sbrt is non-inferior to standard chemo-radiation for locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreas...

Upload: jacob-repko

Post on 03-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 SBRT is non-inferior to standard chemo-radiation for locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreas cancer: A meta-an

    1/2

    2013 RSS Meeting Abstract Submission

    ABSTRACT TITLE:

    SBRT is non-inferior to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced, non-

    metastatic pancreas cancer: A meta-analysis of published data.

    AUTHOR AND CO-AUTHORS:

    Jessica Varley, Thomas B. Daniels, MD, John J. Kresl, MD, PhD, FACRO, Chad L. Lee,

    PhD, and Lauren D. Stegman, MD, PhD

    OBJECTIVES:

    Image-guided body stereotactic radiosurgery (SBRT) is an emerging treatment

    option for definitive therapy of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The objective of

    this study was to assess the efficacy of this treatment by combining data from the

    available small, single institution published series.

    METHODS:

    The MEDLINE database was searched to identify publications reporting on the

    outcomes of cohorts of at least 20 patients without imaging evidence of metastatic

    disease treated with body radiosurgery. The actuarial overall survival plots from

    these studies were digitized. Individual patient survival data were reconstructed as

    per the method of Guyot et al. (BMC Medical Research Methodology 2012, 12:9).

    The accuracy of the data reconstruction process was verified by comparing the

    calculated Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities from the reconstructed data with the

    published results. The individual patient survival data was then aggregated to

    create the combined actuarial survival data. Similar methodology was used to

    reconstruct aggregate survival data from five Phase I/II prospective trials ofgemcitabine-based, standardly fractionated chemoradiation each with cohorts of 20

    patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic disease.

    RESULTS:

    Seven studies of pancreatic radiosurgery were identified meeting the inclusion

    criteria, which included a total of 274 patients. The aggregate, actuarial median

    survival after radiosurgery was 12.6 months with 6 month, 1 year, and 2 year

    survival probabilities of 85%, 52%, and 22%, respectively. The aggregate, actuarial

    median survival of 199 patients treated on the prospective ECOG, Hoosier Oncology

    Group, Israeli, and CALGB chemoradiation therapy trials was 10.8 months with 6

    month, 1 year and 2 year survival probabilities of 74%, 44%, and 15 %, respectively.This represented a non-significant trend towards better survival with SBRT as

    compared to chemoradiation with a HR for death of 0.89 (95% CI 0.73 1.08, p =

    0.24).

    For patients treated with SBRT, overall survival was statistically improved with

    neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy with a HR for death of 0.71 (95% CI

    0.55 0.92, p = 0.01). The median survival was 13.7 months in the three studies in

  • 7/28/2019 SBRT is non-inferior to standard chemo-radiation for locally advanced, non-metastatic pancreas cancer: A meta-an

    2/2

    which more than 90% of patients received induction chemotherapy prior to SBRT (n

    = 114 patients) versus 11.1 months in the four studies (n = 160 patients) in which

    chemotherapy was given after radiosurgery. The delivered BED varied across

    studies from 47.2 Gy10 - 87.5 Gy10. When treated as a continuous variable, no

    radiotherapy dose response was identified (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.997 1.013, p =

    0.17).

    Conclusions:

    Meta-analysis of published reports of SBRT for locally advanced, non-metastatic

    pancreatic adenocarcinoma using reconstructed individual patient survival data

    suggests this therapy is not inferior to standard chemoradiation therapy. The

    apparently equivalent outcomes indicate that future randomized trials comparing

    SBRT to conventional chemoradiation may need to be conducted using a non-

    inferiority design. Patients receiving induction chemotherapy prior to SBRT appear

    to have more favorable outcomes than those treated with up-front radiosurgery. It

    is unclear if this is due to selection of favorable prognosis patients with

    chemosensitive disease or due to chemosensitization or another biologic interactionbetween the timing of systemic therapy and SBRT. There was no clear radiation

    dose response, although this may be confounded by the stronger effect of

    chemotherapy timing. These data support the development of prospective

    randomized trials comparing induction chemotherapy followed by SBRT versus

    standard chemoradiation.

    Character Count: 3998