school improvement plan presentation 2010-2011 creating bridges inspiring success

Custer Baker Intermediate

School

School Improvement Plan Presentation

2010-2011

Creating Bridges Inspiring Success

School Improvement Team

Grade Level Teams

Building-Based Student Team (BBST)

School Steering Committee

Department Chairs

Parent Support

Administration/Counseling/Support Staff

CBIS Leadership Teams

ISTEP+Language Arts Trend Data

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

2015 (Current 8th Grade)

0.890000000000002

0.860000000000001

0.840000000000001

0.830000000000001


0.880000000000002

0.830000000000001

0.81 0.830000000000001


0.880000000000002

0.820000000000001

0.820000000000001

NaN


0.890000000000002

0.860000000000001

NaN NaN

73%

78%

83%

88%

93%

98%

General Education StudentsP

assin

g I

STEP

+

ISTEP+Math Trend Data



0.850000000000001

0.830000000000001

0.820000000000001

0.78


0.860000000000001

0.870000000000002

0.820000000000001

0.8


0.8 0.700000000000001

0.740000000000002

NaN


0.8 0.78 NaN NaN

68%73%78%83%88%93%98%

General Education StudentsP

assin

g I

STEP

+

ISTEP+ Language Arts Trend Data



0.49 0.48 0.28 0.35


0.44 0.320000000000001

0.380000000000001

0.390000000000001


0.51 0.330000000000001

0.310000000000001

NaN


0.46 0.44 NaN NaN

5%

25%

45%

Special Education StudentsP

assin

g IS

TEP

+

The percentage of special education students passing Language Arts ISTEP+ will improve by 5% as measured by the 2010-11 ISTEP+ assessment

Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade) From 31% to 36%


ISTEP +Special Education LA Goal

Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)


31%

44%36%

49%42%

37%

Percent Of Students Passing LA ISTEP+

2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION

ISTEP Special Education LA GoalSTATUS

ISTEP+ Math Trend Data


2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.56 0.42 0.44 0.47

2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.54 0.5 0.45 0.47

2017 (Current 6th Grade) 0.54 0.36 0.26 NaN

2018 (Current 5th Grade) 0.54 0.41 NaN NaN

5%15%25%35%45%55%

Special Education StudentsP

assin

g I

STEP

+

The percentage of special education students passing Math ISTEP will improve by 5% as measured by the 2010-11 ISTEP+ assessment

Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)From 26% to 31%

Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)From 41% to 46%

ISTEP +Special Education Math

Goal

ISTEP Special Education Math Goal

STATUS



26%

41%

31%

46%

37%34%

Percent Of Students Passing ISTEP+

2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION

Special Ed Program Adjustments

2009 -10 2010 -11Discovery Team – 2 Teachers

Discovery Team – 3 Teachers

2 Block Rotation 3 Block Rotation

120 Minutes Math 120 Minutes EDM

Compass Learning

UNCHANGED

150 Minutes of Reading/Language Arts

Science/Social Studies - 45 Minutes

Small Classes

Exploratory / Lunch / Recess

ISTEP+ Language Arts Trend Data


2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.1 0.08 0.07 0.15

2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.15 0.09 0.1 0.21



3%

8%

13%

18%

23%

PASS PLUSP

assin

g I

STEP

Pass P

lus

The percentage of students scoring Pass Plus on the 2011 ISTEP + assessment in Language Arts will increase by 5% as compared to the 2010 ISTEP+ test.



ISTEP Pass Plus Language Arts Goal



21%

13%

26%

18%

24%21%

Percent Scoring Pass Plus in Language Arts

2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION

ISTEP Pass Plus LA GoalSTATUS

ISTEP+ Math Trend Data


2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.11

2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.11



3%8%

13%18%23%28%

PASS PLUSP

assin

g I

STEP

Pass P

lus

The percentage of students scoring Pass Plus on the 2011 ISTEP + assessment in Math will increase by 5% as compared to the 2010 ISTEP+ test.



ISTEP Pass Plus Math Goal



5%

17%

10%

22%20%

30%

Percent Scoring Pass Plus in Math

2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION

ISTEP Pass Plus Math GoalSTATUS

The percent of students with a RIT score at or above

the grade level norm (50th %ile) will increase from:

65% in the Spring of 2010 to

70% in the Spring of 2011

as measured by the NWEA Reading MAP test.

NWEA Reading Goal

NWEA Reading GoalSTATUS

Met30%

70%

Class of 2017 (Current 6th

Grade)

Met33%

67%


Percent of Students Who Have Met Their Yearly Achievement Goal by The Winter NWEA Test

The percent of students with a RIT score at or above the grade level norm (50th %ile) will increase from:

56% in the Spring of 2010 to

70% in the Spring of 2011

as measured by the NWEA Math MAP test.

NWEA Math Goal

Met43%

57%

Class of 2017 (Current 6th

Grade)

NWEA Math GoalSTATUS

Met33%

67%


Percent of Students Who Have Met Their Yearly Achievement Goal by The Winter NWEA Test

RTI -Response to Instruction

“Grizz Time”

Students participate according to proficiency level (remediation to enrichment)

45 minutes daily

Target 4 language arts & 4 math skills

Pre and post test

Data teams identify strategies

Response to Instruction (RTI)

Response to Instruction

Tier 2

5-10%

Tier 1

80-90%

Services across tiers are fluid and data-driven.

Team Behavior Logs, Counseling Services, On-Level Celebrations, Positive Phone Calls, School-wide Discipline Plan

Core Curriculum, Scott Foresman, Everyday Math, Team Book Clubs, Compass Learning, On-Level Celebrations, Data Teams

Tier 31-5%

Scott Foresman, Every day Math, BBST, Compass Learning, Literacy League – Title I, Leveled Readers, Discovery Team, Data Teams

One on One with Administration, Sensory Room, Counseling Services, Functional Behavior Assessment, Check In/Out, BBST, ACT Services Referral, Possible Referral to Adult & Child, Required Parent Conference, Hot Pass, School-wide Discipline Plan

Scott Foresman Sidewalks, Compass Learning, Discovery Team

Sensory Room, Behavior Coach, Functional Behavior Assessment, Investigate Special Services Referral, School-wide Discipline Plan

646 Students currently receiving RTI Tier I 96 - 6th grade band students (daily)

112 Students in Tier 2

35 Students in Tier 3

12 Students with RTI behavior plans Students move among Grizz time (RTI) classes based on pre and post test scores for targeted skills.

RTI Data

Data TeamsTeacher Names Number and names

of students who are LIKELY:ALREADY CLOSE - 7

Number and names of students who are LIKELY:FAR TO GO – 6-5

Number and names of studentsFAR TO GO:INTENSIVE SUPPORT

Projected number at proficiency after instruction

Issac MMike TSam ECharles LBailey BBenjamin CRobert VJacob G

Ben CKaite HAnthony PLucas JD-Lanee DParker SClayton DRachel FTyler CMadison AJalen DPayton PEthan J

Caressa JCheyenne CTim BRebekah JNathan QJack FBen HHanna SJacob T

STRENGTHS1. Students understand the parts of a book (eg, Index).2. Students do well with single-task questions.3. Students remembered bibliography from last year's research unit.

GOALThe percentage of Team Elite students scoring at proficiency or higher in Skill 1 will increase from 31% to 95% by September 13, 2010 as measured by post test on September 13, 2010.

OBSTACLES1. Vocabulary - Students did not understand the word CITATION.2. Question #9 should cite a more current book for the bibliography, and second line of bibliography should be indented on test.3. Question #7 - The students were stumped by the word ENTRIES.4. Students were intimidated by multi-step questions.

STRATEGIES 1. Model and practice - demonstrating how to locate information using Index (references). 2. Cooperative Grouping - constructing an Index from words given to the student by the teacher.3. Think Alouds.4. Gradual Release of Responsibilities.

Data Teams

Attendance Data

08-09 09-10

Rate 0.9664 0.9593

73%

78%

83%

88%

93%

98%

Att

en

dan

ce R

ate

Currently 58 students are being served in Title I

5th Grade 29 students receiving Title I assistance in Language Arts

90% (26 students) with Tier 2 interventions have shown growth

10% (3 students) with Tier 2 interventions have not shown growth

6th Grade29 students receiving Title I assistance in Language Arts

86% (25 students) with Tier 2 interventions have shown growth

14% (4 students) with Tier 2 interventions have not shown growth

Title I Data

Additional School GoalsGOAL STATUS

By 2011, 100% of CBIS science teachers will be using ISTEM practices. COMPLETED

By 2012, 100% of CBIS faculty and administration, in conjuncture with FCSC, will use data-driven decision making to determine instructional decisions related to achievement as measured by data team records.

COMPLETED

By 2012, 100% of CBIS faculty will expand their knowledge and use of action-based research to determine effective instructional strategies. By the end of the 2010-11 school year, 100% of the

faculty will be involved with professional development in action-based research.

By the beginning of the 2011-12 school year, at least one teacher in each core subject will pilot an action-based research activity with their classes.

By the end of the 2012-13 school year, 100% of the faculty will be using action-based research in at least one area.

ON TARGET

2009–10 2010-11

Grizz Time – 30 Minutes Grizz Time – 45 Minutes

High Ability Clusters On Teams High Ability Teams

Health Taught In Focus Class Health Taught In Physical Ed Class

Focus Class Focus Class Eliminated

Math – 45 Minutes Math (EDM) – 90 Minutes

Band – 30 Minutes Band – 45 Minutes

Team Time – 30 Minutes Professional Development Wednesdays – 40 Minutes Prior To School Day

School-wide Program Adjustments

Rigorous Curriculum Specialized Student Groupings Data Driven Instruction/RTI NWEA Goal setting Safe and Disciplined Learning Environment Parent Involvement/Workshops Professional Development:

◦ Gradual Release Responsibility (GRR), Curry-Samara model, Data Teams, Power Writing, Indiana Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (ISTEM) notebooks, Everyday Math, ExamView, Curriculum Mapping, etc.

CBIS Success Strategies

NWEA Goal Setting Spirit Days Honor Roll Attendance Incentives On-level Team Quarterly Incentives Positive Support Programs:

◦ Anti-Bullying, Red Ribbon Week, Rachel’s Challenge, Leadership Breakfast, Lunch with the Principal, Cub Cards, Service Learning Projects, Grizz Kids, etc.

Celebrations and Positive Behavior Supports

Custer Baker Intermediate School

Moving from

Good to Great

school improvement plan presentation 2010-2011 creating bridges inspiring success

Documents