0.0

0.0

20.8

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

85.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

42.9

0.

0

TO

TAL

205

95.6

96

.6

47.8

19

.0

0.0

16.6

9.

3 0.

5

WIL

LIA

MS

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

CO

NTR

A C

OST

A

SUP

C C

OST

A

1ST

DU

I 28

82

.1

89.3

14

.3

21.4

0.

0 3.

6 7.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

66.7

91

.7

8.3

33.3

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

8.3

3RD

DU

I 14

42

.9

100.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

93

59.1

95

.7

0.0

32.3

0.

0 1.

1 3.

2 1.

1

TO

TAL

147

62.6

94

.6

3.4

28.6

0.

0 2.

7 4.

1 1.

4

JUV

C C

OST

A

1ST

DU

I 23

91

.3

17.4

8.

7 0.

0 0.

0 4.

3 65

.2

0.0

TOTA

L 23

91

.3

17.4

8.

7 0.

0 0.

0 4.

3 65

.2

0.0

C

ON

CO

RD

1ST

DU

I 42

7 99

.8

97.7

63

.0

2.1

0.0

3.3

4.0

0.7

2ND

DU

I 13

3 99

.2

98.5

3.

8 83

.5

0.0

81.2

6.

8 60

.2

3RD

DU

I 46

97

.8

95.7

2.

2 26

.1

0.0

21.7

4.

3 13

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

11.1

22

.2

0.0

TOTA

L 61

5 99

.5

97.7

44

.7

21.6

0.

0 21

.6

4.9

14.5

RIC

HM

ON

D

1ST

DU

I 53

1 97

.7

98.7

87

.6

3.2

0.0

2.4

1.5

0.4

2ND

DU

I 22

5 93

.8

99.1

7.

6 73

.8

0.0

72.9

1.

8 16

.9

3RD

DU

I 58

98

.3

98.3

3.

4 62

.1

0.0

31.0

8.

6 13

.8

4TH

+ D

UI

15

93.3

10

0.0

0.0

26.7

0.

0 20

.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

829

96.6

98

.8

58.4

26

.9

0.0

23.9

2.

4 5.

8

PITT

SBU

RG

1ST

DU

I 33

6 92

.9

98.5

85

.1

0.3

0.3

3.9

8.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

8 85

.9

100.

0 5.

5 63

.3

0.0

64.8

23

.4

7.0

3RD

DU

I 34

20

.6

100.

0 0.

0 14

.7

0.0

14.7

17

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 50

5 85

.0

99.0

58

.0

17.2

0.

2 20

.0

12.7

1.

8

WA

LNU

T C

REEK

1S

T D

UI

553

99.6

95

.8

95.8

1.

1 0.

0 5.

6 3.

4 0.

4

2N

D D

UI

159

100.

0 98

.7

5.0

87.4

0.

0 45

.9

15.1

22

.0

3RD

DU

I 46

10

0.0

97.8

2.

2 26

.1

0.0

13.0

37

.0

6.5

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

761

99.6

96

.6

71.0

20

.6

0.0

14.5

8.

1 5.

3

98

Page 111: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

99

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

DEL

NO

RTE

SUP

DEL

NO

RTE

1ST

DU

I 11

63

.6

90.9

18

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

27.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

47

.1

94.1

17

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

23.5

0.

0

CRE

SCEN

T C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 11

9 93

.3

96.6

77

.3

4.2

0.0

2.5

1.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

86

.1

100.

0 36

.1

41.7

0.

0 19

.4

2.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

85

.7

100.

0 7.

1 71

.4

0.0

35.7

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

66.7

33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

172

91.3

97

.7

62.8

18

.0

0.0

9.3

1.7

0.0

EL D

ORA

DO

SU

P EL

DO

RAD

O

1ST

DU

I 14

14

.3

14.3

7.

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

15

.8

31.6

5.

3 5.

3 0.

0 0.

0 10

.5

0.0

JU

V/S

UP

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

PLA

CER

VIL

LE

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C

AM

ERO

N P

AR

K

1ST

DU

I 17

5 98

.3

98.9

81

.1

0.6

0.0

0.6

2.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 66

98

.5

95.5

9.

1 69

.7

0.0

77.3

0.

0 43

.9

3RD

DU

I 28

10

0.0

50.0

3.

6 21

.4

0.0

75.0

0.

0 60

.7

4TH

+ D

UI

9 88

.9

77.8

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 22

.2

0.0

33.3

TO

TAL

278

98.2

92

.4

53.6

19

.1

0.0

27.0

1.

4 17

.6

SO

LA

KE

TAH

OE

1ST

DU

I 17

6 98

.3

97.7

13

.1

2.3

0.0

1.7

1.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 61

96

.7

95.1

1.

6 59

.0

0.0

60.7

1.

6 21

.3

3RD

DU

I 18

83

.3

94.4

0.

0 38

.9

0.0

27.8

5.

6 5.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

TO

TAL

257

96.9

96

.5

9.3

18.7

0.

0 17

.9

1.9

5.8

PL

AC

ERV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

177

99.4

97

.7

91.0

1.

1 0.

0 72

.9

2.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 69

98

.6

98.6

11

.6

78.3

0.

0 82

.6

1.4

2.9

3RD

DU

I 33

10

0.0

97.0

9.

1 30

.3

0.0

48.5

30

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

12.5

12

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 28

7 97

.9

97.9

59

.9

23.7

0.

0 70

.7

5.9

0.7

FRES

NO

SU

P FR

ESN

O

1ST

DU

I 95

65

.3

91.6

1.

1 2.

1 0.

0 1.

1 2.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

40

52.5

90

.0

0.0

2.5

0.0

2.5

2.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 27

29

.6

96.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

7 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

7 29

.9

98.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

279

45.2

94

.6

0.4

1.1

0.0

0.7

1.4

0.0

JU

V F

RESN

O

1ST

DU

I 25

96

.0

16.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

0 60

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 28

96

.4

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7.

1 64

.3

0.0

FR

ESN

O

1ST

DU

I 13

26

99.5

94

.4

86.3

2.

8 0.

0 40

.4

0.0

0.2

2ND

DU

I 55

1 98

.9

96.7

9.

3 70

.1

0.0

71.7

0.

0 4.

7

3R

D D

UI

201

98.5

84

.6

2.0

42.8

0.

0 29

.9

0.0

2.5

4TH

+ D

UI

36

91.7

83

.3

2.8

22.2

0.

0 8.

3 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2114

99

.1

93.9

56

.8

24.5

0.

0 47

.0

0.0

1.6

Page 112: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

100

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

FRES

NO

C

LOV

IS

1ST

DU

I 14

6 97

.9

76.7

84

.9

2.7

0.0

29.5

0.

0 0.

0

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 57

96

.5

93.0

15

.8

68.4

0.

0 68

.4

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 16

93

.8

100.

0 6.

3 18

.8

0.0

18.8

0.

0 6.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

220

97.3

82

.3

60.9

20

.9

0.0

38.6

0.

0 0.

5

CO

ALI

NG

A

1ST

DU

I 17

5 98

.3

97.7

88

.0

2.9

0.0

6.9

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 35

97

.1

94.3

20

.0

65.7

0.

0 25

.7

2.9

2.9

3RD

DU

I 19

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 63

.2

0.0

10.5

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 23

1 98

.3

97.4

69

.7

18.2

0.

0 10

.4

1.3

0.4

FI

REBA

UG

H

1ST

DU

I 15

0 99

.3

99.3

78

.7

0.7

0.0

44.7

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

44

100.

0 95

.5

2.3

54.5

0.

0 54

.5

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

10

0.0

94.4

11

.1

27.8

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

217

99.5

98

.2

55.8

13

.8

0.0

44.7

0.

0 0.

0

FOW

LER

1ST

DU

I 69

97

.1

100.

0 82

.6

4.3

0.0

4.3

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 35

10

0.0

97.1

11

.4

71.4

0.

0 60

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 12

10

0.0

100.

0 8.

3 25

.0

0.0

16.7

8.

3 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

120

98.3

99

.2

51.7

25

.8

0.0

21.7

3.

3 0.

0

KER

MA

N

1ST

DU

I 68

97

.1

97.1

75

.0

5.9

0.0

8.8

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 26

96

.2

96.2

0.

0 73

.1

0.0

42.3

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

9 10

0.0

88.9

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

4 97

.1

96.2

49

.0

26.0

0.

0 16

.3

0.0

0.0

K

ING

SBU

RG

1ST

DU

I 37

97

.3

94.6

94

.6

0.0

0.0

2.7

2.7

0.0

2ND

DU

I 14

10

0.0

85.7

7.

1 92

.9

0.0

78.6

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 55

98

.2

90.9

65

.5

27.3

0.

0 25

.5

1.8

0.0

RE

EDLE

Y 1S

T D

UI

114

96.5

95

.6

88.6

1.

8 0.

0 6.

1 0.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

41

97.6

97

.6

14.6

75

.6

0.0

26.8

2.

4 17

.1

3RD

DU

I 13

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 53

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 16

8 97

.0

96.4

63

.7

23.8

0.

0 10

.7

1.2

4.2

RI

VER

DA

LE

1ST

DU

I 18

94

.4

94.4

94

.4

0.0

0.0

11.1

5.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 23

95

.7

95.7

73

.9

17.4

0.

0 17

.4

4.3

0.0

SA

NG

ER

1ST

DU

I 92

98

.9

95.7

83

.7

4.3

0.0

8.7

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 42

10

0.0

97.6

7.

1 76

.2

0.0

57.1

2.

4 2.

4

3R

D D

UI

11

90.9

90

.9

0.0

27.3

9.

1 27

.3

9.1

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

147

98.6

95

.9

54.4

26

.5

0.7

23.8

1.

4 0.

7

Page 113: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

101

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

FRES

NO

SE

LMA

1S

T D

UI

124

90.3

90

.3

65.3

4.

0 0.

0 10

.5

0.0

0.0

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 50

10

0.0

84.0

6.

0 76

.0

0.0

70.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

23

100.

0 69

.6

0.0

34.8

0.

0 13

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 33

.3

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

200

93.0

86

.0

42.0

25

.5

0.0

25.5

0.

0 0.

0 G

LEN

N

SUP

GLE

NN

1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

11

45.5

90

.9

0.0

9.1

0.0

9.1

18.2

9.

1

TO

TAL

13

53.8

92

.3

7.7

7.7

0.0

7.7

15.4

7.

7

JUV

GLE

NN

1S

T D

UI

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

ORL

AN

D

1ST

DU

I 83

96

.4

94.0

77

.1

13.3

0.

0 2.

4 6.

0 1.

2

2N

D D

UI

41

95.1

92

.7

9.8

53.7

0.

0 58

.5

24.4

22

.0

3RD

DU

I 15

10

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 40

.0

46.7

33

.3

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

2 96

.5

90.1

47

.9

23.2

0.

0 23

.2

15.5

10

.6

W

ILLO

WS

1ST

DU

I 46

10

0.0

95.7

95

.7

0.0

0.0

2.2

4.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 18

10

0.0

100.

0 5.

6 72

.2

0.0

72.2

16

.7

55.6

3R

D D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

33.3

55

.6

33.3

4T

H+

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 76

98

.7

97.4

60

.5

21.1

0.

0 22

.4

14.5

17

.1

HU

MBO

LDT

SUP/

JUV

HM

BLT-

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

EU

REK

A

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

42.9

85

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

50

.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

HU

MBO

LDT

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

EU

REK

A

1ST

DU

I 16

8 94

.6

25.6

67

.3

1.2

0.0

78.0

15

.5

0.6

2ND

DU

I 42

92

.9

92.9

4.

8 52

.4

0.0

71.4

14

.3

7.1

3RD

DU

I 16

87

.5

81.3

6.

3 0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

37.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 9

55.6

88

.9

0.0

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 55

.6

0.0

TOTA

L 23

5 92

.3

43.8

49

.4

10.6

0.

0 69

.4

18.3

1.

7

ARC

ATA

1S

T D

UI

118

93.2

23

.7

86.4

0.

8 0.

0 84

.7

8.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 38

92

.1

97.4

5.

3 81

.6

0.0

89.5

7.

9 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

160

92.5

43

.1

65.0

21

.2

0.0

83.8

9.

4 0.

0

FORT

UN

A

1ST

DU

I 54

88

.9

18.5

87

.0

0.0

0.0

85.2

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

34

94.1

79

.4

17.6

73

.5

2.9

91.2

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

8 87

.5

75.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

96

90.6

44

.8

55.2

30

.2

1.0

82.3

0.

0 0.

0

Page 114: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

102

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

HU

MBO

LDT

GA

RBER

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 40

95

.0

5.0

90.0

0.

0 0.

0 92

.5

0.0

0.0

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 16

93

.8

100.

0 0.

0 93

.8

0.0

93.8

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 61

95

.1

37.7

59

.0

31.1

0.

0 88

.5

3.3

0.0

H

OO

PA

1ST

DU

I 19

84

.2

10.5

78

.9

0.0

0.0

78.9

5.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

7 85

.7

100.

0 0.

0 85

.7

0.0

71.4

14

.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

66.7

33

.3

66.7

33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 29

86

.2

37.9

51

.7

27.6

3.

4 75

.9

10.3

0.

0 IM

PERI

AL

SUP

IMPE

RIA

L 1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

IMPE

RIA

L 1S

T D

UI

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

BRA

WLE

Y 1S

T D

UI

107

99.1

54

.2

81.3

0.

9 0.

0 50

.5

0.0

0.9

2ND

DU

I 45

10

0.0

86.7

17

.8

64.4

0.

0 68

.9

0.0

17.8

3R

D D

UI

23

100.

0 82

.6

4.3

21.7

0.

0 39

.1

4.3

17.4

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

75.0

TO

TAL

179

99.4

65

.9

53.6

20

.7

0.0

54.7

0.

6 8.

9

CA

LEXI

CO

1S

T D

UI

323

100.

0 35

.9

87.3

2.

5 0.

0 78

.6

0.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 70

10

0.0

85.7

15

.7

57.1

0.

0 61

.4

2.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 15

10

0.0

93.3

6.

7 20

.0

0.0

26.7

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 40

9 10

0.0

46.7

71

.9

12.5

0.

0 73

.6

1.0

0.0

EL

CEN

TRO

1S

T D

UI

238

99.6

37

.0

63.0

0.

4 0.

0 50

.4

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 62

98

.4

93.5

8.

1 62

.9

0.0

53.2

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

22

100.

0 95

.5

9.1

13.6

0.

0 18

.2

9.1

4.5

4TH

+ D

UI

9 77

.8

88.9

0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 33

1 98

.8

52.9

47

.4

13.0

0.

3 47

.4

0.6

0.3

W

INTE

RHA

VEN

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 IN

YO

SUP

INYO

1S

T D

UI

3 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

66.7

33

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

16

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

22

9.1

86.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

BISH

OP

1ST

DU

I 13

4 97

.0

22.4

94

.8

0.0

0.0

88.1

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

51

96.1

96

.1

2.0

94.1

0.

0 86

.3

2.0

9.8

3RD

DU

I 18

77

.8

66.7

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

5.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 85

.7

42.9

0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 21

0 94

.8

44.8

61

.0

26.2

0.

0 77

.1

1.0

2.4

Page 115: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

103

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

INYO

IN

DEP

END

ENC

E 1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

28.6

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

10

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 90

.0

0.0

20.0

K

ERN

SU

P K

ERN

1S

T D

UI

102

75.5

75

.5

23.5

1.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

32

53.1

96

.9

3.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

33

.3

94.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 14

2 36

.6

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

294

51.7

90

.8

8.5

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

JU

V K

ERN

1S

T D

UI

24

95.8

0.

0 45

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

96

.0

0.0

48.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

ARV

IN-L

AM

ON

T 1S

T D

UI

224

88.8

75

.4

67.0

0.

4 0.

0 0.

4 0.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

77

94.8

87

.0

20.8

26

.0

0.0

16.9

3.

9 5.

2

3R

D D

UI

18

72.2

94

.4

5.6

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

75.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

323

89.2

78

.9

51.7

7.

1 0.

0 4.

6 1.

2 1.

2

BAK

ERSF

IELD

1S

T D

UI

1258

98

.3

98.2

78

.5

0.0

0.0

2.1

0.6

1.0

2ND

DU

I 52

3 97

.1

73.0

5.

4 14

.3

0.0

41.7

1.

3 27

.2

3RD

DU

I 21

5 94

.9

65.6

4.

2 0.

9 0.

0 34

.0

4.2

30.2

4T

H+

DU

I 42

92

.9

83.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 16

.7

2.4

11.9

TO

TAL

2038

97

.5

88.0

50

.2

3.8

0.0

15.9

1.

2 11

.0

D

ELA

NO

1S

T D

UI

158

100.

0 72

.8

84.2

2.

5 0.

0 1.

9 1.

9 0.

6

2N

D D

UI

81

98.8

87

.7

17.3

51

.9

0.0

44.4

7.

4 23

.5

3RD

DU

I 35

10

0.0

65.7

2.

9 8.

6 0.

0 37

.1

14.3

8.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 11

90

.9

72.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 27

.3

45.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

285

99.3

76

.1

51.9

17

.2

0.0

19.3

6.

7 8.

1

LAK

E IS

ABE

LLA

1S

T D

UI

54

98.1

10

0.0

55.6

9.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

19

100.

0 10

0.0

10.5

36

.8

0.0

26.3

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

81

98.8

10

0.0

39.5

16

.0

0.0

6.2

0.0

0.0

TA

FT

1ST

DU

I 15

2 98

.0

50.0

53

.3

0.7

0.0

25.0

24

.3

4.6

2ND

DU

I 51

98

.0

68.6

0.

0 56

.9

0.0

76.5

13

.7

60.8

3R

D D

UI

10

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

30.0

0.

0 80

.0

0.0

60.0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 21

4 98

.1

54.7

37

.9

15.4

0.

0 39

.7

20.6

20

.6

SH

AFT

ER

1ST

DU

I 18

1 99

.4

98.9

75

.7

6.1

0.0

2.2

0.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 82

98

.8

89.0

8.

5 47

.6

0.0

52.4

1.

2 19

.5

3RD

DU

I 35

91

.4

97.1

0.

0 11

.4

0.0

8.6

5.7

2.9

4TH

+ D

UI

11

72.7

90

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

18.2

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

309

97.4

95

.8

46.6

17

.5

0.0

16.8

1.

3 5.

5

Page 116: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

104

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

KER

N

MO

JAV

E 1S

T D

UI

192

99.0

95

.8

68.8

0.

5 0.

0 1.

6 6.

8 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

78

94.9

98

.7

3.8

41.0

1.

3 42

.3

16.7

1.

3

3R

D D

UI

29

93.1

10

0.0

3.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

65.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

85.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

57.1

0.

0

TO

TAL

306

97.1

97

.1

44.4

10

.8

0.3

11.8

16

.0

0.3

RI

DG

ECRE

ST

1ST

DU

I 18

7 99

.5

95.7

74

.3

1.6

0.0

1.6

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 56

92

.9

100.

0 1.

8 41

.1

0.0

39.3

1.

8 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

13

100.

0 10

0.0

15.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

256

98.0

96

.9

55.5

10

.2

0.0

9.8

0.4

0.0

KIN

GS

SUP

KIN

GS

1ST

DU

I 5

60.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

13

7.7

92.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 30

.8

0.0

TOTA

L 22

22

.7

95.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 45

.5

0.0

JU

V K

ING

S 1S

T D

UI

15

86.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

7 80

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

16

87.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

3 75

.0

0.0

H

AN

FORD

1S

T D

UI

269

87.4

98

.9

72.1

2.

6 0.

0 1.

5 10

.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

6 83

.0

98.1

4.

7 49

.1

0.0

50.9

16

.0

0.9

3RD

DU

I 33

54

.5

97.0

3.

0 6.

1 0.

0 6.

1 36

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 41

6 82

.0

98.6

48

.1

14.7

0.

0 14

.4

13.7

0.

2

AV

ENA

L 1S

T D

UI

43

97.7

97

.7

74.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 2.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

20

100.

0 95

.0

15.0

75

.0

5.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 16

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 71

90

.1

97.2

49

.3

22.5

1.

4 23

.9

1.4

0.0

C

ORC

ORA

N

1ST

DU

I 35

94

.3

100.

0 65

.7

2.9

0.0

2.9

20.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

14

71.4

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

28.6

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

57

84.2

10

0.0

40.4

15

.8

0.0

17.5

22

.8

0.0

LE

MO

ORE

1S

T D

UI

119

85.7

99

.2

63.9

4.

2 0.

0 2.

5 13

.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 36

69

.4

94.4

19

.4

11.1

0.

0 13

.9

33.3

2.

8

3R

D D

UI

20

65.0

95

.0

0.0

10.0

5.

0 15

.0

20.0

10

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

7 79

.7

97.7

46

.9

6.2

0.6

6.2

18.6

1.

7 LA

KE

SUP

LAK

E 1S

T D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 42

.9

100.

0 0.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

38

.5

92.3

0.

0 7.

7 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 117: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

105

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

LAK

E JU

V L

AK

E 1S

T D

UI

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

cont

.

TOTA

L 4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

CLE

ARL

AK

E 1S

T D

UI

140

100.

0 10

0.0

85.0

4.

3 0.

0 2.

1 1.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

70

100.

0 10

0.0

22.9

65

.7

0.0

41.4

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

26

92.3

10

0.0

0.0

84.6

0.

0 26

.9

3.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 24

0 98

.8

100.

0 56

.3

32.1

0.

0 16

.2

1.2

0.0

LA

KEP

ORT

1S

T D

UI

132

99.2

94

.7

90.9

3.

8 0.

0 6.

8 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

52

100.

0 98

.1

7.7

86.5

0.

0 84

.6

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 15

40

.0

100.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 20

2 95

.0

96.0

61

.4

25.7

0.

0 27

.2

0.0

0.0

LASS

EN

SUP

LASS

EN

1ST

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

JU

V L

ASS

EN

1ST

DU

I 5

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 80

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 5

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 80

.0

0.0

SU

SAN

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 13

7 97

.8

98.5

94

.9

2.2

0.0

1.5

2.2

0.7

2ND

DU

I 42

97

.6

100.

0 11

.9

81.0

0.

0 73

.8

4.8

50.0

3R

D D

UI

7 42

.9

100.

0 0.

0 42

.9

0.0

42.9

0.

0 28

.6

4TH

+ D

UI

6 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

2 92

.7

99.0

70

.3

20.8

0.

0 18

.8

2.6

12.5

LO

S A

NG

ELES

SU

P LA

CEN

TRA

L 1S

T D

UI

66

69.7

95

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

53

.3

100.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

12

41.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

86

27.9

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.2

0.0

TOTA

L 17

9 46

.4

98.3

0.

0 0.

6 0.

0 0.

6 1.

7 0.

0

SUP

POM

ON

A

1ST

DU

I 70

70

.0

95.7

0.

0 14

.3

0.0

2.9

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 24

50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 4.

2 0.

0 4.

2 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

20

30.0

10

0.0

0.0

5.0

0.0

0.0

15.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 99

15

.2

100.

0 0.

0 6.

1 0.

0 1.

0 8.

1 1.

0

TO

TAL

213

38.5

98

.6

0.0

8.5

0.0

1.9

5.6

0.5

SU

P LA

NC

AST

ER

1ST

DU

I 12

50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 5

80.0

80

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

40

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 15

6.

7 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

34

32.4

97

.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.9

32.4

0.

0

SUP

VA

N N

UYS

1S

T D

UI

78

60.3

85

.9

1.3

0.0

0.0

2.6

15.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

50.0

83

.3

0.0

8.3

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

10

10.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 83

12

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 14

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 18

3 35

.0

92.9

0.

5 0.

5 0.

0 1.

1 14

.8

0.0

Page 118: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

106

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

SUP

PASA

DEN

A

1ST

DU

I 25

72

.0

80.0

4.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.0

12.0

0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

12

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

8.3

0.0

0.0

8.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 9

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

41

46.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.9

0.0

TOTA

L 87

58

.6

94.3

1.

1 1.

1 0.

0 3.

4 6.

9 0.

0

SUP

LON

G B

CH

1S

T D

UI

20

70.0

90

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.0

5.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 4

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

20.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

11

36.4

81

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

9.1

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 40

52

.5

90.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 5.

0 2.

5 0.

0

SUP

CO

MPT

ON

1S

T D

UI

16

81.3

31

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.3

6.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 5

100.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 24

58

.3

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 0.

0

TO

TAL

47

72.3

38

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.1

4.3

0.0

SU

P N

ORW

ALK

1S

T D

UI

34

73.5

91

.2

2.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 11

45

.5

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 9.

1 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 66

18

.2

98.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 3.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

118

41.5

96

.6

0.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.4

0.0

SU

P SA

NTA

1S

T D

UI

13

84.6

76

.9

46.2

0.

0 0.

0 7.

7 15

.4

0.0

MO

NIC

A

2ND

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 25

.0

25.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

18

55.6

94

.4

0.0

0.0

5.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 39

69

.2

89.7

15

.4

5.1

2.6

5.1

7.7

0.0

JU

V L

A C

O

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

LA

JUV

CEN

TRA

L 1S

T D

UI

17

94.1

41

.2

23.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

17

94.1

41

.2

23.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

ALH

AM

BRA

1S

T D

UI

615

92.7

57

.6

78.7

0.

5 0.

0 51

.2

0.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 17

6 89

.2

96.0

4.

5 40

.9

0.6

38.1

1.

1 3.

4

3R

D D

UI

65

81.5

90

.8

1.5

3.1

4.6

9.2

0.0

3.1

4TH

+ D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 33

.3

16.7

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 86

2 91

.2

68.2

57

.4

9.0

0.5

45.2

0.

6 0.

9

LAN

CA

STER

1S

T D

UI

440

99.1

99

.8

95.2

2.

0 0.

0 2.

0 0.

2 0.

5

2N

D D

UI

141

97.2

97

.9

5.7

88.7

1.

4 87

.9

0.0

31.9

3R

D D

UI

35

91.4

40

.0

0.0

22.9

54

.3

20.0

2.

9 2.

9

4T

H+

DU

I 8

100.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

624

98.2

95

.0

68.4

22

.8

4.3

22.4

0.

3 7.

7

BEV

ERLY

HIL

LS

1ST

DU

I 22

1 99

.5

66.1

94

.1

1.4

0.0

94.6

0.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

39

100.

0 97

.4

23.1

64

.1

0.0

84.6

7.

7 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

13

100.

0 53

.8

23.1

30

.8

15.4

15

.4

46.2

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

275

99.6

70

.2

80.0

12

.4

0.7

88.7

4.

0 0.

0

Page 119: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

107

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

BURB

AN

K

1ST

DU

I 33

0 99

.4

97.0

90

.3

0.6

0.3

60.3

6.

4 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

98

94.9

96

.9

6.1

70.4

1.

0 61

.2

20.4

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

21

90.5

90

.5

4.8

4.8

9.5

0.0

85.7

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

453

97.8

96

.7

67.3

15

.9

0.9

57.2

13

.5

0.0

W

EST

CO

VIN

A

1ST

DU

I 18

47

99.1

68

.2

93.9

1.

7 0.

1 54

.5

3.9

0.2

2ND

DU

I 53

6 98

.5

97.4

7.

1 83

.2

0.4

82.3

4.

1 35

.4

3RD

DU

I 12

8 93

.0

83.6

3.

1 46

.1

14.1

21

.1

2.3

10.9

4T

H+

DU

I 18

83

.3

94.4

11

.1

44.4

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

11.1

TO

TAL

2529

98

.5

75.3

70

.3

21.5

0.

8 58

.5

3.8

8.3

C

OM

PTO

N

1ST

DU

I 84

8 98

.9

77.5

87

.0

2.1

0.1

83.8

2.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

238

99.2

90

.8

12.2

69

.3

0.4

85.7

4.

6 7.

6

3R

D D

UI

75

94.7

96

.0

2.7

44.0

2.

7 29

.3

18.7

2.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 9

88.9

10

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 11

70

98.6

81

.5

65.7

18

.6

0.3

80.1

4.

4 1.

7

CU

LVER

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

201

97.5

24

.4

88.1

2.

0 0.

0 46

.8

9.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 50

98

.0

74.0

18

.0

62.0

8.

0 48

.0

8.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

85

.7

78.6

14

.3

35.7

14

.3

14.3

21

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

266

97.0

36

.8

71.1

15

.0

2.3

45.5

9.

8 0.

0

DO

WN

EY

1ST

DU

I 53

1 99

.2

26.4

90

.6

2.1

0.2

80.2

9.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

172

98.8

91

.3

10.5

75

.0

2.9

73.8

11

.0

2.9

3RD

DU

I 34

97

.1

85.3

5.

9 44

.1

11.8

35

.3

35.3

5.

9

4T

H+

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

741

98.9

44

.5

67.6

20

.9

1.3

76.2

11

.3

0.9

EA

ST L

A

1ST

DU

I 88

3 99

.5

50.6

87

.7

1.1

0.0

76.2

7.

4 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

284

98.9

92

.3

7.4

69.7

0.

7 67

.3

15.1

14

.4

3RD

DU

I 74

10

0.0

94.6

2.

7 16

.2

2.7

12.2

10

.8

1.4

4TH

+ D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1248

99

.4

63.0

63

.9

17.6

0.

3 70

.0

9.3

3.4

EL

MO

NTE

1S

T D

UI

920

99.1

59

.7

86.4

2.

5 0.

0 54

.0

11.7

0.

2

2N

D D

UI

284

98.9

89

.8

6.3

76.8

0.

4 68

.3

14.8

19

.4

3RD

DU

I 87

96

.6

88.5

2.

3 33

.3

9.2

11.5

2.

3 5.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

95

98.9

68

.3

62.9

20

.8

0.7

54.1

11

.7

4.8

G

LEN

DA

LE

1ST

DU

I 47

0 99

.1

40.9

90

.9

3.2

0.0

75.7

0.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

152

100.

0 89

.5

10.5

77

.0

0.0

76.3

0.

0 11

.8

3RD

DU

I 38

97

.4

86.8

2.

6 31

.6

5.3

28.9

2.

6 2.

6

4T

H+

DU

I 8

87.5

10

0.0

0.0

37.5

0.

0 25

.0

12.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

668

99.1

55

.2

66.5

22

.0

0.3

72.6

0.

4 2.

8

Page 120: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

108

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

ING

LEW

OO

D

1ST

DU

I 76

8 91

.8

33.9

81

.8

2.0

0.0

78.0

6.

8 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

246

93.9

88

.2

13.4

71

.5

1.2

80.1

9.

3 1.

2

3R

D D

UI

57

86.0

89

.5

1.8

42.1

8.

8 36

.8

3.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 40

.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

1076

91

.7

49.4

61

.5

20.0

0.

8 75

.9

7.2

0.3

LO

NG

BEA

CH

1S

T D

UI

1296

98

.7

42.7

87

.0

1.8

0.0

63.2

0.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

398

99.0

92

.5

11.3

69

.6

0.0

55.0

0.

3 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

128

96.9

93

.0

5.5

25.8

4.

7 20

.3

0.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

30

26.7

10

0.0

0.0

13.3

0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1852

97

.5

57.8

63

.7

18.2

0.

3 57

.5

0.2

0.0

LA

MET

RO

1ST

DU

I 53

68

99.9

60

.0

93.4

2.

0 0.

0 66

.2

1.5

0.5

2ND

DU

I 14

37

99.4

97

.1

7.5

87.7

0.

1 88

.0

3.4

43.0

3R

D D

UI

346

95.4

88

.2

2.0

42.8

2.

6 44

.8

0.9

33.5

4T

H+

DU

I 43

86

.0

88.4

7.

0 27

.9

2.3

37.2

2.

3 32

.6

TOTA

L 71

94

99.5

68

.9

71.3

21

.2

0.2

69.3

1.

9 10

.8

BE

LLFL

OW

ER

1ST

DU

I 29

2 99

.3

25.0

82

.5

0.3

0.0

52.7

9.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

97

100.

0 93

.8

3.1

75.3

0.

0 68

.0

11.3

9.

3

3R

D D

UI

21

100.

0 90

.5

0.0

23.8

0.

0 19

.0

14.3

4.

8

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 41

2 99

.5

44.9

59

.2

19.2

0.

0 54

.4

10.0

2.

4

VA

LEN

CIA

1S

T D

UI

581

93.3

37

.9

80.6

2.

9 0.

0 57

.5

2.2

0.2

2ND

DU

I 19

4 92

.8

96.4

3.

6 75

.8

0.0

62.4

3.

6 26

.8

3RD

DU

I 59

71

.2

88.1

1.

7 22

.0

3.4

15.3

1.

7 11

.9

4TH

+ D

UI

14

14.3

10

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

7.1

0.0

7.1

TOTA

L 84

8 90

.3

55.8

56

.1

21.0

0.

2 54

.8

2.5

7.2

PA

SAD

ENA

1S

T D

UI

620

98.1

50

.8

86.1

2.

3 0.

0 88

.1

2.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 14

9 95

.3

86.6

12

.8

71.1

0.

7 74

.5

7.4

0.0

3RD

DU

I 58

96

.6

100.

0 1.

7 36

.2

0.0

27.6

13

.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

14

64.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

841

96.9

61

.4

65.9

16

.8

0.1

80.0

4.

6 0.

0

MA

LIBU

1S

T D

UI

178

97.8

15

.2

88.2

1.

1 0.

6 85

.4

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 63

98

.4

73.0

12

.7

77.8

0.

0 92

.1

0.0

3.2

3RD

DU

I 20

95

.0

35.0

20

.0

30.0

35

.0

45.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

100.

0 57

.1

14.3

14

.3

28.6

14

.3

14.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

268

97.8

31

.3

63.4

21

.6

3.7

82.1

1.

1 0.

7

POM

ON

A

1ST

DU

I 78

0 96

.9

39.5

87

.3

2.9

0.0

57.6

4.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

244

96.7

91

.0

9.8

72.5

0.

0 65

.6

4.5

2.0

3RD

DU

I 64

87

.5

92.2

4.

7 31

.3

3.1

10.9

21

.9

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

7 85

.7

100.

0 14

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

28.6

0.

0

TO

TAL

1095

96

.3

54.4

64

.7

20.1

0.

2 56

.3

5.3

0.5

H

UN

TIN

GTN

PK

1S

T D

UI

771

99.2

50

.3

82.0

2.

2 0.

1 25

.3

6.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 21

6 99

.1

94.4

9.

7 69

.0

0.0

29.2

4.

6 4.

6

3R

D D

UI

65

100.

0 92

.3

4.6

35.4

4.

6 9.

2 7.

7 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

10

0.0

90.0

10

.0

40.0

10

.0

10.0

20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

62

99.2

62

.2

61.9

18

.2

0.5

25.0

6.

2 0.

9

Page 121: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

109

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

MO

NRO

VIA

1S

T D

UI

256

100.

0 29

.3

85.9

0.

8 0.

0 80

.9

5.1

0.0

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 77

10

0.0

92.2

10

.4

64.9

0.

0 63

.6

16.9

6.

5

3R

D D

UI

26

100.

0 96

.2

0.0

30.8

3.

8 15

.4

26.9

3.

8

TO

TAL

359

100.

0 47

.6

63.5

16

.7

0.3

72.4

9.

2 1.

7

SAN

TA M

ON

ICA

1S

T D

UI

252

96.4

13

.9

91.7

2.

0 0.

0 87

.7

4.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 67

98

.5

89.6

10

.4

74.6

0.

0 95

.5

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 18

94

.4

77.8

5.

6 50

.0

11.1

38

.9

11.1

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 33

9 96

.8

32.7

70

.5

19.2

0.

6 86

.4

3.8

0.0

TO

RRA

NC

E 1S

T D

UI

996

98.8

20

.8

92.3

1.

3 0.

0 87

.9

2.2

0.1

2ND

DU

I 24

6 98

.0

84.6

15

.4

74.0

0.

4 87

.0

4.9

0.0

3RD

DU

I 63

88

.9

74.6

7.

9 20

.6

12.7

23

.8

11.1

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 23

69

.6

95.7

0.

0 13

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

28

97.7

36

.4

72.4

15

.9

0.7

83.1

3.

1 0.

1

SOU

THG

ATE

1S

T D

UI

474

98.3

42

.2

84.4

3.

2 0.

0 54

.4

3.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

0 98

.7

83.3

13

.3

64.0

0.

0 64

.7

14.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

38

84.2

86

.8

2.6

23.7

2.

6 28

.9

5.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 83

.3

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

668

97.6

54

.5

63.0

18

.7

0.1

55.4

5.

8 0.

0

WH

ITTI

ER

1ST

DU

I 51

7 95

.6

29.0

89

.2

1.0

0.0

78.9

4.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

195

94.9

94

.9

6.7

76.9

0.

5 74

.9

9.7

3.1

3RD

DU

I 57

82

.5

93.0

1.

8 33

.3

5.3

28.1

12

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 16

.7

0.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

775

94.2

50

.8

61.3

22

.6

0.5

73.7

6.

3 0.

8

HO

LLYW

OO

D

1ST

DU

I 12

2 98

.4

41.8

86

.9

2.5

0.0

67.2

1.

6 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

32

100.

0 96

.9

0.0

81.3

0.

0 78

.1

3.1

3.1

3RD

DU

I 6

83.3

83

.3

0.0

33.3

16

.7

16.7

16

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

162

98.1

54

.9

65.4

19

.1

0.6

66.7

2.

5 0.

6

SAN

FER

NA

ND

O

1ST

DU

I 14

08

99.7

50

.9

85.2

2.

3 0.

1 45

.8

16.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

367

100.

0 94

.8

9.3

75.2

0.

3 57

.2

22.1

0.

8

3R

D D

UI

109

97.2

95

.4

1.8

37.6

3.

7 22

.9

7.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 16

.7

16.7

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 18

90

99.6

62

.2

65.4

18

.5

0.3

46.6

16

.9

0.2

SA

N P

EDRO

1S

T D

UI

322

100.

0 48

.1

91.6

2.

2 0.

0 58

.1

2.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

1 99

.1

94.6

9.

9 82

.9

0.0

61.3

13

.5

1.8

3RD

DU

I 25

96

.0

92.0

4.

0 40

.0

4.0

12.0

8.

0 4.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

460

99.6

62

.0

66.7

23

.9

0.2

56.1

5.

7 0.

7

VA

N N

UY

S 1S

T D

UI

2123

99

.2

40.9

92

.3

2.8

0.0

59.7

0.

5 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

583

97.1

92

.8

8.1

82.0

0.

5 68

.4

3.8

11.3

3R

D D

UI

181

93.4

89

.5

3.3

57.5

5.

0 39

.8

3.3

7.7

4TH

+ D

UI

33

39.4

93

.9

0.0

6.1

3.0

9.1

0.0

3.0

TOTA

L 29

20

97.7

54

.9

68.9

22

.1

0.5

59.7

1.

3 2.

9

Page 122: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

110

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

LOS

AN

GEL

ES

1ST

DU

I 46

6 98

.5

29.8

84

.1

3.6

0.0

74.7

1.

1 0.

6 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

120

98.3

90

.8

5.0

78.3

0.

8 71

.7

1.7

44.2

3R

D D

UI

45

91.1

84

.4

4.4

40.0

13

.3

26.7

4.

4 20

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 63

5 97

.8

45.7

63

.0

20.3

1.

1 70

.2

1.7

10.2

AV

ALO

N

1ST

DU

I 6

100.

0 0.

0 83

.3

16.7

0.

0 83

.3

16.7

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

8 10

0.0

25.0

62

.5

37.5

0.

0 75

.0

12.5

0.

0

US

MA

G

1ST

DU

I 8

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

B

AK

ERSF

IELD

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

9 10

0.0

11.1

88

.9

11.1

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

U

S D

IST

CT

LA

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

MA

DER

A

SUP

MA

DER

A

1ST

DU

I 8

87.5

62

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 13

53

.8

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 38

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 28

67

.9

89.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 35

.7

0.0

JU

V M

AD

ERA

1S

T D

UI

3 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

3 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0

CH

OW

CH

ILLA

1S

T D

UI

98

98.0

96

.9

88.8

3.

1 0.

0 0.

0 9.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

37

100.

0 10

0.0

8.1

70.3

0.

0 75

.7

16.2

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

77.8

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

146

98.6

97

.9

61.6

20

.5

0.0

19.2

16

.4

0.0

BO

RDEN

1S

T D

UI

106

98.1

96

.2

83.0

6.

6 0.

0 0.

9 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

35

80.0

91

.4

11.4

60

.0

0.0

37.1

2.

9 2.

9

3R

D D

UI

19

78.9

94

.7

0.0

15.8

0.

0 10

.5

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 16

3 90

.2

95.1

56

.4

19.0

0.

0 9.

8 0.

6 0.

6

MA

DER

A

1ST

DU

I 17

8 97

.2

93.8

86

.5

4.5

0.0

1.7

2.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 67

95

.5

97.0

17

.9

61.2

0.

0 31

.3

4.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 32

87

.5

93.8

6.

3 25

.0

0.0

6.3

12.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

280

95.4

94

.6

60.0

20

.4

0.0

9.3

4.3

0.0

BA

SS L

AK

E 1S

T D

UI

43

100.

0 79

.1

88.4

0.

0 0.

0 14

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 20

10

0.0

90.0

20

.0

55.0

0.

0 40

.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

37.5

0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

72

100.

0 84

.7

58.3

19

.4

0.0

19.4

1.

4 0.

0

Page 123: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

111

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

MA

RIN

SU

P SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 7

57.1

57

.1

42.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 57

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

66.7

33

.3

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 13

76

.9

92.3

23

.1

15.4

0.

0 15

.4

30.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

26

73.1

76

.9

26.9

19

.2

3.8

7.7

38.5

0.

0

JUV

SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 4

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

SA

N R

AFA

EL

1ST

DU

I 93

4 99

.8

6.0

94.8

1.

2 0.

0 94

.0

5.1

0.9

2ND

DU

I 26

1 10

0.0

91.2

5.

4 80

.8

0.0

93.9

5.

0 67

.0

3RD

DU

I 61

98

.4

77.0

3.

3 34

.4

0.0

73.8

24

.6

52.5

3RD

DU

I 41

90

.2

95.1

7.

3 58

.5

0.0

31.7

29

.3

14.6

4TH

+ D

UI

10

100.

0 10

0.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

1266

99

.8

27.7

71

.2

19.2

0.

0 92

.4

6.4

17.0

M

ARI

POSA

SU

P M

ARI

POSA

1S

T D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

MEN

DO

CIN

O

SUP

UK

IAH

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

50.0

10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

M

ARI

POSA

1S

T D

UI

49

98.0

98

.0

91.8

0.

0 0.

0 10

.2

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 9

100.

0 10

0.0

11.1

88

.9

0.0

55.6

11

.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 6

83.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

TO

TAL

64

96.9

98

.4

71.9

12

.5

0.0

15.6

4.

7 0.

0

US

MA

G

1ST

DU

I 66

51

.5

28.8

16

.7

0.0

0.0

10.6

0.

0 0.

0

Y

OSE

MIT

E 2N

D D

UI

15

73.3

60

.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

25.0

75

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

87

54.0

36

.8

12.6

8.

0 0.

0 13

.8

1.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 50

.0

87.5

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

15

73.3

80

.0

13.3

13

.3

0.0

0.0

13.3

0.

0

JUV

UK

IAH

1S

T D

UI

4 75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

4 75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

WIL

LITS

1S

T D

UI

58

96.6

82

.8

87.9

0.

0 0.

0 17

.2

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 18

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 72

.2

0.0

72.2

5.

6 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 83

94

.0

88.0

61

.4

20.5

0.

0 31

.3

1.2

0.0

U

KIA

H M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

262

91.6

87

.4

80.9

6.

5 0.

0 15

.3

0.8

1.1

2ND

DU

I 95

93

.7

98.9

5.

3 74

.7

0.0

55.8

8.

4 7.

4

4TH

+ D

UI

4 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 40

2 91

.5

91.0

54

.7

27.9

0.

0 26

.4

6.0

4.0

Page 124: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

112

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

MEN

DO

CIN

O

BOO

NV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

8 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

37.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 11

81

.8

100.

0 36

.4

36.4

0.

0 9.

1 0.

0 0.

0

PT. A

REN

A

1ST

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

9 10

0.0

100.

0 77

.8

22.2

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

LE

GG

ETT

1ST

DU

I 14

92

.9

92.9

78

.6

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 60

.0

0.0

40.0

20

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

26

96.2

96

.2

42.3

23

.1

0.0

19.2

11

.5

0.0

C

OV

ELO

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

33.3

33

.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 8

100.

0 10

0.0

62.5

12

.5

0.0

12.5

12

.5

0.0

FO

RT B

RAG

G

1ST

DU

I 75

10

0.0

96.0

90

.7

4.0

0.0

5.3

8.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 35

10

0.0

82.9

5.

7 68

.6

0.0

71.4

22

.9

2.9

3RD

DU

I 11

10

0.0

54.5

0.

0 27

.3

0.0

63.6

36

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

3 10

0.0

88.6

56

.9

25.2

0.

0 30

.1

15.4

0.

8

UK

IAH

JUST

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 25

.0

25.0

25

.0

MER

CED

SU

P M

ERC

ED

1ST

DU

I 6

83.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 50

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

26

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.8

11.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

36

55.6

97

.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.6

13.9

0.

0

JUV

MER

CED

1S

T D

UI

15

13.3

0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

19

10.5

5.

3 5.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 5.

3 0.

0

MER

CED

1S

T D

UI

580

99.1

97

.6

87.4

4.

7 0.

0 4.

3 2.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

259

100.

0 99

.6

7.7

79.9

0.

4 63

.7

8.9

1.5

3RD

DU

I 89

96

.6

97.8

1.

1 36

.0

0.0

20.2

28

.1

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

13

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

46.2

0.

0 46

.2

7.7

0.0

TOTA

L 94

1 99

.1

98.2

56

.1

28.9

0.

1 22

.7

6.5

0.4

LO

S BA

NO

S 1S

T D

UI

154

100.

0 84

.4

89.6

3.

9 0.

0 18

.8

0.6

0.6

2ND

DU

I 52

98

.1

96.2

7.

7 82

.7

1.9

71.2

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

32

96.9

96

.9

9.4

43.8

0.

0 21

.9

3.1

6.3

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

242

99.2

88

.8

59.9

26

.4

0.4

30.2

1.

2 1.

2

Page 125: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

113

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

MO

DO

C

SUP

MO

DO

C

1ST

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

ALT

URA

S 1S

T D

UI

54

92.6

96

.3

87.0

1.

9 0.

0 9.

3 11

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 13

92

.3

100.

0 0.

0 84

.6

0.0

69.2

23

.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 70

92

.9

97.1

67

.1

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

15.7

0.

0 M

ON

O

BRID

GEP

ORT

1S

T D

UI

26

100.

0 73

.1

50.0

30

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

33.3

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

TO

TAL

34

97.1

76

.5

38.2

41

.2

0.0

14.7

0.

0 8.

8

MA

MO

TH L

AK

ES

1ST

DU

I 37

10

0.0

54.1

94

.6

0.0

0.0

10.8

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

24

95.8

91

.7

0.0

87.5

4.

2 83

.3

0.0

58.3

3R

D D

UI

5 80

.0

80.0

0.

0 60

.0

0.0

80.0

0.

0 60

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 67

95

.5

70.1

52

.2

35.8

1.

5 41

.8

0.0

25.4

M

ON

TERE

Y SU

P M

ON

TERE

Y 1S

T D

UI

24

91.7

83

.3

16.7

0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 54

.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

86

.7

93.3

0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0 26

.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 13

76

.9

76.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 53

.8

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

83

75.9

94

.0

0.0

1.2

0.0

0.0

54.2

0.

0

TO

TAL

135

80.0

90

.4

3.0

1.5

0.0

0.7

51.1

0.

0

JUV

SA

LIN

AS

1ST

DU

I 16

10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 18

10

0.0

55.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 22

.2

0.0

M

ON

TERE

Y 1S

T D

UI

644

99.2

93

.3

83.2

1.

7 0.

0 1.

1 7.

1 0.

3

2N

D D

UI

212

99.1

97

.2

5.7

65.1

0.

0 25

.5

52.4

6.

6

3R

D D

UI

58

98.3

91

.4

0.0

15.5

0.

0 10

.3

74.1

10

.3

4TH

+ D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

77.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

923

99.1

94

.1

59.4

17

.2

0.0

7.3

22.4

2.

4

SALI

NA

S 1S

T D

UI

1076

99

.1

98.6

85

.0

1.9

0.0

1.4

12.3

1.

2

2N

D D

UI

391

99.0

93

.4

7.4

48.1

0.

0 29

.2

45.5

20

.5

3RD

DU

I 15

1 99

.3

84.8

3.

3 22

.5

0.0

19.2

38

.4

14.6

4T

H+

DU

I 22

90

.9

100.

0 9.

1 4.

5 0.

0 0.

0 40

.9

0.0

TOTA

L 16

40

99.0

96

.1

58.0

14

.8

0.0

9.6

23.0

7.

0

KIN

G C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 38

3 99

.2

99.2

78

.3

0.5

0.0

0.8

23.8

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

158

99.4

10

0.0

7.0

17.1

0.

0 11

.4

74.7

1.

3

3R

D D

UI

58

96.6

10

0.0

0.0

5.2

0.0

0.0

94.8

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 85

.7

14.3

TO

TAL

606

99.0

99

.5

51.5

5.

3 0.

0 3.

5 44

.6

0.5

NA

PA

SUP

NA

PA

1ST

DU

I 25

80

.0

72.0

28

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.0

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

12

66.7

91

.7

0.0

25.0

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 22

27

.3

100.

0 0.

0 4.

5 0.

0 4.

5 0.

0 4.

5

TO

TAL

62

58.1

87

.1

11.3

8.

1 0.

0 4.

8 4.

8 1.

6

Page 126: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

114

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

NA

PA

NA

PA

1ST

DU

I 59

3 99

.0

97.8

91

.6

1.3

0.0

1.7

0.2

0.0

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 21

7 10

0.0

100.

0 6.

5 85

.3

0.0

64.1

0.

0 2.

3

3R

D D

UI

54

94.4

10

0.0

1.9

57.4

0.

0 40

.7

5.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

867

99.0

98

.4

64.4

25

.8

0.0

19.7

0.

5 0.

6 N

EVA

DA

SU

P N

EVA

DA

1S

T D

UI

9 77

.8

66.7

11

.1

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 9

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 19

73

.7

84.2

5.

3 0.

0 0.

0 10

.5

0.0

0.0

N

EVA

DA

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

173

98.8

94

.8

80.9

5.

8 0.

0 17

.3

2.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 67

95

.5

98.5

6.

0 82

.1

0.0

76.1

1.

5 1.

5

3R

D D

UI

20

90.0

10

0.0

0.0

30.0

0.

0 10

.0

25.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 26

1 97

.3

96.2

55

.2

27.2

0.

0 31

.8

4.2

0.4

TR

UC

KEE

MU

NI

1ST

DU

I 10

2 97

.1

91.2

90

.2

2.0

0.0

8.8

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 28

92

.9

96.4

14

.3

78.6

0.

0 57

.1

0.0

14.3

3R

D D

UI

12

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

8.3

TOTA

L 14

2 96

.5

93.0

67

.6

25.4

0.

0 20

.4

0.0

3.5

ORA

NG

E SU

P SA

NTA

AN

A

1ST

DU

I 47

72

.3

91.5

2.

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

23

69.6

91

.3

0.0

8.7

0.0

8.7

8.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

71.4

71

.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

107

70.1

96

.3

0.0

0.9

0.0

0.0

2.8

0.0

TOTA

L 18

4 70

.7

93.5

0.

5 1.

6 0.

0 1.

1 4.

9 0.

0

JUV

ORA

NG

E 1S

T D

UI

50

96.0

28

.0

80.0

2.

0 0.

0 16

.0

76.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

50

96.0

28

.0

80.0

2.

0 0.

0 16

.0

76.0

0.

0

FULL

ERTO

N

1ST

DU

I 24

08

99.5

28

.4

94.7

1.

4 0.

0 78

.8

1.2

0.5

2ND

DU

I 68

6 98

.5

91.1

8.

5 81

.5

0.0

73.8

0.

6 25

.8

3RD

DU

I 15

9 98

.7

95.6

1.

9 77

.4

0.0

32.7

0.

0 24

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

16

81.3

10

0.0

12.5

50

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 18

.8

TOTA

L 32

69

99.2

45

.2

71.7

22

.1

0.0

75.2

1.

0 7.

1

WES

TMIN

STER

1S

T D

UI

1976

99

.1

11.1

92

.5

2.4

0.0

93.8

1.

2 0.

6

2N

D D

UI

562

98.0

92

.0

4.6

84.3

0.

0 93

.1

1.6

37.7

3R

D D

UI

133

94.7

91

.7

0.0

75.2

0.

0 45

.9

0.8

36.8

4T

H+

DU

I 9

100.

0 88

.9

0.0

77.8

0.

0 55

.6

11.1

44

.4

TOTA

L 26

80

98.7

32

.3

69.2

23

.4

0.0

91.2

1.

3 10

.3

LA

GU

NA

HIL

LS

1ST

DU

I 14

65

99.9

8.

9 92

.2

1.3

0.0

92.4

6.

1 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

424

100.

0 97

.2

2.8

89.2

0.

0 89

.9

8.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 92

10

0.0

96.7

1.

1 81

.5

0.0

13.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1985

99

.9

32.0

68

.7

23.8

0.

0 88

.0

6.2

0.0

N

EWPO

RT B

CH

1S

T D

UI

1438

99

.9

16.2

95

.1

1.5

0.0

91.4

6.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

377

99.7

97

.6

3.2

90.5

0.

0 66

.3

31.6

6.

1

3R

D D

UI

77

100.

0 98

.7

1.3

85.7

0.

0 10

.4

11.7

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 12

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 58

.3

0.0

8.3

41.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

1904

99

.9

36.2

72

.5

22.9

0.

0 82

.7

11.9

1.

2

Page 127: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

115

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ORA

NG

E SA

NTA

AN

A

1ST

DU

I 18

21

99.6

34

.4

95.5

1.

5 0.

0 76

.6

2.1

0.6

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 49

7 99

.4

94.8

6.

4 87

.9

0.0

87.5

3.

2 41

.2

3RD

DU

I 11

8 99

.2

95.8

2.

5 89

.0

0.0

52.5

0.

8 44

.9

4TH

+ D

UI

8 10

0.0

100.

0 12

.5

75.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

37.5

TO

TAL

2444

99

.5

49.8

72

.6

23.5

0.

0 77

.5

2.3

11.1

PL

AC

ER

SUP

PLA

CER

1S

T D

UI

13

76.9

61

.5

7.7

7.7

0.0

0.0

46.2

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 83

.3

83.3

16

.7

33.3

0.

0 33

.3

16.7

33

.3

3RD

DU

I 3

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

9 44

.4

88.9

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

11.1

0.

0

TO

TAL

31

64.5

77

.4

6.5

16.1

0.

0 6.

5 25

.8

6.5

JU

V P

LAC

ER

1ST

DU

I 8

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

12.5

0.

0

TO

TAL

8 12

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

12.5

12

.5

0.0

JU

V T

AH

OE

VST

A

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

A

UBU

RN M

UN

I 1S

T D

UI

279

100.

0 95

.3

93.9

1.

8 0.

0 6.

1 3.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

116

99.1

98

.3

7.8

77.6

0.

0 67

.2

3.4

15.5

3R

D D

UI

29

96.6

86

.2

0.0

55.2

0.

0 51

.7

27.6

13

.8

4TH

+ D

UI

10

80.0

10

0.0

0.0

40.0

0.

0 20

.0

20.0

10

.0

TOTA

L 43

4 99

.1

95.6

62

.4

26.5

0.

0 25

.8

5.3

5.3

LI

NC

OLN

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0

ROSE

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 36

0 99

.7

94.2

80

.0

2.8

0.0

7.2

2.8

0.0

2ND

DU

I 10

9 95

.4

93.6

6.

4 76

.1

0.0

77.1

5.

5 45

.0

3RD

DU

I 53

10

0.0

88.7

1.

9 69

.8

1.9

58.5

5.

7 24

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 52

3 98

.9

93.5

56

.6

25.0

0.

2 27

.0

3.6

11.9

AU

BURN

JUST

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TAH

OE

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

265

100.

0 10

0.0

97.0

1.

5 0.

0 26

.4

3.0

0.4

2ND

DU

I 59

98

.3

98.3

5.

1 83

.1

0.0

84.7

10

.2

11.9

3R

D D

UI

10

100.

0 90

.0

0.0

60.0

10

.0

30.0

60

.0

10.0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

336

99.7

99

.4

77.4

17

.6

0.3

36.6

6.

5 2.

7 PL

UM

AS

SUP

PLU

MA

S 1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

100.

0 75

.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

C

HES

TER

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

Q

UIN

CY

1ST

DU

I 84

97

.6

96.4

82

.1

6.0

0.0

85.7

1.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

21

95.2

95

.2

19.0

42

.9

0.0

52.4

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

13

84.6

10

0.0

0.0

30.8

0.

0 30

.8

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

121

95.0

96

.7

61.2

14

.9

0.0

72.7

0.

8 0.

0

Page 128: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

116

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

RIV

ERSI

DE

SUP

RIV

ERSI

DE

1ST

DU

I 10

12

97.3

68

.2

41.6

0.

5 0.

1 20

.1

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

8 97

.7

91.9

2.

3 41

.5

3.9

60.5

0.

0 0.

4

3R

D D

UI

68

95.6

95

.6

2.9

14.7

1.

5 10

.3

1.5

1.5

4TH

+ D

UI

40

62.5

10

0.0

0.0

5.0

0.0

5.0

2.5

0.0

TOTA

L 13

78

96.3

74

.9

31.1

9.

0 0.

9 26

.7

0.1

0.1

SU

P IN

DIO

1S

T D

UI

1143

98

.4

10.8

36

.7

0.7

0.0

93.8

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

362

98.6

84

.3

5.8

58.3

0.

0 90

.3

0.6

0.8

3RD

DU

I 11

6 99

.1

90.5

2.

6 18

.1

0.0

88.8

0.

9 1.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 49

55

.1

89.8

6.

1 10

.2

0.0

36.7

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1670

97

.2

34.6

26

.7

14.7

0.

0 91

.0

0.2

0.3

JU

V R

IVER

SID

E 1S

T D

UI

22

81.8

13

.6

4.5

0.0

0.0

18.2

27

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 22

81

.8

13.6

4.

5 0.

0 0.

0 18

.2

27.3

0.

0

JUV

IND

IO

1ST

DU

I 10

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

10

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

C

ORO

NA

1S

T D

UI

308

100.

0 41

.2

95.5

0.

6 0.

0 65

.6

1.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 87

10

0.0

96.6

26

.4

72.4

0.

0 87

.4

0.0

5.7

3RD

DU

I 22

10

0.0

100.

0 18

.2

27.3

0.

0 13

.6

72.7

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

418

100.

0 56

.0

76.8

17

.0

0.0

67.2

5.

0 1.

2

HEM

ET

1ST

DU

I 36

6 98

.6

70.8

83

.3

6.6

0.0

76.8

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

105

99.0

10

0.0

8.6

79.0

0.

0 85

.7

1.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 18

10

0.0

100.

0 16

.7

44.4

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 50

3 98

.8

78.7

63

.0

24.3

0.

0 75

.0

0.2

0.0

BA

NN

ING

1S

T D

UI

233

98.7

70

.4

85.8

2.

6 0.

0 29

.2

1.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 73

97

.3

93.2

13

.7

75.3

0.

0 78

.1

6.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 15

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 73

.3

0.0

20.0

6.

7 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 32

4 98

.5

77.2

64

.8

22.2

0.

0 39

.5

2.8

0.0

IN

DIO

1S

T D

UI

4 10

0.0

75.0

25

.0

50.0

0.

0 75

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 17

10

0.0

94.1

17

.6

82.4

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

5.9

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 22

10

0.0

90.9

18

.2

77.3

0.

0 95

.5

0.0

4.5

M

ORE

NO

VLY

1S

T D

UI

153

96.7

72

.5

90.8

0.

0 0.

0 2.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

43

100.

0 88

.4

30.2

48

.8

11.6

41

.9

0.0

11.6

3R

D D

UI

10

100.

0 80

.0

70.0

0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

20.0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

100.

0 80

.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

211

97.6

76

.3

77.3

10

.0

2.4

10.9

0.

0 3.

3

PALM

SPR

ING

S 1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 7

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

85.7

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 9

100.

0 10

0.0

11.1

66

.7

0.0

77.8

0.

0 0.

0

Page 129: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

117

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

RIV

ERSI

DE

BLYT

HE

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

19

100.

0 89

.5

10.5

78

.9

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

24

100.

0 83

.3

12.5

75

.0

0.0

95.8

0.

0 0.

0

PERR

IS

1ST

DU

I 52

4 98

.9

53.8

95

.2

1.9

0.0

56.5

0.

6 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

140

98.6

95

.0

17.1

73

.6

0.0

68.6

1.

4 1.

4

3R

D D

UI

37

94.6

94

.6

8.1

43.2

0.

0 18

.9

5.4

2.7

4TH

+ D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

706

98.4

64

.4

74.5

18

.3

0.0

56.5

1.

0 0.

6

ELSI

NO

RE

1ST

DU

I 3

100.

0 33

.3

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 4

100.

0 50

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 75

.0

0.0

0.0

TC

MA

RCH

AFB

1S

T D

UI

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 SA

CRA

MEN

TO

SUP

SAC

TO

1ST

DU

I 63

76

.2

98.4

41

.3

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 4.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

28

85.7

10

0.0

3.6

28.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

31

64.5

10

0.0

0.0

16.1

0.

0 9.

7 3.

2 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 16

1 66

.5

99.4

1.

2 46

.6

0.0

0.0

1.2

0.0

TOTA

L 28

3 70

.3

99.3

10

.2

33.6

0.

0 1.

1 2.

1 0.

0

JUV

SA

CTO

TRA

F 1S

T D

UI

39

43.6

41

.0

7.7

0.0

0.0

2.6

28.2

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 33

.3

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 42

42

.9

40.5

7.

1 0.

0 0.

0 2.

4 28

.6

0.0

SA

CRA

MEN

TO

1ST

DU

I 30

98

99.3

96

.7

87.8

3.

6 0.

0 4.

6 0.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1153

99

.4

99.0

4.

2 72

.0

0.1

67.9

0.

5 2.

2

3R

D D

UI

361

97.8

99

.4

1.7

36.3

0.

0 12

.5

0.8

1.1

4TH

+ D

UI

75

96.0

97

.3

0.0

29.3

0.

0 5.

3 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4687

99

.1

97.5

59

.2

23.4

0.

0 20

.8

0.4

0.6

EL

K G

ROV

E 1S

T D

UI

60

100.

0 96

.7

90.0

1.

7 0.

0 3.

3 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

20

100.

0 10

0.0

15.0

70

.0

0.0

70.0

5.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

7 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

89

100.

0 97

.8

65.2

16

.9

0.0

18.0

1.

1 0.

0

GA

LT

1ST

DU

I 43

10

0.0

95.3

2.

3 79

.1

0.0

2.3

2.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 23

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 78

.3

0.0

73.9

17

.4

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

70

100.

0 97

.1

1.4

74.3

0.

0 25

.7

12.9

0.

0

WA

LNU

T G

ROV

E 1S

T D

UI

19

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

94.7

0.

0 5.

3 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

9 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

88.9

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

25.0

25

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 32

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 87

.5

0.0

31.3

3.

1 0.

0

Page 130: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

118

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAC

RAM

ENTO

U

S C

T SA

CTO

1S

T D

UI

7 85

.7

42.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

6 10

0.0

66.7

0.

0 66

.7

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

92

.9

57.1

0.

0 28

.6

0.0

28.6

0.

0 0.

0 SA

N B

ENIT

O

SUP

SAN

BEN

ITO

1S

T D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

9 88

.9

88.9

11

.1

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 22

.2

0.0

JU

V H

OLL

ISTR

1S

T D

UI

4 75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

4 75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

HO

LLIS

TER

1ST

DU

I 11

5 99

.1

99.1

51

.3

2.6

0.0

2.6

30.4

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

46

97.8

69

.6

6.5

45.7

0.

0 78

.3

8.7

67.4

3R

D D

UI

27

96.3

33

.3

0.0

11.1

0.

0 77

.8

0.0

81.5

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

TOTA

L 19

2 98

.4

81.8

32

.3

14.1

0.

0 32

.3

20.3

28

.6

SAN

SU

P SA

N B

ERN

O

1ST

DU

I 21

61

.9

95.2

4.

8 4.

8 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

BER

NA

RDIN

O

2N

D D

UI

5 60

.0

100.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 23

47

.8

95.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

51

54.9

94

.1

2.0

3.9

0.0

2.0

0.0

0.0

SU

P RA

NC

HO

1S

T D

UI

38

92.1

55

.3

50.0

2.

6 0.

0 5.

3 5.

3 0.

0

C

UC

AM

NG

A

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

21

33.3

10

0.0

0.0

9.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 64

71

.9

73.4

29

.7

7.8

0.0

4.7

3.1

0.0

SU

P V

ICTO

RV

ILE

1ST

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 14

21

.4

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

23

47.8

10

0.0

4.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SU

P BA

RSTO

W

1ST

DU

I 7

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

4 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 23

0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

SU

P JO

SHU

A

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

T

REE

4TH

+ D

UI

6 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 42

.9

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

JUV

TRF

SA

N

1ST

DU

I 24

58

.3

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 16

.7

0.0

BER

NA

RDIN

O

TOTA

L 24

58

.3

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 16

.7

0.0

JU

V S

AN

BER

NO

1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 131: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

119

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

SAN

C

HIN

O

1ST

DU

I 32

1 97

.8

9.7

0.0

2.5

0.0

88.2

1.

9 0.

3

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

B

ERN

ARD

INO

2ND

DU

I 87

97

.7

81.6

1.

1 78

.2

0.0

87.4

4.

6 6.

9 co

nt.

3R

D D

UI

18

94.4

77

.8

0.0

66.7

0.

0 77

.8

11.1

22

.2

4TH

+ D

UI

6 83

.3

83.3

0.

0 83

.3

0.0

50.0

0.

0 33

.3

TOTA

L 43

2 97

.5

28.0

0.

2 21

.5

0.0

87.0

2.

8 3.

0

BARS

TOW

1S

T D

UI

182

96.7

46

.7

0.0

2.2

0.0

54.9

4.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

54

98.1

75

.9

0.0

83.3

0.

0 70

.4

20.4

5.

6

3R

D D

UI

14

64.3

10

0.0

0.0

21.4

0.

0 14

.3

28.6

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 25

1 95

.2

55.8

0.

0 20

.7

0.4

55.8

9.

6 1.

2

RED

LAN

DS

1ST

DU

I 17

0 97

.1

5.3

0.0

0.6

0.0

90.0

1.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

54

98.1

46

.3

0.0

35.2

0.

0 81

.5

0.0

1.9

3RD

DU

I 12

91

.7

75.0

8.

3 16

.7

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 23

8 97

.1

18.9

0.

4 9.

2 0.

0 85

.3

0.8

0.4

S

BERN

CEN

TRL

1ST

DU

I 10

27

98.1

29

.7

0.5

1.9

0.0

67.9

22

.6

0.1

2ND

DU

I 29

7 95

.6

80.1

0.

7 54

.2

0.0

67.7

20

.9

11.4

3R

D D

UI

89

91.0

91

.0

0.0

30.3

0.

0 48

.3

16.9

7.

9

4T

H+

DU

I 18

88

.9

94.4

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

33.3

5.

6 0.

0

TO

TAL

1431

97

.0

44.8

0.

5 14

.7

0.0

66.2

21

.7

2.9

FO

NTA

NA

1S

T D

UI

438

99.5

8.

9 0.

0 1.

8 0.

0 88

.1

0.5

0.0

2ND

DU

I 15

3 98

.7

65.4

0.

0 70

.6

1.3

88.2

0.

7 3.

9

3R

D D

UI

40

97.5

87

.5

0.0

35.0

0.

0 45

.0

35.0

2.

5

4T

H+

DU

I 11

90

.9

90.9

0.

0 27

.3

0.0

27.3

45

.5

0.0

TOTA

L 64

2 99

.1

28.7

0.

0 20

.7

0.3

84.4

3.

4 1.

1

VIC

TORV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

486

98.8

22

.2

0.4

2.7

0.0

77.4

1.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

137

99.3

86

.1

0.0

79.6

0.

0 87

.6

1.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 35

97

.1

65.7

0.

0 31

.4

0.0

65.7

5.

7 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

90

.0

90.0

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

668

98.7

38

.6

0.3

20.7

0.

0 78

.6

1.6

0.0

RA

NC

HO

1S

T D

UI

1213

97

.3

17.2

0.

2 1.

4 0.

0 77

.4

1.0

0.0

CU

CA

MN

GA

2N

D D

UI

338

95.9

89

.6

0.3

79.0

0.

0 88

.2

1.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 10

2 67

.6

89.2

0.

0 34

.3

0.0

36.3

10

.8

2.0

4TH

+ D

UI

11

54.5

63

.6

0.0

18.2

0.

0 18

.2

9.1

0.0

TOTA

L 16

64

94.9

36

.7

0.2

19.3

0.

0 76

.7

1.7

0.1

BI

G B

EAR

LAK

E 1S

T D

UI

79

98.7

12

.7

0.0

1.3

0.0

89.9

2.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

30

100.

0 83

.3

0.0

83.3

0.

0 83

.3

10.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

83.3

16

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 11

5 99

.1

35.7

0.

0 25

.2

0.0

87.8

5.

2 0.

0

TWIN

PEA

KS

1ST

DU

I 69

10

0.0

15.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 79

.7

1.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 16

10

0.0

93.8

0.

0 81

.3

0.0

43.8

43

.8

0.0

3RD

DU

I 10

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

.0

0.0

10.0

10

.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

97

100.

0 39

.2

0.0

14.4

0.

0 64

.9

9.3

0.0

Page 132: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

120

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

SAN

N

EED

LES

1ST

DU

I 10

2 98

.0

11.8

2.

0 2.

9 0.

0 58

.8

22.5

0.

0

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

B

ERN

ARD

INO

2ND

DU

I 21

10

0.0

76.2

0.

0 61

.9

0.0

71.4

9.

5 0.

0 co

nt.

3R

D D

UI

10

90.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 13

5 97

.8

28.9

1.

5 11

.9

0.0

55.6

20

.0

0.0

TR

ON

A

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

2 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4 10

0.0

25.0

50

.0

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

JO

SHU

A T

REE

1ST

DU

I 13

0 97

.7

7.7

0.8

2.3

0.0

90.0

2.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

32

100.

0 62

.5

0.0

78.1

0.

0 84

.4

6.3

3.1

3RD

DU

I 12

10

0.0

91.7

0.

0 41

.7

0.0

25.0

8.

3 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

6 98

.3

24.4

0.

6 18

.8

0.0

83.5

3.

4 0.

6 SA

N D

IEG

O

SUP

SAN

DIE

GO

1S

T D

UI

12

75.0

10

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

60

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

24

62.5

10

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 4.

2 0.

0

SUP

VIS

TA

1ST

DU

I 18

83

.3

100.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 9

77.8

10

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.

0 11

.1

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

71.4

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.

0 14

.3

4TH

+ D

UI

16

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 50

70

.0

100.

0 4.

0 4.

0 0.

0 4.

0 0.

0 2.

0

SUP

CH

ULA

1S

T D

UI

32

71.9

96

.9

3.1

25.0

0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

VIS

TA

2ND

DU

I 8

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 12

.5

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

14

64.3

92

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 56

67

.9

96.4

1.

8 19

.6

0.0

19.6

0.

0 0.

0

SUP

EL C

AJO

N

1ST

DU

I 26

76

.9

96.2

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 7.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

8 87

.5

87.5

0.

0 12

.5

0.0

12.5

12

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

80.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

16

37.5

93

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 55

67

.3

94.5

0.

0 1.

8 0.

0 1.

8 5.

5 0.

0

JUV

SA

N D

IEG

O

1ST

DU

I 46

2.

2 6.

5 2.

2 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 52

.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 48

6.

3 10

.4

4.2

2.1

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

EL C

AJO

N

1ST

DU

I 15

34

97.2

97

.5

85.9

3.

6 0.

0 5.

6 1.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

460

94.6

98

.3

5.4

69.3

0.

0 70

.4

2.4

10.0

3R

D D

UI

112

92.9

99

.1

1.8

40.2

0.

0 22

.3

26.8

2.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 11

72

.7

100.

0 0.

0 18

.2

0.0

9.1

9.1

0.0

TOTA

L 21

17

96.3

97

.7

63.5

19

.9

0.0

20.6

3.

4 2.

3

Page 133: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

121

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAN

DIE

GO

V

ISTA

1S

T D

UI

2873

97

.7

99.3

84

.2

2.6

0.0

2.0

9.5

0.3

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 82

9 96

.7

97.6

9.

5 71

.3

0.0

41.7

17

.5

18.3

3R

D D

UI

209

92.3

98

.1

4.3

34.0

0.

0 10

.5

46.9

5.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 34

73

.5

100.

0 5.

9 20

.6

0.0

5.9

50.0

2.

9

TO

TAL

3945

97

.0

98.9

63

.6

18.9

0.

0 10

.8

13.5

4.

4

SAN

MA

RCO

S 2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

50

.0

0.0

SA

N D

IEG

O

1ST

DU

I 33

69

99.2

97

.7

91.8

3.

6 0.

0 81

.0

1.6

1.5

2ND

DU

I 77

5 98

.3

93.3

7.

7 79

.0

0.0

89.0

0.

9 50

.3

3RD

DU

I 19

6 98

.0

85.7

1.

5 64

.8

0.0

66.3

1.

0 46

.9

4TH

+ D

UI

25

80.0

92

.0

0.0

48.0

4.

0 32

.0

0.0

16.0

TO

TAL

4365

98

.9

96.3

72

.3

20.0

0.

0 81

.5

1.4

12.3

CH

ULA

VIS

TA

1ST

DU

I 11

79

97.5

87

.0

87.4

3.

7 0.

1 16

.7

4.7

0.2

MU

NI

2ND

DU

I 28

3 97

.2

94.7

13

.1

73.5

0.

4 60

.1

6.0

11.7

3R

D D

UI

63

82.5

10

0.0

3.2

46.0

0.

0 30

.2

27.0

6.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 14

85

.7

92.9

7.

1 35

.7

0.0

35.7

42

.9

0.0

TOTA

L 15

39

96.7

89

.0

69.5

18

.6

0.1

25.4

6.

2 2.

5 SA

N F

RAN

CIS

CO

SU

P SA

N F

RAN

1S

T D

UI

8 50

.0

87.5

12

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

66.7

10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 33

.3

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

5 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

41

.2

94.1

11

.8

11.8

0.

0 5.

9 5.

9 0.

0

JUV

SA

N F

RAN

1S

T D

UI

8 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

8 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

SAN

FRA

NC

ISC

O

1ST

DU

I 75

4 97

.3

98.5

93

.2

1.1

0.0

10.1

0.

0 0.

1

2N

D D

UI

197

96.4

98

.5

12.2

76

.1

0.0

57.4

0.

0 16

.8

3RD

DU

I 51

96

.1

90.2

5.

9 37

.3

0.0

27.5

0.

0 13

.7

4TH

+ D

UI

4 75

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

25.0

TO

TAL

1006

97

.0

98.0

72

.6

17.6

0.

0 20

.3

0.0

4.2

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

SUP

FREN

CH

1S

T D

UI

24

29.2

50

.0

4.2

0.0

0.0

4.2

41.7

0.

0

C

AM

P 2N

D D

UI

8 75

.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

50

.0

50.0

4T

H+

DU

I 23

56

.5

82.6

0.

0 0.

0 4.

3 0.

0 21

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 57

49

.1

66.7

1.

8 0.

0 1.

8 3.

5 29

.8

1.8

JU

V F

REN

CH

1S

T D

UI

11

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

C

AM

P TO

TAL

11

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

LOD

I 1S

T D

UI

385

97.9

96

.6

75.1

1.

0 0.

0 2.

3 18

.7

1.8

2ND

DU

I 13

9 10

0.0

91.4

5.

0 65

.5

0.0

73.4

18

.7

50.4

3R

D D

UI

44

100.

0 68

.2

0.0

29.5

0.

0 56

.8

47.7

50

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

14

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

57.1

50

.0

50.0

TO

TAL

582

98.6

92

.1

50.9

18

.7

0.0

24.7

21

.6

18.2

Page 134: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

122

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAN

JOA

QU

IN

MA

NTE

CA

1S

T D

UI

255

100.

0 99

.6

87.1

2.

4 0.

0 1.

2 3.

9 0.

8 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

84

96.4

97

.6

3.6

81.0

0.

0 82

.1

8.3

58.3

3R

D D

UI

38

100.

0 60

.5

5.3

18.4

0.

0 57

.9

36.8

47

.4

4TH

+ D

UI

13

92.3

61

.5

0.0

7.7

0.0

46.2

30

.8

46.2

TO

TAL

390

99.0

94

.1

58.2

21

.0

0.0

25.6

9.

0 19

.2

TR

AC

Y 1S

T D

UI

145

100.

0 99

.3

27.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 4.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

50

100.

0 94

.0

0.0

86.0

0.

0 88

.0

2.0

64.0

3R

D D

UI

22

100.

0 72

.7

0.0

63.6

0.

0 81

.8

13.6

72

.7

4TH

+ D

UI

14

78.6

92

.9

0.0

57.1

0.

0 50

.0

14.3

35

.7

TOTA

L 23

1 98

.7

95.2

17

.3

28.1

0.

0 29

.9

5.6

22.9

STO

CK

TON

1S

T D

UI

952

99.7

99

.6

89.0

2.

5 0.

0 1.

8 4.

8 0.

4

2N

D D

UI

377

99.7

98

.9

7.7

82.8

0.

0 84

.6

1.3

44.0

3R

D D

UI

153

99.3

94

.1

15.7

62

.7

0.0

41.2

27

.5

27.5

4T

H+

DU

I 61

82

.0

96.7

32

.8

14.8

0.

0 14

.8

19.7

11

.5

TOTA

L 15

43

99.0

98

.8

59.6

28

.6

0.0

26.4

6.

8 14

.2

SAN

LU

IS

SUP

S L

OBI

SPO

1S

T D

UI

12

91.7

33

.3

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

O

BISP

O

2N

D D

UI

7 85

.7

100.

0 14

.3

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 57

.1

0.0

3RD

DU

I 6

16.7

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 30

53

.3

96.7

3.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 26

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 55

61

.8

83.6

10

.9

1.8

0.0

0.0

41.8

0.

0

S LU

IS O

BISP

O

1ST

DU

I 10

30

98.3

98

.9

93.7

1.

3 0.

0 0.

4 0.

3 0.

2

2N

D D

UI

372

98.1

97

.8

4.8

83.3

0.

3 76

.3

0.5

8.1

3RD

DU

I 13

1 97

.7

98.5

5.

3 74

.8

0.0

19.1

3.

8 10

.7

4TH

+ D

UI

26

96.2

10

0.0

0.0

84.6

0.

0 15

.4

0.0

3.8

TOTA

L 15

59

98.2

98

.7

63.5

28

.4

0.1

20.3

0.

6 3.

0

PASO

RO

BLES

1S

T D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 SA

N M

ATE

O

SUP

SAN

MA

TEO

1S

T D

UI

31

77.4

10

0.0

61.3

9.

7 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

14

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

78.6

0.

0 35

.7

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 58

56

.9

98.3

0.

0 29

.3

0.0

1.7

0.0

1.7

TOTA

L 11

1 69

.4

99.1

17

.1

33.3

0.

0 5.

4 0.

0 0.

9

JUV

SA

N M

ATE

O

1ST

DU

I 36

72

.2

13.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 5.

6 33

.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

37

73.0

13

.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

5.4

32.4

0.

0

SO S

AN

FRA

NSC

O

1ST

DU

I 12

32

98.7

98

.1

93.6

1.

9 0.

0 1.

3 0.

7 0.

5

2N

D D

UI

411

98.1

95

.1

4.4

83.9

0.

0 72

.7

5.8

53.8

3R

D D

UI

101

86.1

96

.0

1.0

63.4

0.

0 44

.6

0.0

35.6

4T

H+

DU

I 15

73

.3

100.

0 6.

7 33

.3

0.0

26.7

0.

0 20

.0

TOTA

L 17

59

97.6

97

.3

66.7

24

.8

0.0

20.7

1.

9 15

.1

RE

DW

OO

D C

ITY

1ST

DU

I 12

80

98.7

98

.9

93.4

1.

9 0.

0 2.

0 0.

0 0.

8

2N

D D

UI

400

96.5

96

.0

4.8

84.3

0.

0 64

.3

0.3

49.8

3R

D D

UI

138

84.1

92

.0

2.9

64.5

0.

0 52

.2

0.0

46.4

4T

H+

DU

I 12

58

.3

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

41.7

0.

0 41

.7

TOTA

L 18

30

96.8

97

.8

66.6

24

.9

0.0

19.6

0.

1 15

.2

Page 135: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

123

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAN

TA

SUP

SAN

TA

1ST

DU

I 5

80.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0

BA

RBA

RA

B

ARB

ARA

2N

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

5 40

.0

80.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

21

47.6

66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

9.

5 19

.0

TOTA

L 34

55

.9

76.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 23

.5

8.8

11.8

SUP

SAN

TA

1ST

DU

I 3

33.3

66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

M

ARI

A

2ND

DU

I 5

100.

0 60

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 20

.0

3RD

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

27

33.3

92

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

7.4

0.0

7.4

TOTA

L 37

43

.2

86.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

1 2.

7 8.

1

JUV

SA

NTA

1S

T D

UI

13

30.8

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 76

.9

0.0

BA

RBA

RA

TOTA

L 13

30

.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

76.9

0.

0

JUV

LO

MPO

C

1ST

DU

I 10

60

.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

60

.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

SA

NTA

BA

RBA

RA

1ST

DU

I 99

8 97

.2

98.1

90

.5

0.3

0.0

84.3

12

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 32

0 96

.6

95.6

3.

4 27

.8

0.0

33.4

64

.4

4.7

3RD

DU

I 92

92

.4

93.5

2.

2 66

.3

0.0

15.2

76

.1

10.9

4T

H+

DU

I 11

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 90

.9

0.0

0.0

81.8

0.

0

TO

TAL

1421

96

.8

97.3

64

.5

11.5

0.

0 67

.7

28.6

1.

8

SAN

TA M

AR

IA

1ST

DU

I 54

0 98

.7

84.3

79

.6

1.5

0.0

42.2

12

.6

0.9

2ND

DU

I 18

9 97

.9

97.4

8.

5 72

.5

0.0

51.9

39

.7

28.0

3R

D D

UI

72

95.8

91

.7

0.0

20.8

0.

0 22

.2

76.4

15

.3

4TH

+ D

UI

31

61.3

87

.1

0.0

16.1

0.

0 16

.1

22.6

16

.1

TOTA

L 83

2 96

.9

88.0

53

.6

19.8

0.

0 41

.7

24.6

8.

9

LOM

POC

1S

T D

UI

145

99.3

4.

1 92

.4

0.0

0.0

4.8

3.4

0.0

2ND

DU

I 56

98

.2

78.6

8.

9 60

.7

0.0

73.2

10

.7

48.2

3R

D D

UI

28

100.

0 75

.0

7.1

21.4

3.

6 35

.7

35.7

25

.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 23

2 98

.7

31.9

60

.8

17.2

0.

4 25

.0

9.9

14.7

SOLV

AN

G

1ST

DU

I 10

0 10

0.0

17.0

88

.0

0.0

0.0

91.0

9.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

46

97.8

87

.0

6.5

67.4

0.

0 76

.1

19.6

4.

3

3R

D D

UI

24

100.

0 87

.5

4.2

25.0

0.

0 41

.7

54.2

8.

3

4T

H+

DU

I 6

66.7

66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

16

.7

33.3

TO

TAL

176

98.3

46

.6

52.3

21

.0

0.0

78.4

18

.2

3.4

SAN

TA C

LARA

SU

P SN

TA C

LARA

1S

T D

UI

175

71.4

93

.7

44.0

5.

1 0.

0 8.

6 1.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

74

71.6

10

0.0

5.4

56.8

0.

0 10

.8

4.1

1.4

3RD

DU

I 59

52

.5

98.3

0.

0 42

.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

224

50.4

98

.7

0.0

35.7

0.

0 0.

9 0.

0 0.

4

TO

TAL

532

60.5

97

.2

15.2

29

.3

0.0

4.7

1.1

0.4

JU

V S

NTA

CLA

RA

1S

T D

UI

53

98.1

64

.2

88.7

0.

0 0.

0 9.

4 7.

5 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 56

98

.2

66.1

89

.3

0.0

0.0

8.9

7.1

0.0

Page 136: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

124

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SAN

TA C

LARA

PA

LO A

LTO

1S

T D

UI

378

99.5

96

.3

84.9

1.

6 0.

0 5.

0 1.

1 0.

8 co

nt.

2N

D D

UI

137

98.5

94

.9

4.4

75.9

0.

0 81

.8

2.2

41.6

3R

D D

UI

41

92.7

65

.9

2.4

17.1

0.

0 41

.5

0.0

43.9

4T

H+

DU

I 2

100.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 50

.0

TOTA

L 55

8 98

.7

93.5

58

.8

21.0

0.

0 26

.7

1.3

14.2

SAN

JOSE

1S

T D

UI

3177

97

.1

95.2

73

.8

2.3

0.0

7.7

15.5

0.

3

2N

D D

UI

1166

96

.6

97.9

2.

6 60

.5

0.1

61.7

27

.1

8.5

3RD

DU

I 41

8 96

.4

95.9

1.

0 8.

1 0.

0 9.

6 11

.0

4.5

4TH

+ D

UI

55

90.9

94

.5

1.8

1.8

0.0

7.3

5.5

5.5

TOTA

L 48

16

96.9

95

.9

49.4

16

.9

0.0

20.9

17

.8

2.7

SA

NTA

CLA

RA

1ST

DU

I 55

94

.5

96.4

74

.5

0.0

0.0

3.6

14.5

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

17

88.2

10

0.0

0.0

58.8

0.

0 58

.8

17.6

23

.5

3RD

DU

I 11

54

.5

72.7

0.

0 18

.2

0.0

45.5

0.

0 36

.4

TOTA

L 83

88

.0

94.0

49

.4

14.5

0.

0 20

.5

13.3

9.

6

SUN

NY

VA

LE

1ST

DU

I 51

1 98

.2

53.2

85

.9

2.3

0.0

47.2

4.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

152

95.4

98

.0

10.5

78

.3

0.0

80.3

2.

6 30

.3

3RD

DU

I 40

97

.5

92.5

2.

5 17

.5

0.0

15.0

40

.0

10.0

4T

H+

DU

I 8

87.5

75

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.0

25

.0

25.0

TO

TAL

711

97.5

65

.3

64.1

19

.4

0.0

52.2

6.

2 7.

3

GIL

ROY

1ST

DU

I 44

1 98

.4

97.7

90

.2

2.5

0.0

7.5

6.3

0.0

2ND

DU

I 16

8 99

.4

99.4

2.

4 78

.0

0.0

79.2

4.

8 2.

4

3R

D D

UI

56

100.

0 98

.2

3.6

12.5

0.

0 14

.3

1.8

1.8

4TH

+ D

UI

6 10

0.0

83.3

0.

0 16

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 67

1 98

.8

98.1

60

.2

22.4

0.

0 25

.9

5.5

0.7

SAN

TA C

RU

Z SU

P SA

NTA

CRU

Z 1S

T D

UI

5 10

0.0

100.

0 60

.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 17

64

.7

88.2

0.

0 5.

9 0.

0 0.

0 41

.2

0.0

TOTA

L 27

74

.1

92.6

11

.1

7.4

0.0

0.0

37.0

0.

0

JUV

SA

NTA

CRU

Z 1S

T D

UI

17

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

11.8

88

.2

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

18

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

11.1

88

.9

0.0

SA

NTA

CR

UZ

1ST

DU

I 74

9 99

.6

94.9

88

.5

0.4

0.0

4.1

5.9

0.0

2ND

DU

I 25

2 99

.2

98.8

4.

8 53

.2

0.0

53.2

31

.3

0.8

3RD

DU

I 92

10

0.0

100.

0 1.

1 9.

8 0.

0 9.

8 53

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

27

85.2

10

0.0

7.4

3.7

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0

TO

TAL

1120

99

.2

96.3

60

.5

13.1

0.

0 15

.5

17.0

0.

2

WA

TSO

NV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

466

100.

0 98

.5

88.8

0.

4 0.

0 4.

9 9.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

171

100.

0 10

0.0

2.9

43.3

0.

0 42

.7

55.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

52

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

1.9

0.0

3.8

96.2

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 6

100.

0 10

0.0

16.7

33

.3

0.0

16.7

83

.3

0.0

TOTA

L 69

5 10

0.0

99.0

60

.4

11.4

0.

0 14

.2

27.6

0.

0

Page 137: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

125

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SHA

STA

SU

P RE

DD

ING

1S

T D

UI

6 83

.3

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

16.7

0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

4 75

.0

75.0

25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 11

18

.2

100.

0 0.

0 9.

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

22

45.5

95

.5

22.7

4.

5 0.

0 4.

5 0.

0 0.

0

BURN

EY

1ST

DU

I 29

96

.6

96.6

89

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 12

91

.7

100.

0 16

.7

75.0

0.

0 75

.0

16.7

16

.7

3RD

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 46

95

.7

97.8

60

.9

28.3

0.

0 19

.6

8.7

4.3

RE

DD

ING

1S

T D

UI

390

97.9

98

.2

94.6

0.

3 0.

0 2.

3 2.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

162

95.7

97

.5

12.3

79

.0

0.0

71.0

2.

5 8.

0

3R

D D

UI

64

98.4

93

.8

0.0

57.8

0.

0 25

.0

26.6

4.

7

4T

H+

DU

I 20

75

.0

90.0

10

.0

35.0

0.

0 30

.0

15.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

636

96.7

97

.3

61.5

27

.2

0.0

23.0

5.

2 2.

5 SI

ERRA

SU

P SI

ERR

A

4TH

+ D

UI

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

DO

WN

IEV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

15

100.

0 10

0.0

93.3

0.

0 0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

6 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 22

10

0.0

100.

0 63

.6

18.2

0.

0 18

.2

4.5

0.0

SISK

IYO

U

SUP

SISK

IYO

U

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 2

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 5

40.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

D

ORR

IS

1ST

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 10

0.0

100.

0 57

.1

14.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

WEE

D

1ST

DU

I 71

10

0.0

94.4

88

.7

2.8

0.0

2.8

4.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 19

10

0.0

100.

0 21

.1

78.9

0.

0 57

.9

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 9

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

88.9

0.

0 22

.2

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 50

.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

101

100.

0 96

.0

67.3

25

.7

0.0

14.9

3.

0 0.

0

TULE

LAK

E 1S

T D

UI

5 10

0.0

100.

0 60

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

7 10

0.0

100.

0 42

.9

28.6

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

YREK

A

1ST

DU

I 96

97

.9

100.

0 80

.2

2.1

0.0

2.1

11.5

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

30

96.7

90

.0

6.7

70.0

0.

0 63

.3

16.7

36

.7

3RD

DU

I 8

87.5

87

.5

0.0

87.5

0.

0 50

.0

0.0

50.0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

50.0

10

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

138

95.7

97

.1

58.0

21

.7

0.0

18.1

11

.6

10.9

Page 138: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

126

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SOLA

NO

SU

P SO

LAN

O

1ST

DU

I 11

81

.8

90.9

27

.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

18.2

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

5 10

0.0

100.

0 20

.0

60.0

0.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 7

57.1

10

0.0

0.0

42.9

0.

0 0.

0 28

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

49

63.3

98

.0

0.0

28.6

2.

0 0.

0 36

.7

0.0

TOTA

L 72

68

.1

97.2

5.

6 27

.8

1.4

0.0

33.3

0.

0

JUV

SO

LAN

O

1ST

DU

I 26

65

.4

3.8

61.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 69

.2

0.0

TOTA

L 26

65

.4

3.8

61.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 69

.2

0.0

FA

IRFI

ELD

1S

T D

UI

584

97.8

97

.3

87.8

1.

4 0.

0 0.

7 5.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

225

97.3

97

.8

4.9

77.8

0.

0 22

.7

6.2

4.4

3RD

DU

I 78

85

.9

94.9

1.

3 59

.0

0.0

10.3

10

.3

3.8

4TH

+ D

UI

6 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 89

3 96

.4

97.2

58

.8

26.0

0.

0 7.

1 5.

7 1.

5

BEN

ICIA

1S

T D

UI

2 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

100.

0 10

0.0

66.7

33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

VA

LLEJ

O

1ST

DU

I 19

9 98

.0

86.4

89

.4

4.0

0.0

14.1

0.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

84

100.

0 98

.8

17.9

78

.6

0.0

66.7

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

23

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

39.1

0.

0 17

.4

17.4

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

100.

0 80

.0

20.0

60

.0

0.0

20.0

60

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 31

1 98

.7

90.7

62

.4

27.7

0.

0 28

.6

2.6

0.0

SON

OM

A

SUP

SON

OM

A

1ST

DU

I 8

62.5

10

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

5 80

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 54

50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

70

54.3

10

0.0

0.0

1.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

JU

V S

ON

OM

A

1ST

DU

I 25

4.

0 0.

0 4.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 12

.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 27

3.

7 0.

0 3.

7 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 11

.1

0.0

SA

NTA

RO

SA

1ST

DU

I 14

18

97.5

97

.0

59.3

0.

4 0.

0 2.

7 1.

3 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

566

95.9

99

.8

3.5

56.7

0.

0 56

.4

0.4

0.5

3RD

DU

I 21

6 88

.4

99.1

0.

0 10

.6

0.0

9.3

1.4

0.9

4TH

+ D

UI

72

80.6

98

.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

1.4

1.4

0.0

TOTA

L 22

72

95.7

98

.0

37.9

15

.4

0.0

16.6

1.

1 0.

2

PETA

LUM

A

1ST

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

STA

NIS

LAU

S SU

P ST

AN

ISLA

US

1ST

DU

I 14

92

.9

92.9

28

.6

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 8

62.5

87

.5

12.5

12

.5

0.0

12.5

12

.5

0.0

3RD

DU

I 6

50.0

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

53

64.2

10

0.0

1.9

7.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 81

67

.9

97.5

7.

4 6.

2 0.

0 2.

5 1.

2 0.

0

JUV

STA

NIS

LAU

S 1S

T D

UI

34

38.2

38

.2

29.4

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 97

.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 3

100.

0 10

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 37

43

.2

43.2

29

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

97.3

0.

0

Page 139: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

127

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

STA

NIS

LAU

S M

OD

ESTO

1S

T D

UI

1089

98

.8

99.3

87

.4

2.5

0.0

0.9

0.3

0.0

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 39

4 98

.7

98.7

12

.7

74.9

0.

0 44

.2

4.1

3.8

3RD

DU

I 14

9 94

.0

96.6

5.

4 58

.4

0.0

14.1

3.

4 2.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 40

87

.5

92.5

0.

0 37

.5

0.0

10.0

0.

0 5.

0

TO

TAL

1672

98

.1

98.7

60

.4

25.4

0.

0 12

.5

1.4

1.2

TU

RLO

CK

1S

T D

UI

171

98.2

98

.2

78.9

16

.4

0.0

0.6

0.6

0.0

2ND

DU

I 54

10

0.0

100.

0 9.

3 81

.5

0.0

27.8

0.

0 5.

6

3R

D D

UI

16

100.

0 93

.8

0.0

56.3

0.

0 12

.5

18.8

12

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 24

5 98

.8

98.4

57

.1

33.5

0.

0 7.

3 1.

6 2.

0 SU

TTER

SU

P SU

TTER

1S

T D

UI

9 77

.8

100.

0 44

.4

11.1

0.

0 0.

0 22

.2

0.0

2ND

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 25

.0

50.0

0.

0

3R

D D

UI

4 75

.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 14

57

.1

100.

0 0.

0 28

.6

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

31

67.7

10

0.0

12.9

25

.8

0.0

3.2

45.2

0.

0

JUV

SU

TTER

1S

T D

UI

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

4 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

YUBA

CIT

Y 1S

T D

UI

283

97.2

97

.5

91.2

0.

0 0.

0 2.

5 1.

8 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

111

97.3

99

.1

9.9

75.7

0.

9 65

.8

11.7

0.

9

3R

D D

UI

36

88.9

94

.4

0.0

30.6

0.

0 8.

3 69

.4

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

4 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0

TO

TAL

434

96.5

97

.7

62.0

22

.4

0.2

19.1

10

.6

0.2

TEH

AM

A

SUP

TEH

AM

A

1ST

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

1 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 7

14.3

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 14

35

.7

100.

0 14

.3

7.1

0.0

14.3

0.

0 0.

0

JUV

TEH

AM

A

2ND

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

1 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

C

ORN

ING

1S

T D

UI

54

98.1

94

.4

92.6

0.

0 0.

0 25

.9

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 19

78

.9

100.

0 15

.8

63.2

0.

0 26

.3

5.3

0.0

3RD

DU

I 10

30

.0

100.

0 20

.0

10.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

84

84.5

96

.4

65.5

15

.5

0.0

22.6

1.

2 0.

0

RED

BLU

FF

1ST

DU

I 17

9 83

.2

97.8

75

.4

0.6

0.0

3.4

20.1

0.

0

2N

D D

UI

40

57.5

95

.0

7.5

50.0

0.

0 47

.5

35.0

5.

0

3R

D D

UI

17

35.3

10

0.0

11.8

23

.5

0.0

17.6

17

.6

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 33

.3

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

239

74.9

97

.5

58.6

10

.9

0.0

12.1

22

.2

0.8

TRIN

ITY

SUP

TRIN

ITY

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

Page 140: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

128

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TRIN

ITY

WEA

VER

VIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 73

95

.9

95.9

87

.7

4.1

0.0

4.1

9.6

0.0

cont

.

2ND

DU

I 22

90

.9

100.

0 18

.2

68.2

0.

0 59

.1

9.1

9.1

3RD

DU

I 5

80.0

10

0.0

0.0

60.0

0.

0 20

.0

80.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 5

20.0

80

.0

0.0

20.0

0.

0 0.

0 20

.0

0.0

TOTA

L 10

5 90

.5

96.2

64

.8

21.0

0.

0 16

.2

13.3

1.

9 TU

LARE

SU

P TU

LARE

1S

T D

UI

49

79.6

95

.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 11

72

.7

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 9.

1 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

7 71

.4

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 59

44

.1

100.

0 0.

0 1.

7 0.

0 0.

0 3.

4 1.

7

TO

TAL

126

61.9

98

.4

0.0

0.8

0.0

0.0

2.4

0.8

JU

V T

ULA

RE

1ST

DU

I 25

44

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

68.0

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

26

46.2

3.

8 0.

0 3.

8 0.

0 0.

0 65

.4

0.0

D

INU

BA

1ST

DU

I 32

9 98

.8

99.7

88

.1

1.2

0.0

0.9

0.3

0.3

2ND

DU

I 11

6 95

.7

90.5

9.

5 45

.7

0.0

52.6

0.

9 23

.3

3RD

DU

I 40

90

.0

90.0

7.

5 22

.5

0.0

32.5

0.

0 17

.5

4TH

+ D

UI

8 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 25

.0

0.0

25.0

0.

0 12

.5

TOTA

L 49

3 97

.4

96.8

61

.7

13.8

0.

0 16

.0

0.4

7.3

EX

ETER

1S

T D

UI

70

100.

0 10

0.0

92.9

5.

7 0.

0 0.

0 2.

9 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

27

100.

0 10

0.0

3.7

77.8

0.

0 37

.0

3.7

0.0

3RD

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

12.5

62

.5

0.0

0.0

12.5

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

75.0

10

0.0

0.0

75.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

109

99.1

10

0.0

61.5

30

.3

0.0

9.2

3.7

0.0

LI

ND

SAY-

1S

T D

UI

85

100.

0 97

.6

91.8

4.

7 0.

0 3.

5 2.

4 0.

0

E

XETE

R 2N

D D

UI

46

100.

0 10

0.0

17.4

71

.7

0.0

37.0

4.

3 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

14

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

57.1

0.

0 7.

1 14

.3

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

12

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 8.

3 0.

0

TO

TAL

157

100.

0 98

.7

54.8

32

.5

0.0

13.4

4.

5 0.

0

PORT

ERV

ILLE

1S

T D

UI

293

98.3

98

.3

86.7

2.

7 0.

0 1.

0 0.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

110

98.2

97

.3

10.0

68

.2

0.0

46.4

9.

1 1.

8

3R

D D

UI

60

98.3

93

.3

1.7

33.3

0.

0 15

.0

25.0

5.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

90

.0

100.

0 20

.0

40.0

0.

0 40

.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 47

3 98

.1

97.5

56

.7

22.6

0.

0 14

.2

5.7

1.1

TU

LARE

1S

T D

UI

227

95.6

94

.3

64.3

24

.2

0.0

22.5

0.

4 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

93

96.8

96

.8

10.8

60

.2

0.0

61.3

6.

5 7.

5

3R

D D

UI

27

100.

0 10

0.0

18.5

37

.0

0.0

29.6

0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

25.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

351

96.3

95

.4

46.2

34

.5

0.0

33.0

2.

0 2.

0

VIS

ALI

A

1ST

DU

I 44

3 97

.5

96.4

83

.1

6.3

0.0

6.3

0.5

0.9

2ND

DU

I 11

9 96

.6

97.5

14

.3

74.8

0.

0 51

.3

1.7

25.2

3R

D D

UI

44

97.7

86

.4

2.3

50.0

0.

0 47

.7

2.3

36.4

4T

H+

DU

I 30

53

.3

100.

0 3.

3 10

.0

0.0

3.3

3.3

3.3

TOTA

L 63

6 95

.3

96.1

60

.8

22.3

0.

0 17

.5

0.9

8.0

Page 141: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

129

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

TULA

RE

WO

OD

LAK

E-

1ST

DU

I 36

10

0.0

100.

0 86

.1

5.6

0.0

2.8

0.0

0.0

cont

.

EXE

TER

2ND

DU

I 14

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 92

.9

0.0

42.9

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

10

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 1

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 61

10

0.0

100.

0 50

.8

41.0

0.

0 11

.5

0.0

0.0

TUO

LUM

NE

SUP

TUO

LUM

NE

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

3 66

.7

100.

0 0.

0 33

.3

0.0

33.3

0.

0 0.

0

3R

D D

UI

2 50

.0

100.

0 0.

0 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

8 25

.0

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

15

46.7

10

0.0

6.7

13.3

0.

0 6.

7 0.

0 0.

0

SON

ORA

1S

T D

UI

98

99.0

10

0.0

96.9

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 8.

2 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

61

100.

0 10

0.0

1.6

86.9

0.

0 68

.9

0.0

1.6

3RD

DU

I 16

10

0.0

100.

0 6.

3 12

.5

0.0

6.3

0.0

0.0

4TH

+ D

UI

3 10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 17

8 99

.4

100.

0 54

.5

32.0

0.

0 24

.2

4.5

0.6

JA

MES

TOW

N

1ST

DU

I 23

10

0.0

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 8

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

87.5

0.

0 87

.5

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

40.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

36

100.

0 10

0.0

69.4

19

.4

0.0

19.4

0.

0 0.

0 V

ENTU

RA

JUV

VEN

TURA

1S

T D

UI

22

95.5

40

.9

18.2

0.

0 0.

0 4.

5 4.

5 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

1 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

TO

TAL

23

91.3

39

.1

17.4

0.

0 0.

0 4.

3 4.

3 0.

0

VEN

TURA

MU

NI

1ST

DU

I 30

88

98.1

98

.8

88.7

2.

1 0.

0 2.

2 9.

6 0.

3

2N

D D

UI

877

98.9

98

.5

14.4

68

.0

0.0

74.8

15

.6

18.5

3R

D D

UI

287

95.1

95

.5

7.3

40.8

0.

0 34

.8

52.3

21

.3

4TH

+ D

UI

71

62.0

78

.9

23.9

12

.7

0.0

2.8

26.8

2.

8

TO

TAL

4323

97

.5

98.2

67

.2

18.2

0.

0 19

.1

13.9

5.

4 YO

LO

SUP

WO

OD

LAN

D

1ST

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3RD

DU

I 1

100.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

100.

0 66

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

33.3

0.

0

JUV

YO

LO

1ST

DU

I 3

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 3

66.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

W

EST

SAC

TO

1ST

DU

I 5

100.

0 10

0.0

60.0

40

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2ND

DU

I 2

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

100.

0 10

0.0

42.9

57

.1

0.0

28.6

0.

0 0.

0

WO

OD

LAN

D

1ST

DU

I 44

3 99

.5

98.4

82

.6

14.0

0.

0 4.

3 0.

7 0.

0

2N

D D

UI

138

100.

0 98

.6

8.0

83.3

0.

0 83

.3

0.7

1.4

3RD

DU

I 59

10

0.0

100.

0 11

.9

32.2

0.

0 18

.6

18.6

0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 10

10

0.0

100.

0 0.

0 40

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 65

0 99

.7

98.6

59

.1

30.8

0.

0 22

.3

2.3

0.3

YUBA

SU

P YU

BA

1ST

DU

I 3

100.

0 66

.7

33.3

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

4T

H+

DU

I 9

44.4

10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 12

58

.3

91.7

8.

3 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 142: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

TOTA

L 36

4 99

.2

79.4

58

.2

14.6

0.

0 7.

7 29

.7

3.0

130

TABL

E B4

: 19

94 D

UI S

AN

CTI

ON

S BY

CO

UN

TY, C

OU

RT A

ND

OFF

END

ER S

TATU

S* -

cont

inue

d

C

OU

NTY

CO

URT

D

UI

OFF

END

ER

TO

TAL

PRO

BATI

ON

JA

IL

1ST

OFF

END

ER

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

SB 3

8

ALC

OH

OL

PRO

G

30-M

ON

TH

PRO

GRA

M

LIC

ENSE

RE

STRI

CTI

ON

C

OU

RT

SUSP

ENSI

ON

IG

NIT

ION

IN

TERL

OC

K

STA

TUS

N

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

YUBA

JU

V Y

UBA

1S

T D

UI

2 50

.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

cont

.

TOTA

L 2

50.0

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

M

ARY

SVIL

LE

1ST

DU

I 22

5 99

.1

67.1

92

.4

0.0

0.0

0.4

7.1

0.0

2ND

DU

I 93

98

.9

98.9

4.

3 53

.8

0.0

26.9

55

.9

10.8

3R

D D

UI

42

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

4.8

85.7

2.

4

4T

H+

DU

I 4

100.

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

100.

0 0.

0

BE

ALE

AFB

1S

T D

UI

7 85

.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

TOTA

L 7

85.7

0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0 0.

0

Page 143: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

131

TABL

E B5

: D

EMO

GRA

PHIC

2-Y

EAR

PRIO

R D

RIV

ER R

ECO

RD V

ARI

ABL

ES

BY

YEA

R A

ND

SA

NC

TIO

N G

ROU

P FO

R FI

RST

DU

I OFF

END

ERS

YE

AR

SA

MPL

E PE

RCEN

T M

EAN

PE

RC

ENT

2-YE

AR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S Z

IP C

OD

E A

CC

IDEN

T A

ND

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

IND

ICES

**

GRO

UP

SI

ZE

FE

MA

LE

A

GE

CO

MM

ERC

IAL

DRI

VER

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

A

LCO

HO

L A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

MIN

OR

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

IN

JURY

A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

VIO

LATI

ON

S M

OV

ING

V

IOLA

TIO

NS

1989

Susp

ensi

on

5,63

8 12

.3

25.9

1.

4 3.

74

1.90

.3

4 16

.07

2.86

.8

7 .2

2 6.

64

Jail

7,19

9 13

.6

31.9

3.

4 3.

19

1.60

.2

1 11

.29

2.95

.9

5 .2

4 6.

79

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

43,6

26

14.9

32

.7

3.6

2.88

1.

45

.15

10.7

5 2.

84

.86

.22

6.68

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

41,2

23

15.5

32

.8

2.9

3.06

1.

48

.12

9.31

3.

11

.91

.21

6.47

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

4,42

2 14

.0

33.7

3.

6 3.

27

1.79

.3

2 8.

98

3.01

.9

5 .2

5 6.

25

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

54.2

* F

= 57

1.2*

X

2 =

94.

1*

F =

34.4

* F

= 26

.2*

F =

52.0

* F

= 27

7.1*

F

= 80

2.2*

F

= 45

1.3*

F

= 21

7.3*

F

= 20

0.3*

1992

Susp

ensi

on

8,26

5 11

.6

28.2

1.

8 2.

35

1.54

.6

7 7.

46

1.54

.4

6 .1

0 3.

45

Jail

4,76

9 13

.1

32.2

3.

5 2.

23

1.41

.2

2 6.

27

1.53

.4

6 .1

0 3.

33

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

49,5

91

16.4

33

.3

3.3

2.00

1.

31

.11

4.97

1.

52

.45

.10

3.35

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

32,4

76

15.6

33

.1

2.6

2.11

1.

29

.08

4.99

1.

67

.47

.09

3.49

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

5,53

8 14

.4

33.4

3.

6 2.

00

1.30

.2

9 4.

56

1.60

.4

8 .1

0 3.

22

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

151.

4*

F =

439.

7*

X2

= 86

.9*

F =

13.4

* F

= 9.

3*

F =

385.

2*

F =

156.

7*

F =

1123

.3*

F =

254.

9*

F =

277.

3*

F =

386.

6*

1994

Susp

ensi

on

5,52

0 12

.3

28.3

1.

8 3.

45

1.76

.7

3 12

.80

1.51

.4

4 .0

9 3.

28

Jail

3,82

5 14

.6

33.3

3.

3 3.

07

1.71

.2

4 10

.74

1.50

.4

5 .0

9 3.

20

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

37,5

27

16.3

34

.4

3.4

2.73

1.

48

.13

8.61

1.

49

.44

.09

3.18

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

26,9

45

15.3

34

.0

2.7

3.04

1.

71

.10

8.41

1.

63

.46

.09

3.35

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

3,70

9 13

.1

34.5

3.

8 2.

87

1.58

.3

5 8.

40

1.56

.4

7 .0

9 3.

11

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

82.9

* F

= 37

5.2*

X

2 =

67.3

* F

= 29

.1*

F =

2.8*

F

= 27

4.2*

F

= 26

7.6*

F

= 92

9.3*

F

= 21

3.9*

F

= 22

1.5*

F

= 35

2.1*

*St

atis

tical

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

4 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

the

1989

and

199

2 dr

iver

s ar

e ba

sed

on 5

yea

rs o

f dat

a.

Page 144: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

132

TABL

E B6

: D

EMO

GRA

PHIC

2-Y

EAR

PRIO

R D

RIV

ER R

ECO

RD V

ARI

ABL

ES

BY

YEA

R A

ND

SA

NC

TIO

N G

ROU

P FO

R SE

CO

ND

DU

I OFF

END

ERS

YE

AR

SA

MPL

E PE

RCEN

T M

EAN

PE

RC

ENT

2-YE

AR

PRIO

R IN

CID

ENTS

PER

100

DRI

VER

S ZI

P C

OD

E A

CC

IDEN

T A

ND

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

IND

ICES

**

GR

OU

P

SIZE

FEM

ALE

AG

E C

OM

MER

CIA

L D

RIV

ERS

TOTA

L A

CC

IDEN

TS

ALC

OH

OL

AC

CID

ENTS

M

AJO

R C

ON

VIC

TIO

NS

MIN

OR

CO

NV

ICTI

ON

S TO

TAL

AC

CID

ENTS

IN

JURY

A

CC

IDEN

TS

MA

JOR

VIO

LATI

ON

S M

OV

ING

V

IOLA

TIO

NS

1989

Susp

ensi

on

9,48

2 8.

9 32

.0

2.4

3.81

2.

35

5.04

13

.75

2.86

.8

9 .2

3 6.

57

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

23,9

27

10.4

34

.7

3.7

3.37

1.

89

3.37

10

.21

2.97

.8

9 .2

2 6.

63

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

17.8

* F

= 46

2.2*

X

2 =

36.7

* F

= 37

.1*

F =

73.1

* F

= 75

3.7*

F

= 36

3.8*

F

= 15

7.9*

F

= 1.

7 F

= 34

.7*

F =

8.8*

1992

Susp

ensi

on

9,23

0 9.

0 33

.2

2.5

2.06

1.

49

2.77

5.

87

1.50

.4

6 .1

0 3.

40

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

15,9

71

10.3

34

.5

3.1

2.01

1.

38

1.50

4.

75

1.58

.4

6 .1

1 3.

40

Oth

er

10,1

70

9.5

34.3

3.

4 2.

16

1.49

2.

31

5.16

1.

55

.46

.10

3.36

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

12.6

* F

= 51

.7*

X2

= 14

.6*

F =

3.6*

F

= 3.

8*

F =

295.

0*

F =

45.8

* F

= 21

6.3*

F

= 15

.2*

F =

166.

5*

F =

11.8

*

1994

Susp

ensi

on

5,46

1 9.

1 34

.1

2.3

3.0

1.85

4.

02

10.1

1.

46

.44

.10

3.27

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

8,59

5 11

.2

35.4

2.

6 3.

0 1.

90

2.97

8.

1 1.

55

.45

.09

3.24

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

Inte

rloc

k 4,

340

8.7

35.7

2.

6 3.

4 2.

12

2.97

8.

6 1.

56

.45

.09

3.32

Oth

er

7,27

3 9.

4 35

.2

2.7

3.1

1.88

3.

57

9.16

1.

52

.44

.09

3.25

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

X

2 =

27.6

* F

= 39

.3*

X2

= 2.

7 F

= 7.

67*

F =

5.54

* F

= 88

.1*

F =

40.4

* F

= 18

2.1*

F

= 39

.6*

F =

191.

9*

F =

22.6

*

*

Stat

istic

ally

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

4 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

the

1989

and

199

2 dr

iver

s ar

e ba

sed

on 5

yea

rs o

f dat

a.

Page 145: *Section 1 - PourSafe · 2015. 2. 16. · Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

1997 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

133

TABL

E B7

: ZI

P C

OD

E C

ENSU

S V

ARI

ABL

ES (C

OV

ARI

ATE

S) B

Y YE

AR

AN

D S

AN

CTI

ON

GRO

UP

FOR

FIRS

T A

ND

SEC

ON

D D

UI O

FFEN

DER

S

YEA

R FI

RST

OFF

END

ERS

Jail

3,82

5 20

.6

NA

N

A

27.6

13

.3

4.8

42.8

26

.6

Oth

er

10,1

70

44.0

N

A

34,4

68

88.6

14

.5

NA

N

A

NA

Susp

ensi

on

5,52

0 20

.4

NA

N

A

29.0

14

.9

4.9

44.5

26

.3

Susp

ensi

on

9,23

0 44

.0

NA

32

,540

28

.8

16.0

N

A

NA

N

A

GR

OU

P

SAM

PLE

SI

ZE

MO

NTH

S IN

ST

UD

Y

PER

CEN

T O

THER

TR

AN

SPO

RTA

TIO

N

MED

IAN

INC

OM

E PE

RCEN

T SI

NG

LE

PER

CEN

T EL

EM.

EDU

CA

TIO

N

PER

CEN

T U

NEM

PLO

YED

PE

RC

ENT

REN

TIN

G

TRA

VEL

TIM

E TO

W

ORK

(MIN

.)

1992

Susp

ensi

on

8,26

5 43

.9

10.6

N

A

NA

16

.1

NA

N

A

NA

Ja

il 4,

769

44.2

9.

8 N

A

NA

15

.2

NA

N

A

NA

1s

t DU

I pro

gram

& ja

il 49

,591

44

.5

10.6

N

A

NA

13

.3

NA

N

A

NA

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

32,4

76

44.3

11

.4

NA

N

A

14.8

N

A

NA

N

A

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

5,53

8 44

.1

7.7

NA

N

A

11.5

N

A

NA

N

A

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 54

.9*

F =

224.

5*

F =

207.

8*

1994

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

jail

37,5

27

20.5

N

A

NA

27

.9

13.0

4.

7 43

.3

25.8

1st D

UI p

rogr

am

&

rest

rict

ion

26,9

45

20.5

N

A

NA

31

.7

14.5

4.

6 48

.1

27.6

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

3,70

9 20

.0

NA

N

A

27.4

12

.1

4.9

41.4

28

.5

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 20

.8*

F =

1153

.3*

F =

96.1

* F

= 54

.7*

F =

419.

1*

F =

729.

8*

SEC

ON

D O

FFEN

DER

S

1992

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m

&

rest

rict

ion

15,9

71

44.1

N

A

35,4

57

29.2

13

.4

NA

N

A

NA

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 4.

6*

F

= 20

6.1*

F

= 20

.4*

F =

129.

4*

1994

Oth

er

7,27

3 20

.2

NA

N

A

NA

N

A

NA

44

.5

26.4

Susp

ensi

on

5,46

1 20

.4

NA

N

A

NA

N

A

NA

45

.2

25.5

SB

38

prog

ram

& re

stri

ctio

n 8,

595

20.0

N

A

NA

N

A

NA

N

A

44.2

26

.6

SB 3

8 pr

ogra

m/

rest

rict

ion

& in

terl

ock

4,34

0 20

.0

NA

N

A

NA

N

A

NA

46

.5

26.8

Stat

istic

al

si

gnifi

canc

e te

st

F

= 15

.4*

F

= 29

.7*

F =

115.

9*

*St

atis

tical

sig

nific

ance

at p

<.05

, (tw

o-ta

iled)

. **

The

ZIP

Cod

e in

dice

s fo

r the

199

4 ca

ses a

re b

ased

on

3.25

yea

rs o

f dri

ver r

ecor

d da

ta w

here

as th

e in

dice

s for

199

2 dr

iver

s are

bas

ed o

n 5

year

s of

dat

a. T

hese

cen

sus

vari

able

s wer

e no

t app

lied

to th

e 19

89 d

rive

rs

si

nce

thes

e va

riab

les w

ere

not a

vaila

ble

until

afte

r 199

0.