sam sccur presentation [228051]-2
TRANSCRIPT
The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on Innovation
Sam BoutinUndergraduate – Whittier College
Fatos RadoniqiAssistant Professor of Finance – Whittier College
Overview Background
Literature Review
Research Question
Data
Methodology
Results
Conclusion
What Are Mergers?
VW
Vertical Mergers
VW
Horizontal Mergers
VW
Why this may raise Concern
VW
Submit request for approval
Request received
Merger Denied
Merger Approved
Must file for approval with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice
Authorities then have 30 days in which to decide weather or not the merger can take place or if it is in violation of antitrust laws Antitrust laws are in place to
protect consumer welfare and preserve competition
How Are Mergers Monitored
Three Possible Reasons for MergerProductive Efficiency Theory stating that a firm merges in order to take advantage of economies
of scale
Market Power Theory stating that a merger happened solely for the purpose of increasing
the market share of the acquiring company
Agency Cost Merger happens solely because the CEO of the acquiring company wants
control over a larger firm
Productive Efficiency Market Power1. Consequences for the
merging firms:Profits, growth rates, markets shares, productivity, etc.
2. Consequences for industry rivals
3. Consequences for the economy (e.g. social welfare)
As a result of (1) and (2)
Significance of horizontal mergers
Importance of Understanding
These Motives
Why Should We Care?
Source: Institute of Mergers, Acquisitions and Alliances
Literature ReviewEckbo 1981 tests the hypothesis that horizontal mergers generate positive abnormal returns to stockholders
because they increase the probability of successful collusion among rival producers Ahuja and Katila 2001 Examines the impact of acquisitions on the subsequent innovation performance of acquiring firms
finding that among large tech firms R&D intensity increasesGrabowski and Kyle 2008 Analyze Mergers and alliances in pharmaceuticals and the impacts these have on R&D finding that
small firms gain the most benefits from mergers with larger firmsZhao 2009 Examines weather technological innovation is a motivating factor in firms’ acquisition decision and
how said acquisition affects subsequent innovation finding that before an acquisition a firms innovation goes down then recuperates to a higher level after a successful merger
Desyllas and Hughes 2010 explore whether acquirers become more innovative after a merger finding that a large knowledge
base tends to increase R&D productivity Filson, Olfati and Radoniqi Found that in large pharma mergers, cumulative abnormal returns on portfolios of rivals predict post-
merger changes in combined firms R&D intensity
Research Question Are the reactions of companies and their rivals indicative of post merger R&D intensity?
Announcement DatesActual DatesR&D Intensity Cumulative Abnormal Returns
Data
Data SourcesThomson One
M&A Announcement Data
Securities and Exchange Commission
Competitor Info in Company 10-k
HooversCompetitor Info
WhartonCompustatCenter for Research and Security Prices (CRSP)
Data DescriptionAnalyzed mergers that happened between 1990-2014These were large mergers: transaction value > $500 millionMergers were in research intensive industries (High tech)212 total mergers that satisfied these criteria
Narrowing the FieldOnly 156 mergers had (Compustat) data on acquirers past and future R&D intensity
Observations
Acquirer CARs 156
Target CARs 142
Acquirer Rivals’ CARs
146
Target Rivals’ CARs
104
R&D Intensity Change Initial Observations
65.30%
34.70%
Change In R&D Intensity
Positive Negitive
102 mergers saw positive changes in R&D
54 mergers saw negative changes in R&D
Further AnalysisFrom here on you will focus only on the positive portion to see how CARs relate to it Leaving us with a sample size of 102 mergers which we
had found had positive R&D intensity changes
Methodology Event study methodologyAnnouncement New Information change in Research and Development Intensity
ProblemsIs R&D intensity an accurate representation of innovation?How does one separate it from other events?
Results
Series1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.40.31
-0.689
-0.378
Reaction of Acquirer to Announcement
Positive Acquirer CARs Negitive Acquirer CARs Differnce
Series1
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.912
-0.0873
-0.8252
Reaction of Targets to Merger Announcements
Positive Target CARs Negitive Target CARs Differnce
Series1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.3689
-0.631
-0.2621
Acquirers’ Rivals Reactions to Announcements
Positive Acquirers' Rivals CARs Negitive Acquirers' Rivals CARs Differnce
ConclusionAre the reactions of the rivals and the companies themselves indicative of post merger R&D intensity?
Yes the companies themselves display a rise in R&D Intensity post merger even though the stock price of the acquiring firm may go down. The Rivals react negatively to a competitors merger if that merger has increased the acquiring firms R&D.
Thank You!