science in the youtube age
DESCRIPTION
The version with most of the material that was the version I should have used live - but not the version I didTRANSCRIPT
Science in the YouTube Age:How web based tools are enabling Open
Research
Cameron NeylonSTFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon
http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon
http://tinyurl.com/5ffpth
http://twitter.com/cameronneylon
‘If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’
Isaac Newton
‘I never had an idea that couldn’t be
improved by sharing it with as many people
as possible…’Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006)http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html
Science is social
Web 2.0 is social
Science needs Web 2.0?
What amI thinking?
How do Ijustify this?
How do I do this?
What am I doing?
What doesit mean?
Here bejournals
What am I reading?
Who can help me?
Lets go out!
Best placeto go?
How do Ijustify this?
Extract cash from parents
Coordination
Take photos/video/audio
Uploading photos/video
Commentingon photos
What did the others do?
What wasI thinking?!?
What am I doing?
What am I doing?
http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com
What am I doing?
http://chemtools.chem.soton.ac.uk/projects/blogs/blogs.php/blog_id/10
What amI thinking?
What am I thinking?
What does it mean?
http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html
What am I reading?
What am I
reading?
What am I
reading?
http://openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers
How do I do this?
How do I do this?
How do I do this?
Science is social
Web 2.0 is social
Science needs Web 2.0
Science is social
Web 2.0 is social
Science needs Web 2.0
…like a hole in the head
David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biologyhttp://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
•Network size issues
•Barriers to entry
•Not enough time
•Too many ‘me too’ sites
•Fear of being ‘scooped’
Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sinshttp://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins
How do Ijustify this?
• Open call for participants on Blog
• Collaborative writing on GoogleDocs.
• Concept to submitted proposal in five dayshttp://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/
2007/12/12/the-open-research-network-proposal-update-and-reflections/
How do I do this?
Science is social
Scientists are not (necessarily) social
Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness
Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised
Lab notebook
Blog
Lab notebook
Lab notebook
Lab notebook
Blog
Bookmarks
Contacts
Literature
Jeremy Frey, Andrew Milsted, Steve Wilson, Jenny Hale
Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘The Open Science Collective’
Acknowledgements
