sampling and reconstruction - cornell university · 2016-02-18 · cornell cs5625 spring 2016...

Lecture 6 • Cornell CS5625 Spring 2016

Sampling and reconstruction

CS 5625 Lecture 6

1


Sampled representations

• How to store and compute with continuous functions?

• Common scheme for representation: samples write down the function’s values at many points

[FvD

FH fi

g.14

.14b

/ W

olbe

rg]

2


Reconstruction

• Making samples back into a continuous function for output (need realizable method)

for analysis or processing (need mathematical method)

amounts to “guessing” what the function did in between

[FvD

FH fi

g.14

.14b

/ W

olbe

rg]

3


Filtering

• Processing done on a function can be executed in continuous form (e.g. analog circuit)

but can also be executed using sampled representation

• Simple example: smoothing by averaging

4


Roots of sampling

• Nyquist 1928; Shannon 1949 famous results in information theory

• 1940s: first practical uses in telecommunications

• 1960s: first digital audio systems

• 1970s: commercialization of digital audio

• 1982: introduction of the Compact Disc the first high-profile consumer application

• This is why all the terminology has a communications or audio “flavor”

early applications are 1D; for us 2D (images) is important

5


Sampling in digital audio

• Recording: sound to analog to samples to disc

• Playback: disc to samples to analog to sound again how can we be sure we are filling in the gaps correctly?

6


Undersampling

• What if we “missed” things between the samples?

• Simple example: undersampling a sine wave unsurprising result: information is lost

surprising result: indistinguishable from lower frequency

also was always indistinguishable from higher frequencies

aliasing: signals “traveling in disguise” as other frequencies

7

© 2016 Steve Marschner • Cornell CS5625 Spring 2016

Sneak preview

• Sampling creates copies of the signal at higher frequencies

• Aliasing is these frequencies leaking into the reconstructed signal

– frequency fs – x shows up as frequency x

• The solution is filtering– during sampling, filter to keep the high frequencies out so

they don’t create aliases at the lower frequencies– during reconstruction, again filter high frequencies to avoid

including high-frequency aliases in the output.


Preventing aliasing

• Introduce lowpass filters: remove high frequencies leaving only safe, low frequencies

choose lowest frequency in reconstruction (disambiguate)

9


Linear filtering: a key idea

• Transformations on signals; e.g.: bass/treble controls on stereo

blurring/sharpening operations in image editing

smoothing/noise reduction in tracking

• Key properties linearity: filter(f + g) = filter(f) + filter(g)

shift invariance: behavior invariant to shifting the input • delaying an audio signal • sliding an image around

• Can be modeled mathematically by convolution

10


Convolution warm-up

• basic idea: define a new function by averaging over a sliding window

• a simple example to start off: smoothing

11


Convolution warm-up

• Same moving average operation, expressed mathematically:

12

c[i] =1

2r + 1

i+rX

j=i�r

a[j].


Discrete convolution

• Simple averaging:

every sample gets the same weight

• Convolution: same idea but with weighted average

each sample gets its own weight (normally zero far away)

• This is all convolution is: it is a moving weighted average

13

c[i] =1

2r + 1

i+rX

j=i�r

a[j].

ii

ii

ii

ii

9.2. Convolution 191

Σ

0 0 1 4 6 4 1 0 0 ……

a

b =

a b

× 116

Figure 9.4. Computing one value in the discrete convolution of a sequence a with a filter b

that has support five samples wide. Each sample in a ? b is an average of nearby samplesin a, weighted by the values of b.

time instead of equally weighting all samples within a distance r, we use a secondsequence b to give a weight to each sample (Figure 9.4). The value b[i� j] givesthe weight for the sample at position j, which is at a distance i � j from theindex i where we are evaluating the convolution. Here is the definition of (a ? b),expressed as a formula:

(a ? b)[i] =X

j

a[j]b[i� j]. (9.2)

By omitting bounds on j, we indicate that this sum runs over all integers (thatis, from �1 to +1). Figure 9.4 illustrates how one output sample is com-puted, using the example of b = 1

16

[. . . , 0, 1, 4, 6, 4, 1, 0, . . .]—that is, b[0] = 6

16

,a[±1] =

4

16

, etc.In graphics, one of the two functions will usually have finite support (as does

the example in Figure 9.4), which means that it is non-zero only over a finiteinterval of argument values. If we assume that b has finite support, there is someradius r such that b[k] = 0 whenever |k| > r. In that case, we can write the sum


Filters

• Sequence of weights b is called a filter

• Filter is nonzero over its region of supportusually centered on zero: support radius r

• Filter is normalized so that it sums to 1.0 this makes for a weighted average, not just any

old weighted sum

• Most filters are symmetric about 0 since for images we usually want to treat

left and right the same

a box filter

14


Convolution and filtering

• Can express sliding average as convolution with a box filter

• bbox = […, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, …]/5

15


ii

ii

ii

ii

9.2. Convolution 193

1

1

00.6

15/ 1

5/

15/

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2 .2 .2 .2 .2 0

0 0 0 .2 .2 .2 0

a[j]

b[i – j]

a[ j]b[i – j]

b[i – j]

a[ j]b[i – j]

(a b)[i]

×

=

×

==

×ΣΣ

Σ

0

0

0 0

0 6–7

j

i

i – j i – j

i – j

Figure 9.6. Discrete convolution of a box function with a step function.

What is the result of convolving a and b? At a particular index i, as shown inFigure ??, the result is the average of the step function over the range from i� 2

to i + 2. If i < �2, we are averaging all zeros and the result is zero. If i � 2,we are averaging all ones and the result is one. In between there are i + 3 ones,resulting in the value i+3

5

. The output is a linear ramp that goes from 0 to 1 overfive samples: 1

5

[. . . , 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, . . . ]. ⇤

Properties of Convolution

The way we’ve written it so far, convolution seems like an asymmetric operation:a is the sequence we’re smoothing, and b provides the weights. But one of the niceproperties of convolution is that it actually doesn’t make any difference which iswhich: the filter and the signal are interchangeable. To see this, just rethink thesum in Equation 9.2 with the indices counting from the origin of the filter b, rather

Example: box and step

16


Convolution and filtering

• Convolution applies with any sequence of weights

• Example: bell curve (gaussian-like) […, 1, 4, 6, 4, 1, …]/16

17


Discrete convolution

• Notation:

• Convolution is a multiplication-like operation commutative

associative

distributes over addition

scalars factor out

identity: unit impulse e = […, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, …]

• Conceptually no distinction between filter and signal

18


Discrete filtering in 2D

• Same equation, one more index

now the filter is a rectangle you slide around over a grid of numbers

• Commonly applied to images blurring (using box, using gaussian, …)

sharpening (impulse minus blur)

• Usefulness of associativity often apply several filters one after another: (((a * b1) * b2) * b3)

this is equivalent to applying one filter: a * (b1 * b2 * b3)

19


original | box blur sharpened | gaussian blur[Philip Greenspun]

20


Optimization: separable filters

• basic alg. is O(r2): large filters get expensive fast!

• definition: a2(x,y) is separable if it can be written as:

this is a useful property for filters because it allows factoring:

21


Separable filtering

first, convolve with this

second, convolve with this

22

= *


Continuous convolution: warm-up

• Can apply sliding-window average to a continuous function just as well

output is continuous

integration replaces summation

23


Continuous convolution

• Sliding average expressed mathematically:

note difference in normalization (only for box)

• Convolution just adds weights

weighting is now by a function

weighted integral is like weighted average

again bounds are set by support of f(x)

24


One more convolution

• Continuous–discrete convolution

input: a sequence and a continuous function

output: a continuous function

used for reconstruction and resampling

25


Continuous-discrete convolution

26


Resampling

• Changing the sample rate in images, this is enlarging and reducing

• Creating more samples: increasing the sample rate

“upsampling”

“enlarging”

• Ending up with fewer samples: decreasing the sample rate

“downsampling”

“reducing”

27


Resampling

• Reconstruction creates a continuous function forget its origins, go ahead and sample it

28


Cont.–disc. convolution in 2D

• same convolution—just two variables now

loop over nearby pixels, average using filter weight

looks like discrete filter,but offsets are not integersand filter is continuous

remember placement of filterrelative to grid is variable

29


Cont.–disc. convolution in 2D

30


Separable filters for resampling

• just as in filtering, separable filters are useful separability in this context is a statement about a continuous filter, rather than a

discrete one:

• resample in two passes, one resampling each row and one resampling each column

• intermediate storage required: product of one dimension of source and the other dimension of destination

31


two-stage resampling using aseparable filter

[Phi

lip G

reen

spun

]

32


A gallery of filters

• Box filter Simple and cheap

• Tent filter Linear interpolation

• Gaussian filter Very smooth antialiasing filter

• B-spline cubic Very smooth

• Catmull-rom cubic Interpolating

• Mitchell-Netravali cubic Good for image upsampling

33


Box filter

34


Tent filter

35


Gaussian filter

36


B-Spline cubic

37

fB(x) =16

�⌅⇤

⌅⇥

�3(1� |x|)3 + 3(1� |x|)2 + 3(1� |x|) + 1 �1 ⇥ x ⇥ 1,

(2� |x|)3 1 ⇥ |x| ⇥ 2,

0 otherwise.


Catmull-Rom cubic

38

fC(x) =12

�⌅⇤

⌅⇥

�3(1� |x|)3 + 4(1� |x|)2 + (1� |x|) �1 ⇥ x ⇥ 1,

(2� |x|)3 � (2� |x|)2 1 ⇥ |x| ⇥ 2,

0 otherwise.


Michell-Netravali cubic

39

fM (x) =13fB(x) +

23fC(x)

=118

�⌅⇤

⌅⇥

�21(1� |x|)3 + 27(1� |x|)2 + 9(1� |x|) + 1 �1 ⇥ x ⇥ 1,

7(2� |x|)3 � 6(2� |x|)2 1 ⇥ |x| ⇥ 2,

0 otherwise.


Lanczos

40

0

1

-2 -1 0 1 2

0

1

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

fL2(x) =

(sinc(x) sinc(x/2) |x| < 2

0 otherwise

fL3(x) =

(sinc(x) sinc(x/3) |x| < 3

0 otherwise

sinc(x) =sin(⇡x)

⇡x


Effects of reconstruction filters

• For some filters, the reconstruction process winds up implementing a simple algorithm

• Box filter (radius 0.5): nearest neighbor sampling box always catches exactly one input point

it is the input point nearest the output point

so output[i, j] = input[round(x(i)), round(y(j))] x(i) computes the position of the output coordinate i on the input grid

• Tent filter (radius 1): linear interpolation tent catches exactly 2 input points

weights are a and (1 – a)

result is straight-line interpolation from one point to the next

41


Properties of filters

• Degree of continuity

• Impulse response

• Interpolating or no

• Ringing, or overshoot

interpolating filter used for reconstruction

42


Ringing, overshoot, ripples

• Overshoot caused by

negative filtervalues

• Ripples constant in,

non-const. out

ripple free when:

43


Constructing 2D filters

• Separable filters (most common approach)

44


Yucky details

• What about near the edge? the filter window falls off the edge of the image

need to extrapolate

methods: • clip filter (black) • wrap around • copy edge • reflect across edge • vary filter near edge

45

[Phi

lip G

reen

spun

]


Reducing and enlarging

• Very common operation devices have differing resolutions

applications have different memory/quality tradeoffs

• Also very commonly done poorly

• Simple approach: drop/replicate pixels

• Correct approach: use resampling

46


Resampling example

47


Reducing and enlarging

• Very common operation devices have differing resolutions

applications have different memory/quality tradeoffs

• Also very commonly done poorly

• Simple approach: drop/replicate pixels

• Correct approach: use resampling

48


1000 pixel width [Philip Greenspun]

49


250 pixel width

by dropping pixels gaussian filter

[Philip Greenspun]

50


4000 pixel width

box reconstruction filter bicubic reconstruction filter

[Phi

lip G

reen

spun

]

51


Types of artifacts

• Garden variety what we saw in this natural image

fine features become jagged or sparkle

• Moiré patterns

52


600ppi scan of a color halftone image

[Hea

rn &

Bak

er c

over

]

53


downsampling a high resolution scan

by dropping pixels gaussian filter

[Hea

rn &

Bak

er c

over

]

54


Types of artifacts

• Garden variety what we saw in this natural image

fine features become jagged or sparkle

• Moiré patterns caused by repetitive patterns in input

produce large-scale artifacts; highly visible

• These artifacts are aliasing just like in the audio example earlier

• How do I know what filter is best at preventing aliasing? practical answer: experience

theoretical answer: there is another layer of cool math behind all this • based on Fourier transforms • provides much insight into aliasing, filtering, sampling, and reconstruction

55

sampling and reconstruction - cornell university · 2016-02-18 · cornell cs5625 spring 2016...

Documents