scientists call for global totalitarian government

7/29/2019 Scientists Call For Global Totalitarian Government

1/11

Prominent American Scientists Call For Global Dictatorship Under UN

Rule "To Save The Planet"

Kudos to World Mathaba for pointing me towards this:

The Scientific Dictatorship:

In an article to be published by the American Institute of Biological Sciences in the

march 2013 edition of the Institutes yearly journal BioScience under the title Social

!orms and "lobal #n$ironmental %hallenges& 'of (hich I ha$e obtained a copy

ahead of print ) read here*+ a group of prominent scientists call on go$ernment and

their academic ad$isers to begin implementing a program of planned social

engineering of norms& and $alues& in regards to en$ironmental policies,

In addition to this+ they propose putting in place all sorts of en$ironmental rules and
http://worldmathaba.net/http://www.aibs.org/bioscience-press-releases/resources/Kinzig%20et%20al.pdfhttp://www.aibs.org/bioscience-press-releases/resources/Kinzig%20et%20al.pdfhttp://www.aibs.org/bioscience-press-releases/resources/Kinzig%20et%20al.pdfhttp://www.aibs.org/bioscience-press-releases/resources/Kinzig%20et%20al.pdfhttp://worldmathaba.net/


2/11

regulations bac-ed up by fines and penatlies as described in the Agenda 21 document,

.he goal is to hasten the social acceptance of increased go$ernmental control, Also+

the authors propose that the scientific community as a (hole should align itself (ith

go$ernment through a concerted effort to change personal and social norms&,

Science (as e$er fascisms (hore of course so to understand (hat is really going on

(e simply ha$e to follo( the money until the trail re$eals (ho is paying these

propagandists,

.he people in$ol$ed in the upcoming publication include t(o !obel /rie (inners+

economist enneth Arro( and political scientist #linor strom+ as (ell as

beha$ioural scientists+ mathematicians+ biologists and population scientists+ the most

(ell)-no(n of (hom are /aul #hrlich and "retchen %, aily) (hose professional

relationship dates bac- to the #coscience days, .he authors start out by stating:

Some ha$e argued that progress on these 'global

en$ironmental* problems can be made only

through a concerted effort to change personal and

social norms, .hey contend that (e must+ through

education and persuasion+ ensure that certain

beha$iours '4* become ingrained as a matter of

personal ethics,&

Stating that education and persuasion are insufficient to

accomplish beha$ioural changes+ the document states:

Substantial numbers of people (ill ha$e to alter their e5isting beha$iors to

address this ne( class of global en$ironmental problems, Alternati$e

approaches are needed (hen education and persuasion alone are insufficient,

/olicy instruments such as penalties+ regulations+ and incenti$es may therefore

Compliant youth


3/11

be re6uired to achie$e significant beha$iour modification,&

/roposing that effecti$e policies '4*

are ones that induce both short)term

changes in beha$iour and longer)term

changes in social norms&+ the collection

of crystal ball gaers+ casters of runes+

mathematical modelling e5perts+

psychologists and %A"7A8.s9 assert

that go$ernment is uni6uely obligated

to locate the common good and formulate its policies accordingly,&

.he upcoming report ho(e$er stresses that unelected troughers suc-ing up the s(ill

of ta5 re$enues scientists are gi$en a role in formulating go$ernment policies

intended to alter choices and beha$iours& such as acti$e norm management+

changing the conditions influencing beha$iours+ financial inter$entions+ and

regulatory measures,&

r to put it in plain #nglish+ !ai style propaganda and So$iet style brain(ashing,

#ach of these policy should be designed to influence personal and social norms in

different (ays and through different mechanisms the document states, #ach also

carries the danger of bac-firing+ (hich is often called a boomerang effect in the

literature+ eroding compliance and reducing the pre$alence of the desired beha$iours


4/11

and the social norms that support those beha$iours& the document (arns,

Ah+ this is (here the penalties come in,

#roding compliance, 7hat a anodyne term for people recogniing (hat is happening

and fighting for their indi$iduality and independence+ but typical of the sterile

language ur !e( ;nhappy


5/11

e5istent le$els of public permission in order to shift norms+ allo(ing public

sentiment to later catch up (ith the regulation&,

By admitting they are (illing to mo$e beyond

e5istent le$els of public permission& to push

ahead (ith draconian en$ironmental policies+

these prominent scientists 'among (hom+

remember+ are t(o !obel laureates and and

numerous go$ernment and ;nited !ations

ad$isers* ha$e pro$en their readiness to

decei$e and mislead the American population

in order to impose their en$ironmental control

model, Is this perhaps the result of a fit of petulance and $indicti$eness because their

(hole Anthopogenic "lobal 7arming scare has been e5posed as a fraud and a

fabrication, ?ard e$idence (as replaced by projections from mathematical models

and (hen the ans(ers gi$en by those models did not ser$e the purpose of ad$ancing

the global dictatorship agenda+ data (as blatantly falsified,

As Aaron y-es put it (hile inter$ie(ing global (arming sceptic


6/11

8ead on through the document and (e disco$er ho( go$ernment and their scientific

side-ic-s plan to set about shifting norms, .he scientists propose managing

norms& through such things as ad$ertising campaigns+ information blites+ or

appeals from respected figures&, .he other aspect they fa$our is the use of financial

incenti$es and disincenti$es (ith the aim of conditioning the public to accept an

increasing go$ernmental control o$er personal beha$iour, .he paper continues by

saying that the best (ay to o$ercome resistance to changing e5isting beha$iours is

through persuasi$e go$ernment regulations such as penalties+ regulations+ and

incenti$es& in order to achie$e significant beha$iour modification,&

ines can '4* be an effecti$e (ay to alter beha$iour+ in part because they 'li-e

social norm management* signal the seriousness (ith (hich society treats the issue,&

In other (ords+ Cou must ne$er 6uestion authority but again dont you lo$e the

language= .he (ords seem to spring off the page or screen to resonate in the mind

(ith the hea$y "erman accent of a !ai "auleiter in a 1DE0s (ar mo$ie, By

e5tension+ the authors of the proposal e5press hope that beha$iours and $alues (ill

coe$ol$e& alongside increased go$ernment control in the form of state regulations

and fines&:

A carbon ta5 might '4* pro$e effecti$e e$en in the face of near)term

opposition, 7hat needs to be assessed is the possibility that beha$iours and

$alues (ould coe$ol$e in such a (ay that a carbon ta5For other policy

instrument that raises prices+ such as a cap)and)trade systemFultimately

comes to be seen as (orthy+ (hich (ould therefore allo( for its long)term

effecti$eness&

8eferring to the idea that shifting norms (ill coe$ol$e& alongside increased

go$ernment regulations+ the authors state:


7/11

#ach of the go$ernment inter$entions can influence both personal and social

norms+ although they do so through different mechanisms, nly social norm

management directly targets norms, %hoice architecture+ financial instruments+

and regulations can all alter social norms by causing people to first change

their beha$iors and then shift their beliefs to conform to those beha$iors,&

In other (ords: the science !ais propose arousing the concept of cogniti$e

dissonance in the minds of people in order to guide the herd to(ards

proen$ironmental& citienship,

7hen it comes to en$ironmental issues&+ the scientists (rite+ t(o different

types of social norms are at play in these dynamics: social norms of conformity

or cooperation and proen$ironment social norms, nly the first type need be

present to induce proen$ironment beha$iors 'although proen$ironment

personal norms may emerge from this through+ e,g,+ cogniti$e dissonance+

e5perience+ or associating the positi$e feeling from social appro$al for an act

(ith the act itself*,&

In the upcoming publication the concepts of peer)pressure and cogniti$e dissonance

are being brought into the e6uation as effecti$e tool for creating fear and insecurity

and thus increasing dependency and e5tending control:

'4* norms of conformity and cooperation

are far more uni$ersal than are

proen$ironment norms and are therefore

far more po(erful in inducing

proen$ironment beha$iors that do not

conflict (ith pree5isting $alues or

preferences, In other (ords+

proen$ironment $alues are not a necessary

Big Brother is watching.


8/11

prere6uisite to proen$ironment beha$iors,&

7hile the authors do not try to conceal their ambition that go$ernment e5pands

control through all -inds of en$ironmental regulations+ they argue that scientists

'especially life scientists ) careful here+ these people are not tal-ing about life

sciences li-e biology+ medicine+ botany+ oology and such but psychologists+

sociologists+ cogniti$e and beha$ioural sciences and other bullshit sciences* should

align (ith big go$ernment+ join forces in an unrelenting campaign to gradually create

changes in beha$iour so en$ironmental policies (ill be more easily accepted o$er the

course of some time, In other (ords they are mo$ing to(ards creating the scientific

dictatorship first mooted by socialist (riters and philosphers o$er a hundred years

ago as a utopian ideal and later prophesied by (riters li-e r(ell+ ?u5ley+ /hillip

ic-+ @argaret Att(ood+ Gohn 7yndham and 8ay Bradbury to name only a fe(,


9/11

.he scientists (ould+ in such an en$ironmental dictatorship+ be responsible for

ensuring reality complied (ith theory dreamed up in the alternati$e realities of

uni$ersity faculties+ they appear to be saying:

Scientists could '4* effecti$ely e5amine ho( combinations of different

policy inter$entions and of the relati$e timing of deployment play out,&

.he paper is concluded (ith three distinct recommendations to both scientists and

go$ernmental agencies:

'1* the greater inclusion of social and beha$ioral scientists in periodic

en$ironmental policy assessments>

'2* the establishment of teams of scholars and policyma-ers that can assess+ on

policy)rele$ant timescales+ the short) and long)term efficiency of policy

inter$entions> and

'3* the alteration of academic norms to allo( more progress on these issues,&

.his entire publication is a clear and unmista-able admission that a fascist scientific

dictatorship is emerging under the prete5t of en$ironmentalism and that such a

dictatorship has been the long term goal of the academic community, 7hat this

means @ore go$ernment control through regulations and fines 'and e$entually prison

sentences and firing s6uads=* combined (ith a proacti$e+ go$ernment managed

policy of brain(ashing people into accepting this increasing go$ernmental control

(here they (ould other(ise reject official inter$ention, And guess (ho should be the

coordinating body of this scientific dictatorship+ according to the report:

.eams might be supported by permanent entities that maintain communication

(ith policyma-ers> these (ill differ among nations but could be attached to the

;nited !ations and its subsidiary bodies in the international conte5t, ne


10/11

potential model is a national commitment of scientific talent in the ser$ice of

;nited !ations agencies,&

.he ;nited !ations, .hat cesspit of incompetence+ self interest+ third (orld style

corruption and generally a pathological hatred of (estern culture+ $alues and ethics+

that cabal of decadent bureaucrats and time ser$ers+ racists and (ar mongers, .he

;nited chuffing !ations (here a rail(ay cler- (ith po(erful patrons can be put in

charge of a department that could affect the future of millions of people+ and once in

position is allo(ed to use his influence for the benefit of his patrons to the great

detriment of ta5payers in the de$eloped nations+ the ;nited !ations that could not

organie a piss up in a bre(ery and is not fit to be in charge of a gang of shit

sho$ellers,

.hese teams could also be charged (ith anticipating crises and e$aluating

potential policy responses in ad$ance+ since detailed e$aluation in the midst of

a crisis may be problematic> such emergency preparedness (ould probably

focus on the immediate effects of policies on beha$iors rather than on changing

social norms+ because this is li-ely to be of greatest rele$ance in a crisis,&

All this tal- of putting the ;! and the global scientific community behind the

steering (heel of American and #uropean go$ernment points to the coming of age of

the dreaded scientific dictatorship+ against (hich many obser$ers ha$e (arned us,

S people+ (a-e up, ?a$e you e$er -no(n of a sane scientist=

9%A"7A8.s: %arbon anthropogenic gloobal (arming alternati$e reality trolls,

RELATED POSTS:

Our new unhappy lords

Back hat biotech
http://www.scribd.com/doc/125794705/Our-New-Unhappy-Lordshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/121003017/Black-Hat-Biotech-And-World-Dominationhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/125794705/Our-New-Unhappy-Lordshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/121003017/Black-Hat-Biotech-And-World-Domination


11/11

scientists call for global totalitarian government

Documents