satellite communications a part 3

134
Autumn2004 © University of Sur rey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.1 Satellite Communications A Part 3 Link planning / budgetting -Professor Barry G Evans- EEM.scmA

Upload: purity

Post on 04-Feb-2016

87 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

EEM.scmA. Satellite Communications A Part 3. Link planning / budgetting -Professor Barry G Evans-. Link budget & system planning. Mobile System. Performance. (i) QoS – b.e.r. 10-4 if speech 10-6 – 10-8 data (extra coding) (ii) Availability 95% Channel conditions. Basic Transmission. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.1

Satellite Communications APart 3

Link planning / budgetting-Professor Barry G Evans-

EEM.scmA

Page 2: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.2

Link budget & system planning

Page 3: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.3

Mobile System

Page 4: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.4

Performance

• (i) QoS – b.e.r.– 10-4 if speech– 10-6 – 10-8 data (extra coding)

• (ii) Availability– 95%– Channel conditions

Page 5: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.5

Basic Transmission

Page 6: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.6

Carrier Transmission Budget-Antenna Gain-

The antenna gain is defined as the ratio of the power per unit solid angle received/radiated by the antenna in a given direction to the power per unit solid angle received/radiated by an isotropic antenna supplied with the same power.

Page 7: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.7

Basic Transmission

Page 8: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.8

Basic Transmission

Page 9: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.9

Antenna radiation pattern

Antenna radiation pattern = gain variations as a function of the angle relative to boresight

Page 10: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.10

Transmitted power in a given direction

Page 11: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.11

Predicted coverage areas for the HOTBIRD satellites

(a) Superbeam(b) Widebeam(courtesy of EUTELSAT)

Page 12: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.12

Effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP)

Page 13: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.13

Exercise (1) - Carrier Transmission Budget

• Given– Power fed to antenna: PT = 10W– Antenna gain (at boresight): GTmax = 40dB– Distance: R = 36000km (earth to geostationary satellite

• Calculate– Transmitter EIRP in dB(W)– Flux density at receiver in dB(W/m2)

Page 14: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.14

Down Path

Page 15: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.15

GEO - Geometry

Page 16: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.16

Earth station from the geostationary orbit

• Satellite– Height h above the equator

– Sub-satellite point, longitude ΦS

• Earth station– Latitude E, longitude ΦE

– Relative longitude satellite = (ΦE – ΦS) = ΦES

Page 17: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.17

Exercise (2) – Carrier Transmission Budget

• Given– Uplink frequency = 14GHz– Eart station

• Power fed to the antenna: PT=100W• Antenna diameter: D=4 (efficiency =0.6)• Location: Bercenay (France)

Latitude = 48º13’07”N Longitude = 03º53’13”E

– Satellite• Receiving antenna gain at boresight: GRmax=40dB• Location: 7ºE (EUTELSAT 1-F2)

• Calculate– EIRP of earth station– Free space loss– Received power

Page 18: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.18

Noise in an Earth Station

– Noise comes from:• Ta= picked up by antenna from outside ( =effective noise)• Tf= lossy feeder• TLNA, TIPA= amplifiers in receiver chain• TD/C= down converter

– Refer all noise to a reference plane into the LNA

kB

Pa

DEMODBASEBAND

QoS(BER)

LNA IPA

rf if

G/T Ref

Lo

DOWN CONVC/NOD

Ta Tf

Ts

TLNA TIPA

TD/L

Page 19: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.19

Noise in a Payload

G/T Ref

Cu

D/C

C/Nou

• Noise comes from:– Antenna received noise –earth + galaxy– Feeder lossy noise (nb.290K)– Equipment noise –amps / D/C etc. added in same way as for earth

station.

CD

eirps

Page 20: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.20

Page 21: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.21

Page 22: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.22

Noise Characterisation (1)

Page 23: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.23

Noise Characterisation (2)

Page 24: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.24

Noise contribution of an attenuator

Page 25: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.25

B/K10Log(Ts)dL)(GaTG

L)dB - (G referenceat antenna ofGain

10log(g)GdB

α10log(l),LdB

...g x g

T

g

T T )Tf-(1 TaTs

a

IPALNA

CD

LNA

IPALNA

l1

D/CLNA IPA

Ref

Ta Tf TLNA TIPA TD/C

LD/C

LdB

xTal

1

)Tfl

(1

1

IPALNA

D/Cxgg

T

LNA

IPAg

TTLNA

GLNA GIPA

Earth-station system G/Tand noise temp.

Page 26: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.26

Earth station antenna noise temperatureExamples (clear sky conditions)

Page 27: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.27

Exercise (3) - Noise Contribution Budget

• Operating frequency = 12 GHz• LNA: TLNA = 150K, GLNA = 50dB• MIXER: TMX = 850K, GMX = -10dB• IF AMP: TIF = 400K, GIF = 30dB

• Calculate– Receiver effective input noise temperature TR

– Receiver noise figure

Page 28: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.28

Exercise (4) - G/T of C-band earth station

• Dish=15m, n=70%• Ta=30K• Tf=290K• Loss f=0.5dB• TLNA=35K• GLNA=30dB• FIPA=3dB• GIPA=20dB• TD/C=1000K• Loss D/C=-10dB

• Calculate the earth station G/T– What are the advantages of trading off dish size and LNA

temp.?

D/CLNA IPA

Feeder if

Page 29: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.29

Propagation-Effects to be considered-

• Radio noise• Ionospheric effects

– Absorption– Total electron content effects (group delay, refraction,

polarisation rotation)– Scintillation

• Tropospheric effects– Attenuation by rain– Depolarisation– Refraction effects

• Shadowing and multipath effects

Page 30: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.30

• Any ATTENUATION process which involves energy absorption is associated with THERMAL NOISE GENERATION from the medium

• Absorption by atmospheric gases is frequency dependent, hence clear sky noise temperature exhibits similar variations with frequency

Clear Sky Noise Temperature

Page 31: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.31

• See CCIR Rep.719 for a detailed description of practical techniques of calculation for LAG. The following curve displays AAG(E) versus frequency; E is the elevation angle.

Attenuation by atmospheric gases

Page 32: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.32

Noise temperature of the sun

Page 33: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.33

Ionospheric effects

Page 34: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.34

Attenuation due to rain, etc.

• Mist

• Clouds

• Snow

• Ice

Page 35: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.35

Page 36: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.36

References for calculation methodology

• Course notes or chapter 8 of the book

• ITU-R PN 618-3 splant path rain induced attenuation and depolarisation and scintillatin

(available from lending libraries or ITU, Geneva)

Page 37: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.37

Attenuation due to precipitation and cloudsRelevant techniques described in CCIR (see rep.563, 564, 721, 723)

Page 38: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.38

Page 39: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.39

Page 40: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.40

Contours of RAINFALL RATE

R₀․₀₁ (mm/h) exceeded for 0.01% OF AN AVERAGE YEAR:

Maps of rainfall contours (1/3)

Page 41: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.41

Contours of RAINFALL RATE

R₀․₀₁ (mm/h) exceeded for 0.01% OF AN AVERAGE YEAR:

Maps of rainfall contours (2/3)

Page 42: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.42

Contours of RAINFALL RATE

R₀․₀₁ (mm/h) exceeded for 0.01% OF AN AVERAGE YEAR:

Maps of rainfall contours (3/3)

Page 43: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.43

with circular polarization use the arithmetic mean of attenuation with horizontal and vertical polarization

Nomogram for determination of specific attenuation

Page 44: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.44

Comments:30/20 GHz systems face a problem, especially in tropical regions where rainfall rate is very high during small percentage of time.Performance objective must be achieved when rain occurs. The link will probably be over dimensioned during most of the time (margin).

Typical values of rain attenuation

Page 45: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.45

Page 46: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.46

Page 47: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.47

Page 48: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.48

Page 49: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.49

DEPOLARISATION

• Rain and ice cause this due to shape of particles– Need to know shape and orientation of particles– Linear and circular POLN different– Circular POLN is worst case– Can form a model linking depolarisation (XPD)

and attenuation

Page 50: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.50

Page 51: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.51

Page 52: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.52

Page 53: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.53

XPD STATISTICS

Page 54: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.54

Raininduced XPD circular polarisation(for 1% worsth month)

CO-POLAR ATTENUATIONdB

Page 55: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.55

Other tropospheric effects

• Snow– Dry snow –ok (little effect)

– Wet snow –as bad as rain

– Problem if snow builds up on antenna

• Atmospheric absorption– Gas and particle absorption (worse at low

elevation angles)

Page 56: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.56

Noise Contribution Budget-Satellite Antenna Noise Temperature-(1)

Page 57: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.57

Noise Contribution Budget-Satellite Antenna Noise Temperature-(2)

Page 58: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.58

Influence of Rain

Page 59: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.59

Noise

Page 60: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.60

Exercise (5.a) - Carrier Transmission Budget

• Ta=50K, =0.9, Tf=290k• Pointing loss = 0.7dB• Atmospheric loss = 0.3dB• Rain loss = 3dB for 99% lime• Rain temp = 275K

• Calculate the G/T of the earth station under worst weather conditions

• Calculate the down link C/No• Calculate the down link C/N if the link bandwidth is 100KHz• Complete the link budget sheet

Page 61: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.61

Exercise (5.b) – Link budget sheet

• Link budget sheet – Downlink

Satellite EIRP dBW

Pointing loss dB

Atmospheric loss dB

Rain loss (99%) dB

Free space loss dB

Gain E/S dB

Downlink carrier dBW

E/S noise temp. dB-K

E/S G/T dB/K

Boltzmann constant -228.6 dBW/Hz/K

Downlink noise density (NOD)

dBW/Hz

C/NOD dB-Hz

Page 62: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.62

Page 63: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.63

Page 64: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.64

Page 65: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.65

Page 66: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.66

Page 67: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.67

Page 68: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.68

Page 69: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.69

Page 70: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.70

Page 71: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.71

Page 72: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.72

Page 73: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.73

DOWNLINK

Page 74: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.74

UPLINK

Page 75: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.75

Up Path

Page 76: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.76

Exercise (6) – Up-link

• Ku-band uplink 14GHz

• Dish size=5m, =0.65

• Distance to satellite=38,000km

• Uplink atmospheric loss=0.3dB

• Uplink pointing loss=0.7dB

• Uplink rain loss=3dB

• Tx e/s w.g. feed loss=3dB

• Satellite Rx antenna gain=26dBi (from Tx e/s)

• Satellite Tx antenna gain=25dBi (at boresight)

• Rx earth station AR=-2dB

• Satellite Tpdr gain=120dB

• The satellite transponder has a single carrier saturation condition PFDi=-76dBW/m2, eirp sut=50dBW

• The transponder’s is operated at 8dB input and 5dB output back off

Calculate1. The uplink HPA rating if this has to operate at 6dB back off

2. The uplink carrier at the satellite Cu

3. The downlink carrier eirp from the satellite

SAT

120dBCu

eirps

Page 77: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.77

• The order of any intermodulation product is defined as ‘(n+m) where the IMP’s are:

where n, m= 1,2,3,…

• When the center frequency of the amplifier is large compared to its bandwidth, odd-order intermodulation products are the only ones falling within the useful frequency band

• Intermodulation product power decreases with the order of the product. So only third and fifth order intermodulation products are concerned

Characteristics of intermodulation products

)21( fmfn

Page 78: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.78

Link Performance-Intermodulation noise

Intermodulation products may appear at:- the output of the transmitting earth station non linear power amplifier- the output of the satellite repeaterThese intermodulation products can interfere with the desired carriers, and hence be considered as noise called “intermodulation noise”.With modulated carriers, the intermodulation noise is distributed over the entire frequency band.

Example: Intermodulation noise spectrum for a typical TWT with 10 carriers. (6 central carriers modulated by a multiplex of 24 telephone channels, two 64 channels carriers and two 132 channels carriers)

Intermodulation products can be considered as filtered white noise with constant spectral density (No)IM

Page 79: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.79

Page 80: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.80

Intermodulation

• (nf1 mf2), order = (n+m)

• IMP’s vary (order-1)dB/dB with carrier.

– E.g. 3rd – 2dB/dB 5th – 4dB/dB

• Payloads –linearisers to reduce IMP’s

• Ku-band transponders– TV– 3rd order important

• L/S-band transponder –1000’s small mobile carriers. 5th and 7th important

Page 81: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.81

Total Link Operation(link from earth station to earth station)

1 – LINEAR OPERATION: PT‹(PT)max’ (NO)IM = O

Repeater power gain GS is constant. Satellite transmitter output power is shared between:- amplified carriers- amplified input noise

2 – SATURATION REGION OPERATION:

Available power from satellite repeater is limited.

Output power is shared between:- amplified carriers- amplified input noise- intermodulation products

Power gain value depends on operating point.

Page 82: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.82

Total Link Budget-Non linear operation-

Page 83: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.83

Interference

Page 84: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.84

Interference Management (1)

• Between Satellite and Terrestrial systems –limit PFD’s satellites and terrestrial Tx’s

• Radio Reg’s –Appendix S7• 1st stage

– Calculate coordination contour– Calculate all Tx’s inside contour

• 2nd stage– If needed– Detailed calc’s using all parameters– Site shielding– Energy dispersal etc.

Page 85: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.85

EARTH STATION: MADLEYSAT: INTELSAT 5 LONGITUDE 3415RX FREQUENCY: 4.18 GHZ

- CO-ORDINATION CONTOUR- MODE 1 CONTOUR

Radio regulations(Appendix S7)

Page 86: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.86

Interference

Page 87: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.87

Interference Management (2)

• Between satellite networks• Radio Reg’s –Appendix S8• Analyse noise increase ΔT6% (otherwise go to second

detailed stage)

S1 S2

I

C

E1 E2

Page 88: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.88

Total Link Budget-Non Linear Operation-

Total noise at receiver input = uplink retransmitted noise + intermodulation noise + downlink noise:

1 – Assuming that all incoming carriers at repeater input have SAME POWER(as with controlled uplink power FDMA for instance):

(C/N0)T-1 = (C/N0)U

-1 + (C/N0)D-1 + (C/N0)IM

-1+ (C/I0)U/D-1

2 – If incoming carriers at repeater input DO NOT HAVE SAME POWER:

There is a CARRIER SUPPRESSION EFFECT: large power carriers tend to suppress small power carriers.

Generally speaking:

- for SMALL POWER carriers:(C/N0)T is smaller than in the case of equal power carriers.

- for LARGE POWER carriers:(C/N0)T is larger than in the case of equal power carriers.

Page 89: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.89

Exercise (7) – Link Performance

• Given– Uplink carrier power-to-noise power spectral density: (C/No)U=85dB(Hz)

– Downlink carrier power-to-noise power spectral density: (C/No)D=83dB(Hz)

– Carrier power-to-intermodulation noise power spectral density: (C/No)IM=87dB(Hz)

– Uplink carrier power-to-interference power spectral density: (C/No)I,U=90dB(Hz)

– Downlink carrier power-to-interference power spectral density: (C/No)I,D=90dB(Hz)

– Noise equivalent bandwidth of earth station receiver: BN=5MHz

• Calculate– Overall link carrier power-to-noise power spectral density: (C/No)T

– Overall link carrier power-to-noise power ratio: (C/N)T

SATUplink interference

Downlink interference

Uplink path Downlink path

Page 90: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.90

Total Link Budget-Non linear operation with interference

Page 91: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.91

Page 92: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.92

Figure 6.11 Gains and losses in power of signals being relayed by satellite. The signal falls to about one hundred billion billionth of its strength (10-34) on each of its 25,000-mile journeys through space. This great loss is balanced by the grains of the antennas and amplifier

Page 93: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.93

UplinkEIRP

C/NouSatellite

C/IM oC/IU

C/ID

C/ND

Sat. Link Performance

C/NTOT

Requirements for QoS

C/No.Req

Margin =C/NTOT – C/NoReq

If Not 2-3 dB

Increase EIRPAnd Repeat

 

Setting out Link budgets

Page 94: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.94

Types of Objectives

• SIGNAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES:

In terms of thresholds which must not be exceeded for more than a given percentage of time.

• SYSTEM AVAILABILITY OBJECTIVES:

Asys = (required time – down time) / required time

Required time = period of time during which the user requires the link to be in condition to perform a required functionDown time = cumulative time of link interruption within the required time

Interruption is a period in which there is a complete or partial loss of signal, excessive noise, or a discontinuity or severe distortion of the signal.

• PROPAGATION TIME:

The overall link propagation time should not overstep a maximum value depending on the user’s requirement.

Page 95: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.95

System Availability

SYSTEM AVAILABILITY ASYS implies that the quality objectives be met during a given percentage of time (typically between 99 and 99.9%).

This requires the link C/N0 ratio to be larger or equal to a given value for the considered percentage of time.

C/N0 varies according to:- propagation effects (mainly influence of rain)- implementation losses (mainly antenna depointing or equipment failure)

ASYS = ATX Asat Alink ARX

where:ATX = transmitting earth station availabilityAsat = satellite availabilityAlink = link availabilityARX = receiving earth station availability

Page 96: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.96

RAIN INDUCED attenuation and depolarization can reduce the C/N0 value, and cause link outage.

A LARGER MARGIN value leads to a HIGHER LINK AVAILABILITY, as C/N0 will understep the required value during a shorter time interval.

Link Availability

Page 97: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.97

System cost increases rapidly with system availability:

CUSTOMER SHOULD NOT ASK FOR TIGHT SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS STRICTLY NEEDED.

Cost of System Availability

Page 98: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.98

PERFORMANCE: - BIT ERROR RATE- BANDWIDTH

Digital Transmission Techniques-System Model-

Page 99: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.99

Page 100: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.100

Page 101: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.101

Time Division Multiplexing

Digital signals are organized in bursts by means of buffers where bits are stored and then read at a higher clock rate.

Bursts are transmitted sequentially within time slots according to a time frame structure.

Page 102: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.102

Time Division Multiplex Standards

(CCITT,Rec. G702, G732, G733):

Page 103: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.103

Two types of encryption techniques:- stream cipher: each bit of the plain text is combined bit per bit with the keystream,- block ciphering: the plain text is modified block per block.

Data Encryption

DATA ENCRYPTION entails two aspects:- confidentiality: avoid access to message by an unauthorized party.- authentication: protection against someone changing the message content.

Page 104: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.104

Scrambling

• At receiver side CLOCK TIMING for bit detection is extracted from DATA SYMBOL TRANSITIONS. Long data streams of 0’s and 1’s can result in the loss of data synchronization.DIGITAL DATA CSRAMBLING at transmitter side provides a data symbol transition probability close to 0.5. At receiver side DESCRAMBLING is performed to restore original data.

• SCRAMBLING also removes any periodic pattern in the baseband pulse train. Hence it CANCELS any DISCRETE LINE COMPONENT in the modulated RF spectrum. This offers better protection against overstepping the permissible level of radiated power flux density: scrambling is an ENERGY DISPERSAL technique.

Page 105: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.105

Channel encoding

Page 106: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.106

Decoding gain

Page 107: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.107

Digital Speech Interpolation (DSI)

• A talker has an activity factor which is less than 1. By INSERTING BITS from another channel INTO PAUSES of a given channel, DSI compresses a number m of voice channels into a SMALLER number n of satellite channels.

Page 108: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.108

Performance objectives

• Quality objectives for telephony (CCIR Rec.522)DIGITAL TRANSMISSION

– The BIT ERROR RATE (BER) should not exceed:a) 10-6, 10-minute mean value, for more than 20% of any monthb) 10-4, 1-minute mean value, for more than 0.3% of any monthc) c) 10-3, 1-second mean value, for more than 0.01% of any year

• Quality objectives for data transfer (CCIR Rec.614)– for 64 kbit/s channels as part of ISDN:

The BIT ERROR RATE (BER) should NOT EXCEED:a) 10-7, for more than 10% of any monthb) 10-6, for more than 2% of any monthc) 10-3, for more than 0.03% of any month

• No standard yet for bit rates in excess of 64 kbit/s. Likely 10-9 to 10-12.

Page 109: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.109

Noise performance

• Problems– Additive white Gaussian noise– Co-channel interference

• Frequency re-use

– Adjacent channel interference• From other signals

– Intersymbol interference• Due to band limiting

– Phase noise• From carrier recovery

Page 110: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.110

Page 111: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.111

Which modulation?

• Power limited satellite use B/QPSK• Mobiles need OQPSK/MSK to avoid non linear amp problems• Bandwidth limited satellite –16 QAM etc.

PSK

FSKASK

BER

Eb/Nominimum power from satellite

Page 112: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.112

Digital transmission techniquesM-PSK modulation

Page 113: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.113

Carrier-to-noise power ratio at demodulator input

The noise equivalent bandwidth BN of their receiver is assumed to be matched to the modulated carrier bandwidth B

Page 114: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.114

BPSK QPSK

• QPSK is half bandwidth of BPSK• PSD in QPSK is 3dB higher

Rs= Rb/2Rs= Rb

1

0

DECN

ERROR

Prob(Error) = BER

NoEberfcBER

AWGNSIGNAL

2

1

+/2

Vn=AWGN

VR

VR

-/2

2 x errorsBw=1/2 BPSKResult same

11

10 00

01

ERROR

NoEberfcBER

2

1

ERROR

Page 115: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.115

Theoretical Bit Error Probability (BEP)

Page 116: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.116

Bit Error Probability (BEP)

Useful values

Page 117: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.117

Theoretical Bit Error Probability(BEP)

Page 118: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.118

Carrier & Bit Error Probability (cont’d)

Page 119: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.119

Demodulation of digital signalsCONCLUSION

Page 120: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.120

M-PSK modulation Power spectral density

Page 121: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.121

Matched filtering

Page 122: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.122

Page 123: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.123

Page 124: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.124

Bit Rates and Bandwidth

• Example

– What is Rb, Rc and Rs?– If filtering is Rc, =0.5, what is the bandwidth?

PCMcoder

=1/2FEC coder

QPSKMODRb Rc Rs

Page 125: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.125

Spectral efficiency

Page 126: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.126

Exercise (8) – Digital Transmission Techniques

• Given– Type of modulation: coherent QPSK (spectral efficiency r = 1.5 bits/s.Hz)

– Received information bit rate: Rb = 36 Mbit/s

– Required BER = 10-5

• Calculate required value of C/No and bandwidth:– 1. Without coding– 2. With coding (code rate = 3/4)– Could you use a smaller code rate (for instance 2/3 or 1/2)?

satellite transponder bandwidth B=36MHz

Free space loss L=200dB

G/T=14dB(K-1)receiver bandwidth BIF

PT=10W

GT=30dBEIRP=40dB(W)

C/No = EIRP x 1/L x G/T x 1/k

Page 127: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.127

Power/Bandwidthtrade off and coding

• Power and bandwidth limitations are complimentary

• A transponder has finite bandwidth BT and hence traffic limit = BT/BC (BC = channel spacing)

Bandwidth limit case

• A transponder has fixed power so can only support ‘n’ channels at a given QoS (ber)

– Traffic limit (PTPD-Pc)=10log(n) (Pc=power per channel)

Power limit case

• Coding allows trade-off between bandwidth and power to optimise throughput

cnc No

Eb

No

EbPower

1RbB

Page 128: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.128

Page 129: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.129

Exercise (9) – Overall Link Budget

• The attached link budget has been calculated for a 9.6 kb/s email service for a VSAT into a hub. The modulation used is BPSK and the coding gives a coding gain of 4dB. The desired quality of service is a BER of 10-6.

• The hub available has the following parameters:– Antenna diameter = 4m– Efficiency = 65%– Feeder loss = 0.5dB– Skynoise = 50K– LNA temp = 75K– Rain temp = 275K

• Fill in the missing components of the budget.

Page 130: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.130

Exercise (9) cont’d

Page 131: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.131

Page 132: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.132

Exercise A – Earth Station

• An INTELSAT-A (4/6 GHz) earth-station is required to transmit two IDR carriers (eirp = 65 dBW/carrier). The specification of the station is:– G/T >35 dB/K at 5° elevation– 2 carrier IDR, intermodulation eirp is not to exceed 10dBW/4kHz.

• A list of major available equipment is shown in Table next page.• The earth-station waveguide feed loss is 0.5dB on receive and 3dB on

transmit. All components beyond the LNA can be neglected for noise calculation purposes and all antennas have a 70% efficiency. The output back-offs of HPAs can be taken as 10dB for multicarrier operation and the IMP eirp is given by;

• E12 = 2E1 + E2 – 2(GTX – LTX) + D - SF• Where:

– (GTX – LTX) is the effective atenna gain at the HPA flange.

– D = (-2.PSAT – 28 + 2 x BOo)dBW2.– SF (Spreading Factor) = 20 dBW/4kHz.

• Calculate the minimum cost earth-station configuration to meet the specification.

Page 133: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.133

Exercise A – Earth Station (cont.)

• List of equipmentEquipment Cost (£k)

 Antenna

 13.0 m

15.5 m

18.0 m

 Noise Temp

 30 K

25 K

20 K

  

160

200

300

  HPA

125 W

400 W

700 W

   

50

60

80

 LNA

  

 

 

33 K

55 K

80 K

  

30

6

3

Page 134: Satellite Communications A Part 3

Autumn2004 © University of Surrey SatComms A - part 3 - B G Evans 3.134

Exercise B – Payload

• Figure A shows a 20/30 GHz payload with specification– G/T 16.5 dB/K– eirp 50 dBW– C/I3 20 dB

• The input power at the antenna receive terminals is –111 dBW. There is an input feeder loss of 1dB at a temperature of 75K.

i. Determine the noise specification for the payload.ii. 20 GHz LNAs of gain 10, 13 and 20 dB with noise figure of 3, 4 and 5 dB

respectively are available. Determine the LNA configuration to be used.iii. Estimate whether the noise specification is achievable.iv. Describe how you would check the linearity specification.