school of information university of michigan 1 ethics, information technology and today’s...

16
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference @ UCLA

Upload: brendan-jacobs

Post on 29-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

1

Ethics, Information Technology

and Today’s Undergraduate

Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate

2008 iConference @ UCLA

Page 2: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Outline of Issues

iSchool context Principles Course design Technology support Questions

Outline

“We may have to make an unpalatable choice between lives that are morally good,

and lives that are interesting.”D. Dennett, “Information, technology and the virtues of ignorance,”

1986.

Page 3: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Ethics – definitional variations

Codes of professional practice Policies and contemporary issues Behavioral motivation

iSchools

Michigan

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

•Powers, “Real Wrongs in Virtual Communities,” 2003.

“… moral theory is the body of competing accounts of the right- or wrong- making qualities of actions and the general nature of obligation.”

Page 4: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Ethics in the iSchools

The study of ethics is international and interdisciplinary, with diverse publishing outlets (12 peer reviewed journals)

ICIE: 104 scholars worldwide US: 32 people; 30 universities iSchools: 8 faculty in 6 iSchools

iSchools

Michigan

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

•International Center for Information Ethics

Page 5: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Ethics Courses in the iSchoolsiSchools

Michigan

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

Strength of Ethics Course Content

iSchool Some Strong Titled Grad Titled UnderG

Washington 8 4 1 0

Illinois 3 3 0 2Texas 3 3 0 0

IU SLIS 9 2 0 0

Pittsburgh 5 2 2 0

Penn State 3 2 0 0

Maryland 2 2 1 0

Michigan 2 2 1 0

UCLA 2 2 0 1

IU Informatics 7 1 0 1North Carolina 4 1 1 0

Georgia Tech 3 1 0 0

Rutgers 3 1 0 0

Drexel 2 1 1 0

Syracuse 2 1 0 0

Toronto 5 0 0 0

Irvine 2 0 0 0

Florida State 1 0 0 0

UC Berkeley 0 0 0 0

Total 66 28 7 4

Page 6: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Ethics Courses at Michigan

300 + courses with ethics content Campus-wide distribution UM School of Information

– 1 graduate course – professional ethics and public policy issues

Undergraduate informatics initiative places ethics in the core requirements

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

• Ethics in Public Life Initiative

Page 7: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Guiding Principles

Flourishing ethics and human potential (Bynum)

Policy vacuums (Moor) Decision making roles (Himma) Digitization and representation (Capurro) Infosphere and entropy (Floridi)

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

“Information technology has multiplied our opportunities to know, and our traditional ethical doctrines overwhelm us

by turning these opportunities into newfound obligations to know.”Dennett, 1986.

Page 8: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Ethics at the IntersectioniSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

• McRobb et al. “… pedagogy, ethics and technology,” 2007.

Figure 1. The links between technology, pedagogy and ethics

Page 9: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Enabling Factors

Net Generation – stereotypes and reality– Sheltered, protected, pressured, special,

confident, and optimistic (Strauss and Howe)

– New and different expectations regarding the use of technology (Gibbons)

– Enmeshed in a web of technical choices (Nye)

Research on learning Technology infrastructure on campus

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

• Strauss and Howe, Millennials and pop culture, 2006.

Page 10: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Course Design Principles

Use technology to explore the ethical challenges of the technology

Role playing to model the edges and seams of ethical behaviors in a variety of contexts

Create a learning laboratory Integrate assessment and research on

inter-generational ethical tensions

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

Page 11: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Modular Course Design

Team teaching and flexibility to scale Honor code deconstruction Identity in virtual environments

– Trust in individuals and groups Truth in image and text

– Trust in content integrity Open source and security

– Trust in code

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

Page 12: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Technology R&D

Augmenting technology tools in the classroom

Synchronous and asynchronous learning environments

Tracking, recording, measuring, assessing community building, role playing, and changes in perspective

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

• Sakai Foundation

Page 13: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Page 14: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

More Questions than Answers

Should iSchools be more actively engaged with ethics scholarship?

Is the classroom an ethics lab? Is focused coursework on ethics and

information technology an important priority?

To what extent is ethics education at the undergraduate level directive or exploratory?

iSchools

Principles

Design

Technology

Questions

Page 15: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

References See iConference paper for complete citations. Dennett, Daniel C. “Information, technology, and the virtues

of ignorance,” Deadalus 115.3 (Summer 1986), pp. 135-153. McRobb, S., Jefferies, P., Stahl, B. C. 2007. “Exploring the

relationship between pedagogy, ethics and technology: building a framework for strategy development.” Technology, Pedagogy & Education 16, 1, 111-126.

Powers, Thomas M. “Real wrongs in virtual communities,” Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2003): 191-98.

Strauss, W. and Howe, N. 2006. Millennials and pop culture. Great Falls, VA: Life Course Assoc.

Page 16: SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 1 Ethics, Information Technology and Today’s Undergraduate Classroom Ethics and the Undergraduate 2008 iConference

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

Thank you!

Paul ConwayAssociate ProfessorSchool of InformationUniversity of [email protected]