scilab-tech- 26-june 2013-1

25
Official publisher & professional services provider of Scilab, Open Source So+ware for Numerical Computa5on & Simula5on

Upload: doananh

Post on 10-Feb-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Official  publisher  &  professional  services  provider  of  Scilab,  Open  Source  So+ware  for  Numerical  Computa5on  &  Simula5on  

 

Page 2: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Jean-Pierre Bovée ScilabTec 26/6/[email protected]

Our way to energy savings

How does Scilab contribute to this goal?

Page 3: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Agenda

• Understanding Energy Savings opportunities

• Focusing on Heating, Ventilation and Air-

Conditioning (HVAC):

– what it should cost (OPTICLIM: a simulation tool)

– What it actually costs

– How to cut related energy bill

• Next steps

• Conclusion

Page 4: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Understanding opportunities

Page 5: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

A typical Air Handling Unit (AHU)

Page 6: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

HVAC bill cutting schedule

Select an « easy » AHU

Site HVAC mapping

HVAC data collection

Easy: clear zone sharing with other AHUs, easy way to collect

real time data and further to change setpoints and working

schedule

Specifications of:• Room(s) • AHU Chillers and boilers � To populates simulation tool (OPTICLIM)

Populate OPTICLIM wih AHU collected data � get estimated

current energy consumption

Collect AHU real time data� Estimate energy

consumption

Based on this + site HVAC mapping, Identify energy � opportunities, using OPTICLIM

Matching± 20%

Question real data and actual AHU tuningNO

Validate with QA, HSE and Production

Implement and check actual energy bill reduction

A bad matching can originate from stuck valve, cabling error, poor control implementation, …

Monitor T°, RH, air flows and valves positions for heating and cooling valves

Page 7: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

How Scilab contributes to energy savings

Estimate, Simulate, pre-select Savings opportunities

Check against current Data collected from the process

Confirm savings opportunities

Finalize , then run action plan

Check against current Data collected from the process

Scilab: Energy simulation (OPTICLIM)

Scilab: Energy monitoring

Scilab: Energy monitoring

Scilab: Energy simulation (OPTICLIM)

OBJECTIVES TOOLS

Page 8: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Air Handling Units

Real time Monitoring

o Atom module (Modbus over TCP/IP)

o We need to have a robust application: working with

Modbus over TCP/IP is a must.

o Modbus is the most common communication mode in

the industrial world

o Real time data collection: Scilab Team developped an

Page 9: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

HVAC

what it should cost (OPTICLIM)

Objective

• Knowing this initial scenario

– AHU, boilers and chillers specifics

– Weather conditions

– Rooms specifics

– Working schedule

• Calculate expected consumption as for:

– Ventilation and auxiliaries

– Heating and cooling energy

• Simulate other scenario to reduce energy bill

• Select modifications versus payback

Page 10: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Some limits of the « Excel ware »

• Initially, OPTICLIM has been drafted using Excel.

• Lack of development good practicies from developpers

• With no seggregation between data and calculation, the application size

amounts to over 200 Mo (as of today)

• It could even increase with more to come weather data (10 years of data,

hour per hour)

• Maintenance might become a nightmare.

• Deployment across our organisation would no longer be sensible.

� Decision to migrate OPTICLIM as a Scilab application.

� « Exel ware », as an uncontrolled development, may turn a night mare …

Page 11: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 10

Site HVAC initial Temperature mapping

20,5°C + 0,1°C

20°C + 0,1°C

21,7°C + 0,5°C19

,6°C

+ 0

,5°C

20,5

°C +

2°C

19,6°C + 0,1°C

19°C + 2°C

21°C + 0,1°C

19°C + 1°C

18°C + 2°C

20°C + 0,1°C

We notice:

• some quite unrealistic

setpoint tolerances

(0.1°C)

• setpoint discrepancies

that cannot be

explained by any

rationale related to

product considerations

Page 12: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

HVAC

While checking OPTICLIM

Challenging rooms set points (T°, RH)

• First step: setpoints mapping

– Rooms

• T° and RH (if relevant) set points + control tolerance (paramount)

• Products manufactured in the room

– Question differences: why should identical product are manufactured

with different T° or RH setpoints

– Question Tolerances: ex � a tolerance of 0.1 °C is exactly

counterproductive

• Discuss with QA and Production

– Streamline the initial mapping (but do not change anything on the

AHU at this time)

Page 13: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 12

HVAC site mapping: changing Temperature

setpoints at the weekend

19°C + 2°C

17°C + 6°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C

+ 2

°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C

+ 3

°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C

Page 14: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

HVAC

speak with data

Make actual measurements on AHU(s)

• record these values over at least 3 days

• T°, HR, air flowrate(s) (current values and setpoints)

• setpoints applied to control valves (a source of big surprises…)

• understand ∆ between measured values and estimated values by OPTICLIM

• A control valve sometimes remain stuck

• Control systems can perform very poorly for various reasons

• tolerance is too small

• cabling errors on sensors or actuators

Page 15: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

HVAC

speak with data

Start changing working conditions (AHU setpoints, reduced

mode, etc…)

• Estimate savings using OPTICLIM

• Apply the ones selected

• Measure actual savings

Page 16: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 15

Identify energy � opportunities, using OPTICLIM

Step 1: changing Temperature setpoints at working hours

AHUInitial

T+∆t

New

T+∆t

Saving on

Air-heating

Saving on

Air-cooling

Total

savings (%)

total

savings(€)

501 20+0,1 20+2 -5,2% -62,1% -7,4% -953 €

505 20+0,1 20+2 -8,9% -53,0% -7,4% -3 378 €

506 20,5+2 20+2 -0,4% 18,1% 0,3% -459 €

508 20,5+0,1 20+2 -2,3% -54,2% -2,9% -563 €

509 21+0,1 20+2 -1,9% -37,4% -2,0% -1 338 €

510 21,7+0,5 20+2 -1,5% -23,5% -1,4% -1 033 €

511 19+2 20+2 -2,7% -33,5% -3,1% 213 €

517 19,6+0,5 20+2 -4,8% -57,4% -7,1% -1 073 €

518 19,6+0,1 20+2 -6,0% -68,8% -7,3% -868 €

519 21+0,1 20+2 -1,1% -35,7% -2,3% -445 €

525 19+1 20+2 -9,5% -32,2% -4,0% -2 161 €

526 19+2 20+2 -7,2% -60,8% -6,8% 256 €

527 20+2 20+2 0,0% 0,0% 0,0% 0 €

Σ of Expected annual savings from Temperature setpoint changes: - 11 802 €

Microsoft Excel Worksheet

Page 17: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 16

Identify energy � opportunities, using OPTICLIM

Step 2: changing Temperature setpoints out of working hours

AHU

Over the

week

T+∆t

Weekend

T+∆t

Saving on

Air-heating

Saving on

Air-cooling

Total

savings (%)

total

savings(€)

501 20+2 17+6 -39,8% 10,7% -26,0% -2 472 €

505 20+2 17+6 -45,9% 9,6% -20,3% -5 671 €

506 20+2 17+6 -45,5% 10,6% -23,6% -4 891 €

508 20+2 17+6 -18,8% 7,5% -11,0% -1 336 €

509 20+2 17+6 -34,2% 8,7% -18,2% -3 655 €

510 20+2 17+6 -43,9% 9,9% -20,8% -2 166 €

511 20+2 17+6 -41,2% 8,5% -25,2% -3 396 €

517 20+2 17+6 -36,5% 12,5% -23,0% -4 540 €

518 20+2 17+6 -35,2% 10,2% -20,2% -2 336 €

519 20+2 17+6 -22,6% 17,1% -15,0% -812 €

525 20+2 17+6 -28,8% 9,3% -6,8% -1 153 €

526 20+2 17+6 -43,9% 10,5% -19,8% -2 901 €

527 20+2 17+6 -38,6% 11,2% -22,2% -3 328 €

Σ of Expected annual savings from Temperature changes out of working hours

-36,4% 10,4% -19,2% -38 657 €

Page 18: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 17

Identify energy � opportunities, using OPTICLIM

Step 3: changing ventilation setpoints out of working hours

AHU over the

week Flow

rate

Weekend

Flow rate

Saving on

Air-

heating

Saving on

Air-cooling

Savings on

ventilation

Total

savings (%)

total

savings(€)

501 7255 5000 -19,3% -21,8% -24,9% -21,9% -1 467 €

505 23000 15000 -22,5% -5,8% -26,9% -24,3% -4 494 €

506 9370 5000 -37,7% -30,9% -37,6% -37,3% -5 275 €

508 6600 6600

509 11760 11760

510 8660 8660

511 10750 9500 -7,1% -5,0% -9,0% -7,9% -766 €

517 9900 7000 -22,6% -20,6% -23,5% -22,8% -3 380 €

518 6350 6350

519 1500 1500

525 16500 10000 -26,1% -6,7% -30,8% -28,3% -4 299 €

526 10500 7000 -24,1% -21,1% -26,5% -25,5% -2 843 €

527 9500 7000 -17,7% -18,7% -20,9% -19,5% -2 288 €

Σ of Expected annual savings from ventilation change: -24 812 €

• Temperature : 17°C.

• Tolerance : +6°CLe fichier excel

Σ of potentia

l savings: 70 k€ / year

So about 15% savings

Page 19: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 18

Initial temperature setpoints at the week-end

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C 19°C + 3°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C

+ 2

°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C

+ 3

°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 2°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C

19°C + 3°C

Page 20: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 19

Speaking with data: Changing temperature

setpoints at the week-end � initial situation

Supplied air

extracted air

Cooling valve

Page 21: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

| 20

Speaking with data: Changing temperature

setpoints at the week-end (17°C + 6°C)

Supplied air

extracted air

Cooling valve !

Beginning of the weekend

End of the weekend

Page 22: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Reason why it is so important to monitor control valves (heating and cooling)

What an unrealistic temperature tolerance (0.1 °C) can result in

Supplied air

extracted air

Cooling valve

heating valve

This situation is just TERRIBLE ���� heating and cooling valves oscillations result in an enormous energy wa ste

Page 23: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Reason why it is so important to monitor control valves (heating and cooling).Just enlarging

Supplied air

extracted air

Cooling valve heating

valve

Page 24: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

Cutting Energy bill / Next steps

o At Sanofi global level

o Achieve migration of the simulation tool from Excel � Scilab

o Otherwise no effective deployment across our sites will ever happen

o Train all sites (> 100)

o At our site level (Lisieux)

o Check Excel migration with Scilab Team

o Deploy AHU monitoring

o Enhance AHU control using model based control (i.e. predictive control) � still 8 to 10% of potential savings

o Package this approach (simulation, monitoring, enhanced control) to pass it on to other sites

Page 25: Scilab-Tech- 26-June 2013-1

ConclusionHVAC: to conduct a wise energy bill reduction

o The right sequence appears as:

o Question HVAC in terms of

o Environment setpoints versus manufactured products requirements and

working schedule

o Actual control tuning (monitor setpoints AND actuators)

o Simulate changes (OPTICLIM)

o Speak with other business function: QA, Production, Energy management, …

o Implement changes having an acceptable payback, considering future energy

cost increase

o Do not stay dependant on equipment or services performing poorly

o Then and only then, think about changing boilers, chillers or energy production

equipment

And remember!

Scilab definitiv

ely helps achieve all of th

ese goals