seafloor massive sulfides (sms) - pacific communitydsm.gsd.spc.int/public/files/meetings/2011_sopac...
TRANSCRIPT
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Seafloor Massive Sulfides (SMS)
Global characteristics, distribution,
and regional Pacific potential
Sven Petersen
(IFM-GEOMAR)
SPC-EU EDF
Deep Sea Minerals Workshop, Nadi, Fiji, 06.-08. June 2011
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
influx of cold seawater (recharge)
H2O = H+ + OH- Mg2+ + OH- = Mg(OH)2 precipitation excess H+
pH drop to ~ 4-5
heating of seawater to > 400°C leaching of Cu, Zn, Fe, Au, S etc. from the surrounding rock
formation of hydrothermal precipitates due to mixing of hot fluid with seawater
150°C
375°C
Reaction Zone
Gabbro
Dike Section
Extrusives
Magma
Recharge
Discharge
>30% water
<1% water
fluid is hot, buoyant, weakly acid, reduced & metal+sulfur-rich
How do they form ?
source: Comou et al., 2008
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen Hydrothermal sites in the
South Atlantic
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
distribution of seafloor hydrothermal systems in the world ocean
Where do they form ?
latest discoveries: Cayman Trough
Wallis & Futuna
Northern Matas
Piterskoe
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
distribution of seafloor hydrothermal systems in the world ocean
Russian exploration claim area
Chinese exploration claim area
Manafe & DFI
mining liscence
Nautilus
mining liscence
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• >350 known sites of hydrothermal activity
• 270 sites of polymetallic sulfide deposits
• 180 sites of high-temperature hydrothermal activity
(black smokers)
• 57% at mid-ocean ridges
(64,000 km)
• 28% in back-arc environments
15% on submarine volcanic arcs
(combined 25,000 km)
• <1% on intraplate volcanoes
Basic Facts
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Examples are known in very different tectonic settings:
• mid-ocean ridges
(superfast, fast, intermediate, slow, ultraslow spreading centers)
• off-axis volcanoes
• intracontinental rifts & rifted margins
• intraoceanic back-arc basins
• intracontinental back-arc basins
• volcanic island arcs
(Hannington et al., 2005)
Basic Facts
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
other factors: water depth, distance to land, EEZ ?
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
•how many ?
•grade ?
•tonnage?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• 1.8 x 1012 W of heat flux at young crust (Mottl, 2003)
• 10% at black smoker temperatures; the rest is diffuse
• 2 to 5 MW for a single black smoker (Converse et al, 1984)
• 50,000 to 100,000 black smokers (at least 1 every km of ridge axis)
• 200 to 500 MW for a large field (500 to 1,000 fields)
• ~ 15% of the hydrothermal fields are currently known
How many black smokers are there?
Sou
rce: S
OE
ST
(Haw
aii)
>80 % look like this !
© NOAA
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
at fast-spreading ridges
• short lived hydrothermal activity
• cyclic volcanic and hydrothermal activity
• quick burial by extrusives
• 90% of the metals lost to the plume
massive sulfides at
mid-ocean ridges
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
1 cm
pyrite - chalcopyrite - sphalerite
1 cm isocubanite -
pyrrhotite - wurtzite
average geochemistry of MORB-
hosted massive sulfides
mainly pyrite with
5 % Cu
9 % Zn
0.3 ppm Au (strong bias due to sampling of chimneys)
massive sulfides at
mid-ocean ridges
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• systems at slow-spreading ridges tend to be larger !
•commonly located off-axis
•deep penetrating faults allow long-lasting fluid flow
• some sites associated with mantle rocks
massive sulfides at
mid-ocean ridges
N
0 5 10 km
basaltic lava floor
mantle rocks
Logatchev
Logatchev hydrothermal field 2 hydrothermally active fields
largest field 800x300 m
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Logatchev hydrothermal field
1 cm
64ROV-11D
• hosted in mantle rocks • water depth 3000m • very high Cu and Au grades !
23 % Cu 4 % Zn 11 ppm Au
Is it possible to utilize this ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Cu-rich chimney
waste
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen massive sulfides in
back arc basins
Hydrothermal sites in
Papua New Guinea
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
PacManus samples
10.3 % Cu
22.6 % Zn
0.5 % Pb
205 ppm Ag
14 ppm Au
PACMANUS hydrothermal field host rocks: volcanic suite from basalt to rhyolithe
water depth: 1650m
Yeats (CSIRO)
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
58-GTVA
altered dacite
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
exploring companies: exploring countries:
• Nautilus South Korea
• Bluewater, and others Russia
• China
(France/Germany)
PacManus
2010
Susu Knolls
=
1. mine site ?
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
© NOAA
massive sulfides at
island arc volcanoes
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
mid-ocean ridges island/back arcs basalt exposed mantle interm. - felsic
Fe, Cu, Zn Cu, Fe Cu, Zn, Pb, Ba
Co Au, Co, Ni, Sn As, Hg, Sb, Au, Ag
~1 ppm Au 3-10 ppm Au 5–30 ppm Au!
deep water deep water shallow water
source: geochemical differences in the rocks themselves
+ additional factors (magmatic input, biology, zone refining, ... )
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
high grade (Cu±Au±Zn) or large deposits
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
TAG
Middle Valley
Manus
Suiyo
Krasnov Semyenov
Kairei
13°N, EPR
Atlantis II
Logatchev
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Will these deposits by of commercial interest ?
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Uchaly + Novo Uchaly (>220 Mio t)
… compared to those on land ?
Gay (>380 Mio t)
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
© NOAA
Kelley et al., 2001
(C)
Nation
al
Geogra
phic
1992
© MARUM
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• typical EPR chimneys 0.x Mio t
• Atlantis II Deep (Red Sea) 94 Mio t drilled ore mud from brine pool
• Middle Valley (JFR) 8-10 Mio t drilled
large sulfide lenses in sediments (Fe dominated)
• 13°N Seamount (EPR) 5-10 Mio t ?
• Krasnov, Semyenov ~ 15 Mio t ? large pyrite mounds (Fe dominated)
• TAG (MAR) 4 Mio t drilled (low grade in interior)
• Suzu Knolls; Manus Basin >2 Mio t drilled (indicated + inferred)
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
high grade or large deposits
X X
X Fe-only
X too small
X too deep ?
size ?
X
too deep ?
low grade ?
X
too small
size ?
TAG
Middle Valley
Manus
Suiyo
Krasnov Semyenov
Kairei
13°N, EPR
Atlantis II
Logatchev
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Mining seafloor massive
sulfides needs:
•2 mio tonnes of ore /year
(~ 200x200x20m)
• life-time of 10 years
(= 20 mio t of ore !) (may be contained in several orebodies !)
Currently not known !
Will mining of seafloor massive sulfides replace land mining?
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
worldwide VMS Districts (>> 6 billion tonnes)
GSC
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
21. Avoca 37 Mt
20. Iberian Pyrite Belt 1000 Mt
19. Central Nfld. 75 Mt18. Bathurst 250 Mt
16. Abitibi 600 Mt
15. Ladysmith -Rhineland 80 Mt
14. Sturgeon Lake 35 Mt13. Geco-Manitouwadge 60 Mt
12. Flin Flon -Snow Lk 150 Mt
11. Ruttan , Manitoba 70 Mt
45. Mt. Read Tasmania 150 Mt32. Central Urals >100 Mt10. Slave 20 -30 Mt
44. Lachlan Fold Belt31. Southern Urals >400 Mt9. Tambo Grande 200 Mt
43. Central Queensland30. Semail Oman 30 Mt8. Central Mexico 120 Mt 41-42. WA >75 Mt29. Saudi Arabia 70 Mt7. Jerome, Arizona 40 Mt
40. Philippines 65 Mt28. Turkey, Black Sea 200 Mt6. Shasta, Klammath 35 Mt
39. Besshi Japan 230 Mt27. Troodos Cyprus 35 Mt5. Myra Falls 30 Mt
38. Hokuroku Japan 80 Mt25. Bergslagen -Orijarvi 110 Mt4. Northern Cordillera 100 Mt35. Bawdwin -Laochang >40 Mt24. Outokumpu -Pyhslm 90 Mt3. Windy Craggy 300 Mt
34-36. China >500 Mt23. Skellefte Sweden 70 Mt2. Finlayson, Yukon 20 Mt
33. Rudny Altai >100 Mt22. Tondheim Norway >100 Mt1. Alaska, Brooks Range 33 Mt
21. Avoca 37 Mt
20. Iberian Pyrite Belt 1000 Mt
19. Central Nfld. 75 Mt18. Bathurst 250 Mt
16. Abitibi 600 Mt
15. Ladysmith -Rhineland 80 Mt
14. Sturgeon Lake 35 Mt13. Geco-Manitouwadge 60 Mt
12. Flin Flon -Snow Lk 150 Mt
11. Ruttan , Manitoba 70 Mt
45. Mt. Read Tasmania 150 Mt32. Central Urals >100 Mt10. Slave 20 -30 Mt
44. Lachlan Fold Belt31. Southern Urals >400 Mt9. Tambo Grande 200 Mt
43. Central Queensland30. Semail Oman 30 Mt8. Central Mexico 120 Mt 41-42. WA >75 Mt29. Saudi Arabia 70 Mt7. Jerome, Arizona 40 Mt
40. Philippines 65 Mt28. Turkey, Black Sea 200 Mt6. Shasta, Klammath 35 Mt
39. Besshi Japan 230 Mt27. Troodos Cyprus 35 Mt5. Myra Falls 30 Mt
38. Hokuroku Japan 80 Mt25. Bergslagen -Orijarvi 110 Mt4. Northern Cordillera 100 Mt35. Bawdwin -Laochang >40 Mt24. Outokumpu -Pyhslm 90 Mt3. Windy Craggy 300 Mt
34-36. China >500 Mt23. Skellefte Sweden 70 Mt2. Finlayson, Yukon 20 Mt
33. Rudny Altai >100 Mt22. Tondheim Norway >100 Mt1. Alaska, Brooks Range 33 Mt
12
34
10
5
6
7
8
1112
14
15
13 16
17
18 19
9
26
20
21
22
25
23
24
28
27
29 30
32
31
3334
35
46
39
3836
37
40
43
44
45
41
42
50 % in only 50 deposits of >50 mio t
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
a snapshot
in time
At most the modern oceans contain only 175 million years worth of metal !
Current exploration is considering only young crust !
One giant deposit every 200 mio years !
Why is the geologic record so well endowed?
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Most seafloor sites:
• are too small
• are of low grade
• occur too deep
• are too far from land
• occur in the „Area“ (politics)
• or are active and „too hot“
but: mining of few sites might be
economically feasible
massive sulfides as a
resource ?
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen regional Pacific potential
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen regional Pacific potential
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
Opportunities:
There is still a large potential for new
discoveries using regional surveys!
regional Pacific potential
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• Back-arc spreading centers still have large potential to
discover new sites ! By far most of those will be small.
• Intra-plate volcanoes are underexplored but have limited
potential for sulfide deposits.
• Island-arc volcanoes have large potential, but frequent
eruptions and shallow water depth may limit sulfide
potential near the seafloor.
• Where are the large deposits
in the Pacific region ?
regional Pacific potential
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• Current research and exploration is
mainly related to active deposits at or
near spreading axis.
• many deposits are buried underneath
sediments or lava.
• Systematic surveys for hidden deposits
are lacking.
• Regional geological and geophysical
exploration using towed systems or
AUV’s is necessary to define resource
potential.
seafloor hydrothermal systems
Challenges
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
• 6000m depth rating, 4Kn max. speed
• 24 h station time
• turbidity sensor (ECO), Eh-sensor (NIST
Japan), CTD, 120/410 kHz side-scan
sonar (Edgetech), ADCP
3 konfigurations
• 200/400 kHz multibeam (RESON 7125D)
• or sub-bottom profiler
• or b/w digital camera + flash
underwater navigation: • transponder (LBL, USBL)
• inertial navigation (Kearfott)
IFM-GEOMAR’s
AUV ABYSS
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen
central part
= 65 km² !
Reson Seabat 7125
400 kHz
AUV-based
bathymetry
Modern Seafloor
Massive Sulfide
Deposits
S. Petersen AUV-based
bathymetry
Thank You !